THE FRANKLIN
COVER-UP Child Abuse,
Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
"Conspiracy of
Silence" is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a
nationwide child abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest
levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a
highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state
senator, "Conspiracy of Silence" reveals how rogue elements at all
levels of government have been involved in systematic child abuse
and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Based on DeCamp's riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, "Conspiracy
of Silence" begins with the shut-down of Nebraska's Franklin
Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in
November 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the
Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what
initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a
startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child
abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief
investigator died suddenly and violently, like more than a dozen
other people linked to the Franklin case.
So why have you never heard of the Franklin cover-up? Originally
scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel,
"Conspiracy of Silence" was yanked at the last minute due to
formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful
people did not want you to watch this documentary.
You may find yourself becoming angry or upset while watching
"Conspiracy of Silence." Many people do. However, consider that each
of us has at times in our life acted out of selfish motives when it
comes to sexuality and ended up hurting others in one way or
another. Let us take this information not only as a call to stop
this kind of abuse at the nationwide level, but also as a call to
examine our own sexual relationships and make a commitment to deep
honesty and integrity in our own lives around this most sensitive
issue. Thanks for caring and may we all work together to build a
brighter future for ourselves and for our world.
A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former
Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it
available to retired FBI Agent Ted L. Gunderson. While the video
quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is
revealed by the participants involved.
NOTE; This film had to be reassembled from remaining VHS fragments
after an all-out effort was made to block the films release and
destroy all extant copies. Every effort has been made to restore it
to the original and complete "meant to be broadcast" version.
Dedicated to the children who have been, or will be, abused
because of the Franklin cover-up.
Second edition 1996 @ 1992 AWT, Inc. ISBN:
0-9632158-0-9 Library of Congress Catalog Number: 92-070074
First edition: First printing, May 1992 Second printing, August
1992 Third printing, February 1994
Second Edition: First printing, December 1996 Second printing,
January 2001
CHAPTER 21
DRUGS AND THE MONARCH PROJECT
On August 18-20, 1996, a California newspaper, the San Jose
Mercury, published a series of articles implicating elements
of the U.S. government in running tons of cocaine into U.S.
cities during the 1980s. Based upon recently declassified
government documents, eyewitness reports, and court records,
Mercury reporter Gary Webb provided a detailed account of
how the Contras financed their war against the Sandinista regime
of Nicaragua by flying tons of cocaine into the West Coast,
where it would be turned into the deadly, instantly addictive
"crack," and sold to such street gangs as the Cryps and the
Bloods.
All
of this began after the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s passed
the Boland Amendment, which stopped all official financing for
U.S. intelligence's "covert war" in Nicaragua. The whole project
was taken "off-line," and financed by drug sales-the subject of
Webb's articles.
Indignation exploded when Mercury series hit the streets.
Maxine Waters, Congresswoman for South-Central Los Angeles, one
of the areas hardest hit by crack and drug-related violence,
sent a letter to Central Intelligence Agency chief John Deutsch
demanding an investigation of the Agency, in which she said, "As
someone who has seen how the crack cocaine trade has devastated
the South-Central Los Angeles community, I cannot exaggerate my
feelings of dismay that my own government may have played a part
in the origins and history of this problem. . . . The impact and
the implications of the Meneses/Blandon/Roiss Contra CIA crack
cocaine connection cannot be understated. We all have an
obligation to get to the very bottom of the origin, development,
and implementation of this seedy enterprise."
While many were shocked at the news of apparent U.S. government
drug-pushing, to me it was one more confirmation of a key aspect
of the Franklin case. As I had discovered early on (as had Gary
Caradori), the sexual abuse of children was only one part of the
Franklin story. During the 1980s, many of the children, such as
Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci, said that they had been used as
drug couriers to bring cocaine in from the West Coast for Alan
Baer, Larry King, and others.
Then, on September 11, 1996, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
Representative Harold James, chairman of Pennsylvania's
Legislative Black Caucus, and a former undercover narcotics cop
himself, also put out a call for an investigation. In the course
of that press conference another name popped up, that I knew
well from the Franklin investigation: George Bush.
Flanked by political leaders of both the city and the state,
James declared: "As a retired undercover Philadelphia police
officer who worked on narcotics cases, I know we can better
impact the flow of drugs if we stop drugs from coming into this
country, arrest those at the top levels of control, and punish
the white-collar dealers who try to keep their hands clean while
they run the entire operation. On this occasion, we must not
allow anyone to use the 'pretext of national security to
accomplish another cover-up. We need an investigation that goes
right to the top."
As
to where the "top" might be, James charged, in his release to
the press, "previous investigations of the Iran-Contra scandal,
particularly the U.S. House and Senate joint hearings in 1987,
revealed the central role played by then Vice-President George
Bush in covert intelligence operations. . . . One of Bush's key
lieutenants was Oliver North. Bush was also appointed by Reagan
to run the National Narcotics Border Interdiction Sys- tem,
which supposedly coordinated efforts of all federal, state and
local anti-drug agencies, especially along the south Florida
coast. Bush was responsible for the White House anti-drug effort
while, at the same time, according to the recent newspaper
reports, tons of cocaine were allegedly supplied to street gangs
by CIA-related networks."
Concluded James, "There's something wrong with this picture." In
response to a question from one of the ten reporters in
attendance about the role of Bush, Philadelphia City Council
President John Street replied, "If George Bush is involved in
it, someone should find it out. This kind of activity has been
going on for well over a decade."
Lt.
Col. Oliver North - whom at least one witness reported seeing at
a party thrown by Larry King-had overseen the Contra resupply
effort, and had been fully aware of the plane-loads of drugs
coming into the United States. A U.S. Senate subcommittee report
under Massachusetts Senator John Kerry cited extensive evidence
that the Contras were involved in drugs, and North had noted the
fact in his publicly exposed note-books.
From
what I know from my own corner of the world, there is excellent
reason to investigate Bush for possible involvement in the dope
business. Think back to what I reported in Chapter 13, "The
Washington Connection," about how George Bush and Larry King
were linked in multiple ways, including eyewitness reports
placing Bush at King's sex parties. Think about the constant
rumors that King was financing the Contras, who have now been
proved to have been running dope by the ton.
The
first investigative reporter to ever look at Franklin, the
World Herald's James Flanery, told associates that King was
"running guns and money into Nicaragua," and that the CIA was
heavily involved. (Flanery was soon taken off the story and
shipped out of state for a year.)
Records exist to show that Larry King was a top contributor to a
Contra "support committee," the Citizens for America (CFA).
King's own public relations firm was also used by the Contras.
I
became convinced early on that King was deeply involved with the
Contras. I am reminded of the phone call State Senator Loran
Schmit received on the Senate floor as the Franklin case was
just beginning to break. The caller warned him off the case,
because "it would lead to the highest levels of the Republican
party." I am reminded of when Larry King was finally
arrested-just as he was about to go to a breakfast party in
Omaha for his buddy, George Bush! I am reminded of the reports I
used to hear that certain people in Omaha were charging that
Omaha Police Chief Bob Wadman was protecting the expansion of
the Cryps and Bloods into Omaha-far from their home turf of Los
Angeles.
So,
was Larry King's buddy George Bush the country's "drug kingpin"
in the 1980s? I don't know. But what I do know, is that
if Bush were running the Contra affair, and drugs were a
big part of it, that would certainly jibe 100% with everything
known or rumored about Bush, Larry King, and the Franklin Credit
Union. Congresswoman Maxine Waters and Representative Harold
James are right - let's investigate!
. . .
As
follow-up investigation from the Franklin case shows, drugs are
not the deepest level of government -sponsored evil. I think the
lowest level of Hell is reserved for those who conjured up and
carried out the "Monarch Project."
"Monarch" refers to young people in America who were victims of
mind control experiments run either by U.S. government agencies
such 'as the Central Intelligence Agency, or military
intelligence agencies.
The story told by Monarch victims - one of whom is Paul Bonacci
- is that they were tortured for the purpose of creating
"multiple personalities" within them. These multiple
personalities could then be programmed as desired - as spies,
"drug mules," prostitutes, or assassins.
Because of legal cases still pending, I am severely limited in
what I can say about the Monarch Project. Suffice it to say at
this point:
Major intelligence programs in this country did and do exist for
the purpose of protection of this country and to learn what
other countries, particularly our Cold War enemies, were doing
in this area of mind control.
I asked Bill Colby to tell me what he could or would, about
this. He said:
"Of
course the CIA in particular was involved in investigating,
learning and, on occasion, using, everything we could learn
about mind control-and with extremely good reason. Following the
Korean War, this country's military and intelligence communities
went through a period of absolute paranoia about just how far
our enemies were ahead of us in mind control and related
activities.
"There was no particular program called' Monarch,' contrary to
what you want to think. 'Monarch' was merely a name that some
participants in the program-who knew very little about it, other
than from their own limited participation-were given to identify
themselves. But, as far as the CIA was concerned, there was no
such program named 'Monarch.'
"But, with respect to mind control, I will tell you that this
country spent millions upon millions supposedly catching up to
our Cold War adversaries, because we believed they had developed
mind control technology which exceeded anything we had. In fact,
we at the Company [CIA] truly believed for a substantial period
of time, that technology and techniques and drugs had been
developed by Russia which would enable them to have agents who
in fact really were able to have and use ESP-extra sensory
perception.
"Can
you imagine," Bill continued, "how dangerous for this country it
would be if you could have had someone meeting the President of
the United States, who was actually able to read what was in the
President's mind?
"I
know," Bill continued, "it may sound silly today to get all
carried away with this fear; but I can tell you that we took it
all very seriously and believed this ESP thing for some
significant time period.
"I
will tell you one other thing," Bill said, somewhat ominously,
"we are not behind in knowledge of mind control. In fact, we
never were, but we only found that out much later, after we had
poured incredible resources into this area. And yes, I am sure,
there were some problems and abuses that occurred and we will
talk about them at another time."
We
did have that other talk. And, I intend, when I am freed from
court restrictions, to tell that entire story in an upcoming
book. I have deposited extensive documentation on the Monarch
Project with people who have the means, the motivation, and,
most importantly, the guts, to print the entire story, should I
suffer an "accident" before I get around to it. Here, I will
merely quote from the work of one of America's finest
investigative reporters, Anton Chaitkin.
I
had known of Chaitkin, who writes for Executive Intelligence
Review magazine, from the book he co-authored with Webster
Tarpley, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography. This
659-page-book is a devastating expose of Bush, and it played a
notable role in helping to shape the 1992 presidential campaign,
which Bush happily lost.
Perhaps it was because the name "Bush" was
all over the Franklin scandal, that Chaitkin showed up one day
in my Lincoln law office. I told him, "Look, I know you have
been in some tough spots before, but are you really sure you
want to poke around in this? This question of 'mind control' -
the Monarch Project - is the most scary and, dangerous thing I
have ever encountered." As I came to know Anton, probably all
that little lecture did was to spur him on. Chaitkin got his
story on the Monarch Project, and printed it in the December 13,
1993, New Federalist newspaper under the headline,
"Franklin Case Witnesses Implicate FBI and U.S. Elites in
Child-Torture and Murder." Here follows an abbreviated version
of that article:
. . .
WHAT IS THE
FBI PROTECTING?
Since the 1992 publication of John DeCamp's book, The
Franklin Cover-Up, Paul Bonacci has filed new affidavits and
has given extensive interviews to investigators including
reporters for Executive Intelligence Review and New
Federalist. Bonacci's disclosures have been cross-gridded
with evidence supplied by authorities in law enforcement,
psychiatry, and the intelligence community. The result goes a
long way to explain the high stakes involved, and the frantic
nature of the Franklin cover-up. . . .
Paul Bonacci has described in detail being
dragged to Washington for use as a sex toy for Larry King's
clients. Bonacci told investigators he was in one of the private
White House tours for young male prostitutes conducted by
lobbyist Craig Spence, a close political associate of Larry King
in the cloak-and-dagger Contras enterprise. Spence turned up
dead in a Boston hotel room in 1989, soon after his and King's
"compromising" business was exposed in a Washington Times
June 29, 1989 story, headlined: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry
Ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush."
'MONARCH': OR, AUSCHWITZ - TAKE 2
From very early childhood, Paul Bonacci was subjected to
tortures as profound as any the Nazis inflicted on their
captives. This is not merely a comparison; rather it is an
actual continuation, as we shall see. From sexual degradation,
from
witnessing and forced participation in Satanic cult murders,
Bonacci suffered the cracking of his mind into what is called
"multiple personality disorder" (MPD). Tens of thousands of
American children have been diagnosed MPDs; virtually all of
them are thought to have resulted from sexual abuse, of which
perhaps 85 percent were cases of Satanic ritual abuse.
Psychiatric professionals specified in
Paul Bonacci's legal proceedings that through it all, Paul's
different "personalities" have emerged incapable of lying, with
an ultra-sharp memory. In one instance detailed in The
Franklin Cover- Up, Paul was taken by Larry King and others
to a wooded area in California - identified after publication as
the Bohemian Grove. There Paul and another boy were forced to do
sex acts with and to consume parts of a child whom they had
watched being murdered by the cultists. The body was to be
disposed of by "the men with the hoods." A "snuff" pornography
film was made of these events; it was directed by a man the
party had picked up in Las Vegas whom Paul identified as "Hunter
Thompson" -the same name as a well known sleaze-culture figure.
Paul has told investigators that the ring
which plunged him into Satanism was centered at Offutt U.S. Air
Force Base near Omaha; that he was taken to Offutt to be
sexually victimized by a babysitter's boyfriend when he was
about three years old, around 1970. Offutt is the headquarters
for the Strategic Air Command, and has had a cadre of thousands
of intelligence personnel.
At Offutt, and later at other military
installations, Paul says this ring "trained" him by tortures,
heavy drugging, and sexual degradation, while instructing him in
military arts including assassination. In fact, his personal
knowledge in these realms can scarcely be accounted for other
than by crediting the indictments he has made.
Larry King, FBI agent Gerry Wahl/ Alan
Baer, Harold Andersen, and former Omaha Police Chief Robert
Wadman have all been reported as collaborators with this Satanic
military-based ring. King reportedly told Paul's captors at
Offutt, "He's young-but you trained him good." A member of
Nebraska's Concerned Parents group reported hearing from two
North Omaha witnesses that "King used to send limousines down to
Offutt Air Base to pick up CIA agents for parties." Larry King
reported his own adoring relationship to the late CIA Director
William Casey in a Sept. 7, 1988, interview in the Omaha
publication Metropolitan.
Psychiatrists who have treated a growing
number of MPD cases, victims of Satanic ritual abuse, report an
alarming pattern of findings in many of their child patients.
There is a structure to the personalities, conforming to
what is evidently a deliberate breaking and reshaping of the
mind. This phenomenon was identified to Paul Bonacci by his
tormenters, and to other victims and witnesses, as the "Monarch"
project. At Offutt Airbase, Paul was told that what he and other
children were being subjected to was in aid of national
security.
The use of mind-altering drugs, sensory
deprivation, and other brainwashing techniques on U.S. citizens
as subjects was the admitted practice of the CIA, certain
military arms and private institutions joined in the MK-ULTRA,
Artichoke, and Bluebird projects beginning in the early 1950s. A
national security pretext often cited was the need to keep up
with the Soviets in the race to develop a workable Manchurian
Candidate human robot. With the "Monarch" (or whatever official
title may be attached to it) project, the idea is extended to
the production of a horde of children in whom the soul is
crushed, who would spy, whore, kill, and commit suicide.
The material presented here, on this
subject, must be under- stood to be only a bare introduction to
a complex story with immense political and strategic
ramifications. It is a beginning. Professionals probing the
child victims of "Monarch" say there are clearly two responsible
elements at work: the government/military, and cooperating
Satanic (or more exactly pagan) cults. These are
multi-generation groups, where parents donate their own
children-who are proudly called "bloodline" or simply "blood"
cultists - to be smashed with drugs and electric shock, and
shaped. Other children are kidnapped and sold into this hell, or
are brought in gradually through day-care situations.
Paul Bonacci and other child victims have
given evidence in great depth on the central role of Lt. Co!.
Michael Aquino in this depravity. Aquino, alleged to have
recently retired from an active military role, was long the
leader of an Army psycho- logical warfare section which drew on
his "expertise" and personal practices in brainwashing,
Satanism, Nazism, homo- sexual pedophilia and murder.
A former director of the CIA
was asked directly, "what about 'Monarch' "? He replied angrily,
and ambiguously, "We stopped that between the late 1960s and the
early 1970s." If a statement of fact, this would presumably
relate to official participation of the CIA.
SOME CODES AND
ASSIGNMENTS
The disclosures of
Paul Bonacci, which cohere with reports of MPD professionals in
other cases, point to a particular artificially induced mental
structure as common to many victimized children. Space permits
only the briefest treatment of this here; this is intended
mainly to begin to "blow the circuits," so to speak, when
followed up by professional therapists and investigators.
These are some of the widely occurring
separate "persons" which have been formed under torture, and the
corresponding "triggers":
.General
personality-accessible under the code name ALPHA, with possible
Alpha-001, Alpha-009, etc. "persons" with distinct task
orientations.
.Sex programs,
accessible through code name BETA; particular programs (and thus
commands) are for pornography, acting, oral sex, etc.
.Assassination
programs, utilizing very specific modes, and espionage,
accessible through code DELTA.
.OMEGA,
self-destruction programs, ranging from self mutilation to
suicide by many different specific possible acts.
.GAMMA, system
deception, amnesia and disinformation programs. Under this or
'other codes are track-covering false origins for the structure,
giving the child memories of tormenters dressed as space aliens
or Mickey Mouse or in Wizard of Oz costumes.
There are said to be such other
personality levels as Master Programmer, Black Master, and
different mental levels of backup programs. There are
reported to be personnel who have large numbers of
child-victims' assignments and triggers neatly filed in their
little computers.
