Letter from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
to Chancellor Angela Merkel

Letter from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
to Chancellor Angela Merkel

Responsibility By J. Bruce Campbell 9-25-6

Letter From Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, to George Bush
by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

AHMADINEJAD CHALLENGES NEW WORLD ORDER HEAD ON
By Michael Collins Piper

In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate

Her Excellency Angela Merkel

The Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany

Excellency,

Please accept my warmest greetings.

If it had not been for Germany being a great contributor to progress in science, philosophy, literature, arts and politics;

If it had not been for a more important and positive influence of Germany in international relations and promotion of peace;

Moreover, if it had not been for the persistence of a strong will by certain global powers and special groups to constantly portray Germany as defeated and indebted country of World War II in order to continue their extortions;

And if it had not been for the presence of Your Excellency at the top of the executive branch of your country as an experienced stateswoman with bitter and sweet experiences in two dissimilar societies with different political systems and traditions,

And at the same time, if it had not been for the advantages that are limited to women, such as stronger human sentiments and certain manifestations of the divine compassion and kindness, specially in the position of a mother and being at the service of the people, and the common responsibility of all people with faith in God to defend human dignity and worth and to prevent violations of their rights and their humiliation, and proceeding from this conviction that we are all created by the Almighty and He has bestowed upon us all dignity and no one has any special privileges over the other, and under no circumstances could a society be deprived of its rights, barred from pursuit of progress and perfection or be controlled or humiliated;

Finally, if it had not been for the oppression, however different, of our nations, our shared responsibility to promote justice as the most basic foundation for promotion of peace and human equality, I would not have found the motive to write this letter.

Honorable Chancellor

Rulers come and go, but people with culture and history and their attachments and desires will keep on staying. Opportunities in front of those in position of high power are transient, even if they may be vast and broad. These opportunities are very auspicious and can play a key role in the negative and positive transformations and developments of a nation.

Those in position of high power do not normally have many opportunities, but are accountable before the Almighty and people due to their high responsibility. We know this, and you know it as well.

Some of these developments can have regional, continental and global ramifications and can hardly be overlooked.

For sometime I have been thinking why some nations that their history shows they have indeed had an important and prominent share and role in material and spiritual progress of mankind in various arenas of science, arts, philosophy, literature and politics and were makers of civilization are not allowed to be proud as a nation of their historical accomplishments and play their deserved and constructive role on the global arena. They try to keep the black cloud of humiliation and shame hanging over their heads. And even more regrettably, some of the leaders of such a nation regard this situation befitting them and their nation and try to justify it. This is really an astonishing phenomenon in today's world. The propaganda machinery after World War II has been so colossal that has caused some people to believe that they are the guilty party by historical accounts and must pay the penalty fort the wrongs committed by their forefathers for successive generations and for indefinite period of time.

Excellency

World War II came to an end with all its material and moral losses and its 60 million casualties. The death of human beings is tragic and sad. In all divine religions and before all awakened conscience and pure nature of mankind and the sense of right and wrong, the life, property and honor of people, regardless of their religious persuasion and ethnic background, must be respected at all times and all places.

Sixty years have passed since the end of the war. But, regrettably the entire world and some nations in particular are still facing its consequences. Even now the conduct of some bullying powers and power-seeking and aggressive groups is the conduct of victors with the vanquished.

The extortion and blackmail continue, and people are not allowed to think about or even question the source of this extortion, otherwise they face imprisonment. When will this situation end? Sixty years, one hundred years or one thousand years, when? I am sorry to remind you that today the perpetual claimants against the great people of Germany are the bullying powers and the Zionists that founded the Al-Qods Occupying Regime with the force of bayonets in the Middle East.

The Honorable Chancellor

I have no intention of arguing about the Holocaust. But, does it not stand to reason that some victorious countries of World War II intended to create an alibi on the basis of which they could continue keeping the defeated nations of World War II indebted to them. Their purpose has been to weaken their morale and their inspiration in order to obstruct their progress and power. In addition to the people of Germany, the peoples of the Middle East have also borne the brunt of the Holocaust. By raising the necessity of settling the survivors of the Holocaust in the land of Palestine, they have created a permanent threat in the Middle East in order to rob the people of the region of the opportunities to achieve progress. The collective conscience of the world is indignant over the daily atrocities by the Zionist occupiers, destruction of homes and farms, killing of children, assassinations and bombardments.

Excellency, you have seen that the Zionist government does not even tolerate a government elected by the Palestinian people, and over and over again has demonstrated that it recognizes no limit in attacking the neighboring countries.

The question is why did the victors of the war, especially England that had apparently such a strong sense of responsibility toward the survivors of the Holocaust not allow them to settle in their territory. Why did they force them to migrate to other people's land by launching a wave of anti-Semitism? Using the excuse for the settlement of the survivors of the Holocaust, they encouraged the Jews worldwide to migrate and today a large part of the inhabitants of the occupied territories are non-European Jews. If tyranny and killing is condemned in one part of the world, can we acquiesce and go along with tyranny, killing, occupation and assassinations in another part of the world simply in order to redress the past wrongs?

Excellency

We need to ask ourselves that for what purposes the millions of dollars that the Zionists receive from the treasury of some Western countries are spent for. Are they used for the promotion of peace and the well-being of the people? Or are they used for waging war against Palestinians and the neighboring countries. Are the nuclear arsenals of Israel intended to be used in defense of the survivors of the Holocaust or as a permanent thereat against nations of the region and as an instrument of coercion, and possibly to defend the interests of certain circles of power in the Western countries.

Regrettably, the influence of the Zionists in the economy, media and some centers of political power has endangered interests of the European nations and has robbed them of many opportunities. The main alibi for this approach is the extortion they exact from the Holocaust.

One can imagine what standing some European countries could have had and what global role they could have played, if it had not been for this sixty-year old imposition.

I believe we both share the view that the flourishing of nations and their role are directly related to freedom and sense of pride.

Fortunately, with all the pressures and limitations, the great nation of Germany has been able to take great strides toward advancement and has become a major economic powerhouse in Europe that also seeks to play a more effective role in international interactions. But just imagine where Germany would be today in terms of its eminence among the freedom-loving nations, Muslims of the world and peoples of Europe, if such a situation did not exist and the governments in power in Germany had said no to the extortions by the Zionists and had not supported the greatest enemy of mankind.

