US - CHINA - NEW WORLD ORDER

THE RED CHINESE SECRET POLICE IN THE UNITED STATES

"WAL-MART and the RED CHINESE SECRET POLICE, Part One"
by Sherman H. Skolnick 08/27/01

RED CHINA and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS Part One
by Sherman H. Skolnick 1/15/01

RED CHINA and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS Part Two
by Sherman H. Skolnick 1/16/01

China vs New World Order The Final War and the Dark Millennium by Richard Moore

DOJ Confirms Thomas' Revelations Of China's Attack On US Via Canada From Carol Adler 

China Prepares to Execute Christians

National Security Archive Update, February 27, 2002 *The Beijing-Washington Back-Channel and Henry Kissinger's Secret Trip to China*

Sizing Up the Competition -- Is China The Endgame?

SEEDS OF FIRE: China and the Story behind the Attack on America by Gordon Thomas

In the Opium Wars, Great Britain was determined to subdue China by flooding them with dope, which also financed British worldwide interests. It was likewise a great ongoing profit to the British Monarchy. Now American Big Business wants to merge some of their doings with Red China. So IBM, Boeing, and other multi-national Big Feet want to tap into Red China's large pool of low-cost labor. To conceal what is going on, the American monopoly press seldom tell us what is necessary to know to understand all this.

Here are some items, to be dealt with in this series, that the pressfakers do not tell US, the common people of the United States:

[1] The History of the Red Chinese Secret Police IN THE UNITED STATES.

[2] The Red Chinese Secret Police penetration of commodity and other markets and exchanges, including the foreign currency markets.

[3] The overlap and the blackmarket and theft of financial, industrial, and military secrets of the U.S., by the Red Chinese Secret Police.

[4] Paying back the Rockefellers: flooding America with Red China dope through the U.S. heartland.

[5] Red Chinese prisoners' human body parts and the U.S. Rockefeller hospitals.

[6] Other foreign intelligence agencies operating in the U.S. jointly with the Red Chinese Secret Police.

[7] Foreign presslords operating in the U.S. jointly with the Red Chinese Secret Police. And Chinese royalty and the American mass media.

When the Korean War ended, 1953, the U.S. made a peace accord, of sorts, with North Korea. There were no surrender terms, however, apparently with mainland China which had intervened in that war. The Red Chinese Secret Police, one of the most accomplished in the world, had a score to settle with the United States. After all, the Beijing government was disgruntled in that the U.S. Military, supposedly acting for the U.N., under Gen. Douglas MacArthur, had caused Red China to intervene in the war. How? MacArthur ordered U.S. troops to continue their penetration of North Korea all the way to the Yalu River, the North Korea/Red China boundary line.

The result: waves and waves of Red Chinese troops, in the dead of winter, attacked U.S. troops. There were heavy casualties on both sides. Young Americans, ordered into this, froze to death. Those that survived remember the cold horror all the days of their lives. Some like MacArthur wanted to retaliate with massive force, such as nuclear bombs. Setting off a backlash and a furor, President Harry S Truman recalled Gen.MacArthur who was greeted in America with huge ticker tape parades.

Some of what happened thereafter was more or less concealed for most of the balance of the 20th Century. How and what happened requires a short lesson in seldom discussed past events.

The Chinese Secret Police have a long history, going back to 550 B.C. They have always been highly skilled at their work. By the 20th Century they were called Te-Wu and they use a clandestine dialect almost impossible even for professionals to get into and understand. How could the American CIA and FBI---the Secret Police and Counter-Intelligence of the U.S.---deal with such a situation? With only one exception, there have been no defectors to the West from the Red Chinese Secret Police.

The American Secret Political Police either were stymied by all this or did not want to deal with it at all. Certainly not effectively.

Half-heartedly, the American CIA used U.S. espionage experts left over from World War Two. Those who left the CIA predecessor group, OSS, and were supposedly out of service. Quietly, the then-young CIA asked these spy-chasers supposedly to track Te-Wu here. By 1956, the Red Chinese Secret Police launched a massive effort to infiltrate the U.S. and to punish Americans ON THEIR OWN SOIL.

To counter this, only a small number of American spooks were used. And they were not well encouraged or respected by the CIA bosses. The CIA's rationale: the Korean War was OVER, leave well enough alone. The team of trackers were puzzled and startled by what they were finding out. What were the Red Chinese doing here? They were suspected of strange bombings and murders---an on-going campaign to punish the U.S. on their OWN SOIL for causing Red China to intervene in the Korean War and suffer huge casualties.

With the coming of Chairman Mao, a wave of young, clever Chinese supposedly ran away to the U.S. They were ordered to penetrate. Many were from families that became wealthy in the dope traffic through major cities like Shanghai. To counter the dopers, Chairman Mao did not bother with legalities. He claimed the ruling families and their crimes were already too well known. Pictures ended up in Western magazines, of the Chinese financial elite, being publicly executed, shot in the head. What Courts there may have been in China, were not going to be clogged up with the purported defense arguments of long-known and tolerated criminals.

Those that left Shanghai and other major cities retained their family ownership jointly with the British Monarchy in the Hong Kong & SHANGHAI Bank. An interview I once taped with the Chicago branch manager of that Bank had the manager admitting his bank had, in the past, financed the dope trade. Funny thing, the bank branch was located inside the lobby of the building then housing the Chicago Bar Association. I always presumed the U.S. bench and the bar welcomed the fees, profits, and bribes to themselves from the dope traffic.

I find it no coincidence that the Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank later merged with the Marine Midland Bank of Buffalo, New York, run by the Jabobs family reportedly close to criminal interests. [See the details in my series on Greenspan and Bush.]

The Chinese elite, having escaped the coming of Chairman Mao, studied at high-class, rich man's universities and became scientists and super-duper laboratory technicians, and university professors. They infiltrated U.S. technology. About 350 or more were in the U.S. for the Te-Wu, as purported diplomats, some of the highest number of such on American soil.

What happened with their reportedly ill-gotten fortunes? Huge funds were quietly parked in various U.S. banks. Some merged their interests with U.S. multi-nationals, such as Boise Cascade, that retained the documents, later used, to claim ownership of assets seized by Chairman Mao. At some point, the Chinese elite also merged their interests with the Chinese Secret Police. You could not tell which was which. Were some double-agents?

Since the Red Chinese seemed to pose no further military threat from 1953 on, to the U.S., the American CIA simply did nothing but have their small team of "retired" spies track Te-Wu. One thing that made the CIA in later years hesitate was that the Chinese were age-old enemies of Viet Nam, and were a power play in THAT war. Some forget that following the end of the Viet Nam War, in 1975, for about three months, there was a war between China and Viet Nam. The weapons for the Viet Namese during the war up to 1975, came principally from the Soviets.

So, for decades after 1953, the CIA and FBI compiled the reports of the small team of trackers of Te-Wu but did nothing. The team searched out independent-minded journalists and confided what was going on. There was substantial reason to believe that the American CIA covered up the true source of the bombing in 1970 of the Army Math Center, in Madison, Wisconsin. Located on the campus of the University there, the Math Center, strange as it may seem, was sharing data with, at the time, a sworn enemy of the U.S., the Soviets. Further, the Math Center was running the Viet Nam war with computer models. And what were those models? They learned a lot from street narco-terrorist gangs on Chicago's South Side. The gangs would cow and subdue neighborhoods with a variety of horrors. Such as shooting somebody they did not like, in broad daylight, in the middle of a main street, as the target got off a bus. Those not knowing what was going on, were puzzled why the police never investigated or interfered with these terror executions. To no avail, however, some in the Chicago police tried to complain to their bosses, that they suspected the CIA, through foundation fronts, were financing these terrorist events. Those in what was once called the Gang Intelligence Unit of the Chicago Police who spoke out, were told by the police brass, to "shut up" or be suspended for a while without pay. The would-be whistle-blowers confided in independent-minded journalists and commentators.

The street gang terrorists were studied by experts of the Army Math Center as to what methods were successful in controlling neighborhoods. By example, these methods were applied, through the computer models, to controlling and subduing hamlets in Viet Nam.

