|
THE PLOT
AGAINST
THE CHURCH
BY
MAURICE PINAY
1962
Translated from the
German and Spanish
editions of the same work
Dedication
INTRODUCTION TO
THE AMERICAN EDITION
INTRODUCTION TO THE
ITALIAN EDITION
FOREWORD TO THE AUSTRIAN
EDITION
PREFACE TO THE
GERMAN EDITION
INTRODUCTION TO THE
SPANISH EDITION
Part 1:
The Secret Driving Force of Communism
1. Communism as Destroyer
2. The Creators of the System
3. The Head of Communism
4. The Financiers of Communism
5. Jewish Testimony
Part
2:
The Power Concealed Behind Freemasonry
1. Freemasonry, enemy of the Church and Christianity
2. The Jews as founders of Freemasonry
3. The Jews as the leaders of the Freemasons
4. Crimes of Freemasonry
5. Freemasonry as spreader of the Jacobin revolutions
6. Freemasonry favours and spreads Communism
Part
3:
The Synagogue
of Satan
1. Jewish striving for power
2. More concerning the Jewish religion
3. Curses of God against the Jews
4. Massacres of Jews ordered by God (Bible)
5. Antisemitism and Christianity
6. Christ, the symbol of Anti-semitism, so the Jews assert
7. The Deicide People
8. The Apostles condemn the Jews for murdering Christ
9. Morality of struggle and not deadly defeatism
10. The Jews kill Christians and persecute the Apostles
11. The Roman persecutions were caused by the Jews
Part
4:
The Jewish Fifth Column in the Clergy
1. The Octopus strangling Christianity
2. The origin of the Fifth Column
3. The Fifth Column in action
4. Jewry, the Father of the Gnostics
5. The Jew Arius and his heresy
6. The Jews as allies of Julian the Apostate
7. St John Chrysostom & St Ambrose condemn the Jews
8. Saint Cyril conquers Nestor and expels the Jews
9. The barbarian invasion, a triumph of the Arian Jews
10. Catholic victory
11. Toledo Council 3 pulls Jews from public office
12. Toledo Council 4 ex-communicates judaeophiles
13. Negligence in struggle against clandestine Jewry
14. The Church combats secret Jewry
15. It is necessary to destroy the Jewish fifth column
16. Jewish conspiracies punished with slavery
17. Christian-Jewish recon-ciliation. Prelude to collapse
18. The Jews betray their most loyal friends
19. The Church Councils fight Jewry
20. Attempt to subject Holy Roman Empire to the Jews
21. The Council of Meaux combats the Jews
in progress...
23 more chapters to go.......
Appendix
Dedication
To the Immaculate Heart
of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God; to St. Joseph, Protector of the
Universal Church; to St. Michael the Archangel, Prince of the
Supernatural Host in the struggle against Satan, the first
Naturalist; to St. Thomas Aquinas, the Catholic Church’s Teacher of
Order; and to St. Anthony of Padua, “Hammer of the Heretics.”
*
* * * * *
“In our time more than
ever before, the chief strength of the wicked lies in the cowardice
and weakness of good men... All the strength of Satan’s reign is due
to the easy-going weakness of Catholics. Oh! if I might ask the
Divine Redeemer, as the prophet Zachary did in spirit: What are
those wounds in the midst of Thy hands? The answer would not be
doubtful: With these was I wounded in the house of them that
loved Me. I was wounded by My friends, who did nothing to defend Me,
and who, on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of My
adversaries. And this reproach can be levelled at the weak and
timid Catholics of all countries.” Pope St. Pius X, Discourse he
pronounced on December 13, 1908 at the Beatification of Joan of Arc.
*
* * * * *
O most powerful
Patriarch, Saint Joseph, Patron of that Universal Church which has
always invoked thee in anxieties and tribulations; from the lofty
seat of thy glory lovingly regard the Catholic world. Let it move
thy paternal heart to see the Mystical Spouse of Christ and His
Vicar weakened by sorrow and persecution by powerful enemies. We
beseech thee, by the most bitter suffering thou didst experience on
earth, to wipe away in mercy the tears of the revered Pontiff, to
defend and liberate him, and to intercede with the Giver of peace
and charity, that every hostile power being overcome and every error
being destroyed, the whole Church may serve the God of all blessings
in perfect liberty. Amen.
Leo XIII. March 4,
1882.
Note to the Online
Edition
The English
translation of the Complot contra la Iglesia is not as
polished as one would like. Whilst the rendering of many passages is
rather quaint, occasionally it borders on the incoherent. We have
remedied many of the more obvious defects and obscure passages (in
consultation with the original Spanish edition), and hope that the
extraordinary contents of this book will encourage readers to
overlook those defects that remain.
Lest readers be
deterred from continuing their reading by the long, indigestible
lists of Communist personnel found in Chapters 2 and 3 of Part One,
we have relegated much of this material to an appendix (as per the
original Spanish edition) and have presented the remainder in
smaller typeface to indicate its secondary reference-like nature.
Timothy Peter Johnson, March
17, 2006.
INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION
This historically important
book will, in all probability, be attacked as being anti-Semitic.
Let nobody be led astray or distracted, however, from a serious and
scientific consideration of the incontrovertible facts here set out.
We are concerned with a major factor of history, and more especially
of the history of the Christian Church. No crude, negative and
destructive anti-Semitism comes into question. That the Jews have
played a tremendous and not always beneficial role in the whole
story of mankind is obvious; that their activities were not always
friendly to Christianity and to the non-Jewish peoples is equally
obvious, and there is an enormous fund of evidence from Jewish as
well as other sources of unshakable authority to prove this.
This work of great erudition
displays not alone a knowledge of events past, but shows also that
its compilers had had knowledge of events to come in some immensely
important respects. As readers will see from the foreword to a
German-language edition, the first edition of this work, in Italian,
began by stating that its authors knew that the purpose of calling
the Second Vatican Council was to persuade it to declare that the
Jews were not responsible for the Crucifixion of Our Saviour, i.e.,
they were not guilty of deicide, and this book appeared before
the first session of the Council. Subsequently, as forecast, this
proposal was put forward, great pressures were applied to get it
accepted, and something, even if diluted, was agreed upon at the
end.
Now it cannot be denied,
even apart from the essence of the proposal itself, that the fact
that any Jews, however representative or otherwise of most of their
co-religionists and co-racialists, could do what they had done at
the very highest levels of the Catholic Church, is a matter of
tremendous significance to Catholics and all others, even to
non-Christians.
And not only was it possible
to find men at the summit of the Hierarchy to further this project,
but the Council appeared to contain a large number of Bishops who,
at the very least, did not seem to understand the importance of the
problem.
None can sit in judgment on
those concerned; it is understandable that the Jews want to “improve
their image”, especially as they have the power to do so. The
lessons to be drawn are, surely, not that the Jews as such or any
who have been misled should be the objects of severe criticism, but
that the facts, the truth concerning all matters of great
importance, and especially when they affect the purity and influence
of the Church, should be made widely known. In this all Churches
should help with a sense of urgency.
However, it should be
pointed out to the Jews concerned that instead of trying to improve
their reputation and increase their influence by fostering
deceptions and attacking basic Christian traditions, they would
serve their own true interests best by first setting their own
hearts and attitude toward others aright. Again and again they have
overreached themselves over the centuries, and then complained at
the results for which they alone were responsible.
In particular, this recent
initiative in Rome has merely served to draw the attention of
intelligent and decent men to a matter of immediate concern to all.
It is the obvious duty of all who may read this book to make its
contents known and to encourage all their friends to acquire, read
and spread it.
THE EDITOR
St. Anthony Press
Los Angeles, California
February 15, 1967
INTRODUCTION TO THE ITALIAN EDITION
The most infamous conspiracy
is in progress against the Church. Her enemies are working to
destroy the most holy traditions and thus to introduce dangerous and
evil-intended reforms, such as those Calvin, Zwingli and other false
teachers once attempted. They manifest a hypocritical zeal to
modernise the Church and to adapt it to the present day situation,
but in reality they conceal the secret intention of opening the
gates to Communism, to hasten the collapse of the free world and to
prepare the further destruction of Christianity. All this it is
intended to put into effect at the coming Vatican Council. We have
proofs of how everything is being planned in secret agreement with
the leading forces of Communism, of world Freemasonry and of the
secret power directing these.
It is intended to first
carry out a probe and to begin with the reforms which encounter less
resistance from the defenders of Holy Church, in order to then
gradually extend the range, as weakening resistance allows this.
In addition, we have
confirmation of what will still be unbelievable for those who are
not initiated, namely that the anti-Christian forces have at their
disposal, in the ranks of Church dignitaries, a veritable “Fifth
Column” of agents who are the unconditional tools of Communism and
of the secret power directing it. For it has been revealed that
those cardinals, archbishops and bishops, who form a kind of
progressive wing within the Council, will attempt to bring about a
break through shameful reforms, whereby the good faith and the
eagerness for progress of many devout Council Fathers will be
deceived.
The assurance has been given
that the Progressive block forming at the beginning of the Synod
will be able to count upon the support of the Vatican, in which, so
it is said, those anti-Christian forces possess influence. This
appears unbelievable to us and sounds more like boastful arrogance
by the enemies of the Church than sober reality. However, we mention
this, so that one sees how far the enemies of Catholicism and of the
Free World risk revealing themselves. Apart from the dangerous
reforms in the doctrine of the Church and her traditional policy
which stand in open contradiction to what was approved by the
preceding Popes and Ecumenical Councils, it is desired that the
Excommunication Bulls uttered by his Holiness Pope Pius XII against
the Communists and their lackeys be declared nullified.
In this manner the effort is
made to establish a peaceful coexistence with the Communists, which
on the one side would be harmful to the regard for Holy Church in
the eyes of Christians who fight against materialistic and atheistic
Communism and on the other side weaken the morale of these fighters,
hasten their defeat and would have as a consequence dissolution in
their own ranks, in order in such a way to ensure the worldwide
triumph of Red totalitarianism. Concern is taken that Protestants
and Orthodox are in no way invited who fight heroically against
Communism, but rather more only those Churches and Church
counsellors who stand under the influence of Freemasonry, of
Communism and the secret power directing them. In this manner the
Freemasons and Communists disguised in priestly robes, who have
usurped the leading posts in such churches, work together concealed
and in a subtle way, but also very effectively, with their
accomplices who have infiltrated into the Catholic clergy.
