It is not only about Palestine
Israel
Shamir about a new paper by Joachim Martillo
From:
http://www.davidduke.com/
Preface Commentary by David Duke
— There
is much important work going on in Europe exposing the vagaries
of Jewish supremacism. Teaching and lecturing in Europe has
given me a unique opportunity to deepen my understanding of the
Jewish question and to share these insights with my fellow
Americans and the World. The following is a fine paper by
Israel Shamir. Shamir was a diligent Talmudic student in Israel
and served in the Israeli Army (I will not call it a “Defense
Force”). Along the way he realized that Israel was a uniquely
hyper-racist state, and that the Talmud which is the basis of
Jewish law, is viciously racist against non-Jews. He came to the
shocking realization that Israel is the most extreme ethnic and
religious supremacist State on Earth with an underlying Talmudic
creed asserting the right of Jews to rule over not only the
Palestinians but indeed all non-Jews on the earth.
Hard core Jewish supremacists such as Habad Lubavitch
support Halachic Law which states that Jews are of the actual
physical form of God, that they are in fact living Gods while
Gentiles are little more than animals possessing satanic souls.
Habad is not some extremist group off somewhere in the Negev
Desert, it is a multimillion dollar international Jewish
organization that has gatherings and teach-ins in the White
House, gives U.S. cabinet prayers, and its late leader, the
Great Rebbe, who proclaimed this hateful doctrine against all
Christians and all Gentiles, has been honored by the President
and the U.S. Congress! The Jewish extremist domination of media
and government should become pretty obvious to you when you
learn that media and political leaders formally praise and honor
a Jewish extremist who says that Jews have a right and moral
obligation to rule over all Gentiles on Earth! (Read more about
Habad by doing a search for Habad Lubavitch on
www.davidduke.com.)
Israel Shamir’s keen sense of justice simply could not let him
remain silent about the foundations and criminal actions of
Israel and the threat that Jewish extremists posed to Gentiles
not just in Palestine but all over the world. He also came to a
realization that these pernicious Jewish doctines ultimately
bring disaster to the Jewish people themselves. He became a
Christian and since his epiphany, he has written a number of
books, both beautiful in their prose, and hard-hitting in their
truth. I met Shamir at an anti-Zionist conference at my
university in Kiev, and since that time I have read his books
and although we don’t agree on all subjects of government,
ethnicity and economics, I gained a lot of respect for him and
believe that there is much to be learned from his writing. In
the last year, France began a prosecution of him for
“anti-Semitism.” Ironically, anti-Semitism is defined today by
the Jewish influenced press and political establishment
as honest criticism of Jewish supremacism and extremism, Jewish
anti-Gentilism and the massive murder, torture and ethnic
cleansing of the Israeli supremacist State. I think you will
find his review of this important paper by Joachim Martillo very
valuable. – David Duke
Joachim Martillo wrote an important paper called
Judonia Rising: The Israel Lobby and American Society,
purporting to explain, “What the Israel Lobby Really Is”. He
spoke with Stephen Walt, of Walt and Mearsheimer fame, he
followed the discussions of Philip Weiss, he corresponded with
Noam Chomsky and Joseph Massad, he had read Israel Shamir’s
Pardes and James Petras, he knows
MacDonald. An American scholar Martlllo has some Polish
background, and he reads Yiddish and Polish, as well as some
Hebrew. In his view, understanding the Israel Lobby can be based
only on a thorough hardnosed (“non-exceptionalist”) analysis of
Eastern European Jewish history. This is a heretical view, very
close to ours.
It is
heretical, because the very far away border of permitted
antizionist discourse still remains short of discussion: whether
Jews did similar things before Zionism, or do we have a
temporary aberration connected with the state of Israel. The
moment one integrates modern Jewish behaviour with the
pre-modern Jewish behaviour, the moment one notices continuity
of pre-Zionist and Zionist Jewish politics, the moment one
leaves the safe ground of condemning occupation, - one crosses
into totally forbidden “antisemite” territory. Martillo dared
and ventured there, and came with strong and startling
conclusions:
the real issue is not
Palestine. Unless they are neutralized, Israel lobbying groups,
Israel advocates, Zionists, Neoconservatives, and Friedmanites
will steal America and effectively abolish the Constitution in
all but name to create a society of servitude for all Americans
except for those belonging to the hyper-wealthy transnational
Zionist political elite.
