SARTRE II
 
 
 
 
 
 
                       Back by popular demand the return of the 'Dueling Twins' series.  
                     New Crossfire segments from the Hall siblings. 
 
                        Read the CHRISTMAS segment 
                  Iran

 

         The 'Dueling Twins

 

                     Could it be separated at birth? One on the path for wisdom, the other gone afoul! Which one is which?

 

       Introduction: James vs. James

 

I was minding my own business the other day when I got an e-mail from the political columnist James Hall. Wait a minute, I thought, that's me!

But it wasn't, exactly. Now, James Hall isn't a completely unusual name. In fact, there are quite a few of us around. You may have heard of James Hall the gospel singer, James Hall the rock musician, James Hall the Detroit Lions football player, James Hall the writer of detective fiction like Tropical Freeze, while an earlier James Hall co-wrote Mutiny on the Bounty and its two sequels. After a particularly horrendous train or airplane accident you may have even seen James Hall the Director of the National Transportation Safety Board on television explaining what went wrong.

But another James Hall, political columnist, on the internet? That floored me. Especially when I found out that he's a self-described conservative populist. (In my mind the term's an oxymoron. Populists represent the common people, who we know are mostly Democrats. Perhaps he's the populist of the country club set.)

In any case, James has written for Rense.com, Ether Zone, and has his own website, "Breaking All The Rules," at http://batr.org/ where he frequently writes under the pen name of Sartre, demonstrating a keen interest in philosophy. Wait a minute--I enjoy philosophy, too, though I lean towards the English Liberals rather than European Existentialism.

After politely introducing himself, James said he had read my work and agreed with almost nothing I wrote. What nerve! Then he challenged me to a James versus James debate, to see which one of us most deserves to write about politics in our name.

So over the next few weeks, we'll air our opinions and let you, our beloved readers, decide who best merits the name of James Hall, political columnist. May the best James win!

Without further ado, here's James writing about the meaning of third parties in Amercan politics.

James, From the Left

 

Horizontal Divider 24

When I examine myself and my methods of thought,
 I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me
 than my talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
 
Albert Einstein

 

Horizontal Divider 24

Upon discovery that a column was being published under my name sake was surprising. When I read that it was penned from 'Fantasy Land', I was shocked. And after discovering that it is an illusion, written with errors, I must correct the record.

Therefore, the sword fencing must begin! The foil that false fantasy promotes, must be repulsed. The epee art is more than self defense. It is a quest to clear confusion from the public arena. The Duel between Gentlemen, requires a victory. TRUTH reigns supreme.

The task for the sincere is to understand the correct nature of that Reverie, to slay that Chimera, and replace it with Vision of TRUTH and WISDOM!

For this task I accept the challenge to rid the bewilderment and bring sanity back to the Magic Kingdom . . . And follow the lead of those who know the difference.

James - 'The Right'

 

Horizontal Divider 24

The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life
 when he resigns momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
Archibald Macleish

 

Horizontal Divider 24

 

James Hall - From the Left

 

 

How does a liberal columnist survive among so many conservatives and libertarians at TAP, The American Partisan? Well, it helps to grow up in a conservative state and in a family of Republicans. As a child James leafleted for Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign, supported the Viet Nam War, and read Ayn Rand. As James grew older his opinions changed, and he learned to fight for them, outnumbered as he was.

As an almost life-long resident of Orlando, Florida, it seemed quite natural to go and work for the Walt Disney Company, which James did for 23 years, beginning as a ride operator and finishing his Disney career as a technical writer.

Along the way James' liberal activism was honed as a member of District 1908 of the Transportation/Communications Union at Disney, where he served as a shop steward, district trustee, and finally as President and Treasurer, representing the interests of 3,000 Disney employees. His arguing skills were honed in disciplinary hearings, safety meetings, and the negotiating table at Disney, while his writing talents were put to use as a writer and editor of the district's newsletter Signals for nine years.

James says, "The most fascinating part of my job was as a member of a team negotiating labor contracts in concert with other unions and Disney management where issues of pay, personal safety, work rules, and health insurance are involved. Try it yourself sometime to see how important issues become when millions of dollars are on the table."

