Jews Run Scared
of Mike James,
German State Attorney Cites Insanity
live among the sane
and comfortably numb
in the European
Soviet Union of Zionist States
By Mike James in Germany
30 June 2008
“No policeman would ever ask someone born
in 1959 to stand in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible
that he had witnessed a crime that allegedly took place twenty years
before he was born. Such a policemen would soon find himself charged
with corruption and the witness would be incarcerated for perjury.”
-- 'Mike James Sues German Jews for Incitement to Bear False
“It remains the case that the German Reich survived the collapse of
1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor
the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies;
it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial
sovereignty. The BRD is not the legal successor of the German
Reich.” -- Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court),
31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE
2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363)
It’s not every
day an educated and highly-informed former journalist is accused of
insanity. It’s the sort of thing that happened quite frequently
however in the former USSR. It was a classic defence of those
exposed by the STASI for anti-Marxist thinking in the former
communist East Germany.
I don’t have access to a scanner at the moment and can’t upload this
frighteningly Orwellian letter sent to me by the State Attorney of
Frankfurt, so please see my faithfully typed reproduction below.
In essence, the State Attorney, having conferred with the Central
Council of Jews in Germany, has decided not to bring a prosecution
for Volksverhetzung (racial incitement [against the Jews]) against
me for the following reasons (adapted translation):
“The guilt of the accused, following some consideration was
estimated as very minor. It would not be in the public interest to
seek a prosecution. Contingent upon this assessment were the
following factors: the accused has no previous criminal record and
is not under investigation; on account of his psychiatric health
there remains some doubt as to his awareness of the crime.”
Paradoxically, the letter ends with a warning: “If the [mentally
insane] accused continues [to ask troublesome questions] he will
lose the benefit of the above-mentioned ruling.” (Additions in
brackets are mine.)
One strike and you’re crazy; two strikes and you’re sane.
Don’t “crazy” people repeatedly make the same “mistakes” or is the
State Attorney afraid to prosecute a man who will counter-sue for
incitement to bear false witness?
What did I do? Let me refresh your memory. I simply sent
letter to the Central Council of Jews asking them if there was
something mysteriously Kabbalistic about the very rounded and
sacredly indisputable six million number. Why would positing
5,999,999 or even 6,000,001 be considered “holocaust” denial and put
an inquisitive man behind bars? Why can’t mature, grown-up human
beings answer such a question without hauling me before the police
and then involving the State Attorney into the bargain? Did I hit
And why the snide the comment that, should I continue in my
“craziness”, I shall suddenly be deemed sane enough to go before the
bench (without a jury, which is always the case in Soviet Germany)?
Is that not a threat? Is not making threats with menaces a
crime in Germany as it is elsewhere?
There is something else which irks me profoundly by the way I have
been slandered in this letter, and here I have an honest confession
to make. I do indeed suffer from depression and I have a long
history of alcoholism. In the latter case, I’ve kept my old pals,
Johnny Walker and Jack Daniels, well out of reach for ten years,
despite two spectacular relapses. In the former case, I tried
everything the Jewish medical establishment threw at me before
deciding to live with depression and chronic fatigue rather than
endure the horrific side effects delivered by pharmaceuticals.
So how did the Central Council of Jews and the Frankfurt State
Attorney get hold of my medical records? There are very strict
laws in place in Germany that prohibit the betrayal of trust and
confidence in terms of doctor-patient relationships. Who snitched?
Who pried? Who stole information that does not belong in the public
If they really want to know just how crazy I am, I must also fess-up
to a midlife crisis. I’m a divorced 48-year-old desperately in love
with the daughter I never had. Her name is "Billie". I met a young
lady recently who told me she wouldn’t mind cooperating with me in
an intimate manner to bring forth “Billie”, but now I have cold
feet. I would really love to meet “Billie” one day and teach her
everything I know, and learn much more from her besides. I yearn for
this unborn daughter of mine but I have serious doubts about her
prospective mother, and I wouldn’t want her to grow up in the
European Union of Soviet Zionist States.
On April 4, I shared a series of e-mails with a close friend in
Germany. I spoke of my depression and how pessimistic I was in terms
of a free Europe. I spoke at length about ways in which the European
Union could be abolished. I expressed my wish to leave the European
Soviet and live a life of freedom in South America. I may even have
said it would be better to commit suicide than live in the emerging
Soviet fascist European Union.
I awoke the next morning in the company of two policemen. They were
polite, embarrassed almost, but asked me to dress myself as quickly
as possible and pack my necessities. What ensued was the scariest 24
hours of my life. Now, I’ve been there, folks. I was once surrounded
by 36 paratroopers at Nairobi airport, all under orders to shoot me
dead. I was also the target of an MI6 hit-man in the Taunustrasse in
Frankfurt in May 1997. I can still remember having a Kenyan General
Service Unit assassin put a gun in my mouth on the outskirts of
Nairobi, and instead of blinking, I laughed, and he ran off.
