Gnostics, Mystic Sects
& Radicals
Russian mystical
sects played an extremely important part in the Bolshevik revolution, on the
side of the Bolsheviks. In spite of their rejection of the state and the
church, these sects were deeply nationalistic, since their members were
hostile to foreign innovations. They hated the West.
— Mikhail Agursky, The Third Rome
Throughout
nineteenth century Europe we find numerous connections between Gnostics,
mystics, occultists and radical socialists. They constituted what the
historian James Webb calls “a progressive underground” united by a common
opposition to the established order of their day. Constantly, Webb writes,
“we find socialists and occultists running in harness.”2
Sundry
spiritual communities emerged across the United States, with clear Gnostic and
occult doctrines, which attempted to follow a pure communistic life style.
Victoria Woodhull, the president of the American Association of Spiritualists
during the 1870s, was a radical socialist. Woodhull believed that Spiritualism
signified not only religious enlightenment, but also a cultural, political and
social revolution. She published the first English translation of the
Communist Manifesto and tried in vain to persuade Karl Marx that the
goals of Spiritualism and Communism were the same.
Dissident Christian
mystics, spiritualists, occultists and radical socialists often found
themselves together at the forefront of political movements for social
justice, worker’s rights, free love and the emancipation of women.
Nineteenth century occultists and socialists even used the same language in
calling for a new age of universal brotherhood, justice and peace. They all
shared a charismatic vision of what the future could be – a radical
alternative to the oppressive old political, social, economic and religious
power structures. And more often than not they found themselves facing the
same common enemy in the unholy alliance of State and Church.
The birth of radical
socialist ideas in Russia cannot be easily separated from the spiritual
communism practiced by diverse Russian sects. For centuries folk myths
nourished a widespread belief in the possibility of an earthly communist
paradise united by fraternal love, where justice, truth and equality
prevailed. One prominent Russian legend told of the lost land of Belovode (the
Kingdom of the White Waters), said to be “across the water” and inhabited
by Russian Old Believer mystics. In Belovode, spiritual life reigned
supreme, and all went barefoot sharing the fruits of the land and their labour.
There were no oppressive rules, crime, and war. Another Russian legend
concerned Kitezh, the radiant city beneath the lake. Kitezh will
only rise from the waters and appear again when Russia returns to the true
Christ and is once more worthy to see it and its priceless treasures. Early in
the twentieth century such myths captured the popular imagination and were
associated with the hopes of revolution.
In the latter half of the
seventeenth century, a schism occurred within the Russian Orthodox Church of a
new religious movement called the Old Believers. The result was that many
Russian spiritual dissidents took courage from the split to found their own
communities, giving vent to Gnostic ideas that had long been simmering
underground. The Old Believers, in the face of severe repression, clung
tenaciously to their ancient mystic tradition and expressed their separation
from the official world of Imperial Orthodox Russia in collective migration to
the fringes of the state, mass suicide by fire, rebellion, and a monastic
communism.
Gnostic communities, with
their communalism and disdain for private property, proliferated throughout
Russia in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Known by a variety of names
such as Common Hope, United Brotherhood, Love of Brotherhood, Righthanded
Brotherhood, White Doves, Believers in Christ, Friends of God, Wanderers,
their followers reportedly numbered in the hundreds of thousands. Ruthlessly
persecuted by the authorities, they made up a spiritual underground, often
hiding themselves from inquisitive eyes. A countrywide revolutionary
sectarianism that rejected the state, the church, society, law, and even
religious commandments, which they declared were abolished when the Holy
Spirit descended to humanity.
The origin of
Gnostic ideas in Russia is difficult to trace, but they appear to be an
outgrowth of two powerful spiritual impulses in Russian religious history. The
first is the Christian esoteric tradition preserved within the monastic
communities of the Russian Orthodox Church. A mystical tradition going back by
way of Greek Neoplatonism, Origin and Clement of Alexandria to St. John the
“beloved disciple”. “Russian Orthodox mystical theology has bent more
than a little in the direction of the Gnostic heresy,” notes the historian
Maria Carlson.3 The second impulse originated with Essene and Manichean
missionaries who reached Russia in the early centuries of the Christian era.
An impulse later given new vitality by the Bogomils whose Gnostic teachings
had gained a foothold in Russia by the thirteenth century.
