Holocaust Blackmail
The UN Decides On A Universal Ban On Revisionism
Gerard Menuhin, 57, caused uproar by suggesting that Germany was being blackmailed by an international Jewish conspiracy preying on the country's war guilt
Why the Sudden Clampdown on Revisionists
It's Official - No Actual Shortage Of Holocaust Survivors From Jason Collett 12-19-5
(Extracts from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York (published by Verso publishers, London and New York, 2000)
Germar Rudolf Deported. Will Face Prison in Germany
Das Geschäft mit der Schuld von Gerard Menuhin (in German)
Ernst Zündel in Mannheim
Germar Rudolf in Stuttgart
Gerard Menuhin, 57, caused uproar by suggesting that Germany was being blackmailed by an international Jewish conspiracy preying on the country's war guiltHe said Germans are under “endless blackmail” because of the Holocaust, and that “a people that allows itself to be intimidated 60 years after the end of the war with the events of that time is not healthy.”
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
Violinist’s son fired for remarks
The son of famous Jewish violinist Yehudi Menuhin lost his job in Germany over extremist statements. The board of the Yehudi Menuhin Foundation fired Gerard Menuhin as president after it learned of his anti-Jewish statements in far-right German publications. In columns and interviews in the National Zeitung newspaper, the Web site of the National Democratic Party of Germany and the monthly magazine Deutsche Stimme, Menuhin, 57, reportedly referred to “an international lobby of influential people and associations that put Germans under pressure for their own purposes.” He said Germans are under “endless blackmail” because of the Holocaust, and that “a people that allows itself to be intimidated 60 years after the end of the war with the events of that time is not healthy.”
The case underscores the tendency in some circles to embrace Jewish representatives as vehicles for anti-Jewish or anti-Israel views.
November 15, 2005
Menuhin's son forced to resign over 'anti-Semitic' interviewsFrom Roger Boyes in Berlin
THE son of the violinist and humanist Yehudi Menuhin has been ousted as head of the German branch of his father’s foundation because of his extreme right-wing views.
Gerard Menuhin, 57, caused uproar by suggesting that Germany was being blackmailed by an international Jewish conspiracy preying on the country’s war guilt. He was forced to resign as chairman of the Yehudi Menuhin Foundation (YMF) in Germany, which was established to encourage the musical talent of young immigrants.
“It was a logical and comprehensible decision in this re-educated land,” Mr Menuhin, an Old Etonion who lives in Switzerland and Britain, said. “But I’m not going to change my opinions because of it.”
Mr Menuhin is one of two sons of the violinist with his second wife, the British dancer Diana Rosamond Gould, and he has taken over a number of family responsibilities. Apart from his chairmanship of the YMF in Dusseldorf, he sits on the board of the Menuhin Festival in Gstaad.
Until now his political views have barely registered with the outside world even though he has a regular column in the Munich-based ultra-nationalist National Zeitung. One of his more vitriolic columns condemned Jewish “souvenir hunters” who gather evidence in Germany to help them to lodge financial claims for wartime persecution.
“Apart from a few curious comments about America, we weren’t really aware of his politics,” Winfried Kneip, YMF’s chief executive, said.
Mr Menuhin outed himself as a clear sympathiser with the neo-Nazi cause in two published interviews this month. In Deutsche Stimme, voice of the National Party of Germany, he used classical anti-Semitic language while still staying within the boundaries of German law.
“An international lobby of influential people and organisations is trying to keep the Germans under pressure,” he said. “Some nations — mainly America, but other Europeans, too — are profiting from an obedient Germany.”
It was unfair, he said, that Germany should continue to be punished for its Nazi past. “The main tool of this endless blackmail was supplied by the Germans themselves, although the tainted period of 12 years really was only 12 years in over 2,000 years of immaculate development.”
The Menuhin family is descended from Russian Jews, and Baron Menuhin of Stoke d’Abernon, who became a life peer in 1993, was regarded as a great humanist who worked to bring communities together. Hence the shock that his son should let himself be fêted by German parties that stir up sentiment against foreigners and often glorify the Nazis.
In an interview with the National Zeitung, organ of the German Peoples’ Union, Mr Menuhin called on Germans to stop paying taxes and thus protest at the outflow of German funds to the European Union.
“People cannot be eternally exploited in this way,” he said, “as long as there is a budget deficit, no German public money should flow abroad.”
Mr Menuhin, who describes himself as a film producer and writer, is something of a maverick within the family. “He was the least musically gifted,” a family friend said, “and he suffered from that emotionally.”
