DIANA

    Princess Diana was Sacrificed
    To Create the New World Religion

  DIANA DEATH:
   ANOTHER COVER-UP
Wednesday April 4,2007

          The People's Princess

        Revealed: Diana inquiry's tantalising new questions

          Diana Death Investigation Confirms Evidence Of Cover-up There can be no other conclusion than murder

          Diana's True Cause Of Death Sealed For 100 Years

             Diana Was Not the Target  by Rayelan Allan

           Exclusive Diana-Dodi Murder Plot Found In Alleged CIA Document From Sherman Skolnick

          WAS DIANA MURDERED? By SUSAN BRYCE

        Diana's Butler Recounts Queen's Warning About 'Powers'

          From:
        http://www.rumormillnews.com/Diana_Order_page.htm

         Diana, Queen of Heaven
         The New World Religion: The Ancient Goddess Returns

           by Rayelan Allan,
         introduction by Robert Anton Wilson
 

"The true facts, about the murder of Diana, would shake the World to its foundations, since it involves a number of governments and more than a number of intelligence services."

    Princess Diana was Sacrificed
    To Create the New World Religion

A Glimpse of Our Collective Future

How A New Religion is Created

Diana, The Light of the World

The 13th Pillar

My God, How Did This Come to Pass?

What is this secret?

Project Blue Beam Holograms of the Goddess in the Sky

Civilization Will Be Destroyed, But Only If Necessary!

The Creation of a Saint

No Separation of Church and State

Princess Diana, Herself Set the Tone for Temple Service

The Knights Templars The Original Protectors and Servers

A well-informed Templar insider expressed the concept of "protect and serve" this way:

The Illusion of Paradise

The Protectors and Servers of Diana

Agenda 21, The Plan for the 21st Century Government Regulations
Become Church Doctrine

The tenants of Agenda 21 will become the core of the Teachings of the Temple of Diana!

No Personal or National Weapons

Those With the Guns Will Rule

     The People's Princess

         http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/12/11/18336870.php 

Princess Di wanted to ban Landmines. Princess Di was seeing an Arab. Princess Di's body gaurd put his SEATBELT on when he knew the bodygaurd was under mind control, before he struck PILLAR 13.

Lee,

I heard that a few years back wondering why on earth we would be spying on Diana? Aha! Now we know. She was in the way. Shame on her for wanting to ban such an inhumane weapon which kills for years long after wars are finished. Shame indeed. On the US

In a message dated 12/11/2006 7:51:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, lee writes:

Does anyone remember that the day Princess Diana died, she had just returned from Afghanistan touring the Land Mine area. She was about to single handed get an entire classification of weapons made illegal...! The United Nations Motion she was working on has never come up again...?

Now we find out that while she was back in Paris that evening, the press this weekend revealed that American Intelligence was tapping her phone at the time of the so-called accident...? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....?

Anyone find this strange...? HRH Lee Mentley "Eternal Vigilance"

The people involved in the death of diana are connected to the financial ,weapons and large industries.The same people behind the invasion of Iraq to acquire its useful resources out of the hands of Iraq muslims.Diana was involved with a muslim which undermined this aggresive group and its status quo. The driver was mind controlled using a combination of alcohol and anti-depressent drugs to hit the pillar 13. The body guard put his seat belt on once he realised that the driver was unresponsive and programmed to commit suicide. The people behind this kind of thing are a pathetic bunch of satanists who base thier power on materiality and believe that the world can be improved by economic means .They are not knights but live like hungry dogs and die that way.Barking thier mad economic solutions as they poison and murder the innocent.Blair is part of it. He is intellectually very shallow so its easy to capture his being for that lot.

Revealed: Diana inquiry's tantalising new questions

By SUE REID,

Daily Mail Last updated at 10:57am on 17th June 2006

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?
 in_article_id=391065&in_page_id=1770
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html? in_article_id=391065&in_page_id=1770>

Astonishing claims by new witnesses are being examined by British detectives investigating Diana's death. They seem incredible. But if true, they could rock the Royal Family to its foundations.

On the night that Diana, Princess of Wales died, the lights of the British Embassy — less than a mile from the accident spot in Paris — blazed until dawn finally broke over the French capital.

Inside the imposing building, diplomats summoned from their sleep by the British ambassador, Sir Michael Jay, struggled to monitor the tragedy that was unfolding.

Millions of words have been written about the moment that Diana, with her Muslim boyfriend Dodi Fayed, smashed into pillar 13 of the Pont d’Alma road tunnel as they were being driven from the Ritz Hotel in a black Mercedes at 12.20am on Sunday, August 31, 1997.

Ever since, the precise chronology of the fateful night and the roles played by the Royal Family and the Government have been accepted almost without serious challenge.

Yet the Mail can reveal today that new eye-witnesses have emerged in the past few weeks with explosive testimony which raises profound questions about the influence of the House of Windsor and the Establishment over events surrounding the Princess’s death.

These fresh accounts include the astonishing claim that the Queen’s most senior and trusted courtier was seen in Paris, at the British Embassy, half an hour before the crash.

Furthermore, they include a baffling allegation that the RAF crew which flew Tony Blair from his Sedgefield constituency to London to greet the Princess’s repatriated body had been on continual standby to make the flight from two days earlier — when Diana was still alive.

