|
The 1988
'Holocaust' Testimony
Of Joseph Burg

From Ingrid Rimland
irimland@bellsouth.net
4-26-7
The following is rather long but highly
significant. It is the condensed transcript of the testimony of German-Jewish
author, Joseph Burg, who testified in the Second Great Holocaust Trial of Ernst
Zündel some 20 years ago.
Like so much else, there is a personal
story "attached" to this document. Ernst told it to me several times, but I will
ask him to recall it for a future ZGram so that I get it right. It has to do
with the fact that because of this stunning testimony by a Jew demolishing the
"Holocaust", Joseph [Ginz]burg was not allowed to be buried in a Jewish
cemetery, and nobody of the tribe wanted to do his eulogy.
Ernst was in Germany at the time,
visiting a dissident acquaintance, and the two volunteered to do the honors,
because they respected Burg's courage and integrity.
The way Ernst always told this story is
that he swears he heard a "rumbling in the coffin" because Burg, who was an
avowed atheist, was honored in a Catholic church underneath the crucifix, with
the reviled Ernst Zundel and a "Nazi" friend - it might have been Manfred Roeder
(?) - sending him off with honors to the afterlife!
Another piece of Zundel lore!
Please read this carefully. There are
nuances there I bet that most of you haven't ever been privileged to hear.
Ingrid Rimland
=====
The
'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel -- 1988
Joseph G.
Burg
Joseph G. Burg was the twelfth witness
called by the defense. He testified on Tuesday, March 29 and Wednesday, March
30, 1988.
For an eight or nine year period prior
to 1981, Zündel had been in communication by letter and in visits with Joseph G.
Burg, a Jewish author who had written several books on the Second World War.
These books included Guilt and Fate, Scapegoats, Zionist Nazi Censorship in the
Federal Republic of Germany, National Socialist Crimes of Bad Conscience by
Germans Against Germans under Zionist Direction and Major Attacks of Zionists
against Pope Pius XII and the German Governments. Burg had discussed these books
with Zündel and believed the latter had received them. (25-6824, 6825, 6835,
26-6896, 6897)
In his books, Burg dealt with the
subject of the alleged Nazi extermination camps. Burg had spoken to hundreds of
people who had been in Auschwitz and had visited the camp in the fall of 1945.
Burg had wanted to see the crematoria, the hospitals, and in particular, a large
new bakery. He also wanted to find the gas chambers although at that time
gassings were not yet in fashion. He did not find any gas chambers. Burg formed
the opinion that there were no "extermination" camps at all, that gas chambers
had never existed and that there had been no plan to exterminate the Jews of
Europe. These opinions were published in his books and in his correspondence
with Zündel. (25-6825 to 6838)
Burg also visited Majdanek three times.
He did find gas chambers in Majdanek, but testified that they were disinfection
gas chambers for liquidating lice and fleas: bugs which caused epidemics. The
chambers were standard in each camp and had the German words "Attention!
Poisonous Gas!" under a death skull. Zyklon B was the new formula used to
disinfect the clothing. It destroyed the bugs but not the fabric. (25-6839)
After the war, Burg heard a lot about
the allegations that people were gassed at Auschwitz and Majdanek. He proved
that it was either out of stupidity or propaganda. Up to now, he pointed out, no
document had been found showing who gave the order for gassings, who built them
and where they were built. The German authorities especially had been called the
"super-bureaucracis." It therefore couldn't be that after all these years not a
document could be found. (25 6840)
Burg testified that he spoke to hundreds
of people who serviced and operated the crematoria but the people who operated
gas chambers were impossible to find. Nobody had published anything in which it
was claimed that he worked in a gassing institution for human beings. There was
literature about gassing that was completely contradictory. Why? Because it was
all made up. These opinions were published in his books. (25-6840)
In every camp there were crematoria. It
was a practical issue. People died. When the Germans occupied the eastern
territories, the huge camps were established and there were larger and more
crematoria as the war progressed. Epidemics broke out causing an increased
number of deaths. The question of crematoria was one of hygiene: the process was
more hygienic than burial and took less space. (26-6897, 6898)
Like all other activities in the camp,
the inmates looked after the crematoria. It was the most difficult work because
of the heat and the lifting of corpses into the ovens. The inmates worked very
often in three shifts around the clock. (26-6998) These workers did it
voluntarily. They were asked by the Jewish council or the Jewish police. It was
important to ask how the Jewish council or police co-operated with the German
SS. (26-6900)
When they were in full operation, the
chimneys had an increased amount of smoke. So, logically, depending on the
weather or the time of day, the colour of the flames was different. People
invented stories that inside devilish things were going on. They said living
human beings were being burned. They invented the story that every crematorium
was a gas chamber. It had even gotten to the point that the authors had such
large imaginations that when they saw the blue colour of the smoke, they knew
that Jews were being burned. (26-6898, 6899)
Others invented the story that living
Jews were being pushed in to be burned. Burg testified that he would like to see
a Jew who had given such statements during a trial. He said such a Jew should be
forced to take an oath under the rabbi rites with the skull cap, without
pictures of Christ, with the Hebrew Bible, in the presence of a rabbi or a pious
religious Jew. Then he should swear an oath that he had seen something like
that. Then these false statements, these sick statements, would go down by 99.5
percent because the superficial oath was not morally binding for these Jews.
