"Washington Post" Columnist Trashes Buchanan
But Reveals Only
His Own Biblical Illiteracy

 

http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1042

 

BROTHER BUCHANAN telling inconvenient truths.BROTHER BUCHANAN telling inconvenient truths.

By John Lofton, Editor

“Washington Post” columnist Colbert I. King, a black man, has blasted columnist Pat Buchanan, a white man (see, no “discrimination” or racial profiling here) for a column Pat has written in which Pat — well - told some - what shall we call them? - how about — inconvenient truths. This kind of thing happens regularly in Washington DC when someone tells the truth about something — that person gets blasted.

For openers, Brother Buchanan believes there’s just a wee whiff of racism surrounding the slogan of Barack Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. The slogan is: “Unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian.” King writes: “Buchanan and his ilk look at Trinity’s slogan with horror. They label the church’s theological values ‘Afro-centric’ and ‘racially exclusive.’ Trinity is beyond the pale of Christianity, at least their version of it.”

Comment (as one of the “ilk” mentioned by King): I don’t know if Pat is, in fact, literally, “horrified” by this slogan. Probably not. He doesn’t get “horrified” easily. But, yes, there does, indeed, seem to an aroma of racism around this exaltation of blackness in TUCC’s slogan. And, interestingly, King does not defend the slogan. No, instead he begs questions about this slogan saying only: “Psst: Trinity has plenty of company, coast to coast. Many black congregations, from storefronts to mega-churches, are in sync with the Trinity slogan.”

Well, psssssssssst! yourself. Who cares how widespread the support is for this slogan. That’s utterly irrelevant in the context of a discussion re: whether the slogan is racist or not. In the 1950s, in the South, many white folks were “in sync” with hating and sometimes murdering blacks, with segregation , with “White Only” signs in various places, etc. So what?

King writes, re: all those “in sync” with the TUCC’s slogan: “They, too, see no need to apologize for their African roots. Nor are they ashamed of preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

IT'S AMAZING GRACE, not race, Mr. King.IT’S AMAZING GRACE, not race, Mr. King.

Comment: And who, please, has suggested that any blacks apologize for their African roots? Not Buchanan. But, I wonder (though not really): Can a person, as a Christian, exalt and preach the Gospel of Christ and his race and/or ethnic origin? Did Christ or His Apostles go around bragging about their respective races and/or ethnic origins? Not at all. For example, St. Paul says in Galatians 3:28, to Christians: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

 

Got it, Mr. King? As Christians, we are commanded to be all one in Christ Jesus - period.

 No black, no white, no Greek, no Jew, no male, no female, etc. Your race, my race, they are utterly irrelevant to God. There is no “race” in the Bible except as an athletic contest. In fact, God tells us in Acts 17:26 us that He “hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.”

Amazing Grace! That’s what God is about - not anybody’s amazing race.

Do you and Obama want to boast, Mr. King? Then boast not about your race, sir, but boast all day long about God and praise His Name!! (Psalm 44:8). If you are a Christian, boast of God for saving you by grace alone not any works you’ve done (Ephesians 2:8-9).

King asks: “But hey, what’s with this newfound concern about African Americans worshiping among themselves in their own way? More important, who forced that separation? As sociologist Kenneth Clark noted in his book ‘Dark Ghetto,’ ministers and lay leaders of white Christian churches historically were unwilling to incorporate large numbers of blacks into their houses of Christ. That’s still the case today with some churches.”

Comment: If Clark is right then this was/is wrong! If any church turns away anybody only because of their race or ethnic origin this is a sin because it is a judgment based on appearance, on race/ethnic origin which our Lord forbids! John 7:24: “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.” Racism is a sin.

JEREMIAH WRIGHT and one of his sheep. Not all of Wright's rants are wrong. To criticize what our country has done is not always to be 'anti-American.'JEREMIAH WRIGHT and one of his sheep. Not all of Wright’s rants are wrong. To criticize what our country has done is not always to be ‘anti-American.’

 

King writes: “Truth is, folks like Buchanan don’t really care that America’s Christian congregations don’t look like salt and pepper on Sunday mornings. The reality of blacks and whites worshiping apart doesn’t disturb them.”

Comment: True - but not in the way King intends his observation to be taken (that is, that Pat is a racist because he doesn’t racially profile church congregations.) Pat is not a racist and I am not a racist. Thus, we do not care what the racial makeup of our respective congregations is. We do not racially profile during worship. As long as there is no discrimination just because of race or ethnic origin we do not care if our respective congregations are salt & pepper or all salt or all pepper.

 

King’s knickers are also in a wad because Pat said: “America has been the best country on earth for black folks” - an assertion not denied, incidentally. King names no other country where “black folks” have it better than in America. Evidently reading Pat’s mind, he writes: “If anything, Buchanan thinks African Americans are ingrates — that we should be satisfied with our station in lifeƒ.Buchanan would have African Americans fall to their knees and thank white people for their grace.” Pat, of course, did not say any of this; these are King’s words, not Pat’s.

King writes: “Truth is, the right-wing commentariat is content to have black churches with timid members worshipping under the banner: ‘I’m but a stranger here; heaven is my home.’”

Comment: This crack reveals only King’s Biblical literacy because yes, as Christians, heaven is our home. As Philippians 3:20-21 assures us: “For our citizenship is in heaven; whence also we wait for a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: who shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, (that it may be) conformed to the body of his glory, according to the working whereby he is able even to subject all things unto himself.” And you do not have to be “timid” to believe this. Amen!

King writes: “It’s those black congregations with pastors who make their churches a voice of liberating gospel, with a loud emphasis on sticking up for the persecuted and afflicting the comfortable, that right-wingers consider a threat to the republic.”

Comment: Black, schmlack! Stop dragging race into everything! And it’s the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ that “liberates” and it matters not the race of the preacher. It is the preached Word that saves! And it’s God’s judgment and wrath that threatens our Republic not “black congregations with pastors who make their churches a voice of liberating gospel, with a loud emphasis on sticking up for the persecuted and afflicting the comfortable.”

King writes: “I also knowƒthat church plays a religious and cathartic role unlike that of any other institution in the black community. It’s a haven, a place for emotional release and personal affirmation. The pastor is given much leeway, so long as the church is held together as a family.”

Comment: The purpose of “church,” of Christians assembling themselves for worship, is to worship God decently and in order, according to the way He has commanded in His Word, this way assuring that He will, indeed, be worshipped decently and in order. The purpose of worship is not “emotional release” or “personal affirmation.” Such phraseology is secular psychobabble and has nothing to do with God other than being condemned by Him.

King writes: “Those thoughts may be beyond the understanding of people who wonder why Obama will not leave Trinity.”

Comment: Trust me. Had Obama known that the ravings of his Pastor (not all of them wrong, by the way) would become widely known, and have the impact they have had on his political ambitions, he would have hit the ejection-pew button years ago.

Source:
http://www.theamericanview.com/

 

The Old Guy Perspective
DEALING WITH IT.

Thursday, March 20, 2008
Obama says we should talk about race.
He thinks that will help him. It won't.
Most of us have spent a lifetime
absorbing the lesson that seeing
what we see automatically makes us racist.
Do you want to talk about it? Do you? Really?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised: May 18, 2008 .   Communication:   discoverer73(at symbol)hotmail.com     Go to Home Page     Go to Index of All Articles Pages       
Read the
Disclaimer
Last modified: May 18, 2008  Copyright © 1999 - 2008  All rights reserved. [Gnostic Liberation Front].   www.gnosticliberationfront.com