During this investigation, the Mail has also received confirmation that two diplomats working for the secret intelligence service MI6 were operating at the British Embassy in Paris during the weeks before Diana’s death.

These two senior men — who have both enjoyed glittering careers — have admitted their intelligence roles to Lord Stevens, the ex-head of Scotland Yard who is heading the official inquiry into whether there was any conspiracy to murder the Princess.

In the Paris crash, Dodi was killed outright and the Princess was at first thought to have survived. Yet despite attempts by surgeons, she was declared beyond medical help at the Pitie Salpetriere hospital at 4am.

By then, dozens of phone calls had flashed between the British Embassy and Balmoral Castle, the royal retreat in Scotland where the Queen and Diana’s ex-husband, Prince Charles, were holidaying with Princes William and Harry, then aged 15 and 12.

The Queen was the first to be told of the accident, at 2am, when she was woken by her personal page. Still in her dressing gown, she and Prince Philip anxiously paced the tartan-carpeted corridors throughout the night.

Alerted immediately, Prince Charles retired to his private sitting room next to the Queen’s dressing room. There, he made calls and answered those from Paris coming into the castle’s switchboard and his mobile phone.

On the ground floor of the castle, the Queen's deputy private secretary Sir Robin Janvrin based himself in the equerries' room, where he also fielded incoming messages.

Most pertinently, Sir Robin was on duty because his superior — the Queen’s private secretary, Sir Robert Fellowes, a plummy-voiced Old Etonian and Princess Diana's brother-in-law — had taken a weekend's leave.

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister, who was in his North-East constituency, is said to have been woken by a call from Sir Michael Jay which had been forwarded by a secure satellite phone via Downing Street.

At first, he was told the Princess had been involved in an accident and then, later, of her death. It was then he began working on that memorable — and apparently impromptu — speech which he delivered several hours later, describing Diana as the 'People's Princess'.

It was a fitting title and one that the millions mourning Diana embraced.

Yet just as the outpouring of grief continued in the days after the crash, so, too, have those nagging doubts — and conspiracy theories — about Diana’s death, which refuse to abate.

As a result, Lord Stevens’s team of ten detectives have interviewed hundreds of people whose lives crossed Diana’s own. Prince Charles has been questioned. Sir Michael Jay, now Permanent Secretary at the Foreign Office, has been asked to outline his role on the night of the crash.

In a dramatic development in recent weeks, Sir Robert Fellowes — now Lord Fellowes — has been asked about his whereabouts during that tragic weekend.

Significantly, the detectives are also planning to speak to Maud Morel-Coujard, the French legal official who oversaw the police operation on the night of the crash. Indeed, she was waiting at the hospital when Diana was brought there by ambulance just after 2am.

She is in a unique position to know exactly what happened and, crucially, her evidence may give credence to the allegations about Lord Fellowes, Mr Blair’s flight and the two spies.

Her recollections may also explain the feverish volume of communications between Paris, London and Scotland that night.

Mme Morel-Coujard is expected to say that some instructions on the treatment of the dying Princess were issued by Sir Michael Jay, who was also at the hospital. He was, in turn, receiving his orders via his mobile from the British Embassy, Balmoral and Downing Street.

Most contentiously, Mme Morel-Coujard will reveal that a decision to embalm Diana's body two hours before it was flown back to England was made by 'the British authorities'. (Indeed, French law explicitly bans the practice if a post-mortem examination is planned. This is because the preserving chemical formaldehyde corrupts toxicology tests, including those for pregnancy.)

Her revelations will stoke the controversy over why Diana’s body should have undergone this process prior to such a key forensic examination, which took place on the Sunday at 8pm at a West London mortuary.

Was it — as some continue to maintain, despite denials — because Diana was pregnant with Dodi’s baby? And did someone want such an embarrassing fact kept secret?

Recently, the notion of Diana being pregnant was vehemently discounted in the Mail on Sunday by Dominic Lawson, the husband of Diana's close friend Rosa Monckton.

He wrote: "It is in a way obscene that such speculation is the subject of a public inquiry (by Lord Stevens)."

He explained his wife had spent a week with Diana before her death and had told Lord Stevens's team that the Princess could not possibly have been pregnant with Dodi's baby.

He added: "Rosa felt obliged to reveal that, when they said goodbye on August 20, 1997, Diana's period had started and therefore it was biologically impossible for her to have been pregnant at the time of her death."

So what evidence has Lord Stevens's investigation uncovered so far? During his three-year inquiry — which has cost £2million — he has let slip little about his findings. But at a book festival last month, he admitted new witnesses had been found who may provide fresh clues.

He is now writing an interim report (it is expected to be finished by September) for the Royal coroner, Michael Burgess, who will hold an inquest next year once Lord Stevens has completed a final analysis that includes the testimony provided by the new eye-witnesses.

The Mail has learned they include two men with extraordinary tales. The first, whom we will call Mr X, was based at the British Embassy in Paris and formerly worked for the Foreign Office in London.

His tantalising evidence emerged only recently through a third party. If true, it will link the Royal Family to events in Paris on the weekend of the Princess’s death.

Mr X is said to be a middle-aged, English wireless operator at the embassy.

