Waco:
Four Years On

Waco:
Four Years On
Ambrose
Evans Pritchard: J'Accuse! by
Carol A. Valentine Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum
Optics
Expert, Barbara Grant, Rebuts Waco Standoff Report
THE FLIR PROJECT: Revealing Danforth's Deceit Cletus
Nelson
Exerpts
of The Wilcher Report - The Truth About Waco 9-5-99
Waco:
Four Years On
By Carol Moore
As I write this, four
years have past since the combined actions of agents of the United State’s
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) and Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) lead to the deaths of 24 men, 34 women and 23 children at
a religious commune outside of Waco, Texas.
The Justice and Treasury
Departments conducted "investigations" in 1993 which exonerated
federal agents and accused the Davidians of ambush, murder, and mass suicide.
Brief Congressional hearings in 1993 featured Justice and Treasury officials
re-telling the same tale.
In November 1994
Republicans took control of both the United States Senate and House of
Representatives for the first time in 40 years. Some pundits asserted that
there was a "Waco thread through the election," in which millions of
Americans expressed distrust of their government by voting out incumbents. The
Republicans did hold much more extensive hearings in 1995 which brought up
many of the theretofore suppressed facts about Waco. But in the end,
Congressional reports again blamed the Davidians for ambushing and murdering
federal agents and then committing mass suicide.
And so millions of
Americans remain distrustful of a government that seems more intent on
protecting federal law enforcement than protecting Americans from federal law
enforcement. And many American activists, writers and even film producers have
no intention of letting the matter rest. They are still investigating,
disseminating information, and calling for prosecution of culpable federal
agents - and of the officials who helped coverup their crimes. They also call
for freedom for the eight Davidian prisoners who are serving long prison
terms.
In early 1997, a new film,
"Waco: The Rules of Engagement,"
gained wide publicity after only one film festival and one movie theater
presentation, as it sought a national distributor. Having been in touch with
one of its researchers for three years, I was sure it would present a hardcore
and accurate version of events at Waco. And from the many reviews I have read,
it is clear the film does. (Its most new and shocking allegation is that,
according to infrared video experts, FBI infrared video tape taken during the
fire indicates that agents did shoot at Davidians fleeing the back of the
building.) As British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote in one review,
the video played well to a San Francisco audience filled with liberals and
leftists, showing that the issue has the potential of "cross-over"
appeal to more than just gun owners, constitutionalists and militia members.
As a libertarian and
pacifist, I was shocked at the government’s actions at Waco. But I had no
intention of writing a book about the incident until I visited Waco and met
with the Davidians during a fall 1993 vacation in Texas. With other friends in
the Washington, D.C. area I then started the local "Committee for Waco
Justice" which has held more than a dozen demonstrations and press
conferences outside of BATF and FBI headquarters, the Justice Department, the
White House, and Congress. The Committee issued a report, largely written by
me, and a gun owners group paid me to write what became a 500 page book, The
Davidian Massacre.
The massacre of the
Davidians has spawned a mass of sometimes conflicting "facts,"
rumors and "conspiracy" theories - from both the government’s side
and that of other, sometimes highly imaginative, grassroots investigators. My
research through thousands of pages of news articles, books, trial
transcripts, and government reports, my spending hundreds of hours pouring
over photographs, videos, and audio tapes, and my extensive interviews of
participants, including especially the Davidian survivors, did clear up for me
many of the "mysteries" of Waco.
In short, the story of
Waco is one of overly aggressive government agents who killed six innocent
civilians through indiscriminate - and illegal - gunfire. In a "cover
your butt" conspiracy, agents then had to do their best to destroy
evidence that might send some to prison - Mount Carmel Center, the Davidians
home and church. And they did not seem to care how many innocent people died
in the process.
By now it is well known
that David Koresh invited BATF investigators to inspect his guns six months
before the BATF raid. On February 28, 1993 Koresh came to the front door
unarmed and tried to comply with the warrant, crying, "Let’s talk!
There’s women and children here!" According to a Davidian survivor, one
of the 76 heavily armed BATF agents panicked after an agent shot a dog. He
shot first, at Koresh, hitting him and mortally wounding his unarmed
father-in-law who stood behind him.
There is ample forensic
and eyewitness evidence that BATF agents in one or more helicopters fired down
on the Davidians, killing four people. The bullets left more than a hundred
bullet holes in the roof and walls of the Mount Carmel Center. BATF agents
consistently have lied to cover up their acts, falsely claiming Davidians
ambushed them with machineguns, grenades and .50 caliber weapons. Four BATF
agents died, but Davidians claimed they were forced to self-defense by the
barrage of gunfire. A sixth Davidian, trying to return to Mount Carmel later
that day, was ambushed and assassinated by angry BATF agents.
The FBI "Hostage
Rescue Team" took over from BATF agents, but BATF agents at the scene
surely egged them on to "take care of" these fanatics who had
"murdered" federal agents - and who were telling FBI negotiators
"wild" stories about agents shooting first and shooting from
helicopters! Even an FBI negotiator at a Senate hearing alleged that agents
seemed to be purposely sabotaging negotiations by punishing the Davidians
whenever they cooperated and continually harassing and insulting them.
As the siege wore on, FBI
agents pressed to be allowed to initiate a gas and tank attack. They lied to
Attorney General Janet Reno about David Koresh’s April 14, 1993
promise-to-surrender letter, the safety of CS gas, FBI agent fatigue, ongoing
child abuse, the rules of engagement, and their plan to demolish the building.
And so they coerced her into approving their dangerous gas and tank assault.
On April 19, 1993 FBI
agents immediately asserted that Davidians began firing at the FBI tanks
ripping at their building - something survivors deny. Under the rules of
engagement that was all they needed to speed up their attack. Tanks rammed
deep in the building collapsing stairwells and exits, as well as half the
gymnasium. A tank ripped up a phone wire and FBI agents refused to fix the
phone, despite Davidian appeals.
Tanks trapped most
Davidians on the second floor or inside the concrete storage room under the
four storey tower. It is probable that the tank that ripped out the first
floor, southeast corner, around noon knocked over a lamp on the second floor,
starting a fire. The wind-whipped fire, fed by flammable CS gas and stored
flammable fuels, zapped through the long halls of the building in seconds.
Even Davidians close to exits were afraid to exit, fearful they would be shot.
Some of those died. Finally, as the building burned, tanks systematically
pushed bullet pocked walls into the fires, insuring no such evidence of BATF
crimes survived.
Many questions remain
about the involvement of President Bill Clinton’s White House. One of the
raid planners, William Buford, was head of Little Rock, Arkansas BATF and a
close friend of Clinton’s. Did Clinton have any prior knowledge of - or
input into - the raid?
Doubtless the arrogant and
bad tempered Clinton was angry that night after news stories focused on David
Koresh and the Davidians instead of his first months as President. Questions
about White House hidden influence on FBI decision-making continue. Janet Reno
hardly had to twist Clinton’s arm to convince him to approve the FBI gas and
tank attack. Reno admitted before Congress that she spoke to him the morning
of the attack, shortly before the fire. And Reno left FBI headquarters during
the attack, leaving in charge Justice Department official Webster Hubbell,
Bill Clinton’s "best friend." Yet Congressional
"investigators" showed little interest in these facts.
So it is not surprising
the White House and Justice Department promoted the coverup. Clinton used his
presidential prestige to declare that the Davidians were just a "bunch of
fanatics who killed themselves." Federal officials and agents repeated
that story to a shocked public and easily swayed Congress. During the 1995
House hearings documentary evidence was discovered that Justice Department
prosecutors cut short interviews with BATF agents. Prosecutors explicitly
stated they did not want to produce any "exculpatory evidence"
(i.e., of BATF errors or crimes) which might lead to acquittals of the
Davidians being prosecuted for murder of four federal agents.
Jurors found all 11
Davidian defendants innocent of murder, believing Davidians did act in self
defense. Partly because of prosecutorial misconduct, they found eight
Davidians guilty of what they thought were "minor charges" that
would result in only time served. However, the vocally anti-Davidian Judge
Walter J. Smith sentenced the Davidians to a total of 243 years.
The "Waco story"
is not going away. The government will produce evidence that Timothy McVeigh,
accused of masterminding and carrying out the bombing of the Oklahoma City
Federal Building, was motivated by revenge for the government’s murder of
the Davidians. The government again will be attempting to brand the Davidians
as suicidal fanatics in order to further tar the accused McVeigh. And angry
Davidian supporters will counter with their own evidence.
Davidian survivors and
families are suing federal agents and officials for more than a billion
dollars and their attorneys are committed to getting the truth out of BATF and
FBI agents who committed the crimes against them. At this point, these cases
will be heard by Judge Smith, though civil suit attorneys are requesting he be
thrown off the case.
In August 1996 the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals requested that Judge Smith provide evidence to
sustain his sentencing four Davidians to 25 years each for alleged possession
of automatic weapons. However, Davidian attorneys have already presented writs
to the Supreme Court asserting that only the jury can find they possessed such
weapons. So today the Davidians, as well as hundreds of supporters, and
thousands of sympathizers, continue their quest for justice.
The voices of the Davidian
prisoners, in statements delivered before sentencing, are eloquent reminders
of the terrible tragedy and injustices which befell them.
LIVINGSTONE
FAGAN
"Let me also
state for myself personally, never, at any point, have I sought to distance
myself from David Koresh, his teachings, or from the actions of the residents
of Mount Carmel during February 28th through April 19th. There is no doubt in
my mind that the actions that we were forced to take were justified, given the
circumstances that we were placed in by the actions of the agents of the
Government.
"Right from the
beginning, the spiritual aspect of this was totally and absolutely rejected.
Two thousand years ago when Christ was on the cross, we know that he was
innocent. But he didn’t have an appeal, did he? The system killed him.
"I really don’t
think that there is much to be gained by pursuing words. Through the 51-day
negotiation period, David tried to pursue words in an effort to prevent this,
the events that happened, but it made no difference. My purpose here was to
make clear to the public that we in no way want to leave any impression in the
mind of anyone that we are anything but innocent. Absolutely, without any
doubts whatsoever, we know we are innocent."
(Livingstone Fagan, 35,
a British social worker, masters in theology and father of two, left Mount
Carmel during the siege. He was sentenced to 40 years and refuses to appeal.)
JAIME
CASTILLO
"As Livingstone
said, we still stand on our innocence. Judge, you made a statement that the
government is not on trial here. There’s no doubt in my mind that the
government should be on trial for its actions.
"You know, every
time I wake up in the morning, I’m in a jail cell, and it’s kind of hard
to forget what you’re going through and your experience in relation to what
occurred at Mount Carmel. It’s a scar that’s left with me.
