JEW HAS GOT TO GET HIS CUT

We learned here that the Jew is extremely sensitive about getting his cut. Owing to his peculiar set of ethics grounded in his age-old religion, the Jew often requires a much larger cut than might seem reasonable and necessary. Here, we learned that the government of Afghanistan had cut the Jew out completely by shutting down opium cultivation.

SADDAM WOULDN’T PLAY BALL

About the same time, Saddam Hussein was running Iraq. He decided to deprive the Jew of the “cut” by selling the country’s oil in Euros, rather than dollars. (Gavin Putland, The War To Save The U.S. Dollar, Trinicenter.com, 26 March 2003) We learned here that when the Jew is deprived of his “cut”, THERE WILL BE BLOOD.

SO THE BLOOD HAD TO FLOW

The Jew responded by pulling the towers in New York, and blaming it on Islamics.

De Borchgrave: So who did Black Sept. 11?

Gul: Mossad and its accomplices. The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That’s $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don’t believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves. (UPI United Press International, Sep. 26, 2001 interviews General Gul, http://www.robert-fisk.com/hamid_gul_interview_sept26_2001.htm) (emphasis added)

GOING FOR THE GOLD — AS USUAL

When the towers toppled, the Jews had an excuse for war — a special war to grab the two countries that had most troubled them.

It didn’t take that long to start the bombing. The formal war against Afghanistan started on 7 October 2001, less than one month after the Towers Job. About a month later, they captured the capital, Kabul, on 13 November 2001. The Jewish-run (see The Bourne Ultimatum (2007)) CIA started grabbing Islamics left and right. They wanted to get confessions that these boys had pulled the towers.

Their tool? “Enhanced interrogation” methods. Torture. (see at right)

In these modern times, torture has a bad name. So it had to be done in secret. “Secret prisons”, that is. Some were on Navy ships in international waters. Surely no laws applied there. The biggest of these facilities was in Guantanamo, Cuba.

EXTRATERRITORIAL TORTURE FACILITY

When the Americans grabbed Cuba from Spain at the end of the 1800s, they installed one of their own as president of the country. The American citizen president gave them a really long lease:

 

During the Spanish-American War, the U.S. fleet attacking Santiago retreated to Guantánamo’s excellent harbor to ride out the summer hurricane season of 1898. The Marines landed with naval support, but required Cuban scouts to push off Spanish resistance that increased as they moved inland. This area became the location of U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, which covers about 45 square miles (116 km²) and is sometimes abbreviated as GTMO or “Gitmo”.

By the war’s end, the U.S. government had obtained control of all of Cuba from Spain. A perpetual lease for the area around Guantánamo Bay was offered February 23, 1903, from Tomás Estrada Palma, an American citizen, who became the first President of Cuba. The Cuban-American treaty gave, among other things, the Republic of Cuba ultimate sovereignty over Guantánamo Bay while granting the United States “complete jurisdiction and control” of the area for coaling and naval stations. (Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Wikipedia)(emphasis added)

 

PUPPETS GIVING AWAY OTHER PEOPLE’S COUNTRIES

A perpetual lease. The sort of thing the Americans want now from their puppet in Iraq:

Tens of thousands of Iraqis protested in a number of cities Friday against the proposed agreement between the puppet regime of Nouri al-Maliki and the Bush administration that would codify a long-term US military occupation.

In a secret videoconference last November, Maliki and Bush signed an agreement, a cynically titled “Declaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship of Cooperation and Friendship,” which outlined plans for the establishment of permanent American military bases and preferential treatment for US energy conglomerates and investors to exploit Iraqi oil reserves. The full details of the pact, including the general dimensions of the American occupation force, were to be worked out by July 31, 2008. (David Walsh, Thousands of Iraqis protest agreement for indefinite US occupation, wsws.org, 31 May 2008 )

On these ships, and on the ground in Cuba, the Jews could pretend that there was no law to protect the Islamics. And the torture got rolling. Needless to say, all this torture could produce just about any sort of confession.

So far the administration of President George W. Bush has refused to unveil the body of evidence to justify the prisoners’ continued detention, arguing it would be against the interests of national security. (Top US court deals Bush blow on Guantanamo rights, AFP, 12 June 2008 )

So where’s the problem?

The torture was done in secret. Offshore. Why not just liquidate the prisoners and say that the bad guys were caught and punished.

GRABBED THE WRONG PEOPLE

The official line had been that the Islamics had some really, really bad people. And that the Americans had grabbed them.

If the bad people are out of circulation, surely they could be tried for the Towers Job, and then everything would be done.