There has, in fact, been a history of family sympathy for German nationalists. Mr Menuhin’s grandfather, Moshe, was a determined anti-Zionist and expounded his views in the National Zeitung; he was arts editor from 1968 to 1970 although he was aware of its extreme German nationalism. He left the job only because the paper was not anti-Zionist enough.
Lord Menuhin earned applause from German Nationalists when he played with the conductor Wilhelm Furtwängler, who had been a Nazi supporter. But Lord Menuhin’s point was to demonstrate that music can heal wounds. German nationalists, however, regarded the gesture as being something more, a sign of understanding for those who believed in national socialism.
That, and the dedication of some concerts to the plight of German refugees from the East, gave the Menuhin family some standing among German rightwingers. Although Lord Menuhin had humanitarian motives, Gerard appears to have interpreted his father’s gestures as a family blessing for his nationalist opinions.
The Yehudi Menuhin Foundation in Germany was set up by the violinist shortly before his death in Berlin in 1999. Its brief is “to use art to teach peaceful coexistence to children in social crisis areas with high immigrant populations”.
HOW DISCORD WAS SOWN
On a Jewish conspiracy:
“An international lobby of influential people and organisations is trying to keep the Germans under pressure . . .”
“Some nations — mainly America, but Europeans too — are profiting from an obedient Germany . . . Those claiming to speak in the name of (Holocaust) victims have better networks than those representing other groups of survivors. Just think of the survivors of murdered Cambodians, American Indians or the Armenians. I am not the only Jew who thinks in this way . . .”
On the need for a greater role for the far Right:
“The radical parties have to speak a clear language, offer alternatives, especially now that the parties of the centre are virtually indistinguishable and lack courage or solutions . . .”
On the EU:
“The European Union has swollen to gigantic proportions — a monster that is swallowing vast sums, most of which are paid for by Germany”
12. November 2005
NEONAZI-GESINNUNG
Yehudi-Menuhin-Stiftung trennt sich von Vorstand
Von Paul Nellen
Wegen seiner rechtsradikalen Gesinnung hat der Vorstand der Yehudi Menuhin Stiftung seinen Vorsitzenden Gerard Menuhin des Amtes enthoben. Der Sohn des weltberühmten jüdischen Geigers hatte regelmäßig eine Kolumne in der "National-Zeitung" verfasst.
Musik "heilt alle Wunden, tröstet und bringt Freunde". Mit diesem Credo ist der Geiger Yehudi Menuhin als personifizierte Versöhnung von Deutschen und Juden in die Nachkriegsgeschichte eingegangen. Als Menuhin im März 1999 mit 83 Jahren in Berlin starb, war in Deutschland die Trauer über den Tod des Jahrhundert-Geigers groß.
Ein Jahr vor seinem Tod gründete Yehudi Menuhin eine Stiftung, die dem multikulturellen und pädagogischen Erbe des stets sich für die musikalische Breitenbildung engagierenden Künstlers verpflichtet ist. Vor allem "interkulturelle Lernfelder" und die Musikförderung von sozial benachteiligten Kindern liegen der Stiftung am Herzen. Sein "mus-e"-Netzwerk macht unmissverständlich klar, dass es "Ausgrenzung und rassistischen Tendenzen vorbeugt und die Integration von Kindern ausländischer Herkunft fördert".
Der Vorsitz des Kuratoriums wurde mit Ex-Bundestagspräsidentin Rita Süßmuth prominent besetzt. Und für den Vorstand der Stiftung? Musste es natürlich ein Menuhin sein. Gerard Menuhins sanftes Auftreten, darin ganz der Vater, galt als zurückhaltend genug, um ihn - "kaum mehr als zwei Mal im Jahr", wie die Stiftung betont - Repräsentationspflichten erfüllen und gelegentlich einen Bettelbrief unterschreiben zu lassen.
Eine Fehleinschätzung, wie sich jetzt zum Entsetzen der "Yehudi-Menuhin-Stiftung" zeigt: Der zwischen Deutschland, Schweiz und Großbritannien hin- und herpendelnde 57-jährige Geigersohn ist - bis vor einer Woche offenbar unbemerkt von der Stiftung - ein ausgewiesener Rechtsradikaler. Er verbreitet sich über die NPD-Zeitung "Deutsche Stimme", gibt der "National-Zeitung" des DVU-Chefs Gerhard Frey Interviews und schreibt dort seit Monaten eine Kolumne unter dem Titel 'Menuhin und wie er die Welt sieht'. Seine Vorstandskollegen bemerken das erst spät. Per Einschreiben vom 5. November schrieben sie an ihr Aushängeschild von ihrer Bestürzung und ihrer großen "Verwunderung".
