|
YOU ARE ALL SLAVES

YOU ARE ALL SLAVES
The
Bush/Cheney Police State Is Upon Us
Links to
Related Articles On
Gnostic Liberation Front:

YOU ARE ALL SLAVES
Taking Back Your Power
By Allen Aslan Heart
From the
author's website: www.real-debt-elimination.com
Gosh, and you call me paranoid... The
citizenry here is totally asleep, and when the crap comes will find out that
they are owned; yes OWNED by the United STATES, an English corporation. You have
given away your titles,; and you probably have no clue.
So, Im gonna take the heat and try to
educate you poor sheep...ahem chattel on the chance that you may be able to
follow this...
If you want to secede the Union you must
first understand what its real power is, and what your position is relative to
it. Its far worse than you have imagined...
So in the spirit of truth here
goes..
"The money power preys upon the nation
in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more
despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than
bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and
causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been
enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power
of the country will endeavor to prolong its REIGN by working upon the prejudices
of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is
destroyed." President Abraham Lincoln after the National Banking Act of 1863 was
passed.
"Whoever controls the supply of currency
would control the business and activities of all the people". President James
Garfield, shortly before he was assassinated in 1881
"This is a government of the people, by
the people and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by
corporations, and for corporations." President Rutherford B. Hayes
"The Fed should be repealed, and the Fed
Banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately.
Faithless Government officials who have violated their oaths of office should be
impeached and brought to trial".
"Mr. Chairman, the United States is
bankrupt: It has been bankrupted by the corrupt and dishonest Fed. The man who
deceives the people is a traitor to these United States". Congressman Louis B.
McFadden, 1933 Survived two assassination attempts but not a third in 1935.
Since 1933 you and all other Americans
have been pledged for the debt of the UNITED STATES owed to international
bankers, most of whom are foreign to our country. Your credit, labor,
productivity and property have been used and is now being used as collateral by
the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA without your knowledge or consent.
This is legal until you take back your implied consent by a special, lawful
process.
In fact, you are unknowingly
volunteering to be chattel for a mortgage held by financiers from the founding
of this nation. Perhaps you infer that the name on the tax statement is yours
and so you respond as though it were. This is voluntary servitude. To make this
servitude legal it was necessary to "cut a hole in the fence." No matter that
the escape route is hidden, obscured by legal brambles to make escape difficult.
That it is not used presumes consent. It is not impossible, just seemingly
difficult and even implausible.
Your status as a subject is based upon a
presumption that if you did not wish to be so encumbered you would use the law
to do something about it. As long as you do not use the escape route provided by
law it is presumed that you are content to "remain in the pasture and be milked
and used as chattel." This word has the same root as the word, "cattle." Do you
get the picture?
Can such a premise be true? It seems
totally out of step with everything you and I have ever known about our world,
our nation, our government and our relationship to it! Our parents never behaved
as though they we were chattel. They dutifully paid their taxes, voted in
elections, waved an American flag on the 4th of July. Our teachers taught us
about our history, our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, our
Revolutionary War, how we fought the greatest army and navy the world had ever
seen at the time. Nowhere in our history classes did we encounter any such
premise of subjection to a central government that rules our lives. Our civics
teacher never told us anything about this. Nothing in our world even hinted that
we were subjects to a highly centralized government. Surely this could be true
of other peoples, but not of us! For most people this cannot be. The truth
cannot be heard because it is too discordant with our entire experience.
And yet we can document that George
Washington did not chop down a cherry tree, Lincoln did not free the slaves
(they became subjects of the Federal District, the District of Columbia), The
War with Mexico was begun by General Zachary Taylor's provocations along the
Nueces River, the battleship Maine blew up from the inside, Woodrow Wilson knew
that the Lusitania was carrying US munitions to the war in Europe and would be
sunk, Franklin D. Roosevelt had maneuvered the Japanese into an attack on Pearl
Harbor and had cut fuel shipments to the Pacific fleet to ensure the presence of
enough old ships to offer a tempting target, Truman knew that there were other
good alternatives to an invasion of Japan and did not need to drop the Atomic
Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Roosevelt knew about the NAZI concentration
camps, LBJ knew that there was no attack on the Maddox and Turner Joy in the
Gulf of Tonkin when he asked for a Congressional Resolution to attack North
Vietnam, and the US government had been warned by numerous documented sources
that there would be an attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. All of
this is from documented historical sources. Yet we continue to believe the myths
that are in our histories, our movies, our mainstream media and our mass
consciousness. John F Kennedy warned us that,
"The great enemy of the Truth is very
often not the lie - deliberate, contrived, and dishonest - but the myth -
persistent, persuasive and realistic".
You will probably find it hard to accept
that you have been living in an illusion for your whole life. Much of what you
believe is an illusion and you will only find your freedom when you can allow
yourself to look behind the veils of illusion to see Reality. WHO you are is far
greater than "what" you perceive yourself to be. When you have the courage to
stand face-to-face with the illusion and call it what it is, you will have
stepped through the most difficult task set before you on your Earth Journey.
There IS a way out! But the only way out is through—through understanding how we
came to this predicament and following a precise formula to obtain your
sovereignty. We have been warned repeatedly throughout our history, but we
weren't listening very closely. Now we might have one more chance to take back
our power and our sovereignty.
The nature of the conspiracy to defraud
can be best understood in comments by one of the major conspirators in the
triumph of establishing the Federal Reserve, "Colonel" Edward Mandell House, who
said this in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:
"[Very] soon, every American will be
required to register their biological property in a national system designed to
keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of
pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda,
which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and
earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest
over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured
transactions".
"Americans, by unknowingly or
unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and
insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their
pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value
designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in
a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should
figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is
the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the
registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to
us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a
contributor to this fraud which we will call `Social Insurance.' Without
realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in
this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however
begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their
redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy
corporation to foment this plot against America."
We now know how to respond to this
treasonous fraud. All my life I've looked for the roots of war, injustice and
oppression because if we can find the basis of the rampant injustice in the
world, we could relieve enormous struggle and suffering. I've wondered at how
little the Constitution seemed to affect the courts and how often the truth was
buried in silence. Mostly I saw greed and heartlessness in a power struggle
played out in politics. But I didn't realize that a game had been played in
secret throughout American history. And ultimately, it is a game of monetary
policy and politics…. with a spiritual component.
Like you, I've watched and participated
in the American scene for many years. I've written many letters to the editor,
congressmen, senators, presidents, distributed campaign literature to precincts,
represented my precinct at county conventions, fasted, spoke to churches on
social justice, supported the protestors at Honeywell demonstrations against the
manufacture of cluster bombs, and have always spoke my mind.
A Peek into the
Mind of a Tory
In 1999 I watched in utter amazement as
the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Florida State Supreme
Court's decision to proceed with a recount of the contested ballots and the
Eleventh District Court decision to uphold the decision of the Florida court. In
Orwellian doublespeak, Antonin Scalia wrote on Saturday, December 9, 1999:
"the counting of the votes that are of
questionable legality does in my view threaten irreparable harm to [Bush], and
to the country, by casting a cloud upon which he claims to be the legitimacy of
his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe
for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic
stability requires."
It was a brazen and Orwellian
declaration. What American who believes in democracy could claim that something
was wrong with counting votes "first"? What American who believes in democracy
could declare one candidate the winner and protect him from "irreparable harm"
if a vote count showed him not to be the winner, after all? Of course, it
doesn't make any sense, unless you realize the foundation upon which Scalia
based his transparently partisan remarks. He doesn't believe in democracy, he
doesn't even believe in republicanism, he is a monarchist.
Scalia revealed his true motivations
when he spoke on the subject of capital punishment at the University of Chicago
(February 2002). During his remarks, he stated: "The reaction of people of faith
to this tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind government
should not be resignation to it, but the resolution to combat it as effectively
as possible." ("God's Justice and Ours" at
http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0205/articles/scalia.html
Democracy obscuring divine authority
behind government? Perhaps this helps shed some light on why Scalia and the four
other right- wing "justices" could so easily subvert our election process and,
through an act of divine intervention, usher the son onto the throne lost some
eight years earlier by his father, George I. We are assuming that we are still
independent sovereigns and freemen as declared by our Declaration of
Independence and that the Constitution is still in effect. Scalia has no such
illusion. History supports his position, sorry to say.
Scalia is an ideologue so accustomed to
our willingness to continue to be subjects that he does not even consider the
ideal of a government of, by, and for the people. That ideal has remained as
useful fiction to be taught in Civics classes and mouthed by the politicians. HE
KNOWS that we are mere chattel by presumption. Since we have not even discovered
that our status as freemen has been lost through more than two hundred years of
our history, much less withdrawn our implied consent to be subjects, we are
presumed to be subjects before the courts and in the minds of people like
Scalia.
Scalia speaks of civil disobedience with
contempt and quotes the Bible, "Ye must needs be subject." We must, as mere
servants of the ruling class, acquiesce to our divinely guided leaders. For who
are we, as mere subjects, to question those who make (or interpret) the laws?
After all, he says that "government carries the sword as 'the minister of God,'
to 'execute wrath' upon the evildoer." No, he has not reverted to a justice of
another time—WE have, by our ignorance and silence, acquiesced to a lower status
reminiscent of another time.
There you have it! In his eyes, we are
subjects unworthy of honor, peace and justice. Somehow Scalia's statements seem
like a long way from the Declaration of Independence in which Americans stood
before the world as sovereigns invested with certain inalienable rights,
including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. After the
American Revolution, the monarchies of Europe saw Democracy as an unnatural,
ungodly, ideological threat, every bit as radical and dangerous as Communism was
regarded by Western nations upon its inception. Just as the 1917 Communist
Revolution in Russia spawned other revolutions around the world, the American
Revolution provided an example and incentive for people all over the world to
overthrow their European monarchies. What has happened? When did we give up our
natural, God-given rights? Our forefathers fought and won that war didn't they?
