Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

THAT quotation and the following - and many others like them - clearly demonstrate that the words "new world order" are deadly serious and furthermore, have been in use for decades. They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets 

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

"The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other."

Myron Fagan

"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation."

David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

"An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

"The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind."

George Herbert Walker Bush

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."

Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent."

Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

"The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans. "

British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)

"What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil."

Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920

"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."

New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

"From the days of Spartacus, Weisskopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922. 

"We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world."

Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

"The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi occult power which....pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I."

British military historian Major General J.F.C. Fuller, l941 

"For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

"The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

"The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."

Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."

A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes."

Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."

Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

"Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite."

Senator William Jenner, 1954

"The case for government by elites is irrefutable"

Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate - Is Government by the People Possible?

"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future."

U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups."

Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

"The Council on Foreign Relations is "the establishment." Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship."

Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

"The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation."

The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961

"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault."

CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.

"The planning of UN can be traced to the 'secret steering committee' established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department's Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department's postwar planning."

Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, "Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy." (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

"The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for "the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government."

Harpers, July l958

"The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow."

Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

"The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world."

M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

"If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands."

Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

"... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."

H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

"The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual."

Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

"In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace.'"

Excerpt from article entitled "New World Order Pledged to Jews," in The New York Times (October 1940)

"If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order."

The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

"New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor"

Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

"Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis."

Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)

"The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God."

American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

"There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper."

Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

"He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order."

Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

"Alchemy for a New World Order"

Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

"The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'"

Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- The New York Times (February 1962)

"The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order."

Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

"He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order.'"

Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

"If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

"The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species."

Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled "Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions," in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

"My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order."

Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975) 

"At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order."

Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)

"A New World Order"

Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order."

Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

"We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms."

Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

"We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period."

Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long."

President George Bush (January 1991)

"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council."

Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)

"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court."

George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 1991)

"... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier."

William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)

"How I Learned to Love the New World Order"

Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

"How to Achieve The New World Order"

Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund."

Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

"New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State"

Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

"The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all."

Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order."

President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)

Coup d' etat

.....Unfortunately the compilation of quotes ends here since this is an "old" collection. But the quotes and statements of today's politicians and assorted traitors continues to go on and on. The only difference being that they speak much bolder of this "New World Order" now, since its establishment as a One-World government, a dictatorship of the international "elite," appears to be inevitable. Especially, since the events of the attack on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington D. C., have made it possible for them, under the "leadership" of president Bush, to break the spirit and vigilance of the American people through an endless stream of lies and propaganda coming forth from a media which has been part and mouthpiece of the "New World Order" cabal for many decades. 

Is it not all so obvious? First the "fall" of Soviet Russia and the collapse of the puppet communist governments in eastern Europe. Then the presidential elections of November 2000 with what appears to be deliberately created confusion, chaos and fraud, which was finally "resolved" by a obviously biased supreme court decision in favor of George W. Bush. And then the astounding resolve of the Democratic Party and their presidential candidate Albert Gore, after a token show of resistance, to accept the verdict without any further battle. Many people were baffled, at the time, by the passivity and silent surrender of the presidential candidate Albert Gore and the Democratic Party. Why were they so willing to accept a verdict by the Supreme Court which was so obviously biased and which could have been challenged further by the Democrats? Did not the events of this questionable election and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling constitute a coup d'etat? 

Did  not George W. Bush attain the presidency by fraud, mainly stemming from unbelievably corrupt vote-counting  in the state of Florida where his brother is Governor? Did not the media, which is usually considered  "liberal" and therefore slanted towards the Democratic Party, help and abet to bring about this coup d'etat by mocking the re-counts and siding, especially in their editorials, with the Republicans and their candidate George W. Bush, the son of a former president who was the first public official to use the term "New World Order" in a speech to Congress on September 11, 1991. One doesn't have to be a student of political science to understand what was going on. 

The whole thing, like a well rehearsed stage play, was planned well ahead of the "election." Heroes and villains, Democrats and Republicans, Gore and Bush and all the props like the supreme court, congress and senate, media and press, are nothing but actors, stage-hands, chorus, orchestra and directors of a show to entertain the masses and create an illusionary feeling of being an active participant in the play. Nevertheless, it is a play, a show and nothing else. Let no one be fooled by the dramatic acting, the inspiring words and the beautiful props.  The script was written by the New World-Order cabal, the machiavellian conspirators behind the scenes, who cunningly, with the help of behavioral scientists, planned every minute detail of this "production" and our reaction to it. Nothing is left to chance. Yet, we are only important to them and their ultimate plans for us, because we might see through their charade and become part of a possible mass rebellion against their plans. 