Paul Bonacci reports the following
"Monarch"-related activities, often involving his "Commander" at
Offutt AFB, Bill Plemmons, and Lt. Co!. Michael Aquino:
.Picking up cash in
exchange for drugs at various Tennessee locations. Bonacci
identifies several country music personalities as contacts.
.Trips on behalf of the
North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), the pedophile
group now given semi- official status by the United Nations.
Paul cites travel to the Netherlands and Germany carrying child
pornography for sub- sequent "import" to the U.S.A. to avoid
prosecution. In Amsterdam, he names "Charles Hester," and the
British "Tommie Carter," who had on computer a global list of
child pornography users. NAMBLA is also cited for organizing
auctions of children.
.Travel to Hawaii, New
York, Washington (in connection with Craig Spence) to compromise
public figures by performing homosexual pedophile sex with them.
.The trip to California
where the boy was ritually murdered, accompanied by "Monarch"
contact, Mark Johnson of Denver, Colorado,
.Travel to .Mexico for
the transportation of drugs, guns, and children. Paul was
accompanied by the gangster-figure "Emilio," who otherwise
directed the kidnapping of Johnny Gosch of Des Moines, Iowa.
Johnny Gosch's parents commend Paul Bonacci as an accurate
witness relative to that crime.
.Training under
"Captain Foster" (survival skills) at Fort Riley, Kansas, under
"Lt. Dave Bannister" (intelligence) at Fort Bragg, North
Carolina, under "Col. Harris Livik" at Fort Defiance, Virginia,
who is said to run a military school and to have housed
"Monarch" boys. "Col. Bill Risher" of Bamberg, South Carolina,
is said to have supplied children for Michael Aquino.
.Travel to Dresden in
communist East Germany, where weapons were inspected. There and
in the Federal Republic of Germany, the "Monarch" personnel were
frequently neo-Nazis. This milieu is a special project of Lt.
Col. Aquino, who was a West European adviser to the U.S. Chiefs
of Staff. Paul Bonacci has extensive experience in the Aryan
Nation and other White Supremacist cults.
An account of the origin of the "Monarch"
project has been compiled by those who have been debriefing MPD
child-victims. Nazi experimentation in World War II
concentration camps were said to have gone beyond simply insane
physical tortures. They brainwashed people, for military and
strategic purposes. After the war, Allen Dulles and other
Western intelligence people brought Nazi doctors out for use in
the United States. A teenaged concentration camp inmate named
Greenbaum, who had participated to save himself, also came to
the United States. Known later as "Dr. Green," he became a high-
level brainwasher, and is widely represented in brainwashing
programs with a distinctive Cabalistic magic theme.
The precise details of these horrors lie
deeply buried in national security archives. But this history,
as told to psychiatrists, dovetails with what is definitively
known about Anglo- American intelligence operations and the
German Nazis. And once again, the story goes right back to
Nebraska.
The killers in the Nazi camps were
themselves trained and organized by psychiatrists and
eugenicists, operating from the "T4" bureau. These psychiatrists
had long been the pets of white supremacist British and American
financier networks.
At least some of these Nazi doctors were
spirited out of Germany under the supervision of for Bank of
England Governor Montagu Norman and Tavistock Institute Director
John R. Rees on behalf of the British government. Norman,
personally an insane Theosophist who had been chief of the
prewar pro-Nazi faction within England, and Rees organized
postwar propaganda and continuing psychological warfare
activities, and created "Orwellian" groupings within U.S.
psychiatry and mental health fields.
EPILOGUE
I finally understood the true meaning of the Franklin case one
night in early 1996. Watching television and skipping through
the channels, I came upon the movie Billy Budd. Instantly
I zeroed in on this movie, and my heart, rather than the
channels, started skipping.
By the time the movie ended, the Franklin
cover-up made sense. Alisha Owen's imprisonment for telling the
truth made sense. The protection of the perpetrators by our
highest public officials, finally made sense. I understood,
also, why it was necessary to discredit me, John DeCamp, and to
kill Gary Caradori, with his eight-year-old son. Any nagging
doubts I may have had about any aspects of Paul Bonacci's
charges were laid to rest. And it was clear to me, at last, that
public officials at all levels knew Paul was telling the
truth, as they set out to destroy him.
Where did the blinding revelation come
from? Let me go back a few months, to my last attempt to get a
new trial for Alisha Owen. At that hearing, Troy Boner, who had
originally told Gary Caradori the truth, and who had been forced
to recant, was preparing to testify - to tell the truth as you
read it in his affidavit in Chapter 21. Troy Boner was going to
provide the information in open court, under oath, that would
blow the lid off the Franklin case and force a new trial for
Alisha Owen.
As Troy came into the
courthouse, he was immediately ushered into a private room by
county judicial authorities. He was advised that a "Special
Attorney" had been appointed to protect him. For approximately
one hour, while the hearing was delayed, Troy was
cornered in a room with this "Special Attorney" and with other
officials from the prosecutor's office, the very same
prosecutorial team Troy was about to testify against.
When Troy came out of the meeting, I knew
he was broken, his morale smashed. His head hung down. He could
not, or would not look at anyone.
As I approached Troy, his new
court-appointed attorney tried to step between us. With probably
the last ounce of courage he could muster, Troy leaned over and
whispered to me, "Oh God, forgive me. They guaranteed if I talk
here today, they will put me away for twenty years. Guaranteed I
would never see the light of day again. Told me that I would be
charged with perjury for my original testimony, if I opened my
mouth today in court. Don't ~all me up there. I can't survive in
prison. I know they can put me there. Look what they did to
Alisha. Look what they did to my brother. I've got no choice.
They told me I had to take the Fifth Amendment and refuse to
testify. Otherwise, they promised I would be taken directly from
court to jail"
We all proceeded into the court room,
where I called Troy to the stand. I showed Troy his affidavit.
He hung his head, and when I asked my first question, "Would you
please state your name?" Troy responded, "I take the Fifth
Amendment," an answer he repeated, in a barely audible voice, to
all my other questions.
It was hopeless. I ceased my questioning, and shortly thereafter
the hearing ended.
I walked back to the judge's chambers to
clear up any final details. Judge Enbody had been specially
appointed by the Nebraska State Supreme Court to this hearing,
which I had won from the Supreme Court based on Troy's new
information. (The next day I learned that he had been appointed
to the Court of Appeals-a very substantial advancement in his
career.)
Sitting in Judge Enbody's chambers, with
my head hung so low it was hitting my shoestrings, I was given
the key to unlock the meaning of Franklin. "I do not understand
it, Your Honor," I kept repeating. "As God is my witness, I do
not think that there is a judge or other person involved in this
case who does not know that horrible injustice has been done.
Everybody knows that Alisha Owen is telling the truth and
that she is being punished for it. And, Your Honor, a person has
to be deaf, dumb, blind, and totally dishonest, not to know that
some of this state's and nation's top businessmen and public
officials have engaged in the worst crimes possible, which are
now being covered up. And these kids, instead of being honored
and protected for exposing these things, are being sent to
prison. Why? Why? Why?"
Judge Enbody looked at me. Slowly, his
voice shaking, he began to talk.
"I am just a man. I am not a god. I wish I
were. I have no choice in what I have done. I am just a man,
just a man, not a god. I am doing what I must do with the
evidence before me," Judge Enbody concluded. He appeared even
more shaken and upset than I was.
I shook my head. "I don't understand. I
just don't understand," I kept repeating. "Everybody knows what
is happening, but nobody is willing to do anything about it.
Why? Why?!!" Judge Enbody looked at me and said, very slowly,
"If you want to understand the entire Franklin case, I can help
you. Go read 'Billy Budd.' Read 'Billy Budd.' If you will do
that, John, and if you understand the book, then you will
understand the what and why of Franklin, and why it can be no
other way. I do not say you will like it. I do not say you will
agree with it. But at least you will understand it. That, I
promise you. Go read 'Billy Budd'."
Those were the last words I spoke with the
Judge on the case. I left his chambers, burnt out, but angry.
And I forgot all about Billy Budd, until the night I happened
upon the movie. The story of Billy Budd is set in the British
Navy near the end of the eighteenth century. Billy was a young
sailor, who, although impressed into the British Navy, bore no
ill will to the authorities for having dragooned him; indeed, he
was the very picture of innocence and good-will, and was almost
universally loved aboard his war-ship. One officer, however,
developed an insane jealousy of Billy, and set out to frame him
up for allegedly inciting mutiny. Since there had been several
notorious mutinies in the British fleet at the time, the mere
whisper of "mutiny" was enough to spread panic among the ship's
officers.
To make a long story short, because of
certain incriminating appearances in the case, the
captain and his senior officers, although they knew Billy was
innocent of all charges, nonetheless sentenced him to hang, a
necessity - as they viewed it - to "save the system," not just
on their own ship, but in the British fleet as a whole.
Now I think I do understand the Franklin
case. I know, now, that all the public officials involved in
Franklin-whether they ever heard of Billy Budd or not-fully
understood what they were doing.
And what they all have done,
and will continue to do in this case, Franklin, and no doubt
many others like it, is this: Protect the "system" at all costs.
The "system" is the only ultimate sacred cow-not any particular
law or constitution, but only "the system." Because, ultimately,
it is the system which makes certain that the individuals
functioning within it - from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors,
to politicians, to businessmen - have their places and
positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future.
And, though it is
unfortunate, that on occasion the protection of the "system"
requires the deliberate sacrifice of perfectly innocent people,
that is hoped overall to be the exception rather than the rule.
But without the "system". .
So, Judge Enbody, now I understand. And,
as you said, I may not agree, but I do understand.
But then I have one final, nagging
question. How do I know when, or if, the "system" itself has
become so corrupted, that evil is the rule, rather than the
exception? And when that occurs, what do I do about it?
But I think I know the answer to that one - my oId commanding
officer in Vietnam told me what I had to do. I made some
promises to Bill, and I intend to keep them.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Senator John DeCamp has the honor of being the Nebraska state
senator most praised and most attacked by the Omaha World
Herald. He was hailed by that paper as the most powerful and
effective senator, between 1976 and 1986. During the past two
years, the World Herald has attacked him, sometimes
daily, for daring to fight against the drug runners and
pedophiles they protect.
Today, Senator DeCamp is the lawyer for
two victim-witnesses in the Franklin case, Paul Bonacci and
Alisha Owen.
DeCamp is known for his tendency to
"overturn the apple cart," and powerful people shake in their
boots when DeCamp files an aggressive civil rights suit. There
is a method behind this approach, in a state where cowardly
cover-up and pitiful inaction have become all too common.
DeCamp served as an officer in Vietnam,
and has often said that because of what he has seen, he is
determined that the United States must never become a "closed
society," where freedom would disappear as the citizens lost the
opportunity to know or affect what was happening around them.
DeCamp was born in Nebraska, but his
unusual experiences early in life helped make him a man of
uncommon independence and determination. On his own from the age
of thirteen, he traveled, lived, and worked in Europe and Iran.
John DeCamp was a captain in
the infantry in the Vietnam War and also served with the CORDS
program there. He was decorated, and honored at the White House,
as one of the outstanding veterans of the Vietnam War. He is
proud thathe was also the initiator and
organizer of the internationally famous Operation Baby Lift,
which evacuated 2,800 Vietnamese children who were orphaned in
the war in 1975. All the children were subsequently reunited
with people from their families, or adopted. On one flight
alone, nearly 800 children were evacuated, probably the most
people ever flown on one plane. DeCamp and his wife were foster
parents for some of these children, until they could be placed
for adoption. They have four children of their own.
While still in Vietnam, DeCamp became the
first person ever to win election to the Nebraska Legislature,
while serving in combat abroad. Although known as a key figure
in Nebraska politics, he was not known to agree to any political
deal that would compromise his principles. Senator DeCamp was
regarded as powerful, but not politically "owned." He once
bucked political powerbroker Eugene Mahoney, by running against
Mahoney's choice for U.S. Senator.
As a Vietnam veteran with thirty percent
disability, DeCamp has been the attorney and state lobbyist for
both the Disabled American Veterans and the Veterans of Foreign
Wars, and a national committeeman of the VFW and member of the
American Legion.
John DeCamp has emphasized that in his
mind, his experience in saving the defenseless children who were
victims of war, and his commitment to save children victimized
by the pedophile ring, are equivalent. At the beginning of 1991,
DeCamp filed a twelve-count suit in federal court, charging
sixteen prominent individuals and institutions, including Larry
King, Harold Andersen and the Omaha Police Department, with
conspiracy to deprive Paul Bonacci of his civil rights. DeCamp's
suit detailed slander, false imprisonment, child abuse, assault,
battery and infliction of emotional distress suffered by
Bonacci.
DeCamp has been the target of energetic
and systematic efforts to bankrupt him, by behind-the-scenes
pressures to deprive him of law and lobbying clients, as a
result of his Franklin-related work.
Since taking Bonacci's case in 1990,
DeCamp has also been on the receiving end of personal threats.
He told a journalist that during the previous year, "enough
events, and mysterious deaths, and personal communications to me
from extremely credible and responsible people, have made
me believe that there is a very grave potential for getting
killed. . . . " Bonacci's life, he added, "I think. . . is on a
lot, lot, lot thinner string than even mine."
On June 21, 1991, the day Alisha
Owen was convicted, DeCamp received another message, suggesting
that he leave Nebraska for his and his family's safety. DeCamp
treats these signs of danger seriously, but says he can't turn
back. John DeCamp's actions speak loudly and clearly about his
intentions. He is staying, and he is fighting.
"They count on the
fact that the more bizarre and perverted they act the safer they
are because the average joe cannot even fathom the depths of
evil that this agency perpetrates. "
Franklin Cover-Up: Pedophile Conspiracy
Update by JOHN DECAMP
I published 'The
Franklin Cover-Up,' as much as an insurance policy for myself and my
family, as for any other purpose.
Colby had pointed to the extreme danger for a person to have secret
knowledge about a situation, that others who are affected want to
keep out of the public's view.
"Some people will go to any lengths to make sure things stay
secret," Colby had often repeated to me, "which is why the CIA and
the KGB sometimes find their agents dead. Your best interest," he
argued, "may well be in publishing what you know and are able to
prove, rather than keeping those facts secret. Whether you ever sell
a single book or not does not really matter. Putting your
information on the public record is what is important. That way,
there is no logical reason to harm you or your family, to suppress
some truth you have already documented. That is probably your real
life insurance policy in something like this Franklin situation,"
Colby had advised me...
Now, four years later, without a single dollar spent in advertising
or promotion, over 50,000 copies of this book have been sold
nationwide. I am convinced that this is why I am alive today,
although I did receive a warning in September 1996, through reliable
sources, that I am targeted--"just like they got Colby."
There have also been innumerable attempts to disbar me. Although I
have thus far been able to defeat every one of these attempts, they
keep coming; to silence me through disbarment is, for those trying
to hide the truth on Franklin, the equivalent of assassinating me.
So, the battle continues, both in the Franklin case per se--about
which I include stunning new material which proves the truth of Part
I of this book--and in the new cases in which I have become
involved.
As a result of the first publication of The Franklin Cover-Up, as an
attorney, I have become involved in some of the most famous legal
cases now occurring in these United States, from cases involving the
militia movement, to the Oklahoma City bombing, to the notorious
Gordon Kahl shootout with U.S. Marshals, about which documentaries
and movies have been made, to appearances before the U.S. Senate on
all of these matters, including Ruby Ridge and Waco. I have appeared
on all of the national TV networks, and on many national shows, such
as Nightline with Ted Koppel, Good Morning America, CNN's Burden of
Proof, America's Most Wanted, and others. So, I say, as I dedicate
this second edition of The Franklin Cover-Up to my friend and
mentor, William Colby: "Thanks, Bill. You were right, so right it
terrifies me. I told the truth, just as you instructed. Now, as a
result of the publication of the original Franklin Cover-Up, I have
ended up in situations, where, once again, the truth must be told on
some explosive new issues, whose consequences rival those of
Franklin, for the future of this country."
Thus, this new edition contains eight dramatic new chapters (and an
epilogue): The Franklin Investigation, and Cover-up, Continue; Four
Years Later--Where Are They Now?; Troy Boner Steps Forward; Drugs
and the Monarch Project; From Montana to Oklahoma City; The Oklahoma
Bombing; The U.S. Justice Department Murder of Gordon Kahl; and In
Memoriam: Bill Colby.
This concluding chapter will reveal more about Colby's role in
Franklin, and his very last instructions to me, two weeks before his
death. Finally, the last word on the Franklin cover-up is delivered
in the epilogue--not by me, but by the nineteenth-century novelist
Herman Melville. Besides his famous Moby Dick, Melville wrote short
stories. A high-ranking personage involved in the Franklin case,
told me that one of these stories contained the ultimate secret
behind the Franklin cover-up. He was right.
CHAPTER 18 THE FRANKLIN
INVESTIGATION , AND COVER-UP, CONTINUE
When the first printing of what you have just read appeared in May
1992, I was threatened with countless law suits by individuals named
in the book. I was told by their attorneys, from some of the most
prominent law firms in the state and in the country, that "We will
destroy you in court."
As it turned out, although there have been numerous attempts to
disbar me only one law suit for libel and slander was ever launched
as a direct result of the book--and that was a suit I launched and
won, as I will relate. My victory in that case was but one of a
series of what I call the "mini-miracles"--perhaps a hundred or more
unforeseen events since the book first hit the streets, which prove
the truth of The Franklin Cover-Up. I have chosen a small sampling
of these "mini-miracles" to recount here.