Sovereignty,
Revolution, Birth of a New Nation
Yes, our forefathers fought one of the
bloodiest wars in history and won their independence. They understood the
historical roots of war, injustice and oppression, and we've lost this
knowledge. Our history books did, indeed, leave out a lot of the truth and lied
about much of the rest. History teachers often teach history in such a way that
young students swear to never again study history! We have been led and lulled
to forget WHO we are. All this has been engineered by those who would keep us
ignorant of the truth.
The primary reason for the War for
Independence was not "taxation without representation", but the forced payment
of taxes to the King in gold instead of paper money. America was flourishing by
using her own "fiat money" system based only on production, not a gold-based
system that could be manipulated by the King. The King could not "control" the
fiat money system and therefore passed a law requiring that taxes be paid in
gold only. The King had most of the gold—the colonies had little; so
unemployment ensued—and embittered colonists cried for war. Benjamin Franklin
put it this way, "The colonies would have gladly born the little tax on tea, and
other matters, had it not been that England took away from the colonies their
money." Prior to the Revolutionary War, The Times of London said this regarding
fiat money in America:
"If this mischievous financial policy,
which has its origins in North America, shall become endurrated down to a
fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will
pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry
on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of
the world. The brains and the wealth of all the countries will go to North
America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every Monarchy on the
globe."
The truth is that the Revolution failed.
You might say that we won a military victory over the most powerful military
force on the planet at the time. However, reading the Treaty of Paris it is
clear that we were not exactly negotiating as equals.
We had won the recall of British troops
but not the bankers. Even though we are taught that we won our independence from
England, we actually were able to remain free from the international bankers for
only a few years at the close of the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The most
visible of the power structure was the East India Company owned by the bankers
and the Crown in London, England. This was an entirely private enterprise whose
flag was adopted by Queen Elizabeth in 1600—thirteen red and white horizontal
stripes with a blue rectangle in its upper left-hand corner. All debts owed
before the war were to be collected by the foreign creditors.
When the creditors of the new nation
found the Articles of Confederation to be inadequate to exact payment from their
young debtor, the Constitution was written and supported by the bankers through
their associates, for increase their control over the United States of America.
Had the Articles of Confederation been completed and adopted, instead of the
Constitution, the bankers would have had far less control.
Any constitution must have some prior
reference to establish its foundation. The authority for the American
Constitution is based upon the Bible; the Magna Carta, signed in 1215 by King
John; the Petition of Rights, granted by King Charles I in 1628; the English
Bill of Rights, granted by William and Mary in 1689; the right of habeas corpus,
granted by King Charles II, and the Articles of Confederation. Any and every
constitution thereafter must have an enabling clause. From this point onward, no
constitution may diminish, in any manner, those rights already established in
the above six documents.
The Declaration of Independence
established that all people are sovereign under God's Natural Law. Sovereign
people of the various states, created the state governments for the protection
of their rights. They delegated certain authority from the people's powers by
and through the state constitutions in order that the three branches of
government could properly carry out the dictates outlined in the State
constitutions to protect our rights.
The States then
created the United States.
The American Constitution created a new
structure of government that was established on a much higher plane than either
the parliamentary system or the confederation of states. It was a people's
"constitutional republic," where a certain amount of power was delegated to the
states and a certain amount was delegated to the federal government. The United
States, by way of the Congress of the United States, has certain powers
delegated by the Constitution. So far as the several States party to the
Constitution are concerned, the United States may not exercise power not
delegated by the Constitution. All power not delegated to the United States by
the Constitution is reserved to the several States within their respective
territorial borders—or, to the people.
British
Subversion, Banks, and Treason
Even though the Treaty of Paris ended
the Revolutionary War in 1783, the simple fact of our existence threatened the
monarchies where it hurts most: financially. The United States stood as a heroic
role model for other nations, which inspired them to also struggle against
oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Polish uprising
(1794) were, in part, encouraged by the American Revolution. Though we stood
like a beacon of hope for most of the world, the monarchies regarded the United
States as a political infection, the principle source of radical democracy that
was destroying monarchies around the world. The monarchies realized that if the
principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the rest of the world
might avoid the contagion and the monarchies would be saved.
Knowing they couldn't destroy us
militarily, they resorted to more covert methods of political and financial
subversion, employing spies and secret agents skilled in bribery and legal
deception; it was perhaps the first "cold war."
In the 1794 Jay Treaty, the
United States agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as reparations
for the American Revolution. The US Senate ratified the treaty in secret session
and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin's grandson
published it anyway (perhaps our first whistleblower), the exposure and
resulting public up-roar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and
Sedition Acts (1798) so federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers
for reporting the truth about the government.
Since we supposedly had won the
Revolutionary War, why would our Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser?
And why would they agree to pay £600,000 sterling, eleven years after the war
ended? It doesn't make sense, especially in light of the Senate's secrecy and
later fury over being exposed… unless we assume our Senators had been bribed to
serve the British monarchy and betray the American people! That is treason!
From the beginning, the United States
Bank had been opposed by the Democratic-Republicans lead by Thomas Jefferson,
but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won the vote. The initial
capitalization was $10,000,000 -- 80 % of which would be owned by foreign
bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its
paid capital), it was a profitable deal for both government and the bankers,
since they could lend, and collect interest on $10,000,000 that didn't exist.
However, the European bankers outfoxed
the U.S. government, and by 1796, the US government owed the bank $6,200,000 and
was forced to sell most of its shares. By 1802, our government owned no stock in
the United States Bank!
Thomas Jefferson had warned,
"If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then
by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their
children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The
issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom
it properly belongs".
Several short-lived attempts to impose
the central banking scheme on the United States were defeated by the patriotic
efforts of Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln.
Bank Fraud,
Bribery, and Corruption
Chief among the international financiers
was Amshel Bauer of Germany who, in 1748 opened a goldsmith shop under the name
of Red Shield. (in German the name is spelled Rothschild and is pronounced Rote-
shilld). In 1787, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous statement: "Let me
issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not who writes the laws." He had
five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob, Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five
Rothschild brothers expanded by opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London,
and Naples.
The objective behind this bank was to
receive special privilege to use the unjust fractional reserve banking to print
money and loan it to the government and industry. No money could go into
circulation without interest being paid to the bankers.
Fractional reserve banking is very
simple. It is simply a special privilege given to a man or group of men to
create credit out of thin air; by extending this credit/debt to everyone else in
society who does not have the same privilege, and then collecting from society
the money plus interest, they become very rich without having to produce
anything of value.
The basic mathematics behind this system
is very clear. If this system is left in place long enough, the man or group who
controls this system of debt creation will own all the gold available in the
nation. Once the supply of real money (gold) is in his or their hands, this man
or group of men becomes the master of the entire nation. Why? Because this man
or group of men controls the only source of operating medium (money) available
through which the nation functions. Only the man who has the privilege of
printing the money and loaning it at interest can determine who gets special
funding—his friends and allies. Everyone else is limited to how much money they
have access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the friends and
allies of this "banker" will own all of the nation—just as America is now owned
by a very small cadre of very wealthy men.
How long this process takes to work its
way through the wealth of the nation depends upon how successful the "banker" is
in forcing, through bribery and corruption, the restriction of the formal
government's issuance of real money backed by gold or silver. As the supply of
real money shrinks, the people of the nation are forced to rely on the creation
of a fictitious debt by the privileged few to a greater and greater extent,
until finally, the only thing left is a massive amount of "unpayable debt,"
created from nothing and consisting only of the interest charged upon the
fictitious debt, and collecting interest for every moment of its existence. All
for the benefit of the privileged, who become the de facto (illegally usurped)
government because of the "money power" they wield.
Through the Bank of England, the
Rothschilds demanded a private bank in the United States to hold the securities
of the United States as the pledged assets to the Crown of England in order to
secure the debt to which our government had defaulted. As one of his first acts,
President Washington declared a financial emergency. William Morris with the
help of Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, heavily promoted the creation
a private bank to service the debt to the international bankers. In 1791,
Congress chartered the first national bank for a term of 20 years, to hold the
securities of the same European bankers who had been holding the debts before
the war. The bankers loaned worthless, un-backed, non-secured printed money to
each other to charter this first bank. In December 12, 1791, the Bank of the
United States opened its doors in Philadelphia.
The holder of the securities was the
private bank. So under public international law, the creditor nation forced the
United States to establish a private bank to hold the securities as the
collateral for the national debt. James Madison had warned, "History records
that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and
violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling
money and its issuance."
British
Subversion, Titles of Nobility and Treason
For the early decades of US history,
relations between the United States and Great Britain remained strained. Their
relationship deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 1803.
Britain imposed a blockade on neutral countries such as the United States. In
addition, the British took American sailors from their ships and forced them to
serve in the British Navy. Concerned about the many English spies and
troublemakers, Congress passed an amendment to prevent those who had English
titles and connections from obtaining any seat in government. Called the
Titles
of Nobility Act (TONA), it reads as follows:
"If any citizen of the United States
shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or
shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension,
office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or
foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and
shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or
either of them."
All "titles of nobility" were prohibited
in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I,
Section 9 of the Constitution of the United States (1778), but there was no
penalty. Although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional "title
of nobility" amendment was deemed necessary and was proposed in 1789, again in
1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of ratification delivered to
the Secretary of State, an attorney with the title, "Esquire," disappeared. As a
result, there still is no penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from
foreign rulers today, just the prohibition.
Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a
serious threat in "titles of nobility" and "honours," that anyone receiving them
would be required to forfeit their citizenship. Obviously the Amendment carried
much more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent today.
They knew that our freedom could be subverted from inside our government and had
sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today most Senators and Congressmen,
all Federal judges, and some of our Presidents are attorneys who carry the title
"Esquire" often abbreviated as "Esq." The Constitution still forbids this,
nevertheless.
In Colonial America, attorneys trained
attorneys, but most held no "title of nobility" or "honor." There was no
requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney,
attorney general, or judge; a citizen's "counsel of choice" was not restricted
to a lawyer and there was no state or national bar associations. The only
organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA),
chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London. Lawyers admitted to
the IBA received the rank "Esquire" - a "title of British nobility."
"Esquire" was the principle title of
nobility which the 13th Amendment ought to prohibit from the United States. Why?