James also managed to get an education and a Master's degree in Liberal Studies. He has also taught Rhetoric and Composition at Valencia Community College and his written work has appeared in e-zines like Blue Ear Magazine, Philosophy News, and the Coastal Voice. He is currently a columnist for The American Factor and is working on a nonfiction book with former TAP columnist Ian Foster.

Says James, "My twin passions these days are for science, which tells us what the world is actually like, and political philosophy, which tells what we could make of it."

 

 

James Hall - 'The Right'

 

 

SARTRE is the pen name of JAMES HALL, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit's formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic 'Public Service', independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. Their daughter has earned degrees from the University of London.

"Populism" best describes the approach to SARTRE's perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of "Pragmatic Anarchism." Reforms will require an Existential approach. "Ideas Move the World," and SARTRE'S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America.

Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE's only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare ... Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite's, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality.

So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you who invites you to join in on this journey.

SARTRE's home page is at BATR (Breaking All The Rules).

 

Visit SARTRE at Breaking All The Rules

 

 

The 'Dueling Twins'

 

 

thinker2a.gif
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins!

 

Christmas is the one time of year when people of all religions come together to worship Jesus Christ....
Bart Simpson

 

 

 

Point:

“War on Christmas”
or Simple Politeness?
 
by James Hall from the Left

 

Horizontal Divider 24

 

I’ve often said “Happy Holidays” to my Jewish friends and to those whose religion I don’t know, and never knew that I was participating in a liberal plot to destroy Christmas until Jerry Falwell told me it was so.  (Full disclosure: I also say “Merry Christmas” to family and friends I know to be Christians.  I send Christmas cards and put up Christmas lights and buy Christmas presents, too.)

 

I always thought that saying “Happy Holidays” was just being polite.  Saying “Merry Christmas” to someone whose holiday this month is actually Hannukkah or Kwanzaa would be like having your Muslim grocer wish you a pleasant Ramadan, or your Hindu professor urge you to be reincarnated into a higher caste.  Awkward, that: would you say ‘no thanks, that’s not what I believe’ to a friendly gesture or just keep quiet?

 

People have been saying “Happy Holidays” for years.  Now the phrase has become a war cry for the Christian Right.  They are taking aim at those of us who use it, including much of the business community.  They want stores and businesses to proudly claim they are in business for Christ by putting up “Merry Christmas.”  Funny, I thought that Jesus threw the money-changers out of the Temple.  Now the Christian Right wants to turn Macy’s into Christ’s Commercial Temple, and they are holding business’ feet to the hell-fire.

 

Still, isn’t it absurd to claim that retail business, whose biggest season is during the Christmas season, is out to destroy Christmas by saying “Happy Holidays?” Conservative Christians used to deride the commerciality of this season; now, it appears, they want to co-opt it.  But how many pagans will be saved in a Radio Shack or a J. C. Penney’s?

 

Reverend Falwell’s offensive includes taking back the Christmas Tree for Christians.  You can’t call it a Holiday Tree anymore, even though many non-Christians do.  In Japan, where the people are largely Shinto or Buddhist, they put up trees and enjoy the shopping.

 

Strangely, there’s no mention of any Christmas Tree in the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ birth.  The only mention of a tree is in Jeremiah 10:2-4, where the prophet specifically admonishes his people not to decorate their homes with trees, as a number of pagan religions did to celebrate the Winter Solstice.  The early Church Father Tertullian said the same, as did the Pilgrim Governor of Massachusetts, William Bradford, who banned all “pagan mockery.”  The first American church to put up a tree was in 1851, and many of its parishioners accused the minister of paganism.

 

So, Reverend Falwell, whose tree is it?  If anyone has a right to ‘take back’ the tree, it’s the people who first used it, the worshippers of Druidism and Baal (if any of them still exist).  No, Reverend, let’s be charitable and share the tree with anyone who wants it—it’s not ours to keep.

 

Maybe the separation of Christ’s name from the commercial institutions and buying season isn’t such a bad thing after all.  Maybe Christians should focus on the Christmas Story and not on what’s written on advertising flyers and store signs.  Maybe we shouldn’t worry about what store clerks are wishing shoppers or what trees are publicly called and keep Christmas in our hearts.  Happy holidays to you all.