Keiner will es geahnt, geschweige denn gewusst haben - "ein paar kuriose Ansichten über Amerika ausgenommen, wie man sie überall mal hören kann", so der Geschäftsführer der Menuhin-Stiftung, Winfried Kneip. Erst eine Nachfrage von SPIEGEL ONLINE im Büro der zurzeit im Ausland weilenden Rita Süßmuth am 4. November und tags darauf die E-Mail eines Lesers der Onlineausgabe der "National-Zeitung" an die "Yehudi-Menuhin-Stiftung" veranlasste deren leitendes Personal, sich die Ergüsse ihres Vorstandsvorsitzenden im Internet mal genauer anzusehen.
Menuhin gefällt sich ganz zweifellos in der Rolle eines Tabubrechers und ideologischen Grenzüberschreiters. Wie der Vater musikalisch ("Menuhin meets Shankar"), so lässt sich auch der Sohn "nicht von Voreingenommenheit behindern". Die NPD hört es gerne: "Ein Volk, das sich 60 Jahre nach Kriegsende mit den damaligen Geschehnissen einschüchtern lässt, ist nicht gesund. Es gibt ganz nüchterne Gründe dafür, diesen Gewohnheiten endlich ein Ende zu machen. Ohne ein Umdenken, das Selbstvertrauen und Nationalgefühl der Deutschen wiederherstellt, wird die führende Volkswirtschaft Europas bald zugrunde gehen."
Gerard Menuhin ist, wie die "Deutschen Stimme" der NPD das Interview mit ihm einführt, "ein Enkel russisch-jüdischer Immigranten" - und er merkt die kalte Verachtung der Neonazis für den Juden Menuhin nicht einmal, die nur scharf darauf sind, ihm ein paar wohlfeile judenfeindliche Bekenntnisse zu entlocken. Menuhin gibt den abtrünnigen, den "besseren" Juden: "Im Hintergrund agiert nach wie vor eine internationale Lobby einflussreicher Menschen und Vereinigungen, die im Sinne ihrer Sache die Deutschen unter Druck halten... Wer versucht, ans Ufer der Vernunft zu gelangen, wird von den eigenen Leuten unter Wasser gedrückt, bis er ertrinkt."
Kurz vor er letzten Bundestagswahl verkündet Menuhin mit seinem "Faible für Geschichte und Politik" ("National-Zeitung"): "National wählen hilft!" Solche Menuhin-Aufrufe wurden in einschlägigen Blogs weiterverbreitet.
Für die entsetzte "Yehudi-Menuhin-Stiftung" ist damit das Maß voll: "Wir wissen nicht, ob es Ihnen bewusst ist, dass Sie dadurch die Arbeit der Yehudi-Menuhin-Stiftung Deutschland in extremem Maße gefährden, die der von Ihnen vertretenen Ideologie... diametral entgegensteht".
In einer außerordentlichen Vorstandssitzung hat die Stiftung ihren Vorsitzenden Menuhin denn auch am 12. November mit sofortiger Wirkung seines Ehrenamtspostens enthoben. Von SPIEGEL ONLINE dazu befragt, erklärt Menuhin heute diesen Schritt für "logisch und nachvollziehbar - ich hatte das in einem Land der Umerzogenen so erwartet". Menuhin, der Globalanalytiker: "So etwas passt schließlich auch in die amerikanische Politik von heute! Meiner Meinung werde ich deswegen nicht untreu werden!"
Was sich auch durch solcherlei Amtsdurchgriffe nicht hinwegdiskutieren lässt: Schon der Großvater von Enkel Gerard, Moshe Menuhin, war ein bekennender jüdischer Antizionist gewesen, dessen ideologische Heimat nach dem Krieg die "Deutsche National- und Soldaten-Zeitung" des DVU-Gründers Gerhard Frey in München war. Zwei Jahre lang war der Vater des Geigers sogar Leiter des kulturpolitischen Ressorts der rechtsradikalen Postille, der er 1970 den Rücken kehrte - sie war Menuhin in Sachen Antizionismus "nicht kämpferisch genug und zu kompromissbereit".
The UN Decides On A Universal Ban On Revisionism
By Robert Faurisson
11-19-5
On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted - or let be adopted - an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th "International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust". Moreover, the resolution "Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part". Historical revisionism thus sees its existence acknowledged by the whole world, a fact proving that it has some life in it, but, at the same time, this decision means that the revisionists find themselves struck with the reprobation of all the countries of the world. As for the "State" of the Vatican, which has no seat at the UN, it had, as early as in 1992, declared: "There is no historical revisionism that can call into question the inhuman abyss of the Holocaust" (&laqno; Non c'è revisionismo storico che possa rimettere in discussione l'abisso disumano dell'Olocausto ») ( L'Osservatore Romano, 7 November1992).