This is
exactly our view: Palestine is a symbol, a quintessence of the
trouble, but the real issue is our enemy’s attempt to enslave
the world. Martillo begins where Walt and Mearsheimer end their
journey. In his view, in order to understand Jews, it is not
necessary to venture into days of Jesus Christ; history of
Poland will do. He goes to the days of Rzeczpospolita,
the Polish Commonwealth (from 1505 until 1795), then ethnic
Ashkenazim constituted economic elite of the realm. They lost
this status in the partitions of Poland. This is the destroyed
Temple, in Martillo’s view, these are good old days the Jews
miss: they want to be the elite like they were in the days of
Rzeczpospolita. Jews did well after the collapse of the
Polish Commonwealth, notes Martillo, but not as good as they
would like.
“Despite supposedly onerous Czarist oppression, Russian Jews had
higher incomes, more education, and longer life spans than the
non-Jewish populations among whom they lived. They were highly
disaffected because of exclusion from the status and access to
which they believed they were entitled, but they were not
obviously more oppressed than the majority of the Czar’s
subjects and less oppressed than others. Yuri Slezkine belies
the myth of Jewish powerless during the lead-up to WW2 in
The Jewish Century.”
In the
US, the Jews (or Ashkenazim, in Martillo’s terminology)
resurrected their social structure and rebuilt it, like ants who
rebuild anthill after being removed to a new ground. This
structure is ostensibly “Israel advocacy” or “Israel Lobby” but
actually advocating Israel’s cause (“Israel Lobby proper”) is a
small part of its effort. He soberly states that a USA,
whose dominant elite is Jewish, is not necessarily bending to
the Israel Lobby proper when it pursues of pro-Israel foreign
policy. The State of Israel may be a client state of
America, but America is a client state of the American Jewish
Zionist elite, which is probably in the process of establishing
itself as the permanent national “meritocratic” elite.
Jews succeeded to act together because historically Eastern
European Jewish culture strongly controlled social and
intellectual deviation. Many of the social control mechanisms
continue to exist, have evolved in the American environment, and
may help explain why liberal Jews have so empowered the Neocons
to the detriment of US foreign policy interests as
James Petras has described.
It is
not necessary to look for Freemasonry, the Elders of Zion, the
Illuminati, dark Talmudists, malicious Cabbalists, or some other
group of secret puppeteers: Israel lobbying activities
constitute a natural evolution of Jewish, especially ethnic
Ashkenazi, communal organizations. The structure of Israel
lobbying is a response to historical developments generally
unrelated to Zionism. Because there has been a sort of Darwinian
selection in both the official and unofficial organizations as
well as in their techniques, all of which go back often as much
two centuries in European environments, Israel lobbying is
naturally far more effective than a lobby that was put together
over the last few decades or so in response to a specific issue
or to serve a specific corporate interest.
The same
question applies today. Does the so-called “Israel Lobby” merely
act to secure the interests of the State of Israel or is the
real goal enhancement of the wealth, status, and power of those
who pay for it? Not only does Israel not pay the “Israel Lobby,”
but The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy does not give a hint
who really does, and in any case large sections of the “Israel
Lobby” like the Hollywood Crowd do not even appear in the book
even though scholars like Melani McAlister have investigated the
Hollywood foreign policy connection in books likes Epic
Encounters: Culture, Media, and U.S. Interests in the Middle
East, 1945-2000. With such gaps in the analysis of the “Israel
Lobby,” no one should be surprised with the weakness of the
proposals that Professors Mearsheimer and Walt make for
responding to the “Israel Lobby.”
Friedmanites have been so prominent in the economic regime that
the occupation has attempted to impose on Iraq that the common
identification of Milton Friedman’s economic thinking merely
with Cato Institute libertarianism looks incorrect. In today’s
political intellectual environment Friedmanism looks more like
an adjunct of Neoconservatism.
Israel Lobbying in Comparison with Ordinary Lobbies
Martillo
notices that the Jewish lobby has many interests quite
unconnected with Israel but equally nefarious:
In
Boston the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Justice (JALSA),
which is a spin-off of the American Jewish Congress, has an
ongoing project in regendering American society according to
feminist and gay liberation principles.
