|

(Courtesy
Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library, University of
Tulsa).
The Tulsa Race Riot
By Scott
Ellsworth
History does
not take place in a vacuum.
http://www.tulsareparations.org/TulsaRiot.htm
Historical events, be they
great or small, do not exist in isolation, but are a product of the
age during which they occurred. Often times, the reasons why a
particular historical incident turned out the way it did can be
readily located, while for others, the causes may be more difficult
to locate. In both cases, one rule still holds true: that the events
of the past cannot be separated from the era when they occurred.
The same applies to the
Tulsa race riot as well. To understand the riot, one cannot begin
with the first shot that was fired, nor even with the seemingly
insignificant chain of events that led to the first signs of real
trouble. Rather, we must begin with the spirit of the times. Only
seeing the world as Tulsans did in 1921, and by grasping both their
passions and their fears, can we comprehend not only how this great
tragedy could occur, but why, in the end, that it did.
Of all the qualities that
impressed out-of-town visitors about Tulsa in the days before the
race riot, one of them was just how new and up-to-date everything
seemed. From the modern office buildings that were rising up out of
downtown, to the electric trolleys that rumbled back and forth along
Main Street, to the rows of freshly painted houses that kept pushing
the city limits further and further into the surrounding
countryside, compared to other cities, Tulsa was nothing short of an
overnight sensation. Indeed, Tulsa had grown so much and so fast --
in a now-you-don't-see-it, now-you-do kind of fashion -- that local
boosters called it the Magic City.
The elixir which had fueled
this remarkable growth was, of course, oil. The discovery of the
nearby Glenn Pool -- reputed to be the "richest small oil field in
the world" -- in 1905, and by the farsightedness of local leaders to
build a bridge across the Arkansas River one year earlier, the
sleepy rural crossroads known as Tulsa, Indian Territory. was
suddenly catapulted into the urban age.

A birds eye view of Tulsa in 1918 (Courtesy Mark
Adkinson).
By 1910, thanks to the
forest of derricks which had risen up over the nearby oil fields,
Tulsa had mushroomed into a raucous boomtown of more than 10,000.
Astonishingly, its real growth was only beginning. As the word began
to spread about Tulsa -- as a place where fortunes could be made,
lives could be rebuilt, and a fresh start could be had -- people
literally began to pour in from all over the country. Remarkably
enough, by 1920, the population of greater Tulsa had skyrocketed to
more than 100,000.
The city that these
newcomers had built was, in many ways, equally remarkable. Anchored
by the oil industry, and by its new role as the hub of the vast
Mid-Continent Field, by 1921 Tulsa was home to not only the offices
of more than four-hundred different oil and gas companies, but also
to a score of oil field supply companies, tank manufacturers, pipe
line companies, and refineries. While the city also enjoyed its role
as a regional commercial center, serving nearby farms and ranches,
for good reason it was already being referred to as the Oil Capital
of the World.
Despite its youth, Tulsa
also had acquired, by 1921, practically all of the trappings of
older, more established American cities. Four different railroads --
the Frisco, the Santa Fe, the Katy, and the Midland Valley -- served
the city, as did two separate inter-urban train lines. A new,
all-purpose bridge spanned the Arkansas River near Eleventh Street,
while street repair, owing to the ever-increasing numbers of
automobiles, was practically constant. By 1919, Tulsa also could
boast of having its own commercial airport.
A new city hall had been
built in 1917, a new federal building in 1915, and a new county
courthouse in 1912. New schools and parks also had been dedicated,
and in 1914, the city erected a magnificent new auditorium, the
3,500 seat Convention Hall. Tulsa had grown so quickly, in fact,
that even the old city cemetery had to be closed to new burials. In
its place, the city had designated Oaklawn Cemetery, located at
Eleventh Street and Peoria Avenue, as the new city cemetery.2
In 1921, Tulsa could lay
claim to two daily newspapers the Tulsa World, a morning
paper, and a newly renamed afternoon daily, the Tulsa Tribune
plus a handful of weeklies. Radio had not arrived yet, but the city
was connected to the larger world through four different telegraph
companies. Telephone service also existed -- with some ten-thousand
phones in use by 1918 -- although long-distance service was still in
its infancy. While the city was linked both to nearby towns and to
the state capital at Oklahoma City by a network of roads, rail
travel was by far the fastest and most reliable mode of
transportation in and out of town.
Seven different banks, some
of which were capitalized at more than one-million dollars each,
were located downtown, as were the offices of dozens of insurance
agencies, investment advisers, accounting firms, stock and bond
brokerages, real estate agencies, and loan companies. By 1921, more
than two-hundred attorneys were practicing in Tulsa, as were more
than one-hundred-fifty doctors and sixty dentists.
Frequently awash in money,
the citizens of Tulsa had plenty of places to spend it from
furniture stores, jewelry shops, and clothing stores to restaurants
and cafes, motion picture theaters, billiard halls, and speakeasies.
Those who could afford it could find just about anything in Tulsa,
from the latest in fashion to the most modern home appliances,
including vacuum cleaners, electric washing machines and Victrolas.
For those whose luck had run dry, the city had its share of
pawnshops and second-hand stores.3
Many Tulsans were especially
proud of the city's residential neighborhoods -- and with good
reason. From the workingman's castles that offered electric
lighting, indoor plumbing, and spacious front porches, to the real
castles that were being built by the oil barons, the city could
boast of block after block of handsome, modern homes. While Tulsa
was by no means without its dreary rooming houses and poverty
stricken side streets, brand new neighborhoods with names like Maple
Ridge, Sunset Park, Glen Acres, College Addition, Gurley Hill, and
Irving Heights were built year after year. Some f the new homes were
so palatial that they were regularly featured on picture postcards,
chamber of commerce pamphlets, and other publications extolling the
virtues of life in Tulsa.4
So too, not surprisingly,
was downtown. With its modern office buildings, its graceful stone
churches, and its busy nightlife, it is easy to see why Tulsans --
particularly those who worked, played, or worshiped downtown -- were
so proud of the city's ever- growing skyline. What the pamphlets and
the picture postcards did not reveal was that, despite its
impressive new architecture and its increasingly urbane
affectations, Tulsa was a deeply troubled town. As 1920 turned into
1921, the city would soon face a crossroads that, in the end, would
change it forever.
However, chamber of commerce
pamphlets and the picture postcards did not reveal everything. Tulsa
was, in some ways, not one city but two. Practically in the shadow
of downtown, there sat a community that was no less remarkable than
Tulsa itself. Some whites disparagingly referred to it as "Little
Africa", or worse, but it has become known in later years simply as
Greenwood.5 In the early months of 1921, it was the home
of nearly ten-thousand African American men, women, and children.
Many had ties to the region
that stretched back for generations. Some were the descendants of
African American slaves, who had accompanied the Creeks, Cherokees,
and Choctaws on the Trail of Tears. Others were the children and
grandchildren of runaway slaves who had fled to the Indian nations
in the years prior to and during the Civil War. A few elderly
residents, some of whom were later interviewed by WPA workers during
the 1930s, had been born into slavery.6
However, most of Tulsa's
African American residents had come to Oklahoma, like their white
neighbors, in the great boom years just before and after statehood.
Some had come from Mississippi, some from Missouri, and others had
journeyed all the way from Georgia. For many, Oklahoma represented
not only a chance to escape the harsher racial realities of life in
the former states of the Old South, but was literally a land of
hope, a place worth sacrificing for, a place to start anew. And come
they did, in wagons and on horseback, by train and on foot. While
some of the new settlers came directly to Tulsa, many others had
first lived in smaller communities -- many of which were all-black,
or nearly so -- scattered throughout the state.

B. C. Franklin (Courtesy John Hope Franklin).
B.C. Franklin was one. Born
in a small country crossroads about twenty miles southwest of Pauls
Valley, Franklin's family had roots in Oklahoma that stretched back
to the days of the old Chickasaw Nation during the Civil War. An
intelligent and determined young man, Franklin had attended college
in Tennessee and Georgia, but returned to Indian Territory to open
up a law practice. He eventually settled in Rentiesville, an
all-black town located between Muskogee and Checotah, where he
became not only the sole lawyer in town, but also its postmaster,
its justice of the peace, and one of its leading businessmen.
However, as his son John Hope Franklin later wrote, "there was not a
decent living in all those activities". Thus, in February 1921, B.C.
Franklin moved to Tulsa in the hopes of setting up a more lucrative
practice.7
Franklin's experiences,
however, were hardly unique, and scattered about Greenwood were
other businessmen and businesswomen who had first tried their luck
in smaller communities. In the end, however, their earlier
difficulties often proved to be an asset in their new home. Full of
energy and well-schooled in entrepreneurialism, these new settlers
brought considerable business skills to Tulsa. Aided by the buoyant
local economy, they went to work on building business enterprises
that rested upon sturdier economic foundations. By early 1921, the
community that they built was, by national standards, in many ways
quite remarkable.8
Running north out of the
downtown commercial district -- and shaped, more or less, like an
elongated jigsaw puzzle piece -- Greenwood was bordered by the
Frisco railroad yards to the south, by Lansing Street and the
Midland Valley tracks to the east, and by Standpipe and Sunset Hills
to the west. The section line, now known as Pine Street, had for
many years been the northernmost boundary of the African American
settlement, but as Tulsa had grown, so had Greenwood. By 1921, new
all-black housing developments -- such as the Booker T. Washington
and Dunbar Additions -- now reached past Pine and into the open
countryside north of the city.
The backbone of the
community, however, was Greenwood Avenue. Running north for more
than a mile -- from Archer Street and the Frisco yards all the way
past Pine -- it was not only black Tulsa's primary thoroughfare, but
also possessed considerable symbolic meaning as well. Unlike other
streets and avenues in Tulsa, which crisscrossed both white and
black neighborhoods, Greenwood Avenue was essentially confined to
the African American community.9
The southern end of
Greenwood Avenue, and adjacent side streets, was the home of the
African American commercial district. Nicknamed "Deep Greenwood",
this several block stretch of handsome one, two, and three-story red
brick buildings housed dozens of black-owned and operated
businesses, including grocery stores and meat markets, clothing and
dry good stores, billiard halls, beauty parlors and barber shops, as
well as the Economy Drug Company, William Anderson's jewelry store,
Henry Lilly's upholstery shop, and A.S. Newkirk's photography
studio. A suit of clothes purchased at Elliott & Hooker's clothing
emporium at 124 N. Greenwood, could be fitted across the street at
H.L. Byars' tailor shop at 105 N. Greenwood, and then cleaned around
the corner at Hope Watson's cleaners at 322 E. Archer.

Centered
along busy Greenwood Avenue, Tulsa's African-American commercial
district was a bona fide American success story.
Home to literally dozens of black-owned and operated businesses in
the days be fore the riot, "Deep Greenwood" could also lay
claim to a public Library, a postal substation, a Y. M. C. A.
branch, and the offices of two newspapers (Courtesy Don Ross).
There were plenty of places
to eat including late night sandwich shops and barbecue joints to
Doc's Beanery and Hamburger Kelly's place. Lilly Johnson's Liberty
Cafe, recalled Mabel Little, who owned a beauty shop in Greenwood at
the time of the riot, served home-cooked meals at all hours, while
at the nearby Little Cafe, "people lined up waiting for their
specialty -- chicken or smothered steak with rice and brown gravy."
A Coca-Cola, a sarsaparilla, or a soda could be bought at Rolly and
Ada Huff's confectionery on Archer between Detroit and Cincinnati.
Although both the nation and Oklahoma were nominally dry, there were
also places where a man or a woman could purchase a shot of bootleg
whiskey or a milky-colored glass of Choctaw beer.10
For a community of its size,
the Greenwood business district could boast of a number of
impressive commercial structures. John and Loula Williams, who owned
the three-story Williams Building at the northwest corner of
Greenwood Avenue and Archer Street, also operated the
seven-hundred-fifty seat Dreamland Theater, that offered live
musical and theatrical revues as well as silent movies accompanied
by a piano player. Across the street from the Dreamland sat the
white-owned Dixie Theater with seating for one-thousand, which made
it the second largest theater in town. In nearby buildings were the
offices of nearly all of Tulsa's black lawyers, realtors, and other
professionals. Most impressively, there were fifteen African
American physicians in Tulsa at the time of the riot, including Dr.
A.C. Jackson, who had been described by one of the Mayo brothers as
the "most able Negro surgeon in America".11
The overall intellectual
life of Greenwood was, for a community of its size, quite striking.
There was not one black newspaper but two - the Tulsa Star
and the Oklahoma Sun. African Americans were discouraged from
utilizing the new Carnegie library downtown, but a smaller,
all-black branch library had been opened on Archer Street.
Nationally recognized African American leaders, such as W.E.B.
DuBois, had lectured in Tulsa before the riot. Moreover, Greenwood
was also home to a local business league, various fraternal orders,
a Y.M.C.A. branch, and a number of women's clubs, the last of which
were often led by the more than thirty teachers who taught in the
city's separate -- and, as far as facilities were concerned,
decidedly unequal -- African American public schools.
The political issues of the
day also attracted considerable interest. The Tulsa Star, in
particular, not only provided extensive coverage of national, state,
and local political campaigns and election results, but also devoted
significant column space for recording the activities of the local
all-black Democratic and Republican clubs. Moreover, the Star
also paid attention to a number of quasi-political movements as
well, including Marcus Garvey's Universal Negro Improvement
Association, different back-to-Africa movements, and various
nationalist organizations. One such group, the African Blood
Brotherhood, later claimed to have had a chapter in Greenwood prior
to the riot.12
When it came to religious
activity, however, there was no question at all where Tulsa's
African American community stood. Church membership in Tulsa ran
high. On a per capita basis, there were more churches in black Tulsa
than there were in the city's white community as well as a number of
Bible study groups, Christian youth organizations, and chapters of
national religious societies. All told, there were more than a dozen
African American churches in Tulsa at the time of the riot,
including First Baptist, Vernon A.M.E., Brown's Chapel, Morning
Star, Bethel Seventh Day Adventist, and Paradise Baptist, as well as
Church of God, Nazarene, and Church of God in Christ congregations.
Most impressive from an architectural standpoint, perhaps, was the
beautiful, brand new home of Mt. Zion Baptist Church, which was
dedicated on April 10, 1921 -- less than eight weeks before the
riot.13
The new Mount Zion Baptist
Church building (constructed of brick and mortar) also was a
tangible symbol, of the fact that African Americans had also shared,
to some degree, in Tulsa's great economic boom. While modest in
comparison with the fortunes being amassed by the city's white
millionaires, Greenwood was home to some highly successful business
entrepreneurs. O.W. Gurley, a black real estate developer and the
owner of the Gurley Hotel, reportedly suffered some $65,000 in
losses during the riot. Even more impressive was the business resume
of J.B. Stradford, whose assets were said to be nearly twice as
large. Stradford, a highly successful owner of rental property, had
borrowed $20,000 in order to construct his own hotel. Opened on June
1, 1918, the Stradford Hotel, a modern fifty-four room structure,
instantly became not only one of the true jewels of Greenwood
Avenue, but was also one of the largest black-owned businesses in
Oklahoma.14

One of the Mann Grocery stores of the Greenwood
district (Courtesy Greenwood Cultural Center).
Most of the black-owned
businesses in Tulsa were, of course, much more modest affairs.
Scattered about the district were numerous small stores, from
two-seater barber shops to family-run grocery stores, that helped to
make pre-riot Greenwood, on a per capita basis, one of the most
business-laden African American communities in the country. Grit,
hard work, and determination were the main reasons for this success,
as were the entrepreneurial skills that were imported to Tulsa from
smaller communities across Oklahoma.
There were other reasons as
well. Tulsa's booming economy was a major factor, as was the fact
that, on the whole, Greenwood was not only the place where black
Tulsans chose to shop, but was also practically the only place that
they could. Hemmed in by the city's residential segregation
ordinance, African Americans were generally barred from patronizing
white-owned stores downtown -- or ran the risk of insult, or worse,
if they tried. While many black Tulsans made a conscious decision to
patronize African American merchants, the fact of the matter was
that they had few others places to go.15
There was no dearth of
African American consumers. Despite the growing fame of its
commercial district, the vast majority of Greenwood's adults were
neither businessmen nor businesswomen, but worked long hours, under
trying conditions, for white employers. Largely barred from
employment in both the oil industry and from most of Tulsa's
manufacturing facilities, these men and women toiled at difficult,
often dirty, and generally menial jobs -- the kinds that most whites
considered beneath them--as janitors and ditch-diggers, dishwashers
and maids, porters and day laborers, domestics and service workers.
Unsung and largely forgotten, it was, nevertheless, their paychecks
that built Greenwood, and their hard work that helped to build
Tulsa.16
Equally forgotten perhaps,
are the housing conditions that these men and women returned to at
the end of the day. Although Greenwood contained some beautiful,
modern homes -- particularly those of the doctors, business owners,
and educators who lived in the fashionable 500 block of North
Detroit Avenue along the shoulder of Standpipe Hill -- most African
Americans in pre-riot Tulsa lived in far more meager circumstances.
According to a study conducted by the American Association of Social
Workers of living conditions in black Tulsa shortly before the riot,
some "95 percent of the Negro residents in the black belt lived in
poorly constructed frame houses, without conveniences, and on
streets which were unpaved and on which the drainage was all
surface".17
Not all black Tulsans,
however, lived in Greenwood. As the city boomed and the newly-minted
oil tycoons built mansions, purchased touring cars, and in general
sought to mimic the lifestyles of their more established
counterparts back East, there was a corresponding boom in the market
for domestic help. Such positions were often open to African
Americans as well as whites, and by early 1921, upward of
two-hundred black Tulsans were residing in otherwise all-white
neighborhoods, especially on the city's ever growing south side.
Working as maids, cooks, butlers, and chauffeurs, they lived in
servant's quarters that, more often than not, were attached to
garages located at the rear of their employer's property.
For the men and women who
lived and worked in these positions, a visit to Greenwood -- be it
to attend Sunday services, or simply to visit with family and
friends -- was often the highlight of the week. Whether they caught
a picture show at the Dreamland or the Dixie, or merely
window-shopped along Greenwood Avenue, they, too, could take both
pride and ownership in what lay before them.18 Its
poverty and lack of services notwithstanding, there was no question
that Greenwood was an American success story.
Yet, despite its handsome
business district and its brand-new brick church, and the
rags-to-riches careers of some of its leading citizens, neither
Greenwood's present, nor its future, was by any means secure. By the
spring of 1921, trouble -- real trouble -- had been brewing in Tulsa
for some time. When it came to issues of race -- not just in Tulsa
or in Oklahoma, but all across American -- the problems weren't
simply brewing. They had, in fact, already arrived.
In the long and often
painful history of race relations in the United States, few periods
were as turbulent as the years surrounding World War I, when the
country exploded into an era of almost unprecedented racial strife.
In the year 1919 alone, more than two dozen different race riots
broke out in cities and towns across the nation. Unlike the racial
disturbances of the 1960s and the 1990s, these riots were
characterized by the specter of white mobs invading African American
neighborhoods, where they attacked black men and women and, in some
cases, set their homes and businesses on fire.19
These riots were set off in
different ways. In Chicago, long-simmering tensions between blacks
and whites over housing, recreation, and jobs were ignited one
Sunday afternoon in late July 1919. A group of teenaged African
American boys, hoping to find some relief from the rising
temperatures, climbed aboard a homemade raft out on Lake Michigan.
They ended up drifting opposite an all-white beach. The white
beach-goers, meanwhile, who were already angered by an attempt by a
group of black men and women to utilize that beach earlier that day,
began hurling stones at the youths, killing one, and setting off
nearly two weeks of racial terror. In the end, more than
thirty-eight people -- both black and white -- were killed in
Chicago, and scores and scores of homes were burned to the ground.20
A race riot in Washington,
D.C., which broke out earlier that summer, followed a more typical
pattern. After rumors had been circulating for weeks that rapists
were on the loose, a white woman claimed that she had been sexually
assaulted by two young African American men. Although she later
admitted that her original story was false, the white press built up
the incident, and racial tensions rose. Then, on July 19, the
Washington Post published yet another story of an alleged
assault -- "NEGROES ATTACK GIRL" ran the headline, "WHITE MEN VAINLY
PURSUE". The next day, the nation's capital erupted into racial
violence, as groups of white soldiers, sailors, and Marines began to
"molest any black person in sight, hauling them off of streetcars
and out of restaurants, chasing them up alleys, and beating them
mercilessly on street corners". At least six people were killed and
more than a hundred were injured. After whites threatened to set
fire to African American neighborhoods, order was finally restored
when the secretary of war called out some two-thousand federal
troops to patrol the streets.21
Alleged sexual assaults
played a role in two other race riots that broke out that year. In
Knoxville, Tennessee, a white mob gathered outside the jail where a
black male was being held for supposedly attacking a white female.
Troops were called in to quell the disturbance, but the soldiers --
all of whom were white -- instead invaded the African American
district and "shot it up." In Omaha, Nebraska, a similar situation
rapidly developed after William Brown, who was black, was arrested
for allegedly assaulting a young white girl. A mob of angry whites
then stormed the courthouse where Brown was being held, shot him,
hung him from a nearby lamppost, and then mutilated his body beyond
recognition.22
The savage attack on William
Brown brutally demonstrated just how passionately many white
Americans felt about situations involving interracial sexual
relations. While this subject -- which has a long and complicated
history in the United States -- cannot be dealt with in a detailed
fashion here, suffice it to say that during the post-World War I
era, and for many years before and after, perhaps no crime was
viewed as more egregious by many whites than the rape, or attempted
rape, of a white woman by a black male.23
Riots, however, were not the
only form of extralegal violence faced by African Americans during
the World War I era. In 1919 alone, more than seventy-five blacks
were lynched by white mobs -- including more than a dozen black
soldiers, some of whom were murdered while still in uniform.
Moreover, many of the so-called lynchings were growing ever more
barbaric. During the first year following the war, eleven African
Americans were burned -- alive -- at the stake by white mobs.24
Across the nation, blacks
bitterly resisted these attacks, which were often made worse by the
fact that in many instances, local police authorities were unable or
unwilling to disperse the white mobs. As the violence continued, and
the death count rose, more and more African American leaders came to
the conclusion that nothing less than the very future of black men
and women in America hung in the balance.