"In the light of
everything that’s happened, there’s a God. We’re hoping in something,
we’re hoping in the truth. We’re hoping in God’s word. Not following
David Koresh. We’re following the truth. I just hope that out of this whole
situation, I hope it’s pricked the conscience of people to realize and to
understand, to waken people up to the realities taking place in this
world."
(Jaime Castillo, 26, a
musician from California, survived the fire that burned Mount Carmel. He was
sentenced to 40 years and is appealing.)
RENOS
AVRAAM
"I’d like to
say that for those who died at Mount Carmel, I don’t believe they died in
vain. I do believe the Government was responsible. I don’t care what the
Government says, how much they try to whitewash it. Colin Powell gave a report
saying CS gas was harmful and flammable, even self-combustible. I don’t
believe it was right for them to use tanks to go straight into the building
where women and children are.
"David Koresh
told [undercover ATF agent Robert] Rodriguez that "we know you’re
coming," and still they came with helicopters blazing. Helicopters
blazing. David Koresh did come to the door and did try to stop them. But the
plan was, go in through windows, flash-bangs and everything, kill some dogs.
"Well, it’s a
sad situation because so many people died for something that was so simple as
someone’s supposedly converting semiautomatic to full automatic and every
gun was legally purchased. You can have automatic weapons, all you need is a
license. Of course, the Government wants scapegoats out of all of this and we
are the scapegoats."
(Renos Avraam, 31, a
British businessman and musician, survived the fire that burned Mount Carmel.
He was sentenced to 40 years and is appealing.)
KEVIN
WHITECLIFF
"I thought I was
going to die that day. I thought I was going to get blown away. And I
couldn’t believe this was our country doing this to its citizens. I thought
we got attacked by some kind of renegades or some kind of an anti-Christian
group.
"Put in that
situation where you’ve got women and children crying and screaming,
"Oh, my God, please help us, save us, do something! They’re shooting at
us!" You do anything, you pick up anything you can, if your life is
threatened, to defend yourself. And you do your best to live another day or
live another hour or another minute.
"We didn’t ask
anybody to provoke anything. And we’d probably still be there today, minding
our own business, if the 28th of February 1993 never came. There were three,
four helicopters buzzing around, shooting people. What the ATF did was
unjustifiable."
(Kevin Whitecliff, 34,
left Mount Carmel during the siege. He was sentenced to 40 years and is
appealing.)
BRAD BRANCH
"Your honor,
ladies and gentlemen. I’m basically a shy person, so if I faint. I’m going
to stand up here with all humility. And the truth of the matter is, these
people that I’m here with, it’s a basic truth, a Seven Seal truth. We
stand in judgement before God. The question is simple. Who is worthy? I
don’t know what to tell this Court as far as what ya’ll want to hear. And
if I made no sense, it’s because I can’t make any sense of the
Court."
(Brad Branch, 36, a
technician from Texas, left Mount Carmel during the siege. He was sentenced to
40 years and is appealing.)
PAUL FATTA
"Why did so many
of my friends and family have to suffer and die at Mount Carmel? Why did the
Government plan a military assault on such a small group of people? The
majority of people living at Mount Carmel were women, children and elderly.
What our Government did to my friends would never be done to a foreign
country. The Branch Davidians were never given a chance. The Branch Davidians
were for peace, but the Government was for war. David Koresh invited ATF Agent
David Aguilera to inspect all the weapons at Mount Carmel, but he refused.
David Koresh went to the front door unarmed. He told the attacking agents,
"Let’s talk. There are women and children living here." Instead he
was met with gunfire, and him and his father-in-law were both wounded."
(Paul Fatta, 36, a
businessman born in Hawaii, was not at Mount Carmel on February 28, 1993. He
was sentenced to 15 years and is appealing.)
GRAEME
CRADDOCK
"When I came out
of Mount Carmel after the fire, I told the truth to whatever authorities that
asked me. Much of the evidence that was presented against me has come from the
testimony of my own mouth. I wanted the truth to come out, the real truth,
whether it hurt us or not. If there is a God and if there is a judgement to
come after this, then all truth about what happened at Mount Carmel is going
to be revealed."
(Graeme Craddock, 33,
an Australian teacher and engineer, survived the fire that burned Mount
Carmel. He was sentenced to 20 years and is appealing.)
RUTH RIDDLE
"I’d just like
to say that this whole experience has been quite a tragedy, from my point of
view and I’m sure from the agents’ and their surviving families point of
view. I feel that it’s all been based on a misunderstanding. We were a
people living together as a family. We loved one another and we cared about
one another. And we were living there trying to study the word of God, to
learn what was right for our day. And the things that happened last year need
not have happened."
(Ruth Riddle, 31, a
Canadian citizen, survived the fire that burned Mount Carmel. She was
sentenced to 5 years and is not appealing.)
Carol Moore is a
co-founder of the Committee for Waco Justice and is active with the
Libertarian Party of the District of Columbia. Email: cmoore@CapAccess.org
MASS
MARKET PAPERBACK DETAILS GOVERNMENT CRIMES AT WACO
THE DAVIDIAN MASSACRE
by Carol Moore
"Carol Moore has done more research on Waco than anyone else. Her
book pulls together many of the most shocking details of government abuses
that a reader cannot find anywhere else. Anyone interested in Waco should
learn much from her book."
- James Bovard, author of "Lost Rights," writing in Laissez-Faire
book catalogue.
"Of the four books reviewed here, [The Davidian Massacre] is the most
thickly packed with details, complete with emotive characterizations and
imputation of sinister motives to government agents. But the author is not
just a polemicist. She rejects some allegations as unlikely. . .If one reads
this volume with a critical eye, one can learn a lot from it that is not
available elsewhere..."
- Dean M. Kelley, Counselor on Religious Liberty for the National Counsel of
Churches, writing in "First Things" magazine.
About the
Book:
Congress, the Clinton White House, Attorney General Janet Reno and the press
still promote the lies that the Branch Davidians "ambushed" federal
agents, refused to cooperate with negotiators, and killed themselves and their
children. Why does the U.S. government continue to demonize the victims of its
incompetence and wrath? Does the "Waco incident" leave you with the
uncomfortable feeling that the federal government cares more about the
reputation of federal law enforcement than the protection of the American
people? Then you must read this just-published mass market paperback by
longtime libertarian pacifist activist and writer, Carol Moore. The book draws
on government and news sources, trial and congressional transcripts, and
interviews with experts and participants, including Davidian survivors and
prisoners. In 487 pages of text and 20 pages of graphics and photographs,
including photos newly available from the FBI, the book systematically
analyzes evidence that agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) committed real crimes against
the Branch Davidians. It details how these agencies, as well officials of the
Justice and Treasury Departments and the Clinton White House, covered up these
crimes. It provides compelling evidence that:
** BATF investigators ignored local law enforcement advice, even as it heeded
that of "cult busters" committed to the destruction of the group.
The government knows it never had sufficient evidence of child abuse or sexual
abuse to indict David Koresh.
** David Koresh invited BATF investigators to inspect his guns six months
before the BATF raid. On February 28, 1993 Koresh came to the front door
unarmed and tried to comply with the warrant, crying, "Let's talk!
There's women and children here!" BATF agents panicked after an agent
shot a dog and shot first at Koresh, hitting him and mortally wounding his
unarmed father-in-law who stood behind him.
** BATF agents in one or more helicopters fired down on the Davidians, killing
four people and leaving more than a hundred bullet holes in the roof and walls
of the Mount Carmel Center. BATF agents consistently have lied to cover up
their acts, falsely claiming Davidians ambushed them with machineguns,
grenades and .50 caliber weapons.
** BATF and FBI agents purposely sabotaged negotiations by punishing the
Davidians whenever they cooperated and continually harassing and insulting
them. In a "cover your butt" conspiracy, FBI agents attempted to
destroy evidence of illegal gunfire that would have sent BATF agents to
prison. The building itself was the most incriminating evidence.
** FBI agents lied to Attorney General Janet Reno about David Koresh's April
14, 1993 promise-to-surrender letter, the safety of CS gas, FBI agent fatigue,
child abuse, the rules of engagement and their plan to demolish the building
in order to coerce her into approving their dangerous gas and tank assault.
** April 19, 1993 tank attacks collapsed half the gymnasium, as well as
stairwells and exits. Tanks trapped most Davidians on the second floor or
inside the concrete room. The tank which ripped out the first floor, southeast
corner, knocked over a lamp on the second floor, starting a fire. The
wind-whipped fire, fed by flammable CS gas and stored flammable fuels, zapped
through the building in seconds.
** Janet Reno's Justice Department promoted and condoned obvious judicial and
prosecutorial misconduct--especially missing and withheld evidence--during the
1994 trial of eleven Branch Davidians. Jurors found eight Davidians guilty of
what they thought were "minor charges" which would result in only
time served. However, the judge sentenced them to a total of 243 years.
Congressional hearings demonized Davidians and ignored evidence of crimes by
federal agents. Find out the truth about these crimes. Help prevent another
Waco!
* *
ORDERING INFORMATION * *
Order autographed copies from Carol Moore.
Price includes postage and handling:
$9.00 book rate $11.00 first class and Canada $16.00 U.S. cash or 22
international coupons for International. 5 or more copies, $6.00 each book
rate in United States (email for
non-US prices)
Checks to: Carol Moore, Box 65518, Washington, D.C. 20035 202/635-3739, USA
(Will mail immediately if payment by money order.)
For trade discount rates contact the publisher: Gun Owners Foundation,
1-800-417-1486 (USA).
© Copyright New Dawn
Magazine, http://www.newdawnmagazine.com
. Permission to re-send, post and place on web sites for non-commercial
purposes, and if shown only in its entirety with no changes or additions. This
notice must accompany all re-posting.
Return
to top of page
Ambrose
Evans Pritchard:
J'Accuse!
by Carol A.
Valentine
Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum http://www.Public-Action.com
Copyright, March, 1997
May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes
"Your Majesty, the people are
crying out for truth."
"Let them have half-truths .
. ."
March 15, 1997 -- On
March 9, 1997 Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the London Sunday Telegraph wrote a
piece Did FBI shoot in cold blood at Waco? In the piece, Ambrose
promotes the new Waco flick, "Waco: The Rules of Engagement." No one
would argue that some Branch Davidians were murdered on April 19, 1993.
But let's look at Mr. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (just plain "Ambrose" to
Internet denizens) for a moment.
Ambrose claims to have a long-standing interest in exposing the truth about what
happened at Waco. I have worked with him for a number of years, furnishing him
from time to time with information. He is a charming fellow.
