|
For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are
Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people
are generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this
statement is not widely understood or appreciated.
The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change
the fact that these once great nations have become
Zionist-controlled states. The evidence is clearly seen in the
self-destructive foreign policies these nations have pursued for the
past 40 years or so.
The Anglo-American "leadership" positions in the illegal invasion
and occupation of Iraq and their support of the costly Zionist fraud
known as the "War on Terror" is further proof that Zionists control
these nations – as if any were needed.
How did these powerful and independent nations become Zionist
controlled? Unlike Palestine, where Eastern European Zionist
immigrants used brutal terrorism to ethnically "cleanse" and conquer
the land, in Britain and the United States the Zionists gained power
gradually through "dumbing down" and effectively disenfranchising
the native populations.
In Britain and the United States, the Zionists saved the use of
terrorism for later, after they already controlled the media and the
levers of power and government.
Americans today still believe they are free because the media
tells them so and because they don't see the restraints and are able
to move around and buy things. Americans are, indeed, free to work
and shop, but they have virtually no real political power
whatsoever. A good example is that while an overwhelming majority of
the U.S. population is against the war in Iraq, the war and the huge
spending bills to support it go on unchallenged by their
representatives in Congress. Why don't the Congressmen vote to stop
the disastrous war that has consumed hundreds of billions of dollars
and taken more than 3,000 American lives?
Most Americans in the "land of the free and the home of the
brave" are completely unaware that they have lost the most cherished
democratic franchise, i.e. the citizen's fundamental right to vote
and count their votes. They think their vote counts and don't have a
clue that they lost their democratic franchise years ago. They are
unaware of this situation simply because the media has not told
them.
"If the media doesn't talk about, it must not be a problem" is
the American way of thinking.
For the Zionist-controlled media, the absence of any citizen
oversight of the vote-counting process and complete lack of
transparency in American elections are simply non-issues, just like
many other very important subjects of vital importance to the
survival of the republic.
As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly
enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." This aptly
describes the difficult condition Americans face at the beginning of
the 21st Century.
Zionists, a marginal minority of Polish and Russian Jewish
immigrants, were able to gain control of these great
English-speaking nations by obtaining control of two fundamental
institutions: the media and academia. This is not to say that they
don't control other key institutions, but these two are of essential
importance because they largely define the intellectual life of a
nation.
Having worked in the media and studied Middle East history at an
American university, I know what I am talking about here. History of
the Middle East and Europe, and virtually every other subject taught
at American universities, is viewed only through the Zionist prism.
For example, when I studied the Middle East at the University of
California at Santa Cruz, the head of the department was a professor
named Edmund Burke who had studied under the famous British Jew,
Bernard Lewis, at Princeton. Burke was always recommending the books
of Bernard Lewis, which I avoided like the plague.
Bernard Lewis
American historian Joel Beinin called Lewis "perhaps the most
articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle
East academic community."
"Terry" Burke spent 1990 "on sabbatical" with Lewis at Princeton.
He returned to Santa Cruz in the late summer, just before the U.S.
invasion of Iraq in January 1991. I remember Burke giving a speech
in August or September at the federal building in Santa Cruz as the
conflict was heating up. The very first words out of his mouth were
"Balkanization," something that amazes me to this day. He was
unwilling to explain his choice of words when I called him about a
year ago.
Edmund "Terry" Burke of UCSC
Although my main interest was Israel and Palestine, Burke
recommended that I read a book about Yugoslavia. Balkanization, the
breaking up of nations into ethnic statelets, is the Zionist plan
for the entire Middle East, articulated by Oded Yinon of the Israeli
foreign ministry in the early 1980s.
During the many lectures and courses I studied on the Middle
East, never did I hear a critical word about Zionism or its brutal
history in Eastern Europe and Palestine. This is primarily because
the professors of Middle Eastern studies and European history are
usually Jewish and strongly inclined to support Zionism.