It is sad to admit that Europe has lost a lot of its clout in global interactions and has not been able to face and overcome major challenges by relying on itself. This is, of course, understandable. The big powers outside of the continent intend to prove that Europe cannot rely on itself and do anything without their help and intervention.

Our people have also suffered from the interventions by some of the victors of the war after World War II. For many years they interfered in our internal affairs and did not want to see our nation conquer the pinnacles of progress and perfection. They had their eyes on our natural wealth, above all on our energy resources. To secure their own interests, they overthrew the legally constituted government of the time, installed a dictatorial regime and supported it to the end. Later, they supported Saddam in the war imposed on our people and observed no humanitarian boundary in their support for the Iraqi dictator. Our nation has experienced the pain and anguish from the interferences of those who are now crying out for human rights. There are still many suffering from the wounds and injuries of this war.

Many of these aggressions have taken place by those who regard themselves the victors of the World War II. They allow themselves to do whatever they wish, and unfortunately, after the end of the Cold War, the arrogance and expansionist ambitions of these powers have escalated.

We believe that still a major part of the peoples of the world and even international organizations are under the influence of the behavior and the conduct of the victors of the World War II.

I explained the position of the people and government of the Islamic Republic of Iran at the United Nations General Assembly. Is the present state of affairs such as the rules governing the work of the Security Council, especially the right to veto, fair?

Do you not think that the time has come to change these rules in cooperation with independent governments? These rules are by no means acceptable to the collective conscience of nations and are contrary to the sense of reason and human nature. At least, if we want to be fairer, some other countries of the world should be allowed to benefit from the right to veto.

Madam Chancellor

You are familiar with the pains and sufferings currently afflicting our world. Today, the pain and suffering of the people of Iraq that come from occupation, absence of security and daily acts of terrorism are tormenting the entire humanity. Relentless interferences of some bullying powers in the internal affairs of other nations, antagonism toward the inalienable rights of nations to have access to more advanced technologies, subjecting nations to permanent threats by relying on arsenals of chemical and nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction, opposition to popular governments in Latin America, supporting coup d'état and dictatorial regimes, absence of due attention to Africa and taking advantage of the power vacuum there to plunder their wealth are among the problems facing our world today. In my letter to President Bush, I spelled out a long list of contemporary global problems.

Where are the roots of these problems? How long can they continue? Do you not think that the main root lies in the fact that some of the rulers and powers of today have distanced themselves from the teachings of the divine prophets, the teachings of Abraham, Moses and Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) and the Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him).

These teachings are in all divine religions that you and I believe:

· God is the creator of all things and beings. We have all been created free and He has not allowed us to be the servant of anyone other than Him.

· He has commanded us to worship Him and to avoid all oppressors and tyrants. · He has commanded us to be virtuous, to be good to and serve the people, and has directed us to be kind to and defend the oppressed and fight the oppressors.

· God has given humans dignity and scorns their humiliation.

· He has sent his messengers with clear reasons, the Book and a balance and has called on his servants to promote justice.

Based on these shared principles and foundations of our faith, we believe:

· Peace and tranquility can only be established and endure on the basis of faith in God and justice.

· Peace and dignity are the rights of all nations.

· Pursuit of progress and better livelihood combined with spirituality, compassion and well-being is the right of people.

· You and we can found a new movement to achieve these noble human ideals by relying on these principles and the articles of faith that are common to all divine religions.

Our nations believe and are committed to these pillars of faith. The history has shown that the people of Iran are not familiar with aggressing and brutalizing other nations. Nevertheless, we do not allow being the subject and victim of aggression and brutality. The experience of the eight-year war clearly demonstrated this fact to the whole world.

I believe we and you have both been the subject of tyranny. They do not respect your rights and want us also to forego our rights. Fortunately, I have heard that you also speak your mind openly and are against engendering tension and wars.

Honorable Chancellor,

The inner instincts and nature of the peoples of the world have wakened up.

Tendency toward faith in the oneness of God is on the rise.

People will no longer tolerate to be tyrannized, humiliated and their rights violated.

The prevailing circumstances today differ from those of yesterday. Multiple standards and approaches in relations will not endure.

Iran and Germany can play a more important role together in the international arena by relying on the noble and high values.

This cooperative relationship can also enhance the role of Europe on the global scene and serve as a model of cooperation between two governments and nations.

Without doubt, cooperation of two peace-loving, powerful and cultured nations of Germany and Iran will serve the interests of Europe as well. Together we must end the present abnormalities in international relations, the type of order and relations that are based on the impositions of the victors of the World War II on the defeated nations. Nations and many governments will be on our side on this path.

We must make the shadow of World War II disappear and help the international community to promote security, freedom and sense of tranquility.

The people of Iran and Germany are two great nations that have contributed to the making of our civilization. They have rich culture and have been in the forefront of science, literature, arts and philosophy. Both of our people have a strong faith in God and follow the teachings of divine prophets. They have also had long-lasting scientific, cultural and commercial relations and share many valuable mutual interests.

I have no doubt that with the cooperation of the two governments and the support of the two great nations we can take great strides forward in alleviating the problems and abnormalities of our world today.

Daring and courageous decisions are the key to our success in overcoming the existing problems, countering the violations of rights and defending the rights of nations.

To the extent that I know of the people of Germany, they will come along and join us and want restore their dignity and influence for the sake of global peace and calm. Our people have the similar spirit.

Together we will be able to prove to some powers that respecting other nations and their rights is good for them as well. Our two nations and governments, next to each other, will be able to play a fundamental role in promoting peace, security, progress, and human dignity at the scale of two countries and internationally.

In closing, I pray to the Almighty for the success of Your Excellency and the government and people of Germany.

Responsibility

By J. Bruce Campbell

9-25-6

Billions of dollars are spent to make us irresponsible. They are spent by us, that is, it's our money that's being spent. Churches, schools, unions, Hollywood, advertising, sports but mostly the government spend our money in ways to make us irresponsible. We spend away our power on meaningless things and harmful things. So much so that our money itself has become almost worthless, because the most important harmful things we buy are government bonds that are then given to the owners of the Federal Reserve Corporation as collateral on the paper they sell us that we call "dollars." The FRC calls them "notes," or IOUs. They're not dollars, they're not notes - they're just paper that we either accept in trade or we don't trade.

