|
WAR
CRIMES
Opinion By
JB Campbell
8-16-6
In comparison with the father, the son
hasn't killed as many people yet. We seem to forget just how many Iraqis George
H. W. Bush really killed with his Desert Storm and follow-up punishments of the
Iraqi people, which were in the guise of "UN sanctions." Ramsey Clark was
claiming over a million victims back in the late '90s, I believe. The
sardonically-named Operation Iraqi Freedom is just a continuation of the
Bush/Clinton years of Zionist sadism against the Semitic people - the only
people entitled to live in the Middle East (plus the Persians). Zionists are not
Semitic. Arabs are Semitic. Zionists are anti-Semitic. They are also the biggest
liars on the face of this earth.
Back in '91, when I was freshly outraged
by Bush's aggression against Panamanians and Iraqis, I was visited by three
agents of the Secret Service at my home in Los Angeles. A couple of others named
Silverman and Levine had pushed their way into my mother's house in Carmel,
looking for me, the day before. I had written something called Executive Action,
a chapter of my new book, and had sent it out to subscribers who wanted to get
the thing hot off the presses.
The CIA assassin, Bo Gritz, got a hold
of it and passed it to his colleagues in the FBI, who passed it along to the
Secret Service. In the piece I went over Bush's role in the assassination of
Jack Kennedy, just to show his CIA pedigree, and also his treachery against his
Central American and Mesopotamian victims. I wrote that this country-club
commando had an extremely sinister side: He was a client of the Nebraska
child-sex procurer Larry King, according to John DeCamp and Ted Gunderson, and
he was the assassin known as "Icepick," according to Admiral Gunther Russbacher
of the Office of Naval Intelligence and CIA, who was in a position to know.
The Secret Service didn't care for my
attitude and the three amigos who came to my house said they would kill me if I
were seen anywhere near their boss. I had been classified as a terrorist by the
Secret Service and FBI during the summer of 1990. I was probably lucky to
survive the visit. The SS doesn't operate under the same rules of engagement as
do the regular police. They are truly licensed to kill, at their discretion. No
questions asked. They just said they'd kill me if they saw me near Bush.
Bush sent Russbacher to prison around
1990 to keep him from talking about the October Surprise of 1980, in which Bush
made a deal with the Iranian ayatollahs to hold on to their American hostages
for a few extra months so that Jimmy Carter couldn't free them in time for the
November election. That was the birth of the Iran-Contra scandal in which Israel
was given billions of dollars of military spare parts which they sold to the
Iranians and gave some of their profits to Oliver North, who then set up the
Mena, Arkansas operation to trade AK-47s for cocaine with the CIA mercenaries we
knew as the Contras.
The Contras were "against" the people
Jimmy Carter installed in Nicaragua the year before - the Sandinistas. Bill
Clinton, then governor of Arkansas, ran "the Enterprise" for North and Bush
until he got too greedy and it was shut down and temporarily run out of
Guadalajara by North's agent, Terry Reed, who described the dirty details in his
astonishing book, Compromised. Oliver North, using his CIA name ("John Cathey")
and Bill Clinton flooded American cities with cocaine, which Gary Webb tried to
describe in his series in the San Jose Mercury News before he was murdered.
Russbacher approached me from federal
prison around 1992. His boss, a higher-ranking admiral, gave him my book, The
New American Man - A Call to Arms, which called for the violent overthrow of the
US government. (I couldn't think of any other way to do it and I still can't.)
They thought I might be useful as part of their Faction 2 group to take over
from the Rockefeller/Bush gang they called Faction 1. They released certain
sensitive information through my column in the National Educator newspaper.
Russbacher revealed to me that he was the pilot of a business jet who flew Bush
and a dozen politicians of both parties to Paris in October, 1980 to meet with
the Iranians to make the deal. And he flew Bush alone back to Washington DC in
an SR-71 Blackbird at supersonic speeds that gave Bush the ability to deny that
such a trip had ever occurred, with the help of corrupt, lying Secret Service
agents faking his schedule that day. The hostages were held until his and
Reagan's inauguration ceremony, as agreed in Paris.
