|
WHEN VICTIMS RULE
A Critique of Jewish
Pre-eminence in America

All Pictures Added by Gnostic
Liberation Front
Page IX
24 (In three parts)
(two on previous page)
Jewish Influence in
the Mass Media (pt. 3)
[513
Kilobytes] [about 103 paper pages] The mass media's censorship
of critical stories about Jews or Israel; Jews and the "intellectual" and
"radical" media;
Jewish dominance in the music world; Dear Abby, Ann Landers, and Jewish
domination of the "agony aunt" field.
25.
Literature -
"Intellectuals" - "The Family"
[274 Kilobytes] [about 59 paper
pages] Jewish dominance of the "American intellectual elite"; the
intellectual "Jewish Mafia"; seminal influence of the Partisan Review; the
change from the Jewish intellectual base from the socialist camp to the
affluent elite; the Jewish "explosion" of literary talent; "Being Jewish" as
a marketable commodity; Jewish authors' return to traditional Jewish
identity and linkage to the Holocaust; Jewish pre-eminence in sociology,
anthropology, and other academic fields; Jewish chauvinism and ethnocentrism
in literature; Jews of the poetry world; Jewish pre-eminence in the
intellectual elite of Europe.
26.
Modern Art
[370 Kilobytes] [about 81 paper pages] Jewish pre-eminence in
"high culture," including classical music and the visual arts; Jewish talent
agencies; Jewish dominance in the entrepreneurial realm of the visual arts;
predominance of Jewish art dealers, critics, curators; Jewish philanthropy
to art museums ("he that pays the piper calls the tune");
Jewish
dominance of the photography field;
defamation of Christianity in the art world.
24
(pt. 3)
JEWISH INFLUENCE IN THE MASS MEDIA
In 1986 Ze'ev Chafets, an American
Jew who had moved to Israel, returned for a while to the states to do a
book about the American Jewish community; he entitled the resultant
volume, Members of the Tribe. Following an AIPAC (the powerful
Israel lobbying agency based in Washington DC) organizer who was
"hunting Jews" across America, he noted an interesting incident at a
Jewish gathering at the Stardust Motel in Moline, Illinois. Chafets
writes that a fellow Jew sitting next to him in the audience poked the
American-Israeli in the ribs, and then "tapped my copy of the
Quad-City Times ("The Midwest's Most Exciting Newspaper") and
whispered, 'This is a Jewish newspaper' ... The man was referring to
ownership, not content ... Determined to make an impression, the man
poked me again. 'See this motel?' he asked. 'It's a Jewish motel.'" [CHAFETS,
p. 39]
In 1999, the chairman of the
Newspaper Association of America was Richard Gottlieb. He is also
the chairman of Lee Enterprises, based in Davenport, Iowa, which
owns 21 newspapers and 16 TV stations across the United States -- from
Billings, Montana, to Madison, Wisconsin, to Lincoln, Nebraska. Lloyd
Schermer retired as CEO of the company in 1999. A corporate subsidiary,
NAPP Systems, constructs printing plates for about 350 newspapers
in 30 countries. In Nebraska too, John Gottschalk is the chairman and
president of the Omaha World-Herald company. He is also publisher
of the Omaha World-Herald. [BATT, J., 3-24-2000]
In northern California, in the heart of the internationally
important high-tech area of Silicon Valley, David Cohen controls an
area-wide empire as the Publisher/CEO of the Silicon Valley Community
Newspapers (SVCN Inc.). Cohen founded Metro, "Silicon
Valley's weekly alternative newspaper." A SVCN subdivision is Metro
Newspapers. Metro, in turn , "purchased the Los Gatos
Weekly and the more than 100-year old Los Gatos Times-Observer,
which were combined as the Los Gatos Weekly Times. In 1991, the
company acquired the weekly Saratoga News and the Willow Glen
Resident ... In 1993, Metro Newspapers began publishing a
newspaper in Cupertino, and acquired its competitor the Cupertino
Courier, in 1995. The company founded The Sun in 1993. The
most recent addition to the community family was The Campbell
Reporter, which began publishing in March, 1999." [CUEPERTINO
COURIER, 4-11-01]
In Colorado, Edward Lehman publishes a few small town newspapers,
including the Longmont Daily Times-Call, the Loveland Daily
Reporter-Herald, and Superior in Lafayette. The executive
roster for all these papers includes Edward Lehman at the top, Dean
Lehman as president, and Lauren Lehman as vice-president. (Ruth Lehman
is the Associate Editor at the Longmont journal).
In 1975, in New Hampshire, journalist
Kevin Cash wrote an entire volume criticizing the concentrated media and
political power of newspaperman William Loeb. Loeb owned New Hampshire's
two major newspapers -- the Manchester Union Leader and the
New Hampshire Sunday News, as well as the Vermont Sunday News,
and a few smaller New England area papers. Loeb was also in the habit of
writing regular editorials in his newspapers. "The truth is," wrote
Cash, a former reporter at the Union Leader, "is that [Loeb's
papers] are to a large extent monopolistic in nature within the limits
of New Hampshire." [CASH, K., p. 3] Loeb was of Jewish heritage (both
parents were Jewish); he once published in one of his papers, however,
his father's 1906 Episcopal baptismal document, signed by American
President Theodore Roosevelt (his father was Roosevelt's executive
secretary).
In Pittsburgh, Paul Block (1877-1941)
owned the Pittsburgh Evening Sun, the Pittsburgh Morning Post,
and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, as well as the Toledo Times
and Toledo Blade. [GREENBERG, M., p. 53] His sons, William and
Paul, also later added television and cable stations to their
mini-empire. Elsewhere, "in 1978, the Samuel Horvitz Trust [run by three
sons and an employee] owned five monopoly newspapers in Ohio and New
York, cable systems in Ohio and Virginia, and construction firms in
Ohio, and was a major landowner in Florida." [BAGDIKIAN, p. 42]
In a review of Jewish book
publishing in the United States to 1976, Jewish author Charles Madison
noted the following Jewish-founded, or purchased, firms (some still
exist, some are now defunct, some are absorbed by others):
Simon and Schuster (Richard
L. Simon; Max L. Schuster)
Knopf (Alfred A. Knopf)
Random House (Bennett Cerf
and Donald Klopfer)
Pantheon (founded by Kurt
and Helen Wolf)
Viking (Harold Guinzburg)
Dover (founded in 1943)
Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux
- (The father of Roger Strauss --
president of the publishing
company -- was in turn chairman of the
Board of the American
Smelting and Refining Company. From
1955-65 Roger was also
chairman of the board of American
Judaism magazine).
Grove Press (1947) - which
controlled Evergreen Books and the
Evergreen Review.
Praeger (1950)
Basic Books (1952) - Its
founder, Arthur Rosenthal, later became
Director of Harvard
University Press.
The Free Press (1947) - Its
founder, Jeremiah Kaplan, joined Crowell-
Collier, which had acquired
MacMillan, as a Vice-President.
Atheneum (1959)
Crown Publishers
(1936) (headed in later years by Nat Wartels, "a legend in the
business") [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 250]
Academic Press
International Universities Press
Twayne Publishers (1948)
World Publishing Company
(1905)
Frederick Ungar (1941)
Harry Abrams (1950) - mostly
art books.
George Braziller (1955)
Tudor - mostly music books.
[MADISON, CHARLE;, 1976]
"One year,' says famous Jewish novelist Judith Krantz in her
autobiography,,
"when I cam back from Paris, I foolishly risked a certain jail
sentence by
bringing for, buttoned into my blouse, a copy of the utterly
pornographic
Rosy Crucifixion by Henry Miller, an erotic masterpiece
that Jeremy rented
out to his friends as twenty-five cents a day. I'm not taking all
the credit,
but eventually he [Jeremy Tarcher] became the first and
best publisher of
New Age books in the United States." [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 147]
[Krantz notes that her novel Mistral "was quickly bought for
France by
Edition Stock, whose publisher, Jean Rosenthal, as it
happened had
translated my other novels into French."] [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p.
313]
In a continuing trajectory of
percentage of ownership, by 1968 Roger Kahn noted that "Jews own perhaps
half the major book publishing houses: Random House, Simon &
Schuster, New American Library, Alfred Knopf, and
Atheneum are a few that thrive under the leadership of Jews." [KAHN,
R., p. 5] "Owners of new [early to mid-20th century publishing]
concerns, "notes Jay Gertzman, "most of them young Jewish men (Horace
Liveright, Thomas Seltzer, Ben Huebsch, Max Schuster, Alfred Knopf) had
begun to specialize in presenting European writers to an American
audience curious about their sexual frankness and Marxist ideas.
Established houses, such as Doran, Houghton, Appleton, and Doubleday,
did not do so, and some of their executives resented their parvenu
colleagues. Modernist writers especially owed their exposure to Jewish
firms." [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 114]
In the 1980s, Crown Books,
headed by Robert Haft (who also founded the Trak Auto supply
chain), rose to become the third largest bookstore chain with nearly 250
outlets throughout America. At its peak the firm was a national giant
with nearly 10,000 employees and valued between $500 million to $1
billion (the company drastically weakened with in-house, intra-family
legal feuds between Robert and his father Herbert, a Jewish immigrant
from Russia). The Brentano's bookstore chain was also founded by
Jewish entrepreneur August Brentano in the late 19th century. Abraham
Rosenbach and his brother Philip were used book sellers from 1903 until
the 1950s. In 1928, the New Yorker called Abraham "the most
famous dealer in rare books." "If Gutenberg [Bible] sales are taken as
the measure of a dealer," says Guy Lesser, "Rosenbach would have to be
reckoned history's most successful [book dealer], judging by his
transactions over ... four decades." [LESSER, G., JAN 2002, p. 48, 46]
"Whiskey, cigars, deep-sea fishing, and women (to put the last
politely)," adds Lesser, "in roughly that order, after books, seem to
have been his passions." [LESSER, G., JAN 2002, p. 48]
Jewish publishers also brought out
the inexpensive series for mass appeal, including the Little Leather
Library, the Little Blue Books, and the Modern Library (Horace
Liveright); Jewish entrepreneurs also initiated the "Book-of-the-Month
Club." "As an author and editor, [Mortimer] Adler built a publishing
empire on an unlikely foundation: the philosophic system of Aristotle
and St. Thomas Aquinas. That system influenced his work as compiler of
the Great Books of the Western World and as editor of
Encyclopedia Britannica." [D'Alessio, F., 6-29-01] In 2001, Michael
Ross, the publisher of the World Book Dictionary, removed the verb "jew"
(traditionally meaning "beat down in price") from the volume. [LEVINE,
S., JUNE/JULY 2001]
Other Jewish book publishers include Westview, Stein and
Day, Holmes and Meier, Price Stern Sloan, Lyle
Stuart (the founder, Lyle Stuart, was born Lionel Simon),
Ottenheimer (a Baltimore publisher with 200 titles a year), and
Schocken. In England, Lord George Weidenfeld not only
controls a well-known namesake publishing house, he is also chairman of
the Zionist Federation of Great Britain. From England, Andre Deutsch's
namesake company published Norman Mailer, V.S. Naipaul, Arthur
Schlesinger, and other prominent authors. In Canada, Avie Bennett is
president of McClelland & Stewart (1992).
By the late 1990s, Golden Books
Family Entertainment, "the nation's largest producer of children's
books," was headed by Jewish publisher Richard Snyder (who replaced
Richard Bernstein). The next four top executives at the firm were also
Jewish: Steven Grossman, James Cohen, Ira Gomberg, and Ian Reich.
[HOOVER, p. 255]
Alfred Lilienthal, a Jew and
lifelong crusader against Zionism and Jewish chauvinism, wrote in 1982
that
"All the leading magazines, ranging
from Commentary, Esquire, Ladies
Home Journal, New
York Review of Books, New Yorker, and U.S.
News and World Report have
Jews in key positions as publishers,
editors, or managing editors. No
one is able to criticize Jews -- or
even take Israel to task -- for fear
of being out of line with the boss ...
There is [also] the constant
overriding concern of the media about losing
advertising ... at times making a
mockery of 'freedom' of the press ...
[LILIENTHAL, p. 219] ... It would be
futile to list the number of top
Jewish editors and writers across
the country. Many of the largest
book publishers, including Knopf,
Random House, Holt, Liverwright,
Viking Press, Simon and
Schuster, Van Nostrand Reinhold, and
Lyle Stuart are Jewish-owned,
directly or by Jewish-controlled
interests (including CBS,
RCA, Music Corporation of America
[MCA], Litton's, and
Gulf and Western. In other firms such as
Macmillan and Grosset and
Dunlap, one will find editors-in-chief or
presidents who are Jewish."
[LILIENTHAL, p. 220]
In the same year, Jewish literary
agent Bill Adler (formerly the Executive Editor at Playboy when
Mike Cohn was Director of Playboy's book division) wrote a volume
entitled Inside Publishing. Some of the (Jewish) power people in
his New York publishing world included
* Richard Snyder: CEO, president and
Chairman of the Board of
Simon & Schuster
* Joni Evans: (Snyder's wife),
president of Simon & Schuster subsidiary,
The Linden Press
* Robert Gottleib: President and
Editor-in-Chief of Alfred A. Knopf
* Louis Wolfe: President and CEO of
Bantam Books
* Marc Jaffe: Editor-in-Chief of
Bantam Books
* Hillel Black: Editor-in-Chief at
William Morrow
* Nat Wartels: Chairman of Crown
Publishers
* Jonathan Segal: Editor-in-Chief of
Times Books
* Helen Meyer: President of Dell
Publishing)
* Phyllis Grann: Publisher of G.P.
Putnam's Sons
* Jim Silberman: President of
Summit Books
* Howard Kaminsky: President and
Publisher of Warner Books
[ADLER, B., 1982]
Adler's favored choice for
assignment as writing "collaborator" with celebrities was Mickey
Herskowitz. Herskowitz wrote books for Bette Davis, Dan Rather, Gene
Autry, Jimmy the Greek, and others. In the "book packaging" field (where
literary agents produce anthology-type volumes commissioned by
publishers) Lyle Kenyon Engel was "one of the most prolific book
packagers over the years." [ADLER, B., 1982, p. 89]
Jewish actor Kirk Douglas has written some books about his
life; he notes his surprise when he discovered that
"my editor Ushi was becoming fascinated with Judaism [she
eventually converted to it].
Out of the blue, in the fall of 1993,
she announced that she was going to Israel. A whole
month in
Israel would cost her a mere $950 plane fare, food and lodging included.
Could
that be true? Oh yes, but she was doing it through an
organization called Volunteers for
Israel, which basically meant she was going into the Israeli Army
for three weeks."
[DOUGLAS, K., 1997, p. 125]
"Any roll call of the most
respected and/or powerful figures in the publishing world," wrote Robert
C. Christopher in 1989 in a book about the decline of WASP
institutions," whether in editorial or executive positions, has to
include a sizeable number of Jews; among those who automatically come to
mind are Robert Bernstein, Jason Epstein, and Joni Evans at Random
House, Richard Snyder and Michael Korda [also author of Power:
How to Get It and Success!] at Simon and Schuster,
Simon Michael Bessie at Harper and Row, Howard Kaminsky at
Hearst and Marc Jaffe at Houghton Mifflin." [CHRISTOPHER, p.
222] "I don't want to sound chauvinistic," said Jason Epstein in 2001,
"but [Jewish publishers] were smarter than their gentile colleagues."
[GREEN, D., 5-31-01]
Others Jews in positions of power in
earlier years (as noted by Martin Greenberg in 1979) included the
publisher of Collier's and the Women's Home Companion,
founder and editor of the National Guardian, the editor and
founder of AB Bookman's Weekly, the editor of the Saturday
Review, senior editors at Time, Forbes and Newsweek,
the editor of Variety, a member of the Board of Editors for
Fortune, the editor-in-chief of Redbook and on and on.
[GREENBERG, 1979]
More recently, take, for example, a
1996 report in Advertising Age that noted that Ellen Levine, the
editor-in-chief of Good Housekeeping, was having a spat with her
publisher, Alan Waxenberg, and that Jerry Kaplan was one of those being
considered to replace him. [KELLY, p. 47] In 1994, Barbara Grossman left
Simon and Shuster to become the publisher at Viking where
Peter Mayer was the Viking Penguin CEO. In the same era, Joni
Evans (born Joni Goldfinger) became the head of the Turtle Bay
imprint at Random House. Tina Brown, also Jewish, was described
by one London newspaper as "the most famous woman editor in the world
... [She is] the worst social climber since Kong lumbered to the top of
the Empire State Building." [LANGTON, J.]
In England, in 1998 the (London)
Daily Telegraph noted Gail Reubuck, "daughter of affluent Baltic
Jewish immigrants," as "the most powerful figure in British publishing,"
and "recently voted Publisher of the Year." [CAMPBELL, p. D4] Another
example is Richard Malina who started out as a lawyer for Grosset and
Dunlap. By 1985 he was the President of the publishing division of
Doubleday; in 1987 he became the Executive Director and Publisher
of the Jewish Publication Society. [GODFREY, p. 2]
A mere random look at a few 1998
issues of Publishers Weekly evidenced the following items: Al
Silverman retired as "Editor-at-large" at Penguin. He was also
the former publisher and editor-at-large at Viking, and chairman
and CEO of the Book of the Month Club. Mark Lieberman was
the Executive Vice President of Cahner's Publishing Company,
which publishes Publishers Weekly where Sybil Steinberg was the
Senior Editor for Fiction. Jane Friedman was the CEO and
president of HarperCollins. Martha Levin was named the new Vice
President and editor-in-chief at Hyperion (moving over from a
position as Senior Vice President at Doubleday. Lucianne Goldberg
was noted as the literary agent for Linda Tripp (who exposed the
President Clinton-Monica Lewinsky sex scandal. Goldberg -- formerly
Steinberger -- is the wife of Sid Goldberg, former editor of the
North American Newspaper Alliance, and later vice president of
United Media, a syndicator of news stories. One of Lucianne's own
novels is Madame Cleo's Girls, a "frothy tale about three
high-class prostitutes.' [HUBBARD, p. 111]) The Bantam Doubleday
Dell International CEO in 1998 was Stephen Rubin. The president and
editor-in-chief of Summit Books was still Jim Silberman. Marc
Jaffe was publisher of his own imprint at Houghton Mifflin.
Others afforded news making mention in the Publishers Weekly
issues were Jonathan Karp, an editor at Random House, Esther
Newberg, an agent at ICM; and agents Daniel Greenberg and Al
Zuckerman of James Levine Communications. The Horowitz-Rae
book manufacturing company was also noted as sold.
Such Jewish prominence today is all
over the map. Michael Hoffman is the Executive Director of Aperture,
probably the most influential "art" photography journal and book
publisher. Michael Hirschorn is editor of Spin, "the bible of
alternative music." Alan Light is Editor-in-Chief of Vibe
magazine. George Hirsch is the vice-president and publisher of
Runner's World. Nat Lehrman was the publisher of Playboy.
(Richard Rosenzweig was Playboy founder Hugh Hefner's personal
Executive Assistant, Bobbi Arnstein his personal secretary, and Howard
Shapiro his chief legal counsel. By the 1990s, Shapiro was third in
command of the Playboy empire, behind only Hefner and his daughter).
Peter Bart is Editor-in-Chief at Variety. Michael Solomon was
named editor of Premiere in 2000. Lesley Seymour is the editor of
Redbook. Merle Ginsberg is the Entertainment Editor for
Women's Wear Daily. David Bauer is one of the Executive Editors at
Sports Illustrated. David Fine is SI's photography editor. Todd
Gold recently left the editorship of People magazine to found a
company with fellow Jew Adam Werbach, recently stepped down as the
president of the Sierra Club.
Milton Esterow is the publisher and
editor of both ArtNews and Antiques World. He is also
co-editor and founder of the American Art Journal. Jonathan
Steinberg -- son of notorious corporate raider Saul Steinberg --
publishes Individual Investor magazine. Steven Brill founded
American Lawyer and a media watchdog journal called Brill's
Content (editor-in-chief: David Kuhn, formerly executive editor of
Talk magazine), and the Court TV program on television. (A
rival, Peoples' Court, features presiding Jewish judge Jerry
Sheindlin and commentating attorney Harry Levin. Another court TV
program, Judge Judy, features Jerry Sheindlin's wife, Judy, at
the helm.) For years Jerry Finkelstein published the New York Law
Journal. Janice Kaplan is the Executive Producer of TV Guide
Television. Jane Goldman is the Executive Editor of California
Lawyer. Rae Anne Marsh is the managing editor of Arizona
Corridors Magazine. Steven Cohn edits the Media Industry
Newsletter. Rachel Newman edits Country Living. David
Klinghoffer is the literary editor of the National Review. Debbie
Rosenberg is the Managing Editor of Biography. Robert Epstein is
the Editor-in-Chief of Psychology Today. Adam Garfinkle is the
Executive Editor of the National Interest. Michael Berman
co-founded George magazine. Baltimore's Style magazine is
owned by the Baltimore Jewish Times. Michael Gewanda became the
editor of Time (Australia) in 1993. Peter Newman edited Canada's
prominent weekly magazine, Maclean's. Peter Eisenman was "the
father of two architectural publications of note, Oppositions and
Skyline." [ARONSON, S., 1983, p. 303] And on and on and on.
"White and Jewish," Ben Burns
(originally Bernstein) even "made a career in black journalism, editing
the Chicago Defender and helping found Ebony magazine."
[GROSSMAN, p. C1] He also edited Sepia, "a white-owned magazine
for blacks." [ZALLER, p. 30] A more recent black-based magazine is the
musical "hip-hop" The Source; by the mid-1990s it boasted a
newsstand circulation larger than Rolling Stone. The Source
"speaks to young black males," noted USA Today, "in a language
they can understand. More than 60% of its readers are African-Americans.
Over 80% are under age 25." Featuring "shock covers" and articles like
the one about bulletproof vest clothing fashions to ward off "a 44
magnum at close range," the publisher of The Source, Peter Mays,
is also Jewish. [HOROVITZ, p. 1B] In 1998, Elinor Ruth Tatum became the
publisher of her father's newspaper, the Amsterdam News, New York
City's oldest and largest African-American newspaper. Ms. Tatum's father
is Black; her mother is Jewish. [JET, p. 32]
The Detroit News is both
published and edited by Marc Silverman. Howard Kleinberg was, until
recently, the editor of the Miami News. Martin Baron edits the
Boston Globe. Phil Bronstein is the executive editor of the San
Francisco Examiner and the second Jewish husband of non-Jewish
actress Sharon Stone (his father was a former director of the Los
Angeles Jewish Federation). (Michael de Young, also Jewish, founded the
rival San Francisco Chronicle). Jeff Cohen became the Houston
Chronicle chief editor in 2002. Tom Rosenstiel is the director of the
Project for Excellence in Journalism. ABC's Peggy Wehmeyer, a
self-described Protestant, born of a Jewish mother, is "the only network
correspondent specializing in religious and spiritual issues." [SHISTER,
G., 9-11-99, p. G2] At least half of the ten members (Jonathan Alter,
Howard Fineman, Michael Isikoff, Debra Rosenberg, and Ron Haviv) of
Newsweek's "political team" covering the 2000 American presidential
campaign were of Jewish heritage. [NEWSWEEK, 11-20-2000, p. 4] And if
you want to write regularly for editor Steve Wasserman's Los Angeles
Times Book Review, and you're not Jewish, the odds are heavily
against you. His stable of "Contributing Writers" is Anthony Day,
Michael Frank, Jonathan Kirsch, Jonathan Levi, Suzie Linfield, Suzanne
Mantell, and Benjamin Schwarz. Politically conservative commentator
David Horowitz would argue that you'd have to be left-wing too, noting
that:
"I knew Wasserman as a former
Berkeley radical and protégé, in
the 1960s, of a Times
contributing editor, Bob Scheer ... After the
1960s, Scheer had ingratiated himself
with Hollywood's bolsheviks,
married a top editor at the Los
Angeles Times, and become a figure
of influence in the paper's
hierarchy, which enabled him to secure
Wasserman his job." [HOROWITZ, D.,
1999, p. 189]
Longtime media critic for the Los
Angeles Times has been Howard Rosenberg. In a 1991 column he wrote
that
"The mail is coming in about my
column endorsing KCET's recent
presentation of the controversial
film 'Stop the Church,' and nearly
all of it is critical and angry. Most
writers accused me of being
rather a fence sitter and biased
against Catholicism. Some note that
I am Jewish." [ROSENBERG, H.,
9-16-91, p. F1]
The Washington Post media
reporter is another Jewish Howard, this one Kurtz. Until his death in
1997, across the continent, Herb Caen was for fifty years a "legendary
San Francisco columnist" and the city's "most beloved institution."
[SCHEER, R., 2-4-97, p. B7; DOUGAN, M., 2-7-97, p. A1] Looking back into
earlier years, Dennis McDougal singles out (Jewish columnists) Joyce
Haber (of the Los Angeles Times) and Irv Kupcinet (of the
Chicago Sun-Times) as prominent media loyal public
supporters/defenders of Hollywood lawyer/mobster Sidney Korshak.
[MCDOUGAL, p. 396]
In 2000, journalist Katherine Ross
wrote about the case of fellow journalist Lynn Hirschberg:
"She is the premier chronicler of the
entertainment elite for
the New York Times Magazine
... On the beat for almost 20
years, Hirschberg stands at the nexus
of the Los Angeles
entertainment and New York publishing
worlds ... Hirschberg's
pieces almost always deify or
demonize. 'She can make your
career,' says publicist Bumble Ward."
[ROSMAN, K., 5-2000]
Hirschberg started out with help from
David Rosenthal, "then the assistant manager at Rolling Stone and
now the publisher of Simon and Schuster's adult-trade division."
"Hirschberg," adds reporter Ross,
"doesn't just profile and befriend
the powerful. Like most other
successful operators, she is savvy at
facilitating business deals
for friends that will leave those
friends in her debt. In 1993, for
example, Hirschberg brokered a
Time magazine cover story about
her then close friend, the producer
Scott Rudin, written by her
friend Philip Weiss ... [Also]
consider her close alliance with
Peter Kaplan, the editor of the
New York Observer, a weekly
newspaper popular in New York's media
circles. Kaplan and
Hirschberg have never worked
together, but their friendship
has benefited both." [ROSMAN, K.,
5-2000]
All these people are Jewish.
Does all this massive Jewish
predominance in the mass media, internationally, and their
collective sense of destiny in history; upper echelon cliques;
widespread allegiance to Israel; intense sense of collective community;
concerted economic and ideological pressures to encourage
pro-Israel/Jewish views; the systematic political pressures and
omnipresent lobbying maneuvers of the Anti-Defamation League, the
American Israel Political Action Committee, the American Jewish
Congress, the American Jewish Committee; and many other multi-million
dollar lobbying groups whose fundamental purpose is to control
information about Jews and Israel, mean nothing, as so
many Jews insist? Let us take but one aspect of the systematic
censorship throughout American culture by the Jewish community: the
state of Israel. This is what Paul Findley, for twenty-three years a
United States Congressman from Illinois had to say about his book that
described the Jewish-American lobby for Israel in America, They Dare
to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby (the
book was eventually published by a small publisher, Lawrence Hill, and
made the Washington Post's ten top books list for nine weeks):
"My quest for a publisher began in
March 1983 and was predictably
long and frustrating. Declining to
represent me, New York literary agent
Alexander Wylie forecast with
prophetic vision that no major United
States publisher would accept my
book. He wrote, 'It's a sad state of
affairs.' Bruce Lee of William
Morrow and Company called my
manuscript ‘outstanding,’ but his
company concluded that publishing it
'would cause trouble in the house
and outside' and decided against
'taking the heat.' Robert Loomis of
Random House called it an
'important book' but reported that
the firm's leadership decided the
theme was 'too sensitive.' Twenty
other publishers said no." [FINDLEY,
THEY, p. viii]
When in 1986 Israeli defector
Mordechai Vanunu had his photographic evidence of the inside of Israel's
nuclear weapons plant published in England, it should have been a major
news story. Jerry Oplinger, a former White House aide, was amazed at how
little attention the mass media gave it, saying: "I couldn't believe
those guys. There was nothing [significant] in the [New York] Times,
[Washington] Post, and Wall Street Journal. Everybody in
the arms control business was amazed that there was nothing. To me and
my close friends, it was really discouraging." [HERSH, p. 308]
In the London Independent,
in 1998 Robert Fisk wrote an entire article about the mass media's
systematic bias and censorship of stories relating to Israel. Among the
Fisk's list of outrages, is the fact that
"the New York Times ... ran a
syndicated account from an Israeli paper
of an Israeli soldier's life in
Qana before the massacre [when Israeli
troops fired a missile into an Arab
ambulance in Lebanon]: but the New
York Times deleted a
paragraph about how the Israeli troops had stolen
cars from their Lebanese owners and
looted houses -- thus even
censoring the Israeli press ...
History continues to be short-changed in
the American media ... Academics
may one day decide how deeply the
American public has been misled by
the persistent bias of the US media,
and the degree to which this has
led them to support US policies which
may destroy America's prestige in
the Middle East." [FISK, p. 14]
Norman Finkelstein, a well-known
Jewish critic of Israel, tabulated the articles about torture in the
Middle East in the New York Times between 1981 and 1991. He found
over 80 articles -- 26 articles about torture in Iran, 15 in Turkey, 14
in Iraq and 8 in Egypt. "Consider how the case of Israel was treated,"
he wrote,
"Except for a brief period under
[Israeli] Prime Minister Begin,
torture was practiced continuously
from the early 1970s against
Palestinian detainees ... [The
Times] has probably devoted as much
space to coverage of Israel [on
other matters] as the entire Arab
world combined. Yet for the full
decade under consideration
(1981-91), the Times found space for
only five items on Israeli
torture of Palestinian detainees ...
Not once did the Times even hint
at the not trivial fact that
Israel's torture of Palestinian detainees in
the Occupied Territories is
'virtually institutionalized' (Amnesty
International) and 'systematic and
routine' (B'Tselem)." [an Israeli
human rights organization]
[FINKELSTEIN, 1996, p. 67]
In 1982 the Times' Foreign
Correspondent to Israel, Thomas Friedman (also Jewish) ran into trouble
with his Jewish superiors for telling the truth about the Israeli
invasion of Lebanon. Friedman filed a report with his employers about
the "indiscriminate" bombing of the Arab community there. New York
Times editors censored the adjective. Friedman "then sat down and
wrote one of the most indicting messages the Times ever received
from a correspondent, that his editors were 'afraid to tell our readers'
about Israel's 'apparent aim of terrorizing its [Beirut] civilian
population ... I am filled with profound sadness by what I have learned
in the past afternoon about my newspaper.'" [GOULDEN, p. 323] Friedman
was immediately called back to the states and warned that "if you ever
pull a stunt like that again, you are fired. Understand?" [GOULDEN, p.
323]
In 1994, the Jerusalem Post
noted another case of Jewish lobbying-censorship of the American mass
media, this time of the work of Time magazine reporter Murray
Gart:
"Time was planning to publish
a list of Israeli agents in Washington
submitted by the Mossad to the CIA.
[Howard] Teicher's name [a Jewish
National Security Agency adviser]
was purportedly on the list. Time
never ran the story, the editors
pulled it out of the magazine virtually
at the last minute." [RODAN, S.,
1994, p. 18]
Thomas Kiernan notes the case of non-Jewish mogul Rupert Murdoch,
so beholding to the Jews who helped him get a foothold in the world of
international mass media:
"[ABC head Leonard] Goldenson's personality and lectures thus had
the effect of
sharpening Murdoch's sympathy toward Israel. As a result, his
Australian papers
took a decidedly pro-Israel tone during the early 1960s -- a fact
that didn't please
his surrogates in the top editorial chairs. The eventual
resignation of Douglas Brass
as editor for the Sydney Mirror, for instance, is said by
some in Murdoch's organization
to have come about over that issue ..." [KIERNAN, T., 1986, p. 78]
In a discussion of the reportage at Murdoch's New York Post,
Kiernan observes
"I was witness to some of the Post's coverage of the Israeli
invasion of Lebanon
in the summer of 1982 and of the subsequent siege of Beirut.
Throughout that
period, the paper was without a single reporter on the scene, yet
its stories were
laced with un-attributed 'eye-witness' descriptions of Arab
atrocities and Israeli
heroics, many of them invented in its New York newsroom."
[KIERNAN, T.,
1986, p. 262]
In May 2001, during the latest Palestinian intifada (uprising)
against Israeli rule, the Anti-Defamation League announced that their
recent survey showed that "56 percent of major newspaper editorials took
a strong pro-Israel stance." [TEITELBAUM, S., 5-25-01] This was despite
the fact that representatives of organizations as diverse as Amnesty
International, the European Union, the Red Cross, and YMCA were
criticizing, and often condemning, the brutal policies of the Israeli
state. Incredibly, even as most of those who headed press organizations
were emphatically pro-Israel, Howard Goller, chairman of the Foreign
Press Association, publicly complained that "twenty foreign
correspondents in the West Bank and Gaza have been shot at and hit [by
Israeli troops] with live ammunition or rubber coated-bullets since the
start of the intifada ... Worse still, he says, the Israeli government
is refusing to deal with the matter." [HAUSMAN, T., 5-25-01]
Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman
note the case of British author David Irving, who faced the destruction
of his decades-old writing career when he started addressing the Jewish
community critically:
"After Irving testified for the
defense in ["Holocaust denier" Ernest]
Zundel's 1988 'free speech' trial in
Canada, various governments filed
notices of entry denial and
deportation against him. As he recounts
on his Web page, his publishing firm,
Focal Point, has received
notices from the bookstores in
England canceling distribution of
[his book] Hitler's Wars and
other titles. 'Following complaints from
valued customers we no longer feel
able to stock this title,' read one
notice from a Sheffield bookstore in
July 1992. Also in the same year,
the director of Media House
Publications in Johannesburg, South
Africa, informed Irving that with
regard to Hitler's War, "I don't
want any copies on our premises. We
have had some incidents
already. Many of our book buyers are
Jewish. It is much easier
for [my staff] now to say, 'We don't
stock the book.'" [SHERMER/
GROBMAN, 2000, p. 50]
Filmmaker Tom Hayes calls the mass
media's wall of censorship surrounding the state of Israel "the
Information Blockade." This systematic censorship is important in
keeping Americans ignorant about the truths concerning Israel, including
the details of the staggering sums of money -- approximately $78
billion -- American taxpayers have funneled to that other country
(instead of to themselves) since the creation of the Jewish state in
1948, [APAS, p. 106] let alone the myriad of moral injustices
perpetuated upon others by the Jewish nation. [See later chapter]
Arthur Hays-Sulzberger, the publisher of the New York Times,
noted the behind-the-scenes economic intrigues and mass media power of
pro-Israel Jews as early as 1946:
"I dislike the coercive methods of
Zionists in this country who have not
hesitated to use economic means to
silence persons who have different
views." [LILIENTHAL, p. 124]
Those who would like to criticize
Israel, notes Jewish French scholar Maxime Rodinson, "remain silent,
either because they are not in a position to write or speak publicly, or
because they fear the reactions of their immediate environment or the
broader public. I understand them very well. Moreover, publishers,
newspaper editors, and radio and television producers, also tend to be
afraid to let them speak; they suffer constant blackmail from
Judeo-centrists." [RODINSON, p. 15]
Ze'ev Chafets notes a 1979 article
that got past the censors in Newsweek; it read:
"With the help of American Jews in
and out of government, Mossad
[Israel's intelligence agency]
looks for any softening in U.S. support
and tries to get technical
intelligence the Administration is unwilling to
give to Israel."
The normal chorus of Jewish
complaint and pressure to censor any similar future statement was soon
to follow. As Chafets observes, "the editor of Newsweek later
admitted that Newsweek's insinuation that American Jews are
disloyal to the United States 'reflects an anti-Semitic stereotype' and
informed the Anti-Defamation League that 'we have engaged in some
consciousness raising on this subject and I do not expect a recurrence.'
The letter to the ADL was signed by the magazine's editor-in-chief:
Lester Bernstein [also Jewish]." [CHAFETS, p. 281]
Also in the 1970s, CBS news
commentator Jeffrey St. John made a similar mistake about speaking
openly of Jewish dual loyalty on the radio program "Spectrum." He had
the courage to observe that
"American public opinion is shaped
largely by a pro-Israeli viewpoint.
And when someone suggests we should
begin changing our policy,
as an American oil executive did
recently, the pro-Israel propaganda
machine in America crucifies him in
public ... Emotions, not reason,
govern our policy towards Israel ...
The issue is whether you are
an American first and a Jew second
and if forced to choose, which
commands your loyalty first."
[LILIENTHAL, 1983, p. 450]
St. John was gone from CBS
soon afterwards. Likewise, CBS newscaster Eric Severeid took
heavy Jewish lobbying heat in 1975 for daring to say that "A growing
number of American Jews are ... torn in a soul-searching internal debate
as to just where their loyalties should lie and how far they should go
in honoring them." [LILIENTHAL, 1983, p. 449]
In 1994 after rejections from
numerous publishers, John Sack, a respected Jewish journalist for
Esquire and other magazines for nearly 40 years, managed to get his
manuscript (An Eye for an Eye, about the "vengeful" Jewish heads
of post-World War II concentration camps for Germans and Poles)
published by Basic Books. (The book was originally commissioned with a
$25,000 advance by the Henry Holt publishing company. When Sack's final
manuscript was completed, it was abandoned by the firm). "Major U.S.
newspapers and publishers," noted the Associated Press, "shied
away from the manuscript before Basic Books finally put out the English
edition in 1993." [BAJACK, INTERNET] The editor for the volume at Basic
Books, Steve Fraser, noted that
"We concluded it ought not to be
suppressed -- which is what was
happening. I take my vocation as a
publisher seriously enough to feel
that it is my responsibility to
publish something that's important even
if the rest of the industry is
afraid to do that." [WIENER, p. 24]
Terry McDonnell, one of Sack's
editors at Esquire, was one of those refusing to publish any of
the investigators articles about the Jewish commandants of concentration
camps. "[Other publishers are] scared," he told Sack. "And I'm scared
too." [LOMBARDI, p. 18]
Sack had researched the facts of the
volume for seven years. "Although Sack's facts were not disputed," notes
the Associated Press, "the book was slammed as sadistic
sensationalism in a review by powerful German [Jewish] critic Elke
Geisel, whose seething polemic called it 'vile docudrama' and 'a gift to
neo-Nazis.'" "[Sack's book] is the greatest filth," added Ralph
Giordano, a German Jewish writer who never read the book in question, "
... [it is a] vulgar artistic fetish." [AP, INTERNET] (Press censorship
about Jewish history even occurs in Poland, presumably because the new
capitalist state must seek so much western/Jewish economic aid in
rebuilding their nation. In 1994 the Gazeta Wyboroza, one of
Poland's most-widely read newspapers, covered an investigation of
fifteen former officers of the Office of State Security [Poland's
communist secret police]. "The paper is avoiding any mention of Jews,"
notes Jewish journalist Carol Oppenheim. "I think there is widespread
opinion of the dominance of Jews in the Communist Party," said Michael
Cichy, the cultural editor of the paper, "but mention of this in the
Polish press is taboo." [OPPENHEIM, p. 39]
In response to Jewish outrage that
such truthful information be published, the new head (Viktor Niemann) of
the publishing house that printed Sack's book in German, R. Piper,
decided to destroy all 6,000 copies in its warehouses. "It was the
fourth time," notes the Associated Press, "that Sack's story ...
had been bought by a publisher who subsequently decided against
printing." [BAJACK, INTERNET] "It is tragic," wrote Sack in response to
his German publisher's actions, "that 'An Eye for an Eye' is not
being published in Germany now and that Germans have nowhere to learn
the truth." [SACK, p. A18]
When the TV news show 60 Minutes
investigated one of the Jewish subjects of Sack's book, Shlomo Morel,
Sack's broader story "looked as if it might take off," said Carol
Oppenheim, "and it sent shock waves through the Jewish community." "A
feature by '60 Minutes' that backed up Sack seemed to promise
major attention and at least minor bestsellerdom," noted the
Washington Post, "but the rest of the media either attacked or
ignored the book. The general tenor was summoned up in Miami Jewish
Week: "Do me a favor -- don't read this book." [STREITFIELD, p. D4]
In 1994, John Lombardi wrote a
disturbing article for New York magazine about the Sack story and
the massive censorship surrounding it. Lombardi called his piece "The
Book They Dare Not Review: An Inconvenient Holocaust Story." Lombardi
formerly worked at Advance Publication's GQ magazine, the
periodical that had initially paid Sack $20,000 to research and write
about the Jewish concentration camp overseers, only -- after the article
had been typeset -- to quietly kill it.
The most venomous attack on Sack's
book came from the New Republic (owned by avidly pro-Israel
publisher Martin Peretz). Sack wrote a point by point rebuttal to their
review, but the magazine refused to publish any of it in their Letters
to the Editor section. "But," noted the Nation, "the magazine
made the remarkable decision to sell him ad space to run it ($525 for
five column inches). The ad was typeset, but the magazine then chose to
reject it." [WIENER, p. 287] Leon Wieseltier, the Jewish literary
editor of the New Republic, was even quoted as saying, "I'm not
embarrassed to say that as part of my job of policing the culture, I
felt that the sooner we stopped this book, the better.... It's one of
the stupidest books I ever read, and I frankly resolved to do as much
damage as I could." [LOMBARDI, p 18] Elan Steinberg, spokeswoman for the
World Jewish Congress impugned the veracity of Sack's dozens of
interviews with Jewish (and other) eyewitnesses to Jewish-created
atrocities, saying: "You cannot rely on witnesses ... [because] you're
insulting the memory of 6 million [Jewish Holocaust] martyrs." [LOMBARD,
p. 18]
In 1997, the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington DC suddenly cancelled a lecture by Sack
about his book and his findings therein. "The invitation to give your
lecture was issued without my knowledge," wrote Director Walter Reich to
the Eye for an Eye author, "Having had the opportunity to examine
the matter, I have determined that holding the presentation would not be
compatible with the Museum's programs." [STREITFIELD, p. D1] In turn,
Sack decided to rent (for $301) a room at the nearby National Press Club
to discuss his book and the censorship around it. There is no record in
the major national computer research database of America's newspapers
that Sack's press conference was ever reported upon.
"It would be tempting to simply
dismiss this painful book as the work of an anti-Semitic crackpot, as
many have," wrote Jewish author Carol Oppenheim, "The New York Times,
the Washington Post, and Time have ignored An Eye for
An Eye [i.e., not reviewed it]. But John Sack is a noted journalist
with some forty years experience. His work on the Vietnam War is studied
in college classes. And he is also a Jew." [OPPENHEIM, p. 39]
And what are we to make of the case
of Victor Ostrovsky, former Mossad agent and author of 1990's By Way
of Deception, an expose of the international workings of the Israeli
Mossad organization? Although Israel managed to briefly, and
literally, ban his book in America through the American courts, the
censorship was soon lifted. [See earlier discussion] "We will get to him
by other means, we will break him economically," the head of the Mossad,
Israel's CIA, then told the Israeli media. "I'm now convinced," wrote
Ostrovsky in 1997, "that I am the target of a broad collusion between
elements of the Israel government and their gofers, mostly in the
American Jewish community ... My second book was ignored ... A speaker's
bureau in Toronto, which seldom had trouble arranging speaking
engagements with student and other groups eager to have me as a speaker,
found that the engagements were cancelled before I could appear."
[OSTROVSKY, 1997]
When Ostrovsky appeared on Canadian
national television, Yosef Lapid, the former chief of Israeli
television, declared on the same show, via satellite from the Jewish
state, that Ostrovsky's assassination by the Mossad could cause
diplomatic problems now that he lived in Canada, but "I hope that there
would be a decent Jew in Canada who would do the job for us."
Ostrovsky was later stunned that no
North American media outcry rose against this call for his assassination
on live public television. (Recall, in contradistinction, the mass media
outcry against Iran's death sentence on author Salmon Rushdie. Iran, of
course, is a declared arch-enemy of Zionism. And what, one wonders,
would happen to a former president of CBS who called for murder?) But
Lapid? Nothing. A reporter from USA Today interviewed Ostrovsky
about Lapid's public threat and planned to write a story about it, but,
"while I was still in his office," laments Ostrovsky, "his editor told
him by telephone to kill the article." "The same people," wrote the
former Mossad agent, "who presumably would praise someone from the CIA
or the U.S. armed forces who exposed serious wrongdoing in those
institutions were now hard at work to smother my criticisms of an
intelligence agency for a foreign country that, to put it as charitably
as possible, does not have America's best interests at heart."
Eventually he sought to sue the man
who called for the call to kill him, but Ostrovsky's lawyer soon bailed
out, explaining "that the safety of his staff would clearly be
jeopardized if he proceeded." Soon thereafter, Ostrovsky had financial
problems with both his publishers, HarperCollins and, in Canada,
Stoddart. His agent suddenly refused to return his calls and in
due time his "house burned to the ground. The fire marshal's report
declared it arson." In 1997, Washington publisher Regnery backed
out of a plan to publish his next book, already listed in its upcoming
books catalogue. "It suddenly occurred to me," Ostrovsky wrote,
"for the first time, that the forces
of racism, bigotry and apartheid
may win, even here in North America.
In calling out, finally, for help,
I
suddenly fear that I will only be
shouting into the wind. To all who
believe that 'it can't happen here,'
I say beware. It is immensely
satisfying to take a stand and speak
out against coercion and tyranny.
But ... although your friends
cherish you, they may choose to do it
from a distance." [OSTROVSKY, V.,
1997, p. 37, 84-85]
In another case of covert
censorship, in 1996 the London Sunday Telegraph took note of an
unusual article by American Jewish journalist Philip Weiss:
"A studied silence has greeted the
cover story in the normally
scrupulously liberal New York
magazine which claims that Jews
in America wield so much power and
influence that they need no
longer fear the shadow of
anti-Semitism. The magazine refuses to
discuss the article, as apparently
does the author, Philip Weiss ...
The weekly must have known it was
inviting trouble. Even the cover
seemed a calculated risk: a
photograph of the American flag with
some of its stars replaced by the
Star of David. American magazines
rarely confront the issue of Jewish
influence so directly.... Richard
Goldstein, a columnist for the
Village Voice, has already remarked
that the fact Jews have achieved so
much influence despite the anti-
Semitic views of many Americans is
'less a paradox than a time-bomb.'
The irony, of course, is that the
issue is one that has been privately
discussed among Jews for decades."
[LANGTON, p. 24]
In another censorial case, 1989 BBC
reporter Alan Hart complained that United States publishers were afraid
to publish his less-than-condemning book about PLO leader Yassar Arafat
because they "privately feared a backlash from supporters of Israel."
The volume, Arafat: A Political Biography, had already appeared
in three editions in Great Britain -- first published five years
earlier. Over 40 American publishers had passed on publishing Hart's
work until Indiana University Press decided to do it. In a formal
statement, the university publisher remarked that it was "not unaware
that some form of self-censorship might have been the cause" for the
lack of American publisher interest. [ABRAMS, G., 6-19-89, p. 5, 1]
In 1996 the Christian Science
Monitor noted the attack upon a famous Catholic cleric in France,
headlining its article: "Cleric's Comments Ignite the Fury of French
media." The origin of this controversy stems from a book by Roger
Garaudy: The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics. Garaudy, as
noted earlier, wrote this volume that criticized Israel, Zionism, and
the Holocaust as Judeo-centric propaganda; it has been effectively
banned in France. The author, an 82-year old former Resistance fighter
against the Nazis, was also once a Communist member of the French
parliament (expelled from the party in 1970 for criticizing the Soviet
invasion of Czechoslovakia) and later a convert to Islam. He was fined
$20,000 by a French court for writing his book, which, declared the
court, "questions all Jews, not only Israelis ... Far from merely
criticizing Zionism ... Roger Garaudy embarked on a virulent and
systematic questioning of crimes against humanity against the Jewish
community." [ROSENBERG, C., 2-27-98]
The Christian Science Monitor
noted that Garaudy's book was available in only one bookstore in Paris,
and it was not possible to even order the work in many of the others.
The Monitor also noted that most of the critics of the book have
not read it and that "Garaudy's book does not deny that millions of Jews
were murdered by the Nazis." "A "prominent jurist," Francois Terre,
called the 1990 Gayssot Law (that "makes it a criminal offense to
challenge the facts of the Holocaust") totalitarian: It was "a law that
kills historical research and dishonors France ... Even politicians who
oppose the law have been reluctant to speak out against it." [CHADDOCK,
G., 7-25-96, p. 5]
The Catholic cleric Abbe Pierre fell
into the controversy surrounding the book soon after. Pierre, noted the
Washington Post, was "France's most admired man ... For five
decades [he] ranked consistently at the top of the popularity polls in
France for his defense of the downtrodden. As a champion of street
people and a former activist in the anti-Nazi resistance, Abbe Pierre
commanded universal respect and unrivaled media coverage." [RANDALL, J.,
p. 7-3-96, p. A27] Pierre's activities in the French underground also
included smuggling Jews to safety. He is the founder the Emmaus
foundation, 350 centers around the world for the homeless and poor.
The cleric's problems began when he
publicly came out in support of Garaudy. Knowing the author for fifty
years, Pierre attested to his integrity. "I think the average
Frenchman," said Pierre, "will say with relief the taboo [about how the
Holocaust may be examined] is over. You will no longer be called
anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic for saying a Jew sings out of tune."
[RANDALL, J., 7-3-96, p. A27] Unfortunately for Abbe Pierre, however,
not understanding the power of such forces against such an open comment,
this was a gross miscalculation.
The 83-year old cleric was barraged
with critical attack from all sides -- from the French media, civil
rights groups, and eventually -- seeking to assuage vociferous Jewish
complaint -- the Church itself. France's chief rabbi called Pierre's
words those of an anti-Semite. The president of the Jewish Consistory of
France declared that: "[Abbe's] continuous support of Roger Garaudy is
unacceptable." [PHILLIPS, I., 5-39-96, p. 13] Under an avalanche of
criticism, Pierre took refuge in a monastery in Italy. For a while the
old cleric continued to defend his position, digging himself deeper into
controversy, noting that Jewish suffering was only part of the calamity
of World War II. He also "said that according to the Bible, the Jews
committed a genocide comparable with the Shoah when they entered
Palestine 12 or 11 centuries before Christ." Addressing Zionism, he
called it "a world conspiracy," that it was "based in the United States
with world ramifications," and he implored people to have "the honesty
to look at the truth." Zionism, said the cleric, "want[s] the empire
promised to Abraham. And this movement is plotting worldwide for that."
[AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE, 6-17-96] [See later chapters for discussions of
Zionism]
The attacks upon Frances national
"saint," suddenly fallen, continued. Months later a British newspaper
noted that "it is clear that the debate left him traumatized. His
conversation [now] is scattered with references to his friendship, help
towards, and empathy, with the Jews." [FINANCIAL TIMES, 6-21-97] The
Washington Post's reporter Jonathan Randall ended his report on
Pierre with a suggestion of senility in the old man. Quoting Charles
DeGaulle, Randall concluded his piece, saying: "Old age is a shipwreck."
[RANDALL, J., p. 7-3-96, p. A27]
Overwhelmed by the attacks against
him, Pierre finally publicly surrendered. "The attacks of which I have
been targeted have been beyond all measure," he said. "I have greatly
suffered." [PHILLIPS, I., 5-30-96, p. 13] He announced that "I have
decided to retract my statement, and to bow entirely to the sole opinion
of the experts of the Church," also adding that his comments had been
"exploited by elements who dangerously toy with the anti-Semitic,
neo-fascist, and neo-Nazi currents that I have fought and will always
fight against." [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 7-23-96]
A controversy of a somewhat related
vein occurred in Montreal, Canada, a year before the Abbe Pierre story.
A prominent Canadian Jewish lawyer, Julius Grey, faced an avalanche of
Jewish condemnation and outrage when he freely noted in a lecture at
John Abbott College that "I think the Holocaust and anti-Semitism is
being used by some elements and Israel and the Jewish community to keep
people in the fold. What is happening is a fake alarmist mentality,
because there is effectively no anti-Semitism in North America ...
[Modern teaching about the Holocaust] is turning it into a political
incident. Each ethnic group creates its own martyrology, that we're good
and kind and we've been mistreated." [CHERNEY, 4-25-95]
Response to Grey's comments was
overwhelming in the Jewish community. Mike Cohn of the Canadian Jewish
Congress told a reporter that "in the many years I've been at the
congress, I don't remember getting this many phone calls from irate
members of the community." [CHERNEY, 4-26-95] In the flurry of
subsequent editorials about the controversy, one non-Jewish commentator
noted that "the effect of the reaction to Grey's remarks could be to
intimidate, to stifle open debate, to chill free expression. For after
seeing what happened to Grey, others may think twice about expressing
unconventional opinions and ideas." [MACPHERSON, D. p. B3] The original
(Montreal) Gazette reporter who reported the Grey story later
wondered in a later article about "the rush to discredit and silence
Julius Grey ... [Does] a writer need ... a special license to deal with
the Holocaust, or a lawyer need to get permission from the community's
institutions to talk about it ... Could that ... silence dissent?"
[CHERNEY, E., 4-29-95, p. B6]
Elsewhere, in the more personal
realm, when Tom Bower sought to publish his unauthorized and highly
critical biography of Robert Maxwell, the British Jewish media baron
invoked litigation involving at least twelve lawyers, a number of
accountants, and two private detectives in researching Bower's
background. Failing in the courts to stop the book, Maxwell's army of
censors intimidated -- by economic threats and intimidating legal
innuendoes -- much of England's publishing world. Wholesale book
distributors and most British bookshops knuckled under to Maxwell's
power, and didn't carry the book. The mogul even bought a paperback
company that held the rights to Bower's pending volume in order to
effectively censor it. [BOWER, p. ix-x]
In 1997, in a story about Jewish
South African mogul Sol Kerzner, the New York Times noted that:
"In an early test of press freedom
under South Africa's new
constitution, a well-known
international casino magnate has
delayed the publication of a book
about him and is trying to
ban it. The book, 'Kerzner
Unauthorized' ... profiles Sol Kerzner
[who] made his fortune operating
[casinos] under apartheid in
south Africa's black
‘homeland’.... [He] has threatened to sue
local newspapers if they excerpted
it. As a result, a major Sunday
newspaper withheld publication of
an excerpt from the book."
[MCNEIL, p. A3]
The author of the Kerzner volume,
Allan Greenblo, is credible; he is himself the CEO of two major South
African publications -- the Business Day and the Financial
Mail. (Perhaps he himself is Jewish?)
Jewish author Steven Weinberg (author
of Armand Hammer: The Untold Story) was even sued by corrupt
Jewish mogul Armand Hammer. "After The Untold Story was published
in England, Armand filed the most expensive libel action in British
history, suing Weinberg on 157 counts of defamation." [BLUMAY, C., 1992,
p. 449]
In 1988, yet another Jewish business
mogul family (Canada's Reichmanns, at the time owners of the largest
real estate empire on earth) sought to censor the truth about their
past. The (Montreal) Gazette notes that:
"These are dangerous waters for any
journalist. In 1988, Toronto Life
magazine was hit with a $102
million libel suit for publishing an article
by freelance writer Elaine Dewar
which investigates [patriarch] Samuel
Reichmann's murky past as an egg
dealer in pre-war Austria and then
as a currency speculator in wartime
Tangiers. Toronto Life's eventual
apology and out-of-court settlement
suggested that 'libel chill' can be
an effective deterrent for any
wealthy family seeking to keep a curtain
of privacy around itself."
[HADEKEL, p. I]
In the same realm, as microcosm for
the whole problem of censorship and self-censorship in the mass media
world, in reviewing Jewish Hollywood mogul Michael Ovitz at the peak of
his power, Robert Slater noted that
"As the most powerful person in
[Hollywood], Ovitz had the power,
if he chose, to use it in order to
punish any critic who went public by
denying him or her all access to his
stable of stars. The mere possibility
that he exact such punishment was
enough to silence his critics ... No
Ovitz critic was willing to speak
out either on or off the record."
[SLATER, p. 202]
In August 1992, John H. Richardson, a
senior writer at Premiere magazine in Los Angeles, finished a
story about Jewish madam Heidi Fleiss and her drug and prostitution ring
in the Hollywood community. The entertainment magazine, dependent upon
cooperation with the movie world for its very existence, decided against
publishing the piece. The Entertainment Weekly also developed an
article about the story, but threats of legal action from attorneys for
Columbia executive Michael Nathanson killed the story. The
Hollywood Reporter also had an article about Fleiss too; this too
was aborted when Nathanson threatened to "destroy [each reporter's]
reputation" if the story was published. [KENNEDY, D., 8-20-93]
Reporter Dan Moldea experienced a
similar situation when he dared to write an expose (published in 1986)
about mogul Lew Wasserman at MCA. Moldea who has written about
crime for over twenty years (including books about the murder of Bobby
Kennedy, the Teamsters Union, and corruption in professional sports),
noted that "Writing Dark Victory [about Wasserman] was the only
time I ever really feared for my career. I felt raw power coming at me
like a rifle shot." [MCDOUGAL, p. x] "Moldea," notes Dennis McDougal,
"maintains that he was followed and his phone lines tapped during the
year he worked on the book. He is certain that Lew Wasserman targeted
him for harassment." [MCDOUGAL, p. x]
Los Angeles Times reporter
Bill Knoedelseder also faced blatant censorship when he tried to write
about the Wasserman-MCA-Mafia world, which extended to powerful
influences in the Reagan White House (Wasserman was Reagan's Hollywood
agent). The reporter, notes Dennis McDougal,
"changed his mind about his
newspaper's independence.... Somewhere
in plusher, upper reaches of the
Times, beyond the hard scrabble
cubicles of the newsroom, Lew was
enjoying lunch with the newspaper's
executives ... Knoedelseder's stories
about MCA and the derailed Mob
probe [at Los Angeles City Hall]
began to get rejected regularly by his
editors. He was instructed to switch
interests and write about something
other than MCA for a change.
Before the year was out, stories about
MCA and the Mob ceased to
appear in the paper at all, and Bill
Knoedelseder quit his job at the
Times." [MCDOUGAL, p. 468]
In 2000, Los Angeles Times
reporter, Kim Murphy, a 17-year veteran newswoman, wrote some articles
about the community of "Holocaust Deniers" and alleged right wing
political groups that led to many Jews "accusing the Times of
legitimizing the views of anti-Semites." The first article addressed
controversial British historian David Irving who had attempted to, in
effect, sue the international Jewish lobby that had destroyed his
writing career. Murphy's attempts at objectivity rankled a lot of Jews
and the reporter soon found herself under fire. "The story outraged
members of the Los Angeles Jewish community," notes Eric Umansky, "The
controversy even found its way into the Times newsroom." At close
quarters, fellow Los Angeles Times reporter Alan Abramson, of
course Jewish, decried Murphy's work, as did another Jewish newsman,
David Lauter, the Times religion reporter, who said, "Kim is a
very good reporter. But I think she screwed up on this particular
subject." The Times' executive editor, Leo Wolinsky, also Jewish,
"signed off on Murphy's second story after asking her to quote more
sources critical of Irving." Murphy publicly defended herself, insisting
that
"The Holocaust was horrible, "[but]
it's my profound belief that
there are no questions that can't be
asked. This is an issue of
political correctness. There are just
certain things you are not
allowed to say, even in this
country." [UMANSKY, E., 9-2000]
During the era of the 1980s Savings
and Loan scandals across America, Wall Street Journal reporter
Charles McCoy was set to run an article about the Federal Home Loan Bank
Board's questionable decision to allow J. Livingston Kosberg's First
Texas Savings and Loan (fourth largest in Texas) to acquire
Gibraltar Savings (the state's largest S&L whose principal investor
was Saul Steinberg). Connected to the deal was yet another influential
Jewish entrepreneur, Robert Strauss, former chairman of the Democratic
National Party and head of the Jimmy Carter campaign against Ronald
Reagan. Reporter Martin Meyer notes that
"In my presence [Strauss] chewed
reporter McCoy out on the telephone
for a quarter of an hour, informing
him that he (Strauss) was close to
Warren Phillips [also Jewish], CEO of
Dow Jones, and thus McCoy's
employer, and Strauss would have his
ass if there was stuff in the story
of which Strauss disapproved ... [So]
McCoy wrote carefully, and you
had to know what the numbers [in his
story] implied to know what the
story said." [MEYER, M., p. 14]
"The deal shouldn't have been
approved at all...," remarks Meyer, "First Texas was a sinking
ship, losing money on its lending operations ... [But] with Strauss on
one side and [Jewish junk bond manipulator Michael] Milken on the other,
the Bank Board was completely surrounded by political influence ...
First Gibraltar's star board member was [also] Strauss' son, Richard
(who was further blessed in Dallas by his aunt, the mayor)." [MEYER, M.,
p. 13-14]
In 1992, director/actor Woody Allen
faced public embarrassment when actress Mia Farrow (who had a common law
relationship with him for many years; she was also once married to
Jewish conductor Andre Previn) accused Allen of having an affair with
one of their teenage adopted daughters, and that he had repeatedly
sexually molested another daughter, a young child. Criminal charges,
however, were another story. Allen conceded, and defended, his sexual
relationship with the older daughter but denied any other incidents with
others. Paul Williams, the New York Child Welfare worker on the case,
noted that
"based [on the child's] demeanor and
her responses to my questions,
and my conversations with the
caseworker in Connecticut, and
my experiences from interviewing
hundreds of children who have
been abused, I concluded that abuse
did occur and that there was
a prima facie cause to
commence family-court proceedings against
Woody Allen. Then the barriers came
down. There came a litany of
reasons why we should not go forward.
My superior said that Woody
Allen is 'an influential person,' she
talked about his films, and his
'position.' As more evidence came
through interviews, I insisted that
the case should have been filed.
Managers at the Child Welfare Agency
responded that 'pressure [to drop the
case] is coming all the way from
the mayor's office [Jewish mayor: Ed
Koch]." [FARROW, p. 311]
The case was dropped. A child
custody trial featured Allen represented by six different law firms.
[FARROW, p. 316] Later, the Connecticut state attorney, Frank Maco,
announced that "probable cause" for Allen's arrest existed, but that by
then Farrow had decided a public trial would be extremely detrimental to
the abused child. [FARROW, p. 329]
In 1997 Peter Watson's sensational
expose of the systemic corruption within the Sotheby art auction house
(headed by Jewish real estate mogul Alfred Taubman) "sparked scandalous
headlines on both sides of the Atlantic when it was released in
Britain." [NY POST, 2-2-98] "Now that [the book] has finally arrived [in
America]," noted the New York Post, "the press doesn't seem to be
showing much interest. So far, only the weekly New York Observer
has reviewed it -- and even that is going Sotheby's way." [NY POST,
2-2-98] The American publisher of the book, Random House (owned
by Jewish mogul Si Newhouse) backed its publication up three times and
revised part of the European version. The Post suggested that
"Sotheby is getting kid glove treatment thanks to Alfred Taubman getting
a favor from Random House owner Si Newhouse -- an avid collector known
to spend millions at auctions." [NEW YORK POST, 2-2-98, p. 12]
In 1999, independent journalist and
art critic Hector Feliciano found himself facing a $1.8 million lawsuit
at the hands of the (Jewish) Wildenstein family (Daniel, Alec, and Guy).
Feliciano had dared to write about the family's clandestine art dealings
with the Nazis during Hitler's looting of Jewish-owned art treasures.
"They're suing me," said Feliciano, "so that other journalists will
think twice about writing about them." [GOLDBERG, J. J., 6-18-99, p. 14]
Dissident ("self-hating") Jews too
are not immune from enforced censorship about public criticism of their
community. British reporters Christopher Reed and Eleanor Mills note a
well known case in Hollywood:
"An example of Tinseltown shyness
about criticism of Jews is Budd
Schulberg's book What Makes Sammy
Run? Now 82, he wrote the
classic about a ruthlessly ambitious
Hollywood type called Sammy Glick,
in 1941. Five attempts to film it
have failed. After reading the book,
MGM studio chief Louis Mayer said
Schulberg should be deported.
It was pointed out that the author
was not only born in America, he
was the son of the head of
Paramount." [He was also Jewish] [REED, p.
2]
"The charge of anti-Semitism was laid
on the book," notes the Los Angeles Times, "although Schulberg
pointed out that all of Sammy's victims were Jewish too ... These days,
Schulberg fears that What Makes Sammy Run? has become what he
calls 'a handbook for yuppies.' 'It's a new handle on Sammy," Schulberg
says, "Sammy's credo of success at all costs and it doesn't matter how
you get there makes the book seem not truly merely entertaining but a
Bible of sorts." [CHAMPLIN, p. F1] (Along the same censorial lines, in
1963, Jewish cinema verite documentary filmmaker Albert Maysles'
unforgiving film about Hollywood producer Joe Levine evoked such anger
in the Hollywood community that "members of the Oscar screening society
reportedly found 'Showman' so anti-Semitic that they watched only five
minutes before walking out." [JEW JR LA, 1-16-98, p. 26] (Levine, notes
Thomas Hoving, "earned his millions by buying nonentities such as the
Italian Hercules films starring Steve Reeves and Godzilla,
the Japanese monster movie, and hyping them shamelessly." [HOVING, T.,
1993, p. 396]
Jewish singer Eddie Fisher recalls
wanting to play the lead acting role in What Makes Sammy Run? "I
had several meetings with Lew Wasserman, then the president of MCA,"
Fisher says,
"the talent agency that represented me. I wanted to play the lead,
an aggressive
producer named Sammy Glick, maybe the ultimate Jewish hustler. I
knew a lot of
real Sammy Glicks and I felt confident that was a character I could
play.
Wasserman decided Sammy Glick was 'too Jewish, too negative.' He
hated the
concept and did not want the picture made. I think he decided it
was bad for
the Jews." [FISHER, E., 1999, p. 90]
Angry reaction by the Jewish
community to members of their own depicting such Jewish "success
stories" is not uncommon. The (Montreal) Gazette noted Mordechai
Richler as one of Canada's best known writers, but
"caustic, controversial, and often
crude ... [Richler's novel] Dudley Kravitz
remains the best-selling of Richler's
works. A comic extravaganza of a
coming-of-age novel, it tells the
story of a 'scheming little bastard,' a
coarse, driven, young Jew determined
to make something of himself at
any cost. A critical success both in
Canada and beyond, the book
inspired a raging controversy and
denunciation by the Jewish community
that Richler [who is Jewish] was an
anti-Semite." NAVES, p. 12
In the movie making world, in 1996
actor Arnold Schwarzenegger learned a bit about Jewish censorial power
when he dared to consider to make a film about a real life character, a
Nazi captain named Osterman who refused to kill a group of British
prisoners during World War II. His interest came in the wake of Jewish
director Steven Spielberg's colossal hit Schindlers List, where a
Nazi saves Jews. Scheduled to begin shooting in ten weeks,
the director of Schwarzenegger's project backed out of the film. "Other
directors," noted the London Sunday Times, "have privately
admitted they are avoiding a film that might offend the powerful Jewish
lobby in Hollywood ... According to Hollywood reports, Joel Schumacher,
who is directing the latest Batman film, offered Schwarzenegger a short
word of advice about making the film, 'Don't.'" [HARLOW]
In 1999, in an overtly censorial and
revisionist move, the British ITV television company announced
that it was sweetening the unpleasant Jewish "Fagin" character in their
new filming of Charles Dickens' classic novel Oliver Twist. In the new
version too, he would not be Jewish. "We don't want a Fagin that is a
Shylock character," said the ITV Director of Programming, David
Liddiment. "This decision," noted critic Rhoda Koenig, "exemplifies not
only a lack of understanding of our literary heritage, but a contempt
for the past itself. It is also an example of the sentimentality,
arrogance, and cowardice that are now passed off as 'sensitivity' and
'responsibility' ... Why have we become so illiterate, so phony, and so
craven? " [KOENIG, 7-7-99, pl. 13] Dr. David Parker, curator of the
Dickens House Museum in London, responded, saying: "This softening of
Fagin is done to political correctness. Literary stereotypes, however
objectionable, should not be lightly cast aside." [HELLEN, 1-17-99]
In 1997 the mainstream Jewish
Thought Police struggled to censor (and failing that, at least
marginalize) a book by a Jewish author, Norman Finkelstein. Finkelstein,
described in the (Jewish) Forward as "a notorious ideological
opponent of the state of Israel," a man who characterized a more favored
-- and best-selling -- Jewish author as a "Zionist propagandist who
distorted evidence in order to legitimate the existence of the state of
Israel." [MAHLER, p. C1] Hearing that Finkelstein's book, A Nation on
Trial, was set to be published by the Henry Holt publishing
firm, "the literary editor of the New Republic, Leon Wieseltier,
was so startled by the news that he put in a call to Michael Naumann
[also Jewish], an old friend and the publisher of Holt, assured
that [Naumann] could not be familiar with Mr. Finkelstein's work."
[MAHLER, p. C1] The Anti-Defamation League was among those who publicly
rallied against the publication of the "anti-Zionist and anti-Israel"
work. "There seems no question," noted the Forward, "that the
book is something of a hot potato. An esteemed historian who initially
agreed to write the prologue to the book, Istvan Deak, a professor of
Central European history at Columbia University, suddenly changed his
mind." [MAHLER, p. C1]
In the violent criminal underworld,
vengeful censorship actions can be more draconian. Jewish journalist
Robert Friedman was forced to go into hiding in 1998 when authorities
informed him that Russian Jewish mobster Seimon Mogilevich (described by
the Village Voice as "the World's Most Dangerous Gangster") was
overheard contracting for Friedman's murder because of the journalist's
expose about him.
Various forms of censorship by the
powerful -- usually by economic blackmail and intimidation -- is not
uncommon in the mass media world, creating an environment of people
worried about their careers and fear of their bosses, thereby becoming
overly protective of Jews/Israel from criticism. Even leaving aside, for
example, the issues at stake in the simple fact that the vast Newhouse
media empire -- like so many others -- is Jewish-owned (a subject whose
political implications publishers are certainly forbidden to address),
any criticism of the Newhouse organization is smothered
because of its omnipresent economic clout, media interconnectedness, and
long arm of vengeance. Even in the academic world. Take the case of the
Columbia Journalism Review and its Jewish editor, Suzanne Levine,
who in 1992 wanted to find a writer willing to address the many negative
changes affecting the New Yorker magazine after the Newhouses
took it over. Thomas Maier notes that:
"Levine went through numerous
contacts until she found an out-of-state
editor willing to accept the
assignment. 'Why me?' asked the editor, Eric
Utne, who runs his own alternative
magazine. 'You're the perfect person
to do it,' the Columbia
Journalism Review told him. When Utne pressed
for the real reason, he was told
flatly, 'Because no one else will touch
it.'" [MAIER, p. 347]
In 1998, a small publisher, Seven
Stories Press, published an "unauthorized biography" of the Newhouse
family. A reviewer in the New York Times Book Review noted that
"Citizen Newhouse was initially signed with Viking, but new
management there took the unusual step of canceling the book when it was
done -- a decision itself that was the subject of news articles and
gossip columns. [Author] Felsenthal said that once she turned in the
manuscript, Phyllis Grann, president of Penguin Putnam, Inc.,
parent of Viking, told her she couldn't publish it because too
many people mentioned in it were friends." [GOLDSTEIN, T., p. 17]
And what -- away from the
mass-produced popular press -- of Jewish dominance of the more
"high-brow" reading? The most widely-read American "intellectual
periodicals," remarks W. D. Rubenstein, "are either Jewish or contain a
disproportionately Jewish input." [RUBENSTEIN, p. 64] His list is five
journals long: Commentary, The Public Interest, the
New York Review of Books, the Partisan Review, and the New
Republic.
Commentary is a house-organ
publication of the American Jewish Committee (Jewish editors Elliot
Cohen and then Norman Podhoretz), "Commentary," wrote Richard
Curtiss in 1998, "... has been around so long that probably few
Americans even recognize it as the Israel lobby's principal national
publication." [CURTISS, p. 9] In a 1990s survey of "3,000 prominent
Americans" Commentary was ranked third behind the New England
Journal of Medicine and Foreign Affairs among "most
influential" print and electronic media. It was ahead of the New York
Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal.
[TWERSKY, p. 40] "Many Commentary authors," says David Twersky,
"have gone on to serve in government as a result, in large measure, of
being read by the right people at the right time." [TWERSKY, p. 41] Such
Gentile authors have included Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Daniel Moynihan (Commentary
is well known for its "neoconservative" flavor).
"[Editor Norman] Podhoretz's struggle
with his Jewishness," notes Twersky, "is central to the evolution of
Commentary ... [It] came to be defined by the desire of Jewish
intellectuals to create a space for modernism without discarding their
Jewishness." [TWERSKY, p. 43] Yet, according to editor Murray Polner of
a second American Jewish Committee-published journal, Present Tense,
(1973-1990), this second publication was founded "because Commentary
wasn't Jewish enough." [TWERSKY, p. 58] Former non-Jewish journalist
Scott McConnell notes the unpleasant experience he had when (years after
his employment at Commentary) he bumped into Podhoretz at a
dinner party:
"Norman was standing across a round table from me, looking older
and frailer (and
thus in a way sweeter). When I approached him, hand extended, his
distaste in
putting forth his own was palpable. 'I always liked you Scott. But
you wrote an
anti-Israel piece, and I'm very ideological on that subject' ... To
be charged with writing
an 'anti-Israel' column is no small thing -- it has been known to
get people fired ...
The U.S. gains nothing for its own reputation or interests by
backing Israeli
policies that are unjust to the Palestinians, reviled throughout
the Arab world and
opposed by most of the world's governments. In political Washington
(as at some
Hamptons dinner parties), life may go more smoothly if one doesn't
do or say
anything that irritates right-wing Zionists. As my encounter with
Norman reminded
me, the consequences of speaking out sincerely can be quite
unsettling. But it|
it is still the right thing to do." [MCCONNELL, S., v.14, ISSUE 30]
The "New York Intellectuals [a group
of influential social and political critics and theorists, whom
Podhoretz calls "The Family"]," says David Twersky, were "a group made
up largely (though not exclusively) of Jews ... writing in Partisan
Review, and later Commentary and Dissent...., [they]
helped fashion post-war American attitudes toward literature, culture,
art and politics." [TWERSKY, p. 40] The Jewish author Irving Howe
(himself benighted as one of "The Family") wrote in 1968 that
"they have a fondness for
ideological speculation; they write literary
criticism with a strong social
emphasis; they revel in polemic; they
strive self-consciously to be
'brilliant;' and by birth -- or osmosis --
they are Jews." [TWERSKY, p.
40-41]
In a symposium in Commentary
magazine in 1966, notes Arnold Eisen, "all the participants except the
Reconstructionists and Rabbi Jacob Agus affirmed that Jews were God's
Chosen People, and did so in the traditional terms of revelation,
covenant, messiah, and exile, rather than by citing the Jewish
contribution to civilization or explaining that, in fact, it was Jews
who had chosen God ... Significantly, Commentary did not ask asks
respondents whether the Jews were the Chosen People but in
what sense they had been chosen." [EISEN, p. 149]
The second of Rubinstein's "most
widely read" intellectual journals is Public Interest, founded by
Jewish conservatives Irving Kristol and Daniel Bell in 1973. The
third, The New York Review of Books, wrote Dennis Prager in 1980,
"is still edited by Robert B. Silvers and Barbara Epstein ... most of
its political writers were Jews, and its tone, in the words of Irving
Howe ... was a 'snappish crude anti-Americanism." Within a decade it
was the "most influential magazine" among America's 275,000 academics.
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 69]
Jewish authors William Phillips and
Philip Rahv (born Ivan Greenberg) were the founding editors of the
reinstitution of the fourth of Rubinstein's noteworthy magazines,
Partisan Review, in 1937. "The main difference between Partisan
Review and Commentary," said Elliot Cohen, Commentary's
first editor, "is that we admit to being a Jewish magazine and they
don't." [PODHORETZ, p. 99-100] Even today, Partisan Review
remains Jewish-dominated. The Editor-in-Chief remains William Phillips,
the Editor is Edith Kurzweil, and Number three in the hierarchy is
Associate Editor Steve Marcus. Joanna Rose is also Chairman of the
Publications and Advisory Board.
Lastly, of Rubinstein’s five seminal
"high-brow journals,” The New Republic is still owned and
edited by Martin Peretz, "one of the most militant defenders of Israel."
[GOLDBERG, p. 299] Peretz, once a bankroller of the left-wing
Ramparts magazine, was described by a New Republic foreign
editor as "a very emotional guy. He has certain passions in life, one of
which is Israel. I hate to keep bringing in the Israeli thing, because I
consider myself just as pro-Israeli, but it colored his whole view of
the world." [CURTISS, p. 325] (Among other things, Peretz has served on
the Board of Directors of Channel 7 TV in Boston. A Jewish friend,
Robert Kraft, owner of the largest privately owned packaging company in
America, also sat on the Board and was the station's number two
shareholder). [WEINGARTEN, p. 4]
In 1992, a 25-yeard old Jewish
author, Ruth Shalit, "began interning at the New Republic.
Practically overnight she became a star --a TNR Associate Editor
writing cover stories for the political weekly as well as for the New
York Times Sunday Magazine with a $45,000-a-year contract to do
pieces for GQ." [SHEPARDl, p. 34] She was also accused, notes
the American Journalism Review, of "plagiarism, factual errors"
and -- in one specific article -- racism, when she charged that the
Washington Post "had lowered high standards in an attempt to
diversify its newsroom and had softened news coverage of black
politicians so as not to offend African-American readers." [SHEPARD, p.
34]
In 1998, a (Jewish) Associate Editor
at the New Republic, Stephen Glass, was even fired for
fabricating the news stories he authored. Glass, noted the New York
Times about the scandal, "had made up part or all of 27 articles he
wrote." [NEW YORK TIMES, 4-18-00, p. C2] (A former editor of the New
Republic, Michael Kinsley, also Jewish, today is the editor of
Microsoft's Internet magazine called Slate. Michael Hirschorn
edits rival Internet magazine Inside, and Scott Rosenberg is the
vice president and "technology editor" of another of the major Internet
magazines, Salon. Steve Waldman founded and edits the commercial
religious web site, www.beliefnet.com )
Other important intellectual
journals over the years with links to the mostly Jewish "intellectual"
clique include [d] Dissent, run by Irving Howe, Meyer Schapiro
and Michael Walzer; Sol Levitas' New Leader; the New Criterion
(publisher: Samuel Lipman); and the Menorah Journal; a periodical
of entirely Jewish content. Hilton Kramer (for nearly twenty years a
news editor and art critic for the New York Times) founded and
edited the New Criterion; Peter Grose was managing editor of
Foreign Affairs. Laurence Goldstein edits the Michigan Quarterly
Review. Irving Horowitz founded the social-science periodical
Transaction, now called Society, and Transaction
Publishers. "Horowitz," writes fellow Jewish intellectual Nathan
Glazer,
"once an advocate of the
generally undifferentiated poor and powerless
and down trodden, has become over
time much more concerned with
one group in all its specificity:
Jews ... Horowitz is much concerned
with anti-Zionism, which he sees
as extending to what he considers
anti-Semitism -- even in
sociology, with the large numbers of Jews
working in it." [GLAZER, Decomp.,
p. 127]
Theodore Solotaroff was the founding
editor of the New American Review, as well as an Associate Editor
at Commentary. Daniel Pipes is the founder and editor of
Middle East Quarterly. At one point in time, "roughly half of all
the articles of the American medical journals were authored by Jews."
[KRAFETZ, p. 176] Daniel Koshland, Jr., a descendant of the
Levi-Strauss blue jean dynasty, is the former editor of Science
magazine. In 1999, he donated $8 million to an Israeli university. [LUM,
R., 11-19-99, p. 1A] And, as one Jewish observer noted in 1968, "For the
last ten years 70 percent of the editors of the Yale Law Journal
have been Jewish." [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 224] Sam Bercholz, also Jewish,
even founded Shambhala Books, "the first major publisher of
Tibetan Buddhist works in this country." [KAMENETZ, R., 1994, p. 9]
Billed as a left wing alternative to
Commentary, and just as blatantly Jewish in concern, is Tikkun,
the brainchild of editor Michael Lerner. In 1997 Lerner -- always
heralding the beauties of Jewish values and ethics for the problems of
modern society -- was exposed to be regularly (over a period of years)
publishing "letters to the editor" written by himself under fake names.
[KATZ, L, p. 3] Lerner is publicly "known as Bill and Hillary Rodham
Clinton's favorite philosopher." [COLLINS, L., 1994, p. 302] In 1997,
Danny Goldberg, the CEO of Mercury Records, became the publisher
of Tikkun.
The thinking of the educated public,"
wrote Charles Silberman in 1985," is strongly effected ... by a
relatively small number of literary and intellectual magazines and
journals ... Most of these publications are edited by Jews." [SILBERMAN,
p. 145] Aside from the already mentioned publications, Silberman added
Jewish editors William Shawn [original name: William Chon] of the New
Yorker, Stephen Graubard of Daedalus, and Mitchell Levitas of
the New York Times Book Review. More eccentrically, I. F.
Stone's Weekly was an expression of Stone's muck-raking "personal
journalism." Likewise, one of the best known "liberal" periodicals in
America, the Nation, is Jewish owned and edited (today by Victor
Navatsky). Another Nation editor, Katrina van den Heuvel is the
granddaughter of MCA's Jules Stein. [MCDOUGAL, p. xi] Alfred
Lilienthal, an anti-Zionist and anti-Israel Jew, wondered in 1950:
"Who, I ask, are the liberals? The
Nation Associates Freda Kirchway,
Henry Wallace, Clark Eichelberger,
Albert Barkley, William O'Dwyer,
Ludwig Lewisohn, Abba Hillel
Silver, all of whom have intolerantly
and ardently supported Zionism?
[LILIENTHAL, p. 145]
In 1967, I. F. Stone (Isadore
Feinstein) felt it necessary to write: "As a Jew, closely bound
emotionally to the birth of Israel, [I feel] honor bound to report the
Arab side, especially since the U.S. press is so overwhelmingly
pro-Zionist." [LAGUEVIR/RUBIN, p. 327]
Most of the best known "radical" and
hippie 1960s-era newspapers were also Jewish-founded. These include
The Realist (Paul Krassner, later an editor at Ramparts), the
Berkeley Barb (Marvin Garson), Rat (Jeff Shero, who had
funding help from Jason Epstein at the New York Review of Books,
[NOBILE, p. 198], the East Village Other (Allan Katzman), and the
Liberation News Service (Jesse Kornbluth and Marshall Bloom).
[WHITFIELD, American, p. 145] Arthur Kunkin, who eventually
softened from being a "radical Zionist," founded the Los Angeles Free
Press. [PECK, 1991, p. 22] Allen Cohen was "editor of the San
Francisco Oracle." [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 152] Even in
communist Russia, a Jewish author noted in 1969 that "younger Jewish
intellectuals feature prominently in 'protest' campaigns, which here
have taken the form of underground literature. Moscow's first
underground magazine, Syntax, was founded by Alexander Ginsburg."
[LITVINOFF, B., p. 100] Jeff Shero, editor of the above-mentioned
Rat eventually "changed his name to Nightbyrd and launched a
mail-order business selling drug-free powered urine." [KRASSNER, P.,
1993, p. 228]
"The leading exemplars of this genre [of radical journalism]," note
Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, "such as the East Village
Other, the Los Angeles Free Press, the Berkeley Barb,
and Detroit's the Fifth Estate, as well as 'alternative' papers
like the Village Voice, the key personnel were invariably of
Jewish background." [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 107] Today's versions of
this include David Barsamian (founder and director of Alternative
Radio), Michael Albert (editor of Z magazine), and Robert
Weissman (editor of Multinational Monitor). Abby Goodman has for
years been the news director at "progressive" Pacifica station WBAI in
New York; she also hosts its national Democracy Now! program.
Mother Jones, the well-known
left-wing "social conscience" magazine, was largely founded in 1974 by
the philanthropy of Adam Hochschild, heir to a fortune; he thereby
became the magazine's original managing editor, as well as Board
Chairman. Judging by his autobiography, Hochschild's commitment to
create Mother Jones in behalf of the socially and politically
dispossessed appears to have been, in major part, in atonement for the
sins of his father. This man, Harold Hochschild, was the wealthy Jewish
co-founder (and chairman) of an international mining syndicate that sent
entire communities of Africans into holes in the ground for a miniscule
wage, and engendered local wrath for its strip-mining in Appalachia,
pollution of Indian fishing areas in British Columbia, and destroying
Aboriginal lands in Australia. The younger Hochschild was even
embarrassed to discover, while working on a series of exposes about the
CIA as a staff member at an earlier left-wing journal, Ramparts,
that for a decade his father was Chairman of the Board of the
African-American Institute, a front for the CIA. [HOCHSCHILD, 1986, p.
130] Adam Hochschild, noted the San Francisco Examiner in 1998,
is "historically [Mother Jones'] largest funder and the wielder of very
substantial clout within the foundation [that runs Mother Jones]
... Hochschild has placed an unspecified sum in a 13-year account which
... provides money year by year in diminishing amounts." [ARMSTRONG, D.,
9-13-98, p. D1] As editor-in-chief Jeffrey Klein resigned in 1998,
"creative director" Rhonda Rubenstein designed a new format for the
magazine. Today's editor-in-chief at Mother Jones is Roger Cohn.