The history of human societies and religions is rich in prohibitions, bannings, excommunications but, whereas, up to a recent past, the victims could, at least in principle, hope to find a refuge outside of their land or group of origin, here the condemnation is, for the first time ever, of universal character. It is thus confirmed that historical revisionism is a phenomenon of exceptional nature and also that the Jews, yet once more, have been able to obtain exorbitant privileges.
A Sleight Of Hand
It was through a sleight of hand that the Israeli delegation succeeded in getting this resolution passed. It proceeded in a manner like that of certain associations which, in France, under cover of a campaign against paedophilia, have obtained a law prohibiting, on the Internet, communication relating to paedophilia and to revisionism! To begin, they asked: "Is paedophilia not a horror in itself?" The response was "yes". Their second step was to add: "Is paedophilia on the Internet not to be banned by a specific law?" The response, there again, was "yes". As a third step the associations concluded: "Let's fight, accordingly, to obtain a law against paedophilia and revisionism [which they called 'negationism']".
For his part, the President of the General Assembly, the Swede Jan Ellasion, had the deftness on November 1st to ask orally whether anyone was opposed to the resolution aimed at commemorating the "Holocaust". No hands being raised, he declared, without prior recourse to a vote of any kind, that the resolution was thereby adopted, the text of which contained in one of its provisions the condemnation of any form of "Holocaust" revisionism. The draft was approved by the United States in utter disregard of the guarantees of freedom of opinion provided by the first amendment to its constitution. And, most remarkably, this Israeli text was accepted by the Arabo-Moslem countries, including Iran. All those present approved, or let pass with soft verbal restrictions, a resolution originating from the Jews that goes so far as to condemn the right of free research on a historical subject.
The UN act assumes only a political and not a juridical character. Still, since it provides that the Secretary General will have to report on the measures subsequently taken within the framework of the resolution, the revisionists will have reason to fear consequences for themselves of a judicial or administrative nature, for instance, as regards border and airport police, authorisation to enter and stay in certain countries or the issuing of visas.
The resolution will serve morally to justify and facilitate extradition measures taken against revisionists. Precedents are not lacking, what with 1) the European arrest warrant; 2) the virtual handing over of revisionist René-Louis Berclaz by Serbia to Switzerland; 3) the handing over of revisionist Ernst Zündel by the United States to Canada, then by Canada to Germany; 4) the handing over of Belgian revisionist Siegfried Verbeke by the Netherlands to Germany; 5) the handing over of revisionist Germar Rudolf to Germany by the United States. In Austria, on November 11, the semi-revisionist David Irving, a British citizen, was arrested by traffic police on a motorway and is now in detention in Vienna.
For any noted revisionist, it is already risky to leave the confines of his home country. In doing so, he exposes himself to a request for extradition made to the country of transit by either Israel or Germany. There is at present a bill in committee at the Knesset that will authorise Israel to demand the handing over of any revisionist in order to bring him before a court, sitting in Jerusalem, that will apply the 1986 Jewish antirevisionist law against him.
The Jewish State's Offensive
A fortnight ago, Philippe Bolopion, United Nations correspondent for Le Monde, wrote a particularly informative article on the successes achieved at the UN by the Jewish State since June 2004 ("L'offensive de charme d'Israël à l'ONU rencontre un certain succès", Le Monde, 4 November 2005, p. 3). He listed six recent accomplishments of that State: 1) in June 2004, Kofi Annan called for an acknowledgement "that the United Nations' record on anti-Semitism has at times fallen short of our ideals"; 2) in October of the same year, a resolution including a condemnation of antisemitism was adopted; 3) in January 2005, a special session of the General Assembly marked the 60th anniversary of "the liberation of the death camps"; 4) in June, an Israeli ambassador was elected vice-president of the General Assembly - the first Israeli in fifty-three years; 5) in September, on a visit to the UN for a gathering of heads of state and government, Ariel Sharon shook hands with Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf, while the Israeli delegation made numerous new contacts; 6) in October, the Security Council was quick to condemn the Iranian calls, which were nothing new, for the Jewish State to be erased from the map.