He came on duty in the early evening of August 30, expecting his night shift to be routine. From his office in the communications room, encrypted phone calls and messages were sent from the embassy via UK listening stations to Downing Street, the heads of Whitehall departments and, if necessary, senior aides of the Royal Family.

Mr X was proud of his job and is an ardent royalist. However, something unexpected happened that night which he found deeply troubling. He says that just before midnight (as Diana was preparing to leave the Ritz Hotel with Dodi) two well-spoken men burst through the door of the communications room. Described as "public school", they brusquely ordered Mr X to leave his post and not to return until told.

Mr X kept silent about this pertinent episode until 2000 because he had signed the Official Secrets Act.

But then, apparently, he named one of the men to a third party. Exploding with anger, he explained: "It was that b*****d Fellowes. He turfed me out of my own office. He was in Paris the night Diana died."

Of course, Mr X may have been mistaken. Well-spoken Englishmen in smart suits are apt to sound and look very similar. Furthermore, Mr X only saw the two men for a few minutes. But his story, however incredible, is being actively investigated by Lord Stevens and his team.

The Mail understands that in an initial conversation with the Diana squad, Lord Fellowes has said he was enjoying a break at his Norfolk estate with his wife — Diana's sister, Lady Jane Fellowes. He has dismissed the claim he was in Paris that weekend or any part of the night Diana died.

And what of the second new witness, whom we will call Mr Y? He has come forward with a scenario which, if true, will also shed doubt on the official version of Diana's death.

The Mail understands that he was interviewed at length by Lord Stevens's detectives recently. Mr Y was one of the security staff on duty at Tony Blair’s Sedgefield constituency during the weekend that Diana died.

It was one of the first weekends the Labour Prime Minister had spent there with his family since his election. When news arrived overnight that Diana was dead, Mr Blair's weekend, which had been largely free of public engagements, was thrown into disarray.

After delivering his 'People's Princess' tribute, he returned to London to receive Diana's body at Northolt airport at 5pm on the Sunday.

The Prime Minister's wife and their three children were put on a scheduled British Midland flight from Teesside airport at tea-time for them to return to Downing Street. Normally, the Prime Minister would have travelled with them.

But instead, he boarded an RAF plane piloted by a crew based in Scotland which had flown to Teesside. Waiting on the tarmac for Mr Blair was Mr Y.

Idly chatting to the co-pilot, he was told something very strange.

The co-pilot, according to information now with the Diana squad, asked him: "What’s really going on? We’ve been on standby in Scotland since 5pm on Friday waiting to make this flight to Northolt with the Prime Minister."

Incredibly, and if Mr Y’s memory of his conversation with the co- pilot is correct, it would mean that Diana's death was not only expected — it was actually planned.

Yet can that really be true? Or is it just another fantastic conspiracy theory, one of the countless that still surround the Princess's death?

Could Mr Y have perhaps misinterpreted the words of the RAF co-pilot? Or has his memory played tricks about events which happened almost a decade ago?

Mr Y's claim is just one of the many mysteries that are now being unravelled, checked and re-examined by the Diana squad.

Perhaps none of the unanswered questions is more puzzling than the roles of the two MI6 officers who were based at the British Embassy in Paris. Both were listed on the embassy's staff list as diplomats. Yet one had mysteriously only just been posted to the French capital a few days before the crash.

Their names first came to the attention of the Diana squad two years ago when a continuous stream of informants — including one of particular significance because of his position in Britain’s special forces — insisted that the pair were spies who were both implicated in the Princess's death.

Significantly, in one instance, the Diana squad was passed a nine- line note on a flimsy piece of paper purporting to come from an insider at the headquarters of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It has been seen by the Mail and names both men.

Then it adds: "If you are brave enough, dig deeper to learn about them. Both MI6. Both were involved at the highest level in the murder of the Princess."

The files at the Diana squad headquarters, of course, are stacked high with such wild allegations from shadowy informants. Many have a habit of being unprovable or are simply the imaginings of over- fertile minds.

However, the Mail has learned that both these men, in their mid-40s, have been interviewed by officers about their movements on the weekend the Princess died. They were given permission to speak about their roles for the first time by the head of MI6, John Scarlett.

The men have produced tickets and documents dating from 1997 which prove they were not in Paris that weekend. One was in the South of France with his wife and in-laws. The other was taking a short trip to Greece.

Both have told Lord Stevens they only returned to the British Embassy, overlooking the eternally fashionable Rue du Faubourg St Honore near the Champs Elysees, after Diana's body had left French soil for England.

That answer may not surprise Lord Stevens. But equally, it won't stop him looking into the matter further. From the start of his inquiry, he promised that his team would "go wherever the evidence takes us" in the quest for the truth about Diana's death.

And, if necessary, that includes the powerful inner sanctums of the British Establishment.

         Diana Death Investigation Confirms Evidence Of Cover-up

        There can be no other conclusion than murder

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | Updated February 27 2006

The investigation into the death of Princess Diana, led by former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens, continues to confirm previously known facts and unearth new evidence proving that the August 31st 1997 crash was no accident.

As previously exhaustively documented by this website, the evidence pointing to murder is conclusive.

From the mid 1990's, Diana released a series of audio, videotapes and letters voicing her fears that she would be killed in a car crash made to look like an accident. In one letter, Diana stated, "My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for Charles to marry”.

