TO ALL THE CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORISTS
… who believe in the official cockamamie story that 19 Islamic
fundamentalists, led by Osama Bin Laden, holed up in some cave in
Afghanistan, figured out how out-smart the most sophisticated
intelligence organizations (NSA, CIA, FBI, etc.) on the face of the
planet. Remember the official story, by definition, is nothing more than
a conspiracy theory, which is severely lacking in corroborating physical
evidence.
If you don’t feel like reading any more, but are interested learning
what the government, 9/11 commission, and the mainstream media will not
tell you, the best video I have seen to date regarding the events of
9/11 is “Loose Change, 2nd Edition” by Dylan Avery:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
First, I will start with the FACT that there are several former or
current high-up governmental officials who have stated that the official
simply does not add up, and at the very least, the government allowed
the attacks to take place, and some are even stating that 9/11 was
conducted by a faction within the government itself
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia.
Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor
during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds.
Paul Craig Roberts, former Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover
Institution, a former assistant secretary of the treasury in the Reagan
Administration.
George Galloway, Member of U.K. Parliament.
Michael Meacher, former senior member of the Blair government.
Second the FACT the tower collapsed at free-fall speeds, which by
itself, totally disproves the official explanation of how/why the twin
towers collapsed, and thus casts serious, I mean serious, doubt on the
official story that Al-Qaeda was solely behind the attacks. Using the
equations of one-dimensional kinematics, which have been established
(and accepted by all western scientists) since the time on Isaac Newton
in the early 1700s, I will calculate that amount of time it would take
an object to hit the ground that was dropped from the top of the two
towers.
Constants:
gravity (g) = 32 ft/s^2
h1 = height of North Tower = 1368 ft
h2 = height of South Tower = 1362 ft
Equations for an object starting at rest undergoing free-fall:
Distance = (1/2) * (gravity) * (time squared)
d = (1/2) * g * (t^2)
For the North Tower:
h1 = (1/2) * g * (t1^2)
2 * h1 / g = t1^2
t1 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t1 = sqrt (2 * 1368 / 32)
t1 = 9.25 seconds
For the South Tower:
h2 = (1/2) * g * (t2^2)
2 * h2 / g = t2^2
t2 = sqrt (2 * h1 / g)
t2 = sqrt (2 * 1362 / 32)
t2 = 9.23 seconds
Officially the North Tower collapsed in approximately 10 seconds, and
the South Tower collapsed in 8 seconds.
The official explanation is something like:
The structural integrity of the floor(s) hit by the airplanes was
significantly weakened due to the subsequent fire. Then the weight to
the tower above the impact location, cause those floor(s) to collapse,
which set-off a chain reaction where the upper part of the tower
pancaked down onto the lower floors collapsing one-by-one. Now I am not
a physicist, but I know enough physics to know that the upper part of
the tower would have encountered friction/resistance to its downward
motion as it crashed through each of the lower floors. Flight 11 hit the
North Tower at approximately floor 90. Flight 175 hit the South Tower at
approximately floor 80. Now conservatively lets say the each floor
slowed the decent of the upper part of the tower by only .1 seconds, so
we can estimate that the North Tower should have collapsed in 18.25
seconds (9.25 sec + 90 * 0.1 sec) and the South Tower should have
collapsed in 17.23 seconds (9.23 sec + 80 * 0.1 sec). These times are
significantly greater that recorded collapse times. So the only way that
the tower would have collapsed at these speeds would be for the floors
below the impact zone to be blown out with explosives just ahead of the
fall the upper part of the tower, so that it would not encounter any
resistance and thus could descend at free-fall speeds. In other words,
the top of the towers would have reached the ground in the same amount
of time (as the official collapse times), if the part of the tower below
the airplane impact suddenly vaporized out of existence and then the
upper part of the town fell to the ground.
Then on top of this, we have tapes of radio transmissions from
firefighters in the towers reporting several explosions far below the
where the plane impacted the towers, as well as interviews with
firefighters who state there were explosion going off as the towers
started to fall.
Also the Official Explanation states there were intense infernos fueled
by the kerosene of the crashed airplane that covered the floors in the
impact zone, and they burned from the time of impact until the towers
collapsed. But then how were the people standing in the holes in the
towers where the airplanes crashed (there are numerous pictures of
people standing in the holes of both towers) able to survive with the
intense infernos burning hot enough to significantly weaken the steel
infrastructure of the towers. Here is an excellent proof using the Laws
of Thermodynamics showing that there is no way there was enough jet fuel
to have significantly weaken the steel structure of the tower:
http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
Apparently, these fires also burned hot enough to have destroyed the
Black Boxes (made from some of the most indestructible material on the
face of the planet) from the crashed airplanes, since officially no
Black Boxes were recovered. But somehow a passport (made out of flimsy
substance know as paper that ignites at 451 degrees F) of one of the
hijackers survives almost completely unscathed.