After he became the acting president
following the near-death of Reagan, Bush started helping Saddam's Iraq against
the Iranians, which resulted in millions of deaths on both sides. This was a
world-class war crime by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their Zionist managers. No
one in America knew that we were supplying the Iraqis against the Iranians until
the USS Stark was attacked by Iraq in May, 1987 and thirty-seven US sailors
killed. George Schultz assured us that it was a mistake because we were in fact
supplying Iraq in its war against Iran. Fourteen months later, the USS Vincennes
shot down an Iranian airliner and slaughtered two hundred ninety Iranian
passengers. This was a notable war crime. What made it more notable was the
aftermath.
In 1990, after an official enquiry, the
captain of the Vincennes was awarded by President George H. W. Bush the Legion
of Merit for "exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of an
outstanding service." Al Capone couldn't have put it better!
One of Bush's first independent actions
as president was his 1989 invasion of Panama and the kidnapping and silencing of
his cocaine stooge, Manuel Noriega. This is where we saw the secret mass graves
of approximately six thousand Panamanian civilians, dug by US army bulldozers
and shown on CBS's 60 Minutes one Sunday evening in 1990. The next week, CBS
apologized for showing that and said it never really happened. This was a major
war crime and cover-up by the Zionist media/government combination.
I think it was around this time that the
US press lost its guts in the realization that the Bush gang was a bunch of
stone killers.
Right after Desert Storm, Bush nearly
got killed by the Israelis. He always gave Israel about 99% of what it wanted,
including 10 billion dollars in "loan guarantees" for allowing America to wipe
out its Iraqi enemy in 1991. But when Bush and Baker told Israel to back off on
the "settlements," and threatened to delay the loan guarantees, the Mossad
decided to assassinate Bush, according to Victor Ostrovsky, who wrote about the
plot in his second book, The Other Side of Deception. Ostrovsky himself warned
the Secret Service that Bush would be killed in Spain at the G-8 conference.
They believed him, since Ostrovsky was a career Mossad officer. The loan
guarantees, obviously, were given to Israel after that.
Bush was a conflicted guy whose voice
was a combination of John Wayne and Liberace. Russbacher told me that the
bisexual Bush started out after Yale as an assassin for the CIA, and liked to
use an icepick on his victims. Russbacher was also an assassin for the ONI and
CIA and the son of a founder of CIA, and was thus in a position to know his
colleagues and their resumes.
Bush came from the Yale sex and power
club known as the Brotherhood of Death, or Skull & Bones. His penchant for
killing became apparent to us all in 1991, less than a year after he bragged on
television about the New World Order (on September 11, 1990). His version of it
began with the illegal invasion of Iraq and the subsequent mass murders of over
a million souls on behalf of the Zionist entity and his own powerbase, Big Oil.
Bush was himself a one-third partner in Pennzoil and as that an owner of Getty
Oil and Texaco.
As I wrote in Jewish Rule, our criminal
invasion and occupation of Iraq is for the purpose of keeping Iraqi oil in the
ground, and out of the gas tanks of consumers, where it would lower the price of
fuel due to its fabulous abundance. Proven Iraqi reserves place it in the Top
Five, along with Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela and Gulf States. That's the
admitted Top Five. There are other Top Fives that are kept secret and include
the Beaufort Sea, Colorado, MacKenzie River and the Falkland Islands. Fact is,
there's just too much oil and something has to be done to keep it in the ground.
The first place to do that is Iraq. To add to Big Oil's problems, a Florida man
has recently patented a device that alters water molecules slightly for use as a
clean and virtually free replacement for gasoline as fuel. He has prudently
withdrawn his brilliant invention from the market for a few years.
Anyway, the subject is War Crimes, which
are the most serious of all crimes as they include murder, rape, torture,
kidnapping and general aggression and lying. The murder is mass murder and this
cannot be overemphasized. Our government employees are mass murderers and they
do it in our name. Some Americans still justify the nuclear bombing of Japanese
civilians by citing the brutal behavior of their soldiers, sailors and airmen,
all of which was uncontrollable by the civilians. Many Americans still insist
that collective punishment in the form of evaporation for most and agonizing
slow death for some was proper. But because the women and children and old men
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't disarm the Japanese army, they deserved to be
incinerated.
