After “victory” 

 Besides, Yalta caused Stalin to solidarize with the Allies, that is with those powers which have always been the worst enemies of Eurasia. Stalin, perfectly understanding the laws of geopolitics and having already made his eurasist choice, could not fail to understand it. 

Immediately after the german defeat, Stalin began to realize a new geopolitical project, the Warsaw Agreement, integrating East European countries in the atmosphere of Great Soviet Russia. And here came the first conflicts and dissents with the atlantists.

 Until 1948 Stalin disguised his continental intents and even approved the creation of the state of Israel, that was the major strategic act of England (and more generally, of atlantism) in reinforcing its military, economic and ideological influence in the Near East.

 But already in 1948, using besides all other means the chain of command of internal political positions of the army (Zhukov, Vasilevskiy, Shtemenko etc.), Stalin returned to orthodox eurasist geopolitics, renewed the anti-atlantic purges within the Soviet government and pronounced the “condemn” of Israel as an anti-continental formation generated by “anglo-saxon spies”.

 Strangely enough, Stalin’s death coincided with the most dramatic and tense moment in the accomplishment of his eurasist plans, when the perspective was actual of a new continental union - USSR-China, that could radically change the logics of planetary alignment of forces and bring revenge to the Great Order of Eurasia.

 If we take into account these reasons and the geopolitical features of the post-stalinian course in the USSR, the version about the assassination of Stalin (advanced by many european historians) becomes more than probable.

 And the main role of  NKVD and its chief, the sinister Berya, worst enemy of GRU, General Staff and Eurasia, in the supposed assassination of Stalin is remarked by the majority of the historians.*  In 1953, eight years after the pseudo-victory, there was one only step before the real Victory (as well as in 1939). But instead of it the world saw the Fall of the Titan. 

         
The “polar” mission of general Shtemenko 

 During the ‘60s Shtemenko was one of the key figures in the Soviet Army: in different periods he was commander of the armed forces of the Warsaw Agreement countries and chief of the General Staff of the USSR. But the most relevant of his appointments, according to the fundamental line of our conspirological study, was the position of head of the GRU in the years 1946-1948 and 1956-1957.

 With Shtemenko the GRU was completely restored in its “polar”, occult, order features introduced into the structure of GRU by its founder Aralov. Pierre de Villemarest called general-colonel Shtemenko the  first and most outstanding Soviet geopolitician. Shtemenko was a natural and univocal supporter of the Great Continental Project, in full correspondence with the  traditional logic of the eurasist Order.

 In his book Villemarest wrote about him: «Shtemenko belonged to that special caste of Soviet officers who, though being also “soviet”, were nevertheless representative of great-russian spirit and expansionist beliefs». And further: «For this caste the USSR is an empire called to guide [upravlyat] the eurasian continent, and not only from the Urals to Brest, but from the Urals to Mongolia, from Central Asia up to the Mediterranean». 

Strategic plans of Shtemenko included the peaceful economic-cultural penetration into Afghanistan (about which he spoke in the years 1948-1952) and the entry of Soviet troops in the arab capitals - Beyrut, Damascus, Cairo, Algeri. 

Already in 1948 Shtemenko insisted on the special geopolitical role of Afghanistan, which would allow the USSR to gain access to the ocean and boost the military power of the Soviet fleet in the Black and Mediterranean seas. It is important to notice that the famous admiral Gorshkov was a close friend of general-colonel Shtemenko.

 Shtemenko and the occult subdivision, revived by him, in GRU created under Stalin a powerful and advanced network of eurasist influence, which, despite of all Berya's attempts to erase it, was not destroyed even after Stalin’s death - although from 1953 to the middle of the ‘60s the eurasist lobby within the army was compelled to hold a defensive position. 

As an unavoidable evil, GRU agents for 23 years (1963-1986) had to stand as the head of GRU the atlantic agent of Lubyanka, former “liquidator”, general Petr Ivashutin. It was an indispensable compromise. General-colonel Shtemenko, agent of the “Polar Order”, Order of Eurasia - that is key which will help us understand the secret logics of Soviet history from Khrushev to perestroyka.

 This history,- not differently, however, from all world history – is the both open and obscure fight of two secret orders, “Minstrels of Morgana” and “Minstrels of  Mursia”, devotees of the Egyptian Seth, the Red Ass, and devotees of the northern, polar Apollon, killer of the Snake Python. 

         
Nikita Khrushev, agent of Atlantis 

 Despite his dissents with Berya, Khrushev leaned on KGB and at a definite time made the final , opposite to the choice of Lenin and Stalin. Khrushev's activity was directed to destroying the internal structures of the eurasists in the USSR, and also to undermining the global continental project of a supra-statal planetary block.

 The coming of Khrushev was the coming to power of KGB. Khrushev, once he had consolidated his position, begins to strike blow after blow against  all levels of the continental-patriotic lobby.

 All his attention is henceforth centered on the anglo-saxon countries, especially on the US. Khrushev’s slogan “to catch up and bypass the West” means alignment to the atlantic powers and acknowledgement of their social and economic superiority.

 The theses about the rapid approach of communism are directed to riding again the “leftist-messianic”, “bolshevist-internationalist” tendencies almost forgotten during the long years of eurasian imperial geopolitical stalinism.

 Khrushev aims to strike a blow on all “soil” traditional structures, which had been saved, due to the secret protection of the Eurasian Order, even in the most terrible periods of red terror. Khrushev wants definitively to get rid of the Russian Orthodox church. Khrushev was “americanist” and “atlantist” in everything: starting from the famous atlantic “corn” and ending with his military concepts exclusively based on employing intercontinental missiles to the detriment of all remaining kinds of weapons.

 Khrushev did not care at all for the eurasian continent. He was concerned with Latin America, Cuba etc. Between the atlantists from Khrushev war cabinet (whose leader was marshal S.S. Biryuzov) and the eurasists from Shtemenko's group there was almost open conflict.