 

Horizontal Divider 24

Rebuttal:

xmas4.gif

 

War on Christmas, Part Two
 
Once again the claim that America was established as a 'Christian nation' is used to justify impoliteness to non-Christians.  I'm not sure what that claim means, exactly, because America was never exclusively Christian.  Not then, not now.  Just like today, the founding fathers represented a mixture of religions, including non-Christian Deist, Unitarian, and even some atheists.  The founders deliberately refused to establish a national church or offer religious tests for office.
 
What America does stand for, then and now, is religious freedom, the right to worship as one chooses, which is what all groups coming to America sought, and should have.  That means a public space that is religiously neutral, allowing all to worship in their ways.  It's that public neutrality that has allowed so much diversity and vitality in religion in this country, more than in any other place in the world.
 
Yet some want to spoil that wise public policy.  We've fought these battles before.  Ironically, Falwell and his army of Liberty Council lawyers, and the Family Research Council are going after business at a time when the limits of Church and State are well known, and there is little controversy over religious displays in public areas, so long as other displays, including secular ones, are also permitted.
 
No one is trying to destroy the public expression of religion in the commercial sphere.  Note that the ACLU has never filed a brief forcing a business to forgo a Christmas party or promote a "Happy Holidays" season.
 
It's the Religious Right that has intruded into this sphere, attempting to bully businesses to see it their way.  Wal-Mart and Sears aren't government property.  In their attempt to boycott the use of "Happy Holidays" at these stores, religious conservatives are actually telling the owners of private property how to run their businesses and what to do with their property.
 
Let's debate whether Jesus Himself would be in favor of Merry Christmas signs in Burdines or Macy's.  I will leave it up to my esteemed colleague to show me where in the Bible Jesus ever demanded that the public square be made his.  In fact, his comments on the practice of public displays of piety (Matthew 6) in prayer, fasting, and almsgiving were overwhelmingly negative.
 
One wonders how far this Children's Crusade of Falwell's will go.  If 'Happy Holidays' is threatened by Liberty's legions of lawyers, how close are Frosty the Snowman and Santa Claus to legal limbo?  Will the Sugar Plum Fairy, Charlie Brown, and the Toy Soldier join the Reverend's hit list?  Will "Jingle Bells" no longer jingle?
 
Let it go, Jerry!  This mess of Christians claiming the commercial buying season and ownership of ambiguous symbols like the Christmas Tree only serves to dilute Christ's real message.  Conservative Christians used to know this, but in their zeal to fight wars of culture and raise funds for future political action, they have apparently forgotten it.
 
James Hall, From the Left

 

 

Counterpoint:

Christmas is for celebrating CHRIST

 

Horizontal Divider 24

christmas.jpg

 

We all should know that Jesus was not born on December 25th or during the winter season.  Heck, in this secular culture some even argue that HE did not even exist.  So why should it be surprising that so many 'PC' devotees' are so dedicated to purging the Savior from the public square?  The American empire has become a pagan Saturnlian culture.  Saturnlia was the greatest festival of the Roman year, and was marked with great feasting, gift-giving, dancing, playing, and relaxing. Homes were decorated, work was suspended, and there was general merry-making done by all.
 
Only an odd fellow would seek to defend the practice of a pagan celebration.  But that is exactly what the elves of evil secularism want you to do.  Their objection is directed towards a simple objective.  Remove Christ from society.  Those gnomes of multifariousness fanaticism have no room for the array of Christian believers.  Their version of tolerance requires that the intention and purpose for the Good Shepherd tradition must serve up lamb upon the altar of diversity.  A tree as a symbol is not their problem.  No, it is the idea that a land settled as a Christian country must forgo that heritage for the sake of the multicultural high priests of acceptable and appropriate attitudes. 
 
The vast believing majority must subjugate their essential values and mainstream religion to the ecumenical will of heretics.  That's exactly what is being argued when a society marches down the road of purging the spiritual revealed truth for the practice of a false worldly worship.  No particular church has the only message, but there is only one gospel that offers the promise of salvation.
 
So sorry to offend the thin-skinned non-Christians!  Since when do outsiders get to make the rules for a celebration that has the central focus on the Redeemer?  The Christmas observance should discard all those plastic trees and use the real symbol of the Christ.  Therefore, strip those decorations off of trees and replace it with the simple Cross . . .
 
