What we have to do now is to make the public at large aware that
what we're looking at is not a historical event but
- and I have to be brutal and I am going to say it - a racket. Ernst Zundel
Never and Audit on the Count
David
Irving's persecution has been compared to the prosecution of Galileo.
The
Rev. Ted Pike
offers up a list of other less celebrated fatalities of thought
crimes. Pike's prediction is frightening: "The conviction of David
Irving is a chilling wake-up call that hate crimes laws and
international enforcement of them are not going to go away. They are
vital to the ADL/B'nai B'rith master plan for eventual triumph over
Christian civilization."
Austria may
be getting the recent headlines but Germany has the final solution.
It is called by law -
Paragraph 130!
Section 130a Instructions for Crimes
(1) Whoever disseminates, publicly displays, posts, presents, or
otherwise makes accessible a writing (Section 11 subsection (3))
which is capable of serving as instructions for an unlawful act
named in Section 126 subsection (1), and is intended by its content
to encourage or awaken the readiness of others to commit such an
act, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three
years or a fine.
(2) Whoever:
1. disseminates,
publicly displays, posts, presents, or otherwise makes accessible a
writing (Section 11 subsection (3)) which is capable of serving as
instructions for an unlawful act named in Section 126 subsection
(1); or
2. gives instructions
for an unlawful act named in Section 126 subsection (1), publicly or
in a meeting, in order to encourage or awaken the readiness of
others to commit such an act,
"The Jews do not tolerate any
questioning of the 'Holocaust,'" Faurisson told the Mehr News Agency
of Iran. "Against the revisionists they use physical violence and
judicial repression because, on the level of historical and
scientific argumentation, they have been defeated hands down by the
revisionists. We have been able to expose their lies, one by one.
Therefore Jews and Zionists seek refuge in violence and
intimidation. They treat revisionists like Palestinians."
Bollyn
compares Zündel to Luther. But in a direct report from the
Zündel trial,
you get the cruel harsh reality of this kosher inquisition. "Vastly
simplified, the Zundel Heresy Trial has now become the vehicle to try
to shake off Israeli (and Allied) control of Germany, and hopefully of
Europe. Ernst has become the symbol and political icon of that
struggle because he is the best-known Prisoner of Conscience in the
Western world and his name carries weight and prestige with important
dissidents who have put the mosaic together and refuse to live by the
Lie." As reported in the "Poodle Media", the significance of such a
show trial is ignored with its ensuing cover-up in order to perpetuate
the only account of WWII allowed. Since history is written by the
victor - surely there can be no doubt who actually won that war!
Perverted
hate legislation is coming to Amerika and will be written by the same
Pharisee tribe as in Europe. How quickly the lessons in
IMPERIUM
by Francis Parker Yockey are shredded
from consciousness of rational inquiry out of fear from the gulag
despots.
The cultural divide is
no myth. It is essentially a spiritual war. The opponents of
individual liberty must eliminate Christian heritage and destroy
believers in order to achieve their Talmud heretical rule. If you
believe in the Father and in His Son, there can be no rapprochement
with the defilers of His word.
Intimidation and threats
will not destroy the truth. Only apathy and cowardice will guarantee
defeat. The basic purpose of your being is at stake as well as the
future of our country. Allowing the law to be subverted to punish
truth seekers, where ever the evidence leads is wickedness incarnate.
Patrick Henry understood the real meaning of the American experience.
"Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" applies directly to the
treachery of faceless thugs who manipulate the law to silence the
cries of real social justice. Promoting false guilt under the guise
of a phony tolerance is obscene.
Facts of
history do not discriminate among sufferers to make any group
special. Was the dread of the
Bataan march or
the POW that built the
Thai-Burma railway
any less important or dear? What about the killing fields of the
Khmer Rouge or
the
Siberian internment
hell holes? Was the suffering under the hands of Pol Pot or Joseph
Stalin any less tragic? The myth that a Jewish Holocaust (whatever
the actual death count) is the single most evil event in all of
history is objectively offensive.
Recent
threats upon
Rense.com
contributors illustrates that the grand inquisitors of intimidation
seek to export their persecution campaign to America. The case of
Google Video removing two of revisionist
Michael A. Hoffman II's
three videos from its free video online website.
Hoffman received the following e-mail from
Google: Google has been notified that your videos violate our
Program Policies. The titles of the videos are listed at the end of
this message. According to our policy, we are removing the following
videos: World War Two Revisionist Charles Provan [and] Deborah
Lipstadt, "Amalek" and David Irving. "Google is supposed to be
dedicated to providing access to the whole spectrum of human knowledge
and inquiry. But with their self-censorship of the Lipstadt and Provan
videos, they demonstrate
to the world that Google is not an information provider but an
information gatekeeper, similar to the tired, discredited model
perpetuated by the old media," Hoffman concluded.