Israel lobbying efforts benefit from
organizational memory that does not exist in other lobbying
situations. The longevity of Jewish Federation organizations can
give Israel Lobbying efforts a generational aspect not seen
elsewhere. For example, Israel Advocacy organizations worked for
fifty years to delegitimize Arabist points of view in the
foreign service and state department, drive out Arabist officers
or bureaucrats and replace them with Israel sympathetic
personnel (see The Marginalization of U.S. Mideast Experts,
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/1095/9510080.htm
).
Possibly because of long-standing relationships with government
officials, because of the fear of the accusations of
anti-Semitism, or simply because Jews are disproportionately
represented among government officials especially in the legal
and regulation enforcement divisions (another class of saya`nim),
Israel advocacy is unique among lobbying efforts.
While
the American public has not fully comprehended the nature of
power relations, Israeli leaders do, and the American Zionist
elite calls all shots on issues of importance to the American
elite from “Who is a Jew” to whether the USA should attack Iraq
or Iran first.
The
political relational hierarchy and the domination of an American
Zionist elite over all validate the Finkelstein and Massad
critiques of The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy.
The alliance between Israel and the US states is in the process
of creating an internal American caste system that will be
dominated by a small class of hyper-wealthy Zionists. With the
sort of permanent war that has been envisioned since the
beginning of the twentieth century by a segment of the Zionist
elite under the influence of Sorel and with the application of
the Friedmanite Shock Doctrine as described by Naomi Klein, this
caste system will spread globally. (See The Shock Doctrine, The
Rise of Disaster Capitalism, by Naomi Klein.)
The
Israeli economy or more properly a small segment of
hyper-wealthy Israeli Jews linked by family and business
relations to the dominant US Zionist elite is thriving as the US
economy is tanking and Iraq is being ground down. It is the
outcome of which leading Zionists dreamed in the twenties, and
it has a high probability of spreading from the ME throughout
the Muslim world to South America, and to parts of the former
Eastern block.
The
Kremlin, which has never had much tolerance for internal
competing power centers or external powers mucking in its
backyard, saw danger in the extension of a transnational
hyper-wealthy Zionist political elite to Russia and has taken
preventive action against Jewish oligarchs within the
territories of the former Soviet Union. It was stunning how
quickly Jewish and Friedmanite groups rushed to support Mikhail
Khodorkovski in his power struggle with the Russian government.
Among
religious, leftist, and right wing ethnic Ashkenazim there has
long been a current of thought that Jews are safest in alliance
(or better in dominating) an undemocratic government. Thanks to
the Patriot act and other actions of the Bush administration,
the undemocratic Zionist future is coming into being right
before our eyes, and McCain looks like the most likely of
current present candidates to bring about the fulfillment of the
ultimate globalized Zionist dystopia, but Zionists throughout
the political system are poised to influence any other possible
victor except Ron Paul, whom Zionist facilitators and
gate-keepers in the US media are trying to starve of media
attention.
Abolishing Israel and eradicating Zionism would not eliminate
the exploitive tendencies of globalization but would destroy the
focal point of the forces that are aiming for the worst of all
globalized futures.
The
Zionist movement assumed from its earliest phases that it would
be dependent on wealthy and influential Jews in the Diaspora.
Members of the Counsinhood of Britain’s wealthiest Jews probably
paid for the Balfour Declaration. After the propaganda reverses
of the first Intifada, the need for an even wealthier and more
influential class of Jewish Zionists in the USA became obvious.
[In this
strategic framework, the Zionist movement also depends on Jews,
who are not necessarily wealthy but are in critical positions to
serve the Zionist movement especially in intelligence or
logistics matters. Such individuals are today called saya`nim.
The spy Jonathan Pollard is a particularly egregious saya`an,
who was caught. I have expanded the meaning of the term in this
document to include Jewish stealth helpers in Israel Lobbying
efforts.]
In
addition to saya`nim, Zionists have often used Shabbesgoyim like
Orde Wingate during the pre-State period or more recently John
McCain III and his father Admiral John McCain, Jr., who absolved
Israel of blame in the attack on the USS Liberty. (See
http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/01/money-jews-brain-jews-politics.html
.) The Zionist movement has tended to recruit and reward
Shabbesgoyim in families. New York Zionist campaign
contributions have rewarded John McCain throughout his political
career. Today McCain represents the Neoconservative Friedmanite
position in Republican politics without — until recently — a lot
of the social conservative baggage to which many American Jews
and Friedmanites object.]
