News Of Great Interest 

   Page IV

 

 

'Digital Angel' set to fly tomorrow Implant technology to be beta tested on humans

The John Lennon revelations: Was there a high-level MI5 agent in the British Workers Revolutionary Party?

Gothenburg: Political Analysis, Photo of Shooting etc.!

Israel's Psychological Warfare - Richard Falk

Trafficking in women could threaten U.S. aid  -  Israel

The Jews That Aren't

The Library of Alexandria is scheduled to open or should we say
reopen after 1600 years on April 23, 2002

Julius Goldwater, Buddhist priest 

Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels

Yugoslavia Ambassador to U.S. Denies Visa to Ramsey Clark

The Battle of Algiers

Free Speech: Shot Down in Beirut by Joseph Sobran

THE FLIR PROJECT: Revealing Danforth's Deceit / New WACO VIDEO

Part Three  Nader, Princeton, and the CIA???

 

 

 

'Digital Angel' set to fly tomorrow

Implant technology to be beta tested on humans

 

Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com


"And they shall not be able to buy or sell unless they have the mark
of the beast".


http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23232

'Digital Angel' set to fly tomorrow

Implant technology to be beta tested on humans

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com 


Beginning tomorrow, Applied Digital Solutions will begin beta testing
on humans an implant technology capable of allowing users to emit a
homing beacon, have vital bodily functions monitored and confirm
identity when making e-commerce transactions.

The first production run of "Digital Angel®" devices has begun, the
Florida-based, NASDAQ-traded company has announced.

While the manufacturers of the technology bill it as a potential
lifesaver, others fear the advent of the device threatens personal
privacy – and even raises the ugly specter of the Bible's "mark of
the beast." Applied Digital Solutions, an e-business-to-business
solutions provider, acquired the patent rights to the miniature
digital transceiver it has named "Digital Angel®." The company plans
to market the device for a number of uses, including as a "tamper-
proof means of identification for enhanced e-business security."

Digital Angel® sends and receives data and can be continuously
tracked by global positioning satellite technology. When implanted
within a body, the device is powered electromechanically through the
movement of muscles and can be activated either by the "wearer" or by
a monitoring facility.

"We believe its potential for improving individual and e-business
security and enhancing the quality of life for millions of people is
virtually limitless," said ADS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Richard Sullivan. "Although we're in the early developmental phase,
we expect to come forward with applications in many different areas,
from medical monitoring to law enforcement. However, in keeping with
our core strengths in the e-business to business arena, we plan to
focus our initial development efforts on the growing field of e-
commerce security and user ID verification."

Dr. Peter Zhou, chief scientist for development of the implant and
president of DigitalAngel.net, a subsidiary of ADS, told
WorldNetDaily the device will send a signal from the person wearing
Digital Angel® to either his computer or the e-merchant with whom he
is doing business in order to verify his identity.

But e-commerce is only one field to which Digital Angel® applies. The
device's patent describes it as a rescue beacon for kidnapped
children and missing persons. According to Zhou, the implant will
save money by reducing resources used in rescue operations for
athletes, including mountain climbers and skiers.

Law enforcement may employ the implant to keep track of criminals
under house arrest, as well as reduce emergency response time by
immediately locating individuals in distress.

The device also has the ability to monitor the user's heart rate,
blood pressure and other vital functions.

"Your doctor will know the problem before you do," said Zhou, noting
peace of mind is possible for at-risk patients who can rest in the
knowledge that help will be on the way should anything go wrong.

Indeed, peace of mind is Digital Angel®'s main selling point.

"Ideally," the patent states, "the device will bring peace of mind
and an increased quality of life for those who use it, and for their
families, loved ones, and associates who depend on them critically."

Referring to the threat of kidnapping, the patent goes on to
say, "Adults who are at risk due to their economic or political
status, as well as their children who may be at risk of being
kidnapped, will reap new freedoms in their everyday lives by
employing the device."

Digital Angel®'s developer told WND demand for the implant has been
tremendous since ADS announced its acquisition of the patent.

"We have received requests daily from around the world for the
product," Zhou said, mentioning South America, Mexico and Spain as
examples.

One inquirer was the U.S. Department of Defense through a contractor,
according to Zhou. American soldiers may be required to wear the
implant so their whereabouts and health conditions can be accessed at
all times, said the scientist.

But for critics, military use of the implant is not at the top of
their list of objections to the new technology. ADS has received
complaints from Christians and others who believe the implant could
be the fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

The Book of Revelation states all people will be required to "receive
a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man
might buy or sell, save he that had the mark." (Rev. 13: 16-17)

In an increasingly cashless society where identity verification is
essential for financial transactions, some Christians view Digital
Angel®'s ID and e-commerce applications as a form of the
biblical "mark of the beast."

But Zhou dismisses such objections to the implant.

"I am a Christian, but I don't think [that argument] makes sense," he
told WND. "The purpose of the device is to save your life and improve
the quality of life. There's no connection to the Bible. There are
different interpretations of the Bible. My interpretation is,
anything to improve the quality of life is from God. The Bible
says, 'I am the God of living people.' We not only live, we live
well."

Sullivan, responding to religious objections to his product, told
WorldNetDaily no one will be forced to wear Digital Angel®.

"We live in a voluntary society," he said. According to the CEO,
individuals may choose not to take advantage of the technology.

Zhou alluded to some Christians' objection to medicine per se, adding
such opposition wanes when the life-saving, life-improving benefits
of technology are realized.

"A few years ago there may have been resistance, but not anymore," he
continued. "People are getting used to having implants. New century,
new trend."

Zhou compared Digital Angel® to pacemakers, which regulate a user's
heart rate. Pacemakers used to be seen as bizarre, said Zhou, but now
they are part of everyday life. Digital Angel® will be received the
same way, he added.

Vaccines are another good comparison, said the scientist, who
noted, "Both save your life. When vaccines came out, people were
against them. But now we don't even think about it."

Digital Angel®, Zhou believes, could become as prevalent as a
vaccine.

"Fifty years from now this will be very, very popular. Fifty years
ago the thought of a cell phone, where you could walk around talking
on the phone, was unimaginable. Now they are everywhere," Zhou
explained.

Just like the cell phone, Digital Angel® "will be a connection from
yourself to the electronic world. It will be your guardian,
protector. It will bring good things to you."

"We will be a hybrid of electronic intelligence and our own soul,"
Zhou concluded.

ADS, DigitalAngel.net's parent company, received a
special "Technology Pioneers" award from the World Economic Forum for
its contributions to "worldwide economic development and social
progress through technology advancements."

The World Economic Forum, incorporated in 1971 with headquarters in
Geneva, is an independent, not-for-profit organization "committed to
improving the state of the world."

When delivery and beta testing begin tomorrow, it will enlist the
support of a limited number of pre-registered subscribers and end
users and last for a period of 90 days.

*****

'Digital Angel' not pursuing implants
Plans to create under-the-skin monitoring device discontinued

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

By Julie Foster
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Digital Angel® is no longer pursuing implant technology for humans, a
spokesman for the company said yesterday.

Dr. Lawrence Webber of Digital Angel Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Applied Digital Solutions, told WorldNetDaily the company has "no
plan at this time for implant technology." Rather, the company's
patented sensor technology is being used in externally worn devices
only, such as watches and pagers.

The company had been developing implants for humans that would
monitor a wearer's location, pulse, blood-oxygen level and other
vital bodily functions, but has instead put the tiny sensors in
externally wearable devices. The company's earlier projections of
Digital Angel® also described it as an identifier for e-commerce by
sending a signal from the person wearing the device to either his
computer or the e-merchant with whom he is doing business to verify
his identity.

Webber's comments were prompted by WND's Thursday story that implied
Digital Angel® implants were about to be tested on humans. The story
also claimed such testing was to begin yesterday. In fact, the
company will begin testing its first generation of products – watches
for children and adults and a pager – on selected volunteers
beginning July 15. The devices contain sensors that perform
monitoring tasks of the original prototype, including alerting
subscribers to medical emergencies.

Digital Angel® technology requires a monitoring system and an end-
user. Subscribers to the monitoring system can include medical groups
and hospitals hoping to keep an eye on patients, and parents who can
use the system to locate their kids. End users are those people
wearing the sensor – from people to animals to inanimate objects. The
various applications of the tracking and monitoring system are
virtually endless, according to Applied Digital Solutions, which
believes the device will tap into a $70 billion dollar market in
North America alone.

Testing of the watches and pager will be conducted using individual
participants selected from all pre-registered subscribers expressing
interest in the technology. Testing participants will be chosen by
June 30 and will be notified of their selection by July 6. The
testing is expected to extend for a period of 90 days.

"While this is just the first production run, we have incorporated
many of the suggestions of those who have pre-registered, resulting
in the delivery of Digital Angels that are very close to final design
specifications," said Mercedes Walton, president and chief operations
officer of Applied Digital Solutions.

Critics of the monitoring technology fear the development of Digital
Angel® as an implant for humans, claiming the device could be a
fulfillment of biblical prophecy regarding the "mark of the beast."
Others believe the device could lead to the erosion of personal
liberty, particularly if government chooses to adopt the technology
for various uses, such as the monitoring of military personnel and
civilian identification.

Digital Angel® will be available to the general public in October.


If you are interested in a free subscription to The
Konformist Newswire,  please visit:

http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist

Or, e-mail  konformist-subscribe@egroups.com with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"

(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool
catch phrase.)

 

The John Lennon revelations:

Was there a high-level MI5 agent in the British Workers Revolutionary Party?

 

By David North
2 March 2000

 

A former agent for the British Security Service (known as MI5) has alleged in a sworn statement that the agency received reports from a high-level spy inside the Workers Revolutionary Party during the late 1960s.

The ex-agent, David Shayler, is currently living in exile in France, where he has fled to escape prosecution for his exposure of state secrets. In his February 18 affidavit, Shayler asserts that the spy provided MI5 with reports of financial support given by John Lennon to the WRP.

Shayler recounts that he was shown portions of an MI5 file relating to the agency's surveillance of Lennon, whose socialist and anti-imperialist sentiments angered the British ruling class.

The affidavit states that the material “concerned Lennon's support for the Workers Revolutionary Party (WRP), a Trotskyist organization. According to the file, a source in the WRP had reported that Lennon gave tens of thousands of pounds sterling to the WRP in the late 1960s and also provided some funds to the Irish Republican Army at around the same time.”

Shayler's statement was faxed to a federal district court in Los Angeles in support of a Freedom of Information Act motion filed by Professor Jon Wiener, who teaches history at the University of California, seeking the release of Federal Bureau of Investigation surveillance material on Lennon that it had received from MI5.

The FBI has resisted releasing these files on the spurious grounds that they are the property of a foreign government. However, Judge Brian Q. Robbins ruled against the FBI two weeks ago and instructed it to release two letters in which the MI5 summarized the results of the anti-Lennon operation. The documents promise to shed light on the collaboration of US and British governments in the hounding of the great songwriter and musician. It is expected that the FBI will appeal Judge Robbins' ruling.

Ironically, MI5 had been reluctant to share its surveillance reports on Lennon with the FBI because it feared that this information would eventually reach the public. “MI5 believed,” writes Shayler, “that the FBI might make the information public and compromise its source in the WRP.”

An article that appeared in the Sunday Times of London on February 20 provides additional information. According to journalists John Harlow and Nicholas Rufford:

“Officers from MI5's F branch were already carrying out surveillance on the WRP, which was regarded as a serious threat to democracy in Britain. It had a ‘deep throat' within the organization, possibly the very person to whom Lennon talked. This, to MI5, made him a legitimate target—they wanted to know whether he was conspiratorial or just naïve.

“To this end they opened a general file on him, including newspaper cuttings and snatches of gossip.

“It appears also to have included a handwritten version of the lyrics to Lennon's most overtly political song, “Working Class Hero”. He had sent the sheet as a gift to the WRP and it was intercepted by MI5's agent in the party. Today the lyrics would be worth thousands of pounds at auction.”

The Sunday Times article also explains the origins of the collaboration of the FBI and MI5.

“In the early 1970s, when Lennon started worrying the FBI, the Washington agency approached its British colleagues for background information. The request, however, put MI5 into a quandary.

“ Lennon's anti-Vietnam activities were unsettling the American authorities and Nixon was anxious to discredit him. MI5 had, in principle, no problem with that but it feared that any information it handed over could endanger its mole within the WRP.

“A compromise was reached in Curzon Street, then MI5's intelligence headquarters in central London, and a summary of Lennon's file was sent to the FBI, omitting any details that could threaten the MI5 mole. They amounted to little more than a few pages that might encourage but not inflame the FBI, according to American sources.

“Certainly it struck a chord in Washington. Undercover agents tracked the Liverpool-born singer and his wife to Irish bars in New York that were holding fundraising events. Their agents even scribbled down the lyrics of the song he was performing. They noted that after the Bloody Sunday shootings in 1972 he proclaimed: ‘If it's a choice between the IRA and the British army, I'm with the IRA.'”

Shayler's affidavit and the Sunday Times article by Harlow and Rufford raise serious questions that require further investigation. It has been known for more than a decade—certainly since the appearance of Peter Wright's Spycatcher (which the government of Prime Minister Thatcher attempted to suppress)—that the British state attempted to infiltrate agents into the Workers Revolutionary Party. This is the first time, however, that credible information has emerged that indicates that the state had an informer in the upper echelons of the organization.

The WRP, which was until 1985 the British section of the International Committee of the Fourth International, enjoyed a following among important sections of the working class and also among many well-known figures in the artistic community. During the 1960s, the organization—which was known until November 1973 as the Socialist Labour League—grew rapidly. It is not in the least improbable that John Lennon might have donated money to the British Trotskyists. He would have been one among many British artists who gave support to the revolutionary movement during that period.

However, too little information has been provided to accept Shayler's affidavit unconditionally, let alone the additional revelations of Harlow and Rufford. One incongruent element of Shayler's affidavit is its reference to the Workers Revolutionary Party rather than the Socialist Labour League. Any document prepared by the British state prior to the autumn of 1973 would have referred to the organization as the SLL. It may be that Shayler has simply used the better-known later name of the organization, with which politically-informed people are more likely to be familiar. This incongruity should be cleared up with the publication of the two letters whose release has been ordered by Judge Robbins.