Just about every bad thing that's happened to us can be traced back to bad money. Bad money makes bad things happen. When we allow loan sharks to be our only suppliers of currency, our culture rots. We can easily trace the rot. It began in 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was enacted by our elected representatives. I have written that the Masonic US Constitution is a masterpiece of deception without any redeeming features, which had to be tamed by the Bill of Rights. Patrick Henry called it a design for empire, which is what we have had ever since Lincoln invaded the Southern States. The closest the framers got to redemption was the rule they made that the Congress would mint coins and regulate the value thereof. And the dollar was strong and worth something until 1913, when the Warburgs seized control. A Colt Six-Shooter, for example, cost about twelve dollars. Today the same gun (made by US Fire Arms) costs a hundred times that. A Ford truck cost three hundred dollars. Today one costs thirty thousand dollars and even that isn't enough to keep the company afloat because our currency is rotting.

Within four years we were in the first of many international wars. No coincidence. The loan sharks make war loans to governments that can never be repaid. They're not supposed to be repaid, but only to put us all in permanent debt to them. Our debts to them from WWI still haven't been repaid and can't be repaid, due to the little add-on percentage thing they call "interest." Interest wrecks everything for us, including our rotting money. If everyone has to pay back more than he borrowed - and everyone does - then the only way to have enough extra is to inflate the currency supply. And if you have to pay the loan sharks a percentage on top of that, and "taxes" on top of that, well, the whole thing spirals out of control pretty quickly. Which is where we are today. Out of control.

How do we get control back? There's only one way. We men must assume total responsibility for everything.

One of the most irresponsible things we do is vote. Another is to pay taxes. Allowing policemen "to protect and serve" us. Putting our children in "public schools." Listening to preachers, priests and ministers about anything. Might as well listen to a rabbi. All totally irresponsible. But that's how we're trained to live and that's how we are controlled. We have to break out of this trap and start thinking as men, not slaves. And we are slaves, make no mistake. Heavily armed slaves.

Never in human history has a people been in our unique position: Americans are some of the most well-armed people in the world, maybe the most well-armed. Many people think this is a result of the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights and that is partly true. But the actual, massive arming of the American population was done by the CIA. A CIA agent by the name of Sam Cummings "resigned" from the agency and started a company called Interarms, based in Virginia, back in the 1950s. Cummings had toured European battlefields as a young man and scavenged discarded machine guns, rifles and anti-tank weapons. He simply put them in his car and made his way to England where he started storing them in a warehouse in Manchester. When he joined CIA he told the director, Allen Dulles, about all the guns over there. Dulles was surprised and gave him the assignment to go back and get a tally and buy them up. Cummings did so and then soon left the agency to start his massive surplus firearms importing and distribution company, based in both Manchester and Virginia. All machine guns, submachine guns, rifles and pistols entering this country came through Interarms to be distributed through various jobbers and retailers. There are probably more guns in this country than there are cars, and unlike cars, guns generally don't wear out.

Allen Dulles and his brother were founding members of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. The CIA has always been staffed, like the State Department, with CFR members at the top. That's why it's known as the Rockefeller Secret Police.

So why would the CFR want Americans to be so heavily armed? For the same reason it wanted Hitler's Germany to be heavily armed and able to put up a convincing fight. There has to be a credible threat, as we learn in The Report from Iron Mountain. The people must believe it's real. If another civil war is planned, then both sides have to be armed. And the designated loser can always be disarmed if there's no food. No food is the specialty of the Jews. Also, Americans have never demonstrated a propensity for attacking their oppressors, as we see below. We might defend ourselves a little, but we let ourselves be pushed around by cops, attorneys and judges. It hasn't occurred to us to get even with the ones who sent us to Korea, Vietnam or Iraq. We just take it, like good little boys. That has to stop.

America was literally flooded with cheap surplus military weapons and Cummings had a CIA-granted monopoly on this importation and distribution. Then he began to arm other countries and became the most infamous gun runner in the world. But Cummings always said, as he repeats in his biography, that he never sold or supplied weapons without the direct okay from the CIA, that is, from his patron, Allen Dulles, or John McCone or Richard Helms or George Bush.

Any questions?

On the other side of the coin, we have the anti-gun groups Handgun Control, Inc and the National Coalition to Ban Handguns. Both organizations were funded and founded by an active CIA agent named Edwin O. Welles. Both organizations admit that handguns are just the camel's nose in the tent. They want all the guns, or so they say. All they managed to do was to disarm us mentally. I suspect that that was all they meant to do.

The result of this CIA activity is that we are at once heavily armed but mentally disarmed. We have the guns and the idea that we are armed and free but mysteriously we have no will to use them as they were meant to be used. I'm sure this is an interesting phenomenon to the CIA and Mossad psychiatrists who study us so carefully. Yes, our rulers are uneasy that we have all these great guns but time has shown that it hasn't occurred to us to use them to liquidate our sadistic oppressors and greedy loan sharks.

It occurred to me, which was why I started the militia movement in the 1980s. It seemed to me that American men were in a downhill slide into national cowardice, thanks to all the public education and religion and anti-heroic Hollywood movies, plus the outrageous prosecutions of gun owners and those few who did use guns to defend themselves and their loved ones. It all added up to making American men into cowards. Obviously a lot of us didn't want to be cowards and millions of us came to consider ourselves members of the militia just as soon as I suggested it. The militia was really just a state of mind. But it was not the state of mind that I was trying to create. I wanted to create revolutionaries to help me overthrow our renegade gangsters headquartered in Manhattan. I wanted to create a state of mind that would treat Gun Police as rats to be exterminated. Ultimately, we would have to exterminate the head gangsters. No doubt the gangsters understood the implications and, as former CIA director William Colby wrote to John DeCamp, the militia had to be dealt with, justly or otherwise, not because militiamen had guns and practiced with them, but because there were so many of them and because they were made up of "society's ordinary, successful citizens." It was definitely a trend and it had to be stopped. As I have written over and over, it was stopped by the atrocity at Oklahoma City. Colby himself was stopped soon after his remarks were made public.

