Race And CrimeOctober 6, 2005by Nicholas Stix
Imagine if one demographic group in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively crime-free group? Wouldn’t you want to know about such differences? But we don’t have to imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in the new report, The Color of Crime, released by the New Century Foundation, the organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine. * “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.” * Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year. * “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.” But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.) * Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. “Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.” * The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling. * “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.” But how can that be, when for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the majority of the victims of black crime are themselves black? But it has been true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the color of the latter’s skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of lying or laziness. * Far from being guilty of “racially profiling” innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: “… blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes.” * “… police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals.” (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.) * “[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car.” Well, as everyone knows, innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely ignore such statistics. After all, isn’t that what the NAACP, Village Voice, New York Times, and countless black “activists” and prominent academics have been saying for years? And although the folks insisting on the reality of racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn’t produced by the right sort of people. (And of course, the “right sort of people” never tells the truth about race and crime.) * Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, “blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites” in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range. * “… the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct.” * Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives. * Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit “white collar” offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate. * The single greatest indicator of an area’s crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate. Things are actually much worse than the above notes suggest. As The Color of Crime notes, the feds inflate white crime statistics by counting Hispanic offenders as white; at the same time, “Hispanics are a [hate crime] victim category but not a perpetrator category.” If someone attacks a Mexican for racial reasons, he becomes a Hispanic victim of a hate crime. However, if the same Mexican commits a hate crime against a black, he is classified as a ‘white’ perpetrator. Even more absurdly, if a Mexican commits a hate crime against a white, both victim and perpetrator are reported as white.” Thus, the number of white perpetrators is exaggerated, while the number of white victims is constricted by the federal double-standard. And as the study fails to note, with black-on-white male prison rape an institutionalized sport among black inmates, hundreds of thousands of white men have thus been victimized but never counted by the government. Meanwhile, white-on-black male prison rape is virtually non-existent. Some of the study’s many sources were the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCRs); the feds’ National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS), in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all demographic groups, were called; the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS); and Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs); State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS); National Youth Gang Survey; the Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP); and National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP). The succinct report slays dragons in the course of mere footnotes, such as its nailing of tenured California State University criminology professor Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, who in her book Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies, the reality of interracial violence be damned, depicted whites only as perpetrators, and not as the victims of hate crimes. The Color of Crime – not to be confused with a 1998 piece of propaganda of the same name by tenured University of Maryland professor of criminology, Katheryn K. Russell -- is the most scientifically rigorous research on crime and race available. It’s the state of the art. The mainstream media will surely be anxious to publicize and discuss The Color of Crime. After all, hasn’t the public been inundated since the late 1990s (and ultimately, since the 1960s) with dubious charges of racism (“racial profiling”) against law enforcement and the justice system? And don’t the MSM always tell us that they will report on anything newsworthy? Doesn’t the New York Times claim to be “the newspaper of record”? In a future column, we shall see just how the MSM has responded to The Color of Crime. In any event, the report gave in precise numbers what any sentient being over the age of twenty and living in the United States has long known. A 75-year-old Irish neighbor of mine is a retired nurse who was run out of a once-lovely Brooklyn neighborhood forty years ago by “integration” (read: brazen black crime in broad daylight). As she said to me last spring on the street, “The problem is … you know what the problem is.”
© 2005 Nicholas Stix
"Best of the Web" award-winning writer Nicholas Stix is an investigative free-lance journalist who unearths the hidden secrets of politics, education, and race relations that elude the elite media establishment. His work appears in The American Enterprise: A National Magazine of Politics, Business, and Culture; Insight on the News; Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture; Ideas on Liberty; Middle American News; Newsday and CampusReports. Send the author an Email at Add1dda@aol.com To read more, visit Nicholas Stix's article archives
Black Crime IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY, there is a wide range of behavior and attitude. However, having said that, it is critical to note that group behavior is still a valid and important element to society. White society may have produced some serial killers, but the group behavior is to hate such people and to attempt to rid society of their influence. Contrast that attitude with the reaction of the Black community when OJ "the knife" Simpson was acquitted, or its reaction of apathy towards, or even support for, other Black criminals. One clear indication of the group behavior of the Black community, and of the understanding of that behavior by the White community (and that understanding runs deep, even in the most rabid liberal) is the crime rate in ALL predominantly Black communities, and the refusal of White folks to voluntarily move their families into any of these areas. No honest White man actually wants to live in a Black neighborhood. Of course such a choice is always available. For a cost much less than what any White family is paying for housing in a safe White neighborhood, they could have a much larger house in a Black neighborhood. Since they do not make that move, the liberals' actions shout from the housetops, what their lying words deny. In the Washington DC area where rich liberals abound, you will find that they do not send their children to Black dominated public schools. Even with all of