If the information by Shayler is true, the next demand that socialists and all those committed to democratic rights must raise, in Britain and internationally, is the identification of the MI5 agent inside the SLL/WRP. This is important not only to expose the individual (or individuals) involved but to educate a new generation of socialists in the dangers posed by state infiltration and provocation.

According to Rufford and Harlow “there is no way of knowing about the current status of the WRP mole, although he or she is unlikely still to be active.”

This is not a situation that socialists can accept. First, it should be possible to determine whether there is any substance to the Shayler affidavit. There are former leaders of the SLL/WRP who must know whether John Lennon had any contact with the party in the 1960s and whether he donated money to the movement. If he did, this information would in all likelihood have been privy to a relatively small number of people. Moreover, if the story about the interception of the lyrics of “Working Class Hero” is true, an effort should be made to reconstruct who in the organization might have been in a position to get his or her hand on the handwritten sheet and then pass it on to MI5.

The International Committee of the Fourth International calls upon surviving former leaders of the SLL/WRP—and anyone else in the movement who might have relevant information—to contact the World Socialist Web Site or, if they wish, to issue a public statement independently.

From the World Socialist Web Site

 

 

 Gothenburg: Political Analysis, Photo of Shooting etc.!



Foto from the attempt of murder

by Michelle 2:18am Mon Jun 18 '01 (Modified on
6:29am Mon Jun 18 '01)

For the picture see
http://sweden.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2305&group=webcast

This foto documents the moment, the guy that is
still not clear whether he will survice, is shot
in the back by a police officer. Elsewhere we
would call that attempt of murder.
 
As I have been told, that the Swedish press has
been told by the government not to publish
pictures of the shot demonstrators or publish
them only with delay, here is one of the
pictures from France.
 
This one is from the guy that is still not
clear whether he will survice. It shows the
moment the bullet hit him in the back and he is
turning his hand to the back.
 
You see:
 
a) He is running away from the police after he
has thrown a brick on them that did not touch
anybody.
 
b) He is in about 20 meters distance from the
policeman.
 
c) There are no other demonstrators around
attacking the police in that moment
 
d) There is no policeman on the ground that
must be protected by someone in an act of "self-
defense".
 
I do really not know how you would call
shooting someone in the back while there is
absolutely no need or reason for doing so, in
Sweden. In France we call this a cold and
planned attempt of murder.
 
This picture was published on Indymedia Sweden
(www.france.indymedia.org)

---

A Political Analysis of the Events

by Domela 4:21am Mon Jun 18 '01 (Modified on
5:54am Mon Jun 18 '01)

 

What makes a street riot syndicalist..

and 'Who started the riots':
 
most of the fighting would not have happenend
without the raid on the Hv... school on friday
morning. fact is that the city of GBG had given
this building to the protesters for the time of
the EU summit to sleep cook and 'converge'.
 
The raid on the building was mainly a police
decision and a senseless provocation. there were
far more protesters than police in GBG this
weekend, so it was a stupid provocation too. You
can not expect people to take it without a
reaction. Go and evict a police station and see
if the state will 'peacefully demonstrate'
afterwards!
 
Some might say that it was done on purpose,
calculating in that riots would follow ,
allowing 'our' governments even more repression
as a consequence. Well , it rather looks like
some incompetent people on the head of a
brainless herd (of pigs) making the wrong
decisions, leading this herd into a fiasco.
 
The events leading to the police shootings
confirm this theory. How stupid can a cop be?
first 8(sic) cops storm an RTS party attended by
thousands. Then they realize that they are
surrounded by it. Then they throw a stone (they
could just have surrendered all their gear and
left) which triggers an almost logical reaction,
than they draw a gun and shoot people. What
lucky they were not getting killed! Imagine the
angry crowd getting hold of the guns in that
situation.
 
All the display of force afterwards was
ridiculous, seen that no damage could be
prevented at all. Even if they now hire twice as
much cops for a province capital like GBG they
will not see the people that trashed their
parade street and spoiled 'our governments gala
diner' back in the city.
 
and 'violence in general':
 
None of our civil rights today were obtained by
negotiating and peaceful protesting in the first
place. It is undoubtedly an evolution that you do
not have to behead your king (or other ruler)
every time you want a salary raise, but keep in
mind that, if you just walk out and go home
after demanding it in vain on a round (or
square) table, you will never get it. The
message has to be: lets negotiate reasonably
about the issue, because the alternative to it
is a violent clash. And stage one once in a
while because the powerful tend to forget what
it is like.
 
As for the EU and alikes this means that ,
although 'everybody' condemns the street
violence displayed here , some issues will have
to be handled differently in the future.
Repression triggers resistance , the black block
is growing with every summit, and the teenagers
participating are the voting and consuming
citizens of today and tomorrow. Remember 1968 and
afterwards. Rolling tanks over demonstrations
brought armed guerilla to the heart of Europe.
Although these were successfully singled out as
'terrorists', the influence on mainstream
politics are undeniable: abortion rights, labour
rights and so on.
 
Violence covers up the issues it is about on a
short term only, on a long run people in power
will have walk talk and decide in a different
way if they want to stay in power. History shows
that they will! That's why , after all, a street
riot in the right moment is a syndicalist event.
 
VENCEREMOS!

----
 
FAU-IWA bus raided at departure

by Give the cob a psychologist 6:17am Sun Jun
17 '01 (Modified on 10:54am Sun Jun 17 '01)
 
Saturday evening the bus of the FAU-IWA union
from Germany was brutally raided by a special
black-masked police force as it was just about
to leave Gothenburg.
 
Saturday evening the bus of the FAU-IWA union
from Germany was brutally raided by a special
police force as it was just about to leave
Gothenburg.
 
The incident occurred at 9 p.m. when the 50
German anarcho-syndicalists who took part in
Saturdays demonstration, were about to enter
their bus. All over sudden five Chevrolet
transporters driving high speed blocked the bus
at Linneplatsen. From the cars a storm troop of
some 20 black-masked riot cobs surrounded the
anarcho-syndicalists and forced them to enter
the bus, beating some of them.
 
One minute later they changed their minds and
told the people to leave the bus by the backside
door while the cobs entered the bus by the front
door, aggressively pushing the people out of the
bus. The demonstrators where forced to sit down
in front of the bus, the cobs surrounding them.
People who moved or tried to use a handy were
beaten with telescope clubs.
 
The cobs were extremely nervous and aggressive. In
any moment they held their clubs in one hand,
while keeping the other on their guns pockets.
While its not our task to be pity with the
police, some of them had obviously started their
"workday" with injuries, one of them with a
broken nose.
 
The demonstrators tried to calm down the cobs,
because it was not predictable that, as mentally
unstable as they obviously appeared one of them
would draw a gun. The cobs were told that the
people in the bus are syndicalists that entered
Sweden earlier that day and had already been
comprehensively controlled at the border. They
were told to check this. They actually did, it
took them quite a long time, bearing the
impression, that there was actually no
coordination between the border police and those
in Gothenborg.
 
Finally they seemed to be convinced that the
people from FAU-IWA are no "terrorist crowd" and
told the bus to leave Gothenburg. Later at night
we heard, that a French camera team documented
the situation and that it was transmitted in
French TV.
 
From what we have seen in police brutality and
incompetence that Saturday in Gothenburg we
would suggest the Swedish authorities not to
organize an international congress bearing more
conflict potential than an for example an
international table tennis tournament in the
next few years. ---
 
Swedish Media and Politicians Gloss Over Police
Responsibility
 
by T.R.O.Y. 4:47am Sun Jun 17 '01 (Modified on
5:52am Sun Jun 17 '01) eerie@sbbs.se
 
Despite the track record showing that it is
police behavior which determines whether
demonstrators turn violent or not, the Swedish
media and politicians ignore police brutality
and departure from procedure while focusing upon
'violent hooligans.' The result is an extremely
slanted version of what happened in Gothenburg -
and why.
 
Earlier this year in April, after mass arrests
and rioting in Malm? that started out as an
anti-EU demonstration, the Swedish media began
by blaming the problems on 'hooligans'. Soon
though, as the pictures of bloody faces and
police brutality came out, the tone began to
change and more and more criticism was laid on
the police for using excess force.
 
Per Garhton, a well-known Swedish politician,
was one of the factors in that change of tone as
he played a main role in the following debate.
Per Garhton himself had been arrested in Malm?
for debating with the police during the Malm?
arrests.
 
I talked to him during the weekend of EU
protest in Gothenburg to get his opinion:
 
IMC: "Do you see any difference between the way
police have acted here in Gothenburg and the way
they acted in Malm? when you were arrested?"
Garhton: "No, not a bit." IMC: "Except that it
is taking place on a much larger scale here?"
Garhton: "Exactly."

 

Nonetheless, the mainstream media in Sweden is
blaming the entire fiasco upon a small group of
"terrorists", "hooligans" or a "travelling
anarchist circus" as Tony Blair put it. One
Swedish journalist went so far as to compare the
Black Bloc to the Nazis in the 1930's. One local
conservative politician, Johnny Magnusson, has
recommended a total ban on all demonstrations.
 
Though, by all accounts, nothing was thrown
during Saturday's anti-capitalist demonstration
until police charged the marchers -without
forewarning- with horses and dogs.
 
One British activist, John Sheperd, reported: "
Twenty police on horses started to charge at me
as I was peacefully holding a banner. We were
totally peaceful." Mr. Sheperd added: "I came to
voice my opposition to global capitalism."
 
Still, the protestors are being held
responsible for the outbreak of violence. Though
police attacked innocent people with batons and
dogs, the major police-criticism that the media
is releasing is that the police were not hard
enough. And these are comments that have come
after the shooting. They insist that Saturday's
troubles could have been avoided had police used
water cannons, tear gas, and been allowed to
detain innocent people for longer than 6 hours.
 
Similarly, later that day when riot police came
to shut down a Reclaim the City party, a
policeman, without firing any warning shots,
fired straight into the crowd of activists
wounding three. While one demonstrator from
Gothenburg lay critically wounded with a shot
through the chest, riot police were continuing
their tactics of zero-tolerance surrounding a
peaceful gathering with horses and dogs as well
as raiding a school with a special task force
with automatic weapons. The apparent search for
a "German bearing arms" turned up fruitless.
 
Despite the fact that this was the second raid
no guns or knives have been found at all.
 
These are the facts, so why does 90% of
Aftonbladet's readers approve of police
behavior? The answer: because they were not at
the demonstration and are only regurgitating
what Aftonbladet and other newspapers have been
feeding them. Headlines have maintained that the
police have things under control and that
rioters have destroyed the city. One of the main
organizers Anders Svensson notes: "the Swedish
Media are only reporting what the police tell
them."
 
Though the entire event has been planned for
two years, there were significant departures
from standard procedure. Megaphone
communication, for example, has been from null
to minimal. Aside from the lack of warnings
before attacks, the incident that led up to the
shootings was caused in part by a small group of
riot police separating from both standard
procedure as well as the main group of 50 riot
police and entered the Reclaim the City crowd.
Perhaps a more significant violation is the fact
that several police -including one of the riot
police who entered the crowd- picked up stones
and threw them back at unprotected activists.
Furthermore, according to two eyewitness
accounts, the first window broken at Bukowski's
restaurant came not from an activist, but from
an undercover policeman who had disguised
himself as a member of the Black Bloc only to
disappear thereafter behind police lines.
 
Even the fact that police chose to shut down
the Reclaim the City street-party seems a bit
strange. Stockholm and Malm? both had experience
with Reclaim the City. In both cases, the first
time people came out to party in the streets the
police took cracked down and trouble ensued. And
in both cases activists organized another street
party a week later while both Malm? as well as
Stockholm police chose to lay low. And again, in
both cases all went peacefully.
 
"People need space." said one activist.
 
It can be further noted that in this weekend's
protests, every single demonstration that was
left alone by police went smoothly, and in every
case where police attacked the activists, there
was trouble.
 
Much has been made of the talk about dialogue
with the activists, the soft approach of
politicians, and the soft tone of the police.
However, as early as May, police released
information that they were already planning for
mass arrests. This has been backed up by a zero-
tolerance approach which started on Thursday as
riot police with dogs cordoned off a school in
preperation for a raid. That was when action
began to speak louder than words.
 
When the Minister of Justice, Thomas Bodst?m,
complains of a 'few hundred hooligans' who have
come to Gothenburg to cause trouble he is,
strangely enough, not referring to the police
who have shot people 6 times already this year -
including the murder of a foreigner shot in the
back in J?nk?ping.
 
One would think that criticism against police
brutality would be in the interest of everyone -
including the police officers- that believe in a
democratically run society. When even the
Minister of Justice remains not only largely
uninformed during the day's troubles (he did not
want to bother the police), then one can truly
speak of a crisis in democracy.
 
Swedish TV shows Romano Prodi as he condemns
the demonstrators "undemocratic methods" who
then goes on to explain how the popular vote in
Ireland will ultimately be undermined -"There is
no going back" he says. No comment is made by
Swedish media on the fact that Prodi, himself,
is engaging in what many people would consider a
far cry from a genuine democratic process.
Rather, G?ran Persson applauds police behavior.
After all. the police consider that they have
fulfilled their duty: no protesters were able to
enter the meeting and disturb the decision-
making process of a small -and nearly all male-
group of politicians who, in a matter of days,
make decisions that will ultimately have an
affect on the entire world.
 
If the actions of the police in Gothenburg are
a signal of what sort of world they have set out
to create then the troubles that we have seen in
Gothenburg this weekend are probably only the
beginning of darker days to come.
 