In order to be of use to them we must be kept in ignorance and lethargy at all cost. Their last obstacle to the establishment of their New World Order dictatorship was the Constitution of the United States and the unwillingness of the American people to surrender their spirit of independence and love of liberty. It seemed like there was a definite limit to the willingness of the American people to accept their plans and propaganda. Like an invisible barrier, the guarantees of the Constitution protected the American people from a complete victory of the "New World Order" cabal. How, then, could this obstacle be removed? How could the American people be convinced that the guarantees of freedom and liberty through the constitution must be "curtailed" and re-defined for their own good? Of course, by creating such an enormously traumatizing "production," that it would shake the very souls of the masses. Something so dastardly and inconceivable that it would not only rip apart their spirits and souls, but threaten their very existence. 

Thus, after the "dry runs" of Waco, the World Trade Center bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing, ten years to the day after president Bush's New World Order speech to congress, on September 11, 2001, the most traumatizing event ever to occur on American soil happened completely unexpected like an apocalyptic nightmare. Witnessed by millions through television live broadcasts, the pictures of unfolding events seemed like a stunningly realistic Hollywood movie production. Without repeating all the terrifying details which seem to be etched into our hearts and souls forever, let us understand now that this was the final act to break the American spirit and clear the way for the establishment of the "New World Order". 

America the beautiful, the land of the free, has ceased to exist forever. In order to survive and be protected from "terrorism," the American people have handed their freedom and constitutional rights willingly and gladly to the New World Order cabal and their symbolic figurehead, George W. Bush. And let their be no misconception, this man, with the obnoxious grin, like he is privy to some hilarious secret joke, and the narrow eyes of a liar and con-man, is exactly what he appears to be. 

Nevertheless, he is only a useful prop, an actor who is also part of the "production team," essential but replaceable. The same part could have been played by Albert Gore or Clinton, perhaps not as well under the circumstances, but adequate enough. Perhaps they would have had just a little too much heart and soul to play the part as well as George W. Bush, which might be the reason they were so determined to make him president of the United States no matter what.  

It is so pathetic to observe the majority of the American people, whipped up into a blind frenzy of mindless patriotism, through relentless media propaganda and distortions of facts, "approving" anything and everything asked by president Bush and his cabinet in the name of "fighting terrorism" on the "home-front" and abroad. How sad, that the masses are so ignorant and gullible. So many years of schooling children without teaching them anything in depth about history, geo-politics and philosophy have finally paid-off for the cabal. Waving flags and singing patriotic songs, the American masses are now marching eagerly into the one-world plantation giving away their constitutional rights, their liberty and personal freedom at the gate, where president George W. Bush, his father George Bush, vice-president Cheney, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and countless other politicians and representatives of corporations and syndicates, the World Jewish Congress, the ADL, the Vatican, the Council of Foreign Relations with all its sub-organizations, the Bilderberger's, the Trilateralist's and all the other actors of the cabal are waiting to receive them. 

Finally, after a century of planning, plotting, conspiring and murdering countless millions in two World Wars, after inciting revolutions and counter-revolutions around the globe, after concentration camp and gulag experiments, after financing and controlling Communism and National Socialism, after flooding the important nations of the the world with drugs and foreign people in a coldly calculated experiment of multi-culturalism and the subsequent destruction of their natural hegemony and identity, after using drugs to create chaos and law enforcement to control and intimidate, after countless assassinations to shock and confuse the masses, after all the mind-control experiments and all the double-talk, finally all the degenerate acts of machiavellian manipulations and lies have paid off as the American Republic has fallen and it's once proud people have, of their own free will, surrendered unconditionally to the enemy within. Unable or unwilling to search for truth beyond media propaganda they have chosen to 

mediabeat@igc.org 


GEORGE ORWELL IN 2001: SPEAKING FROM THE GRAVE

By Norman Solomon   /   Creators Syndicate


         I dreamed I saw George Orwell last night. Alive as you or me.

         He'd been watching the news, and he was quite irate. "All 
this doublespeak about war crimes is appalling," he said. "That chap 
Milosevic -- I see the U.S. government wants him tried for war 
crimes."