On its side the Kremlin has
already decided to refuse known anti-Communist prelates an exit
visa, and only to allow their unconditional agents or those who,
without being the latter, have bowed out of fear of Red reprisals,
to travel from the satellite states. Thus at the Second Vatican
Council the Church will experience the silence of those who could
defend her best of all and could enlighten the Holy Synod concerning
what takes place in the Communist world.
This will undoubtedly seem
incredible to those who read it; but the events at the Holy
Ecumenical Council will open their eyes and convince them that we
are speaking the truth. For it is there that the enemy intends to
play a trump card, whereby it, so we are assured, will have on its
side unconditional accomplices among the highest Church dignitaries.
A further disastrous plan, which is being prepared, is that the
Church shall contradict itself, so as a result to sacrifice its
regard with the faithful; for later it will be broadcast that an
institution which contradicts itself cannot be divine. With this
proof they wish to desolate the Churches and achieve that the
faithful lose their confidence in the clergy and abandon them.
It is intended to cause the
Church to declare that what it has represented for centuries as bad,
is now good. Among such manoeuvres spun for this purpose one
particularly stands out on account of its importance, and refers in
fact to the conduct of Holy Church towards the damned Jews, as Saint
Augustine calls them; and this in reference both to those who nailed
Christ to the cross, as also to their descendants, who are both
archenemies of Christianity. The unanimous doctrine of the great
Church Fathers, that “unanimis consensus Patrum” which the Church
regards as a source of faith, condemned the unbelieving Jews and
declared the struggle against them to be good and necessary.
For example, in this
struggle, participated, as we will prove by means of irrefutable
evidence, the following Saints: Saint Ambrose, Bishop of Milan,
Saint Jerome, Saint Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, Saint John
Chrysostom, Saint Athanasius, Saint Gregory of Nazianzus, Saint
Basil, Saint Cyril of Alexandria, Saint Isidore of Seville, Saint
Bernhard and even Tertullian as well as Origen, the latter two
during the period of their indisputable orthodoxy. In addition, the
Church fought energetically for nineteen centuries against the Jews,
as we will likewise prove by means of reliable documents, and among
which are found the following: Papal Bulls, Protocols of the
Ecumenical and Provincial Councils as well as the highly renowned
Fourth Lateran Council and many others, the teachings of Saint
Thomas of Aquinas, of Duns Scotus and of the most important doctors
of the Church. In addition we will quote Jewish sources of
indisputable authenticity, like the official Encyclopaedias of
Jewry, the works of famous rabbis as well as of the most well known
Jewish historians.
The Jewish, Freemasonic and
Communist plotters now have the intention at the coming Council of
utilising, as they assert, the lack of knowledge of most clergy
concerning the true history of the Church, to execute a surprise
coup by adopting the standpoint at the assembled Holy Ecumenical
Council that anti-Semitism must be condemned, as well as every
struggle against the Jews who, as we will elaborate, are the
wirepullers of Freemasonry and of international Communism. They
would like the infamous Jews, whom the Church has regarded as evil
for the course of nineteen centuries, to be declared good and
beloved of God. As a result the “unanimis consensus Patrum” would be
contradicted, which laid down exactly the opposite, as well as what
also found its expression through various Papal Bulls and Canons of
Ecumenical as well as Provincial Councils.
Since the Jews and their
accomplices pillory every struggle within the Catholic Church
against the wickedness of the former, as well as the plots directed
against Christ Our Lord, as antisemitism, we will likewise reveal in
this book that Christ Himself, the Gospels and the Catholic Church
can be included among the sources of antisemitism, since they
campaigned for nearly two thousand years against those who denied
their Messiah.
With the condemnation of
Antisemitism, which at times is called Antisemitic racialism, it is
wished to attain that his Holiness the Pope and the assembled
Council in condemnation of Antisemitism experience the catastrophic
event that the Church contradicts itself, and therefore, without
giving account to this, silently also condemn Christ Our Lord
Himself, as well as the Holy Gospels, the Church Fathers and most
Popes, among them Gregory VII (Hildebrand), Innocent II, Innocent
III, Pius V, and Leo XIII, who as we will show in this book, have
fought bitterly against the Jews and the “Synagogue of Satan”.
With such condemnation it
would be successful to simultaneously place countless Church
Councils in the dock, among them the Ecumenical Councils of Nicaea
and the Second, Third and Fourth Lateran Councils, whose Canons we
will subject in this book to a thorough investigation, and which
carried on an energetic struggle against the Hebrews. To put it in
few words, the infamous plotters have the scheme in mind that Holy
Church, by its condemning Antisemitism, condemns itself, whereby one
can easily amplify the disastrous consequences.
It was already attempted at
the last Vatican Council, even if in disguised form, to alter course
in the traditional doctrine of the Church, when it was successful by
means of a surprise manoeuvre and lasting pressure, to influence
countless Church Fathers to signing “a Postulate in favour of the
Jews”. Misusing the Apostolic zeal of the devout prelates, it was
first spoken of a summons to conversion of the Israelites, which
regarded from the theological viewpoint is an intention without
fault; but later they inoculated the secret poison in form of
assertions, which, as we will reveal in the course of this work,
stand in open contradiction to the doctrine which Holy Church has
laid down in this respect.
But upon this occasion, when
the “Synagogue of Satan” believed it had secured the approval of the
postulate on the part of the Council, God, who always stands by His
Church, prevented the mystical body of Christ from contradicting
itself and fructifying the plots of its thousand years old enemy.
The Franco-Prussian war broke out unexpectedly. Napoleon had to
hastily withdraw the troops protecting the Pontificate, and the army
of Victor Emmanuel prepared to take Rome. Therefore the 1st Holy
Vatican Council had to be hastily dissolved, and the prelates
returned to their dioceses, before a general discussion concerning
the postulate in question was able to be begun.
This was, however, not the
first time that divine providence held up such a misfortune by means
of something extraordinary. History shows us that it has done it in
numerous cases, whereby it mostly made use of the Popes and devout
prelates as its medium; among the latter we include Saint
Athanasius, Saint Cyril of Alexandria, Saint Leanero, Cardinal
Aimerico, and even such humble monks as Saint Bernhard or Saint John
of Capistranus. In other cases than those previously mentioned, it
even made use of ambitious monarchs, as the example of Victor
Emmanuel, the King of Italy, reveals.
When in the middle of the
past year we experienced how the enemy was preparing renewed
attempts to unleash a plot which would open the gates to Communism,
prepare the collapse of the free world and deliver Holy Church into
the claws of the “Synagogue of Satan”, we began, without losing any
time, to collect documents and to write the following work which is
intended to be not so much a book with a certain disputed tendency,
but rather an ordered summary of Council records, Papal Bulls and
all kinds of documents and sources, from which we leave out those
whose reliability or truthfulness is doubtful, and select those
which possess indisputable truth.
In this book, not only is
the plot uncovered which Communism and the “Synagogue of Satan” have
entered upon against the 2nd Vatican Council, but also the preceding
conspiracies, which were recorded in the course of nineteen
centuries as cases of precedence, are subject to a thorough
illumination. For what is intended to occur at the new assembled
Holy Synod, has already occurred repeatedly in the past centuries.
In order to grasp what will occur to the full extent, it is
therefore essential to know the cases of precedence as well as the
nature of that hostile “Fifth Column” infiltrated into the bosom of
the clergy. This purpose is served by the extensive investigation of
the Fourth Part, which rests upon a faultless proof of sources.
Since in addition attention
is drawn to the possibility that the Holy See and the Second Vatican
Council might abandon certain traditions of the Church in order to
grant aid to the triumph of Communism and of Freemasonry, we lay at
basis of the two first parts of this work a minute study, whereby we
cite the two most serious sources concerning what one can call the
quintessence of Freemasonry and of atheistic Communism, and
investigate the nature of the secret power directing it. Even if the
fourth part of this book is the most important, then nevertheless
the first three and above all the third make comprehensible the plot
threatening Holy Church in its entire circumference. This plot is
not restricted to its activity during the coming universal Synod but
extends far more to the entire feature of the Church. For the enemy
has already calculated that, if for some reasons at the Holy Synod
strong defensive forces awaken against its planned reforms and these
should bring about the failure of its intentions at the Second
Vatican Council, it will use at a later point any kind of
opportunity to return to its plan, in which respect it would know
how to utilise the strong influence which it pretends to have with
the Holy See.
We are naturally convinced
of the fact that, in spite of the intrigues of the enemy, the
support which God always grants His Church will also cause their
criminal machinations to fail this time. It is also written: “The
Powers of Hell shall not triumph over it!”
Unfortunately, in writing
this very documentary book, we have used more than fourteen months,
and there remain only two until the opening of the Second Vatican
Council. God will help us to overcome all resistance, in order to
have ready the printing of this work either by the beginning of the
Synod or at least before the enemy can cause the first harm. Though
we are also aware that the Lord God will not permit a catastrophe,
nevertheless we must keep before our eyes what an outstanding Saint
expressed: that, although we know that all depends upon God, we
should nevertheless act as if everything depended upon us. And as
Saint Bernard said in a similar grave crisis to that of the present:
“Pray to God and hit out with the stick.”
Rome, the 31st
August 1962. The Author.
FOREWORD TO THE AUSTRIAN EDITION
Due to the numerous requests
that have reached us from the ranks of the Austrian and German
clergy, we have decided to print the Austrian edition of the book
“Plot Against the Church.”
The Fathers of the Second
Vatican Council, to whom this work was dedicated, had occasion to
establish in the course of the Holy Synod that our warning voice
with regard to the existence of a veritable plot against the most
holy traditions of the Church and its defensive powers in the face
of atheistic Communism found their full justification through the
course of the first part of the Holy Council. This shows that our
assertions correspond to a tragic truth.
The events of the coming
months will provide our readers with the confirmation that our
revelations rest upon an incredible but regrettable reality. The
enemies of the Church renewed the attempt at the first sitting of
the world-embracing Synod, by means of their accomplices in the high
clergy, to abnegate or to narrow the tradition of the Church and its
character as a source of revelation. This had already been striven
for before them by the Waldenses, the Hussites and other Mediaeval
heretics, as well as later by Calvin, Zwingli and additional false
teachers; only that this time all this is fought for under the cloak
of the high ideal, inspiring us all, of Christian unity, whereas the
heretics of those times cited for substantiation of the same thesis
further diverse and sophistic arguments.