British activists account of random police
arrest at Gotheplatsen, 16.6 by Ami Greener
6:55am Sun Jun 17 '01 (Modified on 5:22pm Sun
Jun 17 '01) address: Indymedia Israel
balagan26@hotmail.com
 
Jon Sheperd, an activist from London, gives his
account of a brutal and random police arrest
Near Gotheplatsen, afternoon, 16.6

"I was walking to a cafe near Gotheplatsen,
when 2 police vans appeared, the police officers
came out, and was particularly aggresive, pushed
me against the wall, they cut off my shoe
laces, tied my feet up with them , then they hit
me in the face and told me this is my last
fucking trip to Sweden, "Your not welcome here
any more", then they searched me & hit my head
against the wall. the police mad did not want
to give me his number, I was tied up with 20
police men around, the PM hit my head with a
rock, did not let me talk, and warned me that if
I talk, he will "Kick my fucking head", they
left me for 40 minutes leaning against the
wall, & denied me to go to the bathroom, and
laughed at me. They did not even let me look
around. They took me in a van, to the police
station and I spent some 5 hours in a cell
before release. "My story is nothing compared
with the fact that 3 people were shot.

-----

Special Task Force Raids School after a Calm -
but Tense- Day

by T.R.O.Y. 3:12am Sun Jun 17 '01 (Modified on
5:49am Mon Jun 18 '01) eerie@sbbs.se
 
After a day of jubilant protest and peaceful -
but tense- confrontation with police, a special
task force raids one of the schools used during
the weekend of events. Anders Svensson, from
Gothenburg Action, was at the Schillerska School
when a Special Task Force with automatic weapons
raided about 11:00 PM Saturday night.

Saturday began when a demonstration of 20,000
activists marched through Gothenburg under the
slogan "For a different Europe". The march,
which included a wide range of political groups
from the Syndicalist union to attack, from an
array of leftists to the Green Party, made its
way peacefully through town without incident
despite the brief appearance of riot police at
J?rntorget when the Black Bloc section of the
march passed by.
 
Later in the day -about 7:30 PM at J?rntorget-
a hundred or so police with horses and dogs
formed an iron ring around a spontaneous but
peaceful gathering of a couple hundred activists
in reaction to the police shooting of three
demonstrators. After a while the protesters
began to sing children's songs while police
identified and bussed away an unknown number of
protesters. No violence occurred. About the same
time as the police began to draw back from
J?rntorget, another group of police including
the National Special Force (similar to a SWAT
team) raided one of the schools being used by
activists for both lodging as well as events. A
policeman with an automatic weapon forces
observing journalists to depart. Though a few
activists later came out to observe from a
distance there were no demonstrations or
activity directly outside of the school.
 
Anders, who is one of the main organizers and
negotiators during the tumultuous weekend of
events surrounding the EU top meeting in
Gothenburg, was asleep at his desk when the door
flung open. With a flashlight in his eyes and an
automatic gun pointed at him he hears the
policeman scream for him to look away and
freeze.
 
"Then I was told to get up with my hands on the
back of my head and walk towards the door. But
my leg had fallen asleep. I was scared that if I
were to fall down or make a strange movement he
might shoot me."
 
He was then forced to lie on the cold, wet
ground outside the school along with the other
people who happened to be in the building until
the police were ready with them. After a while
he -as well as other Swedish nationals- were
released while foreigners were detained longer.
 
The excuse given for the raid is that the
police were searching for a "German bearing a
weapon." Anders had personally assured the
police earlier that there was no such person at
the school and that if the police wanted to
search the place that the school occupants were
all prepared to fully cooperate with police and
peacefully leave the building together.
Nonetheless, a special task force was arranged
and the school was raided. Considering that the
mainstream media has frivolously referred to the
previous days rioters as "terrorists", one can
imagine the sort of attitude with which the
police entered the school.
 
Another occupant of Schillerska, a young woman
named Tove, tells it like this: "...When they
arrived they had automatic guns with laser
cross. They ordered me and my friend to lay down
on the ground. It was very wet and cold in the
rain. I was hit with a baton because I wasn't
fast enough. Then we heard the dogs come..."
 
Anders, today, is disappointed. Not only have
the police confiscated his personal notebook,
folder with all of the protocols from meetings,
as well as his cell phone, he has not heard his
story come out to the media at all. "After I was
released from the school I came back to the
center for Gothenburg Action and was interviewed
by the mainstream media -TV, radio, and print.
Yet when I checked today there was absolutely
nothing from any of them. The media here in
Sweden are only reporting what the police tell
them. They report the police version without
even checking up the validity of the information
they receive."

----

Eye-wittness from new school attack

by Filippa Beijer 6:03pm Sat Jun 16 '01
(Modified on 5:18am Mon Jun 18 '01)
filippabeijer@hotmail.com

"....When they arrived they had automatic guns
with laser cross. They ordered me and my friend
to lay down at the ground. It was very wet and
cold after the rain. I was hit with a baton
because I wasn't fast enough. Then we heard the
dogs come...."
 
At 10 PM tonight, Saturday June 17th a young
woman named Tove was just finishing her dinner.
She was sitting by the stairs outside in the
chilly air at the Schillerska school. A place of
accommodation organised for travellers gathering
in Gothenburg for the EU-demonstrations.
 
Suddenly two police vans arrived with a team of
policemen dressed in all black with shields
covering their faces and helmets without
identification numbers.
 
This is her story.
 
"When they arrived they had automatic guns with
laser cross. They ordered me and my friend to
lay down at the ground. It was very wet and cold
after the rain. I was hit with a baton because I
wasn't fast enough. Then we heard the dogs come.
We didn't understand what we had done, but the
police only replied; "We have our orders".
 
The police brought everyone else out and
ordered them to the ground, there were about
seventy people all in all. Some of them had no
shoes and only t-shirts on. One of the policemen
said; (SWE) "Låt skiten ligga, om de inte
försöker resa på sig. Då bankar vi ner dem".
(ENG) "Let the dirtbags lay, unless they try to
stand up. Then we'll knock them down."
 
They kicked me because I didn't have my hands
behind my neck. There was a woman who was
breastfeeding that was also forced down despite
her condition. Another girl got muscle-cramps.
She was allowed to sit up, but not to go inside
because there was no surveillance there. A young
man was ordered to lay down in a puddle of dog
food. The policemen then mocked him, making
jokes about dog-food being expensive. I was held
for an hour. Everyone that was let go was filmed
and had to give up name and social security
number. Foreigners and demonstrators they
recognized from earlier, were kept several more
hours then the Swedes. I don't know for how long
they had to lay there."

 

The young people kept inside Schillerska School
came out scared and chocked by the rough
treatment they received from the police. Without
even an explanation for why, the were they
treated like criminals and made to leave their
personal details.
 
The question is why they were even kept at all,
what crime had they committed? And why were the
police protecting their own identity with blank
helmets and shields? Whatever answer the police
will give, I feel no one deserves to be treated
like these young people were treated tonight.

Tove ends her story saying. "It's like they
didn't see us as human beings any more. We were
treated without any respect or understanding. We
were just houligans, a dangerous problem to be
solved."

 

 

 


                          VIEWPOINT                      
"Exploring The Powerful Issues & Emotions of The Middle East"
  Reaching out to 14,483 Viewpoint readers around the globe
               Thursday, May 31, 2001           
------------------------------------------------------------
                   Comments?... Contact:
 mailto:viewpoint@shagmail.com  ">Contact Viewpoint<
------------------------------------------------------------



Israel's Psychological Warfare - Richard Falk



  It is almost inescapable to understand the essential character
of Israeli oppression in the Occupied Territories if you are
confronted with the reality directly. I was a member of the
three-person United Nations commission of inquiry that
visited Israel and the Palestinian territories in late
February. The circumstances of the Palestinians are worse
than my moral imagination is capable of depicting. The
present modalities of Israeli occupation impose on every
Palestinian a daily ordeal, whether closures, checkpoints,
incursions, or random attacks. Israel's larger design includes
a desire to break the will of Palestinians to resist and to
fasten a permanent structure of dominance onto the
territories. The Israeli public, with some notable exceptions,
lacks any real understanding of the Palestinians' daily
suffering.

  Interaction between Palestinians and Israelis looks more and
more like a war of attrition and less like an Intifada. Beyond
the overwhelming military power it uses, Israel also exerts
what can be called "information hegemony." It constructs the
reality about the conflict that [most] Americans accept, one
that not only shifts responsibility to the victims but also
shapes public understanding of a fair solution based on
Israel's starting point. Israel's baselines include regarding
pre-1967 Israel (78 percent of historic Palestine) as belonging
definitively to Israel and accepting the existence of
190 illegal Israeli settlements.

  Most of the violence in the early portions of the Intifada
related to the defense of these settlements and the roads
leading to them; almost no Israeli casualties resulted from
violence during demonstrations. Despite the settlements'
prominent role in the conflict, their expansion has not been
adequately understood at the international level. Their
expansion is part of a psychological war being waged against
the Palestinians and on behalf of a Greater Israel. That
these settlements are continuously expanding in space,
population, number, and road infrastructure casts doubt as
to whether Israel ever intends to withdraw from the Occupied
Territories.

  The settlement dynamic should be viewed as disclosing a
fundamental ambivalence of the Israeli mainstream about
whether it is possible or desirable to seek a negotiated
outcome of the conflict. The settlements could allow Israel to
make the conflict permanently irreconcilable while purporting
to seek "peace" on the basis of a bargain that the
Palestinians will have to reject. They will thus be blamed
for the failure to reach a peaceful solution.

  Palestinians are left further psychologically battered by
Israeli political assassinations, with their seemingly random
hit list. These assassinations appear designed to make
Palestinians feel that no matter who they are or what they
do, Israel has the capacity to kill them at its discretion
and without any obligation to come forward with evidence or
justification. It appears every adult Palestinian is a
potential target. An acute level of anxiety among
Palestinians is evident.

  Destruction of Palestinian property beside settler roads by
Israelis is also notable in its cruelty in concept and
execution. The bulldozers typically arrive between midnight
and 2:00 a.m., soldiers give inhabitants seven minutes to
vacate their home, and then they proceed to destroy it as
well as trees, wells, and farm buildings. There appears to
be no genuine security justification, and even if there were,
Israel could proceed in a far less inhumane manner: giving
notice, providing alternative housing, offering compensation,
and making a demonstration of security needs. House
demolitions are a microcosm of Israel's general approach to
the Palestinian population. Palestinians are not treated as
"protected persons," as legally required by the Geneva
Conventions, or even with a minimal respect due to all
human beings. It is traumatic in the extreme to lose a home
and livelihood as a result of a midnight action of this sort,
especially considering that those so victimized have not been
accused of any wrongdoing whatsoever.

  The Refugees: Israel's treatment of the refugees is an
intensified version of the state's violation of fundamental
Palestinian economic and social rights. Palestinian refugees
are vulnerable in a manner that other refugee communities
around the world are not. They were supposed to be protected
by the UN Conciliation Commission established in 1948 as a
supplement to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)'s role
in providing material humanitarian assistance. Because the
protection role assigned to the Commission never became
operational, however-it has no budget and no operating role,
Palestinians have been left in the cold for decades. If a
protective regime does not operate as intended, then the
refugee community in question is supposed to be reassigned
to the UN High Commission on Refugees. But this has not
happened in the Palestinian case, so they have not qualified
for standard forms of protection normally granted to refugees.

  The conclusions reached, summarized briefly here, are some-
what self-evident, following directly from Israel's approach
since the onset of the Intifada. Israeli police units have
relied on excessive and disproportionate use of force,
shooting unarmed demonstrators, deliberately shooting to kill,
and deploying snipers at the scene of demonstrations. It is
worth stressing that during the early phases of this second
Intifada, there was no Palestinian gunfire. In these circum-
stances, there was no pretext for using snipers. Their active
role since the very beginning of the Intifada was itself
shocking. The first and most major conclusion of the
commission was that Israeli use of force was excessive and
in violation of international law.

  A second conclusion involves a legal condemnation of extra-
judicial assassinations by Israel that have been officially
proclaimed by high military and political officers of the
Israeli government. Such assassinations are grave breaches
of the Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 147, and of inter-
national humanitarian law. The Commission also concluded
that the settlements and their extension are both intimately
connected to the violence of recent months, and a source of
continuous provocations. This pattern violates directly the
Fourth Geneva Convention, which makes the settlements per
se illegal. Our further conclusion was that the Israeli
reliance on closures, curfews, and the destruction of property
of civilian Palestinians violates fundamental economic and
social rights and is, as I suggested earlier, a severe form
of collective punishment. And finally, we found that the
treatment of Palestinian refugees is an intensified version
of this violation of fundamental economic and social rights.

  In conclusion, the sorts of things that the Commission
recommended follow directly from our findings and are rather
obvious. There is, first of all, a strong recommendation to
establish an international protective presence in the
Palestinian territories along the lines unanimously supported
in the Security Council, but failed to be acted upon because
of a veto by the United States. A second recommendation
calls upon the parties to the Geneva Convention to take
urgent steps to secure the implementation of its provisions.
Third, steps need to be taken to secure credible protection
for Palestinian refugees living in Gaza and the West Bank.
Fourth, a clear expression must be made that settlement
activity is illegal and should be stopped and reversed at
once. A final recommendation mandates an end to the
violations of international humanitarian law, such as
assassinations and the destruction of property.

***********************************************************
Richard Falk is Professor of International Law and Practice at
Princeton University. The above text, based on a presentation
at an April 20, 2001 symposium titled, "The Israel/Palestine
Predicament: How to End an Occupation"
***********************************************************

End of VIEWPOINT - Another FREE ShagMail publication  
http://www.shagmail.com  
___________________________________
Copyright 2001 by Pulse Direct, Inc. All rights reserved.
Feel free to forward this, in its entirety, to others.

 

 

 

The Library of Alexandria is scheduled to open or should we say
reopen after 1600 years on April 23, 2002

 

[Anyone know if the "Bohemian Club" mentioned herein is the same as the one
being discussed on another list?]


----- Original Message -----
From: <jasper2015@yahoo.com>
To: <GnosticsMillenium@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: [GnosticsMillenium] Library of Alexandria scheduled to open April
2002


http://www.bibalex.gov.eg/

The Library of Alexandria is scheduled to open or should we say
reopen after 1600 years on April 23, 2002

The history of the ancient library takes time to pull up so if you
want to get started here . . .