Matthew Rothschild edits the
left-wing Progressive (for years published by Erwin Knoll). James
Weinstein is the founding editor and publisher of another influential
leftist journal, In These Times. (Today's editor: Joel Bleifuss).
Naomi Klein is a former editor of a Canadian leftist journal, This.
As mentioned earlier, Jews have dominated Nation for decades.
Louis Weisberg edits Chicago's gay newspaper, The Chicago Free Press.
And as Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter note about the world of
American journalistic communism:
"From the 1930s through the 1950s, Jews were quite active in the
[Communist]
party leadership. Almost half the Communist leaders tried for
violations of the
Smith Act in 1947 were Jewish. In the 1940s, the editor of the
Daily Worker,
the managing editor, and the labor editor were all of Jewish
background.
The publicly visible top leadership, however, was non-Jewish."
[ROTHMAN
LICHTER, 1982, p. 100]
To the American political right, by 1997 Adam Meyerson edits the
Heritage Foundation's Policy Review and Bill Kristol, also
Jewish, former Chief of Staff for former Vice President Dan Quayle,
publishes, and edits, the Weekly Standard, a journal he founded
with fellow Jew John Podhoretz. Even William F. Buckley's well-known
politically conservative (and supposedly Catholic) magazine, the
National Review, founded in 1953, had a strong Jewish foundation. As
George Nash notes:
"The fact remains that a striking
number of National Review's original
luminaries were Jews. [Nash cites
seven] Indeed, without them the
magazine might have never gotten off
the ground, for if Buckley was
the founding father of the journal,
its unlikely godfather was an Austrian
Jewish émigré journalist named
William S. Schlamm ... [And] it was
Morrie Ryskind (1895-1985], a
prize-winning playwright and Hollywood
screenwriter, who organized a series
of crucial fund-raising receptions
for the project at his home in
Beverly Hills. As a result, Buckley achieved
more financial success with Ryskind's
California friends than with anyone
else except his own father." [NASH,
G., 2000, p. 124]
Other influential Jews associated with
the National Review were Eugene Lyons, Frank Meyer, Frank
Chodorov, and Ralph Toledano (an editor at Newsweek who was
offered the Managing Editor job. He turned it down but later became the
National Review's music editor). Marvin Liebman also "emerged as
the outstanding fund-raiser, organizer and coordinator of
'agitation-propaganda' for a vast apparatus of conservative causes
associated with National Review." Will Herberg, also Jewish,
became the journal's first religion columnist. [NASH, G., 2000, p.
124-126, 156]
Other prominent politically
conservative Jewish journalists these days include Charles Krauthammer,
David Brooks, David Frum, John Podhoretz, and Dan Feder. [FRIEDMAN, M.,
1999, p. 110] Even the Christian evangelical World newsweekly
(which has over 100,000 subscribers, reasonably comparable in size to
the "premier magazine for evangelical Christians," Billy Graham's
Christianity Today, which has a circulation of 150,000) is edited by
Marvin Olasky. Olasky is a "Jew turned Marxist turned born-again
Christian ... [He] oversees the magazine from his custom-built home in
the posh hills of Austin, Texas ... He declared himself an atheist at
14, and became a committed Marxist at Yale -- even joining the Communist
Party and touring the Soviet Union." [PERINA, K., JUNE 2000]
And how about "radical" (i.e.,
anti-establishment, anti-Hollywood] documentary filmmakers? For two
years (Jewish) film critic and historian Alan Rosenthal was "supported"
by an Israeli university to do a book about international documentary
filmmaking. (In 1980, the book was published by the University of
California Press). Although it was not a publicly stated interest of
Rosenthal's, this side too of movie-making has also been largely Jewish.
Rosenthal's list of the most important "radical" filmmakers of the 1960s
includes the Maysles brothers, Ricky Leacock, Don Pennebaker, Bill
Jersey, Fred Wiseman, and Alan King. For the 1970s, he singles out
Barbara Kopple, Jill Godmilow, Julia Reichert and James Klein.
[ROSENTHAL, p. 9] Of 14 people cited, at least 8 are Jewish.
Moving back towards mainstream
documentary media, Rosenthal elsewhere observes that "one appreciates
Barbara Kopple, Julia Reichert, James Klein, and Richard Cohen but it
was directors like Al Wasserman and Douglas Leiterman who have helped
enlarge the boundaries of broadcast documentary." [ROSENTHAL, p. 23]
Jewish documentary filmmakers or producers afforded chapter-length
interviews in his book included Robert Vas, Abe Osheroff, Amalie
Rothschild, Richard Cohen, Jerry Blumenthal (with a group), Julia
Reichert and James Klein, Morton Silverstein, David Elstein, and Albert
Wasserman.
Wasserman, notes Rosenthal, had a
career that covers the best years of 'CBS Reports,' the CBS ‘Twentieth
Century’ series, and NBC's 'White Paper' series, which he helped
originate. At present [1980] he works as producer on CBS's
Sixty Minutes.' [ROSENTHAL, p. 91] "I was at CBS until 1960,"
says Wasserman, "Then I went to NBC with Irving Gitlin, who was a
very important figure in the evolution of the television documentary."
[ROSENTHAL, p. 93] Another Jewish writer, director, and producer, Fred
Freed, merited an entire volume about his contributions to documentary
television. [YELLIN 1973]
For all the international muckraking
of all these Jewish documentarians, none of them is noted in Rosenthal's
volume to have turned their critical eyes to Israel, from which the
volume's university support stems. And the only one who mentions Jews in
any way is Robert Vas, who frames himself in the context of the
Holocaust. By 1995, with the mass media increasingly celebrating Jewish
themes, the world could look to more overt mass media Judeo-centrism
when Stephen Spielberg funded the New York-based "Fund for Jewish
Documentaries," an off-shoot of his National Foundation for Jewish
Culture.
****************************
Like the film,
television, and publishing industries, the musical recording business
and general musical world is, and has been, in virtually all its
important facets, dominated by Jews.
Classical music? In 1968 Roger
Kahn noted that "the four pre-eminent American orchestras are
conducted by Jews: Erich Leinsdorf at Boston, George Szell at
Cleveland, Eugene Ormandy at Philadelphia and Leonard Bernstein, who
is about to retire from the New York Philharmonic. A look at the
rosters of these orchestras reveals string sections all but solidly
Jewish clear back to the rear desk in the furthest corner of the
second violins ... [KAHN, p. 6].... A Jewish armada has conquered
musical performance. Jewish names comprise the aristocracy of
performers: Heifetz and Horowitz; Elman and Rubinstein; Piatigorsky
and Koussevitsky; Bernstein and Stern; Fleisher, Glazer, Gomberg,
Graffman, Roisman, Rosen, Schneider ... Jews dominate serious
musical performance in America." [KAHN, p. 63-64] Arnold Schoenberg
is arguably "this century's most influential composer." [HEILBUT, p.
493] "In the 1920s he wrote (a still unpublished) Zionist drama and
began with the preparations for his opera Moses and Aron."
[GRUNFELD, F., p. xix] Philip Glass and Steve Reich are well-know
composers in the "pushing the boundaries" avant-garde genre. "In the
1920s [Aaron] Copland was a primary influence in American music
through the League of Composers." [PEYSER, J., 1987, p. 33]
Joan Peyser, a biographer of
Leonard Bernstein, notes the following about her subject:
"The more one knows about
Bernstein, the more complicated the
portrait is of him as a Jew.
Capable of working productively with
anti-Semites, he still holds a
soft spot in his heart for fellow Jews,
whom he says he finds superior to
all others. 'He is so adamant
about music being Jewish,'
[conductor and composer Gunther]
Schuller says, 'It is important
to him that a composer is a Jew,
that a performer is a Jew. He
told me that Triplum, my composition,
has a Jewish soul. That is meant
as a compliment. I am not a Jew.
When Lenny says, 'You can almost
be Jewish,' that is considered
by him to be one of the most
supreme of compliments.'" [PEYSER,
J., 1987, p. 409]
Throughout the American
geographical terrain, by 1998, Jews were prominent in
directing/conducting America's orchestras: Yoel Levi of the
Atlanta Symphony, David Zinman of the Baltimore Symphony,
Daniel Barenboim of the Chicago Symphony, Yaccov Bergman of
the Colorado Springs Symphony, Neal Gittelman of the
Dayton Symphony, Stephen Gunzenhauser of the Delaware
Symphony, Leonard Slatkin of the National Symphony (Washington DC),
Gerhardt Zimmerman of the North Carolina Symphony, Joel
Levine of the Oklahoma City Philharmonic, Victor Yampolsky of
the Omaha Symphony, Eugene Kohn of the Puerto Rico
Symphony, Robert Bernhardt of the Rochester Philharmonic,
Philip Greenberg of the Savannah (Georgia) Symphony, Gerard
Schwartz of the Seattle Symphony, Bernard Rubenstein of the
Tulsa Philharmonic, and Joseph Silverstein of the Utah
Symphony, among others. [BRUNNER, 1998, p. 736] James Levine became
head of the Boston Symphony Orchestra in 2001. The same year,
a 25 year-old Israeli, Ilan Volkov, became the youngest conductor to
ever be appointed to head the BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra.
In southern California, there
exists the Los Angeles Jewish Symphony, which "is an established and
growing ensemble that aims to fill a cultural niche by exploring new
or seldom heard music by or about Jews." Founder Noreen Green "is
most proud of an original oration and concert, 'Women of Valor,'
sponsored by Hadassah Southern California [the international Jewish
women's Zionist group] which premiered at UCLA." [SMITH, L.,
6-11-2000, p. E1]
Harlan Robinson notes who dominated the musician (especially
violinist) realm of the American classical music realm in the 1940s:
"Further down the 1942-43 [Jewish impresario Sol] Hurok list
was a recent addition
to the stable: violinist Isaac Stern. Though at the time a
newcomer, he, too, would
eventually turn into a steady source of income. Stern would
also become one of
his manager's [Hurok] most trusted advisers and the patriarch
of a group of
Jewish musicians (especially violinists) whose imposing
artistic and booking
influence would come to earn them the ironic nickname the
'Kosher Nostra ...
[ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 287] ... [Itzhak] Perlman turned into a
very popular
and profitable addition to his list. So did another Stern
recommendation, Pinchas
Zuckerman. Together, they became the backbone of the
Manhattan-based
Jewish musical clique jokingly labeled the 'Kosher Nosta.'"
[ROBINSON, H.
1994, p. 427]
Famed pianist Arthur Rubinstein was an ardent devotee of
Israel:
"Another matter that frequently enraged Rubinstein was the
world's attitude
-- or his interpretation of it -- toward Israel. In his last
years, he was not
merely benevolent toward Israel: he was a right-winger, certain
that Israel
could do no wrong. The territories that Israel had occupied in
1967
were Israel's by right, he believed, and he said that the
Palestinians were
nomads in whom Lawrence of Arabia had unfortunately implanted
the
notion of being a people -- after which they had done nothing
but
procreate ... Since the Soviet Union had become the major
supporter of
Israel's opponents, Rubinstein even suggested that the United
States bomb
the Kremlin." [SACHS, H., 1995, p. 393]
Rubinstein once donated $100,000 to Israel's Weizman
Institute, he gave $50,000 to the Israel-American Cultural
Foundation "in honor of Isaac Stern, on the violinist's sixtieth
birthday," and he left $500,000 in his will to the city of
Jerusalem. [SACHS, D., 1995, p. 394]
In 2000, famous Jewish opera
singer Beverly Sills (also chairwoman of New York City's Lincoln
Center performing arts center) was in Seattle to speak to the
northwestern chapter of Hadassah, the Zionist women's group. This
was special news, noted the local newspaper, because Sills "limits
appearances to a dozen a year, often speaking to members of
Hadassah, a Jewish women's organization. She says, 'They're people
trying to make the world a better place.'" [GODDEN, J., 5-2000, p.
B1]
In 1933, a researcher discovered
consistent Jewish overrepresentation in the classical music world,
including "51% of the first violins of twelve orchestras," 23.8% of
the works "performed by symphony orchestras," and so forth. Why was
this so? Comparing Jewish and non-Jewish children, Kenneth Sward
found no intelligence differences, but speculated that "the Jewish
child may be a superior all-around organism by 'nature.'" [WEYL, N.,
1968, p. 188]
Singer Jan Peerce (born Jacob Pincus Perelmuth) from the late
1930s to early 1950s "was a regular on the most popular classical
music [radio] broadcast in American history ... In a story worthy of
Hollywood, he was finally noticed [i.e., 'discovered'] by showman
Samuel L. 'Roxy' Rothafel while performing as a singing violinist."
[ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 253-254] (Peerce "was so deeply religious
that he had even disowned his son Larry, a film director, for
marrying a gentile woman with two children). [ROBINSON, H., 1994, p.
459]
Jewish influence in more popular music
has been profound. During the rise of rock and roll, notes Jory Farr,
"in many ways, the pop business was run as the film business in its
heyday. It was a club, mostly Jewish, filled with wily impresarios,
maverick street fighters, and out-and-out operators." [FARR, p. 126] In
earlier years, the musical agent -- and later executive -- John Hammond,
notes Frederic Dannen, "was the ultimate WASP in a preponderantly Jewish
profession." [DANNEN, p. 62] A network of Jewish executives, agents,
managers, and other entrepreneurs have reigned supreme in the musical
network for decades. ("One writer in 1927," note Claire Pagackowska and
Barry Curtis, "referred to jazz as reaching 'from the black South to the
black North, but in between it had been touched by the commercial wand
of the Jew.'") [PAGACKOWSKA, p. 242]
Kenneth Kanter notes that:
"Both as a business and as an
expression of talent and creative artistry,
American popular music was in large
part shaped and formed by Jews,
many of them immigrant newcomers to
the American scene ... Virtually
all the great names that come to
mind when one considers popular
music -- Rogers and Hammerstein,
Irving Berlin, Lorenz Hart, Jerome
Kern, George and Ida Gershwin,
Irving Caesar, and Charles Harris,
for instance, are Jewish names. Jews
wrote the songs, Jews sang the
songs, and Jews made sure that the
songs were circulated to every
corner of the country, for they
founded and built America's publishing
industry. Among the vanguard
publishers were M. Witmark, Charles K.
Harris, Joseph Stern, Shapiro and
Bernstein, Harry von Tilzer, Leo Feist,
T. B. Harms, and Irving Berlin [born
Israel Baline]. Collectively their
publishing firms came to be known as
'Tin Pan Alley' ... It was the Tin
Pan Alley ethos, combining the
commercial with the aesthetic, that gave
our popular music its distinctive
character." [KANTER, p. ix]
The Jewish Tin Pan Alley monopoly of the music business was solid
for decades. As H. F. Mooney notes:
"By 1941, the virtual monopoly of the ASCAP (American Society of
Composers
Authors, and Publishers, organized in 1914), which had practically
protected New
York's ascendancy in the music market, was broken by legal
judgment. The
consequent opening of broadcasting and recording channels to
non-ASCAP
composers and publishers, many of them unknowns outside the
conventional
musical establishment of Tin Pan Alley ... marked the end of an era
of increasingly
urbane New York composers. These had been heavily Jewish ... Such
New York
Jews as Harold Arlen, George and Ira Gershwin, Jerome Kern, Vernon
Duke
(ne Dukelsky), Herman Hupfeld and Vincent Youmans had produced a
pensive
music of finesse and polish, often using minor strains in the
cantorial tradition.
Their melodic concepts influenced 'white' jazz instrumentalists --
themselves
frequently Jewish -- flowing with increasing facility through
plaintive but
delicately restrained saxophones from Benny Kreuger in the early
1920s
through Frank Trumbaujer to Stan Getz; and through the arabesque
clarinets of Benny Goodman and Artie Shaw." [MOONEY, H. F., 1972, p
p. 258-259]
(Per current Jazz, in 1998 the Cleveland Jewish News
announced that "the world's No. 1 jazz group [is] Spyro Gyra. Meet the
man who started it all -- Jay Beckenstein. The world-renowned musician
and music producer and his jazz crew (Beckenstein and two other members
are Jewish) have been legends since 1970.") [ALPEN, J., 5-1-1998, p. 46]
Jewish domination of the music world did not, of course, end with
the demise of Tin Pan Alley. As we shall soon see, Jewish influence
merely broadened.
Tin Pan Alley (a term invented by
song writer/journalist Monroe Rosenfeld) [SHAW, A., 1982, p. 386] Jews
were also instrumental in maintaining popular negative views about
themselves. "The image of the Jews in the songs of the day," says
Kanter, "was not terribly flattering. Jews were presented as
money-grubbing, hand-rubbing old men who wore crepe hair and ran pawn
shops. The Jews of Tin Pan Alley helped perpetuate this stereotype."
[KANTER, p. 57]
The Jews who dominated Tin Pan Alley
and the turn-of-the century vaudeville world were also central in the
popularization and propagation of profoundly demeaning African-American
stereotypes. Pamela Brown Lavitt notes Tin Pan Alley and the many
onstage Jewish "coon callers":
"Jewish women vaudevillians at the
turn of the century popularized
what is now a little-discussed and
misunderstood performance
venue, known as "coon shouting" ...
Trying to break into the
entertainment business, [Tin Pan
Alley entrepreneurs'] aesthetics
were circumscribed in a vehemently
anti-black and xenophobic
milieu. By the mid-1880-s they had
formed a tight-knit Tin Pan
Alley industry that came to dominate
vaudeville and early black
musicals ... Intended as comedy, coon
song ranged from jocular
and dismissive to cruel and sadistic
... Coon song sheet music
and illustrated covers proliferated
defamatory images of blacks
in barely coded slanderous lyrics.
For example, the 'N' word and
associated inferences were dispatched
in words like 'mammy,'
'honey boy,' 'pickinniny,'
'chocolate,' 'watermelon,' 'possum,'
and the most prevalent 'coon.'"
[LAVITT, P., 2000, p. 253-258]
Especially well known Jewish "coon
callers" included Sophie Tucker, Stella Mayhew, Fanny Brice, Anna Held,
Eddie Cantor, and Al Jolson.
Jews have long gravitated to an
entrepreneurial exploitation of the Black cultural scene and jazz music.
As Burton Peretti notes:
"Aside from the hazards of the mob
[organized crime] environment,
the exploitation faced by jazz
players was rather typical for this era
[1930s and 1940s]. Jazz, like
minstrels and ragtime before it, came
under the control of professional
promoters who sought to make music
profitable. [They adapted] the
technique of advertising, song plugging,
and vaudeville ... Some promoters,
like Joe Glaser (who managed Louis
Armstrong in the thirties) were
associates of organized crime who left
the underworld when prohibition was
repealed. Glaser apparently had
overseen Al Capone's profits from
the Sunset Cafe and a prostitution
ring before he became Armstrong's
manager in 1935. Many more
promoters, however, were veterans
of Tin Pan Alley, Manhattan's
song-publishing industry, including
Irving Mills, a former singer and
songwriter who managed Duke
Ellington's and other black bands in
the thirties." [PERETTI, p. 147]
Glaser ran the Associated Booking
Corporation, often "the exclusive agent for many of the top Black
performers. He became a close associate of many of the top underworld
figures in Chicago and New York, whom he met through his band-booking
agency." [MOLDEA, p. 14] Glaser had been an early partner in the
company with eventual MCA chief Jules Stein. In 1962, mob-linked
attorney Sidney Korshak, also Jewish, gained control of the ABC company.
[MCDOUGAL, p. 141]
Mills and Paddy Harmon, owner of
Chicago's Dreamland Cafe, "sought and gained spurious renown, as
Mills took partial credit for many Ellington compositions and Harmon
patented and gave his name to a trumpet mute that had long been popular
among Joe Oliver and other black players." [PERETTI, p. 148] The
rip-off of Black artists was a norm for the era. As Al Silverman notes
in the case of Fats Waller:
"In his time Fats wrote the
melodies to over 360 songs. Not that many
bear his name today,
unfortunately, because when money was needed
he'd write the music and sell all
rights to unscrupulous Tin Pan Alley
characters." [SILVERMAN, p.
129-130]
"That practice of show business
share-cropping ... in the 1920s and 1930s," notes the director of
Harlem's Apollo Amateur Night, Ralph Cooper, "existed right on through
the fifties and sixties. Its bitterness still exists among many
performers to this day -- a bitterness from the theft of their songs,
their sound, their talent." [COOPER, p. 199] Jewish singers "Sophie
Tucker, Eddie Cantor and Al Jolson," notes Donald Fischer,
"performed in blackface at the beginning of their careers,
singing black songs.
They later built on their successes in this medium to develop
national statures
and professional successes with other music. However, their early
songs were
for the most part borrowed or plagiarized from African-American
sources,
with little or no public recognition -- or monetary reward --
for the creative
talents that produced them." [FISCHER, D., 6-30-2000, p. 21A]
Jews were also prominent in the
overseeing of the Black community's jazz life, including the control of
musical clubs in Black neighborhoods in a variety of American cities.
"The invasion of the Black community by organized crime lords with
connections to downtown money," notes Ted Vincent, "was certainly the
most sensational contribution to the loss of Black oversight of
neighborhood dance halls and theatres." [VINCENT, p. 176] "Slumming
resorts" served a largely non-Black audience and "were noted for their
riverboat decor, fake magnolia plants, and nearly nude dancers ...
Perhaps the nationwide pioneer in the resorts was Isadore Shor's
Entertainment Cafe." [VINCENT, p. 78] In Harlem, such clubs
included Connie's Inn (owned by Connie Innerman) and the famed
Apollo Theatre. "From the opening of the [Apollo] building in 1912
until 1934," notes Vincent, "the theatre was a showcase for white [i.e.,
largely Jewish] vaudeville burlesque shows, with white strippers coming
to be the main attraction." [VINCENT, p. 189] The Apollo was
eventually sold by "Burlesque Kings Hurtig and Seaman" to Sid Cohen and
Morris Sussman, and then to Frank Schiffman and Leo Brecher. Brecher
also owned the Douglas, the Roosevelt, the Lafayette
Theatre ("the prime showcase for black talent in America") [COOPER,
p. 44], and the Harlem Opera House located a block from
the Apollo. [VINCENT, p. 189-192] Jay Fagan, and Moses and
Charles Gale (Galewski), founded the popular Savoy Ballroom in
1926.
Mel Watkins notes the reputation in the Black community of dominant
mogul Frank Schiffman:
"Schiffman was a controversial figure in black entertainment.
Admired and respected
by some, scorned and excoriated by others, he was rarely viewed
neutrally.
His Machiavellian approach to business is a matter of record, and
most would admit
that he was an unrepentant shark in business matters. He quickly
eliminated
his competitors and for decades eradicated all serious competition,
which
earned him the grudging esteem of other showmen. Among performers,
however,
the estimate was not glowing. Of his knowledge of black acts, John
Bubbles
[an African-American performer of the era] said, 'Only thing he
knew was how
to get people cheap as he could, and work them as long as he
could.' And
John Hammond, a record producer and friend, flatly declared 'Frank
had no
artistic taste at all.'" [WATKINS, M., 1994, p. 386]
Samuel Charters and Leonard Kunstad
note the situation of another famous nightclub:
"The Cotton Club had opened at
142nd St. and Lexington Ave. in 1922
with a strict policy of white only.
The owner, Bernard Levy, had pressed
his policy, despite loud protests
from the Harlem community. He used
Negro orchestras and a Negro revue
and ran it as a tourist attraction for
society people who wanted to see a
little of 'Harlem life' ... The club was
forced to admit colored patrons
during the next winter, but the prices he
kept high and it remained
predominantly a tourist attraction until the
Depression." [CHARTERS, p. 217]
New York's Latin Quarter club
(with eventual branches in other cities) was also owned by a Jew, Lou
Walters, father of famous newscaster Barbara Walters; Monte Kay was the
founder of the famous Birdland jazz club. He too was Jewish.
Mobster Morris Levy later controlled the place. The Panama was
one of the top two cabarets in Chicago. It was owned by Isadore Levine.
[BRICKTOP, 1983, p. 53] Bricktop, a famous international
African-American nightclub manager from the 1920s-1950s, wrote about her
time spent in Mexico:
"The most prominent of the wheeler-dealers in Mexico City's
American colony
was a strange, tiny little man called Blumey. He was A. C.
Blumenthal, a
financier who had his fingers in many pies. He was once married to
Peggy
Fears, a Ziegfeld showgirl. Blumey went to Mexico City to dodge
Uncle
Sam's tax collectors, and he was just one of many rich Americans
who had
gone to Mexico City for that reason. The others lived quietly and
inconspicuously,
but Blumey loved the limelight ... He had a stable of tall,
beautiful girls
who towered over him, and he could be found holding court every day
in the
Reforma Hotel, where he was the manager." [BRICKTOP, 1983, p. 223]
As Israeli scholar Robert Rockaway
notes about a common undercurrent in such night life:
"Jewish Gangsters frequented
nightclubs ... In fact, Jewish underworld
figures owned many nightspots and
speakeasies. In New York, Dutch
Schultz owned the Embassy Club.
Charley 'King' Solomon owned
Boston's Coconut Grove. In
Newark, Longy Zwillman owned the Blue
Mirror
and the Casablanca Club. Boo Boo Hoff owned the Piccadilly
Cafe
in Philadelphia. Detroit's [Jewish] Purple Gang owned Luigi's
Cafe,
one of the city's more opulent clubs. Jewish singers and
comedians, such as Al Jolson, Eddie
Cantor, Fanny Brice and Sophie
Tucker played in the mob clubs."
[ROCKAWAY, R., 1993, p. 205]
Upset with outsider exploitation and
degradation of the Black community (where many night clubs were
located), there was an effort by the Marcus Garvey African-American
movement as early as the 1920s to institute Black-owned Liberty Halls
"where the musical offerings would be part of an overall effort at
community uplift and not just a profit-oriented business." [VINCENT, p.
114]
(From France, even the international
jet-set luxury playground/resort of "Club Med" was founded by Gerard
Blitz, and built to power by Gilbert Trigano. Both are also Jewish. By
1999 the firm had 116 sites in 36 countries, now headed by Gilbert's son
Serge. [REGULY, E., 4-25-88, pl. 24; MCDONELL, E., 5-1-99, p. D10]
Hollywood's Roxy nightclub was founded by the Jewish managerial
trio of David Geffen, Lou Adler, and Bill Graham. [KING, T., 2000, p.
187] La Boehme in Hollywood, Florida, was owned by Jack Lansky,
brother of famous mobster Meyer Lansky. [THOMAS, D., 1991, p. 162] )
Jews have of course been prominent
over the years as musical performers. These included three of the most
influential band leaders of the 1930s -- Benny Goodman ("the King of
Swing"), Harry James, and Artie Shaw (Arthur Arshansky). More recent
popular names include Leonard Bernstein, Andre Previn, Arthur Fiedler,
Stephen Sondheim, and many others. As noted earlier too, by the 1930s
MCA (Music Corporation of America) was a powerful talent
agency, founded by Jules Stein and built later to power by Sidney
Sheinbein and Lew Wasserman, who ultimately became one of the most
powerful men in Hollywood. Ronald Brownstein observes that:
"By the mid-1930s, MCA
controlled many of the country's most popular
bands, from Tommy Dorsey to Artie
Shaw." [BROWNSTEIN, p. 181]
For years, MCA's Jules Stein,
adds Michale Pye, "ran the music business so toughly that no dance hall
would stand against him." [PYE, p. 18-19] In a 1946 antitrust trial that
MCA lost, a Los Angeles federal judge "declared that MCA
held a virtual monopoly over the entertainment business." The presiding
judge also stated that MCA was "the Octopus ... with tentacles
reaching out into all phases and grasping everything in show business."
[MOLDEA, p. 2, 3] "The one man," notes non-Jewish band leader Guy
Lombardo, "who probably more than any other solidified the business and
hastened the era of the Big Bands was Jules Stein. He had started his
Music Corporation of America in Chicago and to that city gravitated
bands from all over the country, seeking the buildup and engagements
they would get if MCA took them in the fold." Lombardo was also under
contract to Stein. [LOMBARDO, G., 1975, p. 153] Stein even wrote an
introduction to Lombardo's autobiography.
For years MCA increasingly
interfaced with Chicago's Mafia and other underworld personalities.
Seemingly omnipresent in Hollywood was lawyer Sidney Korshak. "A close
friend of Stein's and Wasserman's," says Dan Moldea, "Korshak quickly
became one of the most powerful influences in the entertainment industry
and in California politics ... [MOLDEA, p. 5] ... Korshak ... has been
described by federal investigators as the principle link between the
[Hollywood] legitimate business world and organized crime." [MOLDEA, p.
2]
And rock and roll? The Jewish
foundation continued. "The most famous and important [rhythm and blues
disc jockey]," note Steve Chapple and Reebee Garofalo, "was ... Alan
Freed, the father of Rock 'n' Roll ... Freed was credited with
co-writing fifteen rock and rock hits including Chuck Berry's
'Maybelline,' but he did little more than promote any of them."
[CHAPPLE, p. 56-57] A biography of Freed notes that "by 1956, there was
no bigger name in rock and roll than Freed, except Elvis Presley."
[JACKSON, p. ix] (Another of America's best known early disc jockeys
was also Jewish, Murray the K, aka Murray Kaufman). In 1960, Freed was
indicted for accepting $30,000 in bribes to play songs at his radio
station. "[Freed] grabbed the kids and led them to the great rock candy
mountain," says Albert Goldman, "He named their music, coined its
us-against-them rhetoric, created rock show biz, including the package
tour ... Alan Freed is really one of the principal exhibits in the Rock
'n' Roll Hall of Ill Fame ... [He] was not only a crook but a
self-righteous hypocrite. Even [Freed's manager] Morris Levy [with deep
ties to the criminal underworld, particular the Mafioso Gigante family]
had to concede that the 'Father of Rock 'n' Roll' was not a nice man.
Speaking as one Jew to another Jew about a third Jew, Levy said simply:
'He could have been another Hitler.'" [GOLDMAN, p. 519-520]
In a book about the Atlantic
Records empire (later swallowed by Warners), Dorothy Wade and
Justine Picardie noted Morris Levy and the kinds of people that
populated the rock and roll industry: "The truth is, with or without mob
connections, Morris Levy was much more typical of the new music moguls
than either [non-Jewish] Ahmet Ertegun or [Jewish] Jerry Wexler ... The
world in which Atlantic had to survive was populated largely by
hoodlums and hustlers." [WADE, p. 57] As Syd Nathan, the owner of
King Records, once said, "You want to be in the record business? The
first thing you learn is that everyone is a liar." [WADE, p. 60] "The
early rhythm and blues companies were run by a fraternity of Jews ...
They were tough and they were shrewd -- some say unscrupulous -- and
they were alternately loved, despised, respected, and feared. The deep
bond of these cultural outsiders prompted one gentile, mild rebuke in
his voice, to comment that 'Yiddish was the second language of the
record business." [COHODAS, N., p. 3-4, 2000]
"To the general public," notes Steve
Chapple and Reebee Garofalo, "the music business seems to have a
tremendous amount of corruption." [CHAPPLE, p. 226] "I think in
Hollywood," media psychologist Stuart Fischel of California State
University at Los Angeles told the Los Angeles Times in 1993,
"people get into a kind of mind meld. You can come in as a relatively
moral and ethical person, but eventually [Hollywood] produces a
re-socializing of a subculture with different norms and ethics based on
hedonism and materialism. It's hard to know what's going to breach the
bounds of acceptable criminality in Hollywood." [ELLER, p. B8, B11]
Aside from drugs, prostitution, and all the other extracurricular norms
of the interrelated music, film, and television worlds of Hollywood,
just at the most basic business level, "payola [bribery] has been a key
factor in the establishment of major artists," says Roger Karshner, "the
evolution of publishing dynasties and the creation of recording empires.
Payola, layola, and taking care of business are the ABC's of the music
industry past and present. It has taken many forms, and many publishers,
artists, managers, and record people at all levels have participated in
payola practices." [KARSHNER, p. 39]
Probably the most important early
rhythm and blues recording company was Chess Records,
founded by Leonard and Phillip Chess, Jewish immigrants from Poland.
They started out with a scrap metal business in the ghetto, then moved
into the liquor business, eventually owning several bars in the Black
neighborhoods of South Chicago, including the large Macamba Club, which
was "reputedly a prime center for prostitution and heavy drug dealing."
[DIXON, p. 78] The Chess brothers soon recognized a profitable
opportunity open to them with the many Black musical acts that played at
their nightclubs; the entrepreneurs soon embarked upon a recording
business, eventually producing blues, gospel, and rock and rock music.
Seminal Black artists who signed on to the Chess label included Bo
Diddley, Howlin' Wolf, Muddy Waters, John Lee Hooker, Etta James, Chuck
Berry, and many others. Berry's songs were among the most influential in
rock and roll history. "Some people have called Leonard and Phillip
Chess visionaries who recognized the potential in the visceral blues of
post-World War II Chicago, "says Don Snowden, who co-wrote the
auto-biography of bluesman Willie Dixon, "A far greater number have
branded the Chess brothers as exploiters who systematically took
advantage of the artists who created that music." [DIXON, p. 78] The
Rolling Stones even found seminal bluesman Muddy Waters still painting
the Chess's home when they came to record in Chicago. [WADE, p. 71]
Frank Schiffman, owner of a number
of musical venues in New York's Harlem area, "was a ruthless competitor
who would do anything, including take advantage of his black employees
and exploit the great black artists who worked for him, in order to
increase his profits and beat down the opposition." [COOPER, p. 44]
"Remember [Black singer] Little Eva Boyd?" asks Ralph Cooper, "She
worked as a babysitter for two Tin Pan Alley [Jewish] rock and roll
writers, Carole King and Gerry Goffen. They wrote a song called
'Loco-Motion' and they asked her to sing it ... Now [1990] she lives in
North Carolina, where her people are from. She's a working mother on
welfare. She works in a barbeque kitchen as a cook." [COOPER, p. 196]
In 1997, Black singer Darlene Love
won a lawsuit for back royalties against famous Jewish musical producer
Phil Spector. (Originally awarded $263,000, it was later dropped down to
$130,000.) Love was the anonymous lead singer on a number of 1960s-era
Spector productions, including He's a Rebel, Da Do Ron Ron,
He's Sure the Boy I Love, and other hits. In the early 1980s Ms.
Love found herself cleaning toilets for a living, but her singing career
later flourished anew. [WILLMAN, C., 10-15-88, CALENDAR, p. 10; WARRICK,
P., 11-2-98]
"I didn't know anything about the
record business," said early rock and roll sensation Little Richard (of
"Tutti Frutti" fame) about his rock and roll career. " I was very dumb
... I was just like a sheep among a bunch of wolves that would devour me
at any moment. I think I was taken advantage of because I was
uneducated. I think I was treated inhumane ... I think I was treated
wrong and many people got rich out of the style of music I created. They
are all millionaires, writ many times, and nobody offered me nothing."
[WADE, p. 74] Dorothy Wade and Justine Picardie note Little Richard's
lamentation, then add: "To which many, if not most, of his black musical
contemporaries would add: Amen." [WADE, p. 74] Among others, Richard
had in mind the Jewish owner of Specialty Records, Art Rupe, who
many years ago bought the rights to his songs for a paltry $10,000.
Chuck Berry remembers being cheated by
the Chess brothers:
"[Phil Chess finally acknowledged] in
writing that no songwriter
royalties had been paid for three
years on my Chess Records
product ... [And in a review of
Chess documents] I was
surprised to learn that I had been
paid the same songwriter
royalties for an LP as I was
receiving for a single record.
Chess claimed to be unaware of
this 'mistake,' as if they had
never noticed that LPs had between
eight and ten songs on
them." [BERRY, C., p. 246-247]
"In 1974 Howlin' Wolf filed a lawsuit against Arc Music [the
publishing wing of Chess Records, it was co-owned by the Chess
brothers and two brothers of Jewish band leader Benny Goodman] [COHODAS,
N., 2000, p. 37] asking for $2.5 million for unpaid royalties from his
songs ... In 1976 Muddy Waters and Willie Dixon filed identical lawsuits
against the publishing company, alleging fraud and conspiracy and asking
to paid money damages and to have their publishing contracts voided."
[COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 308]
In 1972, Martin Otelsberg became the
manager of African-American musician Bo Diddley. Suspecting in later
years that he had been swindled, Diddley filed suit against Otelsberg's
estate in 1994 and recovered $400,000. As Diddley's lawyer (also Jewish)
John Rosenberg noted, "This is a typical story that's happened time and
again to musicians like Bo." [MORSE, S., 6-18-94, p. 28] Diddley
complained of being cheated by the Chess brothers as well. "To me every
nationality has a reason for bein' here," said Diddley, "an' mostly all
the Jewish people own everything. They got all the money. Give him a
thousand dollars, he'll turn it into ten million. How the heck they do
it, I don't know." [COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 110]
The Jewish community, of course, isn't comfortable with this
history. As Jewish author Neal Karlen describes one African-American
depiction of the Jewish music hustler: "In the 1990 film Mo' Better
Blues, Spike Lee crafted an artful if blazingly anti-Semitic
portrait of the fictional Moe Flatbush, an avaricious Jewish club owner
intent on swindling black jazzmen. The ferretlike, Yiddish-spouting Moe,
played by John Turturro, was seemingly lifted straight from the pages of
the anti-Semitic screed The Protocols of Zions." [KARLEN, N., 1994, p.
145]
The Jewish agent-producer
exploitation of Black recording artists in the early rhythm and blues
era of the 1940s and 1950s (and later) was predominant and widespread,
entrenching a Black hostility among many to their Jewish financial
controllers to the present day. The following Jewish entrepreneurs were
among those who founded record labels featuring mainly Black talent:
Herman Lubinsky (Savoy Records); the Braun family (DeLuxe
Records); Hy Siegal, Sam Schneider and Ike Berman (Apollo Records);
Saul, Joe, and Jules Bihari (Modern Records); Art Rupe (Specialty
Records-- its biggest hits were those of Little Richard); Lev,
Edward, and Ida Messner (Philo/Aladdin Records); Al Silver and
Fred Mendelsohn (Herald/Ember Records); Paul and Lilian Rainer (Black
and White Records); Sam and Hy Weiss (Old Towne Records; Sol
Rabinowitz (Baton Records -- Rabinowitz eventually became vice
president of CBS International); and Danny Kessler (head of
OKeh Records, a "cheap" branch of Columbia Records). Sydney
Nathan controlled both the King and Federal record labels
and Florence Greenberg owned the Mafia-influenced Scepter Records
(featuring the Shirelles and Dionne Warwick. "During the 1960s, Warwick
gained fame singing [Jewish] Burt Bacharach-Hal David compositions such
as 'Walk on By' and 'I Say A Little Prayer.' In 1985, she had a brief
comeback with another Bacharach song, 'That's What Friends Are For,'
sung with Elton John, Stevie Wonder and Gladys Knight.") [CNN, 5-13-02]
"Those illiterates," Hy Weiss of
Olde Towne once said about his recording artists, "they would have
ended up eating from pails in Delancey Street if it weren't for us."
[WADE, p. 70] "Artists are pains in the asses,' [music mogul Morris]
Levy said. 'A lot of them are just imbeciles. They're ignorant."
[KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 146] "The record producers were white," says
Nadine Cohodas in her book about the Chess brothers, "their talent for
the most part black, many from impoverished backgrounds and few with
much formal education, living in a society that regarded them as
second-class citizens. The deals between the two parties were not the
negotiations of peers. The relationship could be paternalistic, even
condescending. At Chess it sometimes looked as though Leonard and
Phil gave their musicians an allowance rather than a salary." [COHODAS,
N., 2000, p. 4] The history of rock and roll is, of course," notes Rich
Cohen, "riddled with pioneering white record men who built careers
recording, and sometimes, exploiting black artists: Morris Levy, that
burly, cigar-smoking product of the Brill Building, allegedly stealing
writing credits from Frankie Lyman; Herman Lubinsky, the founder of
Savoy Records in Newark, New Jersey, throwing around nickels as if they
were manhole covers." [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]
In Philadelphia, in 1984 lawsuits
were swirling around WMOT, a company that "developed a reputation
as an aggressive independent record producer specializing in the 'Philly
sound.'" Formerly owned by Steve Bernstein, Alan Rubens, and David
Chacker, it was acquired by Michael Goldberg, Allen Cohen, and Jeff and
Mark Salvarian. Lawsuits even named Israel's Bank Leumi among
defendants in a scheme to use the record company to launder drug money.
The central player in this accusation was Larry Lavin, who was indicted
as the "kingpin of a 13-member [drug] ring that allegedly sold $5
million of cocaine a month." [DAUGHEN, 1984]
By 1978 president Oscar Cohen of the
Associate Booking Corporation presided over "the country's
biggest black talent booking agency." [SHAW, A, p. 419, p. 133]
Recurrent, "mobbed-up" Morris Levy even eventually owned Birdland
in its heyday, the famous jazz club. [WEXLER, p. 130] Levy also
controlled the Roulette Record label. Nat "the Rat" Tarnopol
headed the Brunswick label (Jackie Wilson was one of its most
prominent African-American stars). Tarnopol was indicted twice in the
1970s "for using payola, drugola, and strong-arm goons to get radio
airplay for Brunswick recording artists." [MCDOUGAL, p. 366]
An early and important supporter of
disc jockey Alan Freed and his own empire was Leo Mintz, who owned a
large record store near Cleveland's Black ghetto. Even earlier, Eli
Oberstein founded Varsity records in the 1930s, Joe Davis
launched Beach records in 1942, and "Jake Friedman had
Southland, one of the biggest distributing outfits in the South."
[SHAW, A., Honkers, p. 236]
"The whole history of rock 'n' roll,"
noted the London Guardian in a review of Jewish author Michael
Billig's book about the subject, "has been portrayed as white artists
'ripping off' black music. Only now [with Billig's volume] has the major
Jewish contribution been acknowledged." [ARNOT, C., 10-4-2000, p. 6]
Atlanta-based Mark Shimmel, for instance, is the CEO of LaFace
Records, which headlines TLC, Usher, Tonik Braxton, GoodiMob, "and a
raft of hot hip-hop artists ... He built his own company, managing
talents as varied as John Denver and Broadway composer Frank Wildhorn
... He doesn't worry much about what he calls 'the white guy in the
black music business.'" He has also worked with Huey Lewis, Harry
Belafonte, Ray Charles, and former Eagle Don Henley. [POLLAK, S.,
1-7-00]
Looking to the Hispanic record
market, George Goldner founded the Tico, Rama, and Vee
record companies; he also owned a number of Latino-oriented dance
halls. Goldner later founded the Mafia-influenced Red Bird label.
(Goldner once hired a team of whores to service a deejay convention. He
"had the girls arrive a day early, to sit down and go over his new
releases with them. The idea was for the girls to whisper the names of
those records in the jock's ear while they were making love." [ELIOT,
M., p. 49] By the 1970s, Joseph, Stanley, and Kenneth Cayre (of New
York's Jewish Sephardic community) owned the Salsoul record
label. It was worth $49 million in sales and held a 70% share of the
Latino record market. [UPBIN, 11-10-99]
In the folk music genre, Albert
Grossman managed the career of Peter Paul and Mary ("known
affectionately in the trade as 'two rabbis and a hooker.'" [PHILLIPS,
M., 1986, p. 16] "This established his reputation as a star maker,"
notes Anthony Scaduto, "as some kind of genius manager, even as he was
being criticized for commercializing folk and for being an excessively
sharp operator." [SCADUTO, p. 106] Israel Young ran the Folklore
Center in New York's Greenwich Village in the 1960s. Fred Weintraub
owned the well-known Bitter End nightclub. Manny Roth ran Cafe
Wha? Among the prominent Jewish folksingers of the era were Bob
Dylan, Phil Ochs, Jack Elliott, Peter Yarrow (of Peter, Paul, and Mary),
David Blue (Cohen), and two (Fred Hellerman and Ronnie Gilbert) of the
four Weavers. Ballad singer Leonard Cohen had a grandfather who was the
first president of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
Moe Asch (whose father, Sholem, was
"the most widely read Yiddish writer of the twentieth century")
[GOLDSMITH, P., p. 1] headed Folkway Records, the label that
released recordings by Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger (manager: Harold
Levanthal), Doc Watson, Black blues artist Leadbelly, Josh White, Black
poet Langston Hughes, and ethnic performers from around the world.
(Woody Guthrie's wife, Marjorie Gleenblatt Mazia, was Jewish, and their
child, Cathy Ann, was "raised as a Jew." [POLLAK, O, p. 12]) Guthrie
even lived with Marjorie in a Jewish neighborhood in Coney Island.
Asch got into the recording business
with a connection to David Sarnoff, the eventual head of NBC-RCA.
[GOLDSMITH, P., p. 60] A later version of Folkways was
Verve/Folkways, which featured Tim Hardin, Richard Havens, and
Jewish artists Laura Nyro and Janis Ian. (Nyro's original name was
Nigro, and her name was changed for fear that people might call her
"Negro.") [KING, T., 2000, p. 73] Another Jewish entrepreneur, Maynard
Solomon, headed another prominent folk-oriented record label,
Vanguard, which featured Joan Baez, Buffy St. Marie, Eric Anderson,
among others. Another folk label in Chicago, Flying Fish, was
founded by Bruce Kaplan.
Jewish popular musical performers
are many and varied, including the Beastie Boys ("widely castigated for
glorifying sex and violence") [ANDERSON, 1991, p. 173], Bette Midler,
Billy Joel, Barry Manilow, Randy Newman, Carly Simon (one of the heirs
to the Simon-Schuster publishing house fortune), Helen Reddy, Lesley
Gore, David Lee Roth of Van Halen, Lou ("Take a Walk on the Wild Side")
Reed, [BELL, I., 6-1-93, p. 12] and Mountain's Leslie [Weinstein] West.
Donald Fagen co-founded Steely Dan. Marty Friedman of Megadeth is
Jewish, as is Peter Green of Fleetwood Mac, Marty Balin of Jefferson
Airplane, Marc Knopfle of Dire Straits, Paul Stanley (Stanley Eisen) and
Gene Simmons (born Chaim Whitz in Haifa, Israel) of Kiss, Perry Farrell
(Perry Bernstein; son of a diamond dealer) of Jane's Addiction, Kevin
Dubrow (lead singer of Quiet Riot), Slash of Guns 'n Roses, Geddy Lee (
of Rush -- born Gar Lee Weinrib), Eric Bloom (lead singer of Blue Oyster
Cult), Robbie Robertson, Warren Zevon, Jeff Beck, Mick Jones (of the
Clash), Gavin Rossdale (head of Bush), Jay (Blatt) and the Americans,
Marc Bolan of T-Rex, Manfred Mann (Lubowitz), Norman Greenbaum, Phranc
(a Jewish lesbian folksinger), and Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman of the
Turtles. And on and on. Jewish interest in the subject notes that
ukelele-rooted Tiny Tim's mother was Jewish, Donovan's mother was
Jewish, Cyndi Lauper's father is Jewish, Country Joe MacDonald's mother
is Jewish, Twisted Sister's Dee Snider's father was Jewish and on and
on. [JEWHOO, 2000; BOUCHER, G., 4-17-01, p. 62; TAYLOR, L., 12-27-00, p.
F5]] Even the 1998 "Eurovision Song Contest winner" -- featuring an
event watched by 100 million people in 33 countries -- was Israeli
transsexual Dana International, born Yaran Cohen).
Not Jewish? Want to make it in the music business? Enhance your
chances by learning Yiddish:
"Even gentiles learned to salt their language with pinches of
Yiddish, the industry's
vernacular. Courtney Love, not long before
her own major label debut at Geffen
Records, began boning up with
the help of Leo Rosten's The Joys of Yiddish. 'I'm
going to blow
the minds of all those shemedricks at the record company,'
Courtney
said. She would even sometimes refer to her dispute with
Kat [of the all-female band
Babes in Toyland] over who was the
first to wear a baby-doll dress onstage as 'that
shmatte'
controversy.'" [KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 146]
From France, singer Sergio Gainsbourg [born Lucien Ginzburg]
"is still most famous in Britain for his number one 'Je t'aime
moi non plus': the
scandalous anthem which was in the British charts 30 years ago. He
and
[actress Jane] Birkin simulated their lovemaking so effectively
that the
single was banned by the BBC and formally condemned by the Vatican
...Yet Gainsbourg is the greatest popular musician France has ever
produced ...
Echoes of his favourite technique, of murmuring profanities against
a delicate and beautiful harmony, can be heard in many contemporary
records, not least the later work of Leonard Cohen ... Towards the
end of his
life, the singer's media appearances became ritual provocations: in
one
television broadcast, he subjected a veteran paratrooper --
horrified
by Gainsbourg's dub version of the Marseillaise -- to a torrent of
obscenities, pausing only occasionally, to inflate condoms. On
another notorious
live show, sharing a platform with a young Whitney Houston,
Gainsbourg,
then 58, turned to the presenter Michel Drucker and declared, in
English,
'I want to fuck her.'" [CHALMERS, R., 1-4-00]
The magazine "Bible" of rock and roll
music, Rolling Stone, was also founded by Jewish entrepreneur
Jann Wenner [see elsewhere, Mass Media chapters]. Wenner also is "the
single most important person behind" Cleveland's Rock and Roll Hall of
Fame and Museum. [HINCKLEY, D., p. 9] Joel Siegel, later prominent as a
film critic, was also "TV's first rock and roll reporter." [SLEWINSKI,
C., 3-23-99, p. 102]
Jerry Wexler, the Jewish co-director
of Atlantic Records -- remembers with fondness the early rhythm
and blues and rock and roll industry years with a curious perspective:
"How well I remember those labels and
the grizzled infighters who owned
them. Exclusive (Leon and
Otis Rene), Modern (the Biharis), Imperial
(Lew Chudd), Specialty (Are
Rupe), Old Towne (Hymie Weiss),
Herald/Ember (Al Silver),
Chess (the brothers Chess), and on and on
into the night -- memorable logos,
all. I am reminded of the tribes of the
Sinai desert -- the Hittites, the
Moabites, the Midianites, the Amorites.
Gone, perished, vanished from the
face of the earth. Only one survived --
the Hebrews." [WEXLER, p. 183]
Wexler's written memories also
include stories about other fellow Jews in the later music world,
including the music editor of Billboard, Paul Ackerman; his early
Jewish bosses at MGM Records -- Abe Olman and Mitch Miller, and
A&R men Harry Myerson at RCA and Morty Palitz at Decca;
and Nat Shapiro, the promotion man at Atlantic. "What [Wexler]
achieved at Atlantic makes him a key figure in the history of
post-war black masterworks." [HOSKYNS, p. 10] Among Wexler's most famous
Black talents was Aretha Franklin. Also, "throughout the 1950s and
1960s, Jerry Wexler worked with several of the most influential R&B
singers ever to hit the charts: Wilson Pickett, Otis Redding, Clyde
McPhatter, the Drifters, Joe Tex, Ray Charles, Ruth Brown, the Clovers,
Joe Turner, and La Vern Baker, to name a few. Rolling Stone has
gone so far as to christen him 'the Godfather of Rhythm and Blues.'"
[BEGO, M., 1989, p. 90] In the building of Atlantic Records to
power, non-Jewish co-founder Ahmet Ertegun feared collusion between
Wexler and two Jewish songwriters, Jerry Lieber and Mike Stoller, to
oust him. [HOSYKYNS, p. 10] (Jerry Greenberg was also "one of Ertegun's
top lieutenants at Atlantic." [KING, T., p. 166] Jewish mogul David
Geffen once tried to create a rumor that Ertegun was anti-Semitic which
"could hurt Ertegun's business." [KING, T., 2000, p. 292]
In 1992, Bill McKibben noted an
interesting piece of music trivia that he had heard about on television:
"Neil Sedaka went to the same high
school as Neil Diamond and Barbara
Streisand, and while he was there he
wrote a song about a girl called
Carole Klein who went on to become
Carole King and of course had
several number one records."
[MCKIBBEN, p. 20]
The author doesn't mention it, but,
rather curiously, aside from the fact that they all became famous pop
singers, they were also all Jewish. In fact, in the early 1960s, Don
Kirschner and partner Al Nevins had a company called Aldon Music
as a kind of last outpost of the seminal Tin Pan Alley complex at the
so-called "Brill Building" in New York City. Their hirees (mainly song
writers at that time) were virtually all Jewish, including Carole King,
Gerry Goffin, Barry Mann, Cynthia Weill, Neil Diamond, Neil Sedaka, and
Howard Greenflens. Later came Phil Spector, Jeff Barry, Ellie Greenwich,
Doc Pomus, Mort Shuman, Burt Bacharach, Hal David, Jerry Leiber, and
Mike Stoller. [SCHEURER, T., p. 90] Ellie Greenwich and Jeff Barry,
notes Rich Wiseman, were "one of the hottest songwriter teams in pop."
[WISEMAN, p. 31]
"To my surprise," writes Jewish
author Michael Billig,
"song after well-known pop song,
revealed itself to 'Jewish music,' from
[Elvis] Presley to the soft sounds
of the drifters to [producer] Phil
Spector. So much of the
rebellion-music which I had loved in my
youth and which seemed to be a
window to a foreign, dangerous
world, turned out to be a product
of familiar surroundings. Surprise
was mixed with delight." [ARNOT,
C., 10-4-2000, p. 6]
In the 1960s era, the Beatles'
agent/manager, Brian Epstein, was Jewish, as was the promoter, Sid
Bernstein ("New York's leading promoter in the mid-sixties," [GLATT, p.
87] of their early Carnegie Hall and Shea Stadium concerts. The head of
Bernstein's employer -- the General Artist Corporation -- was
Norman Weiss, also Jewish. A Jewish entrepreneur in America, Irwin
Pincus, "secured foreign rights on six original Beatles recordings."
[ELIOT, M, p. 127] These seminal tunes appeared on the Vee Jay
label (which also recorded the popular Four Seasons) in the early months
of "Beatlemania' in America. (Meanwhile, the state of Israel banned the
Beatles from performing there in 1965 "for fear of the decadent affect
it would have on Israel's youth)." [FRANKEL, G., p. 273] Sandy Gallin
(also Jewish and, like Epstein, gay) "shot to stardom after booking the
Beatles for their legendary 1964 American debut on The Ed Sullivan
Show." [KING, T., 2000, p. 93]
"The daughter of prosperous furniture manufacturers in Sheffield,"
says Albert Goldman, "[Brian Epstein's mother] had been educated in a
school dominated by Roman Catholics, an experience that led to her to
attribute all her subsequent misfortunes in life to anti-Semitism,
another trait Brian adopted." [GOLDMAN] "At age ten," adds Chet Flippo,
"[Brian] was expelled from Liverpool College for scrawling dirty
pictures. He and his mother attributed the expulsion to anti-Semitism."
[FLIPPO, C., 1988, p. 143] Both Epstein's parents "were from prominent
Jewish families in Liverpool" and he was an heir to his family's NEMS
company: the North End Music Store chain, which was purchased in
the 1930s. [FLIPPO, C., 1988, p. 143] "Brian didn't care that much about
the Beatles' music," writes Flippo, "They knew that early on and he
always acknowledged it. He had absolutely no experience in managing a
group and the Beatles knew that. His contacts, such as they were, were
with the business side of record companies." [FLI_PPO, C., 1988, p. 142]
Epstein, notes the Jewish Forward, was a
"gay, Jewish record-department manager -- of the Liverpool store
owned by his
parents -- who met the Beatles and in little more than a year
turned them into the
most successful musical act in the world. The life of the Beatles'
first manager
has been familiar to Beatles fans for decades, though always as
one of the sideshows
to the record-shattering main attraction. With the focus reversed,
some arresting
tidbits emerge, such as when Paul McCartney explains his father's
immediate
approval of Epstein. 'He thought Jewish people were very good with
money,'
Mr. McCartney says. 'That was the common wisdom. He thought Brian
would
be very good for us ... And he was right ... If anyone was the
fifth Beatle, it was
Brian.' MANDELL, B., 2001]
A biography of Epstein is entitled
"The Man Who Made the Beatles." "While none of his performing artists
were Jews," notes author Roy Coleman, "Brian veered towards the company
of Jews in the music business, and some of his senior colleagues were
Jews: Nat Weiss, Dick James [originally Richard Leon Vapnick], Dan
Black, Vic Lewis, Bernard Lee." [COLEMAN, p. 345] Weiss became partners
with Epstein in a company called Nemperor Artists. Another
Beatle-based company (called Stramsact in London and Seltaeb
in America) was formed, in conjunction with Epstein's lawyer, David
Jacobs, to merchandize everything from Beatles chewing gum to wallpaper.
Jacobs funneled considerable Beatles business in America to famous Los
Angeles Jewish lawyer Marvin Mitchelson. [JENKINS, p. 85]
David Jacobs, note Peter Brown and
Steven Gaines,
"adored the young Brian Epstein and
took him under his wing. The
two men were similar in many
coincidental ways. Their families were
both in the furniture business, both
were born and bred of money,
and both had doting Jewish mothers.
Both were homosexual. David
Jacobs became Brian's chief
solicitor. From then on, all legal decisions
and contracts would be made with
David Jacobs' advice."
[BROWN/GAINES, 1983, p. 122]
Victor Lewis, also Jewish, was the
Managing Director of yet another Epstein company, NEMS Enterprises.
The Beatles had a 10% interest in this company that was based on their
profitability; Epstein and his brother held the other 90%. [COLEMAN, p.
305] As Decca writer Tony Barrow once noted, "As for hiring of staff,
what John Lennon said to me upon our introduction -- 'if you're not
queer and you're not Jewish, why are you joining NEMS?' -- proved
to be pretty accurate. They weren't all Jewish, but that was the ideal
combination of the two things that were most close to [Epstein] or his
family's heart." [COLEMAN, p. 178] Nemperor Holdings (formerly
NEMS) was eventually sold to Jewish businessman Leonard Richenberg of
Triumph Trust. "Trust became a 90 percent holder of Nemperor ... The
Beatles were stunned that they had lost Nemperor." After various legal
threats, they managed to reacquire it). [BROWN/GAINES, 1983, p. 322]
The aforementioned Jewish
businessman, Dick James, controlled the Beatles' publishing licenses and
was their publisher at Northern Songs. James, note Peter Brown
and Steven Gaines,
"became the for the Beatles a symbol
of the music business. He was
a balding Jewish 'uncle' to the boys,
a man with a big cigar and a sly
smile, who taught John and Paul one
of the biggest lessons of their
lives ... John and Paul would form a
songwriting partnership called
Northern Songs ... Dick James,
in return for his responsibilities as
a music publisher, would get 50
percent of the earnings. In literal
terms Brian [Epstein] signed over to
Dick James 50 percent of
Lennon and McCartney's publishing
fees for nothing. It made him
wealthy beyond imagination in
eighteen months." [BROWN/GAINES,
1983, p. 186]
Chet Flippo notes the context of Epstein's death (an overdose of
sleeping pills):
"There were immediate rumors then, just as there are rumors now,
that
Brian Epstein was murdered as the end result of one or another of
the
many business deals that he had cut regarding the Beatles. There
were so
many murky deals, involving so many people and so much money, that
it could even have been a deal that he failed to do that might have
resulted
in such rumors of vendetta and revenge. Subsequent court hearings
over the years have showed that the Beatles were probably -- there
is no
information for this kind of data -- the most underpaid superstar
performers ever. Given their worldwide acclaim and the millions of
records
they sold, one would have imagined that they were millionaires many
times
over. That was hardly the case ... As Paul [McCartney] especially
had started to
try to dig into the Beatle business books, which they had never
even thought
to do during the Fab Beatlemania years, suspicions of Brian had
started
bubbling to the surface." [FLIPPO, C., 1988, pl. 244]
Also after Epstein's death, in 1969
James sold the rights to the Beatles songs from under them. "It was the
single most contentious deal arising from the Epstein-James era," says
Coleman. "The Beatles were angry at what they regarded as betrayal."
[COLEMAN, p. 306] Marc Elliot notes that James sold "his interest in
Northern Songs to the notorious [British Jewish media mogul] Lew
Grade, known in the film industry as Low Grade." [ELLIOT, p. 158]
Epstein also had "good communication" with Grade's brother, Bernard
Delfont, "one of the czars of London show business." [COLEMAN, p.
245-246]
Epstein also managed the career of
singer Cilia Black. "After Cilia's performance [in New York City],"
notes Brown and Gaines,
"Brian threw a party for her in a
hotel suite upstairs. The party was
crowded with press and New York show
business personalities when
some woman within Brian's earshot
remarked that the lobby of the
Plaza Hotel looked 'Jewish.' Brian
flew into a wild rage. The party
came to a halt around him as he
screamed, 'Madame, I happen to
be Jewish!’.... It was a small
miracle the incident didn't find its
way into the press." [BROWN/GAINES,
1983, p. 183]
Moving in the circles of rich and
powerful, notes Coleman, "Brian had struck up a particularly warm
rapport in London with Bernice Kinn, wife of the owner of the New
Musical Express. An ebullient, intuitive Jew, she and her husband
Maurice formed part of the core of London's 1960s show business hosts
and party goers." [COLEMAN, p. 245-246] Another of Epstein's "close
friends" was Lionel Bart (Beglieter), the Jewish song writer for many of
pop star Cliff Richard's songs, and originator of the musical score for
the musical play, Oliver! [PRESS ASSOCIATION NEWSFILE, 4-3-99]
The Beatles' "official photographer"
during their peak years (1962-67) was Jewish -- Dezo Hoffman. Paul
McCartney's wife Linda (Eastman -- originally Epstein) was also Jewish.
[GILBERT, G., 1996, p. 77, 172] Eastman's father also became active in
legal squabbles between the Beatles, especially between McCartney and
Lennon. McCartney's lawyer in this contentious era, Charles Corman, was
an Orthodox Jew. [BROWN/GAINES, 1983, p. 333] The producers of the
Beatles first movie, A Hard Day's Night, were Walter Shenson and
Bud Orenstein. Richard Lester directed the movie, and is also Jewish.
[JEWHOO; online] Famous Jewish singer Bob Dylan (Robert Zimmerman)
introduced the Beatles to marijuana the first time he met them, a
gathering arranged by music writer Al Aronowitz. [BROWN/GAINES, 1983, p.
150]
After John Lennon's death, another
Jewish agent, Elliot Mintz, has been for years Yoko Ono's publicist (he
has also worked as a public relations man for Bob Dylan, and other
capacities with pop singers throughout the years). Immediately after
Lennon's assassination, an employee, Fred Seaman, and his "old college
roommate," "psychiatrist and New York diamond dealer" Bob Rosen, set up
a network (termed "Project Walrus") to market Lennon's stolen journals
and other memorabilia. [MINTZ, 1991]
One of the most famous popular music
producers of the 1960s -- Phil Spector -- was also Jewish. Specter was
renowned for his strange temperament and a music style described as a
"wall of sound." "Philip was a very strange person," remarked pop singer
Sonny Bono, "He always had a tough time staying rational, a real tough
time." [WADE, p. 100] Specter also founded Phillips Records with
partner Lester Sil. "The most famous pop producer [Spector] of them
all," noted the Los Angeles Times in 1988,
"was a bigger superstar than any
singers among his bullpen he kept on
hand to belt out wonderfully
disposable ditty after ditty -- and he kept
it that way by issuing most of the
singles under the name of some generic
group, not the actual lead singer."
[WILLMAN, C., 10-11-88,
CALENDAR, p. 10]
Another top Jewish manager, Allen
Klein -- starting out with clients like Steve Lawrence and Eydie Gorme
(both Jewish), Bobby Darin, and Sam Cooke -- eventually owned the
Cameo Parkway company, managing many of the biggest British musical
acts of the 1960s, including the Rolling Stones (whose early agent was
Sandy Lieberson), the Yardbirds, the Kinks, the Animals, and Donovan.
Eventually, upon Brian Epstein's death, Klein even managed the Beatles'
Apple company. "Klein was a New York accountant," notes Mark
Hertsgaard, "whose foulmouthed personality and street-fighter instincts
masked a razor-sharp financial mind but helped explain his propensity
for attracting lawsuits and tax fraud accusations." [HERTSGAARD, p. 287]
"At the peak of his career," says Phillip Norman, "his company was
involved in fifty lawsuits," [NORMAN, p. 184] including one with the
Beatles. The Rolling Stones once sued Klein for $29 million. [SANDFORD,
p. 164]
Christopher Sandford notes that
"By midsummer [Rolling Stones singer
Mick] Jagger was unable to
mention his manager's name [Klein]
calmly. Later he gave an
interview in which he stated, 'Half
the money I've made has been
stolen. Most artists in show business
suffer the same kind of thing...
It's all the hangers-on and
parasites. There are very few honest
people in the profession." [SANDFORD,
p. 139]
Klein had this interchange with a
Playboy interviewer in 1971:
"Q: Would you lie?
A: Oh, sure.
Q: Would you steal?
A: Probably. Look. You have to
survive. Whatever it takes ... It's a
game for Chrissakes and
winning is everything." [GARFIELD, p.
257]
Another legendary Jewish manager,
Albert Grossman, was "probably the best-known, most successful, and
aggressive artist's manager in the music business." [SCADUTO, p. 105] He
ran the careers of Bob Dylan, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, and many other
top musical artists. (When Grossman's business manager, Dick Asher,
signed Joplin to a contract, he never forgot what she said to him: "I
hope you didn't fuck us too much." [DANNEN, p. 76] The early booking
agent for Joplin's Big Brother and the Holding Company band was Todd
Schiffman; its manager was Julius Karpen.
Bob Dylan was also signed to a
song-licensing deal by Lou Levy, and later by Artie Mogull ("a hustler")
[KING, T., 2000, p. 72] at M. Witmark and Sons. Early in songwriter's
career, "when a girlfriend's mother challenged his lies and said she
thought Zimmerman was his real name, he called her an anti-Semite, as if
a mere description of the truth was bigotry." [RUBIN, p. 94] Dylan, who
early in his career hid his Jewish past and made up various lies (he was
from Oklahoma, etc.) about his background, nonetheless joined the Jewish
fraternity house at the University of Minnesota in 1959, Sigma Alpha Mu.
[SCADUTO, p. 26] After becoming rich and famous singing about social
justice, in the 1980s, "Dylantologist" A. J. Weberman declared that the
famous singer "is an ultra-Zionist. He is doing the tour to raise money
for Israel. He has given large sums of money to Israel in the name of
Abraham Zimmerman." [SPITZ, p. 430] Newsweek and Time
each reported that Dylan had indeed donated sums to the Jewish state,
and even the far right-wing Jewish Defense League. [SPITZ, p. 407] A
biographer, Anthony Scaduto, noted earlier, in 1971,
"At this writing, Dylan's search for
personal salvation seems to be
coming around full circle, back to
the religion of his fathers. Bob
has started to study Judaism, and
Hebrew. Dylan, who gets so
Gemini-enthused about everything, has
made several trips to
Israel in the last year to 'sniff the
breeze' as his friends put it. He
has reportedly donated some of his
funds to help support at least
one kibbutz there. Folksinger Theo
Bikel [also Jewish, and a
Zionist activist] adds: 'Dylan has
told me that Israel appears to be
one of the few places left in the
world where life has any meaning.'
He has even attended several meetings
of the militant Jewish
Defense League. The JDL's head, Meir
Kahane, [charged by many,
including Jews, as a racist and
fascist] will say only that Dylan has
'come around a couple times to see
what we're all about' and has
promised to donate money to the
organization. Dylan refuses to discuss
it." [SCADTO, p. 274]
By 1977, the biggest rock concert
promoters were San Francisco-based Bill Graham (a Jewish Holocaust
survivor originally named Wolfgang Wolodia Granjanka, the owner of the
famous hippie Filmore Ballroom who had named his own northern California
estate after the mythic Israelite fortress, Masada), Concerts West,
Concert Associates, Chicago's Frank Fried, and in New York, Ron Delsener
and Howard Stein. [CHAPPLE, p. 152] In 1976, Howard Stein (whose
"father, Jack 'Ruby' Stein, had been a loan shark, ... ended up floating
down the Hudson, sans head") [HADEN-GUEST, ., 1997, p. 66] noted that
the field of his endeavors in musical concert production had a
"territorial overtone":
"It's hard for a major concert
producer to get started in New York City
and do battle with Delsener and
myself. It's equally difficult for a major
concert producer to establish
himself against Frank Fried and myself in
Chicago. In Miami, I virtually
don't consider myself as having any real
competition. In Atlanta, minor
competition. In Texas, some competition.
In New York there are three:
Delsener, myself, and Jerry Weintraub. Bill
Graham on the West coast ... The
power of an impresario or a concert
producer is through associations.
It's very political. It's very personal.
It's building reciprocal
relationships." [LEVINE, F. p. 262]
Jon Fischel at Billboard
magazine named Jerry Weintraub and Bill Graham (sometimes described as
the "Godfather of Rock and Roll") as the "most powerful men in the [rock
concert] business" in their era. [LEVINE, p. 275] "As Bill Graham became
increasingly successful and achieved celebrity status in San Francisco,"
says John Glatt, "he faced a growing hostility from many people who saw
him as a capitalist pig growing rich on the backs of the Love
Generation." [GLATT, p. 61]
By the 1970s, lawyer Allan Grubman
(whose partner was Arthur Indursky) became "the biggest music attorney
in the history of rock and roll." [DANNEN, p. 144] Grubman, Indursky,
Schindler, & Goldstein have been "the country's leading rock-and-roll
law firm." [Karlen, N.,, 1994, p. 59] Irving Azoff, "one of the most
loathed men in the movie business," eventually headed the Front Line
management firm, "the top management firm in rock and roll." [DANNEN, p.
134] Top man at Front Line after Azoff? Howard Kaufman. [KING,
T., 2000, p. 436] Azoff, short in stature, is known by enemies in the
Hollywood world as the "Poison Dwarf." Azoff's acts included the Eagles,
Boz Scaggs, Dan Fogelberg, Steely Dan, REO Speedwagon, Joe Walsh, and
many others. Azoff eventually headed MCA, and later Giant
Records. When he was president of MCA, three of four
vice-presidents were also Jewish: Myron Roth, Zach Horowitz, and Larry
Solters. [KNOEDELSEDER, p. 26] The Leber-Krebs agency became
"one of the biggest management companies in rock"; their acts included
Aerosmith and Ted Nugent. Dan Weiner founded the rock talent agency,
Monterey Peninsula Associates. John and David Handleman (the
Handleman Company) eventually became the largest rock and roll
"jobbers" (distributors) in the United States; in 1991 they bought out
their largest rival, also Jewish-founded -- Lieberman Enterprises.
[HULL, p. 181] "Almost every time you buy an LP, cassette, compact disc
or book at K mart," says Tim Kiska, "you're putting a few dimes in the
Handleman family fortune." [KISKA, p. 91]
Lou Adler (formerly teamed with
fellow-Jewish mogul Herb Alpert) was the backbone producer of the
influential Monterey Pop Festival and head of the Ode record
label. (Alpert and another Jewish partner, Jerry Moss, also founded
A&M Records. Adler, Jay Lasker, and Bobby Roberts also headed
Dunhill Records -- which highlighted the Mamas and Papas, etc.)
[PHILLIPS, M., 1986, p. 72] The Monterey festival was originally
conceived by Benny Shapiro and Alan Pariser who sold the project to
Adler and Michelle Phillips. [HOSKYNS, 1996, p. 142] Ray Manarek
remembers when he and the rest of the Doors rock group went (before they
became famous) to Adler's office, hoping he would sign them to a
recording contract:
"He rejected the whole demo. Ten seconds on each song ... and we
were dismissed
out of hand. Just like that. He took the demo off the turntable and
handed it back
to me with an obsequious smile and said, 'Nothing here I can use.'
We were shocked.
We stood up, the three of us, and [lead singer] Jim [Morrison],
with a wry and
knowing smile on his lips, cuttingly and cooly shot back at
him, 'That's okay, man.
We don't want to be used, anyway.'" [MANZAREK, R., 1998, p.
153]
The landmark 1969 Woodstock Musical
Festival was the entrepreneurial investment of four young Jews: Joel
Rosenman, John Roberts (heir to a pharmaceutical fortune), Artie
Kornfeld, and Michael Lang. The person hired to pull the whole project
together was Stanley Goldstein. Mel Laurence (born Melvin Bernard Lachs)
was also the Director of Operations for the festival creators,
Woodstock Ventures. Bert Cohen, of Concert Hall Publications,
soon joined the production team for various tasks. [SPITZ, 1979] The
first employee of Woodstock ventures was Rene Levine, a bookkeeper and
another Jew, Alex Jaffee, was the company's accountant. In a book
chapter called "Buying Off the Underground," Joel Rosenman recalls when
he and others of the Woodstock Ventures investment team went to
Greenwich Village's East Village Other "counterculture" newspaper
to buy them off, guaranteeing that prominent members of that
anti-capitalist community wouldn't cause problems with the economic
exploitation of the supposedly anti-materialist Love Generation. Famed
radical (and Jewish) agitator Abbie Hoffman demanded $10,000 from
Woodstock Ventures, "or else that fucking festival you guys are
planning is gonna end up around your ass." [ROSENMAN/ROBERTS/PILPEL, p.
102]
Others involved in the Woodstock
project included Judi Bernstein (business manager for the sound company
that handled the festival; she later became executive director of
Boston's Zionist Hadassah Organization) and her husband Harold Cohen;
Lee Blumer (Assistant to the Director of Security); Steve Cohen (who was
"largely responsible for designing and building the Woodstock stage");
Len Kaufman (who "headed the 'elite black shirt' security force"); and
Rona Elliot (who worked in Woodstock Ventures public relations
and later became the music correspondent for NBC's Today
show). Many of the Woodstock musical artists were even boarded at the
famous Jewish resort hotel in the Catskill Mountains, Grossinger's.
Even Max Yasgur, the dairy farmer whose land was used for the festival,
was Jewish. [JEWHOO]
One of the four Woodstock festival
entrepreneurs, Artie Kornfeld, was vice president of Capitol Records
(1967-68). He "wrote and produced all the Cowsills' stuff." In later
Kornfeld recalled how Woodstock was started:
"My secretary said, 'There's a
Michael Lang here to see you.' And I said,
'Who's Michael Lang?' And she said,
'He says he's from your old
neighborhood.' And I said, 'Well, if
he's from the neighborhood, tell him
to come in.' Bensonhurst. It's a
section of Brooklyn that's all Jewish and
Italian. That's how he got to see
me; by saying he was from the
neighborhood.'" [MAKOWER, p. 25]
The two men shared some marijuana in
Kornfeld's office. Later, discussing the grand idea of a gigantic music
festival, Kornfeld notes that much "was basically talked out that night,
that first night, probably behind some Colombian blond, which had
something to do with it. Overachieving, pseudo-intellectual Jewish kids
with an idea that came from outside of us, I believe. It was the
culture." [MAKOWER, p. 27] The two men later paid a visit to join forces
with Rosenman and Roberts (later partners in a venture capitalist firm
called J.R. Capital) and Woodstock was born.
The disastrous 1999 Woodstock Festival
was also headed by Michael Lang, and John Scher. It ended in rioting,
vandalism, injuries, arrests, and sexual crimes. [MORSE, S., 7-27-99]
Also in the rock-and-roll entrepreneurial world, "the first
Lollapalooza," notes Neal Karlen, "was held in 1991 as the brainchild of
Perry Farrell [born Perry Bernstein], former leader of the defunct
Jane's Addiction. That summer's eight band line-up drew 430,000 fans,
grossed $10 million, and was the surprise smash of the entire [music]
industry."
[KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 160]
Another Jewish entrepreneur, Harold
Leventhal, promoted folk acts like the Weavers and Woody Guthrie.
"Jefferson Airplane was the creation of [their manager] Matthew Katz."
[GLATT, p. 57] Danny Rifkind managed the Grateful Dead. Paul Rothchild
produced the Doors (and many other groups); Jac Holzman, head of
Elektra, signed them to his record label. [DENSMORE, J., 1990, p. 79]
(Todd Schiffman signed them to a talent agency). [KING, T., 2000, pl.
97] Rothchild was so integral to the Doors that band member Ray Manzarek
calls him "the fifth Door." [Manzarek, R., 1998, p. 203] Manzarek
recalls Elektra owner Jac Holzman's attitude towards his best-selling
group:
"We were all excited at the prospects of breaking the cherry of a
brand-new, state-
of-the-art [Elektra] recording studio. And we thought it was going
to be for free.
Hell, Jac Holzman built the damned place with profits from the
Doors' record
sales. Everybody called the new Elektra facility on La Cienga 'the
house the
Doors built,' so why shouldn't we record for free? Besides, it was
an in-house
studio. It would be for all Elektra artists. Outsiders could hire
the studio at the
going rates, but Elketra's own people could record there anytime
they wanted
and for free. Right? We were excited. Wouldn't you be? Bullshit! No
free
time. No freebee recording sessions. Everybody paid. Strangers or
family ...
everybody paid. However, Jac did say ... 'Boys, I'll tell you what
I'm going
to do. For you ...' And you could see the calculator in his head
whirling.
You could see that he wanted to be generous to us, he was on the
West
Coast now, he wore love beads, he had grown his hair long, he was
not a
crass materialist, he was new man who believed in peace and love
for all
races, religions, creeds, nationalities. But he was also from New
York.
'For you ... a ten percent discount!'
I almost snorted in his face. [Lead singer] Jim [Morrison] just
spun
around on his heels, unable to face Jac." [MANZAREK, R., 1998, p.
302]
Early in their career the Doors practiced at home of Stu and
Marilyn Kreiger in wealthy Pacific Palisades. [MANZAREK, R., 1998, p.
149] This was the home of the parents of Doors guitarist Robby Kreiger,
also Jewish. Heiress Naomi Hirschorn literally bought the Byrds their
first musical instruments. [CROSBY/GOTTLEIB, p. 86] Terry Melcher
(whose father was Jewish) managed both the Byrds and Paul Revere and the
Raiders. [WYNN, N., 1990, p. 197] Herb Gart "handled" the Youngbloods.
[KING, T., 2000, p. 66] David Kapralik managed Sly and the Family Stone
and Barbara Streisand. [SCADUTO, p. 105] Nik Cohn, a music critic for
the Manchester Guardian, and later the New York Times,
provided Peter Townsend of The Who important criticism in the
development of his rock opera "Tommy." Townsend, notes Larry Smith, had
a "willingness to compromise his work for a favorable review from [this]
respected journalist/friend." [SMITH, L., 1999, p. 3] In 2002, just
before a new Who tour, bassist John Entwistel died. And this is who
announced the bad news:
"John Entwistle, the bassist for the innovative 1960s rock band The Who,
was found dead Thursday in his hotel room of an apparent heart attack
... The Vegas show was canceled but the rest of the tour was undecided,
said Beckye Levin of promoter Clear Channel Entertainment. 'I was
told he passed away in his sleep last night,' Levin said,
breaking into sobs during a telephone interview. Who manager Robert
Rosenberg said he was 'saddened and shocked.'"
The Beach Boys story eventually centered around key member Brian
Wilson's destructive drug habit and his controlling psychotherapist,
Eugene Landy [see elsewhere for the story of Landy's exploitation of his
famous patient]. The band's road manager was also Jewish, Arnie Geller.
At the peak of his success, Wilson also married a 16-year old Jewish
girl, Marilyn Rovell. His autobiography was also written by Todd Gold,
who was hired by Wilson and his psychotherapist Landy, to create the
book (portraying the controversial Landy in an extremely favorable
light) from tape-recorded interviews.
Top rock act Creedance Clearwater
Revival was effectively destroyed largely by its Jewish overseers. The
group signed with Fantasy Records in 1964. In 1967 the company
was bought by Jewish entrepreneur Saul Zaentz (he also produced the
films One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and Amadeus). When
CCR soon began a string of hit records, the group demanded a royalty
increase, per a clause in their contract. Zaentz refused, but led the
group to an acquaintance, an unscrupulous (and mob-linked) Jewish lawyer
named Bruce Kanter, who developed a complicated scheme to secure the
rock group's earnings in a much lower tax bracket. Kanter shifted much
of Creedance's money into tax dodge companies created in the Bahamas;
one such Kanter company was called King David Distributors, and
later Sholom (Hebrew for peace) LTD. [BLOCK, A., p.
268-269]
As Alan Block notes:
"Over the years the Creedance
Clearwater Revival repatriated much
of their Castle [another
Kanter-related firm] money by borrowing
it from companies they actually
owned, or thought they controlled,
under Kanter's plan. Nevertheless,
when Castle went bust it took
$4 million of the group's and [leader
singer/writer] John Fogerty's
money. Before that happened John
Fogerty desperately tried to
extricate himself from Castle
and the Kanter grasp ... Fogerty was
particularly angry with Saul Zaentz
because he held him responsible
for bringing the group into the
Kanter scheme." [BLOCK, p. 271]
In the mess, Fogerty also lost the
rights to every song he wrote with the band. [BLOCK, A., p. 271] In
1983, the group won a lawsuit of $1.5 million against Kanter for his
part in the Creedance problems. The next year, recording again, Fogerty
lyrics in his Centerfield album included obvious references to
Zaentz that could certainly infer anti-Semitic overtones. He was
described as a "little pig" who is "silent and quick / just like Oliver
Twist." [BLOCK, A., p. 272-273]
African-American singing superstar
Diana Ross, originally of the Supremes, married a Jewish Hollywood
public relations agent, Robert Silberstein, in 1971. J. Randy
Taraborrelli, in his biography of Ross, suggests careerist dimensions to
the marriage:
"Why Diana Ross decided to marry Bob
Silberstein remains a mystery
today. If the two of them were in
love, it was the best kept secret
in Hollywood ... Bob Silberstein was
both white and Jewish. Diana's
appearance and singing style were
meant to appeal to Caucasians, so
a white husband would certainly not
hurt her image -- in fact, it would
enhance it -- and Jewish men were
perceived to be shrewd and
intelligent." [TARABORRELLI, p. 249]
(African-American singer-actress star
Diahann Carroll's first two husbands were also Jewish: Monte Kay (owner
of the Birdland jazz nightclub), and Freddie Glusman, head of a Las
Vegas dress shop. The second marriage collapsed after Glusman beat her).
Harvey Goldsmith is the manager of
rock star Elton John, among others. He is recognized as "the best known
rock promoter in England." [GRAHAM/GREENFIELD, p. 551] Doug Goldstein
manages Guns 'n Roses. (Jerry Heller and Samuel Frankel manage Guns 'n
Roses guitarist Slash. [SNYDER, N., 2-19-01] Steven Levine produced
Culture Club. Jerry Meyer "became one of the top independent record
promoters in the country. He was part of an informal group of about 10
promoters known at the Network, which dominated airplay on Top 40 radio
during the '70s and '80s. The Network had the power to make or break
records ... [Meyer] loves music, which next to his Jewish faith, has
been the constant of his life." [VIOLANTI, p. 8M]
Rock superstar Bruce Springsteen
fell under the control of two agents of Jewish heritage, first
"the tutelage of sharpie Mark
Appel, who simultaneously managed
him, ran the production company
through which his contracts were
signed, and owned his
publishing.... [Springsteen] managed to escape
... Appel through a series of
lawsuits prompted by rock critic/social
climber Jon Landau. Landau ran
Rolling Stone's record review section
even as he worked as a producer
for major record labels ... Landau
came out the other end
Springsteen's manager, producer, and best
friend and confidant." [DOHERTY,
p. 54]
Reviewer Brian Doherty noted Landau's
portrayal in a rock and roll history book as "an unethical, anti-art,
money-grubbing climber." [DOHERTY, p. 54]
Elsewhere, Dick Friedberg was a
partner at the Premier rock and roll management service. Gil
Freisen became the president of A&M Records (Janet Jackson,
Sting, et al). Herb Abrahamson was a cofounder of Atlantic Records.
Norman Granz owned Verve. Jac Holzman founded Elektra Records
with "$600 of bar mitzvah money." (President of Elektra? Mel Posner.
[KING, T., 2000, p. 245] Simon Waronker and cousin Herb Newman founded
Liberty Records in 1955 (Ricky Nelson, Jan and Dean, Bobby Vee,
Fats Domino, Johnny Rivers, the Ventures, etc.). Newman also founded
another label, Era. Ted Wallerstein headed RCA records in
its formative years. Art Kass, Phil Steinberg, Hy Mizrahi, and Artie
Ripp founded the Kama Sutra recording label (financed in part by
a known mobster, [WADE, p. 118] and later Buddah. Buddah
producers Jerry Kasentz and Jeff Katz helped develop the trivial genre
of "bubblegum music," including the 1910 Fruitgum Company and Ohio
Express. Both groups had the same lead singer, Joey Levine. [DANNEN, p.
164] Don Kirshner is credited with the supervision of the quintessential
media-illusory artificial band, the Monkees; three of the four band
members didn't even know how to play an instrument. Jewish film moguls
Burt Schneider and Bob Rafelson were their creators. Bob Ezrin's
Migration Records features acts like Peter Gabriel, Aerosmith, Lou
Reed, Robert Flack, Kiss, et al. Trauma Records (owned by Rob
Kahane and Paul Palmer) has featured acts like No Doubt, Bush, and
basketball star Shaquille O'Neal. Israeli arms dealer and Hollywood
mogul Arnon Milchan sought to purchase Trauma in the late 1990s
and merge it into his own Restless Records company.
