Wikipedia Zionists Attack
Honest Historian James Bacque
From Henri the Celt
henrithecelt@gci.net
9-20-6

- James Bacque
-
-
-
- The most sacrilegious
author to come out of World War Two
-
-
-
- Eisenhower,
Churchill, Truman, and others sought revenge on Germans
-
-
-
- How 1.5 million Germans were
murdered in French and American Holocaust Camps after the war ENDED.
-
-
- The Crucifiction
Of James Bacque
-
- It seems that the internet has
given new life to a lot of 'alternate' historians, authors, and their
works. Facets of history that threw a light on things such as the Bolshevik
Revolution, Russia's 1933 famine, the Gulags, the fire-bombing of German
civilians, the Morgantheau Plan, etc., were always conveniently buried. Now
comes the internet, and a flock of curious young minds rediscover the James
Bacques and David Irvings and a whole realm
- of serious research of what really
transpired in the 'great war.'
-
-
- Who Is James Bacque?
-
- James Bacque is a Canadian author
and historian, he has written five books on WW2. He wrote two books on
allied death camps, and the treatment of civilian Germans from 1945- 1950,
which quickly reached anonymity, but now the internet has revived them.
-
-
-
-
-
- What's The
Controversy?
-
-
-
- Wikipedia, which is becoming the
cyber library to the world, is on a campaign to disallow any discussions
that portrays Zionist Jewish history in an unfavorable manner. James Bacque,
who is not an anti-semite, or a revisionist, still crosses the line and
Wikipedia seeks to defame him as it does to hundreds of prominent truth
tellers, journalists and legitimate researchers of the recent past.
-
-
-
- What's Bacque's 'Sin'?
-
-
- His book 'Other Losses' shows
Eisenhower creating death camps for German soldiers. The Eisenhower
HOLOCAUST consumed approximately one MILLION innocent German soldiers and
support personnel AFTER the war ended. It is an outrage by any measure.
-
-
-
-
- In 'Crimes and Mercies,' Bacque
demonstrates the evil and poison that the allies used against the German
people. You see for yourself with facts and irrefutable data, the
psychopathic hatred directed against a nation and its entire culture and
history.
-
-
-
-
-
- The Morgenthau Plan
-
- Henry Morgenthau, a New York
Cornell educated Jew, was International Jewry's point man advising
Roosevelt. He felt Germans were genetically evil, and advocated mass
executions, sterilization, breaking the German state into three sub states,
and turning it's economy into an agrarian one.
-
- The biggest secret of
the war was Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill's heritages.
-
-
-
-
-
- Steven Ambrose
Trotted Out To Discredit Bacque
-
- Since Bacque doesn't want to follow
the politically-correct line, the Wikipedia censors decide to discredit him
using the Court Jesters. Ambrose, a mediocre writer at best, was now
recertified as an historical giant, and called out to protest Bacque. He
said of Bacque: - "Scholars...will find Mr. Bacque's work to be worse than
worthless. It is spectacularly flawed in its most fundamental aspects."
- Eisenhower chose Ambrose write his
biography, and Ike's Jewish roots, his military incompetence, Operation
Keelhaul, the Allies Death Camps, his mistress, etc. were never mentioned.
Eisenhower was portrayed as a political and military genius. Which he was
not.
-
- Ambrose was called on by Hollywood
to verify the 'Holocaust' with 'The World At War' series. He wrote such
fiction as the Band of Brothers, Saving Private Ryan, which
strategically-placed Jewish heroes throughout the plot.
-
-
-
- Relating Bacque's
Books To The Big Picture
-
- What if our young
people...university and high school students of history...began putting
together that simple truth that WW2 was caused by these three backing
Poland, which, in 1939, killed 58,000 German Nationals. What if they began
to consider that Germany and its people were deliberately slaughtered to
eliminate the one force that stood in the way of the
Jewish/Bolshevik/Communist takeover of the world
-
- The Only Mystery
-
- The only surprise here is James
Bacque naiveté. He can't understand why the Court Historians, and the
World's Cyber Encyclopedia (Wikipedia) hates him. Eisenhower's image is
supposed to be that of a great leader, a war hero, fighting the evil Nazis.
They don't want him seen as a womanizing, pompous, incompetent, Jewish
monster who hated the German people beyond measure and sought, along with
his whiskey-swilling ally, Winston Churchill, to destroy Germany and the
German people once and for all.
Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me?
by James Bacque
In 1989, I published the first in a series of books
about the Second World War and its aftermath. The first, Other Losses,
showed the tremendous atrocities committed against enemy prisoners in the
prison camps of the US and France after 1945. The next, Just Raoul,
was a biography of a hero of the French Resistance who saved many refugees
from Nazi death camps. The next, Crimes and Mercies, described the
full extent of all allied crimes against Germans, plus the wonderful charity
work of Canada and the USA in saving 800 million people, including Germans,
Japanese and Italians, from starving to death in the hungry years after
1945. The next, Dear Enemy, illuminated the attitudes of the western
allies to Germany from 1945 to now.