Here are some excerpts pertaining to the Pagans vs. the Christians
Number 75   Summer 1993
Bohemian Club Library Notes
Published from time to time to keep members informed of cultural life
of the club and to encourage use of club library facilities
B I B L I O Q H K H A L E X A N D R E I A S


The roman philosopher Seneca (1st C. AD) states that 40,000 scrolls
were burned during the Alexandria War of 47 BC between Caesar and
Pompeii, when Caesar occupied the Brucheion palace and was attacked
by the Egyptians. Seneca attributes this information to the Roman
historian Livy (from writings now lost). We do not know what part of
the collection was burned, but the location of the fire near the
docks suggests that the books were not in the Library but were stored
in the warehouse awaiting processing.

Plutarch, the Greek biographer and historian (1st c. AD), relates the
improbable story that Mark Antony gave Cleopatra 200,000 volumes from
the Library of Pergamum to assuage her grief on the loss of her
beloved Alexandrian Library. Shaw repeats this story in Caesar and
Cleopatra. When Caesar is besieged in the palace, a Greek scholars
begs him to send troops to save the Library which was set afire as a
result of Roman military operations. Caesar replies: "I am an author
myself, and I tell you that it is better that the Egyptian should
liver their lives rather than dream them away wit the help of books."
Gibbon writes that the Library was totally consumed by Caesar's war,
and that Antony's gift became the foundation for a new library.
Alexandria hosted a number of rebellions against Roman rule during
the third and fourth centuries.
 

In 215, Emperor Caracalla brutally
put down rebellious youths, during which the Museion was sacked. In
272, Queen Zenobia of Palmyra occupied Alexandria, inviting Emperor
Aurelian to punish both the Queen and the city. In this event, the
royal quarter sustained great damage, forcing the resident scholars
of the Mouseion to take refuge in the Serapeion. In 273, troops of
Aurelian again sacked the city in a campaign against a rebel who
proclaimed himself emperor. Ammianus Marcellinus, a 4th c. Roman
historian, states that the Library was destroyed in this campaign.
Another rebellion in 297-98, resulted in the massacre of scholars and
the burning of books by troops of Emperor Diocletian. Books on
alchemy were especially singled out for destruction. Finally, when
St. Jerome visited Alexandria at the end of the 4th c., he reported
that the royal quarter was almost deserted.Anti-Pagan Riots
The loss of a large part of the Library can be attributed to the
efforts of Christian leaders to obliterate all traces of paganism,
when Christianity became the official and later the compulsory,
religion of the state. This anti-pagan policy is exemplified by the
maxim, "One mouth cannot couple the praise of Christ with the praise
of Jupiter." Christian zealots of the fourth and fifth centuries
sought to destroy all books which did not conform to Christian dogma.
For example, copies of Aristarchos of Samos, the astronomer who
discovered the movement of the planets around the sun, were removed
from the shelves because the heliocentric theory (confirmed by
Copernicus in 1543) was contrary to Church belief. It is probable
that many other books deemed undesirable by Christian standards were
also removed from the Library by Church action. Likewise, many
classical texts were lost because they were considered unworthy to be
copied by Christian scribes when the codex (the bound book on
parchment) replaced the papyrus scroll. The fate of the Mouseion
itself can be inferred from that of Hypatia, the famous Neoplatonic
philosopher and mathematician who taught at the Mouseion. Hypatia was
attacked and killed by a mob during the persecution of pagans in 415.
A major loss occurred in 391 when Emperor Theodosius I issued a
decree ordering the destruction of all pagan temples throughout the
Empire. Armed with this imperial edict, Archbishop Theophilos ordered
the destruction of the Temple of Serapis, as Gibbon states, "to make
room for a church erected in honor of the Christian martyrs. The
valuable Library of Alexandria was pillaged and destroyed; and, near
twenty years afterwards, the appearance of empty shelves excited the
regret and indignation of every spectator whose mind was not totally
darkened by religious prejudice."


Constantinople
It is also possible that many of the Library's books were removed by
Emperor Theodosius II (408-450), a ruler of scholarly temperament, to
stock his own library in Constantinople, the capital of the Eastern
Roman (Byzantine) Empire. Evidence for the removal of books from
Alexandria to Constantinople is based on the fact that the majority
of books in the imperial collection came from Egypt and Asia
Minor.

Arabs
The role of the Arabs in the destruction of the Library has been long
disputed. The main source for Arab culpability rests on a medieval
Arabic text of the thirteenth century, written by Ibn al Kifti,
titled History of Wise Men. In it Ibn Al Kifti relates the famous
story that it took six months to burn the mass of books used to feed
the stoves in the 4000 baths of Alexandria. The order to destroy the
books presumably was given by Caliph Omar, when the Arabs led by
General Amr conquered the city in 641042 and put an end to Christian
Egypt. Ibn al Kifti's account contains a dialogue between a certain
John the Grammarian and Amr:
There was at that time a man named John the Grammarian of Alexandria
in Egypt...a Coptic priest, but was deprived of his office owing to
some heresy concerning the Trinity...He lived to see the capture of
Alexandria by the Arabs, and made the acquaintance of
Amr...Emboldened by Amr's favor, John one day remarked, "You have
examined the whole city, and have set your seal on every kind
valuable. I make no claim for anything that is useful to you, but
things useless to you may be of service to us."
"What are you thinking of?," asked Amr.
"The books of wisdom," said John, "which are in the royal treasuries."
Amr asked, "And who collected these books?"
John answered, "Ptolemy Philadelphos, King of Alexandria, was fond of
learning...His search for books went far and wide, and he spared no
costs in acquiring them...and these books continued to be guarded and
preserved by the kings and their successors until our day."
Amr said, "I cannot dispose of these books without the authority of
the Caliph."
When Caliph Omar was informed about the books in Alexandria, he
answered, "Concerning the books you mention, if what is written in
them agrees with the Book of God [Koran], they are not required; ;if
it disagrees, they are not desired. Destroy them therefore."
Arab writers in the Middle Ages repeated this account of the
destruction of the Library, but it was not until the seventeenth
century that the story first appeared in European sources where the
question of its authenticity gave rise to controversy. One aspect of
the controversy concerned whether the vellum or parchment of which
the books were made would or would not burn. (We know that vellum
will burn at a temperature of about 400ºC.) Skepticism focused mainly
on the points that the story first appeared five centuries after the
event, and that no writer - Christian, Pagan, Muslim, or Jew - who
lived at the time of the Arab conquest of Egypt, or during the next
five centuries, mentioned the Library or its destruction. These
facts, as well as internal evidence, support the conclusion that the
story was a fabrication. Most scholars, but not all, now agree that
the use of the books as fuel for the stoves of the city's baths was
an invention of the twelfth century, a period of crusading zeal in
the East and the revival of classical learning in the West. Whatever
books the Arabs destroyed, if any, were probably not classical texts
but Christian theological treatises. 

Christian Riots
Egyptian opposition to Roman authority took on a religious character
as the Early Church sought to define the canons of the Christian
faith. During the centuries after the death of Cleopatra in 30 BC,
which marks the end of the Ptolemaic dynasty, Alexandria was the
scene of interminable riots which were exacerbated by religious
fervor. The city was wracked by the Christological controversies as
Christian groups sought to define the nature of Christ. Ultimately,
the Egyptians refused to accept the orthodox creed, as it was
formalized by the ecumenical councils, and were declared heretical.
Egypt was eventually ostracized by the Emperors, and Alexandria lost
its imperial patronage.
It is against this background that we should place the destruction of
the Library. by the date of the Arab conquest in the middle of the
seventh century, the library had outlived its time, and probably
ceased to exist, having sustained for several centuries the ravages
of fire, plunder and religious fanaticism. Great Loss
The loss of the library of Alexandria, in almost every branch of
letters and science, is one of the greatest disasters in the history
of learning If the Library had not been destroyed, we might have
today, among other masterpieces, 123 plays of Sophocles instead of
seven. The books on its shelves were the medium by which the
scientists, philosophers, poets, historians and musicians of
antiquity enriched human experience wit the their research and
creativity. It is this learning, embodying the genius of classical
Greece, that was lost to subsequent ages. it is estimated that only
one percent of all Greek literature has survived.

 

An antidote to the anti-Japanese hysteria that the Pearl Harbor movie
has been inciting. -- Steve

-----------------------------------------------
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/06/24/MN224996.DTL
-----------------------------------------------
Sunday, June 24, 2001 (SF Chronicle)


Julius Goldwater, Buddhist priest
Elaine Woo, Los Angeles Times


Los Angeles -- The Rev. Julius Goldwater, an early American
convert to Buddhism revered for safeguarding the belongings
of hundreds of Japanese Americans forced into internment camps during
World War II, died June 11 at his home here after an illness. He was
93.

  A descendant of a German Jewish clan that included the late Sen.
Barry Goldwater, his first cousin, he became an ordained Buddhist
priest in the 1930s, when Buddhism was relatively unknown in the United
States and Caucasian converts were rare. He went on to teach Buddhism
in Los Angeles for almost 70 years.

  "As a priest, he was a pioneer in this country," said the
Venerable Walpola Piyananda, president of the Buddhist Sangha Council
of
Southern California.

  From the 1960s to the 1980s, when new waves of immigration brought
Buddhists from Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, South Korea
and other countries to the United States, the Rev. Goldwater helped
them
get settled and establish temples, often with money from his own
pocket.
He was part of the group, along with Piyananda, that founded the
Buddhist Sangha Council in the 1980s to draw together diverse
representatives of Southern California's growing Buddhist community.

  The Rev. Goldwater was born in 1908 to a well-to-do Los Angeles
family. He encountered Buddhism as a teenager when he went to live with
his father in Hawaii after the death of his mother. There he was
impressed by the teachings of three men: the Rev. Ernest Hunt, an
Englishman who had become a Buddhist minister; Yeimyo Imamura, a
Japanese bishop; and Tai Xu, a Chinese monk. In 1928, he started a
study group called the Buddhist Brotherhood in America and began to
teach Buddhism in Los Angeles.

  During the 1930s, he was ordained in Kyoto, Japan, by the Jodo
Shinshu sect. He was ordained again in Hangzhou, China, where he spent
time in a monastery. He took a Buddhist name, Subhadra.

  In the late 1930s he returned to Los Angeles to become a minister
at a large Buddhist temple.

  When President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the evacuation of
Japanese and Japanese Americans on the West Coast in early 1942, the
Rev. Goldwater's role became even more critical.

  As the only priest in the local Buddhist diocese who was not of
Japanese ancestry, he "assumed responsibility for all the temples in
the
district," said the Rev. Mas Kodani of Senshin Buddhist Temple in Los
Angeles.

  The Rev. Goldwater's temple became a warehouse for the furniture
and other possessions left behind by evacuees. During their
incarceration, the Rev. Goldwater, at his own expense, traveled to
camps in California, Arizona, Wyoming, Colorado and Arkansas, bearing
gifts, Buddhist study materials and news of the outside world. He
watched over internees' homes, in one case preventing the illegal sale
of one by alerting the FBI. He wrangled with suspicious officials,
trying to make them understand that Buddhism was autonomous and not
connected with the Japanese government.

  When the internees were released at the end of the war, he turned
the temple into a hostel, where internees could find temporary housing
as well as other assistance, such as obtaining a job, a driver's
license and gas rations. When a congregant needed a car, he loaned his
own.

  When anti-Japanese grocers refused to sell them food, "he would go
out and buy it," recalled Kodani, a temple member who was a child
during the war years. "He was very energetic, very dedicated to
Buddhism . . . and feisty -- he had to be to do all of that."

  The Rev. Goldwater, who had observed the persecution of German
Americans during World War I, resisted attempts to paint his actions as
heroic. "I only behaved as any American would have done," he told the
Los Angeles Daily News in 1992.

  He is survived by his wife of 71 years, Pearl.
___________________________
Copyright 2001 SF Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com

 

Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels

Orginally from http://www.centrexnews.com/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=000114832908976&rtmo=V6sqDfJK&atm o=ggggg3JK &pg=/et/00/9/19/wspy19.html Tuesday 19 September 2000

DECLASSIFIED American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement.

The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.

The documents were found by Joshua Paul, a researcher at Georgetown University in Washington. They include files released by the US National Archives. Washington's main tool for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe, created in 1948. The chairman was Donovan, ostensibly a private lawyer by then.

The vice-chairman was Allen Dulles, the CIA director in the Fifties. The board included Walter Bedell Smith, the CIA's first director, and a roster of ex-OSS figures and officials who moved in and out of the CIA. The documents show that ACUE financed the European Movement, the most important federalist organisation in the post-war years. In 1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the movement's funds.

The European Youth Campaign, an arm of the European Movement, was wholly funded and controlled by Washington. The Belgian director, Baron Boel, received monthly payments into a special account. When the head of the European Movement, Polish-born Joseph Retinger, bridled at this degree of American control and tried to raise money in Europe, he was quickly reprimanded.

The leaders of the European Movement - Retinger, the visionary Robert Schuman and the former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak - were all treated as hired hands by their American sponsors. The US role was handled as a covert operation. ACUE's funding came from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with close ties to the US government.

The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of ACUE in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.

It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which "adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable".

 

 

 

Yugoslavia Ambassador to U.S. Denies Visa to Ramsey Clark

 

--- Action Center <actioncenter@iacenter.org> wrote:

INTERNATIONAL ACTION CENTER
National: 39 W. 14th St., Ste. 206
New York, N.Y. 10011
(212) 633-6646  Fax: (212) 633-2889
Web page: www.iacenter.org
Email: iacenter@iacenter.org
Bay Area: 2489 Mission St., Rm. 28
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 821-6545  Fax: (415) 821-5782
Ramsey Clark, Chairperson

June 27, 2001

  Yugoslavia Ambassador to U.S. Denies Visa to Ramsey Clark;
International Human Rights Attorney Seeking to Visit
Belgrade, as U.S. Pressure to Deport Milosevic Intensifies

  International Action Center Calls for Emergency Campaign to
Grant Visas

  In a blow to human rights and due process, the Yugoslav
Ambassador to the United States, Milan Propic, today refused
to issue a visa to former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark
to enter Yugoslavia.