The Red Chinese Secret Police, operating on U.S. soil with apparent impunity, by connivance, bombed the Army Math Center. And the American CIA and the FBI, to avoid friction with China, blamed it on a lone bomber, an anti-war activist. Later, when the dissident was "caught", his trial was carefully controlled and orchestrated. The role of the Red Chinese Secret Police was NEVER revealed by the monopoly press. Although some reporters attending the trial were puzzled by what was going on, nothing showed up in their reports, on the air, in print, nothing.

Over a period of decades, the "retired" spooks, virtually ignored by their "supervisors" in the American CIA, shared their reports with independent-minded commentators who became knowledgeable about what was being covered up to promote "international relations". They thought: Why keep such reports and notes secret when the FBI and the CIA don't give a damn to really know and do anything about such violence on U.S. soil by foreign operatives.

---How They Penetrated the Markets in Chicago---To understand the details of this series, you need to have a virtual encyclopedic knowledge of several related subjects. A short lesson on what you need to know:

[1] Primary research and investigation. I do not know if anyone has really ever written on what that term really means. Some author highly detailed stories that are followed by numerous chapter notes referring to SOMEONE ELSE'S magazine article or book followed by chapter notes, if any. So, when the article is finished, you are relying on third and fourth hand data which may or may not be true.

We rely on first hand sources. In over 40 years our group has compiled some one million documents, confidential reports, tapes, pictures, and such. Some we can safely post on Internet and elsewhere. Some not. So, from all this, what we on our own have corroborated, we put into our reports. We never, never divulge sources. We do not want to find out our sources are found dead, floating in the canal, or just now mysteriously fell off a building to their death, or that their airplane blew up in the air.

As the head of our group and spokesman, I have been put in jail over the decades some eight times. NOT FOR COMMITTING CRIMES, but for contempt of court, for refusing to divulge sources.

[2] Our work, thus obtained, has led to several dozen judges going to prison for bribery. And the removal or jailing of other corrupt high-level public officials. The results are what counts, not how many footnotes we have quoting someone else's footnotes. Yet, uninformed critics often hollar at us, "Where are you documents, Sherman?" They probably never themselves produced results. And have never, like us, obtained details, directly from those who know but whose identity cannot be revealed.

[3] You have to understand the banking system. We do. What money laundering is, and how public officials are under a malign, if not corrupt influence, by bribery and such, not in an alley at night, but in a bank by daylight.

Several terms before Clinton was Arkansas Governor, the Governor was Winthrop Rockefeller, part of a family that has long owned and operated Arkansas, a sizeable state with a small population. If there ever were "documents" linking William Rockefeller Clinton directly to the Rockefellers, such records have long since been destroyed. The Rockefellers are not stupid, leaving footprints for fools to discover. We have strong reasons to believe the person using the name "Clinton" is an illegitimate great grandson of old John D. Rockefeller, founder of the infamous monopoly called Standard Oil, broken up by Court order 1911 and in later years, corruptly re-combined.

In Chicago, a bank formed at the time of the American Civil War was called First National Bank of Chicago. Now called Bank One. Who knows, by the time you read this, the name will be changed again to confuse people. For many years it has been a Rockefeller bank.

Starting at least in the 1980s, and even earlier, this Rockefeller bank loaned billions to the Red Chinese on the promise of repayment in gold from China's western provinces. But, gold mine "inspectors" were never permitted. So, China was permitted instead to repay by flooding the U.S. with dope, with impunity, through Chicago. The highly crooked Drug Enforcement Administration has been all along willfully blind.

The resulting huge money river enabled China, with the connivance of their partners/patrons, the Rockefellers, to penetrate the markets in Chicago: principally the Chicago Board of Trade, and to an extent as well, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the Midwest Stock Exchange [since a scandal in 1991, renamed Chicago Stock Exchange].

Brokerage and trading firms and their people are supposed to do "due diligence". They are required to find out who their customers are. But, in Chicago, more than one such firm really does not know, OR WANT TO KNOW, who their Red Chinese customers are. It is well accepted, however, that the Red Chinese and their multitude of "spooks" have an armlock on the markets in the Windy City.

For many years, Chairman of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, was Leo Melamed, more recently, Chairman Emeritus. He reportedly grew up in the Orient and understands and/or speaks Chinese. Have the reporters who have interviewed him over the years, ever asked HIM about his reported role in promoting the Red Chinese Secret Police and their domination of the Chicago markets? When, if ever, does the financial press even mention the Red Chinese and the Chicago markets, the prices of items by them referred to worldwide? For a hundred and fifty years the Rothschilds have controlled the Chicago Board of Trade, later joined by the Irish Catholic aristocracy. Do we all understand that the Rothschilds are interwoven with the Vatican? In a simplistic explanation, the world is divided between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. At the annual super-secret Bilderberg Group meetings, each year in a different country, the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, although age-old competitors and "enemies", sit together. Business is business.

On behalf of espionage interests, interwoven with the Rockefellers, Rahm Emanuel helped propel William Rockefeller Clinton into high office. In earlier stories, on my website, I wrote how 3 million dollars was siphoned off a secret federal agency 50 million dollar fund used to keep Bill and Hillary Clinton from being federal criminally prosecuted for bank embezzlement. The 3 million dollars put into the hands of Rahm Emanuel jump-started Clinton's 1992 campaign for President.

[The 1992 presidential election was a fraud. Clinton ran against his mentor/buddy, George Herbert Walker Bush, former head of America's secret political police, the CIA, which created "Clinton". Bush/Clinton agreed never to really attack each other. No "October Surprise" and Iran-Contra revelations against Bush. No criminality, rape, and such against Clinton.]

Clinton was created by, and is owned and operated by, the Rockefellers and their business partners, the Red Chinese Secret Police. And the Rockefellers use the American CIA worldwide as a private security army to protect the Rockefellers' oil interests. The huge dope money, proceeds of the Red Chinese dope into the U.S. via Chicago, is disguised as soybean and other commodity and currency trading.

Brokers are supposed to aid in enforcing the U.S. Treasury regulations requiring detailing the origin of cash in excess of ten thousand dollars. Among brokers, it is generally not enforced and the top-level corruption of the Chicago IRS keeps it that way. [See my series on corruption of high-level IRS officials in Chicago and their money laundry boat in the Caribbean.]

So, the Red Chinese with the aid of their secret political police are able to funnel billions from dirty business coming out looking like soybean and foreign currency deals in Chicago.

An instrumenal reputed player/facilitator in all this has been Rahm Emanuel and his gang. On a local PBS TV outlet show in Chicago, Rahm bragged how as Clinton White House Senior Advisor he had a desk closest to the Oval Office. The TV cameras were allowed right into the White House to show this. In effect, Rahm is reportedly the Deputy Chief, for North America, of Israel's secret police, The Mossad. Rahm is permitted to have dual citizenship. During the Persian Gulf War, he went to Israel to serve in their armed forces, reportedly in an espionage capacity.

And Rahm Emanuel apparently has two faces. He supposedly has been a Clinton administration loyalist. BUT, at the same time, he reportedly controlled and directed the Israel/Red Chinese secret police circle that manipulated Clinton on sexual scandals, diverting our attention from the oil fraud and similar important matters.

Rahm's gang ostensibly included Monica Lewinsky, whose parents for years were reportedly assets of The Mossad. Clinton/Rahm Emanuel sent Monica to the Pentagon to sniff out what Admirals and Generals were planning a coup against Clinton. In the process, she got pregnant and had an abortion. Included apparently in the circle is Linda Tripp who previously was a covert operative of the Delta Forces, one of the few women in that capacity.

There was a stand-off between Clinton and supposed "Independent" Counsel Kenneth W. Starr. They are both master blackmailers against each other. Result: Starr's work dribbled down, no treason, just sex and Monica. Starr had as a PRIVATE law client Wang Jun, the reputed head of the Red Chinese Secret Police. Starr is also reportedly the UNREGISTERED foreign lobbyist of the Red Chinese government. From time to time, Wang Jun visited Clinton in the White House. Clinton reportedly gave him U.S. industrial, financial, and MILITARY secrets. To a sworn enemy of the United States. Knowing about this was White House intern Mary Caitrin Mahoney. She was silenced, July, 1997, when a foreign intelligence team murdered her in a Starbucks Coffee Shop right in the District of Columbia.

So who was going to arrest who? Starr arrested by Clinton's Justice Department? Or Starr to have arrested and prosecuted Clinton for treason with Starr's private law client, Wang Jun, being the common factor?