Both of these instances
illustrate that much more than censorship is the core issue. The
pattern of structured and methodical targeting of voices that dare
challenge the superior status of those who rely upon a hoax of
uniqueness is clearly evident. The legal and natural right of Free
Speech is not only threatened with incarceration, but physical harm is
indeed implied. At what point will their strappado rack be
used to bring a version of the infamous paragraph 130 to the United
States?
In order to
understand and internalize the depth of the spiritual foe, that
politically incorrect academic Jimmy Cantrell in his essay -
The Most Significant Part of the Talmud
- removes the veil from the temple. Roy Schoeman wrote - Salvation is
From the Jews: The Role of Judaism in Salvation History From Abraham
to the Second Coming. "Schoeman is an ethnic Jew who passed from
Talmudic study to academia to having religious visions that led him to
say to God that he did not care who God is or what religion he would
need to join as long as God is not Christ because he did not want to
be a Christian. Jones labels that the Jewish "animus against Christ"
that is "ancestral, visceral and palpable...." Though Schoeman had
prayed that God be anything but Christ, he eventually decided that
Jesus is both the Messiah and God, and Schoeman became Catholic."
Cantrell citing from a
review by E. Michael Jones in the February 2004 issue of Culture Wars,
makes this observation: Jones's review is primarily a study of
what Schoeman does not say directly in his book: "... what the Jews
had become in the centuries since their leaders rejected Christ, not
the religion of Moses but an anti-Christ ideology."
Before
condemning such an insight as anti-Semitic, consider
Revelation 3:9
(New American Standard Bible) " 'Behold, I will cause those of (A)the
synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie--I
will make them (B)come and bow down at your feet, and make them know
that (C)I have loved you. " (additional verses from letter
reference)
The malice within the
imposition of hate laws is apparent. The objective is to silence and
punish any questioning of contrived and erroneous political agendas
that are designed to subjugate Western Civilization under the yoke of
Talmud sacrilege. Yet, this circumstance is not solely a Jewish
plot. Not all Jews worship at the synagogue of Satan.
Likewise not all Catholics were ready to burn Luther or cast Galileo
into a dungeon. Christendom isn't monolithic any more than Jewry.
Light from the Torah
contrasts with Judaism's wickedness of the politically motivated
Talmudical objectives. This distinction is crucial to understand the
underlying reasons why Irving and Zündel are subjected to a Zionist
paragraph 130 kangaroo court. In all likelihood Faurisson
may follow under other trumpeted up charges.
When
François-Marie Arouet
uttered his famous quote, the Jesuit educated polemicist could not
imagine that in his revolutionary Europe he could be sharing a cell
with Irving some two centuries later. Only in a world devised under
the most perverse intentions and tortured legality could such
intellectual inquiry be so criminalized.
When Tony
'poodle boy'
Blair
challenged Iran's Ahmadinejad: "should come and see the evidence of
the Holocaust himself in the countries of Europe", we see the
hypocrisy of the enablers of Talmud tyranny. With blistering speed
Ahmadinejad, a populist conservative took up the challenge and was
soundly
denied access
to inspect the physical evidence that venerates the "Holocaust
Industry". Top this off with Blair's own duplicity: "Labour
leader said he saw a "very strong
case" for making it illegal to say that Hitler's extermination of six
million Jews did not take place. Opening an exhibition dedicated to
Anne Frank, Mr Blair pledged that a Labour government would give
"active consideration" towards legislation."
This is the
Europe that deserved to be rescued so that Zionists could rule over
the vanquished? That's not the Western Civilization that merits
respect and preservation. Voltaire may not agree with what Irving,
Zündel or Faurisson has to say, but he affirmed that he would defend
to the death their right to say it. His
Age of Enlightenment has been
crucified just like Jesus. Those same hands can't wash away the blood
of their deeds without divine redemption.
Before Section 130a
Instructions for Crimes becomes the law for our land, faithful
Americans need to take back our country from duel loyalists and
traitors that dread the awakening of the heartland of God fearing
citizenry. The America-First tradition is the solution. The lines
are clearly drawn, the foes are unequivocally known. The saints need
to act. Martyrdom need not happen.
SARTRE - February 27,
2006
I do not agree with what you have to
say,
but
I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
Voltaire