African Americans rallied solidly behind the
nation's war effort during World War I, and thousands of black
soldiers served in France.
Upon their return to the U. S., however, many black vets found that
the democracy that they had fought to protect overseas
was often unavailable to them back home (Courtesy Oklahoma
Historical Society).
World War I had done much to
clarify their thinking. In the name of democracy, African Americans
had solidly supported the war effort. Black soldiers -- who were
placed in segregated units -- had fought gallantly in France,
winning the respect not only of Allied commanders, but also of their
German foes. Having risked their lives and shed their blood in
Europe, many black veterans felt even more strongly that not only
was it time that democracy was practiced back home, but that it was
a long time overdue.25
They returned home to a
nation not only plagued by race riots and lynchings, but also by a
poisonous racial climate that, in many ways, was only growing worse.
The very same years that saw the emergence of the United States as a
major world power also witnessed, back home, the rise of some
aggressive and insidious new forms of white racism.
Moreover, the new racial
climate was far from limited to the South. Less than fifty years
after the Civil War, a number of northern cities began to bar
African Americans from restaurants and other public establishments,
while in the classrooms of Ivy League colleges and universities, a
new scientific racism -- which held that whites from northern Europe
were innately superior to all other human groups -- was all the
rage. In Washington, the administration of President Woodrow Wilson
proposed dozens of laws which mandated discriminatory treatment
against African Americans. And across the country, racist white
politicians constantly preyed upon racial fear and hostility.26
They soon had a new ally.
Re-established in Atlanta in
1915, the so-called second Ku Klux Klan had adopted both the name
and familiar hooded robes of its nineteenth century predecessor, but
in many ways was a brand new organization. Launched the same year
that D.W. Griffith's anti-black blockbuster, The Birth of
a Nation, was released in movie theaters nationwide, Klan
organizers fanned out across the country, establishing powerful
state organizations not only in the South, but also in places like
New Jersey, Indiana, and Oregon. While African Americans were often
the recipients of the political intimidation, beatings, and other
forms of violence meted out by klansmen, they were not the only
targets of the new reign of terror. Klan members also regularly
attacked Jews, Catholics, Japanese Americans, and immigrants from
southern Europe, as well as suspected bootleggers, adulterers, and
other alleged criminals.27
Although still a young
state, many of these national trends were well-represented in
Oklahoma. Like their counterparts elsewhere, black Oklahomans had
rallied strongly behind the war effort, purchasing Liberty Bonds,
holding patriotic rallies and taking part in home front conservation
efforts. More than a few African American men from Oklahoma --
including a large number of Tulsans -- had enlisted in the army.
Some, like legendary Booker T. Washington High School football coach
Seymour Williams, had fought in France.28
But when Oklahoma's black
World War I veterans finally returned to civilian life, they, too,
came home to a state where, sadly enough, anti-black sentiments were
alive and well. In 1911, the Oklahoma state legislature passed the
infamous "Grandfather Clause", which effectively ended voting by
African Americans statewide. While the law was ruled
unconstitutional by a unanimous vote by the U.S. Supreme Court four
years later, other methods were soon employed to keep black
Oklahomans from the polls. Nor did the Jim Crow legislation stop
there. In the end, the state legislature passed a number of
segregation statutes, including one which made Oklahoma the first
state in the Union to segregate its telephone booths.29

The Ku Klux Klan gripped Oklahoma in the 1920s,
this ceremony was in Lone Grove
(Courtesy Western History Collection, University of Oklahoma
Libraries).
Racial violence, directed
against black Oklahomans, also was a grim reality during this
period. In large part owing to conditions of frontier lawlessness,
Oklahoma had long been plagued by lynchings, and during the
territorial days, numerous suspected horse thieves, cattle rustlers,
and outlaws, the vast majority of whom were white, had been lynched
by white mobs. However, from 1911 onward, all of the state's
lynching victims, save one, were African American. And during the
next decade, twenty-three black Oklahomans -- including two women --
were lynched by whites in more than a dozen different Oklahoma
communities, including Anadarko, Ardmore, Eufaula, Holdenville,
Idabel, Lawton, Madill, Mannford, Muldrow, Norman, Nowata, Okemah,
Oklahoma City, Purcell, Shawnee, Wagoner, and Wewoka.30
The Sooner State also proved
to be fertile ground for the newly revived Ku Klux Klan. Estimates
vary, but at the height of its power in the mid-1920s, it is
believed that there were more than 100,000 klansmen in Oklahoma.
Chapters existed statewide, and the organization's membership rolls
included farmers, ranchers, miners, oil field workers, small town
merchants, big city businessmen, ministers, newspaper editors,
policemen, educators, lawyers, judges, and politicians. Most Klan
activities -- including cross burnings, parades, night riding,
whippings, and other forms of violence and intimidation -- tended to
be local in nature, although at one point the political clout of the
state organization was so great that it managed to launch
impeachment proceedings against Governor John C. Walton, who opposed
the Klan.31
Tulsa, in particular, became
a lively center of Klan activity. While membership figures are few
and far between -- one estimate held that there were some 3,200
members of the Tulsa Klan in December 1921 -- perhaps as many as
six-thousand white Tulsans, at one time or another, became members
of the Klan including several prominent local leaders. At one Klan
initiation ceremony, that took place in the countryside south of
town during the summer of 1922, more than one-thousand new members
were initiated, causing a huge traffic jam on the road to Broken
Arrow. Tulsa also was home to a thriving chapter of the Women of the
Ku Klux Klan as well as being one of the few cities in the country
with an active chapter of the organization's official youth
affiliate, the Junior Ku Klux Klan. There were Klan parades, Klan
funerals, and Klan fund-raisers including one wildly successful 1923
benefit that netted some $24,000, when 13 Ford automobiles were
raffled off. In time, the Tulsa Klan grew so solvent that it built
its own brick auditorium, Beno Hall -- short, it was said, for "Be
No Nigger, Be No Jew, Be No Catholic" -- on Main Street just north
of downtown.32
The local Klan also was
highly active in politics in Tulsa. It regularly issued lists of
Klan-approved candidates for both state and local political offices,
that were prominently displayed in Tulsa newspapers. According to
one student of the Klan in Tulsa Country during the 1920s, "mayors,
city commissioners, sheriffs, district attorneys, and many other
city and country office holders who were either klansmen or Klan
supporters were elected, and reelected, with regularity." In 1923,
three of the five members of the Oklahoma House of Representatives
from Tulsa Country were admitted klansmen.33
In addition to cross
burnings, Tulsa Klan members also routinely engaged in acts of
violence and intimidation. Richard Gary, who lived off Admiral
Boulevard during the early 1920s, still has vivid memories of hooded
klansmen, a soon-to-be horsewhipped victim sitting between them,
heading east in open touring cars. Suspected bootleggers,
wife-cheaters, and automobile thieves were among the most common
victims -- but they weren't the only ones. In May 1922, black Deputy
sheriff John Henry Smitherman was kidnaped by klansmen, who sliced
off one of his ears. Fifteen months later, Nathan Hantaman, a Jewish
movie projectionist, was kidnaped by Klan members, who nearly beat
him to death. The city's Catholic population also was the target of
considerable abuse, as Tulsa klansmen tried to force local
businessmen to fire their Catholic employees.34
Not all white Tulsans, of
course, or even a majority, belonged to the Ku Klux Klan in the
1920s. Among the city's white Protestants, there were many who
disdained both the Klan's tactics and beliefs. Nonetheless, at least
until the mid-1920s, and in some ways all the way until the end of
the decade, there is no doubt but that the Ku Klux Klan was a
powerful force in the life of the city.35
Less easy to document,
however, is whether the Klan was organized in Tulsa prior to the
1921 race riot. While there have been a number of allegations over
the years claiming that the Klan was directly involved in the riot,
the evidence is quite scanty -- in either direction -- as to whether
or not the Klan had an actual organizational presence in the city
prior to August 1921, some two months after the riot. However, since
this is an area of continuing interest, it may prove helpful to
examine this evidence a bit more closely.
According to the best
available scholarship, the first Klan organizers to officially visit
Oklahoma--George Kimbro, Jr. and George C. McCarron, both from
Houston -- did not arrive until the summer of 1920. Setting up
headquarters in the Baltimore Building in downtown Oklahoma City,
McCarron stayed on in the state capital, and began looking for
future klansmen among the membership of the city's various white
fraternal orders. According to Carter Blue Clark, whose 1976
doctoral dissertation remains the standard work on the history of
the Ku Klux Klan in Oklahoma, McCarron "shortly had twelve Kleagles
[assistant organizers] working out of his office selling memberships
throughout the city, and very soon throughout the state." While
Clark concluded that the Klan "could not be credited with
precipitating the riot" -- a finding shared by most scholars of the
riot -- he also determined that Klan organizers had been active in
the Tulsa region beforehand.36
The fact that Tulsa would
have been an early destination for Klan organizers -- who, like
their counterparts elsewhere, were paid on a commission basis -- is
entirely reasonable. Not only did Tulsa itself offer a large base of
potential members, but the city was a likely jumping-off place for
organizing the nearby oil fields.37
Other evidence also points
toward there being members of the Klan in Tulsa prior to the riot.
In the sermon he delivered on Sunday evening, June 5, 1921 -- only
four days after the riot -- Bishop E.D. Mouzon told parishioners at
Boston Avenue Methodist Church that, "There may be some of you here
tonight who are members of the Ku Klux Klan." Furthermore, research
conducted by Ruth Avery in the 1960s and 1970s also points toward
pre-riot Klan membership in Tulsa.38
However, other evidence
suggests that, if anything, the Klan had a very limited presence in
Tulsa before the riot. Throughout the first five months of 1921, for
example, the Tulsa Tribune did not hesitate to print stories
about Ku Klux Klan activities elsewhere, but gave no hint of there
being any in Tulsa.39
Moreover, only one week
before the riot, on May 22, 1921, the Tribune carried an
advertisement for the May Brothers clothing store which poked fun at
the Klan. Announcing that the downtown men's clothiers had created
its own "Kool Klad Klan", the advertisement went on to explain that
this was a "hot weather society" whose members would receive
discounts on their purchases of summer clothing. "Men who join the
K.K.K. pay less for their summer clothes and get more out of them,"
ran the ad copy, "Palm Beach is the favorite suit of most members."
What went unspoken, however, is that the May brothers were Jewish
immigrants from Russia, something that made them likely candidates
for Klan harassment. The fact the brothers ran the advertisement
would seem to suggest that on the eve of the riot, the existence of
the Ku Klux Klan in Tulsa was far from common knowledge, perhaps
reflecting membership numbers that were still low.40
The riot would change all of
that. Beginning with what one student of the history of the Klan
described as "the first open sign of the Klan's presence in Tulsa"
in early August 1921, more than two months after the riot, the Klan
literally exploded across the city. On August 10, more than
two-thousand people attended a lecture at Convention Hall by a Klan
spokesman from Atlanta. Three weeks later, on the evening of August
31, some three-hundred white Tulsa men were initiated into the Klan
at a ceremony held outside of town. Three days later, masked
klansmen kidnaped an alleged bootlegger named J.E. Frazier and took
him to a remote spot outside of Owasso and whipped him severely.
After the county attorney subsequently announced that he would take
no action against the klansmen, and intimated that the victim
probably got what he deserved, more whippings soon followed. With
the attack on J.E. Frazier, Tulsa's Klan era began in earnest.
Despite the lack of
convincing evidence linking the Klan to the outbreak of the riot in
the months that followed, Klan organizers used the riot as a
recruiting tool. The Klan lecturer from Atlanta who visited Tulsa in
August 1921 declared that "the riot was the best thing that ever
happened to Tulsa", while other Klan spokesmen preyed upon the
heightened emotional state of the white community after the riot.
However the pitch was made, it soon became abundantly clear that
Tulsa was prime recruiting territory for the Ku Klux Klan. Indeed,
it had been for quite some time.41
Despite the fact that
segregation appeared to be gaining ground statewide, in the months
leading up to the riot, more than a few white Tulsans instead
feared, at least in Tulsa itself, that the opposite was true. Many
were especially incensed when black Tulsans disregarded, or
challenged, Jim Crow practices. Others were both enraged at, and
jealous of, the material success of some of Greenwood's leading
citizens -- feelings that were no doubt increased by the sharp drop
in the price of crude oil, and the subsequent layoffs in the oil
fields, that preceded the riot. Indeed, an unidentified writer for
one white Tulsa publication, the Exchange Bureau Bulletin,
later listed "niggers with money" as one of the so-called causes of
the catastrophe. During the weeks and months leading up to the riot,
there were more than a few white Tulsans who not only feared that
the color line was in danger of being slowly erased, but believed
that this was already happening.42
Adding to these fears was
the simple reality that, at the time, the vast majority of white
Tulsans possessed almost no direct knowledge of the African American
community whatsoever. Although a handful of whites owned businesses
in Greenwood, and a few others occasionally visited the area for one
reason or another, most white Tulsans had never set foot in the
African American district, and never would. Living in all-white
neighborhoods, attending all-white schools and churches, and working
for the most part in all- white work environments, the majority of
white Tulsans in 1921 had little more than fleeting contact with the
city's black population. What little they knew, or thought they
knew, about the African American community was susceptible not only
to racial stereotypes and deeply-ingrained prejudices, but also to
rumor, innuendo, and, as events would soon prove, what was printed
in the newspaper.
Such conditions, it turned
out, proved helpful to the Klan, and both before and after the riot,
Klan organizers exploited the racial concerns of white Tulsans as a
method of boosting membership. However, the organizers also used
something else. Race relations was not the only major societal issue
that weighed heavily on the minds of many Tulsans during the months
that led up to the riot. Rather, they were also deeply concerned
about something else -- something that, in the end, proved to be a
gateway to catastrophe.
Of all the visitors who came
to Tulsa in the months preceding the riot, not everyone left town
with a positive image. Despite the city's new skyscrapers and
impressive mansions, its booming oil industry and its rags-to-riches
millionaires, some visitors -- like the federal agent who spent five
days undercover in Tulsa in late April, 1921 -- saw a far different
side of local life. In his "Report on Vice Conditions in Tulsa", the
agent had found that:
Gambling, bootlegging and
prostitution are very much in evidence. At the leading hotels and
rooming houses the bell hops and porters are pimping for women, and
also selling booze. Regarding violations of the law, these
prostitutes and pimps solicit without any fear of the police, as
they will invariably remind you that you are safe in these houses.
The agent concluded, "Vice
conditions in this city are extremely bad."48
Few Tulsans, in those days,
would have been surprised by the agent's findings. In addition to
the city's growing fame as the Oil Capital, Tulsa also was gaining
something of a reputation -- and not just regionally, but also among
New York bankers and insurance men -- as a wide-open town, a place
where crime and criminals were as much a part of the oil boom as
well logs and drilling rigs.
Most certainly, there was
plenty of evidence to support such a conclusion. Well- known
gambling dens -- like Dutch Weete's place three miles east of the
fairgrounds, or Puss Hall's roadhouse along the Turley highway --
flourished on the outskirts of town, while within the city, both a
fortune in oil royalties, or a roughneck's wages, could be gambled
away, night after night, in poker games in any number of hotels and
rooming houses.
During the Prohibition era,
both Oklahoma and the nation were supposedly dry, although one would
not know it from a visit to Tulsa. One well-known local watering
hole
flourished in the Boston
Building, less that two blocks from police headquarters, while
scattered across the city were a number of illegal bars offering
corn whiskey, choc beer, or the latest rage, 'Jake" or jamaica
ginger. In Greenwood, customers with a taste for live music with
their whiskey might frequent Pretty Belle's place, while on the
south side of town, the well-to-do oil set, it was said, purchased
their liquor from a woman living at Third and Elgin. Hotel porters
and bellhops regularly delivered pints and quarts to their guests,
while an active bootlegging network operated out of the city's drug
stores and pharmacies. For customers who placed a premium on
discretion, both bootleggers and taxi drivers alike would also make
regular home deliveries.44
Illegal drugs were also
present. Morphine, cocaine, and opium could all be purchased in
Tulsa, apparently without much difficulty. Indeed, one month before
the riot, federal narcotics officer Charles C. Post, declared,
"Tulsa is overrun with narcotics."45
Hand-in-hand with this
illegal consumption came a plenitude of other crime. Automobile
theft was said to be so common in Tulsa prior to the riot, it was
claimed, that "a number of companies have canceled all policies on
cars in Tulsa." Petty crimes, from housebreaking to traffic
violations, were common fodder in the city's newspapers during this
period -- but so were more serious offenses. In the year preceding
the riot, two Tulsa police officers had been killed on duty, while
less than six weeks before the riot, Tulsa police officers were
involved in a spectacular shoot-out with armed bandits at an east
side rooming house. State Assistant Attorney General George F.
Short, who visited Tulsa during this same period, even went so far
as to describe the local crime conditions as "apparently grave."46
While not everyone in town
would have agreed with such a bleak assessment, there was no denying
the fact that, on the eve of the race riot, the city had a serious
crime problem. However, it was equally true that, in many ways, this
was not only nothing new, but had more or less been a constant since
the first heady days of the Glenn Pool and its attendant land
swindles and get-rich-quick schemes. "Tulsans on the whole have had
enough of the slime and crime that characterize a new community
which draws much of the bad with the good in a rich strike," mused
one local editorial writer, "But Tulsa has outgrown that stage."47
A number of Tulsans had
attempted, seemingly without a great deal of success, for years to
do something about the local crime conditions. In 1914, the
Ministerial Alliance had mounted a campaign against gambling and
other forms of vice. Five years later, a group of well-known white
leaders formed a "Committee of One Hundred" to combat local crime
problems. Two years after that, in early 1921, the group was
revived, vowing to see that a "clean sweep of criminals is made here
and that the laws are enforced.."48
However, there was a dark
side to local anti-crime efforts as well. As young as the city of
Tulsa was in the spring of 1921, it could already claim a long
history of vigilante activity. In 1894, a white man known as "Dutch
John", who was suspected of being a cattle rustler, was reportedly
lynched in Tulsa. Ten years later, in 1904, a mob of whites gathered
outside of the local jail, intending to lynch an African American
prisoner held inside, but were turned away by the mayor, a local
banker, and, not the least, by the city marshall, who had drawn both
of his guns on the mob.49
Although violence had been
averted, that was far from the end of vigilantism in Tulsa. In 1917,
after the United States had entered World War I, a secret society
calling itself the Knights of Liberty unleashed a local campaign of
terror and intimidation against suspected slackers, Mennonites and
other pacifists, as well as political radicals. The group's most
infamous action -- that gained the attention of the national press
-- came in November 1917 when, with the encouragement of the white
press and the apparent cooperation of the local authorities, masked
members of the Knights tarred and feathered more than a dozen local
members of the Industrial Workers of the World, a radical union
movement, and forced them out of town at gunpoint.50
Even though the Knights of
Liberty/I.W.W. incident had been an all-white affair, it proved to
be an important step along the road to the race riot. Not only did
local law enforcement refuse to actively investigate the incident,
but the secret society was praised by the white press for taking the
law into its own hands, an important precedent for more such
activities in the future.51
Nevertheless, it would not
be until nearly three years later, during the late summer of 1920,
that Tulsa would experience an incident that would prove to be the
single most important precursor to the race riot. While all of its
participants also were white, it, too, would have profound
reverberations on both sides of the color line.
It began on Saturday night,
August 21, 1920, when a Tulsa cab driver named Homer Nida. was hired
by two young men and one young woman to drive them to a dance in
Sapulpa. Along the way, in the countryside past Red Fork, one of the
men pulled out a revolver and forced Nida to pull over. Striking the
terrified cab driver with the pistol, the gunman demanded money.
When Nida could not produce a sufficient amount of cash, the gunman
shot Nida in the stomach and kicked him out onto the highway, as the
trio sped off in the now-stolen taxi. A passing motorist discovered
Nida a short while later, and rushed the severely wounded driver to
a hospital.52
The next day, police in
Nowata, acting on a tip, arrested an eighteen-year-old one-time
telephone company employee named Roy Belton, who denied having had
anything to do with the affair. Belton was taken to Homer Nida's
hospital room in Tulsa, where the cab driver identified him as his
assailant. Again, Belton denied the accusation.
Two days later, however, Roy
Belton who was now being held in the jail located on the top floor
of the Tulsa County Courthouse changed his story. He admitted that
he had been in the taxicab, and that he and his accomplices had
planned on robbing the driver. He insisted the shooting had been
accidental. Belton claimed that the gun had been damaged when he
struck Nida in the head with it, and that it had gone off
accidentally while he was tying to repair it.53
Belton's dubious account,
however, only added fuel to the already inflamed emotions that many
Tulsans already held about the shooting, a situation made even more
tense by the fact that Homer Nida lay languishing in a Tulsa
hospital. Less than forty-eight hours after Belton's so-called
"confession", Tulsa County Sheriff Jim Woolley had heard rumors that
if the cab driver died, the courthouse would be mobbed and Roy
Belton would be lynched.54
Two days later, on Saturday,
August 28, 1920, Homer Nida finally succumbed to his wounds and
died. In reporting the news of his death in that afternoon's
edition, the Tulsa Tribune quoted the driver's widow as
saying that Belton deserved "to be mobbed, but the other way is
better."55
Other Tulsans thought
otherwise. By 11:00 p.m. that same evening, hundreds of whites had
gathered outside of the courthouse. Soon, a delegation of men
carrying rifles and shotguns, some with handkerchiefs covering their
faces, entered the building and demanded of Sheriff Woolley that he
turn Belton over to them. The sheriff later claimed that he tried to
dissuade the intruders, but he appears to have done little to stop
them. For a little while later, the men appeared on the courthouse
steps with Roy Belton. "We got him boys," they shouted, "We've got
him.56
Belton was then placed in
Homer Nida's taxicab which had been stolen from the authorities --
and was driven out past Red Fork, followed by a line of automobiles
"nearly a mile long". Not far from where Nida had been shot, the
procession stopped, and Belton was taken from the cab and
interrogated. But when a rumor spread that a posse was in hot
pursuit, everyone returned to their cars and set out along the road
to Jenks.
The lynch mob had little to
fear. Tulsa police did not arrive at the courthouse in any
appreciable numbers until after Belton had been kidnaped and the
caravan of cars had left downtown. "We did the best thing," Police
Chief John Gustafson later claimed, "[we] jumped into cars and
followed the ever increasing mob."
By the time police officers
finally caught up with the lynching party, it had reassembled along
the Jenks road about three miles southwest of Tulsa. Once again, Roy
Belton was taken from the cab, and then led to a spot next to a
roadside sign. A rope was procured from a nearby farmhouse, a noose
was thrown around his neck, and he was lynched. Among the crowd --
estimated to be in the hundreds -- were members of the Tulsa police,
who had been instructed by Chief Gustafson not to intervene. "Any
demonstration from an officer," he later claimed, "would have
started gun play and dozens of innocent people would have been
killed and injured."57
In the days that followed,
however, Gustafson practically applauded the lynching. While
claiming to be "absolutely opposed" to mob law, the police chief
also stated "it is my honest opinion that the lynching of Roy Belton
will prove of real benefit to Tulsa and the vicinity. It was an
object lesson to the hijackers and auto thieves." Sheriff Woolley
echoed the chief, claiming that the lynching showed criminals "that
the men of Tulsa mean business.."58
Nor were Tulsa's top lawmen
alone in their sentiments. The Tulsa Tribune, the city's
afternoon daily, also claimed to be opposed to mob law, but offered
little criticism of the actual lynching party. The Tulsa World,
the morning daily, went even further. Calling the lynching a
"righteous protest", the newspaper added: "There was not a vestige
of the mob spirit in the act of Saturday night. It was citizenship,
outraged by government inefficiency and a too tender regard for the
professional criminal." The World went on to blast the
current state of the criminal justice system, ominously adding, "we
predict that unless conditions are speedily improved", that the
lynching of Roy Belton "will not be the last by any means."59
With the death of Roy
Belton, Tulsa had not simply joined the list of other Oklahoma
cities and towns where, sadly enough, a lynching had occurred. Of
equal importance was the fact that, as far as anyone could tell, the
local law enforcement authorities in Tulsa had done precious little
to stop the lynching. Thus, the question arose, if another mob ever
gathered in Tulsa to lynch someone else, who was going to stop them?
The lynching of Roy Belton
cast a deep pall over black Tulsa. For even though Homer Nida, Roy
Belton, and the lynching party itself had all been white, there was
simply no escaping the conclusion that if Belton had been black, he
would have been lynched just the same, and probably sooner. What
about the next time that an African American was charged with a
serious crime in Tulsa, particularly if it involved a white victim?
What would happen then?
A.J. Smitherman, the
outspoken editor of the Tulsa Star, the city's oldest and
most popular African American newspaper, was absolutely resolute on
the matter of lynching. "There is no crime, however atrocious," he
wrote following the lynching of Roy Belton, "that justifies mob
violence."60 For Smitherman, lynching was not simply a
crime to be condemned, but was literally a "stain" upon society.61