Bill and Hillary's crony/pal, Vincent W. Foster, Jr., understood about the Red Chinese money laundered through the Chicago markets and going, in part, to be parked offshore for Bill. That is one reason another intelligence team murdered Foster. [See my website stories about Greenspan-Bush, Part Three.]

After being Clinton White House Senior Advisor, on and off for six years, Rahm Emanuel became a bigshot with the Chicago office of Wasserstein & Perella, New York-based so-called "investment bankers" purportedly for the Red Chinese and their secret police. Through that firm, Rahm has reportedly been able to promote the agenda of China's Gestapo operating on U.S. soil. And Rahm with the financial "muscle" of the Chinese spy machine has reportedly been able to dominate various other brokers, facilitating the money laundering of illicit funds.

Keeping tabs on all this with his own spy shop, Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley reportedly ordered the Irish Catholic aristocracy that manages the Chicago Board of Trade for the Rothschilds: "Get those Red Chinese 'spooks' out of there!" Result: soon thereafter on April Fool's Day, 2000, Richie Daley had a bout of hypertension that put him in Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Was it an accident or did someone send the Mayor a message?

The pressfakers have yet to run stories about the open secret, how the Red Chinese Secret Police have an armlock on the Chicago markets. And how the federal regulators, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [(312)353-5990], at their Chicago headquarters are corruptly willfully blind. CFTC reportedly allows "due diligence" provisions to be violated by various brokers to conceal illicit trading arranged by the Red Chinese and their Gestapo.

Long owned jointly by the Vatican, the Jesuits, and the Rothschilds, Bank of America took over another Vatican-owned money ship, Continental Bank of Chicago. For decades, Continental has been the depository and transaction point for the Chicago markets. And Bank of America is a major player in foreign currency trading. B of A plays a key role in concealing the Red Chinese illicit river of money flowing through Chicago.

On some levels of business, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers do get along. Chicago is also reportedly the center of buying and selling of human body parts harvested from Red Chinese political prisoners. Those with the wrong politics in Red China are put in jail. [About 2 per cent of Americans in jail here are in the same fix.] If they are in good health and an order comes in from America for a human heart, liver, kidneys, to be transplanted through Rockefellers' hospitals---Well, the Red Chinese suddenly condemn the prisoner to death and behead him. [Shooting such prisoners would most likely injure the body parts.] More about this in a later part of this series.

Two key judges on the Federal Appeals Court in Chicago have reportedly been supervising Rockfeller's University of Chicago stock portfolio of over a Billion Dollars, including huge investments in Red China. That is 7th Circuit Chief Judge Richard A. Posner [(312) 435-5806] and his shadow/sidekick, 7th Circuit Judge Frank H. Easterbrook [(312) 435-5808]. Both were once law professors at Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. [So you did not know the Rockefellers founded and run this University? Waiting for the New York Times to tell you?] On my website, see my story about Posner the major crook, for a while negotiator in the Microsoft case.

With the assistance of my TV Show associate, Joseph Andreuccetti, I did several programs pointing out the high-level corruption and judicial perjuries of Posner/Easterbrook. Chief Judge Posner inflicted a reprisal on us: he ordered that we be barred from all the federal courts in the Midwest. [Do not waste my time explaining my constitutional rights. At the hands of crooked judges, our rights are cancelled. And the multi-multi-millionaires on the U.S. Supreme Court refused us a remedy.]

Little-known, the French Secret Political Police has a crack team in Chicago. They intensely track both the Mossad, and the Red Chinese Secret Police, and the huge illicit funds washed through the markets in Chicago. The French are moreover upset that Israel and Red China share nuclear and electronic weaponry secrets to the detriment of the French who would like to target their missiles on both nations.

Heaven, in its Judgment, has cursed us, the common people of America, with a traitor-infested central government, with an evil and fraudulent banking system,with a mendacious press, and with a venal and corrupt judiciary condoned by rapacious and cowardly lawyers. Thus, some say our Constitution is deservedly dead since, in our name, innocent folk on foreign shores are butchered and bombed. We ordinary Americans, if loudmouthed ---Are we quickly approaching the time when foreign secret police on U.S. soil, with impunity, will knock at our door in the dark of night and take us away, who knows, to a world government concentration camp? And will we be the most well-informed inmates of why and how we are there, inside the barbed wire?

Tell me if you can: WHAT IS THE REASON, NONE DARE CALL THIS TREASON?

Reproduced with permission from Skolnick's Report

The Human Body Parts Business and the Rockefeller Hospitals

Eating lunch one day in a well-known south-east side restaurant in Chicago was the State Senator representing the Hyde Park district. After he finished eating, since he knew of me, and I was at the next table, he allowed me to interview him with my tiny tape recorder.

I asked him a few routine question. And then I asked, "How did you come to represent Rockefeller's University of Chicago?" (which is the dominant force in Hyde Park). "Rockefeller's University of Chicago?" he asked, puzzled, like I was just bringing up an unfounded rumor. To try to undercut my question, he added "I own six acres of land in Texas. So far as I know, oil has not been discovered there."

In its simplest form, censorship is never bringing up routine facts when they are pertinent. Or denying known facts. On land they supposedly owned, the Rockefellers founded the University of Chicago sometimes before the 20th Century. [Some claim the land was actually stolen by them. Considering their history, that would not be unusual. The Rockefeller fortune was founded on murders and bombings. To begin to understand, read the series of books from early in the 20th Century by Ida Tarbell.] With their ancient look, the gothic buildings on the University of Chicago campus include a group of hospitals. These stone fortresses seem to represent a hardened view of the world. [In more recent years, some modern looking buildings were added.] An example, is one such place with an almost unknown history. It is called the Home for Destitute Crippled Children. In the 1930s, a well-known orthopedic surgeon there took time off to visit Nazi Germany. He came back, pro-Hitler, and refused to administer the only Jewish child in the hospital.

In the 1980s, on campus was a seminar on Germany and World War Two. I asked a question about the pro-Hitler past of the University and their hospitals. A seminar participant, Milt Rosenberg, demanded I turn off my tape recorder and that my question not be answered. [A forbidden subject: Rosenberg reportedly speaks for the Jewish aristocracy, not the common people, that favored Hitler.] With an intelligence agency background, Rosenberg has for many years conducted a talk show on the Chicago Tribune-owned WGN Radio. His Tribune bosses in the past were very pro-Nazi.

Is it still a secret that after World War Two, the newly-created American CIA brought Nazi war criminals to America to the University of Chicago, to supposedly promote "science"? Documents showing this are in the on-campus Regenstein Library, Rare Books Collection. Not supposed to be copied but we did copy them. Also see: "Project Paperclip" by Clarence Lasby.

A heavily-documented book spells out the details of the Rockefellers collaborating with the Nazis: "Trading With the Enemy-The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949" by Charles Higham, Barnes and Noble Books, N.Y., re-issued 1995.

The Rockefeller family did business with the Nazis all during World War Two, to the detriment of the common Americans who fought and died in the conflict. When the U.S. was sucked into the war, the Rockefellers'Standard Oil of New Jersey refused to participate in the manufacture of synthetic rubber tires for the U.S. war effort. They had a deal with the German petro-chemical octopus, I.G. Farben, to split patents and royalties. War or no war, Standard Oil was not going to counter the secretive deals. Few ordinary Americans knew of this treasonous arrangement. Some still do not know.

So, by the 21st Century, the press seldom mention the Rockefellers linked to the Unversity of Chicago and their hospitals and such. A rare example, however: "The University of Chicago wants to break the contract it made with John D. Rockefeller, Jr. to operate the International House so that it can turn the property over to its profit-making business school, students and their supporters charged in a class-action lawsuit filed Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court....In 1930, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. agreed to donate the land on which International House is located." Chicago Sun-Times, 4/12/2000. [You will read about that newspaper and the Red Chinese Secret Police in a further part of this series.]

Over a period of years, the Rockefeller's University of Chicago hospitals became major advertisers in the local newspapers, on local radio and TV. So no paid reporters who valued their jobs would ever write negatives about the Rockefellers and submit it to their editors.