Salvation through the Son of God is the message.  Why not chuck the commercialism of those phony "Happy Holidays" and ignite a candle of light by erecting the cross of deliverance?  The Falwell's are not the gatekeepers of the faith.  But surely the 'so called' Rev. turned lawyer Barry W. Lynns' of the world are but secular choir-boys in the Black Mass of a Satanic social order. 
 
The marketplace of commerce needs to cater to customers in order to prosper.  Public holidays are mere government contrivance for civic distractions.  Adoration of the Lord is permanent submission to the will of God.  Coupling the materialism of sales with the spirit of HOPE is superfluous at best but seriously detrimental when it becomes ingrained into the culture.  If you want to be polite then be charitable.  However, succumbing to the motive of politeness at the price of denying the essence of your faith reminds of the cock crowing thrice.   
 
If the spirit of cheer is your bag for a holiday merry, then old Saint Nick can dole out to you the presents of joy.  But if your purpose for remembrance on the long-established day called Christmas is to worship the gift of Deliverance, than raise up the Cross of Salvation.  The best reward for non-believers on this day is the example of the glory in the gift of grace.  Don't let all those trees block your view of the promised land . . .
 
James Hall aka SARTRE 

 

Horizontal Divider 24

Final Word:

 

Sophistry is the evangel hymn from which the religiously neutral chant.  The mortal sin for these all-inclusive preachers has the missal text of a devoted heretic.  Falling into the trap of the Falwell canard is hardly the issue.  Those who fashion a fable of distraction surely have forgotten the lesson in The Parable of the Dishonest Steward – Luke: 13-15

 

13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

14 And the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all these things; and they scoffed at him.

15 And he said unto them, Ye are they that justify yourselves in the sight of men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God.

 

Those who worship under the ministry of diversity and claim that such relativity produces vitality in religion, demonstrate their greater love of public neutrality.  As long as faithful believers are forced to obey the commandment of multicultural ecumenism, their sham inclusive church is served.

 

In the marketplace of commerce, how and with whom one spends their money seems to be a basic liberty that the bible ensures.  Like the artificial Christmas Tree, those modern day Pharisees - unpleasant persons - want you to adopt a false shame for behaving badly.  Accepting a secular tolerance for even intolerant religions may seem both modern and progressive!  However, such an ethos requires that the lowest divisor of commercial economy, equate to equal adherence, with the faithful celebrator of the reason for the Holy Day. 

 

Their secular holiday just is not equivalent.  The season is a remembrance of Christ; period.

 

All those trees will not make the “Cross of Christ”.  Yet, how many of those saintly open-minded Scribes would allow the happy vitality of the season if all those trees lost their branches and needles and stood straight and upright with just one horizontal timber to support the faith in salvation through the Messiah?  So we are suppose to swallow that the ACLU is charitable by demanding a neutral Caiphas public policy?  Pray tell, what other blasphemy is necessary to endure in the quest for “Simple Politeness”?

 

The message of the Bible Gospel includes both Old and New Testaments.  Fulfillment by the later does not do away with the former.  Is not that the message of true tolerance?  Is not that the real role of witnessing the Good News . . . for all to hear and receive the gift of grace to believe? 

 

Not so for the ‘Princes of Politeness’.  Let no Divine King take the place of the creed of public neutrality.  So goes the joyful fallacy of a happy holiday, in a universal collective community. 

So goes the secular society, never allow the country’s Christian founding tradition go unchallenged.  So goes the great society of human invention, the civic chaos is but an illusion.  

Don’t be humiliated into thinking that it is unchristian to speak out loud and clear in the public square your submission to the Son of God.  Just maybe a non-believer may receive the Spirit of the season.       

 

James Hall – ‘The Right’

 

 

The 'Dueling Twins'

 

 

thinker2a.gif
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins!

 

 “A blind person who sees is better than a seeing person who is blind”
 Iranian Proverb quotes

 

 

nukes.gif
 
Want A Nuclear Free Middle East? Israeli's nukes must be included in a ban of WMD.

 

 sense.