By the end of the
nineteenth century occult and Gnostic ideas enjoyed wide circulation among all
segments of the Russian population. At one point the Russian philosopher
Nicholas Berdyaev (1874-1948) welcomed the Gnostics, urging “Gnosticism
should be revived and should enter into our life for all time.”4
After
the 1917 Revolution, Gnosticism, observed the Russian scholar Mikhail Agursky,
“contributed considerably to Soviet culture and even influenced Soviet
political life. Its foundations were laid before the revolution…[by] several
gnostic trends in nineteenth century Russian culture.”
While Russian
Gnostics rejected the world order and strove to live by the apostolic precept
to hold “all things in common,”5
they were also profoundly aware of the approaching end of the
age. “Russian popular Gnosticism had a very pronounced apocalyptic
character,” says Mikhail Agursky. “Russian mystical sectarians lived in
anticipation of a catastrophe. The degradation of human life demanded
purifying fire from heaven, which would devour the new Sodom and Gomorrah and
replace them with the Kingdom of God. Any revolution could easily be
identified by such sectarians as this fire, regardless of its external
form.”6
Russian Socialism
Bolshevik
collectivism had roots in long-standing Russian values of individual
self-sacrifice. The suffering, martyrdom, humility, and sacrifice of Christ
was deeply embedded in the texture of Russian religious thought and
practice, and the lives of Russian saints were a litany of suffering. The
Old Believers, heretics in the eyes of the official church for their
adherence to their own version of the truth, suffered persecution for
centuries at the hands of the government and sought escape in mass
immolation, colonization, and, finally, economic mutual aid.
— Robert C. Williams, The
Other Bolsheviks
Alexander Herzen
(1812-1870), seen by many as the father of Russian socialism, was a friend and
admirer of the French revolutionary Proudhon, who viewed himself as a
Christian socialist. Proudhon worked intermittently all his adult life on a
never completed study of the original teachings of Jesus Christ. Herzen also
paid special attention to Russia’s persecuted religious sectarians. He
printed a special supplement for the Old Believers, the mystic Christian
traditionalists who had been driven out of the Russian Orthodox Church.
Nicholas Chernyshevsky, another Russian socialist thinker of the nineteenth
century, wrote an article in praise of the “fools for Christ’s sake” and
defended members of the spiritual underground.
The Russian radicals
of the 1800s, in the words of James H. Billington, looked upon “socialism as
an outgrowth of suppressed traditions within heretical Christianity.”7
They
saw the genesis of Russian socialism in the spiritual underground of the
Gnostics and religious sectarians. One influential network of Russian
socialists openly claimed to be rediscovering “the teaching of Christ in its
original purity,” which “had as its basic doctrine charity and its aim the
realisation of freedom and the destruction of private property.”8
Nicholas Chernyshevsky
(1828-1889), who spent much of his life in penal servitude, penned the utopian
novel What Is To Be Done? as a vision of the future new society and a
guidebook for the revolutionaries who would build it. Chernyshevsky wrote:
Then say to all: this is
what will come to pass in the future, a radiant and beautiful future. Have
love for it, strive toward it, work on behalf of it, bring it ever nearer,
bear what you can from it into your present life. The more you can carry
from that future into your present life, the more your life will be radiant
and good, the richer it will be in happiness and pleasure.
Chernyshevsky’s novel
inspired two generations of idealistic young radicals. Among them was
Alexandre Ulianov, the beloved elder brother of V.I. Lenin. He was executed in
1887 for his part in the attempted assassination of Tsar Alexander III.