By the 1970s, the Rockefeller-owned First National Bank of Chicago began to loan billions of dollars to Red China. Nixon as President paved the way for this. [You can thus understand why, after Nixon resigned in 1974, he was given a townhouse to live in Manhattan, wall-to-wall with David Rockefeller.] Also paving the way was George Herbert Walker Bush, who aided the Red Chinese Secret Police operations in the U.S., when Bush was head of America's secret political police. And he continued, when he was Envoy to Red China in the late 1970s.

The Red Chinese promised to pay back the loans with gold supposedly from their western provinces. BUT: they never allowed westerners to inspect these "gold mines". Among the ways the Red Chinese paid back the Rockefellers was flooding dope, from Southwest China into the U.S. via Chicago. Their dope is referred to by law enforcement as "China White". The Rockefeller-dominated press seldom, if ever, discuss thus. Instead they bombard us with talk about dope from Mexico and Colombia.

As I have written, the proceeds from dope and other such contraband is laundered, disguised as "soybean" and "foreign currency" deals on the Chicago markets: The Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the Chicago Stock Exchange. The highly corrupt U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration is willfully blind to "China White". And as we have said, Rockefeller agent, James "Big Jim" Thompson, former Illinois governor, is reportedly instrumental in the dope traffic arrangements worldwide. Another form of business with Red China, supervised by their secret police there and in the United States, is the human organ business. Human body parts are bought and sold like parts for a car.

On January 9, 2000, a story in the South China Sunday Morning Post tried to blunt the impact of this, by implying that the Red Chinese harvest human organs from their political prisoners for USE ONLY IN CHINA. They said a Southern Chinese hospital is selling livers from executed prisoners to wealthy Asian transplant patients. Undercover reporters were urged to book a liver from a "good young" prisoner during the then current spate of mass executions that precedes the Chinese New Year.

"Our experience tells us that there are many organs before the Lunar New Year", a doctor from the Sun Yat Sen University Hospital in Guangzhou told the newspaper. "If you miss this chance, you may have to wait until Labour Day".

China has always insisted that donations are voluntary. But doctors from the hospital told the newspaper that consent was not required for criminals and most organs came from executed prisoners. The hospital, which subsequently denied the doctors' comments, charges about 20 thousand pounds for a liver transplant. [Cheap by Chicago standards.] Rockefeller's University of Chicago Hospitals are the largest so-called "transplant center" for human body parts in Illinois, if not the entire U.S.

" 'Thirty percent of liver transplant patients are from out of state, and about one-third more of kidney and pancreas transplant (patients) are from out of state,' says Dr. Michael Millis, head of the liver transplant program at University of Chicago Hospitals. 'We should have an expanded donor pool to draw from.' U. of C. performs more transplants than any other hospital in the state. In 1998, it performed 288 procedures, or more than 22% of all transplants in Illinois, including 78 liver transplants, according to the Illinois Health Care Containment Council." Crain's Chicago Business, 3/13/2000.

The newspaper pointed out that "a liver transplant averages $241,000".

Rockefellers' hospitals are reportedly a center for the human body parts from Red China, supervised by the Red Chinese Secret Police IN THE UNITED STATES. The whole procedure is highly clandestine. One cannot expect the Rockefellers and their hospitals, cozy with the press-fakers, will ever admit this. If ever forced to answer, which is doubtful, they will certainly vigorously deny this.

[An example of denial: I interviewed on tape an official of the Rockefeller's University of Chicago Hospitals Public Relations, regarding Gulf War Syndrome. He said there is no such thing and that a doctor on their staff had been a key person on a semi-government group that came to the same conclusion. I told him that sources at their hospitals contend that some doctors and nurses themselves have somehow reportedly contracted this "Gulf War Syndrome" and are severely ill if not dying. In so many words, he said it is all in their mind. And the hospitals only treat the matter as different forms of ailments, he said. So if the medical people themselves are sick with this "imaginary" syndrome and are severely ill or dying, somebody should say, "Get up out of your bed, Doctor, it is all in your imagination. And if your wife has given birth to mis-formed children, or your children are themselves sick with the same syndrome, or your dogs or cats---it is all in their imagination, doctor."]

How does the transplant business reportedly work? Young, healthy political dissidents in Red China are put in jail. [Funny thing, about 3 per cent of those in U.S. jails are likewise political dissidents that some believe were framed up. In some parts of the U.S., the jail population has ballooned by 700 per cent in 30 years.Note the Clinton/Arkansas scandal of selling prisoners HiV-tainted blood to Canada, resulting in a number of deaths.]

Here is how orders for human body parts are filled from the prison/warehouse in Red China. So they are informed that there is an order for a human heart, kidney, lung, liver, pancreas, and such in Chicago. The Red Chinese political prisoners are condemned to death on a human-organ-when-needed basis. The doomed prisoners are not shot but beheaded. That way, their organs are not damaged. Then the parts are packed and quickly shipped to Chicago. Those in the shipment business usually do not ask questions. [Remember the stories of airplanes bringing into the U.S. containers marked "medical items" from Central America, which actually contained cocaine. A favorite trick of the secret police, such as the American CIA.]

And the authorities at the airports and other shipping points are willfully blind. Like the corrupt DEA top officials, they do not know about or see "China White" flooding into the U.S. via Chicago. Or human body parts reportedly headed for the Rockefeller Hospitals.

And where does some of the money from the "transplant business" go, supervised by the Red Chinese Secret Police? Some is washed through the Chicago markets, like dope proceeds, disguised as something else, such as "soybean" or "foreign exchange" trading. Some ends up in Rockefeller's University of Chicago billion dollar stock portfolio, which includes huge investments in Red China. And who reportedly supervises that? Why, two Rockefeller cronies, formerly law professors at the University of Chicago Law School: 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Chief Judge Richard A. Posner [(312)435-5806] and his court shadow/sidekick, 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Frank H. Easterbrook [(312) 435-5808].

Because I and a TV assistant of mine, Joseph Andreuccetti, have pointed out these things about the two federal appeals judges, on behalf of the Rockefellers, the two Judges have ordered that we are BARRED from all the federal courts in Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana. [Do not waste my time explaining to us our First Amendment rights which have thus been cancelled. And the multi-multi-millionaires, owned by the Rockefellers, on the U.S. Supreme Court have refused us a remedy.]

The French secret police have a crack team in Chicago watching all this for themselves. They have their own beef with the Red Chinese secret police.

To confuse matters and divert attention from what is really going on, the Clinton White House has been picking a bone with some members of Congress. Regarding who gets first choice of human organs. That whole issue evades the secret importing of human organs from Red China. The first choice goes to the one who pays the price, not the one most in need. The ultra-rich, when they need a transplant, they ask no questions and are not interested in how the Red Chinese Secret Police arrange to have political dissidents beheaded, the body parts shipped to Chicago, and some of the proceeds laundered in Chicago.

Among the "liars and whores of the press", are key people in a position to know but are silent. Do not waste my time that I should talk to the Chicago Tribune or the New York Times, or any of the pressfakers. This has to be a public issue, without submitting it to be approved by the monopoly press.

More details coming. Stay tuned.

Since 1958, Mr.Skolnick has been a court reformer. Since 1963, founder/chairman, Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts, disclosing certain instances of judicial and other bribery and political murders. Since 1991 a regular panelist, and since 1995, moderator/producer, of one-hour, weekly public access Cable TV Show, "Broadsides", Cablecast on Channel 21, 9 p.m. each Monday in Chicago. For a heavy packet of printed stories, send $5.00 [U.S. funds] and a stamped, self-addressed business sized envelope [4-1/4 x 9-1/2 #10 size] WITH THREE STAMPS ON IT, to Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts, Sherman H. Skolnick, Chairman, 9800 South Oglesby Ave., Chicago IL 60617-4870. Office, 7 days, 8 a.m. to midnight, (773) 375-5741 [PLEASE, no "just routine calls]. Before sending FAX, call.

Reproduced with permission from Skolnick's Report

"WAL-MART and the RED CHINESE SECRET POLICE, Part One"
by Sherman H. Skolnick 08/27/01

To understand Wal-Mart, you have to have a handle on Arkansas. And to figure out Arkansas, you have to be knowledgeable about the Rockefellers. And to fathom the Red Chinese Secret Police, you have to know a lot about the richest family in the world.