W. H. Twine and A. J. Smitherman at Twine's law
office in Muskogee
(Courtesy Western History Collection, University of Oklahoma
Libraries).
Nor was Smitherman alone in
his sentiments. If there was one issue which united African
Americans all across the nation, it was opposition to mob law.
Moreover, that opposition was particularly strong in Oklahoma, as
many blacks had immigrated to the state in no small measure to
escape the mob mentality that was far from uncommon in some other
parts of the country.
However, both the lynching
of Roy Belton in Tulsa, and that of a young African American in
Oklahoma City that same week, brought to the surface some dire
practical issues. In a situation where a black prisoner was being
threatened by a white mob, what should African Americans do?
Smitherman was quite clear on the answer.
As early as 1916, it has
been reported, "a group of armed blacks prevented the lynching of
one of their number in Muskogee."62 In a similar
situation, which happened only five months prior to the Tulsa riot,
Smitherman had strongly praised a group of black men who had first
armed themselves, and then set out in pursuit of a white mob that
was en route to lynch an African American prisoner at Chandler. "As
to the Colored men of Shawnee," Smitherman wrote, . . . they are the
heroes of the story. If one set of men arm themselves and chase
across the country to violate the law, certainly another set who arm
themselves to uphold the supremacy of the law and prevent crime,
must stand out prominently as the best citizens. Therefore, the
action of the Colored men in this case is to be commended. We need
more citizens like them in every community and of both races.63
Five months later, when a
group of African Americans in the state capital had not gathered
until after a black youth had been lynched by a white mob,
Smitherman was unsparing in his criticism. "It is quite evident," he
wrote, "that the proper time to afford protection to any prisoner is
BEFORE and during the time he is being lynched."64
It also was clear that there
were black Tulsans who were prepared to do just that. A little more
than a year before Roy Belton was lynched, an incident occurred in
Tulsa that -- while it received little press coverage at the time
--- gave a clear indication as to what actions some black Tulsans
would take if they feared that an African American was in danger of
becoming the victim of mob violence.
The incident began on the
evening of March 17, 1919, when a white ironworker was shot by two
armed stick-up men on the outskirts of downtown. The ironworker died
of his wounds some twelve hours later, but before he succumbed, he
told Tulsa police detectives that his assailants were black, and he
provided the officers with a rather sketchy description of each man.
"Violence is feared," wrote the Tulsa Democrat of the
shooting, "if the guilty pair is taken in charge."65
Some forty-eight hours
later, Tulsa police officers arrested not two, but three, African
American men in connection with the shooting. Despite proclamations
by the police that the accused men would be protected, concerns for
their safety quickly spread across the black community, and rumors
began to circulate that the trio might be in danger of being
lynched. The rumors reached a crescendo the day after the
ironworker's funeral, when a delegation of African American men --
some of them armed -led by Dr. R.T. Bridgewater, a well-known
physician, paid an evening visit to the city jail, where the accused
men were being held.66
"We understand there is to
be some trouble here," Dr. Bridgewater reportedly informed a police
captain.
The police officer was
adamant that nothing of the kind was going to occur. "There is not
going to be any trouble here," the captain allegedly replied, "and
the best thing you fellows can do is beat it back and drop the
firearms." Despite his confidence, however, the officer allowed a
small contingent to visit with the prisoners in their cells.
Apparently satisfied with the situation, Dr. Bridgewater and the
other African American men returned to Greenwood. There was no
lynching.67
Whatever relief black
Tulsans may have felt following this affair did not last long. With
the lynching of Roy Belton some seventeen months later, the door to
mob violence in Tulsa was suddenly pushed wide open. If a white
could by lynched in Tulsa, why would a black not suffer the same
fate? Moreover, as editor Smitherman observed, the Belton lynching
had also clarified another matter -- one that would prove to be of
vital importance on May 3l, 1921. "The lynching of Roy Belton,"
Smitherman wrote in the Tulsa Star, "explodes the theory that a
prisoner is safe on the top of the Court House from mob violence."68
The death of Roy Belton
shattered any confidence that black Tulsans may have had in the
ability, or the willingness, of local law enforcement to prevent a
lynching from taking place in Tulsa. It also had done something
else. For more than a few black Tulsans, the bottom line on the
matter had become clearer than ever. Namely, the only ones who might
prevent the threatened lynching of an African American prisoner in
Tulsa would be black Tulsans themselves.
Despite the clarity of these
conclusions, it is important to note that white Tulsans were utterly
unaware of what their black neighbors were thinking. Although A.J.
Smitherman's editorials regarding lynching were both direct and
plainspoken, white Tulsans did not read the Tulsa Star, and
Smitherman's opinions were not reported in the white press. As
dramatic and as significant as the visit of Dr. Bridgewater and the
others was to the city jail during the 1919 incident, it received
little coverage in the city's white newspapers at the time, and was
no doubt quickly forgotten.
Rather, when it came to the
matter of lynching, black Tulsa and white Tulsa were like two
separate galaxies, with one quite unaware of what the other was
thinking. However, as the year 1921 began to unfold, events would
soon bring them crashing into one another.
In 1921, most Tulsans
received their news through either one or both of the city's two
daily newspapers -- the Tulsa World, which was the morning
paper, or the Tulsa Tribune, which came out in the afternoon.
While the World went all the way back to 1905, the Tribune
was only two years old. It was the creation of Richard Lloyd Jones,
a Wisconsin born newspaperman who had also worked as a magazine
editor in New York. Hoping to challenge the more established -- and,
in many ways, more restrained -- Tulsa World, Jones had
fashioned the Tribune as a lively rival, unafraid to stir up
an occasional hornet's nest.69 As it turned out, Tulsa's
vexing crime problem proved to be an ideal local arena in which the
Tribune could hope to make a name for itself
Sensing just how frustrated
many Tulsans were with the local crime conditions, the Tribune
launched a vigorous anti-crime campaign that ran throughout the
early months of 1921. In addition to giving broad coverage to both
local criminal activity, and to sensational murders from across the
state, the Tribune also published a series of hard-hitting
editorials. Using titles such as "Catch the Crooks", "Go After
Them", "Promoters of Crime", "To Make Every Day Safe", "The City
Failure", and 'Make Tulsa Decent", the editorials called for nothing
less than an aggressive citywide clean-up campaign.70
Not surprisingly, the
Tribune's campaign ruffled the feathers of some local law
enforcement figures along the way, including the county attorney,
the police commissioner, and several members of the Tulsa Police
Department. While it is uncertain as to how much of the Tribune's
campaign had been motivated by partisan political concerns, both the
paper's news stories and its editorials caused considerable
commotion. Allegations of police corruption -- particularly
regarding automobile theft -- received a great amount of attention,
and ultimately led to formal investigations of local law enforcement
by both the State of Oklahoma and the City of Tulsa.71
By mid-May 1921, the
Tribune's anti-crime and anti-corruption campaign seemed to be
on the verge of reaching some sort of climax. Branding the city
government's investigation of the police department as a
"whitewash", the newspaper kept hammering away at the alleged
inability of, or refusal by, local law enforcement to tackle Tulsa's
crime problem. "The people of Tulsa are becoming awake to conditions
that are no longer tolerable," argued a May 14 editorial. Two days
later, in an editorial titled "Better Get Busy", the Tribune
warned that if the mayor and the city commission did not fulfill
their campaign pledges to "clean up the city", and "do it quick",
that "an awakened community conscience will do it for them."72
Just what that might entail
was also becoming clearer and clearer. The very same months during
which the Tribune waged its anti-crime campaign, the
newspaper also gave prominent attention to news stories involving
vigilante activities from across the Southwest. Front-page coverage
was given to lynching threats made against African Americans in
Okmulgee in March, Oktaha in April, and Hugo in May. The
horsewhipping of an alleged child molester in Dallas by a group of
masked men believed to be members of the Ku Klux Klan that also took
place in May, was also given front-page treatment. Not surprisingly,
the specter of Tulsa's own recent lynching also re-emerged in the
pages of the Tribune in a May 26 editorial. While asserting
that "Lawlessness to fight lawlessness is never justified", the
editorial went on to claim "Tulsa enjoyed a brief respite following
the lynching of Roy Belton." Moreover, the Tribune added that
Belton's guilt had been "practically established . . .."73
A revived discussion of the
pros and cons of vigilante activity was not the only new element to
be added to the ongoing conversation about crime that was taking
place in Tulsa in late May. Despite latter claims to the contrary,
for much of early 1921, race had not been much of a factor in the
Tribune's vigorous anti-crime and anti-corruption campaign.
Crimes in Greenwood had not been given undue coverage, nor had black
Tulsans been singled out for providing the city with a
disproportionate share of the city's criminal element.74
But beginning on May 21,
1921, only ten days before the riot, all that was to change. In a
lengthy, front-page article concerning the ongoing investigation of
the police department, not only did racial issues suddenly come to
the foreground, but more importantly, they did so in a manner that
featured the highly explosive subject of relations between black men
and white women. Commenting on the city's rampant prostitution
industry, a former judge flatly told the investigators that black
men were at the root of the problem. "We've got to get to the
hotels," he said, "We've got to kick out the Negro pimps if we want
to stop this vice."
Echoing these sentiments was
the testimony of Reverend Harold G. Cooke, the white pastor of
Centenary Methodist Church. Accompanied by a private detective,
Cooke had led a small group of white men on an undercover tour of
the city's illicit nightlife -- and had been, it was reported,
horrified at what he had discovered. Not only was liquor available
at every place that they visited, but at hotels and rooming houses
across the city. It was said, African American porters rather
routinely offered to provide the men with the services of white
prostitutes. Just beyond the city limits, the Tribune
reported, the group visited a roadhouse where the color lines seemed
to have disappeared entirely. "We found whites and Negroes singing
and dancing together," one member of Reverend Cooke's party
testified, "Young, white girls were dancing while Negroes played the
piano."75
Considering Oklahoma's
social, political, and cultural climate during the 1920s, the effect
of this testimony should not be taken lightly. Many white Tulsans no
doubt found Reverend Cooke's revelations to be both shocking and
distasteful. Perhaps even more importantly, they now had a
convenient new target for their growing anger over local crime
conditions. African American men who, at least as far as they were
concerned, had far too much contact with white women.
As it turned out however,
Tulsans did not have much time to digest the new revelations. Only
five days later, on May 26, 1921, the city was rocked by the news of
a spectacular jailbreak at the county courthouse. Sawing their way
through their cell doors and through the one-inch steel bars that
were set in an outer window, and then lowering themselves four
stories to the ground on a rope that they had made by tying their
blankets together, no less than twelve prisoners had escaped from
the top floor jail. Remarkably, however, that was not the last
jailbreak that month. Four days later, early on the morning of
Memorial Day, May 30, 1921, six more prisoners -- sawing through the
same hastily repaired cell doors and window bars also escaped from
the courthouse jail.77
Although some of the
escapees were quickly apprehended, the jailbreaks were one more
ingredient in what had become, by the end of May 1921, an unstable
and potentially volatile local atmosphere. For more than a few white
Tulsans, local conditions regarding crime and punishment were fast
becoming intolerable. Frustrated over the amount of lawbreaking in
the city, and by the apparent inability of the police to do anything
about it, they had helped turn the city into a ticking time bomb,
where anger and frustration sat just beneath the surface, waiting to
explode. Moreover, during the last ten days of the month, they also
had been presented with, however fleetingly, a compelling new target
for their fury, namely, black men who, to their eyes, had an undue
familiarity with white women.
As Tulsa prepared to
celebrate Memorial Day, May 30, 1921, something else was in the air.
As notions of taking the law into their own hands began to once
again circulate among some white Tulsans, across the tracks in
Greenwood, there were black Tulsans who were more determined than
ever that in their city, no African American would fall victim to
mob violence. World War veterans and newspaper editors, common
laborers and businessmen, they were just as prepared as they had
been two years earlier to make certain that no black person was ever
lynched in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Precisely at this moment, in
this highly charged atmosphere, that two previously unheralded
Tulsans, named Dick Rowland and Sarah Page, walked out of the
shadows, and onto the stage of history.
Although they played a key
role in the events which directly led to Tulsa's race riot, very
little is known for certain about either Dick Rowland or Sarah Page.
Rumors, theories, and unsubstantiated claims have been plentiful
throughout the years, but hard evidence has been much more difficult
to come by.
Dick Rowland, who was black,
was said to have been nineteen-years-old at the time of the riot. At
the time of his birth, he was given the name Jimmie Jones. While it
is not known where he was born, by 1908 he and his two sisters had
evidently been orphaned, and were living "on the streets of Vinita,
sleeping wherever they could, and begging for food." An African
American woman named Damie Ford, who ran a tiny one-room-grocery
store, took pity on young Jimmie and took him in. "That's how I
became Jimmie's 'Mama,"' she told an interviewer decades afterwards.
Approximately one year
later, Damie and her adopted son moved to Tulsa, where they were
reunited with Damie's family, the Rowlands. Eventually, little
Jimmie took Rowland as his own last name, and selected his favorite
first name, Dick, as his own. Growing up in Tulsa, Dick attended the
city's separate all-black schools, including Booker T. Washington
High School, where he played football.78
Dick Rowland dropped out of
high school to take a job shining shoes in a white-owned and
white-patronized shine parlor located downtown on Main Street. Shoe
shines usually cost a dime in those days, but the shoe shiners -- or
bootblacks, as they were sometimes called -- were often tipped a
nickel for each shine, and sometimes considerably more. Over the
course of a busy working day, a shoe shiner could pocket a fair
amount of money -- especially if he was a teenaged African American
youth with few other job prospects.
There were no toilet
facilities, however, for blacks at the shine parlor where Dick
Rowland worked. The owner had arranged for his African American
employees to be able to use a "Colored" restroom that was located,
nearby, in the Drexel Building at 319 S. Main Street. In order to
gain access to the washroom, located on the top floor, Rowland and
the other shoe shiners would ride in the building's sole elevator.
Elevators were not automatic, requiring an operator. A job that was
usually reserved for women.79
In late May 1921, the
elevator operator at the Drexel Building was a seventeen-year-old
white woman named Sarah Page. Thought to have come to Tulsa from
Missouri, she apparently lived in a rented room on North Boston
Avenue. It also has been reported that Page was attending a local
business school, a good career move at the time. Although, Tulsa was
still riding upon its construction boom, some building owners were
evidently hiring African American women to replace their white
elevator operators.80
Whether - and to what extent
-- Dick Rowland and Sarah Page knew each other has long been a
matter of speculation. It seems reasonable that they would have
least been able to recognize each other on sight, as Rowland would
have regularly rode in Page's elevator on his way to and from the
restroom. Others, however, have speculated that the pair might have
been lovers -- a dangerous and potentially deadly taboo, but not an
impossibility. Damie Ford later suggested that this might have been
the case, as did Samuel M. Jackson, who operated a funeral parlor in
Greenwood at the time of the riot. "I'm going to tell you the
truth," Jackson told riot historian Ruth Avery a half century later,
"He could have been going with the girl. You go through life and you
find that somebody likes you. That's all there is to it." However,
Robert Fairchild, who shined shoes with Rowland, disagreed. "At that
time," Fairchild later recalled, "the Negro had so much fear that he
didn't bother with integrated relationship[s]."81
Whether they knew each other
or not, it is clear that both Dick Rowland and Sarah Page were
downtown on Monday, May 30, 1921 -- although this, too, is cloaked
in some mystery. On Memorial Day, most -- but not all -- stores and
businesses in Tulsa were closed. Yet, both Rowland and Page were
apparently working that day. A large Memorial Day parade passed
along Main Street that morning, and perhaps Sarah Page had been
required to work in order to transport Drexel Building employees and
their families to choice parade viewing spots on the building's
upper floors. As for Dick Rowland, perhaps the shine parlor he
worked at may have been open, if nothing else, to draw in some of
the parade traffic. One post-riot account suggests another
alternative, namely, that Rowland was making deliveries of shined
shoes that day. What is certain, however, is that at some point on
Monday, May 30, 1921, Dick Rowland entered the elevator operated by
Sarah Page that was situated at the rear of the Drexel Building.82
What happened next is
anyone's guess. After the riot, the most common explanation was that
Dick Rowland tripped as he got onto the elevator and, as he tried to
catch his fall, he grabbed onto the arm of Sarah Page, who then
screamed. It also has been suggested that Rowland and Page had a
lover's quarrel. However, it simply is unclear what happened. Yet,
in the days and years that followed, everyone who knew Dick Rowland
agreed on one thing: that he would never have been capable of rape.83
A clerk from Renberg's, a
clothing store located on the first floor of the Drexel Building,
however, reached the opposite conclusion. Hearing what he thought
was a woman's scream, and apparently seeing Dick Rowland hurriedly
flee the building, the clerk rushed to the elevator, where he found
a distraught Sarah Page. Evidently deciding that the young elevator
operator had been the victim of an attempted sexual assault, the
clerk then summoned the police.
While it appears that the
clerk stuck to his interpretation that there had been an attempted
rape -- and of a particularly incendiary kind -- no record exists as
to what Sarah Page actually told the police when they initially
interviewed her. Whatever she said at the time, however, it does not
appear that the police officers who interviewed her necessarily
reached the same potentially explosive conclusion as that made by
the Renberg's clerk, namely, that a black male had attempted to rape
a white female in a downtown office building. Rather than issue any
sort of an all-points bulletin for the alleged assailant, it appears
that the police launched a rather low-key investigation into the
affair.84
Whatever had or had not
happened in the Drexel Building elevator, Dick Rowland had become a
justly terrified young man. For of all the crimes that African
American men would be accused of in early twentieth century America,
none seemed to bring a white lynch mob together faster than an
accusation of the rape, or attempted rape, of a white woman.
Frightened and agitated, Rowland hastened to his adopted mother's
home, where he stayed inside with blinds drawn.85
The next morning, Tuesday,
May 31, 1921, Dick Rowland was arrested on Greenwood Avenue by two
Tulsa police officers, Detective Henry Carmichael, who was white,
and by Patrolman Henry C. Pack, who was one of a handful of African
Americans on the city's approximately seventy-five man police force.
Rowland was booked at police headquarters, and then taken to the
jail on the top floor of the Tulsa County Courthouse. Informed that
her adopted son was in custody, Damie Ford seems to have lost no
time in hiring a prominent white attorney to defend him.86
Word of both the alleged
incident in the Drexel Building, and of the subsequent arrest of the
alleged perpetrator, quickly spread throughout the city's legal
circles. Black attorney B.C. Franklin was sitting in the courtroom
during a recess in a trial when he overheard some other lawyers
discussing what he later concluded was the alleged rape attempt. "I
don't believe a damn word of it," one of the men said, "Why I know
that boy and have known him a good while. That's not in him."87
Not surprisingly, word of
both the alleged incident and of the arrest of Dick Rowland had also
made it to the offices of Tulsa's two daily newspapers, the
Tribune and the World. Due to the timing of the events,
the Tulsa Tribune would have the first crack at the story.
Not only had the alleged Drexel Building incident gone without
notice in that morning's Tulsa World -- perhaps, one is
tempted to surmise, because word of the alleged incident had not yet
made it to the paper's news desk, which may have been short-staffed
due to the holiday -- but Rowland's arrest had apparently occurred
after that morning's edition had already been printed.88
Being an afternoon paper, however, the Tulsa Tribune had
enough time to break the news in its regular afternoon editions --
which is exactly what it did.
Precisely what the Tulsa
Tribune printed in its May 31, 1921 editions about the Drexel
Building incident is still a matter of some conjecture. The original
bound volumes of the now defunct newspaper apparently no longer
exist in their entirety. A microfilm version is, however, available,
but before the actual microfilming was done some years later,
someone had deliberately torn out of the May 31, 1921 city edition
both a front-page article and, in addition, nearly all of the
editorial page.
We have known what the
front-page story, titled "Nab Negro for Attacking Girl in Elevator",
said for some time. In his 1946 master's thesis on the riot, Loren
Gill printed the entire text of the missing -- and what he believed
was no less than "inflammatory" -- story, which read:
Nab Negro for
Attacking Girl in Elevator
A Negro delivery boy who
gave his name to the public as "Diamond Dick" but who has been
identified as Dick Rowland, was arrested on South Greenwood Avenue
this morning by Officers Carmichael and Pack, charged with
attempting to assault the 17-year-old white elevator girl in the
Drexel Building early yesterday.
He will be tried in
municipal court this afternoon on a state charge.
The girl said she noticed
the Negro a few minutes before the attempted assault looking up and
down the hallway on the third floor of the Drexel Building as if to
see if there was anyone in sight but thought nothing of it at the
time.
A few minutes later he
entered the elevator she claimed, and attacked her, scratching her
hands and face and tearing her clothes. Her screams brought a clerk
from Renberg's store to her assistance and the Negro fled. He was
captured and identified this morning both by the girl and the clerk,
police say.
Tenants of the Drexel
Building said the girl is an orphan who works as an elevator
operator to pay her way through business college.89
Since Gill's thesis first
appeared, additional copies of this front-page article have
surfaced. A copy can be found in the Red Cross papers that are
located in the collections of the Tulsa Historical Society. A second
copy, apparently from the "State Edition" of the Tulsa Tribune,
could once be found in the collections of the Oklahoma Historical
Society, but has now evidently disappeared.90
This front page article was
not, however, the only thing that the Tulsa Tribune seems to
have printed about the Drexel Building incident in its May 31
edition. W.D. Williams, who later taught for years at Booker T.
Washington High School in Tulsa, had a vivid memory that the
Tribune ran a story titled "To Lynch Negro Tonight".91
In fact, however, what Williams may be recalling is not another news
article, but an editorial from the missing editorial page.
Other informants, both black
and white, buttress Williams' account. Specifically, they recalled
that the Tribune mentioned the possibility of a lynching --
something that is entirely absent from the "Nab Negro for Attacking
Girl in Elevator" story, and thus must have appeared elsewhere in
the May 31 edition. Robert Fairchild later recalled that the
Tribune "came out and told what happened. It said to the effect
that 'there is likely to be a lynching in Tulsa tonight'". One of
Mary Parrish's informants, whom she interviewed shortly after the
riot, provided a similar account:
The Daily Tribune, a
white newspaper that tries to gain its popularity by referring to
the Negro settlement as "Little Africa", came out on the evening of
Tuesday, May 31, with an article claiming that a Negro had
experienced some trouble with a white elevator girl at the Drexel
Building. It also said that a mob of whites was forming in order to
lynch the Negro.
Adjutant General Charles F.
Barrett, who led National Guard troops from Oklahoma City into Tulsa
the next day, recalled that there had been a "fantastic write-up of
the [Drexel Building] incident in a sensation-seeking newspaper."92
Given the fact that the
editorial page from the May 31 Tulsa Tribune was also
deliberately removed, and that a copy has not yet surfaced, it is
not difficult to conclude that whatever else the paper had to say
about the alleged incident, and what should be done in response to
it, would have appeared in an editorial. "To Lynch Negro Tonight'
certainly would have fit as the title to a Tribune editorial
in those days. Moreover, given the seriousness of the charges
against Dick Rowland, the aggressiveness of the paper's anti-crime
campaign, and the fact that a Tribune editorial had mentioned
the lynching of Roy Belton only four days earlier, it is highly
likely that any editorial the paper would have run concerning the
alleged Drexel Building incident would have surely mentioned
lynching as a possible fate for Dick Rowland. Exactly what the
newspaper would have said on the matter, however, can only be left
to conjecture.
The Tuesday, May 31, 1921
edition of the Tulsa Tribune hit the streets at about 3:15
p.m.. And while the "Nab Negro for Attacking Girl in Elevator" was
far from being the most prominent story on the front page of the
city edition, it was the story that garnered the most attention.
Making his way through downtown toward his office in Greenwood
shortly after the Tribune rolled off the presses, attorney
B.C. Franklin later recalled that "as I walked leisurely along the
sidewalk, I heard the sharp shrill voice of a newsboy, "A Negro
assaults a white girl."93
Indeed, lynch talk came
right on the heels of the Tribune's sensational reporting.
Ross T. Warner, the white manager of the downtown offices of the
Tulsa Machine and Tool Company, wrote that after the Tribune
came out that afternoon, "the talk of lynching spread like a prairie
fire." Similar memories were shared by Dr. Blaine Waynes, an African
American physician and his wife Maude, who reported that after the
Tribune was issued that day, that rumors of the "intended
lynching of the accused Negro" spread so swiftly and ominously that
even "the novice and stranger" could readily sense the
fast-approaching chain of events that was about to unfold. By 4:00
p.m., the talk of lynching Dick Rowland had already grown so
ubiquitous that Police and Fire Commissioner J.M. Adkison telephoned
Sheriff Willard McCullough and alerted him to the ever-increasing
talk on the street.94
Talk soon turned into
action. As word of the alleged sexual assault in the Drexel Building
spread, a crowd of whites began to gather on the street outside of
the Tulsa County Courthouse, in whose jail Dick Rowland was being
held. As people got off of work, and the news of the alleged attack
reported in the Tribune became more widely dispersed across
town, more and more white Tulsans, infuriated by what had supposedly
taken place in the Drexel Building, began to gather outside the
courthouse at Sixth and Boulder. By sunset -- which came at 7:34
p.m. that evening -- observers estimated that the crowd had grown
into the hundreds. Not long afterwards, cries of "Let us have the
nigger" could be heard echoing off of the walls of the massive stone
courthouse.95