If a professor were to openly criticize Zionism as the racist and
violent ideology that it is, he would probably find himself
unemployed in very short order.
I understood this and endeavored to present the anti-Zionist
perspective at the university. I brought speakers like Ralph
Schoenman, the author of The Hidden History of Zionism (1988), to
the campus and led a tour of photojournalists to the West Bank and
Gaza Strip shortly after the invasion of Iraq. Despite a great deal
of effort and years of experience in the region, Burke did not give
me "honors" with my degree, most likely because of my anti-Zionist
views.
The media in the United States is controlled in the same way as
the universities. The editors and journalists are prevented from
investigating and discussing the real history of Zionism because the
news outlets are usually owned by people who are themselves
dedicated Zionists. The takeover of CNN by Gerald M. Levin of AOL
Time Warner marked the fall of the last major non-Zionist media
network.
Gerald Levin
Today, all major news outlets in the United States and Britain
are strongly Zionist. There were a few good newspapers, such as the
Christian Science Monitor, that provided some balance to the
pro-Zionist "mainstream" networks, but even they have now fallen.
The result is that the populations of the United States, Britain,
and Australia are largely ignorant of Zionism and what it has done
in the past in other countries -- and what it is doing now -- in
theirs.
NON-ISSUES
Selecting issues and non-issues for coverage is the primary
method employed by the Zionist-controlled news networks. Issues get
a lot of coverage while non-issues get none.
Here are a few examples of issues and non-issues in the
Zionist-controlled media:
• Iran's legal and monitored efforts to develop nuclear energy
are an issue; Israel's illegal and secret nuclear arsenal is not.
• Discussion of the alleged role of Muslims in terrorist acts is
an issue; solid evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the
London bombings is not.
• The two-year long fake presidential campaign with a host of
Zionist-controlled candidates is an issue; how our electronic
"votes" are counted by mysterious "private" foreign companies of
unknown ownership is not.
I don't know if any other American journalist and 9-11 researcher
has been attacked, TASERed, and had their elbow broken by an
undercover tactical squad in front of their family in the United
States, but I know that when it happened to me in August 2006 it was
very much a non-issue with the controlled media.
WHO ARE THESE FOREIGN MINISTERS?
The position of foreign minister, or secretary of state in the
United States, is a very important position, second only to the
president or prime minister. Since foreign policy is the only policy
coming out of Washington or London these days, these positions are
of crucial importance and speak volumes about who is really
controlling the government.
In the United States and Britain we have very strange people with
odd backgrounds in these high-level appointed positions. The current
British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is a
42-year-old politician named David Wright Miliband, the son of the
Belgian-born Marxist, Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband.
David Milliband
The U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a 53-year-old
former professor, holds the comparable position in the American
government.
What is most peculiar -- and telling -- is that the backgrounds,
loyalties, and ideologies of these two high-level appointed
officials are never discussed in the Zionist-controlled media;
clearly this is a non-issue.
WHO IS DAVID MILIBAND?
It goes without saying that both Miliband and Rice are dedicated
Zionists, they are, after all, serving in extremely pro-Zionist
governments. But why are their personal and family histories not
discussed by the media? Don't the American and British people have a
right to know the person who is overseeing the implementation of
their national foreign policy?
David Miliband, who only became a Member of Parliament in June
2001, was recently in Basra, Iraq, when the British officially
stepped back from their failure and turned over control to Iraqi
authorities.
Although Miliband and other British officials have tried to put a
good face on the disastrous results of the Anglo-American invasion
and occupation, the fact that it has been a complete failure is
painfully apparent to all.
As a senior Iraqi military officer told ABC News, "The British
legacy in Basra is criminal gangs, a corrupt and infiltrated police
force, and borders open to all."
Major-General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander in Basra,
told the Times of London: "They left me militia, they left me
gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world."