I disagree. I believe that only the
guilty should be punished. And the punishment should fit the crime. But by the
prevailing standard in this country, we are all due for collective punishment
for sponsoring and supporting our warlords of Washington.
George W. Bush is a certified war
criminal. He's a chip off the old block. When I say "Bush," of course I refer to
the whole organized crime syndicate under - and over - him. Every single person
in the Bush Administration is subject to prosecution for war crimes and this is
demonstrated by the actions of the sinister little character known as Alberto R.
Gonzales, our 80th Attorney General, when he warned Bush of their exposure and
then went to GOP lawmakers seeking an exemption from the War Crimes Act of 1996.
Gonzales is a Harvard Law School graduate and he knows how to read a statute. It
is easy to see why he is worried:
"The War Crimes Act of 1996 was passed
by the United States Congress and signed into law by President Clinton. The law
defines a war crime as a violation or grave breach of any of the Geneva
Conventions. The law applies if either the victim or the perpetrator is a
national of the United States or a member of the US armed forces. The penalty
may be life imprisonment or death. The death penalty is only invoked if the
conduct resulted in the death of one or more victims." (Wikipedia)
Gonzales is the one who advised Bush to
ignore the Geneva Conventions with regard to kidnap, torture and murder of
Moslems. He's the one who called those protections "quaint." He recommended the
building and staffing and use of offshore torture centers in Cuba, Iraq, Egypt,
Jordan and throughout Europe. They're all modeled on the Israeli torture
centers. Alberto Gonzales represents a dangerous specimen of humanity - the
highly educated professional who sells his skills to rich and greedy murderers
such as George W. Bush, Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
Now, this might not affect the Bush
crime syndicate as long as he remains in office, but it could. These Bush
hoodlums are all subject to the death penalty, according to the War Crimes Act
of 1996, because their conduct has resulted in the deaths of thousands and
thousands of victims. They waged aggressive war, something so heinous that our
own government made it a hanging offense right when they declared it illegal.
And our government hanged a bunch of people who hadn't known about the law,
because it wasn't against the law when they went to war (to defend themselves
from us). We call that an ex post facto law, and at the time of the kangaroo
court in Nuremberg, such a law was illegal for the US to enforce. But that was
then and this is now. Now, everyone knows that if you wage aggressive war you
can be hanged as a war criminal. That's why we've got Saddam in that kangaroo
courthouse in Baghdad - for waging aggressive war against the Kurds. It's the
most serious crime with hanging as the expected punishment. Knowing well how the
Germans were abused at Nuremberg, Saddam has asked to be shot rather than
hanged.
Gonzales knew all this and he warned
Bush that taking the US to war in Iraq under false pretenses was going to be
judged as a war crime and that they all could be arrested, tried and hanged as
war criminals. And he went to the Republican Party leadership and begged for
some kind of exemption for them all. Maybe he got it, but I don't know how.
But let's say he got it. Let's say that
Senator Bill Frist and Senator Pat Roberts and the GOP warlords somehow stymie a
special prosecutor that the Democrats might appoint if the elections go sour. Or
that the Democrats lose their nerve and let the war criminals off, since most of
them voted for the war crimes to take place, although they now claim ignorance.
The question is, what are we going to do about it? Let the politicians handle
it?
Keep on voting?
I say no. No more voting. No more
Elephant and Donkey puppet shows. See where voting has got us? Voting has got us
into the slaughterhouse. Next stop: the poorhouse. Voting is for cowards. Voting
is weak people hiring strong people to boss them around and steal their money
and make all their decisions for them.
Voting is for cowardly fools who will
not take responsibility for their own lives. And that's ignoring the subject of
vote fraud and our rigged elections. Even if the vote was honest, and it's not,
it's still a cowardly practice.