Zionist
connections in the investment banking industry led to earlier
IPOs in the 90s with little or no evidence of profitability.
Subprime mortgages were a similar class of dubious investments,
whose true nature was obscured in CDOs (collateralized debt
obligations), and the valuation of Google and similar companies
like Facebook has similar dubious characteristic. Some serious
forensic analysis and financial analysis is needed to understand
these economic developments, but the end result has been very
clear in the development of a new class of superwealthy that is
mostly Jewish and willing to put a lot of money into Israel
advocacy and into influencing the US government.
While
many members of this New Jewish Elite would reflexively put
money into Israel because of long Zionist indoctrination, they
also need Israel as a means to hide their wealth because Israel
has a level of economic transparency and corruption comparable
to Italy or Egypt. The Bar-Lev line in Tel Aviv is an early
indicator of the degree of embezzlement and sweetheart deals in
Israeli economics and politics. Israelis have long made a lot of
money in providing money laundering and other transaction hiding
services both to Jews and non-Jews. Obviously, all parties in
this sort of business have an interest in preserving the State
of Israel to make sure that this sort business continues.
Post-9/11 Islamophobic scare-mongering as well as the Iraqi
occupation has created a growth industry in hardware and
software for security, control, and checkpoints. This industry
understands that its profitability depends on international
policies that maintain conflict through unconditional support of
Zionism.
A Web of Influence, Conditioned Thinking and Reflexive Behavior
Ongoing
Zionist indoctrination of the American public has produced a
Zionist web of influence, conditioned thinking and reflexive
behavior that is breath-taking in its pervasiveness.
Even
without the presence of media gatekeepers and facilitators,
journalists in print, broadcast and cable media almost
invariably misrepresent relevant Middle Eastern or Eastern
European current events or history. There is little reluctance
to turn Zionist or IDF press releases into news reports with no
qualifications.
American
news organizations almost invariably misquote and mistranslate
Iranian President Ahmedinejad, and America media use tendentious
Zionist language like the “right to self-defense,” “Muslim
extremism,” and “Arab intransigence” while almost never
conceding a similar right of Palestinian or Arab self-defense or
addressing issues of Jewish racism, extremism or fanaticism.
During the recent Lebanon war, the American media with rare
exceptions took the Israeli point of view.
Only
recently have American media begun to concede the role of
Russian Jews in the Russian Revolution and the murder of the
Czar’s family. While scholarly journals discuss the Jewish role
in the Soviet security apparatus before the end of WW2, no
inkling of the Soviet Jewish role in mass murder, ethnic
cleansing and genocide is allowed to reach the general public.
Such facts would interfere with the Zionist legitimization
narrative which requires European Jews to be innocent powerless
victims of the German Nazis, and reasonable people would drawn
the obvious analogy between Soviet Ashkenazi and Zionist
Ashkenazi ethnic cleansing or genocidalism.
Only
occasionally does accurate depiction of Zionist ethnic cleansing
in 1947-8 ever reach the American public, and descriptions of
the start of the 1967 war — even on NPR — still include
descriptions of the movement (”barreling”) of Egyptian tanks
through Sinai to attack Israel.
Roman Catholics according to statistical analysis are less
sympathetic. It is intriguing that practically every time the
Boston Globe runs a story that features a Catholic cleric
expressing a criticism of Israel, within approximately a week,
it also runs a story about a Catholic cleric sex scandal
sometimes featuring events from as much as 25 years ago as if to
provide some crude sort of “balance” that even CAMERA and
HonestReporting do not advocate. It is an often-unconscious
behavior more often associated with an angry ethnic press, and
it may be significant that the Boston Globe Editorial Board
includes Lawrence Harmon, who was editor at the Boston Jewish
Advocate, and that paid entry level newspaper jobs in the USA
nowadays seem to be found mostly at the ethnic Jewish press.
The
hyper-wealthy Zionist elite is trying to create Israel Studies
programs in which only Zionistically correct scholars will teach
while stealth and overt Israel advocacy groups and individuals
attempt to drive any scholars critical of Zionism from American
education. (See http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2007/09/jacob-lassner-and-nadia-abu-el-haj.html.)
