SARTRE II
Back by
popular demand the return of the 'Dueling Twins' series.
New Crossfire segments from the Hall siblings.
The
'Dueling Twins
Could it be
separated at birth? One on the path for wisdom, the other gone afoul!
Which one is which?
Introduction:
James vs. James
I was minding my
own business the other day when I got an e-mail from the political
columnist James Hall. Wait a minute, I thought, that's me!
But it wasn't,
exactly. Now, James Hall isn't a completely unusual name. In fact, there
are quite a few of us around. You may have heard of James Hall the gospel
singer, James Hall the rock musician, James Hall the Detroit Lions
football player, James Hall the writer of detective fiction like Tropical
Freeze, while an earlier James Hall co-wrote Mutiny on the Bounty and its
two sequels. After a particularly horrendous train or airplane accident
you may have even seen James Hall the Director of the National
Transportation Safety Board on television explaining what went wrong.
But another
James Hall, political columnist, on the internet? That floored me.
Especially when I found out that he's a self-described conservative
populist. (In my mind the term's an oxymoron. Populists represent the
common people, who we know are mostly Democrats. Perhaps he's the populist
of the country club set.)
In any case,
James has written for
Rense.com,
Ether Zone,
and has his own website, "Breaking
All The Rules,"
at
http://batr.org/
where he frequently writes under the pen name of Sartre, demonstrating a
keen interest in philosophy. Wait a minute--I enjoy philosophy, too,
though I lean towards the English Liberals rather than European
Existentialism.
After politely
introducing himself, James said he had read my work and agreed with almost
nothing I wrote. What nerve! Then he challenged me to a James versus James
debate, to see which one of us most deserves to write about politics in
our name.
So over the
next few weeks, we'll air our opinions and let you, our beloved readers,
decide who best merits the name of James Hall, political columnist. May
the best James win!
Without further
ado, here's James writing about the meaning of third parties in Amercan
politics.
James, From the
Left

When I
examine myself and my methods of thought,
I come
to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me
than my
talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
Albert
Einstein

Upon discovery
that a column was being published under my name sake was surprising. When
I read that it was penned from 'Fantasy Land', I was shocked. And after
discovering that it is an illusion, written with errors, I must correct
the record.
Therefore, the
sword fencing must begin! The foil that false fantasy promotes, must be
repulsed. The epee art is more than self defense. It is a quest to clear
confusion from the public arena. The Duel between Gentlemen, requires a
victory. TRUTH reigns supreme.
The task for
the sincere is to understand the correct nature of that Reverie, to slay
that Chimera, and replace it with Vision of TRUTH and WISDOM!
For this task I
accept the challenge to rid the bewilderment and bring sanity back to the
Magic Kingdom . . . And follow the lead of those who know the difference.
James - 'The
Right'

The dissenter
is every human being at those moments of his life
when he
resigns momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
Archibald
Macleish