How do we regain our honor and dignity
now that we know that we are led by sadistic war criminals who have ordered the
torture, rape and murder of thousands upon thousands of harmless and friendly
people? War criminals whose only hope to escape the hangman is more corruption
by lawmakers and police and prosecutors and judges, most of whom are corrupt
Freemasons?
Voting is the trademark of Democracy,
right? So, what is Democracy? I'll tell you.
Democracy is what we could call Jewish
rules of conduct. Last month I wrote something called Jewish Rule. It was a
warning of the horrors involved in allowing Jews to rule a society, as they
ruled Russia after 1917, all of East Europe after 1945 and Palestine since 1948.
By Jewish Rule I referred to Communism and Zionism.
Democracy, however, is a transition
stage from liberty to Communism in which Jews make the rules of society by
controlling the currency and credit and virtually all media of communication,
thereby keeping public criticism within bounds acceptable to Jewish censors, and
they censor everything. Practically every special interest group in America has
a Jew in it who tries to control the group's actions and policies. No group is
exempt, not even the Toy Train Collectors' Association, for example, or the
Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association or your homeowners' association.
Certainly no group devoted to anything remotely connected with politics does not
have a Jew in it who gravitates to a position of power very quickly and makes
his or her position even more powerful.
Nowadays, all these Jews are Zionists
who demand support for Israel, or prohibit criticism of Israel.
Israel is called "the only democracy in
the Middle East." This is true, because "democracy" now means Rule by Jews, or
at least Jewish rules of conduct. It doesn't mean majority rule, it means
minority rule. Our craven politicians vie for the crucial "Jewish vote," even
though it represents only 2% of the population. Notice that in Israel, the
Semitic majority does not have a political voice at voting time. The Semitic
majority doesn't get to vote in that democracy. They can't even vote in their
own Palestinian elections the way they want, as we see in the case of Hamas
being voted into power by a landslide in the little sliver of land that is still
called Palestine. Israel simply nullified the election and started arresting and
murdering the newly-elected representatives. Now, that is pure Democracy!
It has just been revealed that the Bush
crime syndicate is behind the invasion of Lebanon by the inept Israeli killers
and that the invasion has been in the works for over two years as a run-up to an
invasion by joint US/Israeli aggressors against Iran and Syria. Bush's neo-con
geniuses figured it would be another cakewalk, as they figured the invasion of
Iraq would be a cakewalk. As this is written, Israel is begging for some kind of
international force to replace its battered killers in south Lebanon. America
can't do it, due to its little misadventure in Iraq. How these Zionist planners
figure to take over Syria and Iran, even after they nuke them, is beyond this
cowboy's imagination.
Have you heard talk radio lately, since
the invasion of Lebanon by Israel? It is like something out of a William Pierce
novel. All the hosts I've heard in the past month, Jew and Gentile alike, are
united in their snarling support of Israel's "right to defend itself." They are
also united in their desire that Syria and Iran be attacked with nuclear
weapons. In other words, they are all war criminals. We hanged a man at
Nuremberg named Julius Streicher because he had a tabloid in the early days of
the NS period that was critical of Jews.
He was no more a part of the Hitler
government that Sean Hannity is of the Bush government, but he was hanged in the
most sadistic fashion by a Jewish hangman. It is something that I have warned
Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh about, because they have
exhorted Americans and the American government to wage aggressive war against
the enemies of Israel on behalf of Israel and as such they are subject to
arrest, prosecution and hanging as war criminals.
They've done far worse than Julius
Streicher ever did. All Streicher did was tell the truth about Jews, and print
political caricatures of them. Hannity, Doyle, Coulter, Limbaugh, the Savage
Wiener, O'Reilly and the rest are paid liars who owe their stinking careers to
the Zionists at Fox, Clear Channel and the Anti-Defamation League. Their
favorite new buzz-word is "Islamo-fascist," which Bush copped from the Savage
Wiener. Now, "fascist" is a real word with an actual definition. But that's not
how Jews and their useful idiots use it.