 

   
 

Dueling Twins

 

Iran


 

Home Prelude Third Parties ANWAR Over Energy Immigration National Education U.N. vs U.S. Social Security Campaign Reform Isolationism Judiciary Kyoto HMO Defense Democrats Stem Cells Republicans Unions Altruism Terrorism Force Ostrich Zionism Airports Media Stimulate Surplus Accord Excess Afghanistan Liberalism After Afghanistan THE Anarchist Abandonment Civilization National ID Taxes Environmentalism Rights Consent States' Rights Church & State Christmas Supreme Court Iran

 


 

The 'Dueling Twins'

 

 

thinker2a.gif
Enter the 'HALL' of the Dueling JAMES Twins!

 

 “A blind person who sees is better than a seeing person who is blind”
 Iranian Proverb quotes

 

 

Counterpoint:

Horizontal Divider 24

Lions and Tigers and Zionists, Oh My!
 
James Hall, From the Left

 

 

This prattle about Zionists makes about as much sense as the haunted forest in The Wizard of Oz.  The lion Dorothy discovered there turned out to be less than formidable.  Today’s Zionists are just as toothless and ineffective.  Look at Israel today, a country divided on a peace policy and futilely trying to wall itself away from its enemies.  That’s the power of today’s Zionism.

 

There are people in America defending Zionism and Israel today, but they are not Zionists—they are fundamentalist Christians who have decided that the occupation of the Holy Land by Israelis is part of God’s Plan.  Some of them, like televangelist Pat Robertson, have even criticized efforts by Ariel Sharon and his supporters to continue the land-for-peace program.

 

We need to be involved in the Middle East, but our presence there is not dictated by Zionists, fundamentalist Christians or even oil-hungry Kissinger realpolitick.  It’s dictated by our own national interest.  The Middle East is the most dangerous place on the planet, a focal point for religious extremisms of all stripes—and into this volatile mix now add intermediate range missiles and nuclear weapons.

 

All experts agree that Israel is nuclear-armed.  Saddam’s nuclear aspirations in response were enough to bluff George W. Bush into his ill-fated occupation of Iraq.  But Iran’s very-real technological abilities, fueled by its oil wealth and close trade ties to Russia and China, make it likely that this nation will join shortly Pakistan as the second nuclear-armed Muslim nation in the world.  Iran has also been testing intermediate range missiles, technology provided courtesy of its trading partners.  And its leader has called for the destruction of Israel.

 

So, you say, no big deal.  What’s a small nuclear war over there to us?

 

There’s a lot at stake.  Iran could lob nukes at Israel, Europe, Australia, and at U.S. forces deployed in Sunni Iraq or Afghanistan.  Israel and perhaps the Europeans might respond in kind, as might we.  If the Middle East goes up in nuclear flames, it will play havoc with our economy and perhaps start religious wars that would sweep the globe.  Iran has close contacts with terrorist groups, and terrorists may even get their hands on nukes, or Iran might marry its nukes with an already-acquired long-distance missile capacity to shoot at U.S. bases in Europe and Asia.

 

What’s to keep Iran from developing intercontinental ballistic missiles, the logical next step in its program?  Then it would have the capability of reaching us directly.

 

At a minimum, Iran’s defiance of the nuclear proliferation treaty would start likely start a nuclear arms race in other countries where there exists a technological capability do develop nuclear weapons.  A world where every other nation is a member of the Nuclear Club is a much more dangerous world than the one that exists today.

 

When we faced a Communist enemy, we had the assurance that our enemy wanted to live in this world.  Kruschev blinked in Cuba; Breshnev balked, and Gorbachev gave in.  But religious fanatics believe they’ll inherit a heavenly paradise even as they turn this earth into a cinder.  It’s for this reason that we can’t turn our backs on the Middle East and let the fundamentalists fight it out there—they’re much too eager for Armageddon.

 

President Bush has to get involved and has to get the rest of the world, which has a stake in this, involved as well.  We have to be prepared to act to take out Iran’s fledgling nuclear capability.  Because a nuclear-armed Iran is a much scarier idea than a haunted forest in a fantasy world, and nuclear war is not a happy ending.

 

Horizontal Divider 24

Final Word:

 

Cooperation, Not Domination

 

What a minute, who said anything about world domination?  We don’t seek to dominate the world, and the proof is that we’ve had that opportunity, many times, and each time we’ve moved in the direction of world cooperation, forging alliances of democracies, not seeking world domination. 

