Satanism, Sex Crimes, and Consequences
Sex Experiments of Alfred Kinsey

    

Imagine an elite group of evil child molesters meeting privately in an undisclosed location. Imagine, too, these wicked sexual predators making plans to conduct grotesque, real-life experiments on innocent little boys and girls. In these experiments, the children will be systematically raped, sodomized, and physically violated. Detailed records will be kept of the children's reactions so that pedophiles worldwide can "enjoy" seeing the results. Satanic Doctor to Conduct Experiment

Next, imagine this elite group deciding that these horrendous sexual experiments are to be supervised by a well known professor, or "doctor," of zoology. The chosen doctor happens to be an admirer of the infamous British satanist, Aleister Crowley (the Beast), and is himself a pedophile. He will be given millions of dollars to set up a sexual laboratory and institute at a public university somewhere in Middle America. After this doctor's depraved team completes its abominable research, the mass media will be employed. The nation's newspapers, television, and radio, along with educational organizations, will join in congratulating the pedophile research doctor on a job well done. His name as a great thinker and scientist will go up in lights. The whole world shall sing his praises and be joyful for what this man has done to these little children, all in the name of science.

The Work is Begun and is Successful

And so it is that the doctor of zoology and his helpers go about their grim business of sexual molestation. Thousands of children are thrown into beds. Pedophile molesters described as "research associates" repugnantly and with wicked abandon ravage their cringing, young bodies. Some infants molested are only five months of age. The abused children are counted as statistics and labeled as "scientific subjects." All goes according to plan. The satanist doctor's name becomes a household word. Educators toast his brilliance. Commendatory books are published examining his work and touting his findings. Clergymen and readers of mass circulation magazines--including family-oriented publications--agree with his conclusions and change their attitudes and behaviors accordingly. No one seems upset. No one is alarmed. Yet, thousands of children are systematically tortured and raped. The majority of people rejoice that a stunning sexual revolution has taken place.

A Horror Movie...or Real?

        
Sex Experiments of Alfred Kinsey

Jim Keith 

An effective foot soldier in the subjugation of the masses was the Rockefeller-funded Alfred C. Kinsey, the co-author of the highly influential Sexual Behaviour In The Human Male, and other volumes. One technique of eugenics (selective breeding) and control is the destruction of traditional morality, and Kinsey may have accomplished more in that respect than any other man this century. Kinsey studied at the Bussey Institution at Harvard in the 1920s (at the time a hotbed of eugenics research), then moved on to teach at Indiana University, where his work in cultural deconstruction would ultimately succeed in decimating American sexual mores, help to fragment the family, and would leave the population far more vulnerable to reproductive, cultural, familial, and mind programming. Kinsey, always portrayed in the press as a wholesome "leave it to Beaver" style family man, was "one of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-World War II", according to biographer James Jones. Kinsey recommended that a portion of the "lower classes" be sterilized to foster a more robust gene pool. Among his intimates was Dr. Ewen Cameron, the infamous CIA-funded mind control doctor. Another of Kinsey's influences was Dr. Herrmann Muller, one of his colleagues at Indiana University. Muller, who had begun receiving Rockefeller funding from the National Research Council in 1925, received a Guggenheim grant in 1932 to pursue his work in the genetics department of the Rockefeller-funded Kaiser Wilhelm Brain Resarch Institute in Berlin. Muller studied under Ernst Rudin, who was to become the head of the Nazi Racial Hygiene Society. One of the benefits of Rudin's policy for the extermination of hereditary undesirables in Germany was that it provided a continual harvesting of fresh brains for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.

Influenced by the Great Beast Another of Kinsey's apparent influences was the occultist Aleister Crowley, "the Great Beast," known in the press as "the wickedest man alive." Kinsey visited Crowley's Thelema Abbey shortly before his death in 1955. Although it has not been established that Kinsey used Crowley as a research source in his books, they shared many friends and acquaintances, such as occultist film maker Kenneth Anger, American Nazi George Sylvester Viereck, and French pedophile Rene Guyon. Anger has said, "Kinsey was obsessed with obtaining the Great Beast's (Crowley's) day-to-day sex diaries..." To obtain grant monies and maintain the support of the university, Kinsey needed the excuse of research to validate his twenty-four-hours-a-day obsession with sex. However, Prok's (Kinsey's nickname) battle cry of 'Do your best and let other people react as they will' seemed a variation on Crowley's 'Do what thou wilt' maxim. (i.e. "Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law").