Nadia
Abu el Haj, Finkelstein, Arun Gandhi, Massad, Dabashi, Saliba,
Debby Almontaser (Khalil Gibran International Academy, New York
City) and many others have been subjected to such attacks. (See
http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2007/11/zionism-penisism-and-joseph-massad.html,
http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/02/arun-gandhi-and-sholem-aleichem.html,
http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2007/12/conspiracy-against-rights-in-nyc.html.)
Altogether Israel Lobbying efforts are grinding down American
Constitutional rights and Israelizing society to the point where
the American political system is under attack by a wide-ranging
seditious conspiracy, and the side-effect of Islamophobic and
Arabophobic incitement against Arab or Muslim investments or
university contributions or charitable donations, is
discouraging the flow of capital from Saudia and the Gulf when
the US economy most desperately needs such liquidity.
Even if
American gets over the current economic crisis, the alliance
with Israel at this point has probably cost every current US
taxpayer at least $10,000.00, and the costs at this point are
rising at least geometrically thanks to Neocon-orchestrated
policies.
Fighting Back to Save America
Pointing
out the cost of Israel to each and every American is a good
starting point to counteract Israel lobbying and advocacy.
The
Zionism of Christian evangelical fundamentalists is part of
generational program of Jabotinskians but is not particularly
deep. Obviously, Rapturists do not care much about the cost of
Israel to America, but Christian Zionism can be fought by
scriptural disputation, by questioning the patriotism of its
leaders and by exposing surreptitious Jewish funding and
organizing.
In other
areas Israel advocates have had so much success because in
today’s America Jews play by a set of rules completely different
from all other Americans, and even not particularly Zionist Jews
have no real incentive to challenge the system, when renders
them Moral Arbiters, Major players in a dramatic narrative of
national rebirth, Beneficiaries of programs like Taglit
(Birthright Israel), Jewish networks in academia, the
professions and politics, Certain of their own righteousness,
and Wielders of the all-powerful accusation of anti-Semitism.
At the
college level, the International Hillel Society acts like a
junior auxiliary to the KKK by running racist programs like
Taglit/Birthright Israel and by hosting extremist speakers that
incite murder and genocide against Palestinians, Arabs and
Muslims or deny that they are human.
Jewish
organizations, no matter how much they campaign against laws and
candidates, get a completely pass of the rules and regulations
of 501(c)(3) organizations. The tax fraud probably reaches tens
of billions of dollars at this point.
Neutralizing Israel lobbying and advocacy groups will be
extremely difficult without a push for the US government to
enforce laws equally for Jews and non-Jews. Then once a good
part of the American public realizes that Israel is a terror
state, the USA will be forced to apply anti-terror laws apply
and seize assets of organized Jewish community along with those
of Zionist billionaires as terrorism supporters just as Islamic
charities have been stripped of their funds.
•Until
the US government begins to enforce laws equitably, activists
will have to research real estate transactions and investigate
who is paying for Israel advocacy programs. They will have to
put together a who’s who of Zionist subversion in the USA.
To
change the consciousness of Americans, activists must fight
American Holocaust religion and work for recognition that the
mass murders of Jews during WW2 were not exceptional or unique,
that
Palestinians, Armenians, Balkan Muslims, and Circassians have
all been genocided from the nineteenth through the twentieth
century and that Soviet Jews were up to the eyeballs in mass
murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide long before German Nazis,
Eastern Europeans, and liberated Soviet nationalities began to
kill Jews systematically out of fear and hatred resulting from
the Jewish role in the Soviet Union.
Activists will have to challenge American Jews socially at
interfaith activities, community events and elsewhere. They must
demand clarification of Jewish loyalties and force Jewish
leaders to acknowledge that Americans are not obligated to
support Israel and that hating Jews for what they do (unlike
hating Jews for being Jews) is not anti-Semitism.
Activists need to make effort to counter Israel advocacy and
Holocaust studies at the high school and even grammar school
levels. They need to work for coordination among anti-Zionist
Arab American, Muslim American, genuinely anti-Israel Jewish
American, conservative, liberal, and other religious (especially
Catholic) groups.
Bottom
line: Joachim Martillo came to the same conclusion as Israel
Shamir and James Petras, namely, it is not only about
Palestine. And we have to deal with it, if we want to
liberate Palestine, or stay free wherever we are.