For example, thirty years ago, Clint
Eastwood's script-reader, a Jewess named Sonia Chernus, told me that my first
screenplay was "fascist." It was about my anti-terror work in Rhodesia which by
its nature was anti-Communist. Jews hate anti-Communists because to them it is
the same as anti-Jewish. So, while the average Birch anti-Communist didn't know
it, the Jews knew that he was anti-Jewish and their dirty word for that is
"fascist." It is the next step up from "anti-Semitic," which can lose you your
job. "Fascist" can get your house burned, depending how active you are, and
"amalek" can get you arrested and killed. This is because the Amalek not only
didn't like Jews, they didn't like the Jewish god.
I personally want to see them all
hanged. I want to be the hangman of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld
and all the Zionist liars on radio and television who have helped to get so many
people killed. The damage they have done is really beyond calculation. I realize
that there a lots of guys such as myself, but I want to be the first to put it
on the record.
The other night the Iranian president,
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, gave a masterful interview to CBS Television. The next day
and ever since, the Zionist gasbags have been united in their condemnation not
only of Ahmadinejad but of Mike Wallace, the old Zionist who interviewed him,
mainly because Wallace was half-way polite, in his own obnoxious way. "Answer
the question!" [about the president's demand that Israel disappear] Ahmadinejad
finally asked him, "Are you the representative of the Zionist regime? Or a
journalist?" Wallace answered, "I am a journalist. I am a journalist."
Sure.
The point is that our government is
apparently planning to wage nuclear warfare against Iran and possibly Syria
while Bush is still president. The Zionists know that the Democrats may win next
time and that they won't be as easy to manipulate. The Zionists are desperate to
seize the entire Middle East NOW. They blew their best chance in 1967 when they
failed to sink the USS Liberty and blame it on the Egyptians. That one would
have worked because many people admired Israel then. This current one is a messy
failure that no one is buying because Israel has been revealed as a tiny nation
of liars, psychopaths and pirates. They may never have the opportunity again in
their lifetimes to steal the entire Middle East and call it Eretz Israel. So
they're going for it now. They want to control all the oil.
So we must make it clear to the war
criminals that we shall punish them. We must punish them or we are not men. All
those who have committed war crimes in our name must be punished in ways that
match their crimes. This is the only way that America can be saved. There must
be public executions of all the men and women who took us to war based on lies,
who ordered the slaughter and torture and kidnap of totally innocent people who
offered not the slightest threat to our precious American way of life.
The sadists of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo
Bay must be punished for crimes against humanity. The bomber pilots must be
punished, the infantrymen who destroyed homes and slaughtered the people, the
ones who launched the cruise missiles from ships at sea. All of them. Our
government already established at Nuremberg that "just following orders" is no
excuse when it comes to war crimes and crimes against humanity, which are one
and the same thing.
These people must all be hanged, which
is the accepted and traditional American punishment for capital crimes and
especially for war crimes. They have already committed the crimes that call for
their hanging, so they feel they have nothing to lose by nuking Iran and Syria
for their Israeli masters. How the nuking of Iran and Syria would be good for
the Jews is another question that we can't examine here because of its
mind-numbing insanity. We are up against a combination of cunning, greed and
insanity that is hard to describe, let alone argue with. It can only be
exterminated, as we do with dangerous or filthy insects and vermin in our homes.
And when we're dealing with rats and cockroaches, we don't take any of them
prisoner.
If we don't hang our war criminals then
we are subject to collective punishment by our victims down the road. This is
obvious, because that's what we have done to everyone else. We must show the
rest of the world that we are responsible for our leaders' crimes. We must take
total responsibility for the direction of this country before our war criminals
destroy the Middle East and probably Europe. This is the only way we can avoid
being destroyed ourselves by those who must do something in self-defense. The
Iranians know that Bush and Olmert are contemplating their nuclear annihilation.
They therefore are justified right now to attack us anyway they can. That is the
law of survival and everyone is entitled to defend himself. Everyone has the
right to survive, except aggressors. Aggressors deserve to die. Traitors must
die because their treachery puts all countrymen in deadly danger. It is the law
of survival.