To attempt that the Church
deny the tradition of its character as a source of doctrine and to
admit such an attribute only to the Holy Bible, more or less equates
to the intention of causing it to contradict itself. This would
accordingly mean that that which had been maintained for almost
twenty centuries to be white was now declared to be black; and in
fact with the devastating result that the mystical body of Christ,
on grounds of contradiction, would forfeit its respect in the eyes
of the faithful, since indeed an institution that contradicts itself
in its essence can with difficulty be called divine.
A step of this kind would
bring Holy Church into such an impossible situation that it could
not be justified through the wishful image of the longed-for
Christian unity, whose realisation at the moment would be very
problematical. But should this dream become fact upon such an absurd
basis, then this would signify that Holy Church recognises it has
been caught up in error and its faithful would as a result turn in
masses to Protestantism, whose essential postulate has always been
from of old to recognise solely and alone the Bible as the source of
true revelation and to refuse such a character to the tradition of
the Catholic Church.
It is incomprehensible that
the enemies of Catholicism and their accomplices in the high clergy
have possessed the audacity to go so far. This also proves that what
was prophesied in our book written before the Holy Council has found
its confirmation through the launching of the same and that the
enemy possessed infiltrated accomplices in the high clergy, who
occupied the highest positions. As we in fact learned from
well-informed sources, upon appearance of this book and after its
distribution among the Council Fathers, the enemies first made a
halt from bringing before the Council more daring proposals, which
apart from the programme of the day they had kept in readiness for
the last few days of the Council. Among such proposals was found
that which had the aim of demanding the lifting of the
Excommunication Bulls directed by Pope Pius XII against the
Communists and their lackeys, as likewise the establishing of a
peaceful coexistence between Church and Communism, and finally the
condemnation of Antisemitism.
This step in retreat, which
was forced by reason of the accusation in this book, may only be of
partial duration. It is hoped that a careful propaganda worked out
in agreement with the Kremlin will soften the resistance of those
defending Holy Church in favour of the setting up of a peaceful
co-existence with atheistic Communism. It is intended to attempt to
weaken the defensive powers of the Church and of the free world, in
which the support of the Red dictator can be relied upon, who in
return would release the prelates imprisoned for many years, address
letters of good wishes to his Holiness the Pope, and display further
signs of visible friendship towards the Church. All this in order to
bring weighty arguments in favour of the accomplices of the Kremlin,
who have infiltrated into the high clergy, to give power to a
lifting of the excommunication Bulls, and to bring about a pact of
the Holy See with Communism.
In alliance with certain
accomplices, who have nested themselves in the highest spheres of
the Vatican, it is even planned in Moscow to take up diplomatic
relations between Holy Church and the atheistic as well as
materialistic Soviet State under the pretence that, as a result, an
easing of the religious persecution in Russia could be introduced.
In reality it is the aim of
the Kremlin and its agents from the ranks of the Church hierarchy to
demoralise the Catholics as well as the heroic clergy who in Europe
and the rest of the world fight heroically against Communism, in
that they wish to provide the impression that the latter are in fact
not so bad, after the Holy See has decided to take up diplomatic
relations with the Soviet Union and other Communist states.
It is therefore also
intended to cripple the fighting spirit of the North American
Anticommunists; for through this step they would see themselves
weakened in their struggle against the dark forces, which seek to
draw even the United States into the Communist chaos. In a word it
is intended, as we have already made clear in the introduction to
the Italian edition, to cripple the defensive powers of the free
world and to level the way for the final triumph of atheistic
Marxism.
But the arrogance of
Communism, of Freemasonry and of the Jews goes so far that they
already speak of bringing the next Papal election under their
control with the intention of placing one of their accomplices in
the distinguished college of Cardinals on the throne of Saint Peter.
Therefore they intend, with aid of the influence that they claim to
have in the Vatican, to exercise pressure upon his Holiness the
Pope, whose health is under much strain, in order to get him to
appoint a large number of new Cardinals, even if the latter should
exceed the highest number provided for. In this manner they will
attain the necessary number of supporters, which is intended to
secure the election of a Pontifex who will transform Holy Church
into a satellite in the service of Communism, Freemasonry and the
“Synagogue of Satan”.
But the forces of the
Antichrist do not reckon with the support which our Lord God will
grant to His Church, in order to prevent that such a manoeuvre gains
upper hand.
It suffices to recall that
this is not the first time in history that such an attempt has been
experienced. As we prove in this book by means of undoubtedly
authentic documents, it was successful for the powers of the
“devilish dragon” to enthrone a Cardinal as Pope who was directed by
the forces of Satan and at times made it seem as though the latter
might be the Lords of the Church. Christ, our Lord, who has never
abandoned His Church, provided, however, such devout men as Saint
Bernard, Saint Norbert, Cardinal Aimerico, the Fathers of the
Councils of Etampes, Rheims and Pisa as well as those of the Second
Ecumenical Lateran Council, with the courage to act and armed their
hands. They all divested Cardinal Pierleoni, this wolf in sheep’s
clothing who for many years was able to usurp the throne of Saint
Peter, of his Papal dignity, excommunicated him and attributed to
him the role of Anti-Pope, which fitted him.
The plans of the Kremlin, of
Freemasonry and of the “Synagogue of Satan” are, however advanced
they may seem, nevertheless nullified by the visible hand of God.
For as in all times men will arise like Saint Athanasius, Saint John
Chrysostom, Saint Bernard and Saint John Capistranus, who hold firm
to the inspiration and strength which Christ, our Lord, chooses to
provide them with, in order in this or that form to cause the
disastrous plot to fail, which once again the dark forces of the
Antichrist instigate to aid to victory the worldwide triumph of
totalitarian Imperialism from Moscow.
We saw ourselves compelled,
in the first Italian edition, to leave out eleven chapters of the
fourth part from this book; and in fact by reason of the haste we
had to distribute this work among the Fathers of the Second Vatican
Council, before the beast could cast forth the first blows of its
paws. But since we have more time at our disposal in the printing of
this edition, we have added the eleven chapters in question, which
are of fundamental importance for the better understanding of the
devilish plot that threatens Holy Church in our days.
PREFACE TO THE GERMAN EDITION
The following book was
compiled by a group of Idealists, who are Catholics of strict belief
and who, as Catholics, firmly believe that the Catholic Church is
now passing through one of the most dangerous periods in its
history.
In order to reveal, what
dangers threaten the Catholic Church, in particular from
International Communism and also from other International
organisations, this Idealist group undertook the enormous task of
compiling and editing this book, using numerous documents from the
Middle Ages and recent times.
The Italian edition has
already appeared and is already in the hands of the high clergy and
other interested parties. Editions in other languages are in
preparation.
The authors believe that it
is vital that the German Catholic Church has this work in its hands,
in order from the documents summarised in this work to be able to
gain authentic information concerning historical facts from the
struggle and life of the Catholic Church.
The authors must beg
forgiveness that it was not possible to once again edit the German
work stylistically. They know that the style in many chapters leaves
much to be desired, and that repetitions also occur, which could
have been prevented. The authors can only promise their highly
esteemed readers that all these faults will be avoided in an
eventual new edition. But they hope, nevertheless, that this work
will find recognition and interest, and that their idealistic and
selfless work for the well-being of our Catholic Church at least
succeeds in informing the German leaders of the Catholic Church
about historical facts that are certainly completely unknown to the
public.
Madrid, 1963. The
Authors.
INTRODUCTION TO THE SPANISH EDITION
A SENSATIONAL BOOK
The facts confirm that the
term “sensational” applied to the book “Plot Against the Church”
(Complot Contra La Iglesia) is not exaggerated. Following the first
Italian edition, distributed in the Fall of 1962 among the Fathers
of the Second Vatican Council, the press of different countries of
the world began to make commentaries on this book, the reading of
which is of capital importance not only for Catholics, but also for
all free men.
It can be stated without
fear of exaggeration that no book in the present century has been
the object of so many commentaries in the world press; virulently
unfavourable were those of communist newspapers and those controlled
by Masons or Jews; and extremely favourable were those commentaries
of some Catholic newspapers, which are independent of those obscure
forces, and which have had, in addition, the courage and the
possibility to express their points of view freely. Even one year
after the distribution of the first Italian edition in the Vatican
Council, the press of different countries of the world is still
occupied with this extraordinary book — a thing truly unusual in
matters of publicity.
In order that the reader may
be informed of the importance of this work, we quote here some
interesting paragraphs that the Rome correspondent of the Catholic
newspaper “Agora” of Lisbon, edition of March 1, 1963,
page 7, tells his readers:
“We are going to refer
to a publication which came out some time ago in Rome. In
addition to other information, we were able to obtain a copy of
this book, which in two months became a bibliographic rarity...
The book was printed in a Roman publishing house, but when the
present authorities in Italy, the Christian Democrats,
favourable to Marxism, took note of its publication, the copies
of the thick volume of 617 pages had already been distributed
among the Fathers of the Ecumenical Council. A fact which
produced alarm both in the Vatican government as well as in the
diplomatic world and in parties of the left. For several days
the printing house was visited by the highest police
authorities, who obtained only the statement that the printing
of the book had been ordered, and that the cost of the edition
had been paid in full. The leftist press attacked it
furiously...”
“The exceptional
importance of the book resides principally in one fundamental
element, and that is, whether the book has one or several
authors. Any person of elemental culture can divine that the
compilation has been made by clerics. Naturally, the most
diverse versions have appeared in respect to this matter. There
are those that affirm that they (the authors) were Italian
prelates, in collaboration with elements of English Catholicism;
others speak of a group of priests including some bishops from
an unidentified country of Southern America... This work,
because of the enormous importance of its scrupulous, erudite,
and minutely detailed documentation, is not just one more of
those products of anti-Semitism based on the ‘Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion’ (which are in no way used in the book).
In conclusion, in the pages, in the arguments, and in the style
of the book, is revealed the presence of Catholic clerics, in
battle against the eternal heresy, which has always tended to
subvert the religious, ethical, and historical bases of
Catholicism, employing successively Simon the Magician, Arius,
Nestor, the Albigenses, and in the present day the leftists of
the Ecumenical Council.”
So much for the quotations
of the interesting commentary made about “The Plot Against the
Church” by the Catholic Portuguese newspaper “Agora”.