(26-6900)
At the time he was in a displaced
persons camp, Burg spoke to thirty or forty people about gas chambers and to
about five to ten people about the crematoria. He had a special permit allowing
him to visit the different areas where Jewish displaced persons were. He tried
to get interviews from various ghettos and camps because at that time he had
already checked various false statements. (26-6901)
In 1946 Burg attended the Nuremberg
trials at times when matters involving Jews were being raised. During one of
these attendances he met Ilya Ehrenburg and a Jewish publisher who had been in
Auschwitz for several years. Burg asked the publisher whether he had seen any
gassing institutions for human beings and he said no. Ehrenburg, who had been
the head of propaganda for the Red Army during the war, told Burg he had been to
Auschwitz but he too had not seen anything of gassings. Burg had discussed this
information with Zündel in general. (25-6857, 6858) Burg could not understand
the emphasis on gassings. (26-6904)
Burg himself was the son of Jewish
parents and spent the war years in Transnystria, an area set aside by the
Germans for banned people such as Jews. The Jews were banned because they had
greeted the Red Army. The people in this area lived in small villages and towns
but had to fend for themselves and were therefore worse off than those who were
in the concentration camps. In the camps the German authorities looked after the
inmates because, on average, they were used for work. There were attacks on the
Jews in this area by foreign ethnic groups, but no attacks organized by the
Germans. (25-6837, 6838, 26-6874, 6875)
In 1946 and 1947, Burg lived in Freising,
a camp for Jewish displaced persons near Munich in the American Zone. The
director was a Jewish-American officer. Burg served as a factotum: he organized
the police, the prison, the newspaper, cultural affairs. He organized groups and
drove them around Bavaria to show them the sights, the museums and castles. His
experiences in the camp were included in the book Guilt and Fate. (25-6841)
Burg was read a passage from Did Six
Million Really Die?:
The first Nazi proposals for a
Madagascar solution were made in association with the Schacht Plan of 1938.
Burg testified that the emigration of
Jews from Nazi Germany who did not go to Palestine was hindered by the Zionists.
The Zionists prevented the Jews from going to other countries because their
interest was in making the Jews go to Palestine. Furthermore, most countries
blocked entrance to Jewish emigration. (25-6842)
The German Reich wanted to get the Jews
out: how and where were secondary questions. The people under Göring dealing
with the Jewish question picked up a plan which came from the founder of the
Zionist movement, Theodor Herzl, which involved moving the Jews to Uganda or
Madagascar. Both of these colonies belonged to France. The plan did not work
out, but the existence of the plan alone proved logically that a liquidation of
the Jews did not exist. Their labour was needed as well. Burg emphasized there
was no liquidation of the Jews by the Germans. (25-6842, 6843, 6844)
The Transfer (Haavara) Agreement of 1933
was one of the most important incidents in the Holocaust framework. Under this
agreement some 2.5 million Jews were to be traded for trucks. The agreement
never came to fruition because the Zionists could not take that number of Jews
to Palestine. (25-6853, 6854)
Burg had discovered that the German
Zionist leaders requested as early as 1933 that the Jews be required to wear the
yellow star. The Zionists saw it not as an insult but as a heroic gesture, just
like the SS wore the swastika. In 1938 the director of the Zionist movement in
the Third Reich brought about the wearing of the yellow star by the Jews against
the wishes of both Göring and Goebbels. (25-6850)
Burg wrote in his books about the
co-operation which existed between the Zionist leadership, including David
Ben-Gurion, with the Nazi regime prior to the war. (26 6877) Several days after
Hitler had been named Chancellor, Rabbi Leo Baeck, a leader of the Zionist
organizations in Germany, announced publicly that the interests of Jewry were
identical with the interests of National Socialism. Burg testified that Baeck
meant "Zionism," not "Jewry." The Zionists at that time in Germany constituted
one and a half percent of the Jewish population. A few days later another
Zionist leader made a similar declaration. The sense of these declarations,
testified Burg, was as follows: 'We nationalist Jews, meaning Zionists, are in
agreement with this regime. We are not ashamed of our nationalist thoughts.' The
Germans who had to deal with the Jewish question co-operated immediately with
this minority of Jews in order to prove to the whole world that they were not
anti-Jewish but were co-operating with the Jews. (26-6878, 6879)
In the early 1930s, as result of this
co-operation between the Nazis and Zionists, some 120,000 Jews emigrated from