The Jewish State's Incomparable Gall
These successes are all the more striking as no nation in the world has made fun of the UN like "Israel", a state that, however, owes its creation to the UN. The Jewish State, with an incomparable gall (in Jewish parlance: chutzpah), has thrown a record number of United Nations "resolutions" straight into the bin. In violation of international law, this State, founded on the colossal lie of the "Holocaust", practises colonialism, racism, apartheid, military occupation and torture. We may add that it possesses an arsenal of atomic weapons and on this score has, for example, in the last few years been supplied by Germany, free of charge, in the name of the said "Holocaust", with three ultra-modern submarines fitted out for nuclear armament. The collusion between, on the one hand, the Jewish State and armed forces and, on the other hand, the German State and armed forces has become such that the German mail service has just released a stamp, for the most regular rate of postage, depicting, on the left, the Israeli flag, then, on the right, the German flag and, finally, linking the two, a strand of barbed wire, symbol of the perpetual "Holocaust". Germany is becoming the Jewish State's "Guantanamo".
On October 5, 2003, Israeli ambassador to the UN Dan Gillerman had warned the Security Council members that the God of the Jews was "watching" them and, on July 16 2004, annoyed at the behaviour of some Arab states, flung the remark at his colleagues in the General Assembly that things had "reached a point where the inmates are running the asylum". On the other hand, on October 31 of this year, he said that he was "moved" when presenting the "Holocaust Day" text, his country's first successful draft resolution ever. He declared: "I feel moved and privileged to present this historic resolution today, as an Israeli, a Jew, a human being and a child of a family of Holocaust victims". That is understandable. The next day, the "adoption" of his resolution marked the triumph of the "Holocaust" sham. For the occasion, one may say that as far as gall, dishonest procedure, spirit of domination and intolerance are concerned, the Jewish State has outdone itself.
This extraordinary UN resolution also constitutes proof that historical revisionism is a reality that can no longer be bypassed, denied or played down. Its notoriety has become global. Still, let us take care to recognise that the revisionist researchers who remain active are now but a handful and, with each passing year, their future grows darker.
Scientist Germar Rudolf Deported - Faces German Prison
The Hoffman Wire Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor 11-16-5
Germar Rudolf Deported. Will Face Prison in Germany
Editor's Note: Former Max Planck scientist Germar Rudolf was deported from the United States today after the Roberts Supreme Court turned down his last appeal, signaling that America is no longer a refuge for the persecuted.
Of all the scientists who have scrutinized the Auschwitz gas chamber yarn, Rudolf was the most meticulous and dispassionate. His deportation to face a prison sentence in the German-Israeli banana republic is a tragedy.
To claim that he incited racial hatred because he cast doubt on the dogma of homicidal gas chambers is like arresting a scientist who questions the Catholic dogma of the Virgin Birth because it might "incite hatred" of Italians. This is just too stupid.
Rudolf leaves a wife and child behind in America. He has another family in Germany, from a first marriage which ended after his German wife deserted him when he went public with his gas chamber skepticism.
In persecuting a man like Germar Rudolf, who anyone would want for a neighbor, a son-in-law, a teacher or a juror, "The West" of Bush and Blair, "The West" we are supposed to defend against Islam, is increasingly little more than a billy club for Zionism, without a shred of honor, justice or compassion.
Cowardice has seized "The West." It deserves to be scourged by Islam for doing dirty work like this against an intellectual of Rudolf's stature, who does not have a biased bone in his body. This heroic man is being hounded and jailed at the behest of anti-German bigots and haters. What a perverse irony!
Man Deported To Face Conviction For Inciting Racial Hatred Former Chemist Disputed Deaths Of Thousands At Auschwitz 11-15-5
http://www.nbc5.com/news/5331363/detail.html
CHICAGO -- Germar Rudolf took a final look at Chicago while aboard a flight taking him to Germany, where he was wanted for his 1995 conviction of inciting racial hatred by disputing the deaths of thousands of Jews held captive at a concentration camp.
Rudolf, 41, was deported around 6:30 p.m. Monday by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said ICE spokeswoman Gail Montenegro.
Rudolph was sentenced by the German government to 14 months in prison for publishing a "scientific" report disputing the deaths of thousands of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz, according to an ICE news release.
He was wanted for violating Germany's Holocaust denial legislation, which was enacted to combat anti-Semitism and protect the memory of Hitler's victims, the release said.
Rudolf, also known as Germar Scheerer, fled Germany in 1996 to avoid imprisonment and had then lived in Spain, Great Britain, Mexico and the United States, according to the release.
Rudolf was ordered to present himself to the Chicago ICE office for deportation on April 7, but did not do so and remained in the United States as a fugitive, Montenegro said.
On Oct. 19 he appeared at the Chicago office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to apply for a green card based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen, she said.
A records check revealed his outstanding order of deportation and he was immediately taken into custody on Oct. 19, Montenegro said.