Nevertheless, the version
predominant in Rome as in the world press, is that the sensational
book was prepared by no more or less than distinguished elements of
the Roman Curia, which is, as is known, the supreme
government of the Church, auxiliary of His Holiness the Pope in
the highest functions. It is repeatedly affirmed that the work “The
Plot Against the Church” is one of the greatest efforts of the
Roman Curia to cause the destruction of those reforms which
the left wing of the Catholic clergy is attempting to bring
about, reforms which, if realized, would completely subvert the
bases on which the Holy Church rests. There are newspapers which
have been even more explicit, which affirm that it was the so-called
“Syndicate of Cardinals” who prepared the book. It is
necessary to explain that the Masons, the communists, and their
accomplices have given the name “Syndicate of Cardinals” to the
heroic group of Cardinals of the Roman Curia who are struggling in
the Second Vatican Council to prevent a group of the
clergy — which in a strange manner is found at the service of
Masonry and communism — from imposing on the Holy Synod a whole
series of theses, subversive, and some heretical, designed to cause
the ruin of the Church. Such ruin will never be consummated, because
it is written: “the gates of Hell shall not prevail against her”,
although the Apocalypse of Saint John also prophesises that such
infernal forces will achieve great temporal triumphs, after which
they will be conquered and destroyed.
So as not to prolong this
Prologue, we will only transcribe in continuation that which an
important Latin American newspaper has to say regarding Masonic and
communist tendencies. We refer to the weekly “Tiempo” published in
Mexico City by Mr. Martin Luiz Guzman, a distinguished
Hierarch of Masonry, who says in referring to the Bishops called
progressive: “The rebellion of the Bishops was considered as the
beginning of heresy by Ottaviani and other Cardinals of the
‘Syndicate’. Even the possibility that the Council would depose the
Pope if it considered him a heretic, was mentioned in ‘L’Osservatore
Romano’. The ‘Syndicate’ (of Cardinals) then published, in October
1962, a libel entitled ‘Plot Against the Church’, having the
pseudonym ‘Maurice Pinay’.” (Number 1119, Volume XIII,
page 60, October 14, 1963). So much for the comment of the above
mentioned newspaper.
What gives this book
definite, provable worth is that it deals with a magnificent and
imposing compilation of documents and sources of undeniable
importance and authenticity, which demonstrates with no room for
doubt the existence of a great conspiracy, which the traditional
enemies of the Church have prepared against Holy Catholic Church,
and against the Free World. These (enemies) are attempting to
convert Catholicism into a blind instrument in the service of
communism, Masonry, and Judaism, in order to weaken free
humanity with it and to facilitate its ruin and, with this ruin, the
definite victory of atheistic communism. The most useful instruments
in this conspiracy are those Catholic clergymen who, betraying Holy
Church, attempt to destroy her most loyal defenders, while at the
same time they assist, in every way they can, Communists, Masons
and Jews in their subversive activities.
In this edition, we attempt
to alert not only Catholics, but also all the anti-communists
of Venezuela and of Latin America, so that they may realize the
grave dangers which at present threaten not only the Catholic
Church, but Christianity and the free world in general, and
so that they may offer all their support to that deserving group of
Cardinals, Archbishops and Bishops who are now fighting in the
Vatican Council and in their respective countries against the
external and internal enemies of the Holy Church and of the free
world; those enemies which, with satanic perseverance, are trying to
destroy the most sacred traditions of Catholicism, and to submerge
us and our children in frightful communist slavery.
THE EDITOR,
Caracas, Venezuela, December 15, 1963.
Part 1:
The Secret
Driving Force of Communism
CHAPTER ONE
COMMUNISM AS DESTROYER
Of all revolutionary
systems, which throughout human history have been devised for the
destruction of our civilised values, Communism is without doubt the
most perfected, most efficient and most merciless. In fact it
represents the most advanced epoch of the world revolution, in whose
postulates it therefore not only acts to destroy a definite
political, social, economic or moral institution, but also
simultaneously to declare null and void the Holy Catholic Church as
well as all cultural and Christian manifestations which represent
our civilisation.
All revolutionary currents
of Jewish origin have attacked Christianity in its different aspects
with particular one-mindedness. Communism, spawned from this same
revolutionary stream of thought, seeks to banish Christianity for
the purpose of causing it to vanish from the face of the earth,
without even the slightest trace remaining. The destructive fury of
this satanic striving, which brings before the eyes of the world the
most terrible pictures of terror and destruction which are possible
to imagine, can only be based on the essence of Nihilism and the
most evil, hate-filled rejection of everything hitherto existing.
For otherwise, one would not be able to understand the indescribable
insanity of its criminal acts and the spirit of destruction, of
annihilation, of insult, of contradiction and of resistance by its
leading personalities against everything, which represents
fundamental features not only of Catholicism but of religion in
general.
The purpose of Communism is,
as we have indeed seen in Russia and in the other lands where it has
been introduced, none other than to enslave the people in the
economic, political, social, human and super-human sense, in order
to make possible a minority rule through violence. From an
international aspect, the goal cannot be clearer:
“To attain through violence
world domination by an insignificant minority, which destroys the
rest of humanity by means of materialism, terror and, if necessary,
by death, completely indifferent to whether in the process the
enormous majority of the population must be murdered.”
The urge to murder, which
has characterised the leading Soviet personages, is known well
throughout the world. There are few, who upon learning of the bloody
purges, which have been undertaken by the Marxists in Russia, will
not be seized by shudders of horror. One needs only to recall a few
details to fill the most stout hearts with fear and alarm.
“In its beginnings the
Red Terror strove above all to exterminate the Russian
Intelligentsia.”1
As proof of this assertion S.P. Melgunow affirms the following, in
which he refers to the “Special Committees”, which appeared in
Russia in the first period of the Social revolution:
“The special committees are
not organs of law, but of merciless extermination according to the
decisions of the Communist Central Committee. The special committee
is neither a commission of investigation nor a court of justice, but
itself determines its own powers. It is an instrument of battle,
which acts on the internal front of the civil war. It does not
pardon whoever stands on the other side of the barricades, but kills
them.
“It is not difficult
to form ideas of how in reality this extermination proceeds, when in
place of the nullified legal code only the revolutionary experience
and conscience command. This conscience is subjective and experience
allows complete free play to the will, which always, according to
the position of the judge, takes on more or less furious forms.”2
“Let us not carry on
war against individual persons” – wrote Latsis – “but let us
exterminate the Bourgeoisie as a class. Do not investigate, through
study of documents and proofs, what the accused has done in words
and deeds against the Soviet authority. The first question to be
placed before him runs as to what class he belongs to, what is his
origin, his education, his training and his profession.”3
During the bloody
dictatorship of Lenin, the Committee of Investigation under Rohrberg
(Rohrberg, C.), which after the capture of Kiev entered this city
with the White volunteers in August 1919, reported the following:
“The entire concrete floor
of the large garage (this was the place where the provincial Cheka
of Kiev had carried out executions) was swimming in blood, which did
not flow but formed a layer of several inches; it was a grisly
mixture of blood with brain and skull fragments, as well as strands
of hair and other human remains. The entire walls, holed by
thousands of bullets, were spattered with blood, and fragments of
brain as well as head skin adhered to them.
“A drain ditch of 25 cm
width and 25 cm deep and about 10 m long ran from the middle of the
garage to a nearby room, where there was a subterranean outlet pipe.
This drain ditch was filled to the top with blood.
“Usually, immediately
after the massacre, the corpses were removed in lorries or
horse-drawn wagons from the city and buried in a mass grave. In the
corner of a garden we came upon an older mass grave, which contained
about 80 corpses, in which we discovered signs of the most varied
and unimaginable cruelties and mutilation. There were corpses from
which the entrails had been removed; others had different limbs
amputated and others again were cut into pieces. Some had had the
eyes poked out, while the head, the face, the neck and the torso
were covered with deep wounds. Further on we found a corpse with an
axe in the breast, while others had no tongues. In a corner of the
mass grave we discovered many legs and arms severed from the trunk.”4
The enormous number of
corpses, which have already been laid to the account of Communist
Socialism and which increase terrifyingly all the while, will
perhaps never be exactly known, but it exceeds everything
imaginable. It is not possible to learn the exact number of the
victims. All estimates lie below the real figure.”
In the Edinburgh newspaper
“The Scotsman” of 7th November, 1923, Professor Sarolea gave the
following figures:
“28 Bishops; 1,219 priests;
6,000 Professors and teachers; 9,000 doctors; 54,000 Officers;
260,000 soldiers; 70,000 Policemen; 12,950 estate owners; 355,250
intellectuals and of the free professions; 193,290 workers and
215,000 peasants.”
The Information
Committee of Denikin on the Bolshevistic intrigue during the years
1918-1919 records in a treatise about the Red Terror in these two
years “one million, seven hundred thousand victims.”5
In the “Roul” of 3rd August 1923, Kommin makes the following
observation:
“During the winter of 1920
there existed in the USSR, 52 governments with 52 Special Committees
(Chekas), 52 Special Departments and 52 revolutionary courts.
Besides countless subsidiary Chekas, transport-networks, courts on
the railways as well as troops for internal security, there were
mobile courts, which were dispatched to mass executions in the
places concerned.”
To this list of courts of
torture must be added the special departments, i.e., 16 army and
divisional courts. All in all one must estimate 1000 torture
chambers. If it is borne in mind that at that time district
committees also existed in addition, then the number rises further.
In addition the number of governments of the USSR increased.
Siberia, the Crimea and the Far East were conquered. The number of
Chekas grew in geometrical ratio.
According to Soviet data (in
the year 1920 when the terror had still not ebbed and the reporting
of news was not restricted) it is possible to establish an average
figure for every court; the curve of executions rises from one to
fifty (in the great cities) and up to one hundred in the regions
recently conquered by the Red Army. The crisis of terror was
periodic and then ceased; in this manner one can daily estimate the
(modest) figure of five victims..., which, multiplied with the
thousand courts, gives a result of five thousand, and thus for the
year roughly one and a half million. We recall this indescribable
slaughter, not because in its totality it was either the most
numerous or the most merciless to arise from the special situation
and inflamed passions consequent on the first victories of the
Bolshevist revolution, but because today, forty-five years after
these mass executions took place, all this might otherwise be
obliterated from the present Communist picture, even for the persons
who were contemporaries of the events and who today, still alive,
have forgotten those tragedies with the ease with which people
forget not only unpleasant events which do not directly concern
them, but even those to which they fell victim.