  Mr. Clark, who is a renowned international human rights
attorney and is a co-chair of the International Committee to
Defend Slobodan Milosevic, says he will continue to attempt
to enter Belgrade to confer with others working on that
committee. "We are at a critical moment, with the United
States government attempting to push through the illegal
deportation of Mr. Milosevic by this Friday," said Mr.
Clark.

  Clark called the visa denial "another consequence of the
intense U.S.-led campaign to force the Yugoslav government
to deport Mr. Milosevic. The real aim of this campaign,
along with ten years of war, blockade and demonization
directed against Yugoslavia, is to reduce all of the former
Yugoslavia to the status of a U.S./NATO colony."

  According to Vladimir Krsljanin, international secretary of
the Socialist Party of Serbia, of which Mr. Milosevic is
chairman, Propic was not acting with the full the authority
of the Yugoslav government. Krsljanin said that the chief of
the cabinet of the Yugoslav government sent a cable at 7:34
p.m. Belgrade time 1:34 p.m. in Washington ordering that Mr.
Clark receive his visa.

  The embassy also refused a visa to Gloria La Riva, a
videographer and the West Coast coordinator of the
International Action Center, who is accompanying Mr. Clark.
La Riva, who was in Belgrade with Mr. Clark twice during the
bombing as a member of Mr. Clark's delegation, produced the
world-renowned film, "NATO Targets," about NATO's war
against Yugoslavia. Clark is the founder of the IAC.

  Mr. Clark condemned the U.S.-led campaign to label Mr.
Milosevic a war criminal "when the murder perpetrated by
NATO political and military leaders during 78 days of
bombing of civilian targets in Yugoslavia is still fresh in
the memory of the world."

  "The undemocratic steps taken to refuse the defendant and
his supporters the right to a consultation on legal and
political questions is evidence that those in charge in
Yugoslavia are capable of denying the most basic legal
rights. We have to be alert to the possibility that they
will deny Mr. Milosevic the due process of his appeal of the
extradition order and simply kidnap him to the International
tribunal in The Hague," said Clark.

  Clark pledged that "we will attempt to find a way into
Belgrade."

  IAC Calls for Emergency Campaign -- Calls and Emails Needed
Immediately!

  IAC co-coordinator Sara Flounders, who applied for the visas
from the Yugoslav Embassy in Washington, said that she was
forced to wait over four hours before being refused for
something the clerk said usually takes five minutes to
approve. "The ambassador and the embassy staff refused to
discuss the question with me. It is absolutely clear that
the ambassador takes his orders from Washington rather than
his own foreign ministry."

  "The IAC," Flounders added, "is asking all its friends and
friends of justice and peace worldwide, to protest this
decision to bar Mr. Clark and Ms La Riva from Yugoslavia, by
flooding the Yugoslav embassy with calls and emails. Time is
of the essence."

  Ambassador Milan Propic can be reached by phone at
202-332-0333 and by email at yuembusa@aol.com. People can
also direct protests to the Yugoslav government in Belgrade.

--30--

------------------
Send replies to iacenter@iacenter.org 

This is the IAC announcement
list. Anyone can subscribe by sending
any message to <ActionCenter.balkan-subscribe@iacenter.org >
To unsubscribe <ActionCenter.balkan-off@iacenter.org>

 


        Forgotten History - Friday, June 29, 2001
        "Little known facts and overlooked history"

       Want to become a Forgotten History subscriber for FREE? Visit:
           http://www.shagmail.com/sub/history.html 



The Battle of Algiers
By Denis Mueller


The Algerian War began in 1954. It started with attacks on
military posts, public buildings and police installations by
the Arab population. These attacks were successful and immo-
bilized superior French forces and created a climate of fear
among the French in the occupied lands. This, in turn, brought
about reprisals from the French who raided Muslim villages
and slaughtered civilians. The French, who had been defeated
in Vietnam, felt that Algeria was a different case and they
could not afford to lose their prize possession.

The war was ghastly with 30,000 French soldiers dying along
with 300,000 Algerians. Socialists, communists and the mili-
tary supported the war, which the French refused to call a
war. Now, new reports are coming out explaining how the French
used torture to get information from the Arab population and
that many in the government, including Francois Mitterand,
knew about it but kept quite.
Paul Aussaresses was a hero of the French resistance. He
fought against the Germans and was sent to Algiers to break
the back of the rebelling population. Aussaresses soon found
himself using the same tactics that he had seen employed by
the Nazi's against the French. The French used devices on
people's testicles and other means of torture without re-
morse. At the time, the streets of Paris were filled with
demonstrators who opposed the war. But Algeria was the jewel
of the French Empire and many, including writer Albert Camus,
felt it was part of France and that it must be kept at all
costs.

The French settlers and the military moved for a putsch again-
st the French government and helped install Charles de Gaulle
as the new president. They felt that de Gaulle would be sym-
pathetic to their cause but de Gaulle was a realist and felt
that the war was unwinnable and quickly moved for disengage-
ment from the conflict. The generals became enraged and formed
their own secret killing squad called the OAS. They carried
out murders and assassinations, even trying to kill President
de Gaulle, but after the signing of the independence treaty,
they were granted amnesty for their crimes.
During the 1950's some, including Simone de Beauvoir and
Jean-Paul Sarte, protested against the tortures but the
French have largely ignored the issue. In the 1980's, satir-
ical magazine "Le Canard Enchaine" reported that top generals
had participated in these crimes against humanity. The paper
was hauled into the court and lost its case.

Now, the recent revelations by Aussaresses have inspired
revulsion; 56% of the French population have called for an
official apology and legal actions against the officers. It
has become clear that the French used tactics that can only
be described as war crimes. All of France is now engaged in
in a debate, films are being shown and a recent seminar took
place at the Sorbonne. I say good for the French. It is time
that they squarely looked at this black mark on French his-
tory. Others, including us, should do the same.

Sources: Le Monde, November 2000
         Special Services, Algeria 1955-1957

------------------------------------------------------------
Questions...Comments..Email us at: mailto:denis@shagmail.com 
<a href="mailto:denis@shagmail.com">Email Forgotten History</a>
***********************************************************
To SUBSCRIBE visit: http://www.shagmail.com/sub/history.html 
***
To UNSUBSCRIBE visit: http://www.shagmail.com/unsub/history.html 
***
Want some Fun and Amusements in your email box FREE! Visit:
                 http://www.shagmail.com 

 

 

The Wanderer                                                                                                April 5, 2001

Free Speech: Shot Down in Beirut

Joseph Sobran

The Institute for Historical Review is the intellectual organ of Holocaust revisionism or, as its enemies call it, Holocaust "denial." It produces a scholarly bi-monthly magazine, The Journal of Historical Review, which deals not only with the Holocaust but with a range of other historical topics. It runs long and fascinating articles on such subjects as Lincoln's real views about race.

Charges that the IHR is anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi are belied by the Journal's calm and reasonable tone, in contrast to the shrillness and violence of its enemies. And I do mean enemies, not merely critics. A few years ago arsonists destroyed the IHR's offices and warehouse. Leading revisionists such as Robert Faurisson have been attacked in the streets and severely beaten by Jewish thugs. Jewish groups, especially Zionist organizations, are forever reviling the IHR and trying to interfere with its activities. They often succeed, and they have just scored another victory -- not only over the IHR, but over free speech itself.

The IHR holds conferences featuring speakers who challenge conventional liberal history. One favorite is the brilliant, controversial British historian David Irving. Other recent speakers include the historian John Toland, the former congressman Pete McCloskey, and the journalist John Sack. Sack, himself Jewish, wrote a semi-complimentary article on the IHR for Esquire, expressing his surprise that the revisionists were "affable, open-minded, intelligent, intellectual. Their eyes weren't fires of unapproachable certitude and their lips weren't lemon twists of astringent hate. Nazis and neo-Nazis they didn't seem to be. Nor did they seem anti-Semites." Sack also acknowledged that the revisionists have poked holes in the official Holocaust story and forced the accredited experts to discard some of the myths, though not, of course, the chief point of contention: whether Nazi Germany deliberately exterminated six million Jews. (Most revisionists think fewer than a million Jews perished of various causes -- chiefly disease -- during World War II.)

This year the IHR decided to co-sponsor a conference in Beirut. But just before it was to begin in late March, when all preparations had been made and the attendees had bought plane tickets and reserved hotel rooms, the Lebanese government suddenly banned the meeting. The Lebanese reportedly did this under American pressure, and the United States Government, it is not far-fetched to suspect, had in turn been pressured by the usual suspects: Jewish-Zionist organizations.

So the U.S. Government acted, underhandedly, to ban a meeting that would have been entirely legal and constitutionally protected in the U.S. Ah, the Land of the Free, spreading the blessings of liberty around the world!

But it isn't just our own government that is, as one Israeli journalist has put it, "in our hands." As Sack notes, Holocaust revisionism is now an imprisonable offense in (and beyond) most of what used to be called Christendom: "in Germany,... Holland, Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, Poland, and Israel, where denying the Holocaust can get you five years, while denying God can get you just one." (Maybe they should inscribe "In the Holocaust we trust" on the shekel.) Irving has been fined $18,000 in Germany for arguing that an Auschwitz cyanide chamber was a mere replica. He was correct, but he had to pay anyway. (Irving is now denied access to many of the German wartime documents he himself discovered!)

The Holocaust controversy is so bitter that it can't even be called a debate. One side refuses to debate, denying that there is anything to debate, rather like the Shakespeare "experts" who insist that there is absolutely, positively no room for doubt that a modestly educated man could write Hamlet. But I will say this for the Shakespeare scholars with whom I've tangled: they've never tried to beat me up, throw me in jail, or ruin my livelihood.

But what are we to think of people who uphold their position with violence, repression, smears, ostracism, and intimidation, while professing to believe that there are no rational grounds for disagreeing with them? Do they -- can they -- really believe in their own position? If so, why not appeal to sweet reason, rather than fear? They behave as if they think that position is so fragile that doubts about it must be immediately squelched by any means, lest those doubts become a fiery contagion.

Deborah Lipstadt, the scourge of Holocaust revisionism who defeated Irving in a sensational libel suit in England last year, makes the extraordinary argument that as Holocaust survivors die off, there will be more and more doubts that the Holocaust ever occurred. Well, the last Civil War veteran was planted quite a while ago, but nobody doubts that the Civil War happened. Mrs. Lipstadt's notion that history depends on living witnesses is startlingly naive, especially considering how many Holocaust "witnesses" have been discredited. (Don't worry: no government will put you in prison for falsely claiming to have been a prisoner at Auschwitz, even though that might seem to sow doubts about the Holocaust.)

I've stayed aloof from the Holocaust controversy; I always tune out when people get into the fine points of how gas chambers are constructed. But I do know that telling the truth is hard work, because even speaking precisely takes a special mental effort. Reconstructing the past is even harder work. You need a long time to acquaint yourself with the evidence. Then you have to learn to evaluate it, sorting out the reliable, the central, the trivial, the misleading. Then you also have to learn to set aside the assumptions and prejudices you didn't realize were shaping and coloring your mind while you were gathering evidence in the first place. Finally you may wind up possessing a precious fragment of the truth, along with the rueful recognition of how much you still don't know. The whole process involves a lot more quiet reflection than shouting.

Freedom of speech means much more than legal protection, though that is a necessary condition. It ultimately means an atmosphere hospitable to calm reason.

Obviously, something disastrous happened to the Jews during World War II; even the revisionists don't deny that. But does the word "Holocaust" accurately sum up the Jewish misfortune? Maybe so; maybe the secular Jewish-Zionist thugs and pressure groups are essentially right. But that's a conclusion I'd want to reach as a free man, not because a different conclusion might result in my kneecaps being broken. And in this controversy, I know which side is appealing to my mind, and which is going for my kneecaps.

 

Joseph Sobran is a nationally-syndicated columnist, lecturer, and author. For 21 years he wrote for National Review magazine, including 18 years as a senior editor. He is now editor of the monthly newsletter Sobran's (P.O. Box 1383, Vienna, VA 22183). This essay is from his "Washington Watch" column in the April 5, 2001, issue of The Wanderer (201 Ohio St., St. Paul, MN 55107), a traditionalist Roman Catholic weekly.

 

 

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com 
http://www.konformist.com/2001/flir-project.htm


THE FLIR PROJECT: Revealing Danforth's Deceit
Cletus Nelson
teevee@earthlink.net 


"Everyone thought that the issues surrounding the WACO tragedy were 
finally dead and buried…We are here today to proclaim the rise of the 
Phoenix and to offer the truth…" 
Press Statement, COPS Productions 


It was a stirring victory for the leviathan state when Independent 
counsel John Danforth produced the interim findings of his WACO 
investigation on July 21, 2000. In starkly unequivocal language, the 
former Senator inveighed with complete certitude "that the "the blame 
rests solely on the shoulders of [Davidian leader] David Koresh" His 
allegedly definitive account of the worst law enforcement debacle 
since the 1890 massacre at Wounded Knee would constitute the second 
legal blow against the Davidian faithful. One week earlier, Judge 
Walter Smith determined that federal officials were not liable for 
the deaths of the 76 men, women, and children who perished during the 
fatal climax of the April 19th, 1993 BATF-FBI siege. As the 
Washington political establishment breathed a collective sigh of 
relief, it would seem the ranks of "extremists" and "conspiracy 
theorists" who showed the temerity to challenge the media-
sanctified "mass suicide" theory had finally been silenced---or so it 
was believed. Enter the FLIR Project.

The brainchild of Emmy-winning Investigative journalist Michael 
McNulty, the man considered to be the driving force behind the 
critically acclaimed 1997 documentary WACO: The Rules of Engagement 
(1997) and its groundbreaking sequel WACO: A New Revelation (1999), 
the third installment of his investigative trilogy is no less 
provocative. Unlike his two previous efforts which exhaustively 
dissect the initial BATF raid and its brutal aftermath, this tightly 
edited video centers on a singular question which strikes at the very 
heart of this unsettling conspiracy: were Branch Davidians deterred 
from exiting the burning Mt. Carmel complex by bursts of FBI gunfire? 