A brief summary of the known evidence is as follows.

- The Pont de L'Alma tunnel was crawling with secret service personnel from French and British intelligence. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul is now confirmed as having worked for the French secret service.

- The unscheduled journey through the symbolic Pont de L'Alma tunnel (an ancient Pagan sacrificial site) took Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Al Fayed AWAY FROM their intended destination, Dodi's flat.

- Just before the car entered the tunnel every police radio in Paris mysteriously died, preventing a quick response which could have saved Diana's life.

- Just before the car entered the tunnel every security camera in the tunnel mysteriously died, preventing us from ever seeing footage of what caused the crash.

- Eyewitnesses reported snipers and gunfire within the tunnel.

- The crime scene was completely cleaned within hours of the crash, a policy totally anathema to standard preservation of any crime scene.

- Diana was still alive after the crash. Unexplained delays in getting her to the hospital, caused by the slow speed of the ambulance and the fact that it passed several nearer hospitals before reaching its destination, ensured Diana was dead upon arrival. A faster response could have saved her life.

- The Mercedes used to transport Dodi and Diana from the Ritz was mysteriously swapped for a car that had been stolen only weeks earlier.

- The foremost reason put forward to explain the 'accident' - that driver Henri Paul was dangerously drunk, has been thoroughly debunked by the camera footage of his behavior before the crash and the fact that the tests on Paul's blood were either faked or swapped with the blood of another dead man. Paul's liver showed no sign of alcohol abuse and his close friends and family said he rarely drank alcohol.

- Multiple eyewitnesses reported a mysterious flash of light immediately before the crash. Many insist that this was a laser directed at the driver to cause temporary blindness leading to the crash.

- The initial French investigation into the crash went to every length to ignore key evidence, intimidate eyewitnesses into silence and outright fabricate evidence.

It is important to stress that a detailed compendium of the evidence pointing to murder would fill a book on its own.

Diana was killed because she was pregnant with Dodi's child and the British Royal Family didn't want an Arab in their sacred bloodline. Diana was also becoming politically involved in the Middle East and the elite saw her as a loose cannon that could rally popular support around anything. Diana herself remarked to reporters that there would be 'a big surprise' from her a few days before her death.

Lord Steven's previous enquiry into Irish Republican Army terrorism unearthed links to British intelligence but seemed to disappear down the memory hole. Our hope is that the inquiry will have some genuine consequences for the criminals who assassinated 'England's Rose' and that it will prevent them from engaging in similar political hits in the future.

      Diana's True Cause
      Of Death Sealed
      For 100 Years

        By Mark Reynolds in London
        and Peter Allen in Paris
        The Daily Express - UK
        10-20-5

A bizarre legal loophole in French law enables the authorities to suppress vital evidence.

Since she was killed in the Paris car crash eight years ago, the identities of 24 bodies placed in the same mortuary as the Princess's chauffeur, Henri Paul, have never been revealed.

Sources close to the investigation believe blood from one of the bodies may have been swapped with Paul's to make it appear he had been drinking heavily on the night he drove himself Diana and Dodi Fayed to their deaths.

A Daily Express investigation has heard allegations that secret agents were behind a plan to switch Paul's blood samples with those of a suicide victim, who died in Paris in August, 1997. Yesterday a judicial spokesman admitted that French death certificates do not show a cause of death and that, apart from close family requests, all information remains confidential for 100 years.

"Even if the identities of the others in the morgue were made public, there is no possibility of us knowing how they died," said the spokesman.

In France there is no central registry corresponding to the General Registry Offices in Britain.

Because of the legal technicality, the French authorities can keep information concerning the other 24 bodies secret for another century.

A spokesman for the Paris Medical Institute, which runs the French capital's mortuaries, explained: "Records of anyone who has died in the past 100 years are confidential and can only be shown to family members."

The heavy bureaucracy prompted by France's extremely strict privacy laws, means the truth behind the Princess's death may now remain a secret until 2097.

Swapped

The legal block means that repeated requests for information about the other 24 bodies, both from the al Fayed family and the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens - who is conducting an inquiry into the deaths of Diana and Dodi Fayed - have fallen on deaf ears.

Last night a spokesman for Mohamed al Fayed in Paris said: "We have struggled for years to establish the identity and cause of death of the 24 other bodies in the morgue that night.

"It cannot be right that no record has been made of their identities or of the causes of their deaths. This just reaffirms our belief that there is an orchestrated cover-up.

"Until anybody can prove otherwise, we believe that Diana was murdered."

Following the Daily Express revelations about Henri Paul's blood tests earlier this week, we asked if readers believed that the authorities were telling the truth about Diana.

Ninety-six per cent of readers said "No", with just four per cent saying "Yes".

Mohamed al Fayed said: "I will fight to my last breath to ver the truth about the death of Diana and my son.

"It was more than just a tragic accident. I take strength from readers poll. They obviously to know the truth as well."

Those who believe that Diana's death was the result of a plot to murder her have questioned French claims that Paul was three times over the drink-driving limit on the night the Princess and Dodi Fayed were killed.

They believe that MI6 agents and their French counterparts played a major role in developments immediately after the crash. The Daily Express revealed earlier this week that Paul's body was taken to the Place Mazas mortuary and placed alongside the other 24 bodies.