 Khrushev insisted on the concept of “nuclear intercontinental blitzkrieg”, which, from the continental point of view, is nothing else than strategic sabotage, weakening the real military power of continental forces, shattering the economy and creating a planetary apocalyptical threat.

 After Khrushev’s dismissal, “Red Star” quite fairly wrote: «That strategy, which we eventually refused, could only be born in an ill brain». Shtemenko even earlier in the same “Red Star” warned: «It is nowise possible to base the safety of the USSR only on ballistic intercontinental missiles». With Khrushev begins the definitive separation of intra-statal functions: “men of the party” and representatives of  Lubyanka solidarize henceforth with khrushevists on the strategy of “nuclear blitzkrieg” (the Soviet Army becomes the first hostage of the “nuclear terrorists” of KPSS [Communist Party of the Soviet Union], more exact, of the atlantic wing of KPSS), while eurasists and GRU lobbyists insist on the development of conventional armaments and try to take a revenge through military space studies.

 In 1958 Khrushev dismisses from authority the powerful and extremely popular eurasian marshall Zhukov. In 1959 he starts another offensive – he places at the head of GRU one of the most odious figures of Soviet history, the bloody carnefice, chekist Ivan Serov, known under the nickname of “Zhivoder”.

 This bloody character - ideal type for the characteristic of Order of Red Ass as a whole – was abhorred by the General Staff and, of course, by GRU agents and patriots of Eurasia in the first place.

 Another “atlantist”, general Mironov, becomes the accountable curator of the so-called “executive organs” - that means supervision above basic army and intelligence subdivisions. However the khrushevist offensive manoeuvres meet the well coordinated occult reaction of the eurasists: Konev, Sokolovskiy, Timoshenko, Grechko try to defeat Khrushev at any cost. 

Each superfluous day of stay in power of this “atlantist” renders an irreplaceable ideological, strategic and political damage to the USSR, and, as a whole, to the interests of the continental powers.

 Let's notice another curious detail: in Khrushev's epoch the domination of the “totalitarian-hegelian” line in Soviet “ritualistic” marxist philosophy (attributing primacy to the supra-individual, “objective” factors above the individual and subjective) is replaced by the domination of the “subjective-kantian” line (attributing primacy to the individualistic and “subjective” above the “objective”).

 Just in those times begins the quick degradation of civic education, appears the new constellation of  “khrushevist”  academicians and scientists representing a mob of unskilled and arrogant laymen. (We shall recollect, for instance, as a representantives of  “khrushevists” A.N. Yakovlev, who admitted to have criticized Marcuse, not having found time at all to read him; the Stalin scientists continuing, though in a peculiar form, the pre-revolutionary academic traditions, as a rule, were distinguished for their knowledge of those authors which they sincerely or not so sincerely criticized).

 With Khrushev begins the step-by-step propagation in the society of  an “atlantism”-oriented, groundless and cosmopolitan intelligentsia, which KGB brood unseen even in its most radical and dissident variants. The themes of the West, the themes of the US begin to spread in the USSR as “prohibited”, but “attractive” ideals from the end of the ‘50s – beginning of the ‘60s. 

       
The long path to 1977 

After Khrushev's knockout the eurasists step-by-step began to recover their positions. Leonid Brezhnev was a figure supported by the eurasists. It is significant, that the writer Smirnov in 1965 wrote: “On May 9, 1965 at the parade for victory in Moscow before the veterans’ columns should pass, celebrating the twentieth anniversary of Victory, marshall Zhukov himself, decorated with battle orders”.

 After seven years of khrushevian disgrace Zhukov was again rehabilitated. It was the present victory of GRU. But the triumph of the Order of Eurasia under Brezhnev was far from being complete. “Atlantists” from KGB were not going to to surrender. The continental projects were constantly stopped. In the middle of the ‘60s even there was a paradoxical situation, when the perspective of the continental block was debated, bypassing the USSR.

 In this respect it is interesting to report the facts about negotiations of Arthur Axmann - former head of the “Hitler-jugend” organization and participant to the eurasian lobby inside the SS - with Zhou Enlai concerning the creation of a united continental block Peking – Berlin - Paris, bypassing the USSR.

 Laval, and even general de Gaulle without reserve greeted such project. A further meeting was held in Bucharest. Arthur Axmann in Madrid told Jean Parvulesco about the following episode on his flight to Peking. In the same plane sat a group of Soviet military, which tried to convince Axmann of the necessity of including also the USSR in this Eurasian project – which was, however, the old dream of Axmann himslef, oppositor of Hitler’s antislavic racism since the times of his implication in the eurasian lobby inside the SS (the SS circle of hauptmann Aleksandr Doleschallek, Richard Hildebrandt, Guenther Kaufmann etc., linked, of course, with Walther Nikolay and Martin Bormann).

 GRU officers also reported to Axmann about the intrigues of the atlantist lobby in the USSR, putting insuperable obstacles to all geopolitical projects oriented to the continent – and so to all continental powers, most important of which being the USSR. 

The atlantists from KGB, using their traditional tactics, forced the Army to resign itself with Ivashutin (old chekist and extremely unpopular figure) at the head of GRU for 23 years. 

But nevertheless, since 1973 Brezhnev began to advance the military closer and closer to the government of the country. In 1973 marshall Grechko became member of the Politburo. Replacing him, also Ustinov entered this body, though we must notice that the chiefs of KGB - Andropov, and later also his heir Chernikov - were members of the Politburo since 1967.

 But the greatest triumph of the Army and GRU was in 1977, when the new brezhnevian constitution founded the “Security Council”, becoming a self-supporting and formally independent legal and political force. It was a victory of the Army over KGB. It was a victory of Eurasia.

 The cautious and never hastening Brezhnev had fulfilled his promise – made to the eurasian lobby – to change the backstage order of the internal soviet structure of power. The army had now its rigorous agency at the highest level. Brezhnev's strategy was on the whole continentally oriented, though space and space weapon became nevertheless the basic sphere of strategic interest. 

In a parallel way to working at space war projects, the geopolitics of the Brezhnev epoch elaborated applicable ideological and political models taking into account the new strategic and military nomenclature and typology of the space age.