Ironically, what undoubtedly frightened Colby and the others more than the militia was the '93 shootout in Waco. I don't think anyone will claim that the followers of "David Koresh" were Christians in any context, considering they made money for the cult by dealing in guns. I wouldn't try to say that they were militia people, either. They were unusual, quiet fanatics. But they had the grit that we all need when the chips are down. They defended themselves and killed homicidal Yankee aggressors, just as the Iraqis are doing today. The Mt. Carmel gunfight, siege and massacre amounted to the modern-day but even more ghastly Alamo. The psychological effect of the deaths of four with many other casualties on the swaggering Gun Police was devastating and orders went out to avoid such a catastrophe in the future. The psychological effect of the mass murder fifty-some days later certainly helped me in my efforts to grow the militia movement, which was suddenly taken much more seriously thanks to those great Waco martyrs.

But I still couldn't sell my plan for the actual overthrow of the Manhattan gangsters. The militia became a defensive state of mind, not offensive. It was gaining momentum and strength of numbers right up through April 19, 1995, when explosives were detonated inside the Murrah Building, killing around 240 federal employees and their children. Then it was all over, overnight.

There was no depth to the militia movement, which name I used only because some men need the authority, or permission, to be men. The old word, "militia," gave them that authority. The Militia Act of 1792 stated that one function of the militia was "to suppress combinations too powerful for the ordinary course of judicial proceedings." That seemed to fit my needs exactly, because I was trying to suppress the Council on Foreign Relations and its co-conspiracies which were definitely too powerful for the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.

There was of course no training to provide the needed depth and heart for withstanding the psychological assault of the OKC massacre. American men had had no training for such an atrocity. American vets were not reliable because of their massive brainwashing and conditioning to follow orders and their reliance on rank. The militia idea was too radical to ex-soldiers and marines who tended to fall back on their military ways. The militia was paramilitary with no rank, no leadership, no cults of personality. It was pretty much the same as the Leaderless Resistance advocated by Louis Beam, who shared the concept developed by Col. U.L. Amoss. The constant threat was infiltration and false leadership by police and federal agents. And there was just no action, but rather a lot of talk and running around and stockpiling guns and ammo. And so, it fell apart when the chips were down.

The militia thing is dead. Any guns and ammo we don't already have are down at the armory. All we need is action against the gangsters. But to get the action, there still is something lacking and that is our acceptance of responsibility.

In the essay called Jewish Rule, I wrote that American men have to accept responsibility for what the Jews have maneuvered our government to do to the rest of the world. One reader thought this was an outrageous idea and that it was in conflict with my accusation of the Jews for all their crimes against humanity. Yes, the Jews are responsible for all the death and destruction, but we are responsible for allowing them to have it done by our government, in our name. Either we are men or we are slaves to the Jews. Which one would you say we are?

What that reader didn't understand is that the path to power is our acceptance of total responsibility for everything our government has done. This is not a gag, because we actually are responsible, once we catch on. Billions are spent to keep us from catching on, as mentioned. But now there's less and less excuse not to know. I mean, there's a huge wall the Jews just built around what's left of Palestine. A big prison wall. That's the symbol of Jewish Rule. The Jews just destroyed Lebanon again. That's what the Jews do. The Jews stole over two trillion dollars from the Pentagon. That's also what they do. The Jews knocked down the World Trade Center because they didn't want to pay to demolish it legally. That sort of insurance fraud is known as "Jewish lightning." They just took it to a new level and parlayed it into a couple of anti-Moslem wars with one more about to break. But now a whole lot of us, thanks to the Internet, know a hell of a lot about these things. That puts us under a certain obligation to do something. Especially now that we know the followingSNow the Jews want Iran destroyed by nuclear annihilation.

It's their bomb, after all. They invented it and built it and dropped it on hundreds of thousands of civilians. And gave it to Stalin and made a few hundred for themselves. It's their scientific claim to fame, the only important invention they can brag about. As we know, they keep quiet on that subject. But I digress. This is about responsibility.

The most responsible man in the world right now is an Iranian engineer named Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. That makes him the most powerful man in the world. He is the role model, the man we need to emulate. Not only is he the president of Iran, but he has been accused for years of being one of the revolutionaries who took the 52 American embassy personnel hostage and held them for 444 days. That makes him a man of action, not just a great theoretician, as he proved in his appearance at the United Nations. But what has just placed Mr. Ahmadinejad in the Hall of Fame was his courageous descent into the belly of the beast. He was, for some demented reason, invited to address the Council on Foreign Relations after his tour d'force at the United Nations. He didn't do this at their actual headquarters at 58 E. 68th Street, but at the Intercontinental Hotel on 48th Street. They probably didn't want him to see their actual headquarters. Might give him ideas.

This, to me, was the most profound moment in modern history. The one important man in the world who understands exactly what the Council on Foreign Relations is and how it has destroyed our world was invited to speak and defend his past statements - to them.

He defended nothing but rather went on the attack. He continued to belittle the Jewish fairy tale of the Six Million and asked again why the Palestinians should pay the price for something that has never been established? He asked them if the Council on Foreign Relations had one voice of support for the Palestinians? Silence was their answer. The man knew that Israel is the CFR's little monster. He was playing with them.

Brent Scowcroft, GHW Bush's consiglieri, was left shaking his head. "He's a master of counterpunch, deception and circumlocution." Translation: We couldn't handle him.

Some of them might have been a little uneasy at the thought of this clear-thinking, straight-talking man having captured and held State Department employees for over a year. After all, the Council on Foreign Relations was organized to run the US State Department. That's what the word "Foreign" refers to, with the ultimate goal of merging our country with foreign countries. The CFR's maiden effort toward this end is scheduled for 2010, at which time we might be merged with Mexico and Canada - if we do not burn down the building known as Harold Pratt House before then. It will also have to be bulldozed because it appears to be made of stone. Again, the address of this den of iniquity is 58 E. 68th Street in Manhattan, which is actually on the corner of Park Avenue and 68th. Harold Pratt was a director of Standard Oil and a Rockefeller relative, I believe.