It is claimed that blood samples from a suicide victim may have been swapped with Paul's blood on the orders of the security services.

This would explain why the readings for alcohol and carbon monoxide were so high. In addition to the blood-alcohol reading, the tests carried out by forensic toxicologists showed such high levels of carbon monoxide 20.7 per cent - that Paul would have been unable to stand, let alone drive the Princess from the Ritz hotel.

A suicide victim who had drunk a bottle of whisky and then attached a hosepipe to their car exhaust as a' method of killing themselves would have given exactly the same readings in their blood.

Adding weight to the contention of Dodi's father Mohammed that there has been a major cover-up by both MI6 and the French equivalent, the DGSE, the French authorities have repeatedly refused to reveal who the other 24 bodies in the mortuary were.

They have also resisted repeated requests by Paul's family to reveal whether any were suicide victims and the results of any blood tests carried out on them.

Just like Dumblain - the evidence is sealed for 100 years. Don't hold your breath expecting, as the Express suggests, we can bring pressure on the UK government to force the French to reveal the evidence. Those involved are in the highest positions of power, both here and overseas. The spiders web is London!! Nothing will change - this is too big.

Reproduced from www.rense.com

  by Rayelan Allan

  Publisher, Rumor Mill News

http://www.rumormillnews.com

Within days of the death of Princess Diana, Conspiracy Nation published an article titled “Who controls Diana, Controls the World.” While most of the world was in shock in the days immediately following the death of Lady Diana, writer Rayelan Allan got right on the story and reported the deeper circumstances. Her blockbuster report, “Who Controls Diana, Controls the World,” was issued only days after the tragic automobile “accident."  It became an instant classic. Robert Anton Wilson, in his encyclopedic catalog of conspiracy theories, Everything Is Under Control, called Rayelan’s article “the most intricately interesting scenario’ to emerge.”

Starting in May of 1996, I received ongoing updates on Princess Diana from the European desk of a major intelligence agency. The information which was passed to me laid out the plans which the International Elite, a.k.a. the New World Order (NWO), had in mind for her once she was fully and legally DI-vorced from Charles. In addition to information about Princess Diana, my source at the European desk provided me with regular updates of President Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Jr. and Hillary Clinton. The information was so amazing that I created a magazine in order to share it. The magazine, Rumor Mill News ( http://www.rumormillnews.com  ), has evolved into one of the Internet’s most popular conspiracy magazines. On June 6, 1996, Rumor Mill News released the following story.

Princess Di in Chicago Hunting an American Husband – NEWS ADVISORY WARNING – Wives of wealthy and powerful men: Be on the look out!! The husband she gains may be your own!

Reliable sources from the super market tabloids have confirmed our earlier breaking story that Di has her eyes set on being the First Lady of America ... According to these sources, the Princess of Wales has come to the United States in search of an American husband who will help her forget the pain and suffering she endured while living in the royal palaces and partaking of her fairytale life.

Wives and girlfriends beware. It is rumored that sources close to the top of the invisible world government have concluded that Princess Di has the charisma and power to squelch all ugliness that would be involved in your divorce, accidental death or unfortunate suicide. If you have an inkling that your man may be the intended new husband of the Princess, it would behoove you to divorce and quickly disappear. Unless you want to end up on a mountainside like Ron Brown.

Within 24 hours of the release of the Rumor Mill News’ story on Diana, the San Francisco Chronicle ran a story in it’s gossip column titled, “Di Charms Windy City – Di in Chi-town.”

The article went on to describe Diana’s visit to Chicago. It also gave the names of two of the three men she had danced with. Phil Donahue and Roger Wilkie were named, but the anonymous third fellow was never named. Who could the anonymous dance partner have been? Bill Clinton? Jay Rockefeller? George W. Bush? Maybe it was a playboy from Hollywood named Emad Fayed. Or could the anonymous suitor have been the handsome publisher of George magazine, the Prince of America, John F. Kennedy, Jr.?

In the June issue of Rumor Mill News we presented an in-depth analysis of the breakup of the marriage of Prince Charles and Princess Diana. In the series of articles, we also presented information showing the connection between the royal family and the international bankers. We discussed the feud between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and we explored the connection between the Rockefeller family and President Bill Clinton. We can summarize by saying that international bankers are trying to merge the U.K. and the U.S. as the first step in creating a New World Order with One Government ruling everything. To accomplish this, they wanted to use Princess Diana and her children; both the born and unborn.

Diana’s “handlers” had decided that her popularity would have brought back the “mythic” Camelot days of the Kennedy years. A Royal Princess in the White House would have been the first step to turning the Presidency into a royal throne perpetuated through bloodline rather than ballot box. By the time William would become King of England, one of Diana’s newly born American children would become an elected official, and well on his or her way to becoming President of the United States.

In the same issue, Rumor Mill News presented the short list of American men that the New World Order had chosen for Diana. Diana would be allowed to choose her new husband from three men that had been handpicked for her. Each man represented a powerful New World Order family: Jay Rockefeller and George W. Bush represented their families respectively. The other candidate was Bill Clinton. All three men were married. Whoever the lucky man was, his wife would have been as unfortunate as her husband was lucky.