 It is important to mention in this context of idea of the writer and ideologist of the patriotic movement A. Prokhanov, tightly linked to definite geopolitical groups in the General Staff since the times of marshall Ogarkov. ?.Prokhanov assures that the soviet-eurasian military strategy at the end of the ‘70s - first half of the ‘80s seriously elaborated the project of a new continental-space civilization based on a combination of spiritual, “soil” and metaphysical traditions of Eurasia with ultra-modern techniques, space stylistics and the global system of the “new communications”.

 This, in Prokhanov’s opinion, should become the eurasian answer to the American pattern of “star wars”, exhibiting the future space age as the celebration of the anglo-saxon idea not only on the planet, but also in the universe. To the American universe, the American Space, the“soil-futuristical”  ideologists of the General Staff, according to Prokhanov, were ready to oppose the russian universe, the eurasian universe, the image of Great Eurasia, projecting itself on boundless regions of stars and planets.

 “Neighbours” of Lubyanka had chosen a Space arranged according to the image of “insular” mercantile-colonial civilizations of the extreme West. The American pattern fully suited them. So, in the newest technological shapes, we again meet with the most ancient themes, with voices from a millennial history, with the call from our far ancestors always solving an essentially single problem: “Is it necessary to destroy Carthago?”- in whatever shape this problem ever presented itself. 

      
Geopolitics of marshal Ogarkov 

 Of the three brezhnevian chiefs of the General Staff - Zakharov, Kulikov, Ogarkov (all three convinced eurasists) – the brightest was Ogarkov, an ingenious connoisseur of masking, many times strategically fooling both external and internal atlantists. 

Ogarkov was the organizer of the Prague operation, which passed so smoothly only because he managed to fully confuse NATO intelligence services  and to impose on them some excellently sent misinformation. It is curious to mark that the events of the “Prague spring”, ended for democratic putschists in a “sad autumn”, were somehow a strategic duel between two characters dedicated to the deepest secrets of the planetary conflict. 

Today it is well-known that the occult author and director of the “Prague spring” was David Goldstucker. In this operation he was confronted to the eurasist Ogarkov, and it is necessary to notice that Ogakov’s victory was not simply the victory of rough force of the Soviet tanks, but a victory of thought, cunning and magnificent mastering of the art of misinformation, “camouflage”, with the help of which NATO leadership was led to commit the worst mistakes and had no time for that reaction which, of course, doctor Goldstucker and his creatures (Dubchek, Havel etc.) from the beggining counted upon.

 Ogarkov pioneered the creation of “Spetsnaz” [special forces], called to perform local and instant operations in the back-zone of the opponent’s front, absolutely necessary for the success especially of continental, local military operations.

 Geopolitically marshal Ogarkov always openly (in contrast to the hidden and cautious eurasist Grechko) defended the “eurasian project” and aspired to transform the USSR Armed Forces so that they could conduct themselves in the best way in a long, local war with prevailing conventional weapons.

 After Krushev the question about “nuclear and intercontinental” kinds of weapons acquired a symbolical sense - depending on the emphasis of the military doctrine on “global war ” or on “local war ” in army circles defined as “ours” and “theirs”, that is representatives of the atlantist or eurasian lobby: “ local war” with application of conventional armaments and without using nuclear weapons was the slogan of the “eurasists”, and “total nuclear war” the slogan of the atlantists, never stopping to put ideological pressure on the Army.

 Around Ogarkov the military élite of eurasian orientation was grouped together. First of all, his fellow comrades were marshals Akhromeev and Yazov. Both of them, especially Akhromeev, were secretly devoted to the “Polar Order ”, founded in the Soviet Army already by Mikhail Tukhachevsky in parallel to Aralov’s similar organization, created by him immediately after the appearance of GRU. 

       
The Afghanistan catastrophe 

Precise data allow to believe that the Afghanistan war was inspired by KGB to discredit the Army in the course of a long and insensate conflict and to provoke the atlantic interference in the internal political situation on part of the US. 

The Afghanistan conflict is considered as the instigating of KGB against the Soviet Army and, more widely, against the whole eurasian lobby, by such specialists of occult sovietology as Pierre de Villemarest and Jean Parvulesco. 

Knowing about the geopolitical projects of general Shtemenko, and in particular, about the geopolitical and strategic value of Afghanistan, the people from Lubyanka decided to provoke an armed and forced intervention in the afghani internal political situation. (It is necessary to notice, thus, that Shtemenko himself excluded such interference, insisting on peaceful integration and gradual economic-strategic infiltration of Afghanistan in complete correspondence with the normal logics of any organic and natural economic and cultural expansion on the north-south axis). And not only starting an insensate war, but also its irresolute, uncertain, dull conducting was a consequence of KGB interference in the affairs of the Army - since the atlantists needed the USSR to lose the war, a war which could result in the definitive destruction of the Eurasian block.

 Therefore in Afghanistan KGB special forces arranged acts of terrorism against the peaceful afghani population - that was a perfect absurdity, if the Soviet troops really wanted to integrate Afghanistan and to make it a geopolitical vassal.

 From above through the Party and the Politburo the atlantists, vice-versa, tried to rein the most reasonable military operations, sometimes stopping them, when they began to be crowned with success.

 Pierre de Villemarest affirms that this war was lost only because the highest ranks in the Soviet government wanted it to be lost. Anyway, this war was fatal for the Army, GRU and the Eurasian Order. 

       
The “right-wing” in KGB and the Andropov paradox 

 For this reason post-war NKVD-KGB, remaining essentially atlantist, adopted some definite ideological features of Army, conservative, “right” orientation. Genetically ascending to the squads of anti-soil, anti-Russian and anti-state punitive red gangs of the ‘20s, KGB at the same time has undergone to a significant influence of “right-wing” eurasists of GRU and the General Staff in those times when Stalin’s imperialism was dominant. 

Such duplicity of KGB logically resulted in a definite compromise in KGB structure, which can explain all the political and conspirological “oddness” linked to this organization.

