|
All Over Again
Or do you think
you don't need to know how the Money Power came to be
our masters using puppet presidents?
More reassuring to them than their control of nuclear and biological weapons or weaponized clandestine weather modification or asymmetrical monetary and credit warfare and monopoly power is there security in you not knowing that they exist and are steering events. This short history of their key actions in the 19th and early 20th centuries deprives them of that defense. This is the story which if known by the world would spell the end of the Global Money power. The facts presented here supply us with the exact reason why the composition of Barrack Obama's team are harbingers of further dearth and death. I see this history as important for defeating the deadly evil we face in the Obama presidency, for understanding how Obama and his three predecessors came to power and why.
What follows
below is much more important that following the moment by
moment news of Obama's staffing choices and his recent
action in Congress killing restoration of bankruptcy
protection for American victims of the Kleptastrophe or his
unfolding laissez-faire (let-the-bankers-do-it) policy to
"stimulate" the economy with new massive borrowing to fund
government spending with fat contracts projects for Money
Power Corporations like Halliburton rather than really
revising our credit system to get to the real cause of the
problem -- an economic system designed to enslave people
with debt, taxes (indirect debt), prison labor, "national
service" servitude and maintain them measured rations and
purchasing power starvation and deflation that extracts the
most labor for what wages will buy. Much more important is
to see once and for all the Obama administration's one more
attempt at an old trick that has worked against us several
times in the past. As in the past, the players and their
roles for this administration were identified and prepared
long before this charade of making selections.
I have typed out
this 1944 pamphlet, which Col. J. Richard Niemela sent to me
last December, because I found in it the historical
examples that demonstrate the exact nature and modus
operandi of the evil we face today in the latest White
House Administration soon to be arrayed against us. I could
not find this item anywhere on the internet, except that a
copy is available in a library in Australia. The fact
that this document and its author, given all that the
article contains, are not available on the internet makes me
think that the document is well known to our ever vigilant
enemy.
What's more I think
I can convince you with my own findings and documentation
that what T.W. Hughes relates is factual. I ask you
to listen to the Jeff Rense interview in which I outlined
the history of role of financier and war profiteer Bernard
Baruch in each of the great Kleptastrophes of the 20th
century --
www.rense.com
sign-up for broadcast and archive access here:
http://www.renseradio.com/signup.htm
and listen to the broadcast of Feb 21 2007. Every claim I
make in that broadcast I have footnoted with reference
situations and complete quotations that can be read here:
http://www.rense.com/rewer.htm. This
exposes the entire American history establishment as frauds
and prostitutes exactly as are the members of the
conservative, mainstream and progressive journalists from
Limbaugh to Grieder, from George Will to Pat Buchanan -- who
recently wrote a book on Churchill that proves to the the
willfulness of his blindness, since I had sent him the REAL
story of Churchill (see rense interview mentioned above) two
years ago. (His book is a white wash smokescreen to conceal
the decisive facts I present. Read my information and you
will see at once that Hughes, in the article from 1944
below, is telling you the same story with an entirely new
set of evidence. The two histories, independently
researched, validate each other. This kind of knowledge is
truth power that we need. It is the kind of power that has
been wanting in the American public's feeble attempts to
answer back to the men from Goldman Sachs who are now using
the American economy as their personal Christmas account.
No intelligent
American of good will who is presented with these two sets
of evidence establishing the International Bankers
Conspiracy can walk away unconvinced. A murder in progress
has been exposed -- our murder and the murder of everything
good this country has ever stood for. And T. W. Hughes shows
us exactly how it this human sacrifice by economic and war
fire has been going on for the last 100 years.
Bear in mind
three things as you read this amazing account. 1) That the
International Bankers begin by stealing the purchasing power
of the people (interest payments, rent, and payment
to monopoly market power rather than true
"better-mousetrap-for-the-dollar" entrepreneurship) of the
various nations so that the people of those nations cannot
buy the things they have produced -- this leaves them with
unsold surplus in each industrial which their debt-financed
ventures must sell abroad. This is the trap that locks in
Imperialism. See but note that with social credit the
public would be able to buy what they themselves produce and
there would be no surplus for Internationalists to sell
abroad in Imperialist ventures --see John Hobson
- Imperialism (1908)
http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/YPDBooks/Hobson/hbsnImp.html
and these items by Arthur Kitson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/28505 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/28176.
In a populist nationalist
system international trade would be essentially barter
of goods and resources where domestic resources and
production pay for whatever is imported and no
"International Finance" takes place, but most of all
there would be new purchasing power originating in the
hands of American households with no debt attached to
it, rather than Obama "stimulating us with borrowed
money going to the Halliburton Corporations of the Money
Power.
Note to that Hughes answers
another lie of the money power. It is internationalism
and imperialism and not nationalism internationalism
and imperialism, not nationalism, balanced
trade, populism and social credit that are behind all
modern (and post-modern) wars and depressions/
So return with us
now to the thrilling days of yesteryear to see how the Money
Power gang has operated to get where it is
today. Their methods, you will recognize at once, have not
changed, nor the role of two-faced heads of state of
government from Disraeli and Teddy Roosevelt to Obama. You
will never be fooled again once you understand their game.
Dick
Eastman
Yakima,
Washington
Every man
is responsible to every other man.
Some History of the International
Banking Conspiracy and U.S. Presidents
T. W. Hughes
Introduction
When in 1934 the New Deal Administration too
us off the Gold Standard and began paying $35 an ounce for
gold the English Bankers had produced for $17 an ounce; and
when four months later in June 1934, Lord Lothian, a ranking
British statesman, after declaring that a new war was
brewing in Europe, begged his Government to have no further
participation in the forcing of that war; it became evident
that the speech of Lord Lothian, they buying of English
gold, the Bank Holiday of March 1933, and the N.R.A of the
same year, when considered together, furnished unmistakable
evidence of a deal between the "Old Dealers" of London (the
International Bankers) and the "New Dealers" of Washington
to destroy our economic-political system and supplant it
with "Socialistic Regimentation." It was then evident that
someone should do for Americans what Lord Lothian had done
for his countrymen in England, warn them of the danger then
impending.
But it was not until four years later that
any American of National standing realized that the forces
sponsoring the new war prophesied by Lord Lothian, and the
forces promoting the New Deal were one and the same. Thus
in 1938 America's leading economist, Dr. Virgil Jordan,
startled the nation with a speech which included this
startling phrase: for eight years past the people of this
country have been the victims of a "well-planned
conspiracy," to destroy our American system and replace it
with a Socialistic Dictatorship. Then a few months later,
Mr. George N. Peek, the nation's leading foreign trade
expert, in a speech in which he explained the foreign-trade
Report which he had prepared in 1934, said, "the
stock-market crash of March 1933 and the new depression
which began in that month were the direct results of the
manipulations of International Bankers." (See below.)
When we remember that the two gentlemen
just mentioned were recognized experts in Economics, Finance
and Foreign Trade and that their every pronouncement on
these subjects was regarded as authoritative by the reading
public of America, we should have expected that their
startling statements would have sufficiently warned our
American people, to have caused the defeat of the New Deal
Conspirators in the election of 1940, but in 1940, our
complacent people still believed "It can't happen here," and
they proceeded to vote as "partisans" rather than as
Americans. Today, in 1944, our people know that "IT can
happen here," and they are terrified lest a fourth New Deal
Victory should result in the complete destruction of what
little is left of our economic and political freedom.