The Jews were upset and claimed they considered resigning from the CFR! Sure. So the affair was billed as a "meeting," rather than the customary dinner. The Jews said they would not eat with him. Hors d'oeuvres were offered but the president wouldn't touch them. Touche. At the end, this is what he said:

And as he left, it was with a jab to his hosts. "At the beginning of the session,

you said you were an independent group,'' he said. "But almost everything

that I was asked came from a government position.'' Then he smiled, thanked

everyone and left the room with a light step. [NY Times, 21 Sept 06]

Mr. Ahmadinejad knows that the Council on Foreign Relations is the de facto government of the United States. He knows that the nuclear attack that is planned for his country was designed by the members of this iniquitous club of Rothschild/Rockefeller. But he still went there and messed their minds up. He so enraged those pampered, perfumed pimps that one of them said later:

"If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are

heading for a massive confrontation with Iran," he said. [ibid]

We know what that means. It means that the Iranians are going to be irradiated. The question is, are we going to allow our Manhattan gangsters to get away with it? They are certainly our responsibility. And of course, the CFR disclaims all responsibility while claiming all power. "We're just a think-tank - a private study group." But the fact is that you can't have power without responsibility, once honest men figure out what you've been doing. They have to answer for their actions, and for their crimes against humanity. They have to answer to us. If they don't answer to us, they'll have to answer to some angry foreigners. You just can't keep mass murdering for eighty years and building the empire and ruining other countries without someone stopping you. Not in this day and age. It has to be American men stopping them. If someone else came over and wiped out the CFR, we would be in permanent disgrace. Our manhood would be irretrievably lost.

As I pointed out last time, the Iranians are perfectly within their rights to attack the United States based on the many reports of Bush's plan to attack them. The fact is, though, that Moslems do not engage in unprovoked action. They generally don't engage in very drastic action even when they are provoked, although a few of them are flexing their muscles in Iraq and Lebanon, showing their true potential. But we have driven them against the wall, and even a rabbit will bite you if you give it no way out of a corner. If Moslems were as murderous as the Jews claim, Israel would no longer exist as a Zionist entity. It is the Jews and Judaized Americans and Englishmen who attack without provocation, as they continue to prove. Jews are the masters of murder, as they proved with 9/11 and just now in Lebanon, not to mention their genocide of Palestinians, of Russians and Ukrainians - and Germans.

The CFR is funded with Rothschild/Rockefeller money laundered at the tax-exempt foundations, money from the Federal Reserve Corporation, the energy corporations and the narcotics corporations. They have all the money in the world. They have all of our money but it's still not enough. A CFR member named Dov Zakheim stole over two trillion dollars from the Pentagon. Imagine that! Its members are Jews, Freemasons and those sexual perverts from the Brotherhood of Death at Yale University, often combinations of all three. There are no normal people in the Council on Foreign Relations; they are all psychopaths who must be stopped before they destroy us all.

These essays are meant to stand alone so we should have a little background on the world's most homicidal organization, the Council on Foreign RelationsS An interesting history of the CFR can be found on their own website, of all things:

www.cfr.org/about/history/

It's not how I would have told it, but it reveals a narcissistic self-fascination and is an admission that they have run this government for almost a hundred years. The 20th Century was a mountain, an Everest, of dead bodies, only because of Them. And they're not done. The first generation's dead, the second's dying but the third's just getting warmed up. We normal people may wonder why these ghouls would want to preside over a graveyard. Don't bother. It'll never make sense. Just deal with what they've already done. These guys have a depopulation program that will boggle your mind. They plan to kill about 75% of the world's people - maybe more. That's not why I want to kill them all. I just want to get even for the ones they've already killed.

Everyone dies. It's how someone died that counts when it comes to getting even. The Council on Foreign Relations caused millions of people to die in the most horrific ways imaginable. Problem is, they'd died in our name. Our presidents, our congress, our militaryS Our State Department killed more than any of them by setting up and supporting every Communist government in the world, ever since the first one in 1917. That's where the big killing was done, by our Communists. And the State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations. Don't ever forget that.

And now Israel is guiding us into a nuclear holocaust. "Holocaust" means "burnt whole."

Israel was created by the CFR, which has subsidized it with our money since 1948. Israel earns all those stolen billions by destabilizing the Middle East and inflating the price of oil, because the CFR represents oil and banking, which are pretty much the same thing. Oil is real wealth and banking is fake wealth, but we don't get one without the other.

They don't want any more oil. There's too damn much oil. They want less oil. They want us to pay more for less oil. They don't need any more money because there's too much money and it's not worth much anyway. They just don't want us to have any money. If we have money then we can afford to go after them. If we're broke, then we can't. It's that simple. Who is in charge of our currency supply? Ben Shalom Bernanke. And if we're sick with man-made diseases with no cures, then we can't go after them. Poisoning through medicine was perfected by Jews centuries ago. If there's a food shortage then we can't go after them. Remember what Joseph did to the Egyptians? Same as Kaganovich did to the Ukrainians, and Eisenhower to the Germans. So we have to go after them before we go broke, get sick or starve. It's going to be a race.

Their oil war in Iraq is being fought to keep Iraqi oil in the ground. A nuclear attack on Iran will keep Iranian oil in the ground. If they could have kept Chavez in jail after their coup, he wouldn't have been giving Venezuelan oil away to our poor people, or offering to lower the price to a permanent level that would still make his huge heavy oil reserves viable. If the CFR kills Chavez then that heavy oil will stay in the ground. The oil price is intended to skyrocket, which should throw our already crippled economy into total chaos. And this will take our minds off the CFR's merger of America with Mexico and Canada in four years.

The path to power is our acceptance of total responsibility. That means, as Americans, we accept responsibility for what our government has done in the past - all the way back to the beginning - and for what it's doing now. Wrongs have to be righted, not immediately but they must begin to be righted. Some wrongs can't be righted all the way because we've killed a lot of people. We can't right that. But we can acknowledge the wrong we've done to others as a first step. And we've done the wrongs, by proxy, at least. Our parents and their parents let them be done just as we have.