Tulsa County Court house where alleged murder Roy
Belton was handed to an angry mob.
This event helped black leaders decide to offer assistance to Tulsa
officials
when Dick Rowland was held in the same position (Courtesy Oklahoma
Historical Society).
Willard M. McCullough, who
had recently been sworn in as the new sheriff of Tulsa County,
however, had other ideas. Determined that there would be no repeat
of the Roy Belton affair during his time in office, he quickly took
steps to ensure the safety of Dick Rowland. Organizing his small
force of deputies into a defensive ring around his now terrified
prisoner, McCullough positioned six of his men, armed with rifles
and shotguns, on the roof of the courthouse. He also disabled the
building's elevator, and had his remaining men barricade themselves
at the top of the stairs with orders to shoot any intruders on
sight.
McCullough also went
outside, on the courthouse steps, and tried to talk the would-be
lynch mob into going home, but was "hooted down" when he spoke. At
approximatley 8:20 p.m., in a near replay of the Belton incident,
three white men entered the courthouse and demanded that the sheriff
turn over Rowland, but were angrily turned away. Even though his
small force was vastly outnumbered by the ever-increasing mob out on
the street, McCullough, unlike his predecessor, was determined to
prevent another lynching.96
Word of the alleged incident
at the Drexel Building, and of the white mob that was gathering
outside of the courthouse, meanwhile, also had raced across
Greenwood. After reading the stories in the afternoon's Tribune,
Willie Williams, a popular junior at Booker T. Washington High
School, had hurried over to his family's flagship business, the
Dreamland Theater, at 127 N. Greenwood. Inside, he found a scene of
tension and confusion. "We're not going to let this happen,"
declared a man who had leapt onto the theater's stage, "We're going
to go downtown and stop this lynching. Close this place down."
Outside, similar discussions
were taking place up and down Greenwood Avenue, as black Tulsans
debated how to respond to the increasingly dire threat to Dick
Rowland. B.C. Franklin later recalled two army veterans out in the
street, urging the crowd gathered about them to take immediate
action, while perhaps the most intense discussions were held in the
offices of the Tulsa Star, the city's premier African
American newspaper.
What went unspoken was the
fact an African American had never been lynched in Tulsa. How to
prevent one from taking place now was no easy matter. It was not
simply the crime that Dick Rowland had been charged with -- although
that, by itself, made the situation particularly dire. Rather, with
the lynching of Roy Belton only nine months earlier, there was now
no reason at all to place much confidence in the ability of the
local authorities to protect Dick Rowland from the mob of whites
that was gathering outside the courthouse. However, exactly how to
respond was of utmost concern.
For A.J. Smitherman, the
editor of the Tulsa Star, there was no question whatsoever
that a demonstration of resolve was necessary. Black Tulsans needed
to let the white mob know that they were determined to prevent this
lynching from taking place, by force of arms if necessary. Others,
including a number of war veterans as well as various local leaders,
the most prominent being hotel owner J.B. Stradford, vigorously
agreed. Moreover, when Dr. Bridgewater had led a group of armed men
downtown to where three accused African American men were being held
only two years later, a rumored lynching did not take place. "Come
on boys", Smitherman is said to have urged his audience, "let's go
downtown."
Not everyone agreed with the
plan of action. O.W. Gurley, the owner of the Gurley Hotel, seems to
have argued for a more cautious approach. So, too, apparently, did
Barney Cleaver, a well-respected African American deputy sheriff,
who had been trying to keep in telephone contact with Sheriff
McCullough, and therefore have something of a handle on the actual
conditions down at the courthouse.97
Despite some entreaties to
the contrary, at about 9:00 p.m. a group of approximately
twenty-five African American men decided to cast their lot not only
with an endangered fellow member of the race, but also, literally,
upon the side of justice. Leaving Greenwood by automobile, they
drove down to the courthouse, where the white mob had gathered.
Armed with rifles and shotguns, the men got out of their
automobiles, and marched to the courthouse steps. Their purpose,
they announced to the no doubt stunned authorities, was to offer
their services toward the defense of the jail -- an offer that was
immediately declined. Assured that Dick Rowland was safe, the men
then returned to their automobiles, and drove back to Greenwood.98
The visit of the African
American veterans had an electrifying effect, however, on the white
mob, now estimated to be more than one thousand strong. Denied
Rowland by Sheriff McCullough, it had been clear for some time that
this was not to be an uncomplicated repetition of the Belton affair.
The visit of the black veterans had not at all been foreseen.
Shocked, and then outraged, some members of the mob began to go home
to fetch their guns.99
Others, however, made a
beeline for the National Guard Armory, at Sixth and Norfolk, where
they intended to gain access to the rifles and ammunition stored
inside. Major James A. Bell, an officer with the local National
Guard units -- "B" Company, the Service Company, and the Sanitary
Detachment, all of the Third Infantry Regiment of the Oklahoma
National Guard -- had already been notified of the trouble brewing
down at the courthouse, and had telephoned the local authorities in
order to better understand the overall situation. I then went to the
Armory and called up the Sheriff and asked if there was any
indications of trouble down there", Bell later wrote, "The sheriff
reported that there were some threats but did not believe it would
amount to anything, that in any event he could protect his
prisoner." Bell also phoned Chief Gustafson, who reported, "Things
were a little threatening."100
Despite such vague answers,
Major Bell took the initiative and began to quietly instruct local
guardsmen -- who were scheduled to depart the next day for their
annual summer encampment -- to report down at the armory in case
they were needed that evening. Meanwhile, a guardsman informed Bell
that a mob of white men was attempting to break into the armory. As
Bell later reported:
Grabbing my pistol in one
hand and my belt in the other I jumped out of the back door and
running down the west side of the Armory building I saw several men
apparently pulling at the window grating. Commanding these men to
get off the lot and seeing this command obeyed I went to the front
of the building near the southwest corner where I saw a mob of white
men about three or four hundred strong. I asked them what they
wanted. One of them replied, "Rifles and ammunition", I explained to
them that they could not get anything here. Someone shouted, "We
don't know about that, we guess we can." I told them that we only
had sufficient arms and ammunition for our own men and that not one
piece could go out of there without orders from the Governor, and in
the name of the law demanded that they disperse at once. They
continued to press forward in a threatening manner when with drawn
pistol I again demanded that they disperse and explained that the
men in the Armory were armed with rifles loaded with ball ammunition
and that they would shoot promptly to prevent any unauthorized
person entering there.
"By maintaining a firm
stand," Bell added, ". . . this mob was dispersed."101
Major Bell's actions were
both courageous and effective but as the night wore on, similar
efforts would be in exceedingly short supply. With each passing
minute, Tulsa was a city that was quickly spinning out of control.
By 9:30 p.m., the white mob
outside the courthouse had swollen to nearly two- thousand persons.
They blocked the sidewalks as well as the streets, and had spilled
over onto the front lawns of nearby homes. There were women as well
as men, youngsters as well as adults, curiosity seekers as well as
would-be lynchers. A handful of local leaders, including the
Reverend Charles W. Kerr of the First Presbyterian Church as well as
a local judge had tried unsuccessfully to talk the crowd into going
home.102
Police Chief John A.
Gustafson later claimed that he tried to talk the lynch mob into
dispersing. However, at no time that afternoon or evening did he
order a substantial number of Tulsa policemen to appear, fully
armed, at the courthouse. Gustafson, in his defense, would later
claim that because there was a regular shift change that very day,
that only thirty-two officers were available for duty at eight
o'clock on the evening of May 31. As subsequent testimony -- as
recorded in handwritten notes to a post-riot investigation -- later
revealed, there were apparently only "5 policemen on duty between
courthouse & Brady hotel notwithstanding lynching imminent."
Moreover, by 10:00 p.m., when the drama at the courthouse was
approaching its climax, Gustafson was no longer at the scene, but
had returned to his office at police headquarters.103
In the city's African
American neighborhoods, meanwhile, tension continued to mount over
the increasingly ugly situation down at the courthouse. Alerted to
the potentially dangerous conditions, both school and church groups
broke up their evening activities early, while parents and
grandparents tried to reassure themselves that the trouble would
quickly blow over. Down in Deep Greenwood, a large crowd of black
men and women still kept their vigil outside of the offices of the
Tulsa Star, awaiting word on the latest developments
downtown.104
Some of the men, however,
decided that they could wait no longer. Hopping into cars, small
groups of armed African American men began to make brief forays into
downtown, their guns visible to passersby. In addition to
reconnaissance, the primary intent of these trips appears to have
been to send a clear message to white Tulsans that these men were
determined to prevent, by force of arms if necessary, the lynching
of Dick Rowland. Whether the whites who witnessed these excursions
understood this message is, however, an open question. Many,
apparently, thought that they were instead witnessing a "Negro
uprising," a conclusion that others would soon share.
In the midst of all of this
activity, rumors began to circulate, particularly with regards to
what might or might not be happening down at the courthouse.
Possibly spurred on by a false report that whites were storming the
courthouse, moments after 10:00 p.m., a second contingent of armed
African American men, perhaps seventy-five in number this time,
decided to make a second visit to the Courthouse. Leaving Greenwood
by automobile, they got out of their cars near Sixth and Main and
marched, single file, to the courthouse steps. Again, they offered
their services to the authorities to help protect Dick Rowland. Once
again, their offer was refused.105
Then it happened. As the
black men were leaving the courthouse for the second time, a white
man approached a tall African American World War I veteran who was
carrying an army-issue revolver. "Nigger", the white man said, "What
are you doing with that pistol?" "I'm going to use it if I need to,"
replied the black veteran. "No, you give it to me." Like hell I
will." The white man tried to take the gun away from the veteran,
and a shot rang out.106 America's worst race riot had
begun.
While the first shot fired
at the courthouse may have been unintentional, those that followed
were not. Almost immediately, members of the white mob -- and
possibly some law enforcement officers -- opened fire on the African
American men, who returned volleys of their own. The initial gunplay
lasted only a few seconds, but when it was over, an unknown number
of people -- perhaps as many as a dozen -- both black and white, lay
- dead or wounded.107
Outnumbered more than
twenty-to-one, the black men began a retreating fight toward the
African American district. With armed whites in close pursuit, heavy
gunfire erupted again along Fourth Street, two blocks north of the
courthouse.108
Dr. George H. Miller, a
white physician who was working late that evening in his office at
the Unity Building at 21 W. Fourth Street, rushed outside after
hearing the gunshots, only to come upon a wounded black man, "shot
and bleeding, writhing on the street," surrounded by a group of
angry whites. As Dr. Miller later told an interviewer:
I went over to see if I
could help him as a doctor, but the crowd was gathering around him
and wouldn't even let the driver of the ambulance which just arrived
to even pick him up. I saw it was an impossible situation to
control, that I could be of no help. The crowd was getting more and
more belligerent. The Negro had been shot so many times in his
chest, and men from the onlookers were slashing him with knives.
Unable to help the dying
man, Dr. Miller got into his car and drove home.109
A short while later, a
second , deadlier, skirmish broke out at Second and Cincinnati. No
longer directly involved with the fate of Dick Rowland, the
beleaguered second contingent of African American men were now
fighting for their own lives. Heavily outnumbered by the whites, and
suffering some casualties along the way, most were apparently able,
however, to make it safely across the Frisco railroad tracks, and
into the more familiar environs of the African American community.110

A typical member of the white mob. Not only did
they set African-American homes and businesses on fire,
but looted their possessions as well (Courtesy Bob Hower).
At the courthouse, the
sudden and unexpected turn of events had a jolting effect on the
would-be lynch mob, and groups of angry, vengeance-seeking whites
soon took the streets and sidewalks of downtown. "A great many of
these persons lining the sidewalks," one white eyewitness later
recalled, "were holding a rifle or shotgun in one hand, and grasping
the neck of a liquor bottle with the other. Some had pistols stuck
into their belts."111

Following the outbreak of violence at the
courthouse, crowds of angry whites took to the streets downtown.
There, according to white eye witnesses, a number of blacks were
killed in the riots early hours.
And even though the fighting soon moved north toward Greenwood,
groups of whites-including these at Main and Archer-were still
roaming the streets of downtown the next morning (Courtesy Oklahoma
Historical Society).
Some were about to become,
at least temporarily, officers of the law. Shortly after the
fighting had broken out at the courthouse, a large number of whites
- many of whom had only a little while earlier been members of the
would-be lynch mob -- gathered outside of police headquarters on
Second Street. There, perhaps as many as five-hundred white men and
boys were sworn-in by police officers as "Special Deputies." Some
were provided with badges or ribbons indicating their new status.
Many, it appears, also were given specific instructions. According
to Laurel G. Buck, a white bricklayer who was sworn-in as one of
these 'Special Deputies", a police officer bluntly told him to "Get
a gun and get a nigger."112
Shortly thereafter, whites
began breaking into downtown sporting goods stores, pawnshops, and
hardware stores, stealing -- or "borrowing" as some would later
claim -- guns and ammunition. Dick Bardon's store on First Street
was particularly hard hit as well as the J.W. MeGee Sporting Goods
shop at 22 W. Second Street, even though it was located literally
across the street from police headquarters. The owner later
testified that a Tulsa police officer helped to dole out the guns
that were taken from his store.113
More bloodshed soon
followed, as whites began gunning down any African Americans that
they discovered downtown. William R. Holway, a white engineer, was
watching a movie at the Rialto Theater when someone ran into the
theater, shouting "Nigger fight, nigger fight". As Holway later
recalled:
Everybody left that theater
on high, you know. We went out the door and looked across the
street, and there was Younkman's drug store with those big pillars.
There were two big pillars at the entrance, and we got over behind
them. Just got there when a Negro ran south of the alley across the
street, the minute his head showed outside, somebody shot him.
"We stood there for about
half-an-hour watching," Holway added, "which I shall never forget.
He wasn't quite dead, but he was about to die. He was the first man
that I saw shot in that riot."114

Groups of whites gathered throughout the city
(Courtesy Western History Collection, University of Oklahoma
Libraries).
Not far away, at the Royal
Theater - that was showing a movie called "One Man in a Million"
that evening -- a similar drama played itself out. Among the
onlookers was a white teenager named William "Choc" Phillips, who
later became a well-known Tulsa police officer. As described by
Phillips in his unpublished memoir of the riot:
The mob action was set off
when several [white] men chased a Negro man down the alley in back
of the theater and out onto Fourth Street where be saw the stage
door and dashed inside. Seeing the open door the Negro rushed in and
hurried forward in the darkness hunting a place to hide.
Suddenly he was on the stage
in front of the picture screen and blinded by the bright flickering
light coming down from the operator's booth in the balcony. After
shielding his eyes for a moment he regained his vision enough to
locate the steps leading from the stage down past the orchestra pit
to the aisle just as the pursuing men rushed the stage. One of them
saw the Negro and yelled, "there he is, heading for the aisle". As
he finished the sentence, a roaring blast from a shotgun dropped the
Negro man by the end of the orchestra pit.115
Not all of the victims of
the violence that broke out downtown were white. Evidence suggests
that after the fighting broke out at the courthouse, carloads of
black Tulsans may have exchanged gunfire with whites on streets
downtown, possibly resulting in casualties on both sides. At least
one white man in an automobile was killed by a group of whites, who
had mistaken him to be black.116
Around midnight, a small
crowd of whites gathered -- once again -- outside of the courthouse,
yelling "Bring the rope" and "Get the nigger". But they did not rush
the building, and nothing happened.117 Because the truth
of the matter was that, by then, most of Tulsa's rioting whites no
longer particularly cared about Dick Rowland anymore. They now had
much bigger things in mind.
While darkness slowed the
pace of the riot, sporadic fighting took place throughout the
nighttime hours of May 31 and June 1. The heaviest occurred
alongside the Frisco railroad tracks, one of the key dividing lines
between Tulsa's black and white commercial districts. From
approximately midnight until around 1:30 a.m., scores of blacks and
whites exchanged gunfire across the Frisco yards. At one point
during the fighting, an inbound train reportedly arrived, its
passengers forced to take cover on the floor as the shooting
continued, raking both sides of the train.118
A few carloads of whites
also made brief excursions into the African American district,
firing indiscriminately into houses as they roared up and down
streets lined with black residences. there were deliberate murders
as well.119 As Walter White, who visited Tulsa
immediately after the riot, later reported:
Many are the stories of
horror told to me - not by colored people - but by white residents.
One was that of an aged colored couple, saying their evening prayers
before retiring in their little home on Greenwood Avenue. A mob
broke into the house, shot both of the old people in the backs of
their heads, blowing their brains out and spattering them over the
bed, pillaged the home, and then set fire to it.120
It appears that the first
fires set by whites in black neighborhoods began at about 1:00 a.m.
African American homes and businesses along Archer were the earliest
targets, and when an engine crew from the Tulsa Fire Department
arrived and prepared to douse the flames, white rioters forced the
firemen away at gunpoint. By 4:00 a.m., more than two-dozen
black-owned businesses, including the Midway Hotel, had been
torched.121

During the nighttime hours of May 31 and June 1,
groups of armed whites
made "drive-by" shootings in black residential neighborhoods, firing
into African-American homes
(Courtesy Greenwood Cultural Center).
The nighttime hours of May
31 and June 1 also witnessed the first organized actions taken by
the Tulsa units of the National Guard. While evidence indicates that
Sheriff McCullough may have requested local guard officers that they
send men down to the courthouse at around 9:30 p.m.,122
it was not until more than an hour later -- about the time that the
fighting broke out at the courthouse - that the local National Guard
units were specifically ordered to take action with regards to the
riot. According to the after action report later submitted by Major
James Bell to local National Guard commander Lieutenant Colonel
L.J.F. Rooney:
About 10:30 o'clock, I think
it was, I had a call from the Adjt. General asking about the
situation. I explained that it looked pretty bad. He directed that
we continue to use every effort to get the men in so that if a call
came we would be ready. I think it was only a few minutes after
this, another call from the Adjt. General directed that "B" Co., the
Sanitary Det. and the Service Co. be mobilized at once and render
any assistance to the civil authorities we could in the maintenance
of law and order and the protection of life and property. I think
this was about 10:40 o'clock and while talking to the General you
appeared and assume command.123
At approximately 11:00 p.m.,
perhaps as many as fifty local National Guardsmen -- nearly all of
whom had been contacted at their homes -- had gathered at the armory
on Sixth Street. Some were World War I veterans. It is unclear
whether any of the men had been trained in riot control. Although
various official and unofficial manuals were available in 1921 on
the use of National Guard soldiers during riots, it is uncertain
whether the Tulsa units had received any training in this area.124

Some of the most intense fighting during the riot
took place alongside the Frisco Railroad yards,
as African-American defenders tried to keep the white rioters away
from Greenwood.
But when dawn broke on the morning of June 1, the black defenders
were simpley overwhelmed
(Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Sociey).
Another interesting aspect
regarding the guardsmen who gathered at the armory exists. Not only
were the Tulsa units of the National Guard exclusively white, but as
the evening wore on, it became increasingly clear that they would
not play an impartial role in the "maintenance of law and order."
Like many of their white neighbors, a number of the local guardsmen
also came to conclude that the race riot was, in fact, a "Negro
uprising," a term used throughout their various after action
reports. At least one National Guard officer went even further,
using the term "enemy" in reference to African Americans. Given the
tenor of the times, it is hardly surprising that Tulsa's all-white
National Guard might view black Tulsans antagonistically. As the
riot continued to unfold, this also would prove to be far from
irrelevant.125
Initially, the local
guardsmen were deployed downtown. Sometime before midnight, one
detachment was stationed in front of police headquarters, where they
blocked off Second Street. Guardsmen also led groups of armed whites
on "patrols" of downtown streets, an activity that was later taken
over by members of the -- similarly all-white -- local chapter of
the American Legion. Tulsa police officials also presented the
guardsmen with a machine gun, which guard officers then had mounted
on the back of a truck. This particular gun, possibly a war trophy,
it turned out, was in poor operating condition, and could only be
fired one shell at a time.126
Taking the machine gun along
with them, about thirty guardsmen then headed north, and positioned
themselves along Detroit Avenue between Brady Street and Standpipe
Hill, along one of the borders separating the city's white and black
neighborhoods. Their deployment was far from impartial, for the
"skirmish line" that the National Guard officers established was
set-up facing - or soon would be -- the African American district.
Moreover, the guardsmen also began rounding up black Tulsans, whom
they handed over -- as prisoners -- to the police, and they also
briefly exchanged fire with gunmen to the east. Far from being
utilized as a neutral force, Tulsa's local National Guard unit along
Detroit Avenue were, even in the early hours of the riot, being
deployed in a manner which would eventually set them in opposition
to the black community.127

North Tulsa burns while a white audience views the
destruction from a safe distance
(Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Society).
In Tulsa's black
neighborhoods, meanwhile, word of what had happened at the
courthouse was soon followed by even more disturbing news. A
light-complexioned African American man, who could "pass" for white,
had mingled with the crowds of angry whites downtown, where he
overheard talk of invading the African American district. Carefully
making his way back home, the man then related what he had heard to
Seymour Williams, a teacher at Booker T. Washington High School.
Williams, who had served with the army in France, grabbed his
service revolver and began to spread the news among his neighbors
living just off of Standpipe Hill.128
All along the southern edge
of Greenwood, in fact, a great amount of activity was in progress.
Alerted to the news of the violence that had broken out downtown,
garage and theater owner John Wesley Williams wasted no time in
preparing for the possibility of even greater trouble. Loading his
30-30 rifle and a repeating shotgun, he positioned himself along a
south-facing window of his family's second floor apartment at the
corner of Greenwood and Archer. Later telling his son that he was
"defending Greenwood," he was one of scores of other African
American residents who were preparing to do exactly the same.129
Other black Tulsans,
however, reached a different conclusion on what was the best course
of action. Despite the fact that many of the city's African American
residents undoubtedly hoped that daylight would bring an end to the
violence, others decided not to wait and find out. In the early
hours of June 1, a steady stream of black Tulsans began to leave the
city, hoping to find safety in the surrounding countryside. "Early
in the evening when there was first talk of trouble," Irene Scofield
later told the Black Dispatch, "I and about forty others
started out of the town and walked to a little town about fifteen
miles away." Others joining the exodus, however, were not as
fortunate. Billy Hudson, an African American laborer who lived on
Archer, hitched up his wagon as conditions grew worse, and set out
-- with his grandchildren by his side - for Nowata. He was killed by
whites along the way.130
Adding to the confusion over
what to do was the simple reality that, for most black Tulsans, it
was by no means clear as to what, exactly, was going on throughout
the city. This was particularly the case during the early hours of
June 1. Intermittent gunfire continued along the southernmost edges
of the African American district throughout the night, while down
along Archer Street, the fires had not yet burned themselves out.
Yet, as far as anyone could determine, Dick Rowland was still safe
inside the courthouse. There had been no lynching.

Street by street, block by block, the white
invaders moved northward across Tulsa's African-American district,
looting homes and setting them on fire
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
At approximately 2:00 a.m.,
the fierce fighting along the Frisco railroad yards had ended. The
white would-be invaders still south of the tracks. As a result, some
of Greenwood's defenders not only concluded that they had "won" the
fight, but also that the riot was over. "Nine p.m. the trouble
started," A.J. Smitherman later wrote, "two a.m. the thing was
done."131
Nothing could have been
further from the truth.
Regardless of whatever was,
or was not, happening down by the Frisco tracks, crowds of angry,
armed whites were still very much in evidence on the streets and
sidewalks of downtown Tulsa. Stunned, and then outraged, by what had
occurred at the courthouse, they had only begun to vent their anger.
Like black Tulsans, whites
were not exactly certain as to what exactly was happening in the
city, a situation that was, not surprisingly, tailor-made for
rumors. Indeed, at about 2:30 a.m., the word spread quickly across
downtown that a train carrying five- hundred armed blacks from
Muskogee was due to arrive shortly at the Midland Valley Railway
passenger station off Third Street. Scores of armed whites including
a National Guard patrol rushed to the depot, but nothing happened.
There was no such train.132
Approximately 30 minutes
later, reports reached the local National Guard officers that
African American gunman were firing on white residences on Sunset
Hill, north of Standpipe Hill. Moreover, it was said that a white
woman had been shot and killed. Responding to the news, guardsmen
including the crew manning the semi-defective machine gun were
deployed along Sunset Hill, an area that overlooked black homes to
the east.133
In other white neighborhoods
across Tulsa, a different kind of activity was taking place,
particularly during the first hours following midnight. As word of
what some would later call the "Negro uprising" began to spread
across the white community, groups of armed whites began to gather
at hastily-arranged meeting places, to discuss what to do next.134

White rioters began setting black homes and
businesses on fire around midnight, largely along Archer Street.
There were atrocities as well. One elderly African-American couple,
it was later reported,
was shot in the back of the head by whites as they knelt in prayer inside
their home (Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Society).
For "Choc" Phillips and his
other young companions, word of this activity came while they were
sitting in an all-night restaurant. "Everybody", they were told, "go
to Fifteenth and Boulder". Phillips wrote:
Many people were drifting
out of the restaurant so we decided to go along and see what
happened at the meeting place. Driving south on Boulder we realized
that many trucks and automobiles were headed for the same location,
and near Fifteenth Street people had abandoned their vehicles
because the streets and intersections were filled to capacity. We
left the car more than a block away and began walking toward the
crowded intersection. There were already three or four hundred
people there and more arriving when we walked up.
Once there, a man stood up
on top of a touring car and announced, "We have decided to go out to
Second and Lewis Streets and join the crowd that is meeting there."135
Returning to their
automobiles, Phillips and his companions blended in with the long
line of cars headed east. He later estimated, the crowd that had
gathered was about six-hundred strong. Once again, men stood up on
top of cars and began shouting instructions to the crowd. "Men,"
once man announced, "we are going in at daylight." Another man
declared that they would be having, right then and there, an
ammunition exchange. "If any of you have more ammunition than you
need, or if what you have doesn't fit your gun, sing out," he said.
"Be ready at daybreak," another man insisted, claiming that meetings
like this were taking place all over town. "Nothing can stop us," he
added, "for there will be thousands of others going in at the same
time."136
The Tulsa police also appear
to have been scattered all over town. No doubt responding to rumors
that armed blacks were supposedly en route to Tulsa from various
towns across eastern Oklahoma, Tulsa police officers had been
dispatched to guard various roads leading into the city. Indeed, no
less than a half-dozen officers that by Chief Gustafson's subsequent
calculations, was nearly one-fifth of the regularly scheduled
available police force that evening, had apparently been posted at
the ice plant overlooking the Eleventh Street bridge. Some local
guardsmen also were deployed to stand guard at various public works
as well including the city water works along the Sand Springs road,
and the Public Service Company's power plant off First Street.137

Sweeping past the black business district, now
aflame, the white rioters
entered the heart of Tulsa's African-American residential area
(Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Society).
Word of what was happening
in Tulsa was also making its way to state officials in Oklahoma
City. At 10:14 p.m., Adjutant General Charles F. Barrett, the
commandant of the Oklahoma National Guard, had received a long
distance telephone call from Major Byron Kirkpatrick, a Tulsa guard
officer, advising him of the worsening conditions in Tulsa.
Kirkpatrick phoned again at 12:35 a.m. At that point he was
instructed by Governor J.B.A. Robertson to prepare and send a signed
telegram, as required by Oklahoma state law, by the chief of police,
the county sheriff, and a local judge, requesting that state troops
be sent to Tulsa. Kirkpatrick, however, ran into some problems as he
tried to collect the necessary signatures, particularly that of
Sheriff McCullough, who was still barricaded with his men and Dick
Rowland on the top floor of the courthouse. However, Kirkpatrick
persevered, and at 1:46 a.m., the needed telegram arrived at the
state capital.138 It read:
WESTERN UNION
TELEGRAM
Tulsa, Okla
June l,1921
Govemor J.B.A. Robertson
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Race riot developed here. Several killed.
Unable handle situation. Request that National Guard forces be sent
by special train. Situation serious.
Jno. A. Gustaftson,
Chief of Police
Wm. McCullough,
Sheriff
V.W. Biddison
District Judge139
Twenty-nine minutes later,
at 2:15 a.m., Major Kirkpatrick spoke again by phone with Adjutant
General Barrett, who informed him that the governor had authorized
the calling out of the state troops. A special train, carrying
approximately one-hundred National Guard soldiers would leave
Oklahoma City, bound for Tulsa, at 5:00 a.m. that morning.140
Tulsa's longest night would
finally be ending, but its longest day would have only begun.
In the pre-dawn hours of
June l, thousands of armed whites had gathered in three main
clusters along the northern fringes of downtown, opposite Greenwood.
One group had assembled behind the Frisco freight depot, while
another waited nearby at the Frisco and Santa Fe passenger station.
Four blocks to the north, a third crowd was clustered at the Katy
passenger depot. While it is unclear how many people were in each
group, some contemporary observers estimated the total number of
armed whites who had gathered as high as five or ten thousand.141
Smaller bands of whites also
had been active. One group hauled a machine gun to the top of the
Middle States Milling Company's grain elevator off of First Street,
and set it up to fire to the north of Greenwood Avenue.142
Shortly before daybreak, five white men in a green Franklin
automobile pulled up alongside the crowd of whites who were massed
behind the Frisco freight depot. "What the hell are you waitin'
on?," one of the men hollered, "let's go get 'em." But the crowd
would not budge, and the men in the car set off alone toward Deep
Greenwood. Their bodies, and the bullet-ridden Franklin, were later
seen in the middle of Archer Street, near Frankfort.143