Vladimir Lenin told how Chernyshevsky’s What Is To Be Done? “captivated my
brother, and captivated me… It transformed me completely.” What impressed
the future leader of the Russian Revolution was how Chernyshevsky:
not only
demonstrated the necessity for every correctly thinking and really honest
man to become a revolutionary, but also showed – even more importantly –
what a revolutionary should be like, what his principles should be, how he
must achieve his goals, what methods and means he should employ to realise
them.9
Nicholas Berdyaev
observed that the “Russian revolutionaries who were to be inspired by the
ideas of Chernyshevsky present an interesting psychological problem. The best
of Russian revolutionaries acquiesced during this earthly life in persecution,
want, imprisonment, exile, penal servitude, execution, and they had no hope
whatever of another life beyond this. The comparison with Christians of that
time is almost disadvantageous to the latter; they highly cherished the
blessings of this earthly life and counted upon the blessings of heavenly
life.”10
Chernyshevsky, like
those who followed him, was passionately committed to the power of reason. His
philosophy firmly grounded in the materialist outlook and a sober
utilitarianism. But in his life Chernyshevsky was the embodiment of
self-abnegation, single-mindedness and asceticism. Like a true saint he asked
nothing for himself, but wanted everything for the people as a whole. When the
police officers took him into exile in Siberia they said, “Our orders were
to bring a criminal and we are bringing a saint. “These two elements, the
religious and the secular, the ascetic and the calculating,” writes
historian Geoffrey Hosking, “remained in unresolved tension in his
personality, but on the level of theory he sought a resolution in the idea of
a social revolution to be promoted by the best people on the basis of personal
example.”11
Inspired by Chernyshevsky,
groups of young radicals emerged committed to the reconstruction of Russia as
a federation of village communes and communally run factories. The reading
list of one such revolutionary cell is revealing because it included the New
Testament and histories of Russian Gnostic communities. The leader of the main
radical circle in the Russian capital St. Petersburg spoke of founding “a
religion of humanity.” He called his circle “an Order of Knights” and
included in its ranks members of a Gnostic “God-manhood sect” which taught
that each individual is potentially destined to become a god. It was not
uncommon for the revolutionary call “liberty, equality, and fraternity” to
be written on crosses, or for Russian revolutionaries to declare their belief
in “Christ, St. Paul, and Chernyshevsky.”
The Russian socialists
frequently visited religious sectarians and sought their support because of
their history of alienation from the tsarist regime. Emil Dillon, an English
journalist who had personal contact with several persecuted religious
communities, reminds us:
Among the various
revolutionary agencies which were at work… the most unpretending,
indirect, and effective were certain religious sectarians…. Coercion in
religious matters did more to spread political disaffection than the most
enterprising revolutionary propagandists. It turned the best spirits of the
nation against the tripartite system of God, Tsar, and fatherland, and
convinced even average people not only that there was no lifegiving
principle in the State, but that no faculty of the individual or the nation
had room left for unimpeded growth.12
V.I. Lenin & The Spiritual
Underground
Men who are
participating in a great social movement always picture their coming action
as a battle in which their cause is certain to triumph. These
constructions… I propose to call myths; the syndicalist “general
strike” and Marx’s catastrophic revolution are such myths.
Georges Sorel, 1906
Religious sectarians
played a significant part in the formation of Bolshevism, V.I. Lenin’s
unique brand of revolutionary Marxism. Indeed, Marxism with its aggressive
commitment to atheism and scientific materialism, scorned all religion as
“the opium of the people.” Yet this did not prevent some Bolshevic leaders
from utilising concepts taken directly from occultism and radical Gnosticism.
Nor did the obvious materialist outlook of Communism, as Bolshevism became
known, stop Russia’s spiritual underground from giving valuable patronage to
Lenin’s revolutionary cause.
One of Vladimir
Lenin’s early supporters was the radical Russian journalist V. A. Posse, who
edited a Marxist journal Zhizn’ (Life) from Geneva. Zhizn’ aimed
to enlist the support of Russia’s burgeoning dissident religious communities
in the fight to overthrow the tsarist autocracy. Posse’s publishing
enterprise received the backing of V.D. Bonch-Bruevich, a Marxist
revolutionary and importantly a specialist on Russian Gnostic sects. Through
Bonch-Bruevich’s connections to the spiritual underground of Old Believers
and Gnostics, Posse secured important financial help for Zhizn’.
The goal of Zhizn’ was
to reach a broad peasant and proletarian audience of readers that would some
day constitute a popular front against the hated Russian government. Lenin
soon began contributing articles to Zhizn’. To Posse, Lenin appeared
like some kind of mystic sectarian, a Gnostic radical, whose asceticism was
exceeded only by his self-confidence. Both Bonch-Bruevich and Posse were
impressed by Lenin’s zeal to build an effective revolutionary party. Lenin
disdained religion and showed little interest in the ‘religious’
orientation of Zhizn’. The Russian Marxist thinker Plekhanov, one of
Lenin’s early mentors, openly expressed his hostility to the journal’s
‘religious’ bent. He wrote to Lenin complaining that Zhizn’,
“on almost every page talks about Christ and religion. In public I shall
call it an organ of Christian socialism.”