For starters, we ought to learn the truth about the great American family holiday called Thanksgiving. Learn about that and see how America has treated others, even before it was called America. Our government exterminated the Indians, starting with Thanksgiving. What was done to the Indians was done to the Germans. Our government waged total war on other Americans from 1861 to 1865. Our government's Jewish agents did it to the Russians and then the Chinese and so many others, recently the Palestinians and now the Iraqis. But the whole thing started with the American genocide of the American Indians. Those we didn't exterminate we exiled to barren "reservations" and gave rotten diets and bad medicine. They're dying out, as they're supposed to do. How do we right that? The first step is to own up to it. Then we very humbly go to the tribes and ask them how they want to proceed from here? Then we do what they want.

The Indians were the ones who had true personal liberty. When our European ancestors got here, they were a bunch of repressed religious fanatics, self-righteous and holy. They were also control-freaks with minds totally warped by their insane Christianity, especially the Old Testament believers in the Chosen People. Of course, they thought they were the Chosen People, same as the Jews do. They soon found a people who were generous and what we now call "democratic." Study for yourself the truth about the Native Americans which is easily available on the Internet. Those sanctimonious, psalm-singing sons of bitches began to kill the natives who kept them from starving because they showed a good way to live which threatened the control of the holy Joes in charge of the Europeans. This bunch of faithful killers became what today we call Yankees. The grasping, self-righteous Yankee mentality would become the scourge of America, eventually wiping out the natives and, in 1865, the idea of liberty found in the Declaration of Independence. The Southerners believed in it and the Yankees didn't.

The Old Testament would prove to be the undoing of Russia, too. The Russian Jews who wandered over here first lived in Russia's Pale of Settlement. That's where the Russians let them live after they were run out of Khazaria by the Golden Horde. They were a bunch of converts to Judaism and were so hard-core that they eventually asked the Russian government if they could have the judicial power to execute those among them who were unbelievers in Yahweh. The Russians said, Hell no, you can't do that! This prohibition on the rabbis to execute heretics and backsliders was the gravest of crimes, in "Orthodox" eyes, and led to what became the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, although many attempts at revolution were made by the Jews before that.

So we have this combination of Bible-guided people in the Council on Foreign Relations, a combination of Jews and Yankees - estimated at 70% Jews. That doesn't make the CFR a religious organization, obviously. But its roots are in the totalitarian dictatorship of Deuteronomy and Leviticus. Zionism means that the Russian Jews must emigrate from Russia to Palestine, seize it from the Palestinians and change the name to Israel, or Zion. And from there they would make the Law go forth. The Law is Deuteronomy. At this point you should actually read Deuteronomy, just to see what the Palestinians, the Iraqis and the Iranians are up against. It's what the Russians were up against when all those Trotsky Jews were shipped over to St. Petersburg from New York. What the Germans were up against when Eisenhower gave all those Morgenthau Jews the green light in 1945 to slaughter PoWs and civilians, in accord with Theodore Kaufmann's manual, Germany Must Perish!. We're going to be up against it, too.

The Council on Foreign Relations created the United Nations in 1945. The UN set up shop on prime Manhattan real estate donated by the Rockefellers, themselves a strange combination of Yankees and Jews. Yankee CFR member and Soviet spy Alger Hiss was the UN's first Secretary General! The first new nation that the United Nations created was "Israel" in 1948. It is a fake nation, a fake nation of parasites that does not deserve to exist, as it is sitting on a foundation of lies.

So, we are responsible. For one thing, the UN is in America. Israel is supported by American tax money and our unpayable debt. We must repudiate this debt because it was incurred by fraud. Israel is the greatest fraud in history, and the most vicious. The UN is just a fraud, but it is the framework for what the CFR has in mind for us. The first step is the North American Union in which we will degenerate into another Third World dump and answer to the US, Mexican and Canadian armies.

We are responsible for everything we've done except for the debt. The debt to the Federal Reserve Corporation and to the Wall Street lenders and the bonds we trade for their counterfeit cash are based on fraud. Fraud nullifies all contracts, with no statute of limitations. We repudiate the debt. The Federal Reserve Corp would cease to exist because most of its directors are CFR. The rest would get the message and quit.

The Council on Foreign Relations has had a great ride since 1921. Its founding members had seized control of the US government ten years earlier through their control of Woodrow Wilson. They created the Federal Reserve and its collection agency, the IRS. They got us to invade Mexico. They started World War I. They created the Communist dictatorship in Russia. They almost got us in the League of Nations. When that failed, they formed the Council on Foreign Relations to design a real world war and a new, improved League of Nations. That only took them twenty years. After ninety-five years of mass murder, with much more in store, however, it is time to call a halt to their crimes against humanity. This cannot be done politely or by civil suit or by filing charges against them. What federal agency would prosecute them?

No federal or state or county or local agency will prosecute them. It will be up to us.

This essay amounts to a warrant for the entire membership, regardless of ethnicity, of the Council on Foreign Relations. It is also my personal opinion. You can figure just what kind of warrant it should be. This will be up to the reader and it will eventually be up to the millions of men who never read this but who will demand to know who is responsible for the coming national suicide of America. The word will get out that engine of our destruction is this malignant, toxic, private ministry of war known as the CFR.

Maybe this man has put into words what some readers are thinking:

Dear Sir:

Supposing that in fact, you indeed, stand by all of your claims; that

is, you are indeed, a "true blue" defender of all that is good and

true, and even, beautiful, then I have a question.

Given your suppositions about the alleged omnipotence of your

adversaries: Would it not seem a little odd that you are allowed to

make your claims so freely -- given the Power you ascribe to Them?

Might it be possible, if not likely, that what I see as "your work"

{I know you - Not} on the internet is in fact, a service to Those who

would like to identify potential "Terrorists" and would-be

troublemakers.

If so, you are, so far, only serving Those that you, so wildly

denounce because you and the website[s] on which your work is posted

are the most heavily surveilled on the planet.

Sincerely,

The answer to these questions is, regardless of who is writing something, does it sound true or not? If something's true, then it doesn't matter if the one saying it has one motive or another. Even if Ariel Sharon said something that's true, it's still true. If something doesn't sound true, then ignore it. Find the truth your own way. But if something is true and you ignore it, then watch out because the truth's going to get you eventually. Maybe sooner than eventually.