After this book appeared, attorneys for Franklin-related individuals
repeatedly appeared in the printed media (particularly in the Omaha
World Herald) and on TV to make statements such as: "This book is
the most libelous and slanderous book I have ever read. The
individuals who have been slandered in this book will definitely be
filing legal actions to stop distribution of this book and against
Mr. John DeCamp personally. That is certain. This book will be
stopped and Mr. DeCamp will be proved to be a liar and made to pay
damages." When reporters who interviewed the lawyers or principals
named in the book contacted me for my response to their threats, I
had one standard answer:
"I agree with certain things these people and their attorneys
attacking me are saying. I agree that the things described in this
book are horrible. If anyone had said these things about me, I agree
that I would sue them. I believe if there is anything false in this
book or if they believe I have not told the truth in this book, that
they should sue me. In fact, I welcome their law suits, because that
will help develop the truth. I personally believe I have been most
careful and cautious in the way I have handled matters, and only
written about those things I can absolutely document."
So, what happened with
those threats? Who sued whom? Who proved what?
The only major lawsuit for libel and slander arising from this book
was my suit against Atlantic Telecast, owner of a television station
in Wilmington, North Carolina, WECT (Channel 6). I charged that
statements made on a WECT news broadcast on November 12, 1992,
attacking me and the book were false. I demanded a retraction and
public apology. The first response I received was from WECT's
station manager, who informed me that WECT had consulted its
attorneys, that the station had thoroughly investigated the matters
described in my book, and that WECT was not only not going to
apologize, but planned to repeat the attacks. WECT's attorney
further advised me that the station had investigated, in part, by
talking to U.S. Senator Bob Kerrey from Nebraska, who was running
for president of the United States at the time, and who had visited
Wilmington, and met with representatives of the TV station. Further
investigation, he claimed, was conducted by talking to the new
Wilmington police chief, a man named Robert Wadman--the former
police chief of Omaha, Nebraska, who had come to Wilmington in the
early 1990s!
After hearing this, I gave a simple demand to WECT: "Rest assured I
am ready to prove everything I wrote in my book. I hope you are
ready and able to prove your claims made on TV. I give you three
weeks for further investigation, and then I will move forward
aggressively on my lawsuit against you. At that time, I will seek
not only an apology, but substantial monetary damages." Just under
three weeks from the date of my ultimatum, attorneys from Atlantic
Telecast contacted me and stated that they had done further
investigation and acknowledged that now they, not I, were in
trouble. Shortly thereafter, a settlement agreement was reached
which stipulated: (1) WECT TV would broadcast a retraction and
public apology to me on its news broadcasts, and would issue a press
release to the same effect; (2) WECT would pay me money damages and
other financial benefits; (3) All other details of the settlement,
other than those stated above, would be kept confidential for the
benefit of the TV station. I accepted the settlement offer, and
dismissed my lawsuit. WECT lived up to its part of the settlement,
and I have lived up to mine. My lawsuit intersected a fierce
political battle between Chief Wadman, upon whom WECT had relied for
its information, and his own police department, particularly with an
officer named Sgt. Robert Clatty. Sgt. Clatty is the Wilmington
Police Department's expert on satanic ritual abuse of children, and
is one of North Carolina's recognized experts as well, with
published works on the subject. Chief Wadman, on the other hand,
claimed that there was no such thing as satanic ritual abuse; he
attempted to make it impossible for Sgt. Clatty to carry out his
work, and, at one point, suspended him. The publicly waged war
between Chief Wadman and his wide array of defenders in Wilmington
and across North Carolina, and Wadman' s adversaries, led primarily
by Officer Clatty, went as high as the State Legislature. From 1992
until roughly mid-1994, it divided the city of Wilmington, and even
the state of North Carolina. The outcome of the war between Chief
Wadman and his own force was that in early July 1994, a secret
meeting was held with city officials and Wadman's attorney. On July
11, 1994, Wadman resigned as police chief. Although city officials
refused to comment on what had transpired in the meeting, Wadman
himself admitted in a television interview later that month, that he
had been ordered to resign from the Wilmington Police Department.
In May 1992, shortly after the first edition of this book was
published, Monsignor Robert Hupp, who had been the head of Boys Town
from the late 1970s through the decade of the 1980s--the critical
time in question for the Franklin case, contacted me and asked to
have a meeting, at which he specified that witnesses must be
present. I anticipated that his purpose was to attack me, and to
deny what I had written about Boys Town. I was completely wrong.
With two witnesses present, Monsignor Hupp opened our discussion
with the simple statement: "John DeCamp, your book stated the game;
I hope I can help with some of the names." Monsignor Hupp and I then
entered into an in-depth discussion on the entire situation
involving Boys Town, Larry King, Peter Citron, the pedophile problem
in general, and the entire story of the Franklin cover-up. He
verified piece after piece of evidence of the Franklin story for me,
and provided guidance on other directions in which to look, to
develop further proof of the children's stories of abuse by this
country's wealthy and powerful. When I asked Monsignor Hupp how this
ever could have happened at Boys Town, he looked at me and told me,
so apologetically, "I am like the wife who did not know, and was the
last to find out. And when I finally did suspect something and tried
to act, the Archbishop [Daniel Sheehan] elected to do nothing about
it, when I asked him to help. And then, when I came upon something
horribly evil, I found public officials and the Church would do
nothing-apparently terrified at the damage it would do to the Church
and to the entire city of Omaha," Monsignor Hupp said.
"What are you talking about?" I asked him. "Is there some particular
story or incident you are talking about in the book that you have
more information about? Please explain what you mean," I asked the
Monsignor. He then described an incident in 1985, in which a young
boy named Shattuck, who lived in Elkhorn, Nebraska, had been
sexually abused and then killed. The Monsignor told me that he was
certain who had killed the boy, a man he identified as a member of
the Catholic clergy in the Omaha Archdiocese. Monsignor Hupp
provided precise detail which he said proved beyond any doubt, that
the particular individual he named was in fact, the child's
murderer. "The Church is plagued by these sexual abuse problems
across the country and by the devastating publicity the clergy abuse
incidents have caused," Monsignor Hupp explained. "The Church's
reaction to these sexual abuse problems is, in most cases, to
immediately get the clergy member involved out of the state and, if
possible, out of the country, and hopefully into treatment. I know
that may not be right, but it is a difficult situation to deal with,
and simply moving the priest or the brother out of the state or
country has been the traditional approach by the Church in America
to addressing the problems. In this case, where an innocent child
was murdered and where I know that a member of our clergy has done
this, I felt I had a moral obligation overriding all other things,
to bring the situation to the attention of the appropriate
authorities. And I did," Hupp concluded. The Monsignor then shocked
me for the second time that day--and in a way that brought back to
me the horrible memories of the Franklin cover-up. He explained that
after he determined that the Catholic Archbishop of Omaha was not
going to take action on the case he then went to the FBI and to the
Omaha law enforcement authorities to provide complete details on the
child's murder.
So, what happened as a result of Monsignor Hupp's actions?
Apparently, nothing. Each year on the anniversary of the child's
murder--now almost ten years--the media talks about the case as
still being "under investigation," and street rumors persist about
the Catholic clergyman--the one Monsignor Hupp believes killed the
child--who was shipped out of state for alcohol treatment right
after the murder. In the aftermath of our meeting, Monsignor Hupp
ran into his own problems. In September 1992, the Monsignor advised
me that he was receiving all kinds of pressure and criticism and
was, he feared, being forced to leave Boys Town. Shortly after that
discussion, in a controversy that received national press attention
on how resources should be used at Boys Town, Monsignor Hupp was
removed from his post. He now lives quietly in a home in West Omaha,
Nebraska. Monsignor Hupp has shown incredible courage, as he has
continued to provide me direction and assistance in the Franklin
investigation and related matters. Monsignor Hupp is not some
13-year-old kid whom the cops say they cannot trust or believe. On
the contrary, he is one of America' s most famous and nationally
honored clergymen; the author of two best sellers; a former
Presidential Appointee as Special Ambassador to the United Nations;
and the former head of America's most famous child care institution
(Boys Town). Monsignor Hupp showed his courage yet again, when he
repeated his charges a year later to a British TV team making a
documentary on the Franklin cover-up, entitled Conspiracy of
Silence.
In mid-1993, after The Franklin Cover-Up had been circulating for
almost a year, the British-based TV station, Yorkshire Television,
sent a top-notch team to Nebraska to launch its own investigation of
the Franklin case. Yorkshire had a contract with the Discovery
Channel to produce a documentary on the case for American
television. They spent many months in Nebraska, and also traveled
this country from one end to the other, interviewing, filming, and
documenting piece-by-piece the Franklin story as I had told it in
the book. They spent somewhere between a quarter-million and
one-half million dollars investigating the story, deploying probably
a thousand times the resources and abilities that I personally had.
Over the year that I worked with them, I was amazed at the team's
ability to gather new documents and witnesses which kept opening up
new and frightening facts about Franklin. They were a crack team. In
the final weeks that they were in Nebraska, they expressed their
certainty that they would win awards for this documented horror
story of government-sanctioned drug-running involving children;
government-sanctioned abuse of children; and government protection
of some of this country's most powerful businessmen and politicians,
who had been the chief actors in the Franklin story. Finally, the
big day came. Their documentary was to air nationwide on the
Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994. It was advertised in the TV Guide
and in newspapers for that day. But no one ever saw that program. At
the last minute, and without explanation, it was pulled from the
air.
It was not shown then, and has never been broadcast anywhere since.
I have a copy of that program, which arrived anonymously in my mail
in late 1995. When I watched this pirated copy, I could see clearly
why the program had been suppressed. Conspiracy of Silence proved,
beyond doubt, that the essential points I had stressed in the book
(and more) were all true. For instance, the team had interviewed
Troy Boner. Sometime after that grand jury was over, Troy,
guilt-stricken because of his lying over Gary Caradori's death,
contacted me and told the truth about what had happened. This is
recorded in a remarkable affidavit (see Chapter 20). The Yorkshire
TV team spent a small fortune to confirm Troy's charges. They flew
Troy to Chicago and paid for a lengthy polygraph (lie detector) test
at the Keeler Polygraph Institute. With the results of that test,
the Yorkshire team was so convinced that Troy was telling the truth,
that they featured him in their documentary. It was only in
mid-1996, that I finally pieced together, through sources I am not
at liberty to disclose, what happened to stop the broadcast of this
documentary.
1. At the time the Yorkshire TV team and the Discovery Channel were
doing the documentary, they had no idea how high up the case would
go into Government, and; what major institutions and personalities
in this country, would be found to be linked to the Franklin story.
Ultimately, the documentary focused on several limited aspects
documented in this book, and developed them much more extensively
than I ever had the resources or abilities to accomplish.
2. These areas which the documentary focused on, were: (a) the use
and involvement of Boys Town children and personalities in the
Franklin Scandal, particularly Peter Citron and Larry King's
relationships to Boys Town; (b) the linkage of Franklin to some of
this country's top politicians in Washington, and in the U.S.
Congress, with particular attention on those who attended parties
held by Larry King at his Washington mansion on Embassy Row; (c) the
impropriety of these-politicians and businessmen and compromising of
these people by Larry King, through drugs and using children for
pedophilia.
3. When the broadcast tape was sent to the United States, Customs
officials seized the documentary and held it up as being
"pornographic material." Attorneys for Discovery Channel and
Yorkshire TV were able to get the documentary released. Then, the
lawyers went through the film for months, making this or that change
or deletion, so that the documentary ultimately advertised to be
shown on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994, would survive any
claims of libel or slander that any of the individuals identified in
the documentary might attempt to bring. The lawyers had cleared the
documentary for broadcast.
4. During the several months that the documentary was being prepared
and advertised for showing, major legislation impacting the entire
future of the Cable TV industry was being debated on Capitol Hill.
Legislation, which the industry opposed, was under debate for
placing controls on the industry and the contents of what could be
shown. Messages were delivered in no uncertain terms from key
politicians involved in the Cable TV battle, that if the Conspiracy
of Silence were shown on the Discovery Channel as planned, then the
industry would probably lose the debate. An agreement was reached:
Conspiracy of Silence was pulled, and with no rights for sale or
broadcast by any other program; Yorkshire TV would be reimbursed for
the costs of production, the Discovery Channel itself would never be
linked to the documentary; and copies of Conspiracy in Silence would
be destroyed. Not all copies were destroyed, however, as I and some
others received anonymously in the mail a copy of the
nearly-finished product.
I said in Chapter 12, "The Omaha Business Community": "As essential
to Franklin as [Harold] Andersen's fundraising and publicity were,
the credit union could not have functioned for a single day without
the complicity of Nebraska's largest bank, FirsTier.... Every dollar
that went into Franklin Credit Union--the missing $40 million was no
exception-went into its account #153-7-353 at FirsTier." In October
1994, evidence released through the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) proved exactly how right I was. These FOIA documents showed
that some of the same attorneys who had threatened so loudly to sue
me, together with the FirsTier Bank with which they were associated,
had reached a financial settlement with the National Credit Union
Association (NCUA), in which they agreed to pay the NCUA $10 million
in damages for their role in improprieties involving Franklin. The
attorneys had to come up with over $6 million, and First Tier
itself, over $3 million. Despite the fact that the FirsTier case was
the biggest malpractice settlement in the history of Nebraska, and
despite the fact that the settlement involved very prominent
individuals--including former Republican Governor Charlie Thone and
attorney Jay Derr--the story received almost no coverage in the
press, that is, before the FOIA material became public. Then the
World Herald jumped in with a huge editorial in October, 1994,
entitled "Franklin Credit Union Crimes Unfairly Claim New Victims."
The World Herald wrote: "Some defendants, including banks and a law
firm, have agreed to pay more than $10 million to the NCUA to settle
the claims. They admitted no wrongdoing. They said they acted to
avoid prolonged litigation. Their position is understandable.
Litigation is expensive. Moreover, this particular litigation ran
the risk of creating a false impression.... The impression could
have taken hold that a wide circle of legal and financial advisers
sat on the knowledge that King was looting the credit union.... Such
an impression would have been false."
There was, indeed, "a wide circle of legal and financial advisers"
in on the looting of Franklin, just as I had charged, and whom I
name in Chapter 12, "The Omaha Business Community." Finally, some of
them, at least, had to pay for it. Nor was this the only
multi-million dollar scam to be exposed in the wake of the first
edition of this book.
In Chapter 6, I described another big money scheme that intersected
the Franklin case--the looting of the Commonwealth Savings Bank, in
which I filed a claim on behalf of the Commonwealth victims. To my
surprise and joy, I succeeded beyond all my expectations in this
case--until a strained interpretation of our state Constitution was
put forward by Nebraska's Supreme Court. First, I presented to the
Claims Board the Commonwealth story exactly as described in this
book, but with even more extensive documentation. The Claims Board
agreed and reached a Settlement for some $16,000,000.00 to be paid
to the Commonwealth victims. But, the Legislature had to approve
this, as did the Governor. So, we took the matter of the
settlement--with me as attorney for the Claimants and victims--to
the State Legislature. Surprise--in a close but bitter battle,
enough Senators stood up to acknowledge the horrible acts that had
occurred, and the intense suffering of the Commonwealth victims that
resulted. The settlement was approved. Next, we went to the
Governor, who signed the legislation for the settlement. Then, the
matter was taken to court by certain unnamed individuals (concerned
citizens), who claimed that they did not want their tax money used
to pay these Commonwealth victims. Nebraska has a unique section in
its State Constitution which forbids the state from using any tax
dollars for purposes of extending the credit of the state or
granting a gift. The result: that which the Claims Board, and the
Legislature and the Governor all agreed the Commonwealth Savings
Bank victims were entitled to because of the failures of the
Government in Commonwealth, was taken away by the Supreme Court of
the State of Nebraska. The Court claimed that Nebraska's
Constitution forbids paying the money to the victims, because they
were only victims of moral wrongdoing, rather than legal wrongdoing.
And John DeCamp, who would have become a multi-millionaire out of
the case because I had done it on a contingent fee basis, ended up
with nothing but the certain knowledge that I had established the
truth as I have written in this book with respect to Commonwealth
Savings Bank and certain of the personalities who are today so
prominent on the national scene-Senator Bobby Kerrey, for example.
Besides Yorkshire TV, the most notable among the electronic media
which became interested in the Franklin story was the TV program,
America's Most Wanted (AMW). In several episodes, AMW opened up a
whole new dimension on just how high up politically the story went
and how wide it reached across the country. For a while, I had great
hopes. For example, AMW interviewed Paul Bonacci in prison and
broadcast his account of a host of specific details about
individuals, places, activities, kidnappings, etc., in which he said
he had participated.
To the shock of AMW (and sometimes, of myself), the incidents Paul
Bonacci described, when investigated by AMW, turned out to be
exactly as Paul had recounted. For instance, a young boy named
"Jimmy" who had been branded by pedophile perpetrators--like you
would brand a steer.
I have brought out
this new, second edition of The Franklin Cover-Up because
the story and its implications continue to have exploding
effects upon the American political and social landscape. In
the four years since the first copies of The Franklin
Cover-Up hit the streets, not only have I and others learned
far more about the Larry King political sub-culture of drugs
and child abuse, but the circulation of The Franklin
Cover-Up throughout the United States has brought many new
cases to my doorstep - and some of those extraordinary
stories I tell here, in the new, second part of this book.
Lastly, earlier in 1996, my dear friend Bill Colby, without
whom The Franklin Cover-Up never would have seen the light
of day, died, under very mysterious circumstances. This
second edition includes my Memoriam to Bill, to whom I now
re-dedicate The Franklin Cover-Up, in renewal of my
commitment to fulfil the promises made to him, in the last
days before his death.
John DeCamp
November 1996
FOREWORD
"What do Ronald Reagan, President George Bush, former CIA
Director William E Colby, Democratic presidential candidate
Bob Kerrey, billionaire and second richest man in America
and now head of Salomon Brothers - Warren Buffett, and
Ronald Roskens, the current administrator of the Agency for
International Development, all have in common?" I asked my
close friend and adviser William Colby one day in 1991.
"I give up," former head of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) Colby said. "What could that group have in common?"
"Three things," I replied, "all of them a burden at times
for those who have to carry them. The three things are me
(John DeCamp), a case called Franklin and a man named Larry
King."