|
 |
|
James Hall - From the Left
How does a liberal
columnist survive among so many conservatives and libertarians at TAP,
The American Partisan? Well, it helps to grow up in a conservative
state and in a family of Republicans. As a child James leafleted for
Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign, supported the Viet Nam War,
and read Ayn Rand. As James grew older his opinions changed, and he
learned to fight for them, outnumbered as he was.
As an almost life-long resident of Orlando, Florida, it seemed quite
natural to go and work for the Walt Disney Company, which James did
for 23 years, beginning as a ride operator and finishing his Disney
career as a technical writer.
Along the way James' liberal activism was honed as a member of
District 1908 of the Transportation/Communications Union at Disney,
where he served as a shop steward, district trustee, and finally as
President and Treasurer, representing the interests of 3,000 Disney
employees. His arguing skills were honed in disciplinary hearings,
safety meetings, and the negotiating table at Disney, while his
writing talents were put to use as a writer and editor of the
district's newsletter Signals for nine years.
James says, "The most fascinating part of my job was as a member of a
team negotiating labor contracts in concert with other unions and
Disney management where issues of pay, personal safety, work rules,
and health insurance are involved. Try it yourself sometime to see how
important issues become when millions of dollars are on the table."
James also managed to get an education and a Master's degree in
Liberal Studies. He has also taught Rhetoric and Composition at
Valencia Community College and his written work has appeared in e-zines
like Blue Ear Magazine, Philosophy News, and the Coastal Voice. He is
currently a columnist for The American Factor and is working on a
nonfiction book with former TAP columnist Ian Foster.
Says James, "My twin passions these days are for science, which tells
us what the world is actually like, and political philosophy, which
tells what we could make of it."
|
 |
|
 |
|
James Hall - 'The Right'
SARTRE is the pen name of
JAMES HALL, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit's
formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served
as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in
many campaigns. A believer in authentic 'Public Service', independent
business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small
business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded
opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and
international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a
world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a
rural community. Their daughter has earned degrees from the University
of London.
"Populism" best describes the approach to SARTRE's perspective on
Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with
an appreciation of "Pragmatic Anarchism." Reforms will require an
Existential approach. "Ideas Move the World," and SARTRE'S intent is
to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common
sense, moral and traditional value culture for America.
Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE's only goal is to ask the
questions that few will dare ... Having refused the invites of an
academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite's, the search for
TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within
yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face
Reality.
So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you who
invites you to join in on this journey.
SARTRE's home page is at BATR (Breaking All The Rules).
Visit SARTRE at Breaking All The Rules |
|
|
The 'Dueling Twins'
|
|
|
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins! |
Christmas is the
one time of year when people of all religions come together to worship
Jesus Christ....
Bart Simpson
|
 |
|
Point:
“War on
Christmas”
or Simple
Politeness?
by James Hall
from the Left

I’ve often said “Happy Holidays” to my
Jewish friends and to those whose religion I don’t know, and
never knew that I was participating in a liberal plot to
destroy Christmas until Jerry Falwell told me it was so.
(Full disclosure: I also say “Merry Christmas” to family and
friends I know to be Christians. I send Christmas cards and
put up Christmas lights and buy Christmas presents, too.)
I always thought that saying “Happy
Holidays” was just being polite. Saying “Merry Christmas” to
someone whose holiday this month is actually Hannukkah or
Kwanzaa would be like having your Muslim grocer wish you a
pleasant Ramadan, or your Hindu professor urge you to be
reincarnated into a higher caste. Awkward, that: would you
say ‘no thanks, that’s not what I believe’ to a friendly
gesture or just keep quiet?
People have been saying “Happy Holidays”
for years. Now the phrase has become a war cry for the
Christian Right. They are taking aim at those of us who use
it, including much of the business community. They want
stores and businesses to proudly claim they are in business
for Christ by putting up “Merry Christmas.” Funny, I thought
that Jesus threw the money-changers out of the Temple. Now
the Christian Right wants to turn Macy’s into Christ’s
Commercial Temple, and they are holding business’ feet to the
hell-fire.
Still, isn’t it absurd to claim that
retail business, whose biggest season is during the Christmas
season, is out to destroy Christmas by saying “Happy
Holidays?” Conservative Christians used to deride the
commerciality of this season; now, it appears, they want to
co-opt it. But how many pagans will be saved in a Radio Shack
or a J. C. Penney’s?
Reverend Falwell’s offensive includes
taking back the Christmas Tree for Christians. You can’t call
it a Holiday Tree anymore, even though many non-Christians
do. In Japan, where the people are largely Shinto or
Buddhist, they put up trees and enjoy the shopping.
Strangely, there’s no mention of any
Christmas Tree in the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ birth. The
only mention of a tree is in Jeremiah 10:2-4, where the
prophet specifically admonishes his people not to decorate
their homes with trees, as a number of pagan religions did to
celebrate the Winter Solstice. The early Church Father
Tertullian said the same, as did the Pilgrim Governor of
Massachusetts, William Bradford, who banned all “pagan
mockery.” The first American church to put up a tree was in
1851, and many of its parishioners accused the minister of
paganism.
So, Reverend Falwell, whose tree is it?
If anyone has a right to ‘take back’ the tree, it’s the people
who first used it, the worshippers of Druidism and Baal (if
any of them still exist). No, Reverend, let’s be charitable
and share the tree with anyone who wants it—it’s not ours to
keep.
Maybe the separation of Christ’s name
from the commercial institutions and buying season isn’t such
a bad thing after all. Maybe Christians should focus on the
Christmas Story and not on what’s written on advertising
flyers and store signs. Maybe we shouldn’t worry about what
store clerks are wishing shoppers or what trees are publicly
called and keep Christmas in our hearts. Happy holidays to
you all.