the (supposedly wonderful) diversity available there, the liberal hypocrites (like Bill Clinton) send their kids to private, predominately White schools. This is an indication of a general understanding in White people of the group behavior of Black people. This observation is not numerically quantified, or exact. It is just an example of common sense at work. White people know that if they move their families into a Black neighborhood, the odds will increase dramatically that their wives and daughters will be raped, their sons will be beaten up, and that one or more of them will be murdered. They know their cars will be vandalized or stolen, and that their houses will be targets for thieves and vandals. Of course, since virtually all White people understand this (demonstrated by their refusal to take advantage of the financial savings provide by a move to a predominantly Black neighborhood, and even more clearly demonstrated by their moving out of a once White neighborhood when it starts to become Black) it is an easy, and flawless step of logic to realize that if we allow our society in general to become predominantly Black, it will be a place wherein none of us would want to live. What is going on in South Africa today is convenient for us to use as an example of this phenomenon, even though it is horribly inconvenient for the White people who are onsite and living through it. You will notice that once the Leftists did their work of destroying the political system in South Africa, their news media suddenly went dead on the subject of that poor nation. Johannesburg has become the murder capitol of the world. Over 1 out of every 3 women have been raped in that city. All over the country, murder, rape, and torture have exploded as White restraint has been removed, and the Black group characteristic behavior has been unleashed upon the White folks. What do we hear of this from the media that once was all afire with concern for "fairness" and "compassion" in South Africa? Nothing! Why is that? It is the same reason that inspired the national cover up of the Wichita Massacre, and the dragging deaths of Patricia Stansfield (1) and Little Jake Robel. It is undeniable and beyond serious debate that White folks today know the dangers of Black group behavior. The fact is clearly established by the choices made by White folks in where they choose to live, and when possible, where they send their children to school. From subjective common sense, let us move to hard objective data. We find that what is going on in South African is also going on in the USA, and that the news media is being just as deceitful in its covering this fact up, as it has been in the near total blackout on covering Black South African crime. If you would like more detail on this topic, a report has been issued by American Renaissance called The Color of Crime. It documents many of the facts on this issue. In per capita numbers of crimes, we find that the Black group behavior is 10 times as likely as White group behavior to commit murder, robbery, or any violent crime. TEN TIMES! The impact on our overall crime rate is astounding for a group that only makes up 12% of the population. The murder rate for America has been raised from the White rate of murder of less than 5 per 100,000 people (which incidentally is similar to the rate found in White European countries) to 9.8 per 100,000 people. Our murder rate is being doubled by a group making up only 12% of our population. The Black group behavior is the very same in the USA as it is in South Africa, and everywhere else on the planet that they reside in large numbers. The sad fact is that many liberals know about the Black crime situation, but instead of facing reality they try and cover up the fact with misdirection. They say that all Black crime is as result of poverty. The absurdity of this claim can be shown several ways. First of all, Blacks are much more likely to commit even white collar crime. That means that even if they are employed, and not in poverty, the group behavior comes through. Secondly, compare the Black group behavior, with the White group behavior of the poorest people in West Virginia, where the poverty level is far worse than anything in Black neighborhoods. Here people are living in shacks, are thin from lack of food, and are barely educated. Yet their crime rate is extremely low. Thirdly, in case the idea is promulgated that it is a combination of poverty and city life that is required as an excuse, as if there could really be one, look at the Great Depression. There were many years of extreme poverty, coupled with city life, little hope, and hungry people. And there was NO INCREASE in crime among the poor Whites. The White group behavior remained constant, even with poverty. It is clearly a lying attempt by the Leftists to use poverty, or anything else, other than Black group behavior, to explain Black crime. The lying nature of their claims, are clearly highlighted by their continual change of direction. One minute they act as if there is no difference in the rate of crime in the group behavior of Blacks and Whites, and the next they are making excuses for that difference! Then, a moment later they are back to the first position again. What about "hate crime," or more specifically and accurately, what about cross-racial crime? Who is the greater danger to whom? Here the numbers are even more astounding. When Whites commit violent crime, 97% of the time it is against other Whites. That is a striking difference from the 57% of Black crime which is directed against Whites. This boils down to the simple fact that Black group behavior is 56 times more likely to commit a cross-racial crime against Whites, than White group behavior will produce a crime against Blacks. That is not twice as likely, or even 10 times as likely, but 56 times as likely! Now compare that hard fact with the news coverage you have seen on cross-racial crime in America. As you will note, the blackout on reality is as complete concerning what is going on in the USA as it is on what is going on in South Africa. The media is quite consistent. The single greatest cross-racial crime difference is in the area of crimes against women. A Black is 200 times more likely to rape a White woman, than a White is to rape a Black woman. This is an outrage that most White folks are completely ignorant of. Instead they are exposed to propaganda movies like "To Kill a Mockingbird" which ignores the reality around us. So, before you let some liberal hypocrite tell you that the Wichita Massacre was just 2 Black guys, and it has no deeper racial meaning, remember that overall group behavior exhibits itself in individual acts like this. It is time for White folks to stop listening to lying liberals and to start looking at the facts of real life. It is important to you to understand what is really going on, but it is even more important to your children. The choices that you make today will affect your children's future and the future of their children. You must stop America from creating another South Africa right here. If you are ignorant of the facts, then you cannot possibly make the right choices for your children's future. ________________________ 1. Two months after the media field day began over the dragging murder of a Black man in Jasper, Texas, there was another cross-racial dragging death in Streator, Illinois. In this event a Black man named, Christopher Coleman, is accused of dragging a White woman, Patricia Stansfield, for 2 miles along Illinois State Road 18 while she screamed for her life, until she died. No national media coverage here. Reproduced from: http://www.gatago.com/misc/survivalism/2829374.html
|
|
Revised:
September 23, 2008
. Communication:
discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com
Go to
Home Page
Go to Index
of All Articles Pages |