The looting and burning of African -American homes
was indiscriminate,
both poor and wealthy families lost their homes (Courtesy Greenwood
Cultural Center).
Across the tracks in
Greenwood, considerable activity also had been taking place. While
some black Tulsans prepared themselves to face the onslaught, others
decided that it was time to go. "About this time officers Pack and
Lewis pushed up to us and said it would not be safe for us to remain
any longer," recalled Mrs. Dimple Bush, who was with her husband at
the Red Wing Hotel. "So," she added, "We rushed out and found a taxi
which took us straight north on Greenwood."144
Not far away, along North
Elgin, Julia Duff, a teacher at Booker T. Washington High School,
faced a similar crisis. Awakened by loud voices outside of her
rented room shortly before dawn, the young teacher was soon nearly
overcome with fear. As later described in a letter published in the
Chicago Defender:
Mrs. S. came into her room
and told her to dress-there was something wrong for soldiers were
all around, and she looked out the window and saw them driving the
men out of the houses on Detroit. Saw Mr. Woods running with both
hands in the air and their 3-month-old baby in one hand and three
brutes behind him with guns.
"She said her legs gave way
from under her," the letter continued, "and she had to crawl about
the room, taking things from her closet, putting them in her trunk,
for she thought if anything happened she'd have her trunk packed,
and before she got everything in they heard footsteps on their steps
and there were six out there and they ordered Mr. Smart to march,
hands up, out of the house.145
Several eyewitnesses later
recalled that when dawn came at 5:08 a.m. that morning, an unusual
whistle or siren sounded, perhaps as a signal for the mass assault
on Greenwood to begin. Although the source of this whistle or siren
is still unknown, moments later, the white mobs made their move.
While the machine gun in the grain elevator opened fire, crowds of
armed whites poured across the Frisco tracks, headed straight for
the African American commercial district.146 As later
described by one eyewitness:
With wild frenzied shouts,
men began pouring from behind the freight depot and the long string
of boxcars and evidently from behind the piles of oil well easing
which was at the other end and on the north side of the building.
From every place of shelter up and down the tracks came screaming,
shouting men to join in the rush toward the Negro section. Mingled
with the shouting were a few rebel-yells and Indian gobblings as the
great wave of humanity rushed forward totally absorbed in thoughts
of destruction.147
Meanwhile, over at the Katy
depot, the other crowd of armed whites also moved forward. Heading
east, they were soon joined by dozens of others in automobiles,
driving along Brady and Cameron Streets. As one unidentified
observer later told reporter Mary Parrish, "Tuesday night, May 31,
was the riot, and Wednesday morning, by daybreak, was the invasion."148
While black Tulsans fought
hard to protect their homes and businesses, the sheer numerical
advantage of the invading whites soon proved to be overwhelming.
After a valiant, night long effort, John Wesley Williams had to flee
from his family's apartment once whites began to riddle the building
with gunfire. Squeezing off a few final rounds a little further up
Greenwood Avenue, Williams then faced the inevitable, and began
walking north along the Midland Valley tracks, leaving his home and
businesses behind.149
He was hardly alone. Not far
away, in her apartment in the Woods Building at 105 N. Greenwood,
Mary E. Jones Parrish and her young daughter Florence Mary had sat
up much of the night, uncertain of what to do. "Finally," she later
wrote,
My friend, Mrs. Jones,
called her husband, who was trying to take a little rest. They
decided to try to make for a place of safety, so called to me that
they were leaving. By this time the enemy was close upon us, so they
ran out of the south door, which led out onto Archer Street, and
went east toward Lansing. I took my little girl, Florence Mary, by
the hand and fled out of the west door on Greenwood. I did not take
time to get a hat for myself or Baby, but started out north on
Greenwood, running amidst showers of bullets from the machine gun
located in the granary and from men who were quickly surrounding our
district. Seeing that they were fighting at a disadvantage, our men
had taken shelter in the buildings and in other places out of sight
of the enemy. When my daughter, Florence Mary, and I ran into the
street, it was vacant for a block or more. Someone called to me to
"Get out of the street with that child or you both will be killed."
I felt that it was suicide to remain in the building, for it would
surely be destroyed and death in the street was preferred, for we
expected to be shot down at any moment. So we placed our trust in
God, our Heavenly Father, who seeth and knoweth all things, and ran
out of Greenwood in the hope of reaching a friend's home who lived
over the Standpipe Hill in Greenwood Addition.150
For Dimple Bush, the flight
from Greenwood had bordered upon the indescribable. "It was just
dawn; the machine guns were sweeping the valley with their murderous
fire and my heart was filled with dread as we sped along,," she
recalled, "Old women and men, children were running and screaming
everywhere."151
Soon, however, new perils
developed. As the mobs of armed whites rushed into the southern end
of the African American district, airplanes -- manned by whites --
also appeared overhead. As Dr. R.T. Bridgewater, a well-respected
black Tulsa physician, later described what happened:
Shortly after we left a
whistle blew. The shots rang from a machine gun located on Standpipe
Hill near my residence and aeroplanes began to fly over us, in some
instances very low to the ground. A cry was heard from the women
saying, "Look out for the aeroplanes, they are shooting upon us."152
Numerous other eyewitnesses
--both black and white -- confirm the presence of an unknown number
of airplanes flying over Greenwood during the early daylight hours
of June 1. While certain other assertions made over the years such
as that the planes dropped streams of "liquid fire" on top of
African American homes and businesses appear to have been
technologically improbable, particularly during the early 1920s,
there is little doubt but that some of the occupants of the
airplanes fired upon black Tulsans with pistols and rifles.
Moreover, there is evidence, to suggest that men in at least one
airplane dropped some form of explosives, probably sticks of
dynamite, upon a group of African American refugees as they were
fleeing the city.153
Gunfire soon erupted along
the western boundary of the black community. Sharp fighting broke
out along Standpipe Hill, where the local guardsmen positioned there
traded fire with armed African Americans, who had set up defensive
lines off Elgin and Elgin Place. Nearby, on Sunset Hill, the white
guardsmen opened fire on the black neighborhood to the east, using
both their standard issue thirty-caliber 1906 Springfield rifles as
well as the semi-defective machine gun provided to them by the Tulsa
police.154
As the waves of white
rioters descended upon the African American district, a deadly
pattern soon emerged. First, the armed whites broke into the black
homes and businesses, forcing the occupants out into the street,
where they were led away at gunpoint to one of a growing number of
internment centers. Anyone who resisted was shot. Moreover, African
American men in homes where firearms were discovered met the same
fate. Next, the whites looted the homes and businesses, pocketing
small items, and hauling away larger items either on foot or by car
or truck. Finally, the white rioters then set the homes and other
buildings on fire, using torches and oil-soaked rags. House by
house, block by block, the wall of flame crept northward, engulfing
the city's black neighborhoods.155
Atrocities occurred along
the way. According to one account, published ten days after the riot
in a Chicago newspaper,
Another cruel instance was
when they [white rioters] went to the home of an old couple and the
old man, 80 years old, was paralyzed and sat in a chair and they
told him to march and he told them he was crippled, but he'd go if
someone would take him, and they told his wife (old, too) to go, but
she didn't want to leave him, and he told her to go on anyway. As
she left one of the damn dogs shot the old man and then they fired
the house.156
There were near-atrocities
as well. After armed whites had led his mother away at gunpoint,
five-year-old George Monroe was hiding beneath his parents' bed with
his two older sisters and his one older brother when white men
suddenly entered the room. After rifling through the dresser, the
men set the curtains on fire. As the men began to leave, one of them
stepped on George's hand. George started to cry out, but his sister
Lottie threw her hand over his mouth, preventing their discovery. A
few minutes later, the children were able to escape from their home
before it burst into flame.157
Some of the fires in
Greenwood appear to have been set by whites wearing khaki uniforms.
The actual identity of these men remains unclear. Most likely, they
were World War I veterans who had donned their old army uniforms
when the riot erupted, rather than an officially organized group.159
They were not, however, the
only uniformed whites observed setting fires in Tulsa's African
American neighborhoods. According to black Deputy Sheriff V.B.
Bostic, a white Tulsa police officer "drove him and his wife from
his home,"' and then "poured oil on the floor and set a lighted
match to it."159
Deputy Sheriff Bostic was
not, however, the only eyewitness to report acts of criminal
misconduct by Tulsa police officers during the course of the riot.
According to one white eyewitness, a "uniformed [white] policeman on
East Second Street went home, changed his uniform to plainclothes,
and went to the Negro district and led a bunch of whites into Negro,
houses, some of the bunch pilfering, never offered to protect men,
women or children, or property." This particular account was
buttressed by the testimony of an African American witness, who
reported that he had seen the same officer in question "on the
morning of the riot, June 1, kicking in doors of Negro homes, and
assisting in the destruction of property."160
Despite the daunting odds
against them, black Tulsans valiantly fought back. African American
riflemen had positioned themselves in the belfry of the newly-built
Mount Zion Baptist Church, whose commanding view of the area just
below Standpipe Hill allowed them to temporarily stem the tide of
the white invasion. When white rioters set up a machine gun-probably
the same weapon that had been used earlier that morning at the grain
elevator, and unleashed its deadly fire on the church belfry, the
black defenders were quickly overwhelmed. As "Choc" Phillips later
described what happened:
In a couple of minutes
pieces of brick started falling, then whole bricks began tumbling
from the narrow slits in the cupola. Within five or six minutes the
openings were large jagged holes with so many bricks flying from
that side of the cupola wall that it seemed ready to fall.
The men stopped firing the
machine gun and almost immediately the houses on the outer rim of
the area that had been protected by the snipers, became victims of
the arsonists. We watched the men take the machine gun from the
tripod, wrap it in a canvas cover then lay it on the bed of the
truck. They rolled up the belts with the empty shell casings, put
away those that were still unused, and in what seemed less than ten
minutes from the time the truck was parked at the location, drove
away.
While standing on the high
ground where the machine gun had been firing, we watched the
activity below for a few minutes. Most of the houses were beginning
to burn and smoke ascended slowly in to the air while people flitted
around as busy as bees down there. From the number that ran in and
out of the houses and the church, there had evidently been a couple
of hundred who remained behind when the mob bypassed the area.
A short while later, Mount
Zion was torched.161

Dedicated only weeks before the riot, the Mount
Zion Baptist Church
was a great source of pride for many black Tulsans.
But after a prolonged battle, the white rioters burned it-as well as
more than a half dozen other African American churches-to the ground
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
Attempts by black Tulsans to
defend their homes and property were undercut by the actions of both
the Tulsa police and the local National Guard units, who, rather
than focus on disarming and arresting the white rioters, took steps
that led to the eventual imprisonment of practically all of the
city's African American citizens. Guardsmen deployed on Standpipe
Hill made at least one eastward march in the early hours of June 1,
rounding up African Americans along the way, before they were fired
upon, apparently by whites as well as blacks, near Greenwood Avenue.
The guardsmen then marched to Sunset Hill, where they handed over
their black prisoners to local police officers.162
An arrest by a white officer
was not a guarantee of safety for black Tulsans. According to Thomas
Higgins, a white resident of Wichita, Kansas who happened to be
visiting Tulsa when the riot broke out, "I saw men of my own race,
sworn officers, on three occasions search Negroes while their hands
were up, and not finding weapons, extracted what money they found on
them. If the Negro protested, he was shot."163
White civilians also took
black prisoners. When the invasion began, Carrie Kinlaw, an African
American woman who lived out toward the Section Line, had to run
toward the fighting in order to help her sisters retrieve their
invalid mother. Reaching the elderly woman in a "rain of bullets",
Kinlaw later wrote:
My sisters and I gathered
her up, placed her on a cot, and three of us carried the cot and the
other one carried a bundle of clothes; thus we carried Mother about
six blocks, with bullets falling on all sides. About six squads of
rioters overtook us, asked for men and guns, made us hold up our
hands.
Not all of her captors,
however, were adults. "There were boys in that bunch," she added,
"from about 10 years upward, all armed with guns."164
Black Tulsans also faced
dangers while in the custody of white civilians. James T. West a
teacher at Booker T. Washington High School, was arrested by whites
at his home on Easton Street that morning. "Some men appeared with
drawn guns and ordered all of the men out of the house," he recalled
immediately after the riot,
I went out immediately. They
ordered me to raise my hands, after which three or four men searched
me. They told me to line up in the street. I requested them to let
me get my hat and best shoes, but they refused and abusively ordered
me to line up. They refused to let one of the men put on any kind of
shoes. After lining up some 30 or 40 of us men, they ran us through
the streets to Convention Hall, forcing us to keep our hands in the
air all the while. While we were running, some of the ruffians would
shoot at our heels and swore at those who had difficulty keeping up.
They actually drove a car into the bunch and knocked down two or
three men.165
Harold M. Parker, a white
bookkeeper for the Oklahoma Producing and Refining Corporation at
the time of the riot, later corroborated how armed whites sometimes
shot at the heels of their black prisoners. "Sometimes they missed
and shot their legs," Parker recalled a half century later, "It was
sheer cruelty coming out."166
The most infamous incident
involving white civilians imprisoning African Americans was that
which concerned Dr. A.C. Jackson, Tulsa's noted black surgeon.
Despite the increasing gunfire, Dr. Jackson had decided to remain
inside of his handsome home at 523 N. Detroit, along the shoulder of
Standpipe Hill. But when a group of armed whites arrived on his
front lawn, Jackson apparently walked out the side door of his home
with his hands up, saying, "Here I am boys, don't shoot."167
What happened next was later recounted by John A. Oliphant, a white
attorney who lived nearby, in testimony he provided after the riot:
Q. About what time in the
morning did you say it was Dr. Jackson was shot?
A. Right close to eight
o'clock, between seven thirty and eight o'clock.
Q. Dr. Jackson was a Negro?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And he was coming toward
you and these other men at the time he was shot?
A. Yes, Sir, coming right
between his house, right in his yard between his home and the house
below him.
Q. What did these men say at
the time he was shot?
A. They didn't say anything
but they pulled down on him; I kept begging him not to shoot him, I
held him a good bit and I thought he wouldn't shoot but he shot him
twice and the other fellow on the other side-and he fell-shot him
and broke his leg.
Q. One man shot him twice?
A. Yes, sir, this is my
recollection now.
Q. Then another one shot him
through the leg?
A. Yes, I didn't look at
that fellow.
Q. These same men that shot
him carried him to the hospital?
A. No, they didn't.
Q. What did they do?
A. I have never seen them
after that, I don't know a thing about what became of them.
Dr. Jackson died of his
wounds later that day.168
Not all black Tulsans,
however, countenanced surrender. In the final burst of fighting off
of Standpipe Hill that morning, a deadly firefight erupted at the
site of an old clay pit, where several African American defenders
were said to have gone to their deaths fighting off the white
invaders. Stories also have been passed down over the years
regarding the exploits of Peg Leg Taylor, a legendary black defender
who is said to have singlehandedly fought off more than a dozen
white rioters. Along the northern face of Sunset Hill, the white
guardsmen posted there found themselves, at least for a while, under
attack.169
Black Tulsa, it was clear,
was not going without a fight.
Despite their gallant
effort, however, Tulsa's African American minority was simply
outgunned and outnumbered. As the white mobs continued to move
northward, into the heart of the black residential district, some of
the worst violence of the riot appears to have taken place. "Negro
men, women and children were killed in great numbers as they ran,
trying to flee to safety," one unidentified informant later told
Mary E. Parrish, ". . . the most horrible scenes of this occurrence
was to see women dragging their children while running to safety,
and the dirty white rascals firing at them as they ran."170

While the white rioters continued their assault
upon the African-American community,
black Tulsans soon found themselves subject to arrest by Tulsa
officials and "Special deputies"(Courtesy Bob Hower).
In the wake of the invasion
came a wall of flame, steadily moving northward. "Is the whole world
on fire?" asked a young playmate of eight-year-old Kinney Booker,
who was fleeing with his family from their home on North Frankfort.
Not far away, a fiery horror was underway. As later recounted by
Walter White in The Nation magazine:
One story was told to me by
an eyewitness of five colored men trapped in a burning house. Four
burned to death. A fifth attempted to flee, was shot to death as he
emerged from the burning structure, and his body was thrown back
into the flames.
Humans, however, were not
the only victims of the conflagration. More that a few black Tulsans
kept pigs and chickens in their backyards in those days. The too
perished in the flames, as did some dogs and other family pets.171
Efforts made by the Tulsa
Fire Department to halt the burning were of little effect. The
earliest attempts by firemen to put out fires in the African
American district were halted, at gunpoint, by crowds of white
rioters. Thereafter, what efforts that were made appear to have been
directed towards keeping the flames away from nearby white
neighborhoods. This may also have played a role in how another new
black church, the First Baptist Church located at Archer and
Jackson, was spared. "Yonder is a nigger church, why ain't they
burning it?" a white woman allegedly asked on the morning of June 1.
Because, she was told, "It's in a white district."172

While only the authorities detained a handful of
white rioters,
most black Tulsans soon found themselves held under guard.
Even in the predominantly white neighborhoods on the city's south
side, African-American domestic workers were rounded up
and taken to the various internment Centers (Courtesy Department of
Special Collections, McFarlin Library, University of Tulsa).
As the morning wore on, and
the fighting moved northward across Greenwood, there was a startling
new development. On the heels of their brief gun battle with African
American riflemen to their north, the guardsmen who were positioned
along the crest of Sunset Hill then joined in the invasion of black
Tulsa, with one detachment heading north, the other to the
northeast. As later described by Captain John W. McCuen in the after
action report he submitted to the commander of Tulsa's National
Guard units:
We advanced to the crest of
Sunset Hill in skirmish line and then a little further north to the
military crest of the hill where our men were ordered to lie down
because of the intense fire of the blacks who had formed a good
skirmish line at the foot of the hill to the northeast among the
out-buildings of the Negro settlement which stops at the foot of the
hill. After about 20 minutes "fire at will" at the armed groups of
blacks the latter began falling back to the northeast, thus getting
good cover among the frame buildings of the Negro settlement.
Immediately we moved forward, "B" Company advancing directly north
and the Service company in a north-easterly direction.173
More remarkable, the
guardsmen came upon a group of African Americans barricaded inside a
store, who were attempting to hold off a mob of armed white
rioter's. Rather than attempt to get the white invaders and the
black defenders to disengage, the guardsmen joined in on the attack.
Again, as described by Captain McCuen:
At the northeast corner of
the Negro settlement 10 or more Negroes barricaded themselves in a
concrete store and dwelling and a stiff fight ensued between these
Negroes on one side and guardsmen and civilians on the other.
Several whites and blacks were wounded and killed at this point. We
captured, arrested and disarmed a great many Negro men in this
settlement and then sent them under guard to the convention hall and
other points where they were being concentrated.174
No longer remotely
impartial, the men of "B" Company, Third Infantry, Oklahoma National
Guard, had now joined in on the assault on black Tulsa.
As African Americans fled
the city, new dangers sometimes appeared. Mary Parrish later
reported that as the group of refugees she was with "had traveled
many miles into the country and were turning to find our way to
Claremore," they were warned to stay clear of a nearby town, where
whites were "treating our people awfully mean as they passed
through".175 Similar stories have persisted for decades.

Whites detained fleeing African Americans as well
as those that stayed near their homes and businesses
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
Not all white Tulsans,
however, shared the racial views of the white rioters. Mary Korte, a
white maid who worked for a wealthy Tulsa family, hid African
American refugees at her family's farm east of the city.176
Along the road to Sand Springs, a white couple named Merrill and
Ruth Phelps hid and fed black riot victims in the basement of their
home for days. The Phelps home, which still stands, became something
of a "safe house" for black Tulsans who had managed not to be
imprisoned by the white authorities. Traveling through the woods and
along creek beds at night, dozens of African American refugees were
apparently hidden by the Phelpses during the daylight hours.177
Other white Tulsans also hid
blacks, or directly confronted the white rioters. Mary Jo Erhardt, a
young stenographer who roomed at the Y.W.C.A. Building at Fifth and
Cheyenne, did both. After a sleepless night, punctuated by the
sounds of gunfire, Erhardt arose early on the morning of June 1.
Heading downstairs, she then heard a voice she recognized as
belonging to the African American porter who worked there. "Miss
Mary! Oh, Miss Mary!" he said, "Let me in quick." Armed whites, he
told her, were chasing him. Quickly secreting the man inside the
building's walk-in refrigerator, Erhardt later recalled,
Hardly had I hidden him
behind the beef carcasses and returned to the hall door when a loud
pounding at the service entrance drew me there. A large man was
trying to open the door, fortunately securely locked, and there on
the stoop stood three very rough-looking middle-aged white men, each
pointing a revolver in my general direction!
"What do you want?" I asked
sharply. Strangely, those guns frightened me not at all. I was so
angry I could have torn those ruffians apart-three armed white men
chasing one lone, harmless Negro. I cannot recall in all my life
feeling hatred toward any person, until then. Apparently my feelings
did not show, for one answered, "Where did he go?" "Where did WHO
go?", I responded.
"That nigger," one demanded,
"did you let him in here?"
"Mister," I said, "I'm not
letting ANYBODY in here!," which was perfectly true. I had already
let in all I intended.
"It was at least ten minutes
before I felt secure enough to release Jack," Erhardt added, "He was
nearly frozen, dressed thinly as he was for the hot summer night,
but he was ALIVE!"178

The Zarrow Family. The parents of Jack and Henry
Zarrow, founder of Sooner Pipeling,
owned a grocery store in the riot-torn area. It was spared be cause
they were white.
The Zarrow's hid many of the fleeing blacks in their business
(Courtesy Greenwood Cultural Center).
Some whites, in their
efforts to protect black Tulsans from harm put themselves at risk.
None, perhaps, more so than a young Hispanic woman named Maria
Morales Gutierrez. A recent immigrant from Mexico, she and her
husband were living, at the time of the riot, in a small house off
Peoria Avenue, near Independence Street. Hearing a great deal of
noise and commotion on the morning of June 1, Morales ventured
outside, where she saw two small African American children, who had
evidently been separated from their parents, walking along the
street. Suddenly, an airplane appeared on the horizon, bearing down
on the two frightened youngsters. Morales ran out into the street,
and scooped the little ones into her arms, and out of danger.
A group of armed whites
later demanded that Morales hand the two terrified children over to
them. "In her English, she told them 'No'," her daughter Gloria
Lough, later recalled. "Somehow or other," she added, "they didn't
shoot her." The youngsters were safe.179
As the battle for black
Tulsa continued to rage, it soon became evident, even in
neighborhoods far removed from the fighting, that on June 1, 1921,
there would be very little business as usual in the city of Tulsa.
When Guy Ashby, a young white employee at Cooper's Grocery on
Fourteenth Street, showed up for work that morning, his boss was on
his way out the door. "The boss told me there would be no work that
day as he was declaring it 'Nigger Day' and he was going hunting
niggers," Ashby later remembered, "He took a rifle and told me to
lock up the store and go home."180

Any fleeing families were denied freedom by whites
positioned on escape routes
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
Downtown, normal activities
were even more in disarray, as business owners found themselves
shorthanded, and crowds of onlookers took to the streets, or climbed
up on rooftops, to stare at the great clouds of smoke billowing over
the north end of town. At the all-white Central High School, several
male students bolted from class when gunfire was heard nearby. One
of the students later recalled, "struck out for the riot area."
Along the way, he added, they were met by a white man who handed
them a new rifle and a box of shells. "You can have it," the man
told them, "I'm going home and going to bed."181
The riot was felt along the
southern edge of the city as well, particularly in the well-to- o
white neighborhoods off of 21st Street, as carloads of armed white
vigilantes went door to door, rounding up live-in African American
cooks, maids, and butlers at gunpoint, and then hauling them off
toward downtown. A number of white homeowners, however, fearing for
the safety of their black employees, stood in the way of this forced
evacuation. When Charles and Amy Arnold refused to hand over their
housekeeper, cries of being "nigger lovers" were followed by a brick
being thrown through their front window.182
Even out in the countryside,
miles from town, people knew that something was happening in Tulsa.
Since daybreak, huge columns of black smoke had been rising up,
hundreds of feet into the air, over the north end of the city.
The smoke was still there,
some four hours later, when the State Troops finally arrived in
town.
The special train from
Oklahoma City, carrying Adjutant General Charles F. Barrett and the
approximately 109 soldiers and officers under his command, pulled
into Tulsa's bullet-scarred Frisco and Santa Fe passenger depot at
approximately 9:15 a.m. on the morning of June 1, 1921. The
soldiers, who arrived armed and in uniform, were all-members of an
Oklahoma City based National Guard unit. In Tulsa, they soon became
known, by both blacks and whites, as the "State Troops," a term
which had the intrinsic benefit of helping to distinguish the
out-of-towners from the local National Guard units. Like the local
guardsmen, the State Troops were also all-white.183

Shortly after the outbreak of violence, the Tulsa
police presented
the local National Guardsmen with a machine gun-only it proved to be
defective.
A second machine gun that was in the hands of white civilians,
however,
was used to considerable effect during the attack on Greenwood
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
By the time the State Troops
arrived, Tulsa's devastating racial conflagration was already ten
and one-half hours old. Dozens of blacks and whites had been killed,
while the wards of the city's four remaining hospitals -- the
all-black Frissell Memorial Hospital had already been burned to the
ground by white rioters -- were filled with the wounded. Most of the
city's African American district had already been torched, while
looting continued in those black homes and businesses that were
still standing. "One very bad thing was the way whites delved into
the personal belongings of the Negroes, throwing their possessions
from trunks and otherwise damaging them," reported M.J. White, a
Denver dental supply dealer who was visiting Tulsa at the time of
the riot. "This lawless looting continued from about 9 until 11
o'clock," he added, "when martial law prevented further spoilation."184