The Zhizn’
publishing enterprise came to an end in 1902 and its operations were
effectively transferred into Lenin’s hands. This led to the organisation in
1903-1904 of the very first Bolshevic publishing house by Bonch-Bruevich and
Lenin. Both men viewed the Russian sectarians as valuable revolutionary
allies. As one scholar notes, “Russian religious dissent appealed to
Bolshevism even before that movement had acquired a name.”13
V.D. Bonch-Bruevich
(1873-1955) came to revolutionary Marxism under the influence of the Russian
novelist Leo Tolstoy’s social teachings. Like Lenin’s wife Krupskaya, he
started his revolutionary career distributing Tolstoy’s The Kingdom of God
Is within You, a work infused with neo-Gnostic themes. In 1899 Bonch-Bruevich
left Russia for Canada to live among the Doukhobors, Russian Gnostic
communists whose refusal to pay taxes and serve in the army drove them into
exile. Bonch-Bruevich reported on the secret doctrines of the Doukhobors and
put in writing their fundamental oral teachings known as the ‘Living
Book’. On his return to Europe in 1901 Bonch-Bruevich introduced Lenin to
the chief tenets of these Gnostic communists. The Doukhobors, with their
radical rejection of the Church and State, with their denial of the uniqueness
of the historical Christ, and their neglect of the Bible in favour of their
own secret tradition, were of some interest to the founder of Bolshevism.
In 1904 Bonch-Bruevich,
with Lenin’s support, began publishing Rassvet (Dawn) in an effort to
spread revolutionary Marxism among the religious dissidents. His first
editorial attacked all the Russian tsars for their persecution of the Old
Believers and sectarians, and stated that the journal’s goal was to report
events occurring world wide, “in various corners of our vast motherland, and
among the ranks of Sectarians and Schismatics.” Rassvet combined
Communist and apocalyptic themes that were both compelling and comprehensible
to Russia’s spiritual underground.
By the early years of the
twentieth century Russia was in a revolutionary mood. Bonch-Bruevich wrote
that this would soon produce a “street battle of the awakened people.” He
urged his fellow Communist revolutionaries to use the language of the
spiritual underground in persuading the masses that the government was
“Satan” and that “all men are brothers” in the eyes of God. He wrote:
If the
proletariat-sectarian in his speech requires the word ‘devil’, then
identify this old concept of an evil principle with capitalism, and identify
the word ‘Christ’, as a concept of eternal good, happiness, and freedom,
with socialism.
Communist God-Builders & The
Occult
If a newcomer to
the vast quantity of occult literature begins browsing at random, puzzlement
and impatience will soon be his lot; for he will find jumbled together the
droppings of all cultures, and occasional fragments of philosophy perhaps
profound but almost certainly subversive to right living in the society in
which he finds himself. The occult is rejected knowledge: that is, an
Underground whose basic unity is that of Opposition to an establishment of
Powers That Are.
— James Webb, Occult
Underground
A Marxist pamphlet written
before 1917 and later reissued by the Soviet government bluntly declared that
man is destined to “take possession of the universe and extend his species
into distant cosmic regions, taking over the whole solar system. Human beings
will be immortal.” Anatoly Lunacharsky, the first Commissar of Enlightenment
in the new Soviet state, believed that as religious conviction had been a
great force of change in history, Marxists should conceive the struggle to
transform nature through labor as their form of devotion, and the spirit of
collective humanity as their god.
A.V. Lunacharsky
(1875-1933) and the Russian writer Maxim Gorky (1868-1936), close friends of
Vladimir Lenin, were acquainted with a broad spectrum of occult thought,
including Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy and Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophy.
Both these prominent Bolshevic revolutionaries shared a life-long interest in
ancient mystery cults, religious sectarianism, parapsychology and Gnosticism.
Maria Carlson maintains that Gorky’s “vision of a New Nature and a New
World, subsequently assimilated to its socialist expression as the Radiant
Future, is fundamentally Theosophic.”14
Gorky valued the writings of the occultists
Emanuel Swedenborg and Paracelsus, as well as those of Fabre d’Olivet and
Eduard Schure.