Rebuttal:

War on Christmas, Part Two
Once again the claim that
America was established as a 'Christian nation' is used to
justify impoliteness to non-Christians. I'm not sure what
that claim means, exactly, because America was never
exclusively Christian. Not then, not now. Just like today,
the founding fathers represented a mixture of religions,
including non-Christian Deist, Unitarian, and even some
atheists. The founders deliberately refused to establish a
national church or offer religious tests for office.
What America does stand for,
then and now, is religious freedom, the right to worship as
one chooses, which is what all groups coming to America
sought, and should have. That means a public space that is
religiously neutral, allowing all to worship in their ways.
It's that public neutrality that has allowed so much diversity
and vitality in religion in this country, more than in any
other place in the world.
Yet some want to spoil that wise
public policy. We've fought these battles before.
Ironically, Falwell and his army of Liberty Council lawyers,
and the Family Research Council are going after business at a
time when the limits of Church and State are well known, and
there is little controversy over religious displays in public
areas, so long as other displays, including secular ones, are
also permitted.
No one is trying to destroy the
public expression of religion in the commercial sphere. Note
that the ACLU has never filed a brief forcing a business to
forgo a Christmas party or promote a "Happy Holidays" season.
It's the Religious Right that
has intruded into this sphere, attempting to bully businesses
to see it their way. Wal-Mart and Sears aren't government
property. In their attempt to boycott the use of "Happy
Holidays" at these stores, religious conservatives are
actually telling the owners of private property how to run
their businesses and what to do with their property.
Let's debate whether Jesus
Himself would be in favor of Merry Christmas signs in Burdines
or Macy's. I will leave it up to my esteemed colleague to
show me where in the Bible Jesus ever demanded that the public
square be made his. In fact, his comments on the practice of
public displays of piety (Matthew 6) in prayer, fasting, and
almsgiving were overwhelmingly negative.
One wonders how far this
Children's Crusade of Falwell's will go. If 'Happy Holidays'
is threatened by Liberty's legions of lawyers, how close are
Frosty the Snowman and Santa Claus to legal limbo? Will the
Sugar Plum Fairy, Charlie Brown, and the Toy Soldier join the
Reverend's hit list? Will "Jingle Bells" no longer jingle?
Let it go, Jerry! This mess of
Christians claiming the commercial buying season and ownership
of ambiguous symbols like the Christmas Tree only serves to
dilute Christ's real message. Conservative Christians used to
know this, but in their zeal to fight wars of culture and
raise funds for future political action, they have apparently
forgotten it.
James Hall, From the Left
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Counterpoint:
Christmas is for celebrating CHRIST