 If the substance and the major centre of KGB remained purely atlantist, integrated in the united planetary network of atlantist intelligences, at the periphery, among ordinary employees and even officers, a “nationalist” atmosphere developed on the whole.

 However this “Lubyanka nationalism” (sometimes joined with a rather strong judeophobia) always corresponded to the principle “blood over soil”- that is, it never had actually a continental, imperial, eurasian character.

 And such situation rather suited the figures of the atlantist Order, as this “naive nationalism” of the ordinary employees served as a perfect masking for the network of anti-soil, “messianic” and mondialist agents. As a whole, post-war KGB was typologically similar to panslavist groups inside the imperial government on the eve of the First World War and with racist, xenophobe organizations in the Reich, serving as a cover for the atlantist residents. 

In this perspective it is necessary to consider the coming to power of Yuri Andropov, former KGB chief, after Brezhnev's death. 

The above mentioned reasons of KGB duplicity will help to understand the duality of Andropov's role, and also the dualist image of this figure, which can be simultaneously considered as both father of perestroyka  and democratization, “accomplished” by Gorbachev, and extreme conservative attempting to restore the totalitarian epoch of Lavrenty Berya.* It is curious, that among simple russian people in relation to Andropov two opposite estimations are common: “Andropov - jew - sionist” and “Andropov - patriot - anti-semite”. (Of course, both these definitions should be “metaphorically” understood).

 Actually, Andropov’s  riddle is simple - he is a representative of KGB, i.e. complete and convinced atlantist, loyal to his Order of the “Dancing Death”. He was simultaneously “jew - sionist” and “patriot - anti-Semite”, as this pair looks contradictory only in extremely simplified conspirological patterns, whereas actually the conspirological picture is much more complex, and its key factors are neither national nor political criteria, but only fundamental geopolitical orientations more often carefully kept secret to the outsiders. 

The coming of Andropov was the second terrible blow against the Army after the beginning of the Afghanistan war. Now the authority in the state was in the hands of a member of that organization which during all its existence had but one goal - to erase the Order of Eurasia inside the USSR, to shatter the secret structures created by Aralov, Tukhachevsky, Shtemenko, Ogarkov, Akhromeev and other eurasists, to blow up Eurasia from the inside, to make once and for all of the idea of a new continental block an unrealizable utopia, a fiction, to gain definitive victory to “New Carthago”, to the US, to establish together with the CIA the New World Order on the planet, the New Trade Construction. The coming of Andropov, the coming of the “right of KGB”, meant no more an no less as the beginning of perestroyka. 

        
The double agent Mikhail Gorbachev 

 But Andropov well understood that at any stage of perestroyka the eurasists could try to take revenge, to throw off the atlantists from KGB and Politburo and to lead the country according to an eurasian policy. 

Therefore the choice of the major figure of the new policy fell on the most evasive and uncertain of the then supreme leaders, who was so cautious, flexible and elusive, that none of the two sides did know for what Order he actually worked. On the other hand, according to the most ancient traditions of Order of Atlantic, to which Andropov belonged, it was accepted to give special attention to people whose appearance showed some eloquent defect. According to this principle were selected the highest priests of the cult of the aegyptian ass-headed god Seth.

 Gorbachev with his mark (which, by the way, one Musselman - traditionalist has read as an arabian inscription of  three letters - kaf, fa, ra, that gives “Kafir”, i.e. “hypocrite”) was the most eligible figure.

 Promoting Gorbachev, Andropov calculated  that his candidature would satisfy both geopolitical groupings, as the solution of internal tensions in the USSR already for a long time had ripened and the political change should logically be backed by both atlantists and eurasists. 

The atlantists’ interest in change was obvious, but also the eurasists - after the beginning of the Afghanistan war and the coming of Andropov to power - were not anymore interested in preserving the status quo, and consequently would easily accept the transformation.

 Gorbachev was convenient and useful to everyone. As Gorbachev's guardians on behalf of the two conflicting Orders were appointed A.I.Lukyanov and A.N.Yakovlev. Both these figures were the immediate participants to the ramified continental conspiracy, showing however two conflicting parties. 

        
The true face of Anatoliy Lukyanov 

Now the destiny of any appointment or promotion among the highest military ranks depended on him. Lukyanov, always showing loyalty to Gorbachev, constantly tried, nevertheless, to interpret in the eurasist key the ambiguous and nebulous instructions of the new Kremlin leader.

 Gorbachev’s aspiration to terminate the Afghanistan conflict was in the hands of the Army, and there are some reasons to believe that Lukyanov was involved in this geopolitical action.

 As flexible and cautious as Gorbachev was, Lukyanov, contrary to him, had a strict and clear geopolitical attitude. His purpose, as well as the purpose of the “Polar” Order, was the Great Eurasia from Mongolia up to the Mediterranean, the Pax Eurasiatica, the great continental union.

 Lukyanov was obliged by virtue of his position to control GRU and to supervise the General Staff, but, actually, this accurate and quiet man was not the “guardian of the messianic bolsheviks ” upon the military eurasian state within the state, but the messenger of GRU, surveilling the bolsheviks-atlantists on behalf of the Army.

 Being covered by his ostensibly standing on a “centre-left” position, Lukyanov realized in the Supreme Soviet a special mission, whose sense consisted in forming the parliamentary block oriented for the benefit of the secret eurasian mission. 

       
“ Mr. Perestroyka  ” 

Dues must be given, that he started his open attacks against the patriots-eurasists already in 1974, when the positions of GRU were very strong and when Grechko already was member of the Politburo.

 By openly invoking the ideological pogrom of the “national-bolshevik” literature, which in those years served as a tribune for the ciphered exchange of information, ideas, concepts and projects for all patriotic eurasian lobby, Yakovlev accepted to run a definite risk.

 And despite intercession from Andropov and the highest circles of KGB after the publication of famous paper «Against anti-historicism», the manifest of russophobe and anti-patriotic atlantism, he nevertheless had to be sent away from Russia. 