Eventually most of the small record
labels were bought out or rendered extinct by large mega-media
corporations. "The term 'oligopoly' is an apt one to describe today's
record business," wrote Frederic Dannen in 1990, "Most Americans get
nearly all their wares from six suppliers -- CBS,
Warners [including the labels: Warners,
Atlantic, Atco, Elektra, Asylum, Reprise],
BMG [the initials of the Bertelsmann Music Group,
which includes RCA], Capitol-EMI, Poly-Gram
[including Mercury, Polydor, London, Vertigo,
Verve, Wing, A&M, Island, Motown],
and MCA [including Decca, ABC-Dunhill,
MCA, Geffen, DGC, GRP] ... Far out in front
there are the big two ... A whopping one-third [of the record business]
belongs to CBS and Warners ... Today CBS and
Warners can be viewed as the record industry's equivalent of the
world's two superpowers." [DANNEN, p. 112]
For years CBS Records was
headed by Walter Yetnikoff. "The heart of Yetnikoff's persona," notes
Dannen, "was his Brooklyn Jewishness ... An outsized number of [record]
label bosses were Jews from Brooklyn, but Walter wore his ethnicity like
a gabardine ... [He] fit well with the record business which was
culturally Jewish ... The goyim. With Walter it was always Us
versus Them. When CBS Records had its annual convention in
London, Walter forbade his people to stay at the Dorchester Hotel
because it was Arab-owned ... One of Walter's inconsistencies was that
he dated only gentile women, preferring well-endowed blondes. Before his
twenty-five marriage broke up in the early eighties, he had already
begun to amass a stable of such girlfriends -- his 'shiksa farm.'"
[DANNEN, p. 23] Yentnikoff was a "close friend" of record industry
mobster Morris Levy, as was Sheldon Levy, another president of CBS
Records. "Walter grew fond of Morris," says Frederic Dannen, "and
spent time at [Morris] Levy's farm." [DANNEN, p. 34]
(To rock star Sting's credit, in
2001 he resisted unspecified "media" pressures to censor an Arab out of
one of his songs. As the Associated Press noted, "Sting told the
[Arab American Institute Foundation] that some people in the media had
advised him not to put out his duet with Algerian vocalist Cheb Mami as
a singer, 'because of the Arab guy singing at the front. 'They said, 'If
you take him out, we'll play it on the radio.' I said, 'No can do. It's
an integral part of the song.' His remarks drew cheers from Arab
Americans across the ballroom.") [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 5-2-01]
Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG)
is a giant German-based entertainment conglomerate. The president and
CEO of BMG Entertainment North America, since 1994, has been the
Jewish executive Strauss Zelnick, formerly the president of Twentieth
Century Fox. From this position he oversees "the operations of all
North American divisions of Bertelsmann Music Group as well as
Music Publishing and Interactive Entertainment
operations worldwide." [BUSINESS WIRE, 9-13-94] The division Zelnick
heads accounts for over $4 billion in yearly sales. In 2001 another
Jewish executive, Joel Klein, was named chairman and CEO of the U.S.
operations of Bertelsmann AG. For years, another Jewish head,
Clive Davis, has overseen the important Arista record division in
BMG's stable. In 1998, another executive at BMG (both a
German convert to Judaism, and a rabbi) quit to become the director of
Germany's chapter of the environmental Greenpeace organization.
In 1997, Frank Woessner, the
non-Jewish CEO of Bertelsmann's giant book division, was awarded
the (Jewish fraternal organization) B'nai B'rith of Continental Europe's
"Gold Medal for Humanitarian Work." "Woessner," noted the Jewish
Week, "was lauded for supporting liberal Jewish causes in speeches
by prominent members of the local Jewish community." [AXELROD, p. 41]
Among the most important of his "humanitarian work" was the publication
of Jewish American author Daniel Goldhagen's controversial work that
affixed blame upon all Germans for the Holocaust (not just
Nazis).
In 1998, the Jewish Bronfman
family's Seagrams firm (which already owned MCA) bought
PolyGram NV -- "the world's largest music company" -- for $10.5
billion. The International Herald Tribune noted that:
"The transaction would be the
biggest in the history of the entertainment
industry, eclipsed only by Walt
Disney's $18.9 billion purchase of
Capital Cities/ABC Inc. and
the $11 billion merger of Time and
Warner Communications
that created Time Warner Inc."
[INTERNATIONAL HERALD, p. 15]
The Polygram-MCA amalgamation
now under the combined rule of Edgar Bronfman made him, at age 43, "the
most powerful mogul in music land," with a quarter of all world record
sales on earth," including the largest output of classics and jazz.
[LEBRECHT, p. 25] Polygram alone, in the Bronfman empire, also
owns over 320,000 song copyrights. Among its labels are A&M,
Mercury, Decca/London, Phillips Classics, and
Island. [HOOVER, p. 138] Worldwide, Polygram-MCA holdings
include the Finnish Sonet Media AB company, Japan's Nippon
Phonogram, Polydor KK, and Rodven Records, "the
leading independent record company in Latin America." [HOOVER, p. 138]
Prominent musical acts in the Polygram stable have included U2,
Sting, Lionel Richie, Soundgarden, Kiss, the Village People, Janet
Jackson and numerous others. MTV-like TV station projects include
Atomic TV in Warsaw, Poland and (in association with MTV)
2 MTV in Asia.
Charles Koppelman was founder of
the SBK record label, which recorded "white rapper" Vanilla Ice,
and Wilson Phillips among others. Through the mid-1990s he was chairman
of EMI Group North America, later founding a company called
CAK Univeral Credits, geared to music stars looking for loans. In
2000, Monte Lipman, co-founder of Republic Records, was named
president of Universal Records (part of the Bronfman empire),
which had bought out the former company. And, in the same year, as the
Cleveland Jewish News noted,
"Instead of forming on their own,
megapop bands like Backstreet Boys
and 'N Sync are the manufactured
creations of Transcontinental
Records
mogul Lou Pearlman, where inspired grooming and marketing
has shepherded a number of record
boy-groups to stardom."
[HOROWITZ, G., 3-24-2000, p. 37]
(In 2000, 'N Sync played at young
Rachel Colburn's private Bat Mitzvah party. She is the daughter of
American Online's President of Business Affairs, David Colburn. "AOL
spokeswoman Wendy Goldberg said the band has a relationship with
Colburn, and they did the gig as a favor." Such a performance by the
singing group normally costs between $250,000 and a million dollars.)
[DESERET NEWS, 6-8-2000, p. A2]
In the music executive scene, at
Warners, for example, for years Mo Ostin headed the music company. "Warners,"
notes Neal Karlen, in his book about the all-female band Babes in
Toyland, "was run by Mo Ostin and Lenny Waronker; the company's entire
A&R department was headed by Mo's son Michael. If [A&R man Tim] Carr
could get his way, the Babes' campaign would be largely orchestrated
from Warner Records' Burbank headquarters by a half-dozen Jewish music
men ... Traveling the spectrum of popular music, one could still
occasionally hear the word Jew used as an epithet. If one listened, one
could catch bands talking of being 'Jewed down' by a record company
executive or having to hire a 'Jew lawyer' to fix a thorny legal hassle.
The attitude was no different in the shrunken universe of alternative
music. True, three of punk rock's spiritual godfathers were Jewish: Bob
Dylan, ne Robert Zimmerman, Lou Reed, ne Louis Firbank; and Joey Ramone,
ne Jeffrey Hyman. Yet signing with a major label, one drunk English
guitarist could be heard saying late one night in 1992 at the historic
New York punk club CBGB, meant turning oneself into 'Jew-bait.'"
[KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 145]
At Sire Records, an affiliate of Warners, Seymour
Stein's artist stable has included Madonna, Talking Heads, the Ramones,
and many other premiere talents. "Before long," says Christopher
Anderson, "[producer Mark] Kamins and Madonna became lovers ... After a
few days together, Madonna felt comfortable enough to spring her tape on
Kamins ... He had become friendly with an up-and-coming artist and
repertorie man at Warner's Sire label named Michael
Rosenblatt ... Rosenblatt took the tape to the mercurial [Seymour]
Stein." Madonna also got her start in movies in Susan Seidelman's
Desperately Seeking Susan. [ANDERSON, 1991, p. 96-98, 121] Guy
Oseary, born in Jerusalem, is "a partner in Madonna's Maverick
Records" and he wrote a book called Jews Who Rock, about
Jewish performers in the rock and roll world. "I keep getting calls," he
says, "And they say, 'Why wasn't I in your book? I rock. And I'm
Jewish.'" [BOUCHER, G., 4-17-01, p. 62; TAYLOR, L., 12-27-00, p. F5]
Oseary "as Maverick's chief talent finder has become one of Madonna's
most trusted confidants." [FURMAN, P., 6-17-98, p. 12]
When Bob Krasnow became the head of
Elektra, "it was, he says, his ethnic credentials more than
anything else, that got him the job." [WADE, p. 58] "I could work for a
big company like Warner Brothers [which swallowed Elektra],"
said Krasnow, "because I had all the ethnic qualities -- I was white, I
was Jewish, they could invite me over to their home for dinner, and I
could talk to Black people." [WADE, p. 58]
Jerry Wexler was the co-founder of
Atlantic. When the head of CBS Records, Clive Davis, was
fired for embezzling $94,000 (including $18,000 for his son's bar
mitzvah [DANNEN, p. 86], he was replaced by Irwin Segelstein. Dick
Asher, also Jewish "was the number two man at Columbia Records under
Clive Davis." [KING, T., 2000, p. 143] ("Since the days of Abraham,"
notes the Jewish Forward, "machers in the entertainment business
have used their sons' and daughters' special day to power-schmooze
fellow moguls. In 1973, Clive Davis, then president of CBS Records,
threw one of the most famous bar mitzvahs in show business history (that
he was fired for it only adds to its mystique.") [DORFMAN, J.,
6-16-2000, p. 2] Davis later ended up as the head of Bell Records
under Columbia Pictures president Alan Hirschfield. (Davis later
had a successful career heading Arista Records, whose artists
included Whitney Houston and the Grateful Dead. Davis' business manager
at CBS was Michael Levy; Goddard Lieberman was CBS Records'
second in command; Lieberman's assistant was Norman Adler. Al Shulman
was head of the CBS Special Products Division and Dick Asher was
CBS Records' Executive Vice President. Ron Alexenburg was a vice
president for promotion at Columbia. Elliott Goldman was the
number two man at Arista Records; Mitch Miller was a prominent
producer and musical celebrity at CBS.
By 1998 Jay Boborg -- co-founder of
IRS Records in 1979 which began the careers of the Go-Gos,
R.E.M., and others -- was the president of MCA Records. Jerry
Greenberg, former head of Atlantic Records, "is now [in 1998,
superstar] Michael Jackson's right hand man and president of MJJ
Records." [VIOLANTI, p. 8M] (Jackson was the best man for Israeli
psychic Uri Geller's wedding. Geller's drawing -- minus a Star of David
-- graces a recent Jackson album). [REUTERS, 11-1-01] Alain Levy is
chairman (1998) of PolyGram. In 1997 Danny Goldberg, chairman of
Mercury Records, was described by the Jewish Week as being
"among the most powerful executives in the entertainment industry."
[GREENBERG, E., MUST, p. 49] Among the divisions he directs is
Motown Records and PolyGram Classics and Jazz in the United
States. Goldberg was also formerly the president of Atlantic Records
where he controlled, among other groups, Nirvana. By 1995 he was the
chairman and CEO of Warner Records, but lost the position during
the controversy over Warners' support of particularly abrasive "gangsta
rap" recordings. Goldberg is also a former chairman of the executive
committee of the American Jewish Congres
In 1987 Goldberg (then manager of Bonnie Raitt, Belinda Carlyle of
the Go-Gos, Don Johnson, and others) organized a record industry-wide
propaganda effort for the state of Israel. As the Los Angeles Times
described it:
"Israel's Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, in an unprecedented
appearance before
a group of recording industry executives, personal managers, agents
and lawyers,
told them that rock music was 'like praying' to some Israeli youth
and exhorted
them to 'come "pray" with our young people so they will celebrate
our [Israeli]
40th anniversary' in 1988. The reception/brunch at the Beverly
Hills Hotel
on Sunday was organized by rock entrepreneur Danny Goldberg, the
president
[then] of Gold Mountain Records ... The 100-plus guests represented
a
cross-section of the music industry, with strong ties to musical
talents. Among
them: Irving Azoff, president of MCA's Entertainment Group; A&M
Records
vice-president Jeff Gold; and personal managers Fred DeMann
(Madonna,
Lionel Richie), Mike Gormley (The Bangles, Oingo Boingo), and
Michael
Lippman (George Michael)." [CAULFIELD, D., 9-29-87, p. 6]
Goldberg told the Times that
"We talked about the fact that Israel needs to establish an
identity with
younger people. They're currently only aware of the country as an
item on
the nightly news. In the 1950s, an alliance was formed between
Israel
and what used to be the heart of show business. I mean, Frank
Sinatra
and Elizabeth Taylor were associated with Israel, but that leaves
out
the people who grew up after them." [CAULFIELD, D., 9-29-87, p. 6]
The brunch was sponsored by the CRB Foundation, founded by Jewish
mogul Charles Bronfman "to create a mutual exchange between Israel and
the rest of the world." The Israeli Foreign Minister, Peres, noted the
Times, received "a standing ovation when he arrived." [CAULFIELD, D.,
9-29-87, p. 6]
In England, Michael Levy headed
Magnet Records, built to power with help in 1972 from the then head
of (British) Columbia Records, Maurice Oberstein. Levy, known for
"chasing people around the office and throwing ashtrays," is also
chairman of Britain's Jewish Care organization. [BRIGHT, p. T2] Levy
"made his personal fortune propelling pop acts -- Alvin Stardust, Chris
Rea, Darts and Bad Manners -- to stardom." [DAVIS, D., 2-10-2000, p.
5] "At one point [he] was selling 8% of all records in the UK." [RED
STAR RESEARCH] In 1991 British producer Ian Levine began recording old
Black Motown record label acts for his new Motorcity
label. Levine gathered over 100 former stars to Detroit. "I was in
control of the entire Motown family," he chortled, "[I brought]
it back together again, and the press and the fans were standing there
in awe." [BULL, p. 14]
Perhaps the most famous
agent/manager/record executive is David Geffen (also Jewish), former
manager of Crosby Stills Nash and Young, and many others, who founded
Asylum, and later, Geffen Records (the artist stable included
Jackson Browne, the Eagles, Joni Mitchell, Linda Ronstadt, and many
others). (Alan Cohen "structured the Asylum Records joint venture
buyout [with Warner and] left Warner to become head of
Madison Square Garden"). [KING, T., 2000, p. 287] Dennis McDougal notes
that Geffen "spotted Aerosmith, XTC, Nirvana, and dozens of other pop
acts in their infancy and nurtured them to monied maturity and more than
fifty gold record albums ... In 1989 alone, Geffen worldwide
record sales came to over $225 million." [MCDOUGAL, p. 474] A key
Geffen partner was Elliot Roberts (Rabinowitz) -- he was the
"pre-eminent manager of L.A.-based folk rock in the seventies,"
including, even later, Neil Young and Tracy Chapman. [GRAHAM/GREENFIELD,
p. 553] The president of Geffen Records was Eddie Rosenblatt.
Geffen's business manager was Jerry Rubenstein. Gil Segel helped to get
him into real estate. [KING, T., 2000, p. 160, 184] "The funny thing,"
says Geffen, " is that I had to forge a letter that I graduated from
UCLA [to get an early job], and today I'm on the Board of Regents of
UCLA." [SMITH, p. 303] ("He used his friendship with [his client] Linda
Ronstadt, who was then dating California governor Jerry Brown, to obtain
a seat on the University board of regents.") [KING, T., 2000, p. 316]
Non-Jewish musical stars, caught in the Judeocentric web of the
musical world, often support Jewish/Israeli ethnocentric interests on
behalf of their Jewish friends and managers. Among the old Geffen
stable, for example, in 2002 a news item noted that Don Henley of the
Eagles was "donating the $7,900 from the sale [of his guitar at auction]
to the Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas for use in supporting Israel
and Jewish organizations." [TOP FORTY CHARTS, 6-12-02] That same
year, the Jewish Week wondered: "What’s one of the world’s
greatest rock stars doing at a Jewish benefit dinner? The answer came
Monday night when Bono, the voice and wordsmith driving the fabulously
popular band U2, became the first rock and roll personality to receive
the Humanitarian Laureate Award from the Simon Wiesenthal Center."
[Jewish Week, 11-22-02] (That same year, the Israeli newspaper
Ha'aretz noted that the new Wiesenthal "tolerance" Center in
Jerusalem was built on a Muslim cemetery).
In the rock and roll world which is so heavily Jewish, there
are apparently different levels of what is considered to be morally
offensive, including the usual admonition: Thou Shalt Not Offend Jews
(Others, especially Christianity? -- No problem). As Leah Garchik wrote
in 2002, "Marilyn Manson reveals in Rolling Stone's new book
'Tattoo Nation: Portraits of Celebrity Body Art" that Madonna's manager,
who was thinking of signing Manson, called Manson's manager to inquire
about whether the rocker had a swastika among his many tattoos. 'Of
course not,' said Manson's manager. 'One of the guys in the band is
Jewish.' 'Oh, OK,' said Madonna's manager. 'We don't have a problem with
the Satanism, but we can't deal with any kind of Nazism.'"
[GARCHIK, L., 11-7-02, p. D14]
Jews even came to prominence behind
the scenes in the world of country music. The first important Jewish
figure in Nashville was Paul Cohen, the A&R man for Decca in
1945-58 (the Decca company in the United States was founded in
Chicago by Jack Kapp in 1934). Cohen, who lived in New York and visited
Nashville for a few weeks at a time, was "called by some 'the King of
Nashville.'" [JONES, M., p. 73] Margaret Jones notes that
"As head of A&R for Decca's
country division, Cohen was responsible
for a blue chip roster of talent that
included the top acts of the time:
Ernest Tubb, Red Foley and Webb
Pierce ... In 1952, Cohen signed
the one and only female star of
country to Decca, Kitty Wells, and by
1954 he had two other solo girl
performers under contract: Goldie Hill
and Wanda Jackson ... After Cohen
signed Webb Pierce, Pierce
became the hottest artist in country
... [JONES, M., p. 74] ... Nashville
was Cohen's 'fishing hole,' and he
galvanized the town, convincing
Ernest Tubb to record there; soon all
the other acts fell into line."
[JONES, M., p. 73]
"Paul was one of the first Jewish
guys who actually came in to Nashville, once they saw country music was
getting to doing something," recalled singer Faron Young. "Before that,
most of the country people wouldn't accept Jewish people. They were too
clannish about that. He more or less broke the ice, then the rest of
them came in and more or less took over this business. Hell, they own
all the labels and everything else now. Them and the Japs." [JONES, M.
p. 73]
Cohen also signed Brenda Lee and
eventual country superstar Patsy Cline, among others, to his stable.
Earlier though, "Patsy got to know and work with Ben Adelman, another
fixture on the [Washington] DC music scene. Adelman, and not Bill Peer,
as one story goes, appears to have been the direct link to Patsy' first
recording contract. The gregarious, redheaded Adelman was a 'Jewish
feller' who hailed from upstate New York and had fallen in love with
country music in the late forties. He was willing to spend a lot of his
wife's money just for the fun of being in the ball game. Fortunately his
wife, Kate Adelman, as an heiress and supported his efforts ...
Adelman's real talent and the focus of his energies was songwriting. His
early compositions were in the Tin Pan Alley mold, but when his
interests shifted to the booming country and western field, he started
writing hillbilly music. His wife claimed he wrote or co-wrote literally
thousands of tunes that are registered in the Library of Congress."
[JONES, M., 1994, p. 50]
"Cohen was a wheeler-dealer in many respects," notes Margaret
Jones, "He started a dozen or more publishing companies of his own --
all named after brands of whisky. Then he had the chutzpah to open his
office two blocks away from Decca, so he would be operating right
under their noses." [JONES, M., p. 71] When Cohen's career was finished
in Nashville, another Jewish Decca agent, Milton Gabler, "took
over for him." [JONES, M., p. 73] Among his finds, Gabler signed Bill
Haley and His Comets in 1954. (Irvin Feld is also credited with
"discovering" Bill Haley, as well as Paul Anka, the Everly Brothers, and
Fats Domino, among others). [BLACKWELL, E., 1973, p. 164] In this same
genre, years later, country star Waylon Jennings recalled that his big
break in Hollywood came through Jewish producer and musician Herb
Alpert.
The Atlanta Jewish Times notes the story of the birth of
another country star, Willie Nelson:
"[Jewish agent Joel Katz] received a phone call from a man with a
distinct Texas
drawl. The man said he had read about the contract Katz had
negotiated for
[Black pop star] James Brown. He didn't have money, but he wanted
Katz
to make him a star. Katz hopped on a plane for Austin, Texas,
walked into
a room at the Ramada Inn, and stared into the eyes of Willie
Nelson."
[POLLAK, S., 1-7-00]
Katz has represented a wide range of singers: from country stars
Tammy Wynette, Waylon Jennings, and George Straight to African-American
artists The Temptations, B. B. King, Stevie Ray Vaughn, Jimmy Buffet,
and the rappers Rone Thugs and Harmony.
Finding a niche wherever it is
available, by the late 1990s Madeline Stone was even a "leading writer
of Christian music," working with top Christian acts CeCe Wilnan, and
the group Anointed. "I see myself," she explained, "as being a Jewish
girl who writes inspirational songs, not a Christian writer." [DREYFUSS,
I., p. Y4] A Reform Jew, Steve Kaufman, is also "the only three-time
winner of the National Flatpicking Championship held in Winfield,
Kansas." As the Jerusalem Post notes,
"His 50 books and videos include A
Smokey Mountain Christmas for
Guitar and Flatpickin' the Gospels.
'My mother said 'Oy,'' he recounted.
'I said, "mom, it's going to sell."
In this business you fill the void. There
weren't many bluegrass gospel
videos.'" [ROBINSON, R., 7-24, 2000]
In the "heavy metal" musical world,
Jewish entrepreneur Jon Zazula of Crazed Management-Megaforce Records
has a stable of acts that includes Method of Destruction (M.O.D.),
Anthrax, Ministry, Metallica, and others. Cliff Burstein and Peter
Mensch have managed AC/DC, Metallica, Def Leppard, Bruce Hornsby,
Queensryche, Tesla, and others. Their Q Prime company also owns
three radio stations in California.
The "godfather of punk," manager and
"mastermind" of the seminal "punk" band -- the Sex Pistols, was Great
Britain's Malcolm McLaren. He was also the manager of the New York
Dolls, Adam Ant, and Boy George. According to Sex Pistol lead singer
Johnny Rotten, his manager was "the most evil man alive." [HARRIS, M.,
8-19-94, p. 11; SHAW, D., 12-16-99, p. 5] McLaren "was brought up by his
maternal grandmother, Mrs. Corre, a formidable woman from a very rich
Sephardic Jewish family." [BARBER, L., 12-22-91, p. 8] The anarchistic
Sex Pistols, notes the London Independent, were "brought into
being quite cynically by Malcolm McLaren as an advertising gimmick to
promote sales of the fetishistic clothes and other devices designed and
sold by himself and Vivienne Westwood." [GRAHAM-DIXON, 8-19-95, p. 2]
(The Ramones are also a candidate for the most influential punk band.
The head of the Ramones, Joey Ramone -- born Jeffrey Hyman -- is also
Jewish. ) [TAYLOR, L., 12-27-00, p. F5] Elsewhere, Geoffrey Weiss "first
made a name for himself as a Harvard undergraduate when he and some
friends took over WHRB, the college's 50,000-watt radio station, and
turned it into an oasis of punk rock known across the country for its
idiosyncratic programming. After graduation, Weiss had gone to work for
A&M records, where he'd helped to launch Soundgarden." [KARLEN, N.,
1994, p. 160] Howie Klein founded the "punk" rock label 415.
Joseph Heller, formerly of
Heller-Fischel, booked acts like Styx, the Electric Light Orchestra,
Boz Scaggs, and a variety of others. "He represented top-drawer rock
talent like Van Morrison, the Guess Who, Marvin Gaye, War, Elton John
and Pink Floyd." [SNYDER, N., 2-19-01] Stretching out as dangerously as
possible to make a buck, Heller eventually gravitated towards a relative
goldmine in the Black ghetto-based "gangsta rap." He cofounded
Ruthless Records and managed the pioneer rap group NWA (Niggaz With
Attitude) from early in their careers. The musical genre of gangsta rap,
notes Jory Farr, "thrives on misogyny, as well as homophobic and
race-baiting rage ... [It] was the perfect music for [a] lifestyle
loaded down ... with warnings of betrayal, murder, revenge, and a short
life." [FARR, p. 70] "I believed that rap would become the most
important music of the nineties," said Heller, "... [But] you can't sell
two million rap records to kids in the inner city. That's a way to sell
200,000. You have to market it to the white kids." [FARR, p. 68, 71]
Heller hired Ira Selsky as his
corporate attorney and an Israeli-born security chief named Michael
Klein to ward off angry, exploited Blacks who quite literally walked
into his office threatening to kill him. Rap star Ice Cube even
threatened Heller in one of his recorded songs, prompting the
Anti-Defamation League to flag it as anti-Semitic. Ruthless Records
released a Jewish rap duo called Blood of Abraham. As Chuck D, the
lead vocalist for the Black rap group Public Enemy, noted, "There's no
way to get trained on the seamier elements of the music business being
on the street -- that element is reserved for boardrooms." [D, CHUCK, p.
85] Those in Chuck D's reminiscences about "boardroom" behavior include
Lyor Cohen (manager of Rush Productions, and an Israeli); Al
Teller, an executive at MCA whose parents died in the Holocaust;
Steve Ralbovsky of CBS; Bill Adler (a publicist); and Rick Rubin
of Def Jam Records. (Jewish diamond dealer Jacob Arabo has made
the news as a favored jewelry merchant to the Black rap crowd that seeks
to symbolize wealth and power, or, as the New York Times put it,
"the jeweler who gives most of today's leading rappers their shine."
[CENTURY, p. 1]
In 2001, Heller was named the "Godfather of Latin Rap" by the
Los Angeles Business Journal; he was joining in attempting to build
a rap movement in the Latino market via Hit a Lick records. As
the Journal noted:
"If Heller is convinced that Latin rap will emerge as the next big
thing, it
probably will be, said other music industry veterans ... Indeed,
Heller is
widely acknowledged as one of the key forces behind gangsta rap's
crossover into the music mainstream ... While Heller has the
second-tier
title of chief operating officer, he acknowledges that the other
partners
'generally run everything by me because of my experience and
expertise.'"
[SNYDER, N., 2-19-01]
By 2001 too, the aforementioned Lyor Cohen had catapulted to power
in the Rap world. Rolling Stone even magazine featured an article
about him, sub-titled How Lyor Cohen -- the White, Jewish
Israeli-Raised President of Island Def Jam Records -- Became One of the
Most Important Men in Hip-Hop, and Why He May Now Become One of the Most
Important Men in Rock & Roll." Cohen started out promoting punk rock
acts like the Circle Jerks, Social Distortion, and the Red Hot Chili
Peppers. He then became president of the rap music label Def Jam in 1988
and soon had become "perhaps the most powerful white executive in an
African-American business." (Def Jam was bought out by the Jewish-owned
Polygram company in 1999). Irv Gott, a Black record producer,
notes that Cohen is "a white Jewish guy, but I think everybody respects
him like he's black. He knows how to carry it too. He knows how to get
gangster, how to fall back, when to shut the fuck up, when to say
something. That's why other white executives are scared of him. He knows
how to deal with the hoods, the criminal element." Cohen, continued
Rolling Stone, has broadened his musical base and "oversees an
empire that includes hundreds of artists performing in dozens of genres,
a roster that features PJ Harvey, American Hi-Fi, Shelby Lynne, Lionel
Richie, Bon Jovi, Melissa Etheridge, Saliva, Ludacris, Kelly Price and
Sisquo." Cohen's nickname is "Little Lansky" (after famed Jewish mobster
Meyer Lansky). He was born in New York City "where his father, an
Israeli, worked in the consulate." He was later raised on an avocado
farm near Tel Aviv. [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]
Cohen has also been active in trying to readjust Black
consciousness of Jewish exploitation of the African-American community.
"In the late Eighties," notes reporter Rich Cohen,
when [Public Enemy's] album It Takes a Nation of Milions to Hold
Us Back was
topping the charts, the group's minister of information, Professor
Griff, made
several anti-Semitic statements. As a Jewish exec working with the
band, Cohen
found himself in the middle of a rough, formative experience. 'When
Professor Griff
from Public Enemy said what he said, and it caused this whirlwind,
the whole
industry asked me, 'What the fuck are you doing?' says Cohen.
'Every president
of every record company called and said, 'Drop them: But I believe
part of
being Jewish is education. And I believe I was instrumental in
changing Public
Enemy's views. I said, "Your voice is being muted because you say
Jews are
this or that. You can't make blanket statements. If you want your
message
out there" -- and it was profound, I think -- "stop generalizing."
And I was
the only Jew in their lives. What if I resigned? They would only be
more
alienated. I hadn't quite being a Jew. I can't quit being a Jew.
Instead, I
tried to have an impact. I felt like I was doing the right thing.
Not just
as a Jew, as a person. They had a big voice da nation of
millions, to
quote their album. I had the Holocaust Museum [the Simon Wiesenthal
Cednter] shut down, and we had a private tour. The first thing you
see
is a Jewish skull plus a black person's skull equals a baboon. The
last
thing is a monkey with enormous lips dressed with a Star of David
holding
a trumpet and a sign saying, 'It's these Jews that are bringing in
this music call
jazz.'" [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]
Then there is former tax attorney Joe
Weinberger who drives a Jaguar S-200, wears a diamond-studded Rolex
watch and "fat gold rings," and carries a "9mm automatic pistol tucked
in his pocket." As the Miami New Times notes about his rise to
power in the African-American rap music world,
"In the early Nineties, Miami's
reigning booty-rapper, Luther Campbell,
hired Weinberger away from the
carpeted hallways of a swash Brickell
Key law firm to help manage a growing
musical empire and its attendant
lawsuits. Within five years Campbell
was bankrupt and Weinberger
had purchased the rights to his
music. Rather than return to the
comfortable confines of his former
life, the 42-year old lawyer, who
is single and childless, opted to
launch his own label, Lil' Joe ... In a
post bankruptcy fire sale overseen by
Richard Wolfe [Weinberger's
lawyer/partner, also Jewish],
Weinberger bought the rights to 2
Live Crew music for about $800,000,
plus the outstanding money he
claims Campbell owed him." [KORTEN,
T., 8-10-2000]
Weinberger has even been accused of
ordering a car bombing and directing death threats against an employee.
Then there is Canada-born Bryan
Turner, who founded Priority Records in 1985; he is also
Jewish. [JEWHOO, 2000] By 1998, Priority had yearly sales of $250
million. As the Los Angeles Times notes:
"When the pioneering gangster rap
group N.W.A. was looking for its
first record deal, it found a
distributor in Priority Records, which
released an album so obscene it
prompted a letter of complaint from
the F.B.I. When Ice-T left Warner
Brothers Records after police groups
and the company's shareholders
objected to his song 'Cop Killer,' he
found a new home at Priority.
When Suge Knight, the imprisoned head
of Death Row Records, who is known
for his pugnacious business
tactics, was looking for his first
deal, Priority gave it to him. Through
all the violence and controversy of
hardcore rap music -- from its roots
in N.W.A to its current resurrection
with Master P -- the Los Angeles
label Priority Records has
been a major player." [STRAUSS, N., 9-3-
98, sec. E, p. 1]
And as the Times noted on
another occasion:
"When Time Warner first parted
ways with rapper Ice-T after the 'Cop
Killer' flap and then with rapper
Paris over a song that portrayed an
assassination fantasy of President
Bush, Turner wasted little time
signing deals with both artists."
[HOCHMAN, S., 7-30-95, CALENDAR,
p. 82]
Jewish entrepreneur Steve Rifkind has also become very successful
in the rap music field. In 1993, Rifkind founded and still heads Loud
Records (its president is Rich Isaacson). Earlier, Rifkind began the
Steven Rifkind Company, "a consulting firm specializing in Rap
and R&B." Loud acts include Wu-Tang Clan, Mobb Deep, Yvette
Michelle, Funkmaster Flex, Alkaholics, Raekwon, and Xzibit. The
company's value is estimated at about $100 million.
[collegemusic.com/1-11-00] "Rifkind," notes the online magazine
Entrepreneur,
"who trademarked the term 'Street Teams,' takes marketing to the
street --
literally -- by hiring youths to tell their communities about his
artists'
music. 'My philosophy has always been 'You can't stop
word-of-mouth,
explains Rifkind, who has street teams across cities, distributing
free singles
to teenagers at housing projects and schools, and scrawling the
names of
his albums in the dust on parked trucks, which then serve as mobile
billboards."
[entrepreneur.com]
Yet another major Jewish rap
entrepreneur is the aforementioned Rick Rubin, who, says Jory Farr,
found his "biggest stars were former gangsters who used beats and rhymes
to glamorize wealth, dope, and violence. Deciding who to sign could be a
moral quagmire ... but Rubin wasn't one to be bothered by the trivia of
social responsibility." [FARR, p. 126] "I could do anything I wanted,"
Rubin once said about his own family life in New York, "We were always
upper middle class. We were wealthy for the community we lived in. In a
sense I was spoiled." [FARR, p. 119]
Rubin's record company Def
American is now called American Recording; at one time
Geffen Records distributed Rubin's material. Earlier in his career
he had signed bands like Slayer (whose lyrics exhorted "everything from
virgin sacrifice and satanism to sadistic mutilations and the atrocities
of Auschwitz" [FARR, p. 109]) and the Geto Boys, who "pushed misogyny
and sadism to new depths." [FARR, p. 108]
Rubin's own star rose so high that
he eventually produced albums for Mick Jagger and the Red Hot Chili
Peppers. Troubles, however, came from a lawsuit against him by Adam
Horowitz of the Beastie Boys and threats from the Meir Kahane-founded
Jewish Defense League. Outraged by Rubin's promotion of violently
anti-Jewish lyrics by Black ghetto groups, the Jewish group reportedly
came looking to beat him up. Rubin couldn't understand their anger. He
told an interviewer that
"They should've talked to me and
found out what I felt before coming to
attack me, because I was a JDO
[Jewish Defense Organization]
supporter.
When I was at NYU I saw [right wing rabbi] Meir Kahane
speak and he blew me
away -- he was amazing ... After hearing him
speak, I wanted to pack my bags and
go to Israel ... I called the JDO
several times, wanted to join, but
they never returned my calls." [FARR,
p. 123]
Among the most controversial "gangsta
rap" labels was Death Row Records (including Tupac Shakur, Dr. Dre, and
Snoopy Doggy Dog). A noted earlier, Death Row products were distributed
by the Jewish-dominated Time-Warner company until "pressure from
stockholders after an outcry over the flagrantly violent and misogynist
lyrics" of its stars. Time-Warner dropped the label, but eighteen
months later it was picked up (for $200 million) by the Universal
Music Group, a subsidiary of the Jewish Bronfman family's Seagram
company. Universal too eventually abandoned the controversial
label, only after "pressure from stockholders and regulators." [HELMORE,
E., 8-29-97, p. 10]
Still another Jewish push -- more recently -- into the rap world is
Koch Entertainment's In The Paint record label. Koch,
one of the largest "independent music distribution companies," is headed
by founder and CEO Michael Koch and President Bob Frank.
[kochentertainment.com]
Jewish author Nearl Karlen doesn't like latent Black perceptions
of Jewish exploitation surfacing in the rap world, writing: "'I want
everybody to try and find this book!' rapper Ice Cube said at a 1991
press conference where he held up a copy of The Secret Relationship
Between Blacks and Jews, a bogus piece of Nation of Islam scholarship."
[KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 146] Karlen later applauds one rappers stand
against "antisemitism, " saying: "Easy-E, former leader of the gangsta
rap group N.W.A., made a courageous stand, going so far as to appear on
a Jewish rap group's single entitled 'Niggaz and Jews (Some Say Kikes).'
Easy-E was not long after lectured by Omar Bradley, the mayor of his
hometown of Compton, California, with 'I won't name the specific racial
group that's using you, brother, but they are destroying us and having
lunch and a bar mitzvah at the same time." [KARLEN, N., 1994, p. 146]
And lastly for the music scene, the
president and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America
--- a lobbying group (with a staff of 72) for the big record companies
-- is also Jewish, Hilary Rosen, who was described in 1997 by the
Washington Post as "a powerful woman in an industry dominated by
men. One of the most influential yet least known players in the U.S.
entertainment behemoth." [WEEKS, p. C1] Rosen became the CEO when
another Jewish executive, Jason Berman, stepped down from the position.
C. Delores Tucker, the founder of the
National Political Congress of Black Women, has singled out Rosen's
organization for special condemnation:
"In terms of children, the RIAA is
the most destructive lobbying force in
America. It is incomprehensible that
anyone with an ounce of concern
for children would be demanding the
promotion, distribution, and sale of
gangsta/porno rap to children."
[WEEKS, p. C1]
Another organization often under
public fire for negatively influencing children and adolescents is the
Interactive Digital Software Association, which represents nearly
fifty video game companies. Doug Lowenstein, also Jewish, [who was once
the Legislative Director for Ohio Senator Howard Metzenbaum], became the
first president of the organization in 1994, and he remains in power.
Lowenstein is often called upon to defend the excessive violence and
decadence found in many of the games. "Video games," he insisted in
1998, "are not the source of violence in society." "The producer of
Flesh Feast, Eric Wahlberg," noted one media report, "agreed."
[MEDIA AWARENESS NETWORK, 5-29-98; BLOOM, D., 9-23-99, p. L8]
The most controversial video game for
the early 1990s was Mortal Kombat, produced by Acclaim
Entertainment. In an appeal to video firms, asking for restraint
from excessive violence, California Attorney General Dan Lundgren noted
that "Mortal Kombat depicts bloody decapitations as well as
scenes where a still-beating heart is pulled from a body." [SAN
FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9-9-94, p. C7] Acclaim Entertainment is
headed by Gregory Fischbach, once hired by Elliot Goldman (the president
and CEO of RCA/ARIOLA) to head RCA/ARIOLA Record International.
(Fischbach represented musical acts Crosby Stills and Nash, Emmylou
Harris, Boz Scaggs, among others.) In 1998, Lawrence Kassanoff, CEO of
Threshold Entertainment, was making a weekly TV series based on
Mortal Kombat.) [KNOEDELSEDER, W., 6-18-86, pt. 4, p. 3; O'HARE,
K., 12-27-98, p. 45]
***********************************
For all the Jewish complaints that
they are "marginalized" in American society and subject to
Gentile-inspired self-hate, Jews have for decades been afforded mass
media dominance in literally telling everyone else how to run their
lives. "Dear Abby" (Pauline Esther Friedman Philips) and "Ann Landers"
(Esther Pauline Friedman Lederer) -- the twin Friedman sisters from
Sioux City, Iowa -- have been mentioned before. One or both of them have
been listed in polls as among "the most admired women in the United
States," "the most important women," and "the most influential women in
America." By the late 1980s both women were in demand in the national
lecture circuit, commanding $10,000 for a half hour talk.
[POTTKER/SPEZIALE, p. viii, 4]
The sisters' father, Abraham, began a
successful theatre business as co-owner of a burlesque house in a seedy
part of Sioux City. [POTTKER/SPEZIALE, p. 15, 312] Ann (Esther) once
admitted that she "learned the facts of life from the girls in the
chorus line." [P/S, p. 16] Both women are remembered by locals in Eau
Claire, Wisconsin, where they later lived, for their ostentation: "their
flare for making an entrance." [P/S, p. 65] Both women took separate
routes to advice column stardom, although "neither twin has had formal
training in social service work or journalism." [P/S, p. 4-5] A
non-speaking, competitive feud between them lasted eight years.
Sister "Abigail Von Buren" eventually
married Morton Phillips, Jewish heir to a Midwestern liquor fortune. In
Eau Claire, the Phillips family also owned a factory, Presto Industry,
(which gained national fame as a maker of pressure cookers) which
alienated some in the town. "Many of the town's blue-collar workers,
resentful of their dependence on the Jewish-owned Presto Industry,
openly made anti-Semitic remarks ... [P/S, p. 65] ... Despite the
profits Presto reported in 1953, including an astounding 48
percent return on net worth the year before, Presto managers
shocked union employees with a proposal for wage cuts." [P/S, p.89]
"Dear Abby" sits on her husband's $70
million philanthropic foundation. A millionaire many, many times over,
she has also done advertising commercials for English muffins and a milk
lobbying organization. Telling the world with assurance how to solve its
problems, her own daughter spent five years in therapy with (the
aforementioned) Judd Marmor. [P/S, p. 178-179]
Sister "Ann Landers" was married to
Jules Lederer, founder of the Budget-Rent-a-Car company. In her
columns she was "ever mindful of maintaining the facade of a happy
marriage, ... presenting her readers with the image of a devoted wife
and loving husband." [P/S, p. 216] In 1975, her husband of 36 years
dumped her for a younger woman. "Gossip about the affair," note her
biographers, "had an extra zing to it. Jules was cheating on the woman
who had set herself up as America's moral conscience ... [P/S, p. 222]
... Perhaps her public statements, years before her divorce, reflected
her fears and insecurities over an empty marriage." [P/S, p. 216] A
friend of the Lederer family, therapist Abe Franzblau, who knew Ann
Landers well, noted that "All it took was a short time in the Lederer
company to realize that [Ann] exhibited the classic, textbook traits of
a cold, rejecting woman." [P/S, p. 217]
Landers also lives a life of extreme
ostentation:
"The ornate showplace at 209 East
Lake Shore Drive is still [Ann's]
home. Wall panels and sconces
imported from a British castle
complemented the mullioned windows
and intricately sculpted ceilings.
Recasts of fifteenth-century statuary
in the living room, including
a covey of kneeling angels...,
provide a stunning counterpoint
to Louis XV sofas and mother-of-pearl
inlaid chairs. Works by
Picasso, Renoir, and Dali cover the
walls ... [Her husband] was
offended by the extraordinary amount
of money [she] was lavishing
on their apartment." [P/S, p. 219]
In 1995, Landers got into hot water
with some comments she made in New Yorker magazine about the Pope
and the Polish people. "He has a sweet sense of humor," she said, "Of
course, he's a Polack. They're very anti-women." Polish-Americans
responded with outrage to the slur, wondering how and why she had
singled them out as being "anti-women." Landers issued a formal apology
but refused to comment further. [O'CROWLEY, P., 12-1-95, p. A1]
The woman who tells the little people
of the world how to handle their lives, also had a chauffeur and
housekeeper. [P/S, p. 229] The values she champions also reflect her
behind-the-scenes "facelift" and "extensive body surgery." Her sister,
Abby, has also had cosmetic surgery. [P/S, p. 255] Both women, but
especially Ann Landers, survived scandal in the 1980s when it was
discovered that the two millionaires were sometimes doing nothing for
their pay -- merely recycling advice columns (not identified as
reprints) from two decades earlier. [P/S, p. 277-283]
Concerning Jewish identity, notes
Landers' daughter Margo, "[My mother] made the rule when I went to
college that I could only date Jewish boys ... Mother was simply
ethnocentric. She made it a point to tell everyone she was Jewish and
often mentioned it in her column." [HOWARD, p. 142-143]
(In 1987 there was a much publicized
search to create a new "Ann Landers" when Esther Lederer left the
Chicago Sun-Times to work at the Chicago Tribune. 12,000
people applied to become the new syndicated advice columnist. Jeffrey
Zaslow, male, and also Jewish, was selected as one of two people to
replace Landers. Zaslow's column was called "All That Zazz"; his wife is
also in the media business, a "TV news anchor.") [ZASLOW, J., 1990;
MOMENT, 12-31-96]
Another syndicated troubles
columnist, Judith Miller ("Miss Manners") is Jewish as is the popular
media sex therapist "Dr. Ruth" (Westheimer) whose shows include her
"Sexually Speaking" radio show, "Good Sex!" cable TV program, and "Ask
Dr. Ruth" TV program. She has also lent her name to a "Good Sex" board
game, a "Terrific Sex" videotape, and ads for condoms, bras, and
typewriters. She has been afforded acting spots in movies and was a
panelist on the TV game show "Hollywood Squares." "I raised my children
with an emphasis on Zionism and idealism," writes Westheimer, "... They
both went to Zionist summer camps ... [When my daughter graduated from
college] she announced that she was going to Israel to live. I knew it
was coming -- I had encouraged it." [italics in original:
WESTHEIMER, p. 180-181] (In 1996, the Cleveland Plain Dealer
noted another Jewish sex therapist, Sherry Levine, who was making
appearances throughout the national media. Levine, headlined the paper,
"is the Dr. Ruth of Northwest Ohio.") [YERAK, p. 8] Dr. Joy Kuriansky is
another prominent Jewish media sex-therapist.
Elsewhere, the second-most
listened-to radio talk show host in America is "Dr. Laura"
(Schlessinger), who has been known to have her rabbi as a guest in her
studio during her show. (Schlessinger's favorite therapist? Rhoda
Markovich "is the best therapist I know of.") [SCHLESSINGER, L.,
9-1-2000] "Geoff Rich [the president of Radio Today, was] one of the key
people in marketing Laura." [BANE, V., 1999, p. 165] Schlessinger, whose
father was Jewish and who asserts an activist Jewish identity, has even
incorporated herself as Dr. Laura Inc. She also has a syndicated
newspaper column and two books that have together sold over two million
copies -- How Could You Say That? and Ten Stupid Things Women
Do to Mess Up Their Lives. By 1997, 60,000 people were calling her
program per day, seeking her advice on how to solve their problems; that
same year she sold the rights to her radio show for $71.5 million.
[MYERS, p. B6]
In 1999, an unauthorized expose of
Schlessinger's life was published by Vickie Bane, which portrayed the
talk show host as an extremely unpleasant personality behind the scenes
and a steady hypocrite in both her past and present, rarely following in
her personal life the moral dictates she demanded for others on her talk
radio show. In 1998, the news world also noted that "her conservative
message had been sullied by the publication of 12 color photographs of
her, either topless or nude, on the Club Love web site." [BONES, p. A21]
The photos were taken over 20 years earlier by her former boss, Bill
Ballance, who gave Schlessinger her start in radio; the photos were
taken when she was separated from her first husband. Schlessinger
unsuccessfully sued both her former lover and an Internet company.
"Schlessinger," notes Yvonne
Crittenden, "hasn't spoken to her mother for fourteen years, and is
equally estranged from her younger sister and family -- more fodder for
critics who claim she's a hypocrite for espousing strong family values
... She fell in love with a married Zoology professor -- Lew Bishop (who
was married with children at the time they met) ... Schlessinger
converted to Judaism after watching a show on the Holocaust with her son
... [An article written by Leslie Bennetts of] Vanity Fair found
her to be "cold and condescending, defensive, evasive and spiteful about
those she'd worked with and hated by many formers friends and
colleagues, all long before she became successful.'" [CRITTENDEN,
10-10-99]
Schlessinger, notes Evelyn Theiss, is
"particularly tough on callers who have been divorced, but she herself
is a divorcee ... By the sheer numbers of documented episodes of such
outrageous behaviors, [author Vickie] Bane persuades us that this is a
woman with some serious problems ... There is plenty more of such
behavior -- an almost stultifying amount." In 1998, "Schlessinger
received Israel's 50th Anniversary Tribute Award for her contributions
to humanity." [THEISS, 10-10-99] The Jewish Forward notes the
brand of Judaism she practices:
"Ms. Schlessinger was born to a Jewish father and an Italian
Catholic mother, but
was raised without religion, she has said in interviews. Prompted
by questions
from her son, Derek, while they watched a Holocaust documentary,
Ms.
Schlessinger began to research her Jewish roots and ended up
converting
under the auspices of Conservative Judaism. She later joined
Chabad-Lubavitch
of Conejo in the Los Angeles area and underwent an Orthodox
conversion
two years ago. The Chabad congregation's rabbi, Moshe Bryski, said
Ms.
Schlessinger regularly attends." [EDEN, A., 2001]
The author, David Reuben, of the
popular volume, Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex But Were
Afraid to Ask, was also Jewish. And for decades, the prim
know-it-all Jewish psychologist, Dr. Joyce Brothers, (real surname:
Bauer) was omnipresent in the mass media (her ride to fame began on a TV
game show when she won "top prize on the first leg of the $64,000
Question, telling twenty million TV viewers that 'cestus' was the name
of the leather glove worn by ancient Roman boxers.") Brothers was "the
only member of the American Psychology Association who was 'repped' by
General Artists Corporation, which said [in its handout to journalists]
for background: she looks like Loretta Lynn, walks like Marilyn Monroe,
and talks like Dr. Freud.") [KRIM, p. 139-140] "She's obviously a
fraud," wrote journalist Seymour Krim, "but I can't undress her in
public. It's too goddamn cruel." [KRIM, p. 140] Brothers has a
syndicated column in 350 newspapers, a daily program on NBC
Radio/Westwood One and "is a long-standing member of the Federation of
Jewish Philanthropies." [HYMAN, p. 191]
Another Jewish psychiatrist in the
talk show business was David Viscott. "At his peak in the early '90s,"
noted the Los Angeles Times, "he advised millions on both radio
and television programs." [ZAMICHOW, p. 10] Viscott had his own
greeting card line, therapy audio tapes, and he had written two
autobiographies. His personal therapy sessions cost $1,500 for two
hours, which helped finance his ostentatious lifestyle including a
Jaguar automobile and a Hancock Park mansion. Consummate hypocrite,
police were often called to his home to break up family fights.
"Abrasively confident on the air," says the Times,
"megalomaniacal off it, Viscott was never in doubt about what other
people should do with their lives. But when his own life began to
crumble, he turned out to be clueless." [ZAMICHOW, p. 10]
Other prominent Jewish American radio
"shrink" talk-show hosts in the last decade have included Elyse
Goldstein, Harvey Ruben, Harry Sobel, and Sonya Friedman (her show was
entitled, "Telling Secrets with Sonya Friedman"). The pioneer (in the
early 1980s) of this radio genre, however, was Toni Grant, "the first in
the growing ranks of 'media therapists' who give free advice on the
airwaves." [BOSWORTH, p. 112] "While Grant is a nationally recognized
advisor on love," noted the Los Angeles Times, "she almost gave
up finding it for herself." "I've been single eight years," she
admitted. "And I confess openly that I was starting to wonder if all I
knew how to do was talk about it." [FINKE, p. VIEW, 5] It is difficult
to locate any ethnic information about Grant, born and raised on Long
Island. She may or may not be Jewish, but, judging by Al Goldstein,
publisher of the free love, semi-porno magazine, Screw, she has
travelled in some intimate Jewish circles. Goldstein told People
magazine that, "she was the hottest sexual partner I ever had. But
basically it was a dishonest relationship. I loved her fame. She loved
my excitement." [CHAMBERS, p. 70]
In 1987, Los Angeles Times
journalist Al Martinez -- intrigued by the avalanche of local telephone
call-in therapy programs -- decided to randomly select one of the
therapists advertising in the Hollywood Reporter. The
psychologist-entrepreneur turned out to be a Jewish woman named Audrey
Levy. Her ad was for call-in psychological help, offering "telephone
counseling out of Beverly Hills by calling 2-RELATE, credit cards
accepted." [MARTINEZ, pt. 9, p. 2]
In 1991, Larry King introduced his
(Jewish) guest and "inspirational speaker" Marianne Williamson, like
this:
"Who is that petit brunette standing
behind the pulpit and why are some
of Hollywood's hottest stars
listening? ... Her detractors say she is a New
Age guru more interested in
self-promotion than teaching others about
self help." [KING, L., 9-26-91[
Jewish mass media psychology
profiteers also dominate the scene in England. "Few people," noted the
London Sunday Telegraph in 1997, "have been so influential in
British life in recent years as the four famous agony aunts [i.e., mass
media personal problem advisers] -- Marjorie Proops, Irma Kurtz, Anna
Raeburn, and Claire Rayner. They have been empresses of pelvic epics and
laureates of female personal pleasure." They are also all Jewish.
[MYERS, p. 26] "The role of the agony aunt is up for examination,"
noted the Telegraph in another piece, "What makes a good one?
There is a joke among top practitioners that the key qualification is to
be a Jewish mamma." "Maybe Jews have been so good at it because we have
such an intense curiosity," suggested Claire Rayner. [GRICE, p. 17]
"Have you noticed," Irma Kurtz once asked an interviewer, "that
three-quarters of the agony aunts in the world are Jewish? We have
carried common sense with us. Why are Jews violinists? You can pick it
up and run." [SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY, 2-13-94]
And what of the personal background
of such people who have given advice to the emotionally needy for
decades? What are their qualifications -- other than mass media
connections and great drive -- towards counseling millions about
etiquette, ethics, and healthy emotional lives? Late in their careers,
there were startling revelations about each of the famous four in Great
Britain, underscoring a profound audacity and hypocrisy at base in their
professional careers.
In 1995 Claire Rayner, agony aunt for
the London Sun, publicly confessed that "I've been a depressive
all my life ... I'm ashamed to admit that I'm still ashamed ... In
America you show off if you need psychiatric help, and in this country
you'd rather die than get it." [(SCOTTISH) DAILY RECORD & SUNDAY MAIL,
8-14-95, p.16] In turn, her husband "has been suffering from severe
depression for ten years which at time have left him feeling suicidal.
Despite his wife's career as an agony aunt, he says she hasn't been able
to help." [MIDDLEHOUSE, 7-26-99, p. 41] "I was beaten to hell and back
as a child," she says, "... I hardly knew my mother so I couldn't love
or respect her. I did not have any self-esteem to speak of..." At the
age of 15, she spent 14 months in a psychiatric hospital because of a
"misdiagnosed thyroid problem." The kind of woman qualified to give
advice to the psychologically and ethically troubled?
Irma Kurtz? In 1999 the London
Daily Mail noted that Kurtz, for over 20 years Cosmopolitan's
"personal problem solver ... has
given advice on everything from
promiscuity and its consequences to
abortion and the advisability
of getting married too young. There
would be those who argue that
her own flawed emotional life is
hardly conducive to dispensing
considered, unbiased advice to women
... Irma admits she was a
recklessly promiscuous young woman
who stopped counting the
number of her lovers when they
exceeded 38. At the age of 30, she
had an abortion when her married
lover got her pregnant. And she
chose a man to father her child, with
no intention of ever marrying
him." Kurtz notes that "when [my son]
was eight or nine, I can
remember getting very low and
sometimes I would drink too much.
There were a lot of nights in a row
when I didn't go to bed sober."
[MIDDLEHOUSE, 2-27-97, p. 46-47]
Marjorie Proops? In 1992 the London
Daily Mirror noted that "In her Mirror column ... she has
often referred lovingly to her husband, giving the impression that she
was writing from the experience and security of a happy marriage."
[BROOKE, 12-24-92, p. 2-3] In her biography of that same year, however,
she admitted that it was a disastrous marriage. "Britain's best known
agony aunt had a largely sexless marriage accompanied by a secret
30-year affair" with the Daily Mirror's chief lawyer, Philip
Levy. (For his part, it was later revealed that he always met Proops at
a hotel and never told her that he lived with another woman, Meli
Meitner). Proops also had three abortions, a divorce, an alcoholic
mother, and "chronic depression." "Every agony aunt has a murky past,"
she once said. "Most use the problems that they've had in the past to
share with their readers." [GRANT, p.23]
Anna Raeburn? She built her
reputation on Capital Radio with a call-in advice show, the first of its
kind in England. In 1998 the London Evening Standard noted that
"she's the agony aunt who has suffered more than her fair share of
anguish: rape, two abortions, three suicide attempts, four periods of
therapy. What next?" She once told an interviewer: "I'm not a nice
woman. I have never been a nice woman. I did try it once and it didn't
suit awfully well." Pregnant by her husband, she told him that he
couldn't "cope" with a child and secured an abortion. [BILLEN, 7-22-98,
p. 23]
In 1994, Ann De Courcy, a critic in
the London Daily Mail, lambasted the profound hypocrisy of this
genre of "agony aunt":
"What makes these women believe that
they are specially gifted to
offer moral guidance? ... They have
no hesitation in telling their
readers how to be happy, nor in
laying down moral guidelines
that often smack of pure hypocrisy
... Most people seeking
made a success of their emotional
life, rather than one traumatized
by it." [De Courcy, 2-1-94]
Other prominent Jewish agony aunts in
Great Britain include:
*Vanessa Feltz. In 1999, she
signed a $4 million deal with the BBC.
Her qualifications for this career
included the fact that "she was
known as 'Vanessa the Undresser'
and her interest in sex was
such that her mother would ring up
hostesses at teenage parties
and tell them: 'Don't let her go
upstairs [with any boys].'" Feltz
wrote a book called What Are
These Strawberries Doing on My
Nipples? I Need Them for Fruit
Salad and was a columnist
for the Jewish Chronicle;
she also presented "Jewish London"
on Greater London Radio. Her comedy
routines she described
as "nice smut ... [like] 'Is sperm
kosher?" Her TV program's
formula, noted one critic, "is not
only moronic, but can be
deeply wounding [to those
participants on the program]." The
London Sunday Times also
noted that "Vanessa lives in some
grandeur with her husband and two
daughters in a Hampstead
mansion with a marble hall, a
ballroom, and a swimming pool.
She plays the much-loved part of
the Jewish princess to
perfection, clothes with jewelry
like a medieval knight togged
out for a tournament ... She says
she cannot understand the
'non-Jewish way of dressing.'"
[SUNDAY TIMES, 8-23-98]
* Miriam Stoppard. Her 25th
book was The Magic of Sex and
she was by 1991 an anchor woman at
BBC's morning program
People Today. "Hailed ... as the
vixen of permissive parenting,"
one critic said that "some are born
to controversy, some achieve
it, and some have controversy
thrust upon them. She luxuriates
in all three, and her latest book,
Sex-Ed -- Growing Up, Relationships
and Sex, has nothing to
diminish that status." [GLOVER, 9-219-97,
p. 7] Stoppard, noted another
media observer, "married playwright
Tom Stoppard when he divorced his
first wife because Miriam was
expecting his child." [DE COURCY,
2-1-94]
* Suzie Hayman, mass media "sex
counselor" and author of The
Good Sex Guide. "The only
thing my mother ever said about my
father was that he was not Jewish,"
she says. "And yet when Dad was
with my mother, he threw himself
into the Israeli War of Independence
... Why had he been prepared to put
himself at such risks, if he
wasn't Jewish?" Hayman's husband's
father was "violently anti-
Semitic"; later she discovered that
he was Jewish too. "And so,"
she resolved, "as I have found time
and time again with counseling
others, the subconscious drives
towards 'martial fit,' keys to common
ground that we are not even told is
there." [HAYMAN, 12-24-97, p. 11]
In America, decadent radio
commentator Howard Stern (with the third-ranked talk show radio in
America), sensationally obnoxious "shock" radio agitator Michael Savage
(Weiner), sports commentator Howard Cosell (William Howard Cohen), talk
show host Larry King, radio personality Dennis Prager, popular Los
Angeles talk show host Michael Jackson (from South Africa), talk-show
physician Dean Edell, woman-beating sportscaster Merv Albert, Jerry
Seinfeld, Ed Asner, and Roseanne Barr were/are Jewish. ("I remember [my
mother] taking us down to the basement [at their home in Salt Lake City]
if someone just came and knocked on the door," says Barr, "I really
truly believed that if anyone found out we were Jewish they would kill
us." [LAHR, p. 126]
Gossip queen Rona Barrett (Burstein)
was Jewish, as was/is gossip columnist Sheila Graham (Lily Shiel),
gossip columnist Louella Parsons (whose father was Jewish), "Let's Make
a Deal" game show host Monty Hall, 50s-era television puppeteer Shari
Lewis, popular media astronomer Carl Sagan, Henry Winkler (the Fonz),
Gilda Radner, Goldie Hawn, and Israeli psychic Uri Geller. Prominent
Jewish film critics include Pauline Kael, John Simon, Stanley Kaufmann,
Judith Crist (born Klein), Gene Shalit, Leonard Maltin, Gene Siskel (of
Siskel and Ebert), and Joel Siegel of "Good Morning America" (among
numerous other Jewish movie commentators). Assassinated Denver talk show
host Allen Berg was Jewish, as is financial columnist Sylvia Porter, and
many, many others are familiar Jewish mass media "personalities" to the
public. Mel Blanc was even the voice for Bugs Bunny, Porky Pig, Daffy
Duck, and other cartoon characters.
In earlier years, prominent Jewish
sports voice personalities included Marty Glickman, Bill Stern
(Sterngold) -- "one of the best known voices on the airwaves," [LEVINE,
P., p. 232] and Mel Allen (formerly Mel Israel). Even the ex-wife,
Claudia Cohen, of billionaire financier and corporate raider, Ronald
Perelman, was a gossip columnist for the New York Post and later
a TV reporter. [BRUCK, p. 218] Not surprisingly, her father is Robert
Cohen, "the wealthy book and magazine distributor." [SPORKIN, p. 150]
Profoundly influential in shaping
American popular culture, it is estimated that seminal gossip columnist
Walter Winchell (original family name: Weinschel) had an audience (for
his weekly radio program or his daily newspaper column) of two-thirds of
all American adults. [GABLER, Winchell, p. xi] His focus was brash and
sleazy. Like most who are driven towards power, he was, notes Neal
Gabler, "vindictive, cruel, egocentric, paranoid, selfish, cheap and
thoroughly reprehensible [GABLER, p. p. xiv] ... What made him a
national phenomenon was gossip ... Winchell introduced a revolutionary
column that reported who was romancing whom, who was cavorting with
gangsters, who was ill or dying, who was suffering financial
difficulties, which spouses were having affairs, which couples were
about to divorce, and dozens of other secrets, peccadilloes and
imbroglios that had previously been concealed from public view ... He
suddenly and single-handedly expanded the purview of American journalism
[GABLER, p. xii] ... Few lives are more instructive of the forces that
shaped mass culture in America than Walter Winchell's." [GABLER, p. xv]
****************************************
In 2001, Jews gathered for a
"special program for student journalists sponsored by the Jewish Agency
for Israel and the World Zionist Organization at the General Assembly of
the United Jewish Communities." "Do Jewish journalists have more
obligations than others?" asked the Jewish Bulletin of Northern
California, "Are they responsible first to their communities, and do
they need to represent Israel in their newspapers?" [RAGOLSKY, H.,
11-23-01] "On campus there is already so much anti-Israel sentiment that
we have to be careful about any additional criticism against Israel,"
Marita Gringaus told a reporter,
"This is our responsibility as Jews, which obviously contradicts
our responsibilities
as journalists." [RAGOLSKY, H., 11-23-01]
"I'm a Jew before I'm a journalist," added Uzi Safanov, a reporter
for Long Island University's school newspaper,
"before someone pays me to write. If I find a negative thing about
Israel, I
will not print it and I will sink into why did it happen and what
can I do to
change it." ("If he eventually wrote about negative incidents that
happen to
Israel," added the Jewish Bulletin, "he would try to find the way
'to shift the
blame.'" [RAGOLSKY, H., 11-23-01]
What of the case of the New York Times' Tom Friedman, "a Jew who
was raised on all the stories, all the folk songs, and all the myths of
Israel." [DIAMOND, E., 1993, p. 44] Edwin Diamond notes the personal
"crisis" Friedman faced when he was confronted with reporting honestly
(which he eventually did) about Israel's involvement in the notorious
Shatila-Sabra massacre of civilian Palestinians in Lebanon:
"Shatila-Sabra became a 'personal crisis' for Friedman, convinced
as he was
of Israeli knowledge -- and probably, approval -- of what happened
inside the
camp. Sitting at his typewriter, trying to reconstruct the
massacre, he felt
driven by 'two conflicting impulses,' the truth-telling role of a
Times journalist
and his private Jewish sympathies. 'One part of me wanted to nail
[Israeli
Prime Minister Menachem] Begin and [Defense Minister Ariel] Sharon
... Yet
another part of me was looking for alibis -- something that would
prove Begin
and Sharon innocent, something that would prove that the Israelis
couldn't
have known what was happening." [DIAMOND, E., 1993, p. 45]
In a much more practical expression of this censorial world view,
in 2001, the Canadian CanWest media conglomerate (headed by
ardent Zionist Israel Asper) announced that "We do not run in our
newspaper Op Ed pieces that express criticism of Israel." CanWorld,
with media holdings in Ireland, New Zealand, and other countries, had
earlier announced that it had acquired "all of the major Canadian
newspaper and Internet assets of Hollinger Inc., including the
metropolitan daily newspapers in nearly every large city across Canada
and a 50% partnership interest in the National Post." [ELECTRONIC
INTIFADA, DECEMBER 11, 2001] CanWest also has major television interests
in Canada and other countries.
In 1993, a former reporter for the Washington Post, Jeffrey
Goldberg, addressed the issue of the "disproportionate" Jewish presence
in the mass media and its implications:
"[There is a] particular perception
about the Jews and the press,
namely, that Jews own the presses,
and not only the ones off
Times Square ... There certainly is a
disproportionate Jewish
presence in the newsrooms of major
media organizations; anyone
who knows what the suffixes 'berg'
and 'stein' generally indicate
would agree. But there is, of course,
no Jewish conspiracy to control
the press, and when I am asked how I
know there isn't (as I was long
ago by an official of the [Lyndon] La
Rouche organization), I offered
two forms of proof: 1) No one has
ever asked me to join such a
conspiracy, even though my
credentials for membership are impeccable;
2) If 'the Jews' really did control
the media, coverage of the Jewish
community and the issues that
interest it would be far superior to what
we see today." [GOLDBERG, JEFFREY,
1993]
Are Goldberg's "proofs" convincing?
Are there any legitimate signs of a "conspiracy" (whatever the semantic
nuances of that word) in the American mass media about expressly
Jewish and Israeli themes? By what reasoning should we ignore, in
the mass media context, incessant in-house ethnocentric Jewish discourse
about their collective superiority, international solidarity with other
Jews, the sacredness of the Holocaust, and special attention to Jewish
welfare? Need pan-Jewish activism express itself today in
"conspiratorial" form, in the sense of a secret spy ring? How can the
everywhere celebrated and distinct Jewish world view --
religious or secular -- be completely discarded in any reasoned analysis
of Jewish dominance in the mass media? (Many Jews declare this in their
in-house writings. As Eric Kahler observes, for example, about highly
assimilated Jews of Europe, "Such distinguished personalities as
[Heinrich] Heine, who was a skeptic, an intellectual adventurer, as
[Baruch] Spinoza, as [Franz] Kafka, whose devotion was entirely
unorthodox, unfixed, exploratory, a Bernard-Lazare who was a
freethinker, and as Werfel, who was almost a Catholic -- all of them
show attitudes and proclivities, clearly deriving from the Jewish
religion.") [KAHLER, E., 1967, p. 7] And is not transnational Jewish
solidarity (so much highlighted and heralded by modern Jewish observers)
manifest in a purely "naturalized" manner the virtual norm in
today's media workplace?
And what of Goldberg's own case?
Here's an American-born reporter who, as we learn in his own writings
about the lack of a "conspiracy" among Jews in the media, volunteered
for service in the Israeli army. Is this of no consequence in
speculating upon this man's objective journalism as a former
Washington Post reporter? Perhaps Goldberg will run across fellow
journalist Bruno Schlumberger in Israel. Schlumberger is a staff
photographer for the Ottawa Citizen who was sent on assignment to
the Jewish state in 1998 to cover its fiftieth anniversary celebration.
"I couldn't sleep, so thrilled was I to be in Israel," wrote
Schlumberger in the paper, "... When I was in high school I joined
Habonim, the Labour-Zionist youth movement." [SCHLUMBERGER] (Although
soured on religous Orthodoxy in Israel, former Cleveland Plain Dealer
editor Stephen Esrati was once even a member of the Zionist terrorist
Irgun Zvai Leumi organization. [GUTH, D., 12-8-00] Hank Greenspun,
publisher of the Las Vegas Sun, as noted earlier, even broke
American laws in delivering weapons to Israel.)
And what of the following
observations by Israeli Ze'ev Chafets?
"In a study undertaken in the winter
of 1979-80, Professor S. Robert
Lichter found that fully ninety-one
percent of the Jewish journalists
he surveyed agreed with the
statement "The United States has a moral
obligation to prevent the
destruction of Israel ... [CHAFETS, 1985,
p. 279]
Can we expect that these Jewish
journalists have the same noble "moral" obligations about El Salvador,
Argentina, Afghanistan, Poland, Russia, Kenya, France, Iran, the
Philippines, or anywhere else? How about the "destruction" of the
Palestinians by Israel?
Here's Max Frankel (for years the Executive Editor of the New
York Times) and his thoughts about Israel in his work:
"I was much more deeply devoted to Israel than I dared to assert.
I had yearned
for a Jewish homeland ever since learning as child in Germany that
in Palestine
even the policemen were Jews! Like most American Jews, however, I
settled
on a remote brand of Zionism, which rejected all importuning to
move to Israel to
share its hardships and dangers ... I did indeed
have many close Israeli friends, not
only relatives and
journalists but high officials, ranging from Yitzhak Rabin to
Lova Eliav. That is why I well understood the full range of
Israeli opinion on all
of the country's vital security concerns ... Fortified by my
knowledge of Israel and
my friendships there, I myself wrote most of our Middle East
commentaries. As
more Arab than Jewish readers recognized, I wrote them from a
pro-Israel
perspective. And I wrote in confidence that The Times
no longer suffered from|
any secret desire to deny or overcome its ethnic roots." [FRANKEL,
M., 1999, p.
401, 402, 403]
When push comes to shove in the world of patriotic allegiance, or
merely objective journalism, where do such men (particularly a Jeffrey
Goldberg or Bruno Schlumberger) stand? And what about an American-born
Israeli soldier who scoffs at the "conspiratorial" view of Jewry,
asserting that no fellow Jews came around in the newsrooms of America,
asking him to join a special underground organization? As Goldberg well
knows, no one needs to ask him to join anything: by religious or secular
perspective, the "organization" is a birthright. The modern state
of Israel codifies this fact: any Jew can emigrate to Israel by
virtue of his genetic identity. And pan-Jewish solidarity and its
collectivist perspective is so widely ensconced in the American mass
media (and American culture as a whole) that there is in fact nothing at
all "conspiratorial" about it whatsoever, since it is, after all, the
prevalent, naturalized norm of operation for all. And yet few recognize
-- and no one dares risk a challenge to -- it.
And the charge of Jewish
"conspiracy?" What does that mean? What are the word's nuances? Do the
"behind the scenes" unified wheelings and dealings of hundreds of Jewish
organizations that seek to maintain the unpopular "separation of Church
and state" fit the bill? Is a lack of public honesty and candor about
Jewish belief, purpose, and identity part of the same paradigm? As
Jewish sociologist Arnold Eisen notes about a veritable Jewish American
cultural trait:
"Many [Jewish] informants [in one
academic study] demanded
assurance of the interviewer's
Jewish background before volunteering
certain responses (especially those
reflecting their less public attitudes
about dominant [Gentile] groups)
... [EISEN, p. 144] ... [The Jew in
public] represents his people before
another, and knows that if his
behavior is found wanting, his
people as a whole will suffer. He must
manipulate the opinion which others
have of him and, as the sociologists
observe, such manipulation is
acceptable in secondary relations but not
in friendships requiring candor and
trust." [EISEN, p. 144]
In this regard of Jewish protective
self-censorship, Lesley Hazeleton notes the case of an Israeli
journalist:
"One of Israel's top journalists had
been asked by an American
magazine to write an article called
'Has Israel Lost Its Soul?' He
turned down the assignment. 'Why?'
someone asked. 'You've been
saying it often enough in the Hebrew
press.' He gave a despairing
shrug: 'I can't. It's read
differently in the States. Knowing that, I'd
only end up writing an apologia.'"
[HAZELETON, L., 1984, p. 26]
In other words, the man felt that he
couldn't write the truth about Israel in English (perhaps in part
because American Jews/media powers were biased towards apologia), but,
more importantly, his critical thoughts would be revealed in a language
that could also be read by a non-Jewish audience. As Peter Novick
notes about journalists in the ethnic Jewish press: "They are 'less
Jewish' in that their public role, the fact that they know what they say
is being listened to by a gentile audience, may make their utterances
less frank, less expressive of spontaneous feelings, more 'correct,'
than conversation around the kitchen table." [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 38]
And the formal, institutionalized
Jewish apologia for the subject of Jewish dominance in the mass media?
After conceding the obvious in the year 2000 (that even a Jewish
scholar, Steven G. Kellman, noted that "most" of the "100 most powerful
people" in Hollywood were Jewish, and that "boosters and anti-Semites
agree: Jews have been prominent and predominant in all phases of the
[motion picture] business: production, distribution and exhibition"),
the Anti-Defamation League was still taking the only apologetic spin on
these facts available to it:
"Though individual Jews control
Hollywood, Jewishness does not ... The
ADL believes that the recitation of
numbers and percentages is not
the answer to the false charges of
Jewish 'control' of the motion
picture industry, or, indeed, of
similar accusations involving the
media, banking, finance and other
businesses. Reliance on statistics
alone plays into the hands of
anti-Semites." [ADL ONLINE, SEPT 1999]
Indeed it does. This is a profound
concession in formally admitting the obvious. What else can the
ADL say, lest it be caught as a public liar in refuting the notion of
Jewish "predominance" in the mass media? Yet the key, however untenable,
to the ADL's Jews dominate the media, so what? argument, is that
Jews don't "in any field act in concert with other Jews similarly
situated simply because they happen to be Jewish." [ADL ONLINE, SEPT
1999]
Maybe not in whether they root for
the Los Angeles Dodgers or New York Yankees, but what reasoned analysis
of Jewish identity and politics can possibly assert that they have no
collective agenda in the mass media? [See also, for example, later
discussed Jewish collective efforts in American government towards
molding American foreign policy in support of Israel]. A recurrent
subject on entertainment television, for example, as noted by Jewish
researchers Jonathan and Judith Pearl, is anti-Semitism, a subject that
-- as we have earlier seen -- is virtually non-existent in modern
America. But it is a crucial antithetical foundation (against
non-Jews) of Jewish identity and socio-economic advantage/advancement.
As the Pearls note about their fifteen years of television research:
"The various manifestations of
anti-Semitism that popular television
has portrayed have been almost
unlimited ... The continued existence
of modern anti-Semitism is reflected
in the numerous programs that
dramatize its many manifestations ...
[TV] invariably depicts anti-
Semitism as an ugly, abhorrent trait
that must be fought at every
turn ... Non-Jews often have a strong
and prominent role in the
battle against anti-Semitism ... For
the vast majority of Americans
who are not Jewish, watching their
favorite TV character do battle
with religious bigots can be an
important influence. And often, non-
Jewish characters can make inroads
against anti-Semitism on their
own turf in ways that Jews cannot ...
[PEARL/PEARL p. 103-104]
... Anti-Semitism is clearly
presented in the television dramatic
programs as an injustice that should
be constantly fought. In virtually
no program is the derogation of Jews
or Judaism left unchallenged
either by inference, word, or action
... This kind of portrayal projects
the important message that fighting
anti-Semitism is not solely a Jewish
concern but the responsibility of all
people." [PEARL/PEARL p. 130]
In 1980, Patricia Erens, noted Jewish
dominance throughout the mass media and its self-protection:
"Although anti-Semitic literature [in
America] has appeared in every
decade, anti-Semitism has not been a
dominant or even prevalent
aspect of the mass media (newspapers,
radio, film, television) or the
fine arts (painting, literature,
drama). Therefore, it is not surprising
to discover that although negative
portrayals of Jews exist in film,
little overt anti-Semitism occurs.
The large number of Jews who hold
the reins of Hollywood's power
prevented this." [ERENS, P., 1980,
p. 117]
And what about the ceaseless
avalanche of Holocaust-related material throughout the mass media, (as
noted in detail elsewhere) including, for example, the front page 1999
article in a Los Angeles Times by Jewish author Josh Geitlin?
Again and again, special sympathy is demanded by the public for
"Jewish survivors" (and Jews in general), now in their old age. In this
case, readers are informed that "as they get older, a lot of these
people feel like they're facing extinction for a second time." [GEITLIN,
p. 1] This "extinction," as the article notes, is death itself,
something -- apparently lost to the author of the piece -- no Jewish
suffering, of "survivor" quality or not, has a corner on.
As Jewish scholar Peter Novick notes why Jewish victimology themes
-- especially the Holocaust -- of the Jewish power elite is so
omnipresent in popular culture:
"There are many reasons why concern with the Holocaust among the 2
or 3
percent of the American population that is Jewish came to pervade
American
society. I will mention one important reason here, if only because
it is often
nervously avoided. We are not just 'the people of the book,' but
the people
of the Hollywood film and television mini-series, of the magazine
article and
the newspaper column, of the comic book and academic symposium. When
a
a high level of concern with the Holocaust became widespread in
American
Jewry, it was, given the important role that Jews play in American
media and
opinion-making elites, not only natural, but virtually inevitable
that it would
spread throughout the culture at large." [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 12]
Let us also turn to other specific
Jewish/Israeli issues in the mass media and widespread Jewish-enforced
censorship against addressing, let alone scrutinizing, the dominant
Jewish presence at the upper echelons of the mass media and its
influence in shaping American popular culture. The taboo against this
subject is itself institutionalized, usually by dismissing any queries
about the subject as both groundless and nakedly anti-Semitic. At a
New York Times-sponsored question-and-answer session for the foreign
press in 1987, for example, Mato Sato, a press officer at the Japanese
mission to the United Nations, made waves for daring to ask Jewish
New York Times Foreign Editor (later Executive Editor) Joseph
Lelyveld why the Times covers "so many Jewish stories" and "how
many Jewish editors are employed at the New York Times?" Sato
apparently did not realize that asking such questions are forbidden and
considered "bizarre" (to use Lelyveld's description of them) in American
society. Lelyveld responded, said the Jewish Week, by saying
"that he was unaware of employees' religious backgrounds." (This is a
curious response for someone whose own father is a rabbi). [ATLAS, J.,
6-7-2000] (Lelyveld was appointed to be Executive Editor by the Times
'Jewish owner Arthur Ochs Sulzberger in 1994, following in that position
fellow Jews Max Frankel -- 1986-1994 -- and A. M. Rosenthal --
1970-1986). Mina Joffe, the wife of an Israeli press officer, followed
up Sato's query with her own sarcastic remark in an attempt to
trivialize Sato's question: "How many blue-eyed people are employed at
the New York Times?" The Jewish Week reported that the
New York Times had not yet gotten "an apology" from the Japanese
United Nations mission for Sato's unseemly curiosity. [LIPMAN, S,
5-22-87]
Jewish scholar David Grossman (who
coauthored a book with a Japanese scholar about Japanese "cultural
stereotypes" about Jews) noted the Sato incident, saying that the
inquirer's "questions were tactless and displayed astonishing naiveté,
but they were probably not malicious and the intense reaction he
received bewildered Japanese observers, who failed to understand what he
had done wrong." [GOODMAN, p. 10] (Meanwhile, while Jews and Israel are
institutionally protected from examination of their collective power in
the mass media, economic, social, and political worlds, it is apparently
no problem for anyone that Marvin Wolf wrote a book in recent years
entitled The Japanese Conspiracy, that Daniel Burstein wrote
Yen! Japan's New Financial Empire and Its Threat to America, or that
Pat Choate called his own work Agents of Influence: How Japan
Manipulates the American Political and Economic System. At least two
of these three authors are Jewish: all three surnames can be found in
Jewish surname databases. In Burstein's case, he links Japanese
self-identity to Hitler's Master Race concept and even mentions the
Japanese reporter's inquiry [about how many Jews work at the New York
Times and why there were so many articles about Jews] to be an
example of Japanese anti-Semitism). [BURSTEIN, D., 1988, p. 72-73]
Sato might well have asked the same
questions about the Jewish stories in the Washington Post. A
Jewish scholar, Barry Rubin, notes that
"Three of four main articles in
the July 22, 1990 Washington Post
features section were about
assimilating Jews who had made widely
different choices -- Andrew Dice
Clay [Silverman], Sandra Bernhard,
and Allen Ginsberg. That
newspaper's October 18, 1992 reviews
section is full of books by or
about Jews: on sports and the American
Jewish experience; a biography of
Bill Graham, a Holocaust survivor
and leading rock and roll
impresario; the story of a upper-class New
York family infected by
anti-Semitism; a South African woman's group
portrait of her set of Jewish
friends; a Jewish couple's volume on
foreign investments in America,
analyzing problems of multiple
loyalties and foreign influence
paralleling issues in assimilation; and a
Jewish author's book on politics
in higher education, discussing
multiculturalism in terms drawn
from the integration of Jews into
American society." [RUBIN, p.
xiii]
Earlier, Rubin (whose specific
interest is declared to be Jewish assimilation into American society),
notes that
"An author knows a subject is
compelling when it seems omnipresent.
For example, the April 1991
Vanity Fair contains four relevant articles
concerning Alfred Stieglitz,
scion of a rich German Jewish family who
founded art photography in
America and wed Georgia O'Keeffe;
Lady Mary Fairfax, whose family
migrated from Poland in the 1920s
and who became a powerful press
lord and doyenne of Australian
society; Charles Feldman, head
of Famous Artists Agency and the
great love of Jean Harlow; and
the actress Ali McGraw, whose
Hungarian mother would never
admit to being Jewish." [RUBIN, p.
xii]
Of course the American mass media is
regularly flooded with stories about Israel. As Doug Bloomfield, "former
chief lobbyist for AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby on Capitol Hill",
remarked:
"If E.T. had stayed in the U.S. and
read the New York Times, the
Washington Post, or the
Christian Science Monitor, or had watched
the network news instead of riding
around in bicycle baskets, when
he finally returned home and they
asked him, 'What is it like on
earth?' -- the first thing he would
have said is, "There are three
superpowers. There is Israel and two
others." [STARR, J., 1990, p. 33]
The Judeo-centric world view of film
director Mel Brooks suggests, increasingly, a useful paradigm in
analyzing the Jewish entertainment world. As Andrea Most observes,
"The humor in Brooks' movies
originate in the idea that everything and
everyone is Jewish -- and it is his
job to reveal it as such. So the oldest
man in the world is Jewish (The
Two Thousand Year Old Man), the
Indians are Jewish (Blazing
Saddles), Sherwood Forest's Merry Band
is Jewish (Robin Hood: Men in
Tights), the past is Jewish (History of
the World),
and the future is Jewish (Spaceballs)." [MOST, A., 1999,
p. 337]
In the Arab-Jewish political field,
in 1985 American media reports were swamped with stories about the
horrible death of wheelchair-bound Leon Klinghoffer, an American Jew
murdered by Palestinian ship hijackers of the Achillo Lauro. Yet, notes
Israeli Amnon Rubenstein, "In the aftermath of the hijacking, the United
States media covered his death in great detail ... The same week, Alex
Odeh, a United States citizen of Palestinian descent who was the West
Coast Director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, was
murdered by a bomb explosion [later attributed by the FBI to an act of
terrorism by the Jewish Defense League]... Odeh's death was virtually
ignored by the national media." [RUBENSTEIN, A., p. 157]
"The truth of the matter," said
novelist Truman Capote on the Johnny Carson Show in 1973, "... is the
entire cultural press, publishing ... television ... theatre ... film
industry ... is almost 90% Jewish-oriented. I mean, I can't even count
on one hand five people of any importance -- of real importance -- in
the media who aren't Jewish. Here's this God-damned Jewish mafia working
tooth and tong on the New York Review of Books, the New York
Times, whether they're doing it consciously or not. And mostly
they're doing it consciously." [FORSTER, p. 108-109] Needless to say,
Capote's public comments are mainstays in Jewish-written books about
Anti-Semitism.
In 1988 John Hohrn, a Black official
at the Mississippi film commission, was assailed by the Anti-Defamation
League and other Jewish groups for the following comment:
"You hear people say, 'Well, that's
civil rights -- that story's been told
already.' But no one has questioned
the right of the Jewish community,
which controls the media, to retell
the story of the Holocaust." [JEWISH
WEEK, 1-15-88]
ADL attorney Betsy Ross denounced
Hohrn's clause about Jews to be "obnoxious ... This person needs an
education. His comments about Jews controlling the media is completely
inaccurate. It's an age-old anti-Semitic canard." [JEWISH WEEK, 1-15-88,
p. 33]
This "anti-Semitic canard" of Jewish
media dominance has held credence, albeit discretely, in some pretty
high places. According to the memoirs of H. R. Haldeman, President
Richard Nixon's Chief of Staff, during one closed door session with his
boss, "there was a considerable discussion of the terrible problem
arising from the total Jewish domination of the media and agreement that
this is something that would have to be dealt with." [NEW YORK TIMES,
5-18-94, p. A19] Nixon's vice-president, Spiro Agnew, even spoke
publicly about Jews and the mass media, complaining that the American
media "was unduly influenced by Zionist opinion ... All you have to do
is look around and see who owns the networks, who owns the Washington
Post ... the New York Times ... As you look around in ... the
big news business you see a heavy concentration of Jewish people."