Wikipedia reviews and criticizes only Other
Losses, and in such a biassed way, that I finally tried to correct their
many errors. Starting in March, 2006, I tried repeatedly over many weeks to
correct the errors, but found that within a day at first, then within hours,
and finally within minutes, some Wikipedian editor had expunged my
corrections, replacing them with ever more hostile and denigrating
allegations. Friends of mine tried also to correct the flawed Wikipedia
article, but found the same situation. Finally we decided that Wikipedia was
deliberately censoring my contributions, and that it was pointless to
continue trying to present the facts on Wikipedia. After Serendipity
(already acquainted with censorship at Wikipedia) heard of this situation I
was offered the chance to publish the real story, which appears below.
Wikipedia quotes Stephen E. Ambrose as saying that
Other Losses is "... spectacularly flawed ..." without saying that
Ambrose also wrote that "You have made a major historical discovery which
will ... span the oceans and have reverberations for decades, yea centuries
to come. You have the goods on these guys ..."
Wikipedia does not say that Ambrose changed his
mind only after he was retained by the US Army to lecture at the War College
in Pennsylvania. Nor does Wikipedia mention that in his attack on me in the
New York Times, he admitted that he had not done the necessary research to
reach the conclusions that he published in that same article. Wikipedia
fails to mention that the Ambrose it cites as an authority admitted that he
had plagiarized several other authors. Wikipedia does not concern itself
with the accusations that Ambrose stole work from a graduate student which
he published as his own.
Wikipedia ignores my book, Crimes and Mercies,
which goes far towards balancing the record of western actions after World
War Two. The book shows the great charity extended by the western allies,
chiefly Canada and the USA, towards the starving around the world after WW2,
including the Japanese and Germans. Saying that the overwhelming majority of
professional historians reject my work, and citing as an authority one
historian who has never worked in this field, Wikipedia ignores the support
given me by the eminent US Army military historian Col. Dr. Ernest F.
Fisher, a former Senior Historian of the US Army Center for Military
History, Washington. Fisher, a professional historian for decades, wrote the
official US Army history of the campaign in Italy. He assisted me for months
in researching documents in the US National Archives, wrote the Introduction
to my book Other Losses, and has supported me with public statements
for the seventeen years since its first publication. He helped me for many
months researching in the archives.
Wikipedia does not mention the expert editing,
research help and public support given me by the eminent epidemiologist and
biostatistician, Dr Anthony B. Miller, former head of the Department of
Biostatistics at the University of Toronto.
Wikipedia also casts aside the support given my
work by Richard Overy, King's College, University of London; Otto Kimminich,
University of Regensburg; Dr Alfred De Zayas, author of many books on
postwar German history; Prof. Dr. Peter Hoffmann, McGill University, author
of the most expert books on the German resistance; Prof. J. K. Johnson,
Carleton University, Ottawa; Professor Ralph Raico, University of Buffalo;
Prof. Ed Peterson, University of Wisconsin; Prof Ralph Scott, University of
Iowa; Prof. Pierre Van Den Berghe, University of Seattle; Prof. Dr Richard
Mueller, former head, Department of English, University of Aachen; Prof.
Hans Koch, University of York and many others.
Among writers who have approved my work and
supported me are Julian Barnes; Nikolai Tolstoy; John Fraser, Master of
Massey College, Toronto; John Bemrose of Toronto; Robert Kroetsch, Winnipeg;
and many others. My work has been published around in the world in ten
languages by Macmillan, Little, Brown, Prima, Ullstein, Editions Sand,
McClelland and Stewart, New Press, and many many others.
Finally, the most glaring omission is that the
massive and detailed KGB Archives in Moscow have millions of documents whose
evidence completely confirms the statistical work in Other Losses.
The math is simple: about 1.5 million German prisoners alive in allied
prison camps at the end of the war never came home, nor were their deaths
reported to the German government, their families, the International Red
Cross or the UN. The figure was determined by the Adenauer government in
Germany, submitted to the UN, and has never been disputed by anyone. Thus
when Other Losses came out in 1989, alleging deaths of about one
million in French and American camps, that left about 500,000 to be
accounted for. They could have died only in the KGB camps, because there
were not half a million prisoners in any other camps in the world. Thus, in
effect Other Losses was predicting that when the communists opened
the KGB archives, they would show deaths of about 500,000. And lo and
behold, when Gorbachev brought down the communist rule, and the archives
were opened, I went there, and found the Bulanov Report which showed that
356,687 Germans died in Soviet captivity, plus another 93,900 civilians
taken as substitutes for dead or escaped prisoners for a total of 450,587.
This astonishing discovery is not
mentioned in Wikipedia, nor by any other of the "professional historians."
Except one, Stefan Karner, who went to the KGB archives, saw the evidence
piled up in enormous quantities, and said he did not believe it. Instead, he
preferred to publish his own "estimates," which confirm the conventional
view.Reproduced gratefully from:
http://www.serendipity.li/hr/bacque_on_wikipedia.htm
|