Drawing on the imagery of
the ancient solar mysteries, Gorky declared in Children of the Sun, “we
people are the children of the sun, the bright source of life; we are born of
the sun and will vanquish the murky fear of death.” In his Confession, the
“people” have become God, creators of miracles, possessors of true
religious consciousness, and immortal. Gorky envisioned a beautiful future of
work for the love of work and of man as “master of all things.” Revealing
his familiarity with parapsychology and faith healing, Gorky tells how an
assembled crowd uses its collective energy to heal a paralysed girl. He was
deeply impressed by research into thought transference, often writing of the
“miraculous power of thought”, while expressing the hope that one day
reason and science would end fear.
The ideas advanced
by Lunacharsky and Gorky became known as God building, described by one
researcher as a “movement of secular rejuvenation with mystery cult
aspects.”15 God building implied that a human collective, through
the concentration of released human energy, can perform the same miracles that
were assigned to supra-natural beings. God builders regarded early
Christianity as an authentic example of collective God building, Christ being
nothing other than the focus of collective human energy. “The time will
come,” said Gorky, “when all popular will shall once again amalgamate in
one point. Then an invincible and miraculous power will emerge, and God will
be resurrected.”16 Years before, Fyodor Dostoyevsky had written in The
Possessed, “God is the synthetic personality of the whole people.”
According to Mikhail Agursky:
For Gorky,
God-building was first of all a theurgical action, the creation of the new
Nature and the annihilation of the old, and therefore it coincided fully
with the Kingdom of the Spirit. He considered God to be a theurgical outcome
of a collective work, the outcome of human unity and of the negation of the
human ego.17
Before the Russian
Revolution, Lunacharsky’s political propaganda relied heavily on words and
images ultimately derived from Russian Gnostics and religious sectarians. In
one pamphlet he urged readers to refuse to pay taxes or serve in the army, to
form local revolutionary committees, to demand ownership of their land,
overthrow the autocracy and replace it with a “brotherly society” of
socialism. Indeed, there was as much attention given to Christ as to Marx in
Lunacharsky’s writings. “Christianity, in all its forms, even the purest
and most progressive,” he wrote, “is the ideology of the downtrodden
classes, the hopelessly immobile, those who cannot believe in their own
powers; Christianity is also a weapon of exploitation.” But Lunacharsky
realised there is also an underground spiritual tradition, the arcane language
and symbols of which might be used to mobilise the people to carry out the
revolution.
Occult elements are
obvious in Lunacharsky’s early plays and poems, including a reference to the
“astral spirit”, and a familiarity with white magic and demonology. He
discussed Gnosticism, the Logos, Pythagoras, and solar cults in his two volume
work Religion and Socialism. After the Bolshevic Revolution, Lunacharsky wrote
an occult play called Vasilisa the Wise. This was to be followed by a
never published “dramatic poem” entitled Mitra the Saviour, a clear
reference to the pre-Christian occult deity. Significantly, it is Lunacharsky,
along with the scholar of Russian Gnostic sects V.D. Bonch-Bruevich, who is
credited with developing the so-called “cult of Lenin” which dominated
Soviet life following the Bolshevic leaders’ death in 1924.
Soviet
Power & Spiritual Revolution
A Weltanschauung
has conquered a state, and emanating from this state it will slowly
shatter the entire world and bring about its collapse. Bolshevism, if
unchecked, will change the world as completely as Christianity did. Three
hundred years from now it will no longer be said that it is merely a
question of organising production in a different way… If this movement
continues to develop, Lenin, three hundred years from now, will be regarded
not only as one of the revolutionaries of 1917, but as the founder of a new
world doctrine, and he will be worshipped as much perhaps as Buddha.
— Adolf Hitler, 193218
In the wake of the total
collapse of Imperial Russia and the devastation caused by the First World War,
Lenin and the Bolshevics seized power in October 1917. A revolution that would
not have been possible without the active support and participation of the
Russian spiritual underground. The Bolshevics, in the opinion of one Russian
scholar:
most probably
would not have been able to take power or to consolidate it if the
multimillion masses of Russian sectarians had not taken part in the total
destruction brought about by the revolution, which acquired a mystical
character for them. To them the state and the church were receptacles of all
kinds of evil, and their destruction and debasement were regarded as a
mystic duty, exactly as it was with the [medieval Gnostic sects of]
Anabaptists, Bogomils, Cathars, and Taborites.19
Ground down by
centuries of autocratic tsarist rule as well as the Orthodox Church, its mere
appendage, the Russian people came to accept the Communism of Lenin.