[VOLKMAN, p. 104] Even when Richard Nixon signed with Warners to
write his memoirs, the people (including his press secretary) who
arranged the deal were almost all Jewish:
"The price, according to the agent,
Irving 'Swifty' Lazar, would be
$2 million. Lazar met with William
Sarnoff and Howard Kaminsky
of Warners Communications and
Nixon's former press secretary,
Ron Ziegler, and sealed the deal
with handshakes." [BAGDIKIAN, p. 34]
In the entertainment world, country
singer Dolly Parton was forced to apologize to the Jewish community for
telling Vogue magazine that "everybody's afraid to touch anything
that's religious because most of the people out here [in Hollywood] are
Jewish and it's a frightening thing for them to promote Christianity."
TV personality Kathy Lee Gifford (whose own father -- Epstein -- was
Jewish) also publicly apologized for complaining that "they're changing
who crucified Jesus," during a TV show that discussed recent New
Testament changes. [ROSENFELD, p. 61] "When the NRA [National Rifle
Association] exercises political power," noted Jewish journalist Philip
Weiss, "it's a hot-button issue. When Jewish money plays a part [in
politics], discussing it is anti-Semitic. If you say anything about
[Jewish power in] Hollywood, you are shouted down." [WEISS, p. 32]
In 1990, Giancarlo Parretti, an
Italian financier (with alleged links to the criminal underworld)
complained to an Italian newspaper that "the Jews have ganged up on me
... The fact is that the Jews don't like the idea that I represent the
first Catholic communications network ... There isn't a single [media]
holding company in the world that isn't in the hands of the Jews."
[TUGEND, T, p. 37]
Parretti was widely attacked for
anti-Semitism for this statement. The Los Angeles Times quoted a
"veteran Hollywood leader" as saying that "it's one thing to note that
many prominent figures in all aspects of Hollywood are Jewish and always
have been. It's quite another, however, to make hostile statements on
that fact." "As an anti-Semite," said another movie executive, "I don't
see how he could ever function in this town." Rushing to Parretti's
defense was Yoram Globus, a Jewish co-President of Paretti's Pathe
Communications Corporation (which had earlier taken over the
Canon Group, owned by the Israeli-born Globus and his cousin Menahem
Golan). "There is not even an inch," proclaimed Globus, "of
anti-Semitism in him." [TUGEND, T, Hollywood, p. 37]
In 1994, William Cash's
aforementioned comments in Great Britain's the Spectator about
Jews controlling Hollywood drew widespread attack and publicity. Both
the New York Times and Chicago Tribune featured prominent
articles about Cash's speaking the unspeakable in a distant overseas
publication. The Toronto Star even joined in with a headline
proclaiming, "Anti-Semitic Article Shakes Hollywood." [TORONTO, p. C4]
A group of Hollywood actors wrote a
letter to the
Spectator accusing Cash's piece of "racist cant" and
"anti-Semitic stereotypes." Jewish author Neal Gabler, in condemning
Cash's ideas of excessive Jewish power in Hollywood, told a Jewish
newspaper that Cash was "only contrite to the extent that he feels he
has damaged his career -- which of course he has. [Cash was a
Hollywood-based reporter for London's Daily Telegraph.] I can't
imagine anyone [in Hollywood] wanting to meet with him after that
article." [CENTURY, p. 1] This danger of Cash losing his entire
journalistic career, of course, is the paradigm for the reason that
those who know well Jewish dominance in the mass media cannot give
public voice to the fact.
Among those formally complaining
directly to Cash's regular employer -- the aforementioned Conrad Black,
owner of the Daily Telegraph -- was Britain's powerful Jewish
Board of Deputies lobbying body. Not only does Black own the
Telegraph, he also owns the Spectator, the journal in which
Cash's offending article appeared. Jewish omnipresence in the mass media
is so great that even the editor of the Spectator itself, Dominic
Lawson, was Jewish -- the son of former British chancellor Nigel Lawson.
[WOOLF, p. 1] For Cash's simple telling of the truth, Rabbis Marvin
Hier and Abraham Cooper of the Los Angeles Simon Wiesenthal Center
charged the sensationally absurd libel that the British author "has
actually plagiarized a page from the playbook of [Nazi theorists] Julius
Streicher and Joseph Goebbels ... fanning the flames of bigotry and
genocide." [RICHLER, p. 32]
Referring to the Vanity Fair
article addressing 16 Hollywood media moguls that Cash used as reference
in his own piece, apologist Gabler -- author of a book on (in his own
words) the "Jewish invention of Hollywood" -- complained that those 16
"are not predominantly Jewish at all. Only nine of the 16 are Jewish."
When the (Jewish) Forward pointed out that Gabler's own books
focused predominantly on Jews, he responded, "What I'm interested in are
the figures who shaped popular culture in the 20th century, and because
such a disproportionate number are Jewish, the subject inevitably
arises." [CENTURY, p. 1]
Richard Neuhaus in the National
Review pointed out the craziness, and even sinister intent, of the
Jewish Cash crucifixion:
"Some Jews have ratcheted up to an
almost painful degree their antennae
for the detection of
anti-Semitism. A few months ago, the New York
Times went ballistic when
the London Spectator ran a little article on the
self-described dominance of Jews
in Hollywood. The somewhat naive
Spectator author thought he
was doing nothing more than reporting
on interesting circumstances; as
it turned out, he was in large part
relying on what Jewish writers had
said about Jews in Hollywood. The
young man did not understand that
non-Jews are not supposed to
notice when Jews publicly
celebrate Jewish influence and success. As
anyone familiar with the large
role of Jews in American history knows,
the large role of Jews in American
popular entertainment goes back to
the nineteenth century and, far
from being a secret, has been frequently
extolled in film and song. With
weeks of letters and commentary in the
Spectator, our British
cousins had great fun with this little squall,
chalking it up as yet another
instance of American hypocrisy about our
professed devotion to free
speech." [NEUHAUS, p. 52]
British journalist Charles Cummings
noted that
"It's a delicate subject. Mention
the relationship between Hollywood and
Jews and you can land in some very
hot water. Journalist William Cash
discovered this in 1991 when he
wrote an article for the Spectator about
the increasing influence of Jews in
the American entertainment industry.
More than a dozen movie luminaries
-- including Charlton Heston,
Barbara Streisand, and Steven
Spielberg -- sent an impassioned letter of
complaint to the magazine,
chastising Cash as a latter-day Nazi and
complaining about the trite and
vulgar stereotypes in which he had
couched his argument. Yet the
thrust of the piece was accurate."
[CUMMINGS, p., 15]
As James Atlas noted in 2000:
"The Jewish dominance in the media,
in newspapers and magazines and
Hollywood and the publishing
industry, is an old story (not that its
implications have been very arduously
explored); I continue to find
myself baffled -- and not a little
amazed -- by the popularity of an
insipid narcissist like Jerry
Seinfeld, but he has certainly achieved
market penetration as a
representative Jew." [ATLAS, J., 6-2000]
In 1997, British author John Le Carre
(David Cornwell) also found himself in hot water with the Jewish Thought
Police. In the best interests of his writing career, he had to grovel
before England's Anglo-Israel Association "to lecture them on his
reasons for detesting anti-Semitism, and to defend himself against
charges which had been made against him on another continent." Years
earlier, his third novel, The Spy Who Came In from the Cold, had
stirred "Jewish American organizations," noted the London Sunday
Telegraph, "to know whether he equated Jew with communist." Le Carre
recounted worse charges against his last novel, The Tailor of Panama:
"We sat head in hand in my American
editor's office, the New York
Times review of The Tailor
of Panama before us, telling us that
consciously or not I had been
listening to the internal voices of
my English anti-Semitism as I wrote
my novel. What could I
possibly say in reply? ... I wanted
to tell the New York Times
that to publish a smear of
anti-Semitism on such arbitrary grounds
was a serious act of editorial
irresponsibility. But a tumult of alarm
broke out among my well wishers. 'If
you write that, your career
in the United States will be
ruined.'" [WAUGH, A., p. 39]
In a rare case of justice against
Jewish-directed persecution, in 2000 William Quigley was awarded $10.5
million in a suit against the Denver, Colorado, regional Anti-Defamation
League. A jury trial found the ADL to be itself guilty of
defamation for publicly accusing Quigley and his wife of
anti-Semitism. As the Cleveland Jewish News observed:
"William Quigley, an executive in the
film industry, claimed that as a
result of the public anti-Semitism
charged against him, his career was
severely damaged. After the charges
he was shunned by colleagues,
most of whom were Jewish, he said."
[KARFELD, M., 5-19-2000, p. 24]
This man, surrounded by Jews in the
film industry, lives in Denver, not Los Angeles or New
York.
Jewish censorship of free speech
about them in the mass media has taken an even more sinister form in
Canada. In 1994, Doug Collins, a veteran journalist for Vancouver's
North Shore News, (with a circulation of only 60,000) wrote a review
of Stephen Spielberg's Holocaust movie, Schindler's List, thereby
launching into a critique of the Jewish Holocaust mythology as a
political and economic weapon, and a lambaste of Jewish power in
Hollywood. His article was entitled, "Hollywood Propaganda."
"I think [Collins] made some valid
points," said his editor, Tim Renshaw. "I wouldn't have approved the
column if it was over the top." [BROOK p. 58] "I've published Doug
Collins for fifteen years," added Peter Speck, the publisher of the
North Shore News. "He has written 1,500 columns for me, and he's a
fine man, a fine journalist, he's a pro, he's the recipient of a
military medal, he served with distinction in the Second World War, and
he was captured by the Germans and he escaped ten times. Ten times!"
[BROOK, p. 58]
In response to Collins' article, the
Canadian Jewish Congress solicited a handful of other organizations to
join it in pressing criminal charges against Collins under a 1993
British Columbia "anti-hate" law which the B.C. Press Council and B.C.
Civil Liberties Union decried as a suppression of free speech in a
democratic society. The law, for the first time tested, prohibited the
publication of material "that is likely to expose a person or group or
class of persons to hatred or contempt because of race, color, ancestry,
place of origin, religion, martial status...” etc., etc. etc. [BROOK,
p. 58]
In 1997 Collins went to trial.
The lawyer for the Canadian Jewish
Congress, Gregory Walsh, "argued [that] the column exposed Jewish people
to hatred." [TODD, JEWS, p. A4] Collins' crime, declared Walsh, was
saying that "Jews are responsible for false Holocaust propaganda, which
is itself hateful; they are master manipulators who use their extensive
ownership of the media to widely disseminate Holocaust 'nonsense' for
profit, to the great harm of innocent people and society generally."
[TODD, JEWS, p. A4]
A University of Toronto professor,
Bart Testa, noted the Ottawa Citizen, testified that Collins'
article "portrayed Jewish people as powerful, manipulative and dedicated
to keeping alternative views of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, the subject
of Schindler's List, out of public view." [TODD, p. F11] Another
Jewish professor, Leonidas Hill, "a specialist in the history of
anti-Semitism," testified that Collins' column infers that "Jews are
deceitful and conspire to swindle the non-Jewish world for their own
gains ... Mr. Collins poses as a dauntless civil libertarian and a
champion of free speech. This pose made it possible for him to continue
publishing his anti-Semitic diatribes." [TODD, p. F11]
In reply, the British Columbia Press
Council lawyer, Roger McConchie, denounced the B.C. Human Rights Code
under which Collins was tried, calling it "the most significant
legislative infringement of press freedom in the history of British
Columbia." [TODD, JEWS, p. A4]
In 1997, the B.C. Human Rights
Commission decreed that Collins' Schindler's List column was "likely to
make it more acceptable for others to express hatred or contempt against
Jewish people," but that it did not have enough "calumny, detestation or
vilification" to punish him. [BOLAN, p. A1] Nonetheless, a Jewish
Victorian businessman, Harry Abrams, filed another complaint against
Collins. (Abrams' tact was to file as an individual, although he is the
British Columbia's representative for B'nai B'rith Canada. The earlier
complaint was filed by another Jewish organization, the Canadian Jewish
Congress). This complaint focused on the cumulative impact of four
Collins columns that had critical commentary about Jews. This time,
Collins lost.
"The columns," decided the
Commission's next tribunal report, "repeatedly reinforced some of the
most virulent forms of anti-Semitism, and perpetuate the most damaging
stereotypes of Jews: that they are selfish, greedy, and manipulative."
[MOORE, D., p. A8] ... "Mr. Collins perpetuates the stereotype against
Jews, especially those which allege widespread power and influence ...
The ideas and statements in these four articles reflect and, in fact,
reinforce common anti-Semitic stereotypes. Mr. Collins not only
expresses discriminating attitudes, but also exposes Jewish people to
hatred and contempt." [VANCOUVER SUN, p. A19]
The Commission's final report was
even ordered to be published in the North Shore News. Managing
editor Tim Renshaw responded with amazement that his paper would be
forced to publish "government-dictated content." "Basically," said
Renshaw, "we have been tried on the same thing [and] they got the
desired result the second time around. I guess if it wasn't the second
time, then there would have been a third time." The B.C. Press Council
declared that the tribunal dictate was "an unjustified violation of the
principle of the freedom of the press." [MOORE, D., p. A8]
Author Doug Collins (whose trial
costs were $200,000) was ordered by the Commission to apologize and pay
Abrams $2000 "as compensation for the injury [Collins' words] have
caused to his dignity and ... self-respect." [VANCOUVER SUN, p. A19] The
North Shore News was also ordered not to publish anything more
"contemptuous" of Jews. The Commission "ordered Collins and the paper to
stop publishing statements that expose or are likely to expose Jewish
persons to hatred or contempt in violation of section 7 (1) (b) of the
human rights code." [BOLAN, K., 12-3-99, p. 5]
"What is particularly odious in its
ruling," noted journalist Claire Hoy, "is that although the tribunal
found Collins had not explicitly violated hate laws (and one could argue
hate laws themselves are an outrageous violation of free speech,
incidentally), the collective wisdom of his columns is enough to give
the impression of hate-mongering." [HOY, p. 5]
After the decision in his favor, Mr.
Abrams said that the Collins columns "soften the ground" for another
Holocaust. "They want to complete the job Hitler didn't finish," he
said. In response to this wild charge, the 78-year old Collins -- a
prisoner of war at the May 31, 1940 battle of Dunkirk -- asserted that
"I was fighting Hitler when that louse bag was in diapers." [DE CLOET,
p. 27; Sinoski, p. B3]
Collins sought to appeal the
Commission's ruling. But the North Shore News could not
join in the appeal. By 1999 the paper was itself owned by Hollinger
International, the ardently pro-Israel media giant discussed
earlier. Its Jewish CEO, David Radler, noted the reason why
Hollinger's North Shore News was abandoning its fight for
free speech: "We support Collins' right to write whatever he wants.
Where we break with Collins is I don't want Collins' view in our
newspaper. Basically, I find them inaccurate and offensive." [TORRANCE,
K., p. 24-25]
In the midst of the Doug Collins
episodes, in 1998 Jewish journalist Paula Brook of the Vancouver Sun
wrote an editorial about yet another successful Jewish censorial effort
in the Vancouver area. After complaints by the Canadian Jewish Congress,
journalist Greg Felton at the Vancouver Courier was forbidden by
the paper's owner, Sam Grippo, to write about Israel again. "I have
received a directive not to publish any anti-Israel commentary in the
newspaper," Felton said in an interview. Noting this case, editor Tim
Renshaw of the North Shore News (of Doug Collins notoriety),
wrote that "the forces of censorship headed by the Canadian Jewish
Congress continue to steamroll over any criticism of Israel or other
things Jewish." [BROOK, p. A17]
The title of Paul Brook's article in
reply to accusations of repeated Jewish censorship was "Business Rights
Versus Free Speech." She concluded her editorial, saying: "If those
offended people [to articles like Felton's] have the numbers behind
them, and are represented by an advocacy group, more power to them. And
if the owner [of the paper] responds by saying, you're right --
reprehensible speech is no longer free around here -- then decisions are
taken and life carries on, and as long as the government stays out of it
we do not call this censorship. We call it business." [BROOK, p. A17]
In response, Rafeh Hulays, Director
of External Affairs for the Arab Community of British Colombia, wrote
that "the bottom line of Ms. Brook's argument is that instead of
entering a debate, a special interest group with powerful friends has
the right to silence the views of journalists with whom it disagrees, no
matter how legitimate these views are." [HULAYS, p. A15]
By 2001, the aforementioned Doug Collins, in his own independent
Internet column, noted the state of Canadian "freedom of the press."
Jewish media mogul Izzy Asper had bought out "Hollinger/Southam's 13
daily newspapers, 126 community newspapers, Canadian Internet
operations, and fifty per cent of National Post." The North
Shore News was now an Asper paper, and both its publisher, Peter
Speck, and Executive Editor, Tim Renshaw -- supporters of Collins right
to free speech about Jews and Israel -- were fired. Likewise, the
aforementioned Greg Felton, critic of Israel, was dumped from the
Vancouver Courier (even before that paper became part of the Asper
chain). [COLLINS, D., 2001] [Click
here to read Collins' explanation of the matter]
Jewish censorial efforts to squelch
free speech, as noted in an earlier chapter, are manifest in many ways
across the world. Even in western democracies, citizens can face
criminal conviction merely for expressing negative opinions about
Jews. Take the case of Robert Holzach, the honorary chairman of
Switzerland's largest bank, who the made the mistake of speaking too
freely to a reporter from New Yorker magazine. In 1997 Holzach
faced prosecution by Swiss courts for remarks he made to Jane
Kramer that there was "a Jewish conspiracy" to take over the world's
most important banks. Formal, legal charges against Holzach for this
comment was made by Marcel Hess, a Jewish politician in Basel. Holzach
denied he ever made the remarks.
Conservative syndicated columnist
Joseph Sobran, (charged often to be an anti-Semite), formerly of the
National Review, notes in overview the problem at stake in all these
cases:
"Not only persecution of Jews but any
critical mention of Jewish power
in the media and politics is roundly
condemned as 'anti-Semitism’...
It's permissible to discuss the power
of every other group, from the
Black Muslims to the Christian Right,
but the much greater power of
the Jewish Establishment is
off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief
measure of its power: its ability to
impose its own taboos while tearing
down the taboos of others ... Power
openly acquired, openly exercised,
is one thing. You may think organized
labor or the Social Security lobby
abuses power, but you don't
jeopardize your career by saying so. But
a kind of power that forbids its own
public mention, like the Holy Name
in the Old Testament, is another
matter entirely ... Journalists are as
afraid of Jewish power as politicians
are. This means that public
discussion is cramped and warped by
unspoken fear -- a fear journalists
won't acknowledge, because it
embarrasses their premises of being
fearless critics of power." [SOBRAN]
Another conservative critical
commentator, Wilmot Robertson, noted the same thing in 1973:
"Any critical discussion of Jewish
wealth -- or for that matter any
critical discussion of any aspect of
Jewish power -- immediately
exposes the author or speaker to
charges of anti-Semitism ...
[ROBERTSON, p. 179] ... Instead of
submitting anti-Semitism
to the free play of ideas, instead of
making it a topic for debate
in which all can join, Jews and their
liberal supporters have
managed to organize an inquisition in
which all acts, writings,
and even thoughts critical of Jewry
are treated as threats to the
moral order of mankind." [ROBERTSON,
W., p. 180]
One has to look long and far to
find any observer willing to stick his (or her) neck out in the mass
media to raise the Jewish issue. A rare example occurred way back in the
1970s, when the directors of the Anti-Defamation League noted (as a
severe example of irrational anti-Semitism) an article that appeared in
a little Gentile-owned newspaper in Vermont:
"In May 1972, the Bennington
Banner of Vermont, a
liberal newspaper, carried a column
headlined 'Decline and Fall'
by Samuel Ogden who wrote about
'WASP' decline resulting
from the fact that 'the news media,
the recent books, the books
reviewed, all speak the viewpoints
of the Jews,' that the
doctorates and professorships are
principally held by Jews, that
as a result 'the American culture is
rapidly becoming Jewish in
character,' which may be its
'manifest destiny' but which has
contributed to a society that is
'taking on the aspects of a
dreadful nightmare.'"
[FORSTER/EPSTEIN, p. 111]
All in all, the mass media itself
and Jewish lobbying efforts have been astoundingly successful in
cloaking Jewish mass media dominance, and framing Jews in America as
relatively meek, oppressed, disenfranchised, and invisible. And
victims. No mainstream media venue dares to address the
dominating Jewish mass media presence. But generic "whites," however
unjustly, and incorrectly, are fair game. In 2001, for example, the
Los Angeles Times, in an article about the lack of minorities in
Hollywood, blamed "whites" for this discrepancy, condemning the
Hollywood power structure, specifically that "90% of each major
[Hollywood] guild (Screen Actors, Directors, Writers and Producers) is
white, the majority of them male." [MUNOZ, L, 3-24-01]
In 1945 a national poll found that 67% of the American population
felt that Jews "had too much power" in America. As Jewish power
actually grew dramatically over the following decades, it was veiled,
and the perception of it was socialized away. By 1962, the perception
of "too much Jewish power" was down to 17%. [GOLDBERG, JJ, p. 117] In
1945, according to one survey, 19% of Americans believed that Jews were
a "threat to America." By 1950, this percentage was only 5 percent.
"This short term shift," noted Jewish psychoanalysts Bruno Bettelhem and
Morris Janowitz, "may well have been influenced by the exposure of Nazi
genocidal practices." [BETTELHEIM/JANOWITZ, p. 6-7] These authors were
especially troubled, however, by the results of a 1952 survey question
that found that college-educated people were more nearly twice as likely
(17 to 10 percent) than grammar school-educated Americans to believe
that "Jews were more likely to be Communists than others."
[BETTELHEIM/JANOWITZ, p. 19] [See evidence elsewhere in this volume that
points to this as an obvious fact]
Always monitoring their fellow
citizens, in a 1986 Anti-Defamation League national survey of 1,000
Christian conservatives, "Jews ranked far down the list of those thought
to have too much power [in America]. Big business was too powerful for
67% of the group, organized labor for 55%, Arabs for 38%, Catholics for
23%, and 11% for blacks, compared to only 7% who thought Jews were too
powerful." [LIPSET, p. 157]
Such beliefs bear repeating, that we
might ponder their implications: In 1945 67% of Americans felt that
Jews had "too much power" in the United States and by 1986 only 7% of a
religious section of them felt that way. In the more recent survey, five
and a half times as many people thought that Arabs have more power in
America than Jews. Over 50% more of these people understand the "power"
of the largely impoverished Black community to be more than that of
Jews. What evidence, one must wonder, has been disseminated to (or
been withheld from) such people, and through what channels, to create,
maintain, and enforce such preposterously skewed opinions? ("Jewish
defense agencies," notes Ronald Bayor, "helped create a climate in which
Jew-baiting was no longer respectable. The assault upon anti-Semitism
found in movies, the press, and general and politically oriented
magazines by 1947 all contributed to its decline as a reputable
movement." [BAYOR, 1986, p. 187] )
Such recent perceptions about Jews
from the likes of "Christian conservatives" are not unusual to Americans
in general. A 1986 Roper Poll of the American public at-large revealed
that only 8% thought that Jews had "too much power" in the United
States. [PENKOWER, p. 321] In 1998, the Anti-Defamation League
conducted a survey of Americans about the fact that the "presidents of
the three national television networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC, are Jewish"
(not mentioning the far deeper cultural hegemony of Jews in the
Hollywood world). 80% of respondents didn't think Jewish executives
"tend to allow more sex and violence programming than non-Jewish
executives" and 80% opined that there was "no connection between the
amount of Christian-oriented programming on TV and the fact that the
executives of the major networks are Jewish." [ADL, NOV 1998]
But we are still very far from finished with the story of Jewish
influence, and "power," in popular culture.
One last word here, however, about
polls and public opinions of "Jewish power" within America. While
American awareness of Jewish economic and mass media influence in
America is miniscule and considered -- when it is rarely evidenced -- as
an "anti-Semitic" view, across the world, in 1983, the Hanoch Smith
Research Center conducted a national poll of the Jews of Israel. Colin
Shindler notes that
"When Hanoch Smith asked his
Israeli respondents whether the Jews
of America have control of
important branches of the American
economy, 73 per cent replied in
the affirmative ... In a non-Jewish
society, this would have aroused
suspicion of anti-Semitism, but
emanating from a Jewish society,
it seemed both a matter of pride
and bewilderment." [SHINDLER, p.
94-95]
Likewise, a 2001 survey of Israelis by the World Jewish Congress
found that
"the most admired characteristic of U.S. Jews is 'their cultural
and political
influence' -- 34 percent -- followed by 'Jewish pride' -- 22
percent -- and
their 'sense of unity and community' -- 21 percent." [AXELROD, T.,
10-29-01]
"By the early
1960s ... Jews were even more heavily
represented in the knowledge professions than they had
been a decade earlier. They clearly dominated the political
culture of New York, where their style and views had been
adopted by relatively large numbers of non-Jewish intellectuals.
They also became increasingly influential in other cosmopolitan
centers such as Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and
Berkeley. In all these cities, they played an important role
in educating non-Jews to a more cosmopolitan perspective."
Stanley Rothman
and S. Robert Lichter, 1982, p. 103
"It is ironic that many of the literary figures who shied
from Jewish themes embodied in their writing more alleged
Jewish traits than more consciously Jewish writers. There
remains in their innermost self unsuspected residues of their
inherited culture which no amount of rejection or denial
could wholly eradicate. In both the self-hater and the detached,
the affinity of supposed Jewish characteristics has been observed
by both critics and laymen alike."
-- Lothar Kahn,
Jewish author, 1961, p. 31
"If the literary output of 1999 reveals anything, it reveals that
Jewish writers are among the privileged
citizens of the global
village ...
Given the unprecedented international reach of their
imaginations,
their absorption in
Jewish history and theology,
and the staggering diversity of
emergent American voices, it
just may be that these young Jewish American writers find that
they share more in common artistically with their Jewish
contemporaries writing
in Israel, Europe, Asia, and the rest of
the Americas than they share in common with their
non-Jewish
contemporaries writing in the United States."
-- Andrew Furman, one of the judges
for the National Jewish
Book award, MAY/JUNE 2000, p. 30]
25
LITERATURE - "INTELLECTUALS"
-- "THE FAMILY"
In a 1974 book, The American
Intellectual Elite, Charles Kadushin produced the results of his
studies. He had tabulated lists of contributors to leading American
"intellectual" publications, narrowed the names down to 200, and in a
series of queries or interviews asked his subjects who were the most
influential intellectuals around. Of the top 21 most highly rated (by
others in this publishing circle), 15 were Jewish, including Hannah
Arendt, Daniel Bell, Saul Bellow, Noam Chomsky, Paul Goodman, Richard
Hofstadter, Irving Howe, Irving Kristol, Norman Mailer, Herbert Marcuse,
Norman Podhoretz, David Riesman, Robert Silvers, Susan Sontag, and
Lionel Trilling. [KADUSHIN, p. 30] Half of the total 200 were also
reputed to be Jewish. As Kadushin notes,
"Jews are indeed much more strongly
represented among leading
intellectuals than the population at
large. They compose about half
of the American intellectual elite.
Catholics are vastly underrepresented,
but Protestants, who are one-third
of the group, are also relatively
underrepresented ... [KADUSHIN, p.
23] ... Even in comparison with
elite American professors (those who
published more than 20 articles
in academic journals and who teach
in high-quality colleges and
universities) of the same age and in
the same fields, there are between
two and five times as many Jews in
the intellectual elite." [KADUSHIN,
p. 24]
In the world of academia
(professorships) at-large, 60% of the "intellectual elite" were found to
be Jewish. [KADUSHIN, p. 24] The "intellectual elite" also had a
geographical flavor -- half of the academic elite held positions at four
East Coast universities -- Columbia, New York University, Harvard, and
Yale. [KADUSHIN, p. 23]
Another (Jewish) professor echoes
this study in claiming that by the late 1970s 50% of the "top
intellectuals" in America were Jewish, the percentage rising to 51% of
all "elite" academics in the social sciences and 61% in the humanities.
[RUBENSTEIN, p. 64] Stephen Whitfield cites evidence that as many as
30% of the professors at "major universities" by the 1980s were also
Jewish. [WHITFIELD, American, p. 9] Yet another Jewish professor
used such figures to declare that 76% "of the most influential
intellectuals had at least one Jewish parent." [DAVIS, D., p. 29]
To begin to understand the
implications of all this, (other than the popular Jewish explanations
that Jews are "just smart," or socially positioned as marginalized
"others" to recognize greater philosophical insights) one must examine
how someone gets on such a list of prominent people. Kadushin's study
sample was selected from those published in "twenty or so leading
intellectual journals." These included the New York Review of Books,
the New York Times Book Review, the New Republic,
Commentary, Partisan Review, Daedalus, Ramparts,
Dissent, the Village Voice and other such periodicals. All
of these were founded, controlled, or edited by Jews, as were many of
the others on the list. "As might be expected," noted Kadushin, "the
persons most often named as having the power to make or break
reputations were the editors of the key journals -- Robert Silvers,
Jason Epstein [and his wife Barbara], and Norman Podhoretz. [All are
Jewish] A few persons [of the intellectuals surveyed in Kadushin's
study] commented on the alliance between journals and book publishers
represented by Silvers and Jason Epstein." [KADUSHIN, p. 53]
Kadushin's definition of a "leading
intellectual" underscores its incestuous current; a "leading
intellectual" is "simply any person who writes regularly for leading
intellectual journals and/or has his books reviewed in them." [KADUSHIN,
p. 8] Kadushin himself confronts the inbred dimensions of the
"intellectual elite": "I have the impression from reading
autobiographical accounts of intellectual life that young intellectuals
tend to be sponsored by older intellectuals and into intellectual
prominence through a combination of journals, circles, and political
parties controlled by the older intellectuals." [KADUSHIN, p. 25]
In order to fully understand this
scenario, one must begin with the 1930s and a group of mostly Jewish
individuals that have sequentially risen en masse in New York City as
part of an interconnected literary, publishing, and "intellectual"
network, often self-referred to as "The New York Intellectuals" or "The
Family." The Family, wrote Philip Nobile, is "an elite array of
critics, editors, novelists, and poets that manage the country's high
culture." [NOBILE, p. 13] "The New York literary world," says Family
member Norman Podhoretz, "began to acquire a recognizable identity ....
[one could] think of it as a Jewish family." [PODHORETZ, Making,
p. 109] To those outside the Family circle in the literary world, they
-- and their heirs today -- are the Jewish (literary) Mafia. Homogeneous
only in that they are almost all Jews (not uncommonly warring among
themselves), they inevitably linked with the many webs of the expanding
Jewish-predominated mass media; a few "intellectuals" even became
household names. As a group, they are credited with profound influence
in the shaping of the twentieth century American cultural, social, and
even the political scene.
"During the last few years," wrote
Family member Irving Howe in 1969, "the talk about the New York
Establishment has taken an unpleasant turn. Whoever does a bit of
lecturing about the country is likely to encounter, after a few drinks,
literary academics who inquire enviously, sometimes spitefully, about
'what's new in New York.' ... As polite needling questions are asked
about the cultural life of New York, a rise of sweat comes to one's
brow, for everyone knows what no one says: New York means Jews." [HOWE,
p. 267]
"[I]n the frothy turbulent 'mix' of America in the 60's, with its glut,
its power drives, its confusion of values," Alfred Kazin decided in
1966, "the Jewish writer found himself so much read, consulted,
imitated, that he knew it would not be long before the reaction set in
-- and in fact the decorous plaint of the 'Protestant minority' has been
succeeded by crudely suggestive phrases about the 'Jewish
Establishment,' the 'O.K. writers and the Poor Goy,' 'The
Jewish-American Push.' Yet it is plainly a certain success that has been
resented, not the Jew." [KAZIN, A., 1966, p. xxiv]
Of course the New York Intellectuals
were -- and their descendants are -- not a formal organization, but
rather an informal clique, a communally self-promotive camaraderie of
writers, critics, editors, and publishers. Alexander Bloom suggests that
the following individuals may be considered to be part of the Family's
inner ring:
Philip Rahv, William Phillips, Lionel
Trilling, Diana Trilling, Meyer
Schapiro, Clement Greenberg, Harold
Rosenberg, Dwight MacDonald,
Elliot Cohen and Sidney Hooks. A
later generation included Irving Howe,
Irving Kristol, Daniel Bell, Delmore
Schwartz, Leslie Fiedler, Seymour
Martin Lipset, Nathan Glazer, Alfred
Kazin, Robert Warshow, Melvin
Lasky, Isaac Rosenfeld, and Saul
Bellow. Still later came Norman Mailer,
Philip Roth, Michael Harrington,
Theodore Solotanoff, Jason Epstein,
Midge Decter, Norman Podhortetz, and
Susan Sontag.
Other candidates for connective
inclusion include Henry Roth, Michael
Blankfort, Leon Uris, Meyer Levin,
Arthur Cohen, Louis Untermeyer,
Herman Wouk, Arthur Miller, Muriel
Rukyeser, Louis Zara, Paul
Goodman, Barbara Epstein, Steven
Marcus, John Simon, and many
others.
Rings radiating outward include I.
F. Stone, Herman Kahn, Hans Morgenthau, Sidney Hertzberg, Ronald Steel,
David T. Bazelon, Nat Hentoff, Oscar Handlin, Daniel Boorstin, and
others.
In 1980, Daniel Bell, a prominent
Family member, broke down his version of the Jewish contingent of the
New York Intellectuals and their "fields of interest" into the following
categories:
ART: Meyer Schapiro, Clement
Greenberg, Harold Rosenberg
PHILOSOPHY: Sidney Hooks, Hannah
Arendt (Ernest Nagel)
LITERARY CRITICISM: Lionel Trilling,
Philip Rahv, Alfred Kazin,
Irving Howe, Leslie Fiedler,
Paul Goodman, Lionel Abel, Steven
Marcus, Robert Warshow, Robert
Brustein, Susan Sontag, Diana
Trilling
INTELLECTUAL JOURNALISM: Elliot
Cohen, William Phillips,
Irving Kristol, Robert Silvers,
Norman Podhoretz, Jason Epstein,
Theodore Solataroff, Midge
Decter
THEOLOGY: (Will Herberg) (Emil
Fackenheim) (Jacob Taubes)
(Arthur Cohen)
SOCIOLOGY: Daniel Bell, Nathan
Glazer, S. M. Lipset, (Philip
Selznick)
(Edward Shils) (Lewis Coser)
HISTORY: Richard Hofstadter,
Gertrude Himmelfarb
ECONOMICS: (Robert Heilbroner)
(Robert Lekachman)
Bell further lists eight Jews as the
"Elders of the Family" (1920-1930), with six Gentile afforded "cousins"
status. Bell adds ten more Jews as the Family's "Younger Brothers"
(1930-40) and seven more Gentiles as "cousins." In the "Second
Generation" of the Family (his own group), Bell lists ten new Jews and,
rather noteworthy, the Gentile "cousin" group has dropped to two. The
1940-1950 new "Younger Brothers" category lists ten more Jews and, alas,
we are down to one non-Jewish cousin. [BELL, Intelligentsia, p.
126-127] "These political intellectuals," says Stephen Isaacs, "include
a number of people who have known one another well for many years and
who have been tagged the "College of Irvings" after Irving Kristol (a
professor at New York University and co-editor of the Public Interest
and Irving Howe (a professor at the City College of New York and editor
of Dissent). [ISAACS, p. 53]
However one portrays the best known
American "intellectuals," New York-oriented or not, a huge proportion
invariably came up Jewish. In the 1970s one commentator, Michael Novak,
framed his own Most Important American Intellectuals List like this:
IVY LEAGUE PRAGMATISTS AND
HUMANISTS: Henry Steele
Commager, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
LITERARY MODERNISTS: Lionel
Trilling, Louis Kampf, Irving Howe,
Leslie Fiedler
PLURALISTS: Nathan Glazer,
Daniel Moynihan, David Reisam, Talcott
Parsons, Will Herberg
NEW RADICALS: Noam Chomsky, and
"the New York Review of
Book" gang
CONSERVATIVE LIBERALS: Sidney
Hooks, Norman Podhoretz, Irving
Kristol
EUROPE-ORIENTED HUMANITIES:
Hannah Arendt, Philip Rahv,
George Lichtheim, Saul Bellow
Jack Porter responded to Novak's
Intellectuals List with his own about the subject, specifically focusing
on a compilation of Jewish intellectual "insiders" who "despite their
political differences, agree on two essential points: the survival and
integrity of the Jewish people and the survival and integrity of the
state of Israel. If any intellectual opposes either one of these, he or
she stands outside the Jewish people." [PORTER, p. 38 -39] Porter's
group includes David Brudnoy, Milton Friedman, Meir Kahane, Norman
Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Milton Himmelfarb, Nathan Glazer, Leonard
Fein, I. L. Horowitz, Irving Howe, Arthur Waiskow, Morris U. Schappes,
and Paul Jacobs.
The most notable factor in these last
two lists is that Noam Chomsky, a Jewish professor of linguistics, is
mentioned on the first, and is "left standing outside the Jewish people"
on the second. Chomsky has in fact long since been ostracized and
marginalized by the Jewish "Family" for his attacks against Jewish
chauvinism and Israel. "What sets Chomsky ... apart," notes David
Herman, "is his fierce attack on his fellow intellectuals as a class ...
Instead of producing truth, he argues, they often betray their vocation
and produce amnesia about the past and distortion of the present ...
Intellectuals in the universities, think tanks, and media create a
consensus of public opinion. All criticism is then marginalized by
placing it beyond the pale of informed debate." [HERMAN, p. 39] Not
unusually, an American-born professor at Hebrew University in Jerusalem,
Barry Rubin, cited Chomsky as someone who was "intellectually unbalanced
or psychologically disturbed." [RUBIN, p. 217]
The New York Intellectuals, says
Alexander Bloom, "held out for their personal independence but
maintained their connections ... They moved across the political
landscape together ... occupying the same large area at the same time
... There is no question that these individuals embodied many of the
most important political and social forces of recent years, that they
helped shape what America thought -- in its universities, its leading
journals, and its political debate." [BLOOM, p. 7] "Once journals have
attained positions of eminence," notes Charles Kadushin, "they have
independent power to make or break the prestige of individual
intellectuals. This power is exercised through the clique and star
system, the ability to publish some people and not others, and the
ability to select some ideas and not others. And as will be evident, the
power to support one idea while ignoring or denigrating another gives
one the key to the kingdom of the intellectuals." [KADUSHIN, p. 51]
By the time [Jewish mogul] Punch Sulzberger [inheritor of the
New York Times] occupied his father's chair in 1963," says former
Times Executive Editor Max Frankel,
"American society had shed many of its anti-Semitic prejudices and
permitted
the rapid advancement of Jews in professional life and corporate
suites. The
general revulsion against fascism turned into a revulsion against
bigotry itself,
as demonstrated by the election of the first Catholic president,
John F. Kennedy.
Exploiting this atmosphere, and Gentile guilt
about the Holocaust, American Jews
of my generation were emboldened to make them themselves
culturally conspicuous,
to flaunt their ethnicity, to find literary inspiration in their
roots, and to bask in the
resurrection of Israel." [FRANKEL, M.,
1999, p. 400]
"Jews play a markedly disproportionate role in political
intellectualism in the United States," wrote Stephen Isaacs in 1974,
"Jewish intellectuals tend to stand out because many of them have been
heavily advertised and, having a touch of the tummler, they themselves
are often experts at self-promotion. They thrive not on mass awareness
of their concepts but on the quality of their audience. The Jewish
intellectuals predominate among the editors of the small but influential
intellectual journals..." [ISAACS, p. 53] "Careers like those of
[non-Jew] Margaret Mead, David Riesman, and Daniel Bell," notes David
Hollinger, "indicate the extent to which social scientists replaced the
clergy as the most authoritative public moralists for educated
Americans." [HOLLINGER, p. 23]
"In a time of intoxicating prosperity," wrote Alfred Kazin in 1966
about this profoundly influential Jewish secular pulpit, "it has been
natural for the Jewish writer to see how superficial society can be, how
pretentious, atrocious, unstable -- and comic. Thus, in a secular age
when so many people believe in nothing but society's values, is the
significance of literature of the Jewish writer's being a Jew." [KAZIN,
A., 1966, p. xxv]
"These people are the Diores and
Shiaperillis of intellectual fashion," the novelist George P. Eliot
observed about the Family, "What they think today, you're apt to find
yourself, in a Sears-Roebuck-ish sort of way, thinking tomorrow."
[BLOOM, p. 313] "The literary field in which Jews are without
qualification in the highest rank is that of the essay," wrote Jewish
author Marie Syrkin in 1964,
"be it column or book-length exposition. As social analyst,
political commentator
or literary critic, the American Jewish writer occupies a major
role. In journalism
every shade of political opinion has Jews among its ablest
exponents. The gamut
runs from the conservative Arthur Krock through the less
predictable Walter
Lippman to the liberal Max Lerner on to extreme radical pundits.
In literary criticism
the same variety and excellence are present." [SYRKIN, M., 1964,
p. 231]
The Family took shape around the
journal Partisan Review in the 1930s; they initially expressed a
radical, confrontational and communist posture towards mainstream
non-Jewish American society. The central theme of their communal
identity -- not yet overtly expressed as being Jewish -- was that they
were all outsiders, "alienated," struggling in the margins of mass
culture. Eventually, distinctly as Jews, notes Alexander Bloom, "they
claimed ... an expertise in marginality based on hundreds of years of
experience." [BLOOM, p. 169] "[The Family]," notes Norman Podhoretz,
"did not feel that they belonged to America or that America belonged to
them.' [PODHORETZ, p. 117] "There was something decidedly Jewish about
the intellectuals who began to cohere as a group around the Partisan
Review in the later 30s," notes Family member Irving Howe, "and one
of the things that was 'decidedly Jewish' was that most were of Jewish
birth!" [HOWE, p. 240] (What was/is a common situation for a non-Jew who
sought/seeks to crack the Jewish-dominated publishing world? Take the
case of British novelist George Orwell, of Animal Farm and 1984 fame.
"His first publisher, Victor Gollanz," says Milton Goldin, "was a
Communist who described himself as a Christian socialist and had been
born into an Orthodox Jewish family. Orwell's second publisher, Frederic
Warburg [also Jewish, was] a descendant of the Swedish branch of the
Warburg banking family ... Jewish editors of the Partisan Review
(then located in New York) acquainted a readership across the Atlantic
with Orwell's views. And when Jewish editors at the Book-of-the-Month
Club chose Animal Farm as a club selection, the breakthrough
at last provided him with a decent living.") [GOLDIN, M., 11-29-2000]
"The chic word among the best Jewish
writers today is 'alienation,'" wrote Arthur Hertzberg in 1964, "which
is a way of recognizing the truth that a Jew is irretrievably different.
Writers like Norman Mailer and Leslie Fiedler, and a host of others,
have the merit of seeing this fact continues to exist even where Jewish
learning or active commitment have evaporated. They may not know why,
and they may deny those reasons that they do know, yet these writers
proclaim that the Jew in his very existence is alien to the world ...
the Jew is not becoming like everyone else they say; it is that everyone
worth mentioning is really becoming just like the Jew. There is some
superficial truth to this assertion at a moment in American life when so
much of its literature is being written by Jews." [HERTZBERG, p. 294]
Jewish poet Delmore Schwartz once noted this "alienation which only a
Jew can suffer, and use, as a cripple uses his weakness in order to
beg." [ATLAS, J., 1977, p. 166]
Among the literature promoted and
disseminated by many Family members was the secular Jewish "religion" of
Freudianism. One Partisan Review staffer noted that, "We were all
more or less saturated with psychoanalytic jargon. Psychoanalysis was at
that time very much in the air, and everybody seemed to be in it or
contemplating it." [TORREY] Partisan Review editor William
Phillips edited two books on psychoanalysis as a basis for
socio-cultural perception, Art and Psychoanalysis (1957) and
Literature and Psychoanalysis (1983). Lionel Trilling's influential
volume, The Liberal Imagination, had chapters on "Art and
Neurosis" and "Freud and Literature." Louis Fraiberg wrote in his own
Psychoanalysis and American Literary Criticism that "No other critic
(than Trilling) has shown a comparable grasp of the significance of
psychoanalysis; no other critic has so well incorporated it into his
criticism." [TORREY] "Many Jewish intellectuals," suggests E. Fuller
Torrey, "sought expiation of their guilt and remorse (about the
Holocaust) in psychoanalysis." [TORREY] In 1990 a random survey of New
York psychiatrists, 50 to 80% of local book and literary journal editors
were believed to be veterans of psychoanalysis. [TORREY]
Norman Podhoretz even described the
Family's bitter arguments among themselves in psychoanalytic -- and
Jewish -- terms:
"To be adopted into the Family was
a mark of great distinction ... But
once adopted, you could expect to
be spoken of by many (not all) of
your relatives in the most
terrifyingly cruel terms ... Transposed into a
different key, it was the Jewish
self-hatred that has always been the
other side of the coin of Jewish
self-love." [PODHORETZ, p. 152]
While most of these Great Thinkers,
in the beginning, distanced themselves from issues of their "Jewishness"
(although, notes Irving Howe, "this severance from Jewish immigrant
sources would later come to be a little suspect" [HOWE, p. 241], their
collective path to money, status, and power is manifest in a most
distinctly Jewish way: they were an influential clique, a clan,
initially homogeneous only in that they were all part of the same
mutually promotive network. Over the following decades their radicalism
softened into an assertion of "anti-communist liberalism"; ultimately
individuals spread from there across the political map. Increasingly
however, after World War II, their most pressing common link was a
strong reaffirmation of their Jewish identities, allegiance to Jewish
parochialism, and emphatic support for the state of Israel.
Ironically, history has proven the
Jewish Mafia's essential self-image of being "alienated" and
"marginalized" (later understood by them to be an ancestral reservoir of
special Jewish insights) to become ridiculous. The Family has proven to
be exactly the opposite of what they proclaimed themselves at first to
be. History has revealed them as a group of literary hustlers and
self-promoters who were profoundly influential and centrally located in
deconstructing the institutions of the surrounding non-Jewish culture
they so much despised until they gained entrée to
prestigious empowerment, at which time they vigorously struggled to
affirm the status quo of which they had become so much a
part, save overt adjustments to their new-found "Jewishness," and a
reconstruction of the world in that image.
Family member Harold Rosenberg
explained the way modern Jewry seeks to rationalize Jewish
particularism as being beneficial to American universalism like this:
"Since modern life is so complex
that no man can possess it in its
entirety, the outsider often
finds himself the perfect insider."
[BLOOM, p. 153]
"In addition to their notions of
group marginality," observes Alexander Bloom, "which differs from
individual feelings of aloneness, [the Family] also attempted to carry
their alienation with them to the central position they felt they should
occupy [in American society]." "What began in the 30s," says Richard
Kostelanetz, "as a collection of ambitious young writers became, by the
60s, the most powerful establishment ever seen in literary America, and
they dominated the scene as it had never been dominated before."
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 39] "Upwardly mobile Jews," notes Alan Wald,
"comprised a disproportionate number of intellectuals in all radical
movements in New York in the 1930s. The veterans of the [Jewish-founded
left-wing magazines] New Masses and New Leader were not
qualitatively different in their Jewish composition from those of the
Partisan Review." [WALD, p. 9]
In historical retrospect, it is
obvious that noble intellectual endeavors and enlightenment really were
not the only -- and probably not the fundamental -- driving forces
behind most of the New York Intellectuals. "A strong desire of class was
also buried in the whole dynamic," notes Alexander Bloom, "Only
subsequently did some of the young men come to see how clearly their own
progress was tied to a desire to rise." [BLOOM, p. 27] Norman Podhoretz
called the Jewish Mafia's deepest motivation in their struggles "a dirty
little secret," and he wrote an entire book, Making It, about his
own -- and others -- obsessions with self-promotive hustling and
status-seeking within the Family. "The lust for success," he wrote, "...
had replaced sexual lust ... especially for writers, artists, and
intellectuals, among whom I lived and worked." [BLOOM, p. 360] "After
all," noted Irving Howe, "it had never been dignity that we could claim
as our strong point." [HOWE, p. 265]
(It was also, as noted earlier, a
parallel situation in the largely Jewish left-wing Group Theatre world
in New York City -- many actors, directors, and producers abandoned
their proclaimed purist principles to migrate to Hollywood for wealth
and fame. Even in the folk music world, singer Dave Von Ronk recalls the
climate of some of the socially-minded, anti-materialist, left-wing folk
singers of the 1960s, naming Jewish singers Bob Dylan, Phil Ochs, David
Cohen, and Gentile Eric Anderson: "They wanted to get rich. They were
hungry, scuffling cats looking to grab the brass ring. I felt it, I saw
how hungry they were. They wanted to be honest, but they suddenly
realized they could say what they wanted to say and make a million
dollars. Dylan was a terrible influence ... Bobby always wanted to be a
superstar. When he discovered the reality of being a superstar he
freaked out." [SCADUTO, p. 227]
"Among aggressive young
intellectuals, ghetto-bred and seeking big reputations," said Alfred
Kazin," [Saul] Bellow was making the world's powers resist him ... he
was ambitious and dedicated in a style I had never seen in an urban
Jewish intellectual; he expected the world to come to him. He had
pledged himself a great destiny." [BLOOM, p. 292][
Concerning Norman Mailer, Kazin once
noted that
"I've never known anyone whose
career was always in public and who
constantly put himself forward the
way movie people do so much as
Mailer." [MANSO, p. 274]
"[Jason] Epstein's literary chutzpah
is indeed legendary," says Philip Nobile, "He is possibly the only
editor in the history of publishing who reviewed a book he himself
edited ... and who even edited a book he himself had written." [NOBILE,
p. 91]
"Most of my friends and I were
Jewish," wrote Seymour Krim of his experiences around the Family, "we
were also literary; the combination of the Jewish intellectual tradition
and sensibility needing to be a writer created in my circle the most
potent and incredible intellectual-literary ambition I have ever seen."
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 12]
In 1963, Richard Hofstadter, another
member of the Jewish intellectual Family, decided that "intellectuals"
were an elite class in modern society:
"It is rare for an American
intellectual to confront candidly the
irresolvable conflict between the
elite character of his own class
and his democratic aspiration. The
extreme manifestation of the general
reluctance to face this conflict is
the writer who constantly assaults class
barriers and yet constantly hungers
for special deference."
[HOFSTADTER, p. 408]
The underlying paradoxical paradigm
here, of course, which Hofstadter does not acknowledge, is the standard
Jewish universalist-particularist tension: to dominate the inner
machinations of American culture and society, but be alienated from it;
to be democratic in abstract philosophy in public life, but a
self-anointed elitist in one's personal and confidential worlds; to be a
universalistic American on the outside, and a particularist Jew within.
Hofstadter never mentions Jews in his entire volume about American
"anti-intellectualism"; instead, he sublimates the Jewish dimension to
all this, as exemplified by a quote he selects from Arthur Schlesinger,
Jr.: "Anti-intellectualism has long been the anti-Semitism of the
businessman." [HOFTSTADTER, p. 4]
The great ambitions that encompassed
the Family at-large were ultimately accomplished, causing members to
reflect from time to time upon their phenomenal success and influence in
American society. Citing examples like fellow Family members Clement
Greenberg, Harold Rosenberg, Lionel Trilling, and Alfred Kazin, "there
emerged," wrote Daniel Bell, "a 'cultural elite,' and this was primarily
a 'university culture' ... [but] the notion of elites extended beyond
campus boundaries. Many of the new cultural arbiters have affected not
only serious painters and novelists, but the standards of the larger
public as well." [BLOOM, p. 200] As Irving Horowitz notes, "The Jew at
the start of the century was identified as the pure marginal, the
outsider, the immigrant incapable of integration. As this century draws
to a close the Jew is now identified as the very apotheosis of American
dominant values and culture." [HOROWITZ, I., p. 90]
"The growing complexity of our
society," Lionel Trilling observed about himself and his Family, "had
helped create a new intellectual class, which stood in a new relation
with power. In addition, intellectual life itself took on a new
character, providing the means of social mobility and social ascent ...
[BLOOM, p. 206] ... The needs of society have brought to the top of the
social hierarchy a large class of people of considerable force and
complexity of mind. Intellect has associated itself with power as
perhaps never before in history, and is now conceded to be itself a kind
of power." [BLOOM, p. 200]
"The most pervasive event in American
letters over the last ten years," joined in Clement Greenberg in the
Partisan Review, "is the stabilization of the avant-garde,
accompanied by its growing acceptance by official and commercial
culture." [BLOOM, p. 297] Among those disturbed with this trend of
largely Jewish intellectual status and reward seeking was sociologist C.
Wright Mills, a non-Jew, and author of critical attacks of American
society called The Power Elite and White Collar. Despite
his proximity, as a professor at Columbia University, to the New York
Family, he was not part of it. Russell Jacoby notes that
"where Trilling celebrated
cultural progress, Mills bemoaned decline,
the degeneration of political
discourse into slogans and toothpaste
commercials ... [Mills argued
in 1955 that] when a stringent
opposition [to social and
governmental norms] had disappeared,
intellectuals embrace a 'new
conservative gentility.' Instead of
criticizing the mediocrity and
mindlessness, they savor their new
status, instead of acting as
'the moral conscience of society,' they
confound prosperity with
advancing culture. Mills named Trilling
as one of the intellectuals
succumbing to this confusion ... From the
end of the war until his
death, he railed against intellectuals who
traded ethics and vision for
salaries and status." [JACOBY, p. 79]
"[As] radical intellectuals," says
Alexander Bloom, "the New Yorkers had once felt that their best hope of
access to intellectual prominence and authority lay with a
reconstructing of society. In the postwar years, they found the very
society which they once scorned, and which had once scorned them, much
more hospitable. They discovered a 'place' and a 'role' for themselves
in it." [BLOOM] "We are witnessing a process that might well be
described as the embourgeoisment of the American intelligentsia," Philip
Rahv observed, "This change, coupled with the new liberal policies,
accounts for the fact that the idea of socialism ... has virtually
ceased to figure in current intellectual discussion." [BLOOM, p. 201]
"Instead of standing in opposition to the prevailing cultural flow--
mass, popular, middle-brow," notes Bloom, "highbrow thought and an
avant-garde orientation now molded society." [BLOOM, p. 298]
Indeed, in their earlier years, many
of the Family were communist activists, their later worldview adjusted
to success and the comforts of capitalism. "In light of the
neo-conservative self-portrait being created by many of the New York
intellectuals," noted Alan Wald in 1987, "one is tempted to conclude
that they have a stake in perpetuating an amnesia that avoids a
forthright disclosure of their previous political history as
revolutionary but anti-Stalinist Marxists." [WALD, p. 8-9]
The much-published ideas and
arguments of the New York Intellectuals and their rise to status and
power took them into university classrooms everywhere and even the very
seat of government power in Washington DC. "Intellectuals established
intimate connections with government as never before," says Bloom, "Some
took jobs in Washington ... While most did not take employment, they
nonetheless felt the connection." "President Kennedy began to flatter
the intellectual," Midge Decter recalled, "which is to say he invited
them to his house for supper." [BLOOM, p. 324] "We became a touch of
minor royalty," says Norman Mailer. [BLOOM, p. 324] "All of us in the
family," says Norman Podhoretz, "were even friendly with members of the
White House staff; they read our magazines and the pieces and books we
ourselves wrote, and they cared -- it is even said that the President
[Kennedy] himself cared -- about what we thought." [PODHORETZ, 1967, p.
312]
Alan Wald notes that:
"The skills and experience [the New
York intellectuals] had acquired
as polemicists and ideologists
during their radical years, and
especially as authorities on
communism with an insider's knowledge,
enabled them to move rapidly into
seats of cultural power in the
1950s. In more recent decades, some
even came to have access to
national power. Irving Kristol, for
example, became an intellectual
consultant to the Nixon
administration, Nathan Glazer's work was
much admired by the Reagan
administration, and neoconservative
articles in Commentary
magazine influenced White House policy
in the 1980s." [WALD, p. 8]
As Jewish commentator Earl Shorris noted in 1982 about these
once-Leftist, now influential "neoconservative," individuals:
"The neoconservative Jews [Shorris notes, as examples, Norman
Podhoretz,
Daniel Bell, Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, Midge Decter, and
Sidney Hook]
have not codified their views. They are still best identified by
the half dozen
middle-aged former leftists who led the garrulous conversions [to
the political
right] ... [T]hey enjoy money as Norman Podhoretz has so loudly
said. They are
unashamedly ambitious, almost greedy. They do not
know or wish to know the
risks of daily life in the world of business; they are more
comfortable in the
role of consultant, advising others on which risks to take."
[SHORRIS, E., 1982,
p. 10]
Even those intellectuals without
university degrees sooner or later gravitated to teaching positions at
universities. Irving Howe, Alfred Kazin, and William Phillips found
positions without PhDs; Philip Rahv even became a professor without a
Bachelor's degree. At Columbia, Nathan Glazer and Daniel Bell (who also
became an editor at Fortune) were deeded PhDs for "research
already published." [BLOOM, p. 311]
"Once intellectuals had come in from
the cold and established connections with power," says Alexander Bloom,
"it became clear that their intellectual endeavors no longer represented
opposition to the prevailing ethos. They were 'chic' because they were
'in' -- they had achieved what they had long ago set out to achieve."
[BLOOM, p. 325] "Where young writers once faced the world together,"
wrote Irving Howe, "they now sink into suburbs, country homes and
college towns ... They not only lose their traditional rebelliousness
but to one extent or another they cease to function as
intellectuals." [original author's emphasis: JACOBY, p.
82]
The Family -- most of them former
communists of various brands -- became so entrenched in the mainstream
corridors of power and influence that a number of them even ended up
having the covert backing of the CIA. During the height of the
post-World War II anti-communist hysteria in America, many Family
members joined an organization called the American Committee of Cultural
Freedom. "Anticommunism became its only prerequisite," says Alexander
Bloom, ".... New York Intellectuals ... provided the solid center of the
organization and filled many positions." [BLOOM, p. 264]
Diana Trilling remembers that
"Even before I came onto the
Executive Board of the American
Committee, I was aware, and it was
clear impression that everybody
else on the Board was also in some
measure aware, that the institutional
body with which we were associated
was probably funded by the
government ... We strongly suspected
that the Fairfield Foundation,
which we were told supported the
Congress, was a filter for the State
Department or CIA money." [BLOOM, p.
264]
The ACCF's parent organization even
funded a British-based "intellectual" journal, Encounter, edited
by Irving Kristol and Stephen Spender. A later editor, Melvin Lasky, is
generally presumed to have been the CIA agent-editor publicly alluded to
by a former CIA-employee. [BLOOM, p. 267]
Throughout the rise to prominence,
status, and power, the incestuous, connections-laden, interlocking of
the New York Intellectual clique ran deep in mutual self-promotion.
"What might seem the result of a 'conspiracy,'" notes Richard
Kostelanetz, "[is] actually caused by a confluence of attitudes,
historical precedents, and initially independent discriminations, all of
which combine to function with a conspiratorial effectiveness ... It is
de facto censorship [of non-Family writers]. [KOSTELANETZ,
p. xvii]
"Intellectuals and publishers," notes
E. Fuller Torrey, "... are often related or familiar with each other
through marriage or shared consorts, recommend and review each others
work and pass promising manuscripts around for publication ... The New
York intellectual community and the publishing industry are essentially
two parts of a single whole." [TORREY]
Midge Decter, for example, the
secretary of the first editor of Commentary (Elliot Cohen),
became the wife of the second editor of that journal, Norman Podhoretz.
She also worked for the Saturday Review and eventually rose to
become an executive editor at Harper's where Norman Mailer became
a featured contributor and Irving Howe a regular contributor.
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 101] John Podhoretz, son of Norman, attained jobs at
the Washington Times and George Bush's White House before
settling in as a television critic for the New York Post. By
1998 he was the paper's Editorial Page Editor. Podhoretz's daughter,
Ruthie Bloom, moved to Israel and became a regular columnist for the
Jerusalem Post. Podhoretz's wife -- the aforementioned Midge Decter
-- has a daughter by another marriage who married Elliot Abrams, an
adviser on Latin America in Ronald Reagan's State Department. [TWERSKY,
p. 45]
"Family" members Lionel and Diana
Trilling were married. Alfred Kazin remarked in 1976 that he didn't like
fellow Family member Daniel Bell (co-editor of Public Interest),
"even though he is my brother-in-law." Irving Kristol, another co-editor
of Public Interest (and the editor-in-chief at Basic Books) was
the brother-in-law of Milton Himmelfarb, a Contributing Editor for
Commentary and also co-editor of the Jewish Yearbook."
[BLOOM, p. 278] Lionel Trilling's former students included Jason
Epstein, who at Doubleday published Trilling's The Liberal
Imagination. Trilling also selected the book titles for the Reader's
Subscription and the Mid-Century Book Society, each organization managed
by former Trilling students, Gilman Kraft and Sol Stein, respectively.
[KRUPNICK, p. 102] Likewise, "the writers from Partisan Review
now came to dominate the New Yorker," Daniel Bell once asserted
to Midge Decter, Partisan Review was getting to be like a farm
team for the New Yorker." [BLOOM, p. 311]
The self-promotion and clannishness
are clearly reflected elsewhere in the interconnectedness of those
selected in Family journals for publication. Elliot Cohen, the first
editor of Commentary, brought on board Clement Greenberg and
Nathan Glazer as editorial assistants and Sidney Hooks as a contributing
editor. Irving Kristol and Robert Warshow later joined the staff. By
the end of the first year, Harold Rosenberg, Paul Goodman, Alfred Kazin,
Hannah Arendt, Saul Bellow, Robert Warshow, Sidney Hooks, Isaac
Rosenfeld, Daniel Bell, Diana Trilling, Irving Howe, Philip Rahv, and
Clement Greenberg had articles or reviews in Commentary. [BLOOM,
p. 160]
"Just as Willie Morris [a rare
non-Jewish member of the Family]," says Richard Kostelanetz, "assuming
the chief editorship of Harper's, prepublished sections of Norman
Podhoretz's Making It, so did Podhoretz feature sections of
Morris' North Towards Home in (Podhoretz's) Commentary."
The kind of interrelated media
circles Norman Mailer traveled in, for example, include -- aside from
the central New York Intellectual luminaries -- the following people who
were solicited for stories for a book of oral histories about his life
(Mailer himself was a co-founder of the Village Voice with Jerry
Talmer, Ed Fancher, and Dan Wolf):
* Bernard Farber -- fiction editor at
the Saturday Evening Post, later senior
editor at Trident Press,
Simon and Schuster, and then CBS
Legacy
Books. He also served as Vice-President of Mailer's film
company, Supreme Mix.
* Benjamin DeMott - columnist for
Harper's and The Atlantic, a
contributing editor to the
Saturday Review.
* Judy Feiffer - Senior Editor at
William Morrow, Vice-President of East
Coast Productions, Orion
Pictures.
* Jules Feiffer - cartoonist at the
Village Voice.
* Henry Geldzahler -- former curator of
twentieth century art at the
Metropolitan Museum of Art.
* Allen Ginsberg -- Beat Poet.
* Lionel Hellman -- screenwriter,
playwright.
* Lionel Abel -- "longtime contributor
to Commentary, Dissent, Partisan
Review
* Leo Lerman -- features editor at
Mademoiselle, Vogue, editor in chief at
Vanity Fair.
* Max Lerner - an editor at the
Nation, columnist for the New York Post
and Los Angeles Times
syndicate.
* Max Linenthal -- Director of the
Poetry Center at San Francisco State
University.
* Adeline Naiman -- Editor at Little,
Brown.
* Sol Stein -- one of ten founding
members of the Playwright Group of
the Actors Studio.
* Al Wasserman -- producer, director,
and writer for NBC News. Married
to Mailer's sister.
In 1996 a Mailer quote was used on
the back cover of friend Lawrence Schiller's book about the O.J. Simpson
trial. "I couldn't stop reading American Tragedy," he said. "My
old friend and colleague Larry Schiller has come up with a book that is
impossible to put down." [SCHILLER, 1996] Mailer had good reason to be
so engrossed in the accusation that Simpson murdered his wife with a
knife. Mailer had once stabbed his own wife, Adele, in the upper abdomen
and back, sending her to the hospital. "One of the wounds was near the
heart," notes biographer Carl Rollyson, "and the cardiac sac had been
punctured." Within a week of the assault, "Mailer appeared on the Mike
Wallace television show. He announced his intention to run for the mayor
of New York City." [ROLLYSON, p. 137, 138] In an obvious reflection
upon the violent incident, one of his 1962 published poems, entitled
Rainy Afternoon with the Wife (in a volume he called Deaths for
the Ladies) stated that
"So
long/as/you/use/a/knife/there's/some/love/left." [ROLLYSON, p. 141]
Some of Mailer's other associations
were -- in view of his public image as a "liberal" -- peculiar. Roy Cohn
-- a driving force behind right-wing McCarthy anti-communist witch hunts
in the 1950s -- helped negotiate a lucrative writing deal between Mailer
and the continually morally dubious Newhouse (Advance) media empire;
Mailer was initially commissioned on projects for Parade
magazine and Random House. Mailer even rented a cottage to Cohn
next to Mailer's own summer home. "Newhouse's overtures to Norman
Mailer, made through Roy Cohn," says Thomas Maier, "would pay [Mailer]
sizeable fees and commissions, throughout the decade of the 1980s and
well into the 1990s, with some of the most lucrative deals ever seen by
an American novelist .... By the early 1990s, Mailer was listed on
[Newhouse's] Vanity Fair masthead as writer-at-large." [MAIER, p.
108-109]
Seizing the opportunity of the New
York city newspaper strike in 1963, Jason Epstein, a Vice President at
Random House, and editor of Viking Books, was instrumental in setting
up the New York Review of Books (which extended its own
mini-empire by purchasing the Kirkus Reviews book reviewing
periodical from Maurice Friedman in 1971). Robert Silvers (formerly at
Harper's and the Paris Review) and Epstein's wife,
Barbara, were installed as editors. [BLOOM, p. 326] "In the second year
of the Review," says Alexander Bloom, "Harold Rosenberrg, Diana
Trilling, and Midge Decter contributed; Daniel Bell and Norman Podhoretz
did so in the third. The degree to which the New York Review
swept the field of contemporary writers and critics led Richard
Hoftstadter to refer to it jokingly as "the New York Review of Each
Others Books." [BLOOM, p. 329] Philip Noble, who chronicled the
Review's early history, characterized the era as prey to 'nepotism,
fratricide, and incest, and even a dose of narcissism. Establishment
liberals were reviewing one another wholesale." [NOBILE, p. 29]
As Jewish scholars Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter noted:
"The New York Review of Books was edited by Robert Silvers
and Barbara
Epstein, and the bulk of its political contributions (especially
articles on
American politics) in the mid-1960s was written by Jews. By and
large
then, as Tom Wolfe has pointed out, 'radical chic' in New York was
a
heavily Jewish phenomenon, and the influence of such people spread
well beyond their own circle." [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 105]
"In the course of the New York
Review's rise," notes Bloom, "two of its prime movers joined the
upper ranks of the New York Intellectual world. Robert Silvers ...
climbed slowly up the intellectual social ladder. Jason Epstein sprang
to the top ... Epstein had helped created the paperback revolution at
Doubleday ... Epstein wore his ambition ... openly." "Jason has the
mind of a scholar but the instincts of a pushcart peddler," recalled a
former colleague at Doubleday. Dwight MacDonald called him "a caricature
of a New York intellectual; a nineteenth century entrepreneur, a robber
baron, only his market is not copper, but intellectuals." [BLOOM, p.
327]
"There is no such thing as a New
York Intellectual establishment," Epstein said to those not part of the
Family, "it just looks that way." [KOSTELANETZ, p. 61] "It is
fashionable," wrote Victor Navasky, editor of Nation (of whom
Diana Trilling once worked as a literary editor), "for the New York
Intellectuals to not only deny its existence but, as a corollary, to
deny its influence." [KOSTELANETZ, p. 79]
As the New York Jewish Mafia built
a foundation of interconnectedness and self-promotive power, "the Upper
West Side, Wellfleet, and Martha's Vineyard now replaced City College
and the Village as centers of their social whirl," says Alexander Bloom,
"They all still attended each others parties, still gossiped to one
another ... [BLOOM, p. 277] ... They remained vitally aware of one
another, even as they expressed their criticism [of each other] in
extremely harsh terms. Like prizefighters in a traveling carnival, they
might be combatants but they remained part of the same show." [BLOOM, p.
279]
Allen Ginsberg, the famous
Jewish-born Beat poet, remembers Norman Podhoretz coming up to him at a
party and offering him entrée into the Jewish Mafia:
"Ginsberg, [said Podhoretz] you
really have some talent and I realize
that you're an intelligent writer
and really gifted. You could have a career
in New York, be part of the larger
scene with us if you'd only get rid of
those friends of yours like
[non-Jews William] Burroughs and [Jack]
Kerouac. You have much better
taste than they. Why aren't you
working with us instead of those
people that are so nowhere? .... I
remember the incident as an
ephiphanous moment in my relation with
Podhoretz and what he was -- part
of a large right-wing proto-police
surveillance movement .... The
Beat group was more or less
based on Vachel Lindsay, Whitman,
populism, and individualism."
[MANSO, p. 314]
Barry Gilford and Lawrence Lee, in an "oral biography" of Jack
Kerouac, note beatnik resistant to conventions of the New York/Jewish
Freudian literary world:
"Kerouac appears never to have considered turning to psychiatry for
insights
or comfort, and Allen's [Allen Ginsberg] rejection of
psychiatry with the aid
of the analyst who recognized the value of Ginsberg's
dissatisfaction was a
turning point in Allen's creative life. But for many Villagers and
other New
Yorkers of the 1950's, analysis was a secular religion which set
forth the
prospect of salvation through personal
accommodations to a world
which
established a definition of sanity through normative behavior.
Thus, for
many, a simple refusal to adjust to the psychoanalytic view of the
world
as it was became a charged act of rebellion." [GILFORD/LEE, 1994,
p. 174]
Upon a visit to New York City, the
novelist George P. Eliot observed that
"What strikes me, as a visitor, ever
more strangely than the intensity with
which these Jews attack and praise
each other, is the attention they pay
to each other." [KOSTELANETZ, p.
25]
Whether hugging or warring, says
Norman Podhoretz, the Family was "preoccupied with each other to the
point of obsession." [PODHORETZ, p. 110]
The novelist Theodore Dreiser
(1871-1945) believed a Jewish-inspired plot was amuck to suppress his
work for his crime of writing critically about the Jewish community. "He
suspected," writes A. A. Swanberg, "that Arthur Pell, head of the
Liveright firm, and Simon and Schuster, were parties to the
plot ... [To a friend] he wrote: Get me the names of a number of fairly
recently organized non-Jewish publishers ... Can you tell me whether
W. W. Norton or anyone connected with his organization in a
financial control sense is Jewish?" [GOULD]
Alas, Dreiser was securely
marginalized by the American literary-cultural establishment by the
early 1960s. "The decline of Dreiser's reputation," notes Irving Howe,
"has not been an isolated event. It has occurred in the context, and is
surely a consequence, of the counterrevolution in American culture
during the forties and fifties ... Dreiser became a symbol of everything
a superior intelligence was supposed to avoid ... He represented the
boorishness of the populist mentality, as it declined into
anti-Semitism." [HOWE, p. 168]
Likewise, notes Ann Douglas,
prominent Beat author Jack Kerouac eventually became "ever more
paranoid," thinking that "the New York Jewish critics were plotting
against him; he joked bitterly about titling Big Sur (1962),
'Another idea for the Jews to Steal.'" [DOUGLAS, A., 19-99] In 2001, Jim
Irsay (whose father's original name was Robert Israel), owner of a
professional football team, bought Kerouac's original manuscript for
On the Road, at auction, for $2.2 million dollars. (Jewish
author Franz Kafka's The Trial had "held the previous record for
an original manuscript sold at auction.") [HERMAN, J., 5-22-01]
"[There is] a Jewish Mafia in
American letters ..., "said popular writer Truman Capote, risking
censure and the inevitable charge of anti-Semitism in 1973, "There is a
clique of New York-oriented writers and critics who control much of the
literary scene through the influence of the quarterlies and intellectual
magazines ... All these publications are Jewish-dominated and this
particular coterie employs them to make or break writers by advancing or
withholding attention ... Bernard Malamud, Saul Bellow, and Philip Roth,
and Isaac Bashevis Singer are all fine writers, but they are not the
only writers in the country as the Jewish Mafia would have us
believe." [FORSTER, p. 109]
The Partisan Review crowd, for
instance, is generally acknowledged to have "made" Saul Bellow. "From
the first," says Alexander Bloom, "Bellow established a recognizable
and, ultimately, uneasy relationship with the New York Intellectuals, as
friends and patrons. Yet he has resisted any notion that they made him
famous." But, says Leslie Fiedler, "[Bellow] really owed a big debt to
them, because they did help introduce him to the world. Rahv thought of
him as one of their boys." [BLOOM, p. 291]
Early in his career, from 1941-1951,
Bellow published six short stories and two novels; five of the short
stories first appeared in Partisan Review. [BLOOM, p. 291] His
second novel, was reviewed in Partisan Review by Family member
Delmore Schwartz and favorably compared with Mark Twain's Huckleberry
Finn, Henry James, and Walt Whitman. "Bellow's success," says Alexander
Bloom, "was more than just personal. whether or not he was 'made' by the
Partisan writers is less significant than the degree to which
his success and the history of the achievement of the New York
Intellectuals in general intertwined ... Lionel Trilling ... made it
clear that a Jew could be a great literary critic; Meyer Schapiro, a
great art historian; and Saul Bellow a great American novelist." [BLOOM,
p. 293]
"Bellow," said Norman Podhoretz, "was
the Family's White Hope, as it were, in fiction." [BLOOM, p. 291]
"Bellow was their novelist," observes Alexander Bloom, "because
he wrote about them, sometimes literally, but more often socially and
culturally." [BLOOM, p. 293]
"What makes Bellow's work so
unusual," decided Alfred Kazin in 1959, "is the fact that his characters
are all burdened by a speculative quest, a need to understand their
particular destiny." [BLOOM, p. 295] In the 1960s, Leslie Fiedler
proclaimed Bellow to be "America's most important living novelist."
[BLOOM, p. 292] Earlier he had declared that of all the contemporary
novelists, Bellow "was the one we need most to understand, if we are to
understand what we are doing at the present moment." [BLOOM, p. 292]
"It is said," wrote Edgar Siskind in
1978, "that more PhD dissertations have been and are being written on
Bellow than any other contemporary writer. No aspect of his work has
been more fiercely analyzed than the question of its Jewish component."
[SISKIN, p. 90]
"Complementing Bellow's individual
success," notes Alexander Bloom, "was his preeminence in what has been
called the emergence of Jewish-American literature in postwar years ...
What is striking about the writers included in this literary category is
the degree to which they all had close connections with the New York
Intellectuals." [BLOOM, p. 295] Such authors include a vast field,
including most of the Jewish names in this chapter. Many of Bernard
Malmud's stories, for example, first appeared in the Partisan Review
and Commentary. Norman Mailer often had pieces published in
Dissent in the 1950s. [BLOOM, p. 296-297] Paul Goodman's book,
Growing Up Absurd, turned down by nineteen publishers, was promoted
by Norman Podhoretz, and serialized in his Commentary. Podhoretz
also persuaded Jason Epstein at Random House to publish it, even though
his firm had already rejected the manuscript. [BLOOM, p. 322]
Commentary also serialized the diary of Ann Frank, as we have seen
earlier, one of the first popular books about the later so-called
Holocaust, bringing the subject to public eye.
"I cannot prove a connection," wrote
Irving Howe, "between the holocaust and the turn to Jewish themes in
American fiction, at first urgent and quizzical, later fashionable and
manipulative ... but it would be foolish to scant the possibility."
[HOWE, p. 265]
"The larger questions of Jewish
existence," notes Alexander Bloom, "as well as the narrower ones of
Jewish intellectuals -- the themes mined by Saul Bellow -- became the
material for a growing literary oeuvre." [BLOOM, p. 297]
By 1975, this "literary oeuvre" had
sparked Jewish critic George Steiner to proclaim
"It is commonplace that recent
American fiction and criticism have to a
a drastic extent been the product
of Jewish tone and explosion of
talent." [MADISON, C., p. 271]
Russell Jacoby had another take on
this Jewish "explosion of talent":
"By quality alone, it is simply not
possible to distinguish the oeuvre of
New York intellectuals from that of
non-New Yorkers. Essay by essay,
book by book, the collective work
of New York intellectuals is neither
so brilliant nor so scintillating
that all else pales. It is almost more
feasible to reverse the common
opinion: the significant books of the
fifties were authored by non-New
Yorkers ... New York intellectuals
received the lion's share of
attention less by reason of genius than by ...
their New York location and their
personal and physical proximity to the
publishing industry. In addition,
their tireless monitoring of themselves
lays the groundwork for further
studies (and myths). For those padded
cultural histories with reports on
what writer X said to editor Y
at Z's party, the New York scene is
a mother lode ... [JACOBY, p. 102]
... New York intellectuals
specialize in the self; theirs is the home of
psychoanalysis, the personal essay,
the letter to the editor." [JACOBY,
p. 103]
As one unnamed "intellectual"
responded to Charles Kadushin's study of American intellectuals, "Power
is in the circles around Commentary, Dissent, the New
York Review of Books, and Partisan. Ninety-nine percent of
what goes on in these circles is bullshit." [KADUSHIN, p. 52]
Norman Podhoretz noted the crucial
importance of hustling and politicking to further one's career in the
Literary In-Crowd, and the desperate Status Chase of it all:
"Did so-and-so have dinner at
Jacqueline Kennedy's last night? Up five
points. Was so-and-so not invited to
the Lowell's to meet the latest
visiting poet? Down one-eighth. Did
so-and-so's book get nominated for
the National Book Award? Up two and
five-eighths. Did Partisan Review
neglect to ask so-and-so to
participate in a symposium? Down two."
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 129]
This "explosion of talent" within the
Jewish Mafia's self-promotive web has been profoundly successful. As
example, of all the thousands of talented writers in America, "for
several years in succession," wrote Charles Angoff and Meyer Levin in
1970, "Jewish authors won the National Book award with works about Jews.
Jewish novels headed the bestseller list." [ANGOFF/LEVIN, p. 13] "[The
New York] mob writers," complained Richard Kostelanetz in 1974, "usually
sit on the selection juries of the National Book Award ... and win these
awards regularly (Bellow getting an unparalleled three)." [KOSTELANETZ,
p. 124] Among the National Book Award winners, twelve years later Family
member Irving Howe even took the prize with his nostalgic look at early
Jewish America, World of Our Fathers. National Book Award winner
for fiction in 2000? Jewish author Susan Sontag.
Likewise, in the Nobel Prize for
Literature world, Jewish author Elias Canetti won the award in 1981,
notes the (Jewish) Forward, "shortly after Saul Bellow and Isaac
Bashevis Singer, in a sequence that some anti-Semites in the Hispanic
world shamelessly called 'Stockholm's Jewish triumvirate." [STAVANS,
1999, p. 1] In 1987, Jewish writer Joseph Brodsky also took the Nobel
prize.
In 1994, Jewish author Lois Lowry won
for the second time the American Library Association's Newberry Medal
for books for young adults. She had won the award in 1990 for Number
the Stars, "the stirring tale of the Danish people's heroic efforts
to protect their Jewish population from the fate that befell their
brothers and sisters in the rest of Europe." [HOFFMAN, M., 4-10-94, p.
23]
"We live in a moment where everywhere
in the realm of prose Jewish writers have discovered their Jewishness to
be eminently a marketable commodity," wrote Jewish author Charles
Madison in 1976, "the much vaunted alienation to be their passport into
the heart of Gentile American culture." [MADISON, C., p. 272] "Everyone
is by now aware," noted Robert Alter in 1965, "of the fact that literary
Jewishness has become a distinct commercial asset." [KOSTELANETZ, p.
13] "The new atmosphere has created a phenomenon which is especially
evident in intellectual circles and on college campuses," noted James
Jaffe in 1968, "Jewishness is now acceptable, sometimes even
fashionable. At the opera and other important cultural battlegrounds in
New York, socially prestigious women are constantly seen with Jewish
escorts ... Yiddish words pepper the speech of television personalities
from Jerry Lewis, who is Jewish, to Johnny Carson, who isn't." [JAFFE,
J., 1968, p. 45]
Pop singer Linda Ronstadt read Herman
Wouk's Marjorie Morningstar (first published in 1955) as a
teenager: "It screwed me up about love and romance and everything. But I
loved it then, and it made me wish I was Jewish." [WHITFIELD, AMERICAN,
p. 12] Marilyn Monroe once expressed an affinity for the Jewish world
that surrounded her in Hollywood, saying,, "It's like the Jews are the
orphans of the world. Maybe that's why I feel so close to them."
[STRASBERG, S., p. 56] Upon marrying Jewish playwright Arthur Miller,
she declared that "if I have kids, I think they should be Jewish.
Anyway, I can identify with the Jews. Everybody's always out to get
them, no matter what they do, like me." [STRASBERG, p. 112] As Susan
Strasberg notes, "Over the next year she'd pepper her conversations with
Jewish expressions as if reaffirming her conversion [to Judaism]. 'Hi
Bubuleh, oy vay, what tsures.'" [STRASBERG, p. 112]
A Jewish friend of Elvis Presley,
Larry Geller, even "introduced Elvis to new ways of thinking about
Judaism ... Both he and Marty [Lacker, another Jewish friend] claimed
credit for encouraging Elvis' decision that Christmas to have a new
headstone placed on [Elvis' mother's] grave -- with a Jewish star on one
side, a cross on the other." [GURALNICK, p. 190] (Elvis' world of Jews
included music agents, movie directors, his Beverly Hills dentist Max
Shapiro, and the South African doctor (later exposed as a fraud) Laurenz
Johannes Griessel Landau who, while treating Elvis for acne, made a
homosexual pass at him. [GURALNCK, p. 47, 620]
"The mostly Jewish New York
intellectuals and their magazines -- Partisan Review,
Commentary, Dissent, New York Review of Books,
Public Interest -- have assumed an almost mythic position among
American intellectuals," says Edward Shapiro, "Thus, Elizabeth Hardwick
once noted that she had left Kentucky to become a New York Jewish
intellectual (her conversion took place in the office of the New York
Review of Books). Hardwick was not alone in assuming mistakenly that
to be a New York intellectual (or any intellectual) one had to be
Jewish. Victor Navasky [also Jewish] editor of the Nation, jested
in 1966 that 'rumors to the contrary notwithstanding, you don't have to
be Jewish to be an intellectual.'" [SHAPIRO, Sidney, p. 153]
The commercial pluses to being Jewish
(and its attendant homage as eternal victims) in a Jewish-controlled
environment were obvious. Even Gentile writers like Robert Lowell and
Mary McCarthy stretched back to claim distant Jewish blood in their
family trees. [KOSTELANETZ, p. 28] "The exotic appeal that ethnicity
offered to the participants in mass culture," says Stephen Whitfield,
"has sometimes even seemed to put the dominant group on the defensive.
Nelson Rockefeller found it advantageous to ventilate hints of his
admittedly distant Jewish ancestry. Caroline Kennedy marched down the
aisle of a church [with a Jew]; a character in the film Pete 'n Tillie
(1972) emphasized his one-fourth Jewish ancestry because, 'I'm a social
climber.'" [WHITFIELD, American, p. 11]
African-American radio personality Howard Lester, once emphatically
decried as an anti-Semite by New York Jews (even threatened and
physically assailed by Jewish protest rallies), eventually decided that,
considering the fact that he had a great-grandfather who was Jewish, he
would convert to Judaism. A key influence in his decision was all the
information he was hearing about Jews in the Holocaust; it is the key
entree to empathy for Jews for many: the Jewish victim paradigm. "The
more I read [about the Holocaust]," Lester wrote, "the greater my
numbness at the horror, the greater my numbness as I read of Jews
affirming God even in the midst of their own negation." [LESTER, H., p.
122] One day Lester wakes ups "and my lips are moving. I listen. I am
trying to say 'Sh'ma Yisrael Adonai Elohenu Adonat Ehad' [Hear O
Israel. The Lord our God the Lord is One]. At night those words resound
in me and when I awake, they are the first words I hear from my lips"
[LESTER, H., p. 123] ... I have lived these past nine months amidst the
ashes of the crypt in heaven. Auschwitz and Treblinka are part of my
daily pain. The spirits of murdered Jewish children shoot marbles with
me in the dirt of a parsonage yard." [LESTER, H., p. 133]
Alfred Kazin noted the Jewish take-over of American literature,
in 1966:
"Definitely, it was now the thing to be Jewish. But in Western
universities and small towns many a traditional novelist and professor
of English felt out of it, and asked, with varying degrees of
self-control, if there was no longer a good novel to be written about
the frontier, about Main Street, about the good that was in marriage?