"Are you serious?" Colby asked.
"Dead serious," I responded. "And I hope that word ‘dead’
does not turn out to be a prophetic pronouncement, as it has
for at least fifteen other Franklin-related personalities."
My statement to Bill Colby was not made lightly. Colby and
his wife, Sally Shelton Colby, a United States ambassador
under President Jimmy Carter, were at that very moment
warning me to get away from the Franklin child abuse
investigation, Larry King, and anybody else linked with
Franklin, as quickly as possible for the sake of my own life
and safety.
Sally and Bill had never talked to me like this before. They
sat me down, made it clear that this was not one of our
routine discussions about life and death and happiness, and
emphasized to me the serious nature of what and whom I was
dealing with.
"What you have to understand, John, is that sometimes there
are forces and events too big, too powerful, with so much at
state for other people or institutions, that you cannot do
anything about them, not matter how evil or wrong they are
and no matter how dedicated or sincere you are or how much
evidence you have. That is simply one of the hard facts of
life you have to face. You have done your part. You have
tried to expose the evil and wrongdoing. It has hurt you
terribly. But it has not killed you up to this point. I am
telling you, get out of this before it does. Sometimes
things are just too big for us to deal with, and we have to
step aside and let history take its course. For you, John,
this is one of those times," Bill warned, with Sally nodding
her head in affirmation.
When a caution of this nature comes from someone of the
stature and experience of Bill or Sally Colby, you have to
take it seriously, even if you do not want to. I had already
had warnings enough, that unless I backed off from the
Franklin situation, I might be looking at life from a pine
box six feet underground.
Bill Colby had ample reason to know the seriousness of the
Franklin case. In secret, Colby had been hired a few months
earlier by the Nebraska Legislature’s investigative
committee, to look into the single-engine plane crash, in
which the Senate’s private investigator, Gary Caradori, and
his son were killed.
"But Bill," I argued, "somebody has to do something. The
problem here is that our institutions of government have
been corrupted. If there is a cover-up - and I now
absolutely believe there is, even though originally I
thought this whole Franklin story had to be a fantasy - then
that cover-up can only take place with the co-operation and
even the active assistance of some of our key institutions
of government, from the courts to the cops, from the highest
politicians, to the media representatives, to the wealthiest
business leaders of our community and country.
"I can’t believe what you are telling me, Bill. Are you
saying I should just lay it down, and walk away from this,
when I know kids are being abused and killed; when I know
our most respected citizens and business leaders are up to
their eyebrows in drug dealing and official corruption; when
every bone in my body tells me that evil is triumphing and
everybody who is anybody is scared beanless to do something
about it, for fear of one thing or another? How can any
honest or intelligent person do this? If I, or someone like
me, do not keep pursuing this, then who will? And if we quit
now, then when, if ever, will the truth come out and
something be done about this evil and this corruption?"
Bill could tell I was excited, frustrated and almost angry.
"Relax, just a moment, John," he said. "Relax, and I will
tell you my own personal story. Maybe it will have some
message for you.
"Last night I returned from Russia," Bill began.
Our conversation was taking place shortly before the now
infamous August 19, 1991 coup attempt to throw out Gorbachov,
and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union as it had
existed since 1917.
"Why was I in Russia?" Bill explained. "For meetings in
Moscow, to try to work with other world leaders and Russian
leaders, privately and quietly, so that when and if a
transition of power and a change of government and economic
policy occur in Russia, they occur in such a way that it
avoids a war.
"I was staying at a hotel located right near Red Square
which, as you know, is the most guarded, sacred spot in the
Soviet Union. It was about 1:00 in the morning. I could not
sleep. The next morning I was to return to the United
States. Not being able to sleep, I thought I would see if it
was possible to walk around and get some exercise.
"I walked out of my room, expecting to be stopped by the
guards or secret police. But nobody paid attention to me in
the hallway. I walked on down into the hotel lobby. Nobody
seemed to care.
"So, I walked out the door of the hotel, directly onto Red
Square. Nobody paid attention. I stopped by Lenin’s tomb. I
stood a few feet away from the entrance to the Kremlin.
"Then it struck me like a ton of bricks: It was over. Here
was the head of the CIA, once hated and feared by the Soviet
Union, wandering unwatched and unguarded around Red Square,
after spending the previous week meeting with their leaders,
trying to help them save themselves from economic collapse
and political revolution, which might turn into a new
totalitarian dictatorship. And nobody cared. The guards did
not care who I was or what I was doing. The system had
collapsed. It was over. Communism was dead. That was the
happy part."
Bill went on, quietly, "But I also realized, that this walk
in Red Square was going to be the only victory parade I
would have, to celebrate my forty-year battle for this.
There were not going to be any parades down Madison Avenue
with ticker tape. This walk in Red Square was the only
victory parade I was going to have."
"So, what’s the message?" I asked. "What are you trying to
tell me?"
"Sometimes," Bill said, "There are forces too powerful for
us to whip them individually, in the time frame that we
would like. We have to keep working at our goal. But we have
to be sensible enough, not to risk everything and get
ourselves destroyed or killed in the process. That victory
we seek may take much longer than we wanted, and come in
ways we never anticipated.
"Maybe, just maybe, you have to have your own private
victory parade. You maybe have to face the fact that you
cannot ‘right’ all the ‘unrightable wrongs’ That there
really are people too powerful, interests too big; that the
rich and the powerful, even when doing evil, can and will
succeed and you can do nothing about it at that moment.
"But," Bill continued, "you do the possible, recognize the
impossible, and if you are right - and you are, and we both
know it - there will be a time when victory will come and
the good will triumph over the evil. Only the when and where
and how are usually unknown to us. the vest we might be able
to do sometimes, is point out the truth and then step aside.
that is where I think you are now. For your own safety and
survival, step aside."
"Maybe I should start carrying a gun," I suggested.
Bill gave a cynical laugh and said, "No, that will only
likely get you killed. If they are going to get you, a gun
you are carrying is not going to stop anything. The best
thing you can do for your personal safety is to tell your
story, and make sure you have the national press interested
in this and looking into it with some really good
investigative reporters."
"Huh," I muttered. "Maybe the simplest thing for me to do is
to try to tell the story."
"Maybe it is," Bill said. "Besides, I myself want to fully
understand what you said at the beginning about what all
those prominent individuals, from President Bush to Bob
Kerrey, from myself to billionaire Warren Buffett, have in
common."
"Maybe I’ll have to write a book, and tell you, won’t I
Bill?"
Well, here it is.
INTRODUCTION
On June 21, 1991, 21-year-old Alisha Jahn Owen was
pronounced guilty by a jury in Douglas County, Nebraska, on
eight counts of felony perjury. On August 8, 1991, she was
sentenced to serve nine to twenty-seven years in prison.
Owen was indicted for telling a grand jury, before which she
testified in 1990, that she was sexually abused as a
juvenile, by a Nebraska district court judge, by the chief
of police of the city of Omaha, by the manager of the
Franklin Community Federal Credit Union, and others. Alisha
Owen also witnessed, she said, the abuse of other children
by figures in Nebraska’s political and financial
establishment whom she named, among them the publisher of
the state’s largest newspaper, the Omaha World-Herald. She
testified that she was in a group of Nebraska children who
functioned for years as illegal drug couriers, travelling
nation-wide, for some of Nebraska’s wealthiest, most
powerful and prominent businessmen.
Two grand juries, one local and one federal, had a mandate
to consider these and other charges of child abuse connected
with the Franklin Credit Union. They indicted the
victim-witnesses for perjury instead!
"This is unprecedented, probably in the history of the
United States," commented Dr Judianne Densen-Gerber, a
lawyer, psychiatrist and nationally prominent specialist on
child abuse, during her visit to Nebraska in December 1990.
"If the children are not telling the truth, particularly if
they have been abused, they need help, medical attention.
You don’t throw them in jail!"
Both grand juries admitted that Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci,
whose testimony extensively corroborated Owen’s, had been
badly abused. But this was done, they concluded, by persons
other than those the young people named. Bonacci, too, was
indicted for perjury. Two other victim-witnesses, whose
stories buttressed those of Owen and Bonacci, recanted under
immense pressure. Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci refused to
recant.
America is suffering an epidemic of child abuse. "SOS
America", a 1990 report from the Washington DC-based
Children’s Defence Fund (CDF), said that "a survey by the
American Association for Protecting Children indicates that
2.2 million children were reported abused, neglected, or
both in 1987 - a 225 percent increase since 1976, and a 48
percent increase in the previous five years." CDF and other
estimates caution, however, that only one in every five
cases of abuse and neglect gets reported. "The dimensions of
the abuse are staggering," Dr A Nicholas-Groth, director of
the sex offender program at the Connecticut Correctional
Institute, told the New York Times in 1990, "If we saw these
same numbers of children suddenly developing some kind of
illness, we’d think we have a major epidemic on our hands."
Shocking as the numbers are, the nature of the crimes is
more so, Ever more frequently, abuse involves what law
enforcement officials refer to as "sadistic, ritualistic"
features, or, to speak plainly, Satanism. What the victims
of this type of abuse describe is so horrific, that parents,
teachers, and even child welfare workers have great
difficulty to grasp what they are being told. The mind
recoils from such evil, inflicted on the most innocent of
all people, children.
In recent months, news media around the country have been
full of propaganda to the effect that children who report
abuse are just telling what they fantasized, or stories fed
to them by adults. As for satanic or ritualistic abuse, many
newspapers declare that it does not even exist, as the New
York Village Voice did in a June 1990 article, which
attacked "the great ritualistic abuse hoax".
A banner-headline story in the Chicago Tribune on May 17,
1991, "A chilling tale of child abuse no one can prove,"
gave typical coverage of the debate over whether or not
children are being abused by Satanists:
All nine children tell the same story, a grisly tale of
being taken out of school and abused in a blue house. They
name the same culprit, a school administrator who performs
satanic rituals as part of his twisted routine. In the 14
months since the first child came forward, police said they
have conducted 140 interviews and cannot substantiate the
claims of the children, who range in age from 5 to 9.
Prosecutor Stanley Levco is more blunt: He doesn’t believe
them, and he plans to publicly clear the accused.
But the children’s enraged parents believe them. And a once-sceptical
psychologist also thinks they are telling the truth.
All agree the children have been traumatized. The problem
is, no one can prove how. "In all these cases, I don’t know
of a single shred of credible, corroborating evidence,"
Levco said ....
The stories of the Evansville children reflect a recent,
bizarre trend in child abuse cases across the country. As
more children are encouraged to step forward and expose
adults who hurt them, police are encountering more cases of
child abuse accompanied by allegations of occult rituals.
The Tribune cited Kenneth Lanning, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s expert on occult crime, on the virtual
non-existence of ritualistic abuse. Lanning, who has
publicized his opinion that "more people have been killed in
the name of Jesus and Mohammed than in the name of Satan",
said on this occasion, that there had "been only one
criminal conviction stemming from charges of satanic ritual
abuse in the US."
On April 28, 1991, the Omaha World-Herald carried a story
along these lines, titled "Satanism ... Lots of Talk, Little
Proof". It said that the problem was not an epidemic of
satanic abuse, but rather, "authorities say, America is
witnessing an epidemic of concern over Satan and his
minions, especially among adherents of fundamentalist
Christianity. So-called ritual abuse is only part of it. But
are these stories of incest and human sacrifice true? Many
mental health experts think not. And at least two law
enforcement officers, with the FBI and the San Francisco
police, say they have looked into some of the claims and
found nothing." (Emphasis added.)
An embattled minority of law enforcement officials disagrees
with Lanning of the FBI. Ted Gunderson, a 28-year FBI
veteran, former special agent-in-charge of the Bureau’s Los
Angeles Field Division, speaks from his personal knowledge
of one of the most infamous recent cases involving ritual
abuse, the McMartin pre-school case in California. After a
33-month trial, and despite voluminous evidence against
them, school operators Peggy McMartin Buckey and her son,
Raymond Buckey, were exonerated in January 1990 on 52 counts
of molesting the children in their care, while the jury
failed to reach a verdict on thirteen other counts against
Raymond Buckey.
In a May 25, 1990 interview with Executive Intelligence
Review, Gunderson said, "In the McMartin case, for example,
before any criminal charges were filed against anyone, 460
complaints were filed with the Manhattan Beach police. Are
we to believe that 460 families fed their children the same
story of ritualistic sexual abuse, animal sacrifices, etc?"
He stressed that the crimes were reported in an affluent
suburban area, where residents are typically sceptical about
organized child abuse or satanic conspiracies.
Gunderson commented on the effect of Lanning’s disclaimers:
"In my opinion, other than [Satanists active in the United
States in the twentieth century] Aleister Crowley, Anton
LaVey and Michael Aquino, Ken Lanning is probably the most
effective and foremost speaker for the satanic movement in
this country, today or any time in the past."
Evidence from Gunderson’s investigations has convinced him
that tens of thousands of children or young people disappear
from their homes each year, and that many are ritually
sacrificed. A decade ago, one estimate, printed in Reader’s
Digest in July 1982, was that "approximately 100,000
children are unaccounted for" each year. That number sounds
too high, but nobody knows what the true figure is, because
the FBI does not keep count. Gunderson observes:
"The FBI has an accurate count of the number of automobiles
stolen every year. It knows the number of homicides, rapes,
and robberies, but the FBI has no idea of the number of
children who disappear every year. They simply do not ask
for the statistics. Every month, every major police
department in the United States files its uniform crime
statistics with the FBI. It would be simple for the bureau
to add one more column to the statistics and get a breakdown
of every reported case of missing children - not to even
mention children who are kidnapped for ritualistic purposes,
and, in some cases, murdered. I am convinced that the FBI
does not ask for these statistics because they do not want
to see them. They would be confronted with an instant public
outcry for action, because the figures would show a major
social problem. That problem would demand action."
The Franklin Credit Union scandal, centered in Omaha, opens
a window into the hideous world of child abuse, and of
organized, illegal drug peddling, patronized and protected
by powerful figures in politics and business.
National media interest in the case flickered in 1988, when
the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union was raided by
federal agencies and shut down. Franklin’s manager was
Lawrence E (Larry) King, Jr, then 44, a rising star in state
and national Republican circles, an officer of the National
Black Republican Council. King sang the national anthem at
the GOP national conventions in 1984 and 1988.
Nearly $40 million was missing from the coffers of the
small, ostensibly community-oriented credit union. The
financial scandal turned into something more, when it became
known that children from Omaha and its surroundings said
they had been flown from city to city, to be abused at
parties held by Franklin’s officers and well-known
Nebraskans, including nationally prominent Republican Party
activists. "A Lurid, Mysterious Scandal Begins Taking Shape
in Omaha," headlined the New York Times.
Three years later, people living outside eastern Nebraska
are unlikely to be aware of the Franklin scandal, and those
in the region have been told that the case is closed. Larry
King is serving his jail term for misappropriation of funds,
after a guilty plea. Law enforcement at the local, state and
federal levels said there was no evidence of drug-peddling,
organized child abuse, or satanic activity by King. The
allegations of child abuse were "a carefully crafted hoax",
according to one of the two grand juries that examined the
affair. A chief witness, Owen, stands convicted of perjury.
The day of Alisha Owen’s conviction, 3,000 Nebraskans
responded to a local radio station’s poll; 94% of them said
they believed that she had been railroaded and that there
was a cover-up.
What the public suspects, the careful investigator of the
Franklin case confronts face to face. This case is far from
closed.
This book will explore the substance of the Franklin case,
much of which has never been revealed to the public until
now. That means evidence concerning key players, which
apparently was never brought before, or was ignored by, the
grand juries. It means evidence gathered for the Nebraska
Legislature’s special committee on the Franklin case, which
found and verified the tracks of criminal activity, where
law enforcement purported to see none. The legislative
investigation, which began in November 1988, ended on
January 9, 1991, when a new Legislature was sworn into
office, and the investigative committee authorized by the
previous Legislature was automatically terminated as
required by the state constitution. The Legislature had the
option to renew the investigation, but did not; many members
knew or suspected what the stakes were, and were terrified.
I write about the unfolding of the Franklin case, its
exposure and its cover-up,, as not only an eyewitness, but a
participant in these events. I knew how high Larry King’s
reach went; I was sitting in the front row, just fifteen
feet from the main podium, at the 1984 and 1988 Republican
national conventions, duly elected by the people of the
State of Nebraska as a delegate, pledged, in the first
instance, to Ronald Reagan and, in 1988, to George Bush.
I was there, as the story of the Franklin Credit Union and
the child abuse broke in Nebraska. I wrote the "DeCamp memo"
in 1990, which marked a new phase of the case. I will
describe events in which I personally was involved. Most of
these have never been made public, and it has pained me
tremendously at times, when I knew that the Omaha
World-Herald was saying something false or distorting a
fact, that I had no forum or no legal right to respond,
because I had to protect a client or honor a legal
privilege.
As an attorney, furthermore, I have some specialization in
cases of allegations by youngsters against adults in the
area of child abuse. It has been my policy and belief, as it
is now, that there is nothing worse than child abuse, with
the possible exception of falsely accusing people of child
abuse. Just in the past year, I have overturned two felony
charges against individuals in rural Nebraska, who were
charged with abusing their daughters, based on allegations
from the daughters. I was convinced the girls were not
telling the truth. I successfully proved this in both cases,
and the girls broke down and told the whole story as to why
they had lied.
In addition, I am the lawyer for the National Child Abuse
Defence and Resource Center of Nebraska, which fights
against false accusations of child abuse, and is made up of
adults who have been falsely accused of child abuse.
By contrast with these cases of fantasy, I can say without
reservation that in one Franklin-related instance after
another, there was sufficient evidence and corroboration
available for anyone seeking it, to back up the victim’s
tales.
My own recollections and considered judgments are just a
fraction of the huge record of the Franklin case.