As this is written, while we have
thousands of soldiers defending South Korea's border, thousands more defending
Israel's borders, Bush has smeared the defenders of the Mexican border as
"vigilantes." Bush really hates those guys. They've shown what a rat-fink he is,
especially when he gave their locations to the Mexican government so the
wetbacks could be diverted around the Minutemen. Remember that? That has to
qualify as a text-book example of Treason, for Mexico is waging war against us,
sending illegal invaders day and night, with the aid and support of George W.
Bush.
The question is probably being asked:
How can our war criminals be punished if we get yet another sell-out special
prosecutor such as Ken Starr or this useless Fitzgerald, who talked so tough
about Karl Rove and then faded? That's the point of this essay, which is that
war criminals must be hanged. It doesn't matter anymore if the government won't
protect us from war criminals. We'll do it ourselves, since we pay the bills.
War criminals may be above the law of the American Bar Association but they are
not above the law of frontier justice, the dreaded law of the vigilante or the
law of our survival.
To survive as Americans, to demonstrate
our responsibility to the rest of the world and to take charge of this shipwreck
before it sinks into the murky depths, we must take the law into our own hands.
All war criminals must be captured, tried in a manner that reveals the true
nature of their crimes and hanged by the neck until they are dead. From this
time forward, there is an open season on war criminals. If we don't do this then
it shows the world that we endorse the war criminals. And payback will be a
bitch because these guys have made some very bad karma for us.
The reasons for this should be obvious.
However, these same war criminals are the ones who have designed the North
American Union, scheduled to take effect in 2010. This will be a martial law
style of dictatorship over us, run by the ubiquitous criminals of the Council on
Foreign Relations, located at 58 E. 68th Street in Manhattan in the building
known as Harold Pratt House. This building is the de facto seat of government of
the United States, soon to be known as the Central District of the North
American Union.
This building, for symbolic reasons,
should be reduced to ashes and rubble at our earliest possible convenience. It
houses the world's most dreadful war criminals who have been and are now
responsible for the untimely and terror-filled deaths of millions of people
around the world since 1914.
Their little private ministry of war
wasn't officially formed until 1921, but the same war criminals seized power in
Wilson's administration and started World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution.
The CFR was just their method to guarantee continuity and control of the
staffing of the State Department and the White House under all presidents after
Wilson, most of whom were also CFR members. The Council on Foreign Relations is
the Rothschild central control of our country and it reportedly has a membership
that is 70% Jewish, which is pretty good for a group that has only 2% of our
population.
The various agencies of the gangster
state of Israel must be similarly disposed of. No more Jewish rules of conduct,
and no Jewish Rule under the North American Union. Do we want to be the
laughingstock of the world? I should say, do we want to continue to be the
laughingstock of the world? To be big, tough Americans who let a bunch of creepy
Jews run us like cattle? Right now, they're the cowboys and we're the cows. They
make us commit war crimes against their enemies. They make us as hated as they
are because the two governments are in lock-step.
The issue now is War Crimes. Some of us
require a just cause to take the law into our own hands (where it truly
belongs). That just cause is War Crimes, whether or not we need a just cause.
War Crimes give us the power we need to seize control of our lives.
We can never be real men until we accept
total responsibility for our government's crimes. Our government cannot be
changed or turned into a positive force - it can only be dismantled and outlawed
and prohibited from ever forming again. Government can only destroy us, never
help us. Study the Masonic US Constitution and try to find any way that the
American government was designed to do something good. It was only designed to
keep the powerful men in power. It took the Bill of Rights to protect us from
the Constitution.
Most people don't understand this basic
fact, that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are in mortal opposition. And
now the Bill of Rights is technically dead, thanks to Bush's so-called PATRIOT
Act, which has been declared "Constitutional" by the Gang of Nine, by the simple
fact that it has not been declared "un-Constitutional." Almost all crimes
committed by the government have been declared "Constitutional" by the Supreme
Court. Where is the "check and balance" on the Masonic Supreme Court, if it
should, say, appoint a demented war criminal as the President of the United
States, even though he didn't get enough votes? Because that's exactly what
happened six years ago.
This government must be dismantled and
the war criminals removed from society before they kill us all.