Was it possible, these critics wondered aloud, that American life had
become so de-regionalized and lacking in local color that the big power
units and the big cities had pre-empted the American scene, along with
the supple Jewish intellectuals who were at home with them? Was it
possible that Norman Mailer had become the representative American
novelist? It was entirely possible, and certainly the thought would not
have astonished Mailer, just as the power of his example for other
novelists did not astonish Saul Bellow." [KAZIN, A., 1966, p.
xxiv]
In 1998, Ross Wetzsteon, a Montana-born WASP (who made the
pilgrimage to New York City), wrote an extraordinarily definitive
explication of WASP-self hate, and his cravings to be a Jew, in a
Village Voice (Jewish-owned and edited) article. The strange product
of Freud's Judeocentric psychotherapy, a journalism career dominated by
Jews, alienation from the norms of American popular culture, long-term
romantic relationships with ONLY Jewish women, and estrangement from his
own family lead him to the rescuing lifejacket of Jews. Wetzsteon
embraces all Jewish-enforced stereotypes of the Jew: Jewish moral
superiority, Jews as eternal victims, Jewish powerlessness,
Jewish bluntness and vulgarity as a form of liberation, and Jews as
being more intellectually interesting. What one begins to recognize at
core here is a kind of ideological indoctrination process, in
Wetzsteon's case deeply rooted in his psychotherapy sessions. Wetzsteon
below maps his metamorphosis into his configuration as an 'honorary'
Jew:
"Everyone always assumes I'm Jewish ... So why do people think I'm
Jewish? My
name? My profession? But more interesting than why I pass for
Jewish is why it
pleases me so ... I was immediately drawn to the Jews because they
seemed so
attractive and because the WASPs seemed so repellent. It was at
this time, in
one of the most painful choices of my life, that I decided to
become a scholar
rather than play centerfield for the Yankees ... It became clear
... that the Jews
represented ... an acceptable rebellion, in that they embodied both
a rejection
of unfulfilling values and a repository of honorable new ones ...
Jews were
both homeless and universal, which appeals to a mind enamored of
'disengaged' sensibilities. And, since most of the Jews I knew were
leftists
... [there was] radicalism as the Jewish version of juvenile
delinquency ...
What Jews seemed to be saying was, 'In our powerlessness, we have a
superior moral heritage' -- an appealing conceit for a teenage
intellectual
who faced the dilemma of being at the center of his culture while
feeling both socially ill at ease and psychologically estranged ...
I came to
to see WASP life as a rigid, deceitful facade that had to be
penetrated if
one cared at all about what was real. Self-control, self-restraint,
self-
effacement were the pious names given to what were really decorous
lies ... [I had] a yearning affection for what I perceived as
'Jewish
openness' ... So-called Jewish vulgarity, in short, became a kind
of
intellectual and moral critique of WASP mentality ... I'll never
forget how
much my therapy had to do with my pleasure. For me, therapy was
primarily a means of liberating inner vulgarity, of releasing a
kind of
pushiness and ostentation in my psychic life -- it was a way of
discovering that the things I valued most were radically opposed
to the WASP ideals that I internalized ... The important point is
that it was quite clear to me that the Jew and the psychotherapist
joined forces in the abolition of WASP hypocrisy, WASP decorum,
and WASP censorship. I even came to see a parallel -- while
obviously aware of the disparities -- between Jewish social
liberation and my own psychological liberation. My ghetto was
my head, my assimilation was through therapy ... I've always been
attracted to Jewish women -- in fact, every long relationship I've
ever had, including my marriage, was with a Jewish woman ...
I regard myself as an 'honorary Jew ... [But] I realized .. that
by seeking my identity in Jews ... I was denying their identity to
themselves.'" [WETZSTEON, R., 9/6-12-98]
Chaim Bermant notes the necessary pro-Jewish metamorphosis that
often takes place among non-Jews in Jewish-dominated environments -- in
this case Hollywood:
"One met the occasional gentile [in Hollywood], like the Skouras
brothers,
who were Greek, or Winfield Sheehan, who was Irish, but the whole
ambience was Jewish and even the gentiles acquired Jewish
mannerisms,
expressions, and habits of speech. As the Scottish director, John
Grierson,
observed after a stay in Hollywood, 'After a few years in the
place, your
foreskin falls away.'" [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 92]
Indeed, this kind of anti-WASP
deconstructionist world view needed strong ideological encouragement to
prosper. After World War II, and militantly after 1967, the Family and
its various satellites began to pay more and more attention to their
Jewish identities. "New questions arose," says Alexander Bloom, " ...
and an essential component of [the Family's] character -- their
Jewishness -- reemerged to demand attention." [BLOOM, p. 125] Largely
children of immigrants (or immigrants themselves), "we knew," wrote
Irving Howe, "that but for an accident of geography we might also be
bars of soap." [BLOOM, p. 137]
"Unable to talk about the Holocaust
itself," says Bloom, "[the Family] began in postwar years to talk about
themselves as Jews, something they had rarely done before ... By the
1950s ... many had become 'enthusiasts of Martin Buber, while the whole
of the New York literary world was ringing with praise of the Yiddish
storytellers, the Hassidim, Maimonides, medieval Hebrew poetry, and even
Rabbis of the Talmud." [BLOOM, p. 142] "To 'write Jewish,'" noted
Charles Angoff and Meyer Levin in 1970, "is in fashion, but recently the
Jewishness in much of our fiction has been one of bland nostalgia ... or
else it is a Jewishness of mystification cum mysticism, in which the
ancient wisdom-image of the Jew is invoked through Hasidic themes or the
idea of Buber ... or it is a Jewishness treated satirically -- basically
an attack on the complacent middle class." [ANGOFF/LEVIN, p. 15]
The move away from Jewish allegiance
to the American melting pot, universalism, and left-wing causes to
rationales for Jewish parochialism within American universities and
public life had begun. Some members of the family -- Irving Kristol,
Daniel Bell, and Nathan Glazer -- even joined Milton Himmelfarb, an
official of the American Jewish Committee, for group study of
Maimonides' texts and other Jewish religious literature. "One after
another," notes Alexander Bloom, "under the influence of political
pressure, social analysis, and personal awareness, the intellectual
began to reassess and reconsider their Jewish past." [BLOOM, p. 143]
Susan Sontag found overwhelming
connection to photographs of concentration camp victims:
"Nothing I have seen -- in
photography or real life -- ever cut me as
sharply, deeply, instantaneously.
Indeed it seemed plausible to divide my
life into two parts ... Some limit
had been reached, and not only that of
horror; I felt irrecoverably
grieved, wounded, but a part of my feeling
started to tighten; something went
dead; something is still crying."
[TORREY]
The classic irreconcilable dialectic
of divisive Jewish values in an all-inclusive, universalistic society
began to be addressed by the Jewish Mafia and explained away:
"Insistence upon being
'one-hundred-per-cent something," wrote Harold Rosenberg, makes us
"uncomfortable when they debate whether one can be an American and a
Jew." [BLOOM, p. 145] "I was born in galut and I accept, now gladly, "
wrote Daniel Bell, one time editor of the New Leader, and editor
at Fortune, and a co-editor of the Public Interest,
"though once in pain, the double burden of my self-consciousness, the
outward life of an American and the inward secret life of a Jew." [BELL,
Reflections, p. 322]
Leslie Fiedler found it useful to tie
the particulars of "being Jewish" into its traditional messianic
subsuming of all humanity under the dominion of ennobled Jewish
suffering:
"In this apocalyptic period of
atomization and uprooting, of a catholic
terror and a universal alienation,
the image of the Jew tends to become
the image of everyone; and we are
approaching the day when the Jew
will come to seem the central
symbol, the essential myth of the whole
western world." [BLOOM, p. 150]
"Some, like [Gentile] social critic
Dwight MacDonald," says Steven Zipperstein, "felt sickened by much of
what he read in Commentary, where, as he saw it, his friends
engaged in self-indulgent trivia. Why, he asked, were such bright people
devoting so much time to 'uninteresting exercises in Jewish culture?'"
[ZIPPERSTEIN, p. 20]
But the first steps of the "Holocaust
is Unique" formula, and the "humankind should look to the Jews for
guidance" enforcement had begun in earnest, and the maze of Jewish guilt
and self-obsession was spread like a tablecloth over the American scene.
"The Jews' life and wanderings," decided Daniel Bell, "are, in a sense,
the image of the world's destiny. His heightened sense of his own
alienation is a prescient tremor of the quake to come." [BLOOM, p. 153]
(This "alienation" from the American power structure has been, of
course, at key points a complete delusion. Chaim Bermant, for example,
notes the Jewish "outsider" status in Hollywood, the most profound
influence upon popular culture: "An essential part of Jewishness is the
feeling that one is an outsider, not part of the crowd. In Hollywood the
entire crowd was so Jewish that non-Jews felt outside. Nor did they have
to feel strange whenever they moved east to confer with the New York end
of the business, for that too was Jewish.") [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 99]
"Whereas [the Family] had earlier
argued for a role as the modern 'cleric' and arbiter of modern culture
because of their intellectual calling," says Alexander Bloom, "they now
claimed to offer a uniquely appropriate view of modern society, thanks
to their ethnic background." [BLOOM, p. 151] "One cannot ... simply
discount the possibility that some essentially Jewish qualities may
adhere to the writing of the most thoroughly acculturated Jews," wrote
Robert Alter in the 1960s, "Most readers have sensed in at least some of
the 'post-traditional' or 'transitional' Jewish writers certain modes of
imagination or general orientation towards art and experience that seems
characteristically Jewish, even though the writer scrupulously avoids
all reference to his ethnic origins." [ALTER, p. 54] "A Jewish book,"
declared Ludwig Lewisohn years earlier, "is one written by someone who
is well aware that he or she is Jewish. Jewish literature, therefore,
consists of all the works -- written in every age and language -- whose
creators knew they were Jewish." [SHAKED, p. 169]
Clement Greenberg (who was for a
while the editor of the Contemporary Jewish Record), says Bloom,
"asserted that [the Jewish author Franz] Kafka held a steady belief in
halakhic order, the belief that Jewish history stopped with the
extinction of Palestine and will begin again when the Messiah comes.
Until then, Jewish life is to be kept 'humdrum, thoroughly prosaic and
historically immobile within the fence of the law. Such history as
persists in Gentile history.'" [BLOOM, p. 154]
Whereas in earlier years Harold
Rosenberg was "bothered by the chauvinism of certain Jewish zealots in
Commentary," [BLOOM, p. 160] and William Phillips "complained
throughout the 80s that intellectuals were now asking whether or not
policies were good for Jews, [TWERSKY, p. 40] the New York Intellectuals
had come, says Alexander Bloom, "to accept and, largely, to proclaim
their Jewishness. Their ethnic identity overcame their former
universalism ... Now self-defined Jewish intellectuals, they laid claim
to a special appropriateness for their personal viewpoint and to a high
value for their insight." [BLOOM, p. 153]
"The Alfred Kazin who proclaimed his
revolt from Jewish sentimental chauvinism," notes Edward Shapiro, "was
the same person who wrote in an autobiography titled New York Jew
how the Holocaust became the consuming event of his life." [SHAPIRO, p.
156] Irving Howe had come to believe that "the only subject truly
worthy of a serious writer ... [is] the problem of collective destiny,
the fate of a people." [KOSTELANETZ] At Philip Rahv's death, it was
found that he had donated his estate to Israel. [SHAPIRO, p. 287] "I
remember," notes Mary McCarthy, "Philip Rahv saying that all Gentiles,
without exception, are anti-Semitic." [MCCARTHY, p. 98] Midge Decter's
views of Israel? "What I do know," she says, "is that Zionism was bred
in my bones ... As for me, the unswerving Zionist, there was the miracle
of the establishment of the state of Israel." [DECTER, M., 1999, p. 185,
187] Susan Sontag? She was awarded Israel's Jerusalem Prize for 2001. As
Alexander Cockburn notes:
"[Israeli minister Shimon] Peres has been quoted as admiring
Sontag's definition
of herself. 'First she's Jewish, then she's a writer, then she's
American. She
loves Israel with emotion and the world with obligation' ... Sontag
has always
been appreciative of irony. Does she see no irony in the fact that
she, relentless
critic of Slobodan Milosevic (upon whose extradition to face trial
in its
Hague Court as a 'war criminal' the US is now conditioning all aid
to
Yugoslavia) is now planning to travel to get a prize in Israel,
currently
led by a man, Ariel Sharon, whose credentials as a war criminal are
robust
and indeed undisputed by all people of balanced and independent
judgement ... Does Sontag sense no irony is getting a prize
premised
on the author's sensitivity to issues of human freedom, in a
society
where the freedom of Palestinians is unrelentingly repressed?"
[COCKBURN, A., 3-20-01]
Hannah Arendt, a German-Jewish
refugee, accelerated this interest in Jewishness and, especially, the
Holocaust, with her controversial 1963 volume, Eichmann in Jerusalem
(first serialized in the New Yorker). Her evidence for Jewish
complicity in their own demise in Europe (and her critique that the
Israelis' focus upon only crimes against Jews by the captured Nazi was a
disservice to wider justice) provoked a firestorm of Jewish outrage. "It
is this tension between the parochial and the universal," wrote Daniel
Bell, "that explains the furious emotions over Miss Arendt's book. For
she writes from the standpoint of a universal principle which denies any
parochial [Jewish] identity." [BELL, ALPHABET, p. 312] Irving Howe
wrote that, in Jewish reaction to her book, "the long-suppressed grief
evoked by the Holocaust burst out. It was as if her views, which roused
many of us to fury, enabled us to finally speak the unspeakable."
[BLOOM, p. 329]
What, wondered Howe, would the
goyim say to this Jewish dirty laundry?
"Hundreds of thousands of
good-middle class Americans will have
learned from those articles that
the Jewish leadership in Europe was
cowardly, inept, and even
collaborationist, and that if Jews had not
'cooperated' with the Nazis, fewer
than 5 to 6 million would have been
killed. No small matter: and you
will forgive some of us if we react
strongly to this charge." [BLOOM,
p. 330]
Dissent, of which Howe was
editor, organized a public discussion about Arendt's book. Mary
McCarthy, a non-Jewish member of the Family, thought the book
"splendid." "Apparently," she noted, "this is so because I am a Gentile
... I don't 'understand' ... It is as if Eichmann in Jerusalem
had required a special pair of Jewish spectacles to make its 'true
purport' visible." [BLOOM, p. 330]
"The emotions tapped," says Alexander
Bloom, "demonstrated the degree to which Jewishness remained a sensitive
issue. Having worked out their own personal sense of Jewishness in the
first postwar years, after the decade of cosmopolitan universalism, the
New York Intellectuals had not fully resolved the more general questions
of Jews in society. Did Jews constitute a particular social grouping
with unique collective attributes?"
[BLOOM, p. 331]
Disbanding allegiance to
universalistic values, says J. J. Goldberg, throughout the Jewish
community "a new set of basic values came to replace them: loyalty to
the Jewish people, commitment to its survival, and hostility to its
enemies." [GOLDBERG, p. 162] Norman Mailer set sights on one of them:
"In their immaculate cleanliness, in
the somewhat antiseptic odor of their
stringent toilet water and perfume,
in abnegation of their walks, in the
heavy sturdy moves so many
demonstrated of bodies in life's harness,
there was the muted tragedy of the
WASP." [SCHRAG, p. 187]
Mailer points the way to what Jewish
observer James Yaffe outlined in 1968 as the nature of the generic
"Jewish intellectual":
"The Jewish intellectual, whatever
else he may do, seldom stretches
under a tree and just thinks. And
then, the intellect can't be just a
tool for him; it has to be a weapon
too. He doesn't use it simply to
discover what the world is like, or
to create something beautiful, or
to communicate his ideas. He must use
it to beat down his competitors,
to prove his superiority. From him
controversy is inseparable from
intellectual activity. Watch him at a
party: note the vicious delight
with which he backs lesser intellects
into a corner. He's implacable;
neither social decorum nor human
compassion can soften his
attack ... Above all he is very
concerned about his 'significance.' He
must always have something profound
to say, even if he has
nothing profound to say. There is
nobody like a Jewish intellectual
for making Important Statements."
[YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 235]
"Intellectuals," wrote Jack Porter,
"are far from ineffectual, although they may be snobs. On the contrary,
they exert enormous power, more than any of the 17th century
Hof-Juden ever dreamed of. At the same time, in the aftermath of the
Holocaust and the establishment of the Jewish state -- there has been a
definite shift in their allegiance to Jewish causes." [PORTER, p. 35]
"These intellectuals," says Alexander
Bloom, "posited that Jews had a central place because of their
Jewishness. They now felt that Jewishness, once a source of scorn among
some writers, offered a special insight, useful in the analysis of the
modern condition." [BLOOM, p. 150] "The Jews," proclaimed Jewish author
Isiah Berlin,
"like the strangers seeking to lose
themselves in the strange tribe,
find themselves compelled to devote
all their energies and talents
to the task of understanding and
adaptation upon which their lives
depend at every step. Hence the
fantastic over-development of
their faculties for detecting trends,
and discriminating the shades
and hues of changing individual and
social situations, often before
they have been noticed anywhere else.
Hence too, their celebrated
critical acumen, their astonishingly
sharp eye for the analysis of
the past, the present, and sometimes
the future also -- in short
their well-known genius for
observation and classification --
above all for reportage in its
sharpest and finest forms." [ISAACS, p. 55]
"Through their Jewish writers,"
declared Leslie Fiedler, "Americans, after the second World War, were
able to establish a new kind of link with Europe in place of the old
pale-face connection -- a link not with the Europe of decaying castles
and Archbishop of Canterbury, nor with that of the French symbolists,
and the deeply polite Action Francaise -- for those are all Christian
Europe; but with the post-Christian Europe of Marx and Freud, which is
to say, of secularized Judaism, as well as the Europe of surrealism and
existentialism, Kafka, neo-Chassidism .... " [KOSTELANETZ, p. 14]
"By the 1960s," notes Robert
Christopher, "Jewish writers had undeniably supplanted white southern
ones as the nation's leading school of novelists; they had, in fact,
come to dominate American fiction to such an extent that, as Norman
Podhoretz recalls in Making It, that wayward WASP Gore Vidal was
moved to complain that there was no longer room on any list of important
contemporary American writers for more than one 'OK goy.'" [CHRISTOPHER,
p. 228] (Symbolic to all this, in 2002 the new Jewish president of
Brooklyn college, Marty Markowitz, made the news when he called an old
portrait of George Washington that hung in his office "an old man" and
announced that "he will probably hang a portrait of a black or a woman
in his office in place of the country's first president.")
[SOCKWELL-MASON/SEIFMAN, 1-16-02]
Alfred Kazin noted the arrogant Jewish displacement of the WASP
intelligentsia, and rising Jewish power to frame the world to Jewish
perspective , like this:
"Generally speaking, the Jewish intellectuals who since the 40's have
exercised so much influence on American culture started very far back.
If the young man from the provinces, as Lionel Trilling named him,
typifies the encounter with the great world in 19th-century novels, it
was significantly the Jewish intellectual who was now to write the key
book on Matthew Arnold, the definitive biographies of Henry Adams, Henry
James, James Joyce ... Just as it was Southern writers, with their
knowledge of defeat and thier instinctive irony, who in the 40's spoke
to the chastened American mind, so it is Jewish writers who now
represent to many Americans the unreality of their prosperity and the
anxiety of their condition. In situations of inestimable complexity,
requiring the most 'sophisticated' and 'expert' 'analysis' of the
'complex factors,' it was often enough Jews, born and pushed to be
intellectuals, who became the connoisseurs of the new chaos, the mental
elite of the power age. Never was interpretation, explanation,
commentary, a vital new midrash, so much needed as in the period,
starting with the war, when the world was so much compressed and
subtilized by the new technological revolution -- and never were there
so many Jewish intellectuals prepared to do the explaining." [KAZIN, A.,
1966, p. xxii]
"Jewishness has become fashionable," wrote Jewish author Peter
Schrag in 1971, "In New York, which is where most of the soapboxes are
kept, it is the goy and not the Jew (or the Negro) who feels defensive.
Half the major book publishers are Jewish and probably more than half of
the art dealers, the music managers (booking agents, publishers, Tin Pan
Alley flacks) and the senior brass of network television." [SCHRAG, p.
108]
Gentile writer Chandler Brossard noted (in the American Jewish
Committee's Commentary magazine) the trend of Jewish dominance in
American "intellectual" life, and the way Jewish culture subsumed all
others, as early as 1950. Brossard recognized the strong influence upon
him to submit to Jewish intellectual landlords in order to succeed:
"There is a new alienated man around. He is the Gentile
intellectual in New York
City. Hopelessly outnumbered by his Jewish colleagues on the New
York
intellectual scene, of late he has begun to feel that his back his
against the wall ...
Partly consciously, partly unconsciously, [the Gentile] starts
assuming some
of the wise style of the Jewish intellectual, to overcome what he
thinks is his
own naiveté, in order to become part of the group surrounding him.
The
implications of this are almost infinite. Strange things happen.
His vocabulary
becomes spiced with Jewish inflections and expressions (his friends
teach him
the correct pronunciations: he has an increasingly strong tendency
to say [the
Yiddish term] 'nu?' instead of 'so?' His gestures become sensual,
curvilinear,
and an elaborate and necessary part of his communication. His humor
becomes
less mirthful -- so long, Mark Twain! -- and more ironic, twisted,
oblique,
and gaggy. (If he is a writer this gag quality finally gags him
insofar as his
originality is concerned). He cannot remember the last time he told
a joke
that did not involved a Jew or the Jewish point of view ... He
feels, in effect,
a kind of clown. His confusion is not helped by the fact that for
the first time
in his life he is now a member of a minority. It almost seems that
he is a kind of
extravagance of his Jewish circle ... He wonders whether he is ever
really being
accepted; he feels that his Jewish friends do certain things for
each other that
they do not do for him. Is he at the center or the periphery? ...
He often winds
up playing straight man to his friends at a nearly all-Jewish party
... He has the
choice now of recognizing his background and origins, his
difference, and living
accordingly, or of denying them and reshaping himself with the
help, or
proximity, of his Jewish friends. The temptation to submit to
reshaping is
strong; it is hard to be different in these surroundings."
[BROSSARD, C.,
in ROGOW, A., 1961, p. 349-353]
In a 1966 introduction to an anthology of Commentary
articles, Alfred Kazin framed the central current of that journal with
the declaration that Jews are the heart of world and "being Jewish"
related to everything.
"It has always been natural for Protestant Americans to believe, in
the words of John Jay Chapman, that 'the heart of the world is Jewish.'
But after 1945 and the unparalleled, inexpressible martyrdom of the
Jewish people in Europe, it was natural for non-Jews everywhere to
believe, as Jews now had more reason than ever to believe, that Jewish
survival and Jewish self-determination related to everything in the
world. The particular distinction of Commentary among Jewish magazines
has been to articulate and to support this many-sided relatedness ...
[KAZIN, A., 1966, p. xxii] ... [A]s this anthology goes on to show, the
Jewish art critic, essayist, economist, political observer,
psychoanalyst, sociologist had only to take up aspects of contemporary
experience in general to show the relevance to all this experience of
his native, obstinate, questing spirit as a Jew." [KAZIN, A., 1966, p.
xxii]
"It is not just that Jewishness was
chic in mainstream circles," says Karen Brodkin, "It also became
mainstream. Observing that J.D. Salinger, Saul Bellow, Bernard Malamud,
and Philip Roth were the great American -- not great Jewish --
writers of the period, Peter Rose notes that '[f]or perhaps the first
time in American literary history, the Jew became everyman and, through
a curious transposition, everyman became the Jew ... Most American Jews
are part of the big wide -- and white -- Establishment.' Indeed, as Neil
Gabler has argued for Hollywood up to World War II, Jews helped create
white Americanness." [BRODKIN, p. 142]
In the world of academe, Irving
Horowitz centers on Jewish preeminence:
"An intellectual immigration took
place that changed the landscape
of American sociology no less than
that of American sociology itself ...
The coming to American shores of
[immigrant Jewish scholars] Theodore
Abel, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Theodor
Adorno, Franz Neumann, Marie
Jahoda, to name just a few, changed
the emphasis in sociology from
civilizational issues to
psychological issues ... [HOROWITZ, I., p. 75]
Can one seriously imagine the study
of sexuality without references to
[Jews like] Sigmund Freud, Alfred
Adler, and [non-Jewish adherent to
psychoanalytic theory] Carl G. Jung?
... Without them, there would be
no Helene Deutsch, or Anna Freud, or
Marie Bonaparte; that is, particular
inquiry into the nature of female
sexuality ... The same holds true for
sub-disciplines like political theory.
One presumes that a literate person
has a working knowledge of the works
of Hannah Arendt, Harold
Lasswell, and Leo Strauss, among
others ... It is conceivable, perhaps
imperative, if the focus is
international law versus national power, that
one world substitute Hans Morgenthau,
Hans Kohn, and Hans Kahn
for the aforementioned trio."
[HOROWITZ, I., p. 125]
Karen Brodkin cites another
commentator about the Jewish molding of American values in broader,
popular culture:
"In the century of Calvin Klein,
Ralph Lauren, and Dinah Shore, need
we ask who but a Jew is best at
packaging un-whining blonde fantasy
figures? I don't know about you,
darlings, but ever since I found out
that Kathie Lee Gifford was nee
Epstein, I don't assume anything.
Why be surprised then, that Barbie,
the ultimate shiksa goddess, was
invented by a nice Jewish lady, Ruth
Handler (with her husband
Eliot, co-founder of Mattel?) Indeed,
the famous snub-nosed plastic
ideal with the slim hips of a drag
queen is in fact named after a real
Jewish princess from L.A., Handler's
daughter, Barbara (who must
have been hell to know in high
school!) Her brother's name was Ken."
[BRODKIN, p. 143]
A Jewish author, Irving Berlin,
penned the famous Christian-based songs "White Christmas" and "Easter
Parade." "No Christmas haters should be put off by [Jody] Rosen's
title [of her book White Christmas. The Song that Changed the World],
" says Jewish author Stanley Price,
"Her book is much more than just 'the story of a song.' She cleverly
uses 'White Christmas' as a focus to explore the phenomenon of Jewish
assimilation into American life in the first half of the twentieth
century .. As Rosen shows, in the world of entertainment and culture, it
was more a take-over than an assimilation. In that golden era of musical
theatre and film, almost the only truly successful gentile was Cole
Porter. The Jews owned most of the theatres and almost all of the movie
studios. For the Jews there was truly 'No business like show business,'
another Irving Berlin hit. America has always been the most comfortable
place to be Jewish, and this fascinating book emphasizes [Irving]
Berlin's contribution to this process of subtle Judaisation -- what
Rosen calls a 'Yankee Doodle Yiddishkeit.' Rosen quotes, as
follows, from Philip Roth's 'Operation Shylock': 'God gave Moses the Ten
Commandments and then he gave Irving Berlin 'Easter Parade' and 'White
Christmas,' the two holidays that celebrate the divinity of Christ --
and what does Irving Berlin do? He de-Christs them both! Easter turns
into a fashion show and Christmas into a holiday about snow.'" [PRICE,
S., 12-6-02, p. 32]
Even the 1990s president of the board of directors of the WASP
world's hallowed Miss America pageant is David Frisch.
Ed McClanahan notes the Jewish dimensions to the Gidget
surfing icon:
"No no, not Sandra Dee or Sally Fields, nor Deborah Walley or Cindy
Carroll or any of the legions of Gidget impersonators of the big
screen or
the small screen or even, yes, the stage. We're talking the Real
Deal here,
the original Gidget, the ur-Gidget you might say, Kathy Kohner
Zuckerman
herself, whose father, a Hollywood screenwriter named Frederick
Kohner,
wrote the hugely popular little novel ... in 1957 ... and made his
daughter
Kathy, who inspired it, a legend in the world of surfing ... The
book was
regarded as mildly scandalous in its day ('Any parents,' fulminated
the
Nebraska Farmer, 'who allow their teen-agers to talk as Gidget does
should be soundly spanked.") Nowadays, in the era of Sex in the
City,
it seems as innocent as Rebecca at Sunnybrook Farm. Still, the
Gidget
character is a bit of a potty-mouth (it was she who brought the
adjective
'bitchen' into the language.)" [MCLANAHAN, E.]
In the sexual realm, in the
formation of popular American values, notes Anthony Heilbut, "The two
major therapeutic changes of the sixties and seventies were ushered in
by [Jewish] émigrés, Fritz Perls of Esalen and Wilhelm Reich ... Their
positions have become the roots of such American phenomena as 'est' or
sex therapy ... Of all Freud's disciples, Reich was the most obsessed
with sexuality." [HEILBUT, p. 439] (Reich died in an American prison in
1957, held on charges of "criminal contempt" in a case involving his
shipments of "orgone accumulators.")
Perls was also "the founder and main
figure of Gestalt therapy." [MASSON, p. 209] At every group Gestalt
therapy session, he recited the "Gestalt prayer," famous doggerel that
profoundly influenced, and exemplified, 1960s-era ethics:
"I do my thing and you do your
thing.
I am not in this world to live up
to
your expectations.
And you are not in this world to
live
up to mine.
You are you and I am I.
And if by chance we find each
other,
it's beautiful.
If not, it can't be helped."
[MASSON, p. 209]
In the 1960s, the American Jewish
Committee even estimated that 40 percent of the youth who emigrated to
the Haight-Ashbury Hippie Mecca in San Francisco were Jewish -- a total
of about 71,000 of them. The average stay there was 3-4 months. [YAFFE,
J., 1968, p. 269] Jewish psychiatrist Oscar Janiger (a cousin of famous
poet and counter-culture icon Allen Ginsberg -- "administered almost
3,000 doses of LSD to 1,000 volunteers. Among them were [Cary] Grant,
fellow actors Jack Nicholson and Rita Moreno, author Aldous Huxley and
musician Andre Previn ... Although his work predated that of LSD guru
Timothy Leary, he never gained widespread recognition for it."
[ASSOCIATED PRESS, 8-17-01]
James Davison Hunter notes, in an
article entitled When Psychotherapy Replaces Religion, one of the
occupational fields that has profoundly influenced the moral climate of
modern America:
"When it comes to the moral life of
children, the vocabulary of
the psychologist frames virtually all
public discussion. For decades
now, contributions from philosophers
and theologians have been
muted or non-existent ... Rather, it
is the psychologists, and in
particular the developmental and
educational psychologists who
have owned this field -- in theory
and in practice. All the major players
in the last half century have been
psychologists. Eric Erickson, B. F.
Skinner, Benjamin Spock, Havighurst,
Carl Rodgers, Jean Piaget,
Abraham Maslow, Rudolph Dreikurs,
William Glasser, Lawrence
Kohlberg, Louis Rath, Sidney Simon,
Jane Loevinger, Daniel
Levinson, Robert Selman, Maurice
Elias -- their assumptions,
concepts, and paradigms have largely
determined how all of us
think about the moral lives of
children, and, indeed, about moral
life generally." [HUNTER, J.D., 2000,
p. 5-22]
Not surprisingly, well over half of
these influential figures have been Jewish.
In the field of anthropology, Jewish
academic Franz Boas was the most preeminent and influential
anthropologist in the early years of the twentieth century. This genre
of the field absorbed and incorporated many of the premises of
Freudianism. "By 1915," notes Kevin MacDonald, "the Boasians controlled
the American Anthropology Association and held a two-thirds majority on
its Executive Board ... By 1926 every major department of anthropology
was headed by Boas' students, the majority of whom were Jewish."
[MACDONALD, 1998, p. 25] Jewish students and ideological descendants of
Boas, who themselves became influential academics, included Alexander
Goldenweiser, Melville Herskovits, Robert Lowie, Paul Radin, Edward
Sapir, Leslie Spir, Alexander Lesser, Ruth Bunzel, Gene Weltfish, Esther
Schiff Goldfrank, Ruth Landes, and Ashley Montagu [born Israel
Ehrenburg].
Sociology? A Jewish historian and
social anthropologist even suggested, notes British sociologist W. S. F.
Pickering, that "there is something about those characteristic virtues
and viewpoints [of the influential Jewish sociologist Emil Durkheim,]
which cannot be understood by gentile readers ... that only a Jew can
understand him and his sociology." [PICKERING, p. 10] (Durkheim started
out in early life as a rabbinical student). "By the early 1960s," says
David Hollinger, "the large numbers of Jews in sociology led to a
faculty-club banter to the effect that sociology had become a Jewish
discipline. In the literary world the triumph of Norman Mailer, Saul
Bellow, and J. D. Salinger led Leslie Fiedler to hail the great
takeovers by Jewish-American writers of a task 'inherited from certain
Gentile predecessors.'" [HOLLINGER, p. 28]
Even some academics who aren't
publicly reckoned to be Jewish are Jewish. As Hershel Shanks notes,
"I think of a teacher of mine long
ago, one of the most eminent
sociologists in the country -- Robert
King Merton. Even when I
was studying with him at Columbia
University in the 1950s, there
were rumors that he was Jewish.
Recently -- he is nearly 90 --
he came out. He was born Meyer
Schkolnick." [SHANKS, H., 2000,
p. 16]
"Jews found sociology attractive,"
noted Family member Nathan Glazer in 1994, 'It was particularly
attractive to those who were socialists ... In time the Jewish newcomers
became the dominant figures in sociology. Concurrently, they abandoned
their early radicalism." [GLAZER, DECOMPOSITION, p. 4] After World War
II, notes Irving Horowitz, "young scholars came from other walks of life
into sociology ... The field soon became populated by Jews to such a
degree that jokes abounded: one did not need the synagogue, the minyan
[the minimum number of Jewish men necessary to hold religious services]
was to be found in sociology departments; or one did not need a
sociology of Jewish life, since the two had become synonymous."
[HOROWITZ, I., p. 77]
Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter note Jewish radical political
dominance in a range of academic subworlds:
"Within academia, Jewish faculty sparked revolts against the
'establishment'
in their professions, struggling to turn them in directions of
direct political
action. In the American Political Science Association, for example,
the
the membership of the Caucus for a New Politics, a radical activist
group,
was initially overwhelmingly Jewish. (Jews were also heavily
represented on
the 'liberal' opposition Ad Hoc Committee, but here they
constituted no more
than about half of a highly fluctuating and informal membership).
The same pattern emerged in the Modern Language Association,
where
the radical caucus was led by Louis Kampf and Paul Lauter, both of
Jewish background. The Union of Radical Political Economists also
initially contained a disproportionate number of individuals of
Jewish
background. While William Appleman Williams, the dean of the group,
was not Jewish, a majority of the leading cold war revisionists
among
historians were (Alperowitz, Kolko, Horowitz, etc.). The largest
number
of those radical educators and writers on education who argued that
American education was linked to capitalism's need to keep lower
classes (including blacks) in their place were also of Jewish
background
(e.g., Herbert Gintis, Donald and Beatrice Gross, Jonathan Kozol,
Edgar Z. Friedenberg, Herbert Kohl, Charles Weingartner, Gerald
Weisntein). The same thing was true in sociology ..." [ROTHMAN/
LICHTER, 1982, p. 104-105]
In this growing context of Jewish
pre-eminence throughout academia, Richard Hofstadter already felt secure
enough in 1963 to write that
"Catholic scholars and writers tend
to be recognized belatedly by their
co-religionists, when they are
recognized at all. All this concerns, of
course, not so much the
anti-intellectualism of American Catholicism as
its cultural impoverishment,
its non-intellectualism."
[HOFSTADTER, p. 140]
Hofstadter, who obviously basked in
his many Jewish cultural treasures, also turned for solace to his own
identity chauvinism to attack the then-current beatnik movement for its
own "anti-intellectualism." Looking past the Beat's moralist, populist,
non-materialist, and oft-times Zen worldviews, Hofstadter said that "the
beatniks have repudiated the path of intellectualism ... to [live] lives
of inverted sainthood, marked by an acceptance of poverty, and their
willingness to do without the usual satisfaction of a career and a
regular income ... The movement seems unable to rise above its
adolescent inspiration." [HOFSTADTER, p. 421] In 1998, Jewish American
professor Jules Chametsky was commissioned to edit a new Norton
Anthology of Jewish American Literature. "One could argue," says
Chametsky, "that without African-Americans and Jews, popular culture
would be very thin indeed in America." [CARNEY, p. 22] (With a different
set of cultural dominators, one wonders, would it not have been "thin,"
but something else?) Noting a 1922 novel by Jewish German
author Hugo Bettauer (The City Without Jews), Jewish author
Michael Brenner exudes the same arrogance and elitism about Jewish
cultural dominance of pre-Nazi German culture:
"As a city without Jews, Bettauer's Vienna soon becomes a dull and
boring place
where rough woolens are declared the latest style of fashion, the
state economy is
overburdened with debts, the currency loses its value, and
intellectual discussion
and cultural activities are defined by the low standard of the
surrounding peasant
population." [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. xvii]
[By whose criteria are such standards
"low?"]
The shoving aside of non-Jewish
writers and thinkers, and non-Jewish traditions and history, by
empowered Jewish particularists has been for decades vigorously
undertaken. "One thing did matter to somebody like me, classified as a
WASP writer," wrote Edward Hoagland in Commentary, "This was
being told in print and occasionally in person that I and my heritage
lacks vitality, that except perhaps for a residual arrogance the
vitality had long since been squeezed dry, if it had ever in fact
existed in this thin blood of mine. I was a museum piece, like some
state-of-Mainer, because I could field no ancestor who had hawked tin
pots in a Polish shtetl [Jewish village]." [HOAGLAND, p. 62]
One of the Jewish characters in prominent Jewish poet Delmore
Schwartz's prose pieces even proclaimed:
"My ancestors, in whom I take pride, but not personal pride, were
scholars,
poets, prophets and students of God when most of Europe worshipped
sticks and stones; not that I hold that against any of you, for it
is not your
fault if your forebears were barbarians groveling and groping about
for peat
or something." [ATLAS, J., 1977, p. 166]
One of the many results of all this
kind of Jewish-enforced revisionism was a 1970 volume, The New Novel
in America, subtitled The Kafkan Mode in Contemporary Fiction,
which featured all Jewish writers except mention of some Gentiles in a
final chapter addressed to "Minor American Novelists." [KOSTELANETZ, p.
27] An intriguing insight on Kafka comes from Clement Greenberg:
"Kafka's own awareness of what he
intuited about the Jewish condition
through his fiction also explains
why he became a Zionist ... Kafka ...
presented the Gentile world and
Gentile history as a trap for the likes
of him and his ... [Kafka's]
heroes ... could, with very few exceptions,
win out only at the last moments
and only by destroying completely
completely the fabric of the kind
of reality in which they are embedded.
For that reality, and that reality
alone, is their enemy." [GREENBERG,
p. 270]
(This perspective, of course, is not
only Zionist but the absolute paradigm for Orthodox Judaism, that is, at
the end of time -- in Greenberg's last "moments" -- Gentile society
will be destroyed and Jews, who cannot ever be free in galut,
will prevail over their historical nemeses).
Even earlier, in the 1950s, says
Richard Kostelanetz, "[Jewish authors] Mordechai Richler was the most
lauded Canadian writer, Don Jacobson and A. Alvarez as the most touted
Englishmen, and Harold Rosenberg as the chief expert on 'the New.'"
[KOSTELANETZ, p. 28] With the publication of Philip Roth's Portnoy's
Complaint, in 1971 Peter Schrag delighted in noting that "a few
months after it was published an editor in New York rejected a
manuscript with a note that 'no one is interested in reading novels
about WASPS.'" [SCHRAG, p. 110]
In due time, there were Jews --
heralding the chauvinist core of their mythic past -- who were declaring
that even the English language wasn't good enough for them. "I am
intrigued," wrote poet Joel Rosenberg in 1971, "with the possibility of
Judaizing the English language." [ROSENBERG, J., p. 170] "I feel
cramped," decided Cynthia Ozick, "I have come to it with notions it is
too parochial to recognize. A language, like a people, has a history of
ideas, but not all ideas: only those known to its experience. Not
surprisingly, English is a Christian language. When I write in English,
I live in Christendum." [EISEN, p. 167] "One need only call to mind
Cynthia Ozick," says Jewish critic Mark Schechner, "currently the most
prominent writer associated with the revolt against secular rationalism,
to understand that her eminence in our literature, in our culture,
portends something of a fairly large movement. In her own mind, and in
ours, she symbolizes a distinct movement toward revival of forms of
Jewish consciousness which, if not identical to halakhah [Jewish
religious law] are certainly unthinkable without it." [in SHAPIRO, M.,
p. 89]
"Having no longer to defend
themselves from real or imagined charges of parochialism," wrote Jewish
critic Ruth Wisse in 1976, "the new Jewish writers of the 70s are free
to explore the 'trivial' and particularist aspects of Judaism, and even,
turning the tables, to speculate on the restrictive limits of English as
a literary language." [WALDEN, p. xiii]
By the 1960s and 1970s, notes Harold
Wechsler and Paul Ritterband, Jewish scholars and intellectuals were
"moved by emotions ... particularly deriving from the Holocaust and the
establishment of the state of Israel, to ... explore the Jewish
component in their studies of Persian literature or Gregorian chants or
Renaissance art." [WECHSLER, p. 282] By 1986 there was enough interest
in Jewish religious roots for a Jewish scholar to author an entire
volume about "Apocalyptic Messianism and Contemporary Jewish-American
Poets." Some of the poets who qualify for this genre, according to
Davka, a Jewish ethnic magazine, include:
David Antin, Edward Ash, David Avidan, John Bennett, Asa
Benviniste, Amy Blank,
Stanley Burnshaw, T. Camri, Neeli Cherkovsky (Neeli Cherry), Andrei
Codrescu,
Leonard Cohen, Richard Culter, Endi Dame, Ben Deutschman, Jacob and
Rose
Drachler, Richard Edelman, Julie Ellis, Mullah Epstein, Marcia
Falk, Walter Field,
Robert Friend, Harold Gershowitz, Allen Ginsberg, Doris Gold, Paul
Goodman, Judith
Goven, Ted Gottfried, Carolyn Haddad, Jack
Hirschman, Frances Horowitz,
Benn Howard, Edmund Jabes, Rodger Kamentz, Walter Kaufmann, Abba
Kovner,
Tuli Kuperberg, David Kupferman, Irving Layton, Emma Lazarus,
Harris Lenowitz,
Denise Levertov, D. A. Levy, Dalia Meltzer, Samuel Menashe, Susan
Mernit,
Deena Metzger, Robert Mezey, Ruth Mintz, Sholom Gorevwitz, Ed
Ochester,
Aicheal Palmer, Stuart Perkoff, Marge Piercy, William Pillin,
Dahlia Ravikovitch,
Charles Reznioff, Edouard Roditi, Isaac Ronch, David Rosenberg,
Janet
Rosenberg, Jerome Rothenberg, Muriel Rukeyser, Nelly Sacks, John
Sanford,
Stuart Schoenberg, Howard Schwartz, Eva Shaltiel, Harvey Shapiro,
John
Silkin, Maurya Simon, David Slabotsky, Carl Solomon, Elaine
Starkman,
Julia Stein, Nathaniel Tarn, Malka Tussman, David Weissbort, David
Weissman,
J. Rutherford Willems, Jerry Winston, Bob Witz, Alla Wlebbott, Karl
Young,
Harold Norse, and Natan Zach.
[
http://www.davka.org/what/text/poetrycollectionbiblio.html and
Twice Blessed
online gay and Jewish page]
"In a single characteristic year," wrote Roger Kahn in 1968, "one
careful researcher compiled a list of 'books of Jewish interest in
America.' Marginalia were discarded; the list totaled 258. Where books
lead, critics follow. Jewish critics proliferated so freely that one
writer has made a most curious charge. He argues that Jewish novelists
prosper because of the praise of Jewish critics." [KAHN, R., p. 6]
James Shapiro is a Jewish professor
in the esoteric field of the English Renaissance, "a culture deeply
infused with Christianity." "For years," he noted in 1996, "I'd look
around and see that many of the leading scholars of the early modern
period were Jews." [WINKLER, K., 1996, 2-2-96, p. A15] Shapiro's
narcissistic Jewish ethnocentrism, and exploration of his Jewish roots,
eventually led him to decide that "at a time when many writers were
trying to reinvent what it means to be English, the English increasingly
defined themselves by what they were not. I would argue that the English
were obsessed with the Jews." Shapiro, noted journalist Karen Winkler,
"admits freely a deeply personal stake in this argument. It is a way for
him to confront his own relationship to Jewish history." "I realized,"
said Shapiro, "that I'm both a professor of English and a Jew, and I
wanted to know how my people had shaped the culture I was studying."
[WINKLER, K., 1996, p. A8]
Likewise, Natalie Zeman Davis, a
Princeton professor and "one of the leading scholars of early modern
Europe," remarked that
"I'm Jewish, and I see putting the
Jews back into the main story of
Europe as a way to tikkun, a
word that means to repair. I've come to
feel it as a way to repair the Nazi
effort to efface the Jews of
Europe." [WINKLER, K., 2-2-96, p.
A15]
Judith Arcana notes Jewish poet/prose writer Grace Paley's
sudden realization that she had to write about things explicitly Jewish:
"Then, one evening, someone read a story at [Paley's] house, a story
that 'was on Jewish themes,' and she 'all of a sudden felt that somehow
I was given permission to write, by that story' ... Her earliest stories
included 'The Contest' with its unforgettable 'Jews in the News' puzzle
series, and 'The Loudest Voice,' in which a whole neighborhood of first
and second generation immigrant Jews debates the required celebrations
of Christmas in their children's school pageant." [ARCANA, J., 1993, p.
85]
Increased Jewish fascination with
"Jewishness" and Jewish Orthodoxy, coupled with Jewish dominance in the
publishing industry, recently created in the 1990s for novelist Nathan
Englander (age 28) a unique opportunity. Englander, raised as an
Orthodox Jew, was "discovered" by Lois Rosenthal, the editor of the
journal Story. The Knopf publishing firm offered Englander
$350,000 for a book of stories about life among Orthodox Jews, "an
astonishing sum," notes the Boston Globe, "for an unknown
writer's first work -- for the collection [of stories] and a novel not
yet written. Suddenly this spring's deal catapulted the Jerusalem
bachelor into literary stardom." [ROCHMAN, p. C6]
Along the same theme, in 1994
Publishers Weekly announced the winner of the HarperCollins
"get-published" contest, noting that:
"Advertised on the back of Olivia
Goldsmith's novel The Bestseller, the
contest attracted an amazing 7,000
entries." The lucky winner selected
was Dalia Rabinovich whose book was
a Latin magic-realist tale inspired
by her Jewish grandparents
immigration to Colombia." [QUINN, p. 113]
Two years later the same journal
noted major publishing interest in -- of all things -- Holocaust
cookbooks:
"For a small press title, In
Memory's Kitchen: A Legacy from the
Women of Terezin, edited by
Cara De Silva, translated by Bianca
Steiner Brown and published in
September by Judaica publisher
Jason Aronson, has received
some incredible publicity: articles in
Newsweek and USA
Today, a November 17 full-page review in the
New York Times Book Review
and a People review expected to hit
today. And now this unusual piece
of Holocaust literature, a collection
of recipes written (some on scraps
of Nazi material) as legacy and life-
affirming defiance by women in the
Czech death camp Terezin, has
received major trade house
recognition: it will become a Delta trade
paperback next September." [QUINN,
J., p. 243]
Then there are the likes of recovering heroin addict and famous
author Elizabeth Wurtzel. Her first book, Prozac Nation: Young and
Depressed in America "immediately became a national best seller when
it was published in the United States in 1995 ... Overnight she became a
poster child for Generation X ... She was paid a half-million dollars
advance for her second book, Bitch. In Praise of Difficult Women
... Her mother frets over her tendency to date shaygetzes
(non-Jews), nevertheless insisting her mother has nothing to worry about
because 'I feel so Jewish ... I am very proud of being Jewish.'" [WENIG,
G., 1999, p. 58-61]
By the 1990s, note David Desser and
Lester Friedman,
"Critics usually interpret a Jewish
author's direct denial of ethnic
influence as a conscious evasion, a
personal blind spot, or a
psychological problem; more
frequently, they ignore denials in
favor of analyzing the work, not
listening to the author. Scholars
even scrutinize these novels,
poems, and short stories lacking
Jewish characters and having little
apparent relationship to Jewish
culture for Jewish points of view,
attitudes toward characters,
and thematic selection ... the
underlying critical assumption is
that the work of a Jewish writer
must either overtly or covertly
reflect a Jewish sensibility."
[DESSER, p. 4-5]
In 2001, the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles noted the
increasing predominance of Jewish authors and Jewish themes in
mainstream publishing:
"It's time to make room for a newer generation of American Jewish
writers, many
of whom are young women who have not even hit 30. Their debut
novels on
Jewish themes are earning large advances, garnering stellar reviews
and reaching
best seller lists ... Daisy Maryles, executive publisher of
Publishers Weekly, the
news magazine of publishing and bookselling, agrees: 'Writers are a
lot less
self-conscious of their Judaism,' she says. 'They are using their
own experiences
to illustrate their relationship to the world at large and to their
tradition ... The
interest in Jewish themes may be part of the wave of
multiculturalism --from
African American to Asian American -- that has captured public
imagination ...
Three themes predominate in contemporary Jewish fiction, says
[Gail] Hochman
[an agent with Brandt and Brandt Literary Agents]: the legacy of
the Holocaust,
survival in Israel or living in the secular world as a practicing
Jew ... Laura
Matthews, senior editor at Putnam, calls it 'curious but
coincidental' that she
has just published two books with Jewish sub-themes .. The 200-plus
Jewish
book fairs held during November and December capitalize on the
demand
for Jewish writers ... But, notes [Carolyn Starman] Hessel,
[director of the
Jewish Book Council], the audience for these books reaches beyond
the
Jewish market. What Jewish women have to say is of interest to the
American
public. [Jewish novelist Susan] Isaacs agrees. 'If we're willing to
read novels
about medieval monks a la 'The Name of the Rose' or Agatha
Christie's Miss
Marple series, about a little Anglican lady in a small town in
England, then
why shouldn't we read about American Jews?" [MUSLEAH, R., JUNE
2001]
[Specifically noted in the article as illustrations of this
increase are Jewish novelists
Nomi Eve, Myla Goldberg, Anita Diamant, Cheryl Sucher, Katie
Singer, Simone
Zelitch, Fran Dorf, Ruth Knafo Setton, and Susan Isaacs].
Many, many Jews are afforded
prominence in modern literature and are thereby subject to such scrutiny
by fellow Jews. In the best-selling -- often sensationalist and sleazy
-- realm are the names of Danielle Steel, Jacqueline Susann, and Judith
Krantz. Danielle Steel married Claude-Eric Lazard, grandson of a partner
of a famous international French Jewish banking firm. Judith Krantz, who
has sold eighty million books in fifty languages, "is the third
largest-selling female novelist in history ... She writes about
fascinating women, beauty, fame, money, and sex ... She does try to make
some serious points and has woven such images as anti-Semitism and the
German occupation in her novels." [HYMAN] Ms. Krantz was introduced to
her future husband -- Steven Krantz (eventual director of programming
for Columbia Pictures Television) -- by Jewish broadcaster
Barbara Walters. "Wherever you go," says Krantz,
"you carry your Jewishness with you,
if you want to. I wanted to ...
[I] would have enjoyed it more if [my
sons] married Jewish women.
Just to continue. Jews have been
around for so many thousands of years,
I hate to think of a world without
Jews. Jews contribute so much talent to
the world, so much spice. What will
happen to the talent? Who will play
the violin?" [BRAWARSKY, S.,
6-26-2000, p. 39]
Krantz's brother Jeremeny Tarcher "became the first and best
publisher of New Age books in the United States." [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p.
147] Krantz's autobiography (Sex and Shopping. The Confessions of a
Nice Jewish Girl) has a firm foundation of Jewish interconnection to
fame, fortune, and power:
"My parents were deeply involved in Jewish philanthropies, often
spending four
four nights a week at various meetings [p. 11] ... Well-known
[Jewish] fashion
fashion photographer [Milton Greene] and I became good friends ...
It was
a world of interrelationships. Milton's ex-wife, Evelyn, was
engaged to [famous
Jewish portrait photographer] Dick Avedon ... Later, when I became
a fashion
editor, I was always galvanized when we worked together ... [My
sister]
Mimi became engaged to a man named David Karney, an Israeli whose
father
was the real-estate 'Rockefeller' of Israel ... [Later] Mimi and
David were living
in Los Angeles, where he was beginning a magnificent career as a
builder [p. 128-129]
... [Jewish friend Andre Sussman changed his named to Surmain and
'became
the owner of Lutece, which instantly became the very best, most
famous French
restaurant in New York [p. 147] ... A friend named Selig Alkon ...
called and
asked if I wanted to go away with a group of other people for the
weekend
of the Fourth ... We were planning to go with Selig's first cousin,
Barbara
Walters [Krantz's husband, Steve, was at one point their boss at
'NBC's flagship station, WNBT.' [p. 160] .... [In New York] we were
part
of an interesting group of young couples, many of them involved in
the
art world, such as Aaron Shikler and his wife Pete. Aaron ..
painted Jackie
and Jack Kennedy for their White House portraits ... There was
David Levine,
the now-legendary caricaturist ... None of them were as rich as
Joanne and
Alfred Stern, whose money came from Sears Roebuck via Al's mother
...
Many of the others lived in the most magnificent East Side
apartments, like
Barbara ... and Jerry Goldsmith ... Among other acquaintances were
a
lawyer, Mort Jankow, and his wife, Linda, who was a granddaughter
of
Harry Warner, of Warner Brothers. Mort later became my agent. [p.
208-209]
... In New York, through Jack La Vien [a common form of Levine], a
friend
of [husband] Steve's, we became members of an exclusive club that
dominated
the chic New York disco scene [p. 221]" [KRANTZ, J., 2000]
Krantz's early publisher was Jewish (Nat Wartel at Crown),
as was Wartel's executive editor, Larry Freundlich. [p. 252] "Sylvia
Wallace, [Jewish novelist] Irving's wife," writes Krantz, "gave me
invaluable advice [when arriving to meet her first publisher]:
'Remember, you travel only by limo,' she said, in the voice of
experience." [p. 252] Freundlich gave Krantz's novel (Scruples)
to Jewish Warners Books mogul Howard Kaminsky, who paid half a
million dollars for it. [p. 254] Krantz worked with Crown Public
Relations execs Bruce Harry and Nancy Kahane. Crown's local Los
Angeles rep was Ernie Greenspan. [p. 261] During her first book
promotion tour, "the best moment was on a television show [in
Minneapolis] run by a famous local host, Henry Wolf." [p. 272] "The day
after Easter Sunday, [friend] Nancy and I had lunch with Leo Lerman,
fabled editor of Vogue." [p. 276] "I had a new editor now, a woman I'd
only met once, in passing, whose name was Carole Baron." [p. 288] "When
the phone rang it was Howard Kaminsky, president of Warner Books, who
had published Scruples in paperback. Howard was a very bright and funny
fellow, [Jewish film director and comedian] Mel Brook's first cousin."
[p. 288] Krantz's novel Mistral "was quickly bought for France by
Edition Stock, whose publisher, Jean Rosenthal, as it happened, had
translated my other novels into French." [p. 313] "Leo Lerman of Vogue
insisted that I call a friend of his named Sybille Gaussen. 'She knows
everybody and everything' he told me." [p. 323] "Polly Guggenheim, a
sculptor who'd lived in Paris most of her life, became our guide into
the art world." [p. 324] "I spent most of my time working on
Manhattan on the Salzmann's kitchen table." [p. 334] [KRANTZ, J.,
2000]
"Soon after the success of Daisy [one of her early novels],"
Krantz says, in providing a lesson in what she calls "Jewish Geography":
"Nat Wartels sold Crown to Random House, which was owned by Si
Newhouse,
one of the richest men in America. On my next trip to New York,
this unknown
billionaire gave a dinner party to welcome me, inviting only
executives from Crown
and Random House. He and Bob Bernstein, who was his
second-in-command at
the time, quizzed me, a total stranger, trying to get a grip
exactly who this strange
Californian was besides being a
successful novelist.
'So where did you go to high school?' Bob began.
'Birch Warthen.'
'My God, did you know my cousin, Alice Bernstein?'
'Well, of course I did, we graduated in the same class,' I
answered
'What did you do after college?' Si wanted to know.
'I worked for Herb Mayes at Good House [Keeping]."
'Herb? I've known him all my life. A great man' was Si's response.
'My father was one of his best friends,' I said modestly, 'and
Alex is one of my oldest
and dearest friends,' I added, knowing
full well that Si had dated their daughter, Alex, at
one point her
life, and that Mitzi Newhouse, his mother, and Grace Mayes were friends
Both men's faces beamed with relief. An absolutely perfect game of
Jewish Geography
had just been beautifully played and I had been
squarely identified as a highly
credentialed, super-nice New York
Jewish girl, no potentially oddball California exotic."
[KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 303]
Bruce J. Friedman's novels, says one
Jewish critic, usually "center on Jews alienated from Christian America
and ignorant of their own roots." [WALDEN, p. 70] Alvin Toffler (Future
Shock) is Jewish as is Studs Terkel. A mere sampling of other
Jewish novelists and prose writers includes Ayn Rand (Alisa Rosenbaum),
Nathaniel West (Nathaniel Weinstein), Harold Robbins (Harold Rubin), and
science fiction authors Isaac Asimov ("As far as I know, I was the first
science fiction writer of note [of Jewish descent] who used his own
name.") [ASIMOV, I., 1974, p. 2], William Tenn, Carol Carr, Robert
Silverberg, Horace Gold, Pamela Sargent, Robert Sheckley, and Harlan
Ellison.
"Two of the best science fiction writers of the 1930s," says Isaac
Asimov, in reflections of his career, "were Stanley G. Weinbaum and Nat
Schachmer, both Jewish. (Weinbaum published for only a year and a half,
during which he immediately established himself as the most popular
science fiction writer in America, before dying tragically of cancer
while still in his thirties." [ASIMOV, I., 1994, p. 16] Martin Greenberg
owned Gnome Press (an early publisher of Asimov's works) Many authors
complained of being exploited by this publisher. (ASIMOV, I., 1994, p.
415-416) There was later a second Martin Greenberg (Martin Harry
Greenberg). This "Marty," says Asimov, "has become so famous in science
fiction that the name Martin Greenberg now applies only to him."
[ASIMOV, I., 1994, p. 416] By early 1990s, Martin Harry Greenberg had
"published nearly four hundred anthologies, and there is no question
that he is far and away the most prolific and, in addition, the best
anthologist the world has ever seen." [ASIMOV, I., 1994, p. 419] Joel
Davis also "had two fiction magazines, both mystery -- Ellery Queen's
Mystery Magazine and Alfred Hitchock's Mystery Magazine." He
also started "Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine" (IASFM). (The
main competitors were [Jewish?] Ben Bova's Analog and Edward
Ferman's F&SF (Fantasy and Science Fiction). [ASIMOV, I.,
1994, p. 422-423]
The Cleveland Jewish News had this to say about the science
fiction investigations of Jewish American English professor Batya
Weinbaum:
"Existing in two worlds is a also a theme of science fiction
written by immigrant
Jews in the early part of the 20th century, says Weinbaum. Jews,
she explained,
dominated the science-fiction field in those days
... Another [Jewish author]
Weinbaum is fascinated with is Leslie
F. Stone, nee Leslie Rubenstein. Like
many Jewish sci-fi writers at the time, Stone used an Anglo-Saxon
pseudonym
to conceal her Jewish ethnicity ... Many other Jewish writers of
the '30s, including
Nat Schachner, Moses Schere and Bernard Sachs, wrote similar
futuristic stories
about dictators, political parties and
assimilation. Stanley Weinbaum's ... "The
Adaptive Ultimate' ...
is yet another tale drawing from the Jewish immigrant
experience of cultural assimilation ... Prof. Weinbaum also
credits Stanley
Weinbaum and Stone with the creation of the 'sympathetic alien, a
kind,
intelligent creature who helped people. This was a far cry from
the 'bug-eyed beasts'
of H.G. Wells, whose only goal was to
eradicate humanity. Many of these
tales were published in anthologies by another Jew, Hugo
Gernsback, whom
Weinbaum calls 'the father of sci-fi.'" [GUTH, D.,
2000, p. 108-]
Irving Stone (Irving Tennenbaum) is
Jewish, as is Saul Bellow, Abraham Cahan, Arthur Cohen, E. L. Doctorow,
J.D. Salinger, Isaac Asimov, Bruce J. Friedman, Dorothy Parker
(half-Jewish), Herbert Gold, Paul Goodman, Joseph Heller, Stanley
Kunitz, Meyer Levin, Bernard Malamud, Hugh Nissenson, Cynthia Ozick,
Howard Fast, Ellery Queen (a fictitious detective created by Daniel
Nathan and Manford Nepofsky), Laura Riding Jackson (Laura Reichenthal),
Grace Paley, Chaim Potok, Norma Rosen, Hortense Calisher, Gertrude
Stein, Henry Roth, Marge Piercy, Susan Fromberg Schaeffer, Erica Jong,
Philip Roth, Delmore Schwartz, Constance Rourke, Leo Rosten, Gerald
Stern, Mary Antin, Judith Rossner, Edward Lewis Wallant, Jerome Weidman,
Leon Uris, E.M. Broner, Stanley Elkin, Daniel Fuchs, Harry Kellerman,
Edward Dahlberg, Jonathan Kozol, Ira Levin, S.J. Perelman, Meyer Levin,
Edward Lewis Wallant, Irving Faust, Francis Ann Leibowtiz, Michael Gold,
Irving Stone, Irving Wallace, Herman Wouk, Irwin Shaw, Sidney Sheldon,
Bernard Schlink, Alan Isler, Steven Bloom, David Margolis, Charles
Powers (also a former Eastern European bureau chief for the Los
Angeles Times), and Anzia Yezierska.
Further Jewish women writers include
Ann Roiphe, Alison Lurie, Gloria Goldreich, Rosellen Brown, Julie Ellis,
Faye Kellerman, Susan Isaac, Amanda Cross, Naomi Regan, Gail Parent,
Louise Blecher Rose, Susan Lukas, Myrna Blythe, Marie Brenner, Sandra
Harmon, Sue Kaufman, Rebecca Goldstein, Roberta Silman, Alix Kates
Shulman, Daphne Merkin, Vivian Gornick, Rochelle Krich, Marissa Piesman,
Batya Gur, Serita Stevens, Rayanne Moore, Carolyn Haddad, Rhoda Lerman,
Rona Jaffe, Bel Kaufman, Nora Ephron, Joyce (Glassman) Johnson, Johanna
Kaplan, Ilona Karmel, Shirley Kaufman, Irene Klepfiscz, Edith Konecky,
Emma Lazarus (who wrote the poem 'The New Colossos' inscribed on the
State of Liberty and became a Zionist covert in 1881), [SYRKIN, M.,
1964, p. 228] Karen Malpede, Emily Mann, Leslea Newman, Allegra Goodman,
Joanne Greenberg, Bette Howland, Fannie Hurst ("known in her era as the
highest paid writer in the world") [ANTLER, J., 1997, p. 145(e)], E. M.
Broner, Rosellen Brown, Edna Ferber, Kim Chernin, Susan Yankowitz, Helen
Yglesia, Ann Birstein, Francise Prose, Nesa Rappaport, Tora Reich, Norma
Rosen, Lore Siegel, Jo Sinclair, Tess Slesinger, Adele Weissman, Alice
Munro, Bella Spewack, Elizabeth Swados, Ruth Whitman, Emma Wolf, and
Lynn Sharon Schwartz. Judith Viorst, wife of prominent journalist Milton
Viorst and for six years a student at the Washington Psychoanalytic
Institute, has authored nearly 50 volumes. [BEAL, E., 1997, p. 36] In
the popular romance genre, Jewish authors include Cynthia Freeman, Belva
Plains, Julie Ellis, and Iris Rainer Dart.
Edna Ferber, "author of Giant, Show Boat, and the
Pulitzer prize-winning novel So Big, attributed her success to
having been born a Jew. 'Being a Jew makes it tougher to get on,' she
commented, 'and I like that.'" [ANTLER, J., 1997, p. 140(e)] "Modernist"
author Gertrude Stein "admired Jews' 'clan feeling' and their high
'ethical and spiritual nature.' It is widely believed that she survived
World War II with her lover, Alice B. Toklas (another California German
Jew), because of her relationship with the [French] Vichy regime."
[ANTLER, J., 1997, p. 140(e)]
When Jewish novelist Anne Michaels'
friend ran across yet another volume about a familiar subject, he
complained about "another book on the Holocaust," not knowing that her
own new work focused on the same theme. [Brawarsky, S., 1998, p. 29]
Carl Djerassi, a Jewish Stanford University scientist who is considered
the "father" of the birth control pill, also writes novels. His most
recent, Menachem's Seed, "ponders how a non-Jewish woman who
impregnates herself with an Israeli sperm can ensure her child will be
born Jewish." [PEARL, L., 1997, p. 34]
"Do we need another ex-junkie from
New York publishing autobiographical novels about sex, violence, and
death?" wondered the [London] Guardian in 1999. The reference was
to Joel Rose's new novel, "Kill Kill Faster Faster," described even by
the author as a "genre novel -- pulp shit." Rose, of Hungarian Jewish
heritage, is a former TV writer for Kojak, Miami Vice, and
McMillan and Wife. [GIBB, 1999, p. T18]
Judy Blume is a best-selling author
of children's books. Ever busy socializing children against Christian
tradition, Blume notes that "I had letters from angry parents accusing
me of ruining Christmas forever because of a chapter in Superfudge
called 'Santa Who?'" [BLUME, p. 65] In 1986 a children's book called
An American Tail was published. "A Steven Spielberg Production," it
was originally an animated movie. Lavishly illustrated, the newly
invented fairy tale focuses upon the Jewish Mousekewitz family, a group
of mice in late 19th century Russia. Both book and film socialize young
children to the persecution myths of Jewish identity (depicted here as
harmless, innocent mice), while broadly stereotyping the entire
non-Jewish community in Eastern Europe as a realm of bloodthirsty
monsters. Beneath an image of three cats with Russian style handlebar
moustaches, saliva dripping from their teeth, all creeping along next to
what appears to be a Nazi (the viewer only sees his black boots and
brown pants) the fairy tale reads:
"Suddenly, the houses began to
jump and shake. The sound of horses'
hooves clattering through the town
and shouts of terrified people made
all the mice tremble with fear.
'The Cossacks! The Cossacks!'
In those days, from time to time,
Cossacks would gallop through
the Jewish villages of Russia,
burning homes and temples, destroying
everything in their path. In the same
kind of way, cat-Cossacks, known
as Catssacks, would race through the
tiny Russian mouse villages,
burning and demolishing the little
mouse homes and capturing whole
mouse families as they ran from their
flaming houses out into the
snow." [KINGSLEY, p. 10]
Other Jewish authors in the
children's market include Paula Danziger, Allen Pace Nilson, Robert
Lipsyte, and E. L. Konigsburg, among others.
In 1999, recognizing the market and
the times, a coffee-table photography book entitled "The Jewish writer"
came out by photographer Jill Krementz. [George Gilbert's history of
Jewish photographers claims her as Jewish; GILBERT, p. 60] Well
connected in the literary world, her editorial dilemma, noted the
Jewish Bulletin, was that there was not enough space in her proposed
book for all 78 images of Jewish authors she had collected. [FAINGOLD,
1999, p. 41A]
Going to Miami? Jewish journalist
Hillel Italie noted in 2000 that Mitch Kaplan is chairman of the Miami
Book Festival, "one of the oldest and most influential literature
festivals in the United States." [ITALIE, 2000] Attending a program at
the famous Poetry Project at St. Mark's Church on the Bowery in
Manhattan? Since 1987 the director of the organization has been Ed
Friedman. (Joel Oppenheimer headed it earlier, beginning in 1966.)
Wondering who might be the "literary executor" of famed non-Jewish poet
W. H. Auden? Edward Mendelson. [MENDELSON, E., 1982, DUST JACKET] Going
traveling with a Frommers guide? Arthur Frommer is Jewish. Using a
Lasser income tax guide? J. K. Lasser is also Jewish. [ETKES/STADTMAUER,
1995, p. 172-173] Need a Berlitz language guide? It too is
Jewish-founded. Editor-in-chief of Webster's New World dictionaries,
major gauge of the English language, from 1948 to 1985? Also Jewish:
David Guranlnick. [KIRSCHNER, S., 9-14-2000, p. 11]
However restricted, oppressed,
marginalized, and unrewarded Jewish women are supposed to be, "in sheer
numbers, some 200 titles produced in the twentieth century since
the first text was published in 1912 are identifiable as
Jewish-American women's biographies -- that is, those in which ethnicity
and gender are significant touchstones for the writer's identification
and (self) creation." [SHOLLAR, B.] Prominent Jews who have held
prominence in the feminist field include Bella Abzug, Phyllis Chesler,
Gloria Steinem, Vivian Gornick, Robin Morgan, Susan Brownwiller,
Shulamith Firestone, Andrea Dworkin, Meredith Tax, Letty Cottin
Pogrebin, and Naomi Weisstein, to headline a long list. Elizabeth
Fox-Genovese is half-Jewish. Jews have also been extremely prominent in
lesbian activism. "[Jews] have been told that they control everything,"
noted Jewish lesbian Irene Klepfisz in 1982, "and so when they are in
the spotlight, they have been afraid to draw attention to their
Jewishness. For these women, the number of Jews active in the movement
is not a source of pride, but rather a source of embarrassment,
something to be played down, something to be minimized." [KLEPFISZ, I.,
1982, p. 47]
Jewish women, noted Ann Roiphe in 1981, "form a ridiculously high
percentage of the women's movement." [ROIPHE, 1981, p. 148] "Carolyn
Stoloff concluded in a study of the backgrounds of those active in the
woman's liberation movement among graduate students at the Univeristy of
Michigan. She discovered that, of those whose religious background could
be ascertained, almost 58 percent were Jewish." [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982,
p. 109] About half of a 1999 issue of Biography magazine's 25
Most Powerful Women in the business and social world "were either
Jewish or had Jewish parents." [SILBIGER, S., 2000, p. 24] "Like [Betty
Friedan], many of the leaders and theorists of the 1960s feminists had
been Jews, albeit largely secular, unidentified ones." [ANTLER, p. 260]
"Friedan," notes Joyce Antler, "used the language of the Holocaust [in
her texts about women's liberation] not merely as a metaphor, or as a
tactic to shock readers, but because she had already made the connection
between the oppression of women and that of Jews." [ANTLER, p. 261]
David Horowitz adds something else
about Friedan (Friedman):
"Her infamous description of
America's suburban family household
as a 'comfortable concentration
camp,' in The Feminine Mystique,
probably had more to do with her
Marxist hatred for America than
for her own experience as a housewife
and mother. Her husband,
Carl, also a leftist, once complained
to a reporter in 1970 that, far
from being a homebody, his wife 'was
in the world during the whole
marriage, either full time or free
lance,' lived in an eleven-room mansion
on the Hudson with a full-time maid,
and 'seldom was a wife and a
mother.'" [HOROWITZ, D., 1999, p.
226]
In 1995, even a non-Jewish Polish-born
scholar, Magdalena Zaborowska, teaching at the University of North
Carolina, knew which way the intellectual and publishing winds blew.
Like many, she too falls prey to the strong force of Judeo-centrism in
the American academic community. In her volume about women immigrants to
America, subtitled "Gender Through East European Immigrant Narratives,"
she focuses on the lives of five women -- Mary Antin, Elizabeth Stern,
Anzia Yezierska, Maria Kuncewicz, and Eva Hoffman -- to illustrate her
theses. The title of the book, nor its theses of investigation, have
nothing to do with Jews. Yet, in attempting to exemplify the collective
voice of the female immigrant experience, the only one who isn't Jewish
in her five subjects is Kuncewicz. Can this, one wonders, be an accurate
overview of the lives, dilemmas, identities, and world views of the
millions of Eastern European women who weren't Jewish?
In 1996, Jewish poet Hal Sirowitz
was awarded a $20,000 National Endowment for the Arts fellowship for his
first collection of poetry, My Mother Said. His second volume was
about his therapist, entitled My Therapist Said. [COLEMAN, S.,
1998, p. 9A] In the poetry world, other prominent Jewish authors
include Philip Levine, Denise Levertov, David Ignatow, Howard Nemerov
(brother of photography icon Diane Arbus), Adrienne Rich, Karl Shapiro,
Allen Ginsberg, Mark Strand, Kenneth Koch, Maxine Kumin, Stanley Kunitz,
Louise Gluck, Louis Zukofsky, Delmore Schwartz (who wrote "Anti-Semitism
ever / Sharpens Jews to be more clever"), [ATLAS, J., 1977, p. 163]
Charles Reznikoff, David Ignatov, John Hollander, Irving Feldman,
Anthony Hecht, Jerome Rothenberg ("who has been called a 'Jew among the
Indians" for his work with early Native American poetic traditions"),
[SHAPIRO, G., 4-20-01] David Meltzer, Robert Mezey, Rose Drachler, Susan
Mernit, Harvey Shapiro, Grace Schulman ("I contain my family of Zionists
within me"), [SHAPIR, S., 3-16-01, p. 12] George Oppen, Gertrude Stein,
M. L. Rosenthal, Marilyn Hacker, (winner of the National Book Award),
Sandra Hochman, Jascha Kessler, Donald Finkel, Naomi Lazard, Marvin
Bell, Gil Orlovitz, Kenneth Fearing, David Galler, Stephen Berg, Daniel
Hoffman, Peter Davison (his mother was Jewish), Babette Deutch, "beat"
poet Stuart Perkoff, Romanian-born Andrei Codrescu, and Muriel Rukeyser,
among others.
Part of a much referred-to poem by
Muriel Rukeyser in Jewish circles goes: "To be a Jew in the twentieth
century/Is to be offered a gift. If you refuse/Wishing to be invisible,
you choose/Death of the spirit, the stone insanity." [ANTLER, J. p. 174]
"Jewish themes," says Daniel Walden, "pervade much of the poetry of
Harvey Shapiro who is probably better known as the editor of the New
York Times Book Review." [WALDEN, p. 397] Poet Joseph Auslander was
editor of the North American Review. Poet Grace Paley has long
been poetry editor of the Nation.
Jewish critic Bonnie Lyon "argues that Jewishness is 'thematically
central' to Grace Paley's work [and] says that 'Yiddishkeit [Jewish
culture], especially the idealistic socialist version ... is the
underlying source of values in her work." [ARCANA, J., 1993, p. 224]
Here's what Jewish biographer Judith Arcana adds about Ms. Paley (born
Grace Goodside) and her Jewish identity in America:
"So what would [Paley's father] think if he knew that his daughter
Grace
has begun to attend services for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur?
Would
he, who lived a culturally Jewish milieu all his long life,
understand her
desire to locate and maintain Jewishness every autumn in Christian
Vermont?
He could never have experienced such a need, for his family was
strongly
identified as Jewish, and he lived surrounded by Jews all
his years in the
United States. Unlike, Judaism, Jewishness, [Grace's sister]
Jeanne says,
'was a given' and was never given up. The Goodside family was not
unconsciously seduced by the insidious force of American
assimilation."
[ARCANA, J., 1993, p. 14]
"Insidious force of American assimilation?!" And this
term applied to a family of presumably universalistic socialists?
Here's more on how Arcana, the Jewish reviewer/critic,
understands Paley, the Jewish poet/prose writer -- Paley, who in the
political world is a Left-wing activist:
"[Non-Jewish husband] Bob [Nichols, her second husband] was, even
with his
Brooks Brothers shirt tucked in, an exotic for this Bronx Jew.
Though Grace
has never been exploitive or condemnatory of Jews in her stories
like her Jewish
brothers-in-print who often attach the unfortunate
effluvia of twentith-century
materialism to Jews (and especially
Jewish women), Grace's Jewish women
nevertheless often couple with non-Jews. From young Shirly
Abramowitz's
tolerance, through Faith's two Catholic husbands and brief
dalliance with Nick
Hegstraw, to the newest autobiographical
figure in the cycle, Ruth Larsen, who
has taken the last name of her husband Joe, Grace's Jewish women
exhibit not
only an acceptance of, but a romantic interest in, goyim.
[Note: the term
'goyim' is traditionally a Jewish pejorative for
non-Jews]. In her poetry, which
she has always acknowledged as being closer to the bone than her
stories
are, Grace has explicitly depicted herself as one who suffers
because she
has forgotten Jerusalem and has coupled with a Gentile. 'Even my
lover, a
Christian with pale eyes and the barbarian's foreskin/has
left me,' the speaker
realizes in 'A Warning.' The speaker in
another poem, untitled, admits that she
'cannot keep [her] mind on
Jerusalem' and wonders what will happen 'when the
Lord/remembers
vengeance/(which is his)/and finds me.' Though her sexual
and romantic interest in the Christian 'other' might be construed
as similar to
that lust for 'blondies' we find so often in fiction
by Jewish men, it is also
based in her lifelong laissez faire acceptance of whatever her
companions
may be and especially her desire for an ongoing cultural, ethnic,
and
racial mixing and blending of peoples. Grace Paley has been mining
that
symbolic vein in her stories and has worked into it the
related issues of
difference, otherness, and, especially, Jewishness." [Paley divorced her
first husband, Jess Paley, in 1972. He was Jewish] [ARCANA, J.,
1993,
p. 160-161]
"Goyim-barbarian's foreskin?"
From 1977 to 1998, fifteen people
were awarded Yale University's prestigious Bollingen Prize (today worth
$25,000) for poetry. At least seven of them were Jewish males -- David
Ignatow, Howard Nemerov, Anthony Hecht, John Hollander, Stanley Kunitz,
Mark Strand, and Kenneth Koch. [BRUNNER, 1998, p. 733] Reflecting
changes in the power elite of the literature world, of the 26 earlier
award winners going back to 1949, only two were Jewish (still an
overrepresentation of Jewry, per their percentage of the American
population, by about 250%).
From Philadelphia, the American
Poetry Review has been described as the "premiere poetry journal in
the country." [LEITER, 1999] Editors are Stephen Berg, Arthur Vogelsang,
and David Bonanno -- at least one, likely two, but very possibly all,
are Jewish. In 1998, "local Jewish activist and patron" Lynne Honickman
and her family's Honickman Foundation instituted a yearly American
Poetry Review "first book" contest for poets. The 1998 judge, Gerald
Stern (winner of the 1998 National Book Award for poetry), was Jewish,
(his choice as APR winner was Joshua Beckman) as was the next
year's judge, Louise Gluck, who selected another fellow Jew as the best
poet, Dana Levin.
Sanford Pinsker, a Jewish reviewer,
notes with satisfaction the "Jewish dimension" to National Book Award
winner Gerald Stern's poetry. Citing Stern's poem called "Behaving Like
a Jew," Pinsker's insights into the poem read like a Mad magazine
parody:
"In this poem, probably the most
anthologized and best known of all
Stern's work, the speaker ruminates
about the death of an opossum,
refusing to treat the event as yet
another instance of the 'joy in death'
and the 'philosophical understanding
of the carnage' he associates
with the anti-Semitic Charles
Lindbergh. Instead, he insists on behaving
like a Jew, which means touching the
animal's face, staring into its
eyes and pulling it off the road.
And as Stern describes this
(Jewish) moment, the opossum in
question metamorphoses itself into
what looks for all the world
like a Hasidic Jew:
'I am not going to stand in a
wet ditch ... / and lose myself in the
immortal life stream / when my
hands are still a little shaky / from his
stiffness and his bulk / and my
eyes are still weak and misty / from
his round belly and his curved
fingers / and his black whiskers and
his little dancing feet.'"
[original author's parenthesis: PINSKER, 1998,
p. 62]
Pinsker isn't joking about this. Not
only does the reviewer declare the poem to be Jewish, so is
the opossum! So much so that the idea of its "whiskers," "round
belly," and "little feet" loom as a kind of dead rabbi to him.
"Writers are all secret Jews,"
declared Maxime Kumin, two years after winning a Pulitzer Prize for
poetry. [HYMAN, p. 766] "All poets are Jews," echoed Russian Jewish
poet Marina Tsvetayeva. [FINKELSTEIN, N., 1998] "To be Jewish means to
be a poet," declared Holocaust hero Elie Wiesel, affirming an apparent
in-house Jewish truism. [STORCH, 1998, p. 8] "A woman poet is a
hunted Jew," declares Erica Jong, "eternally the outsider." [JONG, E.,
1994, p. 100] (Delmore Schwartz has his own take on the
Jew-poet-sufferer closure, noting his period as a student at Harvard
University: " I never thought about anti-Semitism, because everyone was
against me as a poet.") [ATLAS, J., 1977, 166] Hilene Flanzbaum suggests
the psycho-social forces at play from which such a notion -- any poet as
a kind of honorary Jew -- may come from: "The poet's sense of
alienation had come to signal his superiority to a debased American
culture ... That poets are seldom appreciated in their own time or
nation corresponds to the plight of the Jews, long held to be chosen but
nationless." [FLANZEBAUM, p. 267] Hence, being a poet is understood by
many in today's poetry world to be a psychological state of antithesis
to the established order, consciously conceived as an echo of the
traditional Jewish sense of superiority to the surrounding
non-Jewish norms, despite the fact that the elitist cliques that
control the avenues towards crowning as a celebrated "poet" in the
poetry/publishing industry has become, like all the rest of popular
culture, merely an arm of the established -- and increasingly
Judaized -- order itself. Being Jewish, after all (really or
illusorily), is a strong boost towards the gateway of public sympathy,
personal accomplishment, and, in all spheres, success.
Flanzbaum notes the case of famous
non-Jewish poet John Berryman, and the phenomena of Gentile poets
looking for their symbolic selves in the Jewish victimhood paradigm:
"In 1945, John Berryman, a Catholic
poet from rural Oklahoma, won the
Kenyon Review's annual contest
for best short-fiction. His eight-page
story, 'The Imaginary Jew,' featured
a southern boy in New York City
College who is brutally attacked
after being taken for 'a Jew.' In that same
year, Karl Shapiro, a
third-generation American Jew won the Pulitzer Prize
for a collection of poetry called
V-Letter ... Berryman is not the only
imaginary Jew haunting the pages of
modern American poetry. In fact,
many appear at this time."
[Flanzbaum, p. 259, 260]
For Shapiro's part, among his poems
is at least one in homage to the new Jewish state of Israel, described
in the work as the "liberation of Palestine." In it he further
rhapsodizes that "When I see the name of Israel high in print ... I sink
deep in a Western chair and rest my soul." [UROFSKY, M., 1978, p. 241]
(Shapiro was for a few years the editor of the prestigious journal
Poetry.). [SYRKIN, M., 1964, p. 229]
Much-heralded Spanish poet Federico
Garcia Lorca, killed in 1936 during the Spanish Civil War, had a
"fanciful belief that he possessed the blood of gypsies and Jews."
[NADEL, I., 1996, p. 23] In Europe, in 1999, a press report noted a
requisite homage: "[Britain's] Poet Laureate Andrew Motion will read his
poem about Ann [Frank], entitled Ann Frank Huis," marking the
70th anniversary of her birth. [PRESS ASSOCIATION NEWSFILE, 6-7-99]
Nearly forty years earlier, Soviet Union poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko,
"married to a Jewess, leaped to world fame in 1961 as the author of
'Babi Yar,' a poem he wrote in protest against the world's apathy
towards the slaughter of millions of Jews." [LITVINOFF, B., p. 97]
(Yevtushenko was also in New York when a Jewish Defense League bomb --
intended to disrupt a concert by Soviet performers -- killed a Jewish
woman, Iris Kones. In a poem, Yevtushenko "compares the smoke-filled
room in which Iris Kones died to a Nazi gas chamber." [ROBINSON, H.
1994, p. 446] Another Russian poet and novelist for years elevated to
extraordinary attention in the West is Boris Pasternak. He too is
Jewish. So is one of Europe's most celebrated post-war poets, Paul
Celan. "Though Celan never spelled out his Jewishness," says Jewish
scholar John Felstiner, "he aligned himself more stringently with the
Jews than with the non-Jews in his pantheon." [GROSS, N., 7-7-95, p. 8]
Prominent French author Nathalie
Sarraute (Natacha Tcherniak) was also Jewish. Well-known French
writer "Colette" wasn't Jewish but she was married once to Maurice
Goudket, who was Jewish, and who who founded her "beauty institute"
which failed. [THURMAN, 2000, p. 394-395, 441] Here's some of the Jewish
perspectives on Colette's world, as described by her biographer, where
being Jewish is equated with all things progressive, and liberating, in
the social world:
"Colette came of age as a woman and a writer during the Dreyfus Affair,
which dominated the history of the French fin de siecle
[the Dreyfus Affair is a lynchpin in Jewish complaints of
anti-Semitism: a Jewish army officer was falsely tried for treason].