Because the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers was suspect! Lawyers with an "Esquire"
behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose
principle purposes were political and regarded with the same wariness that some
people today reserve for members of the KGB or the CIA.
The archaic definition of "honor" (as
used when the 13th Amendment was ratified) meant anyone "obtaining or having an
advantage or privilege over another." A contemporary example of an "honor"
granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge: Lawyers can
be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and powers, non-lawyers
generally cannot. We address the judge as, "your Honor."
By prohibiting "honors," the missing,
but now found, original 13th amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that
would grant some citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or exercise political
power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 13th Amendment was
to insure political equality among all American citizens, by prohibiting anyone,
even government officials, from claiming or exercising a special privilege or
power (an "honor") over other citizens.
Both "esquire" and "honor" would be key
targets of the 13th Amendment even today, because, while "titles of nobility" no
longer apply now precisely as they did back in the early 1800's, it is clear
that an "esquire" or bar attorney receives far better treatment in and by the
courts as well as by the public at large in general, whereas if you represent
yourself (pro se) or speak as a freeman (pro per), you are treated as though you
were rabble. Your opinions are of little importance in court and you are often
treated similarly by government officials. Because you are not "esquires" or bar
attorneys, you are considered to be a useless eater, a subject "out of control."
The concept of "honor" remains relevant, possibly more so today than at any
previous time in U.S. history, for they, the "honors," are greatly feared and
even revered, even by the esquires who are considered to be below them. Since
the Original 13th Amendment has never been repealed, all acts of government
since 1819 are technically null and void since most lawmakers, prohibited from
participation in government by the Constitution and who should even be stripped
of their right to be a US Citizen under TONA, have continued to interject
themselves into the political process.
When the people discovered that European
banking interests owned most of the United States Bank they saw the sheer power
of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by
economic manipulation and outright bribery. On February 20, 1811, Congress
therefore refused to renew the Bank's charter on the grounds that the Bank was
unconstitutional. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie (money in
coin) by European investors, which in turn, precipitated an economic recession,
and the War of 1812. This "war" was punishment for America refusing to do
business on the terms of the International Banking families of the House of
Rothschild, through the first Bank of the United States. Congress refused to let
the National Bank renew its Charter.
Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson's victory
in the Battle of New Orleans, the War of 1812 produced a string of American
military disasters. The most shocking of these was the British Army's burning of
the Capitol, the President's house, and other public buildings in Washington on
August 24 and 25, 1814. (Americans had previously burned public buildings in
Canada.) During the War of 1812 our national archives and many libraries and
document repositories were burned and some of the evidence of the TONA
disappeared. Nevertheless, the legislature of Virginia ratified the amendment
and it was subsequently printed in many official publications as the 13th
Amendment, even in states which had NOT ratified, such as Connecticut. But
beginning in 1832 it began to disappear from texts, although official state
publications continued to publish it as late as 1876.
There are undoubtedly other examples of
the monarchy's efforts to subvert or destroy the United States; some are common
knowledge, others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, national
archivist David Dodge discovered a book called 2 VA LAW in the Library of
Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, "This is an un- catalogued book in the
rare book section that reveals a plan to overthrow the Constitutional government
by secret agreements engineered by the lawyers of the time." That is one of the
reasons why the TONA was ratified by the state of Virginia in the particular
manner in which they did, although the alleged "notification" thereof was a long
time thereafter claimed to have been "lost in the mail." You see, there is no
public record that this aforementioned book exists either!
That may sound surprising, but according
to the Gazette (5/10/91), "the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued
rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts." There may be
secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a missing
Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary disarray appropriately
describes our situation today: we are inundated with information that we have
not had the time or interest to sort through. As a result we have lost a
precious treasure in the chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty.
One amazing aspect of the War of 1812
was the existence of a depression during wartime. War always brings a short-term
prosperity, except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is vital for
you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially created through
the restriction of a medium of exchange—money. This restriction keeps money OUT
of circulation. Fewer dollars available to facilitate production and
distribution means poverty and starvation.
The precariousness of government finance
during the war and the post war recession convinced the Republican government
under James Madison, to re-establish a national bank. Thus was created the
Second Bank of the United States in 1816.
In January 9, 1832 The Second National
Bank applied for a charter renewal 4 years early. This time President Andrew
Jackson vetoed the Bank's recharter on the grounds that the Bank was
unconstitutional and he successfully paid off the national debt leaving the U.S.
with a surplus of $5,000. He said, "If congress has the right under the
Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to
be delegated to individuals or corporations."
On January 30, 1835, President Andrew
Jackson attended a congressional funeral in the Capitol building. As he exited,
Richard Lawrence, an unemployed house painter, pointed a pistol at Jackson and
fired. The percussion cap exploded, but the bullet did not discharge. The
enraged Jackson raised his cane to strike his attacker, who fired again. The
second weapon also misfired and the sixty-seven-year-old president escaped
assassination at close range. Jackson was convinced that Lawrence was hired by
his political enemies, the Whigs, to stop his plan to destroy the Bank of the
United States.
Andrew Jackson violated public
international law because he denied the creditor his just lien rights on the
debtor. However, the bankers did not lend value (substance), so in actuality
they had an unperfected lien. Therefore the law actually did not apply.
The End of the
American Republic: the Shadow Government is Born
In 1860-61, the Southern states walked
out of Congress. This created sine die, a situation in which not enough
representatives were present to carry on legislative business. This was a
constitutional crisis that the newly elected president, Abraham Lincoln, had to
resolve.
The Introduction to Senate Report 93-549
(93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973) summarizes the situation as best as possible:
"A majority of the people of the United
States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. . . And, in the
United States, actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have
–from, at least, the Civil War—in important ways, shaped the present phenomenon
of a permanent state of national emergency."
From the research information available,
it can be reasonably proven that when the Southern states walked out of Congress
on March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution for the
united States of America was lost. Thus, the only votes that Congress could
lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the time to reconvene,
take a vote to get a quorum, vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place to
reconvene at a later time, but instead, Congress apparently abandoned the House
and Senate without setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of
Congress, when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-
a; literally "without day") and thus when Congress adjourned sine die, it ceased
to exist as a lawful deliberative body, and thus the only lawful, constitutional
power that could declare war was no longer lawful, or in session.
It can also be reasonably proven that
the Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to
exist sine die, and that some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also
adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the
Constitution for the united States of America apparently ceased to exist. On
April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed an executive order, Lincoln Executive
Proclamation 1, and it can also be reasonably proven that the united States of
America have been ruled ever since by the President under executive powers.
It can also be reasonably proven that
when Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military
authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary
bodies or by Constitutional Law, thus placing the American people under martial
rule ever since the "national emergency" declared by President Lincoln. Thus,
the Constitution for the united States of America has subsequently temporarily
ceased being the acknowledged law of the land in many courts, and the President,
Congress, and the courts have unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake
the Union in a new image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were
in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which
presumed to place the Union under the new form of control.
President Lincoln apparently knew that
his executive orders no longer had any force under Constitutional Law. So he
commissioned General Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) apparently as a special
code to govern his actions under martial law and to justify the seizure of
power, which further extended the laws of the District of Columbia and which
also fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses
17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of Washington, D.C. and into the
several states. General Orders No. 100, also called the Lieber Instructions and
the Lieber Code, have apparently extended the laws of war and private
international law into the American states, and the United States government has
become the presumed military conqueror of the people and the land of the several
American nations.
Martial rule has apparently been kept
secret and has never really ended. Lincoln was assassinated before he could
complete the implementation of his plan to constitutionally and not militarily
reform the Southern national governments and restore Congress. Ever since the
united States of America has been ruled under military law under the Commander
of Chief—the President—and his assumed executive powers according to the
policies of Executive Orders: a military dictator type function.
Constitutional law under the original
Constitution for the American states is apparently enforced only as a matter of
keeping the public peace under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under
martial rule. This "peace" is further evidenced in the Preamble of the so-
called Expatriation Act of 1868. Under martial law, title is a mere fiction,
since all property belongs to the military except for that property which the
Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and seizure and
upon which he allows the "enemy" to reside.
In proclaiming the first Trading with
the Enemy Act by Executive Order, President Lincoln set in place the means by
which the federal government could interact with Americans who were not 14th
Amendment citizens. They could technically be designated as enemies. Are you
beginning to understand how We the People could be at odds with our
"government?"
In a message to Congress December 3,
1861, Abraham Lincoln answered the banker's argument that the people could not
be trusted with their constitutional power, the political and monetary system of
free enterprise conceived by our Founding Fathers, by saying:
"No men living are more worthy to be
trusted than those who toil up from poverty -- none less inclined to take or
touch aught which they have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering
a political power which they already possess, and which if surrendered, will
surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they, and to fix
new disabilities and burdens upon them, till all of liberty shall be lost."
In 1865, just before the close of the
Civil War, President Lincoln declared his new monetary policy:
"The Government should create, issue,
and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power
of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these
principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will
cease to be master and become the servant of humanity…. The privilege of
creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government,
but it is the governments' greatest opportunity."
Had it been implemented, it would have
ushered in a worldwide economic renewal. Unfortunately, a few weeks after its
introduction, Lincoln was assassinated because he defied the bankers in
proposing to print interest free money to pay the war debt. Thus, the government
continued to operate fully under the authority of private law dictated by the
creditor.
Since President Lincoln was assassinated
before he could complete plans for reforming constitutional government in the
Southern States and end the martial rule by executive order, the 14th Amendment
to the Constitution has further created a "new citizenship" or "status" for the
expanded jurisdiction. Laws for the District of Columbia were proposed and
passed by Congress in 1871, the District of Columbia being incorporated as a
private, foreign corporation by The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871,
and all states in the Union were apparently reformed as franchisees or political
subdivisions of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new
union of American states. What remained of the government was the private side
under the rule of the bankers.
The first attempt by Congress to define
citizenship was in 1866 in the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Revised Statutes
section 1992, 8 United States Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that:
"All persons born in the United States
and not subject to any foreign power are declared to be citizens of the United
States."