 

What we are working towards is not a U.S. solution to the Iran problem, but a world solution.  Remember that Iran seeks to break an international agreement, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  Its case has been investigated by an international organization, the IAEA (The International Atomic Energy Agency), and that agency has referred Iran to the U.S. Security Council for a decision on possible sanctions.  Any sanction, when and if it comes, will be carried out according to U.N. resolutions and international law.

 

We didn’t even take the lead in dealing with this problem. In an effort to resolve this situation, Iran was first approached by the European nations France, Germany, and Great Britain.  The Russian Federation and China also offered solutions to Iran and have each offered compromises that the U.S. has accepted in principle. 

 

No, this is hardly a U.S. problem, nor will the solution be a U.S.-only one.

 

I will grant my opponent’s point that the Middle East is a morass, a tar pit capable of dragging the strongest predator under.  Every time we meddle over there risks involvement getting in over our heads.

 

But we really have no choice, where nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles are concerned.  We can’t let a fanatical regime get their hands on them.

 

Neither can we claim some kind of neutrality with a nation that already regards us an enemy.  A nation that has held Americans hostage and prays daily for our destruction is not one that we can trust with nuclear weapons, nor can our allies and friends in Europe and the Pacific, who would come under direct threat from a Nuclear Iran.

 

Undoubtedly Israel will play a role in this situation, too; mainly because it can’t permit an enemy that close to it to have nuclear weapons.  It seems clear that Israel will act if we do nothing, and their involvement could easily lead to a widespread Middle Eastern war, and widespread disaster to a world economy dependent on Middle Eastern oil.  That’s just reality, and one doesn’t have to be buddy-buddy with the Israelis to realize this.

 

If we do make the decision to intervene, it will not be to protect Israel.  We will do it because the international treaties that protect the world from nuclear proliferation can’t be flouted, our friends can’t be threatened, and our values can’t be compromised by giving a terrorist regime the weapons it wants.  That’s just common

 

Point:

Horizontal Divider 24

 

Iran - Disinformation Phobia

 

 

Propaganda designed to target Iran as the greatest threat to the world is just the latest sequel in the machinated melodrama of the evil empire.  Make no mistake about it, the imperialists of internationalism are the cause of global insanity.  How many neo-Hiltlers have to be created to impose the New World Order of the Zionist-Amerika axis?  If you equate America and her true national interest with a pre-empted interventionist foreign policy you have been programmed to accept that the globe is flat.  Such horizontal thinking only seeks to smother the earth with that hideous fraud known as controlled democracy which imposes a repugnant servitude upon every dissenting nation that has the gall to disobey the “World Community”. 

 

If this is your idea of the noble traditions of Western Civilization you are a fool.  The ancient Iranian culture is no servant to the Henry Kissenger school of diplomatic empire.  Defiance is Iran’s mortal sin.  But the long history of U.S. interference into the Middle East is the root cause of hatred towards a foreign policy designed in Tel Aviv and fueled with the blessing of the board room of Big Oil.  America’s original sin is the abandonment of a traditional America-First Foreign Policy as practiced at the beginning of the Republic.  Today the world hasn’t changed to demand internationalism, just that the oligarchy precipitates artificial crisis to manage a contrived chaos.

 

Novakeo sums up the house of cards that provokes the plutocrats.  “Iran in 2003 began accepting euros as the exchange currency for their oil exports and in March 2006, Iran will begin their own Oil Bourse that will directly compete with New York's Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and London's International Petroleum Exchange (IPE). These two American owned oil exchanges use the U.S. dollar as their monetary exchange mechanism for the purchase of oil. Iran's plan to establish an Iranian Oil Bourse utilizing the stronger euro for their oil trade represents a dangerous threat to the monetary supremacy of the U.S. dollar and to the American imperial prowess that the petrodollar sustains.”

 

Pat Buchanan goes one step further: “Conservatives must raise the ever-relevant question: Cui bono? Who would benefit from a U.S. war with Iran? Who is prodding us into it? Are they looking out for America first?”

 

For the answer look to Michel Chossudovsky in Nuclear War against Iran: “Since late 2004, Israel has been stockpiling US made conventional and nuclear weapons systems in anticipation of an attack on Iran. This stockpiling which is financed by US military aid was largely completed in June 2005. Israel has taken delivery from the US of several thousand "smart air launched weapons" including some 500 'bunker-buster bombs, which can also be used to deliver tactical nuclear bombs.” 