This essay may have shocked some
readers. It is high-time to face reality and the reality is that the US
government is the main enemy of mankind. Its little puppet state, Israel, is the
American "force projection" against the oil-producing countries of the Middle
East. Whether America controls Israel or vice-versa doesn't matter. What matters
is that the combination of the American government and Israel is the malignant
tumor that will kill this world if it is not taken apart and crushed, piece by
piece.
jb_campbell@yahoo.com
Reproduced from
www.Rense.com
"I
guess I don't understand the problem of "judging men for their actions...using
subsequent knowledge gained 40+ years after the fact." What choice do we have
when knowledge (truth) is suppressed for decades? When the truth finally comes
out, we judge people based on it. What else is there to do? If you live your
life based on certain assumptions, and then years later the assumptions turn
out to have been wrong, what do you do? Stick to them, or adapt to the new
reality? Revisionism is hated and feared by those who have controlled history
for political power. If it turns out that our participation in WWII was based
on lies, shouldn't we try to correct them? If it turns out that the atrocities
and war crimes and post-war crimes our wonderful boys committed in league with
our Soviet and British allies were far worse than ever imagined, shouldn't we
take responsibility for them once we have investigated and found them to have
happened? Shouldn't we constantly search for the truth so as to prevent them
from recurring? Isn't this the way of a responsible, patriotic adult? We
shouldn't be fascinated merely with the details of the war, the battles, the
weapons, the personalities. As Americans we should be more interested in US
policy which got us into that war, and especially the US policy which was
enunciated and put into concrete at Yalta, with our Soviet and British allies.
This US-UK-USSR policy condemned hundreds of millions of people, from Germany
to China, to slavery, torture and death, starting immediately with the US
Army's OPERATION KEELHAUL and the British Army's OPERATION EASTWIND, in which
millions of Russians, Cossacks, Ukrainians, Germans and other Europeans were
rounded up, put in boxcars and sent into the gulags to die. I have interviewed
former US soldiers who were involved in this sickening, outrageous crime
against humanity. It can't be helped if you haven't heard about this--it's not
my fault. Now that you have heard about it, it is your responsibility to
investigate and spread the word. You usually can't detect the reason for a war
until you read the peace treaty. There was no peace treaty with Germany
because we cut her up with our Soviet ally. This was accomplished with The
Yalta Agreement, which liquidated the majority of opponents to the New World
Order, both in Europe and Asia. The Yalta Agreement was the entire purpose of
our participation in WWII. In other words, our wonderful boys fought for the
safety and future of Communism, in Europe, Russia and Asia, and lucrative
"anti-communist," no-win wars for decades to come. You "wonder if Ike would
have wished to have done things differently had he had the luxury of hindsight
at the time?" What do you mean? He gave the orders for the slaughter of German
POWs and for the slaughter of the above-named millions in Ops KEELHAUL and
EASTWIND. Why do you wonder if he would have done things differently? What
difference would it make if he did? Do you just want to believe that he was a
good man, that he became unhinged by Buchenwald? He was guided by US policy
(the Morgenthau Plan) and by his own hatred. He wrote to his wife from London,
long before he ventured into Buchenwald, "The German is a beast. I hate him."
This was only natural--he was paid to hate and kill Germans. If anyone is
guilty of imposing his own later thinking upon past events, it is those of us
who cannot or will not put ourselves back in those times, through study, and
try to understand the dark forces behind our sadistic pre-war, wartime and
post-war policies. Anyone who says, "Well, if this is true, why aren't the
Germans complaining?" How naive! To whom, exactly, could Germans complain, if
they were the complaining types? The Americans? The Soviets? The British?
There is only one subject having to do with WWII which can be discussed in
Germany, and that is German guilt . . . (I)t took until 1990 for the Soviets
to admit that it was they, and not the Germans, who killed 21,000 Polish
officers and intellectuals in the Katyn Forest near Smolensk during the war.
For almost fifty years, we were assured by our government that it was the
Germans. Our foreign policy is based on WWII lies such as this, and many
others of greater significance in terms of numbers. Why don't we stop playing
around with the war's details and talk about the war's purpose, and who was
really responsible? Let the treason trials begin!
JB Campbell

|