And this in turn was followed in 1868 by
the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Code Annotated Amendment
14, declaring:
"All persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they reside."
At this period of time, the only people
in the United States who were under the jurisdiction of the private bifurcated
government of the ten miles square of Washington, D.C., were the government
employees, those within the territories owned by the United States and now the
former slaves. The former citizens of the South, now "captured" became 14th
Amendment citizens. The remainder of the people could still invoke the power
over government through original jurisdiction of the Republic side of the
Constitution.
A new 13th Amendment was enacted
December 18, 1865 and the 14th Amendment was enacted July 28, 1868. It was
ratified in Southern states under martial law. A state could only obtain its
freedom from federal military rule by ratifying this amendment. Any contract
entered under duress is null and void. But then the Constitution was not even in
effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial law.
The 14th Amendment brought the freed
slaves, whose previous owners were private plantations and transferred those
slaves under subjection of the government, the ten miles square jurisdiction of
Washington, D.C. And it offered its protection to those who would choose to
become its subjects…in exchange for their sovereignty.
The 14th Amendment is a good example of
the "give-a-little, take a lot" strategy that is often used, a sugar coating to
a bitter pill. Sovereign Citizens had created a government to guarantee them
their rights. In contrast, the federal government created fourteenth amendment
citizenship to guarantee its power over its citizens. It seems to be taking
citizens under its protection but at the price of servitude. Sovereigns may
choose to become subjects; free men and women to become vassals. This amendment
has always been controversial. Many people over the years have questioned the
amount of power it vests in the federal government. Some have even questioned
its validity. On one occasion Judge Ellett of the Utah Supreme Court remarked:
"I cannot believe that any court, in
full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was
properly approved and adopted. State v. Phillips, Pacific Reporter, 2nd Series,
Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975)
However, the most important fact about
this amendment is that, although it created a new class of citizen, it did not
have any effect on Sovereign Citizens. Both classes still exist: When the
Constitution was adopted the people of the United States were the citizens of
the several States for whom and for whose posterity the government was
established. Each of them was a citizen of the United States at the adoption of
the Constitution, and all free persons thereafter born within one of the several
States became by birth citizens of the State and of the United States.
Both classes of citizen still exist.
It's your right to be a Sovereign Citizen, while it's a privilege to be a
fourteenth amendment citizen, and most importantly, it's up to you to determine
which one you are, and which one you want to be. Just remember that you "pay"
for a privilege, whereas a right carries no obligation. This is at the heart of
your personal Declaration of Independence.
Two Governments,
Two Flags:
the Corporate State

Once the smoke settled after the Civil
War, European international bankers arrived in town. In 1871 the default again
loomed and bankruptcy was imminent. So in 1872, the ten miles square District of
Columbia was incorporated in England. A loophole was discovered in the
Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They
realized that a separate nation by the same name existed that Congress had
created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.
The Congress shall have power:
To exercise exclusive legislation in all
cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten square miles) as may, by
cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of
government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places
purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall
be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other
needful buildings; - And
To make all laws which shall be
necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all
other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States,
or in any department or officer thereof.
This "United States" is a Legislative
"Democracy" within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal
United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its Citizenry, the
residents of the District of Colombia, the territories and enclaves (Guam,
Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a Citizen by
way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized Citizens).
Both United States have the same
Congress that rules in both nations. One "United States," the Republic of fifty
States, has the "stars and stripes" as its flag, but without any fringe on it.
The Federal United States' flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe,
seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental
United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark.,
Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal
United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without
any periods).
The international bankers and the
Congress conjured up this bit of mischief and passed it into law. But whose law?
Congress broke faith with We the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed
a private corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia.
They used the Constitution through the 14th Amendment, as their by- laws,
therefore taking their authority not UNDER the Constitution but taking their
authority OVER the constitution. They copyrighted not only the constitution but
also many related names such as, THE UNITED STATES, U.S. THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, USA as their own. This is the final blow to the original constitution.
Hence forth, the UNITED STATES has been governed entirely by private corporate
law, dictated by the banks as creditors.
The "Act to Provide a Government for the
District of Columbia," Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United
States, Session III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that
the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is applicable
only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia and
to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES, by its
registration in the corporate County, State, and Federal governments that are
under military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this
provision, the military Congress of the UNITED STATES had obtained the power to
pass private international law for application within the federal District of
Columbia. All States of the Union adopted new legislatively created 'conditions'
and 'codified' their laws under federal mandate. State 'codes' were unlawfully
adopted despite their origin as instruments of sovereign people. However, We the
People remained sovereign.
UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28,
3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What
was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28,
3002(15)(3): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of
the corporation. Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private
International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety, is
Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the District of
Columbia.
This incorporation was first reported by
Gary W. Phillips, whose career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service
began in 1956. He was the INS director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years and began
challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000). After
nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to flee his country
to protect his life after exposing the facts of the illegality of the federal
government's criminal income tax collection scam -- facts that are becoming well
know among informed people throughout the country.
Where did the Congress find the
authority in the Constitution to reconstitute any part of the united States as a
corporation? Quite simply, the 1791 Constitution was set aside to make room for
the corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? No, the private, corporate
bottom line is profit. The municipal, public bottom line is service. To replace
our service-oriented form of government with a profit-oriented form of
government without our knowledge or consent can only be described as treason.
A few superficial changes were made to
the original Constitution and it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not
change the name of the document so they could claim to be reading from the
Constitution. They merely changed it from the Constitution for the united States
of America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They changed the
"for" to "of'" and capitalized all the letters. All of the sudden we had two
Constitutions, the original for show and the revision for actual use.
The Act of 1871 provided a government
for the District of Columbia and created a corporation entitled the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities
created by the municipal corporation and operative only in the District of
Columbia. Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of
Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed within the
District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only in the District of
Columbia and it's possessions.
The States of the Republic are not
possessions of the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and
Guam are possessions of the District of Columbia as well as property legally
titled to the UNITED STATES by states and counties.
The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was
put together in the District of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International
Law and is applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of
jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business prosecuting anyone
outside of the District of Columbia or Federal territories. The federal court
has no venue outside of the District of Columbia and, therefore, has no
jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia and its possessions. The
Congress cannot pass a law that is applicable in the several States of the
Republic.
If all the laws passed in the District
of Columbia are Private International Law, including all of the UNITED STATES
CODE and the statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and
enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then how could they have become
the law of the land? Because, not knowing better, We the People allowed it. We
have allowed agents of foreign countries to build an illegal corporation that
has systematically corrupted every state, county and city in this nation and
corrupted the status and standing of most people of the united States of
America. The only way that a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT can have jurisdiction
over a Sovereign is if the latter volunteers to the jurisdiction or fails to
declare his independence as a Sovereign.
This corporation has created dozens of
agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA, and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands
of agents who receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their
friends and families while enforcing the private edicts of the so-called
Congress. The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then direct
their illegal agencies to destroy those who do not fully conform to their
wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do. Kidnapping and conspiracy
are involved in every arrest and conviction by federal authorities outside of
the District of Columbia.
The question now leads to whether our
duly elected public officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the
united States of America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by
a service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation?
It appears by their actions that most
government employees, knowingly or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the
corporate UNITED STATES. It is our duty as the People who elected them into
office, to demand accountability from our "public" officials and confront them
as to where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous corporation
that is controlled by foreign agents from within and without, or is it with our
constitutional Republic, the united States of America and her citizens?
An articulate defender of a conservative
monetary policy, President James A. Garfield urged the resumption of specie
payments and the payment of government debts. He said, "Whoever controls the
volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
In his Inaugural Address in 1881, Garfield said:
The chief duty of the National
Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and
declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is
authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The
present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of
war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its
convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder,
and not upon its compulsory circulation. These notes are not money, but promises
to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.
Garfield was assassinated after only two
hundred days in office, 80 days after being shot by a lawyer, ostensibly because
he was upset about not receiving an ambassadorial posting to France.
In 1909, default loomed once again. The
US government asked the Crown of England for an extension of time. This
extension was granted for another 20 years on several conditions. One of the
conditions was that the United States permit the creditors to establish a new
national bank. The bankers moved deeper into our nation by the establishment of
the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, the IRS to collect the interest on their loans
made to the UNITED STATES, and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, was the
condition for the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced
the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the mercantile system of ancient
Babylonia.
With the passage of the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913, the UNITED STATES was firmly lashed to the yoke, so that a small
number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the people a yoke little
better than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-
compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by the American
people today ($80,000 per American). This vast accumulation of wealth
concentrates immense power and despotic economic domination in the hands of the
few central bankers "who are able to govern credit and its allotment, for this
reason supplying, so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and
grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so that no one
dare breathe against their will." A worldwide tyranny is gradually being
imposed, hidden to most, by the money masters.
First World War
In 1917 we were drafted into the First
World War. President Woodrow Wilson had to find a way to persuade the American
public to go along with an intervention in another of Europe's wars. Although
restrained to be neutral in the deadly conflict by the Neutrality Act, he sent
our navy to shepherd British convoys across the Atlantic. German U-boat
commanders did not take the bait and avoided contact with the US destroyers. To
force the issue, a US naval ship sailed into the midst of a battle between
British and German naval fleets and was sunk. But when the truth was learned,
Wilson had to find another way.
The Lusitania was a speedy warship
refitted by the British as a passenger liner. Unknown to its passengers the
Lusitania was carrying a huge cargo of military equipment and munitions in
violation of the US Neutrality Act. The Germans knew that and tried to warn the
passengers by placing advertisements in prominent US newspapers. The US State
Department ordered all of the newspapers to refuse the ad. Only one newspaper in
Des Moines, Iowa, bravely published the information. To ensure a successful
provocation, the Lusitania was ordered to sail at 75% speed using only three of
its four powerful engines. Then the naval escort was ordered away leaving the
Lusitania vulnerable as it entered the war zone. The first torpedo hit the
explosive cargo and blew the bottom out of the Lusitania. It sank in only 18
minutes. 126 innocent civilians died. Wilson now had his provocation to rally
Americans behind the "War to End All Wars."