“Bolshevism is a Russian word,” wrote an anti-Communist Russian in 1919.
“But not only a word. Because in that guise, in that form and in those
manifestations which have crystallized in Russia… Bolshevism is a uniquely Russian
phenomenon, with deep ties to the Russian soul.”20 Even the Nazi
propaganda minister Dr. Goebbels, who built his political career fighting
Communism, confessed that no tsar had ever understood the Russian people as
deeply as Lenin, who gave them what they wanted most – land and freedom.
Lenin wedded the
dialectical materialism of Marx to the deep-rooted tradition of Russian
socialism permeated as it was by Gnostic, apocalyptic, and messianic elements.
In the same manner he reconciled the Marxist commitment to science, atheism
and technological progress with the Russian ideas of justice, truth and
self-sacrifice for the collective. Similarly the leader of Bolshevism merged
the Marxist call for proletarian internationalism and world revolution with
the centuries old notion of Russia’s great mission as the harbinger of
universal brotherhood. Violently opposed to all religion, atheistic Bolshevism
drew much from the spiritual underground, becoming in the words of one of
Lenin’s comrades, “the most religious of all religions.”
“Nonetheless we have
studied Marxism a bit,” wrote Lenin, “we have studied how and when
opposites can and must be combined. The main thing is: in our revolution… we
have in practice repeatedly combined opposites.” Several centuries earlier
the Muslim Gnostic teacher Jalalladin Rumi pointed out, “It is necessary to
note that opposite things work together even though nominally opposed.”
After the 1917 Bolshevic
Revolution:
occultism was part of a
cluster of ideas that inspired a mystical revolutionism based on the belief
that great earthly events such as revolution reflect a realignment of cosmic
forces. Revolution, then, had eschatological significance. Its result would
be a ‘new heaven and a new earth’ peopled by a new kind of human being
and characterized by a new kind of society cemented by love, common ideals,
and sacrifice.
The Bolshevic
Revolution did not quash interest in the occult. Some pre-revolutionary
occult ideas and symbols were transformed along more ‘scientific’ lines.
Mingled with compatible concepts, they permeated early Soviet art,
literature, thought, and science. Soviet political activists who did not
believe in the occult used symbols, themes, and techniques drawn from it for
agitation and propaganda. Further transformed, some of them were
incorporated in the official culture of Stalin’s time.21
Apocalyptic and messianic
themes, popularised for centuries by the Russian spiritual underground, were
played out in the Bolshevic Revolution and fueled the drive to build a
classless, communist society. The dream of a communist paradise on earth
created by human hands, a new world adorned by technological perfection,
social justice and brotherhood, was found both in Marx and in the Russian
spiritual underground.
Lenin promulgated a law
exempting religious sectarians from military service. Writers and poets,
drawing inspiration from the Russian religious underground, hailed the
Revolution as a messianic, world mystery. One writer compared the Bolshevic
Revolution with the origin of Christianity. “Christ was followed,” he
exclaimed, “not by professors, nor by virtuous philosophers, nor by
shopkeepers. Christ was followed by rascals. And the revolution will also be
followed by rascals, apart from those who launched it. And one must not be
afraid of this.”
Alexander Blok
(1880-1921) was the most important Russian poet to recognise the Bolshevics. A
student of Gnosticism, Blok discerned the inner meaning of the tumultuous
political and social events. There was a hidden spiritual content at the core
of the external upheavals of the Revolution and the bloody Civil War that
followed. Blok clearly expressed this in his famous poem The Twelve,
where the invisible Christ leads the revolutionary march.
Another Russian poet and
occultist, Andrei Bely, a disciple of Steiner’s Anthroposophical movement,
hailed the Revolution as the first stage of a far greater cultural and
spiritual revolution to come. For Bely, as for his contemporary Blok, the
Bolshevic Revolution was above all a powerful theurgical instrument. Andrei
Bely (1880-1934) saw theurgy as a means to change the world actively in
collaboration with God. In spite of the turmoil and bloodshed, for these
Russian occultists the revolution served as an instrument of the new creation.