To the many state apologists who seem all-to-willing to justify the 
ill-conceived tear-gas attack, the placement of a few stray rounds 
may seem an insignificant matter. Nevertheless, the law is 
unambiguous about the illegality of such an act. "Ordinary citizens 
can use deadly force to defend themselves and others from imminent 
harm. But if someone fired a gun to keep others from fleeing a 
burning building, he would be subject to prosecution for murder" 
observes CATO Institute legal analyst Timothy Lynch (No Confidence, 
An Unofficial Account of the WACO Incident, Cato Institute, April 9, 
2001). 

This is no mere speculative claim. There is a  great deal of 
circumstantial evidence which lends credence to this troubling 
thesis. A post-mortem  autopsy has revealed that nearly two-dozen of 
the deceased showed suspicious gunshot wounds. Moreover, on the day 
of the deadly fire, author Carol Moore reports that "CNN and other 
news outlets reported that as many as 20 Davidians were seen fleeing 
out of the back of the building" but "Such claims ceased as soon as 
the FBI announced there were only nine survivors"(The Davidian 
Massacre, Legacy Communications, 1995). 

The bureau's recent admission that agents fired over  300 
deadly "ferret rounds" into a building containing women and children 
provides further evidence that a "shoot to kill" mentality 
characterized the relentless attack on the embattled religious sect. 

However, in perhaps the cruelest of ironies, the FBI's own Forward 
Looking Infrared Red (FLIR) footage of the paramilitary assault is 
central to this allegation. Prior to the conflagration which overtook 
Mt. Carmel, an FBI FLIR camera mounted to an observation plane 
documented several ephemeral flashes of light directed toward the 
rear of the building. A battery of experts have subsequently analyzed 
the staccato-like emissions and attributed their unique thermal 
signature to automatic weapon fire. These aren't the half-baked 
ramblings of armchair experts or Internet rumor mongers,  but the 
qualified assertions of highly credible specialists like Dr. Edward 
F. Allard, former Deputy Director of the US Defense Department's 
Night Vision Laboratory, and the late Carlos Ghigliotti, a renowned 
expert in thermal imaging technology. 

Nevertheless, without even acknowledging this wealth of contradictory 
data, Danforth avers with "100% certainty" that no evidence exists to 
refute the FBI's claim that agents didn't fire a single shot. 
However, the learned Senator's rhetorical hyperbole hangs on a slim 
evidentiary thread: the March 19, 2000 WACO "recreation" conducted at 
Ft. Hood TX. The costly field test,  which allegedly replicated the 
dramatic final moments at WACO, was later examined by Vector Data 
Systems (VDS)---  a British firm retained by the Office of Special 
Counsel (OSC). VDS (whose parent company possesses contracts with 
some 50 federal agencies), predictably ascribed the rhythmic flashes 
on the FLIR tape to "glint" and  ruled out allegations of  FBI 
treachery because the muzzle flashes captured on the eight-year-old 
surveillance tape are "too long to be gunfire." 

Neither the establishment press nor the Congress have attempted to 
reconcile this analysis  with expert opinion---a vast conspiracy of 
silence which compelled McNulty to conduct his own shadow 
investigation last Fall. After staking out locations in two western 
states, the Colorado filmmaker assembled a team of experts  to assess 
the available evidence. The results are distilled in this intense 35-
minute video which surgically demolishes the credibility of the Ft. 
Hood Reenactment, challenges the legitimacy of the Danforth report, 
and offers the disquieting counter-theory that FBI agents did indeed 
open fire on the trapped Davidians. 

Perhaps the greatest advantage of the documentary medium is its 
inherent ability to convey a particular message by using powerful 
photographic, video, and other graphic images. In this instance, 
McNulty builds his case against the OSC investigation by 
incorporating data from the 1993 FBI FLIR tape, footage taken at  Ft. 
Hood, and test shots taken by the FLIR Project team. 

The resulting analysis demonstrates the surfeit of oversights, 
anomalies, and outright falsehoods which permeate the Danforth probe. 
For example, the former Senator's mendacious claim that "People are 
Not Visible on FLIR" is adeptly undermined within seconds by the 
presentation of FLIR imagery depicting highly visible FBI shock 
troops prowling through the Mt. Carmel wreckage. 

Repeated assertions that reflective materials or "glint" produced the 
noticeable flashes which appear on the FBI tape are proven equally 
untenable. Having attached a FLIR  camera to a stable hoist, McNulty 
and his crew provide extensive Infrared footage of aluminum foil, 
hubcaps, window glass, and other highly reflective objects which seem 
utterly unlike the thermal signatures which appear on the contested 
FBI footage. 

Yet this is merely the tip of the iceberg. It is revealed that 
Danforth's investigative team issued M-16 A-2  assault rifles for the 
reenactment despite the fact that  photos of the WACO assault team 
depict agents toting short-barreled M-4 caribines. This dissimilitude 
in barrel length effectively inhibited the amount of heat detected by 
the Ft. Hood FLIR camera. As if to fabricate a greater disparity in 
the muzzle flash produced by each weapon, military rounds were 
dispensed  for the March reenactment. Once again, FBI photos provide 
evidence that FBI and BATF agents used highly volatile commercial 
ammunition during the initial raid  and its tragic end. 

The questionable decision to use military ordinance which contains 
chemical additives designed to limit muzzle flash throws into 
question the Special Prosecutor's glib assurance that the variance in 
test results constitutes de facto proof that federal law enforcement 
didn't fire at Davidians. 

The film climaxes with the FLIR Project's attempted WACO 
reproduction. Using M-4 carbines loaded with commercial ammunition 
and allowing for a number of important variables ranging from 
temperature to the highly visible dust clouds caused by tanks ramming 
the Mt. Carmel structure, the  lengthy and sustained muzzle flashes 
recorded at Mt. Carmel are eerily duplicated.  "It is with a high 
degree of certainty that COPS, Productions and the scientists who 
conducted the tests depicted in the FLIR Project" allege the "FBI did 
fire on the trapped Branch Davidians in the burning building as women 
and children burned to death in the inferno" states the movie's web 
page. 
While the more skeptical viewers may dispute the exactitude of this 
replication, few will contest either the presence of FBI gunfire on 
the initial FLIR tape, the overwhelming evidence debunking the 
Danforth report, or the existence of a massive cover-up. Indeed, the 
FLIR Project suggests  that the high-profile  investigation was 
cleverly rigged from the outset with government investigators using 
alternative weapons, different ammunition, a malfunctioning camera, 
and other unsavory stratagems to ensure the exoneration of FBI 
officials. 

Meticulous, even-handed, and subtle in its execution, the FLIR 
Project effectively illuminates yet another chapter in the WACO cover-
up and builds a strong case against the FBI. If the Neo-con 
lightweights and drug war hawks who comprise the Bush Administration 
intend to truly restore faith in government, it is imperative that 
the issues raised by this highly-credible video be addressed. Whether 
this powerful documentary will spur yet another investigation into 
the events at Mt. Carmel remains to be seen, but this highly 
recommended film offers one definite certainty: the WACO killers 
remain at large.


If you are interested in a free subscription to The
Konformist Newswire,  please visit:

http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist 

Or, e-mail  konformist-subscribe@egroups.com  with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"
 
 
 
Part Three  Nader, Princeton, and the CIA???
 

Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:11:28 -0000
   From: radicalexposes@movemail.com 


Subject: Part Three  Nader, Princeton, and the CIA???