The US participation in WWI exacerbated
the national debt so that it became impossible for us to pay it off in 1929. It
also enhanced the War Powers Act that President Lincoln, by Executive Order put
in place during his Presidency. This War Powers Act was re-enforced and the
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was passed to define, regulate, and punish
those who were trading with enemies, who were then required by that act to be
licensed by the government to do business. This will become more important later
on.
The Great
Depression: From Sovereignty to Servitude
We all know what happened in 1929. This
was the year of the stock market crash and the beginning of The Great
Depression. The stock market crash moved billions of dollars from the people to
the banks. This also removed cash from circulation for the people's use. Those
who still possessed any cash, invested in high interest yielding Treasury Bonds
driven higher by increased demand. As a result, even more cash was removed from
circulation in the general public to the point where there was not enough cash
left in circulation to buy the goods being produced. Production came to a halt
as excess inventory overwhelmed the market. There were more products on the
market than there was cash to buy them. Prices plummeted and industries plunged
into bankruptcy, throwing millions of people out of work. Foreclosures on homes,
factories, businesses and farms rose to the highest level in the history of
America. A mere dime was literally salvation to many families now living on the
street. Millions of people lost everything they had, keeping only the clothes on
their backs.
In Europe, the International Bankers in
1930 declared several nations bankrupt, including the United States. In 1933,
immediately after Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office, his first act as
President was to publicly declare the United States bank holiday. He further
went on to issue his Presidential Executive Order on March 5th, 1933 that all
United States Citizens must turn in all their gold in return for Federal Reserve
Notes. This was passed into law by Congress on June 5, 1933.
We the People turned in all our gold at
that time. Why? Were we United States Citizens? No. We were still a sovereign
people until that time. We just thought that we were required to turn in all our
gold. Only those people living in Washington, D.C., and the 14th Amendment
Citizens were so required. As sovereigns, we were not under the jurisdiction of
the United States of America, which incorporated in 1872.
When we turned in our gold, we just
volunteered to be citizens of the jurisdiction of the ten miles square of
Washington D.C. and their laws. We became 14th Amendment Citizens. Our birth
certificates, the title to our bodies, were registered at the Department of
Commercial. This title to our bodies, all of our property and all of our future
labor, was pledged to the International Bankers as security for the money owed
in bankruptcy. This was done under the authority of commercial law (Babylonian
law) by and through Title. The American People were not in bankruptcy. Only the
Corporate UNITED STATES was in bankruptcy. But with the US Corporation holding
the title to your body and life, you could be used for collateral to secure the
national debt through the birth certificate given by parents voluntarily to be
entered into the Commercial Registry. This act, in commerce, gave Title to your
body by way of a "constructive" contract.
Next, the government created an
artificial 'person' in your name, a corporation, a fictitious entity to take its
place in a virtual reality of contract law and corporations. By and through an
adhesion contract, the government then made you, the real man or woman,
responsible for that fictional entity, a fiduciary and surety for an artificial
entity. Your artificial entity secured the National debt and through it, you
became a 14th Amendment Citizen of the UNITED STATES. In other words, they got
you to think and act as though you really were that fictional entity. You agreed
by your action or failure to act. YOU adhered to a contract offer because you
thought or acted as though you were the receiver of the offer. In doing so, YOU
were presumed to have ACCEPTED THE CONTRACT.
All licenses and all existing contracts
are made between the UNITED STATES or THE STATE OF (whatever state you live in)
and your artificial entity. That fictitious entity binds you to the UNITED
STATES and its sub-corporations because they have, through adhesion contract,
made you, the real man or woman, fiduciary and responsible for that artificial
entity. Of course, you voluntarily sign, and even request, all those contracts,
don't you? It seems to be your name, although you probably never spell it all in
capital letters as they do. They wish for you to think nothing of the
aberration, perhaps just something they do to be clear and error-free.
All of these contracts you sign carry
with it your agreement to obey and uphold all the laws, rules and regulations
passed by the Congress of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION and THE STATE OF. . . .
and will be enforced against you.
From that day forward, We the People,
once upon a time sovereigns who created government for our convenience and
welfare, could never own property in allodium because the state now had
possession of it all. In 1964, the state obtained title to all private property.
You can only "rent" homes that you believe you own by paying taxes. You only
have a certificate of title to the car you think you own, and you continue to
drive it because of your yearly fee. The state owns the true title to our homes,
our cars, to everything we thought or think we own. You married the state
through your marriage license and your children became wards of the state. All
of this was pledged, including all the fruits of your future labor, to the
bankers as security against the national debt and was placed in the possession
of the Secretary of State of each state as an agent for the Trustee of the
Bankruptcy, the U.S. Secretary of Treasury. Not knowing the rules of the game
you went directly to jail, you could not pass GO and you could not collect $200.
Cows in the
Pasture or Freedom: the Hidden Choice
The way out of this is dilemma can be
very complex. In fact, its complexity was intentional. Roosevelt had violated
the law by placing us into servitude without our consent. Congressman Louis T.
McFadden brought formal charges against the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of
the Treasury and was coming dangerously close to calling for impeachment of
Franklin D. Roosevelt. Two months AFTER the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933,
the Senate and House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st Session, at 4:30 pm
approved House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold
Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint Resolution to assure uniform value
to the coins and currencies of the United States, which formally declared the
bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES.
F.D.R. by Executive Order declared the
people outside federal territories to be the enemy by illegally altering the
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1861, revised 1918.
The creation of Federal Zone citizenship
further tightened up when you applied for your Social Security number after
1935. The benefits offered by this contract were hurriedly and voluntarily
entered into when the Social Security Act was signed into law. Further contracts
were to be entered into and license to be applied for–all voluntary actions. We
unknowingly were entering into lifelong servitude to receive the benefits of the
Lord of the Manor. We had descended into feudal vassalage without recognizing
it.
President Roosevelt then called all the
Governors into Washington D. C. for a conference. This was the beginning of the
states losing the remainder of their sovereignty. It was not until 1944 that the
corporate states lost all their power over the corporate United States with the
Buck Act. With this Act, the states became, essentially, 14th Amendment Citizens
as well. This completed the destruction of the corporate states having any power
to protect against usurpation by the U.S. Government. The corporate states went
under the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.
Strangely enough, on October 28, 1977,
HJR-192 was quietly repealed by public law 95-147. The joint resolution entitled
"Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the
United States" approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463), shall not apply to
obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section.
The reason for the repeal of HJR-192 is
somewhat obscure. After 44 years of unchallenged implementation, this public
policy is clearly established by custom, usage and participation in the credit
system by the American public. Those of us operating on the privilege of limited
liability, via the public credit, are still bound.
The adoption of the Uniform Commercial
Code by all States in 1964 and a number of other like laws and Acts were
incorporated into this nation. This made the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the
Supreme Law of the Land.
Courts Shift from Common Law to Equity
and Admiralty Courts
Under the Constitution, based on Common
Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases: at
Law, in Equity, and in Admiralty.
(1) Law is the collective organization
of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the
organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a
common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a
natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties;
to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since
an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property
of another individual, then the common force—for the same reason—cannot lawfully
be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups.
Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don't infringe upon
the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance.
Today's so-called laws (ordinances,
statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously
perceived as law, but just because something is called a "law" does not
necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between "legal" and "lawful."
Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]
(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of
compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what
is fair in a particular situation. The term "equity" denotes the spirit and
habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the
intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in
your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.
(3) Admiralty is compelled performance
plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty.
By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally
between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over
legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt
and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned
everything—the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their
legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was
mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over
government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable
instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our
debts at common law with gold or silver coin.
The change in our system of law from
public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the
United States in the Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case,
in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the
procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based
upon public law—or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional
limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is
termed public policy.
Public policy concerns commercial
transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument's Law, which is a branch of
the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as
the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the
fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the UNITED STATES.
In offering grants of negotiable paper
(Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union
for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the
States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States
(as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted
the "benefits" offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a
commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate
States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the
Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of
the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit
loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was
predicated upon equitable paper.
This system of negotiable paper binds
all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial
agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common
Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law.
Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute
of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they
have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law
whereby, when forced to use a so-called "benefit" offered, or available, to
them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law
guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement,
that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Howard
Freeman
http://www.deoxy.org/lib/2us.htm
In 1976, Congress took away any
semblance of law or justice left within our court system. All law today is now
construed, constructed and made up by the judge as it happens before your very
eyes. Common law has almost disappeared from the courts. They took away any
control or authority we might have had over the court system. This has been very
well hidden from all of us.
Many of us going into court often wonder
why and how the courts can simply override the laws we put into our paperwork.
It's very simple now that we know how they do it. They operate on the words
`construe and construct.'
A simple word such as `in' changed to
`at' as in `at law' or `in law' has a totally separate meaning. For example: If
you're in the river, you are wet, you can swim, etc., but if you're at the
river, you might enjoy a refreshing picnic, play baseball or run races. See the
difference a simple word can make? And, the attorneys often change this word
when they answer your motions – in addition to many others.
It will pay you in dividends to read the
answers of attorneys to your paperwork. Compare what they say the case law says
to the actual case law itself. You'll discover that they have actually changed
the words therein. This is illegal, you might say. No, not, according to the US
Code.
You see, they can now construe and
construct any law or statute to mean whatever they decide it means, for their
benefit. You don't know any of this. You think they are railroading you in a
kangaroo court. No, they are `legal' in what they do. They usually follow the
law to the letter; Their law, private law, the law of contract, that you know
nothing about. This law is called contract law.
Uniform
Commercial Code: Contract Acceptance and Honor
If you don't understand contract law or
realize what law you are dealing with when you go into court, you will lose.
Even if you have filed your UCC-1 and have captured your Title and your
artificial entity, this makes no difference in the above courts. Why? They
operate in total fiction, in the land of Oz. They can only recognize contracts.
