What May Have
Melted
The WTC Vehicles
From Ted Twietmeyer
3-24-7
- To come up with a theory to explain
"toasted vehicles" at the WTC we need to have a solution that explains the
cause of the damage found with these vehicles. It clearly appears that the
damage is the result of a weapon, and not the result of an ordinary fire or
ignition source.
-
- First, let's briefly look at other
phenomena of a highly unusual nature. With spontaneous human combustion (SHC)
events, we rarely see the body is consumed 100%. Usually the area below the
knees is relatively intact. It is believed that the reason is a lack of fat
in this area of the body. However, the cause of the initial combustion event
remains somewhat of a mystery. Some theories state that SHC is the result of
metabolism which is out of control for unknown reasons. There is a well
documented case of a man who was simply driving down the road during the
day, when his left arm began to smoke. Fortunately he didn't die from it,
but no cause for it was found by doctors. Only SHC could be the cause.
-
- I am not directly comparing
destroyed vehicles at the WTC to SHC. This is intended to strictly serve as
an analogy only. There is always an explanation for bizarre phenomena,
whether it is fully understood or not. In the case of the WTC, damage
occurred to vehicles located some distance away from the WTC on Roosevelt
Dr.
-
- At the WTC, there is strong
evidence that a shaped (see papers by Dr. Ed Ward, MD on Rense.com - ed)
nuclear device(s) were used. In building demolition, charges are often
placed near the base of the building on columns. These columns are often
weakened by removing some of the material, to insure that cutting charges
will work correctly. Charges are angled to slice the column diagonally, so
the weight of the building will insure it slides off at a slight angle, and
doesn't simply drop straight down and stop moving.
-
- None of this would be required when
using a nuclear device. All building columns in the vicinity (at least
several hundred feet) would be vaporized almost instantly, bringing the
building straight down. Steel found in molten form months after the collapse
is a sure sign of extreme heat, probably nuclear in origin. However, few
have considered there is yet another effect of using a nuclear device. It's
an electromagnetic pulse. The power of this pulse unleashed by a nuclear
detonation is almost unimaginable.
-
- EDDY CURRENTS
-
- What does an electromagnetic pulse
do? First, we need to look at the effects and uses of eddy currents induced
by a strong magnetic field. There are amusement park rides such as Kinda-Ka
that use eddy currents for braking. This braking system works on the eddy
current principle. An array of stationary magnets is raised under the
aluminum plates mounted on the bottom of each car as they approach the
station. This creates powerful high current, low voltage eddy currents in
the aluminum plates as the cars pass over the magnets. These currents form
temporary, opposite magnetic fields that cause attraction to the passing
magnets under the tracks. Cars are slowed to a complete stop. This is a
perfect self- regulating braking system as long as the magnets are raised
at the right time.
-
- In older electric meters there is a
silver disk. This disk directly drives gears which move the hands on the
dial. That disk is actually made of aluminum. It is rotated by invisible
magnetic fields from coils inside the meter. The more current your home
draws through these coils, the faster the disk rotates. This is yet another
example of eddy currents put to a practical use.
-
- Rail guns use eddy currents to
deform heavy copper rails, which accelerate a projectile to fantastic
speeds. These guns used for mainly for research, and must be rebuilt after
each firing to remove the deformed copper bars.
-
- And else do eddy currents create?
HEAT if the currents are strong enough. The stronger the eddy currents, the
more heat which will be generated. Although magnetic fields are being
created, they are temporary in aluminum because it is not magnetic, but
paramagnetic. This means aluminum will be affected by magnetism, but it
cannot be magnetized. Water is paramagnetic as well. Almost anything that
conducts electricity but will not be attracted to a permanent magnet can be
considered paramagnetic.
-
- With this understanding of eddy
current effects, let's look at the damage seen at the WTC and see how eddy
currents can fit the observations.
-
-
-
-
-
- Missing mirrors - all vehicle
mirrors in use today are a glass or plastic plate with an aluminum
reflective coating on the back. This coating is conductive to electricity
and hence, eddy currents. A strong magnetic pulse induced into the mirror
would cause tremendous stress as the field interacted with the steel mirror
housing. The glass would shatter, blowing out most of the glass and the
surrounding gasket. It appears that a small fragment of the mirror can still
be seen in the housing above. Note the metal trim around the wing window on
the driver's door appears as though it was overheated as well. Although the
steering wheel appears to be intact, it is possible the steel body of the
vehicle has shielded the steering wheel from the pulse. Any magnetic pulse
will have less strength with the square of the distance, so it is possible
this truck was near the outer fringes of the damage threshold.
-
- What we still do not know is what
damage occurred INSIDE apartments and businesses in the surrounding
buildings.
-
-
-
-
-
- This windshield damage may have
resulted from an intense magnetic field in the metal trim around the
windshield which became magnetic and interacted with the steel body. Two
headlights appear blown out, and two others do not. It's also possible
another vehicle was parked between the blast or pulse source and the
driver's front side of the truck. This could shield the driver's side
headlight from the magnetic pulse. There may have also been a pressure wave
involved as well that caused this damage, as considerable trash is seen
embedded in the grill. It cannot be easily determined whether a blast wave
or a magnetic pulse blew out this windshield. This vehicle was clearly not
exposed to the pulse magnitude which other vehicles were, or the damage
would be far more. Again, the distance and orientation from the pulse source
is not known.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Other vehicles have missing engine
blocks, which probably vaporized from tremendous eddy currents. Intense heat
would flash-ignite volatile fluids under the hood such as grease on engine
parts and fluids like transmission fluid, power steering fluid, gasoline in
the fuel system, brake fluid and engine oil. A tremendous fireball under the
hood would completely destroy the engine and the entire front of the vehicle
as we see above. And this is exactly what we see with many vehicles. Note
how the fire stops right at the junction of the left front fender and
driver's side door. This is consistent with other vehicle photographs.