Increased illicit sexual conduct Kinsey's most effective weapon for psychological warfare on the world was his Rockefeller-funded study of American sexuality, the most famous volume being his vaunted study of "normal" sexuality, Sexual Behaviour In The Human Male, published in 1948. 200,000 copies of the book were sold within the first two months of its publication. Kinsey was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and, according to Judith A. Reisman, PhD, the author of Kinsey: Crimes And Consequences, Kinsey's quantitative research, and his numbers, were a perfect fit for Rockefeller to utilize the mass media to 'shape public attitudes and conduct.' Attitudes were changed through mass communications, which caused a rejection of chastity, self control and moral public governance, as well as increased illicit sexual conduct. 'Social management' of this sort was nothing less for Rockefeller than changing America's way of life, by among other things altering what Kinsey would call 'breeding patterns' along an evolutionary or animalistic view of human sexual conduct. The main problem with Kinsey's "quantitative research and his numbers" is that they were radically skewed in order to achieve his purposes. Researchers into Kinsey's methods, which purportedly catalogue normal sexuality, have noted that he loaded the ranks of his test subjects with an inordinately high number of persons imprisoned for sex deviancy, prostitutes and child molesters, criminals estimated by one researcher as providing as high as one third of his overall subjects. Kinsey entered them into his database as normal examples of the population Kinsey's manipulation extended to his choice of staff. His assistants in his studies were selected from young students, both male and female, who were required prior to coming on board to provide their detailed sexual histories. Another requirement was that they be filmed in explicit sexual movies, ostensibly for research, that were shot in Kinsey's attic; Kinsey's research included observation of child sexuality, the manual and oral stimulation of children's genitals, and the timing of child orgasms with stopwatches. Part of Kinsey's collection of sex films included films of children in sex acts and adult-with-child sex. According to Reisman, "The Kinsey Report claims at least '317´ pre-adolescents' were sexually experimented upon by 'older adults,' and confirmation of at least 2,035 child experimental subjects were later admitted in 1980 by [assistants] Gebhard and Pomeroy as reported in Ethical Issues in Sex Therapy."

He said 95% violate sex laws.

The information that was released in the Kinsey sex studies was damning in the extreme to traditional concepts of sexuality. Kinsey reported that 95 percent of American males had violated sex laws seriously enough to put them in jail, 85 percent had experienced premarital sex, 69 percent had used prostitutes, 45 percent were adulterers, as high as 37 percent had experienced orgasm in a homosexual act, and that 17 percent had had sex with an animal. In these post-Kinsey days this information is not that shocking, in fact it is almost believable, but in 1948 it fell upon the public like a bombshell. According to reports of the time, the Kinsey Report "shocked" and "dumbfounded" the nation. The reason was simple: Americans knew that this information did not fit their own conceptions of sexual mores and behaviour.

And they were right: Kinsey's statistics were wrong, and they remain wrong. According to researchers Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams, "Recently, several studies have shown that America is not the hotbed of promiscuity and deviancy that Kinsey's study made it appear to be, even after forty-six years of influence by that study, which was loudly trumpeted as fact by the media and much academia." One recent study by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago showed that 83% of Americans had sex with one person or did not have sex in the preceding year, with half of those polled having had only one sex partner in the previous five years. Any sex act is now acceptable. This does not mean, however, that the American media does not continue to portray the country as one big swingers' club. With Kinsey, American mores have been almost completely warped, to the point where almost any sexual act is now acceptable. Wife swapping, easy divorce, swinging, the depiction of sex acts in the media, homosexuality, and sadomasochism are promoted as norms. As with most actions of the social engineers, I believe that there are a number of reason for this. One is the creation of what has been called a "sensate" society, satiated with sex, drugs and TV (the modern form of "bread and circuses"), creating a numbed electorate who will never mount a challenge to their controllers. Another reason for this is the decoupling of sex from procreation, thus making the institution of sterilization and birth control policies, including abortion, more easily introduced to the masses.

An additional purpose is the destruction of the nuclear family, opening the door for greater social intervention and manipulation. Although it is dangerous to point out in this era of Ellen-degenerated "sexual liberation," the forces that have sought to limit our real freedoms have historically been the first wave of assault for the destruction of traditional values regarding sex. This approach was exemplified by the Nazis, for whom, according to author Pearl Buck, "Love was old-fashioned, sex was modern. it was the Nazis who restored the 'right to love' in their propaganda."