FLY IN THE OINTMENT

Enter physics professor Dr. Steven Jones. He presented scientific proofs that the towers didn’t collapse from the planes, but rather from explosives already in the buildings. David Griffin also put out a book. And then there was the work of Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, and many others.

This was real evidence. If a real trial were to be held in a real court, with real defense lawyers, the body of lies concerning not just the Towers Job, but also the Iraq WMD story, would come out. Plus the story of the tortures. The Islamics may be guilty of bad breath, but they would be judicially cleared on any involvement in the Towers Job.

SPOILING THEIR PARTY

The Jews had a story. They had alleged perpetrators (suspected militants). And plenty of time to torture them in secret.

But these scientists like Dr. Jones had real evidence. The newspapers could hush it up, but who reads newspapers any more? The evidence was all over the internet.

If you can’t hold a real trial, why not let the people go?

Ah, that blows the entire story of Islamics pulling the towers. Plus the people will tell stories of the horrible tortures.

A WICKED PACK OF DUNGEON BEASTS

So they made plans to hold the Islamics indefinitely. In their Cuban dungeons.

Dungeons??

Ah, yes, like the one used by Mr. Josef Fritzl to confine a sex slave. Make that “Dungeon monster Josef Fritzl”. (Tom Wells, Neil Syson, Brian Flynn, Dungeon beast: My story, The Sun, 9 May 2008 )

Check. Someone who confines people indefinitely in a secret prison is a Dungeon Beast, and Monster. Says The Sun. The Sun is, of course, owned by Jewish Press Magnate Mr. Rupert Murdoch, so it may be considered authoritative.

DUNGEON BEASTS HAVE A WEAK CASE

The official story had so many weaknesses.

If the dangerous men had really been caught, why was the war still going on? If they had really been caught, where were the pictures?

Dungeon Beast Josef Fritzl had pictures. He’s even been seen by his fellow prisoners. They call him “Satan”. (Wells, supra)

Prison guards have revealed Fritzl’s fellow inmates continually yell at him: “Satan, come on out — we’re going to kill you.” (id.)

But “Satan” has given interviews, and even gets to see a real lawyer. He’s a real prisoner.

Then there are the prisoners in the “secret” prisons.

No one gets in to take their pictures. No interviews show up.

TOTAL LACK OF BELIEVABLE EVIDENCE

Incriminating evidence was in really short supply, so these secret prisoners couldn’t be brought before a real court. Evidence was so limited that there are serious doubts that the prisoners are who the Jews say they are.

SO WHY NOT SET UP A FAKE COURT
Like at the Eidsiva Lagmannsrett:

Following the general capitulation of Germany in Europe, including Norway, on May 10, 1945, the restored Norwegian government-in-exile (which had fled to London when Germany invaded the country) moved to prosecute individuals for treason or war crimes during the German occupation–during which Quisling’s pro-German puppet regime ruled Norway.

In all cases, the jurisdiction of Norwegian law was invoked, and the
specific statutes were derived from the “Treason Ordinance” (Landssvikanordningen) passed by the Norwegian government in exile, authorized under the Elverum Authorization, civil claims for damages incurred by the Nazi authorities and their collaborators, laws concerning war crimes, and existing legislation concerning the death penalty during times of war.

The purge has been subject to some controversy in later years. The constitutional basis has been questioned [there was no basis], both because some of the laws were retroactive [unlawful] in that all members of Nasjonal Samling after April 9, 1940 were subject to prosecution. There were also questions about the constitutionality of the Elverum Authorization. The prosecution
of individuals who had served with the German Red Cross was questioned, [was totally unfair] among them Hanna Kvanmo, who later rose to fame as a socialist politician. Finally, although a number of Norwegians had served in the SS on the Eastern Front, these were only charged and tried for treason, never for war crimes. [because they commited no war crimes] In total, 28,750 individuals were arrested as part of the purge; these were subject to various kinds of penalties, including fines, prison sentences, and in a small number of cases, death. [and plenty of torture]

Earlier in the war, Crown-Prince Olav stated to the New York Times that he anticipated that all members of Nasjonal Samling would be executed, which would have been over 2% of the Norwegian population. (Legal purge in Norway after World War II, Wikipedia)(emphasis added)

The Jewish king and his son (also Jewish, naturally) Prince Olav were sitting in London. They made a law there to kill all their enemies. Especially dangerous, of course, were the women who served with the Red Cross.

The Jews had a sweet operation going in Norway. The Germans and Nasjonal Samling (the Norwegian Nationalist party) deprived the Jew of his cut. And we all know what happens then. There will be blood.