On one occasion, Ambrose relied on me for leads concerning Kiri Jewel's
testimony during the 1995 House Waco hearings. The result was his piece Sloppy
Right lets Clinton off the hook, London Sunday Telegraph July 23, 1995, in
which Ambrose challenged the
veracity of Kiri's testimony.
I live in the Washington, D.C. area, home of the CIA, FBI, the Pentagon, NSA,
foreign embassies, and the international press corps. This area is loaded
with spooks and poseurs of every size and shape. Here the question is not
"Is Joe Blow an agent?" but "Who does he
work for?" (which agency).
And a number of savvy people in this town have been telling me for years that
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is British military intelligence. The evaluations I
heard were made without rancor (some even with benign amusement) just as a
Southerner might describe a neighbor as
an employee of Southern Bell. My policy on Ambrose was this: As long
as Ambrose helped expose the lies surrounding Waco, I would help him, and regard
him as an ally.
Now I see Ambrose as part of the Waco cover up, and I come forward. "J'Accuse!"
I say, to borrow a headline from one of Ambrose's own London Sunday Telegraph
articles.
Let's look at the history:
In November, 1996, I had a lengthy conversation with Ambrose concerning the Waco
Holocaust Electronic Museum. I gave Ambrose the Museum's website address:
http://www.Public-Action.com/SkyWriter/Waco/Museum
and summarized the contents of the site for his convenience. On the
subject of the deaths of the mothers and children, I gave him this
information:
- The story concerning
their deaths is phoney
- The structure in which
their bodies were found did not collapse
- The bodies of the mothers
and children were mutilated -- dismembered, burned, pulped-- in order to
disguise the real time, cause, and manner of death
- "Body
laundering" is the practice of mutilating bodies to disguise the real
time, cause, and circumstances of death
- Body laundering is
practiced by the Special Operations Command of the Pentagon to disguise the
circumstances of those killed while serving in Pentagon/CIA black bag jobs
- Special Operations flew
the black helicopters on February 28, 1993 and strafed the Mt. Carmel Center
- Contemporaneous reports
stated "a child" or "children" were killed on February
28
- The state of
decomposition of the corpses provides clear evidence the victims died at
different times
- The state of
decomposition provides clear evidence that at least some died long before
the April 19, 1993 gas attack.
I referred him to the official
Autopsy Reports and the research of world-class forensic anthropologists, both
of which can be found in the Death Gallery of the Museum. I told him he
had access to the original source material I used--just at the flip of the
switch on his computer.
To my surprise, Ambrose became argumentative. He said the notion that some
of the April 19 victims were dead before April 19 was at variance with what the
Branch Davidian survivors said--was I calling them liars?
I explained a few simple truths:
- The government admitted
to having plants living among the Branch Davidians, and has still not
released the identities of the plants;
- The surviving Branch
Davidians are surely people under duress--their families have been tortured
and murdered, their colleagues are still in jail and at the mercy of the US.
Arguably there were many ways
the feds could blackmail or intimidate the Branch Davidians. I asked
Ambrose if he had seen a Chicago Tribune article of April 21, 1993, which was
based on an interview with the ex-wife of the present Branch Davidian leader
Clive Doyle.
The former Mrs. Doyle, who had lived in Waco for years, said that the Doyle
grandchildren were in the Mt. Carmel Center during the siege. Ultimately
no Doyle grandchildren were listed among the dead after April 19.
Provided the former Mrs. Doyle was not lying or mistaken about having
grandchildren, the ramifications might be obvious to an independent observer:
The lives of the youngsters are perhaps being used as bargaining chips by the
FBI. "Liar" would not describe a person who succumbed to such
intimidation.
An investigator would at least entertain the possibility that the Tribune report
might be factual and worth follow-up investigation. But Ambrose instantly
dismissed it--out of hand--as erroneous. "Why would you believe the
Chicago Tribune and not Clive Doyle?" he
asked me.
On the other hand, why would Ambrose leap to the conclusion that another
newspaper had necessarily done a shoddy reporting job, or that Mrs. Doyle was
lying or mistaken about having grandchildren? The Chicago Tribune report of
grandchildren certainly did not
discredit the Davidians or hold them up to ridicule; if the Chicago Tribune
report had been accurate, and the children used as bargaining chips, obviously
Clive Doyle could not admit to having grandchildren.
With the incurious and brusque dismissal of that report, it seemed to me Ambrose
had clearly stepped out of his role as a reporter and revealed himself as a
partisan.
During this conversation, Ambrose asked several times if I knew who had
perpetrated the crimes of April 19, 1993. He seemed concerned. No, I did
not say "the 'butcher-and-bolt' British commandos helped kill them,"
even though we are aware that the British were
accessories to the torture of the Branch Davidians. Recall the SAS spy
plane over the Mt. Carmel Center, reported by the London Times on March 21,
1993?
http://www.Public-Action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/war/fig/w_fig01.jpg
AMBROSE THEN TOLD ME THAT HE COULD NOT USE THE MUSEUM'S INFORMATION BECAUSE HIS
EDITORS THOUGHT HE HAD DONE ENOUGH ON WACO ALREADY.
At a later date Ambrose called me, this time to ask questions concerning
Livingstone Fagan. His editors wanted Fagan's treatment in prison covered
because Fagan was British, he said. [Note: Ambrose later told me he found
out Livingstone Fagan was Jamaican.] On that occasion, I again suggested
Ambrose cover the evidence contained in the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum for
his paper.
AGAIN AMBROSE DECLINED, SAYING HIS EDITOR ONLY AGREED TO COVER
LIVINGSTONE BECAUSE LIVINGSTONE WAS BRITISH. Otherwise, the London
readers would have no interest in Waco.
When I got off the phone, I wondered why the London Telegraph editors were not
interested in the other British citizens who died in the Holocaust. Surely
the scandalous cover-up and body laundering documented in the Museum would be of
interest to British readership--after all, the Death Certificates issued the
British victims were arguably false! Honestly reported, the US cover-up
and murder of British citizens could cause international repercussions.
Surely this was news worthy.
On March 4, 1997, before Ambrose traveled to the West Coast to see "Waco:
The Rules of Engagement," he called me to ask if I had seen the flick.
I said no, but I had visited the film's webpage, and read the synopsis of the
film. I pointed out to Ambrose:
- The flick apparently
forwards the lie that the February 28, 1993 raid was a bungled law
enforcement action, despite abundant evidence that the raid was a domestic
Gulf of Tonkin incident, set up to provide an excuse for military
escalation. I again referred Ambrose to the publicly available evidence in
the Museum.
- The flick apparently
makes no mention that at least some of the Branch Davidians whose remains
were found in the concrete room were long dead by April 19, 1993 and that
the bodies had been laundered to disguise the real time, cause, and
circumstance of death.
But Ambrose said he still was
not interested in covering this evidence contained in the Museum for his London
readers. Why?
THIS TIME AMBROSE SAID THE IDEA THAT THE BRANCH DAVIDIANS WERE
DELIBERATELY MURDERED WAS TOO MUCH FOR MOST PEOPLE TO ACCEPT,
INCLUDING HIS EDITORS. Most people still believed that the Davidians set
themselves on fire, and people had to be brought up to the truth slowly, he
said.
Let's apply Ambrose's logic to another atrocity: First you tell the world
that 100 Jews were killed in the German Holocaust. When that is accepted,
you change the number to 200. On and on, up until you hit the six million
mark. Does the logic make sense? If not, why
apply it to the Davidians?
I told Ambrose that people should be directed to the evidence, including his
editors. Ambrose intimated his editors were too delicate psychologically
to deal with the news directly, and had to be brought up to the truth over a
matter of time. I told Ambrose his editors sounded like cot cases, and Ambrose
defended them, saying all editors were cot cases.
"They are newspeople. They deal in news," he explained.
Ambrose said that he was going to write a story about "Waco: The
Rules of Engagement," to illustrate the "changing perceptions"
about Waco.
"Changing perceptions?" Since when do newspapers chronicle
"changing perceptions?" Perceptions are based on information.
Newspapers used to be the source of INFORMATION. If perceptions are based on
newspaper reports, and newspaper reports cover only
"perceptions," what kind of an information system do we have?
Exactly. Not an information system at all. It is a PsyOps operation, and Ambrose
is right in the middle of it.
Consider: Ambrose's employers were willing to fly him across the
continent, pay for airfare, lodgings, meals--all to have an article about
"perceptions." Meanwhile, Ambrose's employers are
uninterested in an article about cold factual evidence which would have cost
them virtually nothing, evidence which had been available to them for months.
Consider: Ambrose is UNwilling to report evidence of murder as documented
in the Museum, but is willing to report "changing perceptions" about
the murder which the film portrays. Why is "murder"
verboten in one case, but not in the other?
I asked Ambrose if he had read the Museum yet, and he allowed he'd popped in
quickly, but had not really read it closely because he had not written anything
about Waco since. Yet here he was getting ready to go on a plane to do . .
. an article on Waco.
Ambrose has developed the non sequitur to high art form.
Since the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum was posted on the World Wide Web,
many thousands of people around the world have read it and downloaded the
material to their own computers. Surely this is evidence of changing
perceptions? No matter. Apparently the London Sunday Telegraph wants
London readers to hear about movie-generated
changing perceptions but not Internet-generated changing perceptions.
In this March 4 conversation Ambrose called the new flick "damning."
Considering that Ambrose had not seen the movie yet, it sounded like he
had the story already drafted before he got on the plane.
Folks, I think what is going on is this:
* The powers-that-be don't want to publicize the fact that the February
28, 1993 raid was a set-up, a phoney, a domestic Gulf of Tonkin incident,
courtesy of the US military looking to secure a broadened role for itself
in civilian US life.
* The powers-that-be don't want to publicize the fact that some of the
mothers and children were long dead by the April 19, 1993 gas attack. They
don't want us to know the real time, cause, and circumstances of death of the
victims.
* If public attention is diverted to the murder of adult Davidians, people will
forget about the murders of the mothers and children. The adults,
remember, are accused of shooting at the agents, and as active combatants, do
not hold the same victim status as three-dozen-odd mothers and children and
babies.
* The British are in it up to their ears, much like The LondonTimes
reported, and much like Linda Thompson and George Zimmerlee have been reporting.
Kiri Jewel's statements did not impact on the interests of the British
government. Ambrose's article on her testimony made him an opinion leader
on Waco, at no expense to the British. But the nature of the military
involvement in the initial attack and the dates of the mothers and children's
deaths are
British sensitivities. That's why they can't be reported and attention
must be taken off that information and placed elsewhere. And that's where
Ambrose comes in.