Rumors have circulated in Arkansas since the time Bill Clinton’s mother was born that she was the illegitimate daughter of Winthrop Rockefeller. This would explain how a back-water hillbilly from Hope, Arkansas ended up as a Rhodes Scholar, Governor of Arkansas and finally President of the United States. However, Clinton was angry with the Rockefellers because they had chosen to marry a legitimate Rockefeller to Diana. He turned his back on his own blood family, and defected to the enemy camp – the Rothschilds.

Diana had a mind and a heart of her own. The short list of husbands was not agreeable to her. Her first choice for a husband was John F. Kennedy, Jr.

On July 20, 1996, Rumor Mill News received an update from a source in Chicago. We were told that Diana’s visit to the windy city was actually a clandestine meeting with Rothschild bankers. It appeared that the Rothschilds had bought the hand of the princess and would marry her to a man of their choice. Now it became clear why President Clinton had defected and joined the Rothschilds. Would Diana have been happy with Bill Clinton, or was Diana pressuring the Rothschilds to choose John Kennedy, Jr.?

On Tuesday, September 24, 1996, President Clinton was in New York signing the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. This meeting had been planned for months, and the President could not get out of it. Knowing this, Hillary made sure that Princess Diana was invited to the White House on that day. The White House meeting between Hillary and Diana was only two days after the sudden, swift and secret marriage of John F. Kennedy, Jr. to Caroline Bessette. Could Hillary have been afraid that now that JFK, Jr. was no longer available, Diana would settle for Bill?

At the White House breakfast, Hillary told Diana something that made her leave the United States immediately. What could Hillary have told Diana that would have made her turn and run? Maybe Hillary talked about Juanita Broderick, the woman who says Bill Clinton raped her. Maybe Hillary told her how Bill had killed Hillary’s lover, Vince Foster. Diana understood this type of control. She believed Charles had ordered her bodyguard and best friend killed. Whatever Hillary said to Diana at that September White House meeting, Diana left the United States and never returned.

Not only did she never return to the United States, she immediately began a relationship with the son of a powerful man whose disdain for the Royal Family matched her own. An MI-6 document shows that Diana began a relationship with Dodi Al Fayed in November of 1996, just days after the White House meeting with Hillary. Did Diana believe the Al Fayed family was powerful enough to protect her from whatever it was that Hillary had told her?

The MI-6 document is one of several found by Vienna police when, acting on a tip from Mohammed Al Fayed, they arrested long-time CIA operative Oswald LeWinter. LeWinter was charged with trying to extort money from Mohammed Al Fayed for phony documents. Off the record, LeWinter claims the documents are real. He said, “I had a choice at my arrest to identify the documents as genuine or as fakes. If I said genuine I would face charges in the U.S. of high treason... so I said they were forgeries and was arrested for Fraud.”

Even though there were many secret documents in the hotel room where LeWinter was arrested, only one was released to the Vienna newspaper, The Kurier. The MI-6 document reads: “1. Relationship initiated between Diana POW and Dodi aF according to reliable intel sources in November 1996. Intimacy begins shortly after they meet. (Report filed).”

The New World Order and its Opposition

A series of Rumor Mill News articles also covered the origins of the New World Order. We released information that was not widely known about a group of men who opposed the New World Order. This covert group, known only as Faction 2, was/is centered within a group of Austrian and Bavarian royal family members. These men all claim direct descent from one or both of two groups: the original Knights Templars and the Canaris Conspirators.

Admiral Wilhelm Canaris headed the German Abwehr (military intelligence) during WWII. The conspirators who planned the assassination of Adolf Hitler were hidden and/or protected by the Abwehr. After the Hitler assassination attempt failed most of the conspirators were killed. The ones who were not captured made their way to the United States. Others, whose identities were not compromised, such as Kurt Waldheim, stayed in Europe. After the war, some of these men and their children were forced by the U.S. government to work for them, or be turned over to the Israelis to be tried and hung.

The members of the Abwehr who ended up in the United States quickly began to seek out Americans they could trust. One of these Americans was an OSS (Office of Strategic Services – the forerunner to the CIA) man named William Casey. The top men in the OSS came from the East Coast elite establishment. Most were connected with the powerful international banking families who had created the Federal Reserve Banking System. William Casey was a poor Irish Catholic from New York City. Even though he was smarter and more qualified than the rest, he did not have the right pedigree. This was made clear to him, and to many other “poor” boys who tried to be spies. William Casey continued his ties to government intelligence agencies until he became CIA Director under President Reagan.

During Reagan’s Administration a scandal known as Iran/Contra dominated the headlines. One of the top names in the scandal was Adnan Khashoggi. At the time, Khashoggi, an arms dealer, was considered the richest man in the world. His brother-in-law and partner was Mohammed Al Fayed, Dodi’s father.

The connection between Al Fayed and the Iran/Contra scandal was difficult to prove, but Richard Taus, former FBI agent, states that Al Fayed and Khashoggi were connected to the Iran/Contra scandal through Castle Securities. Castle Securities was formerly Drexel Company, which was connected to Drexel, Burnham, Lambert and the junk bonds scandal. Taus states that many people who were involved in Castle Securities were part of a group out of Freeport, Long Island known as the K-Team. Most if not all K-Team members were part of the Iran/Contra scandal. The K-Team had a front operation with a patriotic sounding name: the National Freedom Institute. The K-Team called its operations, “The Enterprise.” (Defrauding America, Rodney Stich, pp. 668-674)

Taus reported that the K-Team was a CIA operation which included many infamous names such as Oliver North, Admiral John Poindexter, Richard Secord, and Adnan Khashoggi. Taus and Stich both state the K-Team was filled with assassins.