Germany to Palestine. Difficulties began, however, when Britain, which
administered Palestine, refused to issue any more immigration permits because of
Arab unrest. (26-6879, 6880)
Zionists in Germany worked at organizing
schools for children in the Jewish language, workshops for young people, etc.,
to help prepare people to emigrate at some point to Palestine. The Zionists were
interested only in emigration to Palestine and did everything they could to make
sure that outside of Palestine no Jews were admitted. The Nazis were interested
in getting the Jews to emigrate wherever they could. Nevertheless, co-operation
continued between the Zionists and the Nazis, such people as Adolf Eichmann,
Golda Meir and David Ben-Gurion, until 1942 when the Zionist leaders were of the
opinion they had reached their goal. Burg stated that even at that point
Germany's defeat could be seen and the Zionists became like "rats leaving a
sinking ship." (26-6880 to 6884)
Burg discussed the topic of Nazi and
Zionist co-operation often with Zündel. Burg believed that the Zionists were the
guilty party and that the Germans had been trapped. To brush everything over,
the Zionists behaved like the cunning thief who runs ahead of the police
screaming "Stop the thief!" It was Zündel's duty to fight against it and Burg
stated he would help. Why? "Because otherwise it will never come to a
reconciliation of the people. The truth is slowly coming out, and this is how,
provoked by the Zionist leaders, a hatred against the Jews is growing." (26
6885)
Zündel had told Burg that thanks to his
book Guilt and Fate, published in 1962, Zündel had become what he now was, a
fighter for the truth, a fighter against the false accusations made against his
people. (26-6885)
Burg testified that there was no
liquidation in the concentration camps. The healthier people were used for free
labour. Burg pointed out that even a golden cage was a limitation of freedom and
even a crime, but the invention of gassings came from sick minds. Burg wanted to
prove that even at Birkenau, where gassings allegedly occurred, Jewish men and
women could get special treatment. An example was Benedikt Kautsky, a Jew who
was a spiritual personality in the Socialist-Marxist world movement. Kautsky was
in Birkenau during the war doing office work. His mother, aged 79, was also sent
to Birkenau. When she became sick she got a separate room and a special diet
ordered by the doctor. This was "special treatment," given so the woman's life
could be prolonged if not cured. She died when she was 80 years of age. When he
was liberated, Dr. Kautsky returned to Vienna, Austria where he continued his
scientific work. (26- 6893, 6894) In 1946, immediately after the liberation, Dr.
Kautsky was one of the first to publish a book. It had the German title Teufel
und Verdammte (Devil and Damned). Burg testified that the book was the truth and
had historical value. However, the whole edition was burned. One and a half
years later, he published another edition in which he rewrote portions and made
changes. But he didn't completely rewrite it. There was no documentation about
gas chambers and Kautsky himself admitted he never saw a gas chamber himself.
(26-6902)
In Schuld und Schicksal (Guilt and Fate)
Burg dealt with the Warsaw and Lodz ghettos. When the German troops occupied
Warsaw, they wanted to concentrate the Jewish population. Real ghettos had been
there for centuries but the assimilated or emancipated Jews had lived far way
from the ghettos. Now the Germans wanted to have the Jews all together. In a
practical sense, the ghetto was also organized for the protection of the Jewish
population. (26-6885, 6886)
The Zionists were happy with this
arrangement. An appointed Jewish Council was the governing body of the ghetto.
They had their own police, jails and everything else. Naturally, there were some
who were cruel. One of these was the vice president of the police, who was later
executed. In Burg's eyes, this execution was evidence that Jews defended
themselves against the minority of Zionists who were using the majority of Jews
for their own purposes. (26-6886, 6887)
In the Lodz ghetto there was a Jewish
police force, a Jewish bank, Jewish money, a Jewish post office, stamps only for
Jews. There were workshops for Jews. If there was a German plan to liquidate the
Jews, why were there workshops?, asked Burg. Why those expenses? Why train
children for jobs? Thanks to Berlin, Burg testified, the Jews practiced a small
Israel. These things could not be said today, however, because it was now said
that there was a "Holocaust" and the Jews were murdered. (26-6888, 6889)
The German people, not just the Nazis,
had been blamed falsely; and not just Germans living in Germany but Germans
living throughout the world. Burg had an interest in this because he believed it
provoked hatred against Jews. Zionist leaders even today had a interest in the
origination of pogroms against the Jews and Burg was testifying to prevent this.