-
- Note that steel can become
extremely hot from eddy currents, even though steel is magnetic and not
paramagnetic. However, steel has a far higher melting point than aluminum.
It would hot very quickly with a pulse of sufficient strength to easily
ignite paint and rubber.
-
- We must answer another question -
why would certain vehicles have damage and not others? Why would only
certain parts of them be damaged, and other areas remain pristine? The
answer lies in magnetic SHIELDING. Magnetic pulses are like other
electromagnetic energy, which radiates out from a source in a straight line
unless they wrap around back to their source (such as a bar magnet does.)
However, these magnetic pulses were not generated with a bar magnet, but by
a very different means. When a magnetic field hits steel, the energy becomes
trapped and barely penetrates it. By drawing lines across the tops of cars
with damaged and undamaged areas, we can determine the general direction and
height of the source of the pulse. Initial observations using vectors show
that the nuclear device or pulse source was not underground, but higher up.
This is also is supported by the standing floors at ground level after the
building's collapse.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- "SACRIFICIAL VEHICLES"
PROVIDE SHIELDING
- FOR OTHER VEHICLES AND SHOW
PULSE VECTORS
-
- A vector is simply a line that
shows direction and usually has an arrow. Arrows are not shown above, in an
attempt to simplify the image. The direction of force is from upper left to
lower right. The notated image above provides a possible explanation for the
location of the source of the magnetic pulse, and why some vehicles were
damaged and others were not. This parking lot may be the best evidence in
support of my theory.
-
- Yellow lines indicate the pulse(s)
blocked by the rear row of vehicles. It appears the entire outside of all
rear vehicles were destroyed. Note how several hoods on the rear row of
vehicles have white dust or ash, indicating an intense heat originating from
under the hood. This is probably caused by the engine block vaporizing, and
the white dust may be aluminum oxide. If the vehicles are still around
somewhere in a junk yard, some simple lab tests will confirm this.
-
- White lines show the pulses that
reached the vehicles in the foreground.
-
- Orange shapes around each car show
the damage threshold line. The cars are basically undamaged below these
lines and some might be repairable. If it wasn't for "sacrificial" vehicles
at the rear, those in the foreground would have been completely burned.
-
- Note that white and yellow lines
are not meant to be a literal interpretation to show size of the pulse, how
many lines of force hit each vehicle, etc... Each line is intended to show
only the direction the pulse(s) came from. Regardless of whether this
parking lot is close to the WTC or not, it clearly shows that the nuclear
device (or pulse source) was high above the ground. If the pulse source were
close to the Earth, then vehicles in the foreground would have been
completely shielded from the pulse.
-
- In reality, magnetic pulse lines
would have been so dense that if all of them were to be drawn here, you
wouldn't even be able to see any vehicles in the picture. It would be a sea
of lines.
-
-
-
-
-
- Van (right) provided some shielding
for the blue pickup truck (center.) Rear body of the pickup truck above the
van does have severe damage. Dust on the ground below the vehicles appears
to show these vehicles were in place when the WTC collapsed, except for the
white pickup truck (far left) which has no damage at all. Because of the
direction of the pulse, the windshield on the blue pickup truck is largely
intact and undamaged.
-
- Vehicles missing steering wheels
are explainable using eddy current theory. Most steering wheels have a
circular steel rod in the center. In electrical terms, a steering wheel is a
shorted 1 turn coil. If you induce a sufficiently powerful magnetic pulse
into any shorted coil, it will vaporize very quickly because of excessive
current (amperage.) The hot steel core inside the steering wheel would
ignite the surrounding molded plastic, and the steering wheel would be
completely gone. The time required to vaporize a steering wheel in this way
is dependent on the length of the pulse and the power level. Missing or
vaporized steering wheels are perhaps some of the best evidence for a pulse
or weapon theory.
-
- CONCLUSION
-
- Evidence is overwhelming that
either a nuclear device or advanced weapon technology was used at the WTC.
Missing engine blocks along with only partial destruction of the same
vehicles show that this type of damage was not caused by heat. There may
have been a blast wave that hit some of these vehicles in conjunction with a
magnetic pulse. A powerful magnetic pulse(s) appears to have taken place,
and the source clearly was not at ground level but much higher.
-
- The power level required to
flash-ignite vehicles is almost beyond comprehension, especially at
distances of several hundred feet away. This would require a multi-gigawatt
power levels to cause such destruction.
- (1 gigawatt = 1 million-million
watts.)
-
- We cannot fully determine the
height of the pulse source from images found thus far, but it certainly this
is not the result of a building(s) collapsing to the ground.
-
- Nor is it the result of plane(s)
crashing into the WTC more than 1,000 feet above.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
- tedtw@frontiernet.net
-
www.data4science.net
-
www.bookonmars.info
Reproduced from
www.Rense.com
|