As more and more African Americans were detained
the "protective custody"
alternate holding locations had to be used including McNulty
baseball Park
(Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library, University of
Tulsa).
There were ongoing horrors
as well. "One Negro was dragged behind an automobile, with a rope
around his neck, through the business district," reported the
Tulsa World in its "Second Extra" edition on the morning of June
1". Decades later, both former Tulsa mayor L.C. Clark, and E.W.
"Gene" Maxey of the Tulsa County Sheriff's Department, confirmed
this report. "About 8 a.m. on the morning of June 1, 1921," Maxey
told riot chronicler Ruth Avery,
I was downtown with a friend
when they killed that good, old, colored man that was blind. He had
amputated legs. His body was attached at the hips to a small wooden
platform with wheels. One leg stub was longer than the other, and
hung slightly over the edge of the platform, dragging along the
street. He scooted his body around by shoving and pushing with his
hands covered with baseball catcher mitts. He supported himself by
selling pencils to passersby, or accepting their donations for his
singing of songs.
The street car tracks ran
north and south on Main Street, and the tracks were laid on pretty
rough bricks. The fellow that was driving the car I knew--an outlaw
and a bootlegger. But I won't give his name because he has some
folks here. There were two or three people with him. They got that
old colored man that had been here for years. He was helpless. He'd
carry an old tin cup, sing, and mooched for money. One of them
thuggy, white people had a new car, so he went to the depot, and
came back up Main Street between First and Second Streets. We were
on the east side of the street. These white thugs had roped this
colored man on the longer stump of his one leg, and were dragging
him behind the car up Main Street. He was hollering. His head was
being bashed in, bouncing on the steel rails and bricks.
"They went on all the speed
that the car could make," Maxey added, ". . . a new car, with the
top down, and 3 or 4 of them in it, dragging him behind the car in
broad daylight on June 1, right through the center of town on Main
Street."185
When the State Troops
arrived in Tulsa, the majority of the city's black citizenry had
either fled to the countryside, or were being held -- allegedly for
their own protection -- against their will in one of a handful of
hastily set-up internment centers, including Convention Hall, the
fairgrounds, and McNulty baseball park. There were still, however,
some pockets of armed black resistance to the remnants of the white
invasion, especially along the northern reaches of the African
American district. In certain borderline areas such as the
residential neighborhood that lay just to the east of the Santa Fe
tracks where the Jim Crow line ran right down the center of the
street, a number of African American homes had escaped destruction,
sometimes through the efforts of sympathetic white neighbors.186
Upon their arrival in Tulsa,
the State Troops apparently did not proceed immediately to where the
fighting was still in progress, although it is uncertain how long
this delay lasted. The reasons for this seeming hold-up appear to be
largely due to the fact that certain steps needed to be fulfilled --
either through protocol or by law -- in order for martial law to be
declared in Tulsa. Accordingly, after detraining at the Frisco and
Santa Fe station, Adjutant General Barrett led a detachment of
soldiers to the courthouse, where an unsuccessful attempt was made
to contact Sheriff McCullough. Barrett then went to city hall,
where, after conferring with city officials, he contacted Governor
Robertson in Oklahoma City and asked to be granted the authority to
proclaim martial law in Tulsa County. Other detachments of State
Troops, meanwhile, appear to have begun taking charge of black
Tulsans who were being held by armed white civilians.187
However, another account of the riot, published a decade later,
alleges that upon their arrival in Tulsa, the State Troops wasted
valuable minutes by taking time to prepare and eat breakfast.188

Remarkably, a handful of Tulsa's finest
African-American homes were still standing
when the State Troops arrived in town. But about one-hour later, a
small group of white men were seen
entering the houses, and setting them on fire. By the time the State
Troops marched up Standpipe Hill,
it was too late, the homes were gone (Courtesy Tulsa Historical
Society).
As it turned out, while the
State Troops were occupied downtown, not far away, some of the
finest African American homes in the city were still standing.
Located along North Detroit Avenue, near Easton, they included the
homes of some of Tulsa's most prominent black citizens, among them
the residences of Tulsa Star editor A.J. Smitherman, Booker
T. Washington High School principal Ellis W. Woods, and businessman
Thomas R. Gently and his wife, Lottie.189
For several hours that
morning, John A. Oliphant a white attorney who lived nearby, had
been telephoning police headquarters in an effort to save these
homes, that had been looted but not burned. Oliphant believed that a
handful of officers, if sent over immediately, could see to it that
the homes were spared. As he later recounted in sworn testimony:
Q. Judge, when you phoned
the police station what reply did you get?
A. He said, somebody in
there, I thought I knew the voice but I am not certain, he said, I
will do the best I can for you." I told him who I was, I wanted some
policemen, I says, "If you will send me ten policemen I will protect
all this property and save a million dollars worth of stuff they
were burning down and looting." I asked the fire department for the
fire department to be sent over to help protect my property and they
said they couldn't come, they wouldn't let them.190
Oliphant's hopes were
raised, however, when he observed the arrival of the State Troops,
figuring that they might be able to save the homes along North
Detroit. "I sent for them," he testified, I sent for the militia to
come, send over fifteen or twenty of them, that is all I wanted."
But, instead, at around 10:15 a.m. or 10:30 a.m., a party of three
or four white men, probably so-called 'Special Deputies," each
wearing badges arrived, and then set fire to one of the very homes
that Oliphant had been trying to protect. By the time the State
Troops arrived in the neighborhood later that morning, it was too
late. Most of the homes were already on fire.191
One of the few that was not
belonged to Dr. Robert Bridgewater and his wife, Mattie, at 507 N.
Detroit. Returning to his home -- after being held at Convention
Hall -- in order to retrieve his medicine cases, Dr. Bridgewater
later wrote,
On reaching the house, I saw
my piano and all of my elegant furniture piled in the street. My
safe had been broken open, all of the money stolen, also my
silverware, cut glass, all of the family clothes, and everything of
value had been removed, even my family Bible. My electric light
fixtures were broken, all of the window lights and glass in the
doors were broken, the dishes that were not stolen were broken, the
floors were covered (literally speaking) with glass, even the phone
was torn from the wall.192
The Bridgewaters, as they
well knew, were among the fortunate few. Most black Tulsans no
longer had homes anymore.
By the time that marital law
was declared in Tulsa County at 11:29 a.m. on June 1, the race riot
had nearly run its course. Scattered bands of white rioters, some of
whom had been awake for more than twenty-four hours straight,
continued to loot and burn, but most had already gone home. Along
the northern and eastern edges of black Tulsa, where homes were
mixed in with stretches of farmland, it had become difficult for the
rioters to distinguish the homes of African Americans from those of
their white neighbors. The home that riot survivor Nell Hamilton
shared with her mother out near the Section Line was, perhaps,
spared for just that reason.193

As the riot wore on, African-American families
frequently became separated,
as black men were often the first to be led away at gunpoint. For
many black Tulsans,
it was hours-and, in some cases, much longer-before they learned the
fate of their loved ones
(Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library, University of
Tulsa).
A final skirmish appears to
have occurred a little after Noon, when the remaining members of the
white mob exchanged fire with a group of African Americans not far
from where the Santa Fe railroad tracks cut across the Section Line,
just off of Peoria Avenue. The black defenders had apparently held
off the whites who were gathered along the railroad embankment. When
a second group of whites, armed with high-powered rifles, arrived on
the scene, the African Americans were soon overrun.194

From their positions along Standpipe and Sunset
Hills, members of the Tulsa-based units
of the Oklahoma National Guard also took black Tulsans into
"protective custody."
And as the local guardsmen began making forays into the
African-American district,
they actively took black prisoners (Courtesy Oklahoma Historical
Society) .
Most of the city's black
population, meanwhile, was being held under armed guard. Many
families had been sent, at first, to Convention Hall, but as it
filled to capacity, black Tulsans were taken to the baseball park
and to the fairgrounds. As the day wore on, hundreds would soon join
them. As the men, women, and children who had fled to the
countryside, or had taken refuge at Golden Gate Park, began to
wander back toward town, they too, were taken into custody. While
the white authorities would later argue, and not without some
validity, that this was a protective measure designed to save black
lives, other reasons including a lingering white fear of a "Negro
uprising" undoubtedly played a role in their rationale. In any
event, following the destruction of their homes and businesses on
May 31 and June 1, black Tulsa now found itself, for all practical
purposes, under arrest.195

On the morning of June 1, most black Tulsans who
were taken into custody
were brought to Convention Hall, on Brady Street.
But as the day wore on, and more and more African Americans were
placed under arrest,
new internment Centers had to be established (Courtesy Oklahoma
Historical Society).
Following the declaration of
martial law, the State Troops began to move into what little
remained of Tulsa's African American neighborhoods, disarming whites
and sending them away from the district. After the riot, a number of
black Tulsans, strongly condemned, in no uncertain terms, the
actions of both the Tulsa Police Department and the local National
Guard units during the conflict. However, the State Troops were
largely praised. "Everyone with whom I met was loud in praise of the
State Troops who so gallantly came to the rescue of stricken Tulsa,"
wrote Mary Parrish, "They used no partiality in quieting the
disorder. It is the general belief that if they had reached the
scene sooner, many lives and valuable property would have been
saved."196
Additional detachments of
State Troops from other Oklahoma cities and towns arrived in Tulsa
throughout June 1, and with their help, the streets were eventually
cleared. All businesses were ordered to close by 6:00 p.m. One hour
later, only members of the military or civil authorities,
physicians, or relief workers were allowed on the streets. It was
later claimed that by 8:00 p.m. on the evening of June 1, order had
been restored.197 The Tulsa race riot was over.
Doctors, relief workers, and
members of the military and civil authorities were not, however, the
only ones who were active in Tulsa on Wednesday evening, June 1,
1921. As Walter White later reported:
O.T. Johnson, commandant of
the Tulsa Citadel of the Salvation Army, stated that on Wednesday
and Thursday the Salvation Army fed thirty-seven Negroes employed as
grave diggers and twenty on Friday and Saturday. During the first
two days these men dug 120 graves in each of which a dead Negro was
buried. No coffins were used. The bodies were dumped into the holes
and covered over with dirt.198
Other written evidence,
including funeral home records that had lain unseen for more than
seventy-five years, would later confirm that African American riot
victims were buried in unmarked graves at Oaklawn Cemetery.199
But oral sources would also point to additional unmarked burial
sites for riot victims in Tulsa County, including Newblock Park,
along the Sand Springs road, and the historic Booker T. Washington
Cemetery, located some twelve miles southeast of the city.200

Scene in front of Convention Hall as African
Americans are being incarcerated on June 1
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
Conducted, no doubt, under
trying circumstances, the burial of Tulsa's African American riot
dead would nevertheless bear little in common with the interment of
white victims. Largely buried by strangers, there would be no
headstones or graveside services for most of black Tulsa's riot
dead. Nor would family members be present at the burials, as most of
them were still being held under armed guard at the various
detention centers. It appears that in some cases, not only did some
black Tulsa families not learn how their loved ones died, but not
even where they were buried.
In the week following the
riot, nearly all of Tulsa's African American citizenry had managed
to win their freedom, by one way or another, from the internment
centers. Largely homeless, and in many cases now penniless, they
made their way back to Greenwood. However, Greenwood was gone.

As black Tulsans won their re lease from the
various internment Centers,
and re turned to Greenwood, most discovered that they no longer had
homes any more
(Courtesy Department of Special Collections, McFarlin Library,
University of Tulsa).
What they found was a
blackened landscape of vacant lots and empty streets, charred
timbers and melted metal, ashes and broken dreams. Where the African
American commercial district once stood was now a ghost town of
crumbling brick storefronts and the burned-out bulks of automobiles.
Gone was the Dreamland and the Dixie, gone was the Tulsa Star
and the black public library, gone was the Liberty Cafe and Elliott
& Hooker's clothing store, H.L. Byars' cleaners and Mabel Little's
beauty salon. Gone were literal lifetimes of sweat and hard work,
and hard-won rungs on the ladder of the American Dream.

Stone and brick walls were all that were left
of most of the homes in the Greenwood section (Courtesy Oklahoma
Historical Society).
Gone, too, were hundreds of
homes, and more than a half-dozen African American churches, all
torched by the white invaders. Nearly ten-thousand Tulsans,
practically the entire black community, was now homeless.
Across the tracks and across
town, in Tulsa's white neighborhoods, no homes had been looted and
no churches had been burned. From the outside, life looked much the
same as it had been prior to the riot, but even here, beneath the
surface, there was little normalcy.
In one way or another, white
Tulsans had been stunned by what had happened in their city. More
than a few whites, including those whose homes now featured stolen
goods, had undeniably, taken great joy in what had occurred,
particularly the destruction of Greenwood. Some whites had even
applauded as black families had been led through the streets, at
gunpoint, toward the various internment centers.201 Some
would soon find a new outlet for their racial views in the hooded
order that was about to sweep across the white community.
Other white Tulsans were
horrified by what had taken place. Immediately following the riot,
Clara Kimble, a white teacher at Central High School opened up her
home to her black counterparts at Booker T. Washington High School,
as did other white families.202 Others donated food,
clothing, money, and other forms of assistance. For many whites, the
riot was a horror never to be forgotten, a mark of shame upon the
city that would endure forevermore.

Many African Americans were forced to spend the
winter after the riot in tents
(Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Society).
However, for black Tulsans,
the trials and tribulations had only just begun. Six days after the
riot, on June 7, the Tulsa City Commission passed a fire ordinance
designed to prevent the rebuilding of the African American
commercial district where it had formerly stood, while the so-called
Reconstruction Commission, an organization of white business and
political leaders, had been fuming away offers of outside aid .203
In the end, black Tulsans did rebuild their community, and the fire
ordinance was declared unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme
Court. Yet, the damage had been done, and the tone of the official
local response to the disaster had already been set. Despite the
Herculean efforts of the American Red Cross, thousands of black
Tulsans were forced to spend the winter of 1921- 22 living in tents.204
Others simply left. They had had enough of Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Iron bed frames were all that remained of many
residences in North Tulsa
(Courtesy Oklahoma Historical Society).
For some, staying was not an
option. It soon became clear, both in the grand jury that had been
impaneled to look into the riot, and in various other legal actions
that, by and large, languished in the courts, that African Americans
would be blamed for causing the riot. Nowhere, perhaps, was this
stated more forcefully than in the June 25, final report of the
grand jury, which stated:
We find that the recent race
riot was the direct result of an effort on the part of a certain
group of colored men who appeared at the courthouse on the night of
May 31, 1921, for the purpose of protecting one Dick Rowland then
and now in the custody of the Sheriff of Tulsa Country for an
alleged assault upon a young white woman. We have not been able to
find any evidence either from white or colored citizens that any
organized attempt was made or planned to take from the Sheriff's
custody any prisoner; the crowd assembled about the courthouse being
purely spectators and curiosity seekers resulting from rumors
circulated about the city.
"There was no mob spirit
among the whites, no talk of lynching and no arms,," the report
added, "The assembly was quiet until the arrival of armed Negroes,
which precipitated and was the direct cause of the entire affair."205