To begin. The Rockefellers like to own and operate entire states with a sizeable geography, good natural assets, and a relatively small population. That way, if need be, to win a so-called "election", they could more or less find it cheap to buy all the votes they may need to install their people. West Virginia is such a state. Like an ancient Colossus of Rhodes, astride the entrance to a harbor, the Rockefellers have a foot on both sides. On occasion, they pretend to be Democrats. Other times, as Republicans. They have installed as U.S. Senator (W.Va., D.) John D. Rockefeller 4th, great grandson of John D. Rockefeller, founder of the bloody and infamous Standard Oil Trust. Broken up by a U.S. Supreme Court decree in 1911, the Standard Oil Trust, changing its name slightly to fool novices, is back together again.

Historically, Standard Oil would bomb their own obsolete plants, to blame onto a competitor, thereby gaining public support and strangling competition. [Ida Tarbell wrote early in the 20th Century detailed accounts of Rockefeller crimes.]

As U.S. Senator he calls himself Jay to be cute. His wife, Sharon Percy Rockefeller, has a key position in so-called "public" broadcasting. Consequently, we call it National Petroleum Radio. NPR and PBS would never finger the Rockefellers and Big Oil. [Happily, she has no sayso whatever in local public access Cable TV, where we operate an opposition to the monopoly press.]

We have determined to our satisfaction, by confronting them, that Chicago-based Harris Bank reportedly has dozens and dozens of secret joint accounts of the Percy/Rockefeller Family with so-called "terrorist" Osama bin Laden, tied together through Mid-East construction contracts. Ha! Ha! The oil-soaked White House says they would like to freeze bin Laden's bank accounts if they can find them. Really?

Another Rockefeller owned and operated state is Arkansas. Sizeable land, small population. You cannot be so much as a successful dog-catcher there without the blessings of the Rockefellers. Several terms before Clinton, Winthrop Rockefeller was Governor. Our interviews with middle-level members of the Rockefeller Family convinces us his proper name should be WILLIAM ROCKEFELLER CLINTON. We feel certain, from all we know, that Sludge Willy is the illegitimate great grandson of the unsmiling Rockefeller patriarch.

The Rockefellers are not naive plutocrats. If there ever were ANY documents proving that Winthrop Rockefeller fathered five illegitimate children around the nation including the person who calls himself "Bill Clinton", those records, if any, have long since been destroyed.

So please, like some ninny, do not heckle us with "Where are your documents?" Until the Rockefellers are ready to throw away Bill and Hillary as no longer useful, they are untouchable. At the Senate Clinton Impeachment trial, the U.S. Senators certainly understood all this. [As an example, is it necessary for us to point out that the so-called "Watergate Affair" was touched off without a single document?]

It is surprising how some people look at a backward state like Arkansas, and yet do not wonder about the so-called great fortunes headquartered there. Tyson Chickens. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and all their subsidiaries, and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA, reportedly has undercover agent reports how Tyson, in the past, has been partly financed by dope trafficking. [Of course, their major user, McDonald's, having their own problems, obviously is not interested to know. Visit our website story about McDonald's, "Coca-Cola, the CIA, and the Courts, Part 8".]

Cynics point to Puerto Rico where Tyson supposedly got some of their chickens. Was contraband tucked into some of the birds who were so old, wags claimed these chickens were eligible for Social Security pensions? Tyson has supposedly offered their chicken preparation expertise to Red China. Really? The Chinese have been handling chickens for centuries. Do they REALLY need consulting with Tyson? Need we point out, that Southwest China, where Tyson may have visited, are producers of "China White" dope, a major export to the U.S., much, often via Chicago.

Starting about the late 1970s, the Rockefeller banks, such as the First National of Chicago, now to confuse people re-named Bank One, began loaning billions and billions of dollars to mainland China. The promise was that Red China would pay back with gold from their western provinces. BUT, China did not allow in any inspectors to determiine if there is that much gold there to be used to re-pay the loans. Instead, China has been allowed to pay back with "China White" flooding into the U.S. All the while the pressfakers keep falsely saying that most of the dope is coming from Colombia.

The American CIA, after all, are the security force worldwide protecting the assets and oilfields of the Rockefellers. So it should come as no surprise that ethnic Chinese, the Riady Family, suddenly got big in Arkansas. A money laundry vehicle has been Stephen & Co., the Rockefeller-linked bond house, second only to Wall Street, headquartered in Little Rock.

In the 1980s, the CIA was shipping through the southern states, guns to Central America, and return trips of dope. Some originating in Colombia and a few other places. It was centered around a small community in western Arkansas, Mena, and the Mena Airport. The Riadys bought the tiny First National Bank of Mena reportedly as a laundry vehicle to the Chicago markets. [Visit our extensive website stories about the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange.] With the aid of the Rockefellers and through the Riadys, reportedly billions of dope dollars traveled this route.

You can understand how profound the corruption is. Instrumental in the past in covering up this massive dope smuggling has been Asa Hutchinson. Get this. He has been recently named head of the DEA.

Wal-Mart and J.B. Hunt Transport Services. Where did the funding come from in the 1980s, for them to get so big? If you think they spread out simply because they are clever, then you are a firm believer in fairy tales. In simple terms, the backward state of Arkansas, controlled by the Rockefellers, with Rockefeller-agent calling himself "Bill Clinton" (or whatever his real name is), became the shuttle point for the Red Chinese in America.

When it comes to "evidence", you have to recognize that circumstantial proof can be as powerful as paper records. How about those in murder cases sentenced to the death penalty, not by way of eyewitnesses, but only circumstantial proof, not "documents".

In its simplest terms, Wal-Mart is a front for the Rockefellers and the Red Chinese Secret Police. Do not the top honchos at Wal-Mart know that their cheap prices are based on production by Chinese slave labor, in camps and factories operated by the Secret Police? By the way, there has been a movement in the U.S. to pay reparations to the descendents of American slavery. Will there some day be a similar movement in mainland China, to compensate the families and descendents of slave laborers?

Items that other stores sell for twenty dollars are sold by Wal-Mart for ten dollars. And Wal-Mart reportedly pays only twenty cents for the item made by slave labor. There is very little about the period of the 1980s as to Wal-Mart, when the Rockefellers were installing the Chinese in Arkansas and in American business. Who was noticing when the Rockefellers were playing their China card?

Who is a major transporter for Wal-Mart and got likewise big in the 1980s? Why, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., now headquartered in Lowell, Arkansas. Some of J.B. Hunt's drivers have confirmed to us, off the record, because they do not wish to jeopardize their good jobs (1) that reportedly they have reason to believe on occasion they are transporting contraband, believed by them to be narcotics and (2) that state authorities, such as in Illinois, know J.B. Hunt trucks are untouchable, not to be stopped for searching such as for contraband, or suspected overloading, or any other trucking or other violations. In Illinois, the trucks are headed for a J.B. Hunt terminal in a Chicago suburb.

On their own website, www.jbhunt.com, here is how they describe their founder Johnnie Bryan Hunt, "J.B. Hunt embodies the American rags-to-riches FABLE in its most engaging personification. A living example of the AMERICAN DREAM fulfilled. He guided his billion-dollar trucking empire with the same enthusiasm and raw fortitude from which it began. But the young Hunt was an unlikely candidate for financial success of such magnitude." (Emphasis added.) [At this point is where the Rockefeller violins start playing.] "Born in 1927 to a family of sharecroppers, Hunt grew up working the cotton fields of north-central and eastern Arkansas."

We think the term FABLE is well-chosen as is the myth promoted by the monopoly press of "American Dream". On their website is the purported "History" of J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. They tell us little about how they got big in the 1980s, at the time the Rockefellers were setting up Arkansas as a Red Chinese outpost in America. And at a time when the Red Chinese Secret Police got bigger and bigger in the U.S. using their front, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and its various units.

A few years ago, some local TV stations heckled Wal-Mart with small-time criticisms. Why? Well, Wal-Mart did not advertise much on local TV, so one way of jacking them up, is to start raising small questions about them. Wal-Mart got the message. Now that Wal-Mart advertises on TV more heavily than in the past, you can bet that stories like this one are totally unacceptable to the liars and whores of the press.