Unhappily, time has
shown us a truly demonic excess of Communism in its murderous
activity, about which we give no details and do not present the
monstrous statistics because all this is known to us. Several of
these cruel bloodbaths have only taken place recently, so that one
still seems to hear the lament of the persecuted, the death-rattle
of the dying and the dumb, the terrible and haunting complaint of
the corpses.6
It may suffice to recall the
recent giant bloodbaths in Hungary, Poland, East Germany and Cuba as
well as the earlier mass killings by Stalin and the annihilation of
millions of Chinese through the Communist regime of Mao-Tse-Tung.
But also the Communist attempts at revolution, which failed to
achieve lasting permanence, such as that of Bela Kun who occupied
Hungary in such a brutal way in the middle of 1919; of Spain in
1936, where the Bolsheviks gained control of Madrid and parts of the
Spanish provinces and murdered more than 16,000 priests, monks and
nuns, as well as 12 Bishops; further the happily unsuccessful
attempt in Germany, its most successful realisation in the Red
Republic of Bavaria in the year 1919. All these attempts were in
fact orgies of 1918, which was directed by Hugo Haase, and which had
blood and unrestrained bestiality.
One must also not
forget that this Apocalyptic storm, which brings a flood of corpses,
blood and tears, falls upon the world with the sole goal: to destroy
not only the Catholic Church but the entire Christian civilisation.7
Before this shattering picture the world asks itself with heavy
heart: who can hate our Christian features in such a form and try to
destroy them with such Godless fury? Who has become capable of
instigating this bloody mechanics of annihilation? Who can with such
insensitivity direct and order this monstrous criminal process? And
reality answers us completely without doubt that the [Bolshevik]
Jews are those responsible, as will later be proved.
CHAPTER TWO
THE CREATORS OF THE
SYSTEM
There is absolutely no
doubt, that the Jews are the inventors of Communism; for they have
been the instigators of the dogma, upon which that monstrous system
is built, which at present with absolute power rules the greatest
part of Europe and Asia, which stirs up the lands of America and
with progressive certainty floods over all Christian peoples of the
world like a deadly cancerous growth, like a tumour, which steadily
devours the core of the free nations, without apparently an
effective means of cure being found against this disease.
But the Jews are also the
inventors and directors of the Communist methods, of effective
tactics of struggle, of the insensitive and totally inhuman
government policy and of aggressive international strategy. It is a
completely proven fact that the Communist theoreticians were all
Jews, unheeded of what system the Jews lastingly use, as well as the
theoreticians and the experienced revolutionaries, which has veiled
from the eyes of the people, where they lived, their true origin.
1. Karl Heinrich Marx was a
German Jew, whose real name was Kissel Mordekay, born in Trier,
Rhineland, son of a Jewish lawyer. Before his famous work “Das
Kapital” which contains the fundamental idea of theoretical
Communism, whose concepts he strove with inexhaustible activity up
to his death in the year 1887 to spread over the world, he had
written and published with the Jew Engels in the year 1848 the
Communist Manifesto in London; between 1843 and 1847 he had
formulated in England the first modern interpretation of Hebrew
Nationalism in his articles, as in the publication in the year 1844
in the periodical “Deutsch-Franzosische Jahrbücher” (German-French
Year Books) under the title “Concerning the Jewish question”, which
shows an ultra-national tendency.
2. Friedrich Engels, creator
of the “First International”, and close collaborator of Marx, was a
Jew and born in Bremen (Germany). His father was a Jewish cotton
merchant of the city. Engels died in the year 1894.
3. Karl Kautski, whose real
name was Kraus, was the author of the book “The Beginnings of
Christianity”, in which he mainly combats the principles of
Christianity. He was the most important interpreter of Karl Marx and
in 1887 published “The Economic Doctrine of Karl Marx Made
Intelligible for All.” “The Bloodbath of Chisinaw and the Jewish
Question”, in the year 1903, “The Class Struggle”, which for Mao-Tse-Tung
in China was the fundamental book for Communist instruction; and the
work with the title “The Vanguard of Socialism”, in the year 1921.
He was also the author of the “Socialist Programme” from
Erfurt/Germany. This Jew was born in the year 1854 in Prague and
died in 1938 in the Hague (Holland).
4. Ferdinand Lassalle, Jew,
born in the year 1825 in Breslau. He had interfered in the
democratic revolution of 1848. In the year 1863 he published his
work entitled “Open Answers”, in which he outlined a plan of
revolution for the German workers. Since then he worked tirelessly
for a “Socialist” crusade, which was directed at the rebellion of
the workers. For this purpose he published a further work under the
title “Capital and Labour.”
5. Eduard Bernstein. A Jew
born in Berlin in the year 1850. His principal works are
“Assumptions concerning Socialism”, “Forward, Socialism”, “Documents
of Socialism”, “History and Theory of Socialism”, “Social Democracy
of Today in Theory and Practice”, “The Duties of Social Democracy”,
and “German Revolution”. In all his writings he expounds the
Communist teaching and bases it on the views of Marx. In the year
1918 he became Finance minister of the German Socialist state,
which, however, could fortunately only maintain itself a few months.
6. Jacob Lastrow, Max
Hirsch, Edgar Loening, Wirschauer, Babe, Schatz, David Ricardo and
many other writers of theoretical Communism were Jews. In all lands
are found writers, almost exclusively Jewish, who preach Communism
to the masses, although with many opportunities they strive to give
the appearance in their writings of a feeling of humanity and
brotherhood. We have indeed already seen in practice what this
means.8
However theoretical all Jews
mentioned may have been, they were not satisfied with setting up the
doctrinaire bases, but each one of them was an experienced
revolutionary, who busied himself in whatever particular land he
found himself, to factually prepare the upheaval, to direct or to
give it support. As leaders or members of revolutionary associations
known only to one another, they took more and more active part in
the development or Bolshevism. But apart from these Jews, who in the
main were regarded as theoreticians, we find that almost all
materialist leaders, who develop Communist tactics, also belong to
the same race and carry out their task with the greatest efficacy.
As indisputable examples two
movements of this type can be recorded:
A) In the year 1918 Germany
was showpiece of a Communist, Jew directed revolution. The Red
Councils of the republic of Munich was Jewish, as its instigators
prove: Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg, Kurt Eisner and many others. With
the fall of the monarchy the Jews gained control of the country and
the German government. With Ministers of State Haase and Landsberg
appear Kautsky, Kohn and Herzfeld. The Finance minister was likewise
a Jew, had his racial fellow Bernstein as assistant and the minister
of the Interior, likewise a Jew, and sought the collaboration of his
racial brother, Doctor Freund, who helped him in his work.
Kurt Eisner, the President
of the Bavarian Councils Republic, was the instigator of the
Bolshevist revolution in Munich.
“Eleven little men
made the revolution”, said Kurt Eisner in the intoxication of
triumph to his colleague, the Minister Auer. It is no more than
right to preserve the unforgettable memory of these little men, who
were, in fact, the Jews Max Lowenberg, Doctor Kurt Rosenfeld, Caspar
Wollheim, Max Rothschild, Carl Arnold, Kranold, Rosenhek, Birnbaum,
Reis and Kaisser. These ten with Kurt Eisner van Israelowitsch led
the presidency of the Revolutionary court of Germany. All eleven
were Freemasons and belonged to the secret lodge N.° which had its
seat in Munich at No. 51 Briennerstrasse.9
The first cabinet of Germany
in the year 1918 was composed of Jews.
1. Preuss,
Minister of the Interior.
2. Freund, Minister of the Interior.
3. Landsberg, Finance Minister.
4. Karl Kautski, Finance Minister.
5. Schiffer, Finance Minister.
6. Eduard Bernstein, secretary of the State Treasury.
7. Fritz Max Cohen, director of the official information
service. (This Jew was earlier correspondent of the Jewish
“Frankfurter Zeitung”).
The second “German Socialist
government” of 1918 was formed of the following Jews:
1. Hirsch,
Minister of the Interior.
2. Rosenfeld, Justice Minister.
3. Futran, Minister of education.
4. Arndt, Minister of education.
5. Simon, State secretary of finances.
6. Kastenberg, director of the department of science and art.
7. Strathgen, director of colonial department.
9. Wurm, secretary of food.
10. Merz, Weil, Katzenstein, Stern, Lowenberg, Frankel,
Schlesinger, Israelowitz, Selingsohn, Laubenheim, etc., took up
high posts in the ministries.
Among the remaining Jews who
controlled the sectors vital to life of the German state, which had
been defeated through the American intervention in the war, were
found in the year 1918, and later:
1. Kohen,
President of the German workers and soldiers councils (similar
to the Soviet council of soldiers and workers of Moscow in the
same year).
2. Ernst, police president of Berlin.
3. Sinzheimer, police president of Frankfurt.
4. Lewy, police president of Hessen.
5. Kurt Eisner, Bavarian state president.
6. Jaffe Bavarian finance minister.
7. Brentano, Industry, trade and transport minister.
8. Talheimer, minister in Württemberg.
9. Heimann, another minister in Württemberg.
10. Fulda, in the government of Hesse.
11. Theodor Wolf, chief editor of the newspaper “Berliner
Tageblatt.”
12. Gwiner, director of the “Deutsche Bank”.10
B) Hungary in the year
1919. On 20th March 1919 the Jew Bela Kun (Cohn) took over power in
Hungary and proclaimed the Hungarian Soviet republic, which from
that moment on was submerged in a hair-raising sea of blood.
Twenty-eight (28) Commissars formed with him the new government and
of these 18 were Israelites. That is an unheard of proportion, when
one bears in mind that in Hungary lived one and a half million
Israelites compared to 22 million inhabitants. The 18 Commissars
held the actual control of rulership in their hands and the eight
Gentile Commissars could do nothing against them.11
“More than 90% of the
members of the government and the confidence men of Bela Kun were
also Jews. Here follows a list of members of the Bela Kun
government:
1. Bela Kun,
general secretary of the Jewish government.
2. Sandor Garbai, “official” president of the government, who
was used by the Jews as a Hungarian man of straw.
3. Peter Agoston, deputy of the general secretary; Jew.
4. Dr. E. Landler, Peoples commissar for internal affairs; Jew.
5. Bela Vago, deputy of Landler, a Jew with the name Weiss.
6. E. Hamburger, Agriculture Commissar; Jew.
7. Vantus, deputy of Hamburger; Jew.
8. Csizmadia, deputy of Hamburger; Hungarian.
9. Nyisztor, deputy of Hamburger; Hungarian.
10 Varga, Commissar for financial affairs; Jew by name
Weichselbaum.