We all should know that Jesus was not born on
December 25th or during the winter season. Heck, in this
secular culture some even argue that HE did not even exist.
So why should it be surprising that so many 'PC' devotees' are
so dedicated to purging the Savior from the public square?
The American empire has become a pagan Saturnlian culture.
Saturnlia was the greatest festival of the Roman year, and was
marked with great feasting, gift-giving, dancing, playing, and
relaxing. Homes were decorated, work was suspended, and there
was general merry-making done by all.
Only an odd fellow would seek to defend the
practice of a pagan celebration. But that is exactly what the
elves of evil secularism want you to do. Their objection is
directed towards a simple objective. Remove Christ from
society. Those gnomes of multifariousness fanaticism have no
room for the array of Christian believers. Their version of
tolerance requires that the intention and purpose for the Good
Shepherd tradition must serve up lamb upon the altar of
diversity. A tree as a symbol is not their problem. No, it
is the idea that a land settled as a Christian country must
forgo that heritage for the sake of the multicultural high
priests of acceptable and appropriate attitudes.
The vast believing majority must subjugate
their essential values and mainstream religion to the
ecumenical will of heretics. That's exactly what is being
argued when a society marches down the road of purging the
spiritual revealed truth for the practice of a false worldly
worship. No particular church has the only message, but there
is only one gospel that offers the promise of salvation.
So sorry to offend the thin-skinned
non-Christians! Since when do outsiders get to make the rules
for a celebration that has the central focus on the Redeemer?
The Christmas observance should discard all those plastic
trees and use the real symbol of the Christ. Therefore, strip
those decorations off of trees and replace it with the simple
Cross . . .
Salvation through the Son of God is the
message. Why not chuck the commercialism of those phony
"Happy Holidays" and ignite a candle of light by erecting the
cross of deliverance? The Falwell's are not the gatekeepers
of the faith. But surely the 'so called' Rev. turned lawyer
Barry W. Lynns' of the world are but secular choir-boys in the
Black Mass of a Satanic social order.
The marketplace of commerce needs to cater to customers in
order to prosper. Public holidays are mere government
contrivance for civic distractions. Adoration of the Lord is
permanent submission to the will of God. Coupling the
materialism of sales with the spirit of
HOPE
is superfluous at best
but seriously detrimental when it becomes ingrained into the
culture. If you want to be polite then be charitable.
However, succumbing to the motive of politeness at the price
of denying the essence of your faith reminds of the cock
crowing thrice.
If the spirit of cheer is your bag for a
holiday merry, then old Saint Nick can dole out to you the
presents of joy. But if your purpose for remembrance on the
long-established day called Christmas is to worship the gift
of Deliverance, than raise up the Cross of Salvation. The
best reward for non-believers on this day is the example of
the glory in the gift of grace. Don't let all those trees
block your view of the promised land . . .
James Hall aka SARTRE

Final Word:
Sophistry is the evangel hymn from which the religiously
neutral chant. The mortal sin for these all-inclusive
preachers has the missal text of a devoted heretic. Falling
into the trap of the Falwell canard is hardly the issue.
Those who fashion a fable of distraction surely have forgotten
the lesson in
The Parable of the Dishonest Steward
– Luke: 13-15
13 No servant
can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the
other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
14 And the
Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all these
things; and they scoffed at him.
15 And he
said unto them, Ye are they that justify yourselves in the
sight of men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is
exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God.
Those who
worship under the ministry of diversity and claim that such
relativity produces vitality in religion, demonstrate their
greater love of public neutrality. As long as faithful
believers are forced to obey the commandment of multicultural
ecumenism, their sham inclusive church is served.
In the
marketplace of commerce, how and with whom one spends their
money seems to be a basic liberty that the bible ensures.
Like the artificial Christmas Tree, those modern day Pharisees
- unpleasant persons - want you to adopt a false
shame for behaving badly. Accepting a secular tolerance for
even intolerant religions may seem both modern and
progressive! However, such an ethos requires that the lowest
divisor of commercial economy, equate to equal adherence, with
the faithful celebrator of the reason for the Holy Day.
Their secular
holiday just is not equivalent. The season is a remembrance
of Christ; period.
All those
trees will not make the “Cross of Christ”. Yet, how many of
those saintly open-minded Scribes would allow the happy
vitality of the season if all those trees lost their branches
and needles and stood straight and upright with just one
horizontal timber to support the faith in salvation through
the Messiah? So we are suppose to swallow that the ACLU is
charitable by demanding a neutral Caiphas public
policy? Pray tell, what other blasphemy is necessary to
endure in the quest for “Simple Politeness”?
The message
of the Bible Gospel includes both Old and New Testaments.
Fulfillment by the later does not do away with the former. Is
not that the message of true tolerance? Is not that the real
role of witnessing the Good News . . . for all to hear and
receive the gift of grace to believe?
Not so for
the ‘Princes of Politeness’. Let no Divine King take
the place of the creed of public neutrality. So goes the
joyful fallacy of a happy holiday, in a universal collective
community.
So goes the
secular society, never allow the country’s Christian founding
tradition go unchallenged. So goes the great society of human
invention, the civic chaos is but an illusion.
Don’t be
humiliated into thinking that it is unchristian to speak out
loud and clear in the public square your submission to the Son
of God. Just maybe a non-believer may receive the Spirit
of the season.
James Hall –
‘The Right’
|
|
|
|
|
The 'Dueling Twins'
|
|
|
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins! |
“A blind
person who sees is better than a seeing person who is blind”
Iranian Proverb quotes

|
|
Want A Nuclear Free Middle East? Israeli's nukes must be included in a
ban of WMD. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
|
Dueling Twins
|
|
Iran |
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
The 'Dueling Twins'
|
|
|
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins! |
“A blind
person who sees is better than a seeing person who is blind”
Iranian Proverb quotes
|
|
Counterpoint:

Lions and Tigers and Zionists, Oh My!
James
Hall, From the Left
This prattle about Zionists
makes about as much sense as the haunted forest in The Wizard of Oz.
The lion Dorothy discovered there turned out to be less than
formidable. Today’s Zionists are just as toothless and ineffective.
Look at Israel today, a country divided on a peace policy and futilely
trying to wall itself away from its enemies. That’s the power of
today’s Zionism.
There are people in America
defending Zionism and Israel today, but they are not Zionists—they are
fundamentalist Christians who have decided that the occupation of the
Holy Land by Israelis is part of God’s Plan. Some of them, like
televangelist Pat Robertson, have even criticized efforts by Ariel
Sharon and his supporters to continue the land-for-peace program.
We need to be involved in the
Middle East, but our presence there is not dictated by Zionists,
fundamentalist Christians or even oil-hungry Kissinger realpolitick.
It’s dictated by our own national interest. The Middle East is the most
dangerous place on the planet, a focal point for religious extremisms of
all stripes—and into this volatile mix now add intermediate range
missiles and nuclear weapons.
All experts agree that Israel
is nuclear-armed. Saddam’s nuclear aspirations in response were enough
to bluff George W. Bush into his ill-fated occupation of Iraq. But
Iran’s very-real technological abilities, fueled by its oil wealth and
close trade ties to Russia and China, make it likely that this nation
will join shortly Pakistan as the second nuclear-armed Muslim nation in
the world. Iran has also been testing intermediate range missiles,
technology provided courtesy of its trading partners. And its leader
has called for the destruction of Israel.
So, you say, no big deal.
What’s a small nuclear war over there to us?
There’s a lot at stake. Iran
could lob nukes at Israel, Europe, Australia, and at U.S. forces
deployed in Sunni Iraq or Afghanistan. Israel and perhaps the Europeans
might respond in kind, as might we. If the Middle East goes up in
nuclear flames, it will play havoc with our economy and perhaps start
religious wars that would sweep the globe. Iran has close contacts with
terrorist groups, and terrorists may even get their hands on nukes, or
Iran might marry its nukes with an already-acquired long-distance
missile capacity to shoot at U.S. bases in Europe and Asia.
What’s to keep Iran from
developing intercontinental ballistic missiles, the logical next step in
its program? Then it would have the capability of reaching us directly.
At a minimum, Iran’s defiance
of the nuclear proliferation treaty would start likely start a nuclear
arms race in other countries where there exists a technological
capability do develop nuclear weapons. A world where every other nation
is a member of the Nuclear Club is a much more dangerous world than the
one that exists today.
When we faced a Communist
enemy, we had the assurance that our enemy wanted to live in this
world. Kruschev blinked in Cuba; Breshnev balked, and Gorbachev gave
in. But religious fanatics believe they’ll inherit a heavenly paradise
even as they turn this earth into a cinder. It’s for this reason that
we can’t turn our backs on the Middle East and let the fundamentalists
fight it out there—they’re much too eager for Armageddon.
President Bush has to get
involved and has to get the rest of the world, which has a stake in
this, involved as well. We have to be prepared to act to take out
Iran’s fledgling nuclear capability. Because a nuclear-armed Iran is a
much scarier idea than a haunted forest in a fantasy world, and nuclear
war is not a happy ending.

