-
The
Fleecing Of America
By Stephen Lendman
10-6-8
-
- Over 200 years ago,
Thomas Paine wrote a treatise on government in which he said
"a republic is supposed to be directed by certain
fundamental principles of right and justice, from which
there cannot, because there ought not to, be any deviation.
(It) is executed by a select number of persons, who act as
representatives, and in behalf of the whole, and who are
supposed to (govern) as the people would do were they all
assembled together....
-
- When a people agree
to form themselves into a republic (they) mutually resolve
and pledge themselves to each other, rich and poor alike, to
support this rule of equal justice among them....A republic,
properly understood, is a sovereignty of justice, in
contradistinction to a sovereignty of will."
-
- Since its founding,
America was never governed by Paine's principles. Never less
so or more disgracefully than under George Bush.
-
- This article
follows from an earlier one titled Grand Theft America. On
the crime of the century. The greatest one ever. Unbridled
excess gone awry. An economic system built on a foundation
of greed and fraud. Threatening the country with insolvency
and ruin. World economies with it. Plundering the national
treasury to save it. Bailing out criminal bankers. Rewarding
fraudsters with public funds. Making the world safe again
for capital (or trying to) and heading it for an even
greater calamity ahead. Maybe next time (or this one) one no
financial engineering can fix.
-
-
An Update on the "Bailout": The Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act (EESA)
-
- EESA defrauds the
public. Fleeces the treasury to reward criminal bankers.
Arranged secretly behind closed doors. The $700 billion is
just for starters. Another $150 billion was just added to it
(discussed below). Trillions will be pilfered for this
scheme. Millions of innocent people will suffer grievously.
Crumbs at best are in it for them.
-
- This goes way
beyond a subprime crisis as author Ellen Brown explains. The
real problem is a "black hole of ($180 trillion in
bank-held) derivatives." If enough of them implode, so will
world economies. The "bailout" and various other schemes
hope to prevent it, but there's no guarantee anything will
work. That's the real dilemma.
-
- Public
pronouncements about EESA were deceitful on their face.
George Bush calling it a plan for Main Street, not Wall
Street. Nancy Pelosi saying that "All of this was done in a
way to insulate Main Street and everyday Americans from the
crisis on Wall Street," and added: "The party is over. No
longer will taxpayers be forced to bail out reckless
investors." That's precisely what they're being forced to
do.
-
- Both presidential
candidates endorse the plan and voted for it. Most party
leaders as well. A bipartisan conspiracy to compound the
fraud. Reward criminals with public money. Empower the
Treasury secretary as a financial czar. With unlimited
authority to dispense public money. Direct it as he wishes.
Stipulate the terms. Conceal the plan's true purpose from
the public. To save Wall Street and big banks. The entire
financial system. Industrial capitalism in trouble. And make
ordinary people pay for it.
-
- The Senate passed
EESA on October 1 - by a 74 - 25 vote. The same body that
(on September 26) rejected a $56 billion stimulus plan that
would have extended unemployment benefits, increased food
aid, and funded new construction projects to create jobs at
a time the economy is in a deepening recession.
-
- After first
rejecting EESA, the House reversed itself (263 - 171) on
October 3. Global markets reacted convulsively. Plunging on
September 29. Soaring the next day. Plunging again.
Continuing the same volatile pattern begun last fall. From
the crisis-level weakness of major banks worldwide and the
effect on global economies. The possibility that nothing
proposed will work. The likelihood that only mass worldwide
infusions of public funds and recapitalizations have a
chance.
-
- Ignoring the core
reason for the crisis. The extraordinary amount of criminal
fraud. Rewarding and not prosecuting the fraudsters.
Compounding the enormity of their crime. Looting the
national treasury for it. Rejecting emergency measures with
proven past success. Recapitalizing banks through government
interest-bearing loans with guaranteed repayment provisions
out of future profits. Temporarily nationalizing troubled
banks. Letting governments take over weak ones until things
stabilize. Restarting credit flows now frozen. Then
designing a whole new system to replace the current failed
one.
-
- The present crisis
shows industrial capitalism's failure. Financialization-based.
Speculative finance. Frankenstein finance. Unfettered.
Unregulated. Greed-based. Rewarding fraud and harming
people. The government - business partnership behind it. The
inevitability that nothing this pernicious is sustainable.
The naked truth about an ugly system.
