|
Jewish tradition of chicken swinging
comes under criticism
Correspondents Report - Jewish tradition of chicken swinging comes under
criticism
[This is the print version of
story
http://www.abc.net.au/correspondents/content/2006/s1752634.htm]
Correspondents
Report - Sunday, 1 October , 2006
Reporter: David
Hardaker
PAULA KRUGER: For the past week, a
custom that may seem strange to outsiders is being performed by Jewish
people around the world.
The tradition in its more strict form involves swinging a live chicken
around the head - a symbolic way of cleansing oneself of sin.
For hundreds of years the ritual has marked the most holy ten days of
the Jewish calendar, but this year there have been demonstrations
against what some regard as a cruel and barbaric act.
In Jerusalem, Middle East Correspondent David Hardaker spoke to Anat
Hoffman. Anat Hoffman is the Executive Director of the Israel Religious
Action Center (IRAC) of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism, and
is taking on the religious establishment to end the live chicken ritual.
She begins by describing gruesome details of what happens to the
chicken.
ANAT HOFFMAN: The awful thing is that she wakes up in the morning and is
placed in a cage, and in the worst conditions brought to the centre of
town, without air conditioning of any kind, is placed in the heat, in
the sun for many, many hours. Many of them die just of the heat.
And then she's picked up by her feet and swung above somebody's head,
and then her throat is slashed, but not all the way, so she can run in
the dust and the blood is pouring, and pouring till she dies.
DAVID HARDAKER: This ritual surely has been going on for hundreds if not
thousands of years. What kind of reaction are you getting now to this
attempt to stop it after all this time?
ANAT HOFFMAN: It's becoming now possible to criticise the Kapparot
ritual.
For many years it was accepted as something halachic, meaning that it
comes out of Jewish law. But it's now very clear that it has nothing to
do with, not with the Bible, not with the Talmud, it's not mentioned
anywhere.
It's a folk habit that I wouldn't be surprised we picked up from some of
the neighbours. It doesn't evolve out of Judaism, it's very popular.
There's something very enticing about seeing how your sin is moved from
you right now to that animal, and you can say this cock shall meet
death, but I will have a long life of peace.
I'm disappointed that this is still popular, and I'm delighted that
there are now voices out loud of Rabbis criticising it.
DAVID HARDAKER: But aren't there just some occasions, and maybe this is
one of them, where the rights of an animal need to take second place to
the long-standing traditions of a society?
ANAT HOFFMAN: What a question!
Look, if there are alternatives, we should take the alternatives. And
there are alternatives. I can understand the desire to atone by doing an
action, not just feeling something in your heart, then let's do a good
action. Let's clean up the environment to atone, let's give some
tzedekah, some money to a poor person, as a way of atoning.
I think of one million Jewish ways to do a good deed in the world, and
make ourselves atone for our sins, than killing an animal in this way.
DAVID HARDAKER: But when you take the idiosyncracies, the strange
things, the illogical things out of a religious practice, you're kind of
almost destroying the religious practice, aren’t you?
ANAT HOFFMAN: Rabbi Israel Eichler today on Israel television said the
following: he said the generation that will stop doing this ritual will
give birth to a generation that will stop observing the day of
atonement, and the generation that will stop observing the day of
atonement, will give birth to a generation that will marry non-Jews.
Straight away, from stopping killing the chickens, we start marrying
non-Jews.
DAVID HARDAKER: Well these symbols matter, don't they?
ANAT HOFFMAN: David, these are cognitive leaps that I would invite you
not to jump into. These are not correct things.
I think Judaism has to, we say in Hebrew (Hebrew phrase) - we're saying
the old will be renewed, and the new stuff is going to be hallowed.
Let's think of modern rituals that fit our values.
Maybe what I want to say is that rituals are supposed to serve the
values that we believe in. What is the value of killing this chicken?
And hopefully it will become less popular, as we become more modernised
and more... a thinking Jew.
DAVID HARDAKER: Your politicians react really to popular pressure,
votes, more than - don't they? - or a religious ritual or any regard for
it. Isn't that what they're reacting to? They're going to turn a blind
eye, because they don't want to have a backlash from a religious
community?
ANAT HOFFMAN: You have just given us another reason to atone in this Yom
Kippur, that we have not provided the public in Israel with politicians
that are immune to this, politicians who remember what our values are
and keep their eye focused on the ball. That's a good reason to atone
for that.
PAULA KRUGER: Anat Hoffman, Executive Director of the Israel Movement
for Progressive Judaism, speaking with David Hardaker.
© 2006
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Copyright information:
http://abc.net.au/common/copyrigh.htm
Privacy information:
http://abc.net.au/privacy.htm
|