And you are a real sentient being. (Still with numerous adhesion contracts
attached to you). Whatever you file in that court, whether it is your UCC-1 or
Law from the Judicial and Original Jurisdiction side, that is real, Lawful,
truth. They do not recognize truth of any sort. They only recognize fiction and
contract law. So, when you go into any court, be aware that it is their law,
that the judge or the prosecutor can `construe' and `construct' that law in any
fashion they choose. It will always mean what they choose it to mean.
So, are the courts bound by the
Constitution? Law? Statutes? No, contracts only and the statutes used to enforce
the contracts.
When used in conjunction with one's
signature, a stamp stating "Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207" is sufficient to
indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called
"courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He
is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial
agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as
would be the case in any Common Law contract.
Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103,
the statute being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement,
must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the
tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who
is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new
system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his
unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while
those about him "curse the darkness" of Commercial Law government, lacking the
truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United
States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue. Howard
Freeman
Summary of
Historical Development of Modern Feudalism
THE UNITED STATES as a corporation,
created in England, came under the jurisdiction of England. This entitled
England to create laws as England saw fit to do, establish those laws in THE
UNITED STATES and everyone who at that time was a 14th Amendment Citizen were
subject to obey those laws. This also placed the Congress of THE UNITED STATES
above that portion of what we think is the constitution, not under the authority
of the constitution. Copyrighted, remember? The only Bill of Rights left at this
point in time is four Amendments -- 13th, 14th 15th, and 16th. That is all the
Courts are required to take cognizance of when you appear in their courts.
The 1929 stock market crash and the
Great Depression that followed placed the American people in desperation,
homelessness, poverty and even starvation. The minds of the people were focused
on survival. They were then in a condition to accept any handout given by the
government, no matter what the cost to their freedoms.
We were drawn in as 14th Amendment
Citizens through the registration of our birth certificates. We were further
enticed deeper into that system by volunteering for many other licenses and
privileges given by the government. We were also made enemies of THE UNITED
STATES. This act gave the UNITED STATES authority, under the laws of war and as
a captured people, to force anything on us they choose to create.
Then, in 1976, Congress removed any
semblance of justice in our court system with Senate bill 94-201 and 94-381.
From this point forward, the 'officers of the court' can construe and construct
the laws to mean anything they chose them to mean.
As 14th Amendment Citizens, we are not
citizens of the America we have always thought. We are actually citizens of
England, through the corporation of THE UNITED STATES.
There is no law today except as fiction
of copyrighted statutes, to be interpreted by 'judges' who construe and
construct whatever they choose to have those statutes mean.
We, as sovereigns irresponsibly
recognized the Crown of England (IMF) as PRINCIPLE of America. In reality, the
IMF was the Creditor of the UNITED STATES, a corporation, but NEVER you. The
Creditor of the UNITED STATES designed invisible contracts to ensnare the
sovereign people of America as subjects. The Creditor of the UNITED STATES
implemented the invisible contracts through apparent 'color of law' and the
sovereigns irresponsibly agreed. We, as Sovereigns, through the invisible
contracts, and our irresponsibility to reject the Creditors (IMF) ideas, have
voluntarily given our substance to the mythical creator of our situation.
You'll find that there is a common
thread woven throughout our entire history and that thread is commerce, the
merchant, the money-changer (banks), the law merchant, i.e., the law of
commerce, civil law and maritime law. This is not to say that commerce is bad.
It does, however, say that commerce brings with it the laws of commerce.
Wherever commerce goes it brings laws that can bind people into slavery. This
can happen only if the people agree with it.
Banks create "money" today out of thin
air; then, they charge, we, the people, interest on their creation. This can
happen only if the people agree with it. Thereafter, the merchants and the
bankers create laws, through lawmakers whom they control, that protect commerce
and bind the people to obey. This can happen only if the people agree with it.
The only reason this occurs is that we
do not handle our own affairs.
Me and My
Shadow: the Fictional STRAWMAN
The elected and appointed administrators
of government United States government have been filing certified copies of all
our birth certificates in the United States Department of Commerce as registered
securities. These securities, each of which carries an estimated $1,000,000
value, have been (and still are) circulated around the world as collateral for
loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just like any other security.
There's just one problem—we didn't consciously authorize it. Now that you know,
you can choose to let them use you for collateral and pay interest on the debt
or you can take back your power and sovereignty.
The United States is a District of
Columbia corporation. In Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785 we find "The United
States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State" (NY re:
Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a
fictitious "person" (it cannot speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it cannot, by
itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility,
a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the fictitious person, and the fictional
world in which it exists, to the real world. Why is this important?
LIVING people exist in a real world, not
a fictional, virtual world. But government exists in a fictional world, and can
only deal directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states,
etc. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there must be a
connection, a liaison, a go-between. This can be something as simple as a
contract. When both "persons", the real and fictional, agree to the terms of a
contract, there is a connection, intercourse, dealings, there is communication,
an exchange. There is business.
But there is another way for fictional
government to deal with the real man and woman—through the use of a
representative, a liaison, a go-between. Who is this go-between that connects
fictional government to real men and women? It's a government-created shadow, a
fictional man or woman, a corporation with the same name as yours.
This PERSON was created by using your
birth certificate as the Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the
state in which you were born as the "port of entry." This gave fictional UNITED
STATES government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly. This PERSON is
a STRAWMAN.
STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin - A man of straw,
one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from
Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of
STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, STRAWMAN.
STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is
put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a
transaction, one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking
title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the
principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal
identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise allowed.
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate
Dictionary defines the term "STRAWMAN" as "A weak or imaginary opposition set up
only to be easily confuted; or a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually
questionable transaction".
The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an
imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person
regarded as a nonentity. The STRAWMAN is a "shadow", a go-between.
For quite some time a rather large
number of people in this country have known that a man or woman's name, written
in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking
this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no
provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not to be
used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct.
Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or J.A. Smith or JOHN ADAM
SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith
identifies the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a
deceased man or a fictitious man such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.
Over the years, government, through its
"public" school system, has managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep us
all ignorant of some very important facts. Because all facets of the media have
an ever increasing influence in our lives, and because media is controlled (with
the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government and its agencies, we have slowly
and systematically been led to believe that any form/appellation of our name is,
in fact, still us as long as the spelling is correct. This is not true.
We were never told, with full and open
disclosure, what our government officials were planning to do ... and why. We
were never told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a
fictitious "person". We were never told that government had quietly, almost
secretly, created a shadow corporation, a STRAWMAN for each and every American
... so that government could not only control the people, but also raise an
almost unlimited amount of revenue; so it could continue, not just to exist, but
to GROW.
We were never told that when government
deals with the STRAWMAN it is not dealing with real, living men and women. We
were never told, openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that
since June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never told
that we had been pledged (and our children, and their children, and their
children) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created by government
officials who created treason in doing so.
We were never told that they quietly and
cleverly changed the rules, even the game itself, and that the world we perceive
as real is in fact fictional - and its all for their benefit. We were never told
that the STRAWMAN—a fictional person, a creature of THE STATE—is subject to all
the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. decreed by government,
but that WE, the real man and woman, are not. We were never told that we were
being treated as property, as slaves, albeit comfortably for some, while living
in the land of the free—and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud. We
never realized that we were being abused. By knowing the difference between our
real self and our STRAWMAN and behaving accordingly, we regain our proper
sovereignty over "legal fictions" and the ability to experience true freedom
which is our birthright, for the enjoyment of the Divine in us all.
There's something else you should know:
Everything, since June 1933, operates in COMMERCE. Why is this important?
Commerce is based on agreement, on contract. Government has an implied agreement
with the STRAWMAN which they created and the STRAWMAN is subject to government
rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh and blood man and
woman, infer that they are trying to communicate with us and therefore step into
their commercial "process" we become the "surety" for the fictional STRAWMAN.
Reality and fiction are reversed. We then become liable for the debts,
liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real (protected
by the Constitution) character as we stand in for the fictional STRAWMAN.
So that we can once again place the
STRAWMAN in the fictional world and keep ourselves in the real world (with all
our "shields" in place against the fictional government) we must send a
non-negotiable (private) "Charge Back" and a non-negotiable "Bill of Exchange"
to the United States Secretary of the Treasury, along with a copy of our birth
certificate, the evidence, the Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin of the
STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge our portion of the public debt, releasing
us, the real man or woman, from the debts, liabilities and obligations of the
STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities and obligations exist in the fictional
commercial world of "book entries" on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a
world of "digits" and "notes", not of money and substance. Property of the real
man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy.
Sending the non-negotiable Charge Back
and Bill of Exchange accesses our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our TDA?
Title 26 USC section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: "The aggregate
amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not exceed
$1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate
return)."
This $1,000,000 account is for the
STRAWMAN, the fictional "person" with the name in all caps and/or last name
first. It is there for the purpose of making book entries, to move figures,
"digits" from one side of ledgers to the other. Figures, digits, the entries in
ledgers must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce
dies. No movement, no commerce.
The fictional persona of corporate
government can only function in a functional commercial world, one where there
is no real money, only fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits.
Corporate, STATE courts only have
jurisdiction over the STRAWMAN. A presentment from fictional government—whether
traffic citation or criminal charges—is a negative, commercial "claim" against
the STRAWMAN. This "claim" takes place in the commercial, fictional world of
government. "Digits" move from one side of your STRAWMAN account to the other,
or to a different account. This is today's commerce. In the past we have
addressed these "claims" by fighting them in court, with one "legal process" or
another, and failed. We have played the futile, legalistic, charade—a very
clever distraction—while the commerce game played on. We were playing checkers
whereas the rules were MONOPOLY.
But what if we refused to continue
playing the charade, and played the commerce game instead? What if we learned
how to control the flow and movement of entries, figures and digits, for our own
benefit? Is that possible? And if so, how? How can the real man in the real
world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game exists?
When in commerce do as commerce does -
use the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one
contract in the world that CANNOT be broken. The power of this document is
awesome.
Since the TDA exists for the STRAWMAN -
who, until now, has been controlled by the government - WE can gain control and
ownership of the STRAWMAN by first activating the TDA and then filing a UCC-1
Financing Statement. This does two things for us.