-
- EESA's hidden
details make the prima facie case. Besides add-ons, it's
little different from its initial version. It:
-
- -- directs the
original $700 billion to Wall Street and big banks;
-
- -- lets the
Treasury buy unlimited amounts of junk assets (some
worthless or close to it) but hold no more than $700 billion
at one time; pay whatever prices it chooses;
hold-to-maturity prices if it wishes for toxic waste;
-
- -- includes whole
mortgages in the program, not just securitized asset pools;
- -- compounds fraud
by rewarding it;
-
- -- beyond tokenism
and disingenuous rhetoric, provides no relief for
beleaguered homeowners;
-
- -- excludes a
measure to allow bankruptcy judges to amend mortgage terms
to help homeowners avoid foreclosure;
-
- -- another one that
would have allotted 20% of any government bank assets resale
profit to a housing fund; set aside for the public;
-
- -- also a
bank-imposed fee to compensate the government for buying
junk assets at inflated prices;
-
- -- leaves executive
compensation, golden parachutes, and lavish benefits
unrestricted by inserting toothless provisions against them;
-
- -- establishes a
fake independent oversight panel consisting of the Treasury
secretary, Fed chairman, SEC chairman, Federal Home Finance
Agency director, and Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
secretary;
-
- -- an equally
fraudulent Congressional Oversight Board composed of House
and Senate leadership-chosen bankers and big investors -
called "financial experts;" fraudsters to manage the
"bailout;" business and government foxes in charge of the
looting the national treasury;
-
- -- includes a
provision authorizing the SEC to suspend GAAP (Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles) standards requiring mark-
to-market valuations to let banks (on their balance sheets)
carry toxic assets at purchased prices, not fair market
value, and be able to conceal their losses; and
-
- -- another
providing tax breaks for companies holding Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac preferred shares.
-
- The White House,
Paulson and House and Senate leadership scrambled after
EESA's defeat. Cobbled together a revised plan. Kept the
original's core provisions unchanged, and added new ones:
-
- -- temporarily
(maybe permanently) increases FDIC insurance per account to
$250,000;
-
- -- lets FDIC borrow
unlimited amounts from the Fed to protect against bank runs;
thus exempts banks from paying premiums for additional
deposit insurance;
-
- -- another
provision to exempt the bill from constitutional challenge;
-
- -- includes about
$150 billion in tax cuts and so-called "extenders";
provisions to renew or extend expiring tax breaks;
-
- -- $78 billion for
business as well as extending current business tax breaks
for renewable energy efforts;
-
- -- $8 billion for
hurricane and other natural disaster relief; and
-
- -- another $65
billion extension for Alternative Minimum Tax relief; mostly
to high-income earners.
-
- The plan ballooned
from its original 3-page version to the House's 106 pages.
Then to the final 451 pages (not likely written in 48 hours)
with various additional earmarks for:
-
- -- film and
television productions;
-
- -- wooden arrows
for children;
-
- -- Exxon Valdez oil
spill litigants;
-
- -- Virgin Island
and Puerto Rican rum;
-
- -- railroads;
-
- -- auto racing
tracks;
-
- -- wool research
and more.
-
- In addition,
Section 128's Acceleration of Effective Date refers to
Section 203 of the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act
of 2006. EESA moved up its original effective date from
October 1, 2011 to October 1, 2008, and thereby changed the
United States Code Title 12 - Banks and Banking, Chapter 3 -
Federal Reserve System, Subchapter XIV - Bank Reserves. The
measure is solely to help banks. Foreign ones included. The
changes:
-
- -- no longer
require banks to maintain cash reserves to cover deposits;
-
- -- abolished the
Fed's Earnings Participation Account for the supplemental
reserve fees it charges banks; meaning the Fed can retain
them; and
-
- -- lets the Fed
create its own rules for distributing earnings as well as
payments to foreign banks.
-
- EESA greatly
expands Treasury and Federal Reserve powers. Rewards
fraudsters and does nothing for beleaguered homeowners. Both
presidential candidates voted for the bill. Obama
hypocritically saying that the plan is "our best and only
way to prevent an economic catastrophe (and be able to help
families) on Main Street." McCain pretty much agreed in a
bipartisan show of homage to their big Wall Street backers.
-
- Ignored is their
criminal fraud. The harmful fallout to many millions, and
the fact that $700 billion (now $850 billion) is a down
payment with trillions more to come. A systematic looting of
public funds. Nearly all of it to fraudsters.
-
- Ahead of EESA's
initial defeat, the American Bankers Association (ABA) was
pleased with the plan. Its chief executive, Ed Yingling,
called the financial crisis "like a big Category 4
hurricane." Unleashed an army of lobbyists on Congress. To
assure final legislation contained wanted measures and
excluded ones bankers opposed.
-
- In the end, the ABA
prevailed. It got nearly everything it asked for. So did
Wall Street, but they're far from out of the woods.
Nonetheless, big banks are taking advantage by devouring
smaller and some big ones. Weaker ones on the cheap. Merrill
Lynch to Bank of America. Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual
to JP Morgan Chase, and Wachovia's retail banking operations
(including $400 billion in deposits) to Citigroup for $1 a
share. Then Wells Fargo trumped Citi for most of Wachovia
for $7 a share. A deal now held up after New York Supreme
Court Justice Charles Ramos blocked it temporarily.
-
- The above
acquisitions were giveaways under planned creative
destruction. Enabling greater consolidation in the hands of
fewer giant players. The result is less competition and a
fundamentally unfair system less fair.
-
- The announced deals
are for starters. Many more will follow as a powerful
industry concentrates into few, larger hands. But providing
no help for distressed households. Nor relief for over-
indebted homeowners facing foreclosure. Rejecting better,
fairer ways to recapitalize banks in crisis. Measures proved
effective in the past yet unconsidered.