And then what about WTC 7, did you know that it collapsed later in the
afternoon on September 11, even though it was not hit with an airplane
nor falling debris from the collapses of the towers. In fact there were
several buildings closer to WTC 1 and 2, one of which was actually
struck by falling debris, which did not collapse. The official
explanation for the collapse, was due to fire, but anyone who has seen a
video of the collapse of WTC 7 would have a hard time believing that it
was not brought down by explosives, as it is a picture perfect instance
of controlled demolition. Physicist Steven E. Jones from BYU does an
excellent job covering the physics of the collapse of WTC 7 at:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Some skeptics then might say, well if it were true that explosions
brought down the towers, then the steel in the rumble should show
evidence of that. But unfortunately Mayor Gulliani had all the scrap
metal immediately removed from Ground Zero and shipped to China for
refurbishing. Now all you watchers of the CSIs and the Law & Orders
should say hey wait a second, that was the biggest crime scene in US
history, nothing should be removed and least of all destroyed before it
has properly been investigated. However, in spite of this attempted
destruction of all the physical evidence, there were reports of molten
metal below the rumble as long a month after 9/11. Now jet fuel
(kerosene) at it hottest burns at 1300 degrees F, but steel does not
melt until 3000 degrees F. Maybe the Islamic Terrorist filled their
hijacked aircraft with “magic” jet fuel that burns hot enough to melt
steel.
Isn’t it funny how the so-called skeptic who vehemently oppose all the
so-called conspiracy theories, get really pissed-off at anyone who
questions the official explanation, calling them un-American or
un-Patriotic or using some sort of expletive to describe them (because
of course as everyone knows, people who use profanity obviously know
what they are talking about), but do not actually provide any physical
evidence to support their own conspiracy theory. The problem with these
so-called skeptics is that they are not skeptical at all when it comes
to the official story, and will irrationally accept any explanation (no
matter how crazy) put forth by the government and the mainstream media.
But when faced with anything that goes contrary to that mainstream
explanation, they switch from being irrationally accepting to being
irrationally skeptical, and it seems like no matter how much physical
evidence they are presented with, they are steadfast in their belief of
the official conspiracy theory.
If you still believe the official Neo-Con (or we might as well call them
Neo-Facist or Neo-Nazi) explanation for the events that transpired on
9/11, rather that Laws of Kinematics that have been established and
accepted since Isaac Newton in the early 1700s, then you might as well
stamp a bar-code on your forehead, implant a tracking microchip, and set
your time machine to 1984. Or maybe Osama Bin Laden and his posse holed
up in a cave in Afghanistan, figured out how to defy not only the laws
of physics, but also how to defy death, since at least 7 of the supposed
19 hijackers are still alive as reported by the BBC. Maybe that is
easier to accept than the terrorism that is going on right under our
noses, orchestrated by the very people to claim to be our saviors.
BUT SERIOUSLY, DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, do your own research and draw
your own conclusions. What a novel concept, thinking for oneself. When
is the last time you heard the government or the mainstream media
telling you to think for yourself. Wow, I must be a crazy Anti-American
conspiracy theorist telling people to question the government and think
for themselves. I sincerely love this country, our Republic (remember we
are a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy), and our Constitution,
and that is why I am not going to sit idly by and watch this Aristocracy
destroy the United States of America. And the worst part is that they
(they being not only the Neo-Cons in the public eye, but also the real
Aristocracy who own the Central Banks like the Rothschilds and the
Rockefellers and control thing behind the scenes) are laughing their
asses off because the general public is too stupid to figure what is
going on right in front of their faces. Who else is a true Patriot and
will stand with me and fight against the true terrorists (because by
definition our own government and media are terrorists) and the
resulting Tyranny, which Founding Fathers warned us about?
What I have stated above is only the tip of the iceberg, websites
contain mountains of additional evidence that you might find interesting
are:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project/index.htm
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.wtc7.net/
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
http://www.loosechange911.com
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.propagandamatrix.com
911 - inside job. Demand investigation!
http://www.wtc7.net -
http://www.physics911.org -
http://www.911-strike.com
http://www.oilempire.us -
http://www.dieoff.org -
http://www.peakoil.net
http://bombsinsidewtc.dk -
http://www.911review.com
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/index.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca -
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org
http://www.911review.com/index.html
http://www.911review.com/911review/index.html