(26-6889)
In 1982 Zündel wrote to Burg twice
asking him for help against the Zionists in Toronto who were creating problems
for him, and for a recommendation. Zündel had been of the opinion that this
could be helpful for him. (26-6891)
Burg had frequently discussed the
subject of German restitution with Zündel. In Burg's opinion, if the Holocaust
hadn't been invented, the Germans wouldn't be paying restitution and, he pointed
out, "they are paying." He dealt with the subject in his book Guilt and Fate
which Zündel read in the 1960s. (25-6850, 6851) Israel was created in 1948 and
in 1951 still had no diplomatic ties with the Federal Republic of Germany. In
that year, Israel gave Dr. Nahum Goldmann, a representative of the World Jewish
Congress, authority to negotiate with Dr. Adenauer, the Chancellor of the
Federal Republic of Germany, concerning Germany's guilt. Israel, under Ben
Gurion, wanted money from the "damned Germans" but didn't want to sit down at a
table together with them to negotiate. The negotiations between Goldmann and
Adenauer resulted in a recognition by Germany that it had committed a holocaust
against the Jews. (26-6904, 6905)
Burg testified that it was important to
distinguish payments to the state of Israel. Israel did not exist during the
war. It was Palestine then and belonged to the British administration. During
the whole of the Second World War, not one single German soldier was in
Palestine. What was there to make good again, to repair?, asked Burg. (26-6905)
Israel submitted a document to Germany
stating that of four European Jews, three had been killed and for those dead
people Israel demanded restitution. The document did not claim that 6 million
died. Neither gassings nor murder were obvious from the document. The word used
was "killed." The initial sum of 3.5 million marks had grown and not only
today's Germans would pay but also the newborns. The sums were justified by
inventions that 40 million Jews were gassed, then 25, then about 6 million, the
level at which it had stayed. (26-6907)
Burg testified that the reason for the
continuation of war crimes trials in both the Federal Republic of Germany and
the United States was to prove to everybody that the Germans, even the ones born
in America and Toronto, were to be blamed for the murdering and gassing of Jews.
(26-6907)
Israel existed on the basis that a
Holocaust happened. The German people of the Federal Republic paid money
honestly earned by work to Israel, a barrel without a bottom. (26-6916)
Goldmann also negotiated for those who
had been liberated from the concentration camps. These were the ones who had
suffered, said Burg, who had their homes and apartments taken away from them,
who had left everything behind. Special offices for restitution were set up
around the world where Germany had representations. (26-6906)
Burg discussed with Zündel who was
responsible for the upset in the world between Germans and Jews. He told Zündel
that the First World War had brought the Zionists a homestead in Palestine but
not a nation. This was much too little and everything had to be done to create a
state of Israel. This was only possible by war activity. A world war had to come
about. The Zionists therefore co-operated with what was known as Wall Street.
Wall Street brought about the Second World War, just as they had brought about
the First World War. Burg noted that the Hitler regime had also been supported
because it was supposed to fight the Communists. Like the National Socialists,
the Communists did not want to subordinate themselves to Wall Street. The plan
of Churchill, together with the Zionists and the Americans of Wall Street, was
to ensure that the National Socialists and Communists "knocked each other out."
Chaim Weizmann had stated that he was willing to sacrifice German Jewry in the
interest of a state of Israel. (26- 6912, 6913, 6915)
Burg agreed that Zündel had shown a
sincere curiosity about the Jewish question. Zündel was a German and he was
defending his country, said Burg. Zündel had told him that he saw it as his
life's work to defend his people because they were being defamed. Burg himself
believed the German people were being defamed. He had expressed this view in his
books "again and again" and suffered personally as a result. Burg was happy that
Zündel had learned a little from him, by not talking automatically of "Jews" but
instead emphasizing "Zionists." (25-6848 to 6851)
If the Holocaust story went on the way
it was going, said Burg, there would never be a sincere relationship between the
Jews and the Germans. The Zionist leaders would see to that. Burg had told
Zündel that films such as Holocaust and Shoah were fortifications of a
falsification of history, made for the purpose of showing Germans why they had
to pay and that the paying would go on for another few generations. (25-6851,
6852)
Burg testified that if Zündel had gone
along with the current, he wouldn't have the problems he did. It would have been
a much easier life for him. It was Burg's opinion that if there were another two
or three Zündel's, it would be better for Jews as well. (26-6892, 6893)
The Crown chose not to cross-examine
Burg.
-----------------------
http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/burg.html
J. G. Burg (Joseph
Ginsberg)
Background:
Author of
many books ("Schuld und Schicksal", "Zionazi", "Das Tagebuch der Anne
Frank", "Auschwitz in alle Ewigkeit" etc.) as well as many pamphlets and
two documentary interviews with Ernst Zündel. Chief Jewish advisor,
mentor and Zündel witness in the
1988 Great Holocaust Trial.
Repercussions:
Persecuted and
beaten by Holocaust enforcers of Jewish Defense League type thugs.
Denied burial in the Munich Jewish cemetery. (Ernst Zündel and Otto
Ernst Remer gave the eulogies.) |

|
|