-
- Also unaddressed
are severe money market stresses and unwillingness of banks
to lend to each other. Resume a free flow of credit. It
shows in unprecedented spreads on unsecured inter-bank
lending. Only confidence can change that. Something no
government can legislate. It can make good policy as a way
to start building it.
-
- On September 30,
the Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf headlined his
commentary: "Congress decides it is worth risking
depression" and said "We are watching the disintegration of
the financial system." Such a "dire outcome is no longer
impossible." The free flow of credit is frozen and unless
thawed "no modern economy can survive. Yet that is now
threatened."
-
- We're experiencing
a "downward spiral of panic." What economist Hyman Minsky
called "revulsion." A "Minisky Moment." The final stage of
bubble deflation when cheap credit ends or is frozen like
now. Investors dump assets. Any bad news roils markets, and
it's infectious. Quickly turning euphoria into "revulsion"
and creating downward momentum much greater and faster than
the upside.
-
- Wolf has mixed
feeling about EESA. Calls it flawed and directed by the
wrong man. A "titan of high finance charged with bailing out
Wall Street," but worrying mostly about Congress doing
nothing and causing "ruin." He wants something passed and
much more. Ensuring "liquidity needs are fully met during
this period." Europeans addressing the same issue. Worrying
about a greater crisis ahead, yet ending with a hopeful
thought. Winston Churchill's words that "The United States
invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted
every other alternative." The greater issue now is a
deepening crisis so great that no constructive intervention
can work.
-
- Events are
fast-moving and changing almost daily. So far in an
intensifying contracting cycle. A perfect storm of:
-
- -- recession;
-
- -- rising
unemployment;
-
- -- public trauma;
-
- -- failing banks;
-
- -- frozen credit;
-
- -- multi-trillions
in toxic debt;
-
- -- the worst
housing slump since the Great Depression; spilling over into
commercial real estate as well;
-
- -- millions of
homeowners threatened with foreclosure;
-
- -- trillions of
eroded household wealth;
-
- -- hugely
over-indebted consumers; and
-
- -- contagion
spreading everywhere and the danger that it may be
uncontainable.
-
- Fleecing the
American Dream
-
- This article
explores other ways a government - business partnership
gains power and wealth. Harms the public. Heads the nation
toward insolvency, tyranny and in the end ruin. Political
theorist Sheldon Wolin refers to our "managed democracy
(and) inverted totalitarianism." Our "wielding total power
without appearing to." With no jack boots in the streets or
concentration camps. Nor "enforcing ideological uniformity,
or forcibly suppressing" dissent. America's genius is that
it appears to be a democratic showcase. Fooling most of the
people most of the time to believe it. So far.
-
- In charge -
powerful corporate giants and the rich. Feeding at the
public trough. Protected by the military-industrial complex.
Single- mindedly pursuing profits. Dismissive of public
welfare. Socially democratic institutions. Elements of
social progressivism. New Deal political and other gains.
Purposely aiming to dismantle them. Everything benefitting
people to further corporate power and privilege.
-
- Partnered with
government to do it. One of its choosing. Pursuing a policy
of empire. Doling out largesse. Transferring wealth to the
privileged. Exploiting people without their even noticing.
Waging wars for profit. Privatizing everything. Getting
around democracy through subterfuge. Making believe it's
real when it's fantasy. Heading toward when all pretense
will be gone. Remaining public revenue as well unless
boundless profligacy can be curbed. So far it's growing.
Unsustainably toward a very unpleasant future. Because
people empowered are fleecing America. Strip-mining it
toward demise. Hollowing it out. Mindless to the lessons of
history showing empires, militarism, and extremism can't
endure. Eventually will understand when it's too late to
matter.
-
-
Corporate Dominance in America
-
- Corporate giants
rule America and the world as the dominant institution of
our time. Their influence is pervasive and profound. Over
every facet of our lives. What we eat and drink. What we
wear. Where we live. What we're taught. How we get our
essential services. Where our main sources of information
come from. How we think. Who'll govern and for whose
benefit.
-
- With no
constitutional empowerment. Self-empowered collaboratively
with Congress and the courts. To "invest, speculate, trade,
and accumulate wealth," according to Michael Parenti. To
maximize shareholder equity by increasing sales and profits.
Gaining new markets, resources, and growing in size or risk
being left behind. Benefitting hugely at the public's
expense.
-
- They're run by
wealthy and powerful figures. The elitist top 1%. Owning
over one-third of the nation's wealth. Stocks, bonds, land,
natural resources, business assets and other investments. In
the most unequal of world developed countries. Rigidly class
structured. Plagued by racism and inequality. Mocking the
notion of a land of opportunity for everyone.
-
- Squandering our
national resources. Exploiting and underpaying labor.
Dismantling the social safety net. Impoverishing millions of
people. Revealing America's dark side. The failure of our
"democracy." Government's unaccountability to the public. To
provide essential services. Consumer safety. Social justice.
Concern for the environment. Closing the gap between haves
and have- nots. Having enough compassion to care.