The truth was that KGB had decided to turn “poison into medicine” and to use Yakovlev's envoy in Canada for activating an espionage atlantist network.

 According to the informations collected by Jean Parvulesco in his report The GRU Galaxy, in Ottawa, where Yakovlev was sent afterwards, he entered into contact with David Golstucker, who represented at that time in the US the international interests of Israel, under the cover of his involvement in confidential negotiation with a Chicago firm linked to nuclear power engineering.

 Dr. David Golstucker who, as it is known, was a relevant figure not only in Israeli special services, but also directly in special services of anglo-saxon countries (this on the whole reminds of a situation characteristic also for Soviet KGB), elaborated together with Yakovlev the atlantist strategy of the future perestroyka. 

This fact is so well-known in the West, that Yakovlev's name there is just “Mr. Perestroyka”. So already for the second time in history, practically the same figures prepared for a desperate, complex, dangerous and capturing geopolitical duel.

 Once before, during the Prague spring, Goldstucker, agent of  the“Dancing Death”, suffered a crushing defeat from GRU - from the collected, clever, brilliant and courageous servants of the Order of Eurasia, general Shtemenko and marshal Ogarkov. 

The same Goldstucker ten years after prepared his revenge. This time GRU and Soviet General Staff should be attacked on their own territory, instead of “neutral” Czechoslovakia.

 And this time Goldstucker hoped not for the slow NATO with its huge, terrible, but in some situations useless nuclear arsenal. Now the major destructive weapon of the resident of planetary atlantism - Goldstucker - should become the swollen “Mr. Perestroyka”, the brand-new tactical weapon of the Order of the Red Ass, hope of the atlantic battle orders, captain of the occult anglo-saxon “spetsnaz”, deserted from Ottawa in the rear of the eurasist opponent. 

         
Between false alternatives 

 Such conspiracy resulted, eventually, in the catastrophe of the eurasian lobby. The atlantic authors of the anti-imperial project of perestroyka resorted in this case to a traditional method - the creation of a pseudo-opposition, i.e. the substitution of a false “conservative” pole to the real one.

 Since the true enemies of the atlantists were not simply nationalists, but “ nationalists of an imperial, continental kind ”, “continentalists”, it is natural that the pseudo-opposition to the open atlantism of “Mr. Perestroyka” should be anything but eurasist.

 Following this logics the people from the Atlantic Order, with the active involvement of KGB, created parallel and consequently false poles. These poles were: 

1) “communists - conservatives”. Their symbols were Yegor Ligachev and then Ivan Polozkov (both of them at some moment vanished as smoke, and this is not surprising, as their opposition was generally not based on any principles, and besides was a centuries old and well-known set-up).

2) “patriots - nationalists”. This movement was created through the active involvement of KGB, which projected chauvinistically a judeophobe position on marginal groupings of sincere but short-sighted patriots, thus setting up a special algorithm of “patriotic movement”, unable to cause any serious harm to the more and more legalized atlantist lobby. 

3) “national-bolsheviks”. This current was more interesting and stood close to the conceptions of the eurasist lobby, but, thanks to the efforts of KGB, the sense of measure here was lost and the “national-bolshevik”conception assumed a repelling, grotesque and extremist character - both in the sense of an excessive accentuation of “leninism”, and in the sense of excessive judeophobia. 

4) finally, the highest ruse of the atlantist KGB was to promote KGB itself as an opposition to the “democrats” - and this course too worked, since even to open employees of “Lubyanka” the “patriots” referred with definite trust, and even with some hope. 

 

So “the most elusive man” with a characteristic mark on his front plied between “Mr. Perestroyka” and Anatoliy Lukyanov, but exteriorly it seemed, that his second pole was not at all Lukyanov, but someone different, more odious, more scandalous, more showy, but really either a completely insignificant figure, or a clear straw-man. GRU and the Army with expectation and impatience looked at Anatoliy Lukyanov. Yes, to some changes - end of the insensate war, reduction of intercontinental arms, foreign policy steps towards Germany, Japan and China – the eurasists could pay compliments.

 Even the dedication to the theme of the “common european home” in the “Polar” Order could be easily interpreted in the key, since this doctrine was drawn from the geopolitical arsenal of that eurasist opposition within the SS to which belonged Axmann, Hildebrandt, Doleschallek, Kaufmann etc. (typologically linked with the Order of Eurasia in GRU).

 But the ruin of the Union, the attacks against the Army, the attempts to involve the Army in nationalist and micro-territorial conflicts, the suicidal policies in the Baltic Republics, shattering the last remains so valuable for the eurasists of the Ribbentropp-Molotov pact, the promotion of uncontrolled mafia and open criminals into the political arena, and many other things led GRU in a blind alley. But Anatoliy Lukyanov remained in the shadow. Cautiously, consequently and step by step he prepared a back strike, decisive and final. Up to last moment it seemed that everything could be saved in a moment, and then the eurasist lobby would use all the positive geopolitical sides of “perestroyka”, having done with “Mr. Perestroyka” and his accomplices, who from then on were all “burned”, and the new great era would begin, free from the communists, atlantists and servants of the “Dancing Death”, the era of Eurasia, Cosmic Eurasia, era of Sacral Solar Continent, Era of the East. But has burst August 1991.

               
Putsch, culmination of the occult war 

 Only in this case, the declaration of deputy Obolenskiy acquires sense, and his reliance on safety of secret becomes clear. 

The August putsch was (or should be, on premeditation of his authors) the culmination of geopolitical opposition, the decisive moment of the invisible war. The order of Atlantic could not ignore that the eurasists prepared for winter 1991-1992 years a definite operation, which should result in introducing a military regime on the whole USSR territory under pretext of stabilizing the social, political and economic situation. They also perfectly understood that the ideological attitude of the eurasist military direction would have been non-communist and patriotically oriented, but without the “anti-semitism”, xenofobia and “panslavism” traditional for KGB.