If it is true as said by Dr. Jordan, that
for years past the New Dealers have been promoting a
"well-planned conspiracy;" and if it is also true as said by
George N. Peek, that the International Bankers were
responsible for the stock-market crash and the new
depression which began in March 1933 (the month the New
Dealers came to power); then it would seem clear beyond
argument that the International Bankers and the New Dealers
were working TOGETHER to promote that "well planned
conspiracy."
It is to prevent a fourth New Deal victory
and a further extension of this "well planned conspiracy"
that I present this booklet. But since we cannot rightly
appraise Rooseveltism until we first correctly appraise
International Banking, we must now devote some pages to that
"Conspiracy for World Dominion" which beginning 150 years
ago resulted finally in forty years of Rooseveltism.
... Only by absolute secrecy could the
International Bankers promote their plan for the destruction
of NATIONALISM and the establishment of INTERNATIONALISM
and For this reason they have moved in mysterious ways and
required their pre-paid economists and politicians to DENY,
that any such thing as an International Banker has ever
existed.
... While every fact and major event
presented herein may be found recorded in the history books
used in our public schools, this is the first time these
facts and events have been arranged in their proper
sequence; catalogued, dated and explained. ...
International Banking originated about 150
years ago when Mayer Amschel, the founder the the House of
Rothschild in London, sent his four sons to establish branch
banks in the four other financial centers of Europe: Paris,
Vienna, Frankfort and Naples. ...
The father had earlier explained to the
sons that whoever controlled the gold flows of a nation
controlled also the currency and credit of that nation. ...
Some 30 years prior to the establishment
of these international bank branches, King George III of
England had bought from the Landgrave of Hesse, the services
of 12,000 Hessian soldiers (later used against the American
colonies) paying 20 million dollars IN GOLD. ... Much of
this gold was later loaned to the House of Rothschild, and
divided between the five great banks of the family, at
London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfort. ... Thus with
their unrivaled command of gold, plus their unequalled
financial genius and their five branch-banks strategically
located, the House of Rothschild soon achieved financial
dominance in Europe; from which vantage their power was
later spread across the world. ...
By 1820, the other great banking houses of
Europe, for reasons of policy or necessity, had allied
themselves with the Rothschild, and then began on a
world-wide scale, what we have since known as International
Banking.
But we greatly underestimate the genius of
these first International Bankers if we imagine that their
vision and plan went no further than the domination of
Europe's currency and credit; for even at this early date
they were dreaming of world domination wherein they would
control industry and commerce as well as finance. ... As
they saw from the very outset, their dream could never be
realized until they had first destroyed nationalism. And
since in each European nation, nationalism centered around a
king or a prince who would resent the domination of an alien
financial power, it was clear to these early
internationalists that royalty and aristocracy must be
removed or at least silenced, before they could safely
proceed to their goal.
Thus from the very moment the first
Rothschild received from the Landgrave of Hesse that twenty
millions in gold, there began the Rothschild's active
operations against royalty and aristocracy; and when
occasion demand, against orderly government whatever its
form. ... For these early Internationalists realized even
as did the great teacher of Nazareth, "that no man (and no
nation) can serve two masters;" and so it happened that
from the days of Valley Forge until this hour, under some
such slogan as "Democracy" or "Liberty, Equality,
Fraternity," they have labored ceaselessly to undermine
national unity wherever they found it and to promote
disunity which is the condition precedent of
Internationalism.
Thus in the dark days of Valley Forge when
the cause of American "Democracy" seemed all but lost, it
was the money of these International Bankers, relayed
through Haym Salomon to Robert Morris and then to the
Continental Congress, that saved the day for American
"Democracy." ... A few years later it was again their
money which supported the French revolution until King,
Queen and Nobility were liquidated and French "Democracy"
established. And a few years later their money was again
used to finance Napoleon and his war against the Royalty of
Spain.
But we again underestimate the genius of
these early Bankers if we imagine that their attacks upon
the Royalty of England, France and Spain were sponsored out
of their love for Democracy, for when the seat of War had
removed from Spain to France, it was their money which
financed the English Army under Wellington, to defeat
Napoleon and the armer of "Democratic" France. ... Proof
that even in this early day International Money had neither
conscience nor patriotism, nor could have, since both in
power and objective, it was "international."
So from the days of Waterloo to the present
hour they have shifted their gold from land to land,
financing first one nation, then another -- and endless
series of wars and revolutions.
... Thus in 1812 they were financing England
in her wars against America and France. In 1848 their money
spread revolutions throughout Europe. From 1860 to 1865
their money was financing the South in our American Civil
War. Their money was again present in the Russian
revolution of 1917, the German revolution of 1918, and the
Spanish revolution of 1935. That all of these wars and
revolutions were fought in the name of Democracy is a matter
of history, but in reality, they were used if not actually
started by the International Bankers, to destroy the
confidence of the people in their respective governments,
whether headed by a King or an Empire, a Czar or a Sultan, a
Parliament or a Congress. In brief to destroy nationalism.
...
For the past 44 years, or since 1900, they
have both modified and amplified their International
procedure, and following their wars, revolutions, panics and
labor disorders, they have urged Democracy, and more
Democracy (?) as the only solution of the world's ills; and
to this end in more recent years, they have financed
communist newspapers and periodicals, communist radio
programs and forums. To promote democracy? Of course not.
But to destroy Democracy and promote chaos through which
they will complete their plan for World Domination as
described ...(below).
Nearly one hundred years ago the great
British statesman, Disraeli, said boastingly, that people
little realize who is really ruling them. It was the
International Bankers who had made him Prime Minister of
England.
To reveal who are these real rulers, I
wrote in 1935 "The Truth About Money" to show exactly how
the International Banker operates in the field of Finance.
In 1940 I issued booklet, "The Truth About England" to show
how these internationalist operate in the field of "World
Politics." No I shall deal with the final stage of this
Internationalist Plot for world dominion which is not but
one short step from final success ... unless ... we elect
as President, a man who believes in Nationalism, who
believes in saving America FIRST, and in saving other
nations when and if convenient. Some years ago Sinclair
Lewis published his famous book "It Can't Happen Here," the
book in which he prophesied that IT WOULD HAPPEN HERE, as it
did. For three years following the publication, by platform
and radio all over this nation, hundreds of orators
including some Senators and Congressmen warned the country
that it was "happening here" and that if the people
themselves did not unite to stop it, the day would come when
power-drunk New Deal Bureaucracy, throwing caution and the
Constitution to the winds, would step forth as a Dictatorial
government and start ruling by decree. And just within the
past wee (April 1944) that Bureaucratic government has given
us proof that the warning thus issued was neither prejudiced
nor ill-advised. For the seisure of Montgomery Ward was
both a sensational event and a guaranty that similar events
might be expected on an ever widening scale. And the
conslusion would seem inescapable, that if given another
four years in office the extension of the Dictatorial power
of the New Dealers will be limited only by their own greed.
Thus in this year of grace 1944 I publish
this third booklet, to give a third and perhaps final
warning to our people to stop cold and permanently that plot
for world domination which first entered America in 1901
when Theodore Roosevelt inherited the Presidency, and which
40 years later had all but completed its Imperialist
program, when in 1941, a second Roosevelt took us into war.
SPLENDID ISOLATION
After eight years as President, George
Washington ended his long career of service and leadership
with the most powerful and persuasive speech ever delivered
to this nation; a speech so fraught with wisdom and so
filled with love of country that for more than one hundred
years that speech was the foundation, the walls and roof of
our nation's Foreign Policy.
For in this his "Farewell Address" he had
said to succeeding Presidents and to the nation, "KEEP OUT
OF FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS" and "never quit our own to stand
on foreign ground." ... It is interesting to reflect that
if the Father of our Country were with us now and advocating
such a policy, he would be arrested as a "subversive" and
jailed for "sedition." What a difference between this
Washington policy, and that of a later president who said
"our frontier is on the Rhine, and the British Navy is our
first line of defense."
But "there were giants in those days of
Washington," giants in wisdom and courage and in their love
of all things American. . . Thus the men of his day were so
quick to see the wisdom of his advice, that it immediately
became known as the "Washington Policy of Splendid
Isolation;" and in due time became our "Traditional Foreign
Policy." And for the next hundred years each succeeding
President adhered faithfully to Washington's advice as they
saw the nation growing in population, power and prosperity
as a result of our "Splendid Isolation." And while
throughout that same one hundred years the people of Europe
were engaged in war, preparing for war, or recovering from
war, the people of America continued to prosper, because
their Government had refrained from those alliances and
entanglements that must ever lead to war. It was therefore
inevitable that during that one hundred years our people
would become increasingly "Nationalistic;' which is to say
they became increasingly aware that they owed their
continuing prosperity to their Government's adherence to the
Washington Foreign Policy of "Isolation" ...
Though again and again as in 1787, 1811,
1863 and 1893, the International Bankers by their monetary
maneuvers had sought to wreck American prosperity; Though on
four occasions, as in 1812, 1848, 1863 and 1898, the
International Bankers had used the emergencies of War in
their efforts to wreck our independence: Though innumerable
times during that one hundred years the International
Bankers endeavored to "entangle" us in Foreign Alliances;
yet through all this one hundred years of Internationalist'
intrigue our Government adhered to our traditional policy,
and our people seemed destined to an unending career of
peaceful prosperity, as a result of our "Splendid Isolation"
...
But, alas, we were doomed to
disappointment, for we had underestimated the genius of the
International Bankers. For after one hundred years of
immunity, our "Splendid Isolation" came to an end in 1901,
when following the assassination of William McKinley,
Theodore Roosevelt inherited the Presidency.
Now at long last the International Bankers
had a friend in the White House, and now they could move
their base of operations from London to Washington and begin
their 40 year plan for the subjugation of America, as the
next step in their greater plan for World Domination.
Just 40 years later in 1941, another
Roosevelt by taking his country into a global war, had all
but completed the destruction of our Traditional American
Policy.
Taft, Harding Coolidge and Hoover
Before beginning the story of Rooseveltism
it might be wise to answer an objection that could be
entered here: -- "That between the administrations of the
two Roosevelt's there were Presidents like Taft, Harding,
Coolidge and Hoover who opposed the violation of our
"Traditional Policy." That these honored gentlemen were
thus opposed is true, but it must be well remembered that
once the "International" virus had entered our nation's
economic bloodstream; that once we had departed from
precedent and violated our Traditional Policy; and that one
the International Bankers had become entrenched in American
Finance, Commerce and Industry, nothing less than a
first-class miracle could have saved the nation from the
poison still coursing through its veins. It is true that
the four Presidents above named did their best to neutralize
that Internationalist poison, but to neutralize was the best
they could do, a miracle they could not perform. So the
poison remained and though latent for a time, awaited the
coming of a president who would instead create a national
condition of confusion and disunity in which that
International poison could spread its paralyzing and
destructive effects.
Thus as will be shown in the pages that
follow, there has been no break in the chain of Rooseveltism
from the days of Theodore to the days of Franklin. . . In
the life of an individual, some disastrous event might be
explained as an "accident" but there are no accidents in the
life of a Nation. Those outstanding events which profoundly
affect or change the life of a nation are never accidental:
They are "Planned that Way" ... And with this thought in
mind we begin the story of
HOW THEODORE ROOSEVELT CAME TO POWER
Here follows a WORLD story in which an
American is the central figure; a story the reader should
both memorize and circulate. For here is more than a mere
story, here is HISTORY, arranged in such chronological
sequence that even a New Dealer will be able to see that
every National and World event for the past 130 years was
but the Effect of a foregoing Cause, and that the motivating
power back of each foregoing Cause was the genius of the
International Banker, slowly, methodically and successfully
"planning" his way toward world dominion. As each Cause
begets and effect, and that Effect in time becomes a Cause
begetting another Effect, thus in tracing the reason for
Theodore Roosevelt's promotion to Power we go back from
effect to cause, from effect to cause, until be come to that
day in July 1815 when the English army financed by a London
Banker defeated the army of Napoleon; with the result that
in twenty-four yours after Waterloo, this same London Banker
had become the richest man in the Empire and a power in the
Bank of England. ... With the defeat of Napoleon at
Waterloo, England in twenty-four hours had moved from her
position as a second-rate power and become overnight, the
greatest power on Earth; but more important still, this new
and greater England had fallen under the mastery of the
greatest financial genius of all time, Nathan Rothschild . .
.
For the next seventy-five years no nation
on earth could challenge or even question England's
supremacy on land or sea, or in commerce or Finance. During
those seventy-five years England's territorial possessions
were more than doubled and her wealth in Finance, Industry
and Commerce was more than quadrupled, and the credit for
this stupendous expansion should go to Nathan Rothschild and
to the man his son Lionel made Prime Minister, Benjamin
Disraeli.
Until near the end of that seventy-five years
it was the belief of the British Aristocracy, Princes,
Bankers and Merchants, that the world was their "oyster" and
that nothing could or would happen to disrupt their
continued exploitation of their captive mollusk. But
something DID happen; in fact had been happening for nearly
20 years before they discovered their danger. For in 1890
the English Bankers and Merchants awoke to the realization
that in the preceding twenty years two other nations,
Germany and the United States, had become her equal in
Industry, were well on their way to become her equal in
foreign commerce, and, if given another twenty years to
prosper, would neutralize if not destroy England's Financial
supremacy. In brief, in that twenty years Germany and the
United States had climbed to power TOGETHER.
AND HERE IS HOW IT HAPPENED
Prior to 1870 the several states of
Germany were little more united than were the Balkan states
of that day, but following the defeat of the French at Sedan
in 1870 these little German states were welded by Bismarck
into a German Empire, and under the guidance of the Iron
Chancellor the new Empire soon learned that "In Union there
is Strength" and then began the rapid and steady advance in
Industry and Commerce, which in just twenty years had made
Germany the strongest power on the Continent ... As early
as 1880 this growth of German power had excited the jealousy
of her neighbors Russia and France, but neither nation was
then in a position to challenge German expansion. Even
England by 1880 was aware of Germany's growing strength but
chose for a time to regard German expansion with favor since
it served England's interest as a bulwark against a
Russian-French alliance. ...
But finally in 1890 English Bankers,
Industrialists and Merchants came to a full realization of
the following facts: (A) the EXTENT of German expansion in
Industry and Commerce; (B) The Economic reason for that
expansion.
Let us study them in turn: -- From 1846
to about 1886 England had absorbed the major portion of the
surplus food-products and raw-materials produced in her
Colonies, paying for such imports with the products of her
English factories. This trade between the Colonies and the
Mother Country was little other than Trade and Barter, with
no distinct monetary gain to either party: England's
monetary profits during this period had come from the
re-sale of Colonial products to the nations of Europe,
partly from the sale of factory products to the same
nations, but MAINLY from her loan of gold and credit to the
European nations by which their purchases of English and
Colonial products had been effected ... As a result of this
three-way commerce, the Colonies were loyal to England as
the only market for their surplus products, and England in
turn was dependent upon the Colonies as the source of those
products the re-sale of which made it possible for her to
dominate the Commerce and Banking of Europe . . . In brief,
for this period of forty years from 1846 to 1886 the
European market had been a dumping-ground for the surplus
products of England and her Colonies, and had furnished a
fertile field for investment of English capital. So
considered this European market had been for forty years the
"foundation" of British and Colonial prosperity. But as the
strength of a building depends largely upon the strength of
its foundation, so the strength of the British Empire no
depended upon the retention of this European market. To
lose that market would be to lose her best field of Capital
investment, would mean loss of her best market for surplus
products of English Industry, and the loss of the ONLY
market into which she could dump the surplus products of her
Colonies ... As the International Bankers saw the picture in
1886 the Empire's former STRENGTH was about to become its
greatest WEAKNESS: To lose that European market would mean
the break-up of the British Empire ... It must not be lost.
Thus for the next four years or until 1890
the English Bankers devoted themselves to a careful study of
both the EXTENT and the REASONS for that rapid German
expansion which in a few short years had robbed England of
two-thirds of her European market ... They discovered first,
that German factories and laboratories were producing three
articles which no other nation was then equipped to
produce: Dyestuffs, Chemicals and Precision Tools, the
three articles which were soon to become the foundation of
all modern industry: And that with these three products as
a lure or bait, Germany by 1890 had caught two-thirds of the
European market. The English Bankers next discovered the
source of Germany's food and raw materials, one-half of
which had come from the smaller nations of Europe and the
other half from the United States of America: And, that
whereas England must maintain a great Army, and Navy to
protect her own source of food and raw materials, no such
protection was necessary to protect German sources of
supply.
But finally and worse yet, it was
discovered that Germany's trade with her neighbors and the
United States was being carried on without the need of
Capital or financing; for to facilitate her trade Germany
had established what was practically a system of Trade and
Barter, by which the surplus products of German factories
and laboratories were being exchanged for the surplus foods
and raw-materials of other nations ...
Then to cap the climax, the English
Bankers discovered that Germany was establishing IN the
United States vast plants and laboratories for the
manufacture of Chemicals, Dye-stuffs and Precision Tools;
and that these factories together with heavy German
investments in American Factories and Railroads, had built
up in the United States, an Industrial System that would
soon deprive England of her American Markets, as German
expansion on the Continent had deprived England of her
American Markets, as German expansion on the Continent had
deprived England of her European markets ... To shorten a
long story, English Bankers and Merchants by 1890 had come
to realize that Germany in Europe and the United States in
the Western Hemisphere had built up Industrial Empires more
modern and more resourceful than their own; and that these
German and American Industrial systems had become the two
mill-stones which would eventually grind the British Empire
into dust ...
Naturally, of much concern to the Bankers
was their loss of the American Market for Capital
Investment, for prior to 1890, 70% of American Railroads and
Factories had been financed by English capital, but now that
American Industry was being financed by American capital
and equipped with German machines and chemicals, it was
clear to the International Banker that his plan to achieve
World Dominion, by shifting his gold from nation to nation
was doomed to failure; unless and until a way could be found
to destroy not one but both of these new Industrial Giants
... It was no longer a question of advisability, it was now
a matter of necessity ... One of two things must disappear,
the World Plan of the International Banker or the Industrial
Power of Germany and America.
CHINA'S BOXER REBELLION TRAPS RUSSIA
In 1890 the International Bankers began
work on a secondary plan to remove the barrier which blocked
the progress of their World Plan; the barrier of German and
American competition. And the question which then concerned
them was, which nation should they attack first, and how?
But before they could take their first step toward their
secondary plan, a new danger confronted them in China where
their third best market was endangered by the Boxer
Rebellion ... Now a "rebellion" is usually the uprising of
a people against their own government, but this Boxer
Rebellion was directed against foreign governments (Chiefly
England) which had been exploiting the Chinese people. This
rebellion must be put down or another great market for
English goods and capital would be lost. But how could the
International Bankers employ England's army and Navy in
China, when that army and navy would soon be needed to
regain her market in Europe?
The answer was both simple and typical:
they would get some other nation to do the fighting; so they
hurriedly signed a commercial treaty with Japan by which
British rights of extra-territoriality in Japan were
abolished, and Japan given the money and machinery necessary
for a war against China. This war which began in 1894 soon
liquidated what remained of the Boxer rebellion, and what
was almost equally important, gave Korea to Japan; thus
making Japanese military power a new and dangerous threat to
Russia, AND TO A TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILROAD then being
considered by Russia and China ... It will be remembered
that since the days of Peter the Great, Russia had attempted
to modernize and take her place among the industrial nations
of the West: But as Peter the Great and a dozen later
monarchs had realized, Russia could never become a great
power until she could first secure passage for her shipping
through the Dardanelles and into the Mediterranean and the
Atlantic. But for two hundred years Turkey, backed by
English naval and military power had defeated the dozen
attempts made by Russia to secure this all-the-year passage
to the Seven Seas. Thus, when in 1877 the English army and
navy again came to Turkey's aid and drove the Russian armies
back from Constantinople, the Russian Czar realized that
some other method of solving Russia's shipping problem must
be developed. .... To this end in 1879 the Czar proposed a
military alliance with France in the West, and similar
alliances to the nations of the Balkans. Through it was
some years before these alliances were achieved the danger
from such alliances was immediately apparent to Germany,
Austria and Italy, and these three nations in 1883 formed
what was later known as The Triple Alliance. For some years
thereafter England approved of this Triple Alliance since it
caused France to seek England's friendship in the West; and
also weakened Russia in Asia and Siberia. At this time in
1890 Russia was preparing to begin the Siberian Railroad
which would give Russia an all-the-year port on the
Pacific. But for two reasons England did not want this
railroad built. First, because Russia since 1880 had been
following America's example of using German machines and
chemicals for the building of a Russian Industrial system;
and though Russian Industry would not endanger English
Industry and Commerce so long as Russian products were sold
within the Empire, those products would become a menace and
particularly in China, with the building of the Siberian
Railroad ...
England's second reason for opposing
Russian expansion was the fact that if Russia grew too
strong it would be difficult and more expensive later, when
England would propose a military alliance with Russia and
France, against Germany.
But as the records show, England was not
able to prevent the building of the Trans-Siberian railroad,
and because of her failure England was later compelled to
use both War and Bribes to bring Russia into the Triple
Entente.
Thus in 1897 the International Bankers
made their first move to entrap Russia when Japan adopted
THE GOLD STANDARD: Five years later they made their next
move, and in 1904 Japan attacked Russia. Fifteen months
later when the Russian Fleet had been destroyed and the
Russian armies annihilated, the Bankers made their third
move, WHEN THEY DELEGATED PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT to
"arbitrate" a Peace Treaty between Russia and Japan ...
This was the first time the International Bankers had used
their friend Theodore, but it was by no means the last
time. It was also during these proceedings that Theodore
entered into a "secret" agreement with Japan (see Mussey's
American History 1942 ed. page 566) , an agreement so secret
that even American statesmen knew nothing about it until
years later. (See also Mussey's History, page 560-565.)
But here we are ahead of our story, so
let's return to that fateful year 1890 when the
International Bankers first began their plans to remove
German and American competition. The question which then
troubled them was, which of the two nations should be
attacked frist, but having had some experience in attacking
America, in 1776 and 1812, they quickly and wisely decided
to center their first attack upon Germany: And to this end
in 1900 they set out to secure allies to "aid" them with the
fighting. Aware that France was still suffering as a result
of the German defeat at Sedan in 1870; and that France had
long desired to seize and colonize Morocco just across the
Mediterranean; and remembering finally that France's
ambitions in Morocco had long been thwarted by Great
Britain; the Bankers now planned to give Morocco to France,
in return for a French pledge to join England in a later
attack upon Germany. The Bankers were well aware of the
risk they here assumed for a "colonized" Morocco would not
only double the economic and military strength of France but
would bring this revitalized France right next door to
British possessions in Egypt and the Sudan. Moreover the
gift of Morocco to France would not only be resisted by
Spain and Morocco but might be resisted by both Germany and
Italy. But since their European market was at stake and
their World Plan endangered, they were forced to assume
these risks; and so in 1904 the secret treaty for the theft
of Morocco was duly signed by France and England . . . And
you may be sure that here as in the treaty between Theodore
and Japan, the PEOPLE of the countries involved had no
knowledge of the Secret Treaty . . . That Spain made no
open resistance to the French-English plot against her
holdings in Morocco, is understood when we remember that
Spain had just lost her financial, economic and military
power in the Spanish-American War; Nor did Morocco have the
resources for successful resistance. But as the
International Bankers had foreseen, Germany DID resent the
French-English plot and for a good reason . . . For more
than twenty years prior to 1904, almost all of the
hydro-electric, sanitary and railroad equipment installed in
Morocco had come from Germany and had been paid for with the
surplus products of Morocco . . . As in our own case, this
"trade and barter" carried on without borrowed Capital had
been highly profitable to both countries and particularly to
Morocco: And as a by-product of this trade a strong
friendship had grown up between the German Kaiser and the
Sultan of Morocco. Therefore when in 1905 it was clear that
the French-English plot would deprive both German and
Morocco of their profitable trade, the Kaiser visited the
Sultan and urged the Moroccan monarch to resist the French
and English. Sorrowfully the Sultan replied that he could
not resist; he was surrounded on all sides by French and
English military and naval strength.
But the Kaiser COULD do something about it
and he did: He demanded that German trade still have free
passage into and out of Morocco (And had this been then
agreed to Morocco would never have become a French colony
and France might then have hesitated to join England in a
war against Germany.) So at the suggestion of the
International Bankers, the matter was referred to
arbitration. But what nation or monarch in Europe could
arbitrate such a matter when they were all financially
interested in the outcome? For this question the
International Bankers had been waiting and they at once
proposed Theodore Roosevelt as arbitrator, since he, they
said, had no interest in the outcome. In 1906 Theodore made
his report and as you have already guessed his report was in
favor of France and England and against Germany. (Mussey's
History, p. 575.)
Aware at last that he had been tricked,
the Kaiser again demanded that Moroccan ports be kept open
to German shipping; and since neither France nor England
were then ready for their war, they were forced to submit.
Out of that affair only one nation came forth as victor, and
that was England; for she had won permanently, French
support for her coming war; and of equal importance for the
success of that war, she had won for the second time the
support of Theodore Roosevelt, who two years later would
appear for the third time as a friend of the International
Bankers.
With France already preparing for the War,
England now turned to Russia, whose boundaries encircled
Germany on the East as did those of France on the West. As
the International Bankers had feared, the winning of Russia
would prove far more difficult than had been the winning of
France; For Russia still remembered that it was England
which for two hundred years had deprived her of a passage
into the Mediterranean, and that in the past fifty years
English armies had twice defeated Russian armies at
Sevastopol and Constantinople . . . Moreover in still more
recent years Russia's plan to acquire the oil fields of
Persia had been blocked by this same England. Thus when
asked to join the French-English military alliance against
Germany, Russia demanded both a passage into the
Mediterranean and the oil- fields of Persia. This was
clearly a terrible price to pay for a Russian alliance, for
the Persian Oil fields were already being developed by the
British Bankers and were among the most valuable oil fields
in the world: And to grant Russia a passage-way through the
Dardanelles would not only endanger English domination of
the Mediterranean, but might drive Turkey into an alliance
with Germany (as later happened.) Moreover to bring Russia
into Persia and the Mediterranean might later endanger
English domination of India; and the India of that date
furnished two-thirds of Britain's income.
But again England must assume all the risks
here involved, and with her promise that Russia should have
the Persian oil fields and a passage into the Mediterranean,
the British-Russian military alliance against Germany was
signed in 1907.
A few months later England arranged a
similar treaty with Belgium by which English money and
French engineers erected a chain of forts along he
Belgian-German border. Being already allied to Greece and
Rumania by Royal marriages, the fall of 1907 found England
ready to begin actual preparation for war. For between 1900
and 1907, England had completely encircled Germany with a
wall of steel, and beyond that wall stood the armies of
Russia, Rumania, Greece, France, Belgium and England, ready
for the word to attack.
Thus in 1907, the English press suddenly
burst forth with violent and continued attacks upon Germany,
propaganda to secure the support of the English public, for
the war which the International Bankers had hoped would
begin in 1908 ...
But there was one English statesman who
knew that England was not ready for war, for as this
statesman Winston Churchill pointed out, they could not
safely attack Germany until a way could be found to stop the
flood of food and raw-materials flowing into Germany from
Scandinavia and the smaller states of Europe. If these
imports had been of great value to Germany in time of Peace
they would be absolutely vital in time of war. But how
could these European states be persuaded to stop their trade
with Germany when that trade was as important to them as it
was to Germany?
Again the International Bankers had the
answer. They would call in their good American Friend
Theodore Roosevelt; as president of the United States he
could solve their problem, and he did.
For during 1907 and 1908 the American
Government entered into "reciprocal Trade Treaties" with
every nation in Europe EXCEPT Germany; as a result of which
treaties ALL THE SURPLUS PRODUCTS OF THESE EUROPEAN NATIONS
could be bought by the United States and would be paid for
with Gold or goods as the said nations might require ...
Thus for the third time in four years the "good-neighbor"
Theodore had stepped into the World Picture; and by so doing
was guilty of a direct violation of the Constitution and of
his twice repeated oath of office; but he had pulled the
"Big" Banker's chestnuts out of the fire ... But he had done
more than that; he had destroyed that Washington Policy of
Isolation to which we had adhered for one hundred and ten
years to our continuing profit; and he had set in motion
that forty-year period of Internationalist Imperialism which
has already cost us two Wars, four Depressions, a dozen
Panics, and a Financial loss beyond computation. And the
end is not yet.
Thus with the three-time assistance of
Theodore Roosevelt, the British picture in 1908 stood as
follows: -- By secret treaties with Russia, Rumania, Greece,
France and Belgium, England had completely encircled Germany
with a wall of steel; and by the nearly secret Reciprocal
Trade Treaties of Theodore, England had cut off most of the
food and raw-materials upon which Germany must depend in
time of war ...
[Note from
DE: Which is why the US remained "neutral" until 1917, for
if the US were a belligerent then the Scandinavian countries
would have reason to modify their trade patterns to maintain
their own neutrality in the war.]
Why then, did not the shooting begin in
1908 when the "Allies" were prepared? Why did they postpone
the war until 1914 and thus give Germany six years to
prepare? Ah, the reader has forgotten something; he has
forgotten that the International Banker plan of 1900 not
only proposed to remove Germany as a competitor but the
United States as well; and thus the postponement . . . In
brief, in 1908 the International Bankers inserted in their
Plan a new idea, the idea that if the United States could
not be persuaded to fight in the coming War, they could at
least be forced or persuaded to finance it.
The Big Bankers had at first hoped that
Theodore could be persuaded to run for the third term so
they could have a friend in the White House when the war
began; but when this idea was finally rejected their next
successor in office would be a man "who would listen to
reason"; the selection of this man being left to the
Roosevelt entourage ...
[DE note:
See my rense interview footnotes to learn that J. P. Morgan
personally approved Wilson as the choice of a "reasonable
man for Baruch, Edward House, Dr. Grayson and the new Mrs.
Wilson to control.]
Fortunately for America but unfortunately
for the Big Bankers, the choice fell to William Howard Taft;
who was later elected. Soon after Mr. Taft's election,
Theodore left for England where he would be joined by
some "economic royalists" of London and then proceed to
Africa for his famous hunting trip. No sooner had he landed
in London than he was besieged by his Banker friends who
asked if he was absolutely certain that Taft could be
depended upon to "CARRY OUT THE ROOSEVELT POLICIES." Teddy
quickly convinced them that Taft would carry out the
Roosevelt Policies, and thus assured, the jolly friends
sailed away to Darkest Africa. But soon after reaching
their happy hunting ground they were informed by their
fellow conspirators in London, that while Taft was carrying
out the Roosevelt policies, he was carrying them to the
incinerator. Teddy at once wrote Taft to stop being a
boy-scout and to resume the Roosevelt policies or else ---
. Mr. Taft replied that HE was president of the United
States and that as such he would adhere to the policies of
Washington and the Constitution, rather than the policies of
Roosevelt, (and the International Bankers). The answer was
such a terrific shock to Teddy and his friends that soon
after, both were back in London and at work on a plan to get
rid of Taft at the coming election of 1912. [DE
note: With this plan Bernard Baruch makes his entry into US
national politics.]
Returning to America Teddy began his part
of their plan for the elimination of Taft, by a continuing
series of newspaper and platform tirades against the
President: And while Teddy was so engaged, Col. E. Mandel
House who up to that time had never been heard of, set out
to promote a Democratic Candidate who if elected would
resume and continue the original Roosevelt plan.
As the date of the Democratic National
Convention drew near it was clear to Col. House and his
International Banker associates that neither of the two more
prominent candidates, William J. Bryan or Champ Clark, could
be used in their conspiracy; which left only the scholarly
but inexperienced Woodrow Wilson as a prospect. So off to
Sea Girt, New Jersey, went Col. House for a week's
conference with Mr. Wilson. When the conference had ended
Col. House informed his Banker friends that Mr. Wilson was
perfectly "safe." Thereafter Col. House went to Baltimore
to "Influence" receptive Delegates, while his Banker friends
went to New York to "influence" Charles Murphy; the Boss of
Tammany Hall and the New York Delegation.
For several days thereafter neither Col.
House nor his Banker friends had much success for after more
than one hundred ballots, the Convention was still
dead-locked . . . Bryan having damned Boss Murphy and
Tammany Hall, and Murphy having double-damned Bryan, it
seemed impossible to get both Bryan and Murphy to support
the same candidate. Finally, however, Boss Murphy "cracked"
and threw the New York Delegation to Wilson, and the deed
was done. But nominating Wilson and electing him were two
different things, as his conspiratorial soon discovered.
Not only was President Taft highly popular throughout the
nation but his Administration had been both free of
corruption and genuinely progressive. As for Candidate
Wilson he just didn't seem to click, and try as they did his
sponsors were unable to provoke the proper enthusiasm.
Thereupon the International Bankers went into a huddle, to
later come forth with a play destined to secure a
touchdown. And as you well remember, they called on the
redoubtable Teddy to carry the ball. Or, as they say in
Harvard, Mr. Theodore Roosevelt was chosen to run on the
Progressive Ticket, or to be still more accurate, to head
the Progressive Party, which Teddy and his Banker friends
proceeded to steal from the Senior Bob La Follette.
There have been some rotten campaigns in
Denmark, New York and Chicago (1940) but nothing before or
since has equaled the campaign of 1912, with its
unadulterated putridity and its criminal betrayal of the
hopes and interests of the American people. . . . For
we know now and many of us knew then, that the Big Bankers
hadn't the slightest hope that Teddy would be elected for a
third term and that the only reason he had been sent into
the campaign was to split the Republican vote, and thus
defeat Mr. Taft who would NOT play the Banker's game, while
electing Mr. Wilson who WOULD play that game. And play it
he did, whether he ever fully realized it or not.
Thus for the fourth time in his strange
career this strange man Theodore had endangered his
country's welfare to play the game of Internationalism and
Imperialism. It is of course possible that in the first
three times he had served the Internationalists, Teddy
believed he was acting for the best interests of his
country; but in this fourth and final effort to serve the
Bankers, even the most stubborn of his friends must find
cause for shame.
It was the Republican Party which had made
him Governor of New York, and the Republican Party which had
made him President of the United States; therefore when in
the campaign of 1912 his desertion of his Party made
possible the election of Wilson and the War and tragedy that
followed; it was a circumstance that can neither be lightly
dismissed nor ever forgotten.
This leaves but one further fact to be
explained in this story of HOW Theodore became President and
WHY ...
While the assassination of William
McKinley was a tragedy, it was still less tragic than the
events which immediately followed; the death of American
Nationalism and the birth of those tragic twins,
Internationalism and Imperialism.
It will be remembered that having been
forced to declare war on Spain in 1898, (to weaken Spain for
the later theft of Morocco) and having in 1900 been
compelled to accept Theodore Roosevelt as Vice-presidential
Candidate, McKinley saw close ahead the rocks upon which our
traditional American policy would soon be wrecked; and that
it was then that he gave expression to his now immortal
statement, "I regret to see my country forced into the
United Paths of Empire" . . . Picture the sorrow of this
truly great American as he saw his country being drawn into
a spider-web of alien intrigue; being forced to abandon the
policies which for more than one hundred years had made and
kept it great; and being compelled to follow the "United
Paths of Empire" which from the days of Babylon, Greece and
Rome had ended always in the swamp of disaster . . . Well
might he regret the "Untried Paths," and well may we.
Beyond any doubt when all the facts are
known, it will be discovered that his words decrying the
Untried Paths, were the words that sealed his doom. For a
Power greater than his or any other government, a WORLD
Power, a SUPER-Government had need at that moment for an
American president who would follow its lead toward World
Domination. Such a president McKinley was NOT, and would
never be; but if through divine providence or some more
rapid method McKinley could be removed, the man who would
succeed him might prove just the president for that fateful
hour.
And strange or not, McKinley WAS removed
and with him the Washington Policy: To be succeeded by the
Man of the Hour and the Roosevelt Policy that still endures
. . . Thus in 1912 the International Bankers could
review the chain of events they had set in motion in 1900:
-- a) Spain had been removed as a threat to their rape of
Morocco; (b) Russia had been forced into their alliance by
the Russo-Japanese War, financed with their money; (c) By
their Secret Treaties, Germany had been encircled with a
Wall of Steel and an economic blockade; (d) McKinley had
been removed to be followed with the friendly Roosevelt; (e)
Taft had been removed to be followed by the friendly Wilson:
And all was now ready for the great War; all but one thing,
-- a method by which America could be forced to pay for that
War.
To he completion of this last detail, they
set to work immediately following the election of Wilson,
and by December 1913 this last detail had been arranged when
President Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act.
Having for some years made a careful study
of American Banking, the International Bankers were aware
that it would be far more difficult to enforce their will
upon the 28,000 banks in America than upon some Central Bank
or System as maintained in France or England . . .
Moreover they were aware that one-half of America's banks
were located in rural areas and both molded and REFLECTED
the Isolationist sentiment of those rural areas. Clearly
such an extended and powerful banking system could not be
molded to their will; nor could they proceed with their plan
to make America pay for their war until these strongholds of
Isolationism could be removed. Thus through their agents
Warburg and Wilson, the Federal Reserve Act was forced
through Congress and their last detail had been arranged.
Thereafter the money of America was (in
theory) under the control of the twelve Federal Reserve
District Banks; actually it was under the control of the
Federal Reserve Bank in New York. And that the
International Bankers had planned both wisely and well was
almost immediately proven, when they sold more than three
billion dollars worth of French and English bonds to the
smaller bankers of the nation, who dared not refuse to buy
them. And being familiar with all literature, they recalled
the words of the Master, "where your treasure is, there will
your heart be also;" and knowing this words to be true,
they knew that in due time the American people would follow
their treasure to Europe, and into War.
Thus in April 1917 the International
Bankers could rub their hands in glee and say, "WE planned
it that way." And so today, from our too much disinterested
vantage point, we can look back over that period of
seventeen years from 1900 when Theodore was elected
Vice-President to 1917 when Woodrow Wilson took us into War,
and see as in some vast panorama an unbroken series of wars
and revolutions in which thrones toppled into dust, empires
followed suit, and Kings, Emperors, Czars and Sultans joined
the ranks of the forgotten men, and over which and through
which the Four Horsemen, War, Pestilence, Famine and Death
rode like the Valkyries of some demoniac Wagner.
From the wreckage there wrought, NOW was
to follow another seventeen-year period in which little
blood was spilled, but an ocean of tears was spent as a
broken world through stock market crashes and panics,
depressions and hunger, sought once again the fields of
peace. Thus is happened that from the days of Woodrow
Wilson until the coming of the second Roosevelt, our people
increasingly declared that "Never again" would we "leave our
own to stand on foreign ground," and that "never again"
would American wealth and manhood be used to save British
Imperialism, in the name of a false Democracy . . . But
again they were doomed to disappointment for the wars and
depressions that had brought them sorrow and tragedy, had
brought to the International Bankers not merely an increase
of wealth and power, but more important still the certainly
that another seventeen or twenty years would bring them the
completion of their World Plan for World Dominion . . . And
so we turn to the second part of the Roosevelt saga to
discover
How FRANKLIN Roosevelt came to
Power and WHY . . .
It will be remembered that in June 1934
Lord Lothian startled the world with the declaration that a
new war was being planned for Europe and that powerful
forces in England were sponsoring that war. So the question
now arises "How long before Lord Lothian's speech had these
powerful forces been at work to produce this new war; and
WHY did they desire a second World War? The powerful
English forces implied in Lord Lothian's speech had been at
work since December 1931, our American depression was
reaching for the bottom, with ten millions unemployed, and
business-failures spreading like a prairie fire. The reader
may also recall that in this same year another terrible
depression was spreading through Europe and England, and as
a result Communism was also spreading through Europe and
England, and as a result Communism was also spreading
throughout the Continent. On August 7th, 1931 England's
best known newspaper the Manchester Guardian said "Farmers
are burning the wheat in their fields to avoid the expense
of harvesting, and over thousands of square miles no attempt
will be made to plant a crop for next year." Not only were
English crops being left to rot in the fields, but the
fishermen of England had stopped fishing; cattle and sheep
raisers stopped raising live stock, and the sit-down strike
of these food-producers guaranteed a food shortage in
England for the years following. By December 1931 the coal
mines and textile mills had closed down and all through
England hunger parades became a daily occurrence. And these
tragedies cited by the English Press were being repeated in
every nation in Europe, -- except Russia. As a result of
this wide-spread unemployment and hunger, Communism was
growing rapidly in every part of Europe that agents of
Soviet Russia were quick to take advantage of this
wide-spread suffering, and moving through every Country of
Europe pointed out how in Capitalistic Europe and America
millions were unemployed and hungry while in Communist
Russia there was no unemployment and no hunger. As pointed
out recently by the distinguished author, Mr. John Hargrave,
"While this world collapse had been planned by the Big
Bankers, the slump had gotten beyond their control." But
more important still this "planned" world depression had
created a condition in which Communism could and did thrive,
until now (December 1931) it threatened to sweep across the
borders of Russia and engulf all Europe. This was an
eventuality the Big Bankers had not foreseen: It was
something new.
In former world depressions of their
creation, the Big Bankers had permitted these depressions to
run their course, and then, as and when they chose, the
Bankers would restore the world to normalcy, and now in 1931
the Big Bankers might not have time to restore normalcy, for
Communism might first sweep across Europe and thus end both
their power, and their plan for World Dominion. Communism
must be stopped then and there: But HOW? To this question
the Big Bankers gave their usual answer: By War In Europe .
. . Having so decided Mr. Montagu Norman, the chief of the
Big Bankers, hurried to Germany, and then to France, and
then to the United States, to consult with other Big Bankers
who play the Imperialist game. . .
When Mr. Norman had returned from his
visit to America he reported to his London associates that
he could do business with the American Bankers, but not with
the American President (Mr. Hoover) In brief in 1931 the
Big Bankers faced the same problem as had confronted them in
1912: Now as they found in the White House a President who
would not play their game. Thus, as in 1912 they had
planned to remove Mr. Hoover. Then and there the Big
Bankers set to work upon a Political plan, SO FANTASTIC,
that even the gods who are supposed to be always solemn must
have laughed when they heard it. That plan was to finance
Adolph Hitler to power in Germany, while financing Franklin
Roosevelt to power in the United States . . . Yes, dear
Reader, I know you are shocked, but this WAS the plan as
drawn in London in December 1931; and they not only "planned
it that way" but they put it over as planned.
Thus in January 1932 the London
International Bankers arranged with Dr. Schacht, President
of the German Reichsbank and Mr. Thyssen, a German
industrial baron, to finance Mr. Hitler into power . . .
When almost immediately it became known that now for the
first time the Nazi Party had unlimited funds and that these
funds had been advanced by Messrs. Schacht and Thyssen, the
International Bankers to cover up their part in the plot had
it announced that the German Industrialists had financed
Hitler as a move against Labor Unionism. As we will now
recall, the whole world was fooled by this explanation and
therefore the world was kept in ignorance of the real reason
for promoting Hitler to power, to-wit: That when Hitler and
Germany were prepared, Germany would attack Russia and thus
end the danger of Communism sweeping through Europe. But
there was one part of the plan which the Big Bankers
concealed from Hitler and the German Industrialists and that
was: that after a long and destructive war between Germany
and Russia, both countries would be so exhausted that
England and France would find it easy to quickly suppress
what was left of Germany and Russia, and then could recover
their European markets, restore the Balance of Power and
remove any future threat of Russian influence in Persia,
Turkey or India.
. . . Six years later in 1938, after Germany
had built up a large and modern navy, a mechanized army and
a large air-force, and had taken Austria and Czechoslovakia;
Prime Minister Chamberlain met Mr. Hitler in the now famous
conference at Godesburg. At this conference Mr. Chamberlain
plaintively reminded Mr. Hitler that he had been given the
money (international banker money) to rearm Germany; upon
Mr. Hitler's definite promise that he would then attack
Russia: And now that Germany was rearmed the Rhineland
fortified and Czechoslovakia out of the way, why didn't Mr.
Hitler keep his promise and attack Russia? Mr. Hitler
replied evasively that he still needed more time for
preparation; and that being the best answer Mr. Chamberlain
could get, he made his sorrowful return to London. but at
this conference Mr. Hitler had outsmarted Mr. Chamberlain,
for the Prime Minister's words had been taken down on a
dictograph record and the record put aside for future use .
. . Some months later when it was clear that Hitler was
double-crossing the International Bankers who had financed
him and was not going to attack Russia English agents went
to Moscow and for two months tried to persuade Stalin to
start a war against Germany. For that matter what did the
International Bankers care whether Stalin or Hitler started
the war, so long as both Russia and Germany would be
exhausted by the war and thus make it easy for the big
Bankers to regain control of Europe as above explained?
At the last moment when it seemed Stalin
might sign up with Britain and France, Von Ribbentrop took
his dictograph-record and played it for Stalin, -- the
record in which Mr. Chamberlain had reminded Mr. Hitler that
Germany had been re-armed for an attack on Russia.
Von Ribbentrop then said to Stalin, "Do
you now see the plot whereby Russia and Germany were to
destroy each other so that the International Bankers through
the armies of England and France could restore their Balance
of Power in Europe?" Stalin DID see; and startled the world
by announcing an alliance with Germany . . .
Since this part of the story is continued
in the last chapter of this booklet, we now return to the
other half of the Political Plot set in motion by the Big
Bankers in December 1931.
Having financed the Nazi Party for the
campaign which would end in December 1932 with the election
of Hitler (an election in which the Communist vote was but 2
millions less than the Nazi vote), the Big Bankers were
ready to start a campaign in the United States for
the election of Franklin Roosevelt.
Recalling how they had promoted Theodore
Roosevelt from Asst. Secretary of the Navy to the
Governorship of New York and then to the Vice-Presidency;
and that they had later promoted Franklin Roosevelt from
Asst. Secy. of the Navy to the Governorship of New York, it
should be remembered that through all the years between his
days in the Navy Department and his becoming Governor,
Franklin Roosevelt had been under the watchful eye of the
International Banker agent Col. E. Mandel House: Thus in
January 1932 Mr. House started a nation-wide movement to
make Franklin Roosevelt the ONLY Democratic Candidate in the
campaign that year and the movement was so successful that
Franklin took the nomination by an overwhelming vote . . .
Therefore in that summer of 1932 the International Bankers
had TWO candidates running for the job of Chief Executive;
Franklin Roosevelt in the United States and Adolph Hitler in
Germany. And to try to laugh that off, it can't be done.
About September 15th 1932, this author
appeared at the Republican National Headquarters in the
Palmer House in Chicago, to report for his usual duties with
the Speakers Bureau of the National Committee. Talking with
his superior on that first day, the superior said, "We are
going to have a hard time in the campaign because we haven't
any money: Wall Street that usually gives a large
contribution has turned us down flat." When I asked Why
Wall Street wouldn't help us since they usually contributed
to both parties, the superior answered, "Well, for one
thing, they don't like Hoover, but the main thing is they DO
like Roosevelt." . . .
So Wall Street had gone Democratic? Wasn't
that something for the Socialists and the Radicals to think
about? In fact this Republican author thought
about it and kept thinking about it until, in late June
1934, he saw the connection between (1) The Big Bankers
support of Franklin in 1932, (2) the Bank Holiday of 1933,
(3) The buying of English gold for $35 an ounce, and (4)
Lord Lothian's declaration of June 1934, that a new war was
brewing in Europe. It was then clear, that as in 1912 with
the FIRST World War brewing in Europe they wanted Franklin
in the White House and again wanted America to finance the
war. And that WAS HOW FRANKLIN CAME TO POWER.
There is more to
this booklet, but this has been enough to draw the lessons
we need to learn for understanding what is happening to our
government today. I hope you will think this over and begin
today in organizing the people around you to combat this
greatest of all evils the world has known.
America today is a Lone Ranger episode. The Lone Ranger is
the Still-Living
Good
John Hobson - Imperialism (1908)
.
By the
way, I come at this from the standpoint of the the sociology
of the conflict of interests (Ludwig Gumplowicz,
Ratzenhoffer, Franz Oppenheimer, Herbert Spencer, C. Wright
Mills, etc.); the economics of imperialism (John Hobson);
the "A + B" Theorem of why, without social credit, modern
debt-system economies must result in mass debt slavery,
depression and war (Arthur Kitson, C. H. Douglas, Michael
Even); the revisionist historians (Charles Beard, Harry
Elmer Barnes,James J. Martin, Charles Callent Tansill); the
conspiracy detectives (Douglas Reed, Anthony Sutton, Eustice
Mullins, Cleon Skousen, Jeff Rense, David Ray Griffin, Col.
Richard Niemier, Daryl Bradford Smith, Justin Raimando,
Peter Myers, Richard Koshimizu, Steve Watson, Bob Bowman,
Barbara Honegger, Enver Masud, Carol Valentine, Wendell
Solomons, Vicky Davis, etc. .......and the example of men
who have fought for right in the past Jefferson,
Washington, Madison, Paine, Bolivar, Tolstoy, Garibaldi ),
Mohandis K. Gandhi, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, William Jennings
Bryan, Huey Long, Martin Luther King, Joe McCarthy, John F.
Kennedy, the old right (Taft, Harding. Coolidge, Hoover) ,
the populists, etc. But first you have to get a handle on
events leading to the present situation.
|
By Dick Eastman
2-7-09
....Cpl. Pat Tillman, who gave up a
three million dollar
football career to enlist in our armed forces and avenge
"the attack on New York," the 9-11 false-flag
mass-murder deception perpetrated by international
Jewry and Communist China to provoke an American war
against Islam, only to be cut down himself by informed
"friendly fire" at a time when he was raising
lie-shattering questions in his unit about the mission
in Afghanistan and the true nature of the
ostensible enemy and our alleged "best friends."
How Obama fixes his
mistakes --
He assured victim-family member Beverly Eckert
he would investigate her claims of 9-11 negligence.
Less than a week later she dies in a Continental Express
plane that suddenly nosedives into a house
in Erie Country, New York.
.....On Feb. 6, 2009 Beverly
Eckert and other
family members of 9-11 victims met with
President at the Executive Office building
in Washington DC. Present were victims
of both the USS Cole bombing and the
9-11 mass-murder with crash-bombings
and planted explosives.
Obama assured her -- see picture -- that
he would prosecute anything that
she could present...Read
More
A Tribute
From Dick Eastman
Every man is responsible to every other man.
Populism must forever throw out the racial supremacism of any self-styled
"chosen people" and follow the lead of Martin Luther King Jr.,
a true American exponent of the principles
of Jesus, Jefferson, and Gandhi against all injustice.
Gareth
"Gary" L. Wean:
The Connection (1997)
Preface by Dick Eastman
...Let this information be the Rosetta Stone
for deciphering the new sub-conspiracies
coming down the pike. Better still, let it be
a silver bullet we can use to finish this
network of evil once and for all
all around the world...
The talented Mr. Greenspan
salon.com > News Jan. 10, 2000
The Federal Reserve chairman has resisted
slowing the economy while waiting for his reappointment,
but will he put the brakes on now?
By Ian Williams
....For example, reportedly he is a staunch atheist,
but that did not stop him taking an oath on the Talmud
(held by his aged mum) to become chairman
of Nixon's Council of Economic Advisors,
while his prophetess Ayn Rand beamed away in the front row.
Apart from his quasi-cultist past, the main problem
with Greenspan is that he has too much power based on
his alleged powers of economic prediction....
The Last Shout
By Mike James in Germany
November 29, 2008
....America has just elected an
avowed Marxist,
aligned with the principles of British Fabianism,
to be their president for at least the next four years.
McCain would have been no different;
for the Zionists and the State of Israel,
who control America, stacked their cards
to ensure for themselves
a satisfactory outcome either way....