Next time you speak to Ambrose, he may tell you I have mischaracterized our
conversations. In response, just challenge him to tell his British readers
about the Waco Holocaust Electronic
Museum and give them its website address. See what he says.
If he agrees to do the story and actually does one, I will eat these words.
Until then: "J'Accuse!"
www.wizardsofaz.com/waco/waco.html
Optics
Expert, Barbara Grant, Rebuts Waco Standoff Report
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/11207WACOOPTICGS.html
Barbara Grant says she
relied on science in her analysis of what happened at the Branch Davidian
compound.
By Alan D. Fischer ARIZONA
DAILY STAR, Dec 7, 2001
Tucson optics consultant
Barbara Grant used science - not politics - to determine that law enforcement
agents likely fired guns at the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas, in
the moments leading up to the building burning to the ground.
A November 2000 report said
agents fired no shots at Branch Davidians that day in 1993. Grant spent two
years studying infrared tapes taken by the FBI between 11:18 a.m. and 12:15 p.m.
on April 19, 1993, from a plane circling 4,000 to 6,000 feet above the compound.
A 51-day standoff between
the Branch Davidians and federal agents ended that day after a fire engulfed the
compound following efforts to drive the occupants out by using tear gas and
demolishing portions of the structure. About 80 people died, and some survivors
were severely burned.
Grant, speaking to about 50
people at Thursday's Arizona Optics Industry Association luncheon meeting,
showed segments of the FLIR infrared sensor tape that recorded temperature
variations at the compound, including several sequences of multiple, sequential
high-temperature "flashes" aimed toward the building.
"I believe the most
likely explanation of the flashes is gunfire," Grant said. She said the
series of flashes occurred periodically until about 12:10 p.m., when the
compound burst into flames. Her research focused primarily on a multiple flash
sequence at 11:28 a.m.
A report on the incident,
released Nov. 8, 2000, by Waco Investigation Special Consul John C. Danforth,
states "unequivocally" that "government agents did not shoot at
the Branch Davidians on April 19, 1993."
Casey Stavropoulos, public
affairs press assistant at the U.S. Justice Department in Washington, D.C., said
late Thursday that she had no information on Grant's investigation. "I
don't have anything to comment on in response to what her findings are,"
Stavropoulos said.
A Justice Department
representative said earlier this week that the agency stands behind the Danforth
report's findings.
Other explanations of the
flashes have included a malfunction of the FLIR sensor and heat from the sun
glinting off debris at the compound.
The Danforth report states:
"It is concluded with a confident level of certainty that of all of the
analyzed flashes seen on FLIR videotapes from April 19, 1993, between 10:41
a.m.-12:16 p.m. are caused by solar or heat reflections from single or multiple
objects. "The results from this investigation have shown, with a confident
level of certainty, that the flashes on the FLIR videotapes from April 19, 1993,
between 10:41 a.m.-12:16 p.m. cannot form evidence of gunfire."
Grant said her study showed
the sensor malfunction and debris reflection scenarios are far less likely to
explain the infrared flashes than the muzzle flash of weapons. "I would
discount the first one," she said. "For the second one, in our
experiments we found glass gives a pretty awful reflection in the infrared
spectrum - not like visual light, it appears as a vague glow, not like the
flashes that appeared on the tape."
She said that debris would
have to be shiny, elevated and precisely aimed at the FLIR sensor in the moving
aircraft to work as an explanation for the heat flashes. Grant said that unlike
Danforth's report, she would not claim to be 100 percent certain of her
findings.
"My mind is still open.
If someone can come up with a better solution, I will be glad to consider
it," she said. "I am saying this is the most likely conclusion."
"It was valid
science," Arizona Optics Industry Association member Keith McLeod said of
Grant's presentation. "It wasn't schlepping one side or the other. It was
simply taking basic high school and college analysis to dismantle the FBI's
position."
Kathleen Perkins, CEO and
publisher of OpticsReport, said, "This is a fine example of how optical
engineers can find thorough solutions to problems."
Grant, a 1989 University of
Arizona Optical Sciences Center graduate, is an electro-optical engineer who
specializes in radiometric measurement and data analysis. This involves the
measurement of light and the analysis of data obtained from optical instruments.
She has worked as a Tucson-based electro-optics consultant the past four years.
She said she was drawn to
the Waco controversy and wanted to approach it from a technical, analytical
angle, avoiding the emotion and politics that had crept into some other
investigations.
"I stayed very much in
the technical realm. There is more technology here than you can shake a stick
at," she said. "I haven't accepted a dime of money from anyone. I
wanted to make this as objective as possible."
Grant and local attorney
Dave Hardy, who pursued a Freedom of Information Act suit for two years to get
the FBI to surrender a copy of the FLIR tape, made their own infrared tapes of
weapons firing at a local shooting range for comparison.
These tests at the Desert
Trails Gun Club and Training Facilities showed that muzzle flashes could last
four times longer than the government said was possible, and helped Grant show
that muzzle flashes would appear on the 30-frame-per-second FLIR videotapes.
THE FLIR PROJECT:
Revealing
Danforth's Deceit Cletus Nelson
teevee@earthlink.net
"Everyone thought that the issues
surrounding the WACO tragedy were finally dead and buried…We are here today to
proclaim the rise of the Phoenix and to offer the truth…" Press Statement, COPS
Productions
It was a stirring victory for the
leviathan state when Independent counsel John Danforth produced the interim
findings of his WACO investigation on July 21, 2000. In starkly unequivocal
language, the former Senator inveighed with complete certitude "that the "the
blame rests solely on the shoulders of [Davidian leader] David Koresh" His
allegedly definitive account of the worst law enforcement debacle since the 1890
massacre at Wounded Knee would constitute the second legal blow against the
Davidian faithful. One week earlier, Judge Walter Smith determined that federal
officials were not liable for the deaths of the 76 men, women, and children who
perished during the fatal climax of the April 19th, 1993 BATF-FBI siege. As the
Washington political establishment breathed a collective sigh of relief, it
would seem the ranks of "extremists" and "conspiracy theorists" who showed the
temerity to challenge the media- sanctified "mass suicide" theory had finally
been silenced---or so it was believed. Enter the FLIR Project.
The brainchild of Emmy-winning
Investigative journalist Michael McNulty, the man considered to be the driving
force behind the critically acclaimed 1997 documentary WACO: The Rules of
Engagement (1997) and its groundbreaking sequel WACO: A New Revelation (1999),
the third installment of his investigative trilogy is no less provocative.
Unlike his two previous efforts which exhaustively dissect the initial BATF raid
and its brutal aftermath, this tightly edited video centers on a singular
question which strikes at the very heart of this unsettling conspiracy: were
Branch Davidians deterred from exiting the burning Mt. Carmel complex by bursts
of FBI gunfire?
To the many state apologists who seem
all-to-willing to justify the ill-conceived tear-gas attack, the placement of a
few stray rounds may seem an insignificant matter. Nevertheless, the law is
unambiguous about the illegality of such an act. "Ordinary citizens can use
deadly force to defend themselves and others from imminent harm. But if someone
fired a gun to keep others from fleeing a burning building, he would be subject
to prosecution for murder" observes CATO Institute legal analyst Timothy Lynch
(No Confidence, An Unofficial Account of the WACO Incident, Cato Institute,
April 9, 2001).
This is no mere speculative claim. There
is a great deal of circumstantial evidence which lends credence to this
troubling thesis. A post-mortem autopsy has revealed that nearly two-dozen of
the deceased showed suspicious gunshot wounds. Moreover, on the day of the
deadly fire, author Carol Moore reports that "CNN and other news outlets
reported that as many as 20 Davidians were seen fleeing out of the back of the
building" but "Such claims ceased as soon as the FBI announced there were only
nine survivors"(The Davidian Massacre, Legacy Communications, 1995).
The bureau's recent admission that
agents fired over 300 deadly "ferret rounds" into a building containing women
and children provides further evidence that a "shoot to kill" mentality
characterized the relentless attack on the embattled religious sect.
However, in perhaps the cruelest of
ironies, the FBI's own Forward Looking Infrared Red (FLIR) footage of the
paramilitary assault is central to this allegation. Prior to the conflagration
which overtook Mt. Carmel, an FBI FLIR camera mounted to an observation plane
documented several ephemeral flashes of light directed toward the rear of the
building. A battery of experts have subsequently analyzed the staccato-like
emissions and attributed their unique thermal signature to automatic weapon
fire. These aren't the half-baked ramblings of armchair experts or Internet
rumor mongers, but the qualified assertions of highly credible specialists like
Dr. Edward F. Allard, former Deputy Director of the US Defense Department's
Night Vision Laboratory, and the late Carlos Ghigliotti, a renowned expert in
thermal imaging technology.
Nevertheless, without even acknowledging
this wealth of contradictory data, Danforth avers with "100% certainty" that no
evidence exists to refute the FBI's claim that agents didn't fire a single shot.
However, the learned Senator's rhetorical hyperbole hangs on a slim evidentiary
thread: the March 19, 2000 WACO "recreation" conducted at Ft. Hood TX. The
costly field test, which allegedly replicated the dramatic final moments at
WACO, was later examined by Vector Data Systems (VDS)--- a British firm retained
by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). VDS (whose parent company possesses
contracts with some 50 federal agencies), predictably ascribed the rhythmic
flashes on the FLIR tape to "glint" and ruled out allegations of FBI treachery
because the muzzle flashes captured on the eight-year-old surveillance tape are
"too long to be gunfire."
Neither the establishment press nor the
Congress have attempted to reconcile this analysis with expert opinion---a vast
conspiracy of silence which compelled McNulty to conduct his own shadow
investigation last Fall. After staking out locations in two western states, the
Colorado filmmaker assembled a team of experts to assess the available evidence.
The results are distilled in this intense 35- minute video which surgically
demolishes the credibility of the Ft. Hood Reenactment, challenges the
legitimacy of the Danforth report, and offers the disquieting counter-theory
that FBI agents did indeed open fire on the trapped Davidians.
Perhaps the greatest advantage of the
documentary medium is its inherent ability to convey a particular message by
using powerful photographic, video, and other graphic images. In this instance,
McNulty builds his case against the OSC investigation by incorporating data from
the 1993 FBI FLIR tape, footage taken at Ft. Hood, and test shots taken by the
FLIR Project team.
The resulting analysis demonstrates the
surfeit of oversights, anomalies, and outright falsehoods which permeate the
Danforth probe. For example, the former Senator's mendacious claim that "People
are Not Visible on FLIR" is adeptly undermined within seconds by the
presentation of FLIR imagery depicting highly visible FBI shock troops prowling
through the Mt. Carmel wreckage.