Rudolf, a former chemist and author of "Dissecting the Holocaust," tested bricks in the gas chambers for traces of Zyklon B, a cyanide compound used to kill Jews during the Holocaust. His report claimed that because he did not find evidence of Zyklon B on the bricks, it was unlikely that mass gassings of Jews occurred in Auschwitz.
City News Service contributed to this story.
The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/news.html
Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/news.html
Why the Sudden Clampdown on Revisionists?
Rixon Stewart - November 20, 2005
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3840
Virtually unreported by the mainstream media and given little prominence even by those outlets that have reported it - probably so as not to alert too many - recent weeks have seen a major clampdown across the planet. On both sides of the Atlantic historians, researchers and investigators have been arrested, detained and deported to Germany to face charges of "Holocaust Denial".
Among their number is German born Ernst Zundel, who immigrated to Canada in 1958 to work as a graphic artist. In the 1980's, he published a book called "Did Six Million Really Die?" and thereafter continued publishing and questioning conventional notions surrounding holocaust.
In 1985, he was charged with "publishing false news" and a series of trials followed between 1985 and 1988. In his defence he brought in gas chamber experts, other historians and cross-examined a number of Holocaust survivors, who reportedly fell apart under questioning.
In 2003 he was arrested for an alleged immigration violation while visiting the United States. Thereafter he was deported back to Canada, where he was held in solitary confinement in a maximum-security jail for nearly 2 years before being deported back to Germany.
Upon arrival in Mannheim, Germany, the 65-year-old Zundel was charged with "Holocaust Denial", an offence that carries a penalty of up to 5 years in jail.
Likewise Germar Rudolph was also recently deported back to Germany to face similar charges. A German-trained chemist, Rudolf re-examined Auschwitz and Birkenau in 1989 for traces of Zyklon B, the gas the Nazis are supposed to have used to gas millions. As a scientist, he found the "gassing" claims to be scientifically untenable and therefore, in the eyes of German law, was judged to be "denying the Holocaust".
He was sentenced in Germany to 14 months in jail but fled to the US before he served time. However he was arrested on November 18, 2005 in Chicago, and extradited back to Germany.
Similarly, British historian David Irving was arrested on November 14, 2005, while visiting Vienna at the invitation of students from the city's university. He was to have spoken of Adolph Eichmann's offer <http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Eichmann/Brand/index.html > to Jewish leaders in Budapest in 1944, to release Hungarian Jews in exchange for cash or trucks.
However, before he could address students he was arrested on charges brought against him nearly sixteen years ago, of publicly denying aspects of the Holocaust.
According to an Austrian state prosecutor, if convicted he could face up 20 years in jail.
Not only have America and Canada been deporting individuals to Germany to face the "Holocaust Denial" charge, the Netherlands has too.
A Belgian national, Siegfried Verbeke was charged with denying the holocaust in August this year, after he questioned the Anne Frank story. Two months later on October 6th, the Netherlands agreed to extradite him to Germany, where he faces 14 months in prison.
So why the sudden clampdown on Revisionists and why now?
It's been suggested that the Internet has panicked the Zionists, who to a large extent owe their power and influence to the Holocaust. After all, Israel was founded on its memory and if it's proven to be a lie, or at least a gross exaggeration, the power the Zionists hold over ordinary Jews could be undermined. For the very notion of the Holocaust has been used not only to extract financial redress from other nations but also to keep ordinary Jews compliant.
In effect, it's become like a grotesque doll wielded by witch doctors, used to keep individuals from asking too many questions, from thinking for themselves and stepping out of line.
Formally the likes of Ernst Zundel might have been written off as cranks or extremists but Internet changes that. It allows isolated individuals to question, often quite convincingly, the official line touted by the establishment and the mainstream media.
Moreover, the Internet illustrates that the accused are not "Holocaust Deniers" - in the sense that they deny the Holocaust ever took place - or "right wing extremists" intent on resurrecting the Third Reich. That's what the mainstream media would us believe but almost without exception, the accused admit that the Nazis were guilty of gross human rights abuses. What's at issue here are the numbers of dead, how they died and whether there was any clear plan of genocide at all.
In effect these men were engaged in historical inquiry, trying to establish the truth and broadcasting their findings, and that cannot be allowed in the New World Order.
Without even questioning what happened during the Holocaust, we should be asking ourselves: if it's necessary to exact such draconian measures against those who ask questions, what exactly is being protected here? Are historical truth and the memory of dead holocaust victims being defended? Or is it one of the foundations of the New World Order, modern Zionist power?