-
- Instead, defending
the rich against the poor. Siding one-sidedly with business.
Through tax breaks. Huge subsidies. Export ones. Price
supports. Loan guarantees. R & D grants. Free use of the
public broadcasting spectrum. Bailouts. All sorts of other
measures to redistribute wealth upward to the top. Providing
legal protections and empowerment. Depriving the many for
the few. Socialism for the rich. Free-market capitalism for
most others. Sink or swim, on our own, with a disappearing
social safety net for those who can't. Redefining "justice"
to mean "just us."
-
-
Militarism and Wars for Profit - Spending
Ourselves Toward Insolvency and Ruin
-
- Since WW II,
America was unchallengeable. With no external enemies or
threats, the Soviet Union notwithstanding. Yet according to
the Center for Defense Information, 60 years of military
expenditures (in constant dollars) since 1945 totaled an
astonishing $21 trillion. And since 2001, annual defense
spending more than doubled under George Bush.
-
- Christopher
Hellman, Military Budget Analyst for the Center for Arms
Control and Nonproliferation, refers to a "runaway military
budget" with core allocations and add-ons. Including all
defense categories, FY 2008 exceeds $1 trillion for the
first time. More than the rest of the world combined.
Including war supplementals, budgets expanded dramatically
since the mid-1990s and are at the highest level since WW
II.
-
- Here's analyst
Robert Higgs' breakdown for FY 2006 in billions, and FY 2009
proposed numbers are several hundred billions higher:
-
- -- Department of
Defense: $499.4; for FY 2008, it's $623 billion with
supplemental add-ons for Iraq and Afghanistan; proposed for
FY 2009, it's $711 billion by the same calculation; other
estimates place it over $760 billion;
-
- -- Department of
Energy: $16.6
-
- -- Department of
State: $25.3
-
- -- Department of
Veterans Affairs: $69.8
-
- -- Department of
Homeland Security: $69.1
-
- -- Department of
Justice (including FBI, DEA and other federal law
enforcement agencies): $1.9
-
- -- Department of
the Treasury (for Military Retirement Fund): $38.5
-
- -- NASA: $7.6, and
-
- -- Net interest
attributable to past debt-financed defense outlays: $206.7.
-
- A total of $934.9
billion. Higgs estimated FY 2007 at $1.028 trillion, and
each year the numbers grow to more out-of-control levels.
Unsustainable, and those reported exclude black budgets for
CIA, NSA and other off-the-books operations amounting to
tens of billions more. In nominal totals and as a percent of
GDP, he calls it nonsensical. Insanity for others. A death
wish for the economy at this unsustainable level.
-
- Higgs and others
also cite the unreliability of official numbers. He believes
it's more accurate to take the Pentagon's basic budget and
double it because as much as 40% of it is black or hidden.
Concealing secret projects. Now under the most secretive
administration in our history. Also, the more powerful the
Pentagon becomes, the more spending benefits accrue to
congressional districts, and less willing Congress is to
hold it accountable.
-
- The Department of
Defense's 2007 Base Structure Report shows how large the
Pentagon has become. Even with important information left
out:
-
- -- DOD is the
world's largest landlord with over 577,500 (reported)
facilities (buildings, structures and linear structures) on
more than 5300 sites covering 32 million acres and 2.4
billion square feet of space in the US, its territories and
overseas; these numbers are way understated and are, in
fact, much higher.
-
- -- including
undisclosed ones, over 1000 overseas bases in over 150
countries; additional secret ones shared with or leased from
host countries; of varying sizes and importance, including
the largest Main Operating Bases (MOBs) for permanent combat
troops; extensive infrastructure; command and control
headquarters; and extensive accommodations in many places
for families, including hospitals, schools and recreational
facilities;
- -- about 6000
homeland bases and military warehouses, and
-
- -- from a DOD March
31, 2008 active duty personnel strength report, a total
worldwide force of 1,373,000. Of that, 1,083,000 are US-
based and in its territories; another 290,000 are abroad,
and 195,000 are "in and around Iraq as of March 31, 2008,
includ(ing) deployed Reserve/National Guard" forces; another
31,000 are in Afghanistan, including Reserves and National
Guard; the US National Guard is a joint US Army - Air Force
reserve component that numbered 460,000 as of December 31,
2007, according to the Congressional Research Service.
-
- In his 1961
farewell address, Eisenhower warned about the "military-
industrial complex." Its "grave implications" evident nearly
50 years ago. A "coalition of the military and
industrialists who profit by manufacturing arms and selling
them to government." The need to "guard against the
acquisition of unwarranted influence....by the military
industrial complex....The potential for the disastrous rise
of (its) misplaced power...."
-
- After the Vietnam
War, its resurgence under Ronald Reagan. A prelude to George
Bush's aggressive militarism. Ideologically driven. Waging
"Global Wars on Terrorism." Exploiting 9/11 fears to pursue
them. Disregarding budgeting constraints. Spending on all
sorts of new weapons systems. The way Ian Mount, Matthew
Maier and David Freedom described it on March 1, 2003 in
Business 2.0 magazine. They called it "The New Military
Industrial Complex To arm for the digital-age war, the
Pentagon has turned to a new generation of defense
contractors. The hardware is impressive. It's also deadly."