Repeated assertions that reflective
materials or "glint" produced the noticeable flashes which appear on the FBI
tape are proven equally untenable. Having attached a FLIR camera to a stable
hoist, McNulty and his crew provide extensive Infrared footage of aluminum foil,
hubcaps, window glass, and other highly reflective objects which seem utterly
unlike the thermal signatures which appear on the contested FBI footage.
Yet this is merely the tip of the
iceberg. It is revealed that Danforth's investigative team issued M-16 A-2
assault rifles for the reenactment despite the fact that photos of the WACO
assault team depict agents toting short-barreled M-4 caribines. This
dissimilitude in barrel length effectively inhibited the amount of heat detected
by the Ft. Hood FLIR camera. As if to fabricate a greater disparity in the
muzzle flash produced by each weapon, military rounds were dispensed for the
March reenactment. Once again, FBI photos provide evidence that FBI and BATF
agents used highly volatile commercial ammunition during the initial raid and
its tragic end.
The questionable decision to use
military ordinance which contains chemical additives designed to limit muzzle
flash throws into question the Special Prosecutor's glib assurance that the
variance in test results constitutes de facto proof that federal law enforcement
didn't fire at Davidians.
The film climaxes with the FLIR
Project's attempted WACO reproduction. Using M-4 carbines loaded with commercial
ammunition and allowing for a number of important variables ranging from
temperature to the highly visible dust clouds caused by tanks ramming the Mt.
Carmel structure, the lengthy and sustained muzzle flashes recorded at Mt.
Carmel are eerily duplicated. "It is with a high degree of certainty that COPS,
Productions and the scientists who conducted the tests depicted in the FLIR
Project" allege the "FBI did fire on the trapped Branch Davidians in the burning
building as women and children burned to death in the inferno" states the
movie's web page. While the more skeptical viewers may dispute the exactitude of
this replication, few will contest either the presence of FBI gunfire on the
initial FLIR tape, the overwhelming evidence debunking the Danforth report, or
the existence of a massive cover-up. Indeed, the FLIR Project suggests that the
high-profile investigation was cleverly rigged from the outset with government
investigators using alternative weapons, different ammunition, a malfunctioning
camera, and other unsavory stratagems to ensure the exoneration of FBI
officials.
Meticulous, even-handed, and subtle in
its execution, the FLIR Project effectively illuminates yet another chapter in
the WACO cover- up and builds a strong case against the FBI. If the Neo-con
lightweights and drug war hawks who comprise the Bush Administration intend to
truly restore faith in government, it is imperative that the issues raised by
this highly-credible video be addressed. Whether this powerful documentary will
spur yet another investigation into the events at Mt. Carmel remains to be seen,
but this highly recommended film offers one definite certainty: the WACO killers
remain at large.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/wilcher.htm
Exerpts
of The Wilcher Report - The Truth About Waco 9-5-99
Rumor Mill News was started
in June of 1996 by Gunther and Rayelan Russbacher and several of Gunther's
colleagues. Gunther and two of his best friends were the men who gave Paul
Wilcher the information that is contained in the Wilcher Report
Paul Wilcher was a lawyer
and investigator who had met Gunther and Rayelan shortly after Gunther had gone
public that he was the October Surprise Pilot. This revelation on Gunther's
part, earned him a 21 year prison sentence.
Paul Wilcher went from
Washington D.C. to Jefferson City, Missouri to help Russbacher prove that he was
a CIA deep cover operative. If this could be proved, Missouri would have to
release him from prison. Wilcher stayed over three months interviewing and
debriefing Russbacher. Many documents and tapes were produced from these
meetings with Russbacher.
he ended up dead....wilcher
did...onto something apparently...if a lawyer can have difficulties proving a
special forces soldier was a deep cover operative...don't expect me to be able
to prove it - in a court anyway...perhaps you are more open minded than such a
situation...
In addition to learning
about the October Surprise scandal, Wilcher learned about the related pattern of
crimes and coverups that have been committed by various branches of the United
States government. Wilcher was privy to current inside information because
Russbacher, even though in prison, received daily CIA briefings.
The following information
was passed to Paul Wilcher via telephone by Gunther Russbacher and others.
Wilcher recorded the conversations and wrote a letter to Janet Reno that was
over 100 pages long. Gunther Russbacher told his wife, Rayelan and author,
Rodney Stich, that the complete Wilcher letter was 105 pages. The last four
pages are missing.
* * * * *
From the
Wilcher Report Starting on Page 29
#16) Mind Control &
Memory Blocks to Ease the Consciences of the CIA's PROFESSIONAL Killers:
Thus far, we have been
discussing mind control and memory blocks in the context of the CIA's
"Manchurian-Candidate-type robot assassins - those low-level individuals --
like Sirhan Sirhan, David Hinckley, Mark David Chapman (who assassinated the
Beatles' lead singer/song writer John Lennon), and the six (6) Black men
murdered in Pershing Park -- as discussed starting on Page 22 above -- persons
who are programmed by the Agency to be used only once and then "thrown
away" and discarded -- i.e., persons who are destined either to be killed
or imprisoned for the rest of their lives, once they have performed their
pre-ordained secret mission. In other words, these low-level individuals are
highly expendable -- particularly when getting rid of them will 'preserve the
"plausible deniability" that the Agency had anything to' do with their
training, conduct, or activities.
In the context of these
low-level individuals, the mind control programming we have been discussing is
used not only to condition the desired robotic response to a pre-ordained secret
signal, but also to prevent the subject from remembering anything about the
conditioning and programming experience, so that he is virtually helpless to
counteract or overcome it -- without many years of deep hypnosis and therapy --
as in the case of Candy Jones, discussed on pages 20 and 21 above. There is,
however, a totally different category of covert operatives employed by the CIA
-- the real PROFESSIONAL killers -- who are used for multiple high- level, top
secret missions, over an entire life time. These top-level "black"
operatives are generally men of extraordinary intelligence, education, talent,
training, and experience, and it is into their hands that most of the real
'dirty work" of the Agency -- including top-level assassinations is
entrusted.
For example, the Agency will
use a low-level programmed robot like a Sirhan Sirhan or a David Hinckley -- to
be the "patsy" for a top-level assassination, or assassination attempt
(like the murder and attempted murder of Senator Robert Kennedy and President
Reagan, respectively). But they rarely entrust the task of actually pulling the
trigger in such a high-profile case to such a low- level cutout.
Instead, the real work in
such top-level assassinations is carried out only by the Agency's true
PROFESSIONAL killers -- persons who are NOT used just once and then discarded,
but who, instead, are used over and over again, year in and year out, for nearly
all of the Agency's most secret and sensitive dirty work. "Wet" Ops:
Such dirty work is generally referred to, among "black" (covert)
operatives within the Agency, as "wet" operations -- operations where
one or more persons are to be killed, where human blood (which is wet) is to
be--spilled.
DEBRIEFINGS
AFTER CIA "WET" OPERATIONS
The normal procedure is that
after each "BLACK" or "wet" operation all persons
participating in or connected with the operation are totally debriefed by a
special debriefing team sent from Agency headquarters -- including a
psychiatrist skilled in the various mind control and memory block techniques we
have been discussing.
In this debriefing, each
member of the "wet" team is required recite to the debriefing team
exactly what happened during the operation, in a precise, step-by-step, detailed
manner. Each member's recitation is generally repeated several times -- once
normally, once under hypnosis, once with a polygraph, and once under scopolamine
-- and only when the debriefers are fully satisfied that they have gotten ALL
the details and that there are no glaring inconsistencies between these
different recitations, is the debriefing brought to a close.
Part of the reason for this
debriefing process is to provide detailed records and feedback to the Agency
concerning all of the top-level "black" and "wet" operations
-- i.e., precisely what was done? Was the operation a "success"? Did
it go off as planned? What mistakes, if any, were made? And what improvements
can be made so that on succeeding operations, the task at hand can accomplished
even more professionally and expeditiously?
NOTE WELL:
The importance of this point
cannot be overstated. For, this means that deep within the bowels of the Central
Intelligence Agency -- if you only know where to look -- you can find the
detailed debriefing records on all of the "black" and "wet"
operations carried out by the CIA over the past,30 years or so.
You should subpoena these
records immediately, Attorney General. And once you get them -- If you ever get
them -- you should put them under the tightest security imaginable to protect
them from being tampered with or destroyed.
All these records should
then be made available for the debriefing and complete testimony of the 16 or so
top covert operatives who now wish to come forward to testify -- see pages 102
(RMNews--The copy of his
report that Paul Wilcher left with his friend Sarah McClendon contained only the
first 101 pages. The copy left with McClendon is the copy from which all the
copies of the Wilcher Report, which are now in circulation, have come. The
Wilcher Reports, which are currently being printed, are being made from the copy
Wilcher gave to McClendon)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
and following below
and as their testimony is given, released to the public.
Then, at the conclusion of
the debriefing, once the debriefers are confident they have gotten ALL of the
factual details, each operative is put under deep hypnosis, and the psychiatrist
in the team implants memory blocks into his subconscious memory:
of course, forms of
hypnosis vary...if you have had your sleep interrupted for weeks as a means to
break down your resistance, for instance, and then subjected to theaters of
trauma...to be honest, sometimes i can recall it all vividly and sometimes
not...
(a) first, to make it far
more difficult for him to remember what he and his other "wet" team
members did during the operation i.e., to block many of the gory details as to
precisely how each of the persons targeted for "elimination" was
"taken out"(i.e., murdered) -- so that he will be less likely to be
troubled by recurring nightmares concerning what he and his team members have
just done; and
(b) second, to alleviate the
guilt which would otherwise be associated with these memories, and to allow him
to justify in his mind, to the extent he is able to remember what happened, that
what he and his fellow team members did was "praiseworthy," rather
than highly criminal -- i.e., that the person or persons they murdered were a
"menace" to society and deserved to die, and that he was doing his
country a valuable service by eliminating these "targets" from
society.
Of course, these memories of
what he and his fellows have done on these various "wet" operations
are never completely erased, and can, with work, be fully recovered. But at
least these mental blocks make it easier for the operative to live with himself
and his conscience, and help to keep these vivid and gory images from flooding
into his consciousness, and becoming obsessive thoughts and recurring
nightmares.
These memory blocks are also
a way for the operative to justify his having acted as the targets' accuser,
prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner -- all in one fell swoop, without the
target's having been given the benefit of due process whatsoever -- i.e., NO
notice, NO hearing, NO right to confront and cross-examine his accusers, NO
right to put on a defense, NO right to testify personally or call witnesses in
his behalf, and NO right to be tried before an honest judge and a jury of his
peers, according to the laws and the Constitution of the United States.