Finally, a 1948 Red Cross report < http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735 > details nearly a quarter of a million Jews died in Nazi concentration camps but found no evidence of Genocide. This is in distinct contrast to the figure touted nowadays by the mainstream media and portrayed by Hollywood. At the time the Red Cross was a neutral body with no political axe to grind, so why the difference? And we need to ask ourselves, not only why there is such a difference in the numbers but also why those who ask such questions are being silenced?
Like they say: "he who controls the past, controls the present..." and our perception of past events shapes the way we look at the world around us now. The Zionists understand this and know that the idea of the "Holocaust" is crucial to their power. Which is why such harsh measures are being exacted against those who ask too many questions.
It's Official - No Actual Shortage Of Holocaust Survivors
From Jason Collett 12-19-5
(Extracts from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York (published by Verso publishers, London and New York, 2000)):
On page 83 Finkelstein notes that 'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million.'
On page 127 he further notes 'If 135,000 former Jewish slave laborers are still alive today, some 600,000 must have survived the war. That's at least a half-million more than standard estimates.. If Jews only constituted 20% of the surviving camp population and, as the Holocaust industry implies, 600,000 Jewish inmates survived the war, then fully 3 million inmates in total must have survived. By the Holocaust industry's reckoning, concentration camp conditions couldn't have been that harsh at all; in fact, one must suppose a remarkably high fertility and remarkably low mortality rate.. If, as the Holocaust industry suggests, many hundreds of thousands of Jews survived, the Final Solution couldn't have been so efficient after all exactly what Holocaust deniers argue. (pp127-8). '
'Both my father and my mother were survivors of the Warsaw ghetto and the Nazi concentration camps.. One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: "History is bunk." (ibid. p7).
'The Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel' (ibid p30).
'Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense, if not sheer fraud.' (p 55).
'Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics'. (p 68).
'Annual Days of Remembrance of the Holocaust are a national event. All 50 states sponsor commemorations, often in state legislative chambers.. Seven major Holocaust museums dot the American landscape. The centerpiece of this memorialization is the United States Holocaust museum in Washington.. (This) museum's annual budget is $50 million, of which $30 million is federally subsidized.' (p72). (This is in spite of the fact that, as he points out on page 32, per capita Jewish income in the US is almost double that of non-Jews). 'With a reelection campaign looming, Jimmy Carter initiated the (US Holocaust Museum) project to placate Jewish contributors and voters, galled by the president's recognition of the "legitimate rights" of Palestinians.' (p 73).
To conclude:
'The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the "greatest robbery in the history of mankind".. The Holocaust industry has clearly gone berserk.'(p 138-9).
'Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. " (p3).
A Tricky Little Problem - The Missing "Holocaust"
"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct-not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."
- Richard Lynn Professor Emeritus University of Ulster, December 5, 2005
Warum immer mehr und immer pompösere Gedenkstätten und Gedenkveranstaltungen?
Von Gerard Menuhin
Mit der gleichen verfehlten Logik, mit der man Deutsche als „Tätervolk“ bezeichnet, könnte man dies auch mit Juden tun.
Das behauptete, zusammengefasst, Martin Hohmann am 3. Oktober 2003. Er berührte damit ein Tabu und verlor bald darauf alle politischen Ämter. Denn seit 1945 haben bestimmte jüdische Kreise darauf gesetzt, immer und ewig Opfer zu sein. Auch um möglichst viel Geld von Deutschland zu erhalten. In der Bundesrepublik hat man, im Vergleich zu Österreich oder der früheren DDR, diese Taktik sehr gefördert, weil sich ihre Politiker gerne schuldig und zahlungsbereit zeigen.
Welches andere Land?
Sind Juden die ewigen Opfer, so müssen die Deutschen die ewigen Täter sein. Welches andere Land würde es erlauben, wertvolle Grundstücke im Herzen seiner wichtigsten, aber gleichzeitig bankrotten Städte einfach wegzugeben, um sie mit hässlichen Mahnmalen oder mit „Dokumentationszentren“ überbauen zu lassen?
Wenn es im Londoner Nottinghill Gate 200.000 Zulu gäbe, die ein Mahnmal am Piccadilly Circus verlangten, um die von der britischen Armee bei Rorke’s Drift (Südafrika, 1879) getöteten Zulu und die unzähligen Schwarzafrikaner, die von der Kolonialmacht umgebracht wurden, zu ehren – würde die britische Regierung sie ernst nehmen?
Wenn die amerikanischen Indianer ein Mahnmal zum Beispiel an der Stelle des Watergate-Gebäudes in Washington D.C. verlangten, um die unzähligen von amerikanischen Siedlern ermordeten Indianer zu ehren – würde Präsident Bush es bewilligen?