 In other words, the military direction promised to be stable, liberal in the economic field, geopolitically correct, exempt from terrorist kurtosises peculiar to bolshevik forms of dictatorship. Besides, the Eurasian Military Regime, Roman-imperial Regime, had every chance to be popular to the highest degree, as it would refrain from “communist dogmatism” and “marxist utopism”, on the one hand, but on the other - it would be quite responsive to the natural inclination to hierarchy, to discipline, to centralization and communitarianism, sociality, “integrality” (in Khomyakov's sense) of all true Eurasian ethnoses.

 The patriotism of the Military Regime should have been imperial, instead of “russian” and “nationalist” in the narrow sense of this concept. 

All this made such perspective not only unacceptable, but fatal and deathly to the atlantist lobby inside the USSR, and also for world-wide atlantist mondialism.

 Despite of the huge destructions caused to the country by the agents of the “Order of the Dancing Death”, by “Mr. Perestroyka”, together with his comrade from KGB, Shevardnadze (accursed, by the way, by his own Georgian people), the Order of the Eurasists knew how to use this negative situation to the benefit of their own position, since in the secret GRU departments there worked worthy followers of the great russian strategists - Shtemenko and Ogarkov. 

The geopolitical duel with Goldstucker could end with a defeat for this skilled and active representant of the Atlantic Order. The major problem for the atlantists was to prevent the forming of a war situation in the USSR, to which, it appear, the logics of events was leading. Just to this purpose the August putsch was organized. 

               
Miscalculations of marshal Yazov 

On the other hand, the fraudulent manoeuvres were made also at the  top of power - both Chebrikov and Kryuchkov aimed at solidarizing with the eurasist-military against “cosmopolitans-democrats”. (As a matter of fact, the whole democratic movement was of course organized just by the KGB, and further, it was even more artificial and “built-on” than the patriotic movement, since for the Russian and other originally eurasian ethnoses it is much more natural to support the “right”, than the “left” - this is an historical constant). 

To conceal this double game, the atlantists from KGB created myths about the “jewish-masonic wing”of KGB (as such were called, in particular, its Moscow branch as a counterweight to the Union’s, and later the KGB of Yeltsin’s RSFSR [Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic], etc.).

 As a matter of fact, KGB was busy with sharply anti-eurasian activities, destroying the structures of the eurasian network in the countries of Eastern Europe, overthrowing “soil” and anti-atlantist regimes (such as the Ceausescu regime, which, by the way, was always oriented towards an eurasian continental block and hated the atlantist “sell-out” of the USSR government - see Claude Carnou “Again on  the  East” in the review Crisis, n. 5 April 1990, France).

 Anyway, the GKChP affair plainly proves that some rather unclear moves of Kryuchkov succeeded in convincing some eurasists - marshal Yazov and Oleg Balkanov - to hurry with the forming of a war situation, and to accept the help from KGB, on condition that it took distance from its atlantism and stood, in the end, on the side of the Army and ready to act against the “democrats”. 

Probably, Kryuchkov had stipulated some conditions also for his organization, as in case of a rigorous military eurasist regime the KGB structures of course would be erased - at least, in their old, party-terrorist, mondialist and atlantist kind. What arguments the agents of Order of Eurasia reported to marshal Yazov, we do not know yet. It is obvious only that the signing of the Novo-Ogarev Agreements had not the slightest relation to this. Everything could be changed once again, annulling any “paper” which had come out from under the pen of casual people, not so clearly realizing the geopolitical situation, led by the extremely evasive “Gorby”- delivered to this position not for taking decisions, but for “masking”, and by virtue of a mark of definitely occult “election”.

 What must have said Kryuchkov to marshal Yazov, for the latter – essentially devoted to the strategy of the Eurasian Order - to jeopardize the destiny of a multi-millennial occult opposition, the destiny of the continent, destiny of the Eurasian Space, a destiny inevitable and, as it seemed, so close to victory?

 Why Yazov has chosen the chief of the most anti-eurasist body? For the moment, we have to limit ourselves to assumptions about it. And is perfectly clear that the mistake of marshal Yazov hides some terrible secret, maybe even involving any paranormal, “magic” or telepathical influence, or the effects of some special psychedelic drugs.

All this is not so unbelievable, if we remember the testimonies of some GKChP members about their complete amnesia during those three fatal days. Only complete idiots could consider that people, having arrived up to the highest levels of their political, military, intelligence and “conspirological” career, can in such a decisive situation behave like irresponsible drunken tramps, that is stoplessly getting drunk and going to get over it in the city, crowded with tanks and “democratic” propagandists.

 But also the version about the poisoning of Kryuchkov by the remaining eight members appears scarcely believable to us, as the GRU people guarded their chiefs more vigilantly than Gorbachev itself. In the affair about the “mistakes of marshal Yazov”, probably, there took place a combination of many occult-ideological and parapsychological factors, synchronically operating. But what “weapon” this time has been used by the Atlantic Order? We shall talk about it very soon. 

               
“Mr. Perestroyka” goes on attack 

The russian parliament, made of completely incompetent and casual people, not having any explicit geopolitical attitude and acting on casual, random and anarchist emotions in its coward lobbying, after the shock of the Moscow farce, could spoil the whole deal. 

Yeltsin, whether he had not received in time the information, or simply had forgotten about the most important thing (the mental condition of the Russian president also causes to believe that he too was under some parapsychological influence, as remarked not only by european conspirologists, but also by many western journalists - in the beginning explaining Yeltsin’s complete inadequacy by his belonging to the “extreme right”, but later forced to resort to the version about occult or psychotrope influences), concentrated his crushing polemics against the eight, having forgotten about the principal task.

 
Yakovlev came to the “white house” (more reminding in that moment a “yellow house ”) to demand the arrest of Lukyanov. Yeltsin compliantly repeated for “Mr. Perestroyka” the famous phrase - “behind the conspiracy of the eight there was Lukyanov, he is major ideologist of the conspiracy ”. 

