Exposing Daryl Bradford Smith: Part 1
By Curt Maynard
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Initially I thought Daryl Bradford Smith [hereafter referred to as DBS or Smith] was probably the real deal with an ego that just wouldn’t quit. There are many people like that you know, they love themselves and they want to be the center of attention. Me, I like to keep a relatively low profile in order to live my life free from the kind of harassment that tends to go hand in hand with those critical of God’s chosen people.
So as I said, initially I thought DBS was probably legitimate and just liked to have his ego stroked extensively, but then I noticed that he began to call people that I know “Zionist agents,” and tools of the Zionists. I then began to scrutinize him a little closer. Not long after that someone emailed me an article written by John Kaminski which detailed what Kaminski thought was a well orchestrated attack on him during a DBS radio interview, Kaminski stated that DBS blindsided him with accusations of racism and xenophobia, which is a bit funny in that Kaminski is a liberal and tends to lean to the left, especially when and where it applies to race relations. In short, John Kaminski cannot be considered a racist period! In fact, much of Kaminski’s writings could be considered anti-racist, except when he focuses on Jewish Supremacism, in which case he can be highly critical of the Jewish ethnos/religion. On January 20, 2006, DBS himself confirmed the fact that he had accused Kaminski of racism and xenophobia when he openly admitted as much on his radio program; allegedly believing Kaminski to be involved in an attempt to have him [DBS] arrested - the result of French anti-free speech laws.
After reading the Kaminski article, I put the information in the back of my mind and proceeded on with life. Not too long after that though, I received another email from someone detailing the fact that DBS was now accusing Michael Collins Piper of some mischief, adding of course the by now expected “Zionist agent” for good measure. After reading that I couldn’t be silent any longer, I was at the time working on an essay about Bill O’Reilly entitled “Bill O’Reilly is a Lying Son of a Whore.” As an afterthought, I decided to toss in my two cents about DBS. Based upon the fact that DBS had accused far better people than himself of being agents of Zion I noted that I believed him to be an “agent provocateur,” and “focused almost entirely on smearing the good names of other dissidents, anti-war activists and historical revisionists,” which is true, all one need do is listen to his radio program and/or read his website. According to DBS, he, Eric Hufschmid and Christopher Bollyn are the only honest individuals associated with the truth movement. Come on people, that right there should send alarm bells off in your head!
I don’t have an opinion on Christopher Bollyn, I was saddened to see him leave American Free Press and even more saddened to see him align himself afterward with Smith. I don’t know anything about Hufschmid, as I’ve never listened to him or closely read anything he’s written, but I do know that he’s involved with Smith and has actively engaged in the same type of ill-defined, condemnatory slanders of men far better than himself, which causes me to suspect that he’s no good either. Based upon what I just wrote above you might conclude that I don't pay a great deal of attention to Internet squabbles. You're right, I don't, I consider them to be counterproductive and/or a waste of time. But in the case of DBS, I'll make an exception. Read on and you'll see why.
In any case, Smith apparently read my article and decided that I too must be a Zionist agent, after all, I dared to question his self appointed status as “truth teller number one.” In any case, DBS remained for the most part a non-entity in my life until I visited his website a month or so ago and noted that he was accusing Ernst Zundel of being a Zionist stooge as well. That was the last straw for me. At that point I knew that DBS himself is the Zionist agent, nobody in their right mind could or would consider Zundel to be anything other than what he is, the #1 Political Prisoner in the world today. Who does this guy DBS think he is, Zundel has been on the front lines battling Zionism for more than thirty years, he’s been spat on, slandered, taken to court innumerable times, firebombed and most recently has spent the last four years of his dwindling life in jails and prisons in three countries all because he refuses to accept the official version of the holocaust narrative without question! That’s it, that’s his crime. Do you understand that? Zundel was arrested [without warrant], deported to Canada from the United States [without due process], spent two years in SOLITARY CONFINEMNT in a Canadian maximum security prison, and was then unconstitutionally deported to Germany where he now sits in a prison for the next five years for nothing more than questioning history. Is this sinking in? Do you understand what is being said here? The law that Canada used to deport Zundel was recently overturned because of its unconstitutionality, yet nobody is talking about how Zundel was negatively impacted by this Orwellian legislation. And here we have an upstart like DBS accusing a great man like Ernst Zundel of being a tool of the Zionists? Chrissakes people, wake up, this guy Smith is no good.
In one of Smith’s articles entitled “Can we trust Viktor Ostrovsky” Smith utilizes and exploits the reputation and prestige of the great revisionist Robert Faurisson by suggesting that anyone unable to “discuss the research of Robert Faurisson” should be held under a cloud of suspicion. I guarantee you that if Robert Faurisson knew that DBS had accused Zundel, who by the way is very familiar with Faurisson’s work, of being a traitor to truth and revisionism, he’d condemn Smith in a New York second! Of this, there is no doubt. This is obviously a case in which Smith feels free to denounce one notable revisionist [Zundel] by bolstering another [Faurisson] in an effort to convince listeners/readers that he’s legitimate and actually cares about historical revisionism. Zundel and Faurisson are close friends and have been for decades. For Smith to exploit Zundel’s inability to defend himself while the man sits in jail is nothing less than cowardly.
“Daryl Bradford Smith does not discuss or investigate evidence related to the Holocaust [Capitalized again]. He will, however, speak about free speech issues and our basic human right to freely exchange ideas.”