Part Three  Nader, Princeton, and the CIA???
Was Ralph Nader recruited by the CIA while he was
at Princeton? Nader
was allegedly  in the US Army reserve in 1959
according to material at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/elections/2000/whitehous
e/naderralph/  Nader allegedly served in the US
Army in the early
1950s according to material at 
http://www.thekcrachannel.com/sh/election2000/stories/election2000-200
00531-224128.html
Nader was born in 1934 and was graduated from
Princeton in 1955 and
from Harvard in 1958 with a law degree. Thus if
he did serve in the US
Army in the early 1950s it would have to have
been a very brief stay.
Perhaps the date on the above reference is
incorrect and Nader's
alleged Army Service was confined to his alleged
Army Reserve Service
in 1959? If anyone knows the answers either way
please post that
information. Thanks.  Could the CIA have
recruited him during that
alleged Army service?  Or was his service
confined to the 1959 US Army
Reserve service? Consider: "The House committee
investigating the CIA
will not get into this subject. This committee is
working on
government reorganization activities and is
administered by
Presidential aide Donald Rumsfeld. This top
committee has an active
and important subcommittee on the Reorganization
of the CIA. The CIA
may be reorganized, but there is little chance
that any of the present
investigations will get deeply and significantly
into the Fourth Force
concept." 
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/4thForce.html
"The CIA,
under Allen Dulles, put exceptionally able
operatives into each
military headquarters. The over-worked planning
staffs found these
extra hands ready and eager to help with any odd
task. Such offices as
Subsidiary Plans, Special Operations,
Psychological Warfare, and
Unconventional Warfare began to spring up and
they were all loaded
with "helpful" CIA men."The United States
Military Consists of the
Army, The Air Force, The Navy and Marines, and
THE FOURTH FORCE By L.
Fletcher Prouty The military forces came up with
a solution. The Army,
Navy, and Air Force all created "phony" CIA cover
units. Then they let
the CIA "equip" these units according to the War
Plan and in time the
CIA acquired a huge stockpile of military
equipment, even aircraft,
ostensibly for its formal Fourth Force mission.
Over the next few
years the CIA amassed more and more equipment.
Its phony Army, Navy,
and Air Force units did not have the usual
"equipment lists" or
"tables of equipment" that other United States
military organizations
had; so the Agency had in effect an open-ended
horn of plenty.
Warehouses in England, Germany, Libya, Okinawa,
and the Philippines,
among others, were bulging with CIA-owned
military hardware. - By the
mid-1950s the CIA was ready to exploit its new
capability. It turned
its back on hard-core Soviet and East European
targets and began to
operate secretly in the realm of the Third World.
When it wanted to
equip a rebel cabal to overthrow some government
the CIA did not have
to ask anyone for weaponry. It could ask the Air
Force for planes to
fly "training equipment" into some country; and
the next thing anyone
knew a well-equipped and well-financed rebel
force would be rising up
against an "enemy" government."
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/4thForce.html
"It makes sense that
the Bush team now argues against counting the
ballots. They have long
favored secrecy over disclosure. George H. W.
Bush was CIA Director in
the mid-1970s. The CIA, and George W.'s dad, are
no strangers to
rigged elections-in Third World countries."
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/9325/PLCoverup.html
"TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - One attorney charged there
was a  "sinister"
conspiracy to aide George W. Bush. A former CIA
agent said he was just
trying to help GOP voters. A county                             
elections official said she let Republican
operatives correct absentee
ballot applications."
http://www.thedailycamera.com/extra/campaign/recent/07asemi.html
http://www.bret2001.com/schundlerarmy/absentee_ballot.pdf
is the url
where the 2001 Schundler campaign offered
absentee ballot materials to
its supporters. Something to look out for in the
general election this
fall!!!. Schundler's defeated opponent Bob
Franks, a moderate former
Republican Congressperson complained about the
ballots during the
campaign because they were being returned to
Schundler's campaign
office rather than to election officials.
DejaCoupAllOver Again,
Florida Re-Visited. "Despite its name, the
Central Intelligence
Agency's main purpose is, and has always been,
carrying out covert
operations involving economic warfare, rigged
elections,
assassinations and even genocide." 
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA%20Hits/CIA_GreatestHits.html
The CIA's history is filled with rigged
elections, fraud, bribery,
sabotage and economic warfare. CIA officials have
masterminded
psychological warfare, extensive propaganda and
the spreading of lies
and misinformation through the media.
http://www.neww.org/pipermail/academic-resources/2001-January/000643.h
tml  "A report on the January 20 inaugural
protest in Austin, Texas
from start to finish, including the confrontation
with Bush supporters
and a unauthorized march in the streets. The
election, he told me, was
a quiet coup d'etat. "The CIA rigged elections in
other countries for
years. I never thought it would happen here."
http://austin.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=354
"The Naderites are responsible for sparking this
constitutional
crisis. The fact is that there is a
progressive-liberal majority in
the popular vote, and when you add the two votes
together, it's
substantial. Without Nader, Florida goes to Gore,
fairly convincingly.
Sean Wilentz is Dayton-Stockton professor of
history at Princeton
University and a contributing editor to the New
Republic." 
http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/08/crisis/print.html
"Ross Baker, a political science professor at
Rutgers University noted
that Ralph Nader's third-party presidential
candidacy cost Al Gore at
least one and possibly two states, and thus the
election, in 
November."
http://inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2001/05/18/local_news/JGOV18.ht
m
Now the Greens want to do it again! They have a
Green candidate for
Governor of New Jersey who may well cause
Republican Bret Schundler to
be elected New Jersey's next Governor this fall.
As such Schundler
would name Torricelli's replacement in the US
Senate thus returning
control of the US Senate to the Republicans.
Schundler himself is bad
news. While Schundler is a Harvard Graduate, Like
Dubya, Schundler's
father went to Princeton! Just like Ralph Nader
Frank Carlucci, 
Dubya's point man in Florida  James Addison 
"F--- The Jews They Don't
Vote For Us Anway" Baker, Donald Rumsfeld, Allen
Dulles, Laurance
Spelman Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, and so
many others mentioned
in this series. "The Class of 1934 Hans Otto
Schundler '35  majored in
economics at Princeton. Otto served in the Army
Air Corps during the
war, and worked briefly with Morgan Stanley
afterwards. Then he formed
what became a very successful family business of
processing and
distributing the mineral derivatives vermiculite
and perlite.
Survivors  include Bret" 
http://www.princeton.edu/~paw/archive_old/PAW96-97/09-0205/0205mem.htm
l
"the son of German immigrants"
http://www.schundler.org/jerseycitymayoroffers.html
see also http://www.schundler.com/  "In the early
1920's, Fritz
Schundler was the first to expand vermiculite
commercially in the
United States for use as insulation in the meat
packing industry and
as an ingredient in under-coating materials for
cars. Later Fritz
Schundler was among the first to begin importing
vermiculite from
countries like South Africa, discovered and
operated what became one
of the largest perlite mines in America,"
http://www.schundler.com/profile.htm
What was that word? Vermiculite? Have you heard
it before? Yes you
have! "Tears were shed in the committee hearing
room as asbestos
victims from Libby, Mont., some clutching tanks
of  oxygen, told how
hundreds in their tiny town were killed or
sickened from asbestos that
contaminated the vermiculite dug from a mine
owned by Grace."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BushBusters/message/1205 
http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/national/hall04.shtml  
EXCERPTED FROM
"Cheney's firm backed bill to limit asbestos
liability Friday, August
4, 2000  By ANDREW SCHNEIDER AND LISE OLSEN
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
REPORTERS Dick Cheney and the giant energy
company he will leave to
run for vice president have contributed more than
$150,000 to members
of Congress who sponsored legislation that would
limit the ability of
workers to sue companies for asbestos exposure.
The Halliburton Co.,
an oil-field services company based in Dallas,
and its subsidiaries 
have had about 273,300 suits filed against them 
since 1976 by workers
suffering  from asbestos-related disease."
"TRENTON, N.J. (AP) --
after winning New Jersey's GOP gubernatorial
nomination.  Among Bret
Schundler's well-wishers was President Bush, who
called to
congratulate the Jersey City mayor Tuesday night
following his
surprise defeat of former Rep. Bob Franks. At his
victory party were
national party Chairman Jim Gilmore and former
GOP vice presidential
nominee Jack Kemp. "They said we could never win,
but you didn't
believe them did you?" Schundler, a conservative
who opposes abortion
and supports gun ownership, said to cheering
supporters  he called the
"Schundler Army."   Who is in that Schundler Army
mentioned in the
story quoted above? Perhaps people like the
voters quoted in the story
from the url below
http://www.bergen.com/news/religbret20010604.htm
"Schundler (is) an evangelical Christian who once
planned to be a
minister. "I guess I'll vote for Schundler
because he's a godly man as
I see him. I know his character. this man
[Schundler] is a godly
man.-" "He's pro-life, he's for school choice and
tax cuts. I think
he's a breath of fresh air for the Republican
Party after all these
moderate, spineless candidates we've seen."  Well
Schundler beat the
moderate Republican Franks decisively in the New
Jersey Republican
Gubenatorial primary and Schundler is now the
Republican Party
Gubenatorial candidate in New Jersey. Are we
going to let the Greens
divide the Left again and elect him Governor of
New Jersey?
Greens May Get Another Gold Star from Bush "If
Karl Rove can
circumvent the corrupt political apparatus of New 
Jersey and help
elect Bret Schundler this November, that'll
warrant a  star on Bush's
report card."
http://www.nypress.com/print.cfm?content_id=4113
Everyone who can do so, should go to New Jersey,
and work to make sure
that the Greens do not get away with divide and
conquer garbage again!
The US Senate is at stake in this NJ
Gubenatorial campaign. We need
to make sure that the Democratic Gubenatorial
Candidate is elected.
The  next Governor of New Jersey will pick
Torricelli's replacement if
Torricelli is forced out of office. If the Green
candidate gets away
with this the Republican candidate ,Schundler, 
will win and will pick
a Republican  to replace Torricelli in the US
Senate. There is a Green
Party Candidate for Governor of New Jersey We
need to stop that
candidacy from dividing the Left by educating the 
citizens of New
Jersey about these divide and conquer tactics.
Jim McGreevey,
http://www.mcgreevey2001.com/biography.htm  is
the Democratic nominee
for Governor of New Jersey 
http://www.mcgreevey2001.com/get_involved.htm  We
hope that everyone
who cannot go to New Jersey in person can get
involved with his
Campaign in some other way.  Those who can go to
New Jersey should do
so at once and plan to stay through his election
victory. The
Republicans and the Greens will do everything
they can to beat him
thus making certain that the Republican Schundler
will be elected
unless we get involved in supporting McGreevey.
In an upset victory
Schundler beat the more moderate Franks for the
Republican
Gubenatorial nomination. McGreevey won the
Democratic Gubenatorial
nomination. "The Club for Growth - Upcoming
Events Officer, Enron
Corporation Brian  Wesbury, Chief Economist,
Griffin, Kubik and
Stephens 12:00 - 2:00: Lunch Brett Schundler,
Mayor, Jersey City, New
Jersey. http://www.clubforgrowth.org/events.html
"About half the
contributions - $865,150 - came from private 
foundations, including
the single largest donation: $500,000 from the
John M. and  Sara R.
Walton Foundation of Upper Marlboro, Md."The
Bodman Foundation of  New
York gave $150,000, the Hickory Foundation of New
York donated 
$100,000, and the Dorchester Foundation of New
Brunswick provided
$75,000. Four other foundations, including one
run by Schundler's
wife, Lynn, gave an additional  $40,150."
http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/index.ssf?/news/jjournal/bret30.html
"If Karl Rove can circumvent the corrupt
political apparatus of New 
Jersey and help elect Bret Schundler this
November, that'll warrant a
star on Bush's report card."
http://www.nypress.com/print.cfm?content_id=4113
" Schundler is reported to have a strong
relationship with the local
community and Arab American Republicans are
hosting a fundraiser for
him on March 25.(2001)"
http://www.arabamerican.org/elections/update_page.asp?updateid=78
"May 17, 2001, Thursday Anti-Abortion Group
Endorses Schundler for 
Governor  By DAVID M. HALBFINGER  Source: The New
York Times New
Jersey Right to Life, the state's largest
anti-abortion group, 
endorsed Bret D. Schundler for governor today,
throwing the weight of
its 150,000 member households behind the Jersey 
City mayor's
campaign." "06/13/01 BY JOHN HASSELL STAR-LEDGER
STAFF Schundler, who
opposes abortion, has not stressed the issue in
his  radio or TV ads,
for fear of alienating moderate voters. But he
sent  more-conservative
voters a letter from Republican values guru Bill 
Bennett that
underscored his anti-abortion credentials.
"Unlike his  opponent, Bret
is unequivocally pro-life," Bennett wrote.-
Schundler, states  that
Franks "opposes  Bush's tax cut plan." "This
year, Muslims in New
Jersey are turning their attention to the  race
for  governor. Muslim
groups held a fundraiser for Jersey City  Mayor
Bret  Schundler, a
Republican." 
http://www.bergen.com/news/islamjc200104272.htm 
"Enter
Bret Schundler. While you may not have heard his
name before,  it is
more than likely that you will hear it repeated
many times over  in
the months to come. For the past couple of years,
conservative and 
Republican activists have been doing cartwheels
over this political 
novice. William F. Buckley and Jeffrey Hart have
touted him as likely
future presidential candidate. George Will and
Grover Norquist have 
also taken notice of this man's accomplishments
and record. The New
York Times has spent a great deal of ink covering
Schundler. And 
Republican leaders have been hosting and feting
him all over the 
country. Not a bad bit of national attention for
the mayor of Jersey 
City. Jersey City? Yep Jersey City. Hardly a
hotbed of conservatism,
Jersey City is a working class, Catholic city
that is two-thirds
minority. Which is why the 1993 election of
Schundler - who is a
pro-life, Harvard-educated investment banker, -He
was the first
Republican to be elected as Mayor of Jersey City
since World War I.
And he not only won, but he won big. Running for
his first full term,
he managed to get 68 per cent of the vote. He was
later re-elected by
a similar margin. A devout Christian, Schundler
standing up to
left-wing activists who objected to the public
display of religious
symbols. He took them to court and won. And now
he wants to do for the
state of New Jersey what he has done on the local
level."
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0301schundler.htm
"Schundler, the mayor of Jersey City, emphasized
his opposition to gun
control and his support for abortion restrictions
as he sought to cast
himself as the true social conservative-a
strategy he hopes will to
appeal to hard-line conservatives ."
http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/elections/ledger/138570f.html
" Schundler  Sunday, April 29, 2001By ROBERT
RATISH Staff
WriterPARSIPPANY-Assembled on the front lawn of a
church Saturday
afternoon, gun control advocates staged a vigil
and declared their
opposition to Republican gubernatorial candidate
Bret Schundler.The
National Rifle Association has endorsed Schundler
for governor,
staging meetings in Atlantic City and Princeton
to rally support for
him.About 30 gun control proponents attended the
vigil, organized by
Ceasefire New Jersey, a Cherry Hill-based group
that supports gun
control, and the Million Mom March.Bryan Miller
of Ceasefire New
Jersey said the organization hopes to bring
attention to Schundler's
position on guns and his endorsement by the
NRA."Bret Schundler
supports gun owner's rights. He speaks the NRA's
language very
clearly," Miller said, The NRA has been focusing
on New Jersey, which
is one of two states electing a governor this
year.."The NRA has
endorsed Bret because they understand that he is
committed to Second
Amendment rights," he said. The vigil at the
United Methodist Church
was scheduled in response to reports that the NRA
planned a meeting.
It was unclear why the meeting did not take
place. NRA member Stephen
Potts of Franklin was among those who did show up
expecting to attend
the meeting. The Democratic Party is anti-gun.
Schundler has come
right out and told us he's not going to restrict
our rights," he
said.Joyce Sooy of Emerson was among those taking
part in the anti-gun
gathering She said gun control is an important
step toward preventing
suicide. Ceasefire also used the vigil to voice
its support of the
childproof handguns bill. The bill would prohibit
any handguns other
than personalized ones once the technology
becomes available.
Personalized guns fire only when held by the
owner. Schundler opposes
the bill, Guhl said." Staff Writer Robert
Ratish's 
http://www.bergen.com/region/nrarr200104291.htm 
"Schundler is the
only major party candidate in the state who
opposes abortion rights,
and he counts national Christian evangelist Pat
Robertson  as a
supporter and friend.  "Robertson believes that
people of faith
shouldn't be ashamed of it, and they should be
willing to act on their
faith," says Schundler. Schundler says parents
should be told when
their children seek birth control .These views
place Schundler, the
41-year-old mayor of Jersey City, outside New
Jersey's political
mainstream. " Schundler made friends in the
anti-abortion movement by
attending rallies  against an abortion clinic in
Montclair,. Karen
Joseph, spokeswoman for the NJEA, says her union
believes   Schundler
is "the antithesis of everything we hold sacred
about public
education."  Giving poor children money to leave
public schools will
make unspeakable ghettos of the schools for
children who do not
benefit from Schundler's programs, she says.
"People should know that
Bret Schundler will do everything in his power to
destroy the public
schools of New Jersey," Joseph says. "He will do
everything in his
power to shift funds away from the public
schools, thereby making it
more difficult to teach the children."  But
Schundler says he is proud
to have the "left-wing members" of the teachers
union as enemies. "I
hope they spend a lot of money. I want every
single person to know
they're against me," he says."
http://www.southjerseynews.com/issues/january/m011401g.htm
"12/22/94
Jersey City, NJ - The ACLU filed suit against
Jersey City Mayor Bret
Schundler for allowing the display of a Nativity
scene in front of
City Hall."
http://www.catholicleague.org/1994report/94activists.htm
"the NRA  (is ) holding three meetings around New
Jersey to mobilize
support for Bret Schundler, who is a strong
opponent of gun violence
prevention legislation. The first of the NRA
meetings is slated for
Saturday from 9-12 at the Princeton Marriott on
Route 1.To counter the
efforts of the NRA to influence the election in
opposition to gun
violence prevention, three groups are
co-sponsoring Saturday's Vigil:
Ceasefire NJ, the Coalition for Peace Action, and
the NJ Chapter of
the Million Mom March. Vigil against Gun Violence
12 noon - 1 pm,
Saturday, April 21 Palmer Square, Princeton, NJ
timed to counter NRA
advocacy  At the vigil, there will be posters,
banners, and leafleting
urging the public to inform themselves about
candidate positions on
gun violence prevention in deciding how to vote.
The public is invited to attend the Vigil. For
further information,
contact the Coalition for Peace Action at
(609)924-5022, web site
www.peacecoalition.org; or Ceasefire NJ at
(856)489-5960, web site
http://www.ceasefirenj.org "The NRA had a
stranglehold in preventing
sensible gun violence prevention bills for many
years. In 1993, we
broke that stranglehold in successfully defending
New Jersey's Assault
Weapons Ban, the first in the nation, against an
NRA effort at
rescission. In 1994, the National Assault Weapons
Ban became law. Now
we have the opportunity to do the same thing by
becoming the first
state to pass the Childproof Handgun Bill. If we
can legislate
childproofing aspirin bottles, we certainly
should do so for the most
dangerous consumer product of all. We must not
let the NRA special
interest stranglehold become re-established,"
said the Rev. Robert
Moore, executive director of the Coalition for
Peace Action."
http://www.peacecoalition.org/action/archives/vigil_against_gun_violen
ce_2001.html
"Decision announced May 24 by Vermont Republican
Senator James
Jeffords to leave GOP to become independent, thus
throwing control of
US Senate to Democrats, now focusing more
attention on future of NJ
Senator Robert Torricelli. Possible resignation
of Senator Torricelli
could again give GOP Senate control if Torricelli
replaced by
Republican. On May 27, New York Post also
reported that federal
sources believe sufficient evidence now exists
for Senator's
indictment, which might come before end of summer
in order to beat
five-year statute of
limitations deadline on charges that Torricelli
took an $8,100 Rolex
watch from businessman David Chang in November
1996 and money for a
Mercedes in August 1996. If indictment is
forthcoming, Some lawyers
feel Torricelli might benefit in using political
leverage to work out
early deal to resign, allowing Acting Governor
Donald T. DiFrancesco
to name successor, swinging Senate control back
to Republicans. Others
feel, however, that Torricelli
more likely to fight potential charges through
possible trial, at
least until next year when Democrat Jim
McGreevey, if elected governor
in November, could control selection of
successor. Others targeting
National Rifle Association as possible source of
damaging stories on
DiFrancesco personal finances that led to his
exit from gubernatorial
race.Theory
is that NRA held grudge from DiFrancesco's
support of assault weapons
bill pushed through by Governor Jim Florio, and
that it conducted
negative research leaked to media."
http://www.njinsider.com/hotline.htm
"Next came a bizarre political specimen in the
form of Jersey City
Mayor Bret Schundler. The mayor held us
spellbound as he recounted the
conversion he underwent from liberal Democrat to
Republican
free-marketeer-all thanks to repeated listening
to "the voice of Newt
Gingrich" via the ousted Speaker's set of GOPAC
tapes."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/weekend/weekend1999/cooper1-19-99.htm
"in Jersey City, NJ:, a city of 230,000 people
just across the Hudson
from Manhattan.Bret Schundler, a 34-year-old
former executive at
Salomon Brothers and C.J. Lawrence, won a full
four-year term on
Tuesday with an astonishing 68% of the vote. Mr.
Manzo's main issue
was that Mr. Schundler was a "Wall Street shark",
and "a Republican
backer of Reagan-Bush greed." Manzo flyers
charged him with
"supporting apartheid"
http://www.schundler.org/earthquakehits.html
"Schundler has enlisted nationally prominent
conservatives to help his
campaign."
http://www.trooperhogan.com/RecordArticles/122000-DiFrancesco%20would%
20be%20acting%20governor.htm The Greens in New
Jersey should read what
The Hudson County chapter of the Green Party of
New Jersey has to say
about Bret Schundler. The Green Party
gubenatorial candidate could
split the Left electing Bret Schundler as
Governor:" But now Mayor
Brett Schundler and the Liberty State Park
Development Corporation
want to hack out a section of the border of our
park and hand it over
to private developers. The taxpayers of Jersey
City would bear the
burden of additional traffic and pollution for a
proposed waterpark
that local residents would not be able to afford.
We would lose open
space and a natural reserve in our urban area, a 
place to take our
children and let them experience what a true wild  
ecosystem is like.
What would be gained? A few private developers
making more money?"
http://www.hudsongreens.org/history.htm
"For President In 2008 Race,Look To Bret
Schundler Originally appeared
in the New York Post on Monday, July 19, 1999
by William F. Buckley, Jr."
http://www.schundler.org/buckley071999.htm
"Rush Limbaugh Letter September, 1993 I have put
together a
back-to-school issue in honor of the fall season.
This issue, I
introduce you to Jersey City Mayor Bret
Schundler, who won a stunning
electoral victory in a Democratic stronghold."
http://www.schundler.org/rushlimbaughletter.html
"WOR Talk Show Host Bob Grant To Attend  Bergen
County Schundler
Event-MEDIA ADVISORY -- (WEST ORANGE, MARCH 23) -
WOR Talk Show Host
Bob Grant will be the special guest at an event
organized for
supporters of Jersey City Mayor Bret Schundler.
The Sunday afternoon
gathering, billed as an event where Bergen
Republicans "Can Still Pick
Their Own Horse," is an opportunity for Bergen
County Republicans to
meet Mayor Schundler."
http://www.bret2001.com/news/pressreleases/032501ma.shtml
"Florida's Governor Jeb Bush and Jersey City
Mayor Bret Schundler were
two of several education reform leaders who
testified about the
advantages such arrangements would offer state
and local policymakers
seeking to develop their own innovations."
http://www.heartland.org/education/dec00/congress.htm
"The Top Ten
Conservative Idiots (Week 12)  April 2 , 2001
Lower Expectations Than
Usual Edition Bret Schundler - Unless you live in
New Jersey, you may
have never heard of Bret Schundler. Mr. Schundler
is the mayor of
Jersey City, and also the founder of the New
Jersey Scholarship Fund,
a program which helps needy families send
children to private or
parochial schools. -it was revealed last week
that Schundler spent
$800,000 from the Scholarship Fund last December
on TV ads that gave
him wide exposure - coincidentally just one month
before  announcing
his candidacy for governor of New Jersey. Strange
then that Schundler
spent a slightly less impressive $150,000 on
actual scholarships
throughout all of last year. So, scholarship fund
for underprivileged
children, or private slush fund for a rotten
politician? You be the
judge."
http://democraticunderground.com/top10/top10_2001_12.html
"Schundler under scrutiny for TV ads  Before he
started running for
governor, his scholarship fund spent $150,000 on
students - and
$800,000 on commercials.  By Tom Turcol  INQUIRER
STAFF WRITER  In the
weeks before announcing his candidacy for
governor in New Jersey, Bret
Schundler took the nonprofit scholarship fund he
runs in a radically
new and uncharted direction. While similar funds
across the country
were diverting almost every dime to 
scholarships, Schundler spent
$800,000 from his New Jersey Scholarship Fund on
television
commercials that gained him wide exposure to
voters as the election
season was getting under way.The ads featured
Schundler, the
Republican mayor of Jersey City, promoting new
tax incentives for
private-school scholarships. Meanwhile, he spent
$150,000 last year to
help provide actual scholarships, according to
figures provided by
Schundler."
http://inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2001/03/29/south_jersey/JSCHOLA
RSHIP29.htm
"Schundler Spends Students' Money on TV Ads The
Philadelphia Inquirer
reported that Brett Schundler may have used money
from a non-profit
fund for disadvantaged students to raise his
profile for his campaign.
Weeks before he announced his candidacy.
Schundler took $800,000 from
his New Jersey Scholarship fund and began a
statewide television ad
campaign featuring himself. In the six years that
he has run the fund,
Schundler has never before run a single
television ad, let alone funded a  statewide
campaign. And similar
foundations do not run television ads and spend
all of their funding
on the students (Philadelphia Inquirer,
3/29/01)."
http://www.democraticgovernors.org/dga/press/releases/digest20010404.h
tml
"Manhattan Institute New York City Conference on
School Choice
Wednesday, December 13th, 2000 Millennium Hotel
145 West 44th Street
New York, NY Introduction and Opening Remarks
Welcome by Henry Olsen, The Manhattan Institute
The Honorable Rudolph
W. Giuliani, Mayor of New The Honorable Bret
Schundler, Mayor of
Jersey City" 
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/nyc_school_choice.htm
"Just in the past two years the (Federalist)
Society at Camden has
hosted and co-hosted forums with: Jersey City
Mayor Bret Schundler."
http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/federalist/