                
Lukyanov and the ritual dwell on marshal Akhromeev’s tomb

 This was an unpreviewed and annoying miscalculation for the atlantists. Therefore Yakovlev, bypassing all legal norms, hurried in a  “revolutionary way” to get Lukyanov accused by Yeltsin's stuttering lips of being the ideologist of the conspiracy (on the ground that Lukyanov really was the ideologist, but of the other conspiracy, the “Polar” conspiracy, conspiracy of the saviours of the great Continental Power, conspiracy of Eurasia against the Western Islands). But despite of the imprisonment of Lukyanov, it was nevertheless not possible to present him as the head of the conspiracy and to erase on this basis all the the eurasist agents network, all GRU secret structures. 

The atlantist winners could lift only the higher layer of “party” and military conservatives, which even so did not represent a special danger. Except for Pugo’s assassination, the most important blow to the lobby of Eurasia was the aenygmatic death of marshal Akhromeev and the subsequent strange events on his yet fresh tomb. Here it is necessary to make a short digression in the history of the Atlantic Order, and specially in the history of the medieval Order “ Minstrels of Morgana”, whose emblem was the “Dancing Death”, Dance Macabre.

 According to Grasset d'Orcet, who was occupied with the study of this Order, its adherents used as a hieroglyphic password the symbol of the “Revived Deadman” or  “Dead leaving its tomb”. In some definite branches of this Order, dealing not so much with occult politics and geopolitics, how much with “magic” and “necromancy”, there was a ritual exhumation of corpses with symbolical and occult purpose. 

The whole history of death and subsequent exhumation of Akhromeev’s corpse addresses to the implication in his death’s crime of the Atlantic Order and maybe, its most dark, magic ramifications. Anyway, western conspirologists univocally associate the detail of the profanation of the marshal’s body with  to the “ritual exhumation”, till now practiced in the West by the members of rather dark sects. Probably, the atlantist agents also hoped to find any secret documents hidden together with Akhromeev, or any special marks on his corpse. All this becomes more than believable, once we take into account the major role of Akhromeev in the army “Polar” Order and his tight connection to Ogarkov, one of the major characters of the Eurasist Order.

 Anyway, after the putsch the atlantists have undertaken some resolute steps to beheading the eurasists. But after one month it became clear that their attack was wrecked, and behind their hysterical attempts urgently to complete the ruin of the state, fear and panic were also clearly visible. The order of Eurasia was not definitively erased and now comes its turn to strike back. Some definite signs allow to consider that this blow should be the Last. 

                        
Metaphysics of the occult war 

The order of Eurasia, Order of the Male Principle, Sun, Hierarchy, is the projection of the Mount, Apollon, Ormudz, Solar Christ-in-Glory, Christ-pantocrator. Eurasia as the Earth of East is the Earth of Light, Earth of Paradise, Earth of Empire. The Earth of Hope. The Earth of the Pole. 
The order of the Atlantic, Order of the Female Principle, Moon, Orgiastic Equality is the projection of the Egyptian Seth, Python, Ahriman, Christ Suffering, Human, immersed in the metaphysical despair of the lonely Getsemane prayer.

The Atlantic, Atlantis as the Earth of the West, is the Earth of the Night, the Earth of the “pit of exile” (as an islamic sufi said), Centre of Planetary Skepticism, Earth of the Great Metaphysical Spleen. 

Both Orders have the deepest ontological and sacred roots, and have the metaphysical reasons to be what they are. To consider any of these Orders as an historical accident means to deny to the secret logics of human and cosmic cycles.

 The choice of a geopolitical path mirrors the choice of a metaphysical path, esoterical path, the path of the Spirit across the universe. Therefore any warranties do not exist, therefore it is impossible, strictly speaking, to affirm that Eurasia is good and Atlantic is bad, that Rome is saint and Carthago is wicked, nor the contrary.

 But everyone called by the Order should commit a resolute step and serve the Order. The laws of our world are such that the outcome of the Great Battle is not predetermined, the outcome of the drama “Eurasia against Atlantis” depends on the totality of planetary solidarity of all those called on to serve, all the soldier of geopolitics, all the secret agents of Land and the secret agents of Sea. The outcome of the cosmological war of Apollon with the Snake Python depends on each of us, whether we understand it or not. 

       
The end of Times 

 For example, for the orthodox christians at the end of Times judaism is considered as the religion of the Anti-Christ, and for jews “ the goi-christians from the northern country of king Gog ” act as a concentration of eschatological Evil. Hinduists consider that the Tenth Avatar, the one who should come at the end of the cycle, will erase “Buddhists”, and Buddhists believe that the Buddha of Forthcoming Times, the Savior Maytreya will appear among a buddhist community etc. 

All this does not testify about the relativity of the division of roles in the Last Battle, but about the impossibility to early choose a self-evident Good, to secure oneself and obviously to take part in the eschatological battle on the “right” side. Therefore it is said about the Last Times “even the chosen ones will be tempted”. 

The choice of one of two escatological “parties” cannot be something formal. It is a choice of the Spirit, it is the Highest Hazard, it is the Great Metaphysical Drama. For this reason nothing in the reality of the escatological epoch - and many traditional and religious authorities affirm that we now live just in such epoch - can serve as absolute negativeness or absolute positiveness. And it is especially silly to absolutize any political form, equating it to “Absolute Evil” or to “Absolute Good”.

 Even the beginning of the true choice stands far beyond the border of exterior political ideologies, beyond the border of the relative dividing between democrats, fascists and communists.

 The true choice begins at a level of geopolitics and ascends further on “along a prophetical helix” (according to the expression of Jean Parvulesco) to the abysses of Mysticism, Metaphysics, Gnosis, to the abysses of the Incomprehensible Divine Secret.

 Eurasian Order and Atlantic Order are the last secret of exterior, human, public history. As a matter of fact, inside these Orders there are many other mysterious and closed spheres linked with Pure Metaphysics. But anyway, the true, rigorous and conscientious eschatological fight begins just with Order of Eurasia or Order of Atlantic. Even not diving deep into the ultimate secrets, simply to work in an Order is already enough to be an active, called and elected participant of the Great Drama. 