Yousif Nassar, one of Basra’s most famous composers, is also
disappointed at what the British did to his city. "The British
Forces created chaos and failed to deliver what they promised," he
said, as reported by the Times of December 17, 2007.
The Times article was entitled "Crumbling services and violence
on the streets, but hope follows British pullout."
"We congratulate all of those who have helped achieve this, most
notably British and Coalition military and civilian personnel,"
Defense Secretary Des Browne and David Miliband said in a joint
statement when the pullout was announced. How could these senior
British officials congratulate anyone for their achievments in
Basra? The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq is nothing but an
unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that was the plan all along?
Knowing who David Miliband is and what he represents is key to
understanding the real power behind Britain's foreign policy. This
is certainly the reason the Zionist-controlled media keeps the
British population – and the world – ignorant of the Miliband
family's roots – in Brussels.
David Milliband
David Miliband is the son of Ralph Miliband, born Adolphe in
Brussels in 1924, and Marion Kozak. Ralph was a well known Marxist
political theorist. Ralph, who died in 1994, is buried in Highgate
Cemetery close to his idol, Karl Marx.
Miliband and his father, the Marxist Ralph Milliband at his spacious
home in a comfortable part of London
David's brother, Edward Samuel Miliband, is also a member of
Prime Minister Gordon Brown's cabinet where he has been chairman of
the Treasury's Council of Economic Advisers, which directs the UK's
long-term economic planning.
Beyond that, the family history gets confusing and misleading, on
purpose I'm sure.
The online biography of Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband says he was born
in Brussels of Polish-Jewish emigré parents and that both his
parents lived in the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his father,
Samuel "Sam" Miliband, joined the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet or
Bolshevik War (February 1919 – March 1921).
Sam Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World
War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather
worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army
under the command of Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) in
1920.
The commanders who served under Trotsky in the Bolshevik War
against Poland were Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Aleksandr Yegorov, Joseph
Stalin, and Felix Dzerzhinsky.
Nikolay Bukharin, writing in the Soviet newspaper Pravda, urged
the Bolsheviks to carry on beyond Warsaw "right up to London and
Paris."
General's Tukhachevsky's order of July 2, 1920 read:
To the West! Over the corpse of White Poland lies the road to
world-wide conflagration. March on Vilno, Minsk, Warsaw! Onward
to Berlin over the corpse of Poland!
Why would a poor leather worker in Belgium give up his work and
travel all the way to Poland to fight with the Bolshevik Red Army
against the Polish Republic and the West? If this is true, Samuel
Miliband must have been a very dedicated communist.
This is, however, most certainly not the whole truth. The family
tree of the family of David and Edward Miliband clearly indicates
that their grandfather Samuel Miliband was also born, like their
father Adolphe, in Brussels in 1865. In this case, Brussels-born Sam
must have been an extremely dedicated communist. There is another
possible explanation. Perhaps Sam was a Zionist emissary on a
mission to bring support and funds to the Red Army in their attempt
to conquer Poland. If the family tree is correct that Sam Miliband
was born in Brussels, there is something more to the Miliband story.
The Miliband family tree provides the names and dates of birth of
Samuel's 11 siblings, his parents, and even his grand-parents, data
which supports it as a credible source. Why then has the
Zionist-controlled media obscured the Miliband family history and
pretended that David's father was born in Warsaw, when his family
records indicate he was born in Brussels?
This is information about the Miliband family that the
Zionist-controlled media had evidently decided that the public does
not need to know. It also suggests that the preferential treatment
and promotions that the Milibands have received since coming to
Britain have more to do with their high-level connections than with
their abilities.
Their connections and loyalties are evidently to the highest
levels of the Zionist "Communist" International in Brussels, which
is the only reason they are in the positions they are in. Their
loyalty is clearly not to the British nation or people.
WHO IS JOSEF KORBEL?