The files of the Legislature’s main investigator, the late
Gary Caradori, testify to the mass of leads law enforcement
would not pursue. Documentary evidence presented in this
book, never before made public, makes it possible to
contrast the assurances of local and state officials that
there was little or no Franklin-related abuse, with what
those agencies had in their own files.
The chapters of this book dealing with Franklin are based,
apart from my direct experience, strictly on documents
available and documented facts. I do not claim to know the
accuracy or veracity of every statement made by every
witness or other person, recorded in these documents. I do
claim, however, that the statements and the evidence were
officially presented exactly as described. Readers can draw
their own conclusions, as to what is or is not believable.
I have been very careful to present only material and
documents which I can legally and properly, in my opinion,
make available.
I also must state, that I received none of the Franklin
committee documentation from the committee’s chairman,
Senator Loran Schmit, other than what I was entitled to as
attorney for Paul Bonacci. Some people inevitably will
claim, as they did when I issued the DeCamp memo in January
1990, that Senator Schmit, whose private attorney I am,
‘leaked’ everything to me. I said then, and I say now, that
nothing could be further from the truth.
Neither is anything whatsoever from grand jury documents -
some of which I had access to - presented here, because I am
not allowed to disclose this information. I wish I could. I
wish everything about Franklin could be made public. Then,
the public could judge even more thoroughly about what is
true and what is false. I believe that sunshine and exposure
of all facts from all agencies that have information about
Franklin would establish the truth of the stories of drug
abuse, child abuse, pedophilia, abuse of positions of public
trust, cover-up by institutions of government, and, most
tragic, involvement in this conduct and later cover-up by
some of our most respect and wealthiest citizens.
I believe that the record must get out into the open, to the
extent possible, and that the public has to share the
information. Otherwise, truth becomes whatever those who
control the institutions of government, and the press, say
it is. Benjamin Franklin said, "Whoever would overthrow the
liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of
speech." For a textbook example of how this can be done, I
would say: Come to Nebraska! Watch how when you totally
control the press, when you own the press, you can make
truth be whatever you want, you can make villains out of
heroes, sinners out of saints, and vice versa.
In this book, therefore, much of the material has been kept
in its documentary form - the words of investigators, state
senators, victim-witnesses, parents, police, or FBI, as
recorded in police documents, eyewitness reports, testimony
to the Legislature, published interviews, and so on. I will
allow these documents to speak for themselves.
Spelling and punctuation have been left as they appear in
documents, except for minor punctuation changes in
transcripts. Interpolations in quoted material are denoted
by brackets []. When the name of a victim or other person is
not his or her real name, it is marked with an asterisk *
the first time it appears.
The Franklin case, which has dominated political life in
Nebraska for three years, has chilling implications for the
whole United States. The unfinished business of the Franklin
investigation is a matter not only of justice for children
in one state, but of the lives of untold numbers of children
everywhere. Evidence developed from Franklin and King’s
activities leads into drug-trafficking, money-laundering,
pornography, child prostitution, and the kidnapping and sale
of children in different parts of the United States, and
abroad.
The shocking treatment of Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci by
the courts in Nebraska is one give-away, of what a high
stake has been wagered on suppressing the Franklin scandal.
Members of the state Senate and investigators who sought to
discover the truth of the matter, found that out earlier on,
in a personal, violent manner.
When the first printing of what you have just read appeared
in May 1992, I was threatened with countless lawsuits by
individuals named in the book. I was told by their
attorneys, from some of the most prominent law firms in the
state and in the country, that ‘We will destroy you in
court’. As it turned out, although there have been numerous
attempts to disbar me, only one lawsuit for libel and
slander was ever launched as a direct result of the book -
and that was a suit I launched and won, as I will relate.
My victory in that case was but one of a series of what I
call the ‘mini-miracles’ - perhaps a hundred or more
unforeseen events since the book first hit the streets,
which prove the truth of The Franklin Cover-Up. I have
chosen a small sampling of these ‘mini-miracles’ to recount
here.
* * * * *
After this book appeared, attorneys for Franklin-related
individuals repeatedly appeared in the printed media
(particularly in the Omaha World Herald) and on TV to make
statements such as:
"This book is
the most libellous and slanderous book I have ever read.
The individuals who have been slandered in this book
will definitely be filing legal actions to stop
distribution of this book and against Mr John DeCamp
personally. That is certain. This book will be stopped
and Mr DeCamp will be proved to be a liar and made to
pay damages."
When reporters who interviewed the lawyers or principals
named in the book contacted me for my response to their
threats, I had one standard answer:
"I agree with
certain things these people and their attorneys
attacking me are saying. I agree that the things
described in this book are horrible. If anyone had said
these things about me, I agree that I would sue them. I
believe if there is anything false in this book or if
they believe I have not told the truth in this book,
that they should sue me. In fact, I welcome their
lawsuits, because that will help develop the truth. I
personally believe I have been most careful and cautious
in the way I have handled matters, and only written
about those things I can absolutely document."
So, what happened with those threats? Who sued whom? Who
proved what?
The only major lawsuit for libel and slander arising from
this book was my suit against Atlantic Telecast, owner of a
television station in Wilmington, North Carolina, WECT
(Channel 6). I charged that statements made on a WECT news
broadcast on November 12, 1992, attacking me and the book,
were false. I demanded a retraction and public apology.
The first response I received was from WECT’s station
manager, who informed me that WECT had consulted its
attorneys, that the station had thoroughly investigated the
matters described in my book, and that WECT was not only not
going to apologize, but planned to repeat the attacks.
WECT’s attorney further advised me that the station had
investigated, in part, by talking to US Senator Bob Kerrey
from Nebraska, who was running for president of the United
States at the time, and who had visited Wilminton, and met
with representatives of the TV station. Further
investigation, he claimed, was conducted by talking to the
new Wilmington police chief, a man named Robert Wadman - the
former police chief of Omaha, Nebraska, who had come to
Wilmington in the early 1990s!
After hearing this, I gave a simple demand to WECT: "Rest
assured I am ready to prove everything I wrote in my book. I
hope you are ready and able to prove your claims made on TV.
I give you three weeks for further investigation, and then I
will move forward aggressively on my lawsuit against you. At
that time, I will seek not only an apology, but substantial
monetary damages."
Just under three weeks from the date of my ultimatum,
attorneys from Atlantic Telecast contacted me and stated
that they had done further investigation and acknowledged
that now they, not I, were in trouble.
Shortly thereafter, a settlement agreement was reached which
stipulated:
WECT TV would
broadcast a retraction and public apology to me on its
news broadcasts, and would issue a press release to the
same effect;
WECT would pay
me money damages and other financial benefits;
All other
details of the settlement, other than those stated
above, would be kept confidential for the benefit of the
TV station.
I accepted the settlement offer, and dismissed my lawsuit.
WECT lived up to its part of the settlement, and I have
lived up to mine.
My lawsuit intersected a fierce political battle between
Chief Wadman, upon whom WECT had relied for its information,
and his own police department, particularly with an officer
named Sgt Robert Clatty. Sgt Clatty is the Wilmington Police
Department’s expert on Satanic ritual abuse of children, and
is one of North Carolina’s recognized experts as well, with
published works on the subject. Chief Wadman, on the other
hand, claimed that there was no such thing as Satanic ritual
abuse; he attempted to make it impossible for Sgt Clatty to
carry out his work, and, at one point, suspended him.
The publicly waged war between Chief Wadman and his wide
array of defenders in Wilmington and across North Carolina,
and Wadman’s adversaries, led primarily by Officer Clatty,
went as high as the State Legislature. From 1992 until
roughly mid-1994, it divided the city of Wilmington, and
even the state of North Carolina.
The outcome of the war between Chief Wadman and his own
force was that in early July 1994, a secret meeting was held
with city officials and Wadman’s attorney. On July 11, 1994,
Wadman resigned as police chief. Although city officials
refused to comment on what had transpired in the meeting,
Wadman himself admitted in a television interview later that
month, that he had been ordered to resign from the
Wilmington Police Department.
* * * * *
In May 1992, shortly after the first edition of this book
was published, Monsignor Robert Hupp, who had been the head
of Boys Town from the late 1970s through the decade of the
1980s - the critical time in question for the Franklin case,
contacted me and asked to have a meeting, at which he
specified that witnesses must be present. I anticipated that
his purpose was to attack me, and to deny what I had written
about Boys Town.
I was completely wrong. With two witnesses present,
Monsignor Hupp opened our discussion with the simple
statement: "John DeCamp, your book stated the game; I hope I
can help with some of the names."
Monsignor Hupp and I then entered into an in-depth
discussion on the entire situation involving Boys Town,
Larry King, Peter Citron, the pedophile problem in general,
and the entire story of the Franklin cover-up.
He verified piece after piece of evidence of the Franklin
story for me, and provided guidance on other directions in
which to look, to develop further proof of the children’s
stories of abuse by this country’s wealthy and powerful.
When I asked Monsignor Hupp how this ever could have
happened at Boys Town, he looked at me and told me, so
apologetically, "I am like the wife who did not know, and
was the last to find out. And when I finally did suspect
something and tried to act, the Archbishop [Daniel Sheehan]
elected to do nothing about it, when I asked him to help.
And then, when I came upon something horribly evil, I found
public officials and the Church would do nothing -
apparently terrified at the damage it would do to the Church
and to the entire city of Omaha," Monsignor Hupp said.
"What are you talking about?" I asked him. "Is there some
particular story or incident you are talking about in the
book that you have more information about? Please explain
what you mean," I asked the Monsignor.
He then described an incident in 1985, in which a young boy
named Shattuck, who lived in Elkhorn, Nebraska, had been
sexually abused and then killed. The Monsignor told me that
he was certain who had killed the boy, a man he identified
as a member of the Catholic clergy in the Omaha Archdiocese.
Monsignor Hupp provided precise detail which he said proved
beyond any doubt, that the particular individual he named
was, in fact, the child’s murderer.
"The Church is plagued by these sexual abuse problems across
the country and by the devastating publicity the clergy
abuse incidents have caused," Monsignor Hupp explained. "The
Church’s reaction to these sexual abuse problems is, in most
cases, to immediately get the clergy member involved out of
the state and, if possible, out of the country, and
hopefully into treatment. I know that may not be right, but
it is a difficult situation to deal with, and simply moving
the priest or the brother out of the state or country has
been the traditional approach by the Church in America to
addressing the problems. In this case, where an innocent
child was murdered and where I know that a member of our
clergy has done this, I felt I had a moral obligation
overriding all other things, to bring the situation to the
attention of the appropriate authorities. And I did," Hupp
concluded.
The Monsignor then shocked me for the second time that day -
and in a way that brought back to me the horrible memories
of the Franklin cover-up.
He explained that after he determined that the Catholic
Archbishop of Omaha was not going to take action on the
case, he then went to the FBI and to the Omaha law
enforcement authorities to provide complete details on the
child’s murder.
So, what happened as a result of Monsignor Hupp’s actions?
Apparently, nothing. Each year on the anniversary of the
child’s murder - now almost ten years - the media talks
about the case as still being ‘under investigation’, and
street rumors persist about the Catholic clergyman - the one
Monsignor Hupp believes killed the child - who was shipped
out of state for alcohol treatment right after the murder.
In the aftermath of our meeting, Monsignor Hupp ran into his
own problems. In September 1992, the Monsignor advised me
that he was receiving all kinds of pressure and criticism
and was, he feared, being forced to leave Boys Town.
Shortly after that discussion, in a controversy that
received national press attention on how resources should be
used at Boys Town, Monsignor Hupp was removed from his post.
He now lives quietly in a home in West Omaha, Nebraska.
Monsignor Hupp has shown incredible courage, as he has
continued to provide me direction and assistance in the
Franklin investigation and related matters.
Monsignor Hupp is not some 13 year old kid whom the cops say
they cannot trust or believe. On the contrary, he is one of
America’s most famous and nationally honored clergymen; the
author of two best sellers; a former Presidential Appointee
as Special Ambassador to the United Nations; and the former
head of America’s most famous child care institution (Boys
Town).
Monsignor Hupp showed his courage yet again, when he
repeated his charges a year later to a British TV team
making a documentary on the Franklin cover-up, entitled
Conspiracy of Silence.
* * * * *
In mid-1993, after The Franklin Cover-Up had been
circulating for almost a year, the British-based TV station,
Yorkshire Television, sent a top-notch team to Nebraska to
launch its own investigation of the Franklin case. Yorkshire
had a contract with the Discovery Channel to produce a
documentary on the case for American television.
They spent many months in Nebraska, and also travelled this
country from one end to the other, interviewing, filming,
and documenting piece-by-piece the Franklin story as I had
told it in the book. They spent somewhere between a
quarter-million and one-half million dollars investigating
the story, deploying probably a thousand times the resources
and abilities that I personally had.
Over the year that I worked with them, I was amazed at the
team’s ability to gather new documents and witnesses which
kept opening up new and frightening facts about Franklin.
They were a crack team. In the final weeks that they were in
Nebraska, they expressed their certainty that they would win
awards for this documented horror story of
government-sanctioned abuse of children; and government
protection of some of this country’s most powerful
businessmen and politicians, who had been the chief acts in
the Franklin story.
Finally, the big day came. Their documentary was to air
nation-wide on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994. It was
advertised in the TV Guide and in newspapers for that day.
But no one ever saw that program. At the last minute, and
without explanation, it was pulled from the air. It was not
shown then, and has never been broadcast anywhere since.
I have a copy of that program, which arrived anonymously in
my mail in late 1995. When I watched this pirated copy, I
could see clearly why the program had been suppressed.
Conspiracy of Silence proved, beyond doubt, that the
essential points I had stressed in the book (and more) were
all true.
For instance, the team had interviewed Troy Boner. Sometime
after that grand jury was over, Troy, guilt-stricken because
of his lying over Gary Caradori’s death, contacted me and
told the truth about what had happened. This is recorded in
a remarkable affidavit (see Chapter 20). The Yorkshire TV
team spent a small fortune to confirm Troy’s charges. They
flew Troy to Chicago and paid for a lengthy polygraph (lie
detector) test at the Keeler Polygraph Institute. With the
results of that test, the Yorkshire team was so convinced
that Troy was telling the truth, that they featured him in
their documentary.
It was only in mid-1996, that I finally pieced together,
through sources I am not at liberty to disclose, what
happened to stop the broadcast of this documentary.
1. At the
time the Yorkshire TV team and the Discovery Channel
were doing the documentary, they had no idea how high up
the case would go into Government, and what major
institutions and personalities in this country, would be
found to be linked to the Franklin story. Ultimately,
the documentary focused on several limited aspects
documented in this book, and developed them much more
extensively than I ever had the resources or abilities
to accomplish.
These areas
which the documentary focused on, were:
(a) the use and involvement of Boys Town children and
personalities in the Franklin Scandal, particularly
Peter Citron and Larry King’s relationships to Boys
Town;
(b) the linkage of Franklin to some of this country’s
top politicians in Washington, and in the US Congress,
with particular attention on those who attended parties
held by Larry King at his Washington mansion on Embassy
Row;
(c) the impropriety of these politicians and businessmen
and compromising of these people by Larry King, through
drugs and using children for pedophilia.
When the
broadcast tape was sent to the United States, Customs
officials seized the documentary and held it up as being
‘pornographic material’. Attorneys for Discovery Channel
and Yorkshire TV were able to get the documentary
released. Then, the lawyers went through the film for
months, making this or that change or deletion, so that
the documentary ultimately advertised to be shown on the
Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994, would survive any
claims of libel or slander that any of the individuals
identified in the documentary might attempt to bring.
The lawyers had cleared the documentary for broadcast.
During the
several months that the documentary was being prepared
and advertised for showing, major legislation impacting
the entire future of the Cable TV industry was being
debated on Capitol Hill. Legislation, which the industry
opposed, was under debate for placing controls on the
industry and the contents of what could be shown.
Messages were delivered in no uncertain terms from key
politicians involved in the Cable TV battle, that if the
Conspiracy of Silence were shown on the Discovery
Channel as planned, then the industry would probably
lose the debate. An agreement was reached: Conspiracy of
Silence was pulled, and with no rights for sale or
broadcast by any other program; Yorkshire TV would be
reimbursed for the costs of production, the Discovery
Channel itself would never be linked to the documentary;
and copies of Conspiracy of Silence would be destroyed.
Not all copies were destroyed, however, as I and some others
received anonymously in the mail a copy of the
nearly-finished product.
When the Discovery
Channel program, Conspiracy of Silence, was being prepared,
the British investigative team insisted that they would not
go forward on the program unless they had the on-camera
personal interview, and verification of Bill Colby himself,
that John DeCamp was reporting the truth with respect to
Franklin, and with respect to this book, The Franklin
Cover-Up. Colby went on camera, and thoroughly shocked the
Yorkshire TV team in how strongly he came out, risking
himself, to support me and my work on Franklin.
Bill also wrote a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno, in
which he strongly recommended that the Justice Department
investigate this case from the standpoint I outlined in my
book, a copy of which he enclosed with his letter. He got a
formal response back from a Justice Department official,
promising that the Department would indeed look into the
case.
But then, Bill had always backed me up, right from the
earliest days, beginning in Vietnam.
Suspicious Deaths
Tied to the Franklin Cover-Up
At least fifteen people who were close to the Franklin case
have died under suspicious circumstances. Many of these
deaths were violent, others were unexplained.
1. Bill Baker. He was a restaurant owner in Omaha,
and a partner of Larry King in homosexual pornography
operations. He was found shot in the back of the head.
2. Shaun Boner. Brother of victim-witness Troy Boner,
he died of a gunshot wound from ‘Russian roulette’.
3. Gary Caradori. Chief investigator for the
legislative Franklin Committee, Caradori told associates
days before his death that he had information that would
‘blow this case wide open’. He died when his plane crashed
on July 11, 1990.
4. Andrew ‘AJ’ Caradori died at the age of 8, in the
plane crash with his father.