       
Endkampf 

In Israel, since 1962 devout jews live in a special “final Time”, in the “time of the Messiah”.

 The US aspire to establish on the planet a special New World Order. 

European mondialist Jean Attali preaches for the coming of the last phase of a special Trade Regime.

 Islamic peoples (especially shi'ites) expect in the near future the incoming Mahdi, the hidden Imam.

Hinduists are assured of the rapid termination of Kali-Yuga, the Dark Century.

 There is a revival of racist eschatologism on behalf of world national-socialist movements. 

In the Christian communities prophesies ever more circulate about the Last Pope (Flos Florum) for the roman catholics and about the  Last Patriarch for the orthodoxes. 

Lamaists are sure that the present Dalai Lama will be the last. 

China has hardened in mystical expectation. 

Soviet communism fell suddenly and unexpectedly. 

All these signs tell us about the beginning of the Endkampf, about the beginning of the  Last Battle. And in the eschatological context even the words of the bolshevik songs «It is our last and decisive fight» sound as a disturbing revelation, as a hint to the planetary Endkampf. 

       
Order and “ours” 

 The famous tele-reporter Aleksandr Nevzorov  realized it in practice in a series of broadcastings. “Ours” has become today in the russian Empire an univocally eurasist concept, including not only russians or slavs, but also tartars, turks, ugro-finns etc., realizing a genetic connection to imperial space and imperial idea.

 In practice Nevzorov's “ours” is a synthetic definition of native born eurasians, imperial autochtones, masters, by right of culture and birth, of the great land. It is indicative that the atlantists in Russia do not use this word (it is logical, for here they are among “not ours” [ne-nashi], another's; for them, their own “ours” live beyond the border of the continent, on a distant and dismal “Island”). 

But for Jean Parvulesco, who too made of this term a fundamental geopolitical and conspirological concept, the concept “ours” is even more all-inclusive (though he willingly ranks himself also to Nevzorov's “ours”). Jean Parvulesco identifies the concept “ours” with the whole network of partizans of the Great Continental Block - from Japan to Belgium, from China to France, from India to Spain, from Iran to Germany, from Russia to Italy.

 “Ours” for Parvulesco is a synonym of the Eurasist Order itself with all branches and groups, finding themselves, consciously or not, obviously or secretly, in the zone of its geopolitical, mystical and metaphysical influence.

 “Ours” is the united invisible eschatological front of the Continent, Front of the Land, Front of the Absolute East, whose western province is Europe, “our” Europe, Europe opposed to “West”, the Europe of Tradition, Soil, Spirit.

 “Ours” is both roman catholics and orthodoxes and islamists, both hinduists and taoists and lamaists, both pagans and agnostics and mystics... But only those among them who are devoted to the Continent of East, to its mysterious and unknown Destiny.

 Parvulesco speaks about a “parallel France”, “parallel Romania”, “parallel Germany”, “parallel Russia”, “parallel China” etc. as about a spiritual substance, as about the invisible spiritual measure of real countries secretly united into the only “parallel Eurasia”, “Eurasia of Pure Spirit”.

 “Ours” are the soldiers of “parallel Eurasia”, heroes of Absolute East, all of them serving through the occult logic of the “prophetical helix ” the One and Only Idea, Purpose, Hidden Principle.

 Once the german conservative-revolutionary, nationalist, russophile and eurasist Arthur Mueller van den Bruck said, rephrasing Khomyakov (“the Church is One”): “There is only one Reich (one Empire), as well as there is only one Church”. It is the Reich of “ours”, the Church of “ours”, it is  “our” Empire and “our” Church.

        
Hour of Eurasia 

Only, we should refrain from falling into archaism, defending any obsolete cultural, social or political forms; we should not be simple conservatives, conservatives for inertness. The order of Eurasia is a total Conservative Revolution, this Great Arousing of geopolitical consciousness, it is the path of the Vertical, instead of the snake-like oscillations from left to right or attempts to move backwards.

 The order of Eurasia is the cruel and open duel with the strong and clever Opponent, with the Order of Seth, Red Ass, Order of the “Dancing Death”. 

We should throw the servants of the Ocean into the Ocean, we should ship the agents of the “Island” back to their “Island”. We should pull out from the political, cultural, national flesh of Continent those who betrayed “ours”, who betrayed our ideals, our concerns.

 Yes, our enemies have their truth. Yes, we should respect their deep metaphysical choice, we should fix our eyes into their Secret, into the secret “Pit of the West ”.

 But this should not influence our resoluteness, our rage, our cold and passionate Cruelty. We shall be indulgent only then, when our Continent will be free, when the last atlantist will be dropped into Salt Waters, in the elements symbolically belonging to the Egyptian god with the Crocodile face.

Judging by definite signs, “the Time is near”. The Endkampf, Last Battle should burst out very soon. Are you ready, gentlemen of the “Polar Order”? Are you ready, soldiers of Eurasia? Are you ready, wise strategists of GRU? Are you ready, great peoples having made your bet by the fact itself of your birth? 

         
Already tolls the decisive Hour of Eurasia...
The GREAT WAR OF CONTINENTS already approaches its last point. 
 

                                                                                         
Moscow, February 1991 - January 1992 
 
 
 Note

* It is necessary to warn that the Author's views about Berya have substantially changed since this paper was written, along with new elements of historical interpretation brought to light by (mostly) russian historians.
So  in the review Elementy (n.9) appeared an article by A.Potapov (Eurasia and secret services) presenting a completely different view of Berya and his role.
Dugin himself wrote in «The Jews and Eurasia»  - here in english translation :
«When the antisemitist tendency in the Soviet government grew beyond definite   borders — especially scandalous was the destruction of the jewish anti-fascist committee composed practically  by 100 percent from convinced eurasists and direct agents of Lavrenti Berya (which speaks only to their benefit)..» etc.
A recent outstanding paper revisiting the figure of Lavrenti Berya has been published by A. Parshev.
(translator's note).

Permission for reproduction on this web site granted by author A. Dugin

Return to Part I of this Article