The Pentagon refers to a "revolution in military affairs (RMA)."
Building an unchallengeable high-tech arsenal. A new
military-industrial complex.
-
- The old one remains
and gets huge contracts for new and more traditional
weapons. The result of an influential "iron triangle" of
Congress, the Pentagon and defense industry. Conservative
think tanks also like:
-
- -- the Project for
a New American Century (PNAC); its "Rebuilding America's
Defenses" scheme for US global hegemony;
-
- -- the Center for
Security Policy (CSP) headed by super-hawk Frank Gaffney;
promoting a policy of "Peace through Strength" and perpetual
wars for perpetual peace;
-
- -- the Committee on
the Present Danger (CPD); its hard right leadership and
members; "fighting terrorism and the ideologies that drive
it;"
-
- -- the National
Institute for Public Policy (NIPP); its focus on defense
issues; ties to the nuclear weapons industry; and
-
- -- the Center for
Strategic and International Studies (CSIS); emphasizing
national security and "advancing (US) global interests;"
specializing in crisis management and connected to the
highest levels in government and the Pentagon.
-
- Another element is
hugely important and destructive to a free society. The
nation's 16 intelligence agencies, including CIA, NSA, DIA
(Defense Intelligence Agency), FBI, Army, Navy and Air Force
Intelligence, DHS (Department of Homeland Security), and
Department of State. A multi-billion dollar funded, largely
off-the-books, clandestine anti-democratic network.
Interconnected with thousands of private contractors. Tied
to world governments and their intelligence services. Hugely
expensive. Powerful. A force unto themselves. Secretive by
the nature of their work, and gaining strength from their
own momentum.
-
- Together they
comprise a government-military-industrial- intelligence
service-think tank colossus. Heading the nation toward
insolvency, tyranny and ruin. Wrecking the remnants of a
free society. Looting the public treasury. Pursuing a
single-minded drive for empire. Mindless to its harmful
effects. Masking it behind a democratic facade. Plagued by
the same dynamic that doomed past empires unwilling to
change.
-
- For Chalmers
Johnson: "perpetual war, the collapse of constitutional
government, endemic official lying and disinformation,
isolation, overstretch, the uniting of local and global
forces opposed to imperialism, and in the end bankruptcy."
Tyranny and ruin as well. The loss of personal freedom, and
vital social safety net essentials. An ugly America few
today can imagine. Arriving at flank speed after eight
disastrous years under George Bush with scant hope for
change under a new administration, Republican or Democrat.
-
- Ruinous
militarization is wrecking the nation. The insane amounts of
spending on it. Military Keynesianism. A permanent war
economy. Institutionalized after WW II. The current "Global
Wars on Terrorism." The misguided notion that they promote
sustainable economic growth. Mindless to their destructive
effects. Eroding our social fabric. The national and human
infrastructure. Looting the national treasury. Diverting
productive economic efforts to war making. Ignoring vital
re-industrialization needs. Instead doing the opposite.
Losing our competitiveness. Eroding our political
credibility, and leading the world solely in military might
and the recklessness to use it.
-
- It shows in waging
perpetual wars. Allowing the destruction of our
manufacturing base. Letting malls replace factories as the
nation's engine. Amassing unsustainable current account and
budget deficits. The former approaching $900 billion. The
latter to exceed $400 billion, according to a September CBO
Congressional Budget Office estimate. It excludes around
$300 billion from the Social Security "Trust Fund." Without
it, the deficit is $700 billion. Then add expected hundreds
of billions of "bailout" dollars, and the total for FY 2009
skyrockets. Will way exceed $1 trillion.
-
- Economist John
Williams says the above numbers are grossly understated.
Based on Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP), he
calculates the FY 2007 budget deficit at $1.2 trillion. Down
from $4.6 trillion in 2006 because of one-time actuarial
assumption changes. It includes the year-to-year changes in
the net present value of unfunded liabilities in programs
like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Washington
calculations are by "cash accounting" with no provisions for
future payouts in years when they accrue.
-
- By GAAP estimates,
Williams also says that total federal debt obligations rose
to $59.8 trillion in 2007 from $58.6 trillion the previous
year and that FY 2008 numbers will be higher. He reverse
engineers data. Reveals administration and congressional
bookkeeping gimmicks, and gives what he believes is a more
accurate picture of the nation's financial health. In deep
trouble by all his measures, and reckless military
Keynesianism is why. It's heading the nation toward
insolvency and getting progressively closer each year.
-
- According to
Williams, America is already bankrupt, and Bush
administration policies get much of the blame. The official
national debt was under $1 trillion in 1981. In January
2001, it was $5.7 trillion. It jumped to $9 trillion for
2007. Williams, however, puts it at $14.7 trillion, up from
$14.1 trillion in 2006. It'll easily top $15 trillion (by
his calculation) for 2008 and go far higher in future years.