The anti-semitism, homophobia, and misogyny of the period proved to
have much in common. The Jews, the 'New Woman,' and the homosexual were
at once fascinating and repulsive figures in the popular imagination. In
each case, the danger that they posed to the established order was the
same miscegenation. They threatened to corrupt the old fixed categories
of national identity in one case, gender in the other two, at a moment
when all kinds of boundaries, external and internal, were being
transgressed." [THURMAN, J., 2000, p. xv]
Also in Colette's world was Georges Kessel:
"Georges Kessel was a wit, an idler, a pretty boy and a dandy. He had
married very young and well, his wife's income supported his passion for
gambling. He dabbled in fiction and worked briefly as the private
secretary to [publisher] Gaston Gallimard, who was impressed by his
decadent charm. But at twenty-four, unexpectedly, Georges shook off his
dilettante's torper and became the editor-in-chief of a weekly magazine
devoted to crime stories ... The venture was underwritten by Gallimard,
who paid Georges an enormous salary. He earned it, but he also began
embezzling large sums from his patron, in the form of advances to
fictitious writers to pay for his cocaine habits and his debts at the
track." [THURMAN, J., 2000, p. 403]
An international Jewish writers conference in San Francisco in 1997
featured prominent authors from Guatemala (Victor Perera), Brazil
(Moacyr Scilar), Mexico (Elan Stavans), Romania (Norman Manae), Great
Britain (Dan Jacobson), Poland (Henryk Broder) and Hungary (George
Konrad, "who has been discussed as a potential Nobel Prize candidate.")
[SCHIFRIN, D., 1997, p. 1] Famed Russian author Maxim Gorky wasn't
Jewish, but his agent, Alexander Lazarevich Helphand/Gelfand (nicknamed
Parvus), was. [VOKOGONOV, D., 1994, p. 112]
As Ilan Stavans notes about the recent upsurge in "Jewish issues"
writing in South America:
"Jewish authors, for example, seem to have more presence [than
before] in the
Southern Hemisphere. From Argentina, there is Ricardo Feierstein,
Marcos Aguinis,
Jorge Goldenberg, and Fingueret herself; from Mexico, Rosa Nissan;
from Uruguay,
Mauricio Rosencof. Many of those authors began their careers
decades ago, but
now the collective impact of their work is beginning to be felt.
Some are even achieving
popular success. And while few take the
genocide in Europe as their central focus,
many do offer it as backdrop. Editorial Mila and the
Acervo Cultural in Argentina
publish Holocaust survivors' accounts, like that of Charles
Papiernik, originally a
French citizen, who endured four years in Auschwitz. And a recent
fiction contest,
organized by Feierstein, brought a handful of Holocaust-related
narratives, including
El ultimo dia, by Mina Weil, about a Jewish girl growing up
in Mussolini's Italy. I've
also seen some nonfiction articles, like one about relationships
among Holocaust
victims by Diana Wang, a psychologist in Buenos Aires, who found
out she was
Jewish as she was about to take first Communion. Films, too, are
part of the trend.
I'm acquainted with fewer than half a dozen movies made in Latin
America that
address the Holocaust directly, but several others deal with the
topic at least
tangentially." [STAVANS, I., 5-25-01]
Muriel Spark, an avowed Catholic, born of a Jewish father, has
been described as "arguably the most formidable Scottish writer."
[WHITAKER, R., 1-21-96] Jorge Isaacs, of partial Jewish heritage, has
long been regarded as Colombia's "national poet." [SACHAR, H., p. 267]
Australia's "most widely read and celebrated poet" is Dorothy Porter,
whose father, proudly notes a Jewish ethnic magazine, is Jewish.
[MANDIE, D., 1999, p. 68-69] The great German writer, Johann Goethe,
wasn't Jewish, but "[Albert] Bielschowsky, like so many Goethe
biographers [was] a Jew ... German Jews played a leading role in Goethe
societies ... In the mid-1920s, Jews were almost a majority in the
Berlin Goethe society." [MOSSE, G., 1983, p. 45] Isaac Deutcher noted in
1968 that "quite a few Polish writers have been of Jewish origin, for
instance Julian Tuwim and Antoni Slonimski, the most eminent poets of
the inter-war period." [DEUTCHER, I., 1968, p. 54]
And who was America's official "poet
laureate" for the late 1990's, whose job -- for $35,000 a year -- is to
serve as a poetry "consultant" to the Library of Congress? Jewish poet
and Boston University professor Robert Pinsky. "One of his grand works,"
notes the Los Angeles Times, "An Explanation of America,
(Princeton University Press, 1979) is an epic poem written for his
oldest daughter, now a manager at Borders Books in Los Angeles."
[MEHREN, p. E1] Pinsky is the former poetry editor for the avidly
pro-Israel New Republic. In 1999, Pinsky became the "first poet
laureate to be named for a third year by Congress." [KUSHNER, L.,
5-28-99, p. 1]
In 2000, Stanley Kunitz was named to
replace Pinsky as America's poet laureate. Kunitz is also Jewish.
Including Kunitz, at least five of the last eight American poet
laureates (i.e., since 1988) have been Jewish: Kunitz, Pinsky, Howard
Nemerov, Mark Strand, and Joseph Brodsky.
Jewish American playwrights in (the
Jewish-dominated) theatre include Arthur Miller, Neil Simon, Lilian
Hellman, Elmer Rice, Paddy (Sidney) Cheyefsky, Abe Burrows (Abraham
Solomon Borowitz), George S. Kaufman, Wendy Wasserstein, Moss Hart,
Elmer Rice, S.N. Behrman, and Clifford Odets. [PLESUR, M. 1982, p. 173]
In France, surrealist Eugene Ionesco's mother was Jewish. In Britain,
where Jews are less than one percent of the population, in 1969 "Lord"
Goodman, the (Jewish) chairman of the British Arts Council, observed
that "in the theatre at this moment the younger school of dramatists is
perhaps seventy-five percent Jewish." Such authors included Harold
Pinter, Arnold Wesker, Bernard Kops, Frank Marcus, Peter Shaffer, Lionel
Bart, and Wolf Mankowitz, among others. [LITVINOFF, B., p. 168] "Their
contention is that they are English writers," said Barnet Litvinoff,
"... [yet] a hidden sentiment was activated among them in 1967, however,
and they made a swift if somewhat condescending rediscovery of their
Jewishness." [LITVINOFF, B., p. 168]
"What could be prompting the increased visibility of so many
Jewish figures on the modern British literary scene?" wondered Merritt
Mosely (author of The Dictionary of Lietrary Biography: British
Novelists Since 1960) in 2001. Mosley notes Howard Jacobson (whose
"Jewishness consciousness ... continues to animate his novels") as the
best of them. "Two other celebrated novels of the year 2000 were about
Jewishnessness," he adds, including Will Self's How the Dead Men Live
("Mr. Self has said that [the character] Lily is partly based on his
mother, who was also a Jewish anti-Semite") and Linda Grant's When I
Lived in Modern Times, winner of the Orange Prize for Fiction (it is
"a historical novel about a young Jewish woman growing up in London's
Soho during World War II.") "Two widely noticed 1999 titles were about
Jews, assimilation and anti-Semitism in England," adds Mosely (these are
Gillian Freeman's His Mistress's Voice and Bernice Ruben's I,
Dreyfus. [MOSELEY, M., 5-25-01]
Germany? "Nathan the Wise," notes
Michael Brenner, "became one of the most popular figures in post-war
German theatre. He was soon to be joined on the stage by many other
Jewish figures, ranging from the Fiddler on the Roof to Ann Frank. In
recent years in Germany there has also been a remarkable revival of
German-Jewish authors, such as Else Lasker-Schuler, Kurt Tucholsky,
Erich Muhsam, and Alfred Dublin. Such towering names as Franz Kafka and
Walter Benjamin are much better known today than during their own
lifetimes." [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. xxi]
Aside from the many Jewish "Family"
critics already mentioned, other prominent Jewish literature/culture
critics include Walter Benjamin (Detlev Holz), George Steiner, Louis
Untermeyer (whose son, Joseph, was active in Zionist efforts to get
weapons to Israel) [UROFSKY, M., 1978, p. 157] and Clifton Fadiman,
among many others.
By 1996, Sylvia Barack-Fishman, a
professor at Brandeis University, noted that
"A search for the essence of Jewish
identity has become a focal point of
contemporary American Jewish
literary and intellectual exploration
spanning all brow levels, in works
from the most complex fiction to
the soap-operatic life-cycle angst
of popular films and television
programs." [BARACK-FISHMAN, p. 58]
She also even notes that these days
"Israel figures prominently in fiction by such authors as Saul Bellow,
Chaim Potok, Elie Wiesel, Jay Neugeboren, Hugh Nissenson, E.M. Broner,
Tova Reich, Mark Helprin, and many others." [BARACK-FISHMAN, p. 279]
"Even Norman Mailer," says Desser and Friedman, "who includes few Jewish
characters in his books, and actually fights against his Jewish
identity, is usually included in anthologies and critical works about
Jewish authors." [DESSER, p. 4-5]
Here's how novelist Jonathan Kellerman's interest in Israel was
reported in 2002:
"Best-selling novelist Jonathan Kellerman placed the winning online
auction bid for a guitar signed by Don Henley and his fellow Eagles
bandmates. Henley is donating the $7,900 from the sale to the Jewish
Federation of Greater Dallas for use in supporting Israel and Jewish
organizations. Kellerman, the author of 23 books who lives in Los
Angeles, is a longtime musician and collector of vintage guitars. But he
said he bought the new, Takamine G330 acoustic guitar expressly because
the proceeds will provide support for Israel. 'I've lived in Israel, set
a novel ('The Butcher's Theater') there and am dedicated to supporting
organizations that strengthen Israel,' he said in a statement
Tuesday." [TOP FORTY CHARTS, 6-1-02]
"Complementing the focus on [the
Holocaust] survivor syndrome," says Lillian Kremer, "is the attention of
writers to [a] survivor mission. This is manifest in [Marge] Piercy's
and [National Book award winner] Adrienne Rich's advocacy of Zionism."
[DAVIDSON, p. 396] Elsewhere, mystery writer Richard "Kinky" Friedman
"is a hawk on the Arab-Israeli conflict." As a Jewish country western
singer, he was once awarded the Jewish Defense League's "prize for
cultural contribution"; among his compositions (often performed) is "a
particularly tasteless song about using a picture of Jesus for toilet
paper." [CHAFETS, MEMOIRS, p. 175, 176] "A number of new books from
university presses, Jewish publishers, and mainstream publishers," noted
the Jewish Week in 1999, "are searching out women's voices in
Jewish history and Jewish texts, reclaiming Jewish tradition."
In the feminist movement, of which
Jewish women have been so much a part, publishing and literary heroines
began making their inevitable march home to reconnect with Jewish
exclusionist/elitist tenets. Abandoning an abstract solidarity with the
generalized human community for the narrower, more tangible, glories of
Jewish particularism and Holocaust victim/unity, they somehow managed to
tiptoe around the massive anti-woman keystones of traditional Jewish
teachings. In an article about alleged anti-Semitism in the women's
movement and being a "born-again" Jew, Letty Pogrebin, a founding editor
of Ms magazine, announced to her readers that
"During the past few years
something has changed, something that
makes me no less a woman but more
a Jew ... [POGREBIN, p. 76,
1987] .. Looking back, I suppose
my first visit to Israel had something
to do with this epiphany ... As
instructive as the first visit was, it was
the MS tour of Israel that
grew out of my account of it in this magazine
that something clicked for me ...
[POGREBIN, p. 77, 1987] ... Before I
had believed in a universalistic
ideal, in feminine synthesis, and
de-emphasizing differences, but
now, secularly as well as spiritually, I
was 'born again' to my people. The
change is subtle but seismic."
[POGREBIN, p. 77]
"I have never considered myself
religious," wrote Betty Friedan, former President of the National
Organization of Women (NOW) and author of one of the most influential
feminist tracts, The Feminine Mystique, "For me as for other
Jewish feminists, religion perpetuates the patriarchal tradition that
denies women access to Judaism's most sacred ritual and enshrined them
within the confines of their biological roles. But when women like me
broke through to our authentic personhood as women, we found the
strength to dip deep down into ourselves on other levels ... Now with a
sense of confidence born of the women's movement, I and many other
feminists found we could embrace our authentic Jewishness in a new way
... In some strange and wonderful way my feminism and my Judaism were
merging." [SILBERMAN, p. 264]
"After fifty," says best-selling
author (best known for the novel Fear of Flying) and feminist
Erica Jong:
"I began to question my ambivalent
relationship to my Jewish identity
and the unexamined assimilation I
have written about earlier. It seems
astonishing to me that a woman born
at the height of the Holocaust
should not have been trained to a
stronger sense of Judaism. And I
also began to regret not having
raised my [my daughter] more Jewishly,
and not having more Jewish children
to replace those lost among the six
million [Holocaust victims]. Lately
I have begun to yearn for solidarity
with other Jewish feminists ... to
celebrate Jewishness without shame."
[TEMPLIN, p. 126]
(How, by the way, did Jong first get published? Her mother sent her
to a Jewish family friend, Bessie Golding -- Jong's grandfather's
mistress. Jong presented poems to Golding at her office who read them
for twenty minutes, then looked up and decided that "You're going to be
the most famous woman poet of your generation." Golding passed the poems
along to an executive at the Holt publishing company "who passed it on
to Aaron Asher [also Jewish]," the Holt publisher. Thus was born Jong's:
Fruits and Vegetables.) [JONG, E., 1994, p. 134-137]
One wonders how prominent author
Cynthia Ozick, active in Jewish religious circles, reconciles the
virulent anti-female Jewish tradition:
"In the world at large I call myself
and am called a Jew. But when on
Sabbath I sit among women in my
traditional shul and the rabbi
speaks the word 'Jew,' I can be sure
that he is not referring to me.
For him 'Jew' means male Jew. When my
rabbi says 'A Jew is called
to the Torah,' he never means me or
any other living Jewish woman.
My own synagogue is the only place in
the world where I, a middle-
aged adult, am defined exclusively by
my being the female child of
my parents. My own synagogue is the
only place in the world
where I am not a Jew." [ROIPHE, 1981,
p. 202]
As Rabbi Frisch's Marriage Manual,
a traditional view of Judaism, says:
"Even though the woman is a man's
partner, she should not think
of her husband as a comrade but
rather as a master. And the woman
should love her husband and he shall
rule over her as it is said:
'And thy desire shall be to thy
husband, and he shall rule over
thee.'" [HEILMAN, S., 1992, p.
332]
Rosellen Brown, a fiction editor at
the Jewish magazine Tikkun, notes that stories submitted to her
tend to be about old Jewish characters, the Holocaust, and old New York
City Jewish neighborhoods. "What you can probably see emerging here,"
she wrote in 1993, "... [is] nostalgia ... [BROWN, p. 79] ... The
majority of work we see is thematically hard breathing and anxious. And
where its spirit is I have no idea, except that it seems bent on
discharging some long-forgotten obligation." [BROWN, p. 82]
Andrew Furman, a judge for the
National Jewish Book award, noted in 2000 the flavor of modern Jewish
literature:
"Jews, the world over, continue to
write fiction at a fierce clip ... The
'ethnic,' mid-century wave of Jewish
American writing, fueled by the
immigrant consciousness, has clearly
given way to a new wave of
Jewish writing. Concomitantly, the
burden of alienation and marginality
amid a host culture are no longer the
twin occupations of Jewish
writers. Rather, the literary
grandchildren of Bellow, Roth, and Malamud
-- at home now amid their environs --
look increasingly inward these
days as they engage more explicitly
Judaic concerns: the toxic legacy
of the Holocaust, the retrieval of
extinct Jewish worlds (e.g., the
European shtetl, New York's lower
East Side), Jewish feminism,
the viability of Orthodoxy, and the
biblical resonances in the modern
world." [FURMAN, A., MAY/JUNE 2000,
p. 29]
In poetry, for instance, Jewish poet
Linda Pasten was afforded space in the 1990s in Tikkun for her
poem about an almost obligatory theme, concluding:
"and when my mother saw the
swastika
on an envelope in the kitchen
table,
she picked up fast, and we
returned
to the steamy city." [FIRESTONE,
p. 4]
Erica Jong's first collection of poetry (Near the Black Forest)
was "weighed with poems about my discovering my Jewishness in Germany."
[JONG, E., 1994, p. 133]
In a book about Jewish women, Paula
Hyman and Deborah Moore note that:
"A significant group of contemporary
Jewish writers produced an inward-
turning genre of fiction that
explores the individual Jew's connection to
other Jewish people, to the Jewish
religion, culture, and tradition, and to
the chain or Jewish history.
Contrary to the expectations of
assimilationists and the example of
Jewish literature during the first half
of the twentieth century,
particularist woman's Jewish fiction became
commonplace ... Among the themes
that emerged is the late twentieth
century American Jewish fiction
focusing on women, some of the most
important include: the role of the
Holocaust in the identity of survivors,
their children, and the broader
Jewish community; Israel as a focal point
of American Jewish identity, and a
setting for the exploration of Jewish
identity." [HYMAN, p. 422]
"It must be emphasized," notes
Gershon Shaked, "that American Jewish literature today is prouder of its
dual identity than any other 'foreign' Jewish literature has ever been."
[SHAKED, p. 176]
Also among the major current genres
of Jewish fiction is the Jewish "tough guy" story, what Paul Breines
calls the "Rambowitz syndrome." Breines notes that he is familiar with
about fifty novels that celebrate an "idealized representation of Jewish
warriors, tough guys, gangsters, Mossad agents, and Jews of all ages and
sexes who fight back against their tormentors." [BARACK-FISHMAN, p. 280]
"A noticeable change has occurred in
recent decades," says Stephen Whitfield, "The fresh appreciation of
ethnic differences that began in the mid-1960s has included the
celebration of Jewish identity in many best-selling novels, in serious
analyses of Yiddishkeit [Jewishness] ... in musicals ... and in
other cultural artifacts too numerous to mention." [WHITFIELD,
Americans, p. 11] "Ours is close to a golden age," wrote Leonard
Fein in 2000, "... Here's one piece of current evidence: On the 'new
non-fiction ' table in a local (non-chain) general bookstore the other
evening, 11 out of 30 titles were on Jewish subjects." [FEIN, L.,
9-8-2000, p. 9]
Thanks to such an avalanche, and
Jewish power to empower and enforce it, Jewish chauvinism has become an
institutionalized norm and is an increasingly integral -- and even
dominant -- part of the mainstream American landscape. "According to a
theory which seems to be tacitly assumed by many critics," wrote Robert
Alter, "the main currents at least of modern culture all derive from
subterranean Jewish sources." [KOESTER, p. 21] "The massive entry of
Jewish intellectuals into the academy in the late 1940s through the
1960s," says David Hollinger, "was a crucial victory for the
cosmopolitans. The attendant de-Christianization of American public
culture was sometimes openly proclaimed -- by Leslie Fiedler, for
example -- who in 1967 celebrated what he called 'the great take-over by
Jewish-American writers' of the task of speaking for Americans."
[HOLLINGER, p. 167]
"The acceptance of [Saul] Bellow as
the leading novelist of his generation," wrote Fiedler in evaluating the
impact of the Jewish literary Mafia upon America, "must be paired off
with the appearance of [Herman Wouk's] Marjorie Morningstar on the front
cover of Time. On all levels, the Jew is in the process of being
mythicized into the representative American." [KOSTELANETZ, p. 1]
"Bellows's Humboldt's Gift," noted Chaim Bermant in 1977, "which
is in some ways an odyssey of literary America, or at least literary New
York (which nowadays has come to mean the same thing), shows how far the
process of assimilation has gone, and it is no longer quite certain what
has happened to whom: whether the Jew has become Americanized or the
Americans Judaized. It is a world in which a writer like Gore Vidal, who
can trace his roots back to an older America, must feel like an
outsider, or a Court goy." [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 158]
Efforts by highly placed Jews to
appropriate all that is great as innately "Jewish" extended to one of
the greatest -- perhaps the greatest -- popular artists in
history: Hollywood's Charlie Chaplin. "Chaplin's own background and
experience," wrote Hannah Arendt, "taught him the traditional Jewish
fear of the 'cop' -- that seeming incarnation of a hostile world; but on
the other hand, it taught him the time-honored Jewish truth that, other
things being equal, the human ingenuity of a David can sometimes
outreach the animal strength of a Goliath." [DESSER, p. 10]
"Chaplin was an English Jew," wrote
Albert Goldman, "who was at pains to deny or minimize his Jewish origins
... his infatuation with blond-haired, fair-skinned, voluptuously
innocent maidens, whom he courted with eyes brimming with Jewish soul
and sentiment, were the classic notes and signs of the Jewish comic
hero." [DESSER, p. 10]
The slight problem here, of course,
is that Charlie Chaplin was not Jewish. None of his parents were
Jewish, nor his grandparents. He was not raised in a Jewish home and he
did not know Hebrew or Yiddish; he was not known to have even been in
any kind of association with Jews at all, at least until he ended up in
Hollywood [DESSER, p. 10] (where one of his wives was a Jewish
actress, Paulette Goddard -- i.e., Paulette Levy). Jewish insistence to
claim him as one of their own, of course, reflects the widespread
inability of Jews to understand the universal dimensions of
Chaplin's loveable tragi-comic character, the Tramp, and the
universal depth of his follies, misfortunes, and foibles against a
world that is hostile to anybody.
If anything, note Desser and
Friedman, "Chaplin is an essentially Christian filmmaker. The
overarching themes of his finest films involve a redemptive Christian
vision revolving around self-sacrifice and charity as the highest form
of love." [DESSER, p. 10] These, as we have amply seen, and as these
Jewish film critics aptly note, are not particularly classic elements of
the Jewish tradition.
* The issues in this chapter of
course have an international flavor. In Russia, during and after the
communist revolution, Zvi Gitelman notes Jewish "intellectual" influence
in securing the new regime: "The Jewish intelligentsia had neutralized
the boycott of the Bolshevik regime by the Russian intelligentsia. In
Lenin's words, they had 'sabotaged the saboteurs.' At the same time
Lenin suggested this should not be emphasized in the press because 'in a
peasant land one must sometimes also reckon with such hateful phenomena
as anti-Semitism.'" [GITELMAN, 1972, p. 115]
Venita Datta has written an entire
book entitled the Origins of the Intellectual in France, noting
that the 1914 Dreyfus Affair (when a Jewish army officer was unjustly
accused of being a traitor) "is often cited as the moment at which the
intellectual was born ... French intellectuals have served as role
models for intellectuals all over the world ... [The intellectual]
supplanted the traditional priest as a source of moral authority in
modern French society." [DATTA, p. 1]
In recent years, there have been
many Jews of influence in the French (and international) intellectual
world, including Claude Levi-Strauss, Michael Foucault, Louis Althusser,
Roland Barthes, and Jacques Lacan.
In the years around 1900 the
80,000 or so Jews of France represented less than one percent of the
French population of 39 million. Yet, "as many anti-Semites noted," says
Datta,
"with the advent of the [French]
Third Republic, more Jews than
ever were visible in the fields
of art, literature, journalism, and
academe. Furthermore, noted
Jewish intellectuals, in particular Emile
Durkheim of the Sorbonne and
Henri Bergson of the College de
France, were seen as pillars of
the republican establishment, as
official 'intellectuals who had
risen to positions of power and fame
via the republican university
system ... [DATTA, p. 85] ... This new
[Third Republic] regime sought to
'de-Christianize' public spaces
... In no other country where
anti-Semitism was present did it possess
such a strong literary character.
Anti-Semites in France were more
interested in responding to
political, social, and cultural developments
than in developing racial
theories ... [p. 87] ... Many Jews rose to
prominent positions in the army,
politics, and high civil service, as
well as the arts and academe ...
[p. 95] ... Jews were particularly
prominent as cultural middlemen,
that is, as reviewers, critics, and
art collectors ... Significant
numbers of Jews were at the forefront of
avant-garde movements, not only
in the literary and artistic avante-
garde ... but also in the
academic disciplines ... [p. 96] ... [One
influential journal] the Revue
Blanche, was more than a journal,
it as also a milieu and a group
of friends linked by school ties and
family relations ... Jewish
collaborators represented roughly half
of the review's staff and a much
higher proportion of its editorial
board." [p. 105]
************************
Aside from Jewish publishing and mass media pre-eminence in
pre-Nazi Germany [see other chapters], Frederick Grunfeld notes the
situation for Jewish authors in that era:
"Literally dozens of writers afterwards banned as 'Jewish -- though
many of them hardly thought of themselves as such -- were producing
important contributions to Germany literature. Among the leading dramatists
were Carl Sternheim (The Snob), Arthur Schnitzler (La Ronde), Ernst
Toller (The Machine-Wreckers), Walter Hasenclever (The Sun), Ferdinand Bruckner (Criminals) and the Hungarian expatriate Ferenc Molnar (Liliom); among the novelists, besides Broch and Kafka, Alfred Doeblin (Berlin Alexanderplatz), Jakob Wasserman (The
World's Illusion), Lion Feuchtwanger (Jew Suss), Franz Werfel (The Forty
Days of Musa Dagh), Alfred Neumann (The Deuce), Bruno Frank (Days of the King), Arnold Zweig (The Case of Sergeant Grischa), Ernest
Weiss (Nahar), Joseph Roth (Radetzky March), and Vicki Baum (Grand
Hotel); among the poets, Ernst Blass, Alfred Mombert, Rudolf Borchardt,
Albert Ehrenstein, Martin Gumpert, Walter Mehring, Nelly Sachs, Berthold Viertel, Karl Wolfskehl and Aflred Wolfenstein; among the essayists
and criktics, Karl Kraus, Alfred Polgar, Maximilian Harden, Theodor Wolff, Egon Friedell, Theodore Lessing, Kurt Tucholsky, Freidrich Torberg, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch and Felix Salten (who also happend to be the author of Bambi)." [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. 27]
The non-Jewish German Nobel Laureate Thomas Mann once wrote about
the key factor that elevated him to fame and attention:
"Jews 'discovered' me, Jews published me and propagated my
reputation; they performed my impossible play; it was a Jew, the late S.
Lublinski, who wrote of my Buddenbrooks (after it had been greeted
elsewhere with sour expressions), 'This book will grow with time, and will still
be read generations from now.' And when I go out into the world, and visit
cities, it is almost always Jews, not only in Vienna and Berlin,
who welcome, shelter, dine, and pamper me ... It is a fact that simply
cannot be denied that, in Germany, whatever is enjoyed only by 'genuine
Teutons' and aboriginal Ur-Germans, but scorned or rejected by
the Jews, will never amount to anything culturally." [GRUNFELD, F., 1996, p. 28]
"The man who translated Salman
Rushdie's 'Satanic Verses' into Persian -- and was threatened with death
for his work -- is seeking asylum in Israel. Dr. Jamshid Hasni, 57, is
married to an Israeli woman and is undergoing a conversion to Judaism.
He told the Ma'ariv newspaper that he could not "return to my
homeland because extremists will harm me. I prefer to live in a Jewish
country. I want to be part of the Jewish people." [Jewish Chronicle (Great Britain), December 6, 2002, p. 13]
"American Jews have made tremendous contributions in all aspects of
general culture. In the professions, in music, in literature, in
painting and
sculpture, in the academic world, and in the area of science, Jews
are
often distinguished and in many instances pre-eminent."
-- Milton Plesur, 1982, p. 168-169
Jews are dominant in virtually all
controlling facets of the modern art world. In the world of
"high-culture" dance, music, and theatre, for decades S. Hurok
Productions was the major force in performance promotion. When
Sol Hurok (born Solomon Izrailevich Gurkov) died in
1974, notes Harlan Robinson, "he was the last large-scale independent
commercial producer of high culture in the United States ... [ROBINSON,
p. xv] ... [He] was an important force behind the establishment of the
National Endowment for the Arts." [ROBINSON, p. xiv] An early Hurok
partner was Jacob Berman. [ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 120] An early
competitor in the "concert management business" was Daniel Mayer's
and Marks Levine's National Broadcasting and Concert Bureau,
with links to the fledgling NBC broadcast network. [ROBINSON, H., 1994,
p. 133] In 1972 Hurok's head of publicity, Martin Feinstein,
became the Executive Director of Performing Arts for the newly created
John F. Kennedy Center in Washington DC. (Hurok's son-in-law, Barry
Hyams, originally hired Feinstein to the Hurok firm. [ROBINSON, H.,
1994, p. 298] In 1975, the president of Hurok Concerts, Sheldon Gold,
was replaced by Maynard Goldman. Gold became president later of
the major talent agency ICM Artists Ltd., a newly formed
classical music and dance division of Marvin Josephson
Associates.
In assessment of Hurok's closest associates, Harlan Robinson
notes that "beyond his domestic employees [cook, servant], Hurok had not
real close friends, with the possible exception of [Jewish violinist
Isaac] Stern. The violinist was also a favorite with Peter
Hyams and Peter's sister Nessa. They also remember their
grandfather had a group of 'cronies,' including some Russian Jews, whom
he had known for years and to whom he remained steadfastly loyal. These
included his accountant and his longtime lawyer, Elias Lieberman,
an old-time socialist who had helped to found the International Ladies
Garment Workers Union" [ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 405] At Hurok's death, he
"left money to his grandchildren and to a variety of Jewish charitable
organizations ... Surprisingly, only one performing arts organization
was included in Hurok's will: the Musicians' Emergency Fund, Inc."
[ROBINSON, H. 1994, p. 462]
Hurok was even succesful in getting a Hollywood movie made about
his life (screenplay writers: Harry Kurnitz and George
Oppenheimer; producer: Georgie Jessel). [ROBINSON, H., 1994,
p. 320] "Highest on the list of Hurok's demands [for the movie] was the
removal of any Jewish ethnicity in the character of the impresario hero
or his associates ...[ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 321] ... Similarly, Hurok
strongly objected to the presence of 'the stock figures of cigar-smoking
impresarios' present in the script's original opening sequence. Such
images would, he feared, detract from the image of refinement and good
taste he wanted his fictionalized self to convey ... [He did not want to
appear as] some sort of back-room shyster." [ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 322]
In the mainstream, the resultant film was not widely acclaimed. The
Jewish Ledger declared, however, that "Jews in America will be proud
of the film ... Himself a very modest person, Mr. Hurok is very much
interested in everything that is Jewish and lends a helping hand in
Jewish affairs." [ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 332]
In the world of theatre, notes
Lester Friedman, "by the early 1890s a good deal of the theatrical
booking business in New York City was in Jewish hands, thanks to the
Klaw & Erlanger syndicate, the Shubert brothers,
Marcus Loew and Adolph Zukor, the Schenck brothers,
and a host of other agents and stage managers." [FRIEDMAN, L., 1982, p.
9]
Likewise, for decades the most
prominent mogul on Broadway was a Jewish producer, David Merrick
(born David Margulies). Merrick's abusive personality saddled him with a
widely known nickname: "the abominable showman." Another Jewish theatre
mogul, Joseph Papp (Papirofsky), founded the New York Shakespeare
Festival, created the influential Public Theatre for playwrights, and
produced such Broadway hits as Hair and A
Chorus Line. Papp's "ego was
huge," says Jewish author Helen Epstein,
"but instead of slickness, he exuded reserve and a sobriety that
made me think
of Old Testament patriarchs ... Papp had influenced a huge
number of his
contemporaries and younger people in the arts. Hundreds of
writers, actors,
directors, composers, designers, producers, arts
administrators, stage managers,
journalists and critics traced
the beginnings of their careers to the [Shakespeare]
Festival. Thousands more dated
their first exposure to
Shakespeare to a production
in Central Park. Millions of others had seen his productions on
television and on
Broadway. The name Joseph Papp embodied the history and very
best possibilities
of New York." [EPSTEIN, H., 1994, p. 10-ll]
Oscar Hammerstein I, also Jewish, by the early years of the
20th century built thirteen theatres/music hall (often for the opera) in
New York, Philadelphia, and London. "The name and personality of Oscar
Hammerstein," notes Vincent Sheean, "became as familiar to the nation as
if he had been elected its President ... Oscar Hammerstein ... commanded
more space in the press than the Vanderbilts, Astors, Morgans, than
William Jennings Bryan or indeed any other personage of his day except
President Theodore Roosevelt." [SHEEAN, V., 1956, p. 3-4] Hammerstein
(and son Willie) even owned the Victoria Theatre ("the great nut
vaudeville house of New York") which was famed for freak shows,
featuring "persons notorious for whatever reason" -- "bridge jumpers and
stunt flyers, divorcees, channel swimmers, and record-breakers of any
kind; whether they had stage talent was irrelevant." [SHEEAN, 1956, p.
112] Hammerstein's greatest rival in the opera world (who eventually
bought him out) was also Jewish, Otto Kahn, "banker and
connoisseur of the arts [and] principal financial power of the
Metropolitan [Opera Company]." [SHEEAN, V., 1956, p. 296]
But the most powerful entrepreneurial network in theatre production
and control has long been the Shubert company. Jerry Stagg notes
that Samuel, Jacob, and Lee (Levi) Shubert
"invaded New York City in 1900, armed with tireless energy, boundless
confidence, a lust for money, power, and fame, and $15,000, most of it
borrowed. A quarter of a center later, their worth was estimated at half
a billion dollars. [The Shuberts] took control of theatre in America."
[STAGG, p. 3] (Shubert CEO in the year 2000? Gerald Schoenfeld).
More at ground level, Lee Strasberg and Stella Adler of
New York's Group Theatre were legendary and profoundly influential
acting teachers. Lawrence Langner was one of the founders of the
Washington Square Players.
As
Ellen Schiff notes:
"A few years ago, Tyrone Guthrie speculated that if Jews withdrew
from the
American theatre, the institution 'would collapse about next
Thursday.'
Guthrie was no doubt assessing Jewish contributions at every level
of
of show business from artistic, to administrators, to 'angels.'
[i.e,
philanthropists]." [SCHIFF, E., 1986, p. 79]
By 1999, Jewish entrepreneur
Robert F.X. Sillerman's SFX company was causing shock waves
in the live theatre and music promotion worlds. In one and a half years
it had spent $1.5 billion in gobbling up other companies. The
Financial Post noted that he was still attempting to "strengthen his
domination of live theatre promotion in the United States. SFX
also is the single largest player in [music] concert promotion. So
large, in fact, that regulators expressed concern last year ... SFX
is now believed to be close to purchasing its only major rival,
Universal Concerts, a division of Montreal firm Seagram Company
[controlled by the Jewish Bronfman family]." [LANG, A., 5-28-99, p. C1,
C17]
SFX also owns or operates over
80 venues in the United States, mostly concert halls, as well as the
rights to many theatrical productions (Phantom of the Opera, et
al). It also produces over 13,000 events a year. Its recently purchased
Falk Associated Management Enterprises division manages 650
professional athletes and broadcasters -- basketball star Michael Jordan
among them. "Talent agencies, ticketing companies, and independent
promoters," notes the (New York) Daily News, "have complained
that the new live entertainment giant exerts too much control over the
industry." [FURMAN, 6-7-99, p. 57] In August 1999 SFX moved into
Great Britain too, purchasing the Apollo Leisure Group
(one of the largest theatre and arena operators in that country) for
$254 million. The purchase also included Tickets Direct and the
Barry Claymore Corporation. [FARMER, N., 8-21-99, p. 13]
In the dance world, Martha Graham was
one of the icons of this art form in the 20th century. She wasn't
Jewish. But in her early seventies her "right hand man" became Ron
Protas, Jewish and in his twenties, who eventually positioned
himself to inherit her entire estate at her death. As Ismene Brown notes
"When dance great Martha Graham died
at the age of 96, she left him
[Protas] everything. It was the
greatest legacy to dance this century.
Five years later Ron Protas
stood as the only inheritor of the Graham
works, the Graham company, and the
Graham industry. After reading
the section on Protas in the huge
biography of Graham by her long-term
colleague and fellow choreographer
Agnes de Mille (Rodeo, Oklahoma!);
it's hard not to expect to meet
Svengali, Mephistopheles, and a leech
rolled into one. No one could have
been more damned in print. He
caused a 'blood-letting,' 'policed'
Graham, de Mille says; turned her
against old friends, made her into
an elderly fool performing into
her seventies, and tainted a
monumental career with sleazy celebrity
games. The object of this scorn
(shared by many) is a shock to meet --
an amiably shambling, hunched-up man
of 49, black curly hair,
chubby Jewish features, constantly
wreathed in smiles, very disarming."
[BROWN, I., 10-16-96, p. 17]
Famed dancer Isadora Duncan's accompanist was Max Rabinovitch.
[ROBINSON, H., 1994, p. 91] Duncan's husband, Russian poet Seregei
Yesenin, was once publicized as an "anti-Semite." "Not surprisingly,"
notes Harlow Robinson, "and probably with [Jewish impresario Sol]
Hurok's help, the story of Yesenin's anti-Semitism immediately
hit the newspapers, elaborately embroidered." [ROBINSON, M., 1994, p.
92] As Julia Foulkes declares about the Jewish angle to the modern dance
world:
"Although the leaders of modern dance in the 1930s -- Martha
Graham, Doris
Humphrey, Chalres Weidman, and Haya Holm -- were not Jewish, Jewish
women filled modern dance classes, companies, organizations, picket
lines,
and concert audiences. Teachers, such as Blanche Talmud and Edith
Segal,
taught performers, such as Lily Mehlman and Lillian Shapero;
performances
by choreographers such as Anna Sokolow and Sophie Maslow, were
reviewed
by critics, such as Edna Ocko; while organizers, such as Helen
Tamiris and
Fanya Geltman, hassled labor unions and the federal government for
increased
attention to dance. These efforts in substantiating a new art form
have been
overlooked because our view of the arts tends to focus on a few
stars,
emphasizing individual genius rather than collective momentum and
organizational
drive. Jewish women shaped the foundation of modern dance, and in
the mid-
1930s their impact was well enough known that the eminent social
commentator
[and Jewish comedian] Fanny Brice could unleash her satire on the
subject,
playing Martha Graham in a sketch entitled 'Modernistic Moe,' in
which she
cried 'Rewolt!' in a Yiddish accent." [FOULKES, J., JUNE 2000, p.
233-252]
Even the best known mime in history, Marcel Marceau
(originally Mangel), is Jewish. To his credit, he once told a Jewish
ethnic newspaper: "I find it hard to identify with Jewish issues --
humanity is my overriding battle cry." [JOSEPHS, J., 3-30-01] Performer
Meredith Monk is also Jewish. [TWICE BLESSED, online gay/Jewish
website]
Jewish influence in the visual arts
is a huge story. "Modern art" (hereafter defined as painting, sculpture,
and other visual arts) in capitalist society is a paradox. Its
practitioners generally believe that their personal expressions of the
human experience through physical objects are secularly sacred. Yet, to
survive and prosper as artists, to garner the support to do further work
that transcends mere consumerism, this belief itself must be
fundamentally prostituted. "Fine art," notes anthropologist Stuart
Plattner, "is similar to religion ... as an institution that counteracts
the crassly commercial search for advancement in a capitalist art world.
At the same time, these objects of supposedly sublime vision are bought
and sold as commodities." [PLATTNER, p. 4]
The elitist "art world" strata --
so-called "High Art"-- is the milieu of painting provenances, artist
pedigrees, and the changing "avante-garde" superstar brand-names. There
are, strangely, no objective standards in this strata to discern quality
or value in either the artist or his creations. Not only are there no
clear standards of evaluation, "in the age of conceptual, minimal, and
performance art, it is often unclear what museum quality art is supposed
to look like." [PLATTNER, p. 5] The confirmation of artistic importance
(and, hence, quality and value) is merely the decision of the "informed
opinion" of High Art insiders, whose dictates are often self-rewarding.
Such insiders include an incestuous cabal of professional art curators,
critics, and dealers who swim back and forth among these occupational
categories of art trade. (There are other entrees to the art community,
of course. One of the most prominent art critics of the 1960s and 1970s
was Harold Rosenberg who was trained as a lawyer and who became
an influential "art critic" after a career in advertising. [JACOBY, p.
110] As Rosenberg himself once noted, "Since the rise of art history, in
the nineteenth century, art historians have been directly linked with
the market prices of paintings and sculptures because of their authority
in deciding attributions. By the 1970s, art history, having achieved the
leading role in the day-to-day life of art, had overgrown all its
theoretical boundaries and gone to seed; it was now prepared to put the
stamp of value on anything, not excluding publicized fakes." [MEYER, K.,
1979, p. 186]
While there is no clearly unifying
and objective standard of art evaluation, there is a referential High
Art history, the entwined tales of artists and wealthy business patrons
who brought them to public attention and acclaim. There is also an art
jargon, and meta-language "art talk" for those in the know.
As Duncan Cameron, once-director of the Brooklyn Museum, said in a
speech to the United Nations:
"In summary, then, the traditional museum has been administered by
a curatorial
elite whose members are trained as scholars in disciplines relevant
to the museum
collections ... structured according to specific models of
knowledge. These
models are generally incomprehensible to other than those trained
in a
specific discipline and may be said to be encoded in the private
languages
of scholarship ... This situation has persisted through the
reluctance of the
public to protest it and the willingness of governing bodies to
support it.
Both have been in awe of the mystique of curatorship, both have
been
unprepared to admit that the content of the museum is meaningless
and lacks
a personal relevance ... For a few, the upper-middle class with
higher
education and therefore some key to the secret codes, it becomes a
domain with class and status connections." [MEYER, K., 1979, p.
236-237]
"Art has become a commodity," notes
Sophy Burnham, "Collectors bought art as profitable speculation. Museums
bought what their trustees (these same collectors) demanded they
immortalize. Critics pushed art in which they had financial interest ...
The artist had no part in these exchanges. Once his work passed out of
his hands ... he received no further royalties. He watched the prices
rise and the dealers in art get fat ... Art was whatever would sell."
[BURNHAM, p. 9]
"On the assumption that "he who pays
the piper calls the tunes," says Judith Huggins-Balfe, "critics have
accused both individuals and institutional private patrons of altering
some presumably 'natural' development of art, in their own class and
commercial interests." [BALFE, p. 314] Si Newhouse, for instance,
(whom we have met before as chairman of the huge Advance media chain),"
said dealer Leo Castelli, "is one who has put together a perfect
choice of artists, starting out with Pollack and de Kooning." [WATSON,
p. 104]
While trained "art professionals"
are influential, the foundation of the modern art world is those who buy
and sell it (sometimes these very art professionals). Such people decide
what has value, and even what art is and is not. Most do not truly care
about cutting edge perceptual insights or transcendent visions but,
rather, money. Most buying and selling of art today, especially in the
realm of High Art, is an economic investment. In 1984 major art
journals, including ArtNews and Art and Antiques, even
began publishing lists of major art collectors. 60% of the list were
Americans. The next most populous were Japanese, then Germans. [WATSON,
p. 388] (In more recent years, with Japanese economic woes, Japanese
influence has correspondingly diminished and a significant percentage of
today's "German" art activity we can safely presume to be Jewish).
The heart of the American (and
international) High Art market is New York City. "Although Los Angeles,
Chicago, San Francisco, Santa Fe, and other centers have large demands
[for art]," says Stuart Plattner, "New York is hegemonic on the national
scale, and even the international level, meaning that only elite gallery
exposure in New York creates art-historical significance." [PLATTNER, p.
8] New York City is also home for the most important art magazines and
other periodicals whose sphere of reportage is usually its immediate
vicinity. By 1973, some estimated that 75-80% of the 2500 core "art
market' personnel -- art dealers, art curators, art critics, and art
collectors -- were Jewish. [BURNHAM, p. 25] These people -- and their
progeny -- in New York largely control American artistic tastes and
values at the most important tier. (In 2001, according to ARTnews,
at least eight of the "Top Ten" art collectors were Jewish: Debbie and
Leon Black, Edythe and Eli Broad, Doris and Donald
Fisher, Ronnie and Samuel Heyman, Marie-Josee and Henry R.
Kravitz, Evelyn and Leonard Lauder, Jo Carole and Ronald
S. Lauder, and Stephen Wynn). [ESTEROW, M., SUMMER 2001]
When Alice Bellony-Rewald (an
artist, critic, and art model) first moved into the New York art world
from France, she noted that :
"I was plunged into a world of
highly sophisticated Jewish art collectors,
and it took me a long time to
reconcile my mental picture of speakeasies
and the Wild West with people who
spoke five languages fluently and
lived surrounded by period
furniture, Meissen china, and Old
Masters." [PEPPIATT, p. 16]
Jewish author Howard Jacobson
wrote in 1993 about his experiences with prominent New York City art
critic Peter Schjeldhal:
"'I came to New York to be Jewish,'
[Schjeldhal] once told me.
'Did you make it?'
'No.'
'What were you before?'
'Porcelain-sink Lutheran.'
'And now? Since you haven't made it
across as one of us?'
He paused. He wasn't sure he wanted
to be that un-Jewish.
'A certain transformation has
occurred; but a certain gulf
remains.'
It takes me a little while to put
it together -- the fact that just about
every gallery/space/loft we go into
is run by a Jew. This isn't Jewish
how I like it. This is slow-drawl,
camp Jewish, retreating, high-toned,
not very sense-of-humorish Jewish.
The pallid women gallery-owners
whose walls and wine we absorb are
also Jewish." [JACOBSON, H.,
1995, p. 84-85]
Famous Jewish novelist Judith Krantz notes in her biography
her avenue into the upper tiers of the art world: "Polly Guggenheim,
a sculptor who'd lived in Paris most of her life, became our guide into
the art world." [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 324]
In 1996, Jewish art historian
Eunice Lipton admitted that the main reason she went into a career
as an art historian was to be in a field dominated by Jews:
"I wanted to be where Jews were --
that is, I wanted a profession that
would allow me tacitly to
acknowledge my Jewishness through the
company I kept." [RUBIN- DURSKY, p.
289]
Elsewhere, she notes that:
"On the face of it, art history
seemed a gentile profession. For one thing,
the study of Christian art was its
center. In addition, there was an ancient
Jewish injunction against making
graven images. But the fact is, the
field was filled with Jews. One
might even say it was shaped by them.
Art history is characterized in
this century by studies in connoisseurship,
formalist analysis, the study of
iconography and iconology, and social
analyses. Jews have been prominent
in all categories." [LIPTON, p. 285]
"Today," wrote Gerald Krefetz in
1982, "... Jews enjoy every phase of the art world: as artists, dealers,
collectors, critics, curators, consultants, and patrons. In fact, the
contemporary art scene has a strong Jewish flavor. In some circles, the
wheelers and dealers are referred to as the Jewish mafia since they
command power, prestige, and most of all, money." A few important
members of the Jewish mafia in recent decades included dealers Leo
Castelli, Ben Heller, and Larry Rubins (as well as
Rubins' brother, William, a curator at the Museum of Modern Art),
free lance art critic Clement Greenberg and Hilton Kramer
(long time art critic for the New York Times, Henry Geldzahler
(curator of the Metropolitan Museum of Art), among many others.
"This group is a formidable power," noted Krafetz, "in forming tastes
and promoting some schools of art to the exclusion of others." [KRAFETZ,
p. 161]
The study of iconography and
iconology [keys in modern art evaluation] says Eunice Lipton, was
"developed by Erwin Panofsky and practiced by [other] Jewish
scholars like Leo Steinberg, Irving Lavin, and Linda
Seidel." [LIPTON, p. 286] Still other Jewish art scholars of
prominence include Meyer Schapiro, Walter Friedlander,
Robert Rosenblum, and Rosland Krauss, to begin a list just
among those termed "formalist." Joseph Hodin was a prominent
Jewish art scholar in Britain, as was the Viennese-born E. H.
Gombrich, author of the internationally influential textbook in
every art student's locker, The Story of Art. "The notion of
Jewish culture," he curiously claims, "was an invention of Hitler."
[SEARLE, p. T9]
Traditional Judaism has prohibited
"graven images" and idolatry, and throughout most of history Jews were
usually reluctant to engage in many types of activities western culture
describes today as "art." "It is ... forbidden to draw the picture of a
man," declares the Orthodox Code of Jewish Law, "even only the
face of a man." [GANZFRIED, p. 53] "This is when [Jewish] religious law
became all powerful," noted the prominent Jewish religious philosopher
Martin Buber, "The human body is despicable. Seeing is a sin. Art
is a sin ... Everything creative is smothered at its first appearance."
[OLIN, p. 45] "To a non-Jewish reader," says Margaret Olin, "such
judgments appear damning. Buber's readership, however, was Jewish, since
his book appeared under Zionist auspices." [OLIN, p. 45]
In 1887, two French archaeologists,
Georges Perrot and Charles Chipiez, reconstructed models of ancient
Jewish temples and decided that Jews were the "least artistic of the
greatest people of antiquity." [OLIN, p. 42] A year later a prominent
German art historian, Wilhelm Lubke, declared that "Jews, having no
artistic sensibility of their own, borrowed architectural forms on an
eclectic principle from the nations dwelling around them." [OLIN, p. 42]
"[This] remark sounds innocent from
a postmodern standpoint," says Margaret Olin, "but for Lubke to
characterize Jews as a people who borrowed from others the art they
could not create on their own lent a historical basis to the
anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews as chameleon-like parasites." [OLIN, p.
42]
Even the well-known Jewish
turn-of-the-century art historian Bernard Berenson reiterated
what Olin calls a recurrent anti-Semitic theme. "The Jews," said
Berenson, "like their Ishamaelite cousins the Arabs, and indeed
perhaps like all pure Semites (if such there be), have displayed little
talent for the visual, and almost none for the figure arts." [OLIN, p.
49]
But, although there was "absent a
Jewish visual tradition prior to this century," [FREUDENHEIM, p. 9]
there was nothing to prevent them from engaging in the market place of
it. Even "in the avant-garde circles of the twenties, thirties, and
forties," notes Nathan Glazer and Patrick Moynihan, "Jews were
very often the critics (and entrepreneurs), non-Jews the creators. This
was so in literature, painting, music, and the theatre."
[GLAZER/MOYNIHAN, p. 173]
"In the broad spectrum of
Judeo-Christianity, one group, often figured as Jewish," says Marc
Shell, "is relatively comfortable with money and uncomfortable with
representational art, while one group, frequently reckoned as
Christianity, is relatively comfortable with art and uncomfortable with
money. It is, according to this stereopticon, the essence of Judaism to
reject representational art and the essence of Christians to expel
changing coins from the temple." [SHELL, p. 7]
There is, as we have repeatedly seen,
little sacrosanct in Jewish religious tradition that prohibits
money-making; certainly the exploitation of objects of human expression
would fall within the marketable sphere. The merger of money and art as
a single consumer commodity, the whole art world as a field for
exploitation, and the profanation of modern art that is regarded as
illusorily -- yet secularly -- "sacred," has in our own day been
profoundly effected by Jewish influence. Norman Cantor, for
example, notes that:
"A member of the Warburg banking
family single-handedly started up
the field of art history ...
[CANTOR, p. 271] ... All the art history
departments in the world are
direct descendants of Aby Warburg's
Institute (moved from to London in
1932 to escape the Nazis) and his
great Jewish disciple, Erwin
Panofsky. Is it anomalous that a Jew would
have been so creative in the study
of art that was so little cultivated in
Jewish tradition? All the more
that a liberated white Jew should pursue
art history. But one can see a
Judaizing tendency in Warburg's method
of art historical criticism. The
picture is studied for its 'iconology,' its
pattern of ideas illustrating
textual passages. Art is thereby approached
in hermeneutic fashion, again
recalling Talmudic exegesis, rather than for
its aesthetic content. Yet the
most significant aspect of Warburg's
development in art history is the
demonstration that market capitalism
could embrace and fund a purely
cultural and academic operation. The
distinct equality of capital was
not its materialism, but its liquidity, the
fungible capacity of capital to
transform into any commodity, including
art and humanities literature that
represents a dynamic power in society.
Aby Warburg's historical and
critical mastery of art was structurally the
same as his brother's mastery in
their international bank of money and
its investment potential. The
transformative interaction between art and
capital is central to the nature of
the market economy." [CANTOR, p.
271]
(As Jewish scholar George Mosse
notes about the Warburg art circle: "Erwin Panofsky, one of
the Warburg library's most famous collaborators [was] like almost all of
its early collaborators a Jew ... [Ernst Cassierer was] the
Warburg library's most prolific author.") [MOSSE, G., 1985, p. 53]
"Jews may or may not have become
more culture conscious," suggests Gerald Krefetz, "but they certainly
were among the first to realize that modern art is not a bad investment
... [Some Jews saw] in modern art one of the most lucrative ways to
duplicate money since the invention of compound interest." [KREFETZ, p.
146] "The linkage of art and commercial gain," notes Alfred Lindemann,
"became more important in the United States than in any other country in
history." [LINDEMANN, p. 207] (Coincidence that Jewish administrator
Lee Caplin "created and directed the Federal Program 'The Business
of Art and the Artist' while serving as Special Assistant to the
Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts?") [CAPLIN, L., 1989, p.
ix] "Some dealers are commodity brokers, not selling pork bellies or
soybean futures, but work by recognized artists, mostly dead," says
Krafetz, "They buy and sell their works as they would any other product
... They are basically brother traders." [KRAFETZ, p. 147]
A good example of such attitudes of
quite literally "brother traders" can be found in a 1994 article in
ARTnews that profiles three Jewish art investors -- brothers
Joseph, David, and Ezra Nahmad, heirs to a Syrian
banking fortune. "Secretive and elusive," reporter Andrew Decker also
observes that the brothers "are among the richest art traders in the
world. They are also among the least known ... They have one of the
largest stockpiles of art in the world ... The inventory ... consists of
about 1,000 paintings that usually sit untouched in a warehouse ...
[DECKER, p. 116] ... According to several sources, Joseph's greatest
interests are money, art, and women, roughly in that order." [DECKER, p.
119] Joseph has been convicted in France for currency violations; in
Italy he was jailed for having 25,000 stolen British pounds in his
possession. He was also investigated in Italy for income tax evasion,
owing over $13 million. In 1973 the Nahmad brothers were found to be in
the possession of Giacometti bronzes that had been stolen eight years
earlier.
In Israel, the hundreds of thousands
of Jews flooding into Israel in recent years have brought with them art
treasures from Russia, particularly old Russian Orthodox Christian
icons. They are sold in Israel to dealers, collectors, or tourists for
anywhere from $500 to $30,000. Their values can range from $500 to $2.5
million; the best quality pieces are sent from Israel to Europe or
America for higher price resale. "Taking them out of the Soviet Union
-- or its successor independent republics," notes the Atlanta Journal
Constitution, "is illegal. But the immigrants take the risk, often
bribing custom officials to look the other way." [SALOME, p. A6]
In 1995 Dmitri Yakubovsky,
once kicked out of Russian military school for what he decried as
anti-Semitism, and later owner of a $5.3 mansion in suburban Toronto,
had a new home. It was "a decrepit Russian prison cell in St.
Petersburg's Kresty Detention Center. He was arrested in Moscow last
December and is charged with complicity in the theft of a historic
$130-million collection of rare far Eastern and antique European
manuscripts from the Russian National Library." [GOLD, J., p. 37] The
police laid a trap for Yakubovsky, "his arrest followed immediately, and
the net expanded to Israel, where a group of Israelis were arrested."
[WARD, p. B6]
A venerable Israeli "Holocaust museum" has even been involved in
international art smuggling from the former Soviet Union. In 2001, the
Associated Press noted that
"In a secret operation, Jerusalem's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial
has
smuggled out of Ukraine fragements of murals by Polish-Jewish
artist Bruno
Schulz, sparking an international controversy. Yad Vashem
maintains it
was merely exercising its right to preserve the works of a
prominent
Jewish writer, artist and Holocaust victim, but Ukrainian and
Polish
officials say their removal was a crime." [SHARGORODKY, S.,
6-20-01]
In such an international art sphere,
in 1995 ARTnews published a piece about the man who "is spending
more freely than any other collector in history," an Iranian-born Jew,
now an American citizen living in Great Britain, Nasser Khalili.
His personal collection of Islamic art alone is insured for $1.5
billion. Khalili spent $7.5 million just to publish a thirty volume
catalogue of the Islamic works he owns. Among other genres of his 27,000
art objects is a Japanese art collection worth as much as $100 million,
Russian enamels and Faberge, ancient Mesopotamian pottery figures,
19th-century Spanish metalwork, Swedish bridal tapestries (1750-1850),
Indian woven silks (1200-1500), and 16 of 50 pre-16th century silks "all
in Tibetan monasteries until the 1980s." [NORMAN, p. 120] An early
Jewish-Iranian adviser to Khalili was Mehdi Mahboubian "who was
the most important of the group of Jewish Iranian art dealers in Tehran
in the 1970s and acted as a personal adviser to the shah and shahbanu
[the shah's wife]." [NORMAN, p. 120]
Rabbi Alan Lew notes the curiously incongruous expressions of
Zen master/art dealer "Rudrananda":
[There was] a guru named Rudrananda, or, as he was known, Rudi.
Rudi's
real name was Albert Rudolph. He was a Jewish guy who grew
up in Brooklyn
... [LEW, A., 1999, p. 51] [He had] a large store ... where all of
Rudi's students
lived. The store was lined with tonkas, Tibetan tapestries, and
priceless Buddhas.
Some of them were very large, over six feet tall, and all of them
were
exquisite. Rudi had stood at the Indian border when the Tibetans
were fleeing
the Chinese, buying all their priceless Buddhas and art treasures.
Now he
was an art dealer, selling his treasures to museums and extremely
wealthy
people. I had to wait a long time while he obsequiously waited on
museum
representative and millionaires, periodically going to the back of
the store
where one or two of his students were meditating on him. He would
put his
hand on their heads and somehow transmit energy to them, and they
would
go into convulsions. Other students were coming to see him for
consultations.
It was as if Rudi was giving off electricity. The more advanced the
students
were, the more electrified they would become until they were
trembling, all
in the midst of high-powered transactions over statuary. The
millionaires who
came to buy art objects seemed totally oblivious to everything that
was going
on and never got jolted. It was in the midst of all this that Rudi
told me I
should drop everything and come study with him, that he would make
me
rich, and that I would get laid all the time. 'You should have seen
the knockers
on the woman I was just with in Boston,' he said." [LEW, A., 1999,
p. 54-55]
In Switzerland, Werner and
Gabrielle Merzbacher own "one of the world's greatest accumulations
of modern art." [GREEN, D., p. 37] 139 works by 77 artists were
exhibited at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem in 1998. In Los Angeles,
"in the early 1990s," notes Tom King,
"with his purchased of David Hockney's Double Portrait,
[Jewish Hollywood
mogul David] Geffen began a buying
spree that soon made the art world take
note. He built a collection of modern masterpieces that, for the
artists and periods
he favored, was unparalleled, including many of the most valuable
works by Jackson
Pollock and Jasper Johns. [KING, T., 2000, p. 477]
In England, Jewish advertising mogul
Charles Saatchi and his wife "have built a collection of modern
art that is regarded today as perhaps the most important of its kind in
the world in private hands," largely concentrating on "American
minimalists." [FALLON, p. 325] By the 1980s Saatchi was spending $1
million a year on new art acquisitions. Among his interests was a
"heavy investment in the art of [Jewish painter] Julian Schnabel."
[GLUECK, p. 2, p. 27] Norman Rosenthal of the British Royal
Academy suggested that "the Saatchis are probably the most important
collectors of modern art in anywhere in the world." [FALLON, p. 335]
Political artist Hans Haacke once held an exhibition (called "Taking
Stock") "which was an attack on the Saatchis, their advertising empire,
and on Mrs. Thatcher [the British Prime Minister who was built to power
with the help of Saatchi advertising]." [FALLON, p. 334]
Kevin Goldman even suggests
that:
"Advertising is an industry in which
the amount of money to be made
rivals the fortunes made by
investment bankers and robber barons.
Indeed, one [advertising] man,
Charles Saatchi, made so much money
in advertising that he was able to
control the world's contemporary art
market." [GOLDMAN, p. 21]
"The Saatchi Collection," says
Alison Fendley, "has been a focus of debate in the world of contemporary
art since it opened to the public in 1985. Little is known about the
inner workings of the Saatchi Gallery; even today, its finances are
mysterious." [FENDLEY, p. 6]
Looking for an ikat, "a rare textile
from Uzbekistan?" Try Guido Goldman, who in the last twenty years
has amassed the largest private ikat collection from Central Asia in the
world. (Goldman's father, Nachum, was the "President of the World
Jewish Congress and key player in a host of other Jewish
organizations.") [CEMBALEST, HOW, p. 11] )
Suits of armor? Medieval artifacts? Judaica? Barry Trupin
"owned one of the largest private collections of Judaica in America, as
well as a world-renowned collection of medieval artifacts and suits of
armor. His pride and joy was a suit of armor from Hever Castle in
England that had belonged to Henry II. Trupin wanted to own the armor so
passionately that he paid $3.2 million for it at auction, outbidding
both the Tower of London and the Louvre." [GAINES, S., 1998, p. 231]
How about the works of French poet,
artist, and filmmaker Jean Cocteau? In 1995 Jewish business mogul
Severin Wunderman shut down his "Severin Wunderman Museum" in
southern California and donated "the world's largest collection of
works" by Cocteau to the University of Texas. Wunderman planned to move
to France to live in his restored 15th century castle. [HOWLETT, p. E1]
The works of artist Andrew Wyeth? In the 1980s, Hollywood producer
Joseph E. Levine sold the world's largest collection of Wyeth
paintings. [ARONSON, S., 1983, p. 187]
Jewish TV personality Allen Funt (of Candid Camera fame) began
buying relatively cheap paintings by artist Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema
(1836-1912) to "decorate his apartment." Ruskin had once described
Alma-Tadema as "the worse painter of the nineteenth century." "Funt,"
says Karl Meyer, "proceeded to acquire more and more of the artist's
work; soon enough, publicity being what it is, there were newspaper
features describing his hobby, and Funt had become the unlikely agent of
Alma-Tadema's rehabilitation." After the Metropolitan Museum put on a
show of Funt's collection, Funt sold it all ("In all fairness," says
Karl Meyer, "he needed the money since he had recently been defrauded of
$1,200,000 in Candid Camera profits by his longtime accountant, who
later committed suicide.") [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 184-185]
Native American art? In 1998
Stanley Marcus, chairman emeritus of the Neiman Marcus luxury store,
put his American Indian art collection up for auction at Sotheby's. In
charge of the sale was Ellen Taubman, the head of Sotheby's
Indian art department for 25 years, and the daughter of Sotheby's board
chairman, Jewish real estate mogul Alfred Taubman. Picasso? In
1998, Victor and Sally Ganz put up for auction their art stash,
including "the most important privately-held collection of works by
Picasso in America." Expected sales figures ranged from $125 million to
half a billion dollars. [HANDWERKER, 11-10-97] (Picasso's first art
"contract" was signed with prominent Jewish dealer Daniel-Henry
Kahnweiler in 1912). [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 168] In 1999, an auction of
art (returned after confiscation by the Nazis decades ago) netted the
Rothschild family $90 million.
Art from Germany? Going to auction in
2000, Marvin and Janet Fishman's properties were worth an
estimated $16 million. It was "a collection of some 160 works, one of
the most comprehensive groups of early 20th century German art ever to
be formed in private hands." [RONNER, M., 7-30-2000, p. 16]
Anything else? Jewish dealer
Ronnie Darvick has, over the years, even sold the gun that killed
Lee Harvey Oswald (for $220,000), Marilyn Monroe's certificate of
conversion to Judaism when she married Jewish playwright Arthur Miller
in 1956, the writings of mass murderer Charles Manson, and Adolf
Hitler's autograph. "My mother had her whole family wiped out in
Poland," says Darvick, "Her attitude was, he'd be turning over in his
grave if he knew a Jew was making money off his autograph." [THOMAS,
p.G8]
In 1981 Charles Hamilton, an art and documents dealer, wrote about
his auction world experiences:
"In November, 1975, I put up at auction several unusual Nazi
items, one of
which instantly captivated the press. It was an ornate,
gold-plated license plate
used on Hitler's parade limousine. He'd presented it to his
mistress, Eva Braun,
because she was intrigued by flashy beauty. The plate was made of
heavy brass
plated in gleaming gold. There was an embossed swastika in the
upper left and
a Nazi eagle in the upper right. The plate bore the legend:
'Reichskanzler -- Deutschland.'
Not more than two doors away from the Conrad Suite at the
Waldorf-Astoria where
I was holding the sale of Hitler's license plate, there was by
chance a meeting of the
B'nai B'rith, an assemblage of pensive graybeards wearing
yarmulkes. A television
reporter perceived the anomaly.
'May I borrow that license plate for a few minutes?' he asked.
'Of course,' I said.
I followed him and his television crew into the B'nai B'rith
conference. The
reporter selected an old man who looked as though he might have
suffered the
brutalities of a concentration camp.
'Sir,' he said, 'Mr. Hamilton, the autograph dealer, is
auctioning off, just down
the hall, this license plate from Hitler's limousine. May I have
your opinion of the sale?'
'Disgusting! I cannot believe that anyone would sell or buy such
a revolting object.'
The reporter asked the same question of three or four other elderly
members of the
assemblage. The answers were all vehement
denunciations of me and my auction.
After the license plate was sold for $3,500 to a Jewish dealer, the
reporter asked me what
I thought of the sale." [HAMILTON, C., 1981,
p. p. 180-181]
Elsewhere, Hamilton notes another such story:
"In the fall of 1979 a young man, who introduced himself as Aaron
Goldberg, brought
me for auction a small sheaf of unused stationery imprinted with
Hitler's name and
address.
'I take it your father brought these back from Germany after
the war,' I said,
recognizing the paper as that often used by
Hitler in writing to lower army echelons.
'No,' he explained. 'My father was too old for the army. He
owned a printing shop
in Brooklyn. Two or three years before we got into the war, he was
asked by the Nazi
embassy in New York to print some official
stationery for Hitler. It was tough at that
time to get any sort of work and although Jewish, my father took
the job. I found
these sheets in the back of the shop.'" [HAMILTON, C., 1981,
p.182]
In England, in 1989 a Jewish entrepreneur, Andrew Benjamin,
was evicted by his Jewish landlord when it was discovered that
Benjamin's rented space was a store called "Cutdown," which was "selling
Nazi clothing and medals, as well as racist records, literature, and
videos." [HOROWITZ, D.] (Conversely, in a Jewish censorial action
against an Internet provider, France's International League Against
Racism and Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Student Union went to court in
Europe to seek to ban an on-line Yahoo Internet auction of Nazi
memorabilia. "Is Yahoo expected," complained the company, "to check who
is on-line and comply with the laws of every other country?") [AGENCE
FRANCE PRESSE, 5-16-2000]
Jewish activism to stop the sale of Nazi memorabilia is odd
considering the vast experience of art and documents dealer Charles
Hamilton in the selling of Nazi items:
"In the past twenty years I've sold at auction thousands of Nazi
relics and
documents. And nearly always such sales have evoked criticism,
harrowing
experiences, or even threats on my life ... Today the big threat
to me is not
from bombs [Hamilton once had a bomb threat for having a Hitler
photo for
sale in his gallery window] but from collectors who are stampeding
me and
other autograph dealers in their frenzy to stock up on letters and
documents
of Hitler and his henchmen before the price goes through the roof.
A letter of
Hitler's is now worth five of Churchill's and ten of Franklin D.
Roosevelt's.
Who's in the Third Reich rat race? The Germans are buying. The
British are
buying. But most of all it's Jewish collectors in America. They
bid with aliases
or anagrams, from behind pillars or half-closed doors, or signal
the auctioneer
furtively. Their names are top secret.
Is it just the fascination of evil and violence? Maybe. But as one
Jewish collector
explained to me: 'It's like having the head of
the hunter on the wall instead of the
hunted.'" [HAMILTON, C., 1981, p. 172, 174]
Hamilton continues:
"One of the outstanding Nazi collections in America was formed by
the late
Philip D. Sang, whose collection of Judaica I recently appraised
for presentation
to Brandeis University. I helped Sang to build his superb
assemblage of Jewish
letters and documents and I helped him to gather his huge and
important Nazi
collection. Among the historic items that came from my sales were
the Nazi
top-secret plan for the invasion of Holland and Belgium and
Mussolini's own
copy of Nietzche's Man and Superman, annotated with Il Duce's own
ideas for
implementing the philosophers' vision.
Another Nazi collector, famed for his physical education courses,
once told me
that his entire family was wiped out in an Austrian concentration
camp during the
Holocaust. Yet I never met any man so enthralled
with the Nazis, especially the
more brutal of them. He liked to ensconce his villains in
spectacular frames. I
once put together for him an 'ensemble' of Hitler and Goering,
with examples of
some of the medals worn by the Fuehrer and his pompous air
marshall. As my
customer stood admiring the finished product, glittering with
medals, he commented
on my 'superb job' and I couldn't refrain from asking: 'What are
you going to do with it?'
'Why,' he said, 'I'm going to hang it in my living room.'
I couldn't think of any reply except: 'Not the place I'd pick to
hang Hitler and
Goering.'" [HAMILTON, C., 1981, p. p. 172, 174]
In Miami, among other business projects, Jack Sugarman,
"prominent auctioneer" and owner of Jack Sugarman Auctioneers, once
organized an auction of paperweights owned by Oscar Schindler (of
"Schindler's List" fame). In 2000, Sugarman went to prison for
embezzlement of funds from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[ASSOCIATED PRESS, 4-18-2000] Then there is "Chicago collector"
Million [Is this the Jewish source magazine's typographical error?]
Kohn, who has amassed 700 Holocaust-related artifacts, including "a
list of people scheduled for extermination on July 5, 1943," "a stuffed
pillow with human hair, a bar of soap made from human body fat, and a
patch of skin bearing a tattoo." He has exhibited his collection in 14
countries. [LUM, R., 11-19-99, p. 3A]
The man, Jack Ruby, who
killed Lee Harvey Oswald was Jewish. So was Abraham Zapruder, the
man who filmed President J.F. Kennedy being shot in Dallas. Zapruder
sold the original 8mm film to Time magazine for $150,000.
"Concerned that a Jewish man's profiting from the assassination could
touch off a wave of anti-Semitism," notes Washington Post
reporter George Lardner Jr., "his lawyer suggested that he donate the
first $25,000 to a fund for a Dallas police officer killed that day, J.
D. Tippett. Zapruder readily agreed." [LARDNER, G., 1998, p. A11]
Zapruder died in 1970.
Inexplicably, the film was returned
to Zapruder's heirs in 1975 by Time Inc. Over the years, the
Zapruder family (one of Abraham's sons is a Washington DC lawyer) has
been known to charge outlandish fees for the use of the assassination
footage. Two independent filmmakers who were told that permission to
reproduce the footage in their own movie would cost $30,000,
successfully sued the Zapruders to use the historical material.
[MARGOLICK, D., 1988, p. B20] In 1997, the U.S. government appropriated
the original movie film (it was already in storage, at the Zapruders'
request, at the National Archives.) The Justice Department went to
arbitration with the Zapruder family to decide "just compensation" for
the 26 seconds of footage. The government offered $3 million; the family
asked for $30 million. Three Justice Department judges eventually
decided (2-1) to give the family $16 million. (Kenneth Feinberg
and Arlin Adams voted yes, and Walter Dellinger no -- he suggested $3-5
million as a fair market value). Incredibly, the Zapruders' also
retained copyright -- any reproduction of the film would be subject to a
fee to the family. [REICHMAN, D., 8-3-99]
As the Quincy Patriot Ledger
(Quincy, Massachusetts) editorialized:
"You and I [taxpayers] get the bill
and the government gets to keep the
original footage. Besides the $16
million, the Zapruder heirs retain the
copyright, so they can sell the
footage another 16 million times ... The
family compared its treasure to a Van
Gogh painting." [QUINCY, p. 12]
(Even the man who painted John F. Kennedy and his wife "for their
White House portraits" was Aaron Shikler, also Jewish.
[Jacqueline Onassis] also notes in her biography "David Levine,
the now-legendary caricaturist.") [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 208]
Elsewhere, Stanley Slotkin,
the Jewish founder of the Abbey Rents company, once bought a pile
of rocks dug from a tunnel next to Christianity's traditional Jesus
nativity site (in Bethlehem) in the 1960s; in more recent years his
descendants set the souvenir stones in jewelry frames and are marketing
them in TV commercials (featuring actor Ricardo Montalban) as "nativity
stones," selling for as high as $395 apiece. [DART, J., p. B1]
Of course Jews are active in the
specifically Jewish art market too. Wilbur Wendell Pierce
(originally: Wilbur Persofsky), for instance, even has "an international
reputation for his collection of concentration camp currency, which he
amassed during the past five years [1991-96]." [BIBERMAN, p. 69]
In the field of archeological
swindles, Moses Shapira was the pioneer in the field. "Shapira,"
notes Israeli art curator Irit Salmon, "was the first to
recognize that archeology could be a profitable business." Shapira, a
Russian Jewish transplant to Jerusalem, sold a variety of fake
archaeological artifacts in the late 1800s, including recently
manufactured items he misrepresented to major European museums. "His
exposure as a fraud in 1884," notes Shoshana Sappir, "led to his suicide
a few months earlier." [SAPPIR, S., 7-31-2000] In Great Britain, famed
Jewish swindler Adam Worth was behind the theft in 1876 of Thomas
Gainsborough's painting of the Duchess of Devonshire, which only a few
weeks earlier "had been sold at auction for 10,000 guineas, at that time
the highest price ever paid for a work of art, causing a sensation."
[MacIntyre, B., 1997, p. 3]
Stephen Nohlgren notes the illustrious art fraud history of Elmyr
de Hory:
"While foraging at one garage sale, I paid a few bucks for a book
called
FAKE! [full title: FAKE! The Story of Elymyr de Hory, the
Greatest Art
Forger of Our Times, by Clifford Irving], a biography of
Elmyr de Hory,
perhaps the greatest art forger of all time. De Hory was a Jewish
Hungarian
aristocrat and would-be artist who lived in Paris in the 1920s ...
During
World War II, De Hory's parent's were killed and the family riches
confiscate. He was stranded in Paris with no allowance -- but an
undiminished
taste for high living ... [He] launched a 20-year forgery career.
Never
successful with his own work. De Hory cranked out a prodigious body
of fakery. He could mimic almost all of his old acquaintances. To
sell his
fakes, he'd drop hints that his father had amassed a private
collection in
the 1930s that was later smuggled out of Hungary. He sold to art
dealers
and museums. His work started showing up in art books as originals.
He
forged so many Dufys that an expert once rejected two real Dufy's
as
fraudulent because he mistakenly assumed that De Hory's hand and
style
were the correct ones. He was finally caught in 1967 and spent a
few months
in a Spanish jail." [NOHLGREN, S., 7-16-00]
Auction gallery owner Charles Hamilton notes another Jewish con-man:
"The ability to bilk one's clients at auction is a fine art, make
no mistake
about it. To succeed for a lifetime without detection or exposure,
the auction-
buying crook must have the cunning of a polecat, the ethics of a
Gabon viper, and the acquisitive drive of a dung-beetle. All these
feral qualities were uniquely fused in the late Lew David Feldman,
a rare book and manuscript dealer who operated under a firm name
devised from his cutely bastardized initials -- The House of El
Dieff." [HAMILTON, C., 1981, p. 19]
More recently, in 1987, the Jewish
Week ran an article with a headline declaring "Israeli Art World
Stunned By Forgery Allegations." Ten Israelis were eventually arrested
in the scam, including gallery owners and art dealers. "80 high quality
fakes" of prominent Israeli artists were discovered in the ring, as well
as stolen art from important artist Eliahu Gat. [JW, 4-7-87,
4-10-87]
In the United States, in 1982 the
state of New York created a law, sponsored by the Jewish Community
Relations Council, which sought to undermine the busy market in stolen
Torah scrolls ("150 .... in recent years in New York alone"). Much of
the Torah market theft was attributed to a "Brooklyn-based Russian
Jewish crime ring." [KALMANOFSKY, p. 58] In the new system,
documentation of the previous scroll owner would henceforth be necessary
for any sales transaction. [GALLOB] Although a Sefer-Torah "is the
holiest object in the Jewish religion," a Manhattan Judaica dealer,
Herbie Stavsky, noted that "as long as people like money, there will
always be someone who will steal it. Goes to show you that nothing's
sacred. Anything for the almighty dollar." [KALMANOFSKY, p. 55]
As evidenced with stolen Torah pages,
a growing realm of corruption is the business of buying and selling
Jewish antiquities. In 1990 the Jewish Week noted recent criminal
cases including the $60,000 forgery of a 15th century haggadah by an
Italian Jew, an antique Hungarian book of Psalms that "was stolen only
to appear at an Israeli auction," and a Hassidic art dealer, Chaim
Schneilbalg, who was murdered in a Jerusalem hotel while meeting an
art client. A suspect was an Israeli living in West Germany who was
"reportedly involved in counterfeiting, the running of brothels, and a
previous insurance claim of dubious validity." Schneilbalg, reported the
Jewish Week, "was said to have been jockeying for control of the
market in Jewish manuscripts suddenly available in newly capitalist
Eastern Europe." [MARK, J, p. 31]
In an overview of the growing art
market for Jewish artifacts, Jonathan Mark in Jewish Week
noted that
"Ignorance and fraud were creating
such havoc that in the last twenty
years Judaica buyers and sellers
increasingly turned to non-Jewish auction
houses to protect themselves from each
other ... With many American
Jews experiencing a rise in their
discretionary incomes in the 1970s and
80s, more began buying and selling
Judaica as an investment or hobby. It
was often used for Jewish fund raising
... But even in auction houses ...
certain dealers were known to work in
collusion ... The recent fascination
with the Holocaust has inflated the
market even further. Purchasing an item
that was desecrated by the Nazis was
considered to be very chic
'mitzvah.'" [MARK, J, p. 31]
By 2000, not much had changed.
"Synagogues across Europe are being robbed of treasures worth hundreds
of thousands of dollars," noted the Jerusalem Report. Highly
suspect were "two Israeli con artists" who continued to reappear at
synagogues, particularly in the Netherlands. [LEVY, R., 2-14-2000] In
2001, Israeli police arrested Yerahmiel Hershler, Aharon
Stefansky and Amnon Edri in the Jewish state with stolen
religious artifacts from synagogues from "Britain, Gibraltar and a
number of European countries" worth "at least $2 million ... A fourth
suspect was arrested in northern Israel. A police spokesperson said
additional arrests were expected." HAAS, D., 3-2-01, p. 2]
*********************************
Entrepreneurial Jews have been
especially active in the European "art scene" since Emancipation in the
1800s. "By the opening of the late 19th century," says Howard Sachar,
"Jewish [art] salons in Berlin were well established as the center of
German social life ... Writers, artists, intellectuals and viveurs
all found good food and even better conversation at the gatherings."
[SACHAR, p. 150] (Much earlier, the wealthy Amsterdam Jewish community
often paid for their depiction by the great painter Rembrandt. [37 of
his 200 male portraits are of Jews. "When Rembrandt fell on hard times
in his later years and became bankrupt," says M. H. Goldberg, "he
was given both spiritual and material help by a rabbi.") [GOLDBERG, M.
H., 1976, p. 122]
There were also the likes of Jacques-Louis David:
"Realizing the propaganda potential of art and eager to assert
France's
primacy in all fields of culture, Napoleon reshaped the academy
into a
superb machine for the production of art. Jacques-Louis David, a
former
member of the Royal Academy and an ardent Bonapartist, was one of
the governing elite who spurred artists to glorify France in
painting classical
themes or the battles and heroes of the day." [MEYER, K., 1979, p.
170]
Jews have been particularly
preeminent in the economic exploitation of art and the formation of its
commercial value since the rise of "modern art" in the 1880s. In that
era the center of the art world was Paris. "[There were] two groups of
important art dealers in Paris in the first half of the twentieth
century," notes Peter Watson, " ... one was made up of [Daniel-Henri]
Kahnweiler, Paul Guillaume, Felix Feneon, and the
Rosenbergs [Leonce and Paul], dealers in
contemporary works .... The other was an equally tight-knit but smaller
group of dealers who formed the elite secondary markets dealing with Old
Masters ... and increasingly in the Impressionists. At the center of
this group were [Nathan] Wildenstein, [Rene]
Gimpel, and [Jacques] Seligmann. Loosely attached to
them were three other dealers in London and New York, [Samson]
Wertheimer and [Roland] Knoedler [later run by
Charles Henschel until after World War II]." [WATSON, p. 219-220]
"[Paul] Rosenberg's strait-forward approach and steep
prices shocked Parisian art circles and made him the subject of savage
criticism." He even once said, "As for me, a painting is beautiful when
it sells." [FELICIANO, p. 54] Among those in Rosenberg's art stable was
Picasso, formerly signed to David-Henry Kahnweiler and
Rosenberg's brother Leon. All these people were Jewish.
Further, "one of the oldest art
dynasties in France" was founded by Alexandre Bernheim
[FELICIANO, p. 75] and David David-Weiss, a prominent art
collector, became the President of the Board of Directors of the French
National Museum in 1933. Across the border, Max Friedlander, "one
of the leading experts on Rembrandt," directed the Berlin Museum in the
same era. [EPSTEIN, 1996, p 290]
Disgruntled with such Jewish control
of the art market, in 1915 a lecturer, Tony Tollett, delivered an
address to the French Academy of Sciences, Literature, and Arts in Lyon
entitled: "On the Influence of the Jewish-German Corporation of Paris
Art Dealers on French Art." [WATSON, p. 190] By 1930, notes Pierre
Assouline, "according to dealer Pierre Loeb, during this period
four art dealers out of five were Jewish, as were four out of five art
collectors ... Wilhelm Uhde who had made the same observations, added
art critics to the list." [ASSOULINE, p. 230] After the Nazi's takeover
of France, notes Hector Feliciano, "deploring the lack of experts
available to advise German clients, a number of the Nazi information
services in Paris explained that this was because most of the premiere
art experts had been Jews. Since the 1920s, they had contributed to the
development and maintenance of a worldwide network of wealthy art
buyers. This network collapsed as soon as they were denied a role in
Europe's largest art market." [FELICIANO, p. 124]
Nachum Gidal notes that in
Germany, James Simon "made a gift of his world famous collection
of Italian renaissance paintings, sculptures, medallions, and bronze" to
the Kaiser Friedrich Museum in Berlin, "on whose governing board he
sat." [GIDAL, p. 348] Other prominent German Jewish collections included
those of Marcus Koppel, Franz and Rober von Medelssohn,
Alfred Beit, Oscar Huldschinsky, Eduard Arnhold,
Leopold Sonnemann, H. H. Meyer, and Philip Rothschild,
among others. "The greatest collection of German 19th century painters,"
continued Gidal, "belonged to Max Bohm and Rudolf Mosse;
the greatest collection of Old Master drawings was assembled by Paul
Davidson." [GIDAL, p. 348] Among the major Jewish German art dealers
were Alfred Flechtheim, Herwath Walden, and Paul
Cassirer in Berlin, and Bernheim & Heinemann in Munich.
Many Jewish art dealers grew to be
extraordinarily successful. In 1909 Jacques Seligman "astounded
Paris by acquiring the Palais de Sagan, an even more luxurious house ...
Seligman was the main [art] supplier for the French Rothschilds as well
as [J. D.] Morgan; he was also known for his contacts in Russia ... "
[WATSON, p. 224] "Possibly the most successful, and certainly, the most
secretive [art dealer] was [Nathan] Wildenstein," says
Peter Watson, " ... Another reason for Wildenstein's success was his
close association with Duveen and Gimpel, which made each
others businesses truly international." [WATSON, p. 220-221]
"Georges Wildenstein," notes
Hector Feliciano, "was very well known and actively involved in art
circles in a number of countries, including those within the Nazi sphere
of influence. Even after the French armistice and the German occupation,
Wildenstein seems to have taken advantage of this network to organize a
number of deals with the Germans." [FELICIANO, H., p. 61] Feliciano was
actually sued for such statements about Wildenstein and the Nazis by the
art dealer's heirs in the 1990s. Feliciano counter sued, and with
relevant historical evidence, won the case.
"Notoriously dishonest," [WATSON, p.
166] Joseph Duveen was another prominent Jewish art dealer in the
early decades of the 1900s, "the most successful art broker of the
twentieth century, this trade -- thanks to his undoubted charisma and
his gift for salesmanship, laced with lavish doses of corruption."
[SIMPSON, ARTFUL, p. 1] Upon his move from Europe to New York City,
Duveen was charged (in a legal "case that attracted enormous publicity")
with evading customs duties of -- at today's values -- $102 million.