THESE JEWS CALL IT A MILITARY TRIBUNAL

Sure there was talk of military tribunals:

The United States is making plans to try prisoners held at the US Naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba by military tribunal. All of the potential charges carry a possible death sentence. (Kate Randall, US prepares for military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, World Socialist Web Site, 4 June 2003).

But have you ever heard of judicial proceedings with no sort of official record of court proceedings?

The best solution seemed to be to do nothing at all! Wait for these accused Islamics to die of natural (or unnatural) causes

UNNATURAL CAUSES

Like with Jonas Lie. He ran the Norwegian police between 1941 and 1945.

Mr. Lie had been active in the Norwegian police in the 1930s, and did a good job. He followed this up with service in the Waffen-SS in the Balkans. During his time as Minister of Police, he also led the Norwegian SS.

He knew all about the “home front” and “resistance”. Knew that it involved a pack of criminals (both Jews and non-Jews) who came over from England and murdered innocent Norwegians. Mr. Lie had all the details on these horrid war crimes, and it all would have come out. If there had been a trial.

In May of 1945, the Germans caved in. The next day, Mr. Lie was suicided. An autopsy was conducted, and found no evidence of suicide. Hence, it was just a murder.
 

OUTSIDE PRESSURE

The US Supreme Court Thursday ruledGuantanamo prisoners have the right to challenge their detention at the US military base in civilian courts, dealing a stiff rebuke to the Bush administration. (Top US court deals Bush blow on Guantanamo rights, AFP, 12 June 2008 )

Time to do something, anything, to avoid that.

So it was time get a judicial farce going down at Guantanamo. (Andrew Selsky, US to probe why Guantanamo detainees talked, AP, 6 June 2008 ) The title says it all.

The way things were set up, these people, who are probably Islamics, are being held prisoner by the U.S. military. The dungeon monsters (see above) also were supplying the prosecutor and the judge. That pretty much stacks the deck.

But to leave nothing to chance, they also wanted to require the Islamics to have defense counsel provided by the dungeon monsters.

And so they held a little hearing in Guantanamo. And horror of horrors — the prisoners actually got to talk.

As we see from the picture, prisoners there are not supposed to talk. It seems, though, that some journalists were present in the circus/court room in Guantanamo, and the dungeon beasts thought it might draw attention if the prisoners showed up in their customary outfits.

 

 

WE SHALL END LIBERTY (Protocol 1)

“Chief military defense counsel Stephen David, an Army colonel, said it’s troubling that the alleged coconspirators were allowed to talk unhindered”. (Selsky, supra)

Oh what a plan! The defendants remain silent, and let the Jew talk for them.

But for whatever reason, the defendants dared to talk. The first time in years that they had been allowed to talk “unhindered”.

What does that mean? Unhindered?

Oh, that means without the customary headgear (as shown in picture above).

Jewish defense lawyer David has been troubled, so “We will have to investigate,” David said. (id.)

The Jewish prosecutor is also concerned:

Army Col. Lawrence Morris, the chief prosecutor, said his office was not responsible for controlling when defendants talk to each other, but that “the government is as concerned as the defense” about the issue. (id.)(emphasis added)

But wait. The supposed defense is the government.

WAS the government. All the “defendants” have rejected their Jewish lawyers. (id.) So what is Mr. Stephen David doing now? Why do they call him “the defense”, where elsewhere in the article it says the “defendants” don’t want him?

We compare:

“U.S. military officers responsible for defending Guantanamo detainees said they will investigate why five men accused in the Sept. 11 attacks were allowed to talk among themselves at their arraignment.” (id.)(emphasis added)

and:

“All five said they would represent themselves in the death penalty trial” (id.)(emphasis added)

How are U.S. military officer defending detainees when the detainees represent themselves??

This is just the Jonas Lie play again.

The Jews can’t afford to let these men talk openly.

Anything can happen. Say a quick trial, quick death penalty, and the men are killed.

After all, the trials are all about the death penalty:

Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Protocol 1

Or they could just be suicided. Like with Jonas Lie, or Vince Foster.

The suicides of three detainees at the US base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, amount to acts of war, the US military says.
The camp commander said the two Saudis and a Yemeni were “committed” and had killed themselves in “an act of asymmetric warfare waged against us”. (Guantanamo suicides ‘acts of war’,
BBC; 11 June 2006)

How can a suicide be an “act of warfare”. Really easy. In torture, a prisoner can break, and the torture stops. Some are defiant, and don’t break. They die. Did they “kill themselves”?

In a way. They could have broken.

But then again, the Jewish torturers did the killing. After all, they want their “cut”.

And if a prisoner doesn’t give it? There will be blood.