===================================================================
"accuser,
prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner...sound like that omega post? see: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/agentsmiley/message/8
==================================================================
These memory blocks thus
help the operative to suppress all these troubling thoughts which might
otherwise disturb his waking hours or his restful sleep -- thoughts which might
otherwise force him to reexamine his calling as one of the CIA's top
professional killers, and to consider seriously whether he ought to pursue some
other line of work.
COMMENTS ON
"WET" OPERATIONS
There may be sow argument in
favor of such "wet" operations to "take out" the agents of
foreign governments who were the sworn enemies of this nation during the
"Cold War" era, or even today, in the instance of state-sponsored
foreign or domestic terrorism.
But when such
"wet" operations are used instead to "take out" citizens of
this country who do NOT pose a legitimate threat to the society at large
Like David Koresh and the
other 85 men, women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound -- and whose
only real threat is that IF they were given a legitimate trial before an honest
judge and jury, they might expose some of the CIA's dirty business concerning
its top secret mind control operations and the murderous purposes for which they
are used -- i.e., where these "wet" operations are used merely for the
purpose of covering up and burying the truth, along with the innocent victims,
in order to protect the guilty -- -- as clearly was the case both in Waco and in
Jonestown -- not to mention the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and countless other persons
whom the CIA has deemed a threat to its existence then such "wet"
operations have clearly gone way out of bounds, and absolutely must be exposed,
so that those responsible can be held accountable, and so that such operations
can be prevented from happening ever again in the future.
=================================================================
from above: "as
clearly was the case both in Waco and in Jonestown"
lemme tell ya...A LOT of the
people that died at jonestown were from the indian reservation near middletown,
california...home of 60's experiments in psychology such as est...home of
massive amounts of methamphetamine production...speaking of sleep
deprivation...about an hour northeast of santa rosa...where i had most of my
experiences and about an hour and a half from bohemian grove
But I am getting way ahead
of myself here.
=================================================================
Let's return
to David Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" in Waco, Texas.
#17) Returning to David
Koresh and his 6 Fellow "Sleepers" in Waco: The point to be made here
is that David Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" were low-level
Manchurian-Candidate-type programmed robot assassins -- who were scheduled to be
used at some point in the future, but who had NOT yet been used for their
pre-ordained secret missions
(RMNews--Paul Wilcher was
not told about the mission the Waco "sleepers" had been prepared to
carry out. Gunther Russbacher, Wilcher's primary source for the information
contained in "The Wilcher Report", wrote an outline from memory of the
chemical device the "sleepers" were constructing and alluded to how
and where it would have been used. (Russbacher wrote this outline on a napkin in
the visitors section of the prison where he was housed. A fellow covert
operative smuggled the napkin out of the visitors's room and faxed it to
Russbacher's wife. The operative typed it on an old typewriter. This is the only
way he could be certain that no one knew he had the information until AFTER it
had been faxed. Upon receiving the information, Mrs. Russbacher immediately put
it out over her Fax- tree network. Before the Internet became so popular,
Fax-trees were the way whistle blowers had to work. In other words, the
information had to get out to hundreds of thousands of people in a short period
of time to insure their safety.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
Note Well:
whereas the "wet"
team that went in to "take them out" were some of the CIA's top
professional killers.
The term "sleeper"
in this context connotes:
(a) that the mind control
programming which had been done on Koresh and his inner circle had probably been
done a number of years earlier;
(b)that the secret
instructions implanted deep into their subconscious memories had lain dormant
over the intervening years;
(c) that the CIA now had to
arouse Koresh and the other 6 from their "sleep" -- i.e., to
reactivate the secret conditioned responses implanted into their subconscious
memories -- in order to get them to perform their pre-ordained secret missions
on cue, whenever the CIA deemed it appropriate; and
(d) that the CIA could also
activate the secret "self-destruct" signal, discussed on pages 20 to
22 above, to cause the robotic "suicides" of Koresh and his inner
circle, once they had been performed their secret mission,, or at any other time
the CIA decided they were no longer of any use to the Agency
supposedly...they were going
to go off early and in their own way...this science IS not exact and such is the
risk...
(RMNews--The
"sleepers" had been programmed to commit suicide in a specific way.
They were not programmed to kill the other members of the cult.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
At least that's how all this
mind control programming was supposed; to work in theory.
#18) Koresh's Enormous
Stockpile of Weapons:
It is also important to
understand that the enormous cache of' automatic weapons, military equipment,
ordinance, and ammunition which Koresh and his followers had acquired, had
customized for their purposes, and had stockpiled in the Branch Davidian
compound was all accumulated with the apparent knowledge and consent of the CIA
over a period of several years.
The point to be made here is
that David Koresh had acquired this considerable arsenal for a specific purpose
-- which was NOT just to be able to defend himself and his followers against the
government -- should it ever decide to attack.
Rather, the primary purpose
of this enormous arsenal was to allow Koresh and his 6 fellow
"sleepers" to carry out whatever secret assignments they were to be
given by their CIA "handlers", if and when those handlers felt the
time was right to activate the CIA's prior secret mind control programming of
these 7 robotic assassins.
#19) One Reason why Koresh
was so Skilled in Controlling his Followers:
Therefore, one of the
reasons why Koresh was so successful in controlling and subjugating the minds
and wills of his followers was that he and these 6 men in his inner circle had
been through such intensive and total mind control programming themselves.
==================================================================
keep someone awake for
a week and deliberately confuse them and they WILL begin to absorp your memes...nothing
mystical here...though when one is awake for a week EVERYTHING takes on a
mystical significance...validating one's experiences...they seem
religious...this is why lsd dealers that aren't pro-business and pro-police,
i.e. carrying the memes that are officially sanctioned, get arrested and others
do not...to propagate said mindset..
====================================================================
(RMNews Waco has been used
since the 1950's as a center for CIA experiments in mind control. One form of
mind control that is taught at Waco is similar to Neural Linguistic Programming.
It is a form of mind control that can been used on an individual to bring him or
her under the control of the operative in an extremely rapid manner. Sometimes
less than five minutes. (This form of programming can also be used on cult
followers, such as those in Jonestown and many other so called religious cults
around the world. Recent information has been given to RMNews that various
Christian Millennialists who will be in the Holy Lands for Y2K, have been
programmed to bring about Armageddon, most probably by blowing up Islam's most
sacred site, the Dome of the Rock. This "Super NLP" method was taught
to CIA operatives at the Life Management Institute, LMI, located in Waco.)
===================================================================
from above: "One form
of mind control that is taught at Waco is similar to Neural Linguistic
Programming." sonoma county...the place i had my experiences...is a hotbed
for NLP practitioning...no shit...like shamanism and other forms of cognitive
practices...it can be a tool for healing...
===================================================================
(Wilcher Report cont.)
But once the CIA had
trained these pre-programmed robot assassins, it felt it could NOT just wind
them up, and let them go. It had to keep a careful watch over them -- and, if
push came to shove, to "take them out" (i.e., to kill them), if the
CIA ever felt that Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" could no longer
be counted on to carry out their pre-assigned mission at some date in the future
or, as ultimately occurred, if there was any danger that they might someday
testify in a Court of law, or otherwise be able expose to the public the real
truth about the CIA's mind control operations.
==================================================================
one
practitioner...whilst i was in the throes of psychedelic ecstasy [psilocybin
cubensis]...told me 'if you speak against us, then it's war" - assuredly,
he told me this at this time because of my increased suggestibility...it
obviously didn't work - i can be so anti-authoritarian sometimes...
===================================================================
(RMNews Wilcher was not told
that the "sleepers" had "accidently been triggered" and they
were building a chemical device which they were planning on using on Oklahoma
City. The "sleepers" had been programmed many years before. In the
ensuing time, it was discovered that the wind currents in Oklahoma City would
have dispersed the chemical so that it would have been rendered ineffective. In
other words, it would not have killed the massive number of people that needed
to be killed to send a message to the American people. The chemical device,
which the 7 "sleepers" were in the process of constructing, could have
killed up to 350,000 people. (Which ever agency or department was in control of
the "sleepers" and this project, made the determination that Houston
would be a better target than Oklahoma City, in other words, more people would
have been killed. The seven "sleepers" had not yet been
"recalled" and reprogrammed with the new instructions such as dates
and locations.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
#20) The Reasons behind the
Original February 28th BATF Raid:
By the way, I have no idea
what the secret mission of Koresh and his follow "sleepers" was to be
(RMNews-- The operatives who
gave Wilcher this information used the typical CIA "Need to Know"
protocols. Wilcher was never given more information that he "needed to
know".)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
although I am confident that
you (Janet Reno) will learn what it would have been when the 16 covert
operatives discussed below finally come forward to testify.
But apparently, one of the
factors which strongly influenced the CIA to initiate the original BATF raid on
February 28th, in the first place, was that Koresh and his 6 fellow
"sleepers" were said to be resisting the attempts by their handlers to
prepare them for that secret mission.
===================================================================
what does the CATF [cult of
alcohol, tobacco, and firearms] have to do with a CIA project? not sure - but i
was CONSTANTLY pressured to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol - firearms? well, as
i camped outside of santa cruz - as my residence - i came back one day to find a
case of dynamite planted near my camp...the homeless make easily targeted
experiments and they are easily discredited as well...i did not take the bait,
remembering judi bari's words: the 1st rule of activism is that the person that
offers the explosives is always the fbi agent...he he...i was actually offered a
gun once for FREE - the really strange thing about it is that i am loudly and
professedly NON-VIOLENT - don't see why anyone would think i would even use such
things - however, it would set me up to be stopped and arrested ...sheesh
...actually FOUND A DUFFEL BAG NEAR A CAMP OF MINE IN SANTA ROSA THAT CONTAINED
6 HANDGUNS...BURIED IT IN A RESTAURANT DUMPSTER UNDERNEATH BOUT 300 POUNDS OF
GRIME...WASN'T GOING TO GO TO SOME INSANELY CORRUPT POLICE WITH IT...FIGURED I
WOULD GET FRAMED FOR SOMETHING...it was the best way i could think of to dispose
of it at the time..
==================================================================
(RMNews Wilcher means that
the "sleepers" had refused to be picked up by government agents and
taken to be reprogrammed. Members of the Davidian church did not trust the
government, therefore they resisted attempts to be taken from the compound by
men who appeared to be government agents.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
Therefore, one of the
Principal reasons for the initial February 28th raid was to chasten Koresh and
his fellow "sleepers" -- to frighten them , and to whip them into
shape .