First, by activating the TDA we gain
limited control over the funds in the account. This allows us to also move
entries, figures and digits ... for OUR benefit.
Secondly, by properly filing a UCC-1
Financing Statement we become the "holder in due course" of the STRAWMAN. A
filed UCC-1 is public notice of a registered lien by a real human being who is
the secured party, upon the STRAWMAN, the government-created, foreign non-
registered corporation. With the STRAWMAN under our control, government has no
access to the TDA and they also lose their go- between, their liaison, their
connection to the real, living man and woman. No longer a subject, you become a
free sovereign once again. You declare your independence!
You don't have liability for your
STRAWMAN. If you do commercial assignments, you have an asset called a Bill of
Exchange which you can spend out. The birth certificate represents the body. The
SSN represents the commercial account. Behind every birth certificate is a
$1,000,000 bond which is pre-paid financing on any activity of the STRAWMAN.
Some people have used their TDA to pay off their home or commercial mortgage,
bank or student loans, tax liens, or credit card debt..
When you own your STRAWMAN and anyone
else charges against HIM, then that is commercial trespassing. If anyone goes
after your STRAWMAN and wins any monetary award against the fiction of your
STRAWMAN, then you (the real person/ secured party) get the first $1,000,000 of
that because you have the first lien.
In addition to your own freedom
reclaimed, you will remove your collateral and participation from the frauds,
manipulations, and extortion that have been perpetrated in your name. When
enough people have reclaimed their birthright, we can also reclaim our
constitutional republic that was intended to serve us in protecting our life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness.
From the author's website: www.real-debt-elimination.com
http://www.real-debt-elimination.com/bank_fraud/taking_back_your_power/1-introduction_to_taking_back_your_power.htm
Pictures added by Gnostic Liberation
Front
The Bush/Cheney Police State Is Upon Us
By Steven Z
10-4-6
Have you noticed the
military flag on police officers' sleeves?
Most people may think nothing or
disregard the significance of the military flag on a police officer's sleeve.
However, let's examine just what this means. To start with let's go back to a
history lesson on Who is Running America?
http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html
For a comedic relief version, hear it
from George Carlin: Who is Running America?
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=935607276
After reading the information at the
link - Who is Running America's extensive summation, you will understand that
all "U.S. citizens" are statutory creations and are contractually (i.e., under
Contract Law) considered to be Chattel Property or Indentured Servants of the
private Federal corporation known as The UNITED STATES, which conducts all its
business under Private International Law (i.e., Admiralty / Maritime /
Commercial Law) and land owned or controlled by the aforesaid private
corporation is under martial law, because of the War and Emergency Powers Acts
-- Senate Report 93-549.
Since March 9, A. D. 1933, the private
Federal corporation known as The UNITED STATES has been in a state of declared
national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially-proclaimed
states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by
the Corporation's President / C.E.O. Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the
national emergency proclaimed by the Corporation's President / C.E.O.Truman on
December 16, A. D. 1950, during the Korean Conflict, and the states of national
emergency declared by the Corporation's President / C.E.O. Nixon on March 23, A.
D. 1970, and August 15, A. D. 1971.
These proclamations give force to 470
provisions of Federal "law" (i.e., the administrative rules for the private
Federal corporation and its officers and employees). These hundreds of Corp.
U.S. statutes delegate to the Corporation's President / C.E.O. extraordinary
powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress (i.e., the Corporation's Board f
Directors), which affect the lives of U. S. citizens in a host of
all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer
enough authority to rule the Corporation (NOT the united States of America or
the sovereign American People) without reference to normal constitutional
processes.
Under the powers delegated by these
statutes, the Corporation's President / C.E.O. may: seize property; organize and
control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces
abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and
communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel;
and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all corporation
"U.S. citizens".
The private federal corporation known as
The UNITED STATES went "bankrupt" in A. D. 1933. [Corporation President / C.E.O.
Roosevelt Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187
& 594, 1973]
In 1950, declared "bankruptcy and
reorganization". Secretary of Treasury appointer receiver in the bankruptcy
[Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative
History, Pg. 5967]
The Secretary of the Treasury is the
"Governor" of the International Monetary Fund, Inc. of the U. N. [Public Law
94-564, supra, pg. 5942; U. S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-81; 26
U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11); Treasury Delegation Order No 150-10]
On Oct. 28th 1977, the United States as
a "Corporator" and "State" declared insolvency. State banks and most other banks
were put under control of the "Governor" of the "Fund" (I.M.F.). 26 IRC 165
(g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188,
75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall
447
"Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11.
Members of Congress are official Trustees presiding over the greatest
reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the United States
government..." -- Mr. Trafficant from Ohio, Congressional Record, pg. H1303,
March 17, 1993
"...the United States obligations in the
International Monetary Fund..." -- Public Law 94-564, 94th Congress, Sec. 10(a)
State of National Emergency
"Since March 9th, 1933, the United
States has been in a state of declared national emergency..."
-- Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreword, 1973
"When Congress [i.e., the Board of
Directors for the private Federal corporation known as The UNITED STATES]
declares an emergency, there is no [corporation] constitution..." -- Congressman
Beck, Congressional Record, Farm Bill, 1933
"A majority of people of the United
States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years,
freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in
varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national
emergency..." -- Senate Report 93-549 (Introduction) 1973
"The President may: Seize property,
organize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute Martial Law,
seize and control and transportation and communication, regulate operation of
private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways,
control the lives of all American citizens". -- Senate Report 93-549; Senate
Resolution 9, 93d Congress, 1st. Session (III) 1973
See: Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48,
Statute 1, March 9, 1933; Proclamation 2038; Title 12 U.S.C 95(b)
Currently, permanent state of national
emergency. (i.e., only for the private Federal corporation known as The UNITED
STATES) -- 22 U.S.C.A., 286d. 1977; See Executive Order 12919 signed by the
Corporation's President / C.E.O.Clinton
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 &
1933 (People Declared the Enemy)
Oct. 6, 1917, under the Trading with the
Enemy Act, Section 2, subdivision (c), Chapter 106 - Enemy defined "other than
citizens of the United States..."
March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5,
subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct.6 1917 (40 Stat. L.
411) amended as follows: "...any person within the United States.."
See H.R. 1491 Public No.1
Now let's look at the Issue of the Flag.
The national flag of the united States of America is precisely defined by law.
On June 14, A. D. 1776, Congress made the following resolution: "The flag of the
United States shall be thirteen stripes, alternate red and white, with a union
of thirteen stars of white on a blue field..." Because Congress made no rule for
the arrangement of the stars, they were displayed in different ways, most
usually in a circle. As new states joined the Union, they demanded
representation in the stars and stripes of the flag. In 1795 Congress voted to
increase to 15 the number of stars and stripes. Legislation enacted in 1818
reestablished the number of stripes at 13 and instituted the policy, "That on
the admission of every new state into the Union, one star be added to the Union
of the flag..." An executive order issued by President William Howard Taft on
Oct. 29,1912, fixed the overall width and length of the U.S. flag, known
technically as the hoist and fly, respectively, in a ratio of 1: 1.9. The
thirteen stripes were fixed at equal width. The hoist of the blue field
containing the stars was fixed at seven-thirteenths of the overall hoist, that
is, as extending from the top of the flag to the bottom of the seventh stripe.
The fly of the blue field was fixed at a tiny fraction over three-fourths the
overall hoist. The diameter of each star was established as a minute fraction
under one-sixteenth of the overall hoist.
"The flag of the United States shall be
thirteen horizontal stripes, alternating red and White; and the union of the
flag shall be forty eight stars, white in a blue field. " 61 Stat. 642, July
30,1947, ch. 389. 4 U.S.C.A.1. This describes the civil flag of the United
States, as it is to be flown in the District of Columbia, its enclaves and
overseas on ships and embassies.
Currently, the Flag of the
united States of America is defined as :
The American Flag of Peace of the united
States of America is described as red, white and blue, with thirteen alternating
red and white horizontal stripes, and a blue field (union) with 50 stars, one to
represent each of the several States. The Flag is proportional, (1 X 1.9) . This
proportion is easily determined by measuring the length (fly) and dividing by
the measurement of the width (hoist). The length divided by the width should be
very nearly 1.9. If the flag is not to the correct 1 X 1.9 proportion, it is not
an official Title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 American Flag of Peace of the united States of
America.
Title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 and Presidential
Executive Order 10834, found in the Federal Register at Vol. 24. No. 166, P.6365
- 6367.
Title 4 U.S.C. 3 provides that anything
put on the title 4 U.S.C., 1, 2 American Flag such as gold fringe MUTILATES the
Flag and carries a one-year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of
title 36 U.S.C. 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and represents "color
of law" jurisdiction and when placed on the title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag, mutilates
the Flag and suspends the Constitution and establishes "color of law"
jurisdiction (Refer to title 18 U.S.C. 242, see Black's Law Dictionary).
As provided by title 36 U.S.C. 173 and
Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-1(b), the Flag of the united States of America
is defined and described in title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2. Civilians must use the title 4
U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag (see title 36 U.S.C. 173 and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter
2-7) and when military flags are displayed by Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2
and title 36 U.S.C. 175.
FLAG Martial Law; "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C.
chapter 1, --1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a
military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States,
except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The president of the
United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive
order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief.
FLAG Martial Law;The Placing of a fringe
on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the
stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are
within the discretion of the President as commander in Chief of the Army and
Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.
President, Dwight David Eisenhower, by
Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal
Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated that: "A military flag is a
flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a
yellow fringe border on three sides."
FLAG Martial law; "The use of such a
fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulation no. 260-10." 34 Ops. Atty. .
Gen. 483, 485.
FLAG Martial law; "Ancient custom
sanctions the use of the fringe on regimental colors and standards, but there
seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags." The
Adjutant General of the Army, March 28, 1924, (1925); 34 ()Ops. Atty. Gen. 483,
485.
DISPLAY OF MILITARY FLAG
National flags listed below are for
indoor display and for use in ceremonies and parades. For these purposes the
United States flag will be rayon banner cloth, trimmed on three sides with
golden yellow fringe, 2 1/2 inches wide. It will be the same size as the flags
displayed or carried with it.