To understand the picture that Wal-Mart and other "big dealers" headquartered in Arkansas fit into, you have to study the extensive stories on our website about "THE RED CHINESE SECRET POLICE IN THE UNITED STATES". As we have stated, the Red Chinese Secret Police, since shortly after the Korean War, have been allowed, with impunity, to create murder and mayhem, on U.S. soil.

In April, 2001, a U.S. surveillance plane was forced down in an incident near mainland China. They held those from the plane hostage. For a while, some savvy sorts who know of Wal-Mart's tie to Red China and slave labor there, started a boycott of Wal-Mart stores. The monopoly press reported little if anything about this.

Why are so many Americans generally so BLANK when it comes to understanding the origins of the supposed fortunes like Wal-Mart? Many grow up knowing only what they are taught from the Establishment's propaganda school textbooks. And from what they see and hear on the mass media. Seldom is mentioned documented studies, such as Gustavus Myers "History of the Great American Fortunes", showing they were founded by the most rotten criminals who were never prosecuted and jailed as they should have been. His other heavily-documented book "History of the Supreme Court" shows our legal system, at the highest level, has been riddled with crime-committing judges. Such as the so-called renowned Chief Justice John Marshall from early in the 19th Century. His gold-framed portrait hangs in many law schools. In Chicago, a law school is named for him. Yet, as Myers documents, Chief Justice Marshall covered up on America's highest tribunal , the U.S. Supreme Court, where he presided, massive land frauds INVOLVING HIS OWN FAMILY.

Another important book is "The Corrupt Judge" by Joseph Borkin, showing how important judges were corrupted primarily in patent cases. The press whores are not about to have these books reprinted and promoted as best-sellers. You would be fortunate if you could on some dusty shelf of a public library find even one copy.

NEXT, WAL-MART AND AND THE CROOKED JUDGES.

Stay tuned.

Reproduced with permission from Skolnick's Report

RED CHINA and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

 Part One
by Sherman H. Skolnick 1/15/01

China vs New World Order

 

The Final War and
the Dark Millennium

By Richard Moore

 

The Future of Warfare — The Economist (8 March 1997) — delves into the subject of hi-tech warfare, of which Desert Storm, we are told, was but a primitive prototype. The most advanced elements are still only in the idea stage, but others are well along in development, or already deployed, and the whole program is on a fast-track priority for the U.S. military:

"The world is in the early stages of a new military revolution...

"...over Bosnia the Americans have deployed JSTARS [Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System], a ground-surveillance system in the sky: a single screen can display, in any weather, the position and type of every vehicle within an area 200 kilometres (125 miles) square...

"The revolution in military affairs revolves around three advances. The first is in gathering intelligence. Sensors in satellites, aircraft or unmanned aircraft can monitor virtually everything going on in an area. The second is in processing intelligence. Advanced command, control, and computing systems, known as C4, make sense of the data gathered by the sensors and display it on screen. They can then assign particular targets to missiles, tanks or whatever. The third is in acting on all this intelligence in particular, by using long-range precision strikes to destroy targets. Cruise missiles, guided by satellite, can hit a building many hundreds of miles away...

"The Pentagon already has, or is developing, most of the technologies required for space weapons. For instance it has just awarded a $1.1 billion contract for an airborne laser to hit ballistic missiles. If that technology works, it could be adapted for a satellite...

"Aircraft carriers, like other surface ships, risk being sunk by cruise missiles. Some will be replaced by ‘arsenal ships’, semi-submersible, stealthy barges, carrying hundreds of missiles but few sailors..."

The technologies mentioned above may not sound strikingly futuristic — after all GPS services are available commercially. But employing them as part of a total system, as we saw in Desert Storm, can provide very effective "control of theater," neutralizing weapons and defenses of the enemy, while permitting one’s own weapon systems to have free play throughout the field of battle. One could imagine someone touching a screen in the Pentagon, causing a cruise missile to be launched from a "stealthy barge," and destroying a specific target on the other side of the world — with all the action displayed up-to-date on the screen via secure digital satellite links.

These kind of information-intensive systems are as much software as hardware — permitting radical system advances to be deployed very rapidly, overnight in some cases. One must take seriously the Economist’s claim that we are indeed in the early stages of a "new military revolution."

What’s the Point of This Arsenal?

More important than the technology details are the why questions... what is all this for?...why the urgency? The Economist’s own answers to these questions are both brief and naive on all points:

"This embryonic revolution, unlike the development of nuclear weapons, has not emerged in response to any particular threat to the United States or its allies. It has come about because it is there, that is, because generals want to play with new technologies in case a future threat emerges. In that it may resemble Blitzkrieg, which was based on the technologies of the 1920’s, when defence budgets were declining and there seemed little prospect of another world war."

During the Manhattan Project, the scientists developing the first "atom bomb" were told Germany was making rapid progress on its own atomic research, and thus the Los Alamos team did believe they were rushing against the clock to protect against an enemy atomic threat. But allied intelligence knew the Nazis were stymied in their efforts, and lied to the scientists in order to create a false sense of urgency and keep the project going at full steam. Some of the scientists had serious moral reservations about working on the bomb, and the project might have been in jeopardy if the fiction of an imminent German atomic threat was not maintained. But fiction it was, from the perspective of top-level U.S. strategists.

The strategic motivation for urgent development of The Bomb lies elsewhere than Germany. In the film Day After Trinity, narrated by Robert Oppenheimer, he matter-of-factly explains how Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been carefully spared bombing during the war so that they could serve as clean, live-target test sites for the two new types of weapons (U-235 and Plutonium). Following the Hiroshima bombing, the Japanese sent out urgent communiques expressing a desire to discuss surrender — these were blocked by U.S. intelligence in order that the second test could be carried out. And as planned, when the medical inspectors descended on the rubble, they knew that all the bizarre injuries and diseases they cataloged could be credited to The Bomb.

So in truth, The Bomb was not developed in response to a comparable threat, but rather, quite simply, for the enhanced geopolitical advantage which it afforded. The urgency, as well, did not arise from a threat, but rather from a desire to carry out the tests while there was still an enemy the weapons could be deployed against. The bombings, too, were carried out for reasons other than those found in naive historical accounts.

The official party line — that those particular bombings were necessary to shorten the war — does not stand up to analysis. It ignores the fact that the first bomb already cracked Japanese resolve, and that a military target could have been attacked first, with escalation to a city left as an option. On the other hand, the bombings — as carried out — did accomplish two other objectives: they allowed the effects on people and buildings to be observed (of both weapon types), and they demonstrated to the Russians and allies alike that the U.S. had the stomach to use these new weapons in anger against civilians.

These objectives related to the postwar geopolitical situation — not to the defeat of Japan. When the cover-story smokescreens have been all cleared away, it becomes apparent that the Manhattan Project — taken in its entirety, including the two tests — was designed to give the U.S. a strong postwar geopolitical advantage: the possession of an unmatched, proven weapon of mass destruction, and a world which knew the U.S. would use the weapon if deemed necessary.

Also contrary to the Economist’s theories, Germany’s development of blitzkrieg weapons was not a case of "playing" with new technologies and was not carried out with "little prospect" of another war. William Manchester tells the story in The Arms of Krupp: beginning in the 1920’s, a select team of engineers, with the connivance of German intelligence and long before Hitler, took on the top-secret task of designing a suite of advanced military hardware that was aimed at achieving military superiority in a specific time-window (late 1930’s, early 1940’s) — during which period Germany was to regain its honor and further its expansionist ambitions. Krupp supported Hitler in his election campaign, and became Fuhrer of industry in the Third Reich. The scheme came close to working, and the weapons systems can hardly be blamed for Germany’s eventual defeat.

There is a reason so much space has been devoted to these issues in an article whose topic is China. If we want to understand the strategic significance of America’s current rushed development of a next-generation weapons system, then the Economist is right: we should compare it to previous similar developments. In both examples the Economist cited, it turns out the programs were designed to achieve military superiority over known future adversaries, in an anticipated future conflict scenario. The anticipated scenarios did come to pass, and the weapons systems served their objectives rather well. Contrary to the Economist’s off-the-shelf historical assumptions, these were examples of well thought-out projects, in pursuit of real strategic goals.

Similarly as well, permit me to suggest, America’s current hi-tech-warfare developments do not arise primarily from the play of generals nor even the profit-seeking of arms developers. As with both the A-bomb and Nazi blitzkrieg, what we are seeing with hi-tech warfare is the preparation of a weapons suite crafted with particular — and once more not defensive — missions in mind.