Although social engineer Alfred C. Kinsey is long-dead, his legacy lives on - and the war against sexual sanity continues today. www.nitronews.com/keith.html 

(Jim Keith died mysteriously late in 1999. Cause of death is still unclear, Ed.)

Children For Sale Children For Sale

INDIANA HERALD August 30, 1997

by Lawrence T. Newman

The headlines from the Sudan were enough to turn anyone's stomach. For a scant $15, a Sudanese child can be bought for a life of misery in modern day slavery. Child selling is at epidemic levels internationally. Plug into the Internet, input "sale of children" or "child trafficking,'' and you will get over 500 hits on just the United Nations database. Where is the major media coverage of this monstrous global catastrophe? Nowhere to be found. Today's news reports detail President Clinton's golf game, but ignore the plight of millions of our world's children, their lives and futures bartered and sold for a monetary pittance.

The United Nations Commission on Human Rights has addressed the serious global problem of the sale of children in hundreds of different documents. In a report submitted by the Special Rapporteur appointed in accordance with Resolution 1990/68, the definition of "sale of children" includes "a child transferred to another person in exchange for a sum of money or other considerations which do not constitute the price of the child but which nevertheless represent unjustified profits." In America, foster care "represent(s) unjustified profits" to agencies which profiteer from the removal of children from their homes and the continuing placement of these children outside of permanent homes. The profitability of foster care children is the root cause of children finding their permanent homes in the penal system. Research documents that 60-80% of the U.S. prison population used to be child-wards of the State, and there they learned that their lives had no meaning or worth to anyone.

According to the U.N. Special Rapporteur, "The key (in defining the sale of children) is the exploitation of the child, which usually entails the action of another benefiting from the child in violation of his/her rights." This is certainly the key to therapeutic foster care. In particular, where children are billed out at rates which reach hundreds of dollars a day. Foster care agencies use poor and minority children for heavy monetary gain. This constitutes the "sale of children," whose rights are violated as often as the ocean's waves hit the shore.

In Indiana, foster children are held in virtual bandage for an average of 3.5 years versus the national average of 1.4 years! Indiana's foster children are over 40% Black, while the African-American population in Indiana is about 8%! Foster children are from poor and working poor families. Indiana mirrors our national shame - a classist, racist foster care system which encourages the "sale of children" for the sake of profits to those who are supposed to protect the children.

On August 6, 1992, the United States signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR). The CCPR expressly recognizes that "the inalienable rights of all members of the human family (including children) is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world." Where are our foster children's inalienable rights?

Foster care, and therapeutic foster care, in particular, stand in direct violation of international law as established in Article 7 of the CCPR, which forbids "cruel, inhuman or degrading, treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation." Therapeutic foster children are routinely administered psychotropic drugs without their consent and are regularly subjected to psychiatric regimes without their consent. For some of the drugs routinely forced upon foster children by the social services, no long-term effects are known; extreme cautions are given by the Physician's Desk Reference against their use in young children; and dangerous side effects are listed. Nevertheless, foster children are forced to be the subjects of such medical experimentation and cruel treatments.

Experimentation on helpless children is not a new phenomenon in America. The infamous Kinsey Report, written by Dr. Alfred Kinsey in the 1940's, details sexual responses of children as young as 2 months old. Who would contend that these children were willing participants in these experiments? The Kinsey Report details the torture of helpless children by adult predators. Minority children did not escape the experiments. According to Dr. Judith A. Reisman author of Kinsey, Sex and Fraud. There is no question that some of these children (in the Kinsey Report) were taken from the Black community, and some would probably have been from several Black orphanages and homes for children that Kinsey and his team entered unmonitored."

Kinsey was a zoologist who became a sadomasochist in laboratory experiments on infants and children, whose responses to torture were timed with a stopwatch. Under today's international law, Dr. Kinsey is an evil lawbreaker. As the Kinsey Institute of Indiana University embarks on its 50th anniversary celebration of its founder's macabre research, the voices of thousands of children victimized by Kinsey cry out in anger and anguish, "Close the doors of Kinsey forevermore. Bury his memory in a vacant building under tomes of records of unspeakable experiments inflicted on innocent children." May 1997 be the last year that anyone on earth will ever celebrate the memory of any man who has murdered the innocence of a child.