I never said that our adversaries are omnipotent. I just said they're mass murderers. If I thought they were omnipotent I wouldn't write anything about them. As a matter of fact, I think they are extremely vulnerable once their little magic spell they've got on us breaks. This is how you break it, by speaking truth to power. I think our power is far greater than theirs, in terms of both numbers and truth. Do your homework and speak the truth.

The answer to the question about maybe making things worse for us by speaking the truth is - most of us, if we have any sense, are afraid of danger. The idea is to get past the fear and learn to defeat the aggressor rather than fear him. I mean, guys ride bulls, don't they? Race cars, climb mountains? They learn how to deal with the threat with new skills and techniques and become, if they survive the learning process, professionals or at least skilled amateurs. This just happens to be more meaningful than bull riding or the other blood sports.

And, if some guys have the guts and skill to master the blood sports, why is it that they chicken out when it comes to bloody politics? They're both life and death. One's fun and the other isS not so fun. You can make a lot of money as a bull rider or racing driver. Bloody politics will bankrupt you, so that's a good reason. It can also get you arrested and/or killed.

The questioner asks why this writer hasn't been arrested or killed so far, if what I write about them is true? They've thought about it. Two FBIs told me that in Montana in '96. The Secret Service threatened to kill me in '91 if I got near Bush's old man. Maybe they don't want another Waco. Maybe they need a bogeyman, a home-grown Osama. I won't indulge them in what they think they need. I'll just keep saying what I think they need, which is a real ass-whipping.

Maybe they've tried. I was attacked three times in 2003. Attacked by poison on my steering wheel. I developed severe kidney problems two times and was permanently disfigured. If I hadn't been married to a great doctor/healer, I might have croaked. The third time I found it on the wheel in time. Typical Jewish MO, but it could have been the feds.

Let's start accepting our responsibility. All of it. Taking responsibility for our government's past crimes will give us total power over our future. We will change America's role in the world from a colonizing, war criminal superpower to a responsible and respectful and independent nation. Our first responsibility is to give the Council on Foreign Relations and anyone who works for the CFR a real ass-whipping.

Reproduced from www.Rense.com

 Published on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 by Le Monde (Paris, France)

Letter From Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, to George Bush
by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

IRAN’S PRESIDENT SPEAKS OUT

AHMADINEJAD CHALLENGES NEW WORLD ORDER HEAD ON
 

AS NOTED IN THE OCT. 2 EDITION of American Free Press, AFP correspondent Michael Collins Piper was in New York City on Sept. 20 where he participated in a closed-door roundtable conference with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and a small group of invited journalists and academics. Later Piper was privately introduced to Ahmadinejad who invited Piper to come to Iran as his personal guest. What follows is Piper’s special report on the comments by Ahmadinejad.

By Michael Collins Piper

Even as The New York Sun—a fanatically pro-Israel daily—was editorially demanding his arrest “as a material witness or even as a suspect” in terrorism, outspoken Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was arriving in New York for a whirlwind visit last week. Speaking to the United Nations and visiting privately with different groups, journalists and scholars were anxious to hear what the ex-university professorturned-Mayor of Tehran-turned Iranian president had to say.

This comes at a time when the Islamic republic of Iran is at the center of the global spotlight, the focus of provocative, warlike rhetoric by Israel and its ally, George W. Bush.

Even Ahmadinejad’s invitation to speak at the Manhattan headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), meeting place of the American foreign policy elite, created a stir. Led by Holocaust industry figure Elie Wiesel, Jewish members of the CFR threatened mass resignation if the Iranian leader was permitted to speak, although the revolt never materialized.

Wiesel—whose own credibility is questionable—told anyone who would listen that he believed Ahmadinejad should be declared persona non grata in the United States and that Iran itself should be expelled from the UN while Ahmadinejad is president.

In the end, the proposed formal dinner with Ahmadinejad at the CFR was nixed since Jewish members of the CFR said that they could not abide the thought of sitting down to dinner with the Iranian leader. Instead, Ahmadinejad met with a small number of CFR members in a less formal gathering.

As pro-Israel groups organized boisterous mass anti-Ahmadinejad demonstrations outside the United Nations and the hotel where Ahmadinejad was headquartered, there were some sane folks who did agree to speak with the Iranian president and listen to what he had to say, without interruption. This contrasted with the treatment often accorded Ahmadinejad by biased American media personalities and by the American president who refuses to speak to the Iranian leader.

Speaking at the gathering of the bellicose rhetoric of Bush and his Israeli allies, Ahmadinejad insisted U.S. policy makers are “too smart” to think seriously about war with Iran. In fact, he said, the threats and tough talk by the United States are being used by the White House to apply what he called “psychological pressure” on the European countries to support sanctions against Iraq.

Ahmadinejad predicted any military moves against Iran “will not favor the United States government or the American people.” He pointed out that, even now, “All of the people of our region are beginning to hate the United States because of the policies of the Bush administration.”

And it should be noted, that fully 118 countries recently aligned themselves with Iran’s drive to secure nuclear energy for peaceful purposes—and against the Israel-U.S. axis—at the recent summit of nonaligned nations in Cuba.

The Iranian president expressed dismay that his recent extended letter to President Bush asking for an opening of dialogue, followed by an offer to publicly debate the American leader before the United Nations, has gone unanswered.

“I hoped President Bush would respond to my letter to him. My letter was a human act, not a political act. I meet and dialogue with many people on a daily basis.”

He noted: “There is no better way than holding dialogue. It can be across the spectrum. Any condition for dialogue is helpful to remove tensions. We’ve announced on numerous occasions that we are open for dialogue, but under conditions of mutual respect. Relations can be friendly, balanced and fair.”

Expressing his personal interest and his nation’s interest in, at the very least, opening up exchanges of scientists and academics between the United States and Iran, Ahmadinejad said: “We’ve been urging the institution of a direct flight between Tehran and New York for a long time. We will provide facilities for such exchanges.”

The Iranian president added: “We were very sorry when the United States refused our offer of humanitarian support for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.”