This was different. They took me to a high-security psychiatric
clinic in Koppern and they locked me in a room with lights that
never dimmed, even during sleeping hours. A fat, balding man would
peer in on me every twenty minutes or so, and he wondered why I had
not undressed; why it was that I lay on my bed in the cold, tie
undone, shoes in place. I didn’t plan to stay.
They sent in a battery of doctors and psychiatrists to probe, prod
and test me. They could find nothing wrong with me, and I still have
the report to prove it. Psychiatric health: A-plus. Extremely high
IQ. As sharp as a whistle.
Isn’t that fucking amazing? You’re feeling depressed and you end up
in the most nightmarish, hellish scenario you can ever imagine just
because you told a friend about your fears for the future of
Europeans and how you’re hurting deep down inside for yourself and
your own people.
Do you know what they did? They said, “Okay, here’s your ‘get out of
jail free card’, but (and there’s always a fucking ‘but’ in your
face when that’s the last thing you want to see), “You take these,
and you take them without question.”
So I did.
Do you know what they were? Paxil (Paroxetine). Never heard of this
garbage ever before in my life. I was online for 24-hours-straight
trying to figure out what was going on inside of my head. I did not
know who the hell the I was. I did not even know I had started to
drink again. They put me on this pharmaceutical trip, and I went
wheeling from one bar to another and my guess is I drank the whole
of Bad Homburg dry.
I have no real, quality spectacles anymore. I smashed them by
falling over simply because some girl said, “Hi, Mikey.” I just span
around and my face hit the concrete. I had been off the booze for
three days and eventually flushed those tablets down the toilet
after four weeks. I can’t even remember whether this “Hi, Mikey”
happened to me here in Burgholzhausen, Bad Homburg, Switzerland,
Berlin or even in Shanghai City. Could have been anywhere. Really.
Name that planet.
I purchased two pairs of replacement spectacles at Woolworths, and I
have to keep swapping them out because I get a headache after each
shift. I can neither read nor write for more than ten minutes
without losing vision. I’ve always had migraines, but now they’re
worse than ever before. I now have a tremor in my right hand and it
shows no sign of abating. That Paxil was designed to destroy my
As my readers will know, my Internet connection was recently shut
down for six days. When they can’t win, they kick the game board.
The German government and their Zionist and Jewish puppet masters
have a new weapon in their armoury to be used against those who tell
the truth about suppressed history and the illegal European Soviet
Union: denial of internet access, without warning and without any
It is a cruel cut. In all of my discussions with my ISP and the
infrastructure providers, T-Com, the message came through loud and
clear: We reconnect at our leisure. You’re not welcome here. You’re
making waves. Stop writing the things you’re writing and everything
will be just fine.
What would Billie say?
Michael James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist
resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in
East Africa, Poland and Switzerland.
Letter from the
State Attorney of Frankfurt to Michael James:
Staatsanwaltschaft b. d. LG – 60256 Frankfurt am Main
Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 222524/08
Bearbeiterin: StAin Niesen
Durchwahl: 60 78
Konrad-Adenauer- Str. 20
60313 Frankfurt am Main
Telefon: (069) 1367 – 01
Telefax: (069) 1367 - 2100
In dem Ermittlungsverfahren
gegen Michael James in Friedrichsdorf
wegen des Verdachts der Volksverhetzung
Strafanzeige Zentralrat der Juden in Deutschland in Berlin vom
Wird nach 153 Abs. 1 StPO von der Verfolgung abgesehen.
Nach dem bisherigen Ergebnis der Ermittlungen wäre die Schuld des
Täters als gering anzusehen. Ein öffentliches Interesse, das die
Strafverfolgung gebietet, liegt nicht vor. Maßgebend für diese
Bewertung des angezeigten Einzelfalles sind folgende Umstände: Der
Beschuldigte ist bislang strafrechtlich nicht in Erscheinung
getreten. Angesichts seines psychischen Gesundheitszustandes
bestehen Zweifel an seinem Unrechtsbewusstein.
Weitere Ermittlungen stehen außer Verhältnis.
Bei der Einstellung ist davon ausgegangen worden, dass es sich um
einen einmaligen Fall handelt. Im Wiederholungsfall kann der
Beschuldigte nicht mit weiterer Nachsicht rechnen.
Etwaige vermögensrechtliche Ansprüche werden durch die Einstellung
des strafrechtlichen Ermittlungsverfahrens nicht berührt.
GESTEMPELT / Beglaubigt / Justizangestellte
Were Added To The Article By Gnostic Liberation Front