At the beginning of the Iran/Contra scandal, Dodi Al Fayed was 24 years old. Many believe that Dodi acted in the capacity of a money launderer by investing the proceeds of his uncle’s illegal arms deals in Hollywood films. During that time, Dodi produced two major hits: “Chariots of Fire” and “The World According to Garp.”

Another interesting aspect to the Iran/Contra scandal happened when Oliver North suggested that his group, i.e. the K-Team, tap U.S. allies for assistance. As Director of Central Intelligence, Casey endorsed the idea and informed Robert “Bud” McFarlane, the National Security Advisor to President Reagan, to seek assistance from South Africa as well as Israel. In 1984, Casey dispatched CIA officer Duane R. “Dewey” Clarridge to South Africa to ask for assistance. (Guts and Glory, Oliver North, p. 193) Princess Diana’s father, Lord Earl Spencer, had business ventures in South Africa. His son, Charles Spencer, was a permanent resident of South Africa.

Lord Earl Spencer was the best friend of Adnan Khashoggi’s brother-in-law, Mohammed Al Fayed. Al Fayed was connected to the K-Team and their “Enterprises” through Castle Securities. The ten year friendship between Lord Spencer and Al Fayed eventually led to the introduction of Al Fayed’s 40 year old son, Emad “Dodi” Al Fayed, to Princess Diana. Mohammed Al Fayed and Adnan Khashoggi had been connected to the K-Team through their business deals. The K-Team was/is made up of CIA operatives who were/are members of Faction 1 – the New World Order, and Faction 2 – the opposition to the NWO. Al Fayed and Khashoggi were connected to the men who make up Faction 2.

Khashoggi, Al Fayed and many other members of Faction 2 are Muslims. Since Israel is allied with the New World Order, the enemies of Israel are natural allies of Faction 2. In reference to the MI-6 document, Mohammed Al Fayed has been quoted as saying, “I intend to establish the truth behind the tragic events in Paris last August. MI-6 Director David Spedding is named in one telex and a squad from the Israeli secret service Mossad, referred to as the “K-Team,” appears in another.” Al Fayed has to know that the K-Team referred to in the MI-6 document was not Israeli. Why did he place the blame on the Israelis? Did he hope to gain help from former allies in the old K-Team? The MI-6 document seized by Vienna police and published in the London Mirror reads in full as follows:

DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION Foreign Intelligence Information Report Directorate of Intelligence  WARNING NOTICE - INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED FURTHER DISSEMINATON AND USE OF THE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CONTROLS STATED AT BEGINNING AND END OF REPORT  REPORT CLASS: TOP SECRET  REPORT NO: 00.D 831/173466-97  COUNTRY: France DATE DISTR: 17 June 1997  SUBJECT: File overview: Diana Princess Of Wales-Dodi  REFERENCES DCI Case 64376  SOURCE: CASParis/CASLondon/COSGeneva/CASKingston/  UK citizen Ken Etheridge. 1. Relationship initiated between Diana POW and Dodi aF according to reliable intel sources in November 1996. Intimacy begins shortly after they meet. (Report filed)  2. Reliable source reports Palace seriously disturbed by liaison. PM considers any al Fayed relationship politically disastrous. Edinburgh (Prince Phillip -ed) sees serious threat to dynasty should relationship endure. Quote reported: “Such an affair is racially and morally repugnant and no son of a bedouin camel trader is fit for the mother of a future king,” Edinburgh. (Report filed) 3. Request from highest circles to DEA attache UK for 6 on Dodi re: Cocaine. See File forwarded to UK embassy DC. (Copy filed)  4. US liaison to MI6 requested by David Spedding for assistance in providing permanent solution to Dodi problem. Blessing of Palace secured (Twiz filed)  5. WHuse (White House -ed) denies Spedding (head of MI-6 – ed) request. Harrison authorized only to arrange meeting for MI-6 representative with K-Team Geneva. (Twiz on file)  6. Meeting in Geneva reportedly successful (Report filed)  7. al Fayed Mercedes Limo stolen and returned with electronics missing. Reliable intel source confirms K-team involved. Source reports car rebuilt to respond to external radio controls. (Report filed).

When Al Fayed saw this document, which Oswald LeWinter tried to sell him, he had to have known that the CIA was involved in the death of his son Dodi and Princess Diana. Al Fayed was connected to the CIA K-Team that was mentioned in the MI-6 document. Number 5 on the MI-6 document states that the White House, meaning President Clinton, denied Spedding’s request. What had David Spedding requested? Number 4 from the MI-6 document tells us: “4. US liaison to MI-6 requested by David Spedding for assistance in providing permanent solution to Dodi problem. Blessing of Palace secured. (Twiz filed).”

David Spedding, head of MI-6, was requesting assistance from the United States in finding a permanent solution to the Dodi problem. The term “permanent solution” is a common Intelligence Community euphemism for murder. Even though the White House did not approve Spedding’s request for a US liaison to MI-6 for the purpose of murdering Dodi, the White House did arrange a successful meeting with K-Team members in Geneva.