5. Newt Copple. A confidential informant for Caradori
and his investigative firm, Copple was a key
behind-the-scenes activist fighting the cover-up of the
Franklin case. Son of Commonwealth Savings owner S E Copple,
businessman in his own right, an ex-champion wrestler with
no prior health problems and parents who lived into their
late eighties and nineties, Copple suddenly ‘died in his
sleep’ in March 1991, at the age of 70.
6. Clare Howard. The former secretary of Alan Baer,
who arranged Baer’s pedophile trysts, Howard ‘died in her
sleep’ in 1991.
7. Mike Lewis was a former care-giver for
victim-witness Loretta Smith. He died of a ‘severe diabetic
reaction’ at the age of 32.
8. Joe Malek, associate of Larry King and an owner of
Peony Park, where homosexual galas were held. His death from
gunshot was ruled a suicide.
9. Aaron Owen, the brother of victim-witness Alisha
Owen. He was found hanged in his cell in Lincoln, Nebraska,
hours before one of his sister’s court appearances.
10. Charlie Rogers. A reputed homosexual partner of
Larry King, Rogers said that he feared for his life, in the
days before his death. His head was blown off with a
shotgun, in what was ruled a suicide.
11. Dan Ryan, an associate of Larry King. He was
found strangled or suffocated in a car.
12. Bill Skoleski. An officer in the Omaha Police
Department who was believed to be keeping a file on Larry
King, he died of a heart attack.
13. Kathleen Sorenson. The foster parent for Nelly
and Kimberly Webb after they fled the home of Larry King’s
relatives, Jarrett and Barbara Webb, she was an outspoken
activist against Satanism. Her death in a suspicious car
crash is related in Chapter 15.
14. Curtis Tucker. An associate of Larry King, he
fell or jumped out of the window of the Holiday Inn in
Omaha.
15. Harmon Tucker. A school superintendent in
Nebraska and Iowa, a reputed homosexual, his death had signs
of Satanic ritual murder. He was found dead in Georgia, near
the plantation which Harold Andersen and Nebraska-Iowa FBI
chief Nicholas O’Hara used for hunting.
Who is John DeCamp
author of the "Franklin Cover-Up"?
Senator John DeCamp - Author, Attorney, Politician, Vietnam
War Veteran, Businessman and VETERANS ADVOCATE is a native
of Nebraska and a 1999 Candidate for the office of VFW
National Judge Advocate General.
Senator DeCamp is a household name in Nebraska where Senator
DeCamp served as Senator for 16 years (1971-1987) in
Nebraska’s Unicameral Legislature.
In 1970, DeCamp made military history with his First of Its
Kind entry onto the political scene. Captain john DeCamp in
1969 and 1970 was detailed by the Army in Vietnam to work
directly for Ambassador William E Colby (DeCamp’s close
friend who later became CIA director under Presidents Nixon
and Ford) in developing the controversial Phoenix (Phung
Hoang) program. DeCamp ran his successful Senate Campaign
directly from Vietnam without ever setting foot in the
United States. DeCamp ran his campaign by mail and
controversial Press Releases from Vietnam where DeCamp spent
1969-1970 as a Combat Infantry Captain in the Mekong Delta.
DeCamp’s famous demand published nationally in the United
States in early 1970 caught the ear of politicians and the
World Press. "Let us win or get us out ...." was the
campaign slogan for DeCamp’s successful campaign waged from
the rice paddies of Vietnam, which made military history.
DeCamp and Nga Ma met in 1969 in Vietnam where Nga was a
school girl and John an infantry captain. After the fall of
Saigon in 1975, Nga escaped to the United States where John
DeCamp became her sponsor and eventually they married. The
DeCamps have four children, Jennifer, Shanda, Tara and
Johnny.
In 1975, as Saigon was collapsing and the North Vietnamese
Communists were invading, Senator DeCamp again made military
and political history. Senator DeCamp left his Senate Seat,
boarded an airplane and returned to Vietnam where DeCamp -
with help from the US State Department, US Ambassador Graham
Martin and Vietnamese officials - successfully launched The
Humanitarian Rescue of 2834 half-American, half-Vietnamese
orphans in what has come to be known as "Operation Baby
Lift". Through Senator John DeCamp’s efforts these abandoned
children (Bue Doi, ‘Dust of Life’) from the American
presence in Vietnam - who had ended up in orphanages, which
orphanages were being abandoned as the North Vietnamese
pushed South in their final push to capture Saigon - were
brought to America where all were rapidly adopted and have
become part of this country’s most noble act of the entire
Vietnam War Era.
For this work, Senator DeCamp was honored and decorated by
the President at the White House and named as one of the
Eight Most Outstanding Vietnam War Veterans by the Veterans
Support Group, ‘No Greater Love’.
Today, John DeCamp, Attorney and Author of the best seller
‘The Franklin Cover Up’, practises law in Lincoln, Nebraska,
raises his children and is extremely active nationwide as
Attorney in someof this country’s most famouse cases
including the Militia cases in Montana, the Oklahoma
Bombing, the Gordon Kahl case, Senate hearings on Waco and
Ruby Ridge.
Veterans’ advocate DeCamp is one of two Nebraska attorneys
licensed to practice before the US court of Veterans
Appeals. He was named ‘Most Outstanding Young Man of
Nebraska’ in 1976, by the state Jaycee’s, has served as
Nebraska VFW Legal Advisor and lobbyist for the past 14
years, is the State Judge Advocate of AMVETS and wrote the
By-Laws and articles establishing the AMVETS in Nebraska. He
has severed on seven National VFW Committees (National
Americanism and Community Activities 1993, National Veterans
Employment and Training Committee 1995, 1996; National
Legislative Committee 1989-1994, VFW National Committee on
Veterans Service Resolutions 1991, 1997, 1998, National
Security and Foreign Affairs 1990, 1998). DeCamp is the
current 1998-99 Commander for the Nebraska Veterans’ Council
serving all the veterans organizations in Nebraska.
DeCamp is a Life member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars,
AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans and a member of the
American Legion.
DeCamp believes that: "...As the distance from our last
major war increases, the interest of America and Politicians
in our Veterans’ needs descreases; therefore, Vets must
learn and live this rule: God helps those who help
themselves. And I, John DeCamp, intend to use my psoition
with the Veterans of Foreign wars of the US to protect and
benefit Veterans by leading the efforts to help ourselves."
George Bush: The
Unauthorized Biography
by Webster G. Tarpley &
Anton Chaitkin
Chapter -XXI-
Omaha
On the morning of June 29, 1989,
pandemonium erupted in the corridors of power in the nation's
capital. ``Homosexual Prostitution Probe Ensnares Official of Bush,
Reagan,'' screamed the front-page headline of the Washington
Times with the kicker ``Call Boys Took Midnight Tour of White
House.''
The Times reported, ``A homosexual
prostitution ring is under investigation by federal and District
authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the
Reagan and Bush administrations, military officers, congressional
aides and U.S. and foreign businessmen with close ties to
Washington's political elite.''
The exposeé centered on the role of one
Craig Spence, a Republican powerbroker known for his lavish ``power
cocktail'' parties. Spence was well connected. He celebrated
Independence Day 1988 by conducting a midnight tour of the White
House in the company of two teenage male prostitutes among others in
his party.
Rumors circulated that a list existed of
some 200 Washington prominents who had used the call boy service.
The Number Two in charge of personnel affairs at the White House,
who was responsible for filling all the top civil service posts in
the federal bureaucracy, and Secretary of Labor Elizabeth Dole's
chief of staff, were two individuals publicly identified as patrons
of the call boy ring.
Two of the ring's call boys were allegedly
KGB operatives, according to a retired general from the Defense
Intelligence Agency interviewed by the press. But the evidence
seemed to point to a CIA sexual blackmail operation, instead.
Spence's entire mansion was covered with hidden microphones, two-way
mirrors and video cameras, ever ready to capture the indiscretions
of Washington's high, mighty and perverse. The political criteria
for proper sexual comportment had long been established in
Washington: Any kinkiness goes, so long as you don't get caught.
The popular proverb was that the only way a politician could hurt
his career was if he were ``caught with a dead woman or a live boy''
in his bed.
Months after the scandal had died down, and
a few weeks before he allegedly committed suicide, Spence was asked
who had given him the ``key'' to the White House. The Washington
Times reported that ``Mr. Spence hinted the tours were arranged
by `top level' persons, including Donald Gregg, national security
advisor to Vice President Bush''@s1 and later U.S. ambassador to
South Korea.
We have already had occasion to examine Don
Gregg's role in Iran-Contra, and have observed his curious
performance when testifying under oath before congressional
committees. Gregg indignantly denied any connection to Spence, yet
it is public record that Spence had sponsored a dinner in Gregg's
honor in the spring of 1989 at Washington's posh Four Seasons Hotel
in Georgetown.
George Bush was less than pleased with the
media coverage of the prostitution charges and kept abreast of the
scandal as it mushroomed. The Washington Times reported in an
article titled ``White House Mute on Call Boy Scandal,'' that
``White House sources confirmed that President Bush has followed the
story of the late night visit and Mr. Spence's links to a homosexual
prostitution ring under investigation by federal authorities since
they were disclosed June 29 in the Washington Times. But top
officials will not discuss the story's substance, reportedly even
among themselves.
``Press officers have rebuffed repeated
requests to obtain Mr. Bush's reaction and decline to discuss
investigations or fall out from the disclosures.''@s2 By midsummer,
the scandal had been buried. The President had managed to avoid
giving a single press conference where he would surely have been
asked to comment.
As the call boy ring affair dominated the
cocktail gossip circuit in Washington, another scandal, halfway
across the country in the state of Nebraska, peaked. Again this
scandal knocked on the President's door.
A black Republican who had been a leader in
organizing minority support for the President's 1988 campaign and
who proudly displayed a photo of himself and the President, arm in
arm, in his Omaha home, was at the center of a sex and money scandal
that continues to rock the Cornhusker state.
The scandal originated with the collapse of
the minority-oriented Franklin Community Credit Union in Omaha,
directed by Lawrence E. King, Jr., a nationally influential black
Republican who sang the national anthem at both the 1984 and 1988
Republican conventions. King became the subject of the Nebraska
Senate's investigation conducted by the specially created ``Franklin
Committee'' to probe charges of embezzlement. In November 1988,
King's offices were raided by the FBI and $40 million was discovered
missing. Within weeks, the Nebraska Senate, which initially opened
the inquiry to find out where the money had gone, instead found
itself questioning young adults and teenagers who said that they had
been child prostitutes. Social workers and state child-care
administrators accused King of running a child prostitution ring.
The charges grew with the former police chief of Omaha, the
publisher of the state's largest daily newspaper, and several other
political associates of King, finding themselves accused of
patronizing the child prostitution ring.
King is now serving a 15-year federal
prison sentence for defrauding the Omaha-based credit union. But the
magazines Avvenimenti of Italy and Pronto of Spain,
among others, have charged that King's crimes were more serious:
that he ran a national child prostitution ring that serviced the
political and business elite of both Republican and Democratic
parties. Child victims of King's operations charged him with
participation in at least one satanic ritual murder of a child
several years ago. The Washington Post, New York Times,
Village Voice and National Law Journal covered the
full range of accusations after the story broke in November of 1988.
King's money machinations were also linked to the Iran-Contra
affair, and some say that King provided the CIA with information
garnered from his alleged activities as a ``pimp'' for the high and
mighty.
Pronto, the Barcelona-based, largest
circulation weekly in Spain with 4.5 million readers, reported that
the Lawrence E. King child prostitution scandal ``appears to
directly implicate politicos of the state of Nebraska and
Washington, D.C. who are very close to the White House and George
Bush himself.''
The weekly stated that Roy Stephens, a
private investigator who has worked on the case and heads the
Missing Youth Foundation, ``says there is reason to believe that the
CIA is directly implicated,'' and that the ``FBI refuses to help in
the investigation and has sabotaged any efforts'' to get to the
bottom of the story. Stephens says that ``Paul Bonnacci directly
accused President Bush of being implicated'' in the affair when he
testified before the Franklin Committee.@s3 Bonnacci, who had been
one of the child prostitutes, is identified by leading child-abuse
experts as a well-informed, credible witness.
Lawrence King was no stranger to President
Bush. And Lawrence King was no stranger to Craig Spence. Several of
the Omaha child prostitutes testified that they had traveled to
Washington, D.C. with King in private planes to attend political
events which were followed by sex parties. King and Spence had much
in common. Not only were they both Republican Party activists but
they had gone into business together procuring prostitutes for
Washington's elite.
Bush's name had repeatedly surfaced in the
Nebraska scandal. But his name was first put into print in July
1989, a little less than a month after the Washington call boy
affair had first made headlines. Omaha's leading daily newspaper
reported, ``One child, who has been under psychiatric care, is said
to believe she saw George Bush at one of King's parties.''@s4
A full three years after the scandal had
first made headlines, Bush's name again appeared in print.
Gentleman's Quarterly (GQ) carried a lengthy article, viewed by
many political observers in Nebraska as an attempt to refute the
charges which would not die, despite the termination of all official
inquiries. The GQ piece disputed the allegations as a
conspiracy theory that went out of control and resonated because of
some mystical sociological phenomena allegedly unique to Nebraskan
rural folk who will believe anything and burn ``with the mistrust of
city life that once inflamed the prairie with populist passion.''
Numerous polls over the last few years have recorded over 90% saying
they believe there has been a ``cover up'' of the truth.
GQ reported that yes, there was
theft, corruption and homosexuality in this story, ``but no children
were ever involved in this case.'' In fact, ``the only child even
mentioned was a 9-year-old boy, whom the least reliable of
Caradori's witnesses claimed to have seen in the company of George
Bush at one of Larry King's Washington parties.''
Gary Caradori was a retired state police
investigator who had been hired by the Nebraska Senate to
investigate the case, and who had died mysteriously during the
course of his investigations.@s5
Sound crazy? Not to Steve Bowman, an Omaha
businessman who is compiling a book about the Franklin money and sex
scandal. ``We do have some credible witnesses who say that `Yes,
George Bush does have a problem.'... Child abuse has become one of
the epidemics of the 1990s,'' Bowman told GQ. Allegedly, one
of Bowman's sources is a retired psychiatrist who worked for the
CIA. He added that cocaine trafficking and political corruption were
the other principal themes of his book.@s6
It didn't sound crazy to Peter Sawyer
either. An Australian conservative activist who publishes a
controversial newsletter, Inside News, with a circulation of
200,000, dedicated his November 1991 issue entirely to the Nebraska
scandal, focusing on President Bush's links to the affair. In a
section captioned, ``The Original Allegations: Bush First Named in
1985,'' Sawyer writes,
"Stories about child sex and
pornography first became public knowledge in 1989, following the
collapse of the Franklin Credit Union. That is not when the
allegations started, however. Indeed, given the political flavor
of the subsequent investigations, it would be easy to dismiss
claims that George Bush had been involved. He was by then a very
public figure...."
If the first allegations about a massive
child exploitation ring, centered around Larry King and leading all
the way to the White House, had been made in 1989, and had all come
from the same source, some shenanigans and mischievous collusion
could be suspected. However, the allegations arising out of the
Franklin Credit Union collapse were not the first.
Way back in 1985, a young girl, Eulice
(Lisa) Washington, was the center of an investigation by Andrea L.
Carener, of the Nebraska Department of Social Services. The
investigation was instigated because Lisa and her sister Tracey
continually ran away from their foster parents, Jarrett and Barbara
Webb. Initially reluctant to disclose information for fear of being
further punished, the two girls eventually recounted a remarkable
story, later backed up by other children who had been fostered out
to the Webb's [sic].
These debriefings were conducted by Mrs.
Julie Walters, another welfare officer, who worked for Boys Town at
the time, and who had been called in because of the constant
reference by the Webb children and others, to that institution.
Lisa, supported by her sister, detailed a
massive child sex, homosexual, and pornography industry, run in
Nebraska by Larry King. She described how she was regularly taken to
Washington by plane, with other youths, to attend parties hosted by
King and involving many prominent people, including businessmen and
politicians. Lisa specifically named George Bush as being in
attendance on at least two separate occasions. ``Remember, this was
in 1985,'' emphasized the Australian newsletter.
The newsletter reproduces several documents
on Lisa's case, including a Nebraska State Police report, a State of
Nebraska Foster Care Review Board letter to the Attorney General, an
investigative report prepared for the Franklin Committee of the
Nebraska Senate, and a portion of the handwritten debriefing by Mrs.
Julie Walters. Peter Sawyer says that he obtained the documents from
sympathetic Australian law enforcement officers who had helped
Australian Channel Ten produce an exposeé of a national child
prostitution ring Down Under. The Australian cops seem to have been
in communication with American law enforcement officers who
apparently agreed that there had been a coverup on the Nebraska
scandal. Subsequent investigations by the authors established that
all four documents were authentic.
Mrs. Julie Walters, now a housewife in the
Midwest, confirmed that in 1986 she had interviewed the alleged
child prostitute, Lisa, who told her about Mr. Bush. Lisa and her
sister Tracey were temporarily living at the time in the home of
Kathleen Sorenson, another foster parent. Mrs. Walters explained
that at first she was very surprised. But Lisa, who came from a very
underprivileged background with no knowledge of political affairs,
gave minute details of her attendance at political meetings around
the country.
From Julie Walters' 50-page handwritten
report:
3/25/86. Met with Kathleen [Sorenson]
and Lisa for about 2 hours in Blair [Neb.] questioning Lisa for
more details about sexual abuse.... Lisa admitted to being used
as a prostitute by Larry King when she was on trips with his
family. She started going on trips when she was in 10th grade.