Missions for the Arsenal: 

(1) Enforcing Globalization

The end of the Cold War, to state the obvious, has created an entirely new geopolitical situation. In the immediate postwar era the primary geopolitical reality had been the rivalry between the two superpowers; in the post-cold-war era there is not, as yet anyway, any similar rivalry between more-or-less comparable powers. Instead, the U.S. and its NATO allies have become, on a collaborative basis, the world’s sole dominant military power.

With UN resolutions serving as the source of legitimacy, a multilateral system for policing international "order" has been adopted by the Western powers — the old days of competitive, sphere-of-influence imperialism are long dead. The evolution of the new multilateral policing system can be traced in the headlines of the nineties — in the hot spots of Iraq, Bosnia, and Albania...

Desert Storm, although almost entirely an American operation, was carried out under UN approval and no expense was spared recruiting and publicizing participation by allies.

In Bosnia, non-U.S. NATO troops carried the multilateral flag most of the time, but the U.S. joined in at a critical moment and provided cruise-missile support which was decisive in assuring a military outcome deemed acceptable to the U.S. and its allies.

In Albania we see a multilateral intervention without direct U.S. military involvement and which has, for the first time, an open-ended military mandate. Italy took the lead by suggesting that individual Western powers volunteer to join in an Albanian intervention. The troops — primarily from Italy and Greece — don’t have their hands tied by restrictive rules of engagement. From The Militant (28 April 1997):

"The occupying troops have been ordered to shoot ‘if they face dangerous situations.’ The plan for the... intervention, drafted in Rome by the participating governments, lists potential ‘dangerous situations.’ Among them are ‘involvement in clashes between government forces and the rebels and attacks by armed civilians that may attempt to appropriate the humanitarian aid.’ Among the ‘potential problems’ that the [participants] expect are ‘planted mines at regional roads and the chance of facing guerrilla warfare.’

"Italian Adm. Guido Venturoni, who is commanding the operation, told reporters April 14 that the force ‘will not go into Albania as the blue helmets went into Bosnia, where they were constrained to stand by during grave acts of violence without intervening because the rules of engagement did not permit it.’"

Thus, under the auspices of the UN and NATO, the world now has a de facto official policing force. The force is of, by, and for the dominant Western powers, and there is no effective court of appeal to protect the sovereignty of any country this police force decides to invade. To the rebels in Albania, and for the Third World in general, there would seem to be little difference between this new regime and traditional European imperialism. Instead of competitive, sphere-of-interest imperialism, there is now a collaborative arrangement — but the result is a system where the Euro-American powers take it upon themselves to intervene when and where they desire, maintaining global "order" according to their own criteria.

With ongoing tension in the Muslim world, chronic civil war in black Africa, near chaos in the former Soviet sphere, and a rising sense of activism on the part of the new policing partners, the prospects are for collective intervention — or the threat of same — to become routine, rather than for emergency use only.

This policing regime is the military branch of globalization. The U.S. and the European powers make up the multilateral force and they are also the prime instigators of globalization. As the legislative/administrative branch of globalism (WTO, GATT, IMF, etc) consolidates its dominion over planning the world’s future, the military branch is coming online just in time to assure that the globalist designs will not be thwarted by upstart Third-World peoples who have more nationalist or socialist agendas than globalism finds acceptable.

Some readers may find this assessment a bit harsh — after all, haven’t NATO interventions been for humanitarian purposes? To be sure, the humanitarian angle has been emphasized in the media, and it is humanitarian sympathies that create support in Western populations for the interventions. But a close look at the interventions — how they were carried out, their timing, which local parties were favored — reveals that humanitarian concerns played very little role, and that the real purpose has been to promote regimes that are favorable to globalism (ie international capital investment.) The much-delayed intervention in Bosnia, for example, could hardly have been worse-timed to reduce human suffering, but succeeded quite well in promoting the territorial gains of the Western-preferred Croat side.

The globalist program for the Third World has become very clear. IMF guidelines require explicitly that social spending be cut, as part of focusing Third-World finances on debt servicing. Meanwhile, corporate employers pay starvation wages to their Third-World workers and offer very little economic stability — moving their plants whenever they find a better deal elsewhere. As if that weren’t enough, the free-trade agreements wreak havoc with Third-World economies, as internal markets are lost to cheap imports, and export markets become unpredictable. The squeeze on Third-World peoples is immense, and globalism — both in policy and practice — seems intent only on tightening the screws still further.

This is a sure-fire formula for social unrest, and insurgencies of one stripe or another are in fact already widespread, as we see in Albania, Mexico, Columbia, Peru, and elsewhere. As the globalist squeeze continues, one can only expect the constituency of these insurgences to increase.

There is a common focus for the discontent: neoliberalism, the IMF, corporate policies, and repressive governments subservient to outside interests. International capitalism itself — and its globalist agenda — is increasingly being perceived as the root cause of the troubles. Whereas in the old communist world anti-capitalism was a subject of public indoctrination and rhetoric, in much of the Third World it is becoming a heartfelt general sentiment.

Keeping the populace under control has become the primary occupation of many Third World governments, and sophisticated arms and training are routinely supplied by Western powers to facilitate this mission — increasing the local debt burden in the process.

But when an insurgency grows to civil-war proportions — as in Bosnia, Albania or Zaire — it then shows up on the globalist radar screens, indicating that elite global leaders (euphemistically referred to as the international community) had better formulate a tactical approach to the situation, and alert the media to begin producing whatever emotional news stories (riot scenes, suffering refugees, strutting dictators, whatever) are appropriate to generating support for the chosen tactics — tactics appropriate to the scenario...

If there is disagreement as to which side to back (as in Zaire) then the tactic might be to let the locals fight it out, making money on arms sales in the process. In this case the media’s job is to paint the situation as confusing, with no clear good guys and bad guys — too messy to "entangle ourselves" in.

If an unfavored side gains more territory than the West deems appropriate, as did the Serbs in Bosnia, then the tactic might be to call in the multilateral force to tilt the battlefield toward a more global-friendly side, as we saw with Croatia. In this case the media’s job is to demonize the unfavored side with regular atrocity stories, while portraying the favored side as victims.

Finally, if a general popular uprising threatens to overthrow a global-friendly government, as in Albania, the tactic may be to rush to the support of the government, beef up its security infrastructure, and make sure the rebels get the message that their antics won’t be tolerated. In this case, the media’s job is to sensationalize scenes of anarchy and disorder, to portray the operations of the multilateral force as being "defensive" actions against "unruly mobs," and to leave out mention of the political content of the uprising.

It should be clear that the media can easily spin the news coverage in any direction called for by the interventionist agenda. In Bosnia, for example, the Croats could have been demonized just as easily as the Serbs — the Croats practiced large-scale ethnic cleansing, raped and pillaged, and carried out mass executions of civilians; they also provided excellent demon sound-bites with their overt fascist rhetoric and nazi salutes — but the camera goes where it’s directed to go, and the Serbs have socialist leanings.

Elite corporate interests openly control the major news distribution channels, own much of the media outright, set the overall globalist agenda, control the flow of investments and loans to the Third World, are the major players in the international arms business, and have intimate ties with the Western governments and intelligence services which set the agenda of the multilateral force. It should not be at all surprising that news coverage, official pronouncements, and interventionist operations are all coordinated smoothly so that when intervention occurs, it seems natural and inevitable — perhaps even too little and too late — to the general public.

So we can expect the multilateral force to be used wherever the perpetrators of globalism see fit — the media can always find material to paint the picture as required to achieve popular (and UN) acquiescence in whatever missions are proposed. The only danger to this well-polished military/media policing scheme is the spectre of friendly casualties — when Western boys start coming home in body bags, non-interventionist sentiment can be expected to arise spontaneously, putting the operation on the defensive in the media, and perhaps causing domestic political difficulties of all sorts. Minimizing Western casualties is a strategic political necessity to the globalist planners, and this ties back in to the significance of next-generation hi-tech weaponry.

