|
This is 911TrueStory.com
Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an international consortium.
This is 911TrueStory.com This information focuses on the theory that the World Trade Center buildings were demolished by internally placed bombs.This is called a "controlled demolition". Many people believe this possibility has not been adequately investigated. Links to information that contradicts other aspects of the official version of events are available at www.Question911.com Links to official versions of events are at the bottom of this page. You decide. ............................................... Some video segments are longer than 30 minutes running time. This can take hours to download with a dial up connection. If you right click on these links, and "save target" as a file on your computer, they will load faster the next time you view them. Otherwise, left click to play or read the file. 911 Eyewitness Video part 3 Parts 1 and 2 are available at http://www.Question911.com Secret Evil Of 911 (Video) Painful Deceptions Demolition (Video) Audio analysis of explosions (Video) Scientific presentation by Dr. Steven Jones, Professor Department of Physics and Astronomy at Brigham Young University Or download his draft (version 3.0) as a Word file here "In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the carefully planned use of explosives. I have presented ample evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is testable and falsifiable and yet has not been seriously considered in any of the studies funded by the US government." Newspaper story about Dr. Steven Jones The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True Link to paper by David Ray Griffin Or download Word files here: Griffin paper Griffin endnotes Griffin references David Ray Griffin, author of The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (Video part 1) David Ray Griffin, author of The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (Video part 2) Scientific analysis of WTC 1 dust cloud (Word file) "On September 11th, both of the Twin Towers disintegrated into vast clouds of concrete and other materials, which blanketed Lower Manhattan. This paper shows that the energy required to produce the expansion of the dust cloud observed immediately following the collapse of 1 World Trade Center (the North Tower) was much greater than the gravitational energy available from its elevated mass." (In other words, likely due to explosives.) Loose Change version 1, part 2 (Video) (Or click here to order the latest, version 2 of the Loose Change Video from their web site) Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 Video, part 3 (Part facts, part seething conspiracy rant?) Blog and links to related web sites
Official versions of events: National Institite of Standards and Technology (NIST) Director's 10/26/05 presentation to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science The report completely ignores what happened to Building 7. In a footnote on page 4, this report states: "The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity, this sequence is referred to as the probable collapse sequence, although it includes little analysis of the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable." Therefore, the theory of controlled demolition is not considered. FEMA World Trade Center report The US State Department felt compelled to publish this rebuttal of a British book - 9/11 Revealed The 9/11 Commission Final Report Joint report of U.S. House and Senate Intelligence Committees
Reproduced gratefully from: www.911truestory.com
Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an international consortium. Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11. They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C. These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor." They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking. They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures. If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse. They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern history. Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine. They have found the government's own investigiation to be severely flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation. They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack. Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling: * In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible? * The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible? * Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible? * Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible? * Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible? * Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible? * Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible? * A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible? * A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible? * The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible? Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints. These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality." Reproduced from:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/1/emw339303.htm
150+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media FBI Hides 85 Pentagon Videos And 9/11 Truth For All Of Our 911 Articles Click Here Also Read: The Delmar Edward Vreeland Case
|
|
Revised:
May 18, 2008
. Communication:
discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com
Go to
Home Page
Go to Index
of All Articles Pages |