Evidently, the Geneva K-Team members acted as independent contractors and picked up the “contract” on Dodi. It is a common practice for CIA agents to act as “independent contractors” so they can not be traced back to the CIA and to the United States. According to the MI-6 document, the K-Team stole one of Al Fayed’s limos and began to make plans for Dodi’s murder. The Limo was fitted with electronics that allowed it to be remote controlled.

Diana fled from her White House meeting with Hillary and went directly to Mohammed Al Fayed. Had Diana’s father told her to seek out Mohammed Al Fayed if she ever needed help or protection? If Lord Spencer was involved in business with Al Fayed and the K-Team, then Spencer would believe that Al Fayed had the means of protecting Diana. Even Lord Spencer’s widow went to work for Al Fayed at Harrod’s Department Store.

Al Fayed saw the benefits of a union between Princess Diana and his son Dodi. Had Diana married Dodi, she would have learned everything about the NWO from a group of men who were the age-old enemies of the NWO and the British Throne. Diana would have become the #1 enemy of her former in-laws. Both the NWO and the Palace were afraid that Diana could expose them to the world. When the NWO discovered Diana had sought out the Al Fayeds for protection and was planning to marry Dodi, they knew they had to do something so evil and so monstrous that Diana would fall in line and never again try to defy them. At this point, they still needed her to unite Britain and the U.S. as the first step to a One World Government.

The men who planned the assassination of Dodi knew Diana was pregnant and would be marrying Dodi as soon as possible. They needed to act fast, before Diana and Dodi were married and living in the Paris Windsor Palace owned by Al Fayed. According to renegade MI-6 agent Richard Tomlinson:

Ritz security boss Henri Paul, who drove the death car, was an MI-6 informer paid to spy on Diana and Dodi. The Diana crash was chillingly similar to a previous MI-6 plot. That plot was to assassinate the Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic in Geneva using a powerful laser strobe light—similar to that described by witnesses to the Paris crash—to blind the driver.

Richard Tomlinson lived in Geneva. The assassination plan that Tomlinson claims was “appropriated” to use on Dodi had been created in Geneva. The K-Team that was enlisted by MI-6 was also in Geneva. Tomlinson further states:

I was shown a document proposing an assassination of President Milosevic of Serbia. The plan was to use a strobe light to blind his driver as he went into a road tunnel in Geneva. When I heard witnesses in Paris talk about a bright flash before Diana’s car crash, it made sense. A tunnel is a perfect place for an assassination, with fewer witnesses. The Paris tunnel is also ideal because there are no crash rails along the central pillars, so it’s a death trap.

Tomlinson says his claims about MI-6 involvement in Diana’s death will shock the world. This sounds uncannily similar to the statement made by CIA operative Oswald LeWinter that, “The true facts about the murder of Diana would shake the World to its foundations, since it involves a number of governments and more than a number of intelligence services.”

The Mercedes that Diana and Dodi were using on the night of August 30, 1997 had been stolen five months earlier, on April 20th. This meant that the accident had been planned for at least five months. But who had planned it? As Diana told her therapist: “One day I’m going to go up in a helicopter, and it’ll just blow up. MI5 will do away with me.” (Diana On The Edge, Chris Hutchins & Dominic Midgely) Diana knew that the Palace thought she was a “loose cannon,” and she was certain they were not beyond murdering her.

The MI-6 document shows that Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Palace and Prince Phillip – the Duke of Edinburgh – were seriously concerned about the relationship between Diana and Dodi. They believed it was politically disastrous and could threaten the dynasty. As this document states:

2. Reliable source reports Palace seriously disturbed by liaison. PM considers any al Fayed relationship politically disastrous. Edinburgh sees serious threat to dynasty should relationship endure. Quote reported: “Such an affair is racially and morally repugnant and no son of a bedouin camel trader is fit for the mother of a future king,” Edinburgh. (Report filed)

Richard Tomlinson has also stated:

There’s an arrogant faction inside MI-6, part of the Eton/Oxford/Guards clique, who see themselves literally as defenders of the realm—and for them, that means the royals. When Di broke up with Charles, she immediately became the enemy. When she started a romance with Dodi Al Fayed, that raised an even more terrifying spectre.

What if she’d married him and turned Muslim? What if they’d had children? The thought of Prince William, the future King of England, with a brown-skinned Muslim half-brother or sister was the worst possible scenario for them. In their eyes, Diana would single-handedly destroy the fabric of the nation they (MI-5 and MI-6) were pledged to defend.

Backed by the Al Fayed millions, she could have set up a glittering rival court which would have made Buckingham Palace pale by comparison. She would have become the people’s Queen, so she had to go.

Mohammed Al Fayed had recently purchased the Paris Chateau previously owned by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. This was the wedding gift he was going to give to Diana and Dodi. Tomlinson was right, the Paris Court of Diana and Dodi would have out-shined anything England could offer. Prince Phillip realized that his grandsons, William and Harry, would probably prefer spending time in Paris with their mother. This means that his grandsons would be influenced by “the son of a bedouin camel trader,” one that happened to be aligned with the age old enemies of the present British Throne. As Tomlinson says of the Palace: