|
 |
|
Scientists are now certain that the
universe came to being by a big bang |
However, long before discovering the
established phenomenon of the red shift, and its logical consequence of
describing our universe as an expanding one, scientists used Einstein's theory
of general relativity to extrapolate back in time and came to the striking
conclusion that the universe had actually emerged from a single, unbelievably
small, dense, hot region (the Hot Big Bang Model of the universe).
Formation of the Universe
George Gamow formally proposed the model in
1948, after a lengthy discussion on other models of the universe by a number of
scientists (e.g. Albert Einstein, 1917; William de Sitter, 1917; Alexander
Friedmann, 1922; George Lemaiyre, 1927, etc.). Lemaitre is credited for
introducing the idea of the "primeval atom", where galaxies originated as
fragments ejected by the explosion of this atom.
In 1948, George Gamow modified Lemaitre's
hypothesis into the "Big Bang theory" of the origin of the universe. In this
theory, Gamow proposed that the universe was created in a gigantic explosion,
whereby the various elements observed today were produced within the first few
minutes after the Big Bang, as the extremely high temperature and density of the
universe would fuse subatomic particles into the chemical elements.
More recent calculations indicate that
hydrogen and helium were the primary products of the Big Bang, with heavier
elements being produced later within stars. The extremely high density within
the "primeval atom" would cause the universe to expand rapidly. As it expanded,
the smoky cloud of hydrogen and helium thus formed would cool and condense into
nebulae stars, galaxies, clusters, super clusters, black holes, etc.
This explains the original singularity of
the universe; its explosion to a huge cloud of smoke from which the different
heavenly bodies were formed by separation into eddies of various masses followed
by condensation. The condensed bodies were arranged into stellar systems,
clusters, galaxies, supergalaxies, etc., and the formed galaxies started to
drift away from each other, causing the steady expansion of the universe.
The Glorious Quran describes these three
successive stages in the verses (21: 30), (41: 11) and (21: 104). The first and
the third of these verses are discussed above, while the second reads:
"ثم استوى إلى السماء وهي دخان فقال لها وللأرض إئتيا طوعًا
أو كرهًا قالتا أتينا طائعين"a
(فصلت)
"Then He (Allah) turned to the sky while
it was smoke, and ordered it the earth to come into being willingly or
unwillingly, they answered: we do come in willing obedience*" (41: 11)
Big Bang Evidence
As the universe expanded, the residual
radiation (radiant heat) from the big bang continued to spread outwardly and to
cool down gradually until about the 3K (= - 270°C) of today. This relic
radiation was detected by radio astronomy in 1964, thus providing direct
material evidence for "The Big Bang Model".
Further evidence in support of this model
is provided by the chemical composition of the observed universe. This amounts
to about 74% hydrogen and 24 % helium (by mass), with only traces of other
elements that in total amount to about 2%. All the recorded hydrogen in the
observed universe and almost all the recorded helium are primordial, although
some helium is currently produced by nuclear fusion of hydrogen in the sun as
well as in other stars. Nevertheless, the total mass of hydrogen produced by the
process of nuclear fusion within all the stars since the beginning of creation
amounts to only a small percent.
It is calculated that when the universe was
3 minutes old, its temperature must have been 109 °C (cf. Ohanian,
1985, p. D-6). At such a high temperature, hydrogen was subject to nuclear
fusion, leading to the formation of helium. Theoretical calculations show that
the fusion reactions led to an abundance of about 75% hydrogen and 25% helium,
which is a remarkable agreement with the observed abundance. This further
confirms the Hot Big Bang model for the creation of the universe. The Hot Big
Bang model has steadily and successfully battled other explanations for the
origin of the universe, and the model has been gradually refined with time.
Hot to Cold
The "Hot Big Bang Model" for the origin of
the universe envisages a beginning from an extremely small, hot, dense initial
state some 10-15 billion years ago. This initial, minute body exploded and
started to expand, forming the still expanding, vast, cold universe of
today. The model predicts the formation of nuclei, the relative abundance of
certain elements, and the existence and exact temperature of the cosmic
microwave background radiation (or the glow of radiation left over from the
initial explosion, which is currently permeating the universe).
The prediction of the cosmic background
radiation made by Ralph A. Alpher of Union College and Robert Herman of the
University of Texas at Austin was confirmed by Arno Penzias and Robert W. Wilson
of Bell Laboratories in 1964.
Despite its success, the Hot Big Bang Model
leaves many features of the universe unexplained. For example, the universe
today includes a vast number of regions that could never have been in causal
contact at any stage in their entire history. These regions are moving away from
one another at such a rate that any information, even traveling at the speed of
light, could not cover the distance between them. This "horizon problem" makes
it difficult to account for the striking uniformity of the cosmic background
radiation (cf. J.J. Halliwell, 1991, p. 76). Other unexplained features in the
Hot Big Bang Model include the "flatness problem", the origin of large scale
structures such as galaxies, galactic clusters and super clusters, etc.
The Inflationary Universe
In 1980, Alan H. Guth of M.I.T. suggested a
further refinement of the Big Bang model that he called "the inflationary
universe scenario". In this scenario, the universe is believed to have started
with a very brief, but exceedingly rapid period of expansion (for about 10-30
second), in which matter consisted of scalar-field particles (white in the Hot
Big Bang model, the matter content of the universe is presumed to have been a
uniformly distributed plasma or dust).
As mentioned by J.J. Halliwell (1991), the
origin of the universe in the inflationary scenario can be explained as follows:
by following the expansion of the universe backward in time, the size of this
vast, complex universe tends towards zero. Here the strength of the
gravitational field and the energy density of matter tend towards infinity.
This means that the universe appears to have emerged from a singularity; a
region of infinite curvature and energy density at which the known laws of
physics break down. These conditions are a consequence of the famous "
singularity theorems", proved in 1960 by Stephen W. Hawking and Roger Penrose of
the University of Oxford. These theorems showed that under reasonable
assumptions any model of the expanding universe extrapolated backward in time
will encounter an initial singularity.
The singularity theorems do not imply,
however, that a singularity will physically occur. Rather, the theory
predicting them - classical general relativity - breaks down at very high
curvatures and must be superseded by the quantum theory. Near a singularity,
space - time becomes highly curved; its volume shrinks to very small dimensions,
and here only the quantum theory can be applied.
Quantum cosmologists began a few decades
ago (since the 1960s) to address the problems of the origin and evolution of the
universe in a more subtle way than that proposed by classical astronomy.
Quantum cosmology attempts to describe a
system - fundamentally - in terms of its wave function. Yet many conceptual and
technical difficulties arise. At the singularity, space becomes infinitely
small, and the energy density infinitely great. To look beyond such a moment
requires a complete, manageable quantum theory of gravity, which is currently
lacking.
Whether to accept the Hot Big Bang model of
the universe, or its modified inflationary scenario explanations on the basis of
conventional or quantum astronomy, the established fact is that our universe
emerged from a single, infinitesimally small, dense, hot source. To agree or
differ on the events that unfolded since that moment, including the formation of
matter, followed by its coalescence into galaxies, stars, planets and chemical
systems, does not change the fact of the one singularity from which our universe
was created.
The Quranic precedence with this fact at a
time when nobody had the slightest knowledge of it, or even for several
centuries after the revelation was received, is indeed most striking. The
objective notion to this Quranic verse in the right context of a science course
can indeed be spirit lifting and enlightening for the younger Muslim generations
of students and faculty.
Dr. Zaghlool El-Naggar
is a Fellow of the Islamic Academy of Sciences. Member of the Geological Society
of London, the Geological Society of Egypt and the American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Fellow of the Institute of Petroleum,
London. Prof. Naggar is the author/co-author of many books and more than 40
research papers in the field of Islamic Thought, Geology, General Science and
Education. He was awarded by the Ministry of Education in Egypt the top
“Secondary Education Award” as well as the seventh Arab Petroleum Congress Best
Papers Award in 1970. Elected a member of the IAS Council (1994 and 1999), Prof.
Naggar is currently working at the Arab Development Institute.
The Celestial Origin of Iron
By
Dr. Zaghlool El-Naggar
, Ph.D.
|
 |
|
Our sun converts 6000 million
tons of hydrogen to helium every second. |
The Glorious Qur'an contains a distinct Surah (Chapter) entitled "Al - Hadeed"
(= The Iron) which emphasizes in one of its verses (Verse#25) the following two
facts:
1- That iron was sent down to Earth i.e. it
is of a celestial (extra-terrestrial) origin, and
2- That iron is strong and has many
benefits for mankind. This Qur'anic verse reads: "…and We (Allah) sent down iron
wherein there is mighty strength and many benefits for mankind…*) (LVII: 25).
We
now know that iron is the most abundant element in the total composition of the
Earth (>35% of its total mass) and the fourth abundant element in its crust
(5.6%). This observation has led to the logical conclusion that the majority of
the Earth's iron must be hidden below its crust (i.e. within both its cores and
mantles). If this is the case, how could this element be sent down to Earth as
stated in the above-mentioned Qur'anic verse? And how could it have penetrated
from the outer crust of the Earth to its inner zones of mantle and core?
To
answer these questions, the Earth must be treated as part of the total cosmos
from which it was separated, not merely as an isolated entity. In this context,
recent cosmological discoveries have proved that:
1. Hydrogen (the simplest and the lightest
know element) is by far the most abundant element in the observed universe.
2. This predominant, universal hydrogen is
followed in abundance by helium (the second in the periodic table of elements),
which is less abundant than hydrogen, by a factor of ten.
3. These two, simple nuclei of hydrogen and
helium constitute the greatest percentage of the observed universe, while
heavier elements are only represented by traces that do not exceed 1-2% of its
total mass, and are locally concentrated in certain heavenly bodies.
These fundamental discoveries have led to the important conclusion that hydrogen
nuclei are the basic building blocks from which all the other elements were and
are currently being created by the process of nuclear fusion. This process (the
nucleosynthesis of elements by nuclear fusion) is self-sustaining, highly
exothermic (i.e. releases excessively large quantities of energy) and is the
source of the very hot and glowing nature of all stars.
Nuclear fusion within our sun mainly produces helium, with a very limited number
of slightly heavier elements. The percentage of iron in the sun is estimated to
be in the order of 0.0037%. Knowing that the Earth as well as all other planets
and satellites in our solar system were actually separated from the sun, which
does not generate iron, another question was raised:
Where had the immense quantity of iron in our Earth come from?
|
 |
|
One second after the "Big
Bang", the temperature of the early universe is calculated to have
been in the range of ten billion degrees Celsius.
|
Our sun is a modest star, with a surface temperature of 6,000°C, and an inner
core temperature of about 15,000,000°C. Such figures are far below the
calculated temperatures for the production of iron by the process of nuclear
fusion (which exceeds 5 X 109 K). Consequently, other sources much
hotter than the sun were sought for as possible sites fort the generation of
iron in the observed universe. One of the suggested sources of excessive heat
was the "Big Bang" explosion of the initial singularity from which our universe
was created (cf. Bott, 1982). However all speculations about this event suggest
that shortly after the "Big Bang", matter was in such and elementary stage that
only hydrogen and helium (with possible traces of lithium) could have been
generated. Again, if any traces of iron were produced at that stage, iron would
have been more evenly distributed in the observed universe, which is not the
case.
One second after the "Big Bang", the temperature of the early universe is
calculated to have been in the range of ten billion degrees Celsius. At this
stage, the early universe is visualized to have been in the form of a steadily
expanding, huge cloud of smoke, mainly composed of elementary forms of both
matter and energy such as neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons (anti -
electrons), photons and neutrinos. Radiations in the form of photons from this
very hot early stage of the universe had been predicted by Gamow and others
(1948) to be still in existence around the observed universe, coming from all
directions with equal intensity. This prediction was later proved to be true by
both Penzias & Wilson (1965) through their discovery of the cosmic microwave
background radiation coming from all directions in the observed universe with
equal intensity, together with a remnant temperature reduced to only a few
degrees above the absolute zero (- 273°C).
The Life Cycle of the Stars
During the first three minutes of the history of our universe the neutrons are
believed to have either decayed into protons and electrons, or combined with
other neutrons to produce deuterium (or heavy hydrogen), which could combine to
form helium. In its turn, helium nuclei could partly fuse to produce traces of
lithium (the third element in the periodic table), but nothing heavier than this
element is believed to have been generated as a result of the "Big Bang"
explosion (cf. Weinberg, 1988; Hawking, 1990; etc.). Consequently, all of the
universal hydrogen and most of the helium are believed to have been created
immediately after the "Big Bang", while the rest of the universal helium is
believed to have been steadily generated from the burning of hydrogen in the
interiors of "Main-Sequence Stars" like our sun.
After the "Big Bang" explosion, gravitation is believed to have pulled together
clouds of smoke to form giant clusters of matter. Continued contraction of these
clusters eventually increased their temperature due to the interaction of
colliding particles and the pressures created by the large gravitational
attraction. As the temperature approached 15 million degrees Celsius, the
electrons in the formed atoms were ripped off to create a plasma state.
Continued contraction proceeded until the particles in the plasma moved with
such high velocities that they began to fuse hydrogen into helium, producing
stars with enough energy to generate an outward push (pressure) that reached
equilibrium with the inward pull of gravity.
|
 |
|
Supernovas result from
exhaustion of the nova’s fuel supplies.
|
Most recently, elements heavier than lithium have been proved to be currently
synthesized by the process of nuclear fusion in the cores of massive stars (at
least ten times the mass of our sun) during their late stage of development.
Such massive stars are seen burning helium to carbon, oxygen, silicon, sulfur,
and finally into iron. When elements of the iron group are produced, the process
of nuclear fusion cannot proceed any further. Elements heavier than iron (and
its group of elements) are believed to have been created in the outer envelopes
of super-giant stars or during the explosion of novae in the form of supernovae.
Consequently, it has been proved that stars are cosmic ovens in which most of
the known elements are created from hydrogen and/or helium by the process of
nuclear fusion. At the same time, the unbelievable energy of stars comes from
this process of intra-stellar nucleosynthesis of elements, which involves the
combining of light elements into heavier ones by nuclear fusion (nuclear
burning). This process requires a high-speed collision, which can only be
achieved at very high temperatures. The minimum temperature required for the
fusion of hydrogen into helium is calculated to be in the range of 5,000,000°C.
With the increase in the atomic weight of the element produced by nuclear
fusion, this temperature increases steadily to several billions of degrees. For
example, the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into carbon requires a temperature of
about one billion degrees Celsius.
Burning (fusing) hydrogen into helium occurs during most of the star's lifetime.
After the hydrogen in the star's core is exhausted (i.e. fused to helium), the
star either changes into a Red Giant then into a dwarf or changes into a Red
Super-giant then into a nova where it starts to burn helium, fusing it into
progressively heavier elements (depending on its initial mass) until the iron
group is reached. Up to this point, the process of nucleosynthesis of elements
is highly exothermic (i.e. releases excessive quantities of energy), but the
formation of the iron group elements and of elements heavier than this group is
highly endothermic (i.e. requires the input of excessive quantities of energy).
The explosions of Novae in the form of Supernovae result from the exhaustion of
the fuel supplies in the cores of such massive stars and the burning of all
elements there into the iron group. Heavier nuclei are thought to be formed
during the explosions of the Supernovae.
The nucleosynthesis of the iron group of elements in the
inner cores of massive stars such as the Novae is the final stage of the process
of nuclear fusion. Once this stage is reached, the nova explodes in the form of
a supernova, shattering its iron core to pieces that fly into the universal
space, providing other celestial bodies with their needed iron. With this
analysis, the celestial (extra-terrestrial) origin of iron in both our Earth and
the rest of the solar system is confirmed (cf. Weinberg, 1988; Hawking, 1990;
etc.).