         "Yes," I replied. "All the pundits agree."

         "But meanwhile, the news coverage of the Israeli prime 
minister's visit to the White House failed to suggest that he, also, 
would be suitable for prosecution as a war criminal. After all, 
evidence clearly implicates Ariel Sharon in the massacres of hundreds 
of Palestinian people inside the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in 
Lebanon in 1982. Why aren't the media commentators demanding that he 
stand in the dock at The Hague?"

         "Well, the U.S. government is closely allied with Israel, 
so --"

         Orwell cut me off. "I was asking a rhetorical question. I 
get it. Believe me." His voice began to waver and fade, so only 
fragments were audible. "Plenty of examples ... Turkish 
government ... U.S. ally ... killing Kurds for many years ... 
brutally suppressing their language and culture ... where's the 
press?" He coughed, then started again, faintly: "Henry Kissinger ... 
wholesale murder in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia ... East Timor ... and 
remember Chile ... Any evenhanded reporting would ..."

         "During the last few months," I interjected, "the journalist 
Christopher Hitchens has raised quite a ruckus about Kissinger and --"

         Orwell waved a hand, dismissively. "Scant comfort ... news 
delayed is news denied ... sickening media manipulation ..."

         "You sound way too radical for mainstream media," I 
exclaimed. "Yet these days you're almost universally revered."

         Orwell laughed grimly, in the midst of coughing. His next 
words were at full volume. "Indeed. Embraced with one hand and 
watered down with the other. Now rendered as dreadfully weak tea and -
-"

         Then, suddenly, I woke up. The dull thud of a newspaper 
echoed on the front porch. "Mr. Orwell," I murmured, "what were you 
saying?" But there was no reply. Just the filtered light of dawn and 
the far-off sound of "Morning Edition" on National Public Radio.

         George Orwell died in 1950. If he had lived long enough to 
reach the 21st century, it's a good bet that -- while treasuring the 
civil liberties and other freedoms that exist in the United States -- 
he would deplore the deep patterns of indoctrination that undergo 
constant 
reinforcement in our society.

         "Democratic" processes of intellectual conformity and 
insidious political propaganda were of great concern to Orwell. Not 
content to merely point a finger from West to East in his satirical 
novel about Soviet tyranny, "Animal Farm," he wrote a challenging 
preface, which disappeared from editions of the book for nearly 30 
years.

         The preface included a downbeat analysis of the conditions 
of public discourse in England, where "admiration for Russia happens 
to be fashionable at this moment." Orwell astutely speculated 
that "quite possibly that particular fashion will not last." But, he 
went on: "To exchange one orthodoxy for another is not necessarily an 
advance. The enemy is the gramophone mind, whether or not one agrees 
with the record that is being played at the moment."

         Today, Orwell's record-player metaphor is a bit outdated -- 
we could refer to "the CD mind" -- but his statement remains acutely 
relevant. Ideologies are most pernicious when they're so dominant 
that they aren't even recognized as such.

         What Orwell wrote in his introduction, describing the 
England of 1945, is no less applicable to the United States of 
2001: "In this country, intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a 
writer or journalist has to face... Unpopular ideas can be silenced, 
and inconvenient facts kept dark, without the need for any official 
ban. ... At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas 
which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept 
without question."

         In December 1946, four months after U.S. publication 
of "Animal Farm," Orwell wrote in a letter to literary critic Dwight 
Macdonald: "If people think I am defending the status quo, that is, I 
think, because they have grown pessimistic and assume that there is 
no alternative except dictatorship or laissez-faire capitalism." He 
added: "What I was trying to say was, 'You can't have a revolution 
unless you make it for yourself; there is no such thing as a 
benevolent dictatorship.'"

         Orwell was anti-Communist. He was also a socialist who 
vehemently opposed the capitalist system -- a position that would 
disqualify him from appearing as a regular commentator on any of 
America's big TV networks in the present day.

____________________________________________________

Norman Solomon's weekly syndicated column -- archived at 
www.fair.org/media-beat/   -- focuses on media and politics. His latest 
book 
is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media."

     Return to top of page

Revised: July 18, 2010 .   Communication:   discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com     Go to Home Page     Go to Index of All Articles Pages       
Read the Disclaimer
Last modified: July 18, 2010  Copyright © 1999 - 2008  All rights reserved. [Gnostic Liberation Front].   www.gnosticliberationfront.com