11. Szkely, deputy of Varga; Jew by name Schlesinger.
12. Kunftz, Education minister; Jew by name Kunstater.
13. Kukacs, deputy of Kunfi; a Jew, who in reality was chilled
Lowinger and was the son of the director-general of a banking
house in Budapest.
14. D. Bokanyi, Minister of labour; Hungarian.
15. Fiedler, deputy of Bokanyi; Jew.
16. Jozsef Pogany, War Commissar; a Jew, who in reality was
called Schwartz.
17. Szanto, deputy of Pogany; a Jew named Schreiber.
18. Tibor Szamuelly, deputy of Pogany, a Jew named Samuel.
19. Matyas Rakosi, trade Minister; a Jew, who in reality was
called Matthew Roth Rosenkrantz, present Communist dictator.
20. Ronai, Commissar of law; a Jew named Rosentstegl.
21. Ladai, deputy of Ronai; Jew.
22. Erdelyi, Commissar of supply; a Jew named Eisenstein.
23. Vilmas Boehm, Socialisation Commissar; Jew.
24. Hevesi, deputy of Boehm; a Jew named Honig.
25. Dovsak, second deputy of Boehm; Jew.
26. Oszkar Jaszai, Commissar of nationalities; a Jew named
Jakubovits.
27. Otto Korvin, political examining Commissar; a Jew named
Klein.
28. Kerekes, state lawyer; a Jew named Krauss.
29. Biro, chief of the political police; a Jew named Blau.
30. Seidem, adjutant of Biro; Jew.
31. Oszkar Faber, Commissar for liquidation of Church property;
Jew.
32. J. Czerni, commander of the terrorist bands, which were
known by the name “Lenin youth”; Hungarain.
33. Illes, supreme police Commissar; Jew.
34. Szabados, supreme police Commissar; a Jew named Singer.
35. Kalmar, supreme police Commissar; German Jew.
36. Szabo, supreme police Commissar; Ruthenian Jew, who in
reality was called Schwarz.
37. Vince, Peoples Commissar of the city of Budapest, who in
reality was called Weinstein.
38. M. Kraus, Peoples Commissar of Budapest; Jew.
39. A. Dienes, Peoples Commissar of Budapest; Jew.
40. Lengyel, President of the Austro-Hungarian bank; a Jew named
Levkovits.
41. Laszlo, President of the Communist revolutionary court; a
Jew, who in reality was called Lowy.12
In this government which for
a time held Hungary in thrall, the chief of the Hungarian Cheka
Szamuelly, besides Bela Kun, distinguished himself through countless
crimes and plunderings. While the latter rode through the land in
his luxury automobile (with the symbol of a large gallows mounted on
the vehicle, and accompanied by his capable Jewish woman secretary
R. S. Salkind, alias Semliachkay), the former travelled through
Hungary in his special train and sowed terror and death, as a
contemporary witness describes:
“That train of death
travelled snorting through the black Hungarian nights; where it
stopped, one saw people hanging from trees and blood which ran on
the ground. Along the railway line naked and mutilated corpses were
to be seen. Szamuelly dictated his judgements in his train, and
whoever was forced to enter never lived to tell the tale of what he
saw. Szamuelly lived constantly in this train. Thirty selected
terrorists ensured his security. Selected executioners accompanied
him. The train consisted of two saloon wagons, two first-class
wagons, which were occupied by the terrorists, and two third-class
wagons for the victims. In the latter executions were carried out.
The floor of this wagon was stiff with blood. The corpses were
thrown out of the windows, while Szamuelly sat comfortably in the
elegant workroom of his compartment which was upholstered in rose-coloured
damask and decorated with polished mirrors. With a movement of the
hand he decided over life or death.”13
CHAPTER THREE
THE HEAD OF COMMUNISM
There exists therefore not
the slightest doubt, that the Marxist theory (Communism) is a Jewish
work, just as is also its every action, which aims at putting this
doctrine into practice.
Before the final
establishing of Bolshevism in Russia the directors and organisers of
all Communist movements in their entirety were almost solely Jews,
just as the great majority of the true organisers of the revolutions
were to which they gave the impetus. But in Russia, as the first
land where Bolshevism finally triumphed, and where it was and still
is the fulcrum or driving force for the Communising of the world,
the Jewish paternity of the system of organisation and of Soviet
praxis also allows no doubt or error. According to the irrefutable
data, which has been fully and completely proved and recognised by
all impartial writers who have dealt with this theme, the Communist
work of the Jews in the land of the Czars is so powerful that it
would be useless to deny this disastrous triumph as their monopoly.
It suffices to recall the
names of those who have formed the governments and the principal
leading organs in the Soviet Union, in order to know what one has
immediately to think of the clear and categorical proof of the
evidence.
I - MEMBERS OF THE
FIRST COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT OF MOSCOW (1918)
(Council of Peoples Commissars)
1. Ilich Ulin
(Vladimir Ilich Ulianov or Nikolaus Lenin). President of the
Supreme Soviet, Jew on mother’s side. His mother was called
Blank, a Jewess of German origin.
2. Lew Davinovich Bronstein (Leo Trotsky), Commissar for the Red
Army and the Navy; Jew.
3. Iosiph David Vissarionovich Djugashvili-Kochba (Joseph
Vissarianovich Stalin), Nationalities Commissar; descendant of
Jews from Georgia.
4. Chicherin; Commissar for foreign affairs; Russian.
5. Apfelbaum (Grigore Zinoviev), Commissar for internal affairs;
Jew.
6. Kohen (Volodarsky), Commissar for press and propaganda; Jew.
7. Samuel Kaufmann, Commissar for the landed property of the
State; Jew.
8. Steinberg, law Commissar; Jew.
9. Schmidt, Commissar for public works; Jew.
10. Ethel Knigkisen (Liliana), Commissar for supply, Jewess.
11. Pfenigstein, Commissar for the settlement of refugees; Jew.
12. Schlichter (Vostanoleinin) Commissar for billetings
(confiscation of private houses for the Reds); Jew.
13. Lurie (Larin), President of the supreme economic council;
Jew.
14. Kukor (Kukorsky), Trade Commissar; Jew.
15. Spitzberg, Culture Commissar; Jew.
16. Urisky (Radomilsky), Commissar for “elections”; Jew.
17. Lunacharsky, Commissar for public schools. Russian.
18. Simasko, Commissar for health; Jew.
19. Protzian, Agriculture Commissar; Armenian.
In the
Appendix at
the end of this volume can be found the interesting and illustrative
lists of the Jewish officials in all the government bodies of the
Soviet Union, the Communist Party, the Red Army, the Secret Police,
the trade unions, etc.
Of a total of 502 offices of
first rank in the organisation and direction of the Communist
revolution in Russia and in the direction of the Soviet State during
the first years of its existence, no less than 459 posts are
occupied by Jews, while only 43 of these offices have been occupied
by Gentiles of different origin. Who then has accordingly carried
out this terrible revolution? The Gentiles perhaps? Another
statistic, which was published in Paris by the counter-revolutionary
newspaper “Le Russe Nationaliste”, after the victory of the Jewish
Communists in Russia, reveals that of 554 Communist leaders of first
rank in different offices the racial composition was as follows:
| Jews |
447 |
| Lithuanians |
43 |
| Russians |
30 |
| Armenians |
13 |
| Germans |
12 |
| Finns |
3 |
| Poles |
2 |
| Georgians |
2 |
| Czechs |
1 |
| Hungarians |
1 |
During the Second World War,
and from then on up to our present time, the Jewish clique which
rules the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, continues to be very
numerous, for at the head of the names stands Stalin himself, who
for a long time was regarded as a Georgian of pure descent. But it
has been revealed that he belongs to the Jewish race; for
Djougachvili, which is his surname, means “Son of Djou”, and Djou is
a small island in Persia, whither many banished Portuguese “Gypsies”
migrated, who later settled in Georgia.
Today it is almost
completely proved that Stalin had Jewish blood, although he neither
confirmed nor denied the rumours, about which mutterings began in
this direction.14
Let us look at a list of the
Soviet officials in the government of Stalin:
1. Zdanov
(Yadanov), who in reality was called Liphshitz, foriner
commander in the defence of Leningrad during the 2nd world war.
Member of the Politbüro up to 1945 and one of the instigators of
the decision which excluded Tito from the Cominform in the year
1948 and who shortly afterwards died.
2. Lavrenty
Beria, Chief of the M.V.D. Police and of Soviet heavy industry,
member of the Soviet Atom industry, who was executed upon orders
of Malenkov, and in fact for the same reason for which Stalin
liquidated Yagoda.
3. Lazar
Kaganovich, director of Soviet heavy industry, member of the
Politburo from 1944 to 1952, then member of the Presidium and at
present President of the Supreme Presidium of the USSR.
4. Malenkov (Georgi
Maximilianovich Molenk), member of the Politburo and Orgburo
until 1952, then member of the Supreme Presidium, President of
the Ministerial Council after the death of Stalin; Minister in
the government of Bulganin since 1955. He is a Jew from
Ornsenburg, not a Cossack, as is asserted. The name of his
father, Maximilian Malenk, is typical for a Russian Jew. In
addition there is a very important detail, which reveals the
true origin of Malenkov and also of Khrushchev. The present wife
of Malenkov is the Jewess Pearlmutter, known as “Comrade Schans
chuschne” who was Minister (Commissar) for the fish industry in
the Soviet government in the year 1938. If Malenkov had not been
a Jew, it is extremely unlikely that he would have married a
Jewess, and the latter would also not have married him. There
exists no official description of the life of Malenkov. This is
certainly to be attributed to the fact that he does not want his
Jewish origin to be discovered.
5. Nikolaus
Salomon Khrushchev, present chief (1963) of the Soviet Communist
party, member of the Politburo since 1939, i.e. since the year
when Malenkov was chosen member of the Orgburo. He is the
brother of Madame Malenkov, i.e. of the Jewess Pearlmutter.
Khrushchev is a Jew and his real name is Pearlmutter. Also, the
present wife of Khrushchev, Nina, as well as the wives of
Mikoyan, Voroshilov, Molotov, etc., are Jewesses.
6. Marshal
Nikolaus Bulganin, at present first Soviet minister, former bank
official, was one of the ten Jewish members of the Commissariat
for the liquidation of private banks in the year 1919.
7. Anastasio
Josifovich Mikoyan, member of the Politburo since 1935, member
of the Supreme Presidium since 1952, Trade Minister and
Vice-president in the Malenkov government. He is an Armenian Jew
and not a true Armenian as is believed.