Reflecting upon the possibility that the Bush administration and Israel not only seek to stop Iran from expanding its current nuclear program—which has been the publicly expressed reason for the campaign being waged against Iran—but also have the intention of toppling the Ahmadinejad government and forcing a complete change in the Iranian system of government, the Iranian leader remarked:

Of course, we oppose this type of thinking by the U.S. administration. But they will never be able to impose regime change on Iran. Iran doesn’t need a guardian. This thinking is part of the past. Why does Mr. Bush believe that he can think better than the Iranian people and choose their leadership? Imagine me—as the president of Iran—saying to the American people: “I want to save the American people.” Think of how the Iranian people respond to President Bush’s rhetoric of that type. What is it that Mr. Bush wants to hand to Iran? Iran has always been Iran, but we have now become independent of the West. Iran is stronger than ever. Iran is a nation of families, friends and neighbors who live like one family, and there will be reactions from the people of Iran to any interference in our nation’s affairs.

As far as Iran’s alleged desire to assemble nuclear weapons, Ahmadinejad noted that Iran’s nuclear program is being supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency. “It’s round the clock, with cameras,” he pointed out. In addition, he noted, Iran has signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

Ahmadinejad didn’t mention it, but the truth is that Israel, which has one of the world’s largest nuclear weapons arsenals, has never signed that treaty, nor does it even officially admit that it has nuclear capabilities.

In addition, although it is not widely reported by the American media—which portrays Iran feverishly working to build “the Islamic bomb”—the fact is, as noted by Ahmadinejad, Iran’s supreme Muslim religious leader actually issued an edict, known as a “fatwa,” prohibiting Iran’s building of a nuclear weapon.

“In light of that,” said Ahmadinejad, “it can be said that, religiously speaking, we are against nuclear weapons. We are fundamentally against nuclear weapons. They are for killing.”

What’s more, he pointed out: “The Iranian people don’t need a nuclear weapon. For eight years, during the Iran-Iraq war, we had a voluntary army—including Christians—that rallied to the defense of the nation. Iranians have a love affair with their country.”

Yet, Ahmadinejad asked this: “How can those nations that have nuclear arsenals object to those nations that are trying to produce nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes? The nuclear arena should not be monopolized by a select group of countries.”

Responding to allegations that his country suppresses the media, Ahmadinejad noted, with a smile, that:

If you look at the volume of criticism of the Iranian government and my administration in the media and in academia in Iran, it is substantial. In fact, one of our own government newspapers was recently shut down because it insulted a tribe within our country and that was in violation of the law. So our own government newspaper was punished for violating the law. Iranian journalists accompanying me to the United States were denied visas by the United States government. These journalists are not allowed to travel beyond the confines of the United Nations building. But after I was elected president of Iran, some 200 journalists from all over the world visited a small village where I lived for a very brief period as a small child and interviewed everybody they could find: the baker, the man who tended the fruit stand, all of the neighbors.

As far as political freedom in Iran is concerned, Ahmadinejad noted that in the presidential race in which he was elected, “there were eight different candidates from very different backgrounds, representing very diverse platforms.”

He pointed out that “Our 290-member consultative assembly is wide-open to a variety of ideas and opinions. It is not run along party lines as you find in the United States, for example.” He added:

“Anyone can come to Iran and see that young people, old people—all people—are very politicized and have wideranging opinions. They are cognizant of what is happening in the news about the world today and are very much interested in what’s happening. Americans are not fingerprinted when they come to Iran, but people from other lands are fingerprinted when they come to America.”

Of the efforts by the Christian and Muslim peoples of Palestine to win a homeland, Ahmadinejad reiterated his longtime concerns that reflect the thinking of millions of people around the globe:

“The fate of humanity is connected to what happens in Palestine. The time for occupation in Palestine has long ended. For a thousand years or more, Palestine was Palestine and nothing else. However, for the last 60 years we have seen nothing but hostility and bloodshed and tragedy there. Small babies being killed. Homes destroyed. For what? What is the root cause? The Palestinian people should be able to return to their homeland and choose their own leadership there.”

Addressing hysterical charges that he is a “Holocaust denier,” as has been repeatedly mentioned in American media reports about him, Ahmadinejad said:

I have been criticized in the media for asking for scientific evidence relating to events that were said to have happened during World War II. During that war, some 60 million people died. Yet one small group has gained prominence as victims as if other lives don’t matter. In our society today, God and democracy can be freely researched and questioned. There are many books and papers and commentaries published on these topics, but the question of events in World War II cannot be discussed. I believe, in the spirit of understanding, that we need to do further research in this realm, for the more we understand what really happened, the more we can do to alleviate problems in our society. In the end, after all, if these things happened, they happened in Europe. They did not happen in Palestine. So therefore, why did the Palestinians have to pay the price? There are five million displaced Palestinians in the world today.

Reflecting in general on the world situation, the Iranian president concluded:

“In our world today there are small groups that seek power and wealth. But most societies seek freedom, peace and justice. We have said we are against the imposition of a unilateral position upon the world. The United Nations must be independent of any single power.”

It is not for nothing that Ahmadinejad personally impresses even hostile journalists who meet him. He is witty, whip-smart, deeply spiritual and intellectual and as even Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International, admitted in The Washington Post: “I was struck by how little he conformed to the picture of a madman . . . always calm and intelligent.”

Ahmadinejad has established himself as a firm voice against the forces that demand submission to a New World Order.

A journalist specializing in media critique, Michael Collins Piper is the author of Final Judgment, the controversial “underground bestseller” documenting the collaboration of Israeli intelligence in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also the author of The High Priests of War and The New Jerusalem. all available from FIRST AMENDMENT BOOKS.He has lectured on these topics in places as diverse as Malaysia, Japan, Canada, Moscow and Abu Dhabi.

Reproduced from American Free Press: http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/iran_s_president_speaks.html

Instrument Of Domination...
By Adrian Salbuchi   10-19-6

Revised: July 18, 2010 .   Communication:   discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com     Go to Home Page     Go to Index of All Articles Pages       
Read the Disclaimer
Last modified: July 18, 2010  Copyright © 1999 - 2008  All rights reserved. [Gnostic Liberation Front].   www.gnosticliberationfront.com