Final Word:
Cooperation, Not Domination
What a minute, who said
anything about world domination? We don’t seek to dominate the world,
and the proof is that we’ve had that opportunity, many times, and each
time we’ve moved in the direction of world cooperation, forging
alliances of democracies, not seeking world domination.
What we are working towards is
not a U.S. solution to the Iran problem, but a world solution. Remember
that Iran seeks to break an international agreement, the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty. Its case has been investigated by an
international organization, the IAEA (The International Atomic Energy
Agency), and that agency has referred Iran to the U.S. Security Council
for a decision on possible sanctions. Any sanction, when and if it
comes, will be carried out according to U.N. resolutions and
international law.
We didn’t even take the lead
in dealing with this problem. In an effort to resolve this situation,
Iran was first approached by the European nations France, Germany, and
Great Britain. The Russian Federation and China also offered solutions
to Iran and have each offered compromises that the U.S. has accepted in
principle.
No, this is hardly a U.S.
problem, nor will the solution be a U.S.-only one.
I will grant my opponent’s
point that the Middle East is a morass, a tar pit capable of dragging
the strongest predator under. Every time we meddle over there risks
involvement getting in over our heads.
But we really have no choice,
where nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles are concerned. We can’t
let a fanatical regime get their hands on them.
Neither can we claim some kind
of neutrality with a nation that already regards us an enemy. A nation
that has held Americans hostage and prays daily for our destruction is
not one that we can trust with nuclear weapons, nor can our allies and
friends in Europe and the Pacific, who would come under direct threat
from a Nuclear Iran.
Undoubtedly Israel will play a
role in this situation, too; mainly because it can’t permit an enemy
that close to it to have nuclear weapons. It seems clear that Israel
will act if we do nothing, and their involvement could easily lead to a
widespread Middle Eastern war, and widespread disaster to a world
economy dependent on Middle Eastern oil. That’s just reality, and one
doesn’t have to be buddy-buddy with the Israelis to realize this.
If we do make the
decision to intervene, it will not be to protect Israel. We will do it
because the international treaties that protect the world from nuclear
proliferation can’t be flouted, our friends can’t be threatened, and our
values can’t be compromised by giving a terrorist regime the weapons it
wants. That’s just common
|
Point:

Iran - Disinformation
Phobia
Propaganda designed to
target Iran as the greatest threat to the world is just the latest
sequel in the machinated melodrama of the evil empire. Make no
mistake about it, the imperialists of internationalism are the cause
of global insanity. How many neo-Hiltlers have to be created to
impose the New World Order of the Zionist-Amerika axis? If you equate
America and her true national interest with a pre-empted
interventionist foreign policy you have been programmed to accept that
the globe is flat. Such horizontal thinking only seeks to smother the
earth with that hideous fraud known as controlled democracy which
imposes a repugnant servitude upon every dissenting nation that has
the gall to disobey the “World Community”.
If this is your idea
of the noble traditions of Western Civilization you are a fool. The
ancient Iranian culture is no servant to the Henry Kissenger school of
diplomatic empire. Defiance is Iran’s mortal sin. But the long
history of U.S. interference into the Middle East is the root cause of
hatred towards a foreign policy designed in Tel Aviv and fueled with
the blessing of the board room of Big Oil. America’s original sin is
the abandonment of a traditional America-First Foreign Policy as
practiced at the beginning of the Republic. Today the world hasn’t
changed to demand internationalism, just that the oligarchy
precipitates artificial crisis to manage a contrived chaos.
Novakeo
sums up the house of cards that provokes the plutocrats. “Iran in
2003 began accepting euros as the exchange currency for their oil
exports and in March 2006, Iran will begin their own Oil Bourse that
will directly compete with New York's Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and
London's International Petroleum Exchange (IPE). These two American
owned oil exchanges use the U.S. dollar as their monetary exchange
mechanism for the purchase of oil. Iran's plan to establish an Iranian
Oil Bourse utilizing the stronger euro for their oil trade represents
a dangerous threat to the monetary supremacy of the U.S. dollar and to
the American imperial prowess that the petrodollar sustains.”
Pat Buchanan
goes one step further: “Conservatives must raise the ever-relevant
question: Cui bono? Who would benefit from a U.S. war with
Iran? Who is prodding us into it? Are they looking out for America
first?”
For the answer look to Michel Chossudovsky in
Nuclear War against Iran:
“Since late 2004, Israel has been stockpiling US made conventional and
nuclear weapons systems in anticipation of an attack on Iran. This
stockpiling which is financed by US military aid was largely completed
in June 2005. Israel has taken delivery from the US of several
thousand "smart air launched weapons" including some 500
'bunker-buster bombs, which can also be used to deliver tactical
nuclear bombs.”
According to the Neocon WND -
Iran leader: Islam to 'rule the world'.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying: “We must
believe in the fact that Islam is not confined to geographical
borders, ethnic groups and nations. It's a universal ideology that
leads the world to justice." Now clear your mind of decades of
disinformation and seriously ask yourself if a Nuclear Iran is really
a clear and prevalent threat to bomb America? Is there anyone who
still retains a modest degree of rational intelligence that can deny
that the Zionist are posed to wipe off the map any country that dares
to defy their dominance in the region or their Satanic financial
Federal Reserve Ponzi scheme?
An ideology that does
not bow down and obey the ultimate organized crime syndicate that
pumps up the New World Order using fractional reserve debt revenue and
stolen oil reserves must be targeted for extermination. Who is really
the holocaust denier?
A world based upon CIA and Mossad intrigue produced the Pahlavian
Savak secret police state. The good old days under the Shah of
Iran when all was under Israeli control are gone. Today
Mordechai Vanunu
is the modern day Alfred Dreyfus, but where is his Émile Zola? If
Iran wants an atomic deterrent to counter the nukes from the Dimona
reactor, what Talmudic authority gives contemporary Elders of Zion the
protocols to ferment a nuclear winter?
If citizens of the
world truly want to prevent regional carnage, disarm a nuclear Israel
as a condition to defuse Iranian weapons. Under the global oil for
dollars regimes, the desire or will to lead towards a “world to
justice”, will not tolerate dissident Islamic parity. Just maybe
Iran is not the devil you are conditioned to believe . . .
James Hall aka SARTRE