8. Kruglov,
chief of the M.V.D. after Beria. Upon command of Kruglov the
imprisoned Jewish doctors were released who had been imprisoned
by Riumin, sub-chief of the police, during the rulership of
Beria, in the year 1953. Likewise Jew.
9. Alexander
Kosygin, member of the Politburo up to 1952, afterwards deputy
in the Supreme Presidium and Minister for light industry and
food in the Malenkov government.
10. Nikolaus
Schvernik, member of the Politburo up to 1952, then member of
the Supreme Presidium and member of the Presidium of the Central
Committee of the Communist party; Jew.
11. Andreas
Andreievich Andreiev, who was known as the “Politbureaucrat” of
3 A, member of the Politburo between 1931 and 1952, Jew from
Galicia (Poland). He writes under a Russian pseudonym.
12. P. K.
Ponomareno, member of the Orgburo in the year 1952; afterwards
member of the highest Presidium and culture minister in the
Malenkov government.
13. P. F. Yudin
(Jew), deputy member of the highest Presidium and titulary of
the Ministry for building material in the Malenkov government in
the year 1953.
14. Mihail
Pervukin, member of the Presidium of the central committee of
the Communist party since 1953.
15. N.
Schatalin, official in the sub-secretariat of the Central
Committee of the Community Party.
16. K. P.
Gorschenin, Justice minister in the government of Malenkov.
17. D. Ustinov
(Zambinovich), Soviet ambassador in Athens (Greece) up to the
second world war; defence minister in the Malenkov government.
18. V. Merkulov,
Minister for state control at the time of Malenkov.
19. A. Zasyadko,
Minister for the coal industry under Malenkov.
20. Cherburg,
Soviet propaganda chief.
21. Milstein.
one of the Soviet espionage chiefs.
22. Ferentz
Kiss, Chief of the Soviet espionage service in Europe.
23.
Postschreibitscher (Poschebicheve), former private secretary of
Stalin, at present chief of the secret archives of the Kremlin.
24. Ilya
Ehrenburg, delegate for Moscow in the Supreme Soviet, Communist
writer; likewise Jew.
25. Mark Spivak,
delegate from Stalino (Ukraine) in the Supreme Soviet of Moscow.
26. Rosalia
Goldenberg, delegate from Birobudjan in the Supreme Soviet.
27. Anna E.
Kaluger, delegate of Bessarabia in the Supreme Soviet, Her
brother, not Koluger, but Calugaru in Rumanian, is a Communist
official in the government of Rumania.
Also
Kalinin, one of the great Soviet officials under Stalin who died
some time ago, was a Jew.15
It is only too well known,
that the Anti-Semitism of Stalin was a misrepresentation of the
facts, and that the blood bath among the Jews (Trotskyists) which he
carried out in order to assert his power, was performed by other
Jews. In the last instance the struggle between the Jew Trotsky and
the Jew Stalin was a struggle between parties for control over the
Communist government, which they created, it was purely a family
dispute. As proof, the following list of Commissars for Foreign
Affairs, during the period when Stalin got rid of some certain Jews,
who had become dangerous for his personal power.
1. Maxim
Maximovich Litvinoff, Minister for Foreign Affairs up to 1939,
when he was replaced by Molotov. He afterwards occupied high
offices in the same ministry up to his death in February 1952.
He was born in Poland as son of the Jew Meer Genokh Moiseevich
Vallakh, a bank clerk. In order to conceal his real name Maxim
Moiseevich Vallakh, Litvinoff used various pseudonyms during his
real career, among them Finkelstein, Ludwig Nietz, Maxim
Harryson, David Mordecay, Felix, and finally, when he became an
official in the Communist regime of Russia, he took on the name
of Litvinoff or Litvinov. When this Jew was replaced by Molotov
in the Year 1939, the Jews of the western world and the entire
Jewish-Freemasonic press began to cry out that he had been
removed by Stalin because he was a “Jew”, but they kept quiet
afterwards concerning the fact that up to his death Litvinov
remained in the ministry. Why also say this, if it was not of
interest for the conspiracy? In the Memoirs of Litvinov, which
were published after his death, he wrote that in his opinion
nothing would alter in Soviet Russia after the death of Stalin.
In fact, Stalin died a year after Litvinov and nothing was
altered in the Soviet’s internal and external policies.
What the West calls change
in the policy of the USSR, is simply nothing further than a skilled
propaganda for the necessities of the plan for world rule through
the Jews. Nothing has altered since the death of Stalin. A certain
unrest may have arisen on account of the lack of a new leader of the
stature of Stalin or Lenin, that is all. For this reason the
Jewish-Freemasonic conspirators of the West wish to paint the
Soviet-Communist black raven over with the glittering colours of
“Pacifism”, “Coexistence”, “Human friendliness”, etc., in order to
introduce it to the world as something harmless, until a dictator
with the same lusts of his predecessors arises.
When Litvinov asserted that
nothing would alter with the death or Stalin, he knew very well,
that this would be so, because Stalin was nothing more than one of
the handymen of the Jewish band, which rules the USSR, and because
after him other Jews would be at hand, to carry on the plan of world
domination, for which Bulganin, Baruch, Reading, Thorez, Mendes
France, David Ben Gurion and many others are cooperating.
In continuing the list of
Jews in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the USSR, we mention:
2. Andreas
Januarevich Vishinsky, now dead, who was foreign minister of the
USSR before the death of Stalin and afterwards permanent
representative of the Soviet Union in the UNO. There he missed
no opportunity to sling his obscenities against the
non-Communist lands, exactly as in the times when he was
“Peoples Judge.” His Jewish name was Abraham Januarevin.
3. Jakob Malik,
Soviet representative in the UNO and a great personality in the
Soviet diplomatic hierarchy; Jew.
4. Valerian
Zorin, for a time ambassador in London and likewise a great
figure of Soviet diplomacy, who changes his post according to
necessity.
5. Andrei
Gromyko, diplomat, Minister for foreign affairs since 1958.
6. Alexander
Panyushkin, former Soviet ambassador in Washington, ambassador
in Peking during the year 1955, who is regarded as the actual
dictator of Red China.
7. Zambinovich
(Ustinov), ambassador in Athens up to 1940.
8. Admiral
Radionovich, ambassador in Athens between 1945 and 1946, i.e.,
as the Communist coup d’état in Greece was prepared; Jew.
9. Constantin
Umansky, ambassador in Washington during the Second World War
and afterwards official in the Ministry for foreign affairs in
Moscow.
10. Manuilsky,
former representative in the Ukraine and in the UNO, at present
President of the Ukraine; likewise Jew.
11. Ivan
Maisky, ambassador in London during the war, afterwards high
official of the Foreign Ministry in Moscow.
12. Madame
Kolontay, ambassador in Stockholm until her death in March 1952;
Jewess.
13. Daniel
Solod, ambassador in Cairo in the year 1955. The latter,
supported by a Jewish group which belongs to the diplomatic
corps in Cairo, directs the Israelite conspiracy inside the Arab
world under Soviet diplomatic protection, without the Egyptian
government noticing this. This government should not forget that
David Ben Gurion, first minister of Israel, as well as Golda
Meyerson, Israel’s Minister in Moscow, are Russian Jews like
David Solod.
At present, according to
confirmed data, 80% to 90% of the key positions in all ministries in
Moscow and the remaining Soviet republics are occupied by Jews.
“I do not believe that
there can be any doubt of the origin of all those who occupy the
highest posts in Moscow since the first moment of the revolution;
for the Russians it is a lamentable fact that after all this course
of time things are much worse, for the number of Jews who live in
Russia has increased in frightening degree. All important leading
positions are in their hands...”16
As in Russia the countries
of Europe where Bolshevism has gained control, are also completely
ruled by a Jewish minority; the latter always appears in the
direction of the Communist government with an iron, criminal and
merciless hand, so as to attain the utter enslaving of the native
citizens through an insignificant group of Jews.
More convincing than any
other proof is an exact surveying of the most principal leaders of
the Bolshevist governments of Europe, which are always found in the
hands of the Israelites. We will quote the most principal ones:
A - HUNGARY
1. The most
important Communist leader since the occupation of this land by
Soviet troops is Mathias Rakosi, an Israelite, whose real name
is Mathew Roth Rosenkranz, and who was born in the year 1892 in
Szabadka.
2. Ferenk
Münnich, First Minister in Hungary in the year 1959 after Janos
Kadar.
3. Erno Gero,
Minister of the Interior until 1954.
4. Szebeni,
Minister of the Interior before the Jew Gero.
5. General
Laszlo Kiros, Jew, Minister of Interior since July 1954,
simultaneously chief of the A.V.O., i.e. the Hungarian police,
which corresponds to the Soviet M.V.D.
6. General
Peter Gabor, chief of the Communist political police of Hungary
up to 1953, a Jew, who in reality was called Benjamin Ausspitz
and was earlier a tailor in Satorai-Jeujhely, Hungary.
7. Varga, State
secretary for economic planning; a Jew, who in reality is called
Weichselbaum; former Minister of the Bela Kun government. He was
also President of the supreme economic council.
8. Beregi,
Minister for foreign affairs.
9. Julius Egry,
Agriculture minister of the Hungarian Peoples Republic.
10. Zoltan Vas,
President of the supreme economic council; a Jew, who in reality
was called Weinberger.
11. Josef Reval,
the editor of the Hungarian press and director of the Red
newspaper “Szabad Nep” (The Free People); a Jew; who is really
called Moses Kahana.
12. Revai
(another), Minister for national education; a Jew named
Rabinovits.
13. Josef Gero,
transport minister; a Jew named Singer.
14. Mihaly
Farkas, Minister for national defence; a Jew named Freedman.
15. Veres,
Minister of State.
16. Vajda,
Minister of State.
17. Szanto,
Commissar for purging of enemies of the State, in the year 1951
sent by Moscow; a Jew named Schreiber; former member of the Bela
Kun government.
18. Guyla
Dessi, Justice Minister up to 1955; today chief of the secret
police.
19. Emil Weil,
Hungarian ambassador in Washington; he is the Jewish doctor who
tortured Cardinal Mindszenty.
Among other
important Jewish officials to be mentioned are:
1. Imre
Szirmay, director of the Hungarian radio company.
2. Gyula Garay,
judge of the Communist “Peoples court of Budapest.”
3. Colonel
Caspo, Sub-chief of the secret police.
4. Professor
Laszlo Benedek, Jewish dictator for educational questions.