Connections with several United States Senators and other men of
influence helped Duveen evade the law. [WATSON, p. 166]
Duveen had a long -- and
secret -- association with the very prominent and influential Jewish
art connoisseur, critic, and esthete, Bernard Berenson. Berenson
(whose original name was Bernhard Valvrojenski), an expert on
Christian art, converted to Protestantism and then Catholicism, but
noted in his diary,” At times I seem to myself to be a typical 'Talmud
Jew.'" He also wrote that he longed to drop "the mask of being goyim
and return to Yiddish reminiscences ..." [RUBIN, p. 75] In 1944,
Berenson wrote a piece called, "Open Letter to American Jewry." In
it, notes Barry Rubin, "Berenson warned that envious Christians would
persecute them, 'even if you were innocent as the angels ... and you are
far from that.'" [RUBIN, p. 76]
For his less than innocent part,
Berenson regularly colluded with Duveen over a twenty-five
year period in perpetuating continuous fraud and deceit upon
unsuspecting art collectors. "Berenson was a genius," writes Colin
Simpson, "who early in life channeled his gifts into the study of that
finest flower of Christian art: Italian Renaissance painting. By the age
of 35 he had become the world's leading authority ... The curators of
many of world's greatest museum's were either his former pupils or his
disciples ... They came to hear his opinions, take his advice, and pay
homage to his scholarship and his intellectual integrity. A small
minority saw him as a disgustingly rich, opinionated, spiteful tyrant
... But only a handful were aware that it was Berenson, not Duveen, who
was probably the most successful and unscrupulous art dealer the world
has ever seen." [SIMPSON, ARTFUL, p. 1]
"The raw truth about both men," notes
Peter Watson, "... is... complex and considerably ... sordid." [WATSON,
p. 167] For his part, from 1911 to 1937 Berenson's hidden
association with Duveen netted him alone the equivalent -- in our
day -- of $150 million. [SIMPSON, ARTFUL, p. 2] "Berenson,'
notes Eunice Lipton, "shaped the very terrain of Renaissance studies,
not to mention the market for what became its masterpieces." [LIPTON, p.
285]
Another of Berenson's Jewish
contemporaries who had a strong hand in shaping American art history was
Paul Sachs. "Though not as widely known as Berenson," notes
George Goodman, "Paul Joseph Sachs, too, had a patriarchal
influence in the world of art museums -- in America and abroad. Unlike
Berenson, however, Sachs was born to privilege." [GOODMAN, #2, p.2, p.
54] Sachs' father and uncle founded the prominent Goldman, Sachs New
York investment firm. Paul Sachs, an Associate Director of
Harvard's Fogg Museum and chairman of that college's Fine Arts
Department, aided a number of Jewish art scholar protégés, including
James Rorimer (eventual Director of the Metropolitan Museum of
Art)." "Two other Jewish protégés," notes Goodman, "happened to be
Sach's relatives" -- Charles Kuhn and James Sachs Plaut
(eventual head of the Boston Institute of Contemporary Art). [GOODMAN,
#2, p. 57] Yet another Sachs relative, Samuel Sachs II, became
head of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts in 1973, then later Director
of the Detroit Institute for the Arts and New York's Frick Collection.
Paul Sachs' grandson, Franklin W. Robinson, also became -- in
1979 -- the Director of the Museum of Art at the Rhode Island School of
Design, and later Director of the Johnson Museum at Cornell University.
The patriarch Sachs, says Goodman, "largely invented the notion of
curatorial training." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 145]
Jewish pre-World War II influence in
the European art world -- and Jewish influence in it now -- may be
appreciated by this observation by John Conklin. While some wealthy
German-Jews -- like financiers William Weinberg, Georges Lurcy,
Siegfried Kramarsky, and Jacob Goldschmidt -- were able to
get their art out of Europe as capital,
"In 1973 the Austrian government
declared that the art in its possession
that it had been unable to return
to the rightful owners and heirs would
become state property, saying that
there were no longer many claims
being made. Art magazines and
Jewish groups challenged that position
... From then until 1985, the
Austrian government and Jewish
organizations worked together to
find the owners of the unclaimed
pieces. In 1985, the Austrian
Parliament passed a law to return to their
rightful owners and heirs more than
8,000 works of art that the Nazis
had confiscated. Some from museums
but most from European Jews ...
The law established a period until
September 1986 for claims to be
processed; unclaimed works were
then to be auctioned off and the
proceeds divided among Austrian
[World War II] resistance groups,
the Jewish community in Vienna, and
Jewish groups in the United States.
[CONKLIN, p. 222]
With the rise of German fascism,
Jewish art historians began emigrating out of Europe. At New York
University alone, Jewish refugee art professors included Richard
Ettinghaven, Walter Friedlander, Karl Lehman,
Alfred Salmony, Guido Schoenberger, and Martin Weinberger.
[GOODMAN, #2, p. 61]
Yet another prominent early twentieth
century ring of Jewish art dealers was the Stein family:
Gertrude, Leo, Michael, and Sarah. "They
claimed," says Peter Watson, "often and vociferously, to have discovered
modern Art." [WATSON, p. 161] Their famous Parisian salon "was an
expression of the Steins' desire to show off and have others take them
as seriously as they took themselves ... The Saturday salon made the
Steins famous ... Leo took [his] Renoirs and half of the Cézannes to the
United States. He was keen to get to New York to try Freudian treatment
for three complexes from which he was convinced he suffered: an
inferiority complex, a castration complex, and a pariah complex."
[WATSON, p. 162]
One of the Stein sisters, Gertrude,
became famous as a writer, starting out in America with impressions of
Picasso and Matisse which were published in another influential
German-Jewish art dealer's magazine in New York City, Camera Work.
This man, Alfred Stieglitz, "editor/dealer/entrepreneur/
impresario/photographer," would "spawn the spectacular exhibition that
introduced modern art to the United States. It was a show that would
change American taste for all time, that would eventually cause modern
art to rival Impressionism in all the salesrooms, and that in the long
run would leapfrog New York over Paris as the art capital of the world."
[WATSON, p. 163] For Gertrude Stein's part, "Stein's apparent pride in
her Jewish heritage and frequent assertion of Jewish particularity
suggests a strong, continuing identity." [ANTLER, J., p. 175]
With the shift in the Art world
center from Europe to New York City, the development of the "art
market," "art scene," and "art world" -- in all its most important
permutations -- continued to be Jewish-dominated. Julien Levy, for
example, was a major dealer of surrealist art in the 1930s. Salvadore
Dali was "central to Levy's stable ... Julian Levy and his
gallery are central to the history of American art between the wars."
[ALTSHULER, B., MARCH 1999] Maurice Wertheim (father of Zionist
historian Barbara Tuchman, who we have met earlier) was a major
art collector. Also, "as president of the American Jewish Committee in
the early 1940s, he tried unsuccessfully to foster support for Israeli
statehood." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 61] Wealthy Jewish patron Peggy
Guggenheim sponsored and helped build the career of famous Abstract
Expressionist Jackson Pollock whose wife, Lee Krasner (formerly
Lena Kreisner) was also Jewish. Ms. Guggenheim had a reputation
for "bizarre sexual appetites" and claimed to have slept "with
practically every man she ever met," including Pollock. [NAIFEH/SMITH,
1989, p. 478] Guggenheim sued Pollock's widow in the 1960s, "charging a
failure to hand over at least fifteen works executed by her late husband
between 1946 and 1948 when Miss Guggenheim was subsidizing him on the
condition that he give her everything he produced." [BURNHAM, p. 89]
For her part, Krasner outlived Pollock by 31 years and amassed a fortune
of $26 million, largely from Pollock's estate. "Lee Krasner spent the
rest of her life nurturing the Jackon Pollock legend. Through her crafty
manipulations, the price of Pollock's paintings skyrocketed into the
millions." [GAINES, S., 1998, p. 144]
"After World War II," remarks Gerald
Krefetz, "a new element was added to collecting: investment value. Jews
were perhaps the first to appreciate the new art and the new
ingredient." [KREFETZ, p. 147] Sam Kootz opened a gallery in 1945
(he even experimented, in later years, with selling limited edition art
at department stores such as Macy's and Gimbel's.) He, like some
others, came to art with "a training in law" and a background as an
advertising executive. Among art dealers, says Marcia Bystryn, "Kootz
marks a shift from a concern with establishing a personal bond with the
artist to a concern for a marketable product ... [BYSTRYN, p. 184] ...
[He] was to apply the techniques he learned in the advertising business
to that of marketing his artists." [BYSTRYN, p. 185]
Sidney Janis opened his
influential gallery in 1948, Leo Castelli ("with his aristocratic
manner" [PLATTNER, p. 35] began his own in 1957. "Castelli knows
everyone," wrote Sophy Burnham in 1974, "He appears everywhere. An
article in Vogue, a spread in Life, a piece in the New
York Times Sunday Magazine." [BURNHAM, p. 36]
Castelli, owner of one of the most
influential American art galleries in modern history, is widely credited
to have spectacularly maneuvered the art world to his best economic
advantage, the consequences which have been profound in art history. In
1964 Robert Rauschenberg, one of the artists in Castelli's "stable," won
the prestigious Venice Bienniale Prize. Sophy Burnham notes that:
"It was said that Castelli first
handpicked the American Biennale
commissioner, Alan Solomon,
Director of the Jewish Museum; then
he chose eight American
representatives (four of whom were attached to
his gallery) and the American
judges, then trotted off to Europe to
persuade the other [European] judges
... of the inevitable thunderous
Rauschenberg landslide ... The first
person invited to be the American
judge had turned the job down on the
grounds that he felt he would have
been unable to exercise his own
opinion in the face of American
pressure. [BURNHAM, p. 45]
"I was somewhat responsible for the
Rauschenberg victory," Castelli later admitted to the New York Times
Sunday Magazine. "After Rauschenberg won the Venice Biennale in
1964," notes Stuart Plattner, "the value of this [genre of] art was
'proven,' and prices for the gallery's artists rose." [PLATTNER, p. 35]
"Anyone can discover an artist," Castelli once said, " but to make him
what he is, give him importance, that's really discovery." [ECONOMIST,
p. 98] In this context, Castelli was influential in the "discovery" of
Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, Ray Lichtenstein, Frank Stella, Andy
Warhol, James Rosenquist, Richard Serra, Donald Judd, Ellis Kelly, Cy
Twombly, and others. [ECONOMIST, p. 99] "There is no deviousness in
[Castelli]," insisted Ivan Karp -- another prominent Jewish art dealer
who was formerly employed by Castelli, "He's the victim type." [BURNHAM,
p. 47]
One of the most influential art exhibitions in the early years of
the 20th century, featuring 1,300 art works, was the International
Exhibition of Modern Art, also known as the Armory Show. As Karl Meyer
notes:
"In 1912 painters Arthur B. Davies and Walt Kuhn toured Europe to
gather the
best examples of the most radical modernist works ... By the end of
their
hegira Davies and Kuhn had assembled the first large assortment of
works by
masters of European modernism to be shown in America ... The Armory
Show
has been accurately described by Lloyd Goodman, former director of
the
Whitney Museum of American Art, as the 'opening gun in the long,
bitter
struggle for modern art in this country.'" [MEYER, K., 1979, p.
100-101]
(Jewish art mogul Henry Geldzahler, chairman of the Metroplitan
Museum museum's twentieth-century art and later commissioner of New York
City's Cultural Affairs, also mounted a very influential exhibition in
1969: "New York Painting and Sculpture: 1940 to 1970." [MEYER, K., 1979,
p. 101-102] In the late 1960s, the Metropolitan Museum "assigned five
seats on the Metropolitan board to ensure borough-wide representation."
Of these five, one was an African-American and three were Jewish:
educator Muriel Rosoff Silberstein; Sol Shapiro, a founder of the Bronx
Museum of Arts; and Henry Saltzman, former president of the Pratt
Institute in Brooklyn.) [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 114]
Another of the most important New York
art sales organizations, still strong today, is the Marlborough Gallery,
begun in London in 1948 by two German-Jewish refugees, Frank Lloyd
and Harry Fischer. By the 1980s it had branches in New York City,
Zurich, Toronto, Rome, Tokyo, Montreal, and Liechtenstein, an "art world
multinational corporation." [KREFETZ, p. 160] The Marlborough Gallery's
reputation hit rock bottom in the 1960s -- but survived to prosper --
after an ugly series of lawsuits over the estate of painter Mark
Rothko (a suicide). The gallery seriously undervalued his remaining
work and tried -- by fraud and conspiracy -- to manipulate and skim them
for outrageous profits, ultimately losing the case to Rothko's heirs in
court. Rothko's daughter Kate also successfully sued the executors of
her father's estate -- Morton Levine, Theodore Stamos, and
Bernard Reiss ("the most celebrated accountant in the art world
as far back as the 1940s." [MYERS, J, p. 236] "The only thing that
blocks them [the Jewish mafia] from complete control of the art world,"
Marlborough's Jewish president, Frank Lloyd, proclaimed, "is
Marlborough. We're independent. We are the biggest handicap to that
clique." [KRAFETZ, p. 161] On another occasion he admitted that "I
collect money, not art ... There is only one measure of success in
running a gallery: making money." [SMITH, R., 4-8-98]
Lawsuits and counter suits are
common between artists and their galleries. "The artist sees the dealer
as a leech," observes Sophy Burnham. [BURNHAM, p. 94] Artist William de
Kooning sued dealer Sidney Janis, the Marlborough Gallery initiated
legal action against Naum Gabo.
Other recent prominent Jewish art
dealers include Laurence Rubin, Irving Bloom, Ronald
Feldman, Holly Solomon, Ileana Sonnabend (former wife
of Leo Castelli), and many others. In 1998 a London newspaper
called Jewish dealer Bernard Jacobson "possibly the leading
dealer of modern British art." [COOPER, p. 50] British dealer and art
patron Jonathan Silver "established an art gallery for his friend
[ultimately art superstar] David Hockney." [DAILY TELEGRAPH, p. 31]
Otto Kallir "dealt in expressionist painters ... [He also] became
the representative of Grandma Moses and even edited her autobiography."
[HEILBUT, p. 218] Andy Warhol's world of Jewish art moguls included
Ivan Karp, Irving Blum, and Robert Scull. Henry
Geldzahler, a homosexual and curator of the Metropolitan Museum of
Art, was "Andy's painting mentor .... Although they were never lovers,
the relationship became intimate. Andy spoke to Henry on the phone every
night before he went to sleep and every morning as soon as he woke up."
[BOCKRIS, V., 1989, p. 158, 101]
In 1980, Warhol produced a limited series of pictures entitled
"Jewish Geniuses," featuring portraits of Gertrude Stein,
Franz Kafka, Sarah Bernhardt, the Marx Brothers,
theologian Martin Buber, Louis Brandeis (the "father" of
American Zionism), George Gershwin, Sigmund Freud,
Albert Einstein, and former Israeli prime minister Golda Meir.
An accompanying exhibition was featured at New York's Jewish Museum and
the Judah Magnes Museum in Berkeley, California. Bluma Goldstein
notes the "eagerness of major Jewish museums to mount and advertize the
exhibit and to sell expensive portfolios of the exhibit's serigraphs"
and Warhol's shrewdness in targeting Jewish wealth, prominence in the
art world, self-infatuation, and vanity:
"Warhol's preoccupation with money and status is common knowledge
and is
reflected in his many prints of dollar signs and paper money ...
New York Times
art critic Hilton Kramer, in a review of the exhibit at the New
York Jewish
Museum, and David Bourdon, in his book on Warhol, both commented on
the artist's crass opportunism in targeting a specific sector of
the public. [Carrie]
Rickey calls it 'the synagogue circuit' -- that is middle-class
Jews who could be
counted on to be attracted to things Jewish and contemporary
culture and who
also possessed the means to purchase an expensive portfolio in a
200-count
limited edition ... Not unlike this sector the public, the Jewish
museums were
drawn to an array of famous Jewish faces artistically displayed by
a major artist
popular for the previous two decades ... Ronald Feldman,
owner of a New
York art gallery involved in many successful commercial ventures of
Warhol's
career, assisted Warhol in selecting Jewish figures, organized the
exhibition at
the New York Jewish museum, and issued the print portfolio for
sale."
[GOLDSTEIN, B., 2000, p. 128]
In 1993 the New York Times
Magazine called Arnold Glimcher "the most successful art
dealer in New York. With art collector and Hollywood hot-shot Michael
Ovitz as one his best friends, Glimcher could personally merge the
New York art scene and the Hollywood movie industry." With Ovitz's
Hollywood connections, art dealer Glimcher even became a film director.
In an overview of his career, the Times noted that he lent
"himself a WASP-ish touch in his early days as an art dealer by
assigning himself the Nordic-looking name Arne, and now, in Hollywood,
[he] adopt[s] the more Jewish Arnie." [SCHWARTZMAN, p. 32]
As art dealer, Glimcher represent "19
of the world's most demanding artists, from Donald Judd and George
Baselitze to Joel Shapiro [Ovitz's cousin] and Julian Schnabel."
[SCHWARTZMAN, p. 33] Glimcher also represents Jewish artist Jim Dine,
with whom he spent two months in Israel. [BOXER, T., 5-26-01] Glimcher's
gallery employs dozens of people, including eight full time archivists.
Gallery director, Renato Danese, is a former head of the Visual Arts
Program of the National Endowment for the Arts. "One of the amazing
things about my father," said a Glimcher son who headed his dad's art
catalogue division, "is that in this high-powered world, with all the
various things that he's been successful at, he has this innocence."
[SCHWARTZMAN, p. 44]
"So savage was the [art] business
(fake forgeries and ruthless competition in an unregulated economy),"
wrote Sophy Burnham in the 1970s, "that the Art Dealers' Association
was formed in the early 1960s to help raise the ethics and reputations
of dealers." [BURNHAM, p. 90] But some things never change. In September
1997 ARTnews reported an ongoing Justice Department "probe into
the business practices of art dealers and auction houses." Subpoenaed
galleries included Acquavella, Didier Aaron, William Beadleston, Simon
Dickinson, Robert Haboldt, Hirschl and Adler, Kennedy, Knoedler and
Company, Otto Naumann, Newhouse, PaceWildenstein, Rosenberg and Stiebel,
and the Sotheby's and Christie's art auction houses. [KASTNER, J, p.
43] "It is believed," said the New York Times, "that about two
dozen of New York's more prominent fine art dealers have heard from the
Justice Department," [VOGEL, p. A1] adding Richard L. Feigen, Colnaghi
and Herman Shickman.
In 1991, the Bernard and S. Dean Levy
Gallery in Manhattan was found guilty of collusion and fined $100,000.
In 1996, in New Orleans, Federal marshals shut down the Morton M.
Goldberg Auction Galleries firm under court order after Morton and David
Goldberg were charged with fraud and skimming hundreds of thousands of
dollars from a British supplier of art and antiques. [GREG, p. 21] Also
in 1996, major Jewish art dealer and best-selling novelist (The Thief
of Light, no less) David Ramus was sentenced to 33 months in prison
for fraud, bilking art collecting clients out of millions of dollars.
"There are no rules [in the art world]," he waxed as he prepared for
jail, "only bloated songs of money and ego. It's a treasure hunt for
grown-ups. And it's like dope; nothing -- no profit, no fortune -- is
ever enough." [LAURENCE, p. 21]
In 1999, a Los Angeles Police Department media press release noted
"A museum art thief was convicted of thefts of fine art from two
Los Angeles
museums. Nureet Granott, 50, used a fake driver's license, a
fraudulent credit
card, and fictitious rental agreement information to garner control
of over
$22,000 of art through the art rental galleries of the UCLA/Armand
Hammer
Musuem of Art and the L.A. County Museum of Art in 1995 ... [Others
were fleeced]
for an estimated $100,000 in goods and services -- from a luxury
car to pet bills.
During the museum thefts, Granott assumed the identity of her
sister, Hanit Peretz, who
is living in Israel. During many of the transactions, Granott was
accompanied
by her husband, David Yehuda Cohen. Both are also suspected of
being
involved in questionable real estate transactions." [LOS ANGELES
POLICE,
8-16-99]
In 2001, the New York state attorney general filed an injunction
against the Antique and Design Center (owned by Jill and Dave Schuster)
for selling fraudulent art work over the Internet on e-Bay. It was "the
first case of fraud brought by the State against an online art
retailer." [ART NEWSPAPER, 5-30-01] The same year, in Boston, art
dealers Shirley Sack and Arnold Katzen were "charged with conspiring to
launder $4.1 million in drug money." They were arrested "as they
attempted to sell paintings, which they claimed were originals by
Modigliani and Degas, to a federal agent posing as a drug dealer ... Ms.
Sack had been attempting to sell a painting by Raphael and was prepared
to accept payment in drug money or from organized crime figures."
[MUSEUM SECURITY, 6-3-01]
Also in 2001, Michel Cohen, originally from France, hit the news
with his own spectacular art fraud:
"Many are calling it the biggest art fraud ever. When all the
figures are in,
art dealer Michel Cohen will have taken the art world for at least
$50
million ... [Art dealing] is a jealous and wary system, where each
player
guards sources and clients, but it is built on an essential trust.
This is the
system that has made the art market the largest unregulated money
market
in the world -- a market that Michel Cohen was in a position to
loot."
[HADEN-GUEST, A., 2-6-01] ... Whether for purpose of convenience,
privacy or to avoid paying taxes or the authorities, great sums of
money
are loaned all the time to purchase art. An inhabitant of the art
world's
periphery, Cohen knew this ... The art world's secrecy worked to
Cohen's
advantage. Dealers seldom want their peers to know what they are
doing."
[HADEN-GUEST, A., 2-12-01]
Always within the art world matrix of
incestuous connection and often corruption, the artist has usually
championed a rarified "humanities"-based world perspective that is
usually antithetical to the daily economic morass in which he or she is
mired. Burnham notes that
"[The artist] appears ... at a
museum opening or gallery party, for it is
politic to circulate in the art
crowd. He mingles with the black-tie patrons
of the arts and acts his own
iconoclast part ... all the while hating what
he is doing: the terrible dancing
with a prospective patron, the posing,
while at the back of his mind lurks
this terrible doubt about the place of
art in society." [BURNHAM, p. 8]
"The artist who would be known,"
wrote the great folklorist Joseph Campbell, "has to go to cocktail
parties to win commissions, and those who win them are the ones who are
not in their studios but at parties, meeting the right people and
appearing in the right places." [CAMPBELL, p. 49] "Much time," wrote
Jewish artist Julian Schnabel, "is spent nurturing liaisons with
creatures of the art world mechanism. At first, there is no time for
friendship. Later, there is no capacity for it." [CAPLIN, L., 1989, p.
168]
For some artists, total cooption and
immersion into the most trivial and superficial of values has occurred.
"Striking instances of this culture-industry phenomenon," wrote Anne
Bowler and Blaine McBurney in 1993, "may be seen in the cases of painter
Kenny Sharf [Jewish and gay] and writer Tama Janowitz [not Jewish]. In
both instances, national and sometimes international publicity was
directed at these artists in a manner that illustrates the distanced
values of the culture industry. In the case of Sharf ... a
feature-length cover story in the September 1985 issue of ArtNews
[Jewish owned and edited] is representative of the culture industry
'plugging' and labeling process that produce the art world 'star
system.' ... The ArtNews piece actually spends a great deal of
time discussing everything but Sharf's artwork. Instead, we are treated
to a journalistic tableau of downtown parties, clubs, and
'personalities.'" [BOWLER, p. 172-173]
In Paris, from about 1920 to 1940,
Jewish painters "were almost a school unto themselves," including Chaim
Soutine, Jules Pascin, and Marc Chagall. [KREFETZ, p. 143] Other Jewish
painters included Pissaro, Amedo Modligliani, and Szyk. Jewish
socio-political artists in America in the 1920s and 1930s included Ben
Shahn, Moses Soyer, Chaim Gross, Jack Levine, Morris Kanter, Raphael
Soyer, Saul Steinberg, Max Weber, and Abraham Walkowitz. A partial list
of other prominent Jewish American artists includes Mark Rothko (Marcus
Rothkowitz), Julian Schnabel, Barnett Newman, Joel Shapiro, Roy
Lichtenstein, Louise Nevelson, Sam Francis, Judy Chicago (Cohen), Helen
Frankenthaler, Jules Olitski, George Segal, Ad Reinhardt, Morris Louis,
Adolph Gottleib, Larry Rivers (Yitzroch Loiza Grossberg), Jim Dine (the
Friends of the Tel Aviv Museum's "Artist of the Year" in 2001), [BOXER,
T., 5-26-01] Eleanor Antin, Allen Katz, Jacques Lipschitz, Sol Le Witt,
Dennis Oppenheim, Max Ernst, Milton Avery, Leonard Baskin, Eugene
Berman, Leonid Berman, Hyman Bloom, Louis Eilshemius, Philip Guston,
Hans Hofmann, Philip Pearlstein, Rachel Rosenthal, Carolee Schneeman,
Susan Weil, Hannah Wilke, Ross Bleckner, among many others. Peter Max
has been among the most popularly commercial. "Some critics," says
Gerald Krefetz, "have suggested that the whole field of modern abstract
art is especially Jewish." [KREFETZ, p. 145]
Even Morris Katz
"is listed in The Guinness Book of
Records as 'the most prolific
painter in history,' with over
eighteen paintings painted and sold
to date ... 'Paint fast, sell cheap'
is his motto." [JACOBSON, H.,
1995, p. 62, 63]
In 2000, sculptor Robert Gober was
chosen "to represent the United States at the 2000 Venice Biennale."
[VOGEL, C., 5-19-2000, pt 2, p. E30]
Celebrated Jewish architects in
recent history include Louis Kahn, Richard Meier, Peter Eisenman, Moshe
Safdie, Frank Gehry, Richard Gluckman, Malcolm Holzman, James Polshek,
Robert Siegel, and Robert Stern. Louis Kahn was the architect for both
Yale University's art museums; Moshe Safdie designed Ottawa's National
Gallery and Montreal's Museum of Fine Arts. Emery Roth "became one of
the most prolific architects of high-rise apartment buildings in
Manhattan." [SCHACHTMAN, p. 101] Eisenman "founded the Institute for
Architecture and Urban Studies in New York, the intellectual center of
architectural activity in the United States and the place where
architects from all over the world come to sniff the breeze." [ARONSON,
S., 1983, p. 303] In 2000, "Daniel Libeskind, whose Jewish Museum Berlin
has attracted crowds before its exhibits are even in place, was named
architect of the Denver Art Museum's new [$62.5 million] wing."
[CHANDLER, M., 7-14-2000] "In Germany," notes Cecil Roth," in the middle
of the [nineteenth] century, the most prominent name in [architecture]
is that of George Hitzig, president of the Academy of Art, who designed
the Bourse (1859-64) and the Reichsbank (1869-77). Many of the local
branches of this institution, in the full fortress-like floridity of the
close of the last century, were erected by E. Jacobsthal, while in
Austria, a new tradition in theatrical architecture was started by Oscar
Strnad." [ROTH, C., 1940, p. 159]
Even Sigmund Freud's grandson, Lucien
Freud, has had phenomenal success as a British painter, selling "small
to medium size" pictures for between $200,000-$1 million apiece;
occasional individual sales have topped $2 million. Freud's first wife
was Kitty Epstein, daughter of sculptor Jacob Epstein. [FEAVER, p.
138-139] In 1998 a painting of his daughter Bella sold for $5.83
million, the highest price for a living British artist. A "longtime
friend" of Freud is Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, head of the
famous banking firm. Rothschild also heads the National Heritage
Monument Trust in Great Britain, an arts agency roughly equivalent to
America's National Endowment for the Arts. (Taking a trip to Australia?
Perhaps you might show your art work to Henry Krongeld, the chairman of
the National Art Center in Melbourne, and listed in at least one Israeli
publication as a committed Zionist).
Even Sigmund Freud himself was
afforded art museum attention in 1999 when documents, antiques, and
other artifacts from his personal life, including a reproduction of his
consultation room, toured the United States, beginning at the
Smithsonian museum, and later the Jewish Museum in New York City.
[BARUCH, E., 1999, p. 11]
In the late 1990s, millionaire
British Jewish advertising king Tony Kaye decided he wanted "to have a
bigger impact in the world of communications." [HILTY, p. 16] So he
moved to Hollywood to become a movie director and a gallery artist.
Among Kaye's "art works," noted the (London) Financial Times, was
a project to place a real homeless man "on display at the [British] Tate
Gallery with a price tag of 4m. pounds .... [The man] will soon be
replaced by ... a homeless woman [that] Kaye encountered on Venice Beach
[California] and has displayed at the Getty Museum." [HILTY, p. 16]
"Today," says Stephen Brook, "... many
of the most distinguished [artist] names in Britain are those of Jews
... [R.B.] Kitaj ... has discovered in middle age an increasing
fascination with Judaism ... Like many Jews, his rediscovery of Judaism
sprang from this study of the Holocaust; he became a mad expert in the
whole 'lugubrious business.' ... His obsession with the Holocaust ... is
adumbrated by the inclusion of a chimney-stack motif with some of his
recent work." [BROOK, p. 329]
Kitaj, who was born in Ohio, coined
the term "School of London" to describe the work of himself, Lucien
Freud, Frank Auerbach, Leon Kossoff, Michael Andrews, and Francis Bacon.
He had a major retrospective exhibition in 1994 that was roundly trashed
by critics. Three months later, noted the New York Times, Kitaj's
wife, the painter Sandra Fisher ("who is credited with the largest
picture ever made -- 300 ft. by 100 ft., for a Heineken advertisement"
[BARKER, p. 10], "died unexpectedly of an aneurysm at age 47. And Mr.
Kitaj concluded that his critics motivated by anti-Semitism killed her."
[RIDING, p. 13] "I have long since resolved to be a Jew," once declared
Kitaj, "... I regard that as more important than my art." [STEYN, J.,
1999, p. 153] Juliet Steyn notes traditional Jewish self-conception in
one of Kitaj's paintings: "The chimney [in a Kitaj painting] functions
as an indictment of Christianity. Hence Jewish identity in Kitaj's
painting is achieved in opposition to Christianity ... Innocence and
guilt: Jew and Gentile." [STEYN, J., 1999, p. 168]
The theme of suddenly returning to a
lost Jewish identity (and sometimes Judaism) via the decades-old
Holocaust is a common one, reflected also in the work of Judy (Cohen)
Chicago, a daughter of Marxists and co-founder with Miriam Shapiro of
the Feminist Art Program at the California Institute for the Arts. (In
New York, Jewish artists Barbara Zucker and Pollie Attie founded the
feminist collective gallery "AIR" -- Artists in Residence. Zucker
"recalls being ambivalent and embarrassed at being Jewish, yet felt
guilty for harboring such emotions. In the late 1980s, she began to
explore her Jewish identity." [HYMAN, p. 73] In a like manner, following
her son's bar mitzvah, a rereading of the book of Genesis, and a trip to
Israel [feminist artist] Ann Sperry produced her own version of the
biblical story of creation." [HYMAN, p. 73] Particularly important in
Judy Chicago's Jewish retrieval was her viewing of Claude Lansmann's
Holocaust movie, Shoah. "The next two years," says the Cleveland
Jewish News,
"were spent reading everything she
could find about the Holocaust,
visiting museums and exhibitions,
viewing films and listening to survivor's
tapes ... In 1987, Chicago [and her
Jewish husband, Donald Woodman]
traveled the 'landscape of the
Holocaust,' a 6,000-mile journey following
Hitler's pathway of destruction
through Germany, France, Austria,
Poland, Czechoslovakia, and the
former Soviet Union ... While
Woodman took pictures, Chicago wrote,
writing her impressions and
feelings in her 'Jewish journal.'"
[HELLER, F, p. 14]
Eventually this long escapade became
a popular art installation: Holocaust Project: From Darkness into
Light, Chicago's "journey of identity as a Jew." [HELLER, p. 14]
Art world interest in the Holocaust
might be measured by ARTnews' features in recent years on various
aspects of the subject, including an article entitled "Picasso at
Auschwitz." "Picasso embraced me," recalls Pierre Daix, "and said in a
low voice: 'To think that painters once thought they could paint The
Massacre of the Innocents.'" [DAIX, p. 197]
Art Spigelman's Holocaust comic book,
Maus, merited an article, as did Gay Block's photographic
portraits of "Rescuers of the Holocaust." [DRUCKER, p. 114-118] This
series of portraits of people who saved Jews from Nazis was also an
exhibition at the prestigious Museum of Modern Art. MOMA also "mounted a
show on the making of Maus ... which ... documented Spigelman's working
methods." [BERMAN, A, p. 63-64] Yet another ARTnews article in
1995 featured the paintings of Peter Malkin, "a former Mossad agent who
helped capture [former Nazi] Adolf Eichmann in Argentina." [CLEMENTS,
F., p. xvii]
Another artist, Anselm Kiefer, "one
of the most important artists to emerge in post-war Europe," started out
as an art student in 1969 by having "himself photographed in a
paramilitary costume, giving Nazi-style salutes in front of monuments,
landscapes, and seascapes around Germany." Thirty years later he was
afforded an exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. "We see railroad
tracks anywhere," he was quoted as saying, "and think about Auschwitz."
[MENDELSOHN, J. 1999, p. 37] 54 of the author's works "were acquired"
in 1995. As two Jewish art critics note about the importance of catering
to Jewish concerns in recent art trends, "there are tons of non-Jews --
Christian Boltonski, Anselm Kiefer, Christopher Williams, to name a few
-- who've done astonishing work dealing with Jewish culture, persecution
[and] the Holocaust." [AUERBACH/WEISSMAN, 3-21-99, p. 51]
Art world and auction house cynicism
for profit knows few limits. "On the very day [in 1979] the Pope
preached at Auschwitz," notes Theodore Ziolkowski, "fifty lots of Nazi
memorabilia brought record prices at an auction in New York, including
$5,000 for a small diary kept by Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's mastermind
of the 'Final Solution.'" [ZIOLKOWSKI, p. 685] Adolf Hitler himself was
a water color painter and his work today has sold for thousands of
dollars. Long before Hitler achieved world wide notoriety as a war
monger and mass murderer, notes M. H. Goldberg, "most of the paintings
Hitler did sell were bought by Jewish dealers." [GOLDBERG, M., 1976, p.
37]
As art dealer and memorabilia seller Charles Hamilton notes:
"Contrary to popular belief, Hitler was never
a house painter but was, in fact,
an artist who actually made a meager living from his watercolors
of flowers
and buildings and street scenes. Several years ago I had a visit
from my good
friend, Shea Tennenbaum, a distinguished Hebrew poet, and our
conversation
fell upon art and artists.
'A great artist paints from his soul, not from his mind,' said
Shea. 'It is this flood
of deep, inner emotion that makes a great artist.'
'Don't you think an artist can counterfeit emotion?' I asked. And
without waiting
for a reply, I walked to a file in my gallery and took out a small
watercolor of
flowers in a vase. 'What do you think of this?'
Shea studied it. 'Obviously,' he said, 'the
artist was a man of great delicacy and
profound feelings, a lover of beauty. He has captured the supreme
moment in
the existence of these flowers and recorded it with taste and
skill.'
I said: 'Look at the signature in the lower left.'
Shea looked and gasped in horror. The signature was that of Adolf
Hitler.
For a moment I feared that Shea might slump to the floor, but he
quickly
recovered himself and I apologized for the prank."
After Hitler had twice failed the matriculation test for the
Vienna Academy of
Arts and Sciences -- he had hoped to become an architect -- he
turned to
dabbling in watercolors. His favorite subjects were deserted
streets, public
buildings, and churches. A friend of Hitler's, Reihold Hanisch,
pretended to
be blind so he wouldn't need a peddler's license and hawked
Hitler's paintings
for him in the bars of Vienna. They sold for a few kronen reach
and the two
youths split the take, much of which they spent on pastries and
whipped cream.
At this time Hitler was bearded and wore a derby and a long black
coat that gave
him a very Semitic appearance. Oddly, most of his regular
customers were
Jewish, and since Hitler was fond of quoting Jewish proverbs he
was often
taken for a Jew." [HAMILTON, C., 1981, p. 182]
Holocaust survivor material also has
a price tag. In December 1997, for example, Edith Hahn's "personal
letters documenting her [Holocaust] survival, her love affairs and her
escape as a Jew during World War II" went for $169,250 at a Sotheby's
auction. [BROWN, p. 1] Also on the Holocaust theme, in 1995 Rabbi Israel
Miller gave the Jewish editor of ARTnews, Milton Esterow, an
honorary shofar, "a ram's horn blown in synagogues before and during
Rosh Hoshanah for the magazine's role in transferring the ownership of
thousands of artworks stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis
to the Jewish community of Vienna." [ARTnews, 10-96, p. 53] In the late
1980s, a commission to do a Holocaust memorial art work for the New York
Appellate Courthouse "triggered [in Harriet] Feigenbaum [an] interest in
her Jewish roots." [HYMAN, p. 73]
All this of course reflects latent
Jewish "particularist" exploitation of America's new "cultural
pluralism" paradigm. As Paula Hyman and Deborah Dash note:
"During the last decades, the concept
of America as a melting pot was
gradually replaced by visions of a
multicultural society based on ethnic
diversity, and the concept of
'universal' art reflecting a master-narrative
was challenged by the belief in the
necessity of pluralistic art forms."
[HYMAN, p. 69]
Perhaps the most obsessive "art
work" about the Holocaust, blending aesthetics, mass murder, and a
neurotic Jewish identity, is that of a 23-year Jewish California
lesbian, Marina Vainshtein, who sports 25 body piercings and a red
Mohawk haircut. As one Jewish art critic appreciatively notes,
Vainshtein also has
"tattoos of graphic Holocaust images
over most of her body. On her
upper back, the central image
represents a train transport carrying Jewish
prisoners in striped uniforms
towards waiting ovens ... It was ... in high
school [in Los Angeles] that
Vainshtein became obsessed with
Holocaust literature ...
Vainshtein's tatoos include a violin player ...
surrounded by hanging corpses,
anguished faces and Zyklon B, the
killing agent in the gas chambers.
The screaming faces of prisoners
being gassed are tattooed on one
breast." [APEL, p. 12, 14]
Then there are the likes of Rachel
Schreiber, a video artist, and teacher at the Heron School division of
Indiana University in Indianapolis, whose recent works include a video
expression entitled: "Please Kill Me: I'm a Faggot Nigger Jew."
[SCHRIEBER, R., 2000]
For "superstar" Jewish novelist Judith Krantz, it's not permissible
to even mention some historic art movements. Jewish victimology usurps
them. She recounts her outrage when, visiting a German art museum, her
companion dared to mention the "Dachau school of landscape painting"
[Dachau was also the later site of a Nazi concentration camp where Jews
were murdered]:
"Suddenly [Krantz's German companion] exclaimed, 'Oh, look here at
the masterworks
of the Dachau School of landscape painting.' 'WHAT DID YOU SAY?'
'The
Dachau School of landscape painting,' she replied in all innocence,
showing me
some charming paintings of rural countryside. 'It was a well-known
artistic
movement.' Only then did I realize that Anna laced the faintest
idea of history.
My mind whirling, I couldn't decided where to start her education."
[KRANTZ,
J., 2000, p. 304]
Invariably, within the "back to
Jewish" roots model, surfaces the ages-old Jewish world view,
sanctified in the myths of the Jewish Holocaust, that celebrates
"galut/exile." And the model is this: constant self-hatred in a world
other than Jewish, obsession with physical and/or intellectual markers
of Distinction, the incessant Persecution Complex, and the notion that
Jews -- God's (or no God's) eternal outsiders -- cannot, and should not,
successfully assimilate into the rest of modern American society. In
1997, Jewish art critic Donald Kuspit addressed this theme of modern
Jewish identity in an article called "Unconsciously, Always an Alien and
Self-Alienated: The Problem of Jewish American Artists." The Jew, says
Kuspit
"may symbolize the ultimate alien in
Christian society, the common
enemy against which all Christians
can unite ... In the minds of both
[secular and religious] Jews the
memory -- the threat -- of genocide
remains ever present. For all their
differences, the two [kinds of Jews]
are inwardly united; they know
Christian society regards them as one
and the same." [KUSPIT, p. 30]
In 1999 Juliet Steyn noted a film entitled Jewish Artists in the
East End (of New York City) about David Bomberg, Mark Gertler, and
Alfred Wollmark where "Richard Cork argues that a common identity
existed between them as Jews: alienation in the condition they share."
[STEYN, J., 1999, p. 17]
Among the international artists most
popularized in recent American art history, "rediscovered in the late
60's and early 70's," [TANNER, p. D3] is the Mexican artist Frida
Kahlo. Kahlo, "often described as Mexico's foremost woman painter,"
[SOLOMON, p. 28] was half-Jewish. So, decides reviewer Deborah Solomon,
Kahlo "combined a Jewish feeling for psychic suffering with a Mexican
feeling for bold design." [SOLOMON, p. 28] Her paintings today, notes
the San Francisco Chronicle in a 1992 article entitled Why
Frida Is Everywhere, "sell for millions.' [TANNER, p. D3] "None of
us can claim to be immune from Fridamania," says Holly Barnet-Sanchez,
chief curator of the Mexican Museum.
In 2001, an Arizona newspaper noted one dimension of the Frida
Kahlo craze at an exhibition of Mexican art at the Phoenix Art Museum.
The show featured the collection of wealthy Mexican Jewish collectors
Jacques and Natasha Gelman, "major players in the glamorous Mexico City
film scene of the 1940s":
"Contemporary acquisitions ... [of Jacques and Natasha Gelman] have
been
expertly guided by longtime [Jewish] Gelman friend Robert
Littman, ex-director of Mexico City's now-defunct Centro
Cultural/Arte
Cultural). As president of the Vergel Foundation, which is
responsible for
carrying on the Gelman legacy, Littman seems to possess an
infallible eye."
[Vanesian, K., 6-701]
The Gelmans became rich in the motion picture business in Mexico.
Artist Kahlo, like others, "often paid the rent by doing portraits of
wealthy socialites." One of Kahlo's portraits of Natasha Gelman
"captures the woman, crowned with sausage curls al modo and draped ina a
fur stole." "To anyone familiar with Mexican art history," writes critic
Kathleen Vanesian,
"the Gelman exhibition is not a well-balanced overview of Mexican
art mid-century ...
Rather, it's a classically status-driven,
gotta-be-better-than-the-Gomezes
compilation reflecting one type of art collector's psychic
preoccupation
with memorializing himself and notable public figures with which he
has
socialized. Frankly, it's one more befitting a newly moneyed,
18th-century
Dutch burgher than a discerning, visionary collector seeking
emerging
and mid-career artists' best and most enduring works." [VANESIAN,
K., 6-7-01]
Other intriguing Jewish art angles
these days include the New York Jewish Museum (which gave Robert
Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns their first important exhibitions) where
"a high tech highlight of the galleries devoted to the Israelite period
[is] the interpretive Talmud -- a video that displays Talmudic passages
with inset translations and talking heads." [ROSENBAUM, p. 102]
Elsewhere, "last summer," noted ARTnews in 1994, "Jane Alexander
[a Gentile] was starring on Broadway, playing a Jewish banker in The
Sisters Rosensweig. No one, least of all the actress herself, imagined
that she'd soon take on what may be her most challenging role yet --
leader of the embattled National Endowment for the Arts." [CEMBELAST, p.
71-72] In Eastern Europe, with the collapse of communism,
Jewish-American billionaire George Soros has "introduced artists to new
systems of patronage, exhibitions, and competition" with the Soros
Center for Contemporary Arts in Prague, one of 20 Soros-established
organizations throughout former communist countries. [BERNSTEIN, R]
One of the things the Eastern
Europeans can learn is that in the relatively narrow art world circle,
"there is a constant movement of people around the jobs of the art
world, from college professor to museum director to dealer to magazine
editor." [BURNHAM, p. 125] All such occupations tend to overlap.
Nepotism and interconnectedness run rampant. Prominent dealer Ivan Karp,
for instance, started out as an art critic for the Village Voice.
He later worked for art dealer Leo Castelli before starting his own
gallery, O.K. Harris. Castelli's ex-wife Ileana (Sonnabend) started her
own eventually important gallery too. Artist Alexander Lieberman started
out as a layout editor at Vogue. His stepdaughter became a
contributing editor for Art in America and was married to another
artist, Cleve Gray, who showed at the same gallery as Lieberman, and was
also a contributing editor to Art in America, as well as a
sometimes writer for Vogue. "Those who questioned Liberman's
art," notes Thomas Meir, "invariably mentioned his status as editorial
director at Conde Nast," the firm owned by billionaire media
magnate Si Newhouse, of whom Liberman has been a close friend for thirty
years. [MAIER, p. 70] "Poverty is not conducive to good art," Liberman
told the New York Times in a feature about his studio, "and I
have always believed in living life to the hilt." [MAIER, p. 70]
Prominent art critic Clement Greenberg was both an associate editor of
the Jewish magazine Commentary and art critic for the Nation.
He also worked earlier with Elliot Cohen (later the head of
Commentary) at The Contemporary Jewish Record. [FREEDMAN, M.,
1994, p. 583] Prominent fellow Jewish art critic Harold Rosenberg
"helped launch Clem in his early career as an art critic." [FREEDMAN,
M., 1994, p. 587] Among those many Greenberg himself helped along in
their careers was Rosalind Krauss who he once referred to as one of the
"smart Jewish girls with their typewriters." [FREEDMAN, M., 1994, p.
587]
Such "cross-pollinating" may be
witnessed in the recent case of Tom L. Freudenheim who, at the same
time, has been an executive at the National Endowment for the Arts,
Assistant Secretary for the Arts and Humanities at the Smithsonian
Museum, and Board Vice-Chairman of the National Foundation for Jewish
Culture. Henry Geldzahler was "curator of twentieth century art at the
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, program director for the
Visual Arts of the NEA, a close friend of many artists, and a friend and
follower of [prominent critic Clement] Greenberg." [BURNHAM, p. 127]
Artist Jim Rosenquist really got his
career started when someone "told Alan Stone [about Rosenquist's work]
who told Ileana Sonnenbend, who told Dick Bellamy and Ivan Karp and
Henry Geldzahler and Leo Castelli who came down to the studio in that
order to see the picture." [BURNHAM, p. 106] In the case of prominent
artist William de Kooning, his wife -- Elaine Fried (both Gentiles) --
is credited by some for "largely creating and orchestrating the 'de
Kooning myth," including having sex with influential art critic Harold
Rosenberg and ARTnews editor Thomas Hess [both Jewish]. "When
Elaine slept with Hess," claims an "unnamed elder statesman in the art
world," Bill got publicity in ARTnews. When Elaine had an affair
with Harold Rosenberg, he paid Bill off with attention." [GLUECK, p.
129] She herself eventually wrote art reviews for ARTnews. And
the dominant art critic of that era, Clement Greenberg? "Greenberg's
compulsive womanizing -- often inseparable from his promotion of
female artists -- has long been legendary ... In the early 1950s he
carried on an affair with artist Helen Frankenthaler." [LEWIS, MJ, p.
59]
Incestuous collusion, mutual
back-scratching, under the table wheeling and dealing, nepotism, and
clique allegiance are intrinsic principles of the modern art world.
Another case in point was Bill Rubin, chief curator of painting at the
Museum of Modern Art in the 1970s. Rubin's brother was a New York art
dealer. In 1970 Rubin set up an exhibition of the work of Frank Stella,
a personal friend, and an artist in his brother's gallery. Rubin even
exhibited at MOMA two Stella paintings he owned himself. The show could
be expected to automatically raise Stella's art prices, personally
beneficial to both curator Rubin and his brother.
In 1943 Sam Kootz became an adviser to
the Museum of Modern Art; the next year he was also a private art
dealer, eventually selling works of art by Picasso. When MOMA held a
Picasso exhibition in the 1940s, Kootz was holding a simultaneous
Picasso exhibition as a private dealer. [BYSTRYN, p. 186]
Dore Ashton, an art critic for the
New York Times, was once reprimanded by her editor for choosing to write
about art shows that included her own husband, Adja Yunkers. She wrote
that
"Of this trio, Adja Yunkers, showing
heroic and sultry pastels at the
Emmerich Gallery, is the most
romantic, stoking the fire of color and
shape to degree of thrilling
intensity. Yunkers, who uses pastels with
verve and assurance, organizes
restless compositions in a truly
symphonic way, summing up a complex
infinite of shapes and color
for the majestic 'scoring' of these
beautiful and impressive pictures."
[BURNHAM, p. 342]
During the mid-1960s, says John
Conklin, "the price of favorable attention by a prominent critic Clement
Greenberg was the gift of one or two major works. Critics have built up
reputations of artists whose work they have personally invested, and
then profited from the sale of the art. Art historian Bernard Berenson
sometimes over-praised artworks in which he had a financial stake, even
vouching for paintings that he knew had undergone significant
restorations so as to be made more appealing to buyers. He earned
substantial commissions from the sale of paintings by dealer Joseph
Duveen, collecting more than $8 million from Duveen in their twenty year
partnership ... Moreover, Duveen financed much of Berensen's art
criticism, which he then used to justify the prices he charged to
wealthy collectors." [CONKLIN, p. 44]
Critic Clement Greenberg, member of
the Jewish mafia "New York Intellectuals," and probably the most
powerful art critic of his era, carried with him a reputation for
paybacks for friendly reviews. "No other critic has so openly allied
himself to the merchandizing of art," wrote Sophy Burnham, "...[It is
accused that] he turned his influence to personal profit, accepting free
paintings, writing and lecturing about contemporary art, and selling the
pictures high." [BURNHAM, p. 149-150] "For three decades," notes
Michael J. Lewis, "art criticism in America was the domain of a
rule-giving prophet [Greenberg] ... Where his favor came to rest, as it
did for a time on the paintings of Jackson Pollack, there followed
national celebrity and success." Other prominent Jewish contemporary art
critics "included Meyer Schapiro and Harold Rosenberg. Hilton Kramer
arrived on the scene a bit later." [LEWIS, MJ, 1998] When British/Jewish
art critic David Sylvester died in 2001, London's Daily Telegraph
declared him "modern art's most influential critic." [DAILY TELEGRAPH,
7-20-01]
"Jewish émigrés in flight from the Nazi genocide and Jews of
earlier emigrations, such as Meyer Schapiro and Clement Greenberg, for
example," notes Catherine Soussloff,
"had a definitive and formative influence on art and art history
in America and
England -- and by today in the English-speaking world as a whole.
The impact of
these Jewish art historians, critics, and artists in the
interpretation and exhibition
of art in America and elsewhere was central for art history."
[SOUSSLOFF, C., 2000]
Among his favorites, Greenberg
championed "Washington Color School" artists. "By the end of the 1960s,"
notes Burnham, "Greenberg's Color School artists were being shown in
four important galleries in New York, Paris, London, and Toronto. They
were collected in museums, including the Metropolitan, MOMA, and the
Smithsonian, and considerable muttering could be heard -- not always
good-natured -- about the Mafia and the Kosher Nostra." [BURNHAM, p.
107]
"I've decided the kind of people
attracted to art are often psychopaths," Greenberg once said, "You can
quote me on that. In art and literature both -- Do you know the
difference between psychopaths and psychotics? Psychopaths are people
with defective consciences. They cannot tell right from wrong."
[BURNHAM, p. 157] For his part, Greenberg is reputed to have walked into
artist Barnett Newman's studio and asked for a painting. "Barney was
going to give him something small -- a lithograph perhaps," notes Sophy
Burnham, "'I don't want that,' said Greenberg, 'I want that big one over
there. It's your best picture.' And Newman, inwardly raging, capitulated
to his own ambitions and handed over the painting. Greenberg takes only
the best ... If the critic has an undisclosed stake in the artist's
reputation, it is not for the artist to question." [BURNHAM, p. 131]
Margaret Olin suggests that
widespread Jewish early and mid-twentieth century championing of
formalist art (art denuded of social, political, cultural, and religious
reference) had -- until recent years when celebratory Jewish
"particularism" has been unleashed-- been rooted in their self-interest
in downplaying publicly their Jewish identities. Prominent Jewish art
critics Clement Greenberg and Harold Rosenberg, for example, were
especially prominent in the encouragement of "Abstract Art."
Occasionally, however, latent counter-attitudes to abstract universalism
could indiscreetly surface. Greenberg, for example, once remarked that
"it is possible that by 'world-historical' standards the European Jew
represents a higher type of human being than any yet achieved." [OLIN,
p. 51] This Jewish elitism, lingering just behind a universalistic
front, was also manifest in critic Bernard Berenson. Despite his own
professed "tendency toward universalism and timelessness" and "the same
human quality in every individual," he further proposed to "erect the
same qualities into ultimate standards, and to appraise societies as
well as individuals by the extent to which they have possessed these
qualities." "Thus [for Berenson]," notes Margaret Olin, "like George
Orwell's Animal Farm, which found some animals more equal than
others, he found some societies more universally human than others."
[OLIN, p. 48]
By the 1980s, art critic Peter Halley
found some intriguing historical essences in what he calls a Jewish
American artist renaissance:
"Art in the 80's has been
consistently labeled as ostentatious, garish,
extravagant, garish, extravagant,
vulgar, and over-scaled. These are
the epithets of the parvenu or
nouveau riche. However, they are also
terms that, in earlier decades, were
used to characterize Jewish-American
taste and style. I want to be very
clear that I am not making any claim
that anti-Semitism has entered the
critical debate. I would suggest
instead that the commentators who
have thus defined the 1980s have
been blind to the meanings that this
aesthetic of extravagance may
have for Jewish artists of the 80s."
[HALLEY, p. 28]
Halley might have been thinking,
among many other candidates, about the Metropolitan Museum of Art's
Jewish curator of contemporary art, as did Lee Seldes, in 1979:
"Trendy Henry Geldzahler [is] the
curator of the newly created, hotly
debated contemporary arts department.
His recent exhibition "New
York Painting and Sculpture,
1940-1970," had set a record for swish
ostentation but engaged serious
artists and scholars." [SELDES, p. 5]
"Historically," notes James
Twitchell, "the modern museum has been the site of pitched battles for
control, for social territory, for what modern criticism calls
privileging." [TWITCHELL, p. 214] Steadily, in recent decades,
traditional wealthy White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant control of major art
institutions has been replaced by Jewish art philanthropy and their own
attendant influence and control in shaping -- or reshaping -- the
standards of value and aesthetics in the art world. "Jews significantly
support 'high culture' in America," notes Barry Kossim, "Their support
of hospitals, museums, symphonies, and universities across the country
now appear disproportionate not only to their numbers but also their
proportion of the wealthy." [KOSSIM, p. 26]
Jews have long been prominent in the
institutionalized art world, as both formal, public directors and
powerful behind-the-scenes "philanthropists". George Blumental, for
example, headed (1933-1941) New York's influential Metropolitan
Museum, as did Thomas Hoving (son of the chairman of Tiffany and
Co.) beginning in 1967. [Hoving was once described by New York Times
reporter John Hess as "a compulsive liar and likened [him] to a
cover-up artist." [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 92] Irene and Alice Lewisohn's
Museum of Costume Art merged with the Met in 1946. Michael Friedsam,
Jules Bache, and Samuel Lewisohn were other prominent Met
philanthropists in that era. "When Henry Geldzahler [the eventual
director of the visual arts program of the National Endowment for the
Humanities, and the New York City Commissioner on Cultural
Affairs] ... was brought to the Met as a junior curator of American
art, James Rorimer [another Jewish Met director] advised him not to let
the trustees know he was Jewish." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 71] (Future Met head
Thomas Hoving also became a Rorimer "protégé" when Rorimer hired him as
an assistant curator.) [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 94] "Following the
precedents set by Geldzahler," adds Goodman, "two Jews have since held
the prized curatorship of modern art at the Metropolitan. The
first was Thomas Hess, well known as an art critic and collector. He was
the son-in-law of Edith Stern, a major patron of the New Orleans Art
Museum, and daughter of Julius Rosenwald. Stern's sister, Adele
Levy, was a trustee of the Museum of Modern Art." [GOODMAN, #2,
p. 72]
In 1969 Robert Lehman, a
Vice-President, then the Chairman of the Board, and a Trustee of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art for twenty years, willed to it his $100
million collection of Old Master paintings. "Bobby Lehman," noted a
friend after his death, "wanted his pyramid; with plate glass before the
art works. See, Bobby, knew about Macys [Department Store]: the entrance
is small, but the display windows are large ... when you go to Macys,
the pots and pans are in the basement and the Lanvin perfume is at the
entrance. Art today is a kind of cultural cosmetic." [BURNHAM, p. 173]
By the mid-1980s one-fifth of the Museum's Board of Trustees were
Jewish, including former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, then
CBS-chairman Laurence Tisch, and Mrs. Walter Annenberg.
[CHRISTOPHER, p. 217] Wealthy Metropolitan Museum philanthropist Saul
Steinberg even held his wedding reception at the museum, as did a member
of the wealthy Tisch family. [CANTOR, p. 403]
In 1980, Frederic P. Rose, a real
estate developer and former President of the New York United Jewish
Appeal-Federation, was appointed to the Board of the Metropolitan
Museum of Art. ("There's more yikus [prestige] in being on
the Met Board than in being on our own," said a UJA-Federation
official, "and a lot more clout." [SILBERMAN, p. 215] Soon after, a
friend and fellow Jewish real estate mogul, Harold D. Uris, donated $10
million to the Museum. "As a result," says Charles Silberman,
"the museum decided on a new focus for its fundraising drives. 'Met
Museum Aiming to Tap Real Estate Industry,' a New York
Times headline read, using a euphemism for 'wealthy Jews.'"
[SILBERMAN, p. 215] With the death of Jack Linsky in 1982, his will
stipulated another $50 million for the Metropolitan Museum.
[GOLAN, p. 6]
In 1991 communications mogul Walter
Annenberg willed his whole art collection -- "one of the most valuable
and highly sought-after in history" -- to New York's Metropolitan
Museum. He also pledged a $10 million gift over a five year period
to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. [MOMENT, p. 196]
(Annenberg's wife, Lenore, had been "chief of protocol" for the Reagan
administration's State Department. Renee Crown, wife of the Lester Crown
who has controlled the General Dynamics weapons corporation, has
served as the chair of the Women's Board of the Lyric Opera of
Chicago. [BAER, p. 210] By the early 1990s, other Jewish mass media
barons like S. I. Newhouse of Advance, and Hollywood powerbroker
Michael Ovitz, were on the board of trustees of the Met. "On one
occasion in the 1990s," notes Robert Slater, "[Ovitz] scoured [his 2,000
art] books in search of a suitable background for the advertisement that
[his company Creative Artists Agency] produced for Coca-Cola. One
advertisement, with Coca-Cola bottles falling out of the sky, was meant
to be reminiscent of a Rene Magritte painting." [SLATER, p. 161]
At the Met, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger
(former publisher of the New York Times) eventually became its
chairman. He oversaw an institution in which Jews, says George Goodman,
"have enriched almost area of the Museum's collections, including
pre-Colombian ceramics (Nathan Cummings), African art (Klaus Perls),
ancient Mediterranean and Middle Easter Art (Norbert Schimmel), Old
Masters Paintings (Lore and Rudolph Heinemann), French decoration arts
(Belle and Sol Linsky) modern European Art (Florence May Schoenborn),
modern American art (Muriel Kallis Steinberg Newman; Edith and Milton
Lowenthal), Indonesian bronzes (Samuel Eilenberg), and South and
Southeast Asian Art (Enid Haupt and Lita Hazen, Walter Annenberg's
sisters). " [GOODMAN, #2, p. 73] Throughout the Met too,
galleries, rooms, theatres, and gardens are named after Jewish sponsors
including Iris and B. Gerald Canter, Helene and Michael David-Weill,
Lawrence and Barbara Fleishman, Howard Gilman, Leon Levy, Henry R.
Kravis, Janice H. Levin, Carroll and Milton Petrie, Arthur, Mortimer,
and Raymond Sacker, Laurence Tisch, and Ruth and Harold Uris. (Among the
various Jewish curators at the Museum is Barbara Weinberg, head
of American Paintings and Sculpture).
By the 1990s, across town, both
vice-presidents of New York's equally prestigious Museum of Modern
Art were also Jewish -- Ronald S. Lauder and Richard Salomon. (In
2001, another Jewish member of MOMA's board, media mogul Si Newhouse,
resigned after breaking MOMA 's ethical policy when he maneuvered to
purchase a Picasso painting that was owned by the museum). [D'ARCY, D.,
6-5-01] In 1995 Lauder -- cosmetic heir and Eastern European media mogul
-- became chairman of the board; in 1997 he spent $50 million on a
Cezanne painting for his private collection. (In 1988, after a stint as
a Reagan-appointed ambassador to Austria, he was the subject of an
Austrian parliamentary investigation for his purchase and export from
that country 120 art works worth more than $10 million. Lauder decried
the investigation, saying that the "investigation is a politically
motivated attempt to discredit him for expressing his views on
anti-Semitism in Austria." [PROTZMAN, p. 42] Aside from being a major
donator to the right-wing Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu, and
gobbling up a major share of the mass media system in Eastern Europe,
this is the kind of man that today heads one of the most important
museums in America:
"[Lauder] was recently named
chairman of the Museum of Modern
Art in New York after making
a multi-million dollar pledge ...Some
critics grumbled about [Lauder's]
ascent to the chairmanship of the
Museum of Modern Art earlier
this year after making his pledge."
[Wall Street Journal,
JERESKI, p. A1]
"[Lauder] did a stint at the
Pentagon beginning in 1983 and was an
ambassador to Austria from 1986 to
1987, a job for which he was
widely lambasted as being
ineffectual. (ABC's Ted Koppel once
asked him to comment on reports he was
considered 'a laughingstock'
there, to which he tersely replied,
'Thank you.') -- Wall Street Journal,
[JERESKI, p. A10]
After spending $14 million to buy his
way into the position of New York City's mayor (and failing) in 1989,
Richard Reeves wrote an Atlanta Journal Constitution editorial,
saying:
"To me, Mr. Lauder stands as an
advertisement for confiscatory
inheritance taxes and another
indictment of American campaign
financing. His major claim to
credibility -- other than a declared net
worth of $227 million -- is a
stint as the U.S. ambassador to Austria.
He got that after raising money
for Ronald Reagan." [REEVES, p. A15]
In 1994, Ronald Lauder's brother,
Leonard, was named chairman of another New York City cultural monument,
the prestigious Whitney Museum of American Art. (David Ross
director of that museum since 1991, became head of the San Francisco
Museum of Modern Art in 1998. Adam Weinberg is the Whitney's Curator
of Permanent Collections.) In the early 1990s the Museum of Modern
Art wanted to buy the building next door, the Dorset Hotel.
The key to its successful acquisition was MOCA (another Jewish)
board member Jerry Speyer who "had known the owner, Sol Goldman, for
years, and he know Goldman's children, who inherited the building on
their father's death." [TRAUB, p. 67]
Also in New York, the prominent Jewish
Guggenheim family founded the Guggenheim Museum (1998 president:
Jewish corporate raider Ronald Perelman), as well as the prestigious
humanities foundation that bears their name. By the 1980s, four of the
ten board members that dole out the MacArthur Foundation "genius
awards" were also Jewish; two Jews also sat on the board of the
Russell Sage Foundation. [CHRISTOPHER, p. 121] The Kaplan Fund has
also had an important impact on the art community in divvying out
awards. One of J. M. Kaplan's daughters was married to a prominent
artist, another was the Chairman of the New York State Arts Council.
[KREFETZ, p. 153] Joan Kaplan Davidson was appointed as chairman of the
$34 million New York State Art Council in 1975 despite the fact that she
was "not professionally trained in the arts." Her mother, Alice Kaplan,
was once president of the American Federation of the Arts. The founder
of the Kaplan Fund, J. M., Kaplan, was also founder of the Welch's Grape
Juice company. [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 77]
Jewish dominance in 1990s New York
also continues with Ellen Futter (President of the American Museum of
Natural History), Betsy Gotbaum (Director of the New York
Historical Society), Susan Soros (Director of the Bard Graduate
Center for Studies in the Decorative Arts, David Ross (Director of
the Whitney Museum of Art), Cornell Capa (until recent
retirement, the chief officer at the International Center for
Photography), and Mark Rosenthal (Senior Curator at the
Guggenheim Museum).
Up the Hudson Valley, a bit out of
Manhattan, in smaller communities, the New York Times noted in
1997 that
"At the Performing Arts Center at
Purchase College, bar mitzvahs
ease the unrelenting financial
crunch. In Yonkers, at the Hudson River
Museum, there are weddings after the
public leaves. And in Katonah
at the Caramoor Center for Music
and Find Arts, Jewish High Holy
Day services pay the way." [BRENNER,
SEC. 14, p. 1]
Two Wall Street Journal
reporters noted a "private party" held at the Metropolitan Museum of
Art in the 1980s:
"Outside the Metropolitan Museum
that blustery September evening,
there was all the anticipation of a
Hollywood opening. Through a
phalanx of photographers and
reporters the cream of New York
society hustled outside, the ladies
clutching their hair against the
wind, the men dapper in tuxedos,
flashing invitations by one
account 'as stiff as sheetrock.' In
went the Saul Steinbergs, Carol
and Punch Sulzberger of the New
York Times, Jonathan and
Laura Tisch, and a hundred others.
Few even in this social stratum
had the connections to throw a
private party at the museum, but
greeting their guests inside the
wrought-iron gates of its Medieval
Court was a couple who had
muscled their way in with a $10
million donation: Henry Kravis
and his stunning, fashion-designer
wife, Carolyne Roehm."
[BURROUGH/HELYAR, p. 128] [All the
men mentioned
are Jewish]
At New York University, the
art department is called the "Tisch School of the Arts." The
philanthropist it is named after, Laurence Tisch, "does not hide his
affection for Israel, even when it costs him money. Thus, for example,
when Israeli ministers stay at the Regency Hotel [in New York], owned by
the Tisch-controlled Loews Corporation, they receive a
significant discount." [HANDWERKER]
Going to Carnegie Hall? You'll
probably be sitting in the recital hall named after Sanford I. Weill,
the Jewish chairman and co-chief of Citigroup. Weill gave a large
sum of money to them music center in 1983. He is also the current
Chairman of the Board of Carnegie Hall. [NEW YORK TIMES, Weill,
p. 10]
In Los Angeles, the most important
mover behind the creation of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art
was a Jewish industrialist, Norton Simon (among his economic holdings is
Hunt Foods). Three separate museum buildings were constructed,
two of the three named after a Jewish benefactor: Howard Abrahamson,
Armand Hammer, and Leo Bing (funded by his wife Anna in his memory). The
first chairman of the LACMA board of trustees was also Jewish,
Sidney Brody. Eli Broad, another eventual chairman, was once listed by
ArtNews to be (with his wife) the most important art collector in
the world. (He is the chairman and CEO of SunAmerica). Erica
Feinblatt was the curator of prints and drawings; Maurice Tuchman became
the curator of modern art. An assistant to Tuchman was Stephanie Barron.
"As a Jew," notes George Goodman, "she was also attracted to avant-garde
works considered 'degenerate' by the Nazis." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 135] In
1984, Barron married a LACMA (Jewish) trustee, Robert Gore
Rifkind.
Early Jewish donors of important
art or large sums of money to LACMA included Joan Palevsky (who
purchased for the museum the 650 objects in the Heermaneck Collection of
Islamic Art), B. Gerald and Iris Canter (owners of the largest
collection of Rodin sculptures in the world; New York's Metropolitan
Museum has four galleries named after these philanthropists), Philip
Berg, Hans Cohn, and Arthur Gilbert, among others. In 1997 Bernard
Lewin, a furniture store owner, later art dealer, and "one of the
world's preeminent collectors of modern Mexican artists," [JOHNSON, R.,
p. N1] willed his $25 million Mexican art collection to LACMA
upon his death. The Los Angeles Times noted an exhibition of
Lewin's collection at a public gallery three years earlier, curated by a
Jewish academic in Latin American studies, Shifra Goldman:
"When a museum show consists
entirely of works that are for sale at one
commercial gallery [as this one is]
.... disappointment gives way to
disgust ... When Lewin ... decided
to limit the scope of this show
to the stuff he'd like to sell, the
die was cast ... [Nothing] can redeem
such a colossal
commercial-cum-vanity showcase." [CURTIS, p. F1]
In 1974 Richard Sherwood (a member
of the local American Jewish Committee) became the LACMA
president. Further Jewish donators to the museum included David Lowe,
Armand Deutsch, Michael and Dorothy Blankfort, Nathan Smooke, Philip and
Beatrice Gersh, Stanley and Ellise Gringstein, Max and Ellen Palevsky,
Robert Halff, Betty Asher ("formerly an assistant to Maurice Tuchman,"
now an art dealer), Felix and Helen Juda, Frederic and Marcia Weisman
(sister of Norton Simon), Lucille Ellis (Norton Simon's first wife),
Bernard Levin (a dealer), and Douglas Cramer (a television mogul).
In later years, Micheal Shapiro, a
curator at the St. Louis Art Museum was chosen to head LACMA.
"It would have been newsworthy for the County Museum to hire a
woman, an African-American, an Asian, or a Hispanic, "says Jewish
commentator George Goodman, "but few points would be scored [publicly]
for hiring a Jewish director [this was, after all, the norm].
Nevertheless, the board members turned to Michael Shapiro. Shapiro's
selection must have been intended to impress Jewish donors of the
museum." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 135]
When Shapiro left, he was replaced by
Andrea Rich in 1995. Rich had formally been the Executive Vice
Chancellor of UCLA. As Goodman noted it in his article in
Modern Judaism about what he calls the "Jewish Art Elite":
"For its first [combined] president
and chief executive officer, LACMA's
trustees made a startling decision,
hiring Andrea Rich ... A specialist in
communications and planning, she
had never worked for an arts
organization and was not even a
dues-paying member of the museum.
Ms. Rich is Jewish, however."
[GOODMAN, p. 136]
In 1999, Rich also raised eyebrows by
becoming -- along with her other administrative posts -- the director
of the museum.
Elsewhere in southern California,
other Jews were active in a virtual lock on important directorships in
the art world. Aby Sher hired architect Frank Gehry (a fellow Jew) to
build the Santa Monica Museum of Art. Edith Wylie even
established the Craft and Folk Art Museum across from LACMA.
In 1979 a number of prominent Jewish collectors including Marcia
Weissman (who also donated $3 million to the now-called "Weissman Art
Museum" at the University of Minnesota, as well as other
funds to Minneapolis Walker Art Center) Eli Broad, Philip and
Beatrice Gersh, Lenore Greenberg, Frederick Nichols, and Max Palevsky
broke off from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art to form the
Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA). Today's president of MOCA
[1998] is, of course, Jewish: Audrey Irmas. "Although [Director
Richard] Koshalek deserves much of the credit for MOCA's
success," says George Goodman, "he has several talented associates,
among whom were the Jews Sherri Geldin, an administrator, and Paul
Schimmel, previously a curator at southern California's Newport
Harbor Art Museum." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 139] Noteworthy Jewish
philanthropy to MOCA includes that of Barry Lowen, Marcia
Weissman, and Taft and Rita Schreiber.
David Levanthol (of the Los
Angeles Times) also serves as the current Chairman of the Board of
Trustees for the Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA). In
1996 MOCA's "Temporary Contemporary" branch was renamed
the "Geffen Contemporary" after a $5 million donation from media
mogul David Geffen. Earlier, another $5 million gift had changed the
Westhood Playhouse theatre near UCLA to the "Geffen Playhouse."
The head of the Geffen Playhouse, Gilbert Cates, is also Jewish.
He also "produces the Academy Awards programs and [he] put together the
local Israel 50th anniversary celebration." [TUGEND, 10-22-99]
"Most people, I'd say 90% of donors
want recognition of some sort," remarked Eli Broad, trustee of both the
Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Museum of
Contemporary Art, which has its own "Eli and Edythe Broad Reception
Hall." [MUCHNIC, S, p. F1, 5] "For better or for worse," says Jewish
critic George Goodman, "the museum world is full of -- and to a large
degree formed by -- prima donnas. Collectors such as [early Jewish
philanthropists] Blumenthal and Lehman wanted wings and galleries
bearing their names. In recent years, however, a growing number of
Jewish collectors have let their egos run wild." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 147]
Rich Jewish businessmen with
enormous art hoards have also created major museums and named them after
themselves in Los Angeles to house their collections: the Norton
Simon Museum (the Simon's board of trustees "was led by Jennifer
Jones, his second wife, and other relatives") [GOODMAN, #2, p. 147] and
the Armand Hammer Cultural Center, respectively. "The boondoggle
of the Hammer Cultural Center -- within a lifetime of [Armand
Hammer's] fraud and deception," notes George Goodman, "is ... documented
in Edward Epstein's biography of Hammer." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 141] [See
also Carl Blumay's indicting biography of the ruthlessly corrupt
Hammer]. Armand Hammer, notes the London Sunday Times, in a
review of Epstein's book,
"was one of the great frauds of the
20th century ...The sordid details
of his astonishing life [are those
of] myth, fakery, and deceit ....
[He was] a ruthless charlatan who
bullied and betrayed his
way to an imposing reputation as
billionaire patron of the
arts with a long list of powerful
friends ... [Epstein] also details the
brazen forgery that helped build
Hammer's extensive art collection.
One benefit of the tycoon's Russian
connection was an official
Faberge stamp, given to him in
Moscow, which he used to authenticate
fake Imperial jeweled eggs."
[ALLEN-MILLS]
Hammer set up the L'Hermitage
Gallery, selling Russian art, in New York City in 1925. Years later
he later purchased 75% interest in M. Knoedler and Company,
"America's oldest art gallery." His partner in the business was also
Jewish, Maury Leibovitz. [EPSTEIN, 1996, p. 126, 293] In later years, a
freelance writer, Martha Kaufman, became Hammer's mistress. Wearing wigs
to hinder recognition by Hammer's wife, she also became the curator of
Hammer's art collection and eventually the Director of the Armand
Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center. [EPSTEIN, photo section]
After Hammer's death, various family
members filed lawsuits against each other for parts of the patriarch's
art collection. Others came to court too: "Occidental Petroleum
[Hammer's company] stockholders were outraged at the squandering of
company assets [for Hammer's personal art collection] which they claimed
totaled $95 million." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 141] Hammer also, notes Elliot
Horowitz, "identified himself ... falsely as a Unitarian Protestant
throughout most of his life, even after becoming the CEO of
Occidental Petroleum ... Later he became a great friend of the state
of Israel." [HOROWITZ, E., Too, p. 196] He was once received the Golda
Meir "Man of the Year Award" at an Israeli Bonds banquet. [BLUMAY, C.,
1992, p. 416] (In 1987 he even flew Soviet Jewish dissident/refusenik
Ida Nudel on his personal jet to Israel.) [NUDEL, I., 1990, p. 301-302]
Hammer also has a wing named after
him and his wife at the Los Angeles County Art Museum. [BLUMAY,
C., 1992, p. 436] At his own museum, the chiseling of his name in marble
alone cost $75,000, the "Armand Hammer Fireplace" cost $25,000, and the
marble floors cost $1 million. [BLUMAY, C., 1992, p. 454] In downtown
Los Angeles, the Mark Taper Forum in the Los Angeles Music
Center is named for wealthy Jewish patron S. Mark Taper. (Gordon
Davidson, the current artistic director of the Taper/Ahmanson
Theatre, is also Jewish). A few miles north, the Pepperdine
University Art Museum in Malibu was renamed the Frederick R.
Weissman Museum of Art in 1992 after his gift of $1.5 million. (The
University of Minnesota also has an art museum named after
Weissman; the San Diego Museum of Art and the New Orleans
Museum of Art also contain "gallery complexes" that bear his name).
Another southern California Jewish philanthropist, Mandell Weiss, was
the main patron behind San Diego's Mandel Weiss Forum. With city
public arts cutbacks, in 1993 Leah Goodwin lost her executive director
job at San Diego's Public Arts Advisory Council. [TUREGANO, P.,
9-30-93, p. E12] Also in San Diego, Mathew Strauss and his wife Iris
organized Art Pac, a lobbying group for government funding to the
arts. [TUREGANO, P. 2-13-95, p. D1] Phyllis Epstein, former chairman of
the San Diego Center for Jewish Culture, was appointed to be a member of
the California Council for the Arts in 1999. [JONES, W.,
12-14-99, p. E14] State senator Adam Schiff, also Jewish, is chairman of
California's Joint Committee on the Arts. [CITY NEWS SERVICE,
1-6-98]
In 1999 Glorya Kaufman donated $18
million to renovate UCLA's old Dance Building, now to be called
Glorya Kaufman Hall. It was the largest arts-oriented donation in
University of California history. Among those proclaiming public thanks
was Daniel Neuman, Dean of UCLA's Art and Architecture School. (In
earlier years, MCA's mafia-linked Hollywood mogul Jules Stein
also founded UCLA's giant ostentatious medical wing, the Jules Stein
Eye Institute). In 2000, Jewish businessman Eli Broad topped
Kaufman, donating $20 million to UCLA's art department. The Dickson Art
Center was to be renamed the Eli Broad Center.
After donating an undisclosed sum to
the Orange County Performing Arts Center in metropolitan Los
Angeles, Henry Samueli became a member of its Board of Directors.
Samueli and his wife also gave $50 million to the UCLA and University of
California at Irvine Engineering departments. "In exchange for the
gifts," noted the Los Angeles Times in 1999, "the highly ranked
UCLA School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and UCI's
School of Engineering will bear Samueli's name." [CONWAY, A.,
4-13-99, p. E1] Earlier, in 1987, another Jewish mogul, Harvey Stearn
resigned as the Orange County Performing Arts Center Chairman of
the Board; he remained chairman of the California Arts Council.
That same year Leonard Shaine, "philanthropist long active in community
and Jewish causes," was added to Orange County art center's
Board. [JALAN, A., 8-21-87, p. 1] Jewish real estate mogul Walter
Shorenstein "founded the Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics,
and Public Policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government."
[MOTHER JONES, 3-5-01]
From Texas in 1998, prominent Dallas
art collector and real estate mogul Raymond Nasher donated $7.5 million
to his alma mater, Duke University. The Duke University Art Museum would
be moved to a new building, to be known as the Nasher Museum of Art.
[DUKE, 11-98] In Austin, Texas, Mort and Angela Topfer "have pledged
millions to the Austin Museum of Art, the Dell Jewish Community
Center Campus and other charitable projects." [BARNES, M., 6-17-99, p.
B1] Likewise, Jewish real estate developer John Price donated $7 million
to the Museum of Fine Arts at his alma mater, the University of
Utah (Price's JP Realty offices hold "one of the largest collections of
Depression era lithographs in the country.")[KNUDSON, M., 3-23-97] In
Omaha, Nebraska, Mort Richards was once president of Performing Arts
Omaha. He also served as the top official for other local
organizations, including the Downtown Rotary Club. "In 1978, he received
the State of Israel’s' 30th anniversary award." [1-14-2000, p. 1]
Even the renowned Getty Museum,
founded with funds from the non-Jewish oil mogul, J. Paul Getty (and
with $4 billion to play with, the richest museum on earth) has
consistently had Jews at the economic helm. In 1998, after 17 years,
Harold Williams left the presidency of the J. Paul Getty Trust.
Williams, notes George Goodman, was "raised in a Labor Zionist home in
East Los Angeles." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 142] Williams had earlier retired as
Norton Simon Inc.'s chairman of the board at age 42. He later served as
the Dean of UCLA's Graduate School of Business and Chairman of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in the President Carter
administration.
The new president of the J. Paul
Getty Trust is another Jewish administrator, Barry Munitz, formerly
the chancellor of both the California State University system and the
University of Houston. Munitz's "current project," says Goodman, "is
the renovation and expansion of the [Getty branch] in Malibu,
which will open in 2001 ... The collections donated by Lawrence and
Barbara Fleishman will be one of the highlights." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 144]
The new Getty Center opened in 1998, designed by Jewish architect
Richard Meier and built at a cost of $1 billion. Earlier, George Goldner
had "launched the Getty's drawing collection." He later became the
Getty curator of paintings and the curator of prints and drawings at
the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. He was succeeded at the
Getty by David Jaffe, a Jew born in England, and formerly of the
National Gallery of Australia. (Even the president and CEO of the
Getty Petroleum Corporation is Jewish, Leo Liebowitz; in 1993 he was
charged by journalist Robert Friedman with being in cahoots in a tax
cheating scam with a chief in the "Russian Mafia." [NATIONAL PETROLEUM,
p. 20] )
"In Baltimore, Miami, Atlanta, and a
host of other cities," says Charles Silberman, "cultural institutions
are increasingly dependent on Jewish support." [SILBERMAN, p. 214-215]
In Miami, for example, Jews were the "creators of the New World Symphony
and the Miami City Ballet." [HURIASH, L., 2-15-99, p. B3] Joseph
Meyeroff donated $10 million to the Baltimore Symphony hall, half
its cost. [CHRISTOPHER, p. 214 ] Also in Baltimore, Robert Bergman
became the director of the prominent Walters Art Museum in 1981.
In his first decade he oversaw a $6 million museum renovation. Half a
dozen wealthy Jews "have been among the Walters' most generous
donors." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 123] "Some eyebrows," says Jewish author
George Goodman,
"may have been raised at the
awareness of Baltimore's Jewish 'Art
Mafia.' At the time, Arnold Lehman
was director of the Baltimore
Museum of Art,
Sergio Commissiona was music director of the
Baltimore Symphony (in Meyerhoff
Hall), and Frederick Lazarus IV,
an arts administrator, was
president of the Maryland Institute College
of Art. Also, Herbert
Kessler, a medievalist ... , chaired the well-
regarded art history department at
John Hopkins [University]."
[GOODMAN, #1, p. 123
By 1993, Director Bergman, by now
the president of the Association of Art Museum Directors, became
director of the Cleveland Museum of Fine Arts. Bergman was
replaced at the Walters Museum by another Jewish administrator,
Gary Vikan.
Across town, at the Baltimore
Museum of Art, Florence Levy was the museum's first director;
Gertrude Rosenthal was for decades the chief curator. Goodman notes that
:
"When he was appointed the [Baltimore
Museum of Art] director in
1971, at thirty-five years of age,
Tom L. Freudenheim became one
of the nation's most visible Jewish
museum professionals. Though
secure in his identity as a Reform
Jew and a Zionist, he did not seek
recognition as a trailblazer.
Indeed, he was somewhat puzzled as to
why the Museum's Board sought a
Jewish director, especially one
with such obvious Jewish
credentials. [GOODMAN, #2, p.129]
Perhaps Freudenheim needed only to
look at the Museum's treasury for a solution to this puzzle.
Prominent Jewish donors to his Baltimore museum included Helen and
Abraham Eisenberg, Jacob Epstein, Julius Levy, Alan and Janet Wurtzberg,
Robert and Ryda Levi, and Sadie May. The Museum's Etta Claribel Cone
collection included over 3,000 pieces of art, including paintings by
Renoir, Matisse, Van Gogh, Cezanne, and Gaughin. Freudenheim's other
credentials for his post included internships under prominent Jewish art
custodians E. H. Gombrich, Panofsky, Ettinghausen, Alan Solomon of the
Jewish Museum in New York, and Peter Selz, a curator at the
Museum of Modern Art.
When Freudenheim eventually left the
Baltimore Museum, he was replaced by another Jewish director,
Arnold Lehman, a grandson of a founder of the Gimbels department
store. Lehman eventually became director of the Miami Metropolitan
Museum of Art and later the Brooklyn Museum. Like Bergman,
Lehman has also been president of the Association of Art Directors.
When Lehman eventually left the
Baltimore Museum, he was predictably replaced by yet another Jewish
director, Doreen Bolger, whose credentials include museum directorships
in Texas and Rhode Island (the largest gift to the Rhode Island museum
she directed was from the Jewish benefactors Leonard and Paul Granoff).
Also in Baltimore is the American
Visionary Art Museum, founded and directed by yet another Jewish
powerbroker, Rebecca Hoffberger (formerly a development officer for the
Associated Jewish Charities). AVAM's largest benefactor,
of course, has been Jewish: Zanvyl Krieger. "Hoffberger," notes George
Goodman, "remains active as a volunteer in Jewish organizations, and
[is] devoted to Torah study." [GOODMAN, #2, p. 132]
In nearby Washington DC, by 1998 Jews
in the upper ranks of the art world establishment included I. Michael
Hegman (Secretary, "or Chief Administrator") of the Smithsonian
Museum, real estate mogul Robert Smith (President of the National
Gallery of Art), Allen Shestack (Deputy Director of the National
Gallery of Art), Neil Benezra (Chief Curator of the Hirschorn
Museum, where fellow Jew Stephen Weil recently retired as Deputy
Director), David Levy (Director of the Corcoran Gallery -- his
wife is a Vice President at PBS broadcasting), and Stephen Ostrow
(Curator of Prints and Drawings at the Library of Congress).
Jewish mogul Arthur Sackler's wing at the Smithsonian is the
Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, featuring Asian and Near Eastern art.
Sackler's collection, noted one curator, is 'by far the largest and most
important collection of ancient Chinese art in the world." [GLUECK, G.,
p. B8] Years ago, Jewish collector Joseph Hirshhorn's 6,000 art works
were donated towards the creation of the Hirshhorn Museum.
(Hirshhorn made most of his fortune in uranium mining).
Karl Meyer notes the context for the building (in 1974) of the
Hirshhorn Museum -- so prominent on the Washington Mall -- as a
government institution:
"The federal government was to pay the expenses of building a
museum
bearing Hirshhorn's name; the design of the museum was to be
subject to
Hirshorn's approval, with the title to the art passing to the
government
only upon completion of the project; a ten-member governing board
was to be established, half of whose members would be nominated
by Hirshhorn, who also would nominate the director; and Hirshhorn
would not be required to supply an endowment to help meet future
operating expenses ... These terms aroused considerable disquiet
in the museum world, in good part because they were likely to
encourage other donors to demand equally one-sided arrangements."