Commemoration of the riot conducted by Ben Hooks
(Courtesy Greenwood Cultural Center).
A few other court cases,
largely involving claims against the city and various insurance
companies, lingered on for a number of years afterward. In the end,
while a handful of African Americans were charged with riot-related
offenses, no white Tulsan was ever sent to prison for the murders
and burnings of May 31, and June 1, 1921. In the 1920s Oklahoma
courtrooms and halls of government, there would be no day of
reckoning for either the perpetrators or the victims of the Tulsa
race riot. Now, some seventy-nine years later, the aged riot
survivors can only wonder if, indeed, that day will ever come.
Endnotes
1
A number of general histories
of Tulsa have been written over the years, the most recent being
Danney Goble, Tulsa!: Biography of the American City (Tulsa:
Council Oaks Books, 1997). In addition, also see: William Butler,
Tulsa 75: A History of Tulsa (Tulsa: Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber
of Commerce, 1974); Angie Debo, Tulsa: From Creek Town to Oil
Capital (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1943); Clarence
B. Douglas, The History of Tulsa, Oklahoma: A City With a
Personality (3 vols.; Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Company,
1921); Nina Dunn, Tulsa's Magic Roots (Tulsa: Oklahoma Book
Publishing Company, 1979); James Monroe Hall, The Beginning of
Tulsa (Tulsa: Scott-Rice Company, 1928); and Courtney Ann
Vaughn-Roberson and Glen Vaughn-Roberson, City in the Osage
Hills: Tulsa, Oklahoma (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Company,
1984).
2 John
D. Porter, comp., Tulsa County Handbook, 1920 (Tulsa:
Banknote Printing Company, 1920). Dr. Fred S. Clinton, "Interesting
Tulsa History," a 1918 pamphlet, a copy of which is located in the
Tulsa History vertical files in the library of the Oklahoma
Historical Society. [Federal Writers' Project], Tulsa: A Guide to
the Oil Capital (Tulsa: Mid-West Printing Company, 1938), pp.
23-25, 32, 50, 54. Tulsa City Directory, 1921 (Tulsa: Polk-Hoffhine
Directory Company, 1921). Vaughn-Roberson and Vaughn-Roberson,
City in the Osage Hills, p. 199.
On the old Tulsa city
cemetery, which was located near what is now the intersection of
Second Street and Frisco Avenue, see: Jim Downing, "Bulldozers
Disturb Pioneers' Final Rest," Tulsa World, February 17,
1970, pp. 113, 613; Mrs. J.O. Misch, "Last Resting Places Not Always
Final" and other undated clippings located in the Tulsa Cemeteries
subject files at the Tulsa Historical Society; and, interview with
S.R. Lewis, Indian Pioneer History Collection, Federal Writers'
Project, vol. CVI, pp. 351-352, Oklahoma Historical Society.
3
Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Clinton, "Interesting Tulsa
History". Porter, Tulsa County Handbook, 1920. Goble,
Tulsa! pp. 78-111.
4 While
a complete architectural history of Tulsa as not yet been written,
the homes of the oil barons have been the subject of careful study.
See: Marilyn Inhofe, Kathleen Reeves, and Sandy Jones, Footsteps
Through Tulsa (Tulsa: Liberty Press, 1984); and, especially,
John Brooks Walton, One Hundred Historic Tulsa Homes (Tulsa:
HCE Publications, 2000).
5 On
the history of Greenwood, see: Eddie Faye Gates, They Came
Searching: How Blacks Sought the Promised Land in Tulsa (Austin:
Eakin Press, 1997); Hannibal B. Johnson, Black Wall Street: From
Riot to Renaissance in Greenwood's Historic Greenwood District
(Austin: Eakin Press, 1997); Henry C. Whitlow, Jr., "A History of
the Greenwood Era in Tulsa", a paper presented to the Tulsa
Historical Society, March 29, 1973; Francis Dominic Burke, "A Survey
of the Negro Community of Tulsa, Oklahoma" (M.A. thesis, University
of Oklahoma, 1936); and, [National Urban League], A Study of the
Social and Economic Condition of the Negro Population of Tulsa,
Oklahoma (Washington, D.C.: National Urban League, 1945).
6 The
standard work on the history of African Americans in Oklahoma is
Jimmie Lewis Franklin, Journey Toward Hope: A History of Blacks
in Oklahoma (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1982).
7 On
B.C. Franklin, see: John Hope Franklin and John Whittington
Franklin, eds., My Life and An Era: The Autobiography of Buck
Colbert Franklin (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press,
1997). The John Hope Franklin quote is from his Foreword to Scott
Ellsworth, Death in a Promised Land: The Tulsa Race Riot of 1921
(Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1982), p. xv.
8 On
the transfer of entrepreneurial experience from the all black towns
to Greenwood, credit is due to Professor D.F.G. Williams, an
urbanist at Washington University in St. Louis. Professor Williams
is currently preparing a scholarly article about Tulsa's African
American community at the time of the riot, and was kind enough to
share an early version of this work, titled "Economic Dualism,
Institutional Failure, and Racial Violence in a Resource Boom Town:
A Reexamination of the Tulsa Riot of 1921."
9 Mary
E. Jones Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster (rpt; Tulsa:
Out on a Limb Publishing, 1998), pp. 11, 17. Tulsa City
Directory, 1921. Sanborn Fire insurance Maps, Tulsa Historical
Society. "Tulsa's Industrial and Commercial District," 1921 map
published by the Dean-Brumfield Company, Tulsa. Daily Oklahoman,
June 2, 1921. Oral history interview with Nell Hamilton Hampton,
Tulsa, September 16, 1998. Oral history interview with Edward L.
Goodwin, Sr., Tulsa, November 21, 1976, by Ruth Sigler Avery in
Fear: The Fifth Horseman -- A Documentary of the 1921 Tulsa Race
Riot, unpublished manuscript.
10 Mabel
B. Little, "A History of the Blacks of North Tulsa and My Life",
typescript, dated May 24, 1971. Tulsa Star, April 11, 1914. Oklahoma
City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921. Parrish, Events of the
Tulsa Disaster, pp. 115-126. Franklin and Franklin, My Life
and An Era, p. 193. Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Oral
history interviews with: Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8, 1978; V.H.
Hodge, Tulsa, June 12, 1978; W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 197 8;
B.E. Caruthers, Tulsa, July 21, 1978; Elwood Lett, Tulsa, May 28,
1998; and Otis Clark, Tulsa, June 4, 1999.
11 [State
Arts Council of Oklahoma], "A Century of African-American Experience
-- Greenwood: From Ruins to Renaissance", exhibition brochure. Oral
history interviews with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, by: Ruth Sigler Avery,
in Fear: The Fifth Horseman; and Scott Ellsworth, June 7,
1978. Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Tulsa Star, January 4,
1919. New York Evening Post, June 11, 1921. William
Redfearn vs. American Central Insurance Company, Case 15851,
Oklahoma Supreme Court.
12 Tulsa
Star: May 30, 1913;
June 13, 1913; February 7, 1914; March 7, 1914; April 4, 1914; April
11, 1914; September 12, 1914; February 16, 1918; May 4, 1918; and
January 4, 1919. Tulsa World, June 6, 1921. Daily
Oklahoman, June 2, 1921. Parrish, Events of the Tulsa
Disaster, pp. 83, 89-90. Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
Kavin Ross, "Booker T. Washington High School -- Ellis Walker Woods
Historical Marker/Memorial Proposal", c1999. James M. Mitchell,
"Politics in a Boom Town: Tulsa from 1906 to 1930" (M.A. thesis,
University of Tulsa, 1950).
On the African Blood
Brotherhood, see: the July and November 1921 issues of The
Crusader, the official journal of the organization; "Negroes
Brand Story Race Initiated Riot as Fake", New York Call, June
5, 1921; and, interviews with Binkley Wright, Los Angeles,
California, February and August 25, 2000, by Eddie Faye Gates; and
Tulsa World, March 26, 2000.
On the intellectual and
political life of Greenwood prior to the riot, additional credit is
due to the most helpful insights of Mr. Paul Lee, a journalist and
filmmaker who is currently working on a documentary on early black
migration to Oklahoma.
13 Tulsa
City Directory, 1921.
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 41, 78-80. Gates,
They Came Searching, pp. 165-167. Tulsa Star, March 6,
1915.
On the education of the new
Mount Zion Baptist Church building, see the Tulsa World,
April 10, 1921, p. B-8.
14 Tulsa
Star: May 30, 1913: May 29, 1915; June 26, 1915; July 10,
1915; and February 13, 1919. Panish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
p. 115. Walter F. White, "The Eruption of Tulsa", The Nation,
June 29, 1921, pp. 909-910. [National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People], "Minutes of the Meeting of the Board
of Directors, June 13, 1921", 1,A,l, NAACP Papers, Library of
Congress, Washington, D.C. Oral history interview with Seymour
Williams, Tulsa, June 2, 1978.
J.B. Stradford, who was
forced to flee Tulsa after the riot, was cleared of any wrongdoing
in the affair at a 1996 ceremony. See: "Black Man Cleared of 1921
Tulsa Riot", Arizona Republic, October 27, 1996, p. A14; Mary
Wisniewski Holden, -75 Years Later: Vindication in Tulsa",
Chicago Lawyer, December 1996; and Jonathan Z. Larsen, "Tulsa
Burning", Civilization, IV, I (February/March 1997), pp.
46-55.
Significantly, Stradford
wrote a memoir -- a few pages of which have turned up in Tulsa --
which, if published, promises to be a most important historical
document.
15 Williams,
"Economic Dualism, Institutional Failure, and Racial Violence in a
Resource Boom Town". Whitlow, "A History of the Greenwood Era in
Tulsa". Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Parrish, Events of the
Tulsa Disaster, pp. 82-83. Gates, They Came Searching,
pp. 102-103. Tulsa Star: March 7, 1914; and January 4, 1919.
Oral history interview with Mabel B. Little, Tulsa, May 24, 1971, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
African Americans who tried
to shop downtown were often the targets of discriminatory and
derogatory behavior by white merchants and customers. See, for
example, "Colored Woman Insulted", in the Tulsa Star, July
11, 1913.
At least one white merchant
in an otherwise all-white block of stores did, however, actively
seek black customers. See the advertisements for the North Main
Department Store in the Tulsa Star, March 27 and April 17,
1920.
16 [National
Urban League], A Study of the Social and Economic Condition of
the Negro Population of Tulsa, Oklahoma, pp. 37-39, 87-89.
[Oklahoma Writers' Project], "Racial Elements", typescript, dated
January 17, 1938, in the Federal Writers' Project topical files,
81.05, Archives and Manuscript Division, Oklahoma Historical
Society. Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Gates, They Came
Searching, pp. 62-64, 83-86. Oral history interviews with Kinney
Booker, Tulsa, May 30, 1998; and, Elwood Lett, Tulsa, May 28, 1998.
For a longer term
perspective, see also the comments of Marian Ramsey Jones, Bertha
Black McIntyre, and Walter "Pete" Williams following Hannibal
Johnson's article, "Greenwood: Birth and Rebirth", Tulsa People
Magazine, July 2000, pp. 12-18.
17 Tulsa
City Directory, 1921. On the lives of the African American
men and women who lived in the "Professor's Row" off of Standpipe
Hill, see the forthcoming article by Paul Lee in Essence
magazine.
While a complete copy of the
study conducted by the American Association of Social Workers has
not been located, this report -- and its findings -- was cited in
subsequent publications. The quote is from The Proceedings of the
National Conference of Social Work, 56th Annual Session, June 26
to July 3, 1929 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, c1929), pp.
393-394. The study is also cited in Jesse O. Thomas, "American
Cities -- Tulsa", an unidentified 1924 article, a copy of which is
located in the Oklahoma subject file of the Schomburg Center
Clipping File 1925-1974, Schomburg Center for Research in Black
Culture, New York Public Library, New York, NY.
18 Kathy
Callahan, "Mozelle May Recalls Early Tulsa History", Tulsa World,
April 29, 1974. Tulsa City Directory, 1921. Gates, They
Came Searching, pp. 62-65, 139-140. Walton, One Hundred
Historic Tulsa Homes. Oral history interviews with: Henry C.
Whitlow, Jr., Tulsa, June 6, 1978; and Kinney Booker, Tulsa, May 30,
1998. Telephone interviews with Jewel Smitherman Rogers, Perris,
California, 1998-2000.
19 John
Hope Franklin and Alfred A. Moss, Jr., From Slavery to Freedom: A
History of African Americans, 7th edition (New York: Alfred A.
Knopf, 1994), pp. 346-354. Arthur I. Waskow, From Race Riot to
Sit-In: 1919 and the 1960s (Garden City, NY: Doubleday &
Company, 1966). John Higharn, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of
American Nativism, 1860-1925 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press, 1955). Richard Maxwell Brown, Strain of
Violence: Historical Studies of American Violence and Vigilantism
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1975).
20 The
classic study of the Chicago riot is William M. Tuttle, Jr.'s Race
Riot. Chicago in the Red Summer of 1919 (New York: Atheneum,
1970).
Following the riot, the
Chicago Commission on Race Relations conducted an extensive
investigation of what had occurred. Its report, The Negro in
Chicago: A Study of Race Relations and a Race Riot (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1922), is still quite useful.
22 Tuttle,
Race Riot, pp. 29-30.
22 Ibid.,
pp. 244-245. Franklin and Moss, From Slavery to Freedom, p.
351.
A number of other World War
I era riots have also been the subject of extensive study. See, for
example: Elliott M. Rudwick, Race Riot at East St. Louis, July 2,
1917 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1964);
U.S. House of Representatives, Sixty-Fifth Congress, 2nd Session,
"Report of the Special Committee Authorized by Congress to
Investigate the East St. Louis Riots" (Washington, D.C. :Government
Printing Office, 1918): and, Robert V. Haynes, A Night of
Violence: The Houston Riot of 1917 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State
University Press, 1976).
23 The
literature on interracial sexual relations in America -- including
historical, sociological, and psychological analyses, as well as the
work of some of the country's finest novelist -- is voluminous. For
a historical perspective, two places to begin are: Joel Williamson,
The Crucible of Race: Black-White Relations in the American South
Since Emancipation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974);
and Dan T. Carter, Scottsboro: A Tragedy of the American South
(Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1969).
24 Franklin
and Moss, From Slavery to Freedom, pp. 348-349. Classic
studies of lynching include: Arthur F. Raper, The Tragedy of
Lynching (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1933);
James R. McGovern, Anatomy of a Lynching: The Killing of Claude
Neal (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1982); and
James Allen, Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America
(Santa Fe: Twin Palms Publishers, 2000).
25 Robert
T. Kerlin, The Voice of the Negro, 1919 (New York: E.P.
Dutton, 1920). Franklin and Moss, From Slavery to Freedom,
pp. 323-360. Emmett J. Scott, History of the American Negro, in
the World War (Chicago: Homewood Press, 1919).
26 LA.
Newby, Jim Crow's Defense: Anti Negro Thought in America,
1900-1930 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1965).
Mary Frances Berry, Black Resistance/White Law: A History of
Constitutional Racism in America (New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971). C. Vann Woodward, The Strange
Career of Jim Crow (New York: Oxford University Press, 1957).
27 David
A Chalmers, Hooded Americanism: The History of the Ku Klux Klan
(Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1965). Kenneth T. Jackson, The Ku
Klux Klan in the City (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967).
28 Tulsa
Star, November 11,
1916; February 16, 1918; May 4, 1918; and November 23, 1918.
Interview with Seymour Williams, Tulsa, June 2, 1978. Goble,
Tulsa!, pp. 120-121.
29 Richard
Kluger, Simple Justice (New York: Random House, 1977), pp.
102-104. Arrell M. Gibson, Oklahoma: A History of Five Centuries
(Norman: Harlow Publishing Corporation, 1965), p. 353. Kay M. Teall,
ed., Black History in Oklahoma: A Resource Book (Oklahoma
City: Oklahoma City Public Schools, 1971), pp. 172, 202-204, 225.
30 Mary
Elizabeth Estes, "An Historical Survey of Lynchings in Oklahoma and
Texas!' (M.A. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 1942), pp. 130-134.
31 Carter
Blue Clark, "A History of the Ku Klux Klan in Oklaboma7' (Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1976), pp. vii-xi, 36-80,
169-219. Charles C. Alexander, The Ku Klux Klan in the Southwest
(Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1965). W.C. Witcher,
The Reign of Terror in Oklahoma (Ft. Worth, n.p., c 1923).
Marion Monteval, The Klan Inside Out (Claremore: Monarch
Publishing Company, 1924). Howard A. Tucker, History of Governor
Walton's War on the Klan (Oklahoma City: Southwest Publishing
Company, 1923).
32 Charles
Oquin Meyers, Jr., "The Ku Klux Klan in Tulsa County During the
Early 1920s" (Honor's paper, Department of History, University of
Tulsa, 1974), pp. 6, 12-19. Laurie Jane (Barr) Croft, "The Women of
the Ku. Klux Klan in Oklahoma"(M.A. thesis, University of Oklahoma,
1984), p. 51. Clark, "A History of the Ku Klux Klan in Oklahoma",
pp. 36, 47, 52, 65, 71, 89.
33 Tulsa
World, July 30, 1922. Meyers, "The Ku Klux Klan in Tulsa
Country", pp. 9-12. Ku Klux Klan Papers, Department of Special
Collections, McFarlin Library, University of Tulsa.
34 Alexander,
The Ku Klux Klan in the Southwest, pp. 66, 142-58, 228. Chalmers,
Hooded Americanism, pp. 52-55. Meyers, "The Ku Klux
Klan in Tulsa Country", pp. 20-22, 26-35. Bruce Bliven, "From
the Oklahoma Front", New Republic, October 17, 1923, p. 202.
Jewel Smitherman Rogers, "John Henry Smitherman: A Profile of The
Father, The Man, and The Officer of the Law", typescript, November
1999. Interview with Willa Catherine Smitherman, Tulsa, February 14,
1978, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Oral
history interviews with: William M. O'Brien, Tulsa, March 2, 1998;
and Richard Gary, Tulsa, March 16,1999.
35 Meyers,
"The Ku Klux Klan in Tulsa County", pp. 33-38. Tulsa Man membership
register/ledger, 1928-1929, Department of Special Collections,
McFarlin Library, University of Tulsa. Oral history interview with
Ed Wheeler, Tulsa, February 27, 1998.
36 CIark,
"A History of the Ku Klux Klan in Oklahoma", pp. 42-45.
37 Ibid.,
pp. 36-38
38 TuIsa
World, June 6, 1921. Ruth Sigler Avery, Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
39 The
Tribune, in particular, paid close attention to Klan activities in
Dallas. See the Tulsa Tribune: January 29, 1921, p. 8;
February 4, 1921, p. 1; April 2, 1921, p. 1; April 3, 1921, p. 5;
May 22, 1921, p. 1; and May 24, 1921, p. 1.
40 Tulsa
Tribune, May 22, 1921, p. 2. On the May brothers, see also
the March 27, 1921 issue, p. 2.
41 Meyers,
"The Ku Klux Klan in Tulsa County", pp. 3-7. Clark, "A History of
the Ku Klux Klan in Oklahoma", pp. 46-47.
42 Tulsa
Tribune, April 17, 1921, p. 5. Tulsa World: April 10,
1921, p. 4; April 14, 1921,, p. 4; April 18,1921, p. 4: April 20,
1921, p. 4; and April 23,1921, p. 4. [National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People], "Minutes of the Meeting of the Board
of Directors, June 13, 1921," NAACP Papers, Library of Congress.
Exchange Bureau Bulletin, I, 26 (July 7[?], 1921).
On economic conditions in
Tulsa prior to the riot, see: Harlow's Weekly, December 17,
1920 and September 16,1921; Tulsa Tribune, April 14,1921, p. 6;
Tulsa World, May 19,1921, p. 4; Tulsa City Commission, Record of
Commission Proceedings, August 26, 1921; Ralph Cassady, Jr.,
Price Making and Price Behavior in the Petroleum Industry (New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1954), p. 136; and, U.S. Bureau of the
Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial
Times to the Present (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
Office, 1975), Volume 2, p. 208.
43 "Federal
Report on Vice Conditions in Tulsa," April 21-26, 192 , by Agent
T.G.F., a copy of which is located in the Attorney General Civil
Case Files, Record Group 1-2, Case 1062, State Archives Division,
Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
44 Abundant
evidence on the illegal consumption of alcohol in Tulsa County can
be found in the Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Record Group
1-2, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of
Libraries. See, in particular: the testimony of E.S. McQueen, L.
Medlen, and Mrs. W.H. Clark; "Statement of John Burnett"; "Memo to
Major Daily"; and, "Special Report on Vice Conditions in and Around
the City of Tulsa, by H.H. Townsend", Tulsa, May 18,1921.
Oral history interview with
Elwood Lett, Tulsa, May 28, 1998. Tulsa Tribune: February 7,
1921, p. 1; February 11, 1921, p. 5; February 12, 1921, p. 1;
February 13, 1921, p. 3; and April 15, 1921, p. 13.
45 The
quote from Charles C. Post is from the Tulsa Tribune, May 8,
1921, p. 1. See also: Tulsa World, April 22, 1921, p. 1;
Tulsa Tribune, May 18, 1921, p. 2; and, "Statement of Barney
Cleaver," Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Record Group 1-2, Case
1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
46 White,
"The Eruption of Tulsa", p. 909. Tulsa World: April 23, 1921,
pp. 1,3; and May 13, 1921, p. 1. Tulsa Tribune: January
13,1921, p. 12; February 12, 1921, p. 1; March 5, 1921, p. 1; March
9, 1921, p. 10; March 13, 1921, p. 7; March 14, 192 1, p. 1; March
21, 1921, p. 1; April 5, 1921, p. 1; April 13, 1921, p. 1; May 1,
1921, p. B-14; May 2, 1921, p. 1; May 11, 1921, p. 1; May 18, 1921,
p. 1; May 20, 1921, p. 1; and May 28, 1921, p. 1.
47 Tu1sa
World. April 4,1921, p. 4; April 15, 1921, p. 4; May 13, 1921, p. 4;
May 18,1921, pp. 1, 13; May 19, 1921, pp.1, 4; May 20, 1921, pp.1,
2; May 21, 1921, pp. 1, 4,17; and May 22, 1921, pp. 1, 17. Tulsa
Tribune, May 1, 1921, p. B-14. 4. Tulsa Tribune: April
17, 1921, p. 1; April 19, 1921, p. 16; and May 25, 1921, p. 16.
49 Estes,
"Historical Survey of Lynchings in Oklahoma and Texas," p. 131.
Interview with George B. Smith, Red Fork, Oklahoma, August 24, 1937,
by W.T. Holland, Volume LXIX, pp. 470-475, Indian Pioneer History
Collection, Federal Writers' Project, Oklahoma Historical Society.
50 William
T. Lampe, Tulsa County and the World War (Tulsa: Tulsa
Historical Society, 1918). [National Civil Liberties Bureau], "The
'Knights of Liberty' Mob and the I.W.W. Prisoners at Tulsa, Okla.,
November 9, 1917", pamphlet, 1918. Goble, Tulsa!, pp.
118-122.
53 Tulsa
Times: November 10, 1917, p. 6; and November 12,1917, p. 7.
Tulsa Democrat: November 10, 1917, p.8; and November 11,
1917, pp. 1, 3. Tulsa World. November 10, 1917, p. 1;
November 11, 1917, p. 1; November 12, 1917, p. 4; and November 13,
1917, p. 4.
52 Tulsa
World. August 22, 1920, p. 1; and August 24, 1920, p. 1.
Tulsa Tribune: August 22, 1920, p. 1; August 24, 1920, pp. 1, 4;
August 25, 1920, p. 1; and August 28, 1920, p. 1.
53 Tulsa
Tribune: August 23, 1920, p. 1; and August 27, 1920, p. 1.
Tulsa World. August 25, 1920, pp. 1, 12; August 28, 1920, pp. 1,
9; August 29, 1920, p. 9; August 30, 1920, p. 1; September 1, 1920,
p. 12; and September 2, 1920, pp. 1, 9.
54 Tulsa
World, August 25, 1920, p. 12; and August 31, 1920, p. 4.
Tulsa Tribune, August 28, 1920, p. 1 .
55 Tu1sa
Tribune, August 28, 1920, p. 1.
56 Ibid.,
August 29, 1920, pp. 1-2. Tulsa World. August 29, 1920, p. 1;
and August 30, 1920, p. 3.
57 Tulsa
Star, September 4, 1920, p. 1. Tulsa Tribune, August
29, 1920, pp. 1, 2. Tulsa World: August 29, 1920, p.
1; and August 30, 1920, pp. 1-3. See also: White, "The Eruption of
Tulsa", p. 909.
58 Tulsa
World, August 30, 1920, pp. 1-3.
59 Both
the lynching of Roy Belton, and how Tulsans responded to the event,
was covered extensively in both of Tulsa's daily newspapers. See:
Tulsa Tribune: August 31, 1920, p. 12; September 6, 1920, p. 1;
September 9, 1920, p. 1; September 10, 1920, p. 1; September 21,
1920, p. 2; September 24, 1920, p. 1; and September 29, 1920, p. 4.
Tulsa World: August 30, 1920, p. 4; August 31, 1920, pp. 1,
4; September 1, 1920, pp, 1, 4, 12; September 2, 1920, pp. 1, 4;
September 3, 1920, pp. 1, 18; September 5, 1920, p. A- 1; September
6, 1920, p. 1; and September 10, 1920 pp. 1, 13.
60 Tulsa
Star, September 4, 1920, pp. 1, 4.
61 Ibid.,
March 6, 1920, p. 8.
62 Clark,
"History of the Ku Klux Klan in Oklahoma", p. 17.
63 Tulsa
Star, March 6, 1920, p. 8.
64 Ibid.,
September 4, 1920, pp. 1, 4.
65 TuIsa
Democrat, March 18, 1919, p. 1. Tulsa World, March 18,
1919, p. 1. Tulsa Times, March 18, 1919, p. 1.
66 TuIsa
Times: March 20, 1919, p. 1; March 21, 1919, p. 1; and March
22, 1919, p. 3. Tulsa World, March 21, 1919, p. 1;
Tulsa Democrat: March 19, 1919, p. 11; March 20, 1919, p. 9; and
March 21, 1919, pp. 10,16.
67 Tulsa
Tribune, June 12, 192 1, p. 1.
68 Tulsa
Star, September 4, 1920, pp. 1, 4.
69 Biographical
sketch of Richard Lloyd Jones by Hazel S. Hone, May 10, 1939;
"Richard Lloyd Jones" from Who's Mo in Tulsa, 1950, by Clarence
Allen; and, miscellaneous newspaper clippings on Jones, all located
in the "Tulsa' vertical subject files, Oklahoma Historical Society.
70 Tulsa
Tribune: January 13, 1921, p. 12; February 12, 1921, p., 8;
March 5, 1921, p. 10; April 5, 1921, p. 16; April 7, 1921, p. 16;
May 1, 1921, p. B-14; May 3,1921, p. 18; and May 13, 1921, p. 24.
71 Ibid.:
January 3, 1921, p. 12; March 2,1921, p. 1; March 4, 1921, p. 1;
March 5, 1921, p. 1; March 28, 1921, p. 1; March 29, 1921, p. 1;
March 31, 1921, p. 1; April 4, 1921, p. 1; April 5, 1921, p. 1;
April 13, 1921, p.1; May 8, 1921, p. 1; May 16, 1921, p. 12; May 17,
1921, p. 1; May 19, 1921, pp. 1, 2; May 20, 1921, pp. 1, 2, 22; May
21, 1921, pp. 1, 2; May 22, 1921, p. B-14; May 24, 1921, pp. 1, 18;
and May 25, 1921, pp. 1, 3.16.
The Tulsa World
painted a somewhat rosier portrait of crime conditions in Tulsa.
See, for example: April 15, 1921, p. 4; April 17, 1921, p. 16; May
19, 1921, pp. 1, 3; May 19, 1921, pp. 1, 4; May 20, 1921, pp. 1, 2;
May 21, 1921, pp. 1, 4, 17; and May 22, 1921, pp. 1, 17.
On political issues which
may have influenced the Tribune's campaign, as well as the
subsequent investigations of the Tulsa Police Department, see:
Ronald L. Trekell, History of the Tulsa Police Department, 1882 -
1990 (N.p, n.p., n.d.); Mitchell, "Politics in a Boom Town";
Randy Krehbiel, "Root of the Riot", Tulsa World, January 30,
2000, pp. A- 1, A-2; and, John R. Woodard, In Re Tulsa (N.p., n.p.,
1935).
72 Tulsa
Tribune: May 14, 1921, p. 10; May 16, 1921, p. 12; and May
25, 1921, p. 16.
71 Ibid.:
March 3, 1921, p. 1; April 17, 192 1, p. 1; May 24, 1921, p. 1; May
26, 1921, p. 14; and May 27, 1921, p. 1.
74 Ibid,
June 4, 1921, p. 8.
75 Tulsa
Tribune, May 21, 1921, pp. 1, 2. Typescript reports by members
of Cooke's party can be found in the Attorney Generals Civil Case
Files, Record Group 1-2, Case 1062, State Archives Division,
Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
76 Tulsa
Tribune: May 26, 1921, p.1; and May 27,1921, p. 1. Tulsa
World: May 26, 1921, p. 1; and May 27, 1921, p. 8.
77 Tulsa
Tribune, May 30, 1921, p. 1.
71 Oral
history interview with Damie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22, 1972, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Franklin and
Franklin, My Life and An Era, p. 199. Tulsa City
Directory, 1921. Oral history interviews with: W.D. Williams,
Tulsa, June 7, 1978; and Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8, 1978.
Booker T. Washington High School Alumni Roster, 1916-1929. Loren L.
Gill, "The Tulsa Race Riof' (M.A. thesis, University of Tulsa,
1946), p. 22. "Mob Fury and Race Hatred as a National Danger",
Literary Digest, LXIX (June 18, 1921). Interview with Alice
Andrews in Gates, They Came Searching, pp. 41-42.
Dick Rowland's last name is
sometimes spelled "Roland". Similarly, Sarah Page's surname is
sometimes given as "Paige".
79 Oral
history interviews with: Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8, 1978; and
W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7,1978. Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
Tulsa Tribune, May 22, 1921, p. 4.
80 Tulsa
Tribune: April 17, 1921, p. 5; May 31, 1921, p. 1; and June
1, 192 1, p. 4. White, "Eruption of Tulsa, pp. 909-910.
81 Oral
history interviews with: Damie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22, 1972;
S.M. Jackson and Eunice Cloman Jackson, Tulsa, June 26, 1971; and
Robert L. Fairchild, Tulsa, April 18, 1971; all by Ruth Sigler
Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Oral history interview
with Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8, 1978.
82 Tulsa
World, May 29, 1921, p. A-1. Tulsa Tribune: May
29,1921, pp. 2,8, B-1, B-10, B-12; and May 30,1921, p .l. Oral
history interview with Damie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22,1972, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Sanborn Fire
Insurance Maps, Tulsa, Tulsa Historical Society.
83 New
York Evening Post, June 11, 1921. White, "Eruption of Tulsa",
p. 910. "Mob Fury and Race Hatred", Literary Digest, op
cit. Tulsa World, June 2, 1921, p. 2. Parrish, Events
of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 18. Oral history interviews with:
Darnie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22, 1972; Robert Fairchild, Tulsa,
April 18, 1976; Mabel B. Little, Tulsa, May 24, 197 1; S.M. Jackson
and Eunice Clornan Jackson, Tulsa, June 26, 197 1; all by Ruth
Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
84Tulsa Tribune, May
31, 192 1, p. 1. Tulsa World, June 2, 192 1, pp. 1-5. White,
"Eruption of Tulsa", p. 909. Oral history interviews with: W.D.
Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978; and Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8,
1978.
85 Oral
history interview with Damie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22, 1972, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. On lynching,
see also, "The Ideology of Lynching", in Stephen J. Whitfield, A
Death in the Delta: The Story of Emmett Till (New York: The Free
Press, 1988), pp. 1-14.
86 Tulsa
Tribune, May 31, 1921, p. 1. Oral history interview with
Damie Rowland Ford, Tulsa, July 22, 1972, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in
Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
In early May 1921, the
Tulsa Tribune reported that the Tulsa Police Department had
eighty-eight officers; Tulsa Tribune, May 2, 1921, p. 1.
The Tulsa City Directory, 1921, however, lists only fifty-seven
officers, four of whom are identified as African American.
87 Franklin
and Franklin, My Life and An Era, pp. 195-196.
88 Tulsa
World, May 31, 1921.
89 Gill,
"Me Tulsa Race Riot', pp. 21-22.
90 Red
Cross Collection, Tulsa Race Riot of 1921, Tulsa Historical Society.
The State Edition copy of "Nab Negro for Attacking Girl in Elevator"
was uncovered by Bruce Hartnitt, a Tulsa-based researcher, in the
collections of the Oklahoma Historical Society sometime prior to
1996.
91 Oral