The sole
important Communist of Gentile origin was the Freemason Laszlo
Rajk, former minister for foreign affairs, who was sentenced and
executed by his Jewish “brothers” for his “betrayal.”
B - CZECHOSLOVAKIA
1. Clemens
Gottwald, one of the founders of the Communist party in
Czechoslovakia and president of the country between 1948 and
1953; a Jew, who died shortly after Stalin.
2. Vladimir
Clementis, former Communist minister of Czechoslovakia for
foreign affairs, “sentenced and executed” in the year 1952; Jew.
3. Vaclav
David, present foreign minister of Czechoslovakia (1955); Jew.
4. Rudolf
Slaski, former general secretary of the Communist party of
Czechoslovakia, “sentenced” in the year 1952; a Jew by name of
Rudolf Salzmann.
5. Firi
Hendrich, present general secretary of the Communist party; Jew.
6. Andreas
Simon, sentenced in the year 1952; a Jew named Otto Katz.
7. Gustav
Bares, assistant of the general secretary of the Communist
party; Jew.
8. Josef Frank,
former assistant of the general secretary of the Communist
party, “sentenced” in the year 1952; Jew.
C - POLAND
1. Boleislaw
Bierut, President of Poland up to 1954; Jew.
2. Jakob
Berman, general secretary of the Communist party of Poland; Jew.
3. Julius
Kazuky (Katz), minister for foreign affairs of Poland, who is
well known for his violent speeches in the UNO; Jew.
4. Karl
Swierezewskv, former vice-minister for national defence, who was
murdered by the Anti-Communist Ukrainian country population in
south Poland (the mass of the people is not always amorphous);
Jew.
5. Josef
Cyrankiewicz, first minister of Poland since 1954, after Bierut;
Jew.
6. Hillary
Mink, Vice-prime minister of Poland since 1954; Jew.
7. Zenon
Kliszko, minister of justice; Jew.
8. Tadaus
Kochcanowiecz, minister of labour; Jew.
The sole
important Polish Communist of Gentile origin is Wladislaw
Gomulka who was removed from political leadership since 1949,
when he lost his post as first minister. Sooner or later he will
share the same fate as Rajk in Hungary.
D - RUMANIA
1. Anna Pauker,
Jewess, former minister for foreign affairs of the “Rumanian
Peoples Republic”, and spy No. 1 of the Kremlin in Rumania up to
the month of June 1952. Since then she has remained in the
shadows in Bucharest up to the present day, naturally in
freedom. This Jewish hyena, who was originally called Anna
Rabinsohn, is the daughter of a rabbi, who came to Rumania from
Poland. She was born in the province of Moldau (Rumania) in the
year 1892.
2. Ilka
Wassermann, former private secretary of Anna Pauker, at present
the real directress of the ministry for foreign affairs.
3. Josef
Kisinevski, the present agent No. 1 of the Kremlin in Rumania,
member of the central Committee of the Communist party and
vice-president of the council of ministers. He is a Jew and
comes from Bessarabia; his correct name is Jakob Broitman. Also
he is the real chief of the Communist party of Rumania, although
“officially” the general secretary of the party is the Rumanian
locksmith Gheorghe Gheorghiu Dez, who, however, only plays the
simple role of a political front. Kisinevski took his present
pseudonym from the name of the city of Kisinau in Bessarabia,
where before the arrival of the Red Army he owned a tailor’s
workshop.
4. Teohari
Georgescu, minister for internal affairs in the Communist
government of Bucharest between 1945 and 1952; at the present
time he has been reduced to a second-rank post, although he was
“officially” “expelled” from the Communist party. He finds
himself in the same position as Anna Pauker. His real name is
Baruch Tescovich. He is a Jew from the Rumanian Danube harbour
of Galatz.
5. Avram
Bunaciu, likewise a Jew, is the present (1955) general secretary
of the Presidium of the great national assembly of the “Rumanian
peoples republic”, i.e. the real leader of this assembly, for
the “official” president Petru Groza is only an old Freemasonic
marionette, who is married to a Jewess and plays only a purely
static role. Avram Bunaciu is called in reality Abraham Gutman
(Gutman translated into Rumanian is the corresponding name for
“Bunaciu”, i.e. the pseudonym taken on by this Jew).
6. Lotar
Radaceanu, another Minister of the Communist government of
Bucharest “deposed” in the year 1952, but who in 1955 reappeared
on the honorary tribune. He is a Jew from Siebenbürgen and is
called Lothar Würtzel. Since the “Würtzel” in Rumanian
translates “Radicinu”, this Jew has simply transferred his
Hebraic name into Rumanian and is now called “Radaceanu”.
7. Miron
Constantinescu, member of the central Committee of the Communist
party and minister for mining and petroleum. Now and then he
changes his ministerial posts. He is a Jew from Galatzi
(Rumania), who in truth is called Mehr Kohn, and as is customary
among them, uses a Rumanian pseudonym.
8. Lieutenant
General Moises Haupt, commander of the military district of
Bucharest; Jew.
9. Colonel
General Zamfir, Communist “security chief” in Rumania and
responsible for thousands of murders, which this secret police
has perpetrated. He is a Jew and comes from the Danube harbour
of Braila. He is called Laurian Rechler.
10. Heim Gutman,
chief of the civil secret service of the Rumanian Peoples
republic; Jew.
11.
Major-General William Suder, chief of the information service
and of counter-espionage of the Rumanian Communist army. He is a
Jew, by name Wilman Süder and former officer of the Soviet Army.
12. Colonel
Roman, former director of the E.K.P. service (education, culture
and propaganda) of the Rumanian army up to 1949, and at the
present time Minister in the Communist government. His name as
Jew is Walter.
13. Alexander
Moghiorosh, minister for Nationalities in the Red government;
Jew from Hungary.
14. Alexander
Badau, chief of the Control Commission for foreigners in
Rumania. He is a Jew who originates from the city of Targoviste
whose real name is Braustein. Before 1940 his family in
Targoviste possessed a large trading firm.
15. Major
Lewin, chief of press censorship, Jew and former officer of the
Red Army.
16. Colonel
Holban, chief of the Communist “Security” of Bucharest, a Jew
named Moscovich, former Syndicate (Union) chief.
17. George
Silviu, general governmental secretary of the ministry for
internal affairs; a Jew named Gersh Golinger.
18. Erwin
Voiculescu, chief of the pass department in the ministry for
foreign affairs. He is a Jew and is called Erwin Weinberg.
19. Gheorghe
Apostol, chief of the general labour union of Rumania; he is a
Jew named Gerschwin.
20. Stupineanu,
chief of economic espionage; Jew by name Stappnau.
21. Emmerick
Stoffel, Ambassador of the Rumanian Peoples Republic in
Switzerland; a Jew from Hungary and specialist in bank
questions.
22. Harry
Fainaru, former legation chief of the Rumanian Communist embassy
in Washington up to 1954 and at present official in the ministry
for foreign affairs in Bucharest. He is a Jew named Hersch
Feiner. Before the year 1940 his family possessed a grain
business in Galatzi.
23. Ida
Szillagy, the real directress of the Rumanian embassy in London;
Jewess; friend of Anna Pauker.
24. Lazarescu,
the “Chargé d’Affaires” of the Rumanian government in Paris. He
is a Jew and is really called Baruch Lazarovich, the son of a
Jewish trader from Bucharest.
25. Simon
Oieru, State under-secretary of the Rumanian state; Jew with
name of Schaffer.
26. Aurel
Baranga, inspector general of arts. He is a Jew; Ariel Leibovich
is his real name.
27. Liuba
Kisinevski, president of the U.F.A.R. (Association of
anti-Fascist Rumanian women); she is a Jewess from Cernautzi/
Bukowina, and is called in reality Liuba Broitman, wife of Josif
Kisinevski of the central Committee of the party.
28. Lew Zeiger,
director of the ministry for national economy; Jew.
29. Doctor
Zeider, jurist of the ministry for foreign affairs; Jew.
30. Marcel
Breslasu, director general of arts; a Jew by name Mark Breslau.
31. Silviu
Brucan, chief editor of the newspaper “Scanteia”, official party
organ. He is a Jew and is called Brükker. He directs the entire
campaign of lies that attempts to deceive the Rumanian people
concerning the true situation created by Communism. At the same
time the Jew Brükker directs the fake “Antisemitic” campaign of
the Communist press of Rumania.
32. Samoila,
governing director of the newspaper ‘‘Scanteia”; he is a Jew;
Samuel Rubenstein.
33. Horia
Liman, second editor of the Communist newspaper “Scanteia”; Jew
with the name of Lehman.
34. Engineer
Schnapp, governing director of the Communist newspaper “Romania
Libera” (Free Rumania), the second Communist newspaper on the
basis of its circulation; likewise a Jew.
35. Jehan
Mihai, chief of the Rumanian film industry, Communist propaganda
by means of films; a Jew, whose name is Jakob Michael.
36. Alexander
Graur, director general of the Rumanian radio corporation, which
stands completely and solely in the service of the Communist
party. He is a Jewish professor and is called Alter Biauer, born
in Bucharest.
37. Mihail
Roller, at present President of the Rumanian academy, is a
sinister professor, a Jew, unknown before the arrival of the
Soviets in Rumania. Today he is “President” of the Academy and
in addition he has written a “new history” of the Rumanian
people, in which he falsifies the historical truth.
38. Professor
Weigel, one of the tyrants of the university of Bucharest, who
directs the constant “purging actions” among Rumanian students
who are hostile to the Jewish-Communist regime.
39. Professor
Lewin Bercovich, another tyrant of the Bucharest university, who
with his spies controls the activity of Rumanian professors and
their social connections; an immigrant Jew from Russia.
40. Silviu
Josifescu, the official “literary critic”, who censures the
poems of the best poets like Eminescu Alecsandri, Vlahutza,
Carlova, etc., who all died centuries ago or more than half a
century ago, and alters form and content, because these poems
are “not in harmony” with the Communist Marxist ideas. This
literary murderer is a Jew, who in truth is called Samoson
Iosifovich.
41. Joan
Vinter, the second Marxist “literary critic” of the regime and
author of a book with the title “The problem of literary legacy”
is likewise a Jew and is called Jakob Winter.
The three
former secretaries of the General Labour League up to 1950,
Alexander Sencovich, Mischa Levin and Sam Asriel (Serban), were
all Jews.
E - YUGOSLAVIA
1. Marshal
|