 

 

According to the Neocon WND - Iran leader: Islam to 'rule the world'.  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying: “We must believe in the fact that Islam is not confined to geographical borders, ethnic groups and nations. It's a universal ideology that leads the world to justice."  Now clear your mind of decades of disinformation and seriously ask yourself if a Nuclear Iran is really a clear and prevalent threat to bomb America?  Is there anyone who still retains a modest degree of rational intelligence that can deny that the Zionist are posed to wipe off the map any country that dares to defy their dominance in the region or their Satanic financial Federal Reserve Ponzi scheme? 

 

An ideology that does not bow down and obey the ultimate organized crime syndicate that pumps up the New World Order using fractional reserve debt revenue and stolen oil reserves must be targeted for extermination.  Who is really the holocaust denier? 

 

A world based upon CIA and Mossad intrigue produced the Pahlavian Savak secret police state.  The good old days under the Shah of Iran when all was under Israeli control are gone.  Today Mordechai Vanunu is the modern day Alfred Dreyfus, but where is his Émile Zola?  If Iran wants an atomic deterrent to counter the nukes from the Dimona reactor, what Talmudic authority gives contemporary Elders of Zion the protocols to ferment a nuclear winter? 

 

If citizens of the world truly want to prevent regional carnage, disarm a nuclear Israel as a condition to defuse Iranian weapons.  Under the global oil for dollars regimes, the desire or will to lead towards a “world to justice”, will not tolerate dissident Islamic parity.  Just maybe Iran is not the devil you are conditioned to believe . . .

 

James Hall aka SARTRE  

 

Horizontal Divider 24

Rebuttal:

 

The hypocrisy of the apologists for empire has an acute deficiency in defining reality.  The national self-interest can never be equated with world domination.  If the major powers truly wanted to beat their atomic black mail weapons into plow shears the process of universal nuclear disarmament would attain supreme urgency.  When political stooges like Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf accepts their payoffs to keep the finger off the trigger, you know that the real objective is making the world safe for the Petrodollar monopoly.

 

As long as America is held hostage by an unholy alliance of shadow financial manipulators, that cabal will initiate perpetual war for a permanent state of terror.  Those dreadful 444 days of Iranian hostage taking was over 25 years ago.  Have we not learned anything that the sordid intrusion into the region has always been the essential cause for hostility towards the United States? Islamic deep-seated revulsion for Israeli is not our concern and certainly does not rise to our national interest.  As long as zealot Zionists set Israeli policy, Jews will never be able to call cousins, brothers.

 

Lest you also forget those Christian-Zionists preach a John Neslon Darby heresy that pleases the Mattoid Masters of the manipulated Free Trade world economy.  The source of the deceit does not include every Jew any more then every destructive action is caused by each misguided Dispensationalist.  But what they all have in common is an irrational and illusionary political devotion to the State of Israel.  Most Iranians understand this viewpoint while the majority of Americans remain ignorant to the political game that is being played.  Ignorance is the basis for public support of a destructive foreign policy at best.  At its worse, sheer demented fatherland jingoism rally the masses to act as asses.

 

The canard that Iran might develop ICBM’s ignores the reality that Israel extorted Germany to build and donate two Type 800 Dolphin class submarines equipped for long-range nuclear-capable submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM). According to some reports the submarines may be capable of carrying nuclear-armed Popeye Turbo cruise missiles.  And we are supposed to believe that Iran is a threat to the world while Israel has adopted a Sampson Option?

 

 

One need not endorse Islamic fanaticism to see the reality that U.S. Middle East policy has been bankrupt from the day that the State of Israel was recognized.  The wisdom in repudiating a self-destructive alliance is common sense.  Neutrality with a balanced and constructive interaction is hardly living in the Land of Oz.  It’s the true legacy of our own founding and it would work today, as well as it had in the past, to achieve actual national security for American citizens. 

 

 

 

Go to Sartre Page III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised: May 18, 2008 .   Communication:   discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com     Go to Home Page     Go to Index of All Articles Pages       
Read the
Disclaimer
Last modified: May 18, 2008  Copyright © 1999 - 2008  All rights reserved. [Gnostic Liberation Front].   www.gnosticliberationfront.com