Bely celebrated the 1917 Revolution in a poem, Christ is Resurrected,
in which the Bolshevic take over is compared with the mystery of Crucifixion
and Resurrection. Rudolf Steiner understood why the Russians welcomed the
October Revolution, but criticised Bolshevism as a dangerous mix of Western
abstract thinking and Eastern mysticism.
The Russian spiritual
underground spawned several important writers and poets who welcomed the
Bolshevic Revolution. Two of the most outstanding were Nikolai Kliuev
(1887-1937) and Sergei Esenin (1895-1925). Occult images and Russian messianic
themes abound in their poems. Kliuev saw Lenin as the popular leader and
embodiment of the Old Belief. In typically Gnostic fashion Esenin disdained
the old God of the Church and proclaimed a “new Nazareth”. The young
Esenin gave support to the Bolshevic Red Army and even tried to join the
Bolshevic party. Tragically, Kliuev felt betrayed by the Revolution, was
arrested and died on the way to a labor camp in 1937. Esenin took his own life
in 1925 believing dark forces had usurped the Russian Revolution.
By the early 1920s the
Bolshevics had consolidated their hold over much of the former Russian Empire.
The Communist Party emerged as the monolithic embodiment of the popular will.
All occult societies, including the Theosophists and Anthroposophists, were
disbanded. Freemasonry was virulently condemned and its lodges closed. In the
drive to modernise Russia and build a technologically advanced Soviet Union,
occult notions were publicly classed as superstition and openly ridiculed. The
new Soviet State, with its Marxist-Leninist ideology, became the sole
arbitrator of all thought. Leading occult teachers were forced into exile. Yet
many of those associated with the spiritual underground joined the Communist
Party and found employment in various Soviet organisations.
The sway of the spiritual
underground did not disappear. Arcane truths and primordial urges took on new
forms in keeping with the new reality. Esoteric ideas were clothed in the
language of a new epoch. One writer explains:
In Stalin’s
time, occult themes and techniques detached from their doctrinal base became
part of the official culture…. The occult themes of Soviet literature of
the 1920s were transformed into the magical or fantastic elements that
observers have noted in Socialist Realism. Stalin himself was invested with
occult powers.22
The Russian thinker, Isai
Lezhnev (1891-1955), insisted on the profoundly religious character of
Communism, which was “equal to atheism only in a narrow theological
sense.” Emotionally, psychologically, Bolshevism was extremely religious,
seeing itself as the only custodian of absolute truth. Lezhnev correctly
discerned in Bolshevism the rise of a “new religion” which brought with it
a new culture and political order. He embraced Marxism-Leninism and welcomed
Stalin as a manifestation of the “popular spirit”.
The Russian Revolution,
which gave rise to the super power known as the Soviet Union, cast a gigantic
shadow over the twentieth century. Bolshevism, the materialistic worldview
developed by Vladimir Lenin, left its mark on all aspects of modern thought.
And the roots of Lenin’s Communism and the Soviet Union go deep into the
ancient secret tradition of humanity.
Was atheistic Bolshevism,
for all its worship of science and materialism, the expression of something
supra-natural? Many in the spiritual underground passionately believed so. The
Gnostic poet Valery Briusov (1873-1924), who joined the Bolshevic party in
1920, had been involved in magick, occultism and spiritualism prior to the
revolution. Briusov stressed that Russia’s destiny was being worked out, not
on earth, but by mystic forces for which the 1917 Revolution was part of the
occult plot.
Another prominent Russian
occultist, the acclaimed artist Nicholas Roerich, acknowledged Lenin and Communism as cosmic phenomenon.
In 1926 he wrote:
He [Lenin] incorporated
and circumspectly fitted every material into the world order. This opened up
for him the path into all parts of the world. And people have formed a
legend not only as a record of his deeds but also as a mark of his
aspirations…. We have seen for ourselves how the nations have understood
the magnetic power of communism. Friends, the worst counsellor is
negativity. Behind every negation ignorance is concealed.