-
- The culprit -
unsustainable military spending. All the worse because of
the productive investment lost. Sacrificed for unneeded
weaponry and militarism. To pursue an imperial agenda and
enrich war profiteers. At the expense of advancing the
greater good. The public interest long ago abandoned. Any
pretext that "we the people" matter. The ones who do are
them, not us.
-
-
Transferring Wealth to the Rich
-
- It's been
long-standing but became policy under Ronald Reagan.
Shifting wealth upward. Mainly to the top 1% and major
corporations. Less substantially to another 10% from over 90
million middle-class, lower-earning and poor households. By
what anthropologist David Harvey calls "accumulation by
dispossession." It shows in the decline of organized labor
from a 1950s 34.7% high to around 12% overall today and only
7% in the private sector. The lowest percentage since the
mass unionization struggles of the 1930s and in the private
sector in over 100 years.
-
- The result of a
bipartisan antipathy to workers. A one-sided pro- corporate
agenda. Allowing the dismantling of the nation's
manufacturing base. Along with it the outsourcing of
high-paying jobs. Professional ones also. Wage and benefit
losses as a result. Allowing essential government services
to erode. Replacing permanent jobs with lower-cost part-time
and temporary ones. Creating a reserve army of labor to hold
down wages and benefits. An unfair tax code restructured for
the wealthy and large companies. Forcing workers to bear a
greater burden. Using devious ways to do it. One discussed
below by the 1980s Greenspan Commission.
-
- Establishing
globalized market-based rules. Embodying them in repressive
trade agreements like NAFTA, DR-CAFTA, and an alphabet
- soup from the WTO.
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS). The General Agreement on Trade
Services (GATS). The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) and
others for one purpose. To establish uniform global trade
rules favoring capital over people. To privatize and
commoditize everything and strip-mine the planet for profit.
-
- America's 130
million working class families have suffered. Militarism and
financialization replaced productive investments.
Lower-paying service jobs in place of higher-paying ones.
People now work longer for less pay, adjusted for inflation,
and are increasingly denied benefits. Peoples' overall
standard of living declined. Two household earners are
commonplace. Struggling to get by. College degrees are more
expensive. For many unaffordable and are no longer an
assurance of good jobs and a bright future.
-
- Wealth today is
more unequally distributed than ever. Poverty levels are
rising. Millions of households are affected. The 37 million
US Census Bureau figure masks the real problem. Now
exacerbated by today's financial crisis touching many
millions more. The near-certainty that conditions will
worsen before stabilizing and improving. In the meantime, a
permanent underclass is growing. In the richest country in
the world. Heartless and mindless to the problem. One-sidely
supporting capital. Rewarding criminals for their crimes.
Allowing the middle class to erode. The poor to suffer
grievously, and millions of homeowners to lose everything
and maybe hope.
-
- For a generation or
more, an astonishing wealth transfer up occurred and is
ongoing. Income and benefit reductions. Payroll tax
increases. Loss of pensions and now savings. Well over $1
trillion annually accruing to the rich. And without most
people even noticing. The result is an unprecedented and
growing wealth disparity. An engineered enrichment of
society's richest minority.
-
- Tax cuts for the
rich. In Bush's first term, over $4 trillion. Ballooning to
$11 trillion if his cuts become permanent. Well over another
$1 trillion to corporations. For working Americans - eroding
welfare, lost opportunity, and for many any hope for a
better future. Compounded by letting trillions in wealth be
stashed in offshore tax havens from the Caribbean to Cyprus
to South Asia to the Pacific.
-
- Neither party
objects. Nor to letting corporations pay less than their
fair share. From 28% of federal revenues in the 1950s. To
21% in the 1960s. About 10% and falling since the 1980s, and
according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 94%
of major corporations now pay less than 5% of their income
in taxes. In addition, payments are the lowest in 60 years.
Many pay nothing at all. Some, including profitable ones,
get large rebates on top of huge annual subsidies. Ones
working people pay for under socialism for business and
free-market, on-your-own capitalism, for most others.
-
- For them, welfare
as we know it is disappearing. Public education eroding.
College for many unaffordable. Health care as well for
nearly 50 million uninsured and many millions more
underinsured. New Deal and Great Society programs are
eroding at a time they're most needed. To enrich the
privileged and for unsustainable militarism. Destroying the
American dream and national solvency. A free society with
it. One for "them," not "us."
-
-
Lavish (Taxpayer-Funded) Corporate
Subsidies
-
- Corporations get
tens of billions annually in taxpayer-funded subsidies.
Giveaways. From looting the national treasury and returning
nothing to the public.
-
- The Cato Institute
is no bastion of egalitarianism. It's for limited government
and unfettered "free market" capitalism. Here's what its May
2007 Policy Analysis Number 592 had to say on subsidies.
It's titled: "The Corporate Welfare State - How the Federal
Government Subsidies US Business." Cato's budget studies
director Stephen Slivinski prepared it.