End Part Three

 

 

http://www.haaretz.co.il/eng

HA'ARETZ
E n g l i s h  E d i t i o n
Friday, July 13, 2001
____________________________________________


Trafficking in women could threaten U.S. aid


By Joseph Algazy
Ha'aretz Correspondent and Agencies

  If the Israeli government does not take significant steps to halt
trafficking in women, it will face U.S. sanctions. "Israel does not yet
meet the minimum standards for combating trafficking in persons, and
has not yet made significant efforts to combat the problem," the State
Department said in a scalding report on human trafficking in 2001
issued last night.

  The report cites Israel as "a destination country for women from
Moldova, Russia, Ukraine, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa, and some
countries in Asia." It includes Israel in a "Third Tier" list of 23
countries where human trafficking is endemic, but does note that Israel
"has begun to take steps" to combat the trade - mainly in women for
prostitution.

  The countries named are Albania, Bahrain, Belarus,
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Greece,
Indonesia, Israel, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Pakistan, Qatar,
Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Sudan, Turkey, United Arab
Emirates and Yugoslavia.

  The report was prepared under American legislation approved in
October that calls for imposing economic sanctions in 2003 against
countries that fail to act against traffickers or protect their
victims. If the government does not take significant steps to end the
human trade, Israel will have to face the sanctions.

  Trafficking as a problem has reached "staggering" proportions around
the globe, says the report. Research "clearly demonstrates that most
governments are taking steps to curb this horrific practice ... of
trafficked victims being subjected to threats against their person and
family, violence, horrific living conditions and dangerous work
places."

  The "root causes," says the report, "are greed, moral turpitude,
economics, political instability and transitional and social factors."
The report says the Israeli government  "recognizes that trafficking in
persons is a problem, but devotes limited resources to combating it."

  NGOs and some concerned state officials have strongly criticized the
government for failing to take vigorous action against trafficking,
especially given the sometimes violent practices of the traffickers and
the significant numbers of women who are ferried into the country.

  "In June 2000, the Knesset amended a 1997 prostitution law to
prohibit the buying or selling of persons, or forcing a person to leave
their country of residence to engage in prostitution. The penalties for
rape and violation of the 1997 prostitution law require close to a
doubling of sentences if the victim is a minor.

  "The government has convicted one trafficker under the new
legislation," the report comments laconically. The State Department
says the government "has provided training to immigration officials at
Ben Gurion airport," however "it has not formally begun cooperation
with other governments on trafficking cases," but did work with
Ukrainian officials on one case.

  "The government has not conducted anti-trafficking information
campaigns or other efforts aimed at prevention. Little protection is
provided to trafficked persons," the report says. "Victims of
trafficking are detained, jailed in a special women's prison separate
from other female prisoners, and deported. Victims who are willing to
testify against traffickers may be granted relief from immediate
deportation, but the government does not actively encourage victims to
raise charges against traffickers.

  The report continues: "Israeli NGOs have encouraged victims to take
legal action. Some victims have accused individual police officers of
complicity with brothel owners and traffickers. The government provides
limited funding to NGOs for assistance to victims."

  Israeli law enforcement officials estimate that 85 percent of the
prostitutes in the country are illegal aliens smuggled into Israel via
Sinai. They say present laws do little to protect the women and enable
the pimps and slave traders to operate with relative impunity.

  A report under preparation by a committee including police and
prosecutors is nearing completion and is expected to include
recommendations for a separate hostel for prostitutes escaping the
clutches of slave traders, protection for the prostitutes when they
testify against pimps, and a legal defense mechanism that eliminates a
relatively common occurrence of the pimps hiring lawyers for the women.

 

 

The Jews That Aren't

BY LEO HEIMAN: Copley News Service
TEL AV1V

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government.

His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1,000th anniversary of the Jewish-Khazar alliance were summarily rejected.

An elderly, meek-looking man who migrated to Israel from Russia 43 years ago, Pollock ekes out a living as a translator of scientific texts and proofreader in a publishing firm.

But his great passion, hobby and avocation is historic research.

He has devoted 40 of his 64 years to trying to prove that six out of 10 Israelis and nine out of 10 Jews in the Western Hemisphere are not real Jews' Jews, but descendents of fierce Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of southern Russia many centuries ago.

For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories.

"For all we know, he may be 100 per cent right," said a senior government official. "In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khazars. Many famous scholars, Jews and non-Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works.

"But who can tell today what percentage of Khazar blood flows in our veins, if at all? And who can declare with any degree of scientific accuracy which Jews are Jews and which are descendants of this Tartar-Mongol race?

"As a matter of fact, our alleged descent from the Khazars is the central theme of Arab propaganda," he added. "The Arabs claim most European Jews have no right to be in Israel in the first place because they are not descended from Biblical Hebrews, but from Tartar-Mongol nomad tribes, including the Khazars who were converted to Judaism en masse 1,000 years ago,"

OPINION DIVIDED

Scientific opinion in Israel is divided on the subject. No one argues the basic premise: that a group of 12,000 Jews, fleeing from persecution and wars in the Holy Land, in the wake of Byzantine and Moslem conquests, made the long overland trek to Persia, crossed the territory of today's Turkestan in Central Asia and found asylum in the Khazar Kingdom, which occupied a vast area between the Caspian Sea, Volga River, Ural Mountains, Black Sea and the Polish borderlands.

In the year 965 the Khazars were defeated for the first time in 500 years, by Prince Sviatoslav of Kiev. King Bulan III of Khazaria concluded that Prince Sviatoslav emerged victorious from the war because his troops and mercenaries were Christians, while h i s nomads were pagan worshippers. The king and his nobles embraced Judaism in 965, and in 966 a royal edict was passed enforcing Judaism as the only legal religion in the Khazar Kingdom. Tribesmen had to undergo circumcision, learn Hebrew prayers and recognize Jewish rabbis as their spiritual leaders on pain of death.

As other Jews who were persecuted in the Middle East, medieval Europe and Spain at that time, heard of the new Jewish-Khazar kingdom, rumors spread that the Messiah had arrived at long last. There were several consecutive migration waves to Khazaria, via Persia, Greece and Poland.

Pollock believes the traditional Russian anti-Semitism probably stems from that epoch when Hebrew-speaking Khazar raiders attacked Russian villages, killed the men folk, abducted women, forcibly converted them to Judaism and married them in full-fledged religious ceremonies. This also would explain why so many European Jews are blond and blue-eyed, with a slight Mongol slant to their eyes, as well as the total absence of Semitic features among many Israelis of European descent.

MONGOLS DESTROY KINGDOM

The flourishing Jewish-Khazar Kingdom was destroyed in 1239 by the Mongol invasion of Batu Khan.

Following the Mongol invasion and conquest, surviving members of Jewish-Khazar tribes trekked west and settled in Poland, Hungary, Bohemia, Austria, Romania and the Ukraine.

How can one find out if he is a "Khazar Jew" or a "Hebrew Jew?"

According to Pollock, whose parents came from Poland, if your name is Halperin, Alpert, Halpern, Galpern, etc., you are a 100 per cent Khazar. "Alper" means "brave knight" in the Khazar tongue, and the name was granted by the king to the most distinguished warriors. Names like Kaplan, Caplon, Koppel and the like are positive proof of Khazar descent, according to the scholar. "Kaplan" means "fierce hawk" in the Khazar language. Kogan, Kangan, Kaganvich show aristocratic descent from Kagan-Hagan, King Bulan's chief minister.

 

 

 Want to Know What The World Thinks? Sick of Our Corporate Press?

  ThePaperboy.com  

All International Newspaper Reports !!!

 

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page I

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page II

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page III

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page IV

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page V

Go to: Recent News of Great Interest - Page VI

 

 Pages With Articles On 9-11:

Cocaine, Money Laundering, Oil, Afghanistan And Bush Family Links Page

Page VI   Page VII   Page VIII   Page IX   Page X   

Page XI   Page XII Page XIII Page XIV Page XV  Page XVI

 

 


Return to top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised: July 18, 2010 .   Communication:   discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com     Go to Home Page     Go to Index of All Articles Pages       
Read the
Disclaimer
Last modified: July 18, 2010  Copyright © 1999 - 2008  All rights reserved. [Gnostic Liberation Front].   www.gnosticliberationfront.com