Rebuttal:
The hypocrisy of the apologists for empire has an acute deficiency in
defining reality. The national self-interest can never be equated
with world domination. If the major powers truly wanted to beat their
atomic black mail weapons into plow shears the process of universal
nuclear disarmament would attain supreme urgency. When political
stooges like Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf accepts their
payoffs to keep the finger off the trigger, you know that the real
objective is making the world safe for the
Petrodollar monopoly.
As long as America is
held hostage by an unholy alliance of shadow financial manipulators,
that cabal will initiate perpetual war for a permanent state of
terror. Those dreadful 444 days of Iranian hostage taking was over 25
years ago. Have we not learned anything that the sordid intrusion
into the region has always been the essential cause for hostility
towards the United States? Islamic deep-seated revulsion for Israeli
is not our concern and certainly does not rise to our national
interest. As long as zealot Zionists set Israeli policy, Jews will
never be able to call cousins, brothers.
Lest you also forget those Christian-Zionists preach a
John Neslon Darby
heresy that pleases the Mattoid Masters of the manipulated Free Trade
world economy. The source of the deceit does not include every Jew
any more then every destructive action is caused by each misguided
Dispensationalist. But what they all have in common is an irrational
and illusionary political devotion to the State of Israel. Most
Iranians understand this viewpoint while the majority of Americans
remain ignorant to the political game that is being played. Ignorance
is the basis for public support of a destructive foreign policy at
best. At its worse, sheer demented fatherland jingoism rally the
masses to act as asses.
The canard that Iran might develop ICBM’s ignores the reality that
Israel extorted Germany to build and donate two
Type 800 Dolphin
class submarines equipped for long-range nuclear-capable
submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM). According to some reports
the submarines may be capable of carrying nuclear-armed Popeye Turbo
cruise missiles. And we are supposed to believe that Iran is a threat
to the world while Israel has adopted a
Sampson Option?
One need not endorse
Islamic fanaticism to see the reality that U.S. Middle East policy has
been bankrupt from the day that the State of Israel was recognized. The
wisdom in repudiating a self-destructive alliance is common sense.
Neutrality with a balanced and constructive interaction is hardly living
in the Land of Oz. It’s the true legacy of our own founding and it
would work today, as well as it had in the past, to achieve actual
national security for American citizens.
|
Go to Sartre
Page III
|