(RMNews has been given
conflicting information as to why the BATF got involved. Our information came
from three of the same sources that gave the original information to Wilcher.
According to our sources, the BATF had no idea what was really going on at the
Davidian compound. The BATF was carrying out a raid similar to the raid on Randy
Weaver's family at Ruby Ridge. (The BATF was given information that Koresh was
dealing in illegal weapons. They were also told Koresh and his followers were a
Christian Doomsday cult who were preparing to use the weapons to commit
terrorist acts. The BATF had no idea that a chemical device was being
constructed in the underground bunker or that the device could wipe out up to
350,000 people. (The BATF was told that Koresh and his followers had most of
their weapons stored in a nearby hanger. The arms and ammunition was being
readied for transport by Buffalo Airlines to drug dealers in South America.
RMNews does not know if this information, which was given to BATF agents, was
accurate. What is known, is the BATF did not expect the members at the compound
to be as fully and powerfully armed as they were.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
This is apparently why the
BATF did not try to kidnap Koresh while he was jogging along the county roads
near the compound, and also why it did NOT postpone or call off the raid even
after it knew, to an absolute certainty, that the supposed element of surprise
had been taken away, since Koresh and his followers had been tipped off in
advance that the raid was about to occur.
=================================================================
"This is apparently why
the BATF did not try to kidnap Koresh while he was jogging along the county
roads near the compound"
naw...it was a psyop
experiment...the siege was probably planned for some time...making further
guinea pigs outta them...even the tv event centered around it was a psyop
experiment - with the viewer as the subject...
==================================================================
(RMNews Paul was almost
correct in what he stated. The BATF DID want to "send a message" to
Koresh, his followers, and Christian Patriots nationwide. The message that was
being sent was the same message being sent at Ruby Ridge, i.e. that patriots and
their families will be horribly murdered if they continue to resist the New
World Order. Many people never knew that while the siege was taking place at
Ruby Ridge, a government unit tried to drop flammable liquid on the Weaver's
cabin and burn them alive... just like what happened at Waco. The only thing
that stopped them was the reporters and the friends and family of the Weavers
who were close enough to see what was going on. (According to CIA operative
Gunther Russbacher, there was another message being sent. Russbacher once stated
that Randy Weaver was also a programmed "sleeper". Russbacher
indicated that Vickie Weaver had somehow "deactivated" Randy's
programming. Russbacher seemed to imply that the attack on Ruby Ridge was
intended to send a message not only to the Patriot community, but to all
"sleepers" from the special forces community. Some of these
"sleepers" realized they had been programed, and were trying to find
the "sleeper" program and deactivate it. Russbacher said this was
happening in some of the men who had been programmed during the Viet Nam War.
(In "Operation Open Eyes" an article written by Rayelan Russbacher
from notes given to her by her husband, Gunther, it is detailed how mind
controlled Manchurian Candidates are created. The article discusses the fact
that all Special Forces operatives have been subjected to the same three levels
of programing that "sleepers" go through. "Operation Open
Eyes" can be found on Jeff Rense's Sightings web page. www.sightings.com
Or it can be easily downloaded from the Ru Mills One List archives. You have to
join Ru Mills One List Community to be able to download the article. www.onelist.com
)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
Thus, the purpose of the
raid was NOT to surprise Koresh, or to take him peacefully. The purpose was to
be as heavy handed, and as unsubtle, as possible.
(RMNews According to
Russbacher, this is true) so that Koresh and his fellow "sleepers"
could not possibly miss the message: "Either shape up and get back into
line, or we will 'take you out' -- i.e., "WE WILL KILL YOU.")
Therefore, the fact that
there was a gun battle on February 28th, and that 4 BATF officers, along with 6
cult members, were killed, was NOT a tragedy from the CIA's point of view.
(RMNews--
nor from the standpoint of President Clinton who used the raid to dispose of men
who knew too much about Clinton's past.)
Those 10 deaths merely served to underscore the point they wanted to make to
Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" -- as well as to any other
"sleepers" who might be getting out of line elsewhere across the
country:
"Be prepared to carry
out the orders we will give you, exactly as you have been pre-programmed to do,
or you and all your loved ones will have hell to pay for your
disobedience."
The deaths on February 28th
also gave the government the excuse it needed to mount a permanent armed siege
against the compound. After all (so the argument goes), how can you let ordinary
citizens get away with killing 4 BATF agents in the line of duty?!
(RMNews Paul added his own
comments here. Paul was not fully briefed and as such, when things did not make
sense to him, he improvised. The truth of the matter is, from what our sources
have told us, is the BATF stuck its nose in something it didn't understand. The
BATF learned that a special operations unit from the CIA was preparing to mount
an operation at the Davidian compound. -- The BATF had no knowledge of a
chemical device or of a mind control operation.-- The rivalry between the
various Bureaus, Departments and Agencies is really what is to blame for this
tragedy. The BATF leaped into this situation, without appropriate background
intel, because they wanted to beat the CIA to the punch and in the process,
achieve what they thought would be positive media coverage.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
Never mind that the whole
thing was set up precisely so that one or more BATF agents were guaranteed to be
killed, in order to provide the continuing excuse for this military siege!
(RMNews to the best of our
knowledge and belief, this statement of Paul's is not accurate. The moment the
BATF attacked, special units in the FBI were briefed as to what was really going
on. RMNews believes this unit is the same unit that was headed by Richard
Rogers, who was responsible for ordering the murder of Vickie Weaver at Ruby
Ridge. At the highest level of this FBI unit, the entire story was known.
William Sessions, the director of the FBI at the time of Waco, knew the truth,
but he was held, literally under house arrest, while Clinton and the same FBI
unit responsible for Ruby Ridge, carried out their own agendas. Sessions barely
escaped several assassination attempts. Sessions had lived in Waco, served on
the City Council, and had intimate knowledge of the mind control operations that
were going on in Waco. Wilcher is correct when he says that Attorney General
Janet Reno had no idea what was really going on.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
Therefore, - the loss of
life which occurred on February 28th played right into the CIA's hands, allowing
it to blame Koresh and his followers for all the violence which had occurred as
well as all of the far greater violence which was yet to come to desensitize the
public to all that violence, and to build public acceptance of (and even support
for) the proposition that the government "simply had no other choice"
in dealing with Koresh and people like him.
(RMNews Wilcher would have
been correct if he had said FBI instead of CIA in the above sentence.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
The bottom line here
is that this propaganda we were being fed by the CIA (RMNews read this as FBI)
was to pave the way for a general acceptance of the imposition of martial law
when situations like this "get out of hand" -- which is the way the
CIA (read-- FBI) wants us to view its 51-day siege of the Branch Davidian
compound in Waco.
FURTHER MIND
CONTROL ASSAULTS ON KORESH AND HIS FELLOW "SLEEPERS" AFTER THE
FEBRUARY 28TH BATF RAID
Since, as we have seen, the
entire Waco incident grew out of the CIA's mind control programing of Koresh and
his fellow "sleepers", it should not be at all surprising that such
attempts to control the subconscious minds and wills of Koresh and his followers
continued throughout the entire 51-day siege which followed the February 28th
BATF raid.
Throughout the siege, for
example, we were told each evening on the nightly news that the FBI was shining
high-powered spotlights onto the compound at night, and bombarding those inside
with various kinds of loud and obnoxious noises -acid rock music, Tibetan
chants, Christmas songs, and the like -- in an attempt to annoy Koresh and his
followers, to deprive them of their sleep, to make them cranky and irritable,
and thus to make them more pliable to the FBI's demands that they surrender
peacefully - - so that there would be no loss of life. That's what we were told.
The truth, however, is far
different. That ability and determination to withstand even the most intense
adversity is apparently what made those in charge of the siege angry beyond all
comprehension. And that official anger and frustration apparently is what led to
the final, fatal assault on the compound on Monday, April 19th.
(RMNews again, Paul... who
was a good friend and colleague did not have all the facts and jumped to his own
erroneous conclusions in the above statements. While it is true that Koresh and
his followers were able to withstand the psyops warfare that was being directed
at them, it is not true that this act of "defiance" so angered the FBI
that the FBI attacked the compound in an angry rage and burned the Davidians to
death. (The FBI WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIRES THAT WERE SET! Paul lays this
out very clearly in section #18 "How the fires Were Started.". The
Delta Force Group that was sent in to kill the seven "sleepers", and
anyone else who got in their way, was responsible for setting the fires. The
voices that were heard by the FBI recordings, were probably the voices of this
unit. The Delta Force Group was ordered to set the fires. The men who made up
the group were "compartmentalized." This means they only thing they
knew was that they were ordered to kill "potential terrorists" and
start fires.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
THE
PENULTIMATE PLAN BY "THE DELTA FORCE"
(RMNews
Penultimate means the "second to the last")
Before we get to a
discussion of what actually happened on April 19th, however, there was one
penultimate plan to end the siege which was proposed to you, Attorney General
Reno (according to what I have been told), which you apparently turned down --
only 2 to 3 weeks before that final fateful Monday, April 19th.
This plan, had it gone
forward, would have involved the following,
#1) The plan would have been
carried out by "The Delta Force" -- an elite commando-type military
unit- Composed of specially trained members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Marines, operating under the command of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA;
#2) It would have involved a
night raid on the compound, when the place was pitch black -- NOT illuminated by
the usual spotlights;
#3) It would have been
carried out by crack commandos dressed all in black.
#4) It would have depended
for its success on the elements of surprise, lightning-quick speed, and precise
execution;
#5) And it would have
resulted in the vast majority of the 95 men, women, and children in -the
compound at the time being brought out alive, safe, and unharmed.
There was, however, one
other crucial element of this plan which was highly controversial, but upon
which the commanders of "The Delta Force" and the CIA were most
insistent. And IF you were informed of this element, Attorney General Reno --
though I seriously doubt that you were -- this may well have been why you
reportedly rejected the plan, and refused to go forward with it.
#6) This last element was
that the members of "The Delta Force" were to bring everyone out alive
-- except for David Koresh and his six (6) fellow CIA "sleepers" Those
7 men were to be killed -- no questions asked period. For under NO circumstances
were these 7 ever to be allowed to testify in a Court of law or otherwise to
reveal to the public what they knew about the CIA's secret mind control
programing or its "Manchurian Candidate type" robot assassins.