The same is true of Condoleezza Rice, who was mentored at the
University of Denver by the Czechoslovakian Jewish immigrant, Josef
Korbel, the father of the previous secretary of state, Marie Jana
Korbelova, a.k.a. Madeleine Albright.
Marie Jana Korbelova with her father, Josef Korbel - 1943
One might think that this amazing coincidence would be newsworthy
but it has generally been ignored by the controlled media as well.
This is probably because the obvious question, "Who is Josef Korbel?"
is a question the Zionist-controlled media does not want to address.
Josef Korbel (1909-77) was a Czechoslovakian diplomat in the
London-based "government" in exile of Edvard Benes, which took power
in Prague after World War II. Korbel was the father of Bill
Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, and the mentor of
George W. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. What a
coincidence – or is it?
Condoleezza Rice and Zippy Livni, the Israeli foreign minister.
Livni is the daughter of the former head of operations of the Irgun,
a Zionist terror organization.
Korbel was also a thief. Korbel stole paintings which belonged to
German industrialist Karl Nebrich, whose property in Prague was
confiscated as part of the post-war Benes decrees. Like the more
than three million other ethnic Germans from Bohemia, Moravia, and
Slovakia, Nebrich and his family were expelled from the country
under the postwar decrees, which oddly remain in force to this day.
Would any European nation that banned Jews and confiscated their
property be allowed to be a member of the European Union? Why are
such racist laws permitted against Germans?
Korbel's stealing of property and art is just the tip of the
iceberg. Korbel was involved in the United Nations partition of
India and Pakistan and the illegal arming of the Zionist fighters in
Palestine until the end of 1948.
When the communists came to power in 1948, Korbel was charged and
sentenced and fled to New York where he lived in the cottage house
of a very large mansion in Great Neck, New York. He was eventually
given a teaching position at the University of Denver.
The Korbel's move to New York is described in Seasons of Her
Life, A Biography of Madeleine Albright:
The Korbels settled into a home just outside New York City. One
of Joseph Korbel's colleagues at the United Nations had helped
the family rent a small gardener's cottage at 149 Station Road
in a woodsy section of Great Neck, a prosperous and developing
suburban community on Long Island's North Shore.
Korbel clearly played a key role in the Zionist-Israeli weapons
pipeline from Czechoslovakia, which was the main supplier and base
for the nascent Israeli Air Force. The Zionist air bridge from
Czechoslovakia, known as Operation Balak, was the essential weapons
supply line and is regarded as one of the Israeli Air Force's most
important achievements. Czechoslovakia provided weapons, ammunition,
and the first fighter airplanes to the Zionist forces in Palestine.
The would-be Israelis even operated their own airbase and pilot
training school in Czechoslovakia. Yugoslavia played an important
role as the main transit point for arms shipments going by sea and a
refueling stop for the Israeli and Zionist pilots flying fighter
aircraft from Czechoslovakia to Palestine – which became the State
of Israel after May 1948.
Korbel, an avowed anti-communist and senior member of the Benes
government, became the Czech ambassador to Belgrade at this time,
although he hated the socialism of Tito. Korbel was the ambassador
in Yugoslavia because he was playing another more important role:
the key Zionist point man in the illegal weapons transfers to Jewish
forces in Palestine. The people, such as Shimon Peres, who were
involved in the illegal weapons smuggling to the Haganah and the
Irgun terrorist gangs in Palestine have been at the top of the
Zionist hierarchy since 1948.
There is, of course, much more to the sordid Milliband, Korbel,
and Rice histories. This material is provided simply to illustrate
the high-level Zionist connections of the people who shaped and
taught the current foreign ministers of Britain and the United
States. Because this information is not provided by the controlled
media in these two great nations, I am providing this research to
help my fellow Americans and British friends realize who is
controlling their foreign policy – which is nothing short of
disastrous.
If you appreciate the information found in this article, please
consider supporting my research and writing by sending a donation
via PayPal to:
shop@bollynbooks.com or
Bollyn@bollynbooks.com
|