-
- He calls subsidies
"corporate welfare" and defines them as "any federal
spending program that provides payments or unique benefits
and advantages to specific companies or industries." In FY
2006, he calculates it totaled $92 billion "in direct and
indirect subsidies to businesses and private-sector
corporate entities." Handouts he opposes. Examples are cash
payments to farmers, primarily to agribusiness. Others to
defense contractors. Research grants to high-tech companies,
and indirect funds such as for promoting US products and
industries overseas. Outside his definition are preferential
tax treatment and advantageous trade benefits. Combined they
add tens of billions more.
-
- "What's wrong with
federal business subsidies," Slivinski asks? Its supporters
say they're in the national interest. They promote business,
enhance US competitiveness, and remedy market failures.
Misguided reasoning for him (and Cato) as follows:
-
- -- business, not
government, is best-suited to finding the "Next Big Thing;"
-
- -- subsidies
"create an incestuous relationship between business and
government;" and
-
- -- they're
unconstitutional as opposed to infrastructure spending that
benefits everyone; business and the public.
-
- A case study
example: Agribusiness subsidies. In FY 2006, the largest of
all direct ones totaling $21 billion. In the mid-1990s,
Congress (in the 1996 Freedom to Farm Act) voted to scale
down and eliminate the program, but instead increased it to
record levels.
-
- Another example:
the 1988 Advanced Technology Program (ATP) and Small
Business Innovative Research (SBIR) one to grow the
high-tech economy. Since inception, it funded 768 ATP
projects costing $2.3 billion through 2006. Another $1
billion to SBIR. Cato calls it ill- directed. To already
generously-supported private sector research ventures in
some cases. In others, by crowding out private research
spending. The net result is that government subsidies
produce no overall increase in R & D. Instead, they
underwrite it and increase business profits - at the
taxpayers' expense.
-
- An example Cato
omitted. A likely greater subsidy than to agribusiness. One
media scholar and critic Robert McChesney has studied and
states: "The (US) media and communications systems have been
the recipients of enormous direct and indirect subsidies,
arguably as great as or greater than any other industry in
our economy." He lists:
-
- -- free monopoly
licenses to commercial radio and TV stations; spectrum for
satellite television; and monopoly cable TV and telephone
franchises; valued at about $500 billion;
-
- -- since the advent
of radio in the 1920s, this amounts to hundreds of billions
of dollars;
-
- -- many billions
more in postal subsidies for magazines, periodicals and
other publications;
-
- -- hundreds of
millions for film and television production;
- -- indirect
subsidies through government advertising;
-
- -- another one by
letting businesses write off advertising expenditures as an
expense;
-
- -- additional many
billions in political advertising during every election
cycle amounting to over 10% of commercial TV revenue;
- -- what McChesney
calls perhaps the largest subsidy of all - copyrights; "a
government-created (and enforced) monopoly right to
eliminate the possibility of competitive markets;" and
-
- -- an indirect
subsidy in the form of government serving as a "powerful
lobbying force for commercial media oversea to see that
foreign governments change regulations and divert subsidies
to the benefit of US communications firms."
-
- Though no precise
calculations have been made on these benefits, McChesney
believes combined they're worth up to hundreds of billions
annually. Without people even noticing or that commercial
broadcasters exploit the public airwaves solely for their
own benefit. They and other industries feed at the public
trough. The amount of free money they get is enormous.
Taxpayer dollars fund it with no reciprocal benefit. Another
component of the fleecing of America.
-
- More largesse to
the nuclear industry. In the mid-1990s, it was on its knees.
Strapped by unmanageable debt from billions in cost overruns
and plant shutdowns. Plagued by aging reactors. Expensive
and shoddy maintenance. Haunted by Chernobyl and Three Mile
Island. No nuclear power plant has been built in America
since the 1970s. The last one to start up was the Tennessee
Valley Authority's Watts Bar reactor in 1996 after 23 years
of construction delays.
-
- Today a revival is
underway because of unprecedented subsidies from the 2005
Energy Policy Act along with generous state incentives.
Without them, no new plants would be proposed. Nuclear power
is unsafe, uneconomic, uncompetitive, and unneeded, despite
what its advocate say. Its costs are also rising, and the
industry is plagued with huge cost-overruns. Building a new
plant runs somewhere between $5 - $12 billion dollars
depending on its capacity and problems related to bringing
it online.
-
- Nonetheless, 30 new
reactors are proposed for the US alone. Some in the planning
stages. Others close to groundbreaking. Because of more than
$13 billion in industry subsidies and tax breaks. Unlimited
taxpayer-backed loan guarantees. Limited liability in case
of accidents under the Price-Anderson Act. Absolving
companies of most costs if they happen. Various other
incentives as well to revive a moribund industry. For
construction, R & D, operations, nuclear waste disposal, and
eventual shutdowns. More coming if the administration's
requested 37% FY 2009 nuclear program appropriation increase
is approved. At the same time, a 27% energy efficiency and
renewable energy budget reduction was proposed.
-
-
The Great Social Security Heist
-
- Until the present
fraud-based financial crisis, it was the largest modern era
wealth transfer from the public to the rich. Engineered by
Alan Greenspan in 1981 as head of the National Commission on
Social Security Reform. Called the Greenspan Commission to
address "the short-term financing crisis that Social
Security faced." Based on the fraudulent claim that the
Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund "would run out of
money as early as August 1983." It wouldn't then nor will it
now.