Besides herself and Larry there was also Mrs. King, their son,
Prince, and 2-3 other couples. They traveled in Larry's private
plane, Lisa said that at these trip parties, which Larry hosted,
she sat naked ``looking pretty and innocent'' and guests could
engage in any sexual activity they wanted (but penetration was
not allowed) with her.... Lisa said she first met V.P. George
Bush at the Republican Convention (that Larry King sang the
national anthem at) and saw him again at a Washington, D.C.
party that Larry hosted. At that party, Lisa saw no women
(``make-up was perfect--you had to check their legs to make sure
they weren't a woman'').
The polygraph test which Lisa took only
centered around sexual abuse committed by Jarrett Webb. At that
time, she had said only general things about Larry's trips (i.e.
where they went, etc.). She only began talking about her involvement
in prostitution during those trips on 3/25/86....
Lisa also accompanied Mr. and Mrs. King and
Prince on trips to Chicago, N.Y. and Washington, D.C. beginning when
she was 15 years old. She missed twenty-two days of school almost
totally due to these trips. Lisa was taken along on the pretense of
being Prince's babysitter. Last year she met V.P. George Bush and
saw him again at one of the parties Larry gave while on a
Washington, D.C. trip. At some of the parties there are just men (as
was the case at the party George Bush attended)--older men and
younger men in their early twenties. Lisa said she has seen sodomy
committed at those parties....
At these parties, Lisa said every guest had
a bodyguard and she saw some of the men wearing guns. All guests had
to produce a card which was run through a machine to verify who the
guest was, in fact, who they said they were. And then each guest was
frisked down before entering the party.@s7
The details of the accusations against Mr.
Bush are known to be in the hands of the FBI. A Franklin Committee
report stated:
Apparently she [Lisa] was contacted on
December 19 [1988] and voluntarily came to the FBI offices on
December 30, 1988. She was interviewed by Brady, Tucker and
Phillips.
She indicates that in September or October
1984, when [Lisa] Washington was fourteen or fifteen years of age,
she went on a trip to Chicago with Larry King and fifteen to twenty
boys from Omaha. She flew to Chicago on a private plane.
The plane was large and had rows of two
seats apiece on either side of the interior middle aisle.
She indicates that King got the boys from
Boys Town and the boys worked for him. She stated that Rod Evans and
two other boys with the last name of Evans were on the plane. Could
not recall the names of the other boys.
The boys who flew to Chicago with
Washington and King were between the ages of fifteen and eighteen.
Most of the boys were black but some were white. She was shown a
color photograph of a boy and identified that boy as being one of
the boys on the plane. She could not recall his name.
She indicates that she was coerced to going
on the trip by Barbara Webb.
She indicates that she attended a party in
Chicago with King and the male youths. She indicated George Bush was
present.
She indicates that she set [sic] at a table
at the party while wearing nothing but a negligee. She stated that
George Bush saw her on the table. She stated she saw George Bush pay
King money, and that Bush left the party with a nineteen year old
black boy named Brent. Lisa said the party George Bush attended was
in Chicago in September or October 1984. According to the Chicago
Tribune of October 31, 1984, Bush was in Illinois campaigning
for congressional candidates at the end of October.
Lisa added more details on the Chicago
trip, and told why she was sure it was George Bush she had seen.
According to a May 8, 1989 report by investigator Jerry Lowe,
``Eulice [Lisa] indicated that she recognized George Bush as coming
to the party and that Bush had two large white males with him.
Eulice indicated Bush came to the party approximately 45 minutes
after it started and that he was greeted by Larry King. Eulice
indicated that she knew George Bush due to the fact that he had been
in political campaigns and also she had observed a picture of Bush
with Larry King at Larry King's house in Omaha.''
There is no question that Lisa and Tracey
Webb were abused in the way they claimed. But, in keeping with the
alleged pattern of coverup, a Washington County, Nebraska judge in
December 1990 dismissed all charges against their abusers, Jarrett
and Barbara Webb. The judge ignored presented testimony of the 1986
report by Boys Town official Julie Walters. The report stated:
``Lisa was given four polygraph tests administered by a state
trooper at the State Patrol office on Center Street in Omaha. The
state trooper, after Lisa's testing was completed, told [another
foster parent] he tried to `break Lisa down,' but he was convinced
she was telling the truth.''@s8
Furthermore, numbers of foster care
officials and youth workers debriefed the sisters. All of them fully
believed not only their general story of abuse, but specifically
their account of Bush's involvement. The March 1986 report on Bush
was incorporated into the Foster Care Review Board's official report
presented to the Senate Franklin Committee and to law enforcement.
As Kathleen Sorenson wrote in a report dated May 1, 1989, ``This was
long before he [Bush] was president. It seems like there were more
exciting people to `lie' about if that's what they were doing.''@s9
The rumors about Mr. Bush were given new
life when Dr. Ronald Roskens, the head of the Agency for
International Development (AID), found himself the object of
controversy. Executive Intelligence Review reported in the
fall of 1991 that Dr. Roskens is the subject of a scandal in which
he is being charged with violating federal laws and ethics codes,
according to the Oct. 6 Washington Post. A report prepared by
AID Inspector General Herbert Beckington, dated April 5 and leaked
to the Post, charges Roskens with accepting thousands of
dollars in payments from ``different organizations in compensation
of his and his wife's travel expenses'' while Roskens was on
official government travel. He also took money for a private trip
from a company ``from which Roskens had agreed to divest himself as
a condition of his presidential appointment.''
The inspector general concluded that the
money accepted by Roskens was a clear conflict of interest and
violated federal law against earning non-government income. But on
Sept. 4, after reviewing the charges, the Department of Justice ...
informed Beckington that it had decided not to prosecute--giving no
explanation for its decision. The White House is reviewing the case.
Congressional investigators are already
looking into the allegations. Should they scratch below the surface,
they will find that this is not the first time Roskens has been
touched by scandal. Although President Bush promised that he would
not tolerate even the appearance of impropriety in his
administration, Congress should not be surprised if the White House
threatens to start ``breaking legs'' in Roskens's defense.
It is not just that Roskens is a personal
friend of the President--although he is.... [A]n unimpeded
investigation into Roskens could expose the link between Bush's
little publicized birth control mania--much of which is carried out
through the State Department's AID in the Third World--and the
sexual depravity rampant in U.S. political and intelligence elites.
Any such scandal could shatter the illusions of Bush's conservative
base, many of whom still accept the President's claims to being
``pro-life,'' ``anti-drug,'' and an American patriot. It should also
make anyone who thinks of the propaganda about Bush being the
``education President,'' deeply queasy.
Roskens left his home state of Nebraska for
the nation's capital in early 1990 enmired in controversy. He had
been fired suddenly as president of the University of Nebraska, in a
secret meeting of the state Board of Regents in July 1989. No public
explanation was given for his removal. Yet, within weeks, the White
House offered Roskens the high-profile job in Washington. The
administration knew about the controversy in Nebraska, but Roskens
passed an FBI background check, and was confirmed to head AID.
The FBI appears to have overlooked a Feb.
19, 1990 investigative report by the late Gary Caradori [see
footnote 5 below], an investigator for the ``Franklin Committee'' of
the Nebraska Senate. He wrote, ``I was informed that Roskins [sic]
was terminated by the state because of sexual activities reported to
the Regents and verified by them. Mr. Roskins [sic] was reported to
have had young men at his residence for sexual encounters. As part
of the separation from the state, he had to move out of the
state-owned house because of the liability to the state if some of
his sexual behavior was `illegal.'''@s1@s0
There
has been no independent confirmation of the accusation. As of late
December 1991, a congressional committee was looking into the
charges.
NOTES:
Notes for Chapter -XX-
1. Washington Times, Aug.
9, 1989.
2. Washington Times, July
7, 1989.
3. Pronto (Barcelona,
Spain), Aug. 3, 1991 and Aug. 10, 1991.
4. Omaha World-Herald, July
23, 1989.
5. On July 11, 1990, during the
course of his investigations, Gary Caradori, 41, died in the crash
of his small plane, together with his 8-year-old son, after a
mid-air explosion whose cause has not yet been discovered. A skilled
and cautious pilot, Caradori told friends repeatedly in the weeks
before his death that he feared his plane would be sabotaged.
6. Gentleman's Quarterly,
December 1991.
7. Report, written on March 25,
1986 by Julie Walters and authenticated by her in an interview in
1990.
8. Report, early 1989, compiled by
Jerry Lowe, the first investigator for the Franklin Committee of the
Nebraska State Senate.
9. A book recently published on
the Nebraska affair by a former Republican state senator and
decorated Vietnam veteran, John W. De Camp, The Franklin
Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism and Murder in Nebraska (Lincoln,
Nebraska: AWT, Inc., 1992) tells the whole story.
10. Executive Intelligence
Review, Oct. 18, 1991.
Rusty
Nelson, Photographer for 'Franklin Cover-Up' Coordinator, Accuses
Hunter Thompson of Wanting to Film Child Being Murdered
Witness says
abducted children--23 now dead--abused by 20-30 pedophile
members of congress at child sex parties held at Embassy Row
mansion where Secret Service-secured presidential limo was seen
parked outside
Lincoln, NE -- March 28,
2005 -- TomFlocco.com --
Recently arrested
photographer Russell E. "Rusty" Nelson--who according to U.S.
District court testimony [2-5-1999] was impersonated by another
photographer at Capitol Hill child sex parties during the Reagan
and Bush presidencies, told us last week that in 1988
he refused Hunter Thompson’s offer of $100,000 to film a graphic
child sex "snuff movie to be sold to wealthy private clients
where a young boy would be murdered as a sacrifice."
"I’ve been homeless, in
hiding and staying under the radar screen ever since," said
Nelson.
Thompson reportedly
committed suicide a few weeks ago on February 10, 2005--six days
prior to Nelson’s February 16 arrest, when simultaneous search
warrants were served to confiscate Nelson’s photographic
equipment, computers, photos and "visual depictions of sexually
explicit conduct involving a child," according to copies we
obtained. Nelson said authorities were hoping to find evidence
of child porn; but he claims to have never been involved. His
next public hearing is May 4 in Lincoln.
Nelson enhanced his
credibility in sworn testimony before Nebraska U.S. Senior
District Judge Warren Urbom on February 5, 1999 [pp. 101-154]
resulting in Urbom awarding attorney John DeCamp's
client--pedophile victim Paul Bonacci, $1 million dollars in
damages for sexual abuse in a case against convicted GOP
activist Larry King, who sang the national anthem at the 1984
and 1988 Republican national conventions.
An employee at Lincoln’s
DeCamp Legal Services told TomFlocco.com that the warrant’s
actual violation date was September 1, 2003 [just prior to the
2004 presidential primary season], but it was not served until
February 16, 2005--calling into question why authorities waited
so long.
Questions can also be raised as to whether Hunter Thompson’s
death and the James Guckert-Jeff Gannon White House reporter
scandal resulted in having Nelson taken out of circulation to
intimidate or threaten him while also using the opportunity to
search for criminal evidence--the kind which would place sitting
and retired members of congress in severe legal jeopardy.
The revelations came
during an unexpected phone call from Nelson, 42, who also told
TomFlocco.com he personally witnessed Secret Service agents
arrive at King’s Embassy Row mansion in Washington to set up
security two days prior to a private child sex party attended by
senators and congressmen he declined to name. The party was held
immediately after a public political reception in October,
1988--just prior to the Bush-Dukakis presidential election.
Presidential limousine
On the night of the two
parties, Nelson said he saw a limousine arrive for the second
party--attended by young children. He was told that it was the
presidential limo, adding that he saw "several Secret Service
agents guarding the vehicle from the time it arrived at 9-10 pm
until it pulled away from King’s home after midnight."
In addition to children,
the mostly male "after-party" was attended by members of
congress and other businessmen according to Nelson, who declined
to tell us when we asked if President Reagan or Vice President
Bush had arrived in the limo, saying "I will only tell which one
it was, or the names of senators and congressmen in a
courtroom."
When we asked during a
second phone interview whether there was concrete evidence to
corroborate his allegations, Nelson said "there are many
photographs showing members of congress in fairly explicit--but
not pornographic--poses with children."
"The one impersonating me
at the sex parties--a guy named Nick--took the hardcore porn
photos of children and politicians together for blackmail
purposes, to control their votes in Congress and stuff," said
the photographer.
Nelson said "I found out
from my sources that about 23 children who attended those
parties are now dead; and the politicians would really have a
lot of explaining to do if the pictures ever got out--especially
to their parents; but they won’t unless something happens to
me."
When we asked Nelson
whether he would ever offer sworn testimony and take a polygraph
test to legally certify his more specific but explosive claims,
the photographer said, "In a heartbeat; but no judge, grand jury
or congressmen ever asked me about this stuff. And there are
many grown kids out there, too scared to talk about it."
Nelson’s voice and general
conversation indicated resignation to the fact that no one would
ever touch his testimony, adding that Senate and House
pedophiles still hold public office. This, in spite of the
prosecution and imprisonment of elderly Catholic priests.
Nelson corroborated our
earlier interview with attorney and Franklin Cover-up author
John DeCamp [decamplegal@inebraska.com], revealing that about
20-30 senators and congressmen attended and participated in
mostly male pedophile sex parties at King’s mansion during the
Reagan-Bush 41 administrations--but neither would name names.
DeCamp told us, "I can’t
talk about that now. Bad things happen."
Nelson and Decamp also
said that retired Los Angeles FBI Special Agent Ted Gunderson
flew to Nebraska to assist the photographer; and Nelson told us
Gunderson secured cash from an unidentified individual who paid
to have him released on bail before his next public hearing on
May 4. Nelson said he is worried, remains homeless, and is
served legally by a public defender.
DeCamp said Gunderson has
taken "a personal interest in Nelson and the Franklin case, and
he’s a good friend."
MIT and the U.S. Army
Ensnared as a fall-guy for
what the Washington Times called a White House and congressional
child sex ring, the Nebraska photographer said the warrants were
used to locate photo evidence of Capitol Hill pedophilia, but
Nelson just wants to get on with his life.
Rusty Nelson told us he
attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for two
years, studying electronic engineering in the early 1980’s:
"Photography was my hobby or key interest, and I was offered so
much money, I left school to work for a phone company, building
microwave radio stations, tower dishes--it was more money than I
could have earned with an MIT degree; and it got me out into the
mountains where I could also do photo shows and scenic art."
"The company got bought
out, so I entered the Army for a couple years as a wire climber
who wired phones and I got out in 1986," said Nelson, adding, "I
was approached by people connected to Larry King because of my
photography work in the Lincoln area and pretty soon I started
going with him to Washington, DC to do various photo jobs--but I
never did anything pornographic."
Front-man for the fall
"My problems started at
King’s Embassy Row mansion in January through June, 1988 when
they were trying to bring me into the inner circle at Bohemian
Grove and the room in Larry’s mansion--the sex parties--when I
saw the other guy impersonating me--supposedly without my
knowledge," he said.
"At about that time [age
23-24], I was broke, homeless, with hardly even a few dollars in
my wallet--I depended on Larry for a room and food; but I was on
his jet with little kids and I saw children sold to the highest
bidder at an auction--that‘s when I really started to get
scared," added the photographer and eyewitness to Capitol Hill
crimes still unpunished.
Nelson’s U.S. District
Court testimony weaves a curious tale regarding his
impersonation so that abducted children and others would
identify him as the child porn photographer should it be
necessary:
"Q: How did you come to
know Larry King?...I needed to find a decent job and he [Ron,
who hired Rusty Nelson for photos at club named Max‘s] goes ‘I
know somebody who probably be able to use a good photographer,
I’ll talk to him...All of a sudden, here’s Larry King, I had no
idea who he was...and next thing I’m on a private jet to
Washington, DC and just lavishly being spent money on,
clothes..." Q: How old were you?...About 24, 25...maybe 23...Q:
Did you function as a photographer for Larry?...Oh, yes. Q: What
did you photograph? Things like the opening of Prince’s Palace,
a restaurant, a jazz club he started...took pictures at his
mansion on Embassy Row...he kept wanting me to do kiddie porn,
gay porn. I wanted no part of it...he went to the extent of
insisting I wear certain clothes, my hair had to be a certain
way...Nancy Reagan’s hairdresser [Robin Weir] did my hair.
Permed it, everything, totally changed my appearance...I
happened to come across a man who was also a photographer for
Larry. Whose appearance was almost identical to mine...I came to
gather I was being run as the front man for the fall and this
other person was doing the actual hard core kiddie porn...I
heard somebody was passing themselves off as myself, as Rusty
Nelson..." [U.S. District Court, Nebraska, U.S. Senior District
Judge Warren Urbom, February 5, 1999, Sworn testimony of Russell
E. Nelson, pp. 40-43]
Nelson added, "I saw this
guy [Nick] dressed exactly like me on three different
occasions," adding, "whenever we were in the same area, Larry
would quickly get him out of there. He even had the identical
camera I had."
"One night in the spring
of 1988 on K street in Washington, I’m sound asleep and a guy
knocks on the door and says ‘I just bought you from Larry and
you’re mine for the night,’ "said Nelson, who continued, "I
climbed out the second story window and ran. This was not long
before the presidential election when Franklin Credit Union was
raided."
"Nancy Reagan’s
hairdresser, Robin Weir, did my hair. Permed it,
everything...totally changed my appearance..."
"I was so scared. I lived
in hiding for eight years, never stayed anywhere for more than
three weeks or so usually; did odd jobs, washed windows--hotels,
restaurants to get something to live on; I was shot at and
wanted to keep under the radar," said Nelson.
Silencing the witness
Nelson had by then settled
in Portland, Oregon; and about six weeks before the Clinton-Dole
presidential election on Friday, September 13, 1996, Nelson said
he was finally arrested on the charge he used a child for the
display of sexually explicit conduct.
"I never did it," said
Nelson, adding, "they had no photos and if they did, they
wouldn't show me the photos they were using to put me away. So I
held out; but they set my bail for $873,000 cash, and finally
put me in solitary confinement for 22.5 months on a 13 month
sentence after I gave in to just get it over with."