Authorization for indoor display
Each military courtroom Any courtroom
that displays these flags behind the Judge is a military courtroom. You are
under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or
statute law.
Restrictions "The following limitations
and prohibitions are applicable to flags guidons, streamers, and components."
Unauthorized use of official flags,
guidons, and streamers. Display or use of flags, guidons, and streamers or
replicas thereof, including those presently or formerly carried by U.S. Army
units, by other than the office, individual, or organization for which
authorized, is prohibited except as indicated in below.
Use only by recognized United States
Army division associations . . . ." United States Army Regulation AR 640-10,
October 1, 1979
According to Army Regulations, (AR
840-10, Oct. 1, 1979.) "the Flag is trimmed on three sides with Fringe of Gold,
2 1/2 inches wide," and that, "such flags are flown indoors, ONLY in military
courtrooms." And that the Gold Fringed Flag is not to be carried by anyone
except units of the United States Army, and the United States Army division
associations."
THE AUTHORITY FOR FRINGE ON THE FLAG
IS SPECIFIED IN ARMY REGULATIONS,
BUT ONLY FOR THE NATIONAL (MILITARY) FLAG !
The U.S. Attorney General has stated: "The placing of a gold fringe on the
national flag, the dimensions of the flag, and the arrangements of the stars in
the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the
discretion of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy. .
.ancient custom sanctions the use of fringe on regimental colors and standards,
but there seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags. .
.the use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulations, No.
260-10." (See 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483 & 485) The only statute or regulation, in
the United States, prescribing a yellow fringed United States flag is Army
Regulation No. 260-10, making it a military flag.
By Army Regulation 260-10, the gold
fringe may be used only on regimental "colors," the President's flag, for
military courts martial, and the flags used at military recruiting centers. "A
military flag emblem of a nation, usually made of cloth and flown from a staff;
FROM A MILITARY STANDPOINT flags are of two general classes...those flown from
stationary masts over army posts, and those carried by troops in formation. The
former are referred to by the general name of flags. The later are called colors
when carried by dismounted troops. COLORS AND STANDARDS are more nearly square
than flags and are made of silk, with a knotted FRINGE OF YELLOW ON THREE SIDES.
. .USE OF A FLAG -- THE MOST GENERAL AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE FLAG IS AS A
NATIONAL SYMBOL OF AUTHORITY AND POWER." (National Encyclopedia, Vol. 4)
The adornments (finial) on the top of
the flagpole are for military use only. The gold eagle is for the use of the
President of the United States only, and only in time of war. The gold spear is
for military court martials only (next time you're in a State courtroom take a
close look at the top of the flagpole the State flag is hanging from). The gold
ball is for military recruiting centers only. The gold acorn is for military
parades only. (Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 8).
Colors -- "A flag, ensign, or standard
borne in an army or fleet." (Webster's 1971)
Color -- An appearance, semblance, or
simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facie or apparent
RIGHT. Hence, a deceptive appearance; a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing
a lack or reality; a disguise or pretext. (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)
Color of law -- The appearance or
semblance, without the substance, of legal RIGHT. Misuse of power, possessed by
virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with
authority of state, is action taken under "color of state law." (Atkins v.
Lanning, 415 F. Supp. 186, 188)
Colorable --That which is in appearance
only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned,
having the appearance of truth. (Windle v. Flinn, 251 P. 2d 136, 146)
Colorable alteration -- One which makes
no real or substantial change, but is introduced only as a subterfuge or means
of evading the patent or copyRIGHTS law. (Black's 6th).
Colorable imitation -- In the law of
trademarks, this phrase denotes such a close or ingenious imitation as to be
calculated to deceive ordinary persons. (Black's 6th).
----------------
So the next time that you see a police
officer with a gold fringed U.S. flag on their sleeve -- a military flag -- ask
him or her if they realize the significance of that flag. If you have thoroughly
studied this issue, you will be able to properly educate that officer. Best not
to do it antagonistically, but with honor and respect, because after all, most
of the officers or military officers for that matter do not truly know that they
are employees of, and are serving, a private corporation, NOT a country!
Remember, a Court is not under military
jurisdiction because of the yellow fringed flag, but the yellow fringed flag is
there because the Court is under military jurisdiction.
Reproduced from
www.Rense.com

War Dept. Document from 1825
Reveals Critical Clue to
Missing 13th Amendment
By The Idaho Observer
KANSAS CITY -- The Comfort Inn here was
the third stop for Freedom Drive, 2002, and the place where Titles of Nobility
Amendment (TONA) researcher Suzanne Nevling of San Francisco, California
produced a copy of “Military Laws of the United States to which is prefixed the
Constitution of the United States.”
The book, published under authority of
the War Department in 1825, proves that the original 13th Amendment that
prohibits Americans from holding Titles of Nobility, was part of the
Constitution until it was mysteriously replaced with a new 13th Amendment that
banned slavery after the Civil War. “When we found this book last September we
knew that we had found that the original 13th Amendment was part of the
Constitution as of 1825,” Nevling said.
Previous TONA research proves that on
March 12, 1819, Virginia became the 13th and final state required for
ratification of the original 13th Amendment when it published in the laws of
Virginia Act No. 280 as passed by its legislature.
TONA research has shown that the state
of Virginia forwarded copies of its revised code to the Department of State, the
Congress, the Library of Congress and the President.
There is no indication in the
Congressional Record or any other official journal that the original 13th
Amendment has been repealed. In the absence of a lawful explanation as to the
whereabouts of the missing 13th Amendment, we have little choice but to infer
that it is still the law of the land and those who hold titles of nobility or
receive largesse from foreign nations are no longer American citizens. Such
persons, per the Amendment, are not capable, “... of holding any office of trust
or profit...”
The original 13th Amendment is found in
copies of the Constitution published up to 1876. From that point on, the
original 13th Amendment no longer appears and is replaced by the 13th Amendment
that prohibits slavery. It is still a mystery as to how the slavery amendment,
ratified under President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, replaced the title of nobility
amendment of 1819 in all copies of the Constitution published since 1876.
TONA researchers have been doggedly
trying to find out where a properly ratified and never repealed constitutional
amendment has been hiding for the last 126 years. Though the exact political
location of the missing 13th Amendment has eluded them since David Dodge began
researching the issue in the early 1980s, Nevling believes that the final pieces
of the TONA puzzle will reveal themselves in due course.
Now more than ever
We currently live in an era where
advances in communications, travel and commerce have all but dissolved the
boundaries of sovereign nations. Adding to the intrigue we have the governments
of what remains of sovereign nations operating under credit afforded them by
multinational corporation-owned banks that hold the assets and resources of the
nation as collateral on the loans. If there has ever been a period in American
history where influential persons may be compelled to compromise national
security in trade for titles of nobility, presents, pensions, salaries, offices
or other “emoluments,” it is now.
The purpose of the original 13th
Amendment, which at the time of its ratification had popular support, was to add
severe penalties to prohibitions against the acceptance of titles of nobility or
other favors from foreign powers as found in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of
the Constitution.
The Founders understood that history was
replete with examples of how public servants accepted favors from foreign
interests to the severe detriment of national security. The Founders concern was
so great they addressed it in the first article of the Constitution.
The Founders saw that the Constitutional
provision alone was not sufficient to deter influential individuals from
entering into potentially disastrous relationships with representatives of
foreign nations. The result was ratification of the original 13th Amendment
during the administration of President James Monroe.
“This Article of Amendment is intimately
connected to questions of war and national defense. It is designed to combat
internal subversion and discord sowed by people who are adhering to foreign
powers without stepping across the bold Constitutional line of treason,” TONA
researchers explain.
All attorneys and judges who claim the
title “esquire,” a title of English nobility beneath knighthood and extended to
professional men, are incapable of holding public office under the Amendment. If
enforced, nearly half the legislators in office throughout America would be
removed from office and stripped of their citizenship.
A partial list of influential Americans
who have been “honorarily” knighted by the Queen of England include Henry
Kissinger, Norman Schwarzkopf, Colin Powell, Casper Weinberger, Ronald Reagan,
George Bush, Sr., Rudy Giullani and Alan Greenspan. If the real 13th Amendment
were enforced those men would be stripped of their citizenship and would not be
allowed to hold positions of public trust.
Sir Alan Greenspan is often referred to
as the most powerful man in America because he is the chairman of the Federal
Reserve Board -- the consortium of private international bankers who control the
U.S. money supply.
Sir Henry Kissinger, former secretary of
state under President Nixon and the man whose foreign policies have been behind
nearly every genocidal event on earth since WWII (according to a 36-page report
in Harper's magazine [The Making of a War Criminal, Feb. 26, 2000]) has been
nominated to head an independent investigation of the 9-11 tragedy.
Sir Colin Powell is the current
Secretary of State.
Sir George Bush, Sr., is the father of
current President George Bush, Jr., and has arguably been the real U.S.
president since the Sir Ronald Reagan era began in 1980.
With so many of the queen's knights
holding American public office, one has to wonder who really won the
Revolutionary War. The U.S. government is comprised of men who, while entrusted
with our most vital national security interests, have accepted favors from
foreign interests -- the same favors which are prohibited by both the
Constitution and a (missing?) constitutional amendment.
“[Enforcement of the original 13th
Amendment would be] particularly applicable today in the 21st Century as
government is increasingly for sale to the highest bidder, as foreign and
multinational corporations and individuals compete to line the pockets of
politicians and political parties to accommodate and purchase protection or
privilege, i.e. honors, for their special interests,” commented the TONA
Research Committee.
“The law is still there,” the group
insists, waiting only to be publicly recognized and enforced once again to
protect the Sovereignty and Interests of WE THE PEOPLE, and to force the elected
representatives of the people to adhere strictly to their solemn and binding
oath of office and the limitations of government imposed by the Constitution.
Those interested in the quest to find
the political hiding place of the missing 13th Amendment should visit the
website at www.amendment-13.org . The
TONA Research Committee has been posting the results of its research at the site
which contains both text and electronic images of documents
|