The task of global management can be expected to involve conflicts of various sizes, from anti-"terrorist" operations (Tripoli bombing), to brushfire civil wars (Bosnia), to restructuring of "renegade" regimes (Grenada, Panama) — all the way up to full scale wars (Desert Storm and worse). To handle flexibly this wide range of conflicts — and without sacrificing too many of "our boys" — one can understand why the U.S. needs its multi-faceted, hi-tech, C4-based arsenal. The U.S. will most likely specialize as the heavy artillery of the multilateral force, to be brought in when only the latest weaponry can do the job without major risk to multilateral personnel.

But why does this arsenal need to be upgraded with such urgency? Isn’t it already far ahead of all comers? Didn’t Iraq (which had a highly-rated military) find itself totally immobilized by the weapons the U.S. already had available in the early nineties? Who is the anticipated adversary, and what is the anticipated scenario, which could explain the strategic sense behind this intensive buildup?

One thing is clear, and that is America’s determination to upgrade its military prerogatives on the world stage. A trial balloon was sent up not that long ago whose aim was to add nuclear capability to the internationally-approved war chest. I refer, of course, to Libya and its purported biological warfare plant, a plant which seems, significantly, to no longer be of serious concern. If that balloon had not met with international alarm, Libya might well have become the next in the sequence of America’s field-test blitzkrieg deployments — this time bringing tactical nukes (precise and clean?... but of course) into the arsenal. Once that precedent is achieved, by whatever means, tactical nukes will, presumably, be thereafter a routine tactical option, albeit used reservedly, of the multilateral force.

Missions for the Arsenal:

(2) The China Question

In considering why tactical nukes would be deemed necessary by U.S. military planners (not in Libya, but in the long run) — and in considering why the U.S. seeks to advance further its hi-tech capability when it is already so far ahead of the pack — one is led inevitably to look at the China question.

China is the only remaining significant wild card in the globalization game. There are small countries which are anti-globalist, notably Cuba, but their size precludes them from challenging the steamroller in any serious way. Medium sized "renegades" like Libya can cause a bit more trouble, but Iraq stands as an example of how readily they can be humbled if they get too far out of line. But China — if it does not conform to the demands of the new globalist regime — could be a significant thorn in the side of that regime.

What does globalism demand of China? Economically — to abandon socialism (gradually) and to embrace free-trade (right away); politically — to abandon hopes of creating a Chinese-dominated Asian sphere of influence; human rights and democracy are not a requirement, as "most favored nation" status testifies, rhetoric on the topic notwithstanding.

I assume the economic requirement, as stated above, is obvious to everyone — that’s simply the public agenda of economic globalism.

The political requirement relates to the role of the multilateral police force, whose task it is to maintain a world order harmonious with globalist investment needs. A regionally hegemonous China would be perceived as threatening to a NATO-centric world order, just as Japan’s Co-Prosperity Sphere was considered threatening to U.S. and European national interests at the time. The West has traditionally been comfortable when powers balanced one another in Asia, and this attitude has had no reason to change.

China seems to be doing well in reaching an accommodation with globalism’s economic demands, but China’s nationalist aspirations may turn out to be deep-seated and stubborn.

There are a pair of articles in Foreign Affairs (March/April 1997) — a Council-on-Foreign-Relations journal highly revealing of the globalist agenda — called The China Threat — A Debate. In the first article — The Coming Conflict with America — Richard Bernstein and Ross H. Munro present the case that armed conflict between the U.S. and China may be inevitable.

They tell us: "China’s sheer size and inherent strength, its conception of itself as a center of global civilization, and its eagerness to redeem centuries of humiliating weakness are propelling it toward Asian hegemony." And they pass on an ominous sentiment attributed to General Mi Zhenyu, vice-commandant of the Academy of Military Sciences in Beijing: "For a relatively long time it will be absolutely necessary that we quietly nurse our sense of vengeance. We must conceal our abilities and bide our time" — giving fair warning to be wary of what may appear to be softening in Chinese behavior.

What makes these observations especially dire is the article’s evidently authoritative description of Uncle Sam’s attitude on the matter:

"China’s goal of achieving paramount status in Asia conflicts with an established American objective: preventing any single country from gaining an overwhelming power in Asia. The United States, after all, has been in major wars in Asia three times in the past half-century, always to prevent a single power from gaining ascendency."

The implication is clear that the United States can be expected to act decisively to alter what seems to be China’s expansionist path, even by warfare if that becomes necessary. This traditional American attitude toward Asian balance-of-power is consistent with globalization’s need for an orderly world system, and with Europe’s own military traditions. In what follows, the focus is on the U.S. vs. China — but the U.S. role should be understood in the context of the U.S. as the heavy artillery of the multilateral globalist police force.

The article tells us that China is spending astronomical sums on military modernization — aimed at the ability to knock out U.S. Carrier Task Forces, as well as dominating Asia. We are told that China’s leaders "cannot be counted on to relinquish their monopolistic hold on power" and that "The most likely form for China to assume is a kind of corporatist, militarized, nationalist state, one with some similarity to the fascist states of Mussolini or Francisco Franco."

We are shown a map with seven "flash points," and various plausible scenarios are explored, each of which could easily lead to armed conflicts. It is explained that Japan must be our special partner in counter-balancing Chinese hegemony.

Robert S. Ross, in Beijing as a Conservative Power, takes up the debating position that "engagement" is the proper approach to China — "Treat China as an enemy and it will be one." Details are revealed regarding air and sea power, showing that China cannot be any kind of real threat for a long time to come. That provides time to build relationships and seek to integrate China, adequately if not ideally, into an acceptable scheme of things.

Recent history is visited, and we learn that China has been acting quite to U.S. benefit in geopolitical terms. It balanced the Soviet Union; it stabilized Southeast Asia when Uncle Sam was forced out of Vietnam. We are urged to "invite China to participate in international rule-making," and to "reinforce China’s interest in regional stability and strengthen its commitment to global stability. Engagement, not isolation, is the appropriate policy."

Both articles take it as a given that the U.S. has the "strategic interest" — translation: the right — to insure that a "favorable" balance of power is maintained in Asia: it is categorically unacceptable that China achieve outright hegemony and freedom-of-action in Asia. The debate is about means, not ends.

I must say that the first article is more convincing — the fundamental case for eventual confrontation seems more solid than the likelihood of namby-pamby coaxing bringing about a paradigm shift in China’s thousands-year-old sense of national greatness and sovereign pride.

Given the degree of societal dedication to be expected, and the prowess of China’s scientific and engineering communities, one might anticipate (in this age where offense dominates defense) that China may be able to achieve some technological leap-frog in the local military balance of power — something as surprising as a Sputnik that neutralizes, at least temporarily many of the American advantages.

For strategic military planners on both sides, one must assume that the race has been joined. Can China create a window of opportunity — based on focused achievement of regional military parity — during which time it could establish a firm hold on its own sphere of influence? Could it hold this parity long enough for the new status quo to become accepted by the international community, as has, it seems, the occupation of Tibet?

The China scenario, it must be observed, is strikingly similar to the interwar scenario — when there were similar debates regarding engagement vs. confrontation re/ Japan and Germany. China evidently has the same brand of soul-deep national ambition shared then by Japan and Germany, and a similar potential to express it effectively in action. Japan and Germany could only be tamed — the historic lesson seems to clearly say — by complete destruction and unconditional surrender, followed by complete rebuilding under U.S. tutelage.

These are precedents that cannot be far from the minds of our Foreign Affairs authors, although their pens would be unlikely to develop such comparisons until closer to the climax.

The parallels with the interwar period are only accentuated by what we learn in 'China preys on American minds — The U.S. this week', Guardian Weekly (6 April 1997). Martin Walker describes the on-the-ground implementation of the engagement agenda. We are told of the Beijing-based U.S. Business Council, "a formidable group of U.S. executives whose corporate lobbies back in Washington have worked hard to ensure that no U.S. politician dare confront the engagement-trade-investment model." We are also reminded of "fat Chinese consultancy fees earned by those former secretaries of state, Dr. Henry Kissinger and General Alexander Haig." Clearly Foreign Affairs (Robert Ross) was providing philosophical background for what turns out to be an already operational corporatist agenda — an investment-intensive era parallel to that of the interwar years.

Interestingly, Mr. Walker casts moral derision on this money-grabbing behavior: "There ought to be scandal in the way U.S. corporations scurry to serve Beijing’s interests." He reports with explicit admiration some words of Newt Gingrich, delivered recently a