-
- In January 1983,
the Commission issued its report. Congress, in turn, used it
to enact Social Security Amendments to "resolve short- term
financing problems and (make) many other significant changes
in Social Security law" harmful to the public interest.
-
- A menu of changes
were enacted, including a "consensus package" to fix the
problem by raising payroll taxes on incomes but exempting
the rich beyond a maximum level. It also raised the
retirement age in incremental steps. The result:
-
- -- working
Americans bare the brunt of this unfair regressive tax;
-
- -- the rich barely
feel it;
-
- -- low income
earners pay more payroll than income tax; and
-
- -- the working poor
have an enormous unaffordable burden; many earn too little
to pay income taxes; yet they're not exempt from paying 6.2%
of their wages for Social Security and another 1.45% for
Medicare; employers match them with equal amounts, but it's
not surprising that they pass on these costs through lower
pay and benefits; an effective and unfair 15.3% of income
burden for wage earners.
-
- The public was told
that the changes would make Social Security solvent for the
next 75 years. They weren't told that the program was sound
and needed no restructuring. That doing it was to transfer
massive wealth amounts from working Americans and the poor
to the rich. One part of a greater Reagan administration
scheme to shift more of it upward. In addition to
restructuring individual and corporate income taxes between
1981 to 1986.
-
- The rich benefitted
most with top rates dropping from 70% in 1981 to 50% over
three years and then to 28% in 1986. At the same time, the
lowest rate actually rose from 11 to 15%. It was the first
time that US income tax rates were simultaneously reduced at
the top and raised at the bottom. Even worse was that Reagan
and Greenspan collaboratively defrauded the public.
-
- By engineering the
largest ever income tax cut for the rich combined with the
greatest one ever affecting working Americans earning
$30,000 or less. The payroll tax was doubled, and "Trust
Fund" revenues were then used to reduce budget deficits. The
tax code became hugely regressive, and for the first time a
pay-as-you- go retirement and disability program became one
where wage earner contributions subsidize the rich as well
as support current beneficiaries.
-
- The wealth gap
began widening. Today it's unprecedented with the top 1%
owning 40% of global assets. The top 10% around 85% of them.
The top 1% over one-third of the nation's wealth. The bottom
80% just 15.3%. The top 20% nearly 85%, and in contrast, the
poorest 20% in debt owing more than they own. The result of
a generational wealth transfer as well as the added effects
of globalization, automation, outsourcing, the shift from
manufacturing to services, deregulation, weak unions and
declining membership, and government indifference to human
needs. More than ever under George Bush.
-
- Now compounded by a
deepening financial crisis of unknown magnitude. The
potentially catastrophic fallout from it. Rescue packages
for business alone, and millions of working Americans left
to fend for themselves in a very uncertain environment. The
result of fleecing America. Letting greedy bankers profit
from it. Commit massive fraud and get away with it. Reward
them for their crimes. Looting the national treasury to pay
for them. Is public anger so surprising? Only that it hasn't
boiled over on the streets of the nation's Capitol. Maybe in
time as things keep worsening and Washington only worries
about Wall Street.
-
- Stephen Lendman is
a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on
Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
-
- Also visit his blog
site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global
Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from
11AM - 1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions on
world and national topics with distinguished guests. All
programs are archived for easy listening.
-
-
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10442
Source:
http://www.rense.com/general83/fleec.htm
|
The
October Surprise -
Global Panic
By Stephen Lendman
10-13-8
.....Since 9/11, the notion of an October surprise
has been around. The idea going something like this.
Another real or manufactured terror attack.
The dominant media stokes fear.
The public is again traumatized.
The Bush administration pledges all effective measures
to protect national security. Formerly seizes total power.
Suspends the Constitution and declares martial law.
Mass detentions follow.....
The talented Mr. Greenspan
salon.com > News Jan. 10, 2000
The Federal Reserve chairman has resisted
slowing the economy while waiting for his reappointment,
but will he put the brakes on now?
By Ian Williams
....For example, reportedly he is a staunch atheist,
but that did not stop him taking an oath on the Talmud
(held by his aged mum) to become chairman
of Nixon's Council of Economic Advisors,
while his prophetess Ayn Rand beamed away in the front row.
Apart from his quasi-cultist past, the main problem
with Greenspan is that he has too much power based on
his alleged powers of economic prediction....
The Bankers 9/11
10-8-8
The US - now world - financial
crisis
has given nations a golden opportunity,
but will they seize it,
asks Eric Walberg
Grand Theft America
By Stephen Lendman
9-29-8
.....The result of unfettered capitalism's fatal flaw
- unbridled greed in a rigged system that rewards
the few at the expense of most others.
First an explanation of how it works.
Free-wheeling, "free market" Chicago School
fundamentalism the way economist Milton Friedman
championed it in his 1962 book
"Capitalism and Freedom" and taught it
to students for decades....
|