Deutschland ist nach Amerika und Israel zum wichtigsten Einwanderungsland für Juden geworden. Viele der Neuankömmlinge werden ihre Sache weiter unterstützen und, wie überall dank ihrer Netzwerke, mehr bewirken, als es ihrem Anteil an der deutschen Bevölkerung entspricht.
No business like Shoah business?
Die Schweiz ist seit 1997 mehrfach wegen namenloser Bankkonten zur Kasse gebeten worden. Sie hat bis jetzt 1,25 Milliarden Dollar bezahlt, doch nur 400 Millionen Dollar davon sind an Überlebende weitergegeben worden – die „New York Post“ rechnet mit 208,33 Dollar pro Person. Es gibt einfach nicht mehr genügend potenzielle Zahlungsempfänger. Anwälte der Sammelklage geben zu, dass sie einfach eine Ziffer aus der Luft gegriffen haben. Das restliche Geld wird unter verschiedenen jüdischen Dachorganisationen verteilt (selbstverständlich wird ein Teil davon für die Unterstützung Israels weitergegeben) und den Klägeranwälten ausbezahlt.
Man kann aus dieser Vorgehensweise schließen, dass es einem globalen Netzwerk bestimmter jüdischer Organisationen (darunter der Jüdische Weltkongress, das Simon-Wiesenthal-Zentrum, B’nai B’rith, die Anti-Defamation League und die Jewish Claims Conference) völlig egal ist, wie sehr sie die unabänderliche Vergangenheit aufwühlen, wie sehr sie die restliche Welt dadurch schikanieren und den Alltag von jüdischen Familien der Gegenwart, die nur auf ein ganz normales Leben hoffen, erschweren. Betrachten diese Leute sich als gewöhnliche erwerbstätige Menschen bei ihrer Arbeit? Ist so etwas eigentlich als Beruf anzusehen? Oder stimmt es, was der frühere israelische Außenminister Abba Eban (1915–2002) sagte: „There’s no business like Shoah business“?
Dass es so viele jüdische Schoah-Experten gibt, denen es gelungen ist, mit Hilfe dieses schrecklichen Kapitels der Geschichte Karriere zu machen (z.B. Elie Wiesel), heißt noch lange nicht, dass wir diese Industrie nicht satt haben. Die Mehrheit der Juden würde es meiner Meinung nach vorziehen, unbelastet ihre eigene Gegenwart leben zu können.
Immer neue Mahnmale erleichtern das Geschäft mit der Schuld. Wollen wir das? Warum reicht die Gedenkkultur der ersten fünf Nachkriegsjahrzehnte, für die etwa der „Platz der Opfer des Nationalsozialismus“ in München mit seinem sechs Meter hohen Denkmal steht, nicht mehr aus? Warum müssen immer mehr und immer pompösere Gedenkstätten und Gedenkveranstaltungen her?
Aber nicht nur die Deutschen sind schuld an dem ewigen Leiden von Juden. Nicht nur das Volk von Bach, Beethoven und Brahms, von Goethe und Schiller wird wegen vor 60 Jahren verübter Taten von früh bis spät des Antisemitismus verdächtigt. Auch wer zufällig ein Buch oder Theaterstück von jüdischer Herkunft kritisiert, wird als Antisemit gebrandmarkt.
Opfer und Täter
Indem er eine vom breiten Publikum längst vermutete, aber gleichzeitig tabuisierte Wahrheit öffentlich aussprach, brach Martin Hohmann nicht nur mit der CDU-Parteipolitik, sondern er gefährdete die Grundlagen des Shoah-Business. Er musste gehen.
Rätselhaft bleibt, warum Hohmann für seine Argumentation auf die Vergangenheit der bolschewistischen Revolution zurückgegriffen hat, obwohl doch israelische Machthaber täglich palästinensische Kinder und Frauen morden und ihre Häuser zerstören. Nicht nur hat sich Israel innerhalb von 50 Jahren zu einem klassisch rassistischen Land mit „Lebensraum“-Ansprüchen verwandelt. Es ist Juden auch gelungen, gleichzeitig Opfer und Täter zu sein. Wenn man in diesen Kategorien denken will.
Als Abonnent der NATIONAL-ZEITUNG erfahren Sie die wahren Hintergründe des Geschehens, von denen der Durchschnittsbürger nicht einmal ahnt. Bedienen Sie sich jetzt gleich des Bestellscheins für Abonnements und Geschenkabonnements!
Return to the Dark Ages: Censorship is on the rise --Is it coming to America? Jared Taylor