[MEYER, K., 1979, p. 49-50]
(Hirshhorn's choice for the museum director position was Abram
Lerner). [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 51]
As Sherman Lee, director of the Cleveland Museum of Art, protested
in 1966:
"It is a mistake to accept a collection of contemporary art formed
by one man and to use a large sum of money to house and administer
such a collection. If at least ten million dollars is available for
a
building to bear, not the nation's name, but that of a donor,
sufficient
funds aught to be available to set about the formation of a truly
catholic and articulated national collection housed in a building
bearing
the collective name of all the people. Such a collection is already
begun
in the National Collection of Fine Arts, now bypassed by this
proposed
action." [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 50]
In the midst of the controversy over the Hirshhorn museum,
Washington newspaper columnist Jack Anderson "reported that Hirshhorn
had been in legal trouble years earlier over alleged currency smuggling
and stock manipulation." [MEYER, K., 1979, p. 50]
A highlight exhibition for 1988 at
Washington's Capital Children's Museum (founder and director:
Ann Lewin) was its Holocaust show. "The visiting children," noted the
Washington Post," who are held to groups of 30, sit on the floor in
an intimate room and are told the story of the Holocaust through a video
narrated by a child. A dialogue, led by especially trained docents, some
of them Holocaust survivors, follows." [GAMAREKIAN, p. B7] "[Lewin's]
exhibit about the Holocaust, Remember the Children, " noted the
Post years later, "has traveled around the country and partly
inspired the permanent children's exhibit at the U.S. Holocaust
Memorial Museum." [KASTOR, p. B1]
By the 1970s Stanley Marcus (of
Nieman-Marcus luxury store fame) was the Director of the Dallas
Symphony Society, an Advisory Director of the Fort Worth Art
Museum, a Trustee for the Public Television Foundation for North
Texas, and even a Trustee of Southern Methodist University.
Another Marcus, Richard, was on the board of the directors of the
Dallas Theatre Center, the Dallas Council of World Affairs,
and Assemblage, an organization of the wealthy who are interested
in the arts. [COEVER, p. 123]
In 1993, the Director of the
Milwaukee Art Center noted in an art catalogue that
"since 1957 ... the Jewish community
has been central to the
development of the [Milwaukee]
institution ... The list of members
of the Jewish community who have
been monetary supporters of
the museum would be too long to
elaborate here, as would the many
members of the Museum's Board of
Trustees, presidents and officers
of that board's committee, and
support group members, and
volunteers." [BOWMAN, p. 1]
In Detroit, prominent Jewish
philanthropist/entrepreneurs include financier Max Fisher, Eugen
Appelbaum (founder of Arbor Drugs), Sam Franiel (a real estate
baron), and international glass magnate William Davidson. Davidson also
owns the Pine Knob Music Theatre and the Palace of Auburn
Hills, the two most popular music concert venues in the area. His
companies also manage the Meadowbrook Music Festival. In Denver,
Colorado, Barry Hirschfeld is "past board chairman of the Denver Art
Museum." [PR NEWSWIRE, 3-21-96]
In Canada, Avie Bennett is (1992)
vice president of the National Ballet of Canada; Judith Loeb
Cohen became president of that organization in 1988. Louis Applebaum
headed the Ontario Arts Council from 1971-1980, and was appointed in
1979 to "co-chair a federal review of Canada's cultural policy; he also
helped raise funds for the National Arts Center Orchestra and
served three years as its chairman. [CSILLAG, R., 5-4-2000, p. 6] In
1999 Peter Herrnsdorf, a baptized Jew, was named as the chairman and CEO
of the National Arts Center. Garth Drabinsky (until recent
financial scandals) owned the Pantages Theatre and also managed
and operated the $50-million North York Performing Arts Center.
In 2000, a pair of Jewish brothers "were named to head two of the most
important government-owned cultural institutions in the country
[Canada]." Victor Rabinovitch became president of the Canadian Museum
of Civilization Corp., "the country's largest and busiest museum."
(His brother, Robert, became president of the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation). Victor has also been on the Board of Directors for the
Ottawa Jewish Community Center. [GORDON, S., 11-30-01]
In Australia, Graeme Samuel became Chairman of the Australian
Opera in 1996. Peter Redlich retired from the chairmanship of the
Victorian Arts Center in 1994, the same year that Nathan Waks became
director of music at ABC (Australian Broadcasting Company).
[SINGER/SELDIN, 1995, p. 359] Prominent Australian artists include
Louis Kahan, Desiderius Orban, Sali Herman, Harold Freedman, Asher
Bilup, "renowned portraitist Judy Cossab" and sculptor Karl Duldig.
[RUBINSTEIN, H., 1987, p. 216-217]
In England, the current director of
the Tate Gallery (one of that country's most important museums
with 2.2 million visitors a year) is also Jewish: Nicholas Serota. In a
1995 obituary to another prominent Jewish businessman, (Lord) Aby
Goodman, the Times (of London) noted that, "Not content with
being the chairman of the trusts for both the Observer and the
Jewish Chronicle, he was at the same time Chairman of the Newspaper
Publishers Association; hardly as he finished his second year term as
Chairman of the Art Council than he popped up again as Chairman
of the British Council." [HOWARD, A., 1-19-99] In his lifetime he
was also Chairman of the English National Opera, president of the
National Book League, Director of the Royal Opera at Covent
Garden, and a governor of the Royal Shakespeare Theatre.
[BOGGAM, S., 1018-99, p. 4]
"Glance at the names of board members
of major contributors [in Great Britain] to such institutions as the
National Theatre and Covent Garden," suggests Jewish
observer Stephen Brook,
"and the large proportion of Jewish
individuals and organizations
will be apparent. Jonathan Miller
... argues that Jews mostly support
only the most prestigious
institutions ... That I think reflects not so
much a commitment to the arts as a
commitment to getting a place
in the British establishment. It's
a short cut. You can buy your way
into the centre of the
Establishment. I think it's rather pathetic."
[BROOK, p. 326]
An example of this is England's Arnold
Goodman, a Jewish mogul who died in 1999. Goodman, notes the
Financial Times of London,
"became successively or concurrently:
chairman of British Lion
Films,
the [London] Observer, the Newspaper Proprietors'
Association,
the Committee of Inquiry into Charity Law, the
Arts Council, the Committee
on London Orchestras, the
Housing Corporation, and the
National Building Agency."
[He was also the Director of the
Royal Opera House and
president of the Theatrical
Advisory Committee]. [FINANCIAL
TIMES, 10-16-99, p. 4]
Corrupt Jewish early 20th century art dealer "Lord" Joseph Duveen
also was a philanthropist to British art causes. Duveen
"underwrote the construction costs of entire galleries at the
British
Museum, the Tate Gallery, the National Gallery, and the National
Portrait Gallery in London. (His generosity nonetheless piqued
Osbert Sitwell to demure: 'It is an ironical reflection that while
Lord Duveen's magnificent gifts to the nation stand as a memorial
to his name, much of the money that paid for them was earned by
the sale to the United States of the flower of eighteenth-century
and early nineteenth-century English paintings. We have the
galleries
now, but no pictures to hang in them.')" [MEYER, K., 1979, p.
180-181]
In Cleveland, Richard Bogomolny's $3
million gift to the Cleveland Orchestra -- the largest ever --
secured his position as president of the Board of the Musical Arts
Association, the group that controls the orchestra. In Seattle, a
new symphony venue is called Benaroya Hall, named in honor of the
Jewish Benaroya family's benevolence to the arts. Also in Seattle,
"mega-donor" Samuel Strom (major philanthropist of the Strom Jewish
Community Center, on Mercer Island) "headed the capital campaign" for
the Henry Art Gallery. (Strom is also Chairman of the Seattle
Symphony Board and a regent at the University of Washington). [BARGREEN,
M., 4-27-97, p. N9] In Washington DC, Lessing Rosenwald donated a major
collection of graphic art to the National Gallery. In Atlanta,
Georgia, Ned Rifkind directed the High Museum until he moved to
Houston to head the Menil Collection in 2001. Even in the
hinterlands, in San Antonio, Texas, a museum director noted in 1964 that
"the vast majority of [art] collectors are Jewish." [BRENNER, p. 323]
Even in a place like San Luis Obispo,
California, Chris Cohan [owner of professional basketball's Golden
State Warriors and Sonic Communications, a TV station
conglomeration] "was a central figure in the building of San Luis
Obispo's Performing Arts Center, donating $2.1 million and enduring
a rash of bad publicity in a dispute over whether or not it would bear
his name." [LYONS, ONLINE] In Anchorage, Alaska, the "Sydney Laurence
Theatre" is part of the Alaska Center for Performing Arts. [ANCHORAGE
DAILY NEWS, 3-29-99, p. 2D] In the same genre, in Poland, Zygmunt
Nissenbaum planned to provide funds to "renovate the monument to the
Warsaw Ghetto uprising and affix a plaque with his name on it" at the
site, a narcissistic idea which was "roundly rejected by most Jewish
leaders." [WEINBAUM, L., p. 27]
As James Yaffe noted in 1968:
"Less than 1 percent of all
contributors to Jewish charity are anonymous.
Donors not only like to have their
names known, but immortalized. To
satisfy this desire many
organizations have adopted the practice of
naming things after people.
Hospitals give contributors' names to
everything from new wings to new
oxygen tents. Brandeis University
has a Jewish name attached to
nearly every building on campus. The
Israelis refer to the United States
as Plaquistan." [YAFFE, J. 1968, p.
175]
Howard Jacobson recounts his
amazement about the wealthy Jewish donor name game while visiting the
University of Judaism in Los Angeles:
"A list of the university's founders
is done in gold lettering on marble
tablets in the hall of what is the
SYLVIA AND DAVID WEISZ
EDUCATION WING, which is itself, as I
understand it, part of
the SHIRLEY AND ARTHUR WHIZIN center,
(dedicated to the
JEWISH FUTURE), which is in turn, as
I further understand it, is
housed within the WILLIAM AND FRIEDA
FINGERHUT
ACADEMIC BUILDING, a sub-branch of
NORMAN AND
SADIE LEE COLLEGE. To get from SYLVIA
AND DAVID'S
WING to the BESS AND ALEXANDER L.
BERG DINING
CENTER (fed, incidentally, by a
kitchen dedicated to the memory
of CELIA AND MORRIS I. PELLOW BY
THEIR CHILDREN
JUDITH AND LOUIS), you have to
negotiate the ELIE J.
AND RACHEL GINDI ENTRY PLAZA AND
LOBBY."
[JACOBSON, H., 1995, p. 191-192]
In Boston, like anywhere else,
censorship of art works and ideas is usually easily disguised via the
rejection of artworks for completely subjective and nebulous "aesthetic
reasons." And, of course, there is self-censorship by those who dare
not offend those who economically control -- and legislate
"philanthropic" power -- in the art world. An overt case of Jewish
manipulation, however, occurred in 1991 when Steve Grossman, a Jewish
board member of Boston's Institute of Contemporary Art, resigned
in protest of an ICA curatorial decision to show a series of films by
Palestinian filmmakers. The Anti-Defamation League soon became embroiled
in the matter, as well as high-profile Jewish lawyer Alan Dershowitz,
forcing the Museum to present a concurrent screening of Israeli films,
as well as an "educational forum" to address the Palestinian film's
"political context, not artistic merit."
The injustice of the ICA
decision to fall to Jewish pressure was not lost even to the curator of
the Israeli film show, Ela Chohat, who said: "Can you imagine a program
on black cinema where someone resigns if they don't have a white
perspective?" [HARTIGAN, p. 75-76] (Balance me apartheid," says
filmmaker Tom Hayes, about his own experiences with Jewish demands to
weld their pro-Israel political opinions into any public expression of
the Palestinian point of view, "or the Cheyenne, or the
Japanese-Americans' experience during World War II, the slave's tales
with the slave owners'." [HAYES, p. 6] "At any rate," noted the
Boston Globe, "the upcoming Palestinian series prompted Grossman's
resignation, which raised questions about the role of a board of
directors in programming." [HARTIGAN, p. 75-76]
Likewise in Boston, in 1982,
prominent British actress Vanessa Redgrave -- known for her sympathy to
Palestinian causes -- was commissioned to narrate an oratorio for the
Boston Symphony Orchestra. She was ultimately fired. As Lenni
Brenner notes:
"A key role in the dismissal [of
Redgrave] was played by Irving Rabb, a
leading figure in Boston's Jewish
establishment, and a member of the
Symphony's board of trustees."
[BRENNER, p. 331]
(Redgrave sued, with the support of a
variety of free speech organizations. She won what she would have been
paid for the narration, but a federal judge ruled that she wasn't
entitled to damages. And she also had to pay court costs).
Blatant censorship and/or information
manipulation takes other forms of course. In New York, for example, in
1971 political artist Hans Haacke had his scheduled exhibition cancelled
by the Director of the Guggenheim Museum, Thomas Messer. The
curator for Haacke's show was then fired. Haacke's "art" show was a
public revelation of the various slumlords on the Museum's Board of
Directors. The New York Times noted that
"One of the real estate pieces
that upset the Guggenheim [was] a
deadpan photo documentation of 142
mostly grubby buildings --
many in Harlem and on the Lower
East side -- owned by [Jewish
mogul] Harry Shapolsky and
associates, a major holder of minor
properties in the city." [GLUECK,
#2, p. 27]
The Guggenheim Museum,
declared its director, "was not the proper place in which to expose
slumlords." [GLUECK, #2, p. 27]
In Montreal, Canada, in 1972 Jewish
pressure "forced the Saidye Bronfman Center to cancel a
production [of the play] The Man in the Glass Booth by Robert
Shaw, a play about Adolf Eichman that had been performed, without
outcry, in Israel itself." [PARIS, E., p. 99] In Canada, Jewish
organizations decided the play was anti-Semitic. Two years later "the
same kind of pressure obliged the Saidye Bronfman Center to cancel
another event [An Evening with Dudley Kravitz]." [PARIS, E., p.
101] At the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts there's a performing
hall named after Jewish real estate mogul Max Cummings. [EISENTHAL, B.,
5-24-01]
Elsewhere in the rolls of Jewish
art patrons, in Forth Worth, Texas, prominent philanthropist Rosalyn
Rosenthal is on the board of the Forth Worth Opera Association
and she is a founder of the Nancy Lee and Perry R. Bass Performance
Hall. More curiously, she endowed the E.M. and Rosalyn Rosenthal
Chair in Jewish Studies at Texas Christian University's Brite Divinity
School.
Many Jewish art moguls also have some
very politically-minded philanthropic interests. In Dallas, Stephen
Felder Black was for two terms the president of the Dallas Symphony
and a board member of the Dallas Chamber Orchestra. He was
also, noted the Dallas Morning News in 1996,
"devoted to disseminating
information about Israel ... Earlier this
year, Mr. Block worked to raise
money so the Dallas Symphony
Chorus could perform in
Israel .... At his funeral Monday, 40 members
of the symphony chorus sang the
Israeli national anthem ... At the
time of his death, Mr. Black was
chairman of the Israel Commission
of the Jewish Community Relations
Council and on the
organization's national board."
[SIMNACHER, p. 18A]
Another mogul/philanthropist, Joseph
Meyerhoff, until he died in 1995, was extremely active in the art
circles of Baltimore. But, notes the Baltimore Sun,
"If you think Meyerhoff is a
prominent name in Baltimore, you should go
to Israel ... Meyerhoff ... was an
ardent Zionist whose interest in Israel
started through his involvement with
United Jewish Appeal. He was
also one of the first investors in
Israel Bonds ... Contributions from him
and the foundation that was formed
after his death are responsible [in
Israel] for the construction of 11
libraries, nine day care centers, several
community centers, cultural arts
centers, the emergency wing at
Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem and
several buildings at universities
throughout the country .... 45 to 50
buildings in Israel bear the
Meyeroff name." [RIVERA, p. 2D]
In addition to all this, as sampling,
a scanning of merely a few common, and easily recognized,
Jewish names in an alphabetical list of American art institution
officials (1997-98) revealed the following (selected here are only
people at the pinnacle of their organizations or fields):
Director of the Detroit Institute
of Arts: Samuel Sachs II. (The
Treasurer of this museum is also
Jewish: Gilbert Silverman).
Chairman of the Contemporary Arts
Center of Cincinnati: Stanley
Kaplan.
Public Affairs Director of the
National Museum of African-American
Art in Washington DC:
Janice Kaplan.
President and CEO of Chicago's
Museum of Science and Industry:
James Kahn.
Executive Director of the
Connecticut Historical Society: David Kahn.
Executive Director of the National
Assembly of State Art Agencies in
Washington DC: Jonathan
Katz.
President of the Lincoln Center for
Performing Arts in New York
City:
Nathan Leventhal.
President of the Society of
American Graphic Artists: Martin Levine.
Director of the American Foundation
for the Arts in Miami: May
Levine.
President of the American
Foundation for the Arts in Miami: Richard
Levine.
Public Information Director for the
International Center of
Photography
in New York City: Phyllis Levine.
President of National Assembly of
State Art Agencies, Washington
DC:
Marvin Cohen.
President of the American Society
for Aesthetics: Ted Cohen.
Executive Director of the of the
Arizona Commission for the Arts:
Shelly Cohn.
President of the New York Artists
Equity Association: Arnold
Gold.
Chairman of the Board of Trustees for
the McMichael Canadian Art
Collection in Ontario:
Joan Goldfarb.
Chairman of the Art Academy of
Cincinnati: Stewart Goldman.
President of the Los Angeles Center
for Photographic Studies:
Adrienne Goldstone.
Executive Director of the
Farrington Valley Arts Center in Avon,
Connecticut: Betty
Friedman.
Director and Chief Curator of the
Nova Eccles Harrison Museum of
Art
in Logan, Utah: Steve Rosen.
Executive Director of the American
Institute for Conservation of
Historic
and Artistic Works: Sarah Rosenberg.
President of the Albuquerque (New
Mexico) United Artists: Allan
Rosenfield.
Director of the Lancaster
(Pennsylvania) Museum of Art: Ellen
Rosenholtz.
Chairman of the Board of Trustees, the
Brooklyn Museum: Robert
Rubin.
Commissioner of Chicago's
Department of Cultural Affairs: Lois
Weinberg. [BOWKER]
Alan Stein was also Chairman of the
Board of the American Conservatory Theatre in San Francisco in
the 1990s [WINN, S., 9-24-93, p. C1] and in 1995, also in San Francisco,
"a traveling Jewish theatre [was] the lucky winner of a $150,000
challenge grant from the National Endowment for the Arts ... [It was]
one of only 44 arts organizations in the country (and the only theatre
company in California) to receive that kind of NEA grant [that] year."
[JAMISON, L., 3-8-95]
****************************
In the actual formation of art
tastes and pedigrees, organized Jewry's influence in art market trends
has occasionally been blatant. "[In the 1960s] at first 'relevance'
meant exhibiting avant-garde art," says Sophy Burnham, "Some people
date 'relevance' from the coming of Alan Solomon to the Jewish Museum in
1963. The Jewish Museum had been devoted for years to preserving the
historic traditions in its vessels and chalices. Suddenly it turned
about face and marched after contemporary art. It was a shock. Everyone
was talking about the Jewish Museum and about Alan Solomon, the
director. It was showing Rauschenberg, Johns, Larry Rivers, Richard
Diebenkorn, Ken Noland, Jean Tinguely, [James Rosenquist] ... and later,
an exhibit, a social documentary, of life on the [Jewish] Lower East
Side... Before the decade was out, the other museums had turned to the
chase -- the Smithsonian, the Metropolitan, the Corcoran Gallery in
Washington, the Pasadena Museum ... [BURNHAM, p. 164]
Another seminal turning point in the
modern art market was a 1973 auction of Jewish taxi-cab company-owner
Robert Scull's collection of contemporary art. Scull was, says Stuart
Plattner, "an early and avid pop collector whom the art world loves to
despise for his boorish manners and transparent attempts to use art to
increase his social position." [PLATTNER, p. 35] The auction was a
stunning success and launched a flurry of investment interest in
collecting this genre of contemporary art. The vast fortune Scull reaped
from the sale of exploited artists (who were original paid a small
fragment of the paintings' sale prices) caused artist Robert
Rauschenberg to punch Scull in an auction room. "I've been working my
ass off just for you to make that profit," complained Rauschenberg. (One
Rauschenberg painting Scull bought, for $900, sold for $90,000.) [MEYER,
K., 1979, p. 183-184]
Art gallery sellings and buyings of
important art are usually secret. The most important public gauge for
art market prices are the results of art auctions. The most important
art auction firm has been Sotheby's. [The other major auction house,
Christies, was the subject of movement towards control in December 1997
by a consortium headed by the SBC Warburg company. [CORPORATE MONEY, p.
2-3] (Christie's chief curator for contemporary art, Neal Meltzer, is
also Jewish). In 1966 the Rothschild Investment Trust bought 20%
ownership of the Sothebys firm, [WATSON, p. 351] but by the early 1980s
A. Alfred Taubman, by then "one of the world's richest men," a Jewish
entrepreneur who made his fortune in shopping malls and real estate,
purchased controlling interest in Sotheby's. (He was also married to a
former Miss Israel). [HOGREFE, J., 1986, p. 127]
As a trustee of both the Whitney
Museum and the Smithsonian, and now an art dealer, some critics
complained, to no avail, that Taubman had a serious conflict of
interest in his new buy. "Selling art has much in common with selling
root beer," Taubman told the Wall Street Journal, "People don't
need root beer and they don't need to buy a painting either. We provide
them with a sense that it will give them a happier existence." [WATSON,
p. 385]
In 1998 both Robert Lacey and Peter
Watson authored separate books that exposed the scandalous inner
workings of the Sotheby's company. Watson's expose was supported in part
by BBC television; what he discovered, said CBS 60 Minutes
reporter Morley Safar, "shook the art world to its foundations."
[MYRPHY, p. 15] "A couple of decades on, Sotheby's," noted the
Economist, "now controlled by an American property tycoon, Alfred
Taubman, has grown beyond recognition. So, too, has its ethical malaise,
according to Peter Watson, a British journalist and art-market expert."
[ECONOMIST]
In text and on film, Watson
documented Sothebys' international art smuggling operations, from Old
Master paintings in Europe to religious artifacts in the Third World.
Watson, noted Newsday
"focuses his story on James Hodges,
a disgruntled antiquities
administrator in Sotheby's London
office, who amassed thousands
of documents that outline the
auction house's various alleged
malpractices, including smuggling.
Hodges was later convicted
of the theft of two artworks from
Sotheby's (which he claims
he was "holding" for dealers), but
his documents constitute the
basis of Watson's investigations.
Most shocking of all of Sotheby's
indiscretions is its alleged
collusion in smuggling artworks out of
India. With his television crew,
Watson visits a tiny Indian village
to find the home of a goat-headed
stone goddess that was put up
for sale on Sotheby's London
auction block. All that's left of the
local shrine, once the home of 20
such goddesses, is a pile of
rubble where the villagers still
pray." [LEE, p. B13]
Watson told the New York Times
that his investigations led him to believe that such practice at
Sotheby's was "systematic." [IBRAHIM, p. A9] "Art crime," notes Richard
Myrphy,
"... is far more pervasive than the
occasional well-publicized dramas or
those crooked dealers' ploys would
suggest. The statistics themselves
are sobering. According to a
Cambridge University study, 30 to 40
percent of the world's available
antiquities pass through the sale rooms
in New York City and London. Roughly
90 per cent of these pieces are
of unknown provenance, meaning they
were almost certainly stolen,
smuggled, or both." [MYRPHY, p. 15]
Meanwhile, there is an image to be
maintained. "Taubman's most public gambit," said Watson, in an earlier
volume about the art world, "was to flood Sotheby's board [of trustees]
with a raft of rich friends and acquaintances -- socialites in many
cases -- whose job it was to bring in business and create the impression
in the minds of prospective sellers, at least in he United States, that
Sotheby's was a sort of club, membership in which conferred social
status." [WATSON, p. 381] Among this group was Henry Ford II, for a
while the vice-chairman at Sotheby's, who called himself Taubman's
"token Gentile." [BERMAN, p. C1] (Price-fixing scandals at Sotheby's
forced Alfred Taubman to step down as chairman of Sothebys in 2000,
although he maintained controlling interest in the company. CEO Donna
(Dede) Brooks also resigned with him. That same year, Sotheby's and
Christies art auction houses agreed to pay $512 million to satisfy
numerous class-action suits brought against them.) [LOS ANGELES TIMES,
9-23-2000, p. C1] In May 2001, Taubman was indicted for price-fixing by
a Federal grand jury. [SMITH/HIGGINS, 5-1-01, p. 1]
This elitist, status-laden attitude
is not special to Sotheby's; it has long been the foundation of the
modern art world. (In 1993 Sotheby's even successfully sold the
ownership to the abandoned mechanical rover on the moon for $68,000,
essentially a conceptual possession, an abstract play thing). High-brow
art culture, noted Jewish sociologist Herbert Gans in 1974, serves "a
small public that prides itself on exclusiveness." [DIMAGGIO, p. 142]
Sociologists Paul DiMaggio and Michael Useem reiterated the same theme
in 1989:
"Our findings clearly indicate that
in this country the public for the visual
and performing arts is distinctly
elite in levels of education, occupation,
income, and race. The statistics we
were able to summarize from the
many studies reviewed show little
indication of cultural democracy."
[DIMAGGIO, p. 163]
"Many [art] galleries go out of
their way to be rude," wrote Sophy Burnham, "indeed, one rule of the art
world might be that the more 'important' the gallery, the more haughty
it will be ... The gallery of High Art is so discriminating, so refined,
deals in such precious artistic sensibility and at such prices, that it
affects an ambiance, commensurate with its wares." [BURNHAM, p. 30]
Among Taubman's Sotheby trustee
appointees was the Jewish owner, Max Fisher, of United Brands, a
company that was fined for bribing Honduras government officials in
exchange for tax breaks. "Still," notes Watson, "Fisher was chiefly
known for his enthusiastic fund-raising for Jewish and Israeli charities
... [He also] wrote Op-Ed pieces for the New York Times."
[WATSON, p. 381] Fisher, longtime chairman of the Board of Governors
of the Jewish Agency, gives half his multi-million dollar oil and real
estate income each year to Israel and other Jewish causes," notes the
(Jewish) Forward. [FORWARD]
The fact that Jews are so dominating
in the art world is a reality that is very rarely publicly acknowledged.
It is forbidden -- as always for anyone, anywhere -- to discuss the
subject for fear of being branded "anti-Semitic." Typically, as example,
an entire 1989 academic volume on the "Sociology of the Arts" fails to
mention Jews as sociological entity in the modern art dynamic. There are
analyses of art galleries, "artist groups," art patrons, and art
audiences, broken down into gender, age, income, occupation, and even
"racial and ethnic minorities." We can find that, negligibly, "blacks,
Orientals, and persons of Spanish origin constitute about 7% of the art
audience," but there is nothing whatsoever about Jews, even their own
percentage of that "art audience," let alone how many art galleries they
own, museums they direct, and articles they generate about art value.
[FOSTER/BLAU, 1989]
This kind of false framing is endemic
to modern America. (See, for example, a 1998 scholarly volume entitled
Ethnic Identity and Power. Cultural Contexts of Political Action in
School and Society. The index cites references to Blacks (large
case), "white" (small case), "angry white males," Chicanos, Mexicans,
Hispanics, Asian-Americans, Latino, Native Americans, Eskimos, Haitians,
"Hmong people," Moroccans, and so on. There is nothing about Jews in
the context of power and ethnicity -- they are not afforded a heading in
the book's index). It is institutionalized: no one (certainly not a
non-Jew) is allowed to single out Jewry for an analysis of their power.
Those few who know the story are afraid to speak. Most are merely
ignorant of the dimensions of the issue. Take, for example, American
journalist Thomas Billitteri's crusading article for truth, justice, and
fairness, never mentioning Jewry in his critical appraisal of the mass
media's systemic reluctance to hire minorities (i.e., Blacks, et al).
Instead, Billitteri's mass media culprits are the standard punching bags
-- the amorphous "whites," by which the very particularistic
Jewish dominance in the mass media (especially at the highest
decision-making strata) [See mass media chapter] is conveniently
subsumed, and thereby, as always, hidden: "79% of television new
personnel are white, and 88% of radio news workers are white. In
management ranks, 92 percent of television and news directors are white.
Only 1% of television news directors are black." [BILLITTERI, p. 19] Or
what of the Los Angeles Times' dissimulative assertion in 2001
that "90% of each major [Hollywood] guild (Screen Actors, Directors,
Writers and Producers) is white, the majority of them male." [Munoz, L.,
3-24-01]
Art critic Peter Halley
(self-identified as half-Jewish) took another angle on the "Forbidden to
Be Spoken About" machinations of the modern art world, as represented by
the ethnicity of many of today's most successful artists:
"It is my contention that the art
world of the 1980s represented a kind of
renaissance for Jewish American
artists who came of age in that decade.
The list of young Jewish American
artists who took center stage in the
80's is long -- early in the decade
we might think of Barbara Kruger,
Laurie Simmons, Sherrie Levine, R.M.
Fischer, Donald Sultan, Julian
Schnabel, and David Salle. Later,
the work of Ross Bleckner, Terry
Winters, Haim Steinbach, and Meyer
Vaisman come to the fore ...
What originally motivated me to
explore this subject [of growing
Jewish artist prominence] was the
strange fact that there has been an
inexplicable silence surrounding it.
Especially in this era of multicultural
awareness, it is surprising, to say
the least, that no one has mentioned
this phenomena ... [HALLEY, p.
26-27] ...
One possible reason for this
silence about a Jewish artist renaissance in
the 80's is that at the same time a
great fluorescence of Jewish influence
in the areas of philanthropy,
business, finance and the bastions of high
society was taking place ... By the
1980s ... in cities with large Jewish
populations, like New York, Jews had
largely replaced the older WASP
elite as standard bearers of social
power and prestige in the evolving
American postwar ethnic
meritocracy."
Thus a new and yet unexamined
social paradigm arose. Jews ... [who]
had championed the marginal culture
of Modernism had suddenly
become the pillar of the American
establishment. At the same time, a
new generation of Jewish artists was
emerging whose work was collected
as often as not by Jews in the
cultural elite as part of a continuing
tradition of Jewish support for
contemporary art." [HALLEY, p. 28]
By the 1980s, from such artists,
notes well-known art critic Robert Hughes, "never before had star
artists been so bathed in adulation ... The doings of collectors, the
gyrations of the market, the increasingly passive promotional role of
museums. The whole social circus attached to the art world supplied
limitless fodder for breathless journalists. Art magazines devolved into
sycophantic praise-bulletins. Since the magazines depended on
advertising, revenue from dealers who were not averse to applying
pressure, 95 per cent of the writing published in them was the merest
puffery, garnished with opaque Derridan and Lacanian jargon [Jacques
Derrida and Jacques Lacan were two French -- and Jewish --
psychoanalytic philosophers]." [HUGHES, p. 594]
Hughes may have had Milton Esterow in
mind when he spoke of the slide into purely money-grubbing,
consumerist-spewing "art" magazines. Esterow, the Jewish owner and
editor of ArtNews (America's largest circulation arts
publication) and other media interests, was featured in the New York
Times in 1995 in his quest "for more consumer, or general,
advertising to go along with the substantial art advertising that has
traditionally run his magazine." "Art collectors are passionate about
beautiful things," Esterow said, "This is translatable to beautiful
cars, beautiful clothes, exotic vacations. There is no better setting
for beautiful things than our magazine." [SLOANE, p. D9] Esterow noted
new ads from Infiniti cars and Rolex watches in his publication.
Promotional plans also included an allowance for automobile advertisers
to "place a new car in front of a major museum during a particular
exhibit," and an alcohol company "to hold a tasting at an important art
fair."
[SLOANE, p. D9]
The Jewish influence in "art
photography" -- as artists as well as
dealers, critics, photographers themselves, and curators-- is
overwhelmingly dominant. This is certainly in part due to the fact that
many photographic artists seep over into the High Art realm from
positions of Jewish predominance in hard-to-get advertising, fashion,
and photojournalism positions, each deeply part of the business
world (Annie Liebowitz at Rolling Stone and Vanity Fair,
for instance, or Arthur Penn, Richard Avedon, and Helmut Newton at
Vogue and other slick magazines). Even maverick Robert Frank took a
vacation to Peru early in his career "because he wanted to escape the
commercial success he was beginning to have in New York shooting for
fashion magazines." [WESTERBECK, p. 645] Anthony Heilbut notes that
"during the 1930s, American notions of physical beauty were altered by
the [Jewish] émigrés, a neat reversal of the pattern that once led East
European Jews to celebrate icons unequivocally gentile and heterosexual.
Fashion photographers like Horst and Erwin Blumenthal specialized in
tableaus of exotic, androgynous women." [HEILBUT, p. 492]
In England, in 2001 Gemma Levine had a career retrospective at
London's National Portrait Gallery. She "is one of Britain's leading
portrait photographers ... Her career in photography was initiated by a
commission from [Jewish publishing mogul] George Weidenfeld to take
photographs for two books in Israel in collaboration with [Israeli
heroes] Moshe Dayan and Golda Meir." [absolutearts.com, 2001] Rock and
roll photographer Gered Mankowitz had a retrospective exhibition the
same year:
"Best-known for his work as the unofficial photographer for the
Rolling Stones
in the late 1960s, Mankowitz didn't just take pictures, he created
some of the
most enduring images of that era. Working with talents such as Jimi
Hendrix
and the Stones, he produced the kind of photographs that led nice
teenagers
astray to worship at the altar of rock ... Now 55, the photographer
has been
creating pop images for so long he has become part of the mythology
himself.
As integral to swinging London's music scene as flowing hair and
weed,
Mankowitz's studio was in the heart of it all." [SCOTSMAN,
11-13-01]
Jacques Lowe, son a German father and Jewish mother, was John F.
Kennedy's personal photographer. Lowe "became an assistant to the
renowned [Jewish] photographer Arnold Newman, who became his mentor."
Lowe founded the Visual Arts agency (later called Visual Arts Projects).
[JFK, 2001]
An émigré from Europe in 1938, for
decades Miki Denhof was a "noted mentor of fashion photographers" at
Esquire, Vogue, House and Garden and Glamour.
Her big break was to be hired at Vogue by (fellow Jewish) art
director Alexander Lieberman in 1945. She once donated 900 photographs
from her father's personal collection to an exhibition entitled
"Fighting for the Fatherland: The Patriotism of Jews in World War I."
Denhof's influence in the fashion world was so influential that her
death in 2000 merited an article in the New York Times. [HELLER,
S., 8-6-2000] (The editor-in-chief for 17 years at Vogue was
Grace Mirabella, an Italian-American. Her husband, William Cahan, was a
wealthy Jewish doctor and socialite; his cousin, Abraham Cahan, founded
and edited the Yiddish language Jewish Daily Forward. [MIRABELLA,
1995, p. 167] At her wedding to Cahan, "the Jewish custom in weddings is
to step on a glass and break it. So, after we'd kissed, Nate [Cummings,
a Jewish friend] brought out a glass wrapped in a napkin, and Bill had
to stomp on it. Nate then picked up the pieces, still wrapped, and had
them affixed to a canvas background, which he framed. The collage now
hangs in our home, like an abstract painting." [MIRABELLA, G., 1995, p.
175] She notes that "photographers were becoming big stars too" in her
era, particularly noting Jewish Vogue photographers Bert Stern
who "could only work with ten assistants in his studio," Richard Avedon,
and Arthur Penn.] [MIRABELLA, G., 1995, p. 121-122] Jewish novelist
Judith Krantz notes the Jewish complexion of her photography
connections:
"Well-known [Jewish] fashion photographer" Milton Greene "and I
became
good friends. It was a world of interrelationships. Milton's
ex-wife Evelyn
was engaged to [famous Jewish portrait photographer] Dick Avedon
...
He already had an aura of a vast future about him, a photographer
version
of the young [Jewish conductor] Leonard Bernstein ... Later, when I
became
a fashion editor, I was always galvanized when we worked together."
[KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 128-129]
In the field of photojournalism,
three of the original six staff photographers for Life magazine
were Jewish (Carl Mydans, Margaret Bourke-White, and Alfred Eisenstadt).
"Within a few years Jewish photographers Fritz Goro, Eliot Eliosofon,
Dmitri Kessel, and others (Curt Gunther, Hebert Gehr, Yale Joel, Hy
Peskin, Paul Schutze, Mark Kaufmann, Nina Leon, Ida Wyman, Arthur Shay,
Lawrence Schiller, Henry Groskinsky, Jill Krementz, and Neil Leifer)
became staff or contract photographers." "From the [19]40s to 70s Philip
Stern "was known as Life's photographer in Hollywood." Look
magazine was founded in 1937. "For most of its years the Director of
Photography," notes George Gilbert, "was Arthur Rothstein." [GILBERT,
G., 1996, p. 60, 78] The successful "A Day in the Life" series of coffee
table photography books (A Day in the Life of -- the United
States, Russia, Israel, etc.) have been headed by two Jewish
photojournalists, Rick Smolan and David Cohen.
An influential documentary
photography organization from the late 1930s to the 1950s was the Photo
League. "The overwhelming majority of members of the 200-plus group,"
notes George Gilbert, "including photographers from Life and from
the photo agencies were of Jewish heritage." Jewish photographers Sid
Grossman, Sol Libsohn, and Aaron Siskind founded the group in 1932.
[GILBERT, G., 1996, p. 230-231] Another influential organization, the
American Society of Magazine Photographers (ASMP), was created in 1944.
"Starting with 30 paid-up members," notes Gilbert, "... the group leaped
into prominence in the industry, boasting an estimated three of four of
all eligible magazine photographers as members. The initial roster, with
an exception of two, were all of Jewish heritage." [GILBERT, G., 1996,
p. 237]
Famous turn-of-the-century social documentarian Lewis Hine wasn't
Jewish. But the man who controlled his estate at his death, Walter
Rosenbaum, was. In 2001, the Times of London reported that
"The FBI has begun an investigation into the suspected forgery of
hundreds of
works by one of America's most famous photographers. Tests showed
that
numerous 'vintage' prints by Lewis Hine, who is revered for his
social realist
pictures from the Depression, were printed on paper not available
until more
than a decade after his death in 1940. The investigation was
prompted by a
complaint from a dealer in Santa Fe, New Mexico, about Hine's
longtime
collaborator, Walter Rosenbaum, an acclaimed war photographer and
the
former president of the Photo League co-operative where Hine left
his
archives ... This year [Rosenbaum] was reported to have reached a
confidential settlement out of court with six dealers to create a
690,000
pound fund to reimburse buyers of between 300 and 500 Hine prints
who were unhappy with their purchases." [TIMES OF LONDON, 8-17-01]
Prominent Jews in the photographic
publishing field have included the founders (William Ziff and Bernard
Davis) of Popular Photography magazine, the associate publisher
of Modern Photography, the photo page editor of the New York
Times, the publisher of Photo Dealer magazine, the publisher
of Photo Weekly, and so on. [GILBERT, G., 1996, p. 306] Laura
Levitt notes the increased interest in the photographic publishing world
in Jewish subjects:
"Since 1996 there has been a
proliferation of exhibits on Jews and
photography across the United States
... [There are also] explicit
photographic collections about Jews
[that] are increasingly being
marked as identifactory texts. As I
read it, this larger situation of
loss [of the Jewish past] helps
account for the growing market
for picture books about American
Jews." [LEVITT, L., 2000, p. 90,
65]
Critic James Twitchell calls the
omnipresent merger of modern art and business advertising these days
"adcult," and the medium of photography plays a central role. The
photographic work of Richard Avedon is a case in point, reflecting the
interconnected back scratching of the art and corporate elite.
Concerning an Avedon exhibition at the Whitney Museum of Art, Twitchell
notes that:
"Si Newhouse's Advance Publications
owns the New Yorker, which gave
Avedon more-than-usual space in the
week of the show's opening. The
co-publisher of the exhibition
catalog, with an essay by New Yorker art
critic Adam Gopnik, is Random House,
which is owned by Newhouse.
Among the six speakers at the
Whitney symposium connected to the
show were Random House's CEO Harold
Evans and writers Brendan Gil
[author of a New York Review of
Books article accusing the great
folklorist Joseph Campbell of
anti-Semitism] and Ingrid Sischy who
write for ... the New Yorker.
The curator of the show was Jane
Livingston who does not work for the
Whitney but for Avedon, who
used a grant from Kodak to pay for
the show and the catalog.
Synergies, anyone?" [TWITCHELL, p.
227]
Elsewhere in the criss-cross into
the art world, for years too Cornel Capa (born Karol Friedman) has run
the important International Center for Photography in New York City.
Capa's brother, Robert Capa (Andreas Friedman), was a founder of Magnum,
the seminal photojournalism agency. Tom Freudenheim notes that "many of
the works [of a "Jewish art" exhibition under his review] are by the
most significant photographers of the century and indeed, it can
probably be demonstrated that this is a medium which, unlike painting
and sculpture, was moved primarily by men and women who were Jewish."
[FREUDENHEIM, p. 28] "Photography has been dominated by Jewish
photographers from the 1920s through the 1980s," says Tom Bamberger,
himself both a Jewish photographer and adjunct curator of a Milwaukee
art museum. [FREUDENHEIM, p. 28] Even the famous photography repository
-- the Bettman Archives -- was Jewish-founded, by Otto Bettman, as was
Simon Guttman's London-based international news and photography agency,
Report.
Aside from a core of west coast
nature photographers like Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, and Wynn Bullock
and scattered others across photographic history, there are
comparatively few non-Jews who have cracked Jewish dominance of the
upper echelon of art-world status in photography. A history of American
(and -- as many were immigrants -- even international) photography reads
almost like a history of Jewish photography. A partial
list of well-known Jewish photographic artists and/or recurring grant
and award winners must always start with the gigantic influence of
Alfred Stieglitz. "It was Alfred Stieglitz who was to define the
parameters of American ideas about photography's emotional and
expressive potential" [CRICE, p. 661]; his magazine Camera Work
and 291 gallery were seminal in moving the "tangible acceptance
of photography to the domain of art patrons and other buyers." [BUNNELL,
p. 314] As John Pultz notes: "Steiglitz had been the major force in
avant-garde America photography for over forty years. He had exerted his
will, and would continue to do so, not only through his own photography
but also through the three photography periodicals he had edited between
1893 and 1917 and the three New York galleries he was to run between
1905 and his death in 1946. [PULTZ, p. 484]
"The capitalist concept of the art
work [was] a singular rare object," notes Peter Bunnell, "with a measure
of its importance provided by the extent of its economic value ... The
development of the private gallery, of organized marketing activity
replete with regular exhibitions and published criticisms was an
American contribution. Largely an urban phenomena, it was orchestrated
out of New York by the country's leading practitioner and spokesman for
photography, Alfred Stieglitz ... [BUNNELL, p. 314] ... [He] appl[ied]
capitalist economics to the appreciation and acceptance of art.
Steiglitz clearly positioned himself at the center of power and he was
the major spokesman for Pictorial photography [an early genre of
self-conscious "art" photography]." [BUNNELL, p. 315] In 1993, a 1920
"art" photograph by Steiglitz of artist Georgia O'Keefe's hands and a
thimble sold at auction for $398,500, the highest price ever paid for a
photograph. Another Stieglitz print went for $107,500. [NYT, 10-9-93, p.
A11]
A partial list of celebrated Jewish
photographers includes Paul Strand (Stransky), Richard Avedon,
painter-photographer Robert Rauschenberg, Herb Ritts (another
"photographer of the stars"), Eric Salomon, Alfred Eisenstadt (the
"father of photojournalism"), Man Ray (Emmanuel Radnitsky), Robert Capa
(Endre Friedman), Cornell Capa, Laslo Moholgy-Nagy, Andre Keretsz
("among the most influential photographers in Paris in the 1920s"
[WESTBECK, p. 35], Margaret Bourke-White (her father, originally Weiss,
was Jewish. She was "surely the twentieth century's most famous woman
photographer" [GILBERT, G., 1996, p. ix], William Klein, Helen Levitt,
Aaron Siskind, famous ambulance chaser Weegee (Arthur Fellig, whose
father was a rabbi), Robert Frank, Lee Friedlander, Gary Winogrand,
Diane Arbus (whose major photography influences were Lisette Model
[originally Elise Felice Amelie Seybert] and Marvin Israel), Irving
Penn, Joel Sternfeld, Joel Meyerowitz, Duane Michaels, Lewis Baltz, Carl
Chiarenza, Michael Bishop, Werner Bischof, Roloff Beny, William Wegman
(famed for his in-joke photos of his dog named "Man Ray"), Richard
Misrach, Arnold Newman (whose Israeli-born wife was a "one time member
of Haganah, the pre-state Israeli underground army" [WALMAN, p. 303],
Eve Arnold (originally Cohen: the first woman in the influential Magnum
Photo agency), David Seymour (born Szymin, a co-founder of Magnum),
Brassai (Gyula Halasz), Susan Meiselas, Cindy Sherman, Walter Rosenblum,
Arthur Olman (also the Director of San Diego's Museum of Photographic
Arts), Ruth Orkin, Larry Sultan, Jerry Uelsmann, Judy Dater
[Lichtenfeld], Bruce Davidson, Leonard Freed, Elliot Erwitt, Danny Lyon,
Larry Fink, Art Kane (Arthur Kanofsky), Jay Meisel, Nan Goldin, Simpson
Kalisher, Joe Rosenthal (who took the staged photograph, which has
become a patriotic icon, of soldiers planting an American flag at Iwo
Jima), Ralph Gibson, Helmut Gernsheim, Phillipe Halsman, Ernest Haas,
Annie Leibowitz, Roman Vishniac, John Heartfield (Helmut Herzfelde),
Gisele Freund, Sandi Fellman, Abigail Heyman, Lauren Greenfield, Arthur
Rothstein, Doris Ullman, Rebecca Lepkoff, Sandra Weiner, Andreas
Feininger, Lotte Jacobi, Inge Morath, Lynne Cohen, Rosalind Soloman,
Milton Resnick, Donald Blumberg, Baron Adolf de Meyer, Ellen Land-Weber,
Eva Rubinstein, Dennis Stock (Stockl), Mark Cohen, Paul Diamond, Ray
Metzker, Arthur Tress, Peter Simon, Marcia Resnick, Helmut Newton (whose
sado-masochistic images for glamour magazines have been seminal to the
heroin-addict look in fashion photography criticized by President
Clinton in the 1990s), and many others. [See for example, George
Gilbert's compilation of Jewish photographers].
"It is impossible to deny the impact [Helmut Newton] has made, on
fashion photography in particular," noted England's The Independent
in 2001,
"To radical feminists, Newton is the antichrist. This is the man
who
photographed a woman on all fours with a saddle on her back,
and another sitting on her underwear or an unmade bed, with a gun
in her mouth ... Newton's vision is fuelled by sex, status, power
and, above all,
voyeurism ... Small wonder, then, that much of the photographer's
most successful
imagery has become far more famous than the garments he has chosen
to photograph ... Newton's influence is everywhere ... In the
Sixties and Seventies,
Newton's decadent vision may have been labeled 'porno chic,' but
today the rest
of the world has finally caught up with him and it's just plain
chic. There is
barely a stylist, photographer or designer working in fashion
today who can
fail to acknowledge Newton as an influence ... Helmut Newton was
born to middle-class
Jewish parents in Weimar Berlin in 1920, and the decadent spirit
of that place at that
time is imprinted on his work ... Accusations of misogyny are
still constantly
made against Newton's work." [FRNKEL, S., 5-9-01]
Les Krims' "taste for the bizarre --
deer slayers, dwarfs, murdered women, and naked Jewish mothers making
chicken soup -- made him one of the most controversial artists of the
1970s." [RICE, p. 677] Krims' work "would also be seminal," notes Shelly
Rice, "to the works of Joel Peter Witkin, a young photographer who is
continuing, into the 1990s, to explore the domain of the mysterious.
Attracted to the bizarre, like Krims and, before him, Diane Arbus,
Witkin photographs transvestites, deformed people, dead fetuses, and
other strange phenomena." [RICE, p. 678] Also Jewish, a Witkins
relative, Lee, founded the Witkin Gallery in 1969 which "experienced
great success and became the first commercially viable gallery devoted
entirely to photography." [ALEXANDER, p. 697] (Among many influential
photography galleries were those run by Stephen White in Los Angeles and
Marjorie Neikrug Raskin's Neikrug Galleries in New York (specializing in
antique photography. Charles Traub, also Jewish, was the director of the
influential Light Gallery). Vicki Goldberg is one of many prominent
Jewish critics of photography.
In 1999, another Jewish photographer,
Nan Goldin, was provided a one-person show of her work at Prague's
Galerie Rudolfinum, a spectacular art facility in that beautiful city.
Goldin's show, sponsored by New York's Whitney Museum of Art, framed her
as an ambassador of American art and culture to the Czech Republic. And
what was the show like? Large scale color Cibachrome prints of the
decadent and violent American underworld decorated the elegant museum
walls, including huge confrontational images of drug addicts
masturbating.
Another Jewish photographer is Peter
Basch. His "photographs for male-oriented publications won him the
reputation of having photographed 100,000 nude women." [GILBERT, G.,
1996, p. 60] Daniel Howard Cohen died of AIDS in 1995. He was "an
educator who grew up in Baltimore and went from being an outlaw leftist
to running the photography program at one of the nation's most
prestigious journalism schools ... [He joined] the leftist Weathermen
group in the 1960's. He went underground for several years while he was
wanted by the law." [BALTIMORE SUN, 4-17-95]
Europe's August Sander is also
regarded as a seminal influence in the development of documentary
photography. Roman Vishniac is another well-known name. Probably the
most famous current Polish photographer is expatriate Ryszard Horowitz,
a Holocaust survivor, now living in New York City. The best known
photographer from Brazil? Sebastian Selgado, also Jewish. Jewish
cameraman Yevgeny Khaldei was described by one newspaper as "the
greatest Soviet war photographer." [PIRANI, S., p. 11] W. W. Waglieff
Schapiro was the Tsar of Russia's official "Court Photographer."
[GILBERT, G., 1996, p. 135]
A Jewish refugee from Germany, Laslo
Mohology-Nagy, founded Chicago's Art Institute of Design. Prominent
Jewish graduates have included Aaron Siskind, Nathan Lerner, Arthur
Siegel, Ray Metzker, Ken Josephson, Barbara Crane, and Eileen Cowan,
among others. [WESTBECK, p. 656] More commercially, Morris Germaine
founded "Germaine's School of Photography," H. P. Seidel founded the
"School of Modern Photography," and "on the west coast today's
prestigious Brooks School of Photography also had its start early in the
twentieth century by a Jewish family." [GILBERT, G., 1996, p. 79]
"By 1963," notes Stuart Alexander,
"the teaching of photography at the university level had become such a
significant force in the United States that, under the instigation of
Nathan Lyons [formerly of the George Eastman House] the Society of
Photographic Education was founded to 'discuss educational issues ... It
has its own internal hierarchy and exerts a great influence on American
photography." [ALEXANDER, p. 701] In intellectual cliques, German-born
Walter Benjamin is among the best known of "photo-mechanical" theorists.
"Benjamin," notes George Mosse,
"consciously [sought] to define his
own brand of Judaism. Benjamin,
barely out of school at the age of
twenty, rejoiced in his newly
discovered Jewish identity. Jewish
intellectuals, he wrote in 1912,
provide the principal support and
dynamic for true culture, which
in this case included not only
literature and art but also socialism
and the women's emancipation movement.
Among Jewish intellectuals,
he continued, writers were in the
vanguard of change ... [Jews] took
a central role in creating
alternatives to the existing order ... Benjamin's
preoccupation with Jewish thought,
which for a time, under the
influence of close friend Gershom
Scholem, seemed to shift
Benjamin's early definition of
Jewishness toward a sporadic interest
in cabala [Jewish mysticism] and
Zionism." [MOSSE, G., 1985,
p. 66-67]
In 1997, George Gilbert published a
volume that identified over 500 Jews who have been prominent in the
field of photography as photographers, critics, scientists, or curators.
As Jewish critic A. D. Coleman observed about the volume, "this
selection can't exhaust the list of prospects, indeed it barely
scratches the surface (as a parlor game of sorts, I sat with a friend
for two evenings and compiled a list of at least one hundred figures
Gilbert missed)" ... [These "hundreds and hundreds" of Jews are] so
integral to photography's history as we habitually think of it that a
written version of that history excluding these figures is difficult to
imagine." [COLEMAN, A., D., 1998]
Among the most important genres of
photography is the so-called "New York School." It is overwhelmingly
Jewish (two-thirds of the important artist selections for one book by
curator Jane Livingston on this theme are Jews). "In its art historical
usage," says Coleman,
"the term 'school' connotes a
connectedness among a group of
artists that goes beyond mere
friendship and social interaction to
deeper levels of bonding and
influence: master-apprentice relationships,
stylistic kinships, parallel and
overlapping trains of thought, and
general agreement on what the
important questions are in the
field -- what the philosopher of
science Thomas Kuhn would call
a shared paradigm." [author's
emphasis, COLEMAN, A., D., 1998]
This "shared paradigm," of course, is
intellectual doubletalk for a "collective world view" or, more
pointedly, ideological collusion.
Why such Jewish dominance of the
field, Coleman wonders? Or, as he literally says, "How are we to make
sense of this?" What Coleman, as all, fail to willfully address is the
obvious: Jewish networking and hustling, Jewish predominance in the mass
media, Jewish economic dominance of the art world, Jewish power, Jewish
money, and the connective agreement upon what does, and what does not,
fall within the realm of artistic "quality." For the "New York School,"
Coleman suggests its core is "stylistic rebelliousness and intellectual
contention." "All of them," he adds, "Jewish or not, were functioning in
the liberal-left bohemian intellectual atmosphere of New York City at
the time, which was strongly Jewish-influenced. It was an environment in
which an urban-Jewish atmosphere permeated everyone's thinking,
including that of many non-Jews." [COLEMAN, A. D., 1998]
In another case, Paris-based Michel
Frizet's massive international English-language (1998) volume entitled
"The New History of Photography," features an article by critic Colin
Westerbeck, "On the Road and in the Street: The Post-War Period in the
United States." Of the 23 photographs illustrating the article, at least
16 images (and perhaps as many as 20) are by Jews. [WESTERBECK, p.
641-659] William Klein and Robert Frank are noted as seminally
influential to a new aesthetic: both are also Jewish. Klein's world view
in photography is quintessentially Jewish in its animosity towards
Gentiles. Klein moved to Paris, says Westerbeck, because
"He had needed to escape from New
York because, as a poor Jewish
child in a tough Irish-Italian
neighborhood, he had spent his youth being
terrorized by street gangs. By the
time he went back, in the early 1950s,
photography was, for him, he has
confessed, a 'weapon' with which 'to
get even.' He wanted his photographs
to reveal the harshness of life on
the New York streets, and he realized
that the way to do so was to
cultivate in himself a killer
instinct for pictures as ferocious as the primal
emotions he wanted to betray in his
subjects." [WESTERBECK, p. 644]
The huge, scholarly volume from which
this quote is taken declares itself to be the "new" history of
photography. And even this book about photographic image-making devotes
an entire obligatory page to the specialness of the Holocaust, a brief
article (entitled "The Final Solution") and four photographs. (No such
special attention is provided any world wars or anyone else’s'
collective suffering, genocidal or otherwise). The author of this
article, Anne Lilensztein, assets that surviving photographs of the
"Final Solution" evidentially prove that the Holocaust occurred:
"Testimonies of this madness have been brought to us ... above all [by
the] photographic ... Thus photography is the tangible proof of one of
the greatest tragedies of contemporary history." [LILENSZTEIN, p. 600]
The proof cited for this assertion is
four Nazi-era photographs -- a pile of naked corpses captioned
"Buchanwald, 1946," and a three-portrait series of a woman entitled
"Records of an Inmate at Auschwitz, circa 1943." There is, as usual, no
mention in the text that anyone other than Jews died in Nazi
concentration camps, or that millions of other people died at fascist
hands in other ways too.
The article's stated purpose is to
declare that photography played an important role in "proving" the
atrocities against the Jews. And, as always, the bias against non-Jewish
suffering is intrinsic -- who can say with absolute certainty that the
pile of anonymous corpses depicted are only Jewish? And
even if they are, far more indicting to the author's (and editor's)
ethnocentric premise is that, although non-Jews are never mentioned as
victims in the piece, the three portrait photos of an Auschwitz prisoner
illustrating "proof" of the Final Solution against Jews depict a female
prisoner who is, incredibly, not Jewish.
The woman in these images [page 600]
has a Nazi-created card in the photograph with her prisoner number
noted: it is "POL:F 31848." In the second photo, a patch with her number
and a triangle can be clearly seen sewn to her prison uniform. Tadeusz
Iwaszko, in an authoritative volume published by the Auschwitz Museum in
Poland, notes that: "Besides being tattooed, another element in the
registration process for new arrivals [at Auschwitz] was being
photographed in three poses. In the first photograph, a profile, the
camp number was visible as well as letter symbols for the category and
nationality of the prisoner. Jewish prisoners, who had begun to arrive
in mass transports in 1942, were not photographed. (There were certain
exceptions to this general rule)." [IWASZKO, p. 61] But even if these
photographs in question were such exceptions, Nazi concentration camp
prisoners were identified by both tattooed numbers and sewn cloth
patches (or painted) symbols on their clothing. A red triangle was a
political prisoner, a green triangle meant "professional criminal," a
black one were so called "anti-social" prisoners (including prostitutes,
gypsies, and others. Violet triangles signified Jehovah's witnesses; the
Catholic clergy had red triangles and homosexuals pink ones. "Jews,"
notes Iwaszko, "were identified with a six-sided star, composed of two
triangles of different colors ... [Later] Jews began to be identified by
the same method as the other prisoners, except that a yellow square
patch would be positioned above the single triangle." [IWASZKO, p.
63-64] [See the photographic section before page 33 in Auschwitz: Nazi
Death camp, edited by Piper/Zwieback for photographic examples of the
different identification symbols and portraits for Jews and Poles].
The Nazis were of course meticulous in
their delineation of ethnic/racial backgrounds. The letters "POL" or
"POLE," and then a number series, denoted a Pole. "JUDE," followed by a
series of numbers, denoted a Jew. Hence, three of the four photographs
used to "prove" the Final Solution against the Jews in the New
History of Photography are those of a non-Jewish Auschwitz
inmate. Why belabor this? Because such an error is systemic in
western cultures today. In an otherwise meticulous scholarly
enterprise of such international scope, this mistake is no mere
oversight. The appropriation of the image of an unnoted Gentile
concentration camp victim to "prove" the indisputable facts of the
Jewish Holocaust is a surrender to the constant historical revision
barrage in all realms of life today whereby only Jews count, and even
photographic evidence of non-Jews at Auschwitz is appropriated as
further, irrefutable evidence for the uniqueness of Jewish martyrology.
There is a profound lesson here that subverts the very thesis of
the Final Solution article in the History volume. Even as the author
heralds the absolute truth of photographic evidence, her illustrations
-- as any photographs -- are always susceptible to contextual
manipulation. In this case, as elsewhere, the widespread, monolithic
presumption about the specialness of a Holocaust only for Jews precedes
all and any facts on the matter. Yet, ironically, the images used in
this book in question actually subvert what the author seeks to
illustrate, i.e., that it was only Jews who died in a Holocaust-Final
Solution at Auschwitz.
The overwhelming Jewish dominance in
all realms of art and photography leads us to one place where, in very
recent years, some non-Jews have managed to get considerable attention
for their photographic work. In the late 1980s American art went through
a convulsion of controversy when religious leaders and elected
politicians began attacking -- and legislating against -- what many
perceived as decadent modern art values. Seminal among the troublemakers
was the work of Andres Serrano, Robert Mapplethorpe (both
photographers), and Karen Finley, each in some form rewarded for their
efforts by the National Endowment for the Arts. Andres Serrano's most
controversial piece was a photograph of Christ on a crucifix in a
container of urine, entitled Piss Christ. Mapplethorpe -- who has died
of AIDS -- was celebrated in an NEA-funded retrospective of his works
including homosexual sadomasochism, for example, elegant photos of a man
peeing into another's mouth and one in which a fist goes up a rectum.
Karen Finley is a performance artist
whose central theme was described in one review as "victimization,
especially women as victim, women as underclass, tough stuff ... she
casually peels off her dress and pours gelatin into her bra ... she
lathers chocolate over her body ... strikes blobs of bean sprouts over
body and calls it sperm." [EVANS, p. 209]
None of these controversial artists
are Jewish. However, as Micheal Medved pointed out about the largely
Jewish-run entertainment media, it should also be of serious concern
here that in a field so dominated by Jewish curators, collectors,
critics, and dealers, such material is not only heavily supported, but
encouraged and glorified. And rewarded.
(A similar kind of incident occurred
in 1998 in Great Britain when two Jewish women, Amanda Moss and Marissa
Carr [a former stripper], self-described as the Dragon Ladies, "female
sexual entertainment," were awarded nearly $10,000 from the British Arts
Council. Joe Ashton, a member of Parliament, complained that "It's like
giving a subsidy to porn. This does enormous damage.") [BROWN, D.,
2-22-98, p. 26]
Piss Christ, by any reckoning, is a
childish act of sensationalism to engender attention through outrage. It
is an assault upon Christian identity, and the response that occurred in
reaction to it was predictable. Would the same (largely Jewish) critics,
curators, and art financiers who championed this, in the name of free
speech and pushing artistic boundaries, feel able to champion a "Piss
Star of David" or "Piss Talmud?" If so, where is it? It does not exist
because it is, by "politically correct" dictates, forbidden. Likewise,
does the victimization mythology heralded by the gay community (in
Jewry's martyrological shadow) entitle Mapplethorpe to be funded and
glorified in dehumanizing and degrading human beings in demeaning
sadomasochistic acts? And when Karen Finley howls with sensational rage
about her victimhood as a woman, narcissistically covered with chocolate
on a stage, where might we look for a model for this kind of demand?
Victimhood and sensationalism pays off big time in our era; they are
presently the pillars of modern art-making. Where, one wonders, did this
all come from?
Another art expression of
considerable controversy, albeit in the movie world, was Martin
Scorscece's film, The Last Temptation of Christ, a film that
engendered a storm of protest from angry Christian organizations. Among
the protestors was Reverend Don Wildmon who "during his boycott of the
Last Temptation of Christ ... informed the readers of USA Today
of the Jewish background of the studio president that released the
film." [BOLTON, p. 8]
This revelation is considered by Jews
as an act of anti-Semitism. The issue -- in the political sense -- is
not whether the Last Temptation of Christ is a good or bad movie. The
issue is really the Jewish double standard as dictated by the modern
"art" world: Jewish hallowed sanctity (the Holiest of Holies rendered to
be the secular Holocaust mythos of Consummate Uniqueness and
Irreproachable Innocence), and all other religions and belief systems
subject to critical, and deconstructive, attack. While Jewish economic
and institutional support is offered to deconstruct Christian mythology
in the name of free speech and the expanding of artistic boundaries, a
parallel deconstruction of Jewish mythology --religious or otherwise,
including the Jewish mythologies of incessant victimization -- is
unfathomable.
As "conservative" commentator Robert Knight has noted abut a 1993
rash of anti-Christian art-making:
"Included in the Whitney show were [Jewish artist/father]
Joel-Peter Witkin's 'Maquette for
Crucifix,' a naked Jesus Christ surrounded by sadomasochistic,
obscene
imagery and many grotesque corpses and body parts. [Jewish artist]
Suzie Silver
contributed a film entitled A Spy, in which Jesus is depicted as a
naked woman
with her breasts exposed. It was reminiscent of the Easter event in
1984 at
the Episcopal cathedral of St. John the Divine in Manhattan, when a
statue
of 'Christa' was unveiled to give the world an image of Jesus
Christ as a buxom,
bare-breasted goddess. The Whitney [which is headed by Jewish mogul
Leonard
Lauder] exhibit also included the famous Andres Serrano work 'Piss
Christ,'
a photo of a crucifix in a beaker of the artist's own urine, and a
film by
[Jewish] porn star Annie Sprinkle titled, 'The Sluts and Goddesses
Video
Workshop, or How to be a Sex Goddess in 10 Easy Steps." [KNIGHT,
R., 1998,
p. 168-169]
In May 1996 the Jewish entertainment
mogul, David Geffen ("whose personal collection of art is perhaps one of
the two finest collections in the western United States") donated $5
million to the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA) which
renamed an exhibition center after him. (Geffen has also been a
philanthropist for immigrant Russian and Ethiopian Jews in Israel). A
little over a year later, in August 1997 (under the auspices of Jewish
curator Paul Schimmel), the "Geffen Contemporary" featured an art
installation by homosexual artist Robert Gober, once an altar boy. The
installment featured a life-size sculpture, in classical pose, arms
open, of the Virgin Mary. A large metal shaft like a spear protruded
from her midsection. "While the spiral drain pipe pokes a hole in the
Virgin Mary and her protective dogma," says art critic Suzanne Muchnic,
referring to its accompanying catalogue," It also functions as a phallic
symbol that penetrates her body bloodlessly." [MUCHNIC, Stop]
The setting up of Gober's art
exhibition was a major undertaking, involving the removal of 8,000 cubic
feet of earth, essentially creating a basement for the Geffen
Contemporary museum. "No one will specify the total cost of installing
the piece," noted the New York Times, but the Geffen's own costs
approached $200,000. [SMITH, R., p. E1,4]
When Gober first cast the Virgin Mary
sculpture in New York, the Italian family that owned the business he
hired to do the job initially told him, "You shouldn't be doing this. If
you were a Muslim (and made a similar artwork), you'd be dead."
[MUCHNIC, Stop, p. 6] "The piece," noted the New York Times,
"also set off a storm of protest letters from some of the city's Roman
Catholics, including the director of media relations for the Archdiocese
of Los Angeles. Then it received a positive review, with a photograph in
the Los Angeles Times." [SMITH, R, p. E1] (The president of the
Los Angeles Times' parent company, Time-Mirror, has been David
Levinthol, who is also the chairman of MOCA's Board of Trustees). A
rally against the artwork at the museum drew hundreds of protesters and
the Geffen was barraged by "thousands of letters, most of them
negative." [LA TIMES, 12-20-97, p. B4]
The show continued unabated. Compare
this lack of response to protest to the response of the San Jose
Mercury-News -- the second largest newspaper in northern California
-- in 1992 when it completely changed its advertising acceptance policy
because the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Community Relations
Council of San Jose and the County of Santa Clara, and the Human
Relations Commission saw anti-Semitism in a carpet ad run in the San
Jose newspaper's pages. The ad featured a "Moses-like figure holding
tablets above an epithet that said, 'Thou Shalt Not Pay Retail.'"
[WOLKOFF, p. 25] No more religious characters in ads would be accepted
for publication.
In stark comparison, in 1994 Recycled
Paper Greetings, the fourth-largest greeting card company in America,
headed by Jewish co-founders Phil Friedmann and Michael Keiser, came
under heated attack by Muslim and Arab groups for a "get well" card in
its line. The card depicted a head-to-toe woman in a black veil and was
captioned with "Rather than confront her morbid fear of germs, Millicent
changed her name to Yazmine and moved to Tehran." Inside, noted the
Houston Chronicle, there was "irreverent play on the word 'Mecca'
and 'Shiite.' Hundreds of telephone callers protested to the company and
there were two death threats. The company continued to refuse to pull
the card from it's line. [FRANKLIN, S., 1994, p. 9]
When the Gober exhibit finally
closed, the Religion page of the Los Angeles Times ran a small
article about the artwork (that defamed one of the symbols of the
Catholic faith), entitled "Exhibit That Touched Off Catholic Protest
Closes." Next to it, on the same page, in a story many times larger, an
article entitled "Reform Rabbis Back Return to Dietary Kosher Laws"
respectfully elaborated how some liberal Jews were returning to aspects
of Jewish Orthodoxy. [LA TIMES, p. 12-20-97, p. B4]
In 1999, a parallel event occurred on
the opposite American coast. The Brooklyn Museum made headlines with its
exhibition called "Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi
Collection." New York mayor (of Catholic heritage) Rudolph Giulani and
others were outraged by the show which included real mutilated animals
and an artwork entitled, "The Holy Virgin Mary." This piece "included
cut-outs from pornographic magazines and lumps of elephant dung."
Giulani accused the Museum board of "turning the museum into a preserve
of Catholic-bashers, people who have no regard for animals, and no
regard for the sensitivities of children." [CASIMIR, L., p. 4] Visitors
to the exhibit were formally warned that the show "may cause shock,
vomiting, confusion, panic, euphoria, and anxiety." [BARSTOW, p. B1]
Even the United States Senate passed a resolution condemning public
funds for such artwork. (One-third of the Museum's budget is provided by
New York City coffers, another $500,000 in the last three years came
from the National Endowment for the Arts).
As Michael Holden of the Baltimore
Sun complained:
"Imagine a painting about eight feet
tall and five feet wide. The
subject? Martin Luther King, Jr., or
the prophet Mohammed, or
Buddha, or the Star of David. Now
cover the face in that painting
with elephant dung. Next, surround
the figure in the picture with
color photographs of female
genitalia. Call the finished product
'art,' more specifically, a
'collage.' Then, try to get a museum or
art gallery to display your picture
for the public. No one would
touch it. Why? Because covering a
picture of King or Buddha or
the Star of David with feces and
pornography would be condemned
as a hate crime ... But if you take
the Virgin Mary, the mother of
Jesus and a central figure in Roman
Catholicism as well as in other
Christian religions -- and cover her
image with elephant dung and
female genitalia, your picture will
be displayed in London and
New York art galleries." [HOLDEN, M.,
10-10-99, p. 46]
Based on alleged
abrogation's of the
museum's stated policies in securing city funds, the Giulani
administration instituted legal actions to pull its funding from the
museum. It also accused the Brooklyn Museum of "conspiring with
Christie's auction house, a sponsor of the show, to inflate the value of
the artwork displays, which are all privately owned by Charles Saatchi,
the British advertising executive." [HERSZENHORN, p. A1] In turn, the
museum sued Giulani, accusing him of shutting down free speech.
Not surprisingly, most of the central
power mongers in this drama -- the manipulative inflation of
(controversial) art prices, the celebration of the defamation of a
Christian icon in the name of free speech, and the glorification of
religious attack, were Jewish. These included the owner of all the art
work --Charles Saatchi; the head of the Brooklyn Museum,
Arthur Lehman; the Chairman of the Board of the museum, Robert S.
Rubin; the lawyer who led the counter suit by the museum against the
city, "First Amendment expert" Floyd Abrams; and American Civil
Liberties Union defender of the museum, Norman Siegel. The
New York Times (whose editorial board is largely Jewish; see
earlier) printed an anonymous editorial entitled, "The Museum's
Courageous Stand." (The actual author of the Virgin Mary depiction
elevated to fame was not Jewish. He was African. Lerner insisted
that critics of the painting were being culturally intolerant, that the
animal feces that decorated it was really a fertility symbol.)
The Saatchi show was formulated and first exhibited at the Royal
Academy in London; that venue is also headed by a Jew: Norman
Rosenthal. For another Rosenthal exhibition, after Sensation,
the Times of London noted that the
"curators of the Royal Academy insisted yesterday that hardcore
porn and images
of mutilation by contemporary artists were comparable to the Old
Masters. They
likened a sado-masochistic video to Michelangelo and Renaissance
drawings, a
pile of rubbish to the 16th-century painter Giuseppe Arcimboldo,
and an assemblage
of mutilated toy soldiers to another 16th-century master, Pieter
Breughel the Elder.
Norman Rosenthal, exhibitions secretary of the 237-year-old
institution, and his
colleague, Max Wigram, defended the latest objects to fill
Burlington House - a
sequel to the 1997 Sensation show - against suggestions
that they could not be
described as art. Walking round the Apocalypse exhibition
yesterday before it
opens to the public on Saturday, they repeatedly drew comparisons
with the
Old Masters ... Mr Rosenthal was unable fully to explain how it
differed from
pornography screened in any Soho sex shop: 'I don't see porn
videos in Soho.
This is about men and women. It is a very Existentialist work of
art, like a very
beautiful drawing.'" [ALBERGE, D., 9-20-00]
London's Daily Telegraph complained that at this same Royal
Academy show, Apocalypse, "its organizer Norman Rosenthal
... basks amidst a freak show almost wholly devoid of authentic art."
[JOHNSON, D., 9-20-00] Or, as London's Guardian noted:
"The Royal Academy is a perverse British institution, and Norman
Rosenthal
is a perverse institutional figure. You can't imagine him anywhere
else. The [London
art gallery] Tate would never have put on Sensation!, the
exhibition of Charles
Saatchi's collection the Academy mounted in 1997: how could
the Tate have
allowed Saatchi to stamp himself on history in that way? But
Rosenthal had no
qualms about importing all this stuff into the sacred halls of
Burlington House,
and for many Sensation! is the defining exhibition of young
British art, not only
here but in America. In his office is a framed front page of the
New York Post
leading with mayor Giuliani's attempt to ban the show last year.
'I was at the opening
(at the Brooklyn Museum). All the glamorous people were there.
But, he says, no
protesters at all. 'I was almost disappointed. The whole thing
took place not in real
people's experience but in the clichés of politicians and
journalists. That's so boring.
Art is beyond that.' This denial of a desire to create a stir is
frankly unbelievable.
Rosenthal is the epitome of the art curator as showman ...
Rosenthal's shows have
helped to define British culture now, making the exhibition a
phenomenon, a public
ritual ... Since he became exhibitions secretary more than 20
years ago, Rosenthal
has turned the Royal Academy into a venue for event art. Buzz,
hype, noise, crowds
are what this purportedly posh and staid organisation thrives on."
[JONES, J.,
1-4-00]
Reviewing the Brooklyn Museum's Sensation, Camille Paglia
complained at the Internet magazine Salon.com:
"As an arts educator, I think that the behavior of the Brooklyn
Museum has been
self-interested and short-sighted ... The Brooklyn show
[Sensations] is a perfect
example of the improper diversion of public monies -- in this case
to aggrandize
a single British collector [Saatchi], an obnoxious advertising
executive of
dubious taste ... And I'm just as sick of 'Catholic-bashing' as
Giuliani himself.
I may be an atheist, but I was raised in Italian-Catholicism, and
it remains
my native culture. I resent the double standard that protects
Jewish and
African-American symbols and icons but allows Catholicism to be
routinely trashed by supercilious liberals and ranting gay
activists ... That
a Jewish museum director had no compunction about selecting a
parodic
image of the Madonna from the whole of [artist] Chris Ofili's
dung-bedecked
oeuvre shows either stupidity or malice." [PAGLIA, C., 1999] [Salon.com
even
had a subtitle for Paglia's article, Why are a Jewish collector
and a Jewish
museum director promoting anti-Catholic art?, but it was later
discretely removed.
POLLITT, K., THE NATION, 1999]
"Charles Saatchi is clearly
the big winner in this," said Bruce Wolman, editor of Art and Auction
magazine, "... Saatchi is not a great advertising man for
nothing." [CONNOR, p. 51] The head of the Brooklyn Museum, Arthur
Lehman, also stirred Catholic ire earlier when he purchased an Andy
Warhol version of the Last Supper for a Baltimore museum. (In October
1999, the Jewish ethnic magazine Forward noted that the Council
of American Jewish Museums "was circulating a letter in support of the
Brooklyn Museum of Art in its battle with Mayor Giuliani." Likewise,
"the associates division of the American Friends of the Israel Museum
were scheduled to visit the Brooklyn Museum exhibit on October 17. The
visit was to be followed by a cocktail reception at the home of the
Brooklyn Museum's director, Arnold Lehman.") [FORWARD, 10-8-99,
p. 5]
And the judge selected to hear the
city's case against the Museum? Nina Gershon, described by the
New York Times as having studied "psychiatry and the law at the
Hampstead clinic, run by Anna Freud, the daughter of Sigmund
Freud. She is married to Bernard J. Fried, an acting state
Supreme Court Justice in Manhattan." [FRIED, J., p. B3] In November 1999
Judge Gershon ruled in the Museum's favor.
Thus armed, completely insensitive
to Catholic complaint, Arnold Lehman and his Brooklyn Museum returned in
2001 with yet another controversial defamation of Catholicism. This time
African-American artist Renee Cox was afforded space for her photograph
"Yo Mama's Last Supper," in image in which Christ is depicted as a nude
woman. The curator of this exhibition was also Jewish, Barbara Milstein.
[HERMAN, J., 2-16-01] As Catholic Defense League president William
Donohue wrote to Ms. Milstein:
"I would love to know whether there is any portrayal of any aspect
of history
that you might personally find so offensive as to be excluded
from an exhibition
at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. For starters, would you include a
photograph of
Jewish slave masters sodomizing their obsequious black slaves?
And worry not,
when contemplating your answer, just think of it as a work of
high artistic merit."
[DONOHUE, W., 2-15-01]
Meanwhile, across the world, in 2001 "the Jewish director of
Warsaw's leading state-funded art space, the Zacheta Gallery" resigned.
Anda Rottenberg had been under critical fire and national pressure to be
fired for two of her controversial exhibits. [ART NEWSPAPER, 3-13-01] In
the first, she presented the work of an Italian artist who had a
life-like sculpture of of the Pope (a revered figure in Poland) lying on
the floor, crushed by a meteor. Upon viewing the exhibit,
"two MPs [members of the Polish Parliament] from the Catholic
nationalist party, Halina Nowina-Konopka and Witold Tomcyk, seriously
damaged the sculpture when it was on display ... They authors of the
attack alluded to the Jewish origins of Anda Rottenberg, the museum's
director, 'How would [s]he like a sculpture to be sent to the National
Museum of Israel showing a rabbi squashed by Stalin or Arafat?' ... The
Polish Minister for Culture has been inundated with letters of protest
about the sculpture calling for Mr Rottenberg's dismissal." [ART
NEWSPAPER, 2-23-01]
In the Rottenberg exhibition, it was reported that
"one of Poland's best known actors and film stars is currently
under police
investigation and faces a possible prison sentence for slashing a
portrait of
himself, in an exhibition in Warsaw's leading contemporary art
gallery ...
The show consisted of an uncaptioned series of photographs of
actors in
Nazi uniform, taken from film stills without the actors agreement,
by the Polish
artist Piotr Uklanski ... Accompanied by TV cameramen and reporters
and
as the cameras rolled, the actor Daniel Olbrychski, featured in one
of the
portraits, pulled a sword from under his greatcoat and slashed some
of
the exhibits, then tore the two featuring himself from the wall and
left. The
choice of the sword was significant: it was one used in a film
about a
swashbuckling Polish hero and patriot Kmicic. Mr. Olbrchski later
declared: ' I defend the right to say that there are some frontiers
of
decency which were clearly overstepped in this exhibition, and I
reacted
violently in the hope that my gesture will highlight my objections.
I did it
in the spotlight of the camera and flashlights because I wanted
Poland to
know my feelings about such 'artistic practices.' Furthermore, I
received
the agreement of other actors whose portraits were in the show,
including
the French film star Jean-Paul Belmondo who agreed that I should
protest
in their name. I can understand that there are opportunistic
artists but I
cannot understand why a director of such a serious institution as
Zachenta
has accepted this. Soon Mrs. Anda Rottenberg will organize an
exhibition
at which she will expose the faces of known actors on lavatory
paper because
she considers that as we are public figures she is entitled to do
so."
[ADAM, G., 2001]
* Note a similar museum case in 1968
and a different result (an example of the usual double standard), when
the Jewish community felt defamed by a New York City art
institution. A Metropolitan Museum of Art catalogue for its
African-American photography exhibition, Harlem on My Mind, was
decried as anti-Semitic largely because of the comments about the Jewish
community by African-American author Candice Van Ellison. Van Ellison
noted high amounts of anti-Semitism in the Black community, due to, as
she saw it, the many Jewish landlords in Harlem, the many Black servants
and maids in Jewish homes, and other forms of exploitation. Jewish
pressure forced the museum to pull the catalogue from circulation,
despite the fact that the curator of the show and head of the catalogue
was Jewish, Allon Schoener, and the fact that Van Ellison's offending
comments were merely paraphrases of quotes from a sociological study by
Jewish author Nathan Glazer and non-Jew Patrick Moynihan. [HOVING, T.,
1993, p. 176]
The curator of the Metropolitan,
Thomas Hoving, recalls that he received a call from the office of
then-NYC mayor John Lindsey, who was also under heat from the Jewish
community to act against the catalogue. "Lindsay," said Hoving, "called
upon me to withdraw [the catalogue] at once." "My advice to you,"
(Jewish) mayoral aide Joe Feldstein told Hoving, "is to act now. Do what
the Mayor wants or you're in deep shit!" [HOVING, T., 1993, p. 171] "Two
members of the City Council," notes Hoving, "were calling for a hearing
-- at once! -- to consider halting all funds for the museum until the
offensive catalogue was removed from sale ... [HOVING, p. 172] ...
There were increasing outcries from City Council members to 'launch an
economic boycott against the Metropolitan' ...[HOVING, p. 173-174] ...
On Thursday .. twelve of the more prominent members of the City Council
issued a resolution requesting the immediate withdrawal of the catalogue
and the withholding of city funding until such time." [HOVING, p. 175]
Museum trustees even called in a
former (Jewish) Secretary of Labor, Arthur Goldberg, to provide advise
about how to resolve the situation. The trustees hoped Goldberg could
"figure a way out of this mess" but "what he did was almost the
opposite. Goldberg intoned that in his view there was nothing to be
gained by the 'continuance of offering for sale the offending
catalogue.'" [HOVING, T., 1993, p. 173] Even the New York Times,
defender of "free speech" in the later Brooklyn Museum's defamations
against Christianity, "published a bitter editorial condemning the show
and its anti-Semitic statements." [HOVING, p. 174]
The offending catalogue was published
under Metropolitan auspices by Random House. The president of Random
House, Robert Bernstein, and its chairman, Bennet Cerf, were both
Jewish. Hoving notes that Cerf and Bernstein,
"who had distinguished career fighting
for civil rights all over the world,
had called [curator and catalogue head
Allon] Shoener to task, asking
him to issue a personal apology for
the catalogue. Schoener had refused.
The publishing executives had informed
Schoener that under the
continuing and increasing pressures
from the Jewish community, they
might not be able to hold out much
longer on withdrawing the book.
Schoener said flatly, 'But that would
be book-burning." Cerf, incensed,
shaking all over, thrust his finger
towards Schoener's face and shouted,
'Do you know what you have done to
Random House?'" [HOVING, T.,
1993, p. 174-175]
The Metropolitan Museum and Random
House soon caved in to Jewish pressure and withdrew the catalogue.
Likewise, notes J. J. Goldberg, "In
1994 the San Francisco Jewish community rose up and protested an
anti-Semitic mural on the student union building at publicly funded San
Francisco State University. Unlike the Brooklyn Museum [and its Saatchi
collection], San Francisco State backed down." [GOLDBERG, J. J.,
10-8-99, p. 14]
Also, in 2001, due to immediate
pressure from both private individuals and the city of Los Angeles, part
of a mural painted by two Hispanic artists in Los Angeles on private
property was painted over even before it was finished. The offending
section -- part of a "timeline" about the Hispanic experience in
California -- depicted "an unflattering caricature of a Jewish
landlord." The mural was in Boyle Heights, an area of Los Angles once
largely Jewish, and now Hispanic. Although Jewish slumlords are a
verifiable part of ghetto history throughout America (See Chapter 20),
the landlord image was even construed -- sight unseen -- by the local
SPARC artist organization, as the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles tells it, to be "hateful and racist." Even a non-Jewish
local artist, Dawn Pentecost, volunteered to destroy the art work in her
neighborhood. "I don't think we have to accept expressions of anger and
hate in our environment," she told a Jewish reporter, "We have to have
standards." [TEITELBAUM, S., 3-12-01]
Also in 2001, always eager to check anything that depicts Jews or
Judaism in anything less than an idealistic light, the American Jewish
Congress formally protested "B.C." cartoonist Johnny Hart for his
depiction (at Easter) of the candles of the Jewish menorah going out,
being replaced at the end of his comic strip by a cross. "Supercessionism,"
the AJC declared, "the belief that Christianity can and will replace
Judaism, has been strongly repudiated by many leading Catholic and
Protestant theologians ... Whatever the cartoonist's personal beliefs,
the sudden insertion of religiously offensive cartoons into the comics
section of Sunday newspapers is highly inappropriate and abuses readers,
especially young children, who turn to B. C. every week." There are
certainly such people who have bowed to such Jewish lobbying pressure,
but not only is Christianity a "supercessionist" faith, but so is Islam,
which holds that the prophet Mohammed is the last in the line of
prophets descending from Jewish and Christian tradition. And how is
Judaism itself not "supercessionist?" How could it not be? Judaism was
invented in a social, political, and religious vacuum? The AJC "urged
newspapers across the country to either replace [the cartoon] or print a
disclaimer on Sunday." [AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS, 2001]
Go to page X to continue
|