The philosopher Nicholas
Berdyaev, a former Marxist who came to embrace Christian mysticism, was exiled
from the Soviet Union in the 1920s. He had studied occultism and was
acquainted with many Russian Gnostic sects. His 1909 book The Philosophy of
Freedom is full of Gnostic themes. And like the Gnostics, Berdyaev opposed the
institution of the family as yoking men and women to “necessity” and the
endless chain of birth and death. Writing from exile, more than twenty-five
years after the Revolution, Berdyaev observed:
Russian communism
is a distortion of the Russian messianic idea; it proclaims light from the
East which is destined to enlighten the bourgeois darkness of the West.
There is in communism its own truth and its own falsehood. Its truth is a
social truth, a revelation of the possibility of the brotherhood of man and
of peoples, the suppression of classes, whereas its falsehood lies in its
spiritual foundations which result in a process of dehumanisation, in the
denial of the worth of the individual man, in the narrowing of human
thought…. Communism is a Russian phenomenon in spite of its Marxist
ideology. Communism is the Russian destiny, it is a moment in the inner
destiny of the Russian people and it must be lived through by the inward
strength of the Russian people. Communism must be surmounted but not
destroyed, and into the highest stage which will come after communism there
must enter the truth of communism also but freed from its element of
falsehood. The Russian Revolution awakened and unfettered the enormous
powers of the Russian people. In this lies its principle meaning.23
| The
Hammer and Sickle: Occult Symbols?
Throughout the twentieth century
the hammer and sickle were universally recognised as symbols of
communism and the Soviet Union. For millions of people the hammer
and sickle symbolised a new political and economic order offering
progress, justice and liberty. While countless others looked on the
same hammer and sickle as ominous emblems of oppression, hatred and
tyranny.
Occultists and students of ancient wisdom saw something more. Behind
the outward appearance of these communist emblems, which officially
represented the emancipation of labor, there was an element unknown
to the masses.
Russian occultists saw the Bolshevics as unconsciously working for
the cosmic mission of Russia and interpreted the Soviet hammer and
sickle as hidden symbols of the blacksmith’s art, hinting at
future transmutation and transformation. Both metallurgy and alchemy
(regarded as an occult science) sort to destroy impure elements with
fire and thereby release a refined product, whether forged metal
(the smith) or spiritual gold (the alchemist). Fire is associated
with transfiguration, regeneration, and purification, while iron is
associated with Mars (the god of war) and the astral world.
To the occultist, the communist hammer and sickle
symbolised conflict and transmutation. The forging – in the fires
of struggle – of base elements into a purer, higher form. The
atheistic Bolshevic, like the occultist, proclaimed that ordinary
man must be transformed into new man, free of the bonds of selfish
desires and of the oppressive past, in order to freely build the new
civilisation of the future.
|
Footnotes:
1. Benjamin Walker, Gnosticism
Its History & Influence
2. James Webb, Occult
Underground
3. Maria Carlson, No
Religion Higher Than Truth
4. As quoted in Maria
Carlson, No Religion Higher Than Truth
5. Acts 2:44-47
6. Mikhail Agursky, The
Third Rome
7. James H. Billington, The
Icon and the Axe
8. As quoted in James H.
Billington, The Icon and the Axe
9. As quoted in Nina Tumarkin,
Lenin Lives: The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia
10. Nicholas Berdyaev, The
Russian Idea
11. Geoffrey Hosking, Russia:
People and Empire
12. As quoted in Mikhail
Agursky, The Third Rome
13. Robert C. Williams, The
Other Bolsheviks
14. Maria Carlson, No
Religion Higher Than Truth
15. Richard Noll, The Jung
Cult
16. Mikhail Agursky, The
Third Rome
17. The Occult in Russian
and Soviet Culture, edited by Bernice Glatzer Rosenthal
18. As quoted in Hitler’s
Words, edited by Gordon Prange
19. Mikhail Agursky, The
Third Rome
20. As quoted in Richard
Pipes, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime 1919-1924
21. The Occult in Russian
and Soviet Culture, edited by Bernice Glatzer Rosenthal
22. Ibid
23. Nicholas Berdyaev, The
Russian Idea
From "Countermedia,"
the most intelligent source for information. A division of "New
Dawn" magazine.
© Copyright New Dawn Magazine,
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com .
Permission to re-send, post and place on web sites for non-commercial
purposes, and if shown only in its entirety with no changes or additions. This
notice must accompany all re-posting.