"I pleaded no contest for
a photo of a minor in a sexually explicit pose without any
photos or proof--and no person bringing the charges. I didn’t
even know the accuser and I still don’t; but they just said it
was a minor," he said.
Knowing the political and
criminal implications of a child sex scandal, higher powers had
enough motives to keep Rusty Nelson in solitary confinement--an
unnecessary and unusual punishment normally reserved for
hardened criminals.
But 1996 GOP presidential
candidate Bob Dole’s wife [now North Carolina Senator] Elizabeth
Dole, had an aide who was closely linked to the Washington
call-boy ring, so there is reason to believe it was important to
keep Nelson incommunicado and in solitary confinement.
A news report confirmed
why Nelson was likely taken off the street: "A top Labor
Department advisor to Secretary Elizabeth Dole resigned
yesterday after acknowledging that he had procured male
prostitutes and was subject to blackmail threats by one of the
call boys." [Washington Times, 6-30-1989--The paper had
previously reported that a 15-year old call-boy had toured the
White House at midnight.]
In a letter announcing his
resignation as Mrs. Dole’s political personnel liaison to the
White House, Paul R. Balach wrote: "I hereby resign my position
this date due to the public disclosure of activities concerning
my personal life."
Not mentioning either
children or members of congress, the Times added, "according to
documents obtained, the homosexual prostitution ring includes
not only Reagan and Bush administration officials but military
officers, congressional aides and U.S. foreign businessmen with
close social ties to Washington’s ‘political elite.’ "
Attempts to find photos of
high government officials
Nelson told us, "While I
was in jail, the FBI went to my parents’ farm in Nebraska and
took sledge hammers to the walls, shot out all the windows and
appliances of our barn, ransacked my parents house without a
warrant on two separate occasions--looking for stuff related to
Franklin, evidence--the photos; but I was not shooting kiddie
porn."
"There were military shell
casings all over our property," he said.
"And when I had to leave
Portland to go testify in Nebraska, state parole officers did
everything they could to keep me from testifying before Judge
Urbom," said Nelson, adding, "they said I was in solitary to
protect me but it was more like torture since they woke me up so
much I never got any sleep, spent $50,000 to extradite me back
to Oregon for a DNA sample, then put me on death row at
Leavenworth prison for a few weeks with violent criminals--heck,
I saw them beat one guy and four men died while I was at
Moltnomah County Detention Center in Portland."
"This last arrest [after
the Thompson suicide] in February, I was roughed up, pushed into
walls, and they would not let me see their badge numbers; I was
helping a friend open up her photography studio--that’s the only
way I can earn money to survive," he said.
"They said I was
soliciting a minor for photographs; but we were only looking for
a few junior bridesmaids for a bridal show promotion with other
women. And the parents were all involved and were always
required to sign releases and be present for all photo shoots.
We did nothing wrong. I am good at wedding photography and you
can earn good money in that business," Nelson continued, adding
"how else am I able to work?"
Nelson’s prior links to
the White House child sex ring have continued to draw attention
from unidentified individuals who still threaten him.
"In the spring of 2003
[not long after key child sex ring witness Troy Boner was found
mysteriously dead in a New Mexico hospital], a guy wearing dark
sunglasses came up to me and said, ‘Drop Franklin; you’re in too
deep. Your family and life are in jeopardy.’ Then he walked
away."
Even more recently, on
October 22, 2004 [two weeks before George W. Bush edged out John
F. Kerry for the presidency], Delmart "Mike" Vreeland was
arrested in Franklin county, Iowa on charges of child
prostitution allegedly committed in Colorado.
Vreeland is now off the
street, however, reportedly in solitary confinement with no
contact with other prisoners after having been said to have
predicted the 9/11 attacks in a note written while he was
previously in prison on other charges.
While the
rest of the country reels from relatively frequent amber alerts
in Florida and around the United States, evidence continues to
point toward reasons for commencing an amber alert on Capitol
Hill--what some would say is the epicenter of child sex
criminality.
Paul A. Bonacci v.
Lawrence E. King
The Franklin Scandal Tried in Civil Court
U.S. government mind control
programs, like MK-Ultra and Monarch, directed against helpless
victims--human guinea pigs--have been virtually ignored by the Big
Media Cartel. On Feb. 27, 1999, however, U.S. District Court Judge
Warren Urbom found former Franklin S&L manager Lawrence E. King
guilty of numerous crimes committed against mind control victim Paul
A. Bonacci.
King, serving a 15-year sentence for his role in the theft of $40
million from Franklin, an Omaha, Neb., credit union, was ordered by
Judge Urbom to pay Bonacci $800,000 in compensatory damages and an
additional $200,000 in punitive damages.
This legal judgement against a notorious perpetrator of
satanic-ritual child abuse is unprecedented. In the Memorandum of
Decision, Judge Urbom wrote, "King continually subjected the
plaintiff [Bonacci] to repeated sexual assaults, false imprisonment,
infliction of extreme emotional distress, organized and directed
satanic rituals, forced the plaintiff to 'scavenge' for children to
be a part of the defendant King's sexual abuse and pornography ring,
forced the plaintiff to engage in numerous sexual contacts with the
defendant King and others and participate in deviate sexual games
and masochistic orgies with other minor children.
"He [Bonacci] has suffered burns, broken fingers, beatings of the
head and face and other indignities by the wrongful actions of the
defendant King," the judge declared. "In addition to the misery of
going through the experiences just related over a period of eight
years [1980-1988], the plaintiff has suffered the lingering results
to the present time. "He [Bonacci] is a victim of multiple
personality disorder, involving as many as 14 distinct personalities
aside from his primary personality," wrote the judge.
"He has given up a desired military career and received threats on
his life. He suffers from sleeplessness, has bad dreams, has
difficulty holding a job, is fearful that others are following him,
fears getting killed, has depressing flashbacks, and is verbally
violent on occasion, all in connection with the multiple personality
disorder and caused by the wrongful activities of the defendant
King."
Franklin Cover-up
Bonacci's lawyer, John DeCamp, has waged a long, lonely and
expensive legal campaign in exposing crimes involving an
international pedophile-pornography ring.
In 1991, DeCamp filed a 12-count suit in federal court, charging 16
prominent individuals and institutions, including Lawrence E. King,
Omaha World Herald Publisher Harold Andersen and the Omaha Police
Department with conspiracy to deprive Paul Bonacci of his civil
rights. DeCamp's suit detailed slander, false imprisonment, child
abuse, assault, battery and infliction of emotional distress
suffered by Bonacci.
The complex case also involved high-level politicians, business
leaders, judges and police officials with connections to the drug
distribution/money laundering operations known as "Iran"-Contra
which goes back to then Vice-President George Bush. DeCamp, a former
Nebraska State Senator, even wrote a groundbreaking book about the
sordid history of the case called The Franklin Cover-Up: Child
Abuse, Satanism and Murder in Nebraska.
Monarch Project
The horrendous Monarch Project "refers to young people in America
who were victims of mind control experiments run either by U.S.
government agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency or
military intelligence agencies," writes DeCamp. "The story told by
Monarch victims--one of whom was Paul Bonacci--is that they were
tortured for the purpose of creating 'multiple personalities' within
them," DeCamp continues from his book. "These multiple personalities
could then be programmed--as spies, 'drug mules,' prostitutes or
assassins."
An article by Anton Chaitkin, quoted in the book, states that
"professionals probing the child victims of 'Monarch' say there are
clearly two responsible elements at work: the government/military,
and cooperating satanic (or more exactly pagan) cults. These are
multi-generation groups, whose parents donate their own
children--who are proudly called 'bloodline' or simply 'blood'
cultists--to be smashed with drugs and electric shock and shaped.
Other children are kidnapped and sold into this hell, or are brought
in gradually through day care situations.
"Paul Bonacci and other child victims have given evidence in great
depth on the central role of Lt. Col. Michael Aquino in this
depravity," continues Chaitkin. "Aquino, alleged to have recently
retired from an active military role, was long the leader of an Army
psychological warfare section which drew on his 'expertise' and
personal practices in brainwashing, Satanism, Nazism, homosexual
pedophilia and murder." DeCamp's victory in court and the million
dollar judgement is a vindication of mind control survivors Paul
Bonacci, Alisha Owens and others who were falsely imprisoned to keep
them from testifying against their abusers.
Police and FBI Cover-Up
According to the sworn testimony of Noreen Gosch, an activist on
behalf of "Missing Children," whose own 12-year-old son Johnny, a
West Des Moines, Iowa paperboy kidnapped in 1991, was drugged and
sold into prostitution and pornography. "There was no law on the
books in Iowa or most any other state in the country specifying that
the police would have to act sooner than 72 hours-even though we had
five witnesses that could describe the car, the man and various
details of the kidnapping. So I wrote the first piece of legislation
which became the Johnny Gosch Bill.
Gosch also alleges that the FBI were active in quashing a TV expose.
"Just prior to the 'America's Most Wanted' story going on the
air...within a week or two of airtime, the FBI in Quantico, Virg.
contacted 'America's Most Wanted' and told them to kill the story,"
Gosch continued. They did not want the Johnny Gosch story
broadcast," she says. The only reason the story went on is because
John Walsh is a personal friend, and he stood up to them, and he
said this story goes. This woman does not lie. I've known her for
years. We're going with the story. You can fire me afterwards. We're
doing the story.
And they did the story. But the FBI tried to kill this story."
When DeCamp, the attorney, asked her if she knew why, she replied,
"Well, of course. It would have opened up the biggest scandal in the
United States, bigger than the Iran-Contra story. Bigger than
President Clinton's infidelities." The Satanic-Military MK-Ultra
Mind Control Connection Continuing her sworn testimony, Noreen Gosch
spoke about "the MK-Ultra program developed in the 1950s by the CIA.
It was used to help spy on other countries during the Cold War
because they felt that the other countries were spying on us. It was
very successful.
"...Then there was a man by the name of Michael Aquino. He was in
the military. He had top Pentagon clearance. He was a Satanist. He's
founded the Temple of Set. And he was also a very close friend of
Anton LaVey [the late founder of the Church of Satan].
The two of them were very active in ritualistic sexual abuse. And
they deferred funding from this government program to use this
experimentation upon children where they deliberately split off the
personalities of these children into multiples, so that when they're
questioned, or put under oath, or questioned under lie detector,
that unless the operator knows how to question a multiple
personality disorder they turn up with no evidence.
"They use these kids to sexually compromise politicians or anyone
else they wish to have control of," Gosch continued. "This sounds so
far out and so bizarre. I had trouble accepting it in the beginning
myself, until I was presented with the data. We have the proof. In
black and white."
DeCamp asked her, "You known that Colonel Aquino was drummed out of
the military?" "He was," replied Gosch. "But then there were no
charges filed against him that stuck [the San Francisco Presidio
child abuse allegations]...I know that Michael Aquino has been in
Iowa. I know that Michael Aquino has been to Offutt Air Force Base
[described by numerous victims as a center of mind control-ritual
abuse]. I know that he had contact with many of these children."
Bonacci's Story
One of the most heart-rendering parts of the court transcript is the
testimony of Paul A. Bonacci, the mind control victim survivor, on
whose behalf DeCamp sued Lawrence E. King. Bonacci testifed that
King took him on many trips to Washington, D.C., Kansas City,
Chicago, Minnesota and Los Angeles, where he prostituted the
kidnapped and drugged youngster to the rich and famous--and
depraved.
Bonacci said that "one person I'm not afraid to talk about because
Larry King always said him and this guy were on opposite ends of the
field because this guy was a Democrat and Larry King was a
Republican...And this guy--every time I see him on TV, my wife knows
my hatred for him...His name is Barney Frank."
When asked if he "relationships" with him, Bonacci replied, "In
Washington, D.C. And also I was sent to a house, I believe it was in
Massachusetts in Boston where I believe it was his house because
there's pictures on the wall with him and different people and
stuff, that he had met I guess, but it was in his basement.
Suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder, currently called
Dissassociative Identity Disorder (DID), Bonacci testified that as
one of his alters called Wesley, he lured Johnny Gosch into the van
when he was kidnapped.
"I went up to him, asked him [Gosch] a question," said Bonacci. "At
that point he was close enough to the car where Tony [another
kidnapper] had pulled up in the van and they pushed him in the car
and they had a rag with chloroform in the bag that they had us stick
over his face. And then put it back in the bag after he was out...We
drove several miles...we met up with a station wagon and a van
several times."
After switching vehicles and changing direction, the kidnapping of
Johnny Gosch was over.
More Chilling Memories
When the judge asked Paul Bonacci if Lawrence E. King ever sexually
abused him, he answered, "Yes, he did on numerous occasions." How
many times would you estimate, the judge then asked. "Probably a
couple of hundred. Within all of the different personalities.
Beginning at the time I was approximately 12 or 13 years old. Up
until I was about 17 or 18."
And what was his primary duty, according to directions he received
from Mr. King, asked the judge. "It depended on what was needed,"
replied Bonacci. "Most of the time it was to compromise politicians
so he could get whatever he wanted from them...If they wanted to get
something passed, through the legislature or whatever, he would put
some people that were against it in a compromising position, by
using us boys and girls." And how often was he used at these
"parties" in Washington? the judge asked.
"Kind of hard to say," replied Bonacci. "Because there were times
when there would be four or five in a night. And I hardly knew, I
didn't know most of them. But probably a couple of thousand times."
New Ramifications Since the judgment in favor of Paul Bonacci
contradicts the previous findings of the U.S. Attorney, Nebraska
Attorney General, and the entire judicial system regarding the
"Franklin Cover-Up,"
DeCamp has issued an open letter challenging the verdicts of the
last ten years of court battles regarding this case and its
principals. DeCamp wrote, "I believe that the U.S. Attorney has no
choice but to either charge the witnesses with perjury having
testified under oath in a federal court...or the U.S. Attorney has
an obligation to investigate further into the Franklin saga and
reopen matters.
"This time there are pictures [tens of thousands of pornographic
photos taken by Rusty Nelson], continues DeCamp. "This time Rusty
Nelson [King's former porno photographer] exists and testified
completely contrary to Chief Wadman's testimony under oath to the
legislature. This time Noreen Gosch validated the credibility and
story of Paul Bonacci...At a minimum some Federal or State authority
has an obligation to reopen the Alisha Owen case."
Alisha Owen, another mind control victim, was sent to prison for 15
years for refusing to recant her testimony against her abusers,
namely former Omaha Police Chief Wadman. Despite this victory, the
mind control cover-up continues-as long as Alisha Owen and others
remain in prison.
And the Monarch Program? As more and more survivors appear and give
eyewitness accounts of mind control atrocities, these outrageous
human rights abuses-the Secret Holocaust of the 20th Century-will
finally become common knowledge.
Bibliography
Constantine, Alex. Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations
in America (1997); $14.95; Feral House, 2532 Lincoln Blvd., Suite
359, Venice CA 90291.
DeCamp, John. The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism and
Murder in Nebraska (1996); $12.95; AWT, Inc., P.O. Box 85461,
Lincoln, NE 68501
In the United States District Court For the District
of Nebraska
Paul A. Bonacci, Plaintiff 4:CV91-3037
vs
Lawrence E. King, Defendant Memorandum of Decision
Filed February 22, 1999
On February 27, 1998, I found that default judgment should be
entered against the defendant Lawrence E. King in favor of the
plaintiff, Paul A. Bonacci. A trial on the issue of the damages due
the plaintiff by that defendant was had on February 5, 1999.
Two counts are alleged against the defendant: King in the complaint.
Count V alleges a conspiracy with public officers to deprive the
plaintiff of his civil rights, designed to continue to subject the
plaintiff to emotional abuse and to prevent him from informing
authorities of criminal conduct. Count VIII charges battery, false
imprisonment, infliction of emotional distress, negligence and
conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of civil rights. Between
December 1980 and 1988, the complaint alleges, the defendant King
continually subjected the plaintiff to repeated sexual assaults,
false imprisonments, infliction of extreme emotional distress,
organized and directed satanic rituals, forced the plaintiff to
"scavenge" for children to be a part of the defendant King's sexual
abuse and pornography ring, forced the plaintiff to engage in
numerous masochistic orgies with other minor children. The defendant
King's default has made those allegations true against him. The
issue now is the relief to be granted monetarily.
The now uncontradicted evidence is that the plaintiff has suffered
much. He has suffered burns, broken fingers, beating of the head and
face and other indignities by the wrongful actions of the defendant
King. In addition to the misery of going through the experiences
just related over a period of eight years, the plaintiff has
suffered the lingering results to the present time. He is a victim
of multiple personality disorder, involving as many as fourteen
distinct personalities aside from his primary personality. He has
given up a desired military career and received threats on his life.
He suffers from sleeplessness, has bad dreams, has difficulty in
holding a job, is fearful that others are following him, fears
getting killed, has depressing flashbacks, and is verbally violent
on occasion, all in connection with the multiple personality
disorder and caused by the wrongful activities of the defendant
King.
Almost certainly the defendant King has little remaining financial
resources, but a fair judgment to compensate the plaintiff is
necessary. For the sixteen years since the abuse of the plaintiff
began I conclude that a fair compensation for the damages he has
suffered is $800,000. A punitive damage award also is justified, but
the amount needs to be limited because of the small effect that such
a judgment would have on the defendant King, given his financial
condition and presence in prison. I deem the punitive damage award
of $200,000 to be adequate.
Dated February 19, 1999.
By the Court
/s/Warren Urborn
United States Senior District Judge
HOW A PSYCHO-SEXUAL CULT
HOLDS AMERICA PRISONER By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
On 9/11, the United States Air Force failed to respond to multiple hijacking
reports,
as required by well-established procedure. Additionally, the NORAD defense
system
was placed on “stand down” for the first time in its history.
Was the command and control of America’s defenses compromised
because military leaders had joined a religious cult that believed a “9/11
type” attack,
a “Pearl Harbor” as it were, would justify a “holy war” coinciding
with fringe interpretations of biblical prophecy?
Read Article at Redacted News Site