============================================================
i remember hitching from
santa cruz to san francisco one time...got picked up by 3 nice young college
students...the one i sat next to sat with his book open to a page that had, at
the top, the word 'BRAINWASHING'...i have always been struck by the attempts by
people [that grew on me over time as friends until i learned not to trust them]
to get me to do something illegal - almost as if anything illegal would do...i
thought that, after my stint at fathering JAM ECHELON DAY and due to the fact
that where i go, people listen to me and i won't shutup about things like our
constitutional rights and how to not be manipulated, etc...that perhaps the
destabilization was an attempt to get me to be violent in order to be
jailed...isolated...worked on? dunno but when i saw that this individual had the
book opened to such a page...i decided to ignore it...to try not to be affected
by it...make no mistake...after sometime it becomes destabilizing merely to know
that wherever one goes..someone is trying to elicit a reaction from me...
==================================================================
In other words, this
"Delta Force" plan, had it been allowed to proceed, would have been a
CIA "wet" operation -- carried out by some of the CIA's top
professional killers, fittingly dressed in all black garb, to "take
out" these 7 CIA "sleepers" once and for all, so that their
potentially explosive testimony concerning the CIA's secret mind control program
would be silenced forever.
WHAT REALLY
HAPPENED IN WACO ON APRIL 19TH, 1993
This brings us then to what
actually happened at the Branch Davidian compound on Monday, April 19th, 1993.
You have reported to the
nation, Attorney General Reno, that you met with President Clinton on Sunday,
April 18th, and that after outlining the plan you had been given to him, and
going over it in some detail, he told you to go ahead IF YOU THOUGHT THIS WAS
THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
You have also reported to
the nation that having given the ultimate go ahead for the plan, you (and
President Clinton) are the ones ultimately responsible for what happened in Waco
on Monday, April 19th, 1993.
That, however, is simply NOT
true, Attorney General Reno. What happened in Waco is NOT your fault.
(RMNews
this is true) Nor is it
President Clinton' s fault. (
RMNews-- This is not true. President Clinton, being fully knowledgeable of mind
control operations, knew exactly what was going on. He used the situation to rid
himself of people who knew too much about his drug involvements at Mena, and his
long list of women.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
For, the Reagan and Bush
holdovers at the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, and the CIA, etc., who
carefully planned and orchestrated this disaster, never informed you as to what
their secret right-wing political agenda was in all this. Therefore, neither you
nor President Clinton had any idea what had actually been planned for this
operation in Waco -- much less any hint of the secret agenda which was to be
served by this mass murder and cover up to protect the criminal machinations of
the CIA.
(RMNews Paul had just begun
to wake up to the fact that a New World Order existed. At the time he wrote this
document, he was still thinking that the right wing Republicans were the bad
guys and the left wing Democrats were the good guys. Had he lived a little
longer and seen what the Clinton Administration has done, he would have realized
that instead of calling this a "secret right wing agenda", he should
have labeled it as a "New World Order" agenda.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
What actually happened in
Waco, according to the information I have been given, is as follows:
#1) As early as Sunday
afternoon or evening, April 18th (shortly after your conference with President
Clinton), calls went in to Parkland Hospital in Dallas -- the very same hospital
where President Kennedy was taken after his assassination in Dealey Plaza on
November 22nd, 1963 -- again, at the hands of CIA Professional killers -- to be
prepared to receive a large number of serious burn victims from Waco the
following day.
#2) On the morning of April
19th, the same Delta Force commando team actually, a select group of the CIA's
top professional killers -which would have carried out what I have referred to
above as "the penultimate plan", had it been approved -- was on the
ground in Waco to carry out all aspects of the "wet" operation planned
for that Monday.
#3) This mass murder was
then to be covered up and made to look like a "mass suicide -- just like
Jonestown" -- thereby layering one monstrous CIA lie upon another -- since
both Waco and Jonestown were CIA mass murders, and NOT mass suicides.
=================================================================
wasn't 9-11 a media
event fit for the 21st century?
=================================================================
#4) This "Delta
Force" group was composed of 15 men in all, headed by a Lieutenant Colonel
who was a CIA liaison officer. The group flew into Texas on their own C-130
Transport plane, parked it either at the Waco or Dallas airport all day, and
then departed once their "dirty work" had been completed. The plane
belonged to "Triangle."
#5) Among the.15 men in this
larger group, .there were two (2) smaller operational teams -- the 4-man- team
which actually made the insertion into the compound, as described in detail
below, and a back-up team, which apparently was never used.
#6) These men were dressed
all in black -- black pants, black shoes, black jackets, black gas masks, black
gloves -- very poetic for a "black" (or "wet") operation --
and were dressed to look like all of the other FBI officers on the ground --
probably even wearing jackets with FBI insignias on them (though I am not
certain of this), so that to any outside observer, there would have been
virtually no way of telling these 4 men apart from any of the other federal
officers on the scene at the time.
#7) The whole nation watched
on TV that morning as the FBI used MI-Al tanks to punch holes in the exterior
walls of the compound's living quarters. We were later told that at the same
time they had battered down these walls, the tanks had also lobbed massive
quantities of a very virulent form of tear gas into the compound.
#8) This tear gas had been
designed to be used for crowd control -i.e., it was so virulent and irritating
that even in a fresh air, out-of-doors situation, it was guaranteed to cause
people to flee from its presence instantly simply in order to be able to
breathe.
#9) Now, it was being used
in a closed, indoor living quarters situation where 95 men, women, and children
were trapped inside. The logical expectation would have been that all 95 of
these persons would have fled out-of- doors instantly , just to be able to
breathe. But strangely, not a single person cam out of the compound -- even
after this noisome substance had been poured into the compound in enormous
quantities over a period of several hours.
#10) The logical question
therefore arises: Why? Why did not ANY of these 95 men, women, and children ---
particularly, the women and their children -- instantly flee for fresh air into
the out of doors?
The answer we have been
given by the news media and the official FBI spokesmen is that David Koresh and
his cult members had stockpiled and outfitted themselves with gas masks.
TEAR GAS --
AND NERVE GAS WERE USED
#11) The real truth,
however, is much more sinister and cold-blooded. For what actually happened here
is that the tear gas -- as virulent and noisome as it was -- was only the mask
or cover for the -real, active ingredient being propelled by the tanks into the
compound.
What was actually propelled
into the compound was a nerve reagent - a neuro toxin -- NERVE GAS -- a virulent
poisonous substance, like curare -- which instantly paralyzed and rendered
totally helpless and defenseless all of the 95 men, women, and children inside
the compound -- except for those 9, later rescued, like David Thibideaux, who
were on the 2nd or 3rd floor with their windows wide open on both sides, and who
were thus spared the deadly effects of this tear gas/nerve gas combination.
(RMNews
Paul was killed with curare)
For all the others, that
could no longer coordinate their muscles in the effort required even just to get
up, much less to flee to the life- sustaining fresh air outside, only a few feet
away. 3
(RMNews--The number
"3" which is above, is a footnote. Evidently, the footnotes were
included in the pages of the Wilcher Report which were not given to Sarah
McClendon. The copy given to Sarah McClendon was spiral bound by Wilcher,
himself, using his own equipment. Wilcher did not include the additional pages
in the copy he gave to Sarah McClendon.)
(Wilcher Report cont.)
This is an extremely serious
matter, Attorney General Reno. For it means that here the U.S. military, the
FBI, and the Justice Department -- all directed by the CIA -- used nerve gas on
innocent men, women, and children in our civilian population -- and then
proceeded to murder them in cold blood, as is set forth in detail below. This
clearly rises to the level of War Crimes on a civilian population during peace
time, an unspeakable human rights violation.
And it was committed by our
"intelligence" community against innocent men, women, and children --
simply to bury the truth concerning the CIA's criminal use of mind control
programming to "manufacture" "Manchurian Candidate type"
robot assassins, whose very existence is an unspeakable outrage, in and of
itself.
==============================================================
involves
desensitization...kill your tv
===============================================================
THE
"DELTA FORCE" TEAM ENTERS THE COMPOUND
#12) After this deadly tear
gas/nerve gas combination had had time to do its debilitating and paralyzing
work on all the men, women, and children in the compound, the 4-man "Delta
Force" "Team" -- actually some of the CIA's top professional
assassins -- made its entry into the compound. Fittingly, for a
"black" operation, they were dressed all in black, from head to toe,
as stated above.
=================================================================
assassin, from the word
hashishin...early ismaili cult that had contact with templars...read 'the
templars and the assassins' - at amazon.com there is a review by michael aquino
[amazing!] - aquino is founder of the temple of set [marin county - 30 minutes
from santa rosa...the stage for most of my experiences] AND he used to work for
army psyops...before he was in court over his involvement in MKULTRA [in san
francisco]...he also wrote Mindwar: the Psychology of Victory...you can find it
at google.com or dogpile.com
santa rosa and santa cruz
are the prime stages of my experiences...those towns' names translate into
saint's rose and saint's cross [rose and cross - as in ROSiCRUCian] ...the
former an hour north of san fran the latter an hour south - in the center, in
san fran, is a monolothic scottish rite temple and a little to the south, in san
jose, is the rosicrucian museum...of course, just a few minutes northwest of
santa rosa is bohemian grove
=====================================================================
#13) They were dropped onto
the roof of the compound by one of the several low-flying. heavily armed
military helicopters which hovered overhead throughout much of the day -- while
all of the television cameras were focused on the outside of the building at
ground level -- for example, focusing on the tanks which had just lobbed the
tear gas/nerve gas combination into the building. The actual Insertion into the
building came at approximately 10:25 AM.
#14) Before they entered the
compound, however, this 4-man team of assassins had received shots of atropine,
the antidote to the nerve gas, so that they too, would NOT be overcome and
paralyzed by it.
#15) According to testimony
given before the House Judiciary Committee on the day of your testimony,
Attorney General Reno, the fires in the Branch Davidian compound did not become
visible until approximately 11:45 AM that morning. This means that the team had
something in the neighborhood of one (1) hour and fifteen (15) minutes, or so,
in which to do their "dirty work," and then to make their escape.
#16) The Murder of David
Koresh: One of the first things they did, obviously, was to go into the
so-called communications center, just off the kitchen, where they found, and
quickly subdued and killed, David Koresh, along with any of his close associates
who were nearby. Koresh was killed with single bullet to the middle of the
forehead, about an inch above the eyes, fired from a distance of about 4 inches
away.
In this regard, an article
on page A-3 of The Washington Post, on Tuesday, May 18th, 1993, is directly
relevant. It quotes noted forensic pathologist, Dr. Cyril H. Wecht of
Pittsburgh, who recently completed an independent autopsy of the bodies of David
Koresh and Steve Schneider, one of his chief lieutenants, as saying that the
gunshot wound in the middle of the forehead, which killed Koresh, and the
gunshot wound in the back of the head, which killed Schneider, are "not
typical of suicide." And no wonder! They |