history interview with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978.
92 Oral
history interview with Robert L. Fairchild, Tulsa, April 18, 1971,
by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Statement
of "A.H." in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 62.
Charles F. Barrett, Oklahoma After Fifiy Years: A History of the
Sooner State and Its People, 1889-1939 (Hopkinsville, Kentucky:
Historical Record Association, 1941), p. 206.
93 Franklin
and Franklin, My Life and Era, p. 196.
94 Ross.
T. Warner, Oklahoma Boy (N.p., n.d., n.d.), p. 136. Petition
No, 23325, B.A. Waynes and M.E. Waynes vs. T.D. Evans et al.,
Tulsa County District Court. New York Evening Post, June 11,
1921. Testimony of John A. Gustafson, State of Oklahoma vs. John A.
Gustafson, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State
Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
95 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Final Edition", pp. 1, 8. Major James
A. Bell to Lieutenant Colonel L .J .F. Rooney, "Report on Activities
of the National Guard on the Night of May 31 and June 1, 1921",
Testimony of John A. Gustafson; and Laurel Buck testimony; all in
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. A. J. Smitherman, "A
Descriptive Poem of the Tulsa Riot and Massacre", undated pamphlet,
Oklahoma Historical Society.
96 Tulsa
Tribune: June 3, 1921, p. 1; and June 6, 1921, P. 3. Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Final Edition", p. 8. Oklahoma City
Black Dispatch, June 3, 1921, p.1. New York Evening Post,
June 11, 1921. Typescript notes on the testimony of A.B. Nesbitt;
and miscellaneous handwritten notes; both in the Attorney Generals
Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma
Department of Libraries. Oral history interview with Dave Faulkner,
Tulsa, May 7, 1971, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth
Horseman.
97 Oral
history interview with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978. Franklin
and Franklin, My Life and An Era, pp. 96-97. Oral history
interview with Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, by Eddie Faye Gates, in
They Came Searching, p. 7 1. Tulsa World, June 2, 192 1,
p. 1. White, "Eruption of Tulsa", pp. 909-910. Smitherman, "Me Tulsa
Riot and Massacre". Handwritten notes on the testimony of O.W.
Gurley; and typescript notes on the testimony of Henry Jacobs; both
in Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
98 Oklahoma
City Black Dispatch, June 3,1921, p. 1. Tulsa World.
June 2, 1921, p. 7; June 3, 1921, p. 1; June 6, 192 1, P. 3; June 9,
1921, p. 4; and June 10, 1921, p. 8. Major James A. Bell to
Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney, "Report on the Activities of the
National Guard", typescript notes on the testimony of John Henry
Potts; and miscellaneous handwritten notes; all in Attorney Generals
Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma
Department of Libraries. White, "Eruption of Tulsa:, pp. 909-910.
Oral history interviews with: W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978;
and Seymour Williams, Tulsa, June 1, 1978.
99 Barrett,
Oklahoma After Fifty Years, p. 207. Laurel Buck testimony,
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
100 Bell,
"Report on the Activities of the National Guard", op cit.
Tulsa Tribune: January 16, 1921, p. 5; and March 20, 1921,
Magazine Section, p. 2.
101 Bell,
"Report on Activities of the National Guard." See also: Major Paul
R. Brown to the Adjutant General of Oklahoma, "Work of the Sanitary
Detachment During the Riot in Tulsa", Attorney Generals Civil Case
Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of
Libraries; and, Robert D. Norris, Jr., "The Oklahoma National Guard
in the Tulsa Race Riot: Tentative Summary of Finding", typescript,
1999.
102 John
A. Gustafson testimony; and handwritten notes to the testimony of W.
M. Ellis; both in Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062,
State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Stephen
P. Kerr, "Tulsa Race War, 31, May 1921: An Oral History,"
unpublished manuscript, 1999. St. Louis Argus, June 101-1921.
103 John
A. Gustafson testimony; and miscellaneous handwritten notes; both in
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries
104 Oral
history interviews with Ernestine Gibbs, Augusta Mann, Rosa Davis
Skinner, Robert Fairchild, and Alice Andrews, all by Eddie Faye
Gates, in They Came Searching, pp. 42-43, 71, 85-86, 151,
165-166. Handwritten notes to the testimony of O. W. Gurley;
typescript notes to the testimony of W.C. Kelley; and John A.
Gustafson testimony; all in Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case
1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
105 Following
the riot, some claimed that Sheriff McCullough had actually
requested that this second contingent of African American men come
down to the Courthouse, a highly unlikely possibility. It is,
however, possible to envision a scenario whereby a telephone call by
McCullough to Deputy Sheriff Barney Cleaver - perhaps made to the
offices of the Tulsa Star - might have been misinterpreted,
in the heat of the moment, as a request for assistance. Tulsa
Tribune, June 3, 1921, pp. 1, 3. Tulsa World, June 10,
1921, p. 8. New York Evening Post, June 11, 192 1. White,
'Eruption of Tulsa", pp. 909-9 10. John A. Gustafson testimony;
Laurel Buck testimony; and, handwritten notes to W. N. Ellis
testimony; all in Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062,
State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Oral
history interview with I.S. Pittman, Tulsa, July 28, 1978.
106 Oral
history interview with Robert Fairchild, Tulsa, June 8, 1978.
Handwritten notes to the testimony of W. E. Dudley, Attorney
Generals Civil Case Files, State Archives Division, Oklahoma
Department of Libraries. Tulsa World, July 7, 1921, p. 3.
Tulsa Tribune, June 3, 1921, pp. 1, 3.
107 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Final Edition", p.1. White, "Eruption
of Tulsa," pp. 909-910. William Cleburn "Choc" Phillips, "Murder in
the Streets," unpublished memoir of the 1921 Tulsa race riot, pp.
32-34, 47. Handwritten notes to the testimony of "Witnesses in
Order", Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State
Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
108 Tulsa
Tribune, June 1, 1921, p. 3. Tulsa World, June 1,
1921, "Final Edition", p. 8. Oklahoma City Black Dispatch,
June 3, 192 1, p. 1. New York Times, June 2, 1921.
109 Oral
history interview with Dr. George H. Miller, M.D., Tulsa, August 1,
1971, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
110 Okmulgee
Daily Democrat, June 1, 1921. Oklahoma City Black Dispatch,
June 3, 1921, p. 1. Tulsa World, June 1, 1921, "Final
Edition", p. 8. Tulsa Tribune, June 1, 1921, p. 3. New
York Times, June 2,1921.
111 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets", p. 46.
112 Laurel
Buck testimony; handwritten notes to "Witnesses in Order" testimony;
and miscellaneous handwritten notes; all in Attorney Generals Civil
Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department
of Libraries. Tulsa World, June 10, 1921, p. 8. Gill, "Tulsa
Race Riot", p. 28.
Who actually performed the
swearing-in of the "Special Deputies" is unclear, as is what may
have been the "official policy" -- if any -- of both the Police
Department and the city government in response to the violence
during the early hours of the riot. The latter was often prominently
featured in a number of lawsuits filed after the riot. See, in
particular: "Brief of Plantiff in Error" and "Answer Brief of
Defendant in Error", William Redfern vs. American Central
Insurance Company (1925), Oklahoma State Supreme Court; and
documents involving various cases filed by individuals who suffered
property losses during the riot, including C.L. Netherland vs.
City of Tulsa, Loula T. Williams vs. Fire Association of
Philadelphia, Osborne Monroe vs. Mechanics and Traders Insurance
Company of New Orleans, and H.J. Caver vs. T.D. Evans, et at..
113 Letter
from A. J. Perrine, Tulsa, July 2, 1921, to the Attorney General,
Oklahoma City; Laurel Buck Testimony; Statement of [J.W.] MeGee;
Major Byron Kirkpatrick to Lieutenant Colonel L. J.F. Rooney,
"Activities on Night of May 31, 1921 at Tulsa, Okla."; all in
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Tulsa World: June
1, 1921, "Final Edition", p. 1; and June 2, 192 1. Oklahoma City
Black Dispatch, June 3, 1921, p. 1. Oral history interview with
L. C. Clark, Tulsa, June 25, 1975, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear:
The Fifth Horseman.
114 Oral
history interview with W.R. Holway, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in
Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
115 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets," p. 38. Tulsa World, May 31, 1921, p.
5.
116 Tulsa
Tribune, June 1, 1921, p. 5. Tulsa World, June 1,
1921, "Final Edition", p. 1. New York Times, June 1,
1921. Phillips, "Murder in the Streets", pp. 37-41. Oral history
interviews with: Mrs. C.A. (Helen) Donohue Ingraham, Tulsa, May 4,
1980; and W.R. Holway; both by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The
Fifth Horseman.
117 Major
C.W. Daley to Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney, "Information on
Activities During Negro Uprising, May 31, 1921", Attorney Generals
Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma
Department of Libraries. New York Evening Post, June 11,
1921.
118 Denver
Post, June 4,1921. Kansas City Post, June 2,1921.
New York Tribune, June 2, 1921. New York Times, June
2,1921. Tulsa World, June 2, 1921, p. 2. Tulsa Tribune,
June 1, 1921, p. 5. Daley, "Information on Activities During Negro
Uprising". Handwritten notes to "Witnesses in Order" testimony,
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Oral history interview
with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978.
119 Ed
Wheeler, "Profile of a Race Riot," Impact Magazine, IV
(June-July 197 1), p. 21. Oral history interview with W.D. Williams,
Tulsa, June 7,1978. Tulsa World, June 2, 1921, p. 2. Tulsa
Tribune, June 3, 1921, p. 1.
120 White,
"Eruption of Tulsa," p. 910.
121 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 19. Tulsa World, June
1, 1921, "Second Extra Edition", p. 1; and June 2, 1921, p. 2.
Tulsa Tribune, June 3, 1921, p. 1. New York Times, June
2, 1921. New York Post, June 1, 1921. Captain Frank Van
Voorhis to Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney, "Detailed Report of
Negro Uprising for Service Company, Third Infantry, Oklahoma
National Guard", Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062,
State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
123 Bell,
"Report on Activities of the National Guard". See also: Kirkpatrick,
"Activities on Night of May 31, 1921 "; and, Barrett, Oklahoma
After Fifty Years, pp. 207-210.
124 Bell,
"Report on Activities of the National Guard." Brown, 'Work of the
Sanitary Detachment". Kirkpatrick, "Activities on Night of May 31,
1921." Barrett, Oklahoma After Fifty Years, pp. 207-212.
125 Captain
John W. McCuen to Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney, "Duty
Performed by ["B"] Company, Third Infantry, Oklahoma National Guard,
at Negro Uprising, May 31, 1921"; Lieutenant Roy R. Dunlap to
Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney, "Report on Negro Uprising, May
31, 1921"; Van Voorhis, "Detailed Report of Negro Uprising"; Daley,
"Information on Activities During Negro Uprising and, Letter from
Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney and Charles W. Daley to the
Adjutant General, June 3, 1921; all in Attorney Generals Civil Case
Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of
Libraries.
126 Letter
from Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney and Charles W. Daley to the
Adjutant General, June 3, 1921. Kirkpatrick, "Activities on the
Night of May 31, 1921." Bell, "Report on Activities of the National
Guard." McCuen, "Duty Performed by ["B'] Company." Van Voorhis,
"Detailed Report of Negro Uprising." Daley, "Information on
Activities During Negro Uprising." Muskogee Daily Phoenix,
June 4, 1921, P. 1. Gill, 'Tulsa Race Riot", pp. 30-31, 40-41.
127 Interview
with Major Frank Van Voorhis, Tulsa, October 25, 1937, by Effie S.
Jackson, Indian Pioneer History Collection, Oklahoma Historical
Society. Letter from Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney and Charles
W. Daley to the Adjutant General, June 3, 1921. Kirkpatrick,
"Activities on Night of May 31, 1921." McCuen, "Duty Performed by
["B"] Company".
128 Oral
history interview with Seymour Williams, Tulsa, June 2, 1978.
129 Oral
history interview with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978.
Smitherman, "The Tulsa Riot and Massacre."
130 Oral
history interviews with: Elwood Lett, Tulsa, May 29, 1998; and Nell
Hamilton Hampton, Tulsa, September 16, 1998. Oklahoma City Black
Dispatch, June 10, 1921, p. 8. Tulsa World, June
1, 1921, "Third Extra," p. 1.
131 Smitherman,
"The Tulsa Race Riot and Massacre".
132 Letter
from Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney and Charles W. Daley to the
Adjutant General, June 3, 1921.
133 Ibid.
134 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Final Edition," p. 1. Oral history
interview with Harold Madison Parker, Tulsa, January 3, 1973, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Gill, 'Tulsa
Race Riot," p. 28. Phillips, "Murder in the Streets, " pp. 47-51.
McCuen, "Duty Performed by ["B"] Company." Dunlap, "Report on Negro
Uprising". Van Voorhis, "Detailed Report of Negro Uprising". Daley,
"Information on Activities During Negro Uprising".
135 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets." Jno. A. Gustaftson, Chief of Police Wm.
McCullough, Sheriff V. W. Biddison, District Judge.139
J. B. A. Robertson, June 1,
1921, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
139 Copy
of telegram from John A. Gustafson, Wm McCullough, and V. W.
Biddison to Governor J. B. A. Robertson, Attorney Generals Civil
Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department
of Libraries.
142 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster," pp. 19-21. Tulsa City
Directory, 1921.
143 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets," pp. 68-73.
144 Oklaborna
City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921. Patrolmen Henry C. Pack
and Robert Lewis were two of the approximately four African
Americans who served on the Tulsa Police force at the time of the
riot.
145 Chicago
Defender, June 11, 1921.
146 Testimonials
of James T. West, Dr. R. T. Bridgewater, and J. C. Latimer in
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 20-21, 38, 45-47,
60-61. Tulsa World, June 1, 1921, "Extra," p. 1. Chicago
Defender, June 11, 1921. New York Mail, June 1, 1921.
Phillips, "Murder in the Streets," pp. 70-73. Oral history
interviews with: W.D. Williams, Tulsa, November 29,1970; and S.M.
Jackson and Eunice Cloman Jackson, Tulsa, June 26, 197 ; by Ruth
Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
147 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets", p. 70.
148 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 65. Phillips, "Murder in the
Streets", pp. 70-71. New York World, June 2, 1921.
149 Oral
history interview with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978.
150 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 18-21. Tulsa City
Directory, 1921.
151 Oklahoma
City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921.
152 Testimonial
of Dr. R .T. Bridgewater in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
p. 45.
153 Barney
Cleaver vs. The City of Tulsa, et al., 1921. Testimonials of
James T. West and "A.H." in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
pp. 37, 62. Oklahoma City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921.
New York Times, June 2,1921. Oral history interviews with: W.D.
Williams, Tulsa, November 29, 1970; and S. M. Jackson and Eunice
Cloman Jackson, Tulsa, June 26, 1971; by Ruth Sigler Avery, in
Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Chicago Defender, October 25,
1921. Franklin and Franklin, My Life and An Era, p. 197. Oral
history interview with Allen Yowell, Tulsa, June 5, 1999.
Black Tulsa was not
destroyed--as some have alleged--from the air, but by fires set by
whites on the ground. And similar, latter-day claims that Mount Zion
Baptist Church was specifically targeted and bombed must also be
viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism, given the rather primitive
aerial bombing capabilities that existed, worldwide, in 1921. That
said, however, the evidence does indicate that some form of aerial
bombardment took place in Tulsa on the morning of June 1, 1921--thus
making Tulsa, in all probability, the first U.S. city bombed from
the air.
154 Letter
from Lieutenant Colonel L. J. F. Rooney and Charles Daley to the
Adjutant General, June 3, 1921. Van Voorhis, "Detailed Report of
Negro Uprising." Testimonials of Dr. R.T. Bridgewater and Mrs.
Carrie Kinlaw in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp.
45-57, 50-51. John A. Oliphant testimony, Attorney Generals Civil
Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department
of Libraries. Oral history interview with Kinney Booker, Tulsa, May
30,1998. New York Times, June 2, 1921.
155 Testimonials
of James T. West, Mrs. Rosetta Moore, P.S. Thompson, Carrie Kinlaw,
J.P. Hughes, and "A.H." in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
pp. 37, 42-44, 50-52, 62-63. Gill, "Tulsa Race Riot," pp. 31, 55.
Phillips "Murder in the Streets", pp. 70, 87-88. New York Evening
Post, June 11, 192 1. Franklin and Franklin, My Life and An
Era, p. 197.
156 Chicago
Defender, June 11, 1921.
157 Oral
history interviews with George Monroe, Tulsa, 1997-2000.
158 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 49, 55-56. Laurel Buck
testimony, and notes to the testimony of O. W. Gurley, Attorney
Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division,
Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Gill, "Tulsa Race Riot," p. 31.
Tulsa World, June 1, 1921, "Final Edition", p. 1. Chicago
Defender, June 11, 1921. Oklahoma City Black Dispatch,
June 10, 1921.
The entire issue of fires
being set in Greenwood by whites in military-style uniforms is
further-and perhaps hopelessly--complicated by the use of the
ambiguous term, "Home Guards." When used by whites, it usually
refers to a loose organization of white veterans. When employed by
African Americans, however, the term also appears to refer, at
times, to the local, Tulsa-based units of the National Guard. See,
also: Robert D. Norris, Jr., "The Home Guard", unpublished
manuscript, ca 2000; and, Ellsworth, Death in a Promised Land,
p. 131, n13.
159 Typescript
note on the testimony of V.B. Bostic in letter of June 8, 1921,
Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives
Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. See also John A.
Oliphant testimony, Ibid.
160 Typescript
notes on the testimony of Jack Krueger and Rich Rickard in letter of
June 8, 1921, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, States
Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
161 Phillips,
"Murder in the Streets," pp. 92-93. Parrish, Events of the Tulsa
Disaster, p. 21. Tulsa Tribune, June 1, 1921, p. 5.
Kansas City Post, June 2,1921. New York Times, June 2,
1921. Gill, 'Tulsa Race Riot," pp. 32-33. John A. Oliphant
testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State
Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. See also: oral
history interview with W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978; and oral
history interview with Dr. Raymond Knight, Oklahoma City, February
10, 197 1, by Ben Woods, Living Legends Library, Oklahoma Christian
College.
162 McCuen,
'Duty Performed by ["B"] Company." Van Voorhis, 'Detailed Report of
Negro Uprising." Testimonials of E.A. Loupe and "A.H." in Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 49, 62-63. Miscellaneous
handwritten notes, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062,
State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Oral
history interviews with: Seymour Williams, June 2, 1978; W. D.
Williams, June 7, 1978; Robert Fairchild, June 8, 1978; V. H. Hodge,
Tulsa, June 12, 1978; and I. S. Pittman, Tulsa, July 28, 1978.
163 From
the Wichita Daily Eagle, reprinted in the Chicago Defender,
June 11, 1921.
164 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 50, 55. Oklahoma City
Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921. Daley, "Information on Activities
During Negro Uprising." John A. Oliphant testimony, Attorney
Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State Archives Division,
Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
165 Testimonial
of I. T. West in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p.
37.
166 Oral
history interview with Harold Madison Parker, Tulsa, January 3,
1972, by Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman.
167 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 55.
169 John
A. Oliphant testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case
1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
Oklahoma City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921. Oral history
interview with Wilhelmina Guess Howell by Eddie Faye Gates, in
They Came Searching, pp. 113-115.
169 Van
Voorhis, "Detailed Report of Negro Uprising." McCuen, "Duty
Performed by ["B"] Company." Phillips, "Murder in the Streets," pp.
73-74, 93-95. Interview with Binkley Wright, Los Angeles, February
and August 25, 2000, by Eddie Faye Gates. Curlee Hackman, "Peg Leg
Taylor and the Tulsa Race Riot," in J. M. Brewer, ed., American
Negro Folklore (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1968), pp. 34-36.
170 Parrish,
Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 62-63.
171 Oral
history interviews with: Kinney Booker, Tulsa, May 30, 1998; and
Otis Clark, Tulsa, June 4, 1999. White, "Eruption of Tulsa", p. 910.
172
Guthrie Daily Leader,
June 1, 1921. Tulsa Tribune: June 1, 1921, p. 6; and June 3,
1921, p. 1. Tulsa World, June 2,1921, p. 2. Affidavit of
Albert Herring, December 2,1921, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files,
Case 1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of
Libraries. Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 55.
173
McCuen, "Duty Performed by ["B"] Company."
174 Ibid.
175
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, p. 22.
176 Undated
letter by Mary Korte. Letter from Joan Morgan, Kansas City,
Missouri, June 1998. "Mary Uhrig Korte Tells of Early Life in
Tulsa," Giebar family genealogical newsletter, 1992. Notes on Mary
Korte by Nora Stallbaumer, Tulsa, April 3, 1998. Tulsa City
Directory, 1921.
177 Oral
history interview with Merrill A. "Red" Phelps 11, Tulsa, August 12,
1999.
178 Mary
Jo Erhardt, "My Most Hideous Birthday," unpublished memoir.
179 Oral
history interview with Gloria Lough, Tulsa, June 4, 1999.
180 Oral
history interview with Guy Ashby, Tulsa, November 5, 197 1, by Bruce
Hartnitt.
181
Gill, "Tulsa Race Riot", pp. 36-37, n39.
182 Barrett,
Oklahoma After Fifty Years, p. 212. Oral history interview
with Mrs. Harry Frantz, Enid, May 9, 1985, by Joe L. Todd, Oklahoma
Historical Society. Telephone interview with Mark Childers, Santa
Fe, New Mexico, December 10, 1998. Tulsa City Directory,
1921.
183 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921,
"Third Extra," p. 1. "Report from General Barrett," miscellaneous
typescript. Barrett, Oklahoma After Fifty Years, pp. 211-212.
Kirkpatrick, "Activities on Night of May 3 1, 192 L" Daley,
"Information on Activities During Negro Uprising".
184 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921: "Second Extra," p, 1; and "Third Extra," p.
1. Tulsa Tribune, June 1, 192 1, p. 1. New York Times,
June 2, 192 1. Denver Post, June 4, 1921.
185 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Second Extra," p.1. Oral history
interviews with: L.C. Clark, Tulsa, June 25, 1975, by Hansel Johnson
and Ruth Avery; and with E.W. "Gene" Maxey, Tulsa, 1971 and 1985;
both in Avery, Fear. The Fifth Horseman.
186 Oklahoma
City Black Dispatch, June 10, 1921. Tulsa Tribune:
June 1, 1921, p. 8; and June 2, 1921, p. 3. Testimonials of Richard
I. Hill and Dr. R. T. Bridgewater in Parrish, Events of the
Tulsa Disaster, pp. 41, 44-47. Oral history interviews with
S.M. Jackson and Eunice Cloman Jackson, Tulsa, June 26, 1971, by
Ruth Sigler Avery, in Fear: The Fifth Horseman. John A.
Oliphant testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062,
State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
187 Tulsa
World, June 1, 1921, "Third Extra," p. 1. Barrett,
Oklahoma After Fifty Years, pp. 212-213.
188 Frances
W. Prentice, "Oklahoma Race Riot," Scribner's Magazine, XC
(August 1931), pp. 151-157. Prentice was married to Clarence C.
Prentice, sales manager for the Sabine Oil and Marketing Company. At
the time of the riot, the couple lived at 1446 S. Denver. Tulsa
City Directory, 1921.
189 John
A. Oliphant testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case
1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 55-56, 120.
Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
190 John
A. Oliphant testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case
1062, State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries.
191 Ibid.
192 Testimonial
of Dr. R. T. Bridgewater in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
pp. 46, 120. Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
193 Tulsa
Tribune, June 1, 1921, p. 1. Tulsa World, June 2,
1921, p.1. Barrett, Oklahoma After Fifty Years, pp. 212-213.
Phillips, "Murder in the Streets," pp. 103-105. John A. Oliphant
testimony, Attorney Generals Civil Case Files, Case 1062, State
Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. Oral history
interview with Nell Hamilton Hampton, Tulsa, September 16, 1998.
Phillips, "Murder in the Streets", pp. 97-103.
195 Some
black Tulsans also found refuge in the First Presbyterian Church and
other white churches. Testimonials of James T. West, Jack Thomas,
Mrs. Rosetta Moore, Dr. R. T. Bridgewater, and C.L. Netherland, in
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster, pp. 23-24, 38, 39, 42,
44-47, 57. Tulsa World: June 1, 1921, "Third Extra", p. 1;
and June 2, 1921, pp. 1, 2. New York Times, June 2,1921.
Robert N. Hower, "Angels of Mercy": The American Red Cross and
the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot (N.p., n.p., 1993), p. A-2. Oral
history interviews with Ernestine Gibbs and Robert Clark Frayser, by
Eddie Faye Gates, in They Came Searching, pp. 86, 247. Oral history
interviews with: W.D. Williams, Tulsa, June 7, 1978; and Nell
Hamilton Hampton, Tulsa, September 16, 1998. Van Voorhis, "Detailed
Report of Negro Uprising."
196 Tulsa
Tribune, June 1, 1921, pp. 1, 2. Tulsa World, June 2,
1921, pp. 1, 2. Barrett, Oklahoma After Fifty Years, p. 214.
Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster.
197 Tulsa
World, June 2, 1921,
pp. 1, 7. Tulsa Tribune, June 2, 1921, p. 2. Barrett,
Oklahoma After Fifty Years, pp. 213-215.
199
White, "Eruption of Tulsa," p. 910.
199 Burial
record ledgers for Stanley & McCune Funeral Directors, Tulsa, 1921.
200 Preliminary
scientific tests--primarily involving ground-penetrating radar-were
performed at Oaklawn Cemetery, Newblock Park and Booker T.
Washington Cemetery (now a part of Rolling Oaks Memorial Park) in
1998 and 1999. It is hoped that further and more definitive-tests
will be performed in 2001.
The principal historical
sources for each of the three sites include the following:
Oaklawn Cemetery.
Oaklawn Cemetery burial records, Public Works Department, City of
Tulsa. Historic and present-day Oaklawn Cemetery maps. Burial
records ledgers, Stanley & McCune Funeral Directors, Tulsa, 1921.
Tulsa County Commission, Minutes of Proceedings, 1921. Salvation
Army records, Salvation Army Southern Historical Center, Atlanta,
Georgia. Ruth Sigler Avery, Fear: The Fifth Horseman. Oral
history interviews with Clyde Eddy, Tulsa, 1998-1999.
Booker T. Washington
Cemetery. Historic
and present-day maps for Booker T. Washington Cemetery. Oral history
interviews with Larry Hutchings, Tulsa, April 10, 1998; John Irby,
Tulsa, July 17, 1998; Chris Brockman, Tulsa, April 14, 1998; Elwood
Lett, Tulsa, May 28, 1998; Gladys J. Cummins, Broken Arrow, April
20, 1998; Raymond Beard, Jr. and Sarah Beard, Tulsa, May 25, 1998;
Mavelyn Blocker, Tulsa, May 24, 1998; Deborah Childers, Tulsa, May
24, 1998; Don Kennedy, Tulsa, May 24, 1998; Sarah (Butler) Thompson,
Tulsa, May 25, 1998; and Sherry Thompson, Tulsa, May 23, 1998.
Newblock Park.
Historic and present-day maps and aerial photographs of Newblock
Park. Timothy A. Posey, "The Impact of the New Deal on the City of
Tulsa" (M.A. thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1991). 'Tulsa
Parks," Tulsa Journal, 1, 3 (July 1984). Tulsa Tribune:
February 15, 1921, p. 2; May 17, 1921, p. 1; and May 18, 1921, p. 3.
Oral history interviews with: William M. O'Brien, Tulsa, March 2,
1998; Robert D. Norris, Jr., Tulsa, March 25, 1998; Ruth Avery,
Tulsa, February 20, 1998; Bruce Hartnitt, Tulsa, May 30, 1998; Ed
Wheeler, Tulsa, February 27, 1998; Frank Mason, Tulsa, March 26,
1998; Jeff Britton, Tulsa, March 26, 1998; Leslie Lawrence, Owasso,
March 26, 1998; and Joe Welch and Harvey Schell, Sand Springs, March
18, 1998.
Additional infonmation has
been collected on other potential burial sites, including one other
eyewitness account, and on the transportation of the bodies of the
dead. "Historical Information About the Tulsa Race Riot," telephone
log, January through March 1999. Oral history interviews with:
Richard Gary, Tulsa, March 16, 1999; Ellen Prater Lasson, Tulsa,
August 12, 1999; and Wade Foor and Charlie Anderson, Tulsa, June 5,
1999.
201 Old
and young had to pile on trucks," wrote Mrs. Rosetta Moore after the
riot, "and when we were being driven through town, men were seen
clapping their hands, rejoicing over our condition." Testimonial of
Mrs. Rosetta Moore, in Parrish, Events of the Tulsa Disaster,
p. 42.
202 Chicago
Defender, June 11, 1921. Statement of J. W. Hughes, in Hower,
"Angels of Mercy," p. A-3. Tulsa City Directory, 1921.
Oral history interviews with Jewel Smitherman Rogers, Perris,
California, 1999- 2000. See also the forthcoming article by Paul Lee
in Essence Magazine about the experiences of Julia Duff, a
young teacher at Booker T. Washington High School, during the riot.
203 On
the aftermath of the riot, including relief efforts, local political
maneuverings, and various legal actions, see: Ellsworth, Death in
a Promised Land, pp. 71-97.
204 The
extensive post-riot relief efforts by the American Red Cross, and
its intrepid local relief director, Maurice Willows, is
well-documented in Robert A. Hower, "Angels of Mercy": The
American Red Cross and the 1921 Tulsa Race Riot.
205 Tulsa
World, June 26, 1921, pp